Slashdot Mirror


Jesse Jackson To Take On Silicon Valley's Lack of Diversity

New submitter wyattstorch516 writes "San Jose Mecury News reports that Jesse Jackson will lead a delegation to HP's next board meeting to discuss the hiring of technology companies in regard to African-Americans and Latinos. 'About one in 14 tech workers is black or Latino both in the Silicon Valley and nationally. Blacks and Hispanics make up 13.1 and 16.9 percent of the U.S. population, respectively, according to the most recent Census data.' Jackson sent a letter to HP, Apple, Google, Twitter, Facebook, and others about meeting to discuss diversity issues."

232 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. Fuck that guy. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, I was sick of his guilt-peddling bullshit decades ago.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      there is probably a more nuanced discussion to be had about affirmative action

      but having been in the hiring seat, I can tell you that almost every single
      applicant is white and male, and very few of those are actually qualified

      so unless Jackson thinks HP should hire unqualified people just because
      they are black or latino, he should probably focus his efforts earlier
      in the pipeline

    2. Re:Fuck that guy. by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "affirmative action"? That's nothing but a euphemism for racial discrimination. Here in California, it amounted to a modern-day Chinese Exclusion Act to fuck over Asian kids applying to the cal state universities.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. If a person is qualified, ill hire him regardless of race. Just because you are black or latino you should not get any special treatment. If we do let unqualified people in, then it perpetuates the problem by highlighting their lack of skill.

    4. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I see lots of Chinese and Indian applicants myself. For that matter, I've seen far more Chinese and Indian women than American women, and when they come in I can see that they actually want to do the work. I'd take any of them over any of the social justice warriors I've ever met.

    5. Re:Fuck that guy. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seriously, I was sick of his guilt-peddling bullshit decades ago.

      -jcr

      Seconded.

      Jesse Jackson is one of the most racist, fuckhead mouthpieces alive today. Same goes for his partner-in-racially-motivated-crime, Al Sharpton.

      The worst part of these fucks is, they don't even care about black people, unless by "black people" we mean "their own fat-ass bank accounts."

      Fucking greedy, race-baiting fucks.

      PS before the trolls chime in with their 'fuh fuh dur yer a racist fuh fuh" nonsense, I will have you know that I own not one, but three color TVs.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:Fuck that guy. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pretty much. I've had arguments with a lot of people over affirmative action, and 95% of the time they think it helps Asians get a job and education. Basically they think it helps everybody but whites, and they themselves are huge advocates of white guilt. They quickly shut up once I show them facts about how affirmative action actually fucks over Asians pretty bad, in fact it screws them much worse than white people, mainly because they have an even higher interest in higher education and the high tech career fields than whites do while being an even smaller portion of the population than blacks.

      The problem with affirmative action is it assumes that a given percent of every race is interested in x career or y school, but that just doesn't reflect reality one bit. Take music for example; by far more black people are into rap, but there's nothing inherent about rap that makes them like it more or white people like it less. The underlying cause of this schism is a simple cultural difference. The same thing is likely to cause them to be less interested in IT careers, so they don't even apply for those jobs.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    7. Re:Fuck that guy. by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there is probably a more nuanced discussion to be had about affirmative action

      but having been in the hiring seat, I can tell you that almost every single
      applicant is white and male, and very few of those are actually qualified

      so unless Jackson thinks HP should hire unqualified people just because
      they are black or latino, he should probably focus his efforts earlier
      in the pipeline

      What Jesse seems unaware of is there's a very small pool of qualified "diverse candidates" and they are generally snapped up pronto by employers who want to be able to compete for contracts where a stipulation favors an employer with diverse employees.

      Mr. Jackson seems rooted in an age that has long since gone by. What he needs to do is tell the people he claims to represent, "pull up your damn pants, don't get ugly tattoos all over your body, learn to address people in respectful language and study your ass off rather than trying to figure how you can goof off more. There's boatloads of money, waiting to be made and odds are you aren't going to be a zillionaire hip-hop or movie star, but if you take an interest you could make more than all of them put together.

      Not popular, but then, sometimes you need to turn about and address the crowd that's following you.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Fuck that guy. by Tailhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hire unqualified people just because they are black or latino

      If minority candidates aren't qualified then the problem is unfairly tough and racially biased requirements. Get your mind right.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    9. Re:Fuck that guy. by presspass · · Score: 5, Funny

      PS before the trolls chime in with their 'fuh fuh dur yer a racist fuh fuh" nonsense, I will have you know that I own not one, but three color TVs.

      You mean: "TVs of color".

    10. Re:Fuck that guy. by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      Cheer up. When you begin losing jobs and college entrances to those less qualified, your people have finally made it. Wear as a badge of competence that things need not be set aside for you.

      And Jessie? If I were an American of African descent, I wouldn't vote for, er, ... never mind.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    11. Re:Fuck that guy. by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      hire unqualified people just because they are black or latino

      If minority candidates aren't qualified then the problem is unfairly tough and racially biased requirements. Get your mind right.

      More H1Bs on the way - to people who don't have any problem whatsoever with learning to make it in a country thousands of miles from home.

      It's a funny old world, isn't it?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    12. Re:Fuck that guy. by Frobnicator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. If a person is qualified, ill hire him regardless of race. Just because you are black or latino you should not get any special treatment. If we do let unqualified people in, then it perpetuates the problem by highlighting their lack of skill.

      Great!

      When I graduated from my university, it was almost entirely a blend of american white and asian males in the program. We had 3 white women, 2 black males, and no latinos, in a graduating class of about 70 people. One of the graduation speakers made special point of it in the commencement address when discussing issues in diversity in our field.

      When I am in a position to interview people for our engineering jobs, over the past ten years I recall exactly one female applicant with the mandatory degrees and certifications. We see mostly white males, some Asian males (mostly from India and China) and a handful of others. That isn't because we are refusing to interview minorities, it is because those are the people who have the mandatory certifications. I cannot find any solid statistics on the racial distributions of people with engineering certifications, but I'd assume they are similarly skewed.

      If he wants to address diversity in our field, he needs to look at those entering the program. If he wants more people in the job, help give them the proper educational background and other certifications required to enter the field.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    13. Re:Fuck that guy. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. If a person is qualified, ill hire him regardless of race. Just because you are black or latino you should not get any special treatment. If we do let unqualified people in, then it perpetuates the problem by highlighting their lack of skill.

      If you do bring in unqualified people, regardless of demographic, you'll find your qualified people frustrated with having to help them all the time and resenting they get paid the same as people who do half the work.

      damned if you do... damned if you don't

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    14. Re:Fuck that guy. by gandhi123 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "The problem with affirmative action is it assumes that a given percent of every race is interested in x career or y school, but that just doesn't reflect reality one bit. "

      It's not just this. Even when black students are interested in STEM careers, affirmative action puts them in a position where their white and Asian classmates are much better prepared and capable to handle difficult STEM classes. As a result they get poor grades, feel demoralized, and transfer to easier majors. This is called the "mismatch problem."

      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03...

      Recently, economists from Duke studied the effects of Prop 209, comparing undergraduate graduation rates for blacks, Hispanics and American Indians before and after the ban. In a paper being considered for publication by The Quarterly Journal of Economics, the Duke economists conclude that mismatch effects are strongest for students in so-called STEM majors — science, technology, engineering and math. These subjects proceed in a more regimented way than the humanities, with each topic and class building on what came before. If you don’t properly learn one concept, it’s easier to get knocked off track.

      The Duke economists say that lower-ranked schools in the University of California system are better at graduating minority students in STEM majors. For example, they conclude that had the bottom third of minority students at Berkeley who hoped to graduate with a STEM major gone to Santa Cruz instead, they would have been almost twice as likely to earn such a degree.

      and

      http://blogs.sciencemag.org/sc...

      More Evidence that Admissions Preferences Discourage Minority Students from Majoring in STEM

      Recently Science Careers commented on Mismatch, a provocative and persuasive new book that examines the effects of giving large admissions preferences to minority college students. One of the unintended consequences of such measures, write authors Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., is to steer minority students away from majoring in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. This happens, they argue, because large preferences encourage students to attend colleges where their academic credentials place them toward the bottom of their college classes. Science majors, however, overwhelmingly come from the upper end of their college classes, regardless of where they go to college. Students admitted with large preferences--as many African American and Hispanic students are--are therefore deprived of the realistic opportunity to earn STEM degrees.

    15. Re:Fuck that guy. by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      hire unqualified people just because they are black or latino

      If minority candidates aren't qualified then the problem is unfairly tough and racially biased requirements. Get your mind right.

      Or minorities aren't following the education or career paths to become qualified even under reasonable requirements. This could be because of cultural bias among the minority group or bias against the minority group in the education system.

      I'm not even sure what "unfairly tough and racially biased requirements" means (aside from the obvious "you must be white to apply", which seems... well, unlikely): if some people are qualified (no matter their race), than it doesn't seem to be unfairly tough... unless you're implying minorities are incapable of meeting those requirements.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    16. Re:Fuck that guy. by gandhi123 · · Score: 2

      "If he wants to address diversity in our field, he needs to look at those entering the program. If he wants more people in the job, help give them the proper educational background and other certifications required to enter the field. "

      The affirmative action policies Jackson supports actually reduces the number of blacks who end up with engineering degrees.

      Even when black students are interested in STEM careers, affirmative action puts them in a position where their white and Asian classmates are much better prepared and capable to handle difficult STEM classes. As a result they get poor grades, feel demoralized, and transfer to easier majors. This is called the "mismatch problem."

      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03...

      Recently, economists from Duke studied the effects of Prop 209, comparing undergraduate graduation rates for blacks, Hispanics and American Indians before and after the ban. In a paper being considered for publication by The Quarterly Journal of Economics, the Duke economists conclude that mismatch effects are strongest for students in so-called STEM majors — science, technology, engineering and math. These subjects proceed in a more regimented way than the humanities, with each topic and class building on what came before. If you don’t properly learn one concept, it’s easier to get knocked off track.

      The Duke economists say that lower-ranked schools in the University of California system are better at graduating minority students in STEM majors. For example, they conclude that had the bottom third of minority students at Berkeley who hoped to graduate with a STEM major gone to Santa Cruz instead, they would have been almost twice as likely to earn such a degree.

      and

      http://blogs.sciencemag.org/sc...

      More Evidence that Admissions Preferences Discourage Minority Students from Majoring in STEM

      Recently Science Careers commented on Mismatch, a provocative and persuasive new book that examines the effects of giving large admissions preferences to minority college students. One of the unintended consequences of such measures, write authors Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., is to steer minority students away from majoring in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. This happens, they argue, because large preferences encourage students to attend colleges where their academic credentials place them toward the bottom of their college classes. Science majors, however, overwhelmingly come from the upper end of their college classes, regardless of where they go to college. Students admitted with large preferences--as many African American and Hispanic students are--are therefore deprived of the realistic opportunity to earn STEM degrees.

    17. Re:Fuck that guy. by NemosomeN · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It's not because of racism, it's because black people sag their pants, get tattoos*, are disrespectful, and lazy."

      Oh, okay.

      *Side note, I work in a non-technical white collar job, and a surprising number of my colleagues have tattoos.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    18. Re:Fuck that guy. by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Our developers and QA department is fairly multiracial, but those people are qualified to do the job. Jackson needs to focus his efforts at the local level with school boards, and city leaders.

    19. Re:Fuck that guy. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      "It's not because of racism, it's because black people sag their pants, get tattoos*, are disrespectful, and lazy."

      Oh, okay.

      *Side note, I work in a non-technical white collar job, and a surprising number of my colleagues have tattoos.

      Tats aside, how many pull their pants up and speak clear and proper English when it comes to interviews? I don't think we'd feel much compulsion to grand our time to interview someone who can't make the effort.

      If you must have tats, keep them clean or covered during work. Customers sometimes roam cubeville or the shop and may be offended - that's the word from the top.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    20. Re:Fuck that guy. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      More H1Bs on the way - to people who don't have any problem whatsoever with taking advantage of racist, narcissistic, caste-based hiring practices to gain jobs they're in no way qualified for in a country thousands of miles from home.

      FTFY.

      Sounds like you are referring to people of one particular country. Dwell on that.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    21. Re:Fuck that guy. by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 1

      *Side note, I work in a non-technical white collar job, and a surprising number of my colleagues have tattoos.

      It might be a generational thing. I personally think (thought) tattoos were very unprofessional, but the younger generation seems to have them -- a lot. One of the kids in the group (he's probably pushing 30) has tats nearly everywhere visible. I'm extremely glad they didn't discriminate against him when it came to hiring. He's change my mind on people with tats.

    22. Re:Fuck that guy. by galabar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think "affirmative action" means what you think it means. "Affirmative action" as applied is a system were underrepresented minorities are given a preference in admissions and hiring. Asians aren't an underrepresented minority in just about anything. In fact, they represent overwhelming majorities in many areas and are the most hurt by skin-color preference programs (aka "Affirmative Action"). We may hold different opinions on whether we should judge someone based on the color of their skin (I don't think we should), but we certainly can't argue fact, and how "affirmative action" is applied is fact.

    23. Re:Fuck that guy. by hermitdev · · Score: 2

      Working as a dev in finance for +10 years, now, diversity is not a problem. Whites may make up a significant portion of development staff (and they also make up over 80% of the population in the US), but they're almost equaled in numbers by Indians. Oriental Asians (as opposed to subcontinent) also make up for significant chunk (I've worked with people from China, Japan, Korea, Cambodia & Vietnam - and those are just the nationalities I know/remember). I've worked with a few blacks, fewer African-Americans. One of my bosses was black and he'd probably take offense to being called African-American. He was Nigerian.

      The technology sector doesn't suffer from a problem of diversity, at least in regards to race. Jesse Jackson, as he's oft known for doing, is just race baiting here. If there is a diversity problem, it's in regards to sex, not race.

    24. Re:Fuck that guy. by hermitdev · · Score: 2

      That's a nice story but Asian Americans are all minorities and qualify for affirmative action just as well as any other minority.

      All fine and dandy until the quota's been met and they need to let other, less deserving, people in because they need to make a racial quota.

      .

    25. Re:Fuck that guy. by galabar · · Score: 1

      Damned if you do... damned if you do, I think.

    26. Re:Fuck that guy. by msauve · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why doesn't he go after the NBA? They have way more than a proportionate 17% African-Americans. They must be racists.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    27. Re:Fuck that guy. by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      Thing is, the tattoo trend is inevitably going to fade away, leaving all these dupes with their bodies covered in "art."

      "Like, every single tat has a deep significance to me man. Like this Monster drink logo. That represents my susceptibility to advertisement and that my identity is tied up in what brands are cool or best. It's deep, man, you just don't get it. I'm going to get a yin yang on my forearm because, it's like, deep and I have no idea what cliche or trite means. I'm an individual, man. All my friends get tattoos, it's just cool!"

      Whatever.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    28. Re:Fuck that guy. by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not even sure what "unfairly tough and racially biased requirements" means

      Unfairly tough and racially biased requirements are whatever is required of or tested for among people that are employed by some segment of the workforce that exhibits an incorrect ratio of racial participation.

      For example, since New York fire department minority applicants tended to fail the entrance exam at a higher rate than white applicants the entrance examine is, by definition, racially biased. When medical school requirements are found to impede racial quotas the solution is to create separate standards by race that specify "adjusted" MCAT and GPA figures to correct for systemic bias. The fact that the scores required of black/latino students are significantly lower than those of white/asian students DOES NOT INDICATE A LOWERING OF STANDARDS. Oh no. Rather, the lower score reflect the degree of inherent racial bias in the education system.

      Got it?

      The IT industry has escaped the good graces of contemporary racial justice for too long, as illustrated by your naivety. We welcome the good Reverend Jackson to the den of racial iniquity that is Silicon Valley and we look forward to the application of racial fairness we know he'll provide, and we're certain you do as well.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    29. Re:Fuck that guy. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine who is Hispanic, as in emigrated from El Salvador, and both degreed and competent in IT almost can't not work.
      In fact he works for HP currently.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    30. Re:Fuck that guy. by hermitdev · · Score: 1

      When I am in a position to interview people for our engineering jobs, over the past ten years I recall exactly one female applicant with the mandatory degrees and certifications. We see mostly white males, some Asian males (mostly from India and China) and a handful of others. That isn't because we are refusing to interview minorities, it is because those are the people who have the mandatory certifications. I cannot find any solid statistics on the racial distributions of people with engineering certifications, but I'd assume they are similarly skewed.

      In 10 years of interviewing for development/testing positions, I have never once seen a resume for a female. Not once. I've seen pretty much every race under the sun (excepting those hiding out in the most inaccessible portions of the earth), and I've given them a fair shake. This is not my fault: I give broad technical requirements to the HR recruiters: knows languages x, y & z (z optional, but a bonus). bonus if they know database a.

      I want someone that can do the job. Can they do my job when I'm out sick or on vacation as well as do their job to the extent that I look good (assuming I'm the lead/manager). I don't even care what country they come from, what color their skin is, what god(s) they worship, if any, or if they imbibe (this last one is just a plus). What matters first and foremost is: can they do the job. A quick second after that is, can I communicate with them (admittedly language issues can arise here).

    31. Re:Fuck that guy. by pla · · Score: 1

      racist, narcissistic, caste-based hiring practices to gain jobs they're in no way qualified for in a country thousands of miles from home

      Hmm... Iranian? Chinese? Slavic? Israeli? Strange, none of them seem to quite meet your description.


      Sounds like you are referring to people of one particular country.

      Hmm, yes. Yes, it does sound like you have one particular country in mind. Clearly, one of you has a race card in play, but you might want to check the instant replay before you stick your neck out too far on this one...

    32. Re:Fuck that guy. by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe it's time that interviewers stopped judging people on irrelevancies like clothing style.

    33. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Asians aren't an underrepresented minority in just about anything.

      Prison population. Not that I'd want to give the police departments any tips on implementing affirmative action programs, but something other than the current confirmation bias program they have targeting the black community would be good.

    34. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's ok the UC system seems to prefer Asian kids:
      Asian / Pacific Islander 10,108 44%

    35. Re:Fuck that guy. by Salo2112 · · Score: 4, Informative

      so unless Jackson thinks HP should hire unqualified people just because they are black or latino, he should probably focus his efforts earlier in the pipeline

      He does.

    36. Re:Fuck that guy. by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Jessie Jackson doesn't care about affirmative action. He's a crook and a con-man. If there's anything that's holding African Americans back in this country (I mean besides racism), it's their seeming indifference to Jessie Jacksons and even worse, Al Sharptons (who should be in prison) complete charlatanry. Both of those men are clearly con men and bad ones at that. I don't think Obama's a very good president but at least there's finally a decent black leader that's also a good roll model. My son is black and despite disagreeing with just about all of Obama's politics, I'm still grateful he's president so my son can see someone that's the same color as himself as a not only a leader but a good man. Maybe we should blame the media, I have no idea. But what's been held up as models of the black community over the past 30yrs has been disheartening to say the least.

    37. Re:Fuck that guy. by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      Maybe it's time that interviewees realized that it's not just about them. Acting slovenly has a pretty good chance to offend other people, no matter how good it may or may not make you feel inside.

    38. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your tv's may not be racist but my wash machine sure as hell is.

      Glued to the lid is a guide that tells me how to separate the whites. It even has settings just for whites that are different than colored.

    39. Re:Fuck that guy. by fizzer06 · · Score: 1

      Harley Davidson takes full advantage of that. The brand loyalty is insane, even though customers will admit they're getting royally screwed over on price.

    40. Re:Fuck that guy. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Bill Cosby tried to tell the black kids that, more or less, and the black community practically lynched him for it.

      They don't want to change their behavior. They want everyone to adjust to it, and give them money.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    41. Re:Fuck that guy. by spitzak · · Score: 1

      I really doubt a majority of people think affirmative action helps Asians. It helps underrepresented minorities, and in most jobs and schools Asians are not underrepresented. It seems incredibly unlikely that 95% of people (whether they approve or disapprove of affirmative action) think it helps Asians.

      I suspect you actually made a typo of some sort but am curious what exactly you were trying to say there.

    42. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think "affirmative action" means what you think it means. "Affirmative action" as applied is a system were underrepresented minorities are given a preference in admissions and hiring. Asians aren't an underrepresented minority in just about anything. In fact, they represent overwhelming majorities in many areas and are the most hurt by skin-color preference programs (aka "Affirmative Action").

      We may hold different opinions on whether we should judge someone based on the color of their skin (I don't think we should), but we certainly can't argue fact, and how "affirmative action" is applied is fact.

      Define "underrepresented".

      If you just go by percentage of population, maybe you're right.

      But what if, because of "affirmative action", a lower percentage of Asians who want to be doctors gets to be doctors than some other race? If 10 Asians want to be doctors, and 5 blacks, but because of "affirmative action" you admit all 5 blacks to medical school but only 3 Asians, who's "underrepresented"?

      And no matter how you slice it, "affirmative action" is LITERALLY racist.

      Never mind the fact "underrepresented" is another word for "We need quotas".

    43. Re:Fuck that guy. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I really doubt a majority of people think affirmative action helps Asians.

      Tell that to this guy:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    44. Re:Fuck that guy. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I would like to thank you for your post as you just gave further credence to one of my key points.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    45. Re:Fuck that guy. by lucm · · Score: 2

      That's the difference with Apple customers, who don't admit they're getting royally screwed over on price.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    46. Re:Fuck that guy. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      racist, narcissistic, caste-based hiring practices to gain jobs they're in no way qualified for in a country thousands of miles from home

      Hmm... Iranian? Chinese? Slavic? Israeli? Strange, none of them seem to quite meet your description.

      Sounds like you are referring to people of one particular country.

      Hmm, yes. Yes, it does sound like you have one particular country in mind. Clearly, one of you has a race card in play, but you might want to check the instant replay before you stick your neck out too far on this one...

      I live and work near Silicon Valley and spend a fair amount of time there.

      I've worked with H1B holders from a variety of countries. Further, some are personal friends of mine. Most have done very well for themselves, which was the attraction of coming here. It's not usually an easy option as many take trips back home to visit friends and family left behind. One or two were utter frauds, with resumees which accredited them more skills than humanly possible, but they usually don't last wherever they go.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    47. Re:Fuck that guy. by spitzak · · Score: 1

      It sounds like he is complaining that affirmative action is *not* applying to Asians.

      So I still stand by my statement that the claim that "95% of people think affirmative action is to help Asians" has got to be incorrect.

    48. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time that interviewees realized that it's not just about them. Acting slovenly has a strong correlation with disorganization, which is a big negative when it comes to science, technology, engineering, and math, and leads potential employers to not consider them for that reason.

      There, FTFY.

    49. Re:Fuck that guy. by nuonguy · · Score: 2

      You know what would be cool? Some "facts" of your own you could share with us. How about +5,Interesting worth of facts? Would that be appropriate on a "news for nerds" site?

      Even for those of use who are not fans of Jackson nor on his side on any issues, we might be more easily persuaded with actual citations than vague references to "facts".

    50. Re:Fuck that guy. by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 3, Informative

      so unless Jackson thinks HP should hire unqualified people just because they are black or latino, he should probably focus his efforts earlier in the pipeline

      I doubt that's what he thinks - he doesn't actually care about black or latino people. He just wants the publicity, and some sort of "fund for underprivileged nerds" to be set up, which he can then "administer" in a way that benefits him and his friends. Shakedown, plain and simple.

    51. Re:Fuck that guy. by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      That.

      And generally there's more than one round of interviews. Whenever I've interviewed there's been a screening - "let's see what this guy's like" interview, which is generally followed by the "brass tacks" interview - "let's see what this guy knows and thinks he can do."

      If you can't impress the screening interview you've already failed the brass-tacks one, where you'd have a chance to cinch the job on your skills merits.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    52. Re:Fuck that guy. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Ever price tattoos? They're very spendy where I live. You're paying an "artist" for the hours it takes to ink that thing. Some of the simpler ones are only a few hundred dollars. More elaborate designs can cast thousands.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    53. Re:Fuck that guy. by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

      He has a problem with not enough black people being hired? Well he's black. Lock him in a room with a semiconductor design textbook, and don't let him out until he is qualified to be hired. Let's see how much he cares then.

    54. Re:Fuck that guy. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Poe's Law has never been more applicable.

    55. Re:Fuck that guy. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually what he doesn't realize is that affirmative action is very much applying to Asians. A) It shits on them B) It is working as intended.

      Don't believe me? Here you go:

      http://www.thedailybeast.com/a...

      There's a certain irony in the fact that white students usually bring these affirmative action lawsuits (and that defenses of affirmative action are often framed in terms of white privilege). The evidence seems to show that if completely race-neutral admissions policies were adopted at colleges and universities, the admissions rates for blacks and hispanic would fall dramatically . . . but the admissions rates for whites wouldn't change much. The primary beneficiaries would be Asian students, who would fill nearly four out of five of the extra admissions slots.

      So in other words, the research shows that if affirmative action was removed, whites would be unaffected, but Asians would replace blacks and hispanics in big numbers.

      So what is the end result of affirmative action? Asians get fucked, and a sizable number of hispanics and blacks who are given these position in their place really shouldn't be there. No matter how you slice it, everybody loses here, even if you believe in white guilt and that white people need to be punished (affirmative action doesn't currently appear to punish them.)

      So I still stand by my statement that the claim that "95% of people think affirmative action is to help Asians" has got to be incorrect.

      I didn't make that claim. What I said was 95% of the ones I argue with about it say that.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    56. Re: Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You fail to consider a more likely alternative, that the minority candidates are in fact simply less qualified. They are more likely to come from poor backgrounds and have had less access to quality education. Your definition is idiotic and doesn't control for other factors. You don't see many white, Asian, or Latino sprinter winning gold medals. Is the 100 meter dash similarly biased?

    57. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      hire unqualified people just because they are black or latino

      If minority candidates aren't qualified then the problem is unfairly tough and racially biased requirements. Get your mind right.

      Can I expect that those so called "racially biased requirements" will be also removed when hiring to let's say NBA teams? I can see there large disparity. There is serious under representation of Asians and Hispanics. I would also consider sprinters. This is totally swayed one way.

      I would not call "college graduate" racially biased requirement. That is first filtering step. If you look at drop/success rate "by racial group" you will notice that eligible candidates pool is not evenly distributed.
      When hiring one have to work with "what is available". There is plenty of eligible candidates from minorities which have one flaw - not allowed to work in the USoA. But outsourcing helps a lot with that. Such people are NOT counted as employees in stupid statistics, because there are employed by foreign company.

    58. Re:Fuck that guy. by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      That doesn't change the fact its still racism and white guilt. Racism is racism and we have seen time and time again shit like affirmative action simply does not work. If you want to make ALL schools better? if you want to make it easier for ALL to get a STEM education? That is a good and logical goal, but all you do when you decide "we need more of X" is lower the standards for X and make sure everyone who is X that gets in is looked at as inferior.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    59. Re:Fuck that guy. by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should also consider using Bill Cosby as a rolemodel?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    60. Re:Fuck that guy. by coinreturn · · Score: 2

      Quoting The Daily Beast in an argument against Affirmative Action is like asking mice if they think cats should be outlawed.

    61. Re:Fuck that guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      employing 3 colored TVs is admirable, but i'm wary of your use of "own" in that regard.

    62. Re:Fuck that guy. by Quila · · Score: 1

      You mean actually encourage black family cohesion and work to instill a culture where academic excellence is widely respected instead of derided?

      That sounds too much like work. Let's blame whitey!

    63. Re: Fuck that guy. by Quila · · Score: 1

      You don't see many white, Asian, or Latino sprinter winning gold medals. Is the 100 meter dash similarly biased?

      To apply the logic equally, whites should get a 95-meter dash, Asians a 90-meter dash, but they should count as 100. Now everybody's equal, right Harrison?

    64. Re:Fuck that guy. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Just go to a redneck party. There'll be a drunk guy there who'll give you a tattoo for free!

      tl;dr: You can get cheap tattoos, but don't.

    65. Re:Fuck that guy. by mindpivot · · Score: 1

      "he should probably focus his efforts earlier in the pipeline"

      That's the best and only truly relevant point to the outcome he's hoping for right there. Go after schools, go after school boards that don't make technical proficiency a priority, go after parents who don't know the value of science and tech.

      Jackson has and always will go to the money-men. Why? I don't know for sure so I'd rather not speculate, but the inferences to be made from such moves aren't flattering to him.

      Money matters aside, it's been about 5+ years since he had anything relevant to say, it's about time for him to be latching on to a cause again. If we're being hyper-cynical, the timing in relation to the recent awareness campaign on behalf of women-in-tech produced in him a lightbulb-moment that is otherwise uninspired and downright predictable.

    66. Re:Fuck that guy. by Copid · · Score: 1

      Perhaps just as important, when you come to an interview knowingly dressing below what is expected, you're basically saying, "I find your norms to be slightly inconvenent, so I'm going to disrespect them in a really overt way." I don't expect programmers to look snappy every day at the office, but an interview is a special occasion when both sides are supposed to be on their best behavior. They're supposed to make an effort to be respectful to each other and show some appreciation for the opportunity to start a new business relationship.

      You don't show up on your first date wearing nothing but your underwear, even if you might eventually lounge around the house that way once you're living together. Showing up in your briefs that would immediately get you flagged as somebody with either no manners or no concept of appropriate behavior.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    67. Re:Fuck that guy. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Same info, only from Princeton:

      http://www.princeton.edu/main/...

      Happy?

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    68. Re: Fuck that guy. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      That's funny when you take a few things into consideration:

      US population:
      Whites make up 76%
      Blacks make up 16%
      Asians make up 4.8%
      Hispanic isn't a race, but it is about 16% of the US (Yes, that totals more than 100% of the population, but again Hispanic isn't a race as they come in all three of the above flavors. However they are still weighted the same in affirmative action.)

      Now if they were counting world statistics, they might have something in his case, as Asians make up about 60% of the world's population. They are absolutely without a doubt the majority race, in that case. However, in the world's population whites make up about 10%, and blacks some 15%, and hispanics some 30% (again, hispanic not a race.) In light of that, whites are actually quite a minority.

      Yet it would be a cold day in hell before they'd allow a white guy in there (Unless he has at least one ancestor from a Spanish speaking country) See how silly that is?

      That presentation wasn't about minorities. And this is a douchebag thing to do, but not to the white or asians, but to the people they supposedly represent: What they're telling everybody else is that they were making a presentation aimed at people who somehow ought to be A) Rejected by society and then B) Felt sorry for at every turn so that they are always given a leg up.

      Hey, not my idea, they came up with it, I'm just telling it like it is.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    69. Re:Fuck that guy. by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      The information may be the same, but the spin is not. The Princeton study simply points out that eliminating Affirmative Action would not increase white enrollment, so whites' complaints about AA don't help. Your spin (and The Daily Beast) is that AA is designed to fuck over Asians. Your argument is designed to get Asians to hop on the anti-AA bandwagon. The Princeton link has no such angle.

    70. Re:Fuck that guy. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I thought you were crazy at first. Now I realize that you're inspired and riding the fine line of satire.
      Good job, sir, that is a talented touch.

    71. Re:Fuck that guy. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2

      First, I don't know what the daily beast is trying to say. I'm not a regular reader of that website, rather I just pulled the first thing I found to back my claim; if you actually read slashdot regularly you'll find multiple sources saying the same thing on a somewhat recurring basis, and they come from all kinds of different sources.

      Is the daily beast biased? Who knows, but bias or not when you're right, you're right, and when you're wrong, you're wrong. If Hitler said night was black, I'm not going to argue with him on that just because I think he's wrong on a bunch of other stuff. It seems like you already hate the daily beast (why I don't know) but unless you have proof of the contrary, or a good reason to suspect their wrong, announce it rather than saying something to the effect of "well I just hate them." In other words, attack the argument, not the person.

      Second, I don't need to create such an argument because a lot of Asians are already doing exactly that. And rightfully so as they're the ones getting screwed the hardest. I'm already about to graduate from college myself, and after that happens I intend on being self employed and/or contracting, so AA doesn't apply to me in either case, nor do I have any kids, thus I have no dog in this fight. At the same time though, when I spot an injustice I will call it out, regardless of whether or not it affects me.

      Third, when I say AA is working as intended, I mean exactly that: It is keeping the races aligned according to a rather arbitrary definition of what percent of them "ought to be" there, with complete disregard of the number of them who even apply to begin with or actually do belong there. I never said that it is intended to fuck over Asians, however and this is the key: Its intended result does have the effect of fucking over Asians, even though fucking over Asians isn't the intent of the program itself.

      I hope that is clear enough for you. Thank you.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    72. Re:Fuck that guy. by gohmifune · · Score: 1

      Whites may make up a significant portion of development staff (and they also make up over 80% of the population in the US

      The 2010 US Census says that its 72% apparently, and in that number includes Hispanics, Arabs, and various other minority groups that don't fall into other groups.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...
      http://www.census.gov/2010cens...

    73. Re:Fuck that guy. by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Is the daily beast biased? Who knows, but bias or not when you're right, you're right, and when you're wrong, you're wrong.

      Unless you live under a rock, you know the answer is YES, MOST ASSUREDLY, YES.

      It seems like you already hate the daily beast (why I don't know) but unless you have proof of the contrary, or a good reason to suspect their wrong, announce it rather than saying something to the effect of "well I just hate them." In other words, attack the argument, not the person.

      I don't know where you draw the conclusion that I HATE the daily beast. I never said or implied any such thing. I merely pointed out that they are biased. If you spend more than a minute reading the website that fact will become obvious. I did not say their data was invalid; I merely pointed out that the conclusions and slant of the article makes their agenda obvious.

      I'm already about to graduate from college myself, and after that happens I intend on being self employed and/or contracting, so AA doesn't apply to me in either case, nor do I have any kids, thus I have no dog in this fight.

      FYI, I graduated almost 30 years ago on a scholarship for DC residents that was intended to increase black attendance at GWU; they did not turn me down because I happen to be white. I have no dog in the fight either.

      At the same time though, when I spot an injustice I will call it out, regardless of whether or not it affects me.

      I'm with you there. Because I grew up in DC (very predominantly black), I have seen some serious institutionalized discrimination over the years. It is rampant, in pretty much everywhere I've lived (from coast to coast). If you don't see it, you are likely too young or too blind. AA is supposed to be a form of their "40 acres and a mule" that they never got.

      Third, when I say AA is working as intended, I mean exactly that: It is keeping the races aligned according to a rather arbitrary definition of what percent of them "ought to be" there, with complete disregard of the number of them who even apply to begin with or actually do belong there.

      On that, you are misinformed. People such as Jesse Jackson may use such proportions to show what he perceives as discrimination, but actual AA laws in the US do no such thing. You can begin your education in this area with JFK's executive order 10925 and go from there.

      I never said that it is intended to fuck over Asians,

      Okay, my bad, but it looked like it to me when you said: "affirmative action is very much applying to Asians. A) It shits on them B) It is working as intended." Do you see how easy it is draw that conclusion from your words?

      however and this is the key: Its intended result does have the effect of fucking over Asians, even though fucking over Asians isn't the intent of the program itself.

      I disagree with your conclusion that Asians are being "fucked over" based solely on the fact that they would gain if AA were tossed. If speed limits were abolished, people would drive faster, consuming more fuel. Does this mean that gas stations are being "fucked over" by speed limits? No.

    74. Re:Fuck that guy. by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      tl;dr: You can get cheap tattoos, but don't.

      Unless one of your life goals is to achieve internet notoriety by being featured on Ugliest Tattoos.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    75. Re: Fuck that guy. by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      Am I to take from this comment that there are neckbeards, who think tattoos are absurd, and everyone else who apparently thinks tattoos are the coolest thing ever? At least a beard can be shaven once the owner changes their tastes, tattoos are forever. So good luck with that way cool skeleton fairy on your back, I'm sure the grand kids will think it's awesome, especially once your skin starts losing its plasticity and your former work of art looks like it was done on saggy bread dough.

      Also thought I'd point out that I am quite clean shaven. In point of fact, I can't really even grow facial hair at all. I never considered that my facial hair, or lack thereof, would be such an influence on my opinions.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    76. Re:Fuck that guy. by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Well, that's what your anecdotes say. Mine suggest that the slickly dressed goons with the degrees are the ones who ask the one guy dressed in a tshirt or polo shirt for help. As my language suggests, I'm talking about what should be, not what is.

      A focus on skills over highschool level clique behavior like fretting over fashion would benefit the business world in general.

    77. Re:Fuck that guy. by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      You can flip that first argument around very easily. Employers who enforce dress codes are thinking: "People who think clothing fashion trends and social conformity are more important than getting work done are insecure adolescents who still haven't graduated highschool."

      An interview should model a typical day on the job. Pointless trick questions about 'goals' and personal life, along with passive-aggressive gamesmanship, are bullshit.

      This status quo basically calls for one to lie, to project a false image that complies with either impossible to maintain and/or irrelevant expectations. Dress code is essentially a red herring. Choosing to wear a t-shirt and jeans over a suit is not the same thing as walking around in your underwear in public. ..and if you're dating girls that use your fashion as the first cut, then all I can say is I hope you enjoy getting raped in divorce court.

      Employers shouldn't give a shit what people wear as long as it doesn't get in the way of doing their jobs. The only exception would be safety, and even that fits under the same umbrella.

    78. Re:Fuck that guy. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      or, if the employer was rational, he would instead ask "Can you do XYZ? Yes? Ok, show me" and provide the opportunity to demonstrate relevant skills.. Clothing choice would not come up unless it was a safety hazard.

    79. Re: Fuck that guy. by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Sounds like you spend most of your time hiring and/or working for insecure adolescents who still haven't graduated highschool. What someone wears is of little consequence for a desk job. Why would you ask for commitments from 'third parties' who judge on such irrational means? I wouldn't trust them worth a damn on that basis alone.

    80. Re:Fuck that guy. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time people like yourself realize that skills are more important than whether the 'correct' pair of shoes are being worn. (I thought) most people stopped doing that once they graduate high school.

      There are plenty of slickly dressed sycophants running wall street, the banks, the fortune 100, and the government. Should I assume that all people wearing suits and ties are potential criminals? I fail to see a correlation between dress and ability, but I do see a strong correlation between dresscode policies and senseless conformity.

    81. Re:Fuck that guy. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Yeah well as my language clearly suggests, I'm talking about should-be, not 'what-is.' The status quo selects for traits that cause a lot of organizational problems.

    82. Re:Fuck that guy. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time that adults quit being offended over something that offends low iq 15yo highschool girls? ("eew, omg, what are you wearinnnngg??")

    83. Re:Fuck that guy. by leereyno · · Score: 1

      "Affirmative action" is a system where people are treated as a member of a group rather than judged as an individual.

      Companies that practise such shenanigans are at a competitive disadvantage.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    84. Re:Fuck that guy. by leereyno · · Score: 1

      The lowering of the standards is not a side effect, but is in fact the goal.

      Why? it isn't because those behind these schemes want to make it easier for members of arbitrarily defined groups to do well in comparison to members of other arbitrary groups, but to sabotage them.

      The greatest trick that bigots ever pulled was convincing the targets of their bigotry to view themselves as victims.

      A black or mexican or what have you student in the 92nd percentile put into a school where everyone else is in the 98th percentile is being screwed over, plain and simple.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    85. Re:Fuck that guy. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      On that, you are misinformed. People such as Jesse Jackson may use such proportions to show what he perceives as discrimination, but actual AA laws in the US do no such thing. You can begin your education in this area with JFK's executive order 10925 and go from there.

      I don't think I mentioned any AA laws. AA sets guidelines, and the individual institutions must implement them. That implementation will of course vary depending on how the institution grades its students. Here are two examples:

      http://nwpr.org/post/firestorm...

      Here's what the Virginia state board of education actually did. It looked at students' test scores in reading and math and then proposed new passing rates. In math it set an acceptable passing rate at 82 percent for Asian students, 68 percent for whites, 52 percent for Latinos, 45 percent for blacks and 33 percent for kids with disabilities.

      Effectively this says that race plays a determining factor in whether or not you pass. If you are Asian, your score must be nearly twice as high as a black student in order to be considered passing. Even if you did much better than every black student in the class, but you weren't quite up to the Asian standard, you still fail while the black students pass. (Also look at another thing they're doing here - basically if you're black, you aren't expected to perform much better than somebody who is literally retarded.

      This really is no different than the days where blacks were required to take tests in order to vote where the white people weren't held to any standard at all.

      http://tampa.cbslocal.com/2012...

      On Tuesday, the board passed a revised strategic plan that says that by 2018, it wants 90 percent of Asian students, 88 percent of white students, 81 percent of Hispanics and 74 percent of black students to be reading at or above grade level. For math, the goals are 92 percent of Asian kids to be proficient, whites at 86 percent, Hispanics at 80 percent and blacks at 74 percent.

      I disagree with your conclusion that Asians are being "fucked over" based solely on the fact that they would gain if AA were tossed. If speed limits were abolished, people would drive faster, consuming more fuel. Does this mean that gas stations are being "fucked over" by speed limits? No.

      That's a very bad analogy. A better one would be saying that if you're asian, you're only allowed to drive 20MPH, and blacks are allowed to drive 60MPH. The goal would be to make sure that asians are late to their interviews more so that fewer of them will show up, thus increasing the number of blacks while decreasing the number of asians.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    86. Re:Fuck that guy. by leereyno · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help anyone.

      You can't judge people by which group they belong to. That this group or that group is "underrepresented" does not mean that there is a problem to be solved, let alone a problem that can be solved by manipulating admissions and hiring standards.

      People from whatever group you want to bring up who have the chops to pursue a challenging carreer, and are actually interested in pursuing it, will do so, and they will do as well as anyone else in that field. Their membership in such and such a group does not define who they are, their individual abilities and inclinations do that.

      The only valid way of judging someone is as an individual.

      Social engineering efforts based on group membership backfire. The people behind such efforts are fools, and all too often villains.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    87. Re:Fuck that guy. by leereyno · · Score: 1

      You're making the mistake of assuming that Jackson is the least bit honest in what he is saying.

      He is a hustler.

      He goes around and shakes down companies for money, under the threat that failure to pay will result in his legion of useful idiots making trouble for them.

      The guy is a walking cancer.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    88. Re:Fuck that guy. by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Particular School Boards of Education setting passing levels has nothing to do with Affirmative Action, and everything to do with No Child Left Behind (read your nwpr.org link). Race-based passing levels is certainly absurd. These BOE are just scrambling to find a way to keep their federal funding.

    89. Re:Fuck that guy. by Copid · · Score: 1
      If there was a "getting work done" set of questions that worked reliably in an interview, I'm sure every employer would use the shit out of it. But there isn't. For tech people, it's better than for most other jobs because at least there's a set of questions that are a necessary but insufficient condition for decent productivity. Hiring somebody who bombs those questions but is a snappy dresser is indeed stupid. But given the choice between two candidates with the basic technical chops, I'll choose the one who seems to be able to size up the office culture over the one who seems to be missing that skill any day of the week.

      Choosing to wear a t-shirt and jeans over a suit is not the same thing as walking around in your underwear in public.

      If the norms for where you're going are to wear a suit and no to wear a t-shirt and jeans, the difference is really only one of degree and not kind. Most children learn pretty early that there are things you wear to some places and not others. They get that wearing your Batman costume on Halloween is OK but wearing it to school is not. Adults who don't quite pick up that skill stand out, and not in a good way.

      and if you're dating girls that use your fashion as the first cut, then all I can say is I hope you enjoy getting raped in divorce court.

      I have no idea how we jumped from "sees your obvious inability to recognize basic norms for appropriate dress" to "use your fashion as a first cut" but there you go, I guess. If you show up to take your girl out to French Laundry on a big date wearing a sweatshirt, jeans and flip flops, she won't be judging you on wearing a sweatshirt, jeans and flip flops. She'll be judging you for being a bozo who just doesn't get it it.

      I'll definitely take a step back and say that I'm all for allowing employees to wear pretty much whatever they want if they're not customer-facing, and that companies that enforce strict dress codes when they don't need to are pouring money down the drain for no reason. But if you show up for an interview at a place that has at least some minimal standards for professional dress and you totally blow it off, being surprised or morally outraged when your interviewer thinks, "Well, this guy doesn't have a clue" is not really a fair reaction.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    90. Re:Fuck that guy. by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Tattoos have been around for a long, long time. I doubt they are just going to "disappear."

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    91. Re:Fuck that guy. by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      Tattoos have been around for a long, long time. I doubt they are just going to "disappear."

      I didn't mean to imply that. However, it's hard to deny that the current trend of "MOAR TATTOOS" is just that, a trend. Once the fad has passed, tattoos will once again be the province of strippers, bikers, gang members, and tribal wannabes.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    92. Re:Fuck that guy. by lucm · · Score: 1

      You can also get a free tattoo in prison, but the available designs are limited to a specific subset based on the color of your skin and/or the number of your street.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    93. Re:Fuck that guy. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      there is probably a more nuanced discussion to be had about affirmative action

      but having been in the hiring seat, I can tell you that almost every single
      applicant is white and male, and very few of those are actually qualified

      so unless Jackson thinks HP should hire unqualified people just because
      they are black or latino, he should probably focus his efforts earlier
      in the pipeline

      Jesse is not asking for companies to hire unqualified people. He is asking to not discriminate.
      Baseball, Football, and all sports stopped having barriers in the 50's. Sales, finance and other than software engineering hire talent, irrespective of color. Why not silicon valley?

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. Why are there so few black engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Black culture doesn't reward or encourage intelligence.

    1. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Black culture doesn't reward or encourage intelligence.
      "

      To be honest, AMERICAN culture doesn't either. Is why celebrities, athletes, and entertainers are paid dump truck loads of cash while the really intelligent folks ( scientists, reaearchers, you know folks who actually create the world as we know it today ) are compensated at a much lower level.

      Given that, if you're growing up in America are you going to strive to be a math whiz or a pro-athlete ? Which gives you the ideal " American " lifestyle ?

      Here in the good ol US of A, we glorify a lot of things: War, wealth, and power to name but a few. Intelligence is way, Way, WAY down the list.

      In fact, if you're TOO good at say, Math, in school, you become a target and an outcast because you don't fit in with the cool crowd folks now. Your life will become a living hell.

    2. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by aurizon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, black culture penalizes anyone black who allows his/her intelligence to get them ahead. Any child who does so is beaten and bullied by the other black kids, so they learn to hide their abilities and blend in. Some emerge and excell, but sadly, too many are lost to the lifestyle.
      As a retired teacher, I have seen this and it is hard to eliminate, and if you try, it is risky.

    3. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, black culture penalizes anyone black who allows his/her intelligence to get them ahead. Any child who does so is beaten and bullied by the other black kids, so they learn to hide their abilities and blend in. Some emerge and excell, but sadly, too many are lost to the lifestyle. As a retired teacher, I have seen this and it is hard to eliminate, and if you try, it is risky.

      AC to preserve mods. I really, really don't want to agree with this. It seems like a topic better suited for the 1950's than the 2010's. But, I have seen it happen firsthand at a goddammed university. In grad school, one of the most brilliant people I knew was a blerd, his dad was an engineer and his mom was a nurse, the guy was doing calculus since age 8. I saw him get treated like garbage by his undergrads (he was teaching at the time) because he was a huge black guy who refused to conform to what they thought he should be. It isn't a black or white problem per se, it's a problem of how society has conditioned its members to judge success by different racial groups. Jeremy Lin should have been a doctor, Neil deGrasse Tyson could've been a baller, etc. How on Earth are we still having these conversations?

    4. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, black culture penalizes anyone black who allows his/her intelligence to get them ahead. Any child who does so is beaten and bullied by the other black kids, so they learn to hide their abilities and blend in.

      As an outwardly Caucasian male* who grew up in the rural backwoods of Missouri and went to school with a 99.9% Caucasian student body, I can assure you that being bullied for showing intelligence is far from being a "black problem."

      * Being a solid 1/4 Blackfoot, I prefer to think of myself as a "mud race."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Hey, I went to Pleasant View, Hillcrest, and later Glendale. Yeah, it wasn't the best place in the world to be known as the smart kid. That made for some long, unpleasant bus rides home.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Black culture doesn't reward or encourage intelligence.

      I agree, but I have evidence to back this up.

      I graduated from High School in 1982. I went to a public high school in a poor rural area of North Carolina. The demographics of the student body where 90% black, 3% white and 7% other. I'm in the 3% and graduated 5th out of about 250.

      I ask people to guess how many of the 250 went to college. NOBODY ever guesses low enough. I visited my High School 2 years after I graduated and asked about my classmates. Only 4 in my class had gone on to college, three white one black (on a basketball scholarship). At this point, I know of only two of us who actually graduated with a 4 year degree, but I've not been back to ask and I sincerely hope there have been more since.

      The sad fact is that many of my classmates where certainly able to learn and would have had no issues getting though college, but because their cultural and social situation did not value education, few tried. It wasn't what they valued or what they wanted.

    7. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Black culture doesn't reward or encourage intelligence.

      I think you need to qualify this. American Black culture doesn't encourage intelligence. I've been around some African immigrants. One was a professor. Another was a nurse who spoke English, French, and several tribal languages from her homeland. Smart, motivated... and not from here.

      I seem to recall having read about some issues along these lines wrt to immigrant Blacks having to face hard realities of assimilation, especially if they have children.

      IMHO, the other cultures don't have a bias against intelligence. As to why those other cultures are generally a failure, I really do lay the blame mostly on the fact that they were under the thumb of colonialism well into the 20th century, and they still have mostly fucked political systems that arose as a reaction to that. e.g., Zimbabwe going full-tard communist as a reaction to concentration of land ownership among Whites, with sadly predictable results...

    8. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by aurizon · · Score: 1

      So that .1% fellow blackfooted persecuted you? Or the white rednecks.

      I was referring the the sad fact of black males persecuting other black males who show any ability to study, read etc.
      In some areas there is enough teacher presence in halls, yards and stairwells to curtail this bullying in school. Many places have had wages taken so high that there is insufficient teacher presence in halls, yards and stairwells that bullying flourishes in these areas, and this bullying chills many black students into mediocrity. The really smart ones hang back and keep their own counsel and are able to do well in school.
      I think this is part of the problem in Africa, working hard, studying are seen as bad white traits.

    9. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by slew · · Score: 1

      I think this is part of the problem in Africa, working hard, studying are seen as bad white traits.

      You literally have no idea about Africa if you make that kind of statement.

      It's a bit anecdotal, but I know several people (about 1/2 of them "white/mixed") who grew up in Kenya, South Africa, and Nigeria. According to them, most people in Africa don't even think about "whites". The biggest problems in Africa today are corruption and war. There are plenty of smart people in most countries there, but they have no access to good schools or jobs. Given the economic situation, many have to work very hard just to put food on the table. Everyone they know seems to want to send their kids to the best school they can (which is usually private) and they try to get their kids to study as much as they can.

      The problem is that because of the huge human displacement in Africa (economic, war, etc), there are lots of young kids where their best option is to join a war-gang. This is a sad development, but not because that working hard and studying is a bad white trait.

      In my estimation (talking to people I know who live in various places around the world, Africa, Asia, India, Western Europe, South America), this anti-intellectual attitude is primarily an American phenomena (black, white, Asian, it doesn't matter). I don't think you see this in other areas of the world as much as you see it here.

    10. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it's not like the white kids would offer you crack and call you "brother" if you acted dumb, they'd shit on you for some other reason, so you might as well be a nerd

    11. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by aurizon · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. I was too general. The problems I spoke of are country specific, but there are several of them.
      A friend of mine was a prof in Zimbabwe, prior to the advent of black corrupt rule. He told me stories and why he eventually became an expat.
      That crooked ruler is one whereof I speak.
      The breakdown of society by men with guns who want kids to project their power is also a big problem. Those kids get ruined for any normal life, unlimited booze, hookers and drugs while young with a gun tends to do that to you - sort of "the Lord of the Flies - with added guns"

      Anti intellectualism arises from envy and greed

    12. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by number17 · · Score: 1

      To be honest, AMERICAN culture doesn't either. Is why celebrities, athletes, and entertainers are paid dump truck loads of cash while the really intelligent folks ( scientists, reaearchers, you know folks who actually create the world as we know it today ) are compensated at a much lower level.

      If this were true the why are there no celebrities, athletes, and entertainers on the Forbes Billionaires List(I didn't actually look past #800)? That list is stacked with people running businesses with either new or old money. They own or hire the celebrities, athletes, and entertainers to promote their products.

      To top it off theFortune 500 isn't littered with companies that directly hire celebrities, athletes, and entertainers.

      I can guarantee you that the average and top engineers makes more than the average and top celebrity/athlete/entertainer.

    13. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by schnell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Black culture doesn't reward or encourage intelligence.

      To be honest, AMERICAN culture doesn't either.

      The first statement is racist and the second is incorrect. The correct statement is that "poor and lower-to-middle class culture doesn't reward or encourage intelligence."

      I will bet you anything that the exact same premium on intelligence and achievement is shared among white, black and hispanic families in wealthy Orange County CA suburbs; while the same lack of interest is expressed among poor black families in Philadelphia, latino families in East LA and poor white families in Arkansas. I grew up solidly middle class but from my youngest years it was just understood that I *would* go to college, no excuses otherwise. I would like to think that I would have gone to college because of my intelligence and interests no matter what my upbringing ... but who knows?

      Sadly, this is a self-perpetuating theme that increases the economic divide in the US over time. I am certainly no fan of affirmative action but the situation does imply that a lack of an initial "hand up" to reach the economic and educational status that will value intelligence is a strong barrier to making that part of the culture. You generally have to get your head above water before you can see that there is land there, and the value of education and upward mobility is usually hidden from those who have never glimpsed it because it's just alien to their experience.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    14. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      Many places have had wages taken so high that there is insufficient teacher presence in halls, yards and stairwells that bullying flourishes in these areas, and this bullying chills many black students into mediocrity.

      I think you are reading more into the issue than "high wages" for teachers causing a lack of teachers. If teachers charged the city/state like lawyers do for every minute that they worked, you would see that teachers are far from underpaid even at your "wages taken so high" rates that you currently claim. Even with summer "off", and not including time spent at "teacher meetings" or pre/post school year, teachers in primary and secondary schools work on average just 100 hours less than a person with a 40 hour work week does across the entire year. If the pre/post school year time, and days that teachers are required to report when students do not are included, teachers work more hours during the 180 day school year than a normal person does across the entire 260 day work year.

      To be quite honest, I think teachers should be paid by the minute, just like lawyers charge. Maybe then we might actually have teacher salary that reflects the work they put in and people like you would see the actual time spent to do the job. Remember, when the students go home, the teachers still need to grade assignments/tests, create tests, update lesson plans, student learning plans, input grades into school grading software, possibly hold office hours for after/before class assistance, hold shifts covering detentions, call parents, hold parent teacher conferences, etc., etc.. All of which adds up to a lot of time over the 6 hour 40 minute "school day" that you think is the end of the time a teacher needs to be on the clock...

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    15. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

      Maybe some of them know the difference between "where" and "were." You clearly don't.

    16. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by Talderas · · Score: 2

      I can guarantee you that the average and top engineers makes more than the average and top celebrity/athlete/entertainer.

      If we assume average to mean league minimum within the NFL then the salaries are...

      Rookie : $420,000
      1 Yr : $495,000
      2 Yr : $570,000
      3 Yr : $645,000
      4-6 Yr : $730,000
      7-9 Yr : $855,000
      10+ Yr : $955,000

      Whether that beats out the salary of an equivalent experience average engineer I don't know.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    17. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by sureshot007 · · Score: 1

      Is that what it's like to go to a private school?

    18. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I would agree that the American culture in general does not place value on being intelligent. Just look at the popularity of Paris Hilton and the Kardashians. I do think the black culture has a bigger stigma over appearing to be intelligent. If a black person talks with good English rather than slang they are called names or said to be acting white. Even President Obama was disowned by a lot of the black community for being not black enough in the way he spoke and acted.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    19. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You seem to be assuming that I grew up in the same city I currently reside in, which is not the case.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    20. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I don't assume anything, except that we've both resided in the same place and I very likely know your "rural backwoods" area. :-)

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    21. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So that .1% fellow blackfooted persecuted you? Or the white rednecks.

      The .1% was our black kid. No joke.

      Interestingly, he was treated better than the "nerds" at my school, even with a parking lot filled with Confederate flags. Why? Because he was the only reason all our sports teams didn't completely suck. So, all the "jocks" who picked on the "nerds" were, of course, buddy-buddy with him.

      Literal reverse racism.

      I was referring the the sad fact of black males persecuting other black males who show any ability to study, read etc.

      ... and I was referring to the sad fact that blacks aren't the only race that persecutes their own for showing intellect.

      I think this is part of the problem in Africa, working hard, studying are seen as bad white traits.

      I think that's an incredibly racist thing to say - none of the kids who harassed me had any connection to Africa, nor were they black, yet they exhibited the exact same behavior that you're claiming is exclusive to black people due to... what, geographic origin? That's bonkers.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    22. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by aurizon · · Score: 1

      Again you miss the fact that I spoke of Africa, not within the USA. It has been well documented that white study patterns are looked upon as bad. Now this might be because they have been caught up in the hatred of pushy white religions who are also hated in many areas. Often the true degree of hatred for each aspect can not be dissected - they are all hated.
          It is a strange fact that creams that bleach the skin are hot sellers on Africa and at the same time white infrastructure is decried and destroyed. This reminds me of the Arabs who destroy any Jewish business they take over instead of staffing it with Arabs and making $$.

    23. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Again you miss the fact that I spoke of Africa, not within the USA.

      I didn't miss anything - apparently you missed the fact that I pointed out the "punish the studious" attitude you are apparently claiming is an exclusively African trait is anything but. You're just trying to justify your racism, which I find pretty evident by your use of "white this" and "white that," not to mention the complete non sequitur about Arabs there at the end.

      Feel free to continue speaking and outing yourself as a racist and a bigot, but don't expect me to continue to respond.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    24. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by aurizon · · Score: 1

      ?? Punish the studious exists in kids, but not as they get older, they outgrow it and are taught to not do it.

      Are you so involved in hurling accusations of racism that you deem political correctness the new acme of rationality?

      Ever hear of realpolitik?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      It seems to trump your PC attitudes.

      You will be pleased to know that as online education venues like MIT Academy (http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/) and Khan Academy (https://www.khanacademy.org/) advance, they leave PC behind, because the color of a man's or woman's skin is not evident in keyclicks, and more and more people of all races and tribes are getting an education in whatever path they choose and whatever level their ability allows.

      That said, some third world countries have bad access, however, DVDs and hard drives with entire segments of these courses rendered into memory(it takes banks and banks of drives to hold them all) are being transported to these areas where web centers help. I would like to see broadband come to Africa.

      BTW, the way Arabs attack whatever is Jewish, even as it becomes theirs is much like the antipathy black students have to other black students who "go whitey"

    25. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by metlin · · Score: 1

      Nassim Nicholas Taleb talks about it in his books, "Fooled By Randomness" & "The Black Swan".

      The idea is one of scalability. An athlete paid for a game or a lawyer or a doctor or a consultant are all financially similar to hookers -- i.e. you trade your skills for money for a given period assuming a given performance. No matter how great a hooker or a doctor or a lawyer or an athlete you are, there is a finite limit to how much money you can make. What more, there is a finite time during which you can monetize your performance, before you have to charm new clients. And even then, you stop because your performance stops to fall.

      However, a lot of other professions are not limited by this. They are much more scalable. Imagine JK Rowling or Bill Gates or Dr. Dre. You can write one book or one song that keeps on selling millions. You can have a product that's only limited by your target market, which could keep on growing. Sure, you can write more books or make more songs or update your product, but that only serves to increase your incoming revenue.

      The difference is, an athlete's skills are inherently not scalable. But an engineer's skills are. However, your chances of scaling are much lower, but not any lower than that of getting picked to be an NFL quarterback.

      The other aspect to consider is also the average salary of all engineers (i.e. graduated with an engineering degree) and their unemployment rate over time compared with the average salary and professional employment status of anyone who's an "athlete" (played varsity or any sport in college). Not sure how the numbers would pan out, but I have a feeling that over time, the engineers would probably do better, with some athletes doing exceptionally well (i.e. you were on the Oxford Crew team, went to grad school at Harvard, and worked in private equity - such as this guy - while the rest wouldn't do so hot).

    26. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. Considering I am "Black", all I can remember my culture rewarding was self reliance, equal opportunity under the law and intelligence. Maybe that's because I'm a child of folks who counter-sat, but I don't know about that. A good number of the fellow African Americans I went to high school with ended up in careers in IT or engineering.

      It is almost like saying "White culture tends to sum up all things they don't fully comprehend in a blanket of fear." That's about as inaccurate as the above.

      Now, if you were to say that the present American popular culture does not reward intelligence I might be inclined to agree.

      That said, I don't think Rev. Jackson's efforts are in the right place.

      You want more "minority engineers", then you have to cultivate that at the primary school level. If you find that your are generating people sufficiently tooled, but lacking opportunity, then you have a problem at the higher levels.

      This isn't just a problem for African American and Hispanic youth (or women for that matter), it is a problem for the United States that the skills required to fill these positions are not valued socially (a strong belief in scientific principles; mathematics; problem solving, etc.).

      --
      Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
    27. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by gohmifune · · Score: 1

      Celebrities get paid tens of thousands of dollars when they work. How can you say that can be expected by an engineer?

    28. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by gohmifune · · Score: 1

      I am certainly no fan of affirmative action but the situation does imply that a lack of an initial "hand up" to reach the economic and educational status that will value intelligence is a strong barrier to making that part of the culture. You generally have to get your head above water before you can see that there is land there, and the value of education and upward mobility is usually hidden from those who have never glimpsed it because it's just alien to their experience.

      I think this is something people don't get. You can't judge historically resource poor groups by the standards of non-resource poor groups. The ultimate goal should be for everyone to be on an even playing field before the game even starts.

    29. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by gohmifune · · Score: 1

      I agree, I think this is more of a problem associated with groups with little upward mobility.

    30. Re: Why are there so few black engineers? by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Depends on which "American" culture you're talking about:

      http://www.amazon.com/Coming-A...

      There is a profound difference between the upper middle class educated professional communities that many of us grew up in, and those communities populated by what used to be called "trailer trash."

      If intelligence and academic achievement were not "cool" where you went to school, then you need to make sure that your kids grow up in a place where they are.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    31. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by leereyno · · Score: 1

      You can thank LBJ's "great society" for this.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    32. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Ever watch "Winter's Bone?"

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    33. Re:Why are there so few black engineers? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      Pretty sure I'm the only person on the Plateau that hasn't. Got the book though, hopefully I'll get to it someday.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  3. Maybe he should talk to the NHL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't see much diversity in professional hockey.

    1. Re:Maybe he should talk to the NHL? by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      Or the NBA. They have the same philosophy as silicon valley ... it's all about results.

    2. Re:Maybe he should talk to the NHL? by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, there *is* one black player.

  4. Show us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe Jesse should start his own company, hire strictly based on race, and compete.

  5. Tech is full of minorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just not his minorities, queue the shakedown parade.

    1. Re:Tech is full of minorities by mycroft822 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I work at a large tech company and our engineering staff is probably close to 40% non-white. He needs to go the schools and communities to encourage education if he wants to see the numbers of his minority rise, not corporate boardrooms.

    2. Re:Tech is full of minorities by Zordak · · Score: 1

      Just not his minorities, queue the shakedown parade.

      Exactly. I went to a technical conference for one of my clients. There were a lot of very smart engineers and scientists there. Caucasian males were a decided minority. Most of them were Chinese or Indian, including many women. The Reverend Jesse Jackson needs to direct his white hate somewhere else.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    3. Re:Tech is full of minorities by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this. I work for a Palo Alto startup company. I was employee #12, now we have about 20 programmers. Of those, two of us are white American males. There are two Turks, two Ukranians, six or eight Indian dudes, an Indian girl, two white American girls, two British dudes, and Indonesian guy. The CEO is another Turk.

      I have never worked for a Silicon Valley company before and I have never worked in such a diverse environment. Maybe Jesse Jackson should tell more black people to try out programming. I've known two black programmers in my career; of those, one was half-black and the other was an African. Step up, black people! There are good jobs to be had! Why don't you want these good jobs?

  6. Give old man a break... by enterix · · Score: 5, Funny

    He just wants Jessie Jr to find decent job after he's out of prison...

    1. Re:Give old man a break... by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      His father is already a great role model: Become a preacher, knock up an intern, rinse and repeat.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  7. Unjust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you think of all the good people that suffered long, painful deaths from cancer this year, it is simply a travesty of justice that Jackson was not one of them.

  8. Education... by Luthair · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems like this would be an education issue not a hiring issue. e.g. are there really a lot of underemployed / unemployed black or hispanics with CS degrees?

    I suspect the tech industry has a high percentage of minorities due to Indians and other Asians ethnicity.

    1. Re:Education... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's more of a "Jesse Jackson found yet another way to use black people for his own selfish desires" kinda thing.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Education... by breeze95 · · Score: 2

      Seems like this would be an education issue not a hiring issue. e.g. are there really a lot of underemployed / unemployed black or hispanics with CS degrees?

      You are correct. Blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented in colleges. To make matters worse less than 10% of Blacks/Hispanics get STEM degrees. For White students approximately 20% get STEM degrees. Not to mention, the graduation rate for Blacks and Hispanics is much lower than Whites and Asians. Obviously this is going to have a dire effect on the representation of Blacks and Hispanics in STEM careers. I read an article that states if Black and Hispanic students raise their graduation rates in science and engineering to equal the rate attained by Asians this would raise new STEM graduates by 48,000 annually. In addition, raising Black/Hispanic graduation rates to their share of the population and to reflect that of Asians would increase Black/Hispanic STEM graduates by more than 140,000. So, yeah, it's an education issue. I don't see this changing anytime soon, because American high school students treat STEM education as if it was kryptonite.

    3. Re:Education... by leereyno · · Score: 1

      The very notion of a "minority" is a scam.

      It is just a made up word that seems to mean someone who isn't "white."

      People are encouraged to fret over whether some person or another is a "minority" or not, instead of just treating them like a human being.

      What is more, in fields that tap a global talent pool, people who aren't "white" are the numerical majority.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  9. Not Our Fault by Gre7g · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been in the tech industry (software, circuit board design, chip design, and then back to software) for 24 years. I've worked with engineers with heritage from India, China, Korea, various eastern European countries, and probably a couple other countries in Asia. I've never had a black or latino co-worker. In all those years, I've only ever seen us interview a single black candidate, and he so inadequate that he got sent home after speaking with a single interviewer.

    Hiring is not the problem. A lack of black and latino candidates worth hiring is.

    1. Re:Not Our Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've worked with talented black IT professionals, but, they were from South Africa, not the USA.

      Americans have a "Thug Culture" that makes them stupid in general. It's not a racial thing at all. It's an attitude thing.

    2. Re:Not Our Fault by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've worked with talented black IT professionals, but, they were from South Africa, not the USA.

      Americans have a "Thug Culture" that makes them stupid in general. It's not a racial thing at all. It's an attitude thing.

      Some resist the culture and make something of themselves. In college I met an African-American man who was very sharp - He knew there were programs, more than for any other ethnic group, to help him get a leg up and he was taking advantage of these. He was confounded how few people of his racial group were aware or willing to make the effort. His elevator clearly hit the top floor, smart, motivated and with clear goals in mind - get the engineering degree and move on to a masters. He's probably pulling down the big bucks, wearing a suit and driving his choice of ludicrously expensive car.

      Sadly, so many from the neighboring communities were only interested in doing the basic, whatever would get them a slip of paper saying they accomplished something - so could get a better job in a mall or something. No where near as much fire in them to gain knowledge and use it.

      To be fair, whenever people try to counter these subcultures they simply become bores and are tuned out. These people need a proper scare put into them - you'll be gardeners for the immigrants who claw their way to a BSE or such. How do you feel about that?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Not Our Fault by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      I have had a few black coworkers. Perfectly competent individuals who were good to work with. Their jobs were also practically guaranteed as they survived multiple waves of layoffs because the department managers like the boost they provide to their diversity numbers.

      I would be really interested in seeing the number of unemployed black tech workers with BS degrees or better. I doubt there are many.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    4. Re:Not Our Fault by breeze95 · · Score: 2

      I've been in the tech industry (software, circuit board design, chip design, and then back to software) for 24 years. I've worked with engineers with heritage from India, China, Korea, various eastern European countries, and probably a couple other countries in Asia. I've never had a black or latino co-worker. In all those years, I've only ever seen us interview a single black candidate, and he so inadequate that he got sent home after speaking with a single interviewer.

      Hiring is not the problem. A lack of black and latino candidates worth hiring is.

      So, in 24 years your company only interviewed one Black/Hispanic candidate and that doesn't raise red flags to you. In 24 years, only one Black person and no Hispanic was worthy of an interview. That's statistically unlikely to occur unless it's deliberate. Which proves Jessie Jackson point.

    5. Re:Not Our Fault by Gre7g · · Score: 1

      Nope. 24 years spread over 7 different companies in several states.

      I'm not saying that there aren't qualified black and latino engineers out there, but there can't be that many of them. I've never crossed paths with a single one.

    6. Re:Not Our Fault by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are located in a place these people may not want to live or work - who says it's paradise?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Not Our Fault by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      This is the same logic and jumping to pre-existing conclusions that once led us to burn witches.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Not Our Fault by Quila · · Score: 1

      In my IT office there are four black guys, an asian girl, one black woman, and maybe 20 whites (more men than women). OTOH, many of our people come from a military background where intelligence, education and hard work is promoted, so we kind of have a pre-filter for the "thug lifestyle" types.

  10. Somehow... by otaku244 · · Score: 1

    I don't think HP is the right place to go for this ploy. HP's done a real bang-up job in relation to their consumers in almost every market to say nothing of their staff relations.
    The best Mr. Jackson can expect that is that the shareholders concoct a way to pay minorities less than the current staff to save a few bucks on the bottom line.

    --
    Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
  11. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is the rate at which software engineers find employment affected by racial attitudes? I doubt it. If JJ wants more minorities in tech he needs to encourage said minorities to choose it as a career path. I doubt he's interested in that, though. He'd rather shame these firms into hiring underqualified minorities to increase the ratio.

  12. H1Bs don't count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess "diversity" only applies to black.

  13. "insert-sport-here" league has the same problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think "insert-sport-here" league should hire short, slow, weak players.

  14. Good. by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think everyone should be subjected to this race baiting bullshit as consistently and aggressively as possible.

    This is the solution to people like this... they exploit white guilt. And in exploiting it, they use it up.

    Look at this very forum... look at all the people saying "f this guy"... exactly. Those are the people that are already tapped out of guilt.

    I'm amongst them of course. But not everyone has gotten there yet. Let Al run rampant... Everyone he comes into contact with will be inoculated against his tactics.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Good. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      "Let the bigots speak their minds - they're a hell of a lot easier to avoid when you know who they are."

      -- This guy

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Good. by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting I am a bigot or that Al is one? Its not entirely clear and while you might think its self evident, I've had people answer both ways in this context.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:Good. by Amtrak · · Score: 1

      Not sure if it matters who he thinks the bigot is. If he thinks it you at least he will avoid you. :D

    4. Re:Good. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Al.

      Calling someone out on their bigotry is not bigotry within itself; stay the course, bruddah.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  15. Does Jeese do as he preaches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So do we know the diversity situation for Jesse's organization? Just curious, as I have no idea what the situation is.

  16. Good for him - if he can solve the educational gap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've worked in high tech (computing) doing software close-to the hardware (assemblers/compilers/binary translators/binary instrumentation tools/some device driver work) since 1985. And in every single company, the primary hiring criteria has been skill set. If you had the right skills, you got hired.
    In the companies I've worked for: SKIN COLOR IS IRRELEVANT. Small unknown ones, up through: DEC/HP, Cisco, AMD
    To be blunt, if there were two equally qualified candidates for a job, and one was 'not a white guy', the 'not a white guy' got hired in order to improve diversity in the company.
    The real gap occurs prior to the engineering hiring process. The real gap starts in grade school.
    So if Jesse Jackson can make a dent in the supply of talent, I applaud him for that. He needs to put his money where is (large) mouth is and start some targeted science endowments

  17. Shakedown machine back in action! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cracker-Jackin Jackson is at it again, let no company fail to donate to the cause lest they be labelled racist and boycotted. Rainbow Push must need more money to pay off another staffer he knocked up.

    1. Re:Shakedown machine back in action! by Iconoc · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. He speaks absolute irrefutable truth.

  18. "healing algorythm" not a dumb quota by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I dont have a problem with Jesse Jackson...

    I **do** have a problem with this reductive, tone-deaf initiative of his...this program won't improve anything.

    Just as with the lack of women in tech, the lack of racial diversity is a ***symptom of a greater problem*** and trying to hit some sort of abstract "number" is ridiculous.

    The problem goes all the way back to middle school & all the way up through funding for graduate research. We don't know how to **teach technology**...partially because of misperceptions of how the industry works. Steve Jobs as "technology genius" is a perfect example. Jobs was a 'genius' at marketing & dealmaking. He applied innovation to opening new markets & had the vision to see potentials. These are great traits, but have ***nothing to do with actual computing***

    The misperceptions influence organizaitonal decisions...which influences academia...which just reinforces the cycle of bad theory/practice.

    Diversity is an evolutionary advantage, but it's **two steps** beyond fixing right now...tech's problems are systemic and hitting some artificial quota will not help fix things!!!

    First step is to acknowledge we have a problem & start talking about refining + improving how we explain tech to non-techs and students...and integrating those improvements into our systems naturally.

    It's sort of a "healing algorythm" that has to go throughout the whole system to optimize.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re: "healing algorythm" not a dumb quota by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Everyone seems to be focused on the dynamic between employers and employees. But there is another group of people in this equation: The customers.

      First scenario: Affirmative action does not exist. You walk in the door, and a minority representative asks if they can help you. When you look at them, you know they must know their business to have earned that position. You know they must be a determined individual to have moved beyond their cultural norms to get there. You think "This person is going to do a great job.". You answer "Yes", and they proceed to do a good job, and you have it confirmed to you that this minority is entirely capable of the task in question.

      Second scenario: Affirmative action does exist. When you walk in the door, a minority representative asks if they can help you. When you look at them, you know that there is a high probably that they were under qualified, and were put there despite being under qualified, to meet a quota. You don't know for sure, of course, but the odds are not good. So, you act on this knowledge, and try to find someone else to help you. If there isn't anyone else, and you're stuck with them, chances are they actually will be one of the under qualified people, and you'll walk away from the experience unhappy.

      My point is, affirmative action creates an environment where negative stereotypes are not only reinforced, but made real. Not because the minority in question is inherently incapable, but because the system is designed to put incapable representatives in front of you everywhere you go.

      So, really, affirmative action reinforces racism in the population by making it the truly sensible position to take, and hurts those it's supposed to be helping.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:"healing algorythm" not a dumb quota by Entropius · · Score: 1

      It is not the tech industry's job to set up training programs in the ghetto. Their job is to train and hire people who are good at doing what they need done. If they have a choice between setting up a training program in a place where 10% of the folks are interested and a place where 1% are interested, which do you think they'll take?

      If there were a great demand to learn to code among inner city black folks, they would bring folks into their schools to teach technical skills. There isn't, and they don't. It's a bit patronizing to dictate to the inner city blacks that thou shalt learn Perl for the sake of the sociologists.

      "Illegal immigration"? Immigrants start small businesses at a rate above native-born Americans. I am damn glad that folks from other countries come here, open businesses, and join the labor force.

  19. should go after outsourcing and H-B1 they are by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    should go after outsourcing and H-B1 they are the real killers of work.

  20. Obligatory Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Asians are not the "right kind" of minority because they spend their time working and have no need for troublemakers.

    FTFY

  21. Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How many black/latino students are 1) attending college and 2) studying CS? (Or 3, self-taught programmers). How many apply for jobs in tech, and what's the acceptance/rejection rate? Are there a significant number of people who decide not to study CS in the first place because of a perception of not being welcome in the workplace? Are there relatively few black/latino tech workers in senior positions because of some adverse selection or simply because there are fewer of them in the industry to begin with?

    Similar questions apply to women, who make up roughly 50% of the population but also have low numbers in tech.

    Raw numbers don't tell the whole story, although they help direct the questions that we should be asking.

  22. Color Blind by cob666 · · Score: 1

    My experience has been that IT is more color blind than many other departments in large companies I've worked at. The problem is lack of qualified job candidates. Hiring somebody or giving them preferential treatment in the hiring process based on their race or skin color is discrimination.

    Stop affirmative action.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    1. Re:Color Blind by cob666 · · Score: 1

      And frankly, it's really easy to have that "treat everyone the same" attitude when you've never had to worry about being treated differently based on your race/gender.

      I have been treated differently based on my race. Promoting or hiring a less qualified person because they are of a minority race or gender is wrong and that is the fundamental problem with the way affirmative action is applied. Your vacuum environment isn't relevant because affirmative action wasn't designed to function in a vacuum, it was designed to function in the real world. When applications for a job are equally qualified it can work but this is seldom the case. For fear of being labeled or even sued for racial or gender discrimination I have seen businesses hire the lesser qualified minority.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
  23. Dearth of Applicants by Dimwit · · Score: 2

    I've worked in tech for 15-20 years now. Since about 2005, I've sat on interview panels.

    In all that time, I've interviewed maybe three black people (two of whom ended up getting hired). Same with women. It wasn't that we were intentionally ignoring resumes we thought were from black people or women, we just simply did not ever get them.

    I went to college at a school that had a large black student body (although it wouldn't be classified under the "Historically Black College" scheme). Looking at their website, the college is 52% white, 27% black, 10% hispanic white, 3% Asian. However, in my CS101 class (~50 students), it was all white and Asian guys and one white girl (who ended up changing majors).

    The high school I went to was roughly 50/50 black/white, but my AP Computer Science class in high school was 100% white. There was actually a pretty good split of girls and boys, though (it was the only "computer" class that offered honors credit, so there was an attraction to people who wanted high class-placement even if they weren't interested in CS).

    So yeah. While I don't doubt some corporations are biased in their hiring practices, there also just aren't a lot of black of female applicants, and not a lot of black and/or female CS graduates. I don't know how to address that end of the problem.

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re:Dearth of Applicants by AaronW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's the same here. I have interviewed a number of qualified women and work with several excellent female engineers but I have never interviewed an African American. I don't care what a person's background is, if they're qualified for the position then they'll be hired. The best candidate I ever interviewed was a transgendered Russian. Everyone who interviewed her recommended her and we made an offer. Sadly she didn't join.

      Sadly most candidates I interview are not qualified. When I ask basic questions that anyone with a decent CS or CE degree should be able to answer they fall flat on their face regardless of race and these are for more senior positions.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    2. Re:Dearth of Applicants by Copid · · Score: 1

      Exactly this. It's not like American universities are churning out black engineers by the million, only to have them ignored by HP. HP works with the applicant population they receive. If he wants to make a change, he can't pressure HP into making more black engineers appear out of nowhere. He has to work on creating more of them so HP can hire them. If he wanted to head out to black communitites and push the idea that math and science are cool and drum up scholarships to get kids into engineeirng school, I'd send him a donation right now. But what he's doing now is just more self-agrandizing wanking.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    3. Re:Dearth of Applicants by Copid · · Score: 1

      When I ask basic questions that anyone with a decent CS or CE degree should be able to answer they fall flat on their face regardless of race and these are for more senior positions.

      This was my experince too. We start every candidate (even really senior ones) with a short written "find your ass with both hands" quiz that they take quietly on their own. We give it a quick skim and they either move on to interviewing with the team or a short interview with a team member and an out-the-door handshake. It's embedded C work, so it's very basic pointer stuff (4 lines of C code--point the pointer at a variable, increment, reassign, what happens?) or basic threading conceptual work. Can you traverse a linked list? Can you tell me what the ^ operator does to these two variables? My experience is that candidates either completly ace it or they crash and burn. The few times we've let a mistake slide because of an otherwise decent interview have all resulted in employees that don't make it. Given our resume pool (small company outside the most desirable locations), our failure rate is probably 75%.

      I have no idea why this is or how we can produce so many people with resumes but no skills. One of my senior colleagues walked one of those guys out the door and came back and said, "I'm pretty sure there's about the same number real of programmers today as there was in 1982. We just get more applicants these days."

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    4. Re:Dearth of Applicants by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Is it horrible how those black students at your high school and university discriminated against themselves by choosing not to pursue CS opportunities? /sarc

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  24. Oh please by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You're kidding me, right? If there is one industry that is by its very nature not racist it's IT. Xenophobia simply doesn't work out if half your coworkers are hailing from abroad. You have all sorts of people working together, the whole thing reeks of favoritism.

    Or, in other words, Mr. Jackson trying to play the race card in an attempt to guilt-trip.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Oh please by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, the main reason it's "color-blind" is simply that you often cooperate with people you never met. I've worked together with people for years and don't know to this day what they look like. So I can't even remotely be prejudiced to their "race", I simply don't know and frankly, I don't care. I care about the work they do.

      That portions of society are disadvantaged for various reasons is true. No doubt about that. But you can't solve that problem by telling industry to hire people who lack the education, the solution has to be to put education on equal grounds.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Oh please by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Baloney. The color-blindness of the IT industry is related to the hiring practices, which as many people here have pointed out repeatedly, is skewed white because many tech jobs rarely get black candidates. How, in any way shape or form, is that any fault of the IT industry in any way? If Craig's list has a job opening for a startup in San Francisco, and they interview 100 applicants, none of whom are white, are you seriously saying this is due to some cultural bias of the recruiters or interviewers?

      Or is it much more likely that quite simply, few black folks apply for those sorts of positions?

  25. Why does it remind me of this by serbanp · · Score: 2

    awesome MADTv sketch?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  26. umm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Here is data for C.S. and C.E. bachelors degree recipients in the U.S. See page 5. About 8.7% of degrees were awarded to blacks and Hispanics, which is about one out of 11. So Silicon Valley isn't far off what one would expect based purely on # of degrees awarded. A significant portion of bay area tech workers are likely immigrants to the United States and got their degrees elsewhere. This group likely contains very few blacks and Hispanics. So, if the discussion were limited to Silicon Valley workers born in the United States the the percentage of blacks and Hispanics may well line up with expectations.

  27. Exclusionary zoning by Ichijo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    To this day, many cities continue to use exclusionary zoning to keep minority groups out of certain neighborhoods. In Silicon Valley, is density tightly controlled? Are minimum parking requirements in place? If so, this could help explain Silicon Valley's lack of diversity.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Exclusionary zoning by metlin · · Score: 1

      What lack of diversity? Just because it's not diverse in the way he wants it (blacks and Latinos) doesn't mean it's not diverse. It's got plenty of racial diversity -- Indians, Chinese, Koreans, even South Americans and Eastern Europeans.

    2. Re:Exclusionary zoning by xevioso · · Score: 1

      That, or the fact that it is very expensive to live there.

      And there are black enclaves in Silicon Valley...East Palo Alto has roughly the same amount of black folks as white folks...

    3. Re:Exclusionary zoning by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      HI there, born and raised in Seattle, lived there for the first 36 of the 46 years of my life (Ballard, Lynnwood, Edmonds). I guess the fact that WA State has been dominated over the last 30+ years by the Democrats, and that Seattle is arguably the most liberal (by voter trends towards parties) big city in the US, and that the last "GOP" Governor was Langlie back in the 50s (Evans and Spellman were more Democrat than GOP, based on their voting records), you're condemnation is about rich LIBERAL people, not conservatives. Washington in General, Puget sound more specifically, and Seattle in particular are HIGHLY Democrat and liberal - and that is usually where racism comes from. See Jesse Jackson (Democrat).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Exclusionary zoning by Quila · · Score: 1

      It's not the Republicans, it's just that legislatures often don't get around to symbolically fixing old, unenforceable laws. These covenants are common throught the historically Democrat-run South. They didn't bother to outlaw them, and the recent trend of Republican majorities hasn't bothered either.

  28. Hey, great idea, Jesse by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Funny

    But, before hitting Silicon Valley, why not make a stop by the NBA?

    I mean, asians and whites are dramatically underrepresented there. I'm sure you see this as a big problem, too.

    Right, Jesse?

    Um, Jesse?

    1. Re:Hey, great idea, Jesse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Funny

      But, before hitting Silicon Valley, why not make a stop by the NBA?

      I mean, asians and whites are dramatically underrepresented there. I'm sure you see this as a big problem, too.

      Right, Jesse?

      Um, Jesse?

      Dude - I would pay to have someone ask him that question on national TV, and refuse to cut until he answered it.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Hey, great idea, Jesse by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      But, before hitting Silicon Valley, why not make a stop by the NBA?

      I mean, asians and whites are dramatically underrepresented there. I'm sure you see this as a big problem, too.

      Right, Jesse?

      Um, Jesse?

      I know you are joking, but actually Jesse and others have an ongoing issue with MLB (Major League Baseball) that Blacks are "underrepresented" right now. What they fail to mention is that there are actually plenty of Blacks and Latinos in MLB right now. If anything, they are maybe overrepresented, but many Blacks in MLB are not American, they are from other countries, mostly the Dominican Republic. MLB leaders take Jesse seriously and they throw up their hands and cry "Woe is us! We must fix this heinous problem!" but people have looked into it and nobody really knows what is going on. There doesn't seem to be any discrimination at all going on with the players and all anybody can figure is that young Black guys in the US simply don't play baseball in large numbers any more. But MLB has a program to "change this" so it seems for the moment to have pacified Jesse and his buds. If I remember correctly, a few years ago the Atlanta Braves were specifically mentioned as an example of this kind of supposed discrimination but at the time they had plenty of players of color on the team, it's just that none of them were American born. That is not currently true as they have several American born Black players on the current team.

  29. That's Not a Spotlight, It's Stupidity by organgtool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone in the article keeps saying that Jackson is "shining a spotlight" on the problem. Is he really? He pointed out the lack of blacks and latinos in the tech industry and did fuck-all to state what he believes to be the problem and what we can do to resolve it. If he had come out with figures that showed that there were tons of unemployed or underployed blacks and latinos in the tech industry and that the underlying problem is due to discrimination, then that would give us something to work with. But that doesn't seem to be the case at all. What does he expect these companies to do? Hire underqualified people just to get the numbers to match?

    This sounds like what my dad was telling me the other day. He used to work for the federal government and they had very detailed lists of minorities in each department. Every department was often under stress to get their numbers to match percentage of populations. But what population do you go by? National? Regional? Many of these departments were more focused on meeting these quotas than hiring the most qualified candidates, so overall these systems are counterproductive.

    And if we're so focused on quotas of fairness, should we put a quota that only 13.9% of NFL players should be black? The fact is that Mr. Jackson did a lot of good when qualified black people couldn't find work due directly to discrimination. And while discrimination may not be completely gone, it is a lot better than it used to be and not every case of underrepresentation today is due to discrimination. So keep fighting the good fight against discrimination, but if you're going to complain about underrepresentation and completely fail to show that it is a result of discrimination rather than a lack of interest or qualification, then you can kindly STFU.

    1. Re:That's Not a Spotlight, It's Stupidity by Quila · · Score: 1

      But that doesn't seem to be the case at all. What does he expect these companies to do? Hire underqualified people just to get the numbers to match?

      He expects the companies to make a promise to improve diversity and then donate generously to his bank account as a sort of modern-day indulgence.

    2. Re:That's Not a Spotlight, It's Stupidity by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      What does he expect these companies to do? Hire underqualified people just to get the numbers to match?

      Yes, he expects the companies to hire unqualified people and provide job training for them to match their white counterparts.
      As if that's all it took.

    3. Re:That's Not a Spotlight, It's Stupidity by leereyno · · Score: 1

      You make a lot of great points....that have been made for decades now.

      Hasn't discouraged hustlers like Jackson from their perpetual shake downs.

      They're not interested in the truth. They're not even interested in pursuing the goals they claim to have. They're interested in playing the race card for profit.

      The best way to deal with them is with ridicule.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  30. Sleazy extortionist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Has Jackson forgotten what happened 15 years ago when he brought his extortion racket to the Valley and tried it out on T.J. Rodgers over at Cypress. Didn't work out too well as I recall. Jackson is the worst kind of opportunist there is. His political capitol these days is greatly reduced, so I see no reason for the current crop of execs to even give him the time of day. There are serious people working on racial justice in this country, but Jackson has never been one of them - he is just in it for himself.

    1. Re:Sleazy extortionist by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Has Jackson forgotten what happened 15 years ago when he brought his extortion racket to the Valley and tried it out on T.J. Rodgers over at Cypress.

      Heh heh... Great quote from T. J. Rodgers: "Jessie Jackson is like a seagull. He flies in, craps all over everything, then flies back out again."

  31. Re:When niggers get smarter by cyberspittle · · Score: 1

    Has nothing to do with being a "nigger". Fact is the culture in the inner-city has a social norm of intimidating kids who want to learn. Just look at the poor kid who got beat up in Chicogo. Jessie should focus more on inspiring inner-city people to get educated. He can then focus on educational institutions to offer more than an athletic scholarship (which is where education makes money - colleage sports is a money racket). Jessie should also focus on black-on-black deaths. More blacks are killed by other blacks than "whitey" lynchings. Jessie is a bad case of the pot calling the kettle black. Let's refrain form the word "nigger" as it only adds ammunition to Jessie, that everyone (AKA "white people") is against them. Personally, I think there are more problems *socially* in the intercity that need to be addressed. IMHO, the only thing holding them down is their own culture. As long as they can blame others, one won't fix themselves first. I have known and worked with many minorities and can only say, that the successful ones succeeded in spite of the jacked up community they came from (I had same problem myself in a way).

  32. Affirmative Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Affirmative Action is so decisive that I feel I need to give a bit of background. For all intents and purposes, I'm White (I do have native American ancestors, but too far removed to count tribal membership). I grew up in a part of Hawaii where only 30% of the population was White. Among my own spouse and the spouses of my siblings we have two Asians, one Pacific Islander, and three Latinos (one Latina also is part Black). I do not generally consider myself a racist, nor do I feel any White guilt. Slavery ended so long ago that I would be surprised to meet anyone in the US whose grandparents were slaves in the US. My own ancestors weren't slavers and I believe slavery to be evil, but people of all races can make their own future now.

    In Hawaii, preferential treatment is given to Pacific Islanders. At my university, the highest paying jobs for students ($10 / hour) were reserved for Pacific Islanders, while White like me had to be content with $5.25 per hour. I have been turned down numerous times so that a company could get government credit for hiring a less qualified person from a protected class.

    We are in the 21st century. We need to get rid of diversity quotas. Let the most qualified person get the job. Bill Cosby is right in that Blacks need to rid themselves of the ghetto mentality and educate themselves. Blacks (everyone, really) need to take responsibility for their own situation instead of blaming it on events from the 1800s.

    1. Re:Affirmative Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      This:

      We are in the 21st century. We need to get rid of diversity quotas. Let the most qualified person get the job. Bill Cosby is right in that Blacks need to rid themselves of the ghetto mentality and educate themselves. Blacks (everyone, really) need to take responsibility for their own situation instead of blaming it on events from the 1800s.

      One thing that is exceptionally notable of every other immigrant culture (forced or not) is that they learned the language and made an effort to conform. Instead with inner-city black culture, you see the exact opposite. They invent their own language: ebonics. They invent they own holiday(s): kwanza. It's not whites kicking these people out. They're doing it to their selves. They don't want to integrate. And whose fault is that? Understand that this is not a condemnation of African-Americans in general, but an observation of the inner-city culture.

    2. Re:Affirmative Action by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I'm a white guy who spent a decade in Hawaii, with the military and after getting out. My wife was born and raised in Kaneohe, and is of Japanese descent. (Her father fought with the 442.) She clearly saw the discrimination that happened to whites there when she worked for local companies. She knew which companies I wouldn't get hired at when looking for work. We experienced it at restaurants where the Asian tourists where taken care of, while we sat there waiting forever for service.

      Basically, I just want to verify the AC's account. Some might ignore it because it doesn't have a name tied to it.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  33. Re:Stastaticians by Technician · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the diversity of the population does not equal diversification in job skills.

    This is a repeat of Equal Oppertunity and job quota's from 2 decades ago. In the 70's I had a job with a TS clearance in a technical field and I noted the stark lack of some ethnic groups. I asked my employer about this ethnic bias toward White. He showed me the stack of applications. Minorities very rarely applied or even trained in the high tech trades.

    Due to affirmative action in the 80's by t US Goverment, a family relative applied for an apprenticeship with Bonniville Power Administration. He had the highest test score, until another canidate passed him due to race, ethnicity, etc. My brother was passed by for the position. The selected canidate failed out of the program. By this time 6 months had passed and he took another posiiton in private industry.

    Now 30 years later, the BPA HR staff is in the hotseat because they gave preference to minoriities as part of Affermitive Action, but did not give any preference to Veterans. I and my brother are vets. I did not even apply with BPA because at the time I knew the deck was stacked against me.

    Mainzer's email to staff said BPA was now working with DOE to identify the first wave of applicants, including veterans, who were disadvantaged and provide them with priority consideration for positions at BPA. But his email also suggested that the problems went on until April 2013, a year longer than initially reported.

    http://www.oregonlive.com/busi...

    Stating only a low number are hired is only part of the story. Poor inner city schools, culture, and other factors disadvantage these minority groups. When they change culture, work ethic, schooling, etc and enter the trades, only then will the numbers start to match up.

    Do not fix a lack of a race by hiring 100 percent of the applicatents from a race while only picking 5 percent of a mjority. Testing and qualifications do matter to private industry. It should matter in government positions too.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  34. "tech training programs" are a bandaid by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    the tech industry does not set up training programs of the economically disadvantaged area of this country

    i'm not against the concept at all, but it's got to be at a larger scale in multiple areas

    most of our "tech industry heroes" were ***alienated*** from both Academia & Corporate America. it was their alienation from the "tech industry" that drove them to create something that subverted the bad tendencies that caused their alienation.

    we can all think of examples of this

    my question: how is setting up a dumbed-down version of a system that ***doesn't work*** going to help?

    we don't need to "re-invent the wheel" but we do need to refine how our theory/practice in Academia

    we have a whole **public education system**...we don't need headline grabbing "hackathons" where a bunch of Detroit HS students are sat in front of a computer & taught a few lines of C++ or w/e

    we need **qualified teachers** in every school in America...teaching from a **coherent theory of Human/machine interaction** that they learned from **gov't funded professors** writing papers that establish a theory that can be put into practice consistently

    industry needs to open the wallets as well if they expect to have a quality workforce to draw from and a consumer base with enough disposable income to buy their gadgets

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:"tech training programs" are a bandaid by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      The government can't even produce a school system that can reliably teach kids how to read and write, after 100 years of trying. You really think they're going to have any kind of success teaching kids to program?

    2. Re:"tech training programs" are a bandaid by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Kids will learn to hack on their own, just like many learn to read on their own (after being taught by their parents).

  35. This warms my heart. by galabar · · Score: 1

    Nearly 100% rejection of race-baiting and skin color preferences. Things really have changed for the better.

  36. has racism been institutionalized? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    PBS program last week about struggles of black people from 1960s through today. Near end of program it was mentioned about maybe reason why so many blacks are still living in poverty (inner cities) is because racism has been institutionalized. Also for many white people they don't see blacks except on TV where typically they are seen as sports stars, entertainers, or getting dragged off to jail. There is the President but lately his popularity is not that high. Couple months ago Charlie Bolden, NASA Administrator, said he has experienced walking into a convention (where he is the only black guy) everyone looks at him like he is out of place (or is he one of the waiters?). When someone recognizes and points out he is the NASA Administrator (and former astronaut and Marine general), at an instant he becomes the most brilliant person in the room. (ok, there are many saying Bolden is not effective NASA Administrator but that's another topic for another discussion. Besides there have been white guys that were ineffective administrators).

    It seems to me society should encourage math and science but lots of luck as this country is mesmerized by football. Or put resources into inner city schools will be a good start but unfortunately people will cry foul ("that's socialism!") or say we can't afford it (well we sure found plenty of money to pour into Afghanistan and Iraq). But perhaps ask those at these engineering societies, http://www.nsbe.org/ and http://www.ncalifblackengineer... for their suggestions on what they would present at HP.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:has racism been institutionalized? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't think silicon valley is that racist. They hire tons of chinese and indian people.

      Black people tend to be poor. Poor people tend not to have good schools in their neighborhoods. Having a bad education makes you less qualified to do certain jobs. Rather than trying to get people to hire more black people, we should be trying to fix the massive gap in the quality of schools in rich and poor neighborhoods.

      Rather than trying to implement quotas, we should be trying to eliminate the need for quotas.

      Maybe chinese and indian people have some kind of stigma (good or bad), that they are good engineers. Maybe with a good education system, this prejudice that only certain races are good engineers can be eliminated. My point is that the best way to do this is actually fixing inequalities of opportunity that started in the school system. By the time people are adults, giving them jobs that they are not qualified for (even if it is not their fault), is not actually helping the situation.

    2. Re:has racism been institutionalized? by Copid · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is definitely the type of thing that needs to change very early in life--not at hiring time. Engineering is a field that benefits from spending much of your young life preparing for it. You have to learn your math and science as a kid. You have to be interested in how things work and spend time figuring things out and doing things your friends think are uncool. You have to take college prep classes and do well on tests. You have to do your homework and ignore what the other kids are doing. In short, you have to start making really good life-altering decisions when most people are too young and immature to make good life-altering decisions.

      It helps to go to a good safe school that stresses math and science. It helps to have friends who have similar interests and to avoid kids who will make your life miserable if you work hard and do well in classes. It helps to have educated, disciplined parents who set a good example. If you have none of those things, you're starting way behind in a game that's very hard to win from behind. Among my colleagues, there were a few who "weren't ready" for college and did other stuff before going back to school and becoming damn good engineers. But they're the exception. Most of them have been on this track their entire lives.

      If you want to beat the drum about a lack of diversity in engineering, you need to start way back at the start of the pipeline because that's where the vast majority of your engineering candidates are made or broken.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  37. Bill Cosby by slew · · Score: 1

    The person that seems to have the most alignment with this message is Bill Cosby.

    Sadly, many of the young'ns don't know much about him... Maybe his new show can provide a platform for his message.

  38. We can all rest now. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    Now that Jesse Jackson is on the case, we can all rest knowing that, as long as there is any discrimination, he will never give up trying to exploit it for personal gain.

    Are you being accused of being racist? Are you actually racist? It doesn't matter. All you need to do is give Jesse Jackson money, and he will promise not to make your problems worse than they already are.

  39. It isn't a question of guilt. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I was sick of his guilt-peddling bullshit decades ago.

    It isn't a question of guilt. It is a question of demographics.

    In the future the biggest demographic change in the U.S. is the rise of the majority-minority, an odd concept that shows that we still haven't gotten over the ides that white males are the norm and everyone else is a stranger.
    To thrive domestically as well as globally, being multicultural is essential.

    How Will Changing Demographics in the U.S, Influence Business In the Coming Decade?

    The geek would probably agree that the Republican Party is slowly losing ground as a national force because it is too white, male, inbred and insular. He probably knows that the conflict between the poor and middle class of San Francisco runs deeper than gentrification,

    But he refuses to draw any larger conclusions from the evidence which surrounds him.

  40. The only thing stopping diversity... by AaronW · · Score: 1

    The only thing stopping more diversity is the lack of candidates with the right skill set. My company has made offers to a wide range of people and we don't care what their background is as long as they have the skills needed. One of the best candidates I interviewed was transgendered and we made her an offer but sadly she didn't join. Everyone who interviewed her recommended her. I have never seen discrimination with any of the tech companies I have worked for. I just have never seen any Latino or Black candidates, period. If I see a compelling resume I'll do a phone interview and if that goes well it leads to an in-person interview. I don't care what the color of their skin is, their sex, whether they're straight or gay, only that they have the skills we need.

    If Jesse Jackson wants more diversity then he needs to look at the people graduating from college with computer science and computer engineering degrees and applying those degrees (not going in to IT).

    Unfortunately most of the people I interview are not qualified regardless of their race or background. They exaggerate their skills on their resumes or their C coding skills are not up to snuff. I always give the same programming problem as well which I don't consider very difficult and there's more than one way to solve it though most use the simplest method. Sadly, 60% of the people I interview fail it utterly and another 30% miss key corner cases. If they say they've worked on the Linux kernel, I'll ask some basic Linux kernel questions. If they say they've worked on U-Boot, I'll ask some basic U-Boot questions.

    Right now we're looking for people who can work on bootloader code for 64-bit embedded chips (U-Boot and/or UEFI). All we ask are that you have the skills and speak English (and even that doesn't have to be perfect if the skills are present). Most of the stuff we ask should be known by anyone with a decent computer science degree and an understanding of basic CPU architecture.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  41. Beating a dead horse. by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

    Jesse Jackson has been so discredited as a race baiter and antagonist, that really its best to just ignore him. There is no racial discrimination. It all has to do with qualifications. The fact is, blacks need to stop flunking out of math class if they want these kinds of jobs. The lackadaisical attitude I would see from blacks in schools is indicative, they just didn't care and they did not want to learn the subject. Most of them want to play football and basketball and had little or no interest in mathematics. In most cases, it was the whites and orientals that took the most interest in and excel at mathematics and engineering. Blacks have had the same opportunities in schools but they refuse to avail themselves of it, so its their own fault.

  42. Re:Genetics is a Bitch by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

    J.P. Rushton and others have made a strong and compelling argument for the heriditarian model of IQ. IQ has been estimated to be 60% genetic. The evidence is strong enough that there are racial differences in IQ and it is due to genetics that it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. IQ differences show up by age 3, long before education can have any effect. IQ is strongly coordinated with brain size. State of the art MRI scan studies have shown that the average size of the Black brain is 5 cubic square inches smaller than that of whites. IQ is strongly correlated with life history traits. Self dressing and toilet training earlier is associated with lower IQ. Black children dress and toilet train earlier, and sexually mature earlier, than Orientals and Whites, this is coordinated strongly with lower IQ levels, with Blacks having a lower IQ than whites and orientals.

    This is why blacks avoid mathematics. They are unable to cope with it and therefore either want to become sports stars and when they realize thats not possible, they end up doing some other low skilled labor, or even worse, end up becoming gangsters and drug dealers.

  43. Re:It's worse than that! by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Fools everywhere. But keep in mind, while some admire the bottom rungs of the ladder, others aspire much further up. You wouldn't see too many of them among the wanna-bes, they're probably here making much more money than they could there

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  44. Re:Stastaticians by erroneus · · Score: 1

    It will continue to exist as long as people bow to the loud mouths. We have enough collective wisdom showing that he isn't telling the truth or representing the facts. Twenty years ago, we could claim we didn't know or understand. Today, we have mountains of data and research to prove out all of the problems associated with this issue.

  45. I'm sure of it by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    You really think they're going to have any kind of success teaching kids to program?

    YES.

    You're one of those closet Republican, "I hate anything the government does always no matter what" people & debating you is pointless.

    If you want to talk about your defunct ideas, slide on over to Foxnews.com and have fun in the comments section...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:I'm sure of it by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not even American, thanks.

      I just can't imagine a bigger disconnect than public school teachers and computer programming.

  46. Jesse should put his money where his mouth is. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    Companies only see green. They don't care about any other color, unless it equates to more green.

    Rather than force the companies to hire people who they don't think are qualified, why not sponsor some minorities for 7+ years to them interested in CS and get them a good degree in CS.

    Or better yet, Jesse should shut his mouth, go get a technical degree himself, and then do some real work. IMO, he talks a good game, but he doesn't back it up with his lavish lifestyle.

  47. One suspects... by unitron · · Score: 1

    ...that the tech industry doesn't so much discriminate against certain groups of people just because they are those groups, but that being in those groups produces a tendency on the part of a large number of that group's members to discriminate against the tech industry by not preparing themselves to be qualified to fill positions in it.

    If the tech industry adjusted its standards downwards as far as what they expect hirees to know and be able to do, it wouldn't be the tech industry anymore, and pretty soon everybody working there would no longer have jobs no matter how much the requirements had been relaxed.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  48. Do Latinos like being grouped in w/African Amer? by Andover+Chick · · Score: 1

    I'm kinda guessing the proud and hard-working Latinos don't like being grouped in with African Americans? Obviously demagogue Jackson see opportunity in including the growing population of Latinos. But, take prison gangs for example, it's not like the Norteños and Sureños want blacks in there, that's why they're totally separate gangs. No one works harder than the proud and respectful Mexicans, not sure if I can say the same for surly African Americans. Lastly, given the huge number of Asians (Indian/Chinese) in tech, why does Jackson think there is lack of diversity???

  49. Corporate Shakedowns by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

    Jackson is a master of corporate shakedowns and this has *nothing* to do with equality except where his wallet is concerned.

  50. Time to pay up! by Quila · · Score: 1

    The race card has been played.

  51. Re:Do Latinos like being grouped in w/African Amer by Quila · · Score: 1

    Some Hispanic gangs are trying to cleanse their communities of blacks by terrorizing them. Check out the Azusa 13. No love there just because they are both minorities in the US.

  52. There are totally still racial inequalities... by neminem · · Score: 1

    But they happen *way* the crap earlier than with people trying to get jobs. You want to fix things? Fix things at like the elementary school level. People living in poverty will have kids that will also be living in poverty. Kids living in poverty are not nearly so likely to a. value getting a good education, or b. be able to get a good education even if they do value it. People who don't get a good education are less likely to get good jobs. People who don't value a good education are less likely to even *want* to aspire to have a good job, or even know where to look.

    So, there are totally still racial inequalities... but it isn't really fair to blame Silicon Valley companies, who I can't imagine for the most part would really care what color your skin is, as long as you're the best at whatever job they're hiring for, and can at least like speak English more fluently than not.

  53. Once again: Real problem, Wrong Solution by GasHed · · Score: 1

    While the lack of African-Americans and Latinos in Silicon Valley is certainly a problem worth remedying, this isn't a hiring issue, it's a training issue. Sure, these minorities make up 13.1 and 16.9 percent of the general population, but they make up only 4.6 and 5.2 percent of the Science and Engineering (S&E) workforce - See Table 3.22, NSF S&E Indicators 2014. If we want more of these under-represented groups in our tech companies, we need to first get them to pursue S&E degrees in our schools.

  54. Money by brunnegd · · Score: 1

    Jackson only gets involved if there is an opportunity for his organization to extort money from a company.

  55. Re:Fourteenth Amendment Humanoids by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    I'm having flashbacks to the Fresh Prince of Bel Air - there have been plenty of TV representations of black families that are not 'Ebonics' ghetto dwellers.

    As someone who doesn't live in the US, I honestly couldn't tell you if the Cosby show or The Wire is a more accurate picture of the typical experience of a someone growing up as an African American. I'm not sure how many non-blacks could tell you that either.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  56. How about we hire based on competency? by wolf31o2 · · Score: 1

    I work in Silicon Valley and have worked at several startups. I am also white. I am also the minority. In most of the companies where I have worked, the majority of the software people have been Indian or Asian. Other jobs in the companies seem to be predominantly white/American. Why do I think this is? Well, our education system and values are a good start. We have been trying to grow the company and have several head count to fill. Most candidates coming in the door are also Indian or Asian, have at *minimum* a Master's degree or PhD, and are very driven to succeed. We pick candidates solely based on their skill sets. If a green girl with tentacles came into the office and was a good technical and business culture fit, we would hire them. Want to get more African-American and Latinos in our doors? Make them better candidates. Period.

  57. From the look-who's-talking-dept by TinyTiger8 · · Score: 1

    Not a chance he will even mention the case of female entrants and employees :) How does 50% of humanity strikes you, buster?

  58. In a parallel universe, a headline by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    "Silicon Valley demands Jesse Jackson address lack of qualified applicants interested in working there"

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.