Slashdot Mirror


Russian Officials Dump iPads For Samsung Tablets Over Spy Fears

wiredmikey writes: "Russian government officials have swapped their iPads for Samsung tablets to ensure tighter security, the telecoms minister told news agencies on Wednesday. Journalists spotted that ministers at a cabinet meeting were no longer using Apple tablets, and minister Nikolai Nikiforov confirmed the changeover "took place not so long ago." He said the ministers' new Samsungs were "specially protected devices that can be used to work with confidential information." This isn't the first time Russian powers have had concerns over mobile. In August 2012, Russia unveiled a prototype tablet with its own "almost Android" mobile OS that has the remarkably familiar feel of an Android but with bolstered encryption. In an even more paranoid move, this past July a Russian state service in charge of safeguarding Kremlin communications was looking to purchase an array of old-fashioned typewriters to prevent leaks from computer hardware."

131 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Someone will make money by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What are the odds that someone high up has a company that offers expensive software to protect Android from spies and makes a ton from this?

    1. Re:Someone will make money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably the same as the odds that their fears about their old tablets being exploitable were completely justified.

    2. Re:Someone will make money by Stan92057 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But..why should we trust them? we already know if its made by an American company the US government will force them to make a hole....or... collect the data for the Government? Just saying... And lets say an Mexico software company made the software what guarantees the Mexican government didn't force the company to collect data, for the Mexican Government??

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    3. Re:Someone will make money by djhaskin987 · · Score: 1

      Likely. Either they already owned a company, and got the government to use it; or, learning that the government will use it, they bought into the company.

    4. Re:Someone will make money by citizenr · · Score: 1

      smaller than the odds of NSA having remote logins to every ipad on the Kremlin.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    5. Re:Someone will make money by bberens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They should use Windows 8 RT tablets. No one bothered to figure out how to hack both of the users of that platform.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    6. Re:Someone will make money by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      More likely, this is a purely populist gesture. People in Russia have been making fun of Medvedev's use of iPhone and iPad for a long time now, especially as it was seen as him trying to fit the positive stereotypes of the more liberal, "hipster" demographics. Now that same connection between liberals and Apple products is being played in reverse - "I'm a patriot! I don't use iPad!".

    7. Re:Someone will make money by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Or waht if someone in Russia with knowledge of how the US conducts its spying told them something to make them suspicious of Apple products?

    8. Re:Someone will make money by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny

    9. Re:Someone will make money by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      This all pointing to the concept that all essential tech infrastructure should be locally produced in secured and audited facilities. Any time you import any essential tech infrastructure you leave that infrastructure at the mercy of the source location and it's vested interests. Including and not limited too espionage, industrial espionage, financial espionage and insider trading, targets for criminal extortion, political extortion, attacks upon democratic structures, gross wholesale privacy invasion for the most petty and perverse reasons, planting of false evidence of the most pernicious nature etc.

      So Russia currently pushing Samsung, you can bet in the future Russia will pursue locally produced and sourced from secure facilities and the rest of those capable of doing so will do the same, not vassal states of course for reasons of control they will be forced to source their tech infrastructure from their ruling state like the relationship between the US and Australia much to the shame of many Australians.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:Someone will make money by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Most likely they interrogated Snowden on the issue and got all his source materials.

  2. In Soviet Russia by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    iPads use YOU!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Most upvoters were caught using the Russian mobile OS backdoors and the FSB had them terminated.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  3. Paranoia? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean we aren't out to get them.

    1. Re:Paranoia? by siddesu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They aren't paranoid enough then. It is hard to see how using a Samsung device with Google instead of an Apple tablet and iOS is making them safer from spying.

    2. Re:Paranoia? by epiccollision · · Score: 1

      its magic...made from money and lies...

    3. Re:Paranoia? by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Do the words "open source" mean anything to you?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:Paranoia? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean we aren't out to get them.

      Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get us. Crimea was only the first, and unlikely to be the last.

      I think it is also a bit early to have much sympathy for the new would-be overlords.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Paranoia? by chihowa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The software delivered on Samsung tablets isn't entirely open source, either. Anyway, iOS is built on Darwin (among many other open source components), which is open source, too.

      None of Google's non-OS apps, including the Play Store, are open source. The words "open source" are not a complete explanation of this situation.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    6. Re:Paranoia? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      None of Google's non-OS apps, including the Play Store, are open source. The words "open source" are not a complete explanation of this situation.

      How about the fact that the devices are "specially protected devices that can be used to work with confidential information," as stated in the summary?

      The "paranoia" about the iPad probably comes from (a) it's American which means that the NSA has it's hooks in it and (b) the device is closed off so that you can't see anything that anything is doing. That's fine for my Mom...

    7. Re:Paranoia? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      So how does "specially protected devices that can be used to work with confidential information" translate to "open source"? Products with that many qualifiers tend to be extremely proprietary.

      As to the paranoia, the Android in question was designed by a very close US ally and runs an OS designed by a US company. I wouldn't rule out the presence of "hooks" in their devices.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    8. Re:Paranoia? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      You may have misunderstood - I think they're wretched bastards and I have no sympathy for them. I just think they're justified in their paranoia.

  4. Zero info in article by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    But it sounds like jumping from the frying pan into the fire by moving to Android, unless they rewrite all the Android code themselves with the help of Russia's equivalent of the NSA.

    1. Re:Zero info in article by confused+one · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But they can do this... Whereas with the iPad they have to take Apple's word for it. This may be the limitation that drove them to Android and Samsung

    2. Re:Zero info in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except they have to take now Google and Samsung's word for it.

    3. Re:Zero info in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So.. Why would you trust Samsung over Apple? Samsung is a Koren Chaebol, the largest of 5 companies that contol 90% of the SK economy. They pretty much own the SK Govt. Samsung also has a history of gaping security holes.. Baked right in to their custom ARM cpus. (Ask the cyanogen devs what they think of Samsung's SoCs.. But put in earplugs first.)

      This has nothing to do with security and everything to do with Putin's extremely aggressive propaganda. This non-story and the only reason you see it is because it's being pushed by their state media and western media outlets.

    4. Re:Zero info in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or use Replicant?
      http://www.replicant.us/
      If they choose the hardware wisely and pay some developers, they can probably get something pretty good and as safe as it gets.

    5. Re:Zero info in article by imikem · · Score: 1

      For mod points...

      When are people going to understand that these giant companies will ALL sell you, or their own grandmothers, if it will make them $UNIT_OF_CURRENCY. Or if their buddies at $GOVT_AGENCY ask nicely.

      Excuse me, someone's knocking at th

      --
      Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est.
    6. Re:Zero info in article by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      But even if they rewrite all the software, can they trust the hardware itself? Modern devices are more than a single processor, a lot of sub-components have their own microcontrollers, etc.

    7. Re:Zero info in article by hondo77 · · Score: 2

      So.. Why would you trust Samsung over Apple?

      Because the nice Samsung people payoff the right Russians better than the ones at Apple?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    8. Re:Zero info in article by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Open source versus closed source.
      There is a difference.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    9. Re:Zero info in article by mspohr · · Score: 1

      It is about security.
      I don't trust closed source.
      With open source, I can trust and verify.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    10. Re:Zero info in article by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      But they can do this... Whereas with the iPad they have to take Apple's word for it. This may be the limitation that drove them to Android and Samsung

      I'm not sure I'd trust any tablet handed to me by Putin's government, regardless of the OS that came on it. They may be secured against the US, but I'd bet there is a healthy amount of domestic spying going on in Russia.

    11. Re:Zero info in article by LDAPMAN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A $100 developer license is "impenetrable"? I can run anything I like on my iPad and I can deploy anything I like to the devices in my company.

    12. Re:Zero info in article by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      No they don't. They can remove Samsung's version of Android and put their own version of Android on it. Just because the tablet says Samsung doesn't mean that it must be running Samsung's version of Android.

    13. Re:Zero info in article by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      At least Android is (mostly) open source. Though I wouldn't trust the stuff Samsung preloads the phone with, there is always Cyanogenmod.

    14. Re:Zero info in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      O rly? And you get the source code of the OS and are able to change and build it yourself? All for $100?

    15. Re:Zero info in article by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You can get the Darwin part of the OS, although you can't built it yourself. Similarly, with the typical Android device, you can get source code for something similar to the OS on it, and on some (not all) devices you can change and build the OS.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    16. Re:Zero info in article by mytechstoreusa · · Score: 1

      So.. Why would you trust Samsung over Apple?

      Because the nice Samsung people payoff the right Russians better than the ones at Apple?

      i agree with you....

  5. Samsung? For Security!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Informative

    What?! :-)

    You mean proven "hardware backdoor" Samsung?

    I don't know about Cook & Ives shuck and jive, since the passing of Jobs... But I'm pretty sure the iOS crypto flaws are lower risk than ANYTHING those gangsters make at Samsung. I won't let them land an icebox in my house!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Samsung? For Security!!! by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you see, Russia is also run by gangsters - and among each other gangsters have their own code of honor, which in fact may be far more effective at keeping each other honest in their dealings than the legal processes among so-called "honest businesses" - which are generally no less corrupt, but protect the guilty individuals from any personal liability.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:Samsung? For Security!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you see? The UNITED STATES is also run by Gangsters and Oligarchs! And they have no honor.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Samsung? For Security!!! by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      Until you see the godfather and the devil playing both ends against the middle to generate blood money in a process commonly known as human trafficking. Then the soviet union fell. It will probably end in humanity there fighting over trees to sleep in and low hanging fruit to eat. Unlikely they will have problems like using Apple or Samsung when the fabric of their society is being torn apart by their own 'code of honor'.

    4. Re:Samsung? For Security!!! by mspohr · · Score: 1

      That's why you don't trust Apple or Samsung's proprietary blobs.
      With Android, you can install Replicant http://www.replicant.us/ for a complete open source system which you can audit and verify (or re-code) yourself.
      Russia has the tech chops to do this.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:Samsung? For Security!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Funny. My brother in law has that.

      Ice cream buried under two layers of steak.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:Samsung? For Security!!! by metaforest · · Score: 1

      What?! :-)

      You mean proven "hardware backdoor" Samsung?

      I don't know about Cook & Ives shuck and jive, since the passing of Jobs... But I'm pretty sure the iOS crypto flaws are lower risk than ANYTHING those gangsters make at Samsung. I won't let them land an icebox in my house!

      Did you actually drill down into the details? It IS a backdoor, but It IS NOT a hardware back door.

      It is an IPC protocol between the baseband processor and the application processor. The baseband processor can make IPC request for the application processor to modify its FLASH file system. It is a generic service. I am guessing (as are the people who found the backdoor) it was used for development/debugging and got left behind. Stupid oversight for sure. There is nothing sneaky about it at all, and the backdoor has no special privileges beyond libc-bog-std file system calls. The rest of the IPC command table reads about like you'd expect for a protocol between the app processor and the baseband.

      All this shows is that Samsung is just as stupid about security as everyone else.

  6. Of course you should not use US stuff by rhohano · · Score: 1

    You just cannot trust anything with bits&bytes made in the US. How can anyone think otherwise these days?

    1. Re:Of course you should not use US stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You just cannot trust anything with bits&bytes made in the US. How can anyone think otherwise these days?

      Yeah, but what hardware that uses bits and bytes is made in the US anyway?

    2. Re:Of course you should not use US stuff by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      You just cannot trust anything with bits&bytes made in the US. How can anyone think otherwise these days?

      There's a reason why Apple products don't say made in the USA, but rather that they are designed in the USA.

    3. Re:Of course you should not use US stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can say exactly the same thing about bits and bytes made in China.

      China has actually used their NSA-like capabilities for economic gain. The US solar panel industry comes to mind with the hacking attempts (and successes), then the panels being imported for less than the cost of the rare earths.

      Had a US company tried to flood Europe or China with some widget, there would be punitive tariffs enacted the next business day. It took Europe enacting protective/punitive tariffs to stop the hemorrhaging and keeping China from seizing total control of the PV industry.

    4. Re:Of course you should not use US stuff by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      You just cannot trust anything with bits&bytes made in the US. How can anyone think otherwise these days?

      this is why the typewriter method mentioned in the summary is so brilliant. at the very least, it would drive the NSA nuts, to know that some data was recorded and stored in analog and paper. their data wouldn't be complete, and who knows what they could be missing? those russkies are a crafty bunch.

    5. Re:Of course you should not use US stuff by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

      i think the new mac pros say made in china. assembled in usa. designed in california. what components need to be "made in usa" for us to rule out chinese interference? the processor chips? the memory? the fab equipment? where are the true scotsmen?

    6. Re:Of course you should not use US stuff by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Ummm both are made in china.. so your point again?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    7. Re:Of course you should not use US stuff by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      Actually, they say "Designed by Apple in California Assembled in USA"

      http://www.google.com.mx/url?s...

  7. Fart in a hurricane by benjfowler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If certain Western intelligence agencies want to attack certain devices belonging to certain people, they'll find a way in, regardless of which mass market POS they're using. They're wasting their time. This is just a pointless gesture.

    1. Re: Fart in a hurricane by mspohr · · Score: 1

      That's why you don't use those fancy carbon film ribbons.
      Use a nice old school fabric ribbon (preferably one which has been overwritten hundreds of times).

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re: Fart in a hurricane by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter much either way. Russians mastered a technology known as "fire" long ago.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  8. Paranoid? by Filter · · Score: 2

    How in the world is this paranoid?

    --

    "better ways of doing things eventually just replace the inferior things" - Linus Torvalds 09-08-07

    1. Re:Paranoid? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Well, how often have we provably seen our gadgets stealing data for foreign governments? We worry about operating systems, we worry about network controller firmware, and all those are potential risk factors, but has anything been found?

      The very big risk right now are the various networks the data is sent over. There seems to be government wiretaps everywhere, with NSA being the biggest offender, but other countries too. If you have an iPad and are using Apple's cloud services, then that's a potential risk of course.

    2. Re:Paranoid? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      i think GP is incredulously posing the question, why on earth would we think the russians are being paranoid? from their perspective, they have massive evidence that americans are spying on everybody and have owned all the interneet and equipmetn. not to mention that snowden is living in putin's house.

    3. Re:Paranoid? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The networks are a risk but they are a risk that can be mitigated to at least some extent by strong well-managed encryption (and yes this does mean avoiding the easy to use centralised systems where the system operator manages the encryption and going for something more decentralised and that requires more work and understanding but lets you manage the encryption yourself).

      But if the end devices are compromised then the keys can be stolen or the data can simply be copied before it is encyrpted.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Paranoid? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Russian paranoia goes back a long way. Used to be Russia would be invaded fairly frequently from one side or another, so paranoia became a reasonable part of Russian foreign policy, and in this context the USSR is just a renaming of Russia. Since 1800, I can easily list invasions in 1812,1854, 1914, 1918-1920 (multiple, mostly small), and 1941. Given that the game changed in1945-1950, that's a lot of invasions for 150 years.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:Paranoid? by Mondor · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, that Mr. Snowden is now living in Russia. Taking into account how long it usually takes to switch devices and how Russian PM is obsessed with Apple, I guess we can assume they've got the reason to do so.

      Besides, I remember Iran had some troubles with SCADA, and it had something to do with USA.

    6. Re:Paranoid? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to invade you.

  9. Typewriters? by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

    With all those typewriters why even bother buying tablets! On a side note I wonder if the code for their "secure almost-android" OS was typed up.

    Maybe they manually compiled it ?

    1. Re:Typewriters? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      With all those typewriters why even bother buying tablets! On a side note I wonder if the code for their "secure almost-android" OS was typed up.

      Typewriter + good microphone + software that distinguishes the sound that different keys make.

    2. Re:Typewriters? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      With all those typewriters why even bother buying tablets!

      Even better, as TFA explicitly states and TFS quotes: "old-fashioned typewriters". Perhaps these Sholes and Glidden units from 1873.

      [Dear "Journalists", Please kill yourselves now.]

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Typewriters? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Informative
      They already did something much more sophisticated than that in the 1970's. Operation GUNMAN:

      The monograph reveals that beginning in 1976, the KGB successfully installed sophisticated miniaturized electronic eavesdropping equipment and burst transmitters inside 16 IBM Selectric typewriters used by the staffs of the Moscow embassy and Leningrad consulate, which copied everything being typed on the machines, then periodically broadcast their take to KGB engineers manning listening posts just outside.

      The KGB bugs were discovered eight years later in 1984 by a NSA operation codenamed Project GUNMAN

      Here is the NSA's own writeup. Anybody who thinks the Russians are being "paranoid" is a real fool.

  10. Why Samsung? by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2

    If they were really concerned about spying, shouldn't they go with a Nexus that runs stock Android?

    1. Re:Why Samsung? by barlevg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If they were really concerned about spying, shouldn't they go with a Nexus that runs Cyanogenmod?

      FTFY. Cyanogenmod, IIRC, has no proprietary or closed-source components.

    2. Re:Why Samsung? by barlevg · · Score: 2

      Erm, there are still a few proprietary device drivers, it would appear. Still, that's a lot closer to the ideal than stock Android.

    3. Re:Why Samsung? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Perhaps on a certain, small, specific, set of hardware targets; but the "Extract Proprietary Blobs" step is part of the Cyanogenmod build process for a reason...

      I think that it's mostly AOSP at higher levels; but when 'the details' are kernel-level drivers that can do whatever the hell they want without you noticing, or firmware that has its own CPU and memory space in which to hide and do god-knows-what, you can be pretty sure that if there are devils in the details, you are fucked. Gratuitously.

    4. Re:Why Samsung? by james_shoemaker · · Score: 1

      > FTFY. Cyanogenmod, IIRC, has no proprietary or closed-source components

            Except for the radio firmware, and on samsung the radio firmware can do arbitrary reads and writes to main memory.

      James

    5. Re:Why Samsung? by barlevg · · Score: 1

      Yep. Noticed that after I posted. As the replier above you pointed out, Replicant is the best option in this context.

    6. Re:Why Samsung? by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      Samsung is a South Korean company which means that Samsung is not required to follow the so-called Patriot Act. Google, Apple and Microsoft, however, is, making any product from these manufacturers a serious security risk.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    7. Re:Why Samsung? by fhic · · Score: 1

      I interpret this to mean that they already have good enough assets within Samsung to be confident that they're getting what they want without anything extra.

    8. Re:Why Samsung? by knarf · · Score: 2

      CM is full of binary blobs which are as closed and proprietary as they can get. If you want Android without the nasty bits you'd better look at Replicant - that is if it works on your device, of course...

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    9. Re:Why Samsung? by barlevg · · Score: 1

      yep. as the person two replies above you pointed out two hours ago.

  11. make your own by fluffy-the-dest-6649 · · Score: 1

    If you really want a secure mobile just make your own. If you can't for patent and legal reasons, just make your own software. Just make sure the basics of security is integrated like encryption, pgp, ssl and all the other security crap everyone needs but Apple, Android don't have enough.

  12. Pussy riot by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    One can only surmise that the widespread anti-gay sentiment in the Russian government has something to do with them dumping their iPads in favor of Samsung tablets.

    Just saying.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  13. hookers & blow by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    Sammy sent hookers & blow. Google didn't.

    Or, they got the tablets free with new fridges for the kremlin kitchen(s).

    I suppose they could have sent the h&b for the fridges, and threw in the tablets too. :)

  14. Globalization by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The iPad: The OS Designed in America, Built in China shipped worldwide.
    Samsung Tablet: The OS Designed in America, Built in China and shipped world wide.

    The only difference is which CEO gets the Cut The one in America or the one in Korea.

    NSA to Apple: Add spying to your OS or you will not be allowed to sell it world wide.
    NSA to Google: Add spying to your OS or you will not be allowed to sell it world wide.
    NSA to Samsung: Insure the spying features in your OS are not disabled unless you will not be allowed to sell in the US.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Globalization by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Russia is upset about the NSA and the US + EU's reaction to them taking over the Crimea.
      China is upset about the NSA and is backing Russia over Crimea.
      Android is open source.
      Both countries have the resources to go through Android with a fine toothed comb. This looks pretty much like the best short-term option they had - lets see if someone now buys up Symbian, it comes from a Finnish company and could be a good starting point.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    2. Re:Globalization by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Android is open source.
      Both countries have the resources to go through Android with a fine toothed comb.

      And AOSP != Android. In fact, who knows what code that Samsung tablet is running. There can be plenty of proprietary code on Android that's binary only, and no amount of analysis of AOSP will find them because that's not the code running on the tablet.

      Code for the GPU is often closed-source. As is camera code, DSP code (for audio), etc.

      And hell, If it's Samsung, it probably ships with Google apps as well, powered by root-owned Google Services Framework.

      They'd actually be better off dumping iPads for those chintzy $100 tablets - those tend to be practically pure Google and very little of it is proprietary.

      Those proprietary blobs will will you.

    3. Re:Globalization by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Who says they're running a stock ROM?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Globalization by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Except, Russia (or anyone else) can audit Android code or write their own since it is open source.
      With Apple, you just have to take their word for it (FWIW).

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:Globalization by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Russia is upset about US + EU's reaction to them taking over the Crimea, and this is mainly just another form of counter-sanction propaganda.
      China is backing Russia over Crimea. (Because they have a similar idea for some Japanese owned islands as well as other territory.)

      FTFY.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:Globalization by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      China is not really backing Russia, as evidenced by their "abstain" votes in UNSC and GA. They're basically just standing aside and letting West and Russia hash it out.

    7. Re:Globalization by knarf · · Score: 1

      Russia has plenty of resources to create their own Android distribution for whatever piece of hardware they want. They have the resources to reverse-engineer any blobs, aside from the fact that there is a less than zero chance that they already have all the data on those devices through their own version of the NSA. Your reaction implies that they'd run whatever Samsung decided to install on those tablets. That is of course a silly assumption, for many reasons.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    8. Re:Globalization by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      Um, actually the Chinese and NSA go back a long ways as the NSA and China have run a series of listening posts long the former/current Soviet border since the 1970's...

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  15. "Paranoid" by pr0nbot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the post-Snowden world, I think we can replace most instances of the word "paranoid" with "reasonable".

    1. Re:"Paranoid" by epiccollision · · Score: 2

      Do we really need more insight on the country that uses a Jersey Shore "No, Fuck you!" as its national agenda...We made them, just like we made Germany(et al.) after WWI, just like Afghanistan will be in a decade or so. You can't isolate and belittle ignorance with more ignorance, freedom comes with responsibility which we ignored...these are the consequences. Snowden is a small part of a lot of nonsense we let happen, how can we blame him for pointing out the mess we made?

    2. Re:"Paranoid" by hey! · · Score: 2

      Hmm. "Just because you're reasonable doesn't mean they aren't out to get you."

      Wow, that actually works.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:"Paranoid" by PRMan · · Score: 1

      We could have before that except the whole world are idiots...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:"Paranoid" by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Snowden is making more messes.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  16. Tit for Tat by jomegat · · Score: 1

    This has nothing to do with distrust of the Apple, or paranoia of the NSA. It has everything to do with the recently imposed sanctions.

    --

    In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

  17. Just because you're paranoid by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.

  18. Soviets have no style by RR · · Score: 5, Funny

    As the evil Soviet Union rises again, they're back to their old form, rejecting stylish devices from the USA and adopting clunky copycat devices.

    --
    Have a nice time.
  19. Re:We invented freedom and democracy. by xfizik · · Score: 1

    I would take the "Korean bargain bucket crap" over Apple's overpriced overhyped glamour gizmos any day. Actually, I do.

  20. Re:In America by epiccollision · · Score: 1

    Prepare to be upset...they mostly use...PCs...with Windows...that is not properly updated or patched...and they probably still used IE 6 until about 3 months ago...so, there's that.

  21. Did someone told them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Samsung tablets are powered by Google's Android? Google... American Search Giant...

  22. Re:I think they took a step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Devil's advocate (so posting AC):

    I would say that the NSA code in Linux has been a boon rather than a debit in general. SELinux has proven itself in the field and even if something manages to get access to root... it still is stuck in that app's context (barring a kernel hole like the one found a few years back and promptly fixed.)

    Between the hardening of the OS (not just Linux... OS X has gotten a lot of security upgrades over the versions... just look at how passwords were stored on an earlier version versus how they are stored now), and the fact that NIST has very useful (although basic if you know the OS) security guidelines, the NSA has kept my stuff more secure than insecure.

  23. Slow Shift by jm_sullivan · · Score: 1

    This is the worst part of the Snowden leaks from an American business perspective. There will be a slow global migration to other platforms based on the possibility that American products contain the ability to spy on you. I've no idea what that time frame is, but unless the US government pulls a 180 on corporate cooperative spying, there will one day be no market for US tech products outside of the USA.

    1. Re:Slow Shift by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      NATO will always have to buy what compatible and longterm US systems the US offers them.
      As for the wider public marketing still works its magic. Price in the EU might become a factor with Asian brands been able to offer low cost hardware with known regional software with goof cpu and gpu options. The ability to spy on you was within digital networks and is cared for by regional staff. Even local political leaders are handed junk crypto by their own gov experts, their nations insights flowing to a few other nations.
      International standards will herd most firms to brands with junk crypto. Can a firm afford to link a series of white box efforts with their own code vs the support of a big known brand that just works?
      The good news is the need for white box testing and in house code skill set is now been considered.
      No change in the front end for sales but a slow shift to more secure storage long term. Less vast databases kept on open networks.
      A fun test will be next gen low cost made in China/Asia 100% clean hardware/telco layer and OS solutions vs Western telco certification i.e. its not as decryption friendly out of the box.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  24. Re:I think they took a step in the wrong direction by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    I'm not disagreeing with that. I think it's been a positive for the linux kernel as well, making linux a much more secure platform. I just thought it was funny that the Russians swapped their hardware for something that ostensibly the NSA has had more access to.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  25. Re:I think they took a step in the wrong direction by PPH · · Score: 2

    Is it possible that their security people have poured over the millions of lines of C and assembly

    The idea that this is done by some Aspie code geek is wrong. There are some good tools for checking code for bugs, back doors, etc.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  26. In other news.. by sqorbit · · Score: 1

    Russian officials switch from Coke to Pepsi because it's healthier.

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
  27. Not stock, not Cyanogenmod, go Replicant by Phil+Urich · · Score: 2

    If they were really concerned about spying, shouldn't they go with a Nexus that runs Replicant

    I mean, for the average person I'm not saying they need to be so paranoid; there's likely backdoors or potential exploits, but it's also unlikely to ever matter, and some of the functionality that's sacrificed is likely not worth it for the average bloke. But for guarding state secrets? You want something that involves zero binary blobs, and Replicant is the closest you get for Android.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  28. Re:Good by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Funny you don't include Microsoft in your list, because with Apple and Google gone, you know the kind of things they would try to force down on us. History has proof of that.

  29. LMAO by Pope · · Score: 1

    Yeah, no spyware/malware on Android!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  30. Re:I think they took a step in the wrong direction by PRMan · · Score: 1

    But he's asking if there's any obfuscation-contest like stuff in there that looks normal but actually spies on you.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  31. What do the Russians have to hide? by Theovon · · Score: 1

    If Russia are not doing anything nefarious, why should they worry about what spies might discover? :)

    In all seriousness, while it’s nice that NSA spying on US citizens has been exposed, it’s NOT good that so many US state secrets were revealed in the process. Contrary to what some lunatics would like to tell you, there ARE external threats that face America and the American people. You can’t run proper defensive operations if all of your strategies are visible to the enemy. I’m not sure that Edward Snowden realized just how much damage he was going to cause. And I’m not sure that the benefits necessarily outweigh the costs in this case. That being said, if the whistle-blower laws had provided contractors with a safe avenue for reporting legal violations, Snowden may have had the option to blow the whistle WITHOUT fucking with US national security.

    1. Re:What do the Russians have to hide? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And I’m not sure that the benefits necessarily outweigh the costs in this case.

      Unless there's some sort of imminent existential threat that US is exposed to thanks to Snowden revelations, of course the benefits outweigh the cost. The only thing that can be more important than preserving the free character of the country and the nation is preserving its existence.

    2. Re:What do the Russians have to hide? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I consider the Snowden revelations to be overall a good thing, but it isn't all good or all bad. Snowden's revelations about internal spying were badly needed. His revelations about what the NSA does in other countries were harmful to the US. It's not the NSA's job to damage my security or keep records on me (a generally law-abiding US citizen). It is to spy on Angela Merkel.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:What do the Russians have to hide? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It makes sense, but sometimes foreign spying becomes an internal issue - when US spies on UK citizens, UK spies on US citizens, and then they exchange data, for example.

  32. Re:Good by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    In a free market anything that benefits from network effects will tend towards a monopoly or, at best, an oligopoly. And then you'll get all the abuses associated with such. Free markets are wonderful for commodities with low barriers to entry. Not so much for anything else.

    "network effects".

    I think the more commonly-used term would be Economies of Scale.

  33. classic desl telephones by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Desk telephones were in the beginning produced only in the USA, UK, and Italy. Later they were produced everywhere.

    I think we need open source hardware and software for mobile devices. Like it is already done with PHP, GIMP, OpenStreetMap, etc.

    I realized only by now how important these Open Source Software movements are. We should really support such projects. This is our vital interest.

    1. Re:classic desl telephones by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Crypto efforts from the UK and EU where attempted by different firms in the 1950-80's i.e. real crypto for small firms and non EU/EU governments.
      Their efforts faced other brands with vast marketing efforts, lots of cash and loss leader like low prices that seemed to win gov contracts.
      When embassies saw their crypto messages in the Western press years later they understood why. The hardware as sold was crypto junk. What they had found on the international market was a series of US/UK gov backed front companies.
      Expect the same for any 'open source hardware and software" efforts. Some would face huge banding issues with bizarre names, low cash flow and constant infighting with any experts moving to other more productive projects.
      Other start ups with open source hardware and software would have a great 'small' team, get instant and wide press, language translations are ready and have mystery backers with deep pockets.
      So yes open source hardware and software is great but be aware of many past crypto efforts i.e. how great ideas for code and hardware ended back as plain text thanks to poor quality trusted product design.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:classic desl telephones by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Devices usable as telephones are tightly regulated, and have very large numbers of essential patents. They aren't going to be open source any time soon. Touch devices that use WiFi and not cellular data are much better bets.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  34. That makes no sense, aside from a show by enigmatic · · Score: 1

    So Appple, due it being an American company and the Snowden revelations are not considered
    secure by the Russians anymore.
    Makes sense.

    Then they chose a product from Samsung a South Korean company.
    South Korean Intelligence is so tightly coupled with American intelligence as to make no difference.
    Furthermore at the bottom lays an operating system written by an American company just like Apple.
    There is no "secure" Android version from Samsung to be had.

  35. Re:Come on russia, make a google free android... by mspohr · · Score: 1

    Stick with Replicant http://www.replicant.us/ or Cyanogenmod and you don't get that bloated proprietary crapware.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  36. Re:Samsung for Security by gedeco · · Score: 1

    This make more sense then you believe. Ever heard of Snowden? I guess he would also favor Samsung with a custom rom above ipad.

  37. Apple: a Perfect example of Network Effects by lenski · · Score: 1

    No, "network effects" is the right term.

    Apple had a very well-designed, well-built and convenient product with iPod. They followed up with the well-designed and convenient software product, iTunes. iTunes is so profitable and flawlessly exemplifies vendor lock-in, that they followed up with the same model for the iPhone and iPad.

    One ecosystem, which just happens to not work very well with other vendors' products, and essentially never with open-platform systems.

    That model is even sweeter than Microsoft's lock-in model, which was an improvement over IBM's lock-in model.

    The company I work for has implemented some infrastructure with iXxx and they basically regret the decision; Apple's control is *very* effective at many levels, much to our disappointment.

  38. Re:Good by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Them too. They are fairly different concepts though, even if both naturally create monopolies in a free market.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  39. Paranoia by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Isn't it grand.

    I think they would be more trusting of china ( generic ) than south Korea ( Samsung ) or really push hard on their own devices.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  40. Re:I think they took a step in the wrong direction by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re If they're worried about the NSA having code running on their tablets.... why did they swap their mach/freebsd running tablets for ones running and OS that's had heavy development from the NSA?
    Russia always knew its telco and radio and related mil networks where been collected in bulk by the US and UK via surrounding countries.
    Russia tried the onetime pad, no chatter (no extra messages) for a short time in the 1950's. Russia quickly found they could not run a modern mil communications system with that kind of work load per message. The US and UK got much less but rapid internal communications became too difficult.
    By the 1960-70's the US and UK where getting everything as Russia had no option but to upgrade and understood all its communications was leaking and been tracked/mapped.
    Why use a different brand of tablets that will still be NSA ready? Staff need tablets for day to day tasks. The divestment aspect is popular, the open source code is good for local developers and cash spent moves to Asia - hearts and minds.
    The USA has been into all generations of crypto, all networking, software and hardware as sold - no escape from that reality.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  41. Re:Good by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Moron.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  42. Um... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    What about Samsung's well-documented backdoor (in hardware), Tovarsch?!

  43. typewriters can be hacked by swschrad · · Score: 1

    the spies-and-lies folks routinely read carbon IBM ribbons. they could also identify many keystrokes from the sound if they knew what typewriter was being used.

    everything can be spied on. everything.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  44. Re:Good by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Economies of scale affect the manufacturer, allowing the manufacturer to sell cheaper. Network affects affect the user, making it more desirable.

    There's a network effect when each additional user of a product makes that product more useful to the user. Telephone systems are good examples: a telephone's usefulness goes up as additional people I might want to call join the system. They tend to monopolies; imagine if there were two telephone systems that couldn't communicate, and there were people I'd like to talk to on both.

    There are less obvious network effects. If you're into computer games, you doubtless get a Windows system because that's where the games are. If a company wants to publish a new computer game, they'll make it for Windows because all their target audience has that already. This applies to lots of different software, some of which shouldn't be on a full OS (ATMs? Voting machines? Medical device firmware?) The latest version of MS Office is very useful to communicate with other people with the latest version of MS Office, and so it becomes very important for businesses.

    In this case, a closed computer ecosystem like the iDevices tends to have a network effect, since there's a lot of iDevice users. This means Apple can set up really big projects like iTunes and related stores, and it'll be worth it to them. The fact that lots of people use iDevices gives Apple bargaining power to force other companies (cellular carriers, music copyright owners, etc.) to come to agreements more favorable to iDevice users. The fact that there's a lot of iDevice users and they tend to spend money means that app developers can make money with the App Store, so more will write iOS apps and make them good to stand out in the overcrowded store.

    Right now, we've got two really big players in the smartphone and tablet OS space, and several wannabes who want to become big players. I don't think there's room for more than two or three big players here, so some companies are going to get effectively shut out. Having two is far better than having one, because competition is good for the consumer. There's never going to be the same level of competition as commodities like PCs, though.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  45. Typewriters? by smithmc · · Score: 1

    What, they've never heard of carbon paper in Russia?

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!