Slashdot Mirror


Consciousness On-Off Switch Discovered Deep In Brain

An anonymous reader writes "One moment you're conscious, the next you're not. For the first time, researchers have switched off consciousness by electrically stimulating a single brain area. Although only tested in one person, the discovery suggests that a single area – the claustrum – might be integral to combining disparate brain activity into a seamless package of thoughts, sensations and emotions. It takes us a step closer to answering a problem that has confounded scientists and philosophers for millennia – namely how our conscious awareness arises. When the team zapped the area with high frequency electrical impulses, the woman lost consciousness. She stopped reading and stared blankly into space, she didn't respond to auditory or visual commands and her breathing slowed. As soon as the stimulation stopped, she immediately regained consciousness with no memory of the event. The same thing happened every time the area was stimulated during two days of experiments.

166 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Wow! by rotorbudd · · Score: 5, Funny

    That sounds like the experiments that my wife has been doin

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it, but artillery is addressed to " Whom It May concern"
    1. Re:Wow! by peragrin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes but your wife isn't using directed electrical signals to shut you down.

      Your wife is using directed Sound signals to shut down you down.

      completely different method. Definitely worth a separate patent.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Wow! by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      Dibs on the "on a mobile computing device" patent.

  2. Brain ZAP! by karnal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Citizen, you will be implanted with this brain massager free of charge. Please do not attempt to remove this device. That is all.

    --
    Karnal
    1. Re:Brain ZAP! by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hee hee! Oh I like that. Press the button again. Wait until he's chewing that spoonful. Now, replace the ice cream with castor oil. Let me press it! Let me press it!

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    2. Re:Brain ZAP! by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

      The problem with dystopian theories like this is bullets are cheap. If you've subjugated the public to the point that you can force expensive brain surgery on them, why bother? Just shoot the people you don't like.

      Besides, there's a huge market for non-lethal weapons; if this works on everyone and incapacitates rapidly, government labs and defense contractors will be tripping over themselves to reproduce this effect through external stimulus. No surgery necessary. Woo...

      ...and, of course, the end result is police and militaries doing whatever the hell they please with the excuse that their phasers were set to stun.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re: Brain ZAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Dead people leave long tails of hatred. Chronically ill or crazy people leave long tails of sadness and dependency.

    4. Re:Brain ZAP! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Shooting everyone makes a lot of waste to dispose of.

      That's where Soylent Green comes in...

    5. Re:Brain ZAP! by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      On the subject of intrusive government applications, I wonder if it would make prisons more or less humane. No revolts, no issues with control, no angst. Just hook people off of the thing for about three hours a day for feeding and exercising. Can someone sleep while uncounscious like that? (it sounds like a dumb question)

    6. Re:Brain ZAP! by mpeskett · · Score: 2

      If you spent most of your prison sentence unconscious, it would make any attempt at either punishment or rehabilitation impossible. Would still satisfy the "removing you from society" goal, and would still offer some deterrence (maybe not as much if prison was now closer to a null experience than an actively unpleasant one), but still... seems like defeating a large part of the point of imprisoning people

    7. Re:Brain ZAP! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Big Brother would also have to deal with citizens com

      Wait... where am I? How did I get in this cell? Nevermind, you can't hear me through this gag. Damn.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re:Brain ZAP! by ewibble · · Score: 2

      I think rehabilitation part of prison is a joke, you are much more likely to become indoctrinated than rehabilitated. So that leaves punishment, you could consider having X years of your life taken of you as a punishment, it doesn't stop you aging.

      This is a very scary concept, you could imprison anyone, take away there power argue, and still "feel good" about yourself because you didn't kill anyone.

       

    9. Re:Brain ZAP! by manwargi · · Score: 1

      The problem with dystopian theories like this is bullets are cheap. If you've subjugated the public to the point that you can force expensive brain surgery on them, why bother? Just shoot the people you don't like.

      As technology gets better and better, especially at the rapid rate that it grows, exploiting this discovery may not always be that much more expensive.

    10. Re:Brain ZAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to bankrupt Big Brother? With your brain-dead system Big Brother would have to pay for deployment, maintenance, updates... all that does not comes cheap.

      You seem to imply that in a dystopian society the government would be limited by liquidity, like it is in a capitalist, free society. Cost would only be relevant to the extent that the dystopian government can source the needed resources for its Big Brother establishment, and that would be it. And the limiting factor on that would be how many people have to die before they need to make the mines safer in order to maintain an adequate level of production. The scientists? They'll be taught since children that they're doing the right thing (as a superior class?).

      Just imagine Brave New World, but upside down. Brave New World isn't dystopian in that sense (they're all helping maintaining happiness, even though it's not exactly utopia), but imagine instead a perpetual, 1984-style, war, on the Alpha-Epsilon spectrum. Now _that_ would be quite what the Big Brother society needs :)

    11. Re: Brain ZAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chronically ill or crazy people leave long tails of sadness and dependency.

      And Slashdot comments.

    12. Re:Brain ZAP! by everythingistaken · · Score: 1
      To use bullets you have to know you don't like them.

      Brain implants are for the people you like today, but may not like tomorrow.

    13. Re:Brain ZAP! by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The punishment would still be the fact that your are deprived of years of your life. I think it would still suck pretty hard to essentially wake up one morning and find yourself 10 years older.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    14. Re:Brain ZAP! by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      But just imagine a current attack vector today:
        * Remotely infecting a personal computer -- Demonstrated, publicly available
        * Tethered infection of PC to mobile phone -- Demonstrated, publicly available
        * Bluetooth infection of common SOCs on pacemakers -- Not published
        * Pacemaker delivery of ill effects to user -- Demonstrated, details not public

      As more consumer-friendly devices are produced that have a close connection to humans and are marketable, the number of attack vectors increases.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    15. Re:Brain ZAP! by TWX · · Score: 1

      Typically you either use heavy equipment to dig trenches first, then shoot them at those trenches, or you make them dig their own trenches, then shoot them once they've gone deep enough. Just make sure that they pass the shovel back to you first. After all, shovels are expensive.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    16. Re:Brain ZAP! by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      As another pointed out, rehabilitation is pretty much a joke, (especially for the people stupidly incarcerated for minor drug offenses, then they get exposed to far worse behaviors); which just leaves punishment. And increasingly it seems, activist hippies on the far left don't seem to see much difference between justice/punishment and revenge, (typically in capital punishment cases), so this might be a future option.
      What I mean by that remark: take the death penalty for example; if we execute a murderer, the counterargument goes that it makes us somehow just as bad as the murderer (despite the fact he's not an innocent like his victims were). Yet, if we lock up someone like Ariel Castro in a high security prison, (the guy who imprisoned several teenager girls in his basement and regularly raped them), you don't hear the same argument, though it's essentially the same logic, a case of doing to the perpetrator what he did to his victims, only the rape would come (ostensibly) from other inmates.
      This may be a good compromise.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    17. Re:Brain ZAP! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      But also be pretty awesome to be "instantly" transported to the future! Woohoo!

    18. Re:Brain ZAP! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Citizen, you will be implanted with this brain massager free of charge. Please do not attempt to remove this device. That is all.

      Experiencing a bit of claustrum phobium, perhaps?

    19. Re:Brain ZAP! by tomxor · · Score: 1

      10 years older but also in the physical state equivalent to being in a coma for 10 years... I'd rather stay awake.

  3. but... by meglon · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...did it also coincide with the TV being turned on?

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    1. Re:but... by Kryptonut · · Score: 2

      Ah...You've got kids too huh?

    2. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a few. whichever ones i successfully snatched off the playground. usually the slowest runners.

    3. Re:but... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a few. whichever ones i successfully snatched off the playground. usually the slowest runners.

      In case you haven't heard, there's a more fun way of getting kids.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not everyone can afford a jeep and a big net.

    5. Re:but... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I have a few. whichever ones i successfully snatched off the playground. usually the slowest runners.

      In case you haven't heard, there's a more fun way of getting kids.

      Well I have my white van. I just need to write "Expensive Candy" on the side... Because lets face it, you cant ransom kids back to poor people.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:but... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Expensive candy

      Are you trying to pick up 35 year old women?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  4. Part of a larger project? by Friar_MJK · · Score: 1

    I see lots of new and exciting things happen in the world of neurology and such. Are these things directly stemming from the Human Brain Project? How do we know what successes have come out of that program?

  5. Executive summary by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

    So we have a bunch of male scientists who apparently didn't know about rufies.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Executive summary by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      This one is harder to detect by the prosecution.

    2. Re:Executive summary by morgauxo · · Score: 2

      Can't they detect the hole in her head?

    3. Re:Executive summary by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They're called Forget-me-nows.

    4. Re: Executive summary by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      It's... Arrested Development!

  6. boobs by clovis · · Score: 1

    so, any idea how long your brain just went off?

  7. This is scary by invictusvoyd · · Score: 2

    But needs deep brain electodes so I guess it wont be easy to pull off .. But with advances in implant devices , zzz (shivers )

    1. Re:This is scary by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you want to knock people unconscious, there are already less invasive ways of doing it, like general anesthesia. Though it would be interesting to know whether general anesthesia operates by a mechanism related to this one, or is doing something else.

    2. Re:This is scary by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      Right, but anesthesia or a wrench is not exactly the "kill switch" that this seems to be .

    3. Re:This is scary by Livius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Forget implant devices. With enough mental training, Vulcans can stimulate this part of the humanoid brain just by pinching someone on the neck.

      (Luckily, humanoids have very similar physiology in their nervous systems.)

    4. Re:This is scary by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you want to knock people unconscious, there are already less invasive ways of doing it, like general anesthesia. Though it would be interesting to know whether general anesthesia operates by a mechanism related to this one, or is doing something else.

      They have no idea... http://www.surgeryencyclopedia.com/A-Ce/Anesthesia-General.html
      Having had anesthesia many times I think it is worse than most procedures. I feel fuzzy for months after GA. Still it's about the only game in town if someone is going to be carving on a person for medical reasons.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    5. Re:This is scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh... You do know that Vulcans aren't real. Right?

    6. Re:This is scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      General anathesia is actually quite dangerous. This could potentially make surgery a lot safer.

    7. Re:This is scary by pipedwho · · Score: 1

      Right, but anesthesia or a wrench is not exactly the "kill switch" that this seems to be .

      More precisely, both are more likely to be actual 'kill switches' than this new method. In both general anaesthesia and the old wrench to the back of the head, there is a non-trivial likelihood that both will end in the recipients death. This new technique is theoretically attempting to target the required part of the brain with far more accuracy and less collateral damage than existing methods of rendering a person unconscious.

      I perceive it more like a virtual machine suspend.

    8. Re:This is scary by FuzzNugget · · Score: 4, Informative

      General anesthetic is actually a lot more crude than most people think. It's essentially a short-term induced coma, that's why they need to jam a breathing tube down your throat and it feels like you just gave Satan a blowjob when they bring you out.

      This sounds like the first baby steps towards developing a drug-free method of dropping patients out of consciousness, maybe even with little to no side effects.

    9. Re:This is scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you sir are no fun at all

    10. Re:This is scary by danomac · · Score: 2

      This sounds like the first baby steps towards developing a drug-free method of dropping patients out of consciousness, maybe even with little to no side effects.

      Well, except for that hole in your head...

    11. Re:This is scary by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Na, just a few little wires.

      Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re: This is scary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      look into the research from Walter Reed hospital - only part of the brain is asleep. The rest of the brain experiences everything and really screws a lot of people up. Always get general plus spinal.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:This is scary by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      Like I said, baby steps. I didn't say it wasn't a long way off.

    14. Re:This is scary by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 1

      Uh... You do know that Vulcans aren't real. Right?

      Pshhh! That's what *they* want you to believe.

    15. Re:This is scary by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      Na, just a few little wires.

      Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?

      Whagobblypussywobblygarong.

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    16. Re:This is scary by gtall · · Score: 1

      Like political ads, they come through the TV and devastate all within ear shot. Think of them as brain shots.

    17. Re: This is scary by ggrocca · · Score: 1

      Give us sources/links about this. Tried a search but nothing came up. You're implying that the brain experiences pain during surgery but remembers nothing consciously afterwards?

    18. Re:This is scary by swedoc · · Score: 1

      That actually depends. General Anaesthesia can be dangerous under certain circumstances, such as preexisting cardiopulmonary conditions, emergency surgery and others. For young, otherwise healthy individuals GA is actually quite safe. As for the post above, we do have some idea (blocking of GABA channels, stabilisation of membrane potentials) of how it works but not why that actually makes people sleep. This is, however, one article that I will definitely try to read....

    19. Re:This is scary by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this is the mechanism involved in hypnotism.

  8. Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by khb · · Score: 2

    If it can be employed in surgery (putting aside the current implant requirement) it would be a surgical boon (might not be so good for anesthesiologists ;>)

    1. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      Your head has very few pain receptors in it, neural surgery is pretty much painless after you get into the skull even with no anastasia at all, hence why they can probe the brain while you are full conscious and aware.

      So, no, it isn't going to hurt like blazes.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      We've been doing all surgery with no Anastasia since 1918

    3. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      :( stupid autocorrect fixing my poor spelling

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      So, no, it isn't going to hurt like blazes.

      He was referring to whatever surgery the patient had been rendrered unconscious for (say, an appendectomy), not surgery to implant a device in the brain

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    5. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by Cito · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points, I haven't laughed that hard in long time.

    6. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      It's a grace situation. Revolting, in fact.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    7. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      grave. Good grief. :)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    8. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that anesthesia doesn't work like a painkiller. It only reduces consciousness. The patient receives painkillers prior to the anesthesia wearing off in order to manage pain after becoming conscious. Since this would only take place of anesthesia, it would still be reasonable to provide painkillers before waking the patient up.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    9. Re:Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Right, but that can probably be pretty well managed with opiate pain killers, for any major procedure it generally has to be anyway. Addiction issues aside they risk of cardiac, respiratory failure, liver and kidney damage etc, is much lower when you are not using as many drugs and in such high dosages to leave someone unconscious.

      There is also the issue that these drugs stress the body during the already stressful surgical procedure.

      I am not a medical professional but if there was a safe way to just turn off someones awareness during a surgery and then limit anesthesia to post operative pain management I suspect safety could be improved a great deal.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  9. Consciousness by ThePeices · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Wow, if we discover the exact region and mechanism for how consciousness emerges from brain activity, then this, in my mind, is the final nail in the coffin of the Soul Hypothesis ( the religious explanation for consciousness being external to the brain, and as something that survives death ).

    Of course, the religionists will carp on about how this study is all a big conspiracy with science finding or some other claptrap, but for the rest of us, this could be a major discovery!

    1. Re:Consciousness by Livius · · Score: 1

      The soul is information. It doesn't have a physical location.

    2. Re:Consciousness by BasilBrush · · Score: 1, Redundant

      So where's the information stored?

    3. Re:Consciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, no it doesn't. It simply proves that consciousness can be externally shut off.

      I'm not going to go into actual religious discussion, save to say that this would have little if any impact on religion at all.

      It might be a good thing to actually learn about what it is you're trying to get rid of before you start commenting on it.

    4. Re:Consciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't say for sure, but they may be claiming that your brain state is, effectively, your soul. At this point, it's more a question of what you think a soul is. If we say it's what makes you you.. then yeah, your brain state is your soul, and if we can ever find a way to copy or simulate it, we'll be able to move/duplicate souls, hence the lack of physical location. It all comes down to information, however it just so happens that we're used to expecting souls to execute in a consistently identifiable machination - hence the association.

      Of course, this is largely pointless discussion of definitions. I think the actually important part is if we can discover adequate evidence that consciousness is a process, not a thing. That there is no special spiritual sauce that makes thought happen, that with adequate knowledge and resources we can replicate this process and create new consciousness.

    5. Re:Consciousness by Sabriel · · Score: 2

      Why do you believe that consciousness must not emerge from brain activity for there to be a "soul"?
      Why do you believe that there must be a religious explanation for a "soul"?

      Whether or not there actually is a "soul", your provided definition of it doesn't require either of those to be true.

      And it would be no less a major discovery if we found that we did have souls. Or that only some of us did. Or that we only got them at a certain age. Or only under certain conditions. Or that we could create them. Or destroy them.

    6. Re:Consciousness by ichthus · · Score: 1

      New "religionist" theory: the claustrum is the interface of the brain to the soul.

      --
      sig: sauer
    7. Re:Consciousness by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1

      It's stored on the 2d holographic plane at the edge? of the universe. Can't you QM types keep up with your own blabbering? Ah yes, you want room 12A, Just along the corridor.

    8. Re:Consciousness by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Funny

      In quantum fluctuations that happen to reside for some time in part of your brain.

      There is already decent evidence that the 'soul' is a quantum phenomenon, which allows it to reside both in your brain and survive death at the same time and it explains all sorts of other odd 'miracles' that occur as well as things like telepathy and twins seeming to 'feel' their twin even from great distances.

      This satisfies both the religious definition and the OMG GOD DOESN'T EXIST AND I HATE THE IDEA definition.

      Get over it it and accept theres more too it than you understand.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:Consciousness by KeensMustard · · Score: 1

      Wow, if we discover the exact region and mechanism for how consciousness emerges from brain activity, then this, in my mind, is the final nail in the coffin of the Soul Hypothesis ( the religious explanation for consciousness being external to the brain, and as something that survives death ).

      Feel free to believe whatever. Start with an unfounded assertion "there is no soul" and then use unrelated discoveries in a circular logic to justify your belief to yourself.

      Of course, the religionists will carp on about how this study is all a big conspiracy with science finding or some other claptrap, but for the rest of us, this could be a major discovery!

      You don't speak for the rest of us, if indeed, there is a class of people ("religionists") and another class ("the rest of us").

    10. Re:Consciousness by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Wow, if we discover the exact region and mechanism for how consciousness emerges from brain activity, then this, in my mind, is the final nail in the coffin of the Soul Hypothesis ( the religious explanation for consciousness being external to the brain, and as something that survives death ).

      Of course, the religionists will carp on about how this study is all a big conspiracy with science finding or some other claptrap, but for the rest of us, this could be a major discovery!

      And after you convince them that they were wrong about souls, you can then easily convince them that insectivores, Prosimians, and Marsupials* all have souls/whatever makes us human as well.

      *wiki says: "The claustrum has a phylogenetic background appearing predominantly in insectivores, Prosimians, and Marsupials."

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    11. Re:Consciousness by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      http://science.slashdot.org/st...

      Its not like it was my idea, but thanks for proving that you're just an arrogant close minded douche.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:Consciousness by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Dude..... so what you're saying is:

      1) Scientific principle
      2) ....
      3) Magic happens

      Let me know when you've figured out #2 thanks.

    13. Re:Consciousness by turp182 · · Score: 2

      How about this?

      The soul of an individual is composed of the direct and indirect memories people have of one, while living and after death.

      Most people's souls last two to three generations, and then we are just geat-great-grand-father Jason with no stories (I don't even know the names of my family that far back), forgotten other than by name, if lucky.

      Some people's souls live forever, those enshrined in history, such as Abraham Lincoln.

      That's how I see things.

      I'm around to have fun and provide for my family. And after a while I won't be. I really enjoy camping and playing guitar (mostly for myself, which is fine). So I bring my kids camping a lot and play guitar with/for them a lot (my 4 year old daughter requests Follow You Into the Dark, which I love to play). This is the purpose of life.

      I'm not perfect, no one is, but keeping things simple (seek for happiness for you and those around you, the happiness of those around you should be a focus with significant others and children).

      Anyway, the kids are in bed and the guitar is calling. Shameless self promotion, here's a cool video/song of my sunrise drive home on Father's Day this year (I asked for and received a day of solitary camping, it was fantastic):
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    14. Re:Consciousness by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      They will probably always remain inherently beyond the reach of scientific evidence.

      Yes. that's because they are 100% made-up. Just as Santa Claus is inherently beyond the reach of scientific evidence.

      You will never find evidence, that is, anything manifesting as objective reality, for a wholly illusory concept. You can, of course, drown yourself in delusion. We appear to be well designed for exactly that exercise, we even practice it most nights during REM sleep. And it's perfectly acceptable, socially speaking. Imagine away.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    15. Re:Consciousness by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      The claustrum has a phylogenetic background appearing predominantly in insectivores, Prosimians, and Marsupials.

      Hmmm. A hint as to where to look for consciousness most similar to humans?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    16. Re:Consciousness by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. A hint as to where to look for consciousness most similar to humans?

      Nope! Only humans have Human(TM) Consciousness. You wouldn't want to weaken the rights we give ourselves by pointing to creatures that have similar traits, now would you?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    17. Re:Consciousness by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Why do you believe that there must be a religious explanation for a "soul"?

      Why do you believe there must not be a religious explanation for a soul?

      I don't believe either way. It's not a binary choice, you (should) know.

      Ot goes both ways based on current evidence. There is evidence that the soul is a quantum phenomenon that can not be simply created (for varying definitions of simply) and this possibly explains so many things.

      Actual evidence? I was under the impression there were only theories, and if I believe anything, it's that scientific evidence proving the existence (or non-existence) of souls should be front-page news. Okay, maybe page two or three, depending on what else happened that day. But major news nonetheless.

      I acknowledge its only a possibility and the theory has only a small amount of evidence but you have exactly none to back your statements.

      Which statements would those be? I made two. The first was that the previous poster had made a claim that relied on an unsupported assumption; you demanding I provide evidence for someone else's unsubstantiated claim being wrong is a tu quoque fallacy. The second was that it would be no less a major discovery if we found scientific proof that we did have souls (than if we found we didn't); I took it to be self-evident, but feel free to ask a journalist (or priest) their view.

    18. Re:Consciousness by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      He's anti-science for expecting someone to prove their extraordinary claims?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    19. Re:Consciousness by richlv · · Score: 1

      right. because logic and facts made all religions obsolete long time ago.

      --
      Rich
    20. Re:Consciousness by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Wow, if we discover the exact region and mechanism for how consciousness emerges from brain activity, then this, in my mind, is the final nail in the coffin of the Soul Hypothesis ( the religious explanation for consciousness being external to the brain, and as something that survives death ).

      So, the devil's advocate argument would be that finding a center of consciousness in the brain is no different from discovering that the brain and not the heart is the center of consciousness for the body. Back when that was figured out it didn't end the practice of religion.

      We already know that if you're shot in the head you stop acting like a conscious human being. We already have people in vegetative states lying on hospital beds who can do little more than breathe. So, it is already completely evident that consciousness depends on physical structures in the brain operating correctly.

      I doubt that religion will go away even after artificial beings that don't contain (human) brains at all are walking around taking our jobs away...

    21. Re:Consciousness by Wootery · · Score: 1

      What? If I live alone in the desert, I have no soul?

    22. Re:Consciousness by Salgat · · Score: 2

      I wasn't aware of the soul as being defined by that, at least for Christians/Jews the Bible barely makes any mention of its properties. Considering the "soul" is metaphysical, the explanation can be simply explained away as a supernatural copy of our state of mind that is restored after death in a new supernatural body. Who knows though, I sure as hell don't know anything about souls and to discuss it is pure guessing.

    23. Re:Consciousness by xdor · · Score: 1

      Just because the radio can be switched off does not prove the absence of a radio transmission.

    24. Re:Consciousness by gtall · · Score: 1

      The "soul" is not "consciousness". It is a much more abstract notion.

    25. Re:Consciousness by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't.

      Even if we reject religion, and, say, go for a "World is actually The Matrix" hypothesis (which, similarly, has human bodies controlled by observers external to the observed world", the best we can genuinely say about this region of the brain is that activating it disables "whatever controls the brain" (internal or external.) Unless the observers have an seperate memory (and why would they?), everything is consistent with that observation link being severed. The observers (be they souls or Matrix hook-ups) are no longer able to modify the brain's memory, to move the body, or in any other way interact with it. When that part of the brain is allowed to operate again, they can do so.

      If we at least assume memory is local, which it has to be, there's no incompatability. If memory is not local, it's still possible there's no incompatability because the lack of communications between observer and avatar will result in no memory data being written.

      On the other hand, the good news is that as you haven't proven the non-existence of God, you will be unable to prove that black is white, and thus will not be killed on the next Zebra crossing.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    26. Re:Consciousness by TWX · · Score: 1

      I hear that Costco is having a sale on rolls of tin foil...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    27. Re:Consciousness by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Two problems.

      1) The story you link to refers to a claim of the explanation for conciousness being quantume mechanics, not the soul

      2) The link is also simply an example of Betteridges law. The headline asks a question (that the two are linked), and the body gives the answer no.

      but thanks for proving that you're just an arrogant close minded douche.

      My mind may look closed to you, but that's because yours is apparently constructed from swiss cheese and Cheetos.

    28. Re:Consciousness by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I know that the evidence supporting the existence of souls is about as compelling as the evidence for mermaids. Maybe slightly lower actually, since people have actually claimed to see mermaids.

    29. Re:Consciousness by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Not a big surprise coming from an ignorant anonymous coward such as yourself. At least I had the guts to post using my username knowing I could get down-voted posting something such as this here on Slashdot, instead you name call, and make no rational arguments what so-ever, and do it all behind the veil of anonymity. Congrats, you wouldn't want to make yourself look like a fool using your own username.

      Your attack doesn't even make sense, as Hitler didn't study in any science field or advance any of the fields himself, so nice try, trying to compare Hitler to actual scientists that have actually advanced major areas of science and medicine that we still use today as a basis for further research.

      If you want to dismiss the information I put forward so easily, then surely you won't mind not using, and tossing out all the breakthroughs, inventions, discoveries, and theories that have been put forth in all of history by these "blinded" scientists who believed in God. You hold the belief these scientists were blinded by their faith, however I don't see AC in the history books, or getting Nobel's or advancing any scientific field. What contributions have you made, since you obviously don't have these "blinders" on to hinder your thoughts? I'm guessing you haven't contributed to anything.

  10. Does the robot have it? by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

    I particularly liked the manner in which the writer jumped from something as complex as the human brain developing consciousness to wondering if robots have the same function. He should be lobotomized.

  11. Interesting, but N=1 and... by dhj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From TFA:

    Anil Seth, who studies consciousness at the University of Sussex, UK, warns that we have to be cautious when interpreting behaviour from a single case study. The woman was missing part of her hippocampus, which was removed to treat her epilepsy, so she doesn't represent a "normal" brain, he says.

    Normally a scientist will not ethically be able to put deep brain electrodes in a person, but this was likely part of a larger experiment related to the hippocampus surgery. It will be interesting to see if similar cases present similar behaviors and more interesting if the same thing happens in someone with a full hippocampus.

    1. Re:Interesting, but N=1 and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The original article seems to be conspicuously missing. Here is the pubmed reference (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24967698), but the link there is broken too and even browsing through the journal's archive doesn't bring up any reference to the article. Hopefully that gets fixed very soon.
      Also, back when I was PhD student in neuroscience Crick and Koch's idea that the claustrum was the seat of consciousness was one of my class's favorite jokes- if it turns out they were actually right I'm gonna be so f-ing mad.

    2. Re:Interesting, but N=1 and... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find the whole think kind of surprising, since it is known that the whole brain doesn't go to sleep at the same time. Sleepwalking happens when part of it isn't asleep at all.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Interesting, but N=1 and... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this isn't sleep. This is more like watching Fox News.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Interesting, but N=1 and... by devent · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the link is broken?
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu... works fine by me, here is the Abstract:

      [...]Stimulation of the claustral electrode reproducibly resulted in a complete arrest of volitional behavior, unresponsiveness, and amnesia without negative motor symptoms or mere aphasia. The disruption of consciousness did not outlast the stimulation and occurred without any epileptiform discharges.[...]

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    5. Re:Interesting, but N=1 and... by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      The abstract is still up, but not only is the link to the full text no longer working, the paper is not on the list for the issue of the Epilepsy & Behavior that the citation PubMed gives for it says it ought to be in. The full text would make it clear exactly what sort of consciousness is being altered here.

      This seems to be a problem with Epilepsy & Behavior, in that a lot of what they're listed as having in the current issue of the journal on PubMed they don't list as in it on their own site. This does not strike me as a desirable thing in a scientific journal. (Yes, I did take the time to check through PubMed to see if this was a unique-to-this-paper issue or something else, and they've got a few articles that would be of...greater interest to me if I was more confident of their editorial practices.)

  12. Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by digitalhermit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been experimenting with this technique since the early 80s. It is possible to stimulate the claustrum via pressure along the sternocleidomastoid. By pinching this area it causes sympathetic nerve activity that can effective render someone unconscious. My colleague has perfected the technique to the point that he uses it at parties. Quite eerie, actually.

    Peace. Stay healthy and have a long life..

    1. Re:Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by paiute · · Score: 2, Funny

      Logical.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    2. Re:Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Logical.

      Didn't the Vulcan's perfect this?

    3. Re:Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by blue+trane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vulcan neck pinch?

    4. Re:Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fascinating.

    5. Re:Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by blincoln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you sure that's the mechanism at work? "pressure along the sternocleidomastoid" sounds suspiciously like "put someone in a triangle choke/'sleeper hold'", which will cause them to pass out because it cuts off the blood supply to their brain.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    6. Re:Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a blood pressure "sensor" there, if you overload it the heart reduces pressure to the point where the person passes out almost instantly. Take a tap/press at the correct spot. The triangle choke relies on squeezing the juglar to prevent blood getting to the brain. They have similar effects but do it in different ways.

      Neither is what the article suggests, as you implied.

    7. Re:Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 1

      I believe the action is question is more proximal than the medial influence you infer.

    8. Re:Can be stimulated via sternocleidomastoid by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

  13. Very promising ... vs Re:This is scary by NoseBag · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but the surgery is (usually) gonna hurt like blazes the instant the signal is stopped!

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  14. Does the robot have it? by NoseBag · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of "Pause"? LOL

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  15. So does this mean... by Guru80 · · Score: 1

    Neuralizers! Men in Black is the new Star Trek.

  16. Re:Very interesting by quintesse · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know, should we find it *what* exactly, you didn't really state that. Surprising? No, it's not, that's indeed the survival instinct taking over. In general your breathing is not conscious, although we have conscious control unlike for example your heart. But in general it's not possible for example to hold your breath until you are dead. There are some ways to hold your breath until you pass out, but the moment you do you start breathing again. (All this AFAIK)

  17. It nearly always does by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

    it's as if the survival instinct overrode the unconsciousness

    Whenever survival is at stake, consciousness is among the first wasters of valuable resources (energy) to be turned off, or at least substantially modified.. This is a principle, AFAIK.

  18. Re:All kinds of uses by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "Neat. Could be used during surgeries instead of anesthesia, or could be weaponized to disable enemy combatants."

    Nobody would want that. You want to wound (not kill) the enemy soldiers, to bind enemy medics, food, transportation, logistics, field hospitals, pensions and lower morale.

    If you zap them and go away, they will still be there fighting against you. If you take them prisoner, it's YOU who has to provide medics, food, transportation, logistics, field hospitals and get plenty of bad publicity on top.

  19. What is consciousness? by tomhath · · Score: 1

    They zapped a part of her brain that had the effect of stopping conscious thought. I suppose that meets the definition, but it sounds more like they overwhelmed her normal brain function rather than shut it off.

    1. Re:What is consciousness? by countach · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting interpretation of what happened.

      I was also wondering why they said she was unconscious but not asleep. What is the technical difference that allows them to make this distinction?

    2. Re:What is consciousness? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      eyes open, unresponsive to stimuli (can't be woken up), no memory of entering the state

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  20. Next innovation ? by slash0r · · Score: 1

    Direct access to unconsciousness brain part ?

    What is next ?
    - flashing new ideas/learning skills like Neo.... or brainwashing/propaganda...
    - or cheap and instant medical anesthesia, nonlethal cop weapons, alternative to rape drugs...
    - clearing out what is in your consciousness and not in your long-term memory yet, like in Men-in-Black...

    Choose one. Ok, all.

    1. Re:Next innovation ? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I would love to have selective memory wiping capabilities. I could wipe my memories of watching Sword Art Online and watch it again for the first time.

  21. Fortunately, the switch it in the brain... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Imagine what could happen if it were conveniently located on your back!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Fortunately, the switch it in the brain... by slash0r · · Score: 1

      Yess, Hinduists figured out that before : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  22. Let's not jump to conclusions. by jaeztheangel · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Claustrum as an area of the brain has been well established as an area of orchestration of various sensory subsystems. It has been studied for over two centuries[1].

    These studies clearly demonstrate that the Cl is richly innervated with a wide and diverse array of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. Lesion, stimulation and recording experiments demonstrate that the functional and physiologic capacity of the Cl is quite robust. A recurring theme of claustral function appears to be its involvement in sensorimotor integration. This may be expected of the Cl, given the degree of heterotopic, heterosensory convergence and its interconnectivity with the key subcortical nuclei and sensory cortical areas. The Cl remains a poorly understood and under investigated nucleus.

    It makes sense that a major loss of function is associated with interrupting the Claustrum - but there are several nuclii in the brain - the Hippocampus being one. Claiming it is the 'one true center of consciousness' in the brain doesn't account for the countless studies which reveal just how complex the operation of our neural networks actually are, and may be premature.

    References

    1. [1]The claustrum: a historical review of its anatomy, physiology, cytochemistry and functional significance. Edelstein LR1, Denaro FJ.

    1. Re:Let's not jump to conclusions. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      And since there seem to be lots of "off" switches, this is really just adding to the list. (Unless stimulating it can actually bring someone out of a coma?)

  23. IITC? by BlueTemplar · · Score: 1

    So, how well does this finding fit with the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...

  24. Scifi becomes reality by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure I've seen devices like this in science fiction shows. Though absent a very high quality auto-targetting, I can't see the real one having any use against an unwilling subject. I wonder if it also causes short-term memory loss?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  25. Re:All kinds of uses by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Neat. Could be used during surgeries instead of anesthesia, or could be weaponized to disable enemy combatants.

    Sure, just capture them and subject them to brain surgery for the implant, then turn them lose so you can capture them easier next time.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  26. Well... by dale.furno · · Score: 1

    Sounds like all the more reason to keep wearing my Tin Foil Hat!

  27. Non Story by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

    This is a non-story. One subject? Really? Let's seen an actual study with multiple subjects and some deeper analysis into what might be going on. As it stands this is a non-story.

    1. Re:Non Story by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      This is a non-story. One subject? Really? Let's seen an actual study with multiple subjects and some deeper analysis into what might be going on. As it stands this is a non-story.

      Odds are that multiple subjects will only happen if multiple people with neurological trauma in the same area can be found. This is sort of a story, but more in the 'we can justify looking for people with this specific trauma' sense.

      Unless you're actually willing to volunteer, in which case I suppose somebody might be able to locate a neurosurgeon both competent enough to inflict precisely-targeted brain damage & sufficiently lacking in ethics to do so on somebody who volunteered.

  28. Zapp Brannigan? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    or should we say, Zap Brainnigan?

  29. Re:I've been wrong this whole time by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's the Zzz spot, not the G spot.

  30. The police already use this technology by mtthwbrnd · · Score: 1

    "When the team zapped the area with high frequency electrical impulses, the woman lost consciousness. "

    Tazers!

  31. Fainting, conscious experience and consciousness by mynamestolen · · Score: 1

    Having seen someone faint at the sight of blood (the lights went out instantaneously and they hit the floor like a sack of potatoes) this woman's experience doesn't quite match what I saw. The woman seemed still to have muscle tone to remain sitting upright. So this suspension of some sort of executive control/awareness/conscious experience needs a different name.

    The NewScientist article said "To confirm that they were affecting the woman's consciousness rather than just her ability to speak or move, the team asked her to repeat the word "house" or snap her fingers before the stimulation began. If the stimulation was disrupting a brain region responsible for movement or language she would have stopped moving or talking almost immediately. Instead, she gradually spoke more quietly or moved less and less until she drifted into unconsciousness."

    So, she wasn't having conscious experience but wasn't unsconscious. The NS article also talked about being awake but unconscious, which doesn't fit the sack of potatoes unconsciousness.

    --
    work in progress
  32. Enough by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    When the team zapped the area with high frequency electrical impulses, the woman lost consciousness. She stopped reading and stared blankly into space, she didn't respond to auditory or visual commands and her breathing slowed. As soon as the stimulation stopped, she immediately regained consciousness with no memory of the event.

    Hey GOP, leave Lois Lerner alone already!

  33. an important unanswered question... by moogaloonie · · Score: 2

    Where does the soul end and where does the funk begin?

  34. Neuroplastic Heaven by aaronb1138 · · Score: 2

    Girl: Did I fall asleep?

    Doctor: For a little while.

    Girl: Shall I go now.

    Doctor: If you like.

  35. I found other areas by russotto · · Score: 1

    Turns out that a lot of people, if you hit them on the point of their chin they lose consciousness. Most will lose consciousness with a simple tap to the temple. Seems like an easier off-switch to me.

  36. So by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    It turns out that self-awareness is an illusion of a couple of smallish blobs in your brain, without which you would be no smarter than the average computer? Seems like it ought not to be terribly difficult to make a computer think it's self aware too, then.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It turns out that fusion energy is just the produce of a collision of two nuclei at very high speeds, without which you would have only a fraction of energy available from fission? Seems like it out not to be terribly difficult to make a nuclear power plant that uses fusion then.

  37. Useful for research by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they could use this information to try an investigation of how anesthetics work with a narrower scope, giving them a chance for a better understanding of what goes on with those drugs and the ability to make future anesthesia less dangerous.

  38. Re:Finally! by iamacat · · Score: 2

    It's called marriage.

  39. Yes, but which area of claustrum... by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Is responsible for creating consciousness INSIDE claustrum?

  40. Long Distance Flying by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Forget the comedy - this might be an invention that could make long distance flying bearable! Turn off your brain after take off and back on for landing with no memory of many hours of sitting in a tin can in between.

    1. Re:Long Distance Flying by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      You can already do that using anesthetics.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    2. Re:Long Distance Flying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The blood clot prevention will then be left for the air lines. Perhaps placing the unconscious passenger to a massaging and electrically stimulating storage hexagon for that optimal packing density?

    3. Re:Long Distance Flying by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it could be used to help insomniacs. Sleep isn't exactly unconsciousness but still...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Long Distance Flying by TWX · · Score: 1

      You can already do that using anesthetics.

      They'll even provide them on the flight. It's called the Beverage Service.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Long Distance Flying by afidel · · Score: 1

      Doubtful, there are all sorts of housekeeping steps the brain needs to perform while you sleep, like moving short term memories into long term memory. Failure to perform those steps eventually leads to insanity.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Long Distance Flying by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately anesthetics take quite a while to wear off during which you may feel even worse than if you had been awake for the entire time. This would also make them dangerous in case of emergencies.

    7. Re:Long Distance Flying by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      And Micheal Bay movies!

    8. Re:Long Distance Flying by iMySti · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean when the robots shut us down for daily backups. I for one welcome our data-conscious overlords.

  41. Re:Reviving comatose people by Wootery · · Score: 1

    What does that have to do with some idiot AC making accusations?

  42. Scariest. Story. Ever. on Slashdot by fygment · · Score: 1

    Think ( while you can ) at just how much this could be abused.

    Thought: sleep learning/hypnosis. So can we put someone in an unconscious state, put suggestions in their head wake them and voila, brand new religious zealot?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  43. UPDATE: Project now transferred by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Yes, expect this project to be transferred to military control. Who will devise a mechanism to broadcast this signal en masse. The government's wet dream, the ability to shut down instantly all humans at will.

    No more combatants, no more riots, just turn them off...

  44. Obligatory Car Analogy by bityz · · Score: 1
    No need to devise the obligatory car analogy, the article comes with its own!:

    "I would liken it to a car," he says. "A car on the road has many parts that facilitate its movement - the gas, the transmission, the engine - but there's only one spot where you turn the key and it all switches on and works together. So while consciousness is a complicated process created via many structures and networks - we may have found the key."

  45. Re:Reviving comatose people by TWX · · Score: 1

    It was the highest post on the site without a reply, so he was assured of being seen without having to scroll down, that's what it has to do with an AC making accusations.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  46. Re:Very interesting by rhazz · · Score: 2

    In general your breathing is not conscious

    It is now, jerk!

  47. Re:Reviving comatose people by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    I don't know...let's give it a try.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  48. Re:Very interesting by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Also, don't forget to blink. You wouldn't want your eyes to dry up!

  49. Lucid Dreaming Implications by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

    This is pretty cool, and has some implications on inducing lucid dreams. I can't wait until this becomes a more refined process, would be awesome to lucid dream at will. Certainly something I'd pay good money for.

  50. Surgery by Fjandr · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to see if this could be used as a replacement for surgical anesthesia. If so, no more adverse side effects, or the attendant risks that general anesthesia comes with.