Slashdot Mirror


Free Copy of the Sims 2 Contains SecuROM

dotarray (1747900) writes By now, everybody should know that if something looks too good to be true, it probably is. Let's apply that to EA, shall we? The publisher is giving away copies of The Sims 2: Ultimate Collection, for free... and not mentioning that it includes the controversial SecuROM anti-piracy software. Nobody likes SecuROM.

234 comments

  1. SecuROM racket by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

    SecuROM racket
    Despite how you stack it
    Like a beard on a girl
    They just want to hack it
    Burma Shave

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:SecuROM racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Kanye, is that you?

    2. Re:SecuROM racket by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Fart too white and nerdy.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    3. Re:SecuROM racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rasist against my gas?

    4. Re:SecuROM racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SecuROM racket
      Despite how you stack it
      Like a beard on a girl
      They just want to whack it
      Burma Shave


      FTFY

    5. Re:SecuROM racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and let's not forget our other pal starforce and whatever it is that they've since renamed it to...

  2. Could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    At least it's not StarForce.

    1. Re:Could be worse by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      This EA: you only get StarForce if you pre-order at select retail partners or buy the launch-day DLC...

    2. Re:Could be worse by arbiter1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea also you got it for free if you had the promo code so can't really bitch about the DRM in it.

    3. Re:Could be worse by JosKarith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Here's a free ice lolly. What's that, you found that I froze a turd inside it? Well you got it for free so you have no right to complain..."
      Nice logic, man.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    4. Re:Could be worse by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I'll give a damn about the Sims when it becomes a FPS w/ nade launcher.
      Urban Terror; still free, no DRM.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:Could be worse by flyneye · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They could add DRM to the ISO at any time during production. So, I wouldn't count StarForce out, just yet.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    6. Re:Could be worse by kyldere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You forgot to mention that the guy handing out the ice lollies has been convicted several times in the past for putting turds in them...

    7. Re:Could be worse by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Dude, you missed a trick with that one.

      "Here's a free ice lolly. So what if it's made of frosty piss, it's free isn't it!?!"

      Would have been even better if it was the frosty piss, I mean frist post, I mean first post.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Could be worse by TheP4st · · Score: 5, Informative

      you got it for free if you had the promo code so can't really bitch about the DRM in it.

      If I have not been (clearly) informed of it's presence and implications by the publisher I certainly can and so should any person that consider themselves the owner of their machine when it is DRM that is known to:
      - Generate false positives on authentic discs.
      - Create files and reg keys that you cannot access/remove as admin.
      - Snoop on your software usage 24/7.
      - Conflict with debugging software and in some instances even require debuggers to be un-installed in order for you to play the game.
      - Remain installed after you have un-installed the game.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    9. Re:Could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't help if you're one of today's lucky 10 000.

    10. Re:Could be worse by SailorSpork · · Score: 2

      This same version of Sims 2 DX was given to anyone who has registered any Sims 2 software on Origin. It, in fact, replaced any pre-existing Sims 2 version(s) you had as they were "no longer supported." As one of these people, this is basically bait-and-switch because my old version of Sims without drastic DRM is "no longer supported."

      Or to use a car analogy, if the fact that it was given away to everyone else when I already owned it was kind of a slap in the face, the DRM was a slap in the face with a smelly fish that had a nail bat hidden in it.

    11. Re:Could be worse by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You spelled psot wrong.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    12. Re:Could be worse by gmack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lets see how this compares to Canada's new anti spam law since EA has offices in Vancouver and Montreal.

      you got it for free if you had the promo code so can't really bitch about the DRM in it.

      If I have not been (clearly) informed of it's presence and implications by the publisher

      10.(3) A person who seeks express consent for the doing of any act described in section 8 must, when requesting consent, also, in addition to setting out any other prescribed information, clearly and simply describe, in general terms, the function and purpose of the computer program that is to be installed if the consent is given.

      I certainly can and so should any person that consider themselves the owner of their machine when it is DRM that is known to:

      - Generate false positives on authentic discs.

      - Create files and reg keys that you cannot access/remove as admin.

      - Snoop on your software usage 24/7.

      - Conflict with debugging software and in some instances even require debuggers to be un-installed in order for you to play the game.

      (5) A function referred to in subsection (4) is any of the following functions that the person who seeks express consent knows and intends will cause the computer system to operate in a manner that is contrary to the reasonable expectations of the owner or an authorized user of the computer system:

      (a) collecting personal information stored on the computer system;

      (b) interfering with the owner’s or an authorized user’s control of the computer system;

      (c) changing or interfering with settings, preferences or commands already installed or stored on the computer system without the knowledge of the owner or an authorized user of the computer system;

      (d) changing or interfering with data that is stored on the computer system in a manner that obstructs, interrupts or interferes with lawful access to or use of that data by the owner or an authorized user of the computer system;

      - Remain installed after you have un-installed the game.

      11 (5) A person who has the express consent of an owner or authorized user to do any act described in section 8 must

      (a) for a period of one year after any computer program that performs one or more of the functions described in subsection 10(5) but not referred to in subsection 10(6) is installed under the consent, ensure that the person who gave their consent is provided with an electronic address to which they may, if they believe that the function, purpose or impact of the computer program installed under the consent was not accurately described when consent was requested, send a request to remove or disable that computer program; and

      (b) if the consent was based on an inaccurate description of the material elements of the function or functions described in subsection 10(5), on receipt within that one-year period of a request to remove or disable that computer program, without cost to the person who gave consent, assist that person in removing or disabling the computer program as soon as feasible.

      20 (4) The maximum penalty for a violation is $1,000,000 in the case of an individual, and $10,000,000 in the case of any other person.

      Any Canadians affected by this feel like filing a complaint?

    13. Re:Could be worse by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps you might want to try a Sims-inspired RTS for the NES.

    14. Re:Could be worse by msim · · Score: 1

      The guy used to work at the Coogee Bay Hotel?

      If you haven't a clue what I'm talking about, read this.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  3. Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, tell me, what do you mean with anti-piracy? Does it help against evil people in boats comandeering unarmed trade ships? So then must be something good.

    Or have you meant Digital Restrictions Management?

    1. Re: Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't need a boat analogy. I need a car analogy.

    2. Re: Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't need a boat analogy. I need a car analogy.

      Yeah, but you wouldn't download a car analogy, would you?

    3. Re: Anti-piracy by Therad · · Score: 2

      I often download car analogies from /.

    4. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh quit whining about how the meaning of words change in everyday use. Other wise we would have to send all Americans back to elementary school to learn to spell colour and that it's an 's' and not a 'zee' in most words.

      You grumble about your tax dollars on education enough.

    5. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, tell me, what do you mean with anti-piracy? Does it help against evil people in boats comandeering unarmed trade ships? So then must be something good.

      Yes it does. It means said pirates will be struggling to get their games to run and will forget about hunting down ships to steal their wares.

    6. Re: Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Anti-piracy by rossdee · · Score: 2

      "quit whining about how the meaning of words change in everyday use. Other wise we would have to send all Americans back to elementary school to learn to spell colour and that it's an 's' and not a 'zee' in most words."

      The last letter in the English alphabet is a Zed

    8. Re:Anti-piracy by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      Well, "thief" sounds worse... I'll stick with "pirate".

    9. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're both wrong.

      "Pirate" still means one who commits armed robbery on the high seas. It does not mean one who commits copyright infringement except in informal speech and propaganda.

      The misspellings present in modern UK English were not present in the language spoken in England when the American colonies declared independence. The same goes for the silly accent. Current UK English is further removed from what it was back then than US English is, especially eastern and southern US dialects and accents.

      The last letter of the English alphabet is "Z". It's printed form implies no particular pronunciation. Most (or perhaps all) pronunciations begin with the sound a "Z" makes. It's interesting to note that no other letter in the common pronunciation key rhymes with "zed", while "B", "C", "D", "E", "G", "P", "T", and "V" all rhyme with "zee".

    10. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not mean one who commits copyright infringement except in informal speech and propaganda.

      And in English going back over two hundred years...

    11. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about anti-entitled-NEET-millennial, does that sound better?

    12. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, sorry. Anyway as I was saying, I could really go for some pissa right now

    13. Re:Anti-piracy by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Thief implies that there is a theft occurring, which is legally false. They are guilty of copyright infringement, nothing more. If they share copies they become an unauthorized distributor, but that's still something with no legal relationship to theft.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    14. Re:Anti-piracy by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to note that no other letter in the common pronunciation key rhymes with "zed", while "B", "C", "D", "E", "G", "P", "T", and "V" all rhyme with "zee".

      "Z" (zed) has a half-rhyme (or vowel rhyme) with "M", which when recited using iambic heptameter, with a missed soft beat at the beginning so the letter A has the first heavy beat on it, and when pronouncing "W", no beat is allocated on the schwa in the middle, this half rhyme becomes evident, and may reminds one slightly of old english rhyming styles.

      Of course, in actuality, there is no real need for how one pronounces "Z" to rhyme with anything. Take the "Ring around the rosie" poem, for example... the final word in its first verse, "down", doesn't rhyme with any previous word. Rhyming may sometimes be an aid to memorization for small children, but it's clearly by no means essential.

    15. Re:Anti-piracy by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      Do they deliver to sector zed zed 9, plural zed-alpha?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    16. Re: Anti-piracy by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      If you watch Family Guy, you already have one.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    17. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Stop literally raping us with your word definitions!

    18. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Aide to small children"...and Americans.

    19. Re:Anti-piracy by m.alessandrini · · Score: 0, Troll
      Please, stop those mantras "copying is not depriving the other of its copy, etc, etc". We're talking about not paying for something you must, and something that cost a lot of money to produce (movies, videogames). Period. Stallman's phylosophical nuances do not apply.

      Mind you, I'm as "pirate" as average you, but people here costantly trying to *defend* it, I can't tolerate. And I'm a big fan of free software and Stallman's doctrine (a little less of himself), but I see lot of people trying to read it as the bible, and especially trying to extend it to totally unrelated fields.

    20. Re:Anti-piracy by suutar · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Maybe. What does that zed stand for?

    21. Re:Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "quit whining about how the meaning of words change in everyday use. Other wise we would have to send all Americans back to elementary school to learn to spell colour and that it's an 's' and not a 'zee' in most words."

      The last letter in the English alphabet is a Zed

      And you Brits have to relearn how to pronounce consonants. The letter is there for a reason.
      Monty Python got the pronunciation of knight right. It is very close to what proper English sounded like at that time.

    22. Re:Anti-piracy by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      Given Zaphod's massive ego, bolstered by the Total Perspective Vortex proclaiming him the center of the Universe, I'd say the zed's are for his three arms?

      I mean, what are the odds two earthlings and two Betelgeusians would meet not once but twice in an interstellar backwater only to go off on an adventure spanning time and space? At least as big as Zaphod's ego anyway...

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    23. Re:Anti-piracy by suutar · · Score: 1

      true, but given an infinite improbability drive, one in a trillion chances will pop up nine times out of ten

    24. Re:Anti-piracy by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      ""Pirate" still means one who commits armed robbery on the high seas. It does not mean one who commits copyright infringement except in informal speech and propaganda."

      You are flat out wrong. It means what people think it means. And if you called someone a software pirate in most of the English speaking world, they would think you are calling them "one who commits copyright infringement".

      I don't even know what you mean by "propaganda".

    25. Re: Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want costs? Look at MSSQL 2012+ licensing and tell me that corporate greed is fair.

    26. Re:Anti-piracy by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      "Piracy" has referred to commercial copyright infringement for money for a couple of centuries. I'm a bit miffed about it being applied to infringement for noncommercial purposes, but then again I wouldn't steal a ship, would I?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    27. Re:Anti-piracy by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Can you defend copyright other than by treating it as theft? The fact that I'm depriving nobody of anything if I make an unauthorized copy is morally significant, and if you can't deal with that you really should rethink your position.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    28. Re:Anti-piracy by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Forget the "mantras", I'm not trying to justify piracy - I'm talking law. By law copyright infringement is a crime unrelated to theft, only the major publishers are busy trying to blur the line. But they'd probably be dissapointed if they managed it - after all something can only be stolen from you once...

        I quite agree that artists deserve to be compensated for their work if they can manage it, but if you're going to call copyright infringement theft, then you should call imprisonment murder - after all you're depriving someone of a piece of their self-determined life.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    29. Re:Anti-piracy by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      'Propaganda' - one of the most misused and frequently misunderstood words out there... Actually half a dozen closely tied but different meanings
      - Words, statements or other 'media' twisted with lies to convey an emotionally charged meaning..
      - The psychological manipulation of people using intrinsic or subliminal methods..
      - All emotionally charged speech, as used by politicians to sway voters...
      - Black propaganda, the manipulation of people using hate driven by negative stories and communications - either lies or true.
      - Black propaganda, as above but used for the destruction of a particular person, or group, ... the rumour that xx has Nazi sympathies. . .
      - Subliminal propaganda, the use of distraction and repetition to plant internal subliminal messages.. (using your subconscious as a weapon against you)
      - Subliminal propaganda, the use of deliberately invisible (flashing images) or inaudible messages to transmit the actual message subliminally. Probably doesn't work.
      - Engine or radio propaganda, method used by the Nazi's and the BBC and others (using audio filters and compressors) to force program their people using audio sibilance. (also called 'psychic' propaganda)
      - 'Psychic' propaganda, obscure military term for a method based on manipulating Jung's 'archetypes' to manipulate entire populations at a subliminal level.
      - 'Sonic' propaganda, - obscure military term for a form of 'sonic' or 'sub-sonic' subliminal propaganda driven by a device that uses very low frequencies -modulated by a high frequency carrier- at very high power. Designed to create resonance in the target, can also be used as a direct weapon.. (also called the 'Horn of Jericho', also called 'Psychic' propaganda.)
      And I'm sure there's a few I haven't mentioned..

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    30. Re: Anti-piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you wouldn't shoot a policeman, steal his helmet, go the toilet in it and send it to his grieving widow either http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

  4. Fuck those fucking fuckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The title says it all, except for saying the title says it all.

  5. Does anyone have a link by Anarchduke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to a pirated version of this free software? I only ask becuase the pirated version wont have securom and will work better.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    1. Re:Does anyone have a link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Does anyone have a link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://ThePirateBay.se

    3. Re:Does anyone have a link by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2

      https://ThePirateBay.se

      ftfy if you are in india (:

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  6. free as in price, not as in freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Bad news: a free product contains DRM.
    Good news: you still have the freedom not to use it.

  7. Which Anti-Virus Suites detect that Trojan Horse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a Trojan Horse, isn't it? Can they remove it or does it fight its removal like common malware does?

  8. So what? by Racemaniac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there any convention about mentioning anywhere which protection softwares your software is using??
    i get it that some people don't like securom, but is it any surprise that even free versions contain it because the probably couldn't be bothered to remove it before making it free?

    1. Re:So what? by jawtheshark · · Score: 0, Troll
      Yes, I don't get this. They give a game away for free and instead of saying "Fun! Thank you EA" many people are complaining about the DRM. Yes, there is DRM, but you're running Windows to play it, so that really is the least of your problems. I grabbed it. I don't even have Windows in active use, but should I ever have tons of free spare time and want to play a game, I can now install it on a Games-Dedicated-Windows partition.

      I say "Thank you EA".

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:So what? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always any other cracked game installed that the "anti-piracy" software could affect. This IS malware , first, DRM, second. Free isn't free, sweet pea.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    3. Re:So what? by nhat11 · · Score: 1

      Sooo you're comparing slavery to software? I think it's someone that posted before me that's not right in the head.

    4. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad comparison. If you don't get food, you die. If you don't get Sims 2, you have a lot more time live.

      And just to be clear: I think copyright in its current form is as fucked up as the next slashdotter does. One of just many problems is that DRM is practically guaranteed to fuck legitimate users over - at least in the long run when just a minority want to use some software a decade after its release and getting it running on a modern system is a challenge even without DRM. Some requirement that if a company of size X (to make life easier for lone shareware coders, if they still exist), a DRM-free copy and/or the source must be submitted to an independent body upon initial release and if some criteria are later fulfilled, said body releases the uncrippled version to legitimate users. Do note that I'm not saying public domain but just owners of legitimate copies. Addressing when something should become public domain, is yet another subject and I'm already digressing enough.

    5. Re:So what? by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, after the Sony rootkit issue, I do kind of expect vendors to be up front about this.

      Because, "hey, here's our software, oh, it might wreck your computer" is kind of a big deal.

      These companies feel entitled to install all sorts of crap on your machine. But, this being EA, it's already crap.

      They really should be required to tell you the extra crap they're installing, because it has the potential to really fsck up your computer.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ook to play it, you must run Windows, to run Windows means that you almost certainly have malware already.

      It runs fine on Wine. No Windows needed. To nuke from orbit just run rm -rf .wine or whateverSims2Winedir.

    7. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's free as in "one per customer", not free as in "all I can steal".

    8. Re:So what? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      That being the case, what prevents the DRM from raiding the cracked games in your Wine partition?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    9. Re:So what? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      The promotion also ends 31st July, from what I read. After that they'll charge money again, I must presume.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    10. Re:So what? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      You're missing the point entirely.

      The problem is that it is there. Period. End of story.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:So what? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Why? It's a temporary promotion that expires 31th July. After that they're most likely going to ask money for it again. Their game, their rules.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    12. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're completely misunderstanding the complaint. Many people want to avoid having SecuROM software installed on their system, for good reason. They're not complaining about about DRM per se, but about using a trojan horse to install software on their machines without their knowledge and against their will. If EA had simply provided a warning before installing SecuROM then users who didn't want it installed could simply have done without The Sims 2 and everyone would be happy.

    13. Re:So what? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Look to play it, you must run Windows, to run Windows means that you almost certainly have malware already.

      Oh? Please expand on that logic. What malware am I currently running?

    14. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better games exist which have not motivated me to all the hassle of fucking around with getting Windows working on top of the hassle of getting a game working on top of the hassle of anti-consumer, "anti-piracy" mechanisms that actively fight might efforts to play a FREE or already PAID for game. Honestly, this would be a whole different thing if the anti-piracy code only worked on pirates, but that's entirely the opposite of how it works most the time.

      So, I'll try to fiddle with different WINE prefixes a bit to see if I can get it working. The "anti-piracy" feature already seems a non-starter, though, so any serious effort at this point would appear to require me to download a crack. I'm honestly not that hopeful, though, as even after quite a bit of fiddling I presume WINE incompatibility (or the magic mixture of libraries/registry settings/whatever) will elude my efforts. About 50% of my Windows Steam games are in the same boat, and there too I think it has more to do with WINE than Steam's DRM (although it's rather impossible to tell for sure). But since those games came in a bundle and (mostly) the game that compelled me to buy the bundles work, the rest are the same sort of "free" game that don't work.

      True story? The last bundle I bought, I pirated a copy to see if the game I wanted actually worked. Because there was no demo version. But, then, I guess I should have just voted with my wallet and just avoid Steam entirely. I mean, that's obviously making great strides in getting those games off Steam and on Linux natively.

      Oh, right, that's absurd. Nevermind.

    15. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even know? Sounds about right.

    16. Re:So what? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      why in the fucking fuck do they need DRM on something they're giving away for free.
      answer that, please.

    17. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The malware you are currently running is called Windows.

    18. Re:So what? by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "Is there any convention about mentioning anywhere which protection softwares your software is using??"

      Well, one of my settlement agreement terms with EA was that they're supposed to inform every consumer upfront about SecuROM.

      If they're not doing that, they're in breach of our settlement agreement and I'm going to fucking end them in court.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    19. Re:So what? by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that it was already there and they aren't going to spend money to remove it, even though someone out there has probably already done it for them.

    20. Re:So what? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I think his point may be, perhaps, that he routinely sweeps his system to make sure infections don't occur, and can currently account for the source of every piece of software using resources on his system. The other poster was, after all, making the claim that if you have windows, then you have malware on your system... so asking him what that malware might be if one is confident that there is none is a perfectly fair question.

    21. Re:So what? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Because they are only giving it away for free for a limited time.... it's a promotion for the software... they aren't actually making the software freely available in general.

      The alternative would require that they prepare a special version of the software that doesn't come with the DRM solely for the promotional period... which because of how short it is, it probably wouldn't be worthwhile.

      Not that I agree with bundling this software with their game... I remember having it on my system once with some EA software and it caused me a lot of grief (affected my DVD drive in unexpected ways). I haven't installed anything from EA on my computers since, and I doubt I ever will.

    22. Re:So what? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      and can currently account for the origin of every piece of software using resources on his system.

      Fixed that for ya... First of all, the OSS crowd might get confused and call you out for implying that he's reviewed the source for Windows (even though that's not what you were actually saying). Second, and perhaps more importantly, we're talking about EA, so Origin is definitely the correct term.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    23. Re:So what? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      To be honest, SecuROM is much better than many DRM schemes. You can disable SecuROM easily, and in some games it's used only during installation. Never a need to phone-home for permission to play a game, and you can give your games away or resell them. Not all of SecuROM games game with the root kit either.

    24. Re:So what? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why do some people hate SecuROM with a vengeance despite being such a mild copy protection scheme but then turn around and praise Steam and other DRM schemes which affect the games much more (unable to copy/resell/regift, phone home for permission to install, etc)?

    25. Re:So what? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      DRM and copy protection are not the same thing. Copy protection prevents you from copying. DRM prevents you from giving the game away to someone else, reselling it when you're done playing, verifiies that you're playing on approved equipment (granted a small subset of SecurROM games did this), and basically exists to destroy the reseller market and keep the prices high.

    26. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I tried to spread malware that trashed peoples computers I would be in jail and some nitwit would probably call me a cyberterrorist.
      Sadly large companies are above the law.

    27. Re:So what? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Steam at least brings something to the table - fast downloads, huge catalog, chat and matchmaking, workshop, community forums, etc.

      SecuROM just breaks shit.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    28. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you steal a free game that's distributed through a Steam-like distribution system?

    29. Re:So what? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Why do some people hate SecuROM with a vengeance despite being such a mild copy protection scheme but then turn around and praise Steam and other DRM schemes which affect the games much more (unable to copy/resell/regift, phone home for permission to install, etc)?

      Because SecuROM is much more invasive than you describe, because it stay on infecting your computer after you uninstall the program that it is attached to, after you "uninstall" SecuROM" it leaves portions of itself the reinstall itself behind your back, It locks is registry keys so that even as administrator you cant remove them. It will reject valid discs as being illegitamate copies. It will stop the games from running on vista and newer OS's if the network is experiencing congestion. It will refuse to start games if you have various common programming tools installed on your system. And will refuse to run with certain brands of optical drive.

      While steam lets me run game s on or offline, backs up my saves and synces them between my computers, lets me have multiple copies installed at once, You can uninstall it without issue. It does not care if I have a hex editor merely installed on my system.

      SecuROM views you as a hostile party and treats your computer like it is their property not yours.
      Steam veiws you as a customers and tries to help you where it can in hopes of you spending more money with them.

      I have had issues with SecuROM and its ilk interfering with legitament usage
      I have never noticed effects of DRM on Steam except where I have actually benefited from it "saves synced, etc,"

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  9. Anybody know? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given that this is EA we are talking about, I can definitely believe that they'd somehow manage to be paranoid about 'piracy' of a game they are giving away. However, since it's also an older game(pre "Origin" store/client/pox-on-humanity and originally distributed largely on retail disks) and being given away it would be unsurprising if as little effort as possible was put into modifications for the new distribution.

    Does anybody know how deeply baked-in SecuROM has to be? Would the developer/publisher have a 'clean' version that is then put through some sort of SecuROM conversion step, or would you have to go further back, and deeper, into the development process to cleanly rip it out?

    I'm baffled at why including it would be worth much (especially if the license agreement involves any sort of volume-based payment, which would likely wipe out any minor benefits in audience tracking); but if it is sufficiently difficult to rip out then it would be understandable why EA wouldn't bother doing so(aside from just being evil).

    1. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the big complaints about SecureROM is that it roots your system.

      If you give away free software containing it, you're increasing the installed base of SecureROM. This makes it less likely that those machines will be able to successfully run other pirated software protected with the system.

    2. Re:Anybody know? by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So... genuine question...

      What does SecuROM actually do to your system and what are the implications?

      The wikipedia article, beyond a floating comment that SecuROM isn't uninstalled when the game is uninstalled, is basically silent on this. In fact, let's break it down into a series of further questions?

      - Does SecuROM cause security vulnerabilities on PCs on which it is installed?

      - Does SecuROM prevent applications - other than pirated copies of the game it is supposed to "protect" - from functioning on PCs on which it is installed?

      - Does SecuROM create any kind of "always on" background process that consumes resources and potentially reduces performance on PCs on which it is installed?

      If the answer to any of the above is "yes" then obviously there is a fairly major problem here. If the answer to all of the above is "no", then I'm not quite sure what people are getting upset about given that we are talking about a free game (SecuROM being bundled with paid-for games is another issue entirely).

      And to emphasise, I genuinely don't know the answers to the above and can't work them out from the links in TFA.

    3. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given how easily the pirates take it out, I suspect it should be pretty straight forward for someone at EA to do the same.

    4. Re:Anybody know? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      "Root your system" not as in "rooting your cellphone to get privileged access to do it's job" as your cellphone backup app or filemanager does.

      "Root your system" as in applying stealth technologies used to hide malware from your antivirus software, as a so called "RootKit" (special class of malware using said stealth technologies) is doing.

      And no, my video driver isn't doing that.

      --
      bickerdyke
    5. Re:Anybody know? by bickerdyke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      - Does SecuROM cause security vulnerabilities on PCs on which it is installed?

      Adding a method to hide processes running on your system may be considered a security vulnerability. Such systems are usually used only by malware and legitimate software should NOT use any technology to counter the work of anti-virus software. Either your antivirus is weakend (which should be considered a security vulnerability) or "real" malware might also hide under the "invisibility cloak" set up by SecuROM to hide itself.

      SecuROm may not be a security threat in itself, but it uses typical malware patterns and generally weakens your system security.

      - Does SecuROM prevent applications - other than pirated copies of the game it is supposed to "protect" - from functioning on PCs on which it is installed?

      OK, I'm recounting a user report on forum from years ago from the back of my memory here, so take this paragraph with a grain of salt: (may have been a similar copy protection system, if not exactly SecuROM)

      I remember a user reporting a broken DVD writer. He bought a new one and replaced the "malfunctioning" drive only to find out that the new drive was also "broken". Turned out it was a DRM system that blocked the DVD writer and that user threw away a perfectly functioning DVD writer. Actual monetary damage here.

      - Does SecuROM create any kind of "always on" background process that consumes resources and potentially reduces performance on PCs on which it is installed?

      If it is not uninstalled with the software, it permanently eats up ressources that can't be reclaimed by the legitimate owner by uninstalling, as it is hiding itself from the computers software/process management system. (see "rootKit" in #1) As it is hidden, there is no indication that any problem showing up years after the deinstallation of a computer game (#2) might still be connected to a residual software component (read: garbage) from a casual game from a few years ago.

      If the answer to any of the above is "yes" then obviously there is a fairly major problem here. If the answer to all of the above is "no", then I'm not quite sure what people are getting upset about given that we are talking about a free game (SecuROM being bundled with paid-for games is another issue entirely).

      No. ESPESCIALLY for free games. Why add copy protection to free stuff anyway? It's free to begin with! No one needs or wants to "pirate" it. Unless of course you need a "pirated" copy of the game to keep the negative SecuROM effects from your system.

      --
      bickerdyke
    6. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ah! Right. Same kind of answers as Verizon about throttling their mobile network users.

      Is this the same as throttling?
      No, this is not throttling.

      How is this different than throttling?
      The difference between our Network Optimization practices and throttling is network intelligence.

      Sure. https://www.techdirt.com/artic...

    7. Re:Anybody know? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      - Does SecuROM cause security vulnerabilities on PCs on which it is installed?

      Yes. Absolutely. Any additional software, especially ones that embed themselves so deep into the OS, provides additional exploitable bugs.
      Let he who codes without bugs cast the first stone.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Firsthand experience here: I ended up with SecuROM I think from one of the Prince of Persia games, and from that point forward no DVD drive would work with that computer until I nuked the HD flat and completely reinstalled windows. I didn't throw my DVD drive away, but I probably did spend 20 ro 30 hours trying to diagnose it and reinstalling windows.

    9. Re:Anybody know? by Talderas · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. ESPESCIALLY for free games. Why add copy protection to free stuff anyway? It's free to begin with! No one needs or wants to "pirate" it. Unless of course you need a "pirated" copy of the game to keep the negative SecuROM effects from your system.

      Because everyone and their mother didn't pay attention to what actually happened. EA provides The Sims 2 through Origin at a cost. They are currently giving copies of the game away, through Origin, if you use a redemption code which is only valid through July 31st. After that date, you will have to go back to paying for the game if you want to acquire it. You could also acquire the game right now without the redemption code, you'll just have to pay for it. So the game isn't permanently free, it's temporarily free, and it's using the exact same distribution method and version that the not-free version of The Sims 2 uses.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    10. Re:Anybody know? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      thx

      --
      bickerdyke
    11. Re:Anybody know? by JohhnyTHM · · Score: 2

      OK, I'm recounting a user report on forum from years ago from the back of my memory here, so take this paragraph with a grain of salt: (may have been a similar copy protection system, if not exactly SecuROM) I remember a user reporting a broken DVD writer. He bought a new one and replaced the "malfunctioning" drive only to find out that the new drive was also "broken". Turned out it was a DRM system that blocked the DVD writer and that user threw away a perfectly functioning DVD writer. Actual monetary damage here.

      This may have been me on /. a few years ago, but it was with StarForce rather then SecuRom.
      PC started running like crap after installing X3, so I decided to backup my music, photos and game files onto DVD. Every one failed. After much searching I found a website with an answer - a StarForce remover. Used that and my DVD started working again. Also my PC started running normally again. I have never bought a game with this kind of intrusive DRM since. The only way to get the message across is stop giving these people money, or better still, sue the bastards. Stopping people from backing up their photos because you are paranoid about piracy is not acceptable.

    12. Re:Anybody know? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I remember when Crysis came out it was secured with SuckROM. The idea was you inserted the DVD and SuckROM would verify the DVD was in the drive and the game would start, most of the time.

      During the process of running crysis.exe securom would start and your mouse cursor would have this colorful CD icon attached to it. If securom failed to work properly (crash) which was every 1 in 3 or 4 times, the mouse cursor would stay a disco ball looking CD and your CD/DVD drive was rendered inoperable. A reboot was the only solution to solving it.

      After a week of that I downloaded a cracked exe for a game I legally bought with my hard earned cash. And you wonder why the consumer hates DRM. That is part of the reason intrusive, rootkit like DRM needs to die in a fire.

    13. Re:Anybody know? by Imrik · · Score: 1

      I don't know about all versions of windows, but in at least some of them you can see all the processes, you just can't directly affect ones from other users.

    14. Re:Anybody know? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      AFAIK it's a wrapper. It loads itself in RAM, decrypts the actual game binary, and runs it's code. I think there are hooks available for use, as well (think "level 25 boss has infinite health if integrity check fails")

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    15. Re:Anybody know? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you honestly equating process separation in multi-user OSes with rootkits?

    16. Re:Anybody know? by Joel+Cahoon · · Score: 2
      Don't worry, my friend, everything is alright:

      No, SecuROM does not damage a computer in any way.

      SecuROM Frequently Asked Questions

      There's absolutely nothing to worry about here; move along, now.

    17. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about all versions of windows, but in at least some of them you can see all the processes, you just can't directly affect ones from other users.

      Not when a root-kit is in the kernel and masking certain processes from the standard APIs.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit#Kernel_mode

      "Kernel-mode rootkits run with the highest operating system privileges (Ring 0) by adding code or replacing portions of the core operating system, including both the kernel and associated device drivers. Most operating systems support kernel-mode device drivers, which execute with the same privileges as the operating system itself. As such, many kernel-mode rootkits are developed as device drivers or loadable modules, such as loadable kernel modules in Linux or device drivers in Microsoft Windows. This class of rootkit has unrestricted security access, but is more difficult to write.[27] The complexity makes bugs common, and any bugs in code operating at the kernel level may seriously impact system stability, leading to discovery of the rootkit.[27] One of the first widely known kernel rootkits was developed for Windows NT 4.0 and released in Phrack magazine in 1999 by Greg Hoglund.[28][29][30]

      "Kernel rootkits can be especially difficult to detect and remove because they operate at the same security level as the operating system itself, and are thus able to intercept or subvert the most trusted operating system operations. Any software, such as antivirus software, running on the compromised system is equally vulnerable.[31] In this situation, no part of the system can be trusted.

      "A rootkit can modify data structures in the Windows kernel using a method known as direct kernel object manipulation (DKOM).[32] This method can be used to hide processes. A kernel mode rootkit can also hook the System Service Descriptor Table (SSDT), or modify the gates between user mode and kernel mode, in order to cloak itself.[3] Similarly for the Linux operating system, a rootkit can modify the system call table to subvert kernel functionality.[33] It's common that a rootkit creates a hidden, encrypted filesystem in which it can hide other malware or original copies of files it has infected.[34]"

    18. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can second that - and in fact it was a DRM update that came with a Sims 2 expansion pack that did it to me. After installing the expansion pack, my DVD writer could write DVds, but could no longer write CDs at all (digital or audio). However, the drive itself was fine. I was dual booting Linux, and the drive continued to work perfectly under Linux. Eventually I reinstalled Windows (without Sims), and the drive worked as normal again.

    19. Re:Anybody know? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      Would the developer/publisher have a 'clean' version that is then put through some sort of SecuROM conversion step, or would you have to go further back, and deeper, into the development process to cleanly rip it out?

      It's enough of a pain in the ass that it's not worth doing another build without SecuROM, especially since they'd also need to do another QA cycle to make sure they didn't break it for paid customers. It's far easier to just distribute the last version as-is and generating extra keys to hand out as if it's a regular paid copy. In other words, you are correct: "as little effort as possible was put into modifications for the new distribution".

    20. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Does SecuROM cause security vulnerabilities on PCs on which it is installed?

      Unknown. This is closed source software that is not documented publicly. We do know that it is in fact intended to cause vulnerabilities on your PC to prevent copyright infringement and piracy. We do not know exact specifics, or how deep of an impact there is. After StarForce fiasco, which was known to prevent security software from properly functioning, crashing systems and even rendering windows inoperable entirely, many people became much more aware of the potential problems of this type of software.

      - Does SecuROM prevent applications - other than pirated copies of the game it is supposed to "protect" - from functioning on PCs on which it is installed?

      Yes. There are known cases of malfuctions where it prevented software from being installed or run. There are also known cases where securom likely caused entire OS to become inoperable. However these are far less documented simply due to the fact that SecuROM's competitor at the time, StarForce was known to cause all these problems but a couple of orders of magnitude more.

      - Does SecuROM create any kind of "always on" background process that consumes resources and potentially reduces performance on PCs on which it is installed?

      Unknown. SecuROM themselves claim that it doesn't. However SecuROM roots your machine, making installing and running processes hidden from the rest of the system whenever it pleases easy. Again, many of the suspicions come from the StarForce's side, which was caught red handed doing all those things, all while denying doing those. SecuROM faced far less scrutiny simply because most of the resources looking for these problems were focused on StarForce at the time.

    21. Re:Anybody know? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No. ESPESCIALLY for free games. Why add copy protection to free stuff anyway? It's free to begin with! No one needs or wants to "pirate" it. Unless of course you need a "pirated" copy of the game to keep the negative SecuROM effects from your system.

      This is the difference between "free as in beer" and "free as in speech" / copyleft. In the former case, maybe the company offered the program "free" for a limited time or "free" to a certain group of people or "free" as long as some other particular condition were met, and would object to people distributing the program outside of those conditions.

      I'm not saying it's a legitimate reason -- far from it; SecuROM is malware and everyone who conspired to produce or distribute it should be in federal prison-- but it is a "reason."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:Anybody know? by mark-t · · Score: 1
      I agree with everything you've said above, but would like address your last question, which you may have intended to be rhetorical, but actually has a less obvious answer.

      . Why add copy protection to free stuff anyway?

      It's ordinarily a valid question, and honestly the very first thing I thought of as well, but the most obvious reason in this case is because this game isn't really free. It's being given away for free, and only for a limited time. When the promotion ends, people will have to pay for it again.

    23. Re:Anybody know? by alexo · · Score: 1

      No, SecuROM does not damage a computer in any way.

      SecuROM Frequently Asked Questions

      So, if the a copy of SecuRom installed on my machine does any of the things that the FAQ specifically claims it does not, can I bring charges against the company under the unlawful computer access act (or however it is called)?

    24. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant comment on today version of SecuROM but about 6 years ago i emergency-reloaded my PC because i thought i had a nasty Trojan. goodby time i will never get back.

      Legit and paid for game, game i uninstalled weeks before. no uninstaller for SecuROM, DEEP hooks to OS. inability remove from starting with PC. at the time, very little information on it. registry keys which could not be deleted--due to null values, and black-magic. remote- phone home--who knows what else it does they claim it does or doesn't.

      how is this not classified as a virus? it has ALL of the traits of one---Sony (SecuROM creator); along with the distributors need ot be prosecuted for this crap.

      Hello, Electronic Arts, i will not buy another of your games due to your choice to infect my PC. Sony, go frack yourself, i will avoid your products in general for creating and maintaining SecuROM product, and other rootkit-style malware.

    25. Re:Anybody know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your last comment, why put SecuROM on a free game: because i wouldn't be surprised if the SecuROM virus sends data back to their mother ship. why else include it?

    26. Re:Anybody know? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Some SecuROM systems did this, a minority of games. Many SecuROM games did not have root kits and were not at all intrusive in any way, some did not even require having media after installation.

      And to the original question, EA didn't add this for the free version, it was already there in the game from the start and they did not expend significant development time to rip it out for a temporary promotion.

    27. Re:Anybody know? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      SecuROM is a suite of copy protection schemes, not all of them are the same and not all games used the same methods. Not all of them used root kits and not all of them used hidden tasks to monitor CD/DVD copying.

    28. Re:Anybody know? by malianx · · Score: 1

      If securom failed to work properly (crash) which was every 1 in 3 or 4 times, the mouse cursor would stay a disco ball looking CD and your CD/DVD drive was rendered inoperable.

      I think there may have been a more serious problem with your system at the time. Myself and dozens of friends bought crysis 1 when it launched, and never had it fail. Anecdotal sure, but so are your 1 in 3 or 4 times claims.

  10. Who cares? by ildon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's free. If you don't like SecuROM, don't install the game. If someone hates SecuROM so much, they probably hate Origin even more, so this seems kind of moot.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have the same cavalier attitude towards other trojan horses? Is it OK to give shiny things away and hide the fact that you're including a helping of disease?

    2. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with hate.
      SecuROM is a (very) dangerous piece of software.

    3. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Citation needed, otherwise you're a hateful hatemongering hater.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No kidding. And sims 2 has ALWAYS had SecuROM in it. They just didn't feel like taking the time to patch it out. While I'm a firm believer that DRM is a waste of time and money on the game company's part, there's no massive conspiracy here. They used SecuROM when they released Sims 2 (it was released in 2004, they used SecuROM a lot with games then) and they haven't bothered to redo it because, well, it is old and they just don't wanna spend the time.

      Fair enough, particularly for free.

      Plus the nerd rage over it is really overblown. Turns out when there's a problem with something, sometimes companies listen and fix things. So last SecuROM game I played was Battlefield Bad Company 2. It was not problematic at all in my experience. You had to activate it one time online and it then ran without checks or ever going online again. You got a certain number of activations, 5 or 10 I think, but not only could you deactivate it, with a tool or automatically during uninstall, but they would replenish automatically over time. So unless you were doing a ton of reinstalls and not deactivating it was really unlikely you'd have an issue.

      Silly to include DRM in my opinion, particularly for a game mostly played online, but not at all onerous on the user.

      People seriously need to chill about this shit. Support DRM free games when there's a version available (GOG is a good site, please not Steam is not DRM free, Steamworks is DRM) but don't rage and whine if there's DRM and the DRM isn't a problem. Yes it is silly and a waste of money, but don't act like it is some massive issue if it is not.

      If a game has some "always on" DRM bullshit that shuts it off if the connection goes down? Ya that's a reason to get mad and not buy it. If it has a DRM that wants to activate once and then fucks off? Oh get over it, you probably have to get online ones to patch the thing anyhow. Just jump through the hoop and go on about your business.

    5. Re:Who cares? by GuB-42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's free. If you don't like SecuROM, don't install the game.

      It would be a valid argument if there were a clear mention of SecuROM before you install the game.

    6. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a free blanket to keep you warm during the winter, friendly neighbour.
      DON'T COMPLAIN TO ME ABOUT THE POX! I GAVE YOU A FREE BLANKET!

    7. Re:Who cares? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      YES!

      There is no right to a game designed the way you would want to design it. Your right is to vote with your wallets. If the second companies instituted DRM everyone stopped buying their products, then companies would not see DRM as a valid business model.

    8. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SecuROM#cite_note-Tweakguides_PC_Game_Piracy_Examined_Page_9-8
      Knock yourself out.
      Securom is well known for breaking certain CD-ROMs, and set-ups with certain software installed.
      Also removing securom is not as simple as simply uninstalling the game.

    9. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A strong point here is they do not mention they install the DRMware. But you probably think its ok to sell food with huge amounts of arsenic too - because it comes free with the foodstuff and they dont tell you!

    10. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference between Steam and SecuROM is that when Steam fucks up, I can't play my game.

      When SecuROM 7 fucked up, I couldn't use my DVD burner.

      It's not as bad as Starforce, but that's not saying much.

    11. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that most consumers are too stupid to realize that they are installing this crap, and as a result end up thinking they need a new PC sooner than they really do when performance starts to decline or troubles start to appear. The ones who realize how big of a problem this can cause are outraged and speak out, maybe hoping the other users can learn of these troubles and to avoid such problems.

      Not to mention the possibilities of a virus or malware could piggyback off of this software and actually do more than slow down their computer, it could be stealing their banking information or any other valuable information that is used on that computer! This software in a way is taking away an administrator powers and claiming itself as having those powers(at least to most users without advanced knowledge of regaining control).

    12. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately games that have a limited number of activations will fail eventually. I have a driving game, my favourite of all time that I can no longer play without pirating (and only singleplayer) because the activation servers were turned off several years ago without any warning or notification.

    13. Re:Who cares? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone is arguing they have a right to DRM free games, just complaining loudly to EA about their product. Constructive criticism you might call it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright law says otherwise.

      In order to gain copyright protection in the first place the work must be released to the public at a later date for others to build upon. That is the price to pay for such protection.

      While we can't blame EA that "a later time" is no longer within their expected lifetime, the fact remains they clearly are not in any position to make good on their owed debt to the public, so the onus is on them to convince the public why we should also make good on it, both for this work and every work they publish in the future.

      Sorry, but if they don't want to pay the cost of copyright protection then that is on their heads.

         

    15. Re:Who cares? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      How do you vote with your wallet on a free game?

    16. Re:Who cares? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      There is no right to a game designed the way you would want to design it. Your right is to vote with your wallets. If the second companies instituted DRM everyone stopped buying their products, then companies would not see DRM as a valid business model.

      The question is, do you have an obligation to follow a corrupt law enacted solely to protect corporate interests?

      Copyright law, along with the Prohibition and the War on Drugs, are interesting case studies about the limits of law.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    17. Re:Who cares? by Drethon · · Score: 0

      Does the license agreement say it wont install SecuROM?

    18. Re:Who cares? by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      And if you really don't like DRM but want to play Sim City again, shell out 6 bucks and buy SimCity 2000 from GOG (http://www.gog.com/game/simcity_2000_special_edition). No DRM there...

    19. Re:Who cares? by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      Aww crap; showing my age here. I saw the discussion about Sim and EA, and thought Sim City. Oh well...

    20. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS!!! Also, if stores would remove those pesky anti theft devices from clothing that would be good too. And burgular alarms. I think all burgular alarms should come with warning beeps.
        And NSA too! NSA drones should drop leaflets over your house before bombing you.. oh, they do? Still, this is pushing it to far. EA is bad. And broccolli.

    21. Re:Who cares? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      There's probably some license thingy hidden away somewhere that mentions it in a vague fashion.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    22. Re:Who cares? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      There is no right to a game designed the way you would want to design it. Your right is to vote with your wallets.

      Until we decide that there is because we vote with our votes. For example the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act regulates how you can provide consumer warranties. If we wanted to ban certain DRM behaviors or even ban it entirely, we could do that. There's a difference between free market capitalism (equal opportunity for companies to provide competing products) and laissez-faire capitalism (companies can do anything and consumers will weed out bad behavior).

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    23. Re:Who cares? by devent · · Score: 1

      NO!

      The game designer have no right to take away my rights, and adding DRM is taking away my right of re-sale, fair-use and entering into public domain. Copyright is a compromise, we allow you to have a monopole on your software for a certain period of time so you can reclaim money lost on creating the software, inciting you to create software. But always under the premise that we have certain rights on the bought product. If you remove unilaterally my rights, why should I give you any rights back?

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    24. Re:Who cares? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Does the windows licence agreement say that Balmer won't throw a chair at you? Does that give him the automatic right to do it?

      Licence agreements are globally inclusive, not exclusive.

    25. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free as in speech, or free as in system crippling DRM?

    26. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You totally miss the point. It goes too far.

      The game is only how it gets on your system, but it's really spyware. Recording and sending all kinds of information to EA/Sony that have absolutely nothing to do with the game. If you think it's okay, then I need to point out that you agreed to send me all your money, deeds and titles to your property. You agreed to this when you read my message on this site... It's in the EULA.

      You also agreed to waive all of your rights to Privacy, Free Speech, Freedom of Religion, etc. etc. You did that when you got electricity into your home. It's in your current contract with your electrical provider.

      It's an ever expanding abuse, and simply not using something is not reasonable, especially when they don't tell you about it, and don't give all the details about what it does.

      Somebody that works at EA, and or Sony need to leak the information of exactly what is being collected and how it's being used.

    27. Re:Who cares? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The settlement terms of my lawsuit against EA included that they're supposed to inform UPFRONT of the SecuROM DRM.

      If they're no longer doing that, I've got standing to sue the fuck out of them again.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    28. Re:Who cares? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Not a bad mistake! Actually I might add that SimCity 4 is also available at GOG.

    29. Re:Who cares? by alexo · · Score: 1

      The settlement terms of my lawsuit against EA included that they're supposed to inform UPFRONT of the SecuROM DRM.

      If they're no longer doing that, I've got standing to sue the fuck out of them again.

      Please do so.

    30. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I sure am glad that hatred for DRM drove Valve right out of business after they released Half-Life 2.

    31. Re:Who cares? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      The license agreement with the federal, state and local governments say Balmer can't throw a chair at me. His parents signed that agreement when he was born (I'm presuming he is born american...).

    32. Re:Who cares? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      There is no right to a game designed the way you would want to design it.

      But there absolutely is a right to know the full details of the bargain. If EA isn't telling you that the game comes with OS-damaging (by definition) software, then they're not giving you the information required to make a considered decision.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    33. Re:Who cares? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Fallout 3 had SecuROM in it, and it was great. It only used the copy protection during installation, and after that point you could run it without the media, no need to hunt down no-dvd cracks. And no root kits, no background monitor processes, etc. I wish more games used this model.

    34. Re:Who cares? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to be clever or do you not understand how the legal system works at all?

    35. Re:Who cares? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Just did. Now do you have the balls to join the lawsuit or are you just a fag on the underside of the lawsuit?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    36. Re:Who cares? by ildon · · Score: 1

      Every copy of The Sims 2 sold in the past decade has included DRM. Explain to me why you would possibly believe that this one would not? As a hint, let me tell you that modifying the game to use Origin as its DRM system would take a lot of time and money, so that should be eliminated as a possible option immediately. As another hint: This is EA.

    37. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've yet to run into a Steam game that would not run in offline mode. I won't claim they don't exist, but all of the ones I own work fine. And before you ask, I have 112 Steam games from various publishers, not just Valve games.

  11. Well, it is EA, after all. by hooiberg · · Score: 1

    The past years have taught that releases by EA are not finished and not reliable. Because they keep selling software to customers, they get away with this, though. The only way to educate this company would be by wallet.

    1. Re:Well, it is EA, after all. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The only way to educate this company would be by wallet.

      How does that work with a free game?

    2. Re:Well, it is EA, after all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, whenever you can't even give something away, it usually does send a clear message that even idiots like EA can pick up on that they're doing something wrong. And besides, it's not free permanently. It's on a promotion. Is Coke allowed to ship whatever crap they want because they have something on sale or are they still held to standards of their non-sale versions?

  12. Is there an anti-virus type tool for this? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I have no way of knowing what DRM software is on my PC, with the exception of the three I explicitly agreed to (Kindle, audible, and Steam).

    I strongly suspect that other apps may have added unwanted crap but how do I find out?

    1. Re:Is there an anti-virus type tool for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who allows ANY form of DRM on their computer, you are a MONSTER and represent everything wrong with the computer industry. I bet you also use facebook, amazon, and paypal.

      Thanks for ruining computers and the internet for everyone!

    2. Re:Is there an anti-virus type tool for this? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yup, yup and yup. Also I use Windows, and Blu-ray discs.

  13. Didn't it include SecuROM in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was always under the impression that The Sims had heinous DRM underpinning it, and it was one of the most painful games to get running correctly.

    Just because they're giving it away free, why does this mean that they need to re-enigneer it out of it?

    1. Re:Didn't it include SecuROM in the first place? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      They don't need to re-engineer it out, but it serves no purpose any more. What's the point of having DRM to prevent piracy of something you're giving away for free? Given that Securerom is often a source of technical problems, and that removing it should be trivial for the company that developed the game and still has access to the source and pre-DRM build, there is no good reason for them not to do so - simply as a gesture of goodwill and convenience to their customers.

    2. Re:Didn't it include SecuROM in the first place? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm guessing you don't know the offer they're making. You can get The Sims 2 free if you enter a promotional code (which is only good for one week) when purchasing The Sims 2 in Origin. So the copy of the game is simultaneously available for $X and $0 depending on whether you enter that code. It doesn't make sense to re-engineer it out, when the same copy is being distributed to people using the code and people not using the code and the code will become invalid in August.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:Didn't it include SecuROM in the first place? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That makes more sense.

      It's still pointless though, because you can probably get it on every major torrent site.

  14. Whining about something they get for FREE by imthesponge · · Score: 0

    Typical.

    1. Re:Whining about something they get for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could understand if they were complaining about a rootkit in a pirated version, or even if EA just plainly said that this game will root your PC.
      Imagine if ubuntu started adding keyloggers to their distro. Would you still tell people to stop complaining because it's free?

    2. Re:Whining about something they get for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically ubuntu is a keylogger. Something has to record your keystrokes as you type or your keyboard wouldn't work. Every OS roots your PC or it wouldn't be operating your hardware.

    3. Re:Whining about something they get for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because Ubuntu sort of added a keylogger to their distro with the Dash shopping lens. And some people did indeed say that no one should complain, because it was their advertising strategy through which we paid for the otherwise free OS.

    4. Re:Whining about something they get for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty crusty analogy, bro. :D Just having a keyboard driver and an event interface does not define what we usually call a "keylogger".

    5. Re:Whining about something they get for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twenty years ago when computers were crusty and crashed all the time, I installed a keylogger on my own machine because the keylogger was more reliable than my word processor and I didn't have to worry about saving my work every five minutes. True story.

    6. Re: Whining about something they get for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't log the key events so it isn't a logger.

    7. Re:Whining about something they get for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you *wouldn't * whine if you installed this not knowing it used SecuROM (they don't tell you) and it broke your DVD/CD drive (as it does sometimes)? You consider it acceptable that it breaks your PC because its free?
      You are a colossal retard.

    8. Re:Whining about something they get for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, cool idea. :) I appreciate that one.

  15. Just enjoy the game by jones_supa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Other websites: Celebrating the free release of a classic game.

    Slashdot: Angry DRM rant.

    1. Re:Just enjoy the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not everyone will pull down and bend over whenever the corporation have something to (graciously) give you (for free). nothing wrong with naming and shaming bad companies. go ahead and enjoy the game though. because we know supporting EA is the moral choice, they never did underhanded stuff before. and deserve credit for finally releasing an (inferior) version of a game you could find DRM-free on warez-sites before torrents were invented...

    2. Re:Just enjoy the game by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Other websites: Celebrating the surrepitous distribution of DRM malware.

      Slashdot: Angry DRM malware rant.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Just enjoy the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, maybe we could make a new site celebrating all the new free malware everyone can have. woohoo!

    4. Re:Just enjoy the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this pro-corporate spam? Why the same comment twice under two different users?

    5. Re:Just enjoy the game by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      different comments by different users. sometimes they putin FTFY to point out something was changed.

    6. Re:Just enjoy the game by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Other websites: Oooh shiney!

      Slashdot: Er, this isn't shiny, it's shit with sugar on.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  16. Nobody likes EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nevermind SecuROM...

  17. I know it's cliche but... by Cantankerous+Cur · · Score: 1

    "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

    1. Re:I know it's cliche but... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, this is EA, assume malice, because EA are assholes who don't give a rats ass about their customers or what they do to them.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:I know it's cliche but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

      Another cliche:

      Never attribute to stupidity when it makes "mister stupid" some money.

    3. Re:I know it's cliche but... by edawstwin · · Score: 2

      No, EA cares a great deal about their customers - they couldn't stay in business without them. It's just that most of EA's customers don't give a rats ass about what EA does to them.

      --
      I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
  18. You cant spell Awesome with AE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I smell class action lawsuit!!

  19. Nude Patch by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Look, you can all argue over SecureROM, but I downloaded my free Sims 2 and I of course, am going to do what everyone else who isn't bitching is doing, Nude patches.

    https://www.google.com/#q=sims...

    There's a google link to get you all started. First 2 links they want you to pay, screw that.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  20. 'First hit is free' model by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

    Lets be real here, the only reason they're releasing this for free is because The Sims 4 is coming out in a few months. With EA, there's always another motive.

    Someone should write a limerick that highlights all the good game companies EA has killed or corporatized, it wouldn't be hard but it'd sure be lengthy. Oh how I miss the old Maxis.

    1. Re:'First hit is free' model by timrod · · Score: 1

      4chan's video games board has a growing image titled "Victims of EA" that's been circulating for quite a while. Off the top of my head:

      Bullfrog (Dungeon Keeper)
      Origin Systems
      Westwood (C&C)
      Visceral Games (Dead Space)
      Bioware
      Maxis
      DICE (Battlefield)

      There were more, I just don't remember them all.

  21. Re:Which Anti-Virus Suites detect that Trojan Hors by TheP4st · · Score: 3, Informative

    It can be removed but not without quite a bit of hassle. http://www.reclaimyourgame.com...

    --
    "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  22. DRM by ledow · · Score: 1

    In this day and age, I don't really care.

    I prefer Steam because, generally, programs don't put more DRM on than the default Steam stuff (which is non-intrusive, as far as I'm concerned).

    Origin, I can't stand the poorly-designed program that once downloaded something like 40Gb and took nearly a day to install one game, because every update was applied sequentially and every update updated every file, sometimes 9Gb per update.

    But the end-point DRM on the game? You either care what that is and Google it, or you don't. That it's on a "free" game or not, who cares? And Securom is a damn sight better than shite like Games for Windows Live.

    I can't say I've ever seen a machine "messed up" by Securom, certainly not one that can't be fixed by removing it (tricky though that may be).

    As far as I'm concerned, the average bit of freeware comes with crap worse than Securom bundled nowadays. Hell, have you tried stopping Google Update services being created every time you install Chrome or Google Earth? It's a nightmare that DOES affect things.

  23. Re:Which Anti-Virus Suites detect that Trojan Hors by TheP4st · · Score: 1

    Forgot to add that to date there is no known AV that remove it, probably as any AV publisher that did so would face a very costly lawsuit for defamation or similar. I Vaguely recall (and am too lazy tool look it up) AV publishers having faced suits like that in the past for classifying grey area software as malware.

    --
    "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  24. Re:Which Anti-Virus Suites detect that Trojan Hors by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    I hope there is a special place in hell reserved for every EA employee (yes, even the guys in the warehouse)--preferably one where Hannibal Lector runs the place and the rednecks from Deliverance are the guards.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  25. VMware Player by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    I have a VMs that runs windows xp and 98. They is specifically for old games that won't work on newer operating systems or have stuff like tages or securom. VMware player supports 3d passthrough so on a modern system those older games play perfectly without any frame drop.

    1. Re:VMware Player by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

      I have a VMs that runs windows xp and 98. They is specifically for old games that won't work on newer operating systems or have stuff like tages or securom. VMware player supports 3d passthrough so on a modern system those older games play perfectly without any frame drop.

      Jesus... they run. They are. Coffee hasn't kicked in yet :/

    2. Re:VMware Player by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Indeed it hasn't, because the correct corrections would have been to write "I have VMs that run..." and to capitalize Windows since it's a proper noun.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  26. Colorize by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Except that in the cases you cite, etymology supports the American spelling. There was no 'u' in "color" in Latin, and there was no 's' in the Greek root that became English "-ize". Oxford University Press uses "-ize".

    1. Re:Colorize by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      There aren't any "s" (how do you write the plural form of that? "s's" just looks stupid...) in any greek root, because the greek language (ancient or otherwise) didn't use the latin alphabet to begin with.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Colorize by tepples · · Score: 1

      You know what I meant: the letter in the Greek root that became "-ize" was zeta not sigma.

    3. Re:Colorize by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It's just "s'". As in "EA are a bunch of assholes and nobody wants the assholes' DRM."

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re:Colorize by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you. I knew the rule for "words ending in s" but failed to apply it in the case where the letters before s were NULL...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Colorize by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to write out the plural possessive of "asshole", so I should be thanking you!

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    6. Re:Colorize by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      Of course it looks stupid. Stupidity is required to use apostrophes as a form of pluralization.

    7. Re:Colorize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is no I in team, but there is an I in pie."
      - Shaun

  27. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't even care enough to pirate a clean copy of The SIMS.

  28. not interested by javajeff · · Score: 1

    I am not interested in that game for free. I am so glad I did not download it. I may be tempted if they offer that CnC collection.

  29. Slashdot is full of whiny entitled little fucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Film at 11.

  30. Fuck that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Sims 1?

    Sims 2 was atrocious. Killing people was far less satisfying in Sims 2.

  31. *elongated siiiiiiigh* by Maxus+Atom · · Score: 1

    Come on! I thought we won the DRM wars a long while ago. Most publishers/developers today aren't realizing that Steam is a great form of DRM that effectively keeps away pirates without punishing the user. You're also likely to sell more copies on Steam, what with it being a largest social gaming platform for the PC.

  32. EA Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess it's better than EA Origin's Battlefield 3 browser spyware?

  33. English from England ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only the English spell their language wrongly, they even pronounce it wrongly

    For example, the word "Prayer"

    In America that word is pronounced as "Pray"-er

    In England, that word is pronounced as "Praer"

    1. Re:English from England ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only the English spell their language wrongly, they even pronounce it wrongly

      Say "squirrel", then STFU.

  34. Average EA customer's take on the issue by idontgno · · Score: 2
    Homer Simpson has agreed to download this free software for Bart's birthday

    Electronic Arts: Take this software, but beware it carries a terrible DRM!

    Homer: Ooh, that's bad.

    Shopkeeper: But it comes with a free frogurt!

    Homer: That's good.

    Shopkeeper: The frogurt is also cursed.

    Homer: That's bad.

    Shopkeeper: But you get your choice of toppings.

    Homer: That's good!

    Shopkeeper: The toppings contain potassium benzoate.

    [Homer looks puzzled]

    Shopkeeper: ...That's bad.

    Homer: Can I go now?

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  35. Software freedom is worth caring about by jbn-o · · Score: 2

    People who care about controlling their computers care, as should all computer users care. This is another instance in a long line of great learning opportunities to distinguish between 'free as in price' and 'free as in freedom'—software proprietors get away with malware because how the software works is kept secret from its users. TFA tells us that Electronic Arts didn't tell prospective users SecuROM was a part of the gratis Sims 2 install, probably because EA knew users wouldn't install Sims 2 if they knew it came with SecuROM. Proprietors abuse the trust users have placed in them and it's time to teach users how things actually work, not encourage dismissal that hands users over to the abusers ("who cares").

    1. Re:Software freedom is worth caring about by ildon · · Score: 1

      The Sims 2 has always used SecuROM since its release in 2004. This wasn't some "surprise." They just failed to remove it for the Origin version, and judging by the hacks and workarounds some people have had to use to get it to run on Windows 7/8 or at a 16:9 resolution, I'm sure they did absolutely no work to update or modify the Origin version. That's why it has SecuROM. Not as some backdoor to install it. It's not some secret. They're just not wasting time modifying something and then having to do new quality assurance on it to give away a free gift as a short term promotion to get people excited for The Sims 4 (which, by the way, will also have some form of DRM, I guarantee you).

      And as I said in my original post, if you really are not willing to trade away a tiny amount of freedom for the right to play a video game, you're also highly unlikely to install Origin in the first place (which is an always-only DRM system), and won't have access to this deal to begin with.

    2. Re:Software freedom is worth caring about by ildon · · Score: 1

      always-only DRM

      "Always-online DRM", I meant to say.

  36. C&C3:KW used SecureROM ... by antdude · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/search?q...

    My Windows XP Pro SP3's Windows Explorer kept crashing because of SecureROM that was from C&C3:KW addon. It took me a while to figure out why.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  37. Jokes on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've not bothered putting optical drives in any of my computers for about five years now.

    I do have an external drive I used to extract audio data from unusual disks I find at flea markets and used media sellers but I only need one.

  38. Re:Which Anti-Virus Suites detect that Trojan Hors by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Remember the Sony rootkit? AV didn't detect that either, and the AV vendors are paid by the customer and not by Sony. Goddam traitors.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  39. CFAA anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this not a violation of the CFAA?

  40. So people don't steal free software? by doccus · · Score: 1

    Giving copies away.. and still has antipiracy software that registers as malware to AV apps.. Hmm free software bundled with malware? That sounds more like one of those seedy pxrn apps .. I thought this was made illegal years ago.