Slashdot Mirror


Putin To Discuss Plans For Disconnecting Russia From the Internet

New submitter GlowingCat writes: Russian President Vladimir Putin and several high-ranking officials will discuss the security of the Russian segment of the Internet at the meeting of the Russian Security Council next week. According to various reports, the officials will make a number of decisions about regulating the use of the Internet in Russia. This includes the ability to cut off the Russian Internet, known as Runet, from the outside world, in case of emergency.

128 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. Dibs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I call dibs on their IP blocks!

  2. "Emergency" by halivar · · Score: 1, Troll

    In the case of Russia, the ability to obtain non-vetted or embarrassing information (like invading Ukraine) constitutes an emergency.

    1. Re:"Emergency" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      US Communications Act of 1934
      “Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations within the jurisdiction of the United States”

      Then, of course, there is Standard Operating Procedure 303

    2. Re: "Emergency" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When they came for the flashlights, I was silent...

    3. Re:"Emergency" by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      "devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations"

      Does this mean they'll confiscate the alternator on my car? And what about my brain?!

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    4. Re: "Emergency" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then, they took our sun.

    5. Re: "Emergency" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bind them?

    6. Re:"Emergency" by Dishevel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not if it is incandescent.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    7. Re:"Emergency" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So... Russia Today has "reliable" news about the US government's supposed legal authority to shut down the Internet... and it gets posted in a thread about Russia trying to shut down the Internet.

      Where to start... hmm...

      First of all, the 1934 act was superceded by the 1996 act, which basically said "everything from 1934, but with a bunch of modernization and policy changes". So quoting from the 1934 act, while probably technically correct, doesn't mean much. I'd also bet good money that that wording about "devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations" has been amended to include specific types of frequency ranges, device types, or purposes. Otherwise, a crackdown is going to cause problems for anyone in possession of human skin. (Yes, we really glow in the dark. Just not very brightly.) Also, fire, magnets (and thus the Earth itself), and just about everything else in the known universe and beyond. Big fat "good luck with that".

      Second of all, you linked to Russia Today in an article thread about how Russia is mulling a crackdown on the Internet. This paints you in a bad light for anyone that isn't paying you to post astroturf like that. And if you're not paid (thus it's not astroturf), then you're a damned fool for giving people that impression.

    8. Re:"Emergency" by MightyYar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think "Russia is acting like it is 1934" is fairly accurate.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:"Emergency" by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      So instead of attacking the message, or even the popular attack the messenger, you are attacking the envelope the message was in.

      Now that I think about it, brilliant!. But I'm not sure it is as effective as you might think.

    10. Re:"Emergency" by obreiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. All countries have regulations and laws in order to control cirtually EVERYTHING during a war. From a curfew to kill people or modify laws.
      Russia would not be different. This is not news

    11. Re:"Emergency" by s.petry · · Score: 1

      No need for all this, they already accomplished the goal without ever declaring an emergency. It took about 20 years to accomplish simply by deregulation and allowing 3 people to monopolize all of the companies with FCC licenses.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  3. PLEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please disconnect .RU from the internet. Spam and hacking down %25 in one whack

    1. Re:PLEASE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      I second this motion! My websites had 200,000+ attacks in the past year. Most were brute force effort to guess the passwords for the admin accounts. I spent a week going through the log files, removing extra and/or suspicious files, renaming the default admin accounts, using stronger passwords, and setting up special .htaccess files. PITA!

    2. Re:PLEASE! by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      not to mention the instant increase in quality of the League of Legends community.

    3. Re:PLEASE! by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      But... but... but... where will I get all my Viagra spam from if he does this?

    4. Re:PLEASE! by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Yes please disconnect yourselves or we can do it for you! Where's my cable cutters?

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    5. Re:PLEASE! by jmd · · Score: 1

      What are you waiting for?

    6. Re:PLEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, in my experience, it's pretty much far too high.

      ~80% of brute force attacks against SSH and curious attempts at hitting my Postfix servers come from China.

      Russia's somewhere in the other 20%, of course, but not really standing clear above the US (fuck you, AWS), Georgia (the country, not the state), India, and various eastern European nations.

    7. Re:PLEASE! by mlts · · Score: 2

      I'm around the same. The attacks come from where there are unsecured IPs, not where the bad guys live. For a while, IP ranges which consisted of DSL or cable modem clients were on the top of the attack source list. On average, nations coming up to speed tend to have average people who are not up to speed on security. This is why in China, malware from pirated app stores is a major problem while it is relatively rare in the US and Western Europe.

      Of course, it can't hurt to block by IP ranges in the first place (and do the blocks on multiple layers [1] on public facing boxes like Web servers), just to narrow the scope of what is hitting the machine.

      [1]: The firewall, the application, and the OS. That way, if something glitched and the firewall got opened to the world, the servers will still be protected by their own innate IP stack filters.

    8. Re:PLEASE! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Most of my SSH attempts come from Brazil

    9. Re:PLEASE! by s.petry · · Score: 1

      If you are receiving that many brute force attacks and having to manually change admin information, you are doing the Internet wrong!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    10. Re:PLEASE! by s.petry · · Score: 1

      You can easily block all mail from .ru sites. Please (re?)read your MTA documentation. I have not done so for a very long time, but in the 90s did so. In fact I used to block .tw, .ko., .cn, and any other foreign country that sent me Spam. Management was not very happy about it when they finally figured it out, but we had very little spam for those two glorious years...

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    11. Re:PLEASE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      I wasn't aware that I had a problem until my Joomla and Wordpress websites became unstable several months ago. The webhosting company claimed that the problem wasn't on their end. So I had to investigate what was going on. Low and behold, I found log files with all the failed login attempts. The various security hardening guides recommended changing the name of the default admin accounts and using strong passwords. That alone reduced the number of attacks by half since the hackers will have to guess both the admin account name and the password.

    12. Re:PLEASE! by qpqp · · Score: 2

      I wasn't aware that I had a problem until my Joomla and Wordpress websites became unstable several months ago.

      What? You were not aware that Joomla and Wordpress are being cracked wide open on a regular basis?
      It's almost the same as:

      U: "Hi, I am running windows."
      A: "And?"
      U: "I have a problem..."
      A: "You already said that."

    13. Re:PLEASE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I ran my Joomla/Wordpress websites for over five years without problems. When both types of websites became unstable at the same time several months ago, I complained to the web hosting company. Not surprisingly, they denied that the problem was on their end. That's when I took EXTRA steps to harden my websites against hackers.

    14. Re:PLEASE! by qpqp · · Score: 1

      Check out wpscan.

  4. Imagine how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... every multiplayer game experience would improve overnight if they did this.
    Captcha: Repress

  5. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Internet disconnects YOU!

  6. Please go ahead and di it Mr. Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He would be doing the world a favor by removing a very large number of hackers, phishers and virus kiddies from the net.

    Please cut them off as soon as possible!!

    1. Re:Please go ahead and di it Mr. Putin by fisted · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This being modded +5 Insightful is truly pathetic.

  7. In Soviet times by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    they would've simply set up their own version of the internet, the Cosmonet. All of the iron curtain countries would be connected.

    Gosh I miss the old days.

    1. Re:In Soviet times by biptoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who would want to do Cosplay of a French Impressionist artist?

    2. Re:In Soviet times by MaryAnnEvans · · Score: 1

      In the old days the Soviets would have done it first, followed by America.

      (Russua had the first artificial satellite, first animal in space, first human in space, first woman in space, first multi-person space craft, first spacewalk, first to the moon, first rover on the moon etc. It wasn't until the first manned moon landing that America caught up.)

    3. Re:In Soviet times by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      The Iron Curtain countries have moved on. Some of the Soviet Socialist Republics have moved on as well, some have not and one (in particular) moved on but was then dragged back.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  8. Bye-bye, ZheZhe by andywest · · Score: 1

    If this ever comes about, it would being about the hobbling of LiveJournal. Sure, its servers are in the States, but its management is in Moscow, and (if the Russian State does sever its connection to the Internet) unable to reach them.

    --
    --- Andy West http://andywest.org
  9. OH NOES! by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 5, Funny

    But...how could we cope without all the botnet controllers, spam gateways, compromised .ru servers, and all the other wonderful users coming out of Russia? I agree that this could be very interesting if he did this; we could see the real impact of Russia's criminal internet community. The net might work better for awhile without .ru

    1. Re:OH NOES! by LifesABeach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would the Russian Mafia take this loss of income personally?

    2. Re:OH NOES! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Well - when they figure out that the income channels that the internet provides suddenly stops they will probably take action.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  10. oh noes by watcher-rv4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No more car crash videos =/

    1. Re:oh noes by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2

      haha yeah, that's the one thing we'll miss if Russia goes offline.

  11. Dota by nicholas.allevato · · Score: 1

    At least there won't be as many Russians on Dota 2.

    1. Re:Dota by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      A Russian Internet disconnection would seriously alter the power balance/politics in EVE Online too...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:Dota by aralin · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that most of the EU Warcraft servers won't be able to put together a decent raid guild anymore.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  12. The US already had this power for a long time by aristotle-dude · · Score: 3, Informative

    They control all of the root traffic across the internet so they could not only shut down the entire internet but close off the US portion of the internet anytime they wanted. In fact, I believe there was a similar story about Obama wanting to be sure that he could "shutdown" the internet in an emergency.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:The US already had this power for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except they don't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_name_server

      Not all root servers are in the US. Not all root servers are controlled by US companies/government agencies. And there is nothing preventing a cut of potion of the Internet/group of ISPs to route any or all of the these IPs to their own DNS servers.

    2. Re:The US already had this power for a long time by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

      Except they don't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      Not all root servers are in the US. Not all root servers are controlled by US companies/government agencies. And there is nothing preventing a cut of potion of the Internet/group of ISPs to route any or all of the these IPs to their own DNS servers.

      The still control the majority of the routing. They can cripple the internet any time they want and they can get their loyal partners in europe to follow suit.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    3. Re:The US already had this power for a long time by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except they don't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      Not all root servers are in the US. Not all root servers are controlled by US companies/government agencies. And there is nothing preventing a cut of potion of the Internet/group of ISPs to route any or all of the these IPs to their own DNS servers.

      The still control the majority of the routing. They can cripple the internet any time they want and they can get their loyal partners in europe to follow suit.

      This is the kind of control that exists by consensus though.

      The reason that half of Europe and Asia go along with the US, is that at some level most US policies around things like the Internet tend to make sense. I don't care for the intrusive surveillance, but when you look at it at a national level the US comes along, installs a bunch of gear, and likely shares all the data obtained from it with the country that gave them access (I doubt they give them access to everything internationally, but I wouldn't be surprised if a small country could get more data on what is on their own networks by collaborating with the US than trying to do it themselves, and for the most part their interests are aligned with the US on the sort of stuff they'd be looking for anyway).

      The US can't just arbitrarily enact some kind of lasting blockade on the internet, because they wouldn't have the support on the ground to do that.

      Now, the US could exercise control over data travelling through undersea cables that cross its territories, and when it comes to the Pacific I wouldn't be surprised if there are a lot of those (as a result of WWII). Land routes from Europe to Asia, however, are probably fairly free from US direct control.

    4. Re:The US already had this power for a long time by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      They control all of the root traffic across the internet so they could not only shut down the entire internet

      This is a silly concept. I mean "the internet" is a bunch of lines (I know some are wireless) that connect in some way. And in this way, each country has their own internet, and they, so far, all agree to connect their figurative LAN to the figurative WAN. If the U.S. decided to cut off it's connection to the rest of the world, that wouldn't stop France from still communicating with Africa, or any other country besides the U.S. I'm not sure that is true for Canada, and/or Mexico (even all of South America), they may be routed through the US to the rest of the world. Seeing that google has servers world-wide, this probably wouldn't be such a problem for other countries if the U.S. did cut itself off.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    5. Re:The US already had this power for a long time by mlts · · Score: 1

      Possible but unlikely. The main reason why SOPA and PIPA were not passed wasn't the protests and website shutdowns, but the fact that Russia and China made it firm that cutting their websites from the Internet would be viewed as the same thing as a naval blockade... an act of war. With Congress afraid of their own shadow, it is no wonder why they backed down, saying it was the will of the people.

      No way the entire Internet will be shut down by the US. First thing that will happen is that the UN would get handed ICANN's responsibilities, and the Internet would be up... but under new management.

      Second thing is that no US Congressperson would allow it to happen. They get too much money directly from foreign donors, or indirectly companies made rich by foreign trade, which would be shut down in a trade war almost immediately.

      I can see SIPRNet or NIPRNet having a master switch that shuts all core nodes of those down, but the Internet? Extremely unlikely. There is just too much big money that relies on the Internet, and if they can afford billions of dollars of computers for HFT, they can afford to get a President impeached who might even think of harming their business model.

    6. Re:The US already had this power for a long time by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      So this planning by Russia is a logical move. How to selectively cut off foreign regional areas from local national internet, whilst maintaining local national internet and select international connections. This is something that every country capable of doing so should do so. The internet is an essential part of modern communications infrastructure and method should be established to ensure the local national infrastructure continues to operate regardless of government or corporate machinations in foreign countries. Same with network security functions, there should be a clear distinction in managing security operations between local national operations and foreign operations and inherently foreign operations can never be trusted as proven of course by the US government and the NSA.

      Management of essential national infrastructure should always be by a locally elected government and not left to foreign powers whether they be government or even worse corporate. This is just all part of the internet becoming 'essential' infrastructure and not being left to psychopathic corporate interests or foreign manipulations, quite simply all a part of ensuring local national net neutrality.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:The US already had this power for a long time by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Not all root servers are in the US. Not all root servers are controlled by US companies/government agencies.

      You're being naive. As we saw from the leaks last year, if the *hardware* is American, then it's controlled by the US govt. The NSA forces US companies to include hardware modifications into the products they sell, to enable spying and control even through an airgap.

      So yeah, maybe that root server isn't physically in the US, but it's obviously critical strategic infrastructure, and you can assume that the US has hidden controls inside some of the chips to help take over the network if they want to.

  13. boondock saints... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    as soon as i heard this I thought of that geenie joke from the boondock saints...
    ...IT guy goes, "You mean to tell me Russia is off the Internet?"
        Genie goes, "Yeah."
        He says, "Well, um, I'll have a Coke, then."

    1. Re:boondock saints... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      are you sure that's not not The Boondocks, not the boondock Saints?

    2. Re:boondock saints... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      it's more of a couldn't remember due to haven't watched it in a while

  14. Why don't we help him out? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    And disconnect them from this end? If he doesn't want us, why should we offer ourselves up to him?

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  15. In case of emergency by anmre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In case of emergency

    Emergency for Putin or Russian citizens? I can't think of any possible scenario which can be called an emergency where I personally would benefit from having _less_ information.

    I'm disgusted that people like Putin are actually of the same species as myself.

    1. Re:In case of emergency by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can you think of a scenario which can be called an emergency where you would benefit from protection from malicious misinformation?

      Think hard.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:In case of emergency by neoritter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In case of war. Cut access to the internet and cyber attacks from enemy nations becomes harder.

    3. Re:In case of emergency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm disgusted that people like Putin are actually of the same species as myself.

      How do you feel about this?

    4. Re:In case of emergency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they become unnecessary. The purpose of a cyberattack is to disrupt communications, so disrupting them yourself just gives the enemy what they want at no cost to them.

    5. Re:In case of emergency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your sarcasm makes your message unintelligible.

    6. Re:In case of emergency by anmre · · Score: 1

      Define "malicious misinformation" and perhaps I can. You appear to have used some kind of circular logic to prove a point which you failed to make in the first place.

      Think hard indeed.

    7. Re:In case of emergency by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      You're right, but with the NSA snooping on everyone, it could be a good idea, even if just to cut out that snooping. The NSA basically destroyed the concept of LAN/WAN. If all you can do to guard your country from spying is to cut them off from the "snoop-wire" then you should prepare to do just that. I'm not defending Putin, but he does have a job to do for his country.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    8. Re:In case of emergency by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can you think of a scenario which can be called an emergency where you would benefit from protection from malicious misinformation?

      Think hard.

      No.

      I can think of situations where providing accurate information from a more trusted source would protect me from "misinformation," but I can't think of any emergency or security situation where I would benefit from being cut off from [alleged] misinformation.

      Just because people disagree with you, doesn't mean they didn't think "hard" enough. I always wonder though, what sort of people think that thinking is like lifting weights, where you can do it "harder." I mean, an intelligent person just thinks. It just happens. Trying to think "harder" means being distracted by some goal, and that doesn't improve the thinking process. If I think about the most difficult chess tournaments I competed in, my best wins against stronger opponents, I wasn't thinking "harder." I was thinking more easily.

    9. Re:In case of emergency by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      My advice to you is to read the links before posting them. They do not describe anything like what Russia is proposing.

      I only clicked the "you" link. First I'd like to thank you for noticing the similarity between myself and President Obama, though I am not actually Mr. Obama.

      Second, I'd like to point out that these are very different situations. The power that the Senate Committee voted to give to the President is the power to order companies to shut down networks during cyber-attacks capable of causing massive damage or loss of life . There is not some nebulous "emergency" where he can do this; only during narrowly defined situations that threaten to damage the infrastructure being shut down, or threatening loss of life. So for example, if somebody cracks into a nuclear power plant and is causing it to overload, the President can order whatever ISP the power plant is connected through to unplug. Then everybody can slow down and think about, OK, which connections do we really need to shut down, and which can we turn back on? It wouldn't be a blanket "internet kill switch," it would be orders to individual companies whose networks are under attack. And the attacks would have to be stronger than any cyber-attack except for Stuxnet.

      So in short, get a clue, and if you're linking to things that are totally different than what is discussed, try making and defending an actual point. Because those links don't speak to this issue.

    10. Re:In case of emergency by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      You're so caught up in your desire to defend your ridiculous "free expression" ideology that you won't acknowledge that facts exist, or that lies exist. There's a huge blind spot that you can't see past because you've decided that your ideology is beyond critical examination.

      That pedantic crap about "thinking hard" just reinforces that for all your cleverness, you're just another idiot who has been crippled by his preconceptions.

      You should probably stick to the contrived world of the chessboard and leave the real world problems to others.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    11. Re:In case of emergency by reikae · · Score: 1

      I'd like to leave any and all real world problems to others too. Any takers?

    12. Re:In case of emergency by anmre · · Score: 1

      acknowledge that facts exist, or that lies exist

      critical examination

      And how exactly does one critically examine facts and/or lies when the access to that information (the internet) has been cut off?

      you're just another idiot who has been crippled by his preconceptions

      So says the person who pulled the words "malicious misinformation" straight out of his ass.

    13. Re:In case of emergency by anmre · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is how come there isn't any discussion of shutting down the NSA et.al. itself (if we can agree that it is acting beyond the scope of its purview) before giving the Feds the power to kill free expression in the name of preventing terrorism or spying or whatever.

      Personally, I'm far less afraid of some other nation's government "spying" on me than I am of my own government deciding that the First Amendment is no longer applicable due to said spying. We'd all be undoubtedly safer in prison cells too, but I think most would agree that we don't want to give the government the power to arbitrarily lock us up for our own "protection". I realize that's a bit hyperbolic, but then again, in today's world, being cut off from the internet would bring an awful lot of hardship.

  16. bitcoin by dmbasso · · Score: 1

    What happens to the block chain if the network is split, as in this case?

    --
    `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    1. Re:bitcoin by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      People who thought a virtual item could be unique and valuable find out the hard way what anyone with common sense knew all along?

    2. Re:bitcoin by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Double spends for anyone who can connect to both sides of the network. Essentially, there will be two ledgers, an International ledger and a Russian one. If you spend on the Russian ledger, the International ledger will still have your money. When the network rejoins, whatever ledger has the most hashing power behind it will be chosen as the correct one, and all the transactions from the other one will be retried on the new global ledger. If the network saw a new transaction spending a previous transaction's outputs, it would be rejected, as well as any spends referencing that transaction, and so on.

      Thank you, that's exactly what I wanted to know.

      This happened already.

      I guess I've missed the news, any links for my lazy ass?

      Bitcoin sounds like a nice investment for dictators willing to further screw their populaces.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    3. Re:bitcoin by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Others can grab the IPv4 addresses that Russia is using today. Of course - Russia can start using the rest of the IP addresses that the world uses too.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:bitcoin by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      That or they take the USB key carrying their wallet with them to a visit outside the country.

    5. Re:bitcoin by doublebackslash · · Score: 1

      The answer is different in theory than it is in reality, but lets start with the theory first.

      The network ca never practically be slit perfectly evenly, even if it is as more computing power is added to the problem one side will "win out" and the blockchain, by definition, is officially the longest (most complex) chain yet mined. So eventually the losing side would be undone, as if it never happened (within the scope of the blockchain... goods or services would still have been exchanged).

      That assumes that all of the nodes are independent and operating following a basic set of rules and weren't rational beings. What would happen in reality is that the largest mining pools would panic very quickly. Likely they would suspend mining operations in some fashion, likely keeping the workers "busy" with bogus information and throwing away the work. What this would do is drop the hashrate of the network. Assuming coordination (or at least rational action) among the vast majority of the mining effort once the split was resolved (say a treaty was signed) the major operations would resume normal operations.
      In their absence the chain would, at first, flounder, not mining any new blocks until the difficulty was re-adjusted for the now lowered hashrate. Once they came back online in a coordinated way blocks would be mined very quickly, potentially fragmenting the network until, again, the hashrate was adjusted back up. At this point the algorthim takes over and the chain with the most amount of work would win and all the other chains would disapear. This would be very controlled, however, and since the largest pools would be in a position to advertise the split and warn people very little would be lost in terms of bitcoin transactions disappearing. Mostly it would damage the reputation of bitcoin.

      A slightly alternative scenario to this is that the pools suspend operations only long enough to determine who is on the larger side of the split, then resume. This would be nearly seamless to everyone on the winning side and hardly harm the reputation of bitcoin since it, along with many other services, could point to the great Internet split and blame that unfathomable one time event.

      --
      md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
      d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
  17. Go ahead, turn it off! See if I care! by Narcocide · · Score: 2

    While I'd love to imagine the hilarity that would ensue if Russia were to attempt to completely disconnect the internet in order to run their own entirely isolated private one, I doubt this is in reality what would happen. Even if they managed to keep most or all of their population from getting traffic from international social/news networks in, I have the sneaking suspicion that somehow the SPAM would still find its way out.

  18. PLEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    25? I guess you're falling short there.

  19. Not New by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    We have talked about this before for the US.

  20. Cut Russia off in an 'Emergency' by quietwalker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looking out there at other countries use of this sort of power, the only thing it's ever been used for is to crush political opposition including peaceful protests, and to hide government abuse at the time it's happening.

    1. Re:Cut Russia off in an 'Emergency' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe you haven't noticed that Russia has effectively been on the receiving end of a relentless propaganda campaign over the past few years? Most Russians can read English. How many Westerners can read Cyrillic, much less Russian?

      Case in point, how many got up in arms over the so-called Russian "Anti-Gay law"? Now how many actually read the legislation in question? Of those who read the legislation, how many still oppose it?

      If something so intentionally vague as to be unenforceable, expressly targetting Hollywood, and as trivial to bypass as slapping the Russian equivalent of an NC-17 sticker on a flyer is being misrepresented as full-scale fascism, does it not stand to reason that more serious matters are being warped as well?

      In any case, it's most likely a means to resist misinformation and cyber attacks.

  21. Re:Sure why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you're confusing VPN (virtual private network) with VMN (virtual magical network). The difference is one requires a connection to the internet outside russia to work, the other is magic.

  22. Ah... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    So I guess Russias enemies have never had the idea to simply have compromised servers/equipment inside the Russian border... Oh No! I just gave it away! Russia's doomed!

  23. Re:Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's your retarted, idiot.

  24. Russian software by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    I sure am happy that I stopped using the Agnitum Outpost firewall on my PCs a few months back. I didn't like having Russian-developed software in such a critical spot on my PCs, especially with Mr. Putin's irrational sabre-rattling. Now, with the possibility of Russia being taken off the internet, my decision looks even better.

  25. Re:Go ahead, turn it off! See if I care! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    China more or less manages that, only they still allow limited access to the outside. You'd be surprised what an entire nation can do, if it puts it mind to it.

  26. eternal June by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From chernenko@kremvax.UUCP Sun Apr 1 15:02:52 1984
    Relay-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site mcvax.UUCP
    Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 4/1/84 (SU840401); site kremvax.UUCP
    Path: mcvax!moskvax!kremvax!chernenko
    From: chernenko@kremvax.UUCP
    Newsgroups: net.general,eunet.general,net.politics,eunet.politics
    Subject: USSR on Usenet
    Message-ID:
    Date: Sun, 1-Apr-84 15:02:52 GMT
    Article-I.D.: kremvax.0001
    Posted: Sun Apr 1 15:02:52 1984
    Date-Received: Mon, 1-Apr-84 12:26:02 GMT
    Organization: MIIA, Moscow
    Lines: 41



    Well, today, 840401, this is at last the Socialist Union of Soviet Republics joining the Usenet network and saying hallo to everybody.

    One reason for us to join this network has been to have a means of having an open discussion forum with the American and European people and making clear to them our strong efforts towards attaining peaceful coexistence between the people of the Soviet Union and those of the United States and Europe.

    We have been informed that on this network many people have given strong anti-Russian opinions, but we believe they have been misguided by their leaders, especially the American administration, who is seeking for war and domination of the world. By well informing those people from our side we hope to have a possibility to make clear to them our intentions and ideas.

    Some of those in the Western world, who believe in the truth of what we say have made possible our entry on this network; to them we are very grateful. We hereby invite you to freely give your comments and opinions.

    Here are the data for our backbone site:

    Name: moskvax
    Organization: Moscow Institute for International Affairs
    Contact: K. Chernenko
    Phone: +7 095 840401
    Postal-Address: Moscow, Soviet Union
    Electronic-Address: mcvax!moskvax!kremvax!chernenko
    News: mcvax kremvax kgbvax
    Mail: mcvax kremvax kgbvax

    And now, let's open a flask of Vodka and have a drink on our entry on this network. So:

    NA ZDAROVJE!

    -- K. Chernenko, Moscow, USSR
    ...{decvax,philabs}!mcvax!moskvax!kremvax!chernenko

    1. Re:eternal June by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remember, McCain has clearly stated that he knows how to recognize a moderate Syrian rebel from a terrorist, even though he can't distinguish a crazy person from a reasonable vice presidential choice.

    2. Re:eternal June by mmmw · · Score: 1

      I *so* remember that message. kremvax!chernenko Maybe the first piece of spam ever. Certainly the first one to get such wide-spread circulation. I remember a bunch of us geeks sitting around and figuring out how it had been done. Hard to believe it has been 30 years. ....

    3. Re:eternal June by metaforest · · Score: 1

      Erm, this was posted on April 1st... and the phone number has 840401 as the last 6 digits....denoting april 1st, and it also appears in the Posting-Version in two formats.

      Nice one AC.

  27. it has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    this is the trend that will ultimately spread and collapse the internet by 2020. the NSA will be cited as the number one reason why global trust ultimately failed. The next internet will be forged by china and russia alliance and will be unreachable from this side of the planet.

  28. Re:Sure why not by dugancent · · Score: 1

    VPN doesn't work when you physically disconnect.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  29. Re:Sure why not by Minwee · · Score: 1

    The other uses satellites, which are still insufficiently advanced to be called magic.

  30. In case of emergency... by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... like the Russian populace becoming too educated to put up with him any more.

  31. "Obama has a cutoff switch!" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    "I want one too!" - Putin

    Hey, anyone think these world leaders got the sudden urge to have these things after seeing the first episode of Black Mirror? XD

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  32. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations"

    Does this mean they'll confiscate the alternator on my car? And what about my brain?!

    No, it means they "can" not that they 'will".

    They're unlikely to expend the effort only capable of broadcasting gibberish or noise so both your alternator and brain are probably safe.

  33. Yeah, so what if it's the 80s again.... by Joviex · · Score: 1

    In (Soviet) Russia, you don't surf Internet, Internet sErfs? you?

  34. Re:Yikes by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nope, it most certainly is not.
    All I can see here is the Soviet Union rising again. I grew up around the fringes (outside) and somehow it seems worse this time around.
    Want a laugh? The Scottish Referendum and the Soviet observers are mouthing off that the whole affair was not "free and fair", that it had been manipulated.

    This Vlad is sick of this garbage. Oh, and I was in the Ukraine a couple of months back. They have a right-wing lunatic fringe running at around 5% but most of them do not deserve this crud.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  35. What could possibly go wrong by gnu-sucks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People forget how much we depend on the internet for basic things. (Writing from a USA perspective).

    Without the internet, suddenly all the Cisco phones can't check in daily. The windows computers freeze up during windows update (imagine if he flips the switch *during* an update), cash registers can't authenticate credit cards, most iPhone apps fail (maps!)...

    Is Russia as internet-dependent as we are?

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong by reikae · · Score: 1

      Fart apps and Windows updates could fail?! NOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong by ChrisAshcroft · · Score: 1

      "imagine if he flips the switch *during* an update)" Actually windows updates you can easily shut off a computer during an update and it has built-in safeguards that are probably some of the best of all OS's... To the point that they probably go a bit too far and in turn end up causing your windows updates to take a much longer time when compared to other OS's updates. If you want to speed up your update process before you have a whole bunch of windows updates to be ran(for example on a new install), just simply disable the windows system restore feature, and that should really speed it up.

    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong by Tom · · Score: 1

      Is Russia as internet-dependent as we are?

      Russia is independent of the USA part of the Internet to a degree you can hardly imagine. They have their own Facebook (vk), their own Google (yandex), two DNS root-server anycast instances, and even for credit cards they'll not be very sorry as Russians prefer debit cards from their own banks over Master/VISA credit cards.

      Sure it'd be noticeable and some stuff would stop working, but it is certainly feasable.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    4. Re:What could possibly go wrong by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re: "Sure it'd be noticeable and some stuff would stop working, but it is certainly feasable."
      Russia knows most of its spending on Western tech was useful but the reality of phone home or back doors, trap doors, poor quality crypto or other access cannot be totally understood network wide.
      The ability to turn the net off to bulk external chatter would be a safe option for Russia to have fully explored over time. Russia can then just let its air gapped internal networks function and Russians would understand the reason why.
      Academic, science and other larger institutions would be fine on wide national local networks. Domestic phones would work. Russian language sites would show when connecting to any local isp.
      The US could think of it in terms of the quality built into the older POTS networks from the 1950-1980's per building, city, regional site, workers kept on site and expensive voice and data redundancy.
      Chinese backed credit card products will also help.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  36. Sounds like a plan! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    I'm already blocking *.ru and entire IP blocks assigned to russia at the firewall.

    If they want to have their own internet with hookers and blackjack... have at it!

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  37. I've seen the preliminary network architecture. by idontgno · · Score: 1

    Their DNS root and primary router will be KREMVAX.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  38. Re:Great... by 228e2 · · Score: 1

    Greetings, Friend!

    I am ZMundo, Prince of the 52 States of Nigeria! I have an expiring inheritance I would like to share with you if you will provide me with your credit card information!

    --
    Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
  39. Cool! by X10 · · Score: 1

    A lot of the child pornography we see comes from servers in Russia. Most of the spam we get comes from servers in Russia. Now, wouldn't it be nice if Russia cuts itself off the internet?

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  40. What would we lose if... by kylemonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... we just disconnected Russia from the Internet right now?

  41. Re:So they want to be like North Korea by zeroryoko1974 · · Score: 1

    They are getting more like China and N. Korea by the day

  42. Just like Texas by ka9dgx · · Score: 2

    The Republic of Texas has its own power grid. I've heard rumors in the distance past that they have the ability to isolate their phone lines. I see no reason to doubt that they kept up with the times when it comes to the Internet.

    Of course... it's just a rumor.

    1. Re:Just like Texas by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
      Given a choice between having Russia cut off the internet and the Republic of Texas doing the same thing, I wouldn't have much trouble saying that Texas should go.

      For some of us, both seem to be places where demagogs whip up political frenzy to manipulate the masses, mindless violence becomes normal (hello open carry), citizens loose their rights (reproductive rights, for one) and oligarchs warp the system to grab even more power and money (home of the Bushes). Then there's the macho culture, cult of alcohol and fusing of church and state.

      Until I wrote this I had no inkling just how much Russia and Texas had in common. Thanks, Slashdot!

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
  43. Re: by mysidia · · Score: 1

    No, it means they "can" not that they 'will".

    No... it means they say they can. They cannot legally confiscate property without due process contrary to the 5th amendment.

  44. Re: EVE Online by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 1

    Most Russians that I see on EVE Online are mining and PVE bots. I think the economy will be just fine.

    --
    Buck Feta. You know what to do.
  45. Disconnecting by reg · · Score: 1

    Well, that would runet...

  46. Is this a promise?!? by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Imagine how much less spamming and hacking we'll have! No more Russian brides. Yeah!

  47. Modpoints by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 2

    Where are modpoints when you need them. This is an historic posting that needs at least 5 positive.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Modpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The historical posting from April 1 and a phone number to match the date? It's entertaining at least.

  48. Re:Yikes by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    All I can see here is the Soviet Union rising again.

    I'd say this is more like the rise of Imperial Russia again than the USSR. Russia has always had a chip on its shoulder concerning the rest of Europe. Not that the USSR was that much different from Imperial Russia.

  49. Re: by Mr.CRC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In what country?

    In my country, that bastion of freedom known as the USA, they simply take your fucking money and your property whenever they want, just by saying you got it from drugs. It doesn't matter if it's illegal, or contrary to the 5th amendment, because that's just a stupid old piece of paper. And besides, they get to decide what words mean.

  50. Soviet nostalgia again? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Get off my red lawn!"

  51. Goofatologist by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The funnest job in the world would be to create fake front sites for dictatorial countries. For example, I'd make "CNN.com" grab content from onion.com, and stupid.com content would be used to fill up "Amazon.com".

    In "1984", the main character's job was to re-write history with fake BS. He seemed fairly content at that job until he took the proverbial red pill.

  52. BUT BUT BUT!!! by joocemann · · Score: 1

    Where will we get the endless stream of videos of people hurting themselves doing foolish things? That's a pretty big share of the internet right there!

  53. US Allready There by jamander4 · · Score: 1

    There has been recent discussion about the President of the US having the same power at his own personel discretion. So the Russkies are playing catch up with the peace and freedom loving republic of America. I can't remember if there was some specfic leagal frame work or just FREEDOM because you know TERRORISTS ISLAM JIHAD.

  54. Re: by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and often when the police's case falls apart and ends in a non-conviction they keep your stuff anyway. "Civil forfeiture" should be considered unconstitutional...if we moved back in time to the Colonial days this is the EXACT same thing the British were doing that lead to the War of Independence. Illegal seizures, no viable recourse, stealing property without rule of law or real proof of wrong-doing...when a DA does "civil forfeiture" they are considering the "property" itself guilty, as if your house or car has a intelligent consciousness that knows the difference between right and wrong and could have chosen not to be involved somehow. It costs at least $10K to take it to court, so the cops know if they take less than that it's not worth it. And since your property is being charged (not you) then it's considered "guilty until proven innocent", you have to pay for the lawyer, and you have to meet a higher standard of proving absolutely no drugs were ever involved (even before you owned it)

    PBS article

  55. Re: by davester666 · · Score: 1

    yeah, they won't bother confiscating either of them, because that means they need to store them, track them, etc..

    they probably will prefer to just disable both items from generating EMR going forward.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  56. Re:Great by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    Dictatorships trying to firewall the internet == under attack by well funded enemies, who are making progress at stealing their secrets and/or undermining their economy. Maybe the NSA isn't as incompetent as we thought.

  57. Re: by strikethree · · Score: 1

    They are lucky they have not done this to some gun nut. Proof: No police offers or district attorneys are dead yet.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen