Slashdot Mirror


Phablet Reviews: Before and After the iPhone 6

Velcroman1 writes Bigger is better. No, wait, bigger is worse. Well, which is it? Apple's newly supersized 4.7-inch iPhone 6 and the jumbo, 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus are a marked departure for the company, which has clung to the same, small screen size for years. It has gone so far as to publicly deride larger phones from competitors, notably Samsung, even as their sales grew to record highs. Tech reviewers over the years have tended to side with Apple, in general saddling reviews of the Samsung Galaxy Note – a 5.3-inch device that kicked off the phablet push in 2012 – with asides about how big the darn thing was. Are tech reviewers being fair when they review the iPhone 6 Plus? Here's what some of them said today, compared with how they reviewed earlier phablets and big phones from the competition.

277 comments

  1. Very sad by halivar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate, hate, hate, hate large phones. If I needed a bigger screen, I'll pull out my tablet or my laptop. I'm a skinny guy, I wear tight-ish jeans (fiance hates it, but I gotta be me), and pulling a big-ass phone out of my front pocket is a pain in my ass, and that's with an IPhone 5S.

    I'm going to pass on the 6 and hope they come out with a traditional-sized one for the 6S or 7.

    1. Re:Very sad by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hipster doesn't like new thing. News at 11.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't stand large phones either, but the wife likes them bigger (haha) and she has a purse to keep it in, also parents who have poorer eyesight like the larger screens as well.

      It just depends on who the person is I guess.

    3. Re:Very sad by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things? Like if you had an iPad and an iPhone you were a hipster, but if you had an old Android and a Lenovo laptop you were a legitimate human being.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Very sad by trout007 · · Score: 2

      The truth is it's nice using large phones but it sucks carrying them. I actually still prefer the form factor of the 4S with the stainless edge and glass front and back. It has a nice weight to it so I know it's in my pocket plus it's so smooth it slides in and out of a pocket easy.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    5. Re:Very sad by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

      If I needed a bigger screen, I'll pull out my tablet..

      Not if your phone completely obsoletes your tablet, so that you're never carrying one around.

      (But yes, I can see how not everyone wants a tablet, so they might not want a phablet either.)

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    6. Re:Very sad by manu144x · · Score: 2

      There are literally hundreds of phones on the market right now, with ANY imaginable size (i should know, I am an android developer). Just go with the 5s, there is nothing in the 6 you will notice except screen size.

      Yet I agree, they are stupid for offering phablets only. They are in the other extreme now.
      In my opinion, the optimum number would be 3:
      Small (existing size), medium (iphone 6 size) and phablet (iphone 6 plus).

      But they probably had tons of iphones 5c/5s in stock and wanted to get rid of those :)

    7. Re:Very sad by Ranbot · · Score: 2

      I hate, hate, hate, hate large phones. If I needed a bigger screen, I'll pull out my tablet or my laptop. I'm a skinny guy, I wear tight-ish jeans.

      There are the millions of smartphone consumers in the world who don't have the disposable income to buy a smartphone and tablet. Pocket size is not driving the phablet market. The driving force is consumers who want/need to do computing tasks with their phone, but can't afford or don't want to pay for a secondary tablet. Samsung saw this need in the market [particularly in Asia] several years ago, Apple is just now trying to address it.

    8. Re:Very sad by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things?

      I've never been convinced it's well defined.

      It sometimes seems to carry some form of ironic post-modern cynicism, and some fashion sense which is either very modern or 70s/80s style in an ironic manner.

      In other cases it seems to be "people who like new things".

      Either way, I'm closer to the sore hip age than the hipster age, and they (fortunately) don't make skinny jeans for me. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      pulling a big-ass phone out of my front pocket is a pain in my ass,

      If you stop wearing your pants backwards, that will solve your problem.

    10. Re:Very sad by khr · · Score: 4, Funny

      and pulling a big-ass phone out of my front pocket is a pain in my ass.

      If pulling a phone out of your pocket is a pain in your ass, you may be doing something wrong.

    11. Re:Very sad by tangent3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The rest of the world is not obliged to share your opinion, no matter how highly you think of yourself.

      I, too, do not see myself using a large phone. However these large phones are hugely popular, as can be seen by their sales figures and several of my colleagues, even small sized females, happily using these phones. I respect their choice and I applaud Android for allowing manufacturers to give customers a choice of picking a phone they like instead of dictating the customer's choice to them and insulting potential customers that choose differently.

    12. Re:Very sad by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Well see now you have two reasons not to wear skinny jeans.

    13. Re:Very sad by tobiasly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things? Like if you had an iPad and an iPhone you were a hipster, but if you had an old Android and a Lenovo laptop you were a legitimate human being.

      It depends on whether a critical mass of the general population also likes said new thing. When they were the ones waiting in line all night at the Apple store, it was all good. Now that the same lines are filled with people sleeping in trash bags to immediately flip them to China's gray market, not so much.

    14. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love love love large phones. If I needed a smaller screen, I'd get a flip-phone. I'm a big guy. I still wear tight-ish jeans because my inner image does not match my outer image (my girlfriend loves it, but I gotta be me) and pulling a tiny-ass phone out of my front pocket wouldn't really make a difference, especially since I have a Samsung Note 2.

      I'm going to check out the iPhone Plus since it has a comparable screen to my Note.

    15. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate, hate, hate, hate large phones. If I needed a bigger screen, I'll pull out my tablet or my laptop. I'm a skinny guy, I wear tight-ish jeans (fiance hates it, but I gotta be me), and pulling a big-ass phone out of my front pocket is a pain in my ass, and that's with an IPhone 5S.

      I'm going to pass on the 6 and hope they come out with a traditional-sized one for the 6S or 7.

      The only thing more painful than you pulling a huge phone out of your front pocket is looking at grown men wearing skinny jeans.

      Stop bitching about larger screens when you can't even fit what's left of your nutsack in your jeans.

    16. Re:Very sad by master_kaos · · Score: 1

      My views have changed as well (not just because of apples device). I used to think 3.5" screen was perfect.. well now I don't, it is too small. However I still find any 5"+screen way too big. I have found the 4.3-4.7" screens are perfect for me, which is why I picked the regular iphone 6.
      However this is for my needs -- occasional browsing web while on the road, emails, light gaming, and *gasp* phone calls.
      If I was a heavy user for movies, gaming, browsing, and didn't make much phone calls I can understand the appeal to the larger screens.

      I made cardboard cutouts of the dimensions of the two phones and stacked a few togther to get approx thickness and size of the two iphones... iPhone 6 fit perfectly fine in my pocket, 6+ was incredibly uncomfortable and I would be afraid of it falling out or getting pick pocketed. My mom tried in her pocket (shallow pocket) and the 6+ was sticking out by about a 1/3rd

    17. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, hipsters are the guys who like new things that other people don't like.

      Which is EXACTLY the same from a logical perspective as liking things that other people do like: BOTH are defining yourself by the whims of the masses.

    18. Re:Very sad by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It slid out of my pocket too easily, I bend over and it falls out of my shirt pocket. I get fabric cases to help stop this.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    19. Re:Very sad by crashumbc · · Score: 3, Informative

      ROFL at people calling 4.7" a phatablet

      4.7" is small for phones today 5" seems to be the sweet spot. That said I love my 5.5" G3

    20. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome. Did you know that a lot of phones exist? Maybe Apple will do small phone for the 6C, if not jump ship to the wide selection of phones using either Android or Windows Phone.

    21. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made cardboard cutouts of the dimensions of the two phones and stacked a few togther to get approx thickness and size of the two iphones... iPhone 6 fit perfectly fine in my pocket, 6+ was incredibly uncomfortable and I would be afraid of it falling out or getting pick pocketed. My mom tried in her pocket (shallow pocket) and the 6+ was sticking out by about a 1/3rd

      Completely off-topic, but you need to get out of that basement more often.

    22. Re:Very sad by garcia · · Score: 1

      For the first time since I started w/the iPhone (the 3G was my first one), I see absolutely nothing of value with this major release version which makes me want to upgrade to it.

      I'll be paying $99 for the 5S and be happy w/it. Sorry but unnecessarily bigger sizes and a better camera is not worth $200+contract renewal.

    23. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The driving force is consumers who want/need to do computing tasks with their phone, but can't afford or don't want to pay for a secondary tablet.

      As a happy Note (2) user, I'd disagree. I could get a tablet & a phone. Or I could carry one device that is both a PDA and phone (just like I have for the past nearly 10 years (ignoring the horrid, but short HTC Desire experiment). I've done PDA + Phone way back with a Psion Revo and (what would now be called) a "feature phone". Don't see the benefit in going back.

      I also have big pockets.

      Ha, sucks to be you OP.

    24. Re:Very sad by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      If you think a big-ass phone is bad in your front pocket, try putting a big ass-phone in your BACK pocket!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    25. Re:Very sad by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      I hate, hate, hate, hate large phones. If I needed a bigger screen, I'll pull out my tablet or my laptop. I'm a skinny guy, I wear tight-ish jeans (fiance hates it, but I gotta be me), and pulling a big-ass phone out of my front pocket is a pain in my ass, and that's with an IPhone 5S.

      I'm going to pass on the 6 and hope they come out with a traditional-sized one for the 6S or 7.

      I agree with you. Unfortunately, I think that Apple wants us to have a large phone in our bag and an Apple Watch at the wrist.

      I would not hold my breath for an iPhone 6s (with "s" for "small").

    26. Re:Very sad by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the point I was going for; it's whatever particular set of characteristics the person using the word doesn't like and don't fit into another readily available pejorative. Fetishisation of old technology? Hipster. Fetishisation of new technology? Hipster. Disinterest in technology? Hipster. Shaggy clothes and beard? Hipster. Well-groomed and stylish? Hipster. Completely normal looking? Hipster.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    27. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things?

      I've never been convinced it's well defined.

      Oh, it's reasonably well defined I think.
      Anyone who wants to claim that they adopted anything before it became mainstream yet wouldn't be caught dead in anything that isn't popular yet is a hipster.
      People who uses things before they becomes popular (That is, things that aren't popular.) are called nerds.
      Apple is a good example. Before the iMac and the entire i-whatever the only die hard Apple users were nerds.

    28. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I currently have a Siemens A60, would love to get a 4" smartphone if someone makes one. It would be a bit too large of a step to go up to something approaching 5" I think.

    29. Re:Very sad by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I may get the 5s as well when it comes to freedompop. alternatively i'll buy one from sprint unlocked. but $550 sticker price seems really high for a phone like that! I'd pay $399.

    30. Re:Very sad by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Anyone who wants to claim that they adopted anything before it became mainstream yet wouldn't be caught dead in anything that isn't popular yet is a hipster.

      LOL, awesome ... then I should be orthogonal to the set of people which are classed as hipsters.

      Mission accomplished!!

      Although, it's probably hip to not be a hipster, in which case I'm a stealth hipster. Unless knowing that not being hip makes me hip, in which case I'm a wannabe, which may or may not be the same as being a hipster. Unless I'm ironic about the whole thing, and then I'm back to being a hipster.

      This is all very complicated to an old geek.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    31. Re:Very sad by magarity · · Score: 1

      You're probably in luck. The 6 is the setup for the 7 where there's going to be the regular, the plus, and the new iPhone Nano which will be back to a 3.5 inch screen.

    32. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Hipsters only like new things because they are different. Even if it is worse than the previous incarnation, especially if it is worse than the previous incarnation (you just don't appreciate how it challenges you), the hipster is drawn to it like AIDS to a street hooker.

    33. Re:Very sad by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things

      They can like new things, but they have to be ironic about it (in the Alanis way).

    34. Re:Very sad by xevioso · · Score: 1

      No, Hipster-hating is the new thing. It's the newest form of elitism, like hating yuppies or beatniks or goths.

      And of course, being that hipster-hating is the new trend, and the hipster-haters are following said trend like sheeple, it just makes all of the hipster-haters hipsters. And soon the universe will collapse in upon itself.

    35. Re:Very sad by gunnnnslinger · · Score: 1

      YES! Isn't it super satisfying making broad generalizations about the quality of human beings based on which consumer technology they own?

    36. Re:Very sad by xevioso · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding a hipster may be properly described as "someone younger than you who doesn't wear a suit."

    37. Re:Very sad by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I got the iPhone 6 (not the 6 Plus) trading up from a 4S. Still getting used to the 6. For me it is too thin but that's just an opportunity to get a thicker and more protective case.

      But if it wasn't for being able to supersize the icons on the display and Apple Pay, I think I would return it. It's really too big at least until I acclimate - if I acclimate. No way in hell I'd get the 6 Plus unless I got the big gold chain to wear it around my neck and make the display a clock face...

      As phones go, I really liked the size of the 4S better. And so far, I'm not very impressed by the quality of the phone connections. Dropped calls and lots of garbled speech. My 4S had better call quality so far by far. I may still return the 6 if I can't get that figured out as the main reason I have it is to use it as a phone.

    38. Re:Very sad by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Ah, so people who hate hipsters and who were hating hipsters before it was cool...those people would be called...hipsters?

    39. Re:Very sad by halivar · · Score: 1

      Oh, I gotta admit. I walked right into that one.

    40. Re:Very sad by halivar · · Score: 2

      The rest of the world is not obliged to share your opinion, no matter how highly you think of yourself.

      Geez, man, I'm just a regular guy who hates large phones. By no means did I present myself as the Emperor of Man, hold a gun to your head, and demand you to repent of your big-phone heresy. I would do way cooler things if I had that power.

    41. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...pulling a big-ass phone out of my front pocket is a pain in my ass....

      Apple's new patent submission: a device that allows the user to perform a "self wedgie"!!

    42. Re:Very sad by master_kaos · · Score: 1

      um, I was wanting to get an iphone 6 but wasn't sure which one. I knew the 6+ was big but needed context. Seriously whats the big deal, took 5 minutes.

    43. Re: Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the info.

      This is probably the most relevant post I've seen on Slashdot in a long time. 100% on topic and brings up informative points.

    44. Re: Very sad by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      Just did a search on dropped calls and iPhone 6 and found this on Verizon's website. Looks like I'm not the only one seeing it. I'll try resetting my network settings to see if that helps, but it doesn't bode well at least for the short term...

      https://community.verizonwirel...

    45. Re:Very sad by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Front pocket no less. Something is very, very wrong.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    46. Re:Very sad by Stele · · Score: 1

      He was being ironic.

    47. Re:Very sad by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Some hipsters wear suits. I've seen them.

      Their fancy modern cut skinny suit, the skinny tie ... and shoes with toes that extend several inches past their feet ... oh, and the Justin Bieber/swirly haircut, that seems to be mandatory.

      Of course, the sad thing is we now have a bunch of middle aged geeks who were never cool, trying to come up with a definition for hipster, which we're clearly not qualified to understand -- so there's limited utility in it. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    48. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I wear tight-ish jeans

      Stop dressing like a girl and you won't have a problem with a normal-sized phone. You could also carry a purse.

    49. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? It's an ass-phone. He said as much. He also said it was big. I can't imagine extracting something large from your ass would be an easy task. (Thankfully, I have no experience with it. But he wears skinny jeans, so he probably does.)

    50. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they say something like "I was hating on hipsters before it was cool" like it's supposed to mean something.

    51. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > (fiance hates it, but I gotta be me)

      Your mileage may vary but for many, "marriage" is "they will become one flesh" which is really not so much about sex but rather about being closer, change, transformation. You will change, your fiance will change, and hopefully you do not believe both of you are so compatible that no change is possible. Come on, who else should you listen to about clothing than your future wife? Surely not your opinion of your image in the mirror, which was shaped by your mom, your sister, your classmates or your ex? :)

    52. Re:Very sad by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Ah, so people who hate hipsters and who were hating hipsters before it was cool...those people would be called...hipsters?

      No, "grandpa" or "the crazy old guy down the street".

      Now get off my damned lawn, you backy wastards! ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    53. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way in hell I'd get the 6 Plus unless I got the big gold chain to wear it around my neck and make the display a clock face... /me drops what I was doing, fires up Xcode

    54. Re:Very sad by antdude · · Score: 1

      What about those who use old stuff like me with my Casio Data Bank 150 watch, Toshiba VCR, Sharp 19.5" CRT TV, etc.?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    55. Re:Very sad by JustOK · · Score: 1

      or backed into it

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    56. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wear tight-ish jeans (fiance hates it, but I gotta be me)

      I'm sure he'll learn to accept it.

    57. Re:Very sad by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things? Like if you had an iPad and an iPhone you were a hipster, but if you had an old Android and a Lenovo laptop you were a legitimate human being.

      Hitlers, erm, I mean Hipsters hate things that are popular, except when they are targeted at Hipsters like Apple products (Hipsters ignore the fact every middle aged mum and their dog has an Iphone, hypocrisy isn't too mainstream for hipsters which again is ironic given how popular hypocrisy is).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    58. Re:Very sad by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Have you actually tried them? I mean I understand not wanting a Note 4 or iPhone+,
      but have you actually tried phones in the Galaxy S5 class (~5")? The rounded back (which the iPhone 5 hasn't got) helps a lot.
      I was actually surprised how little you feel the phone considering it's size.

      This.

      I used to think the same until I got a Galaxy Nexus. The shape of it was actually designed for holding a screen that size. Same with my Nexus 5, it's clear that someone who has real experience using smartphones designed it. The plastic backing that Iphone users constantly deride is rubberised, which stops it from slipping. Iphones on the other hand have pretty much been two handed phones since their inceptions.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    59. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL at people moderating someone who can't even read the comment they are replying to 'insightful'

      Nobody is comparing the 4.7" iPhone 6 to a phablet, they are comparing the 5.5" iPhone 6 plus... ugh..

    60. Re:Very sad by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points to give, this echos my feelings too. I have a 4s now and have felt that my wife's 5 was already too big. And now we're seeing reports of 6's being bent up because they're too damned thin. I'll be delaying an update of my 4s indefinitely, maybe when the 7 comes out there will be an iPhone Mini that returns to the size of a phone. And I'm neither skinny nor a candidate for tight jeans.

  2. In fairness ... by gstoddart · · Score: 0

    Some of those phones are enormous.

    I've seen people using a phone which looks around the size of my Nexus 7.

    And using it as a phone almost looks like a sight-gag.

    Kind of like when I got my first-gen iPad and a friend held it up to his head and started saying "can you hear me now?".

    Some of these phones don't look like they'd be either easy to carry around, or actually use as a phone. Because it's like holding a paperback novel up to your head.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:In fairness ... by virgnarus · · Score: 1

      I've found with my Note 3 with Otterbox case that I would either need to use the speaker function or have a bluetooth earpiece to call in a convenient manner. Putting the phone up to my ear is just embarrassing.

      Of course, that's not what I got the Note 3 for, otherwise I would've stuck with my old dialpad phone. I got it for PDA functionality, for which it performs the task wonderfully.

    2. Re:In fairness ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I've seen numerous people holding the big giant phone up to their head.

      And, yes, it looks absolutely dorky.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:In fairness ... by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've got a Note 3, and I frequently hold it up to my head to talk on it. I also gave up caring about what people think of based on what technology I use a couple of decades ago.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:In fairness ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, you are holding it wrong.

    5. Re:In fairness ... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 0

      Some of those phones are enormous.

      I've seen people using a phone which looks around the size of my Nexus 7.

      And using it as a phone almost looks like a sight-gag.

      Kind of like when I got my first-gen iPad and a friend held it up to his head and started saying "can you hear me now?".

      Some of these phones don't look like they'd be either easy to carry around, or actually use as a phone. Because it's like holding a paperback novel up to your head.

      When I first bought my iPhone, what I wanted to do with it was things like browsing, rudimentary word processing, games, reading e-books whenever I was in no mood to drag a laptop with me. Today we may piss and moan about how small the iPhone 4/5 displays are but keep in mind that back when the iPhone first came out it had a huge display compared to most of the competition. The iPhone still turned out to be too small for doing a lot of what I wanted it to do. So I bought an iPad only to find that while a tablet does the aforementioned things pretty well it is still no laptop replacement and even if an iPad was capable of making phone calls a 10 inch tablet is simply to big. I wasn't a phablet fan when those things first hit the market and it took me a long time to warm up to the idea simply because of what you point out, the things are too big for a phone and to small for a tablet. But the more I think about it the more I like the idea, it seems to be a fair compromise. Phablets are big enough to do most of what I originally expected to be able to do with the iPhone but small enough to easily carry in my pocket when I leave the laptop at home. Yes phablets are big for a phone but I can work around that, use a combination bluetooth headset/headphones, carry the phone in my breast pocket rather than in my trouser pocket etc... It's not an unsolvable problem and best of all there is one fewer expensive device to drag around and that needs to be replaced every four or five years so I'm buying an iPhone 6 Plus. If I still want an iPad for reading e-books etc. I'll buy a cheap used one when my current model gives up it's ghost. All my real work will be done on a laptop (MacBook if you didn't guess already) and that isn't likely to change any time soon.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    6. Re:In fairness ... by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Hey, you sound just like the fashion police back when I got my first ridiculously huge phone that they wouldn't be caught dead using. My 4.3" HTC HD2.

      Then, again for my huger more ridiculouser 5.3" Galaxy Note.

      Then, again for my hugerer ridiculouserer 6" Ascend Mate.

      Now, my hugererer ridiculousererer 7" Huawei X1.

      I know you reactionary types need time to catch up to new things. Please, do take it, but in the mean time, shut up. Meanwhile, I'll be enjoying reading and watching vids on my "phone", which is really more of a e-reader+media player. Don't worry, you'll get there...

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    7. Re:In fairness ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you're on your way to a 10" phone in the near future :) I wonder if an iPad Air with 3G would work as a phone like that.

    8. Re:In fairness ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen people using a phone which looks around the size of my Nexus 7.
       
      And using it as a phone almost looks like a sight-gag.

      Ok, so it looks unusual to you. But is there an actual problem?

      Someone from the past will also say that people using any sort of wireless phone looks funny. (Do you remember the first time you saw people using them?) They'll also say that white is a preposterous color for a computer because everyone knows they should be beige, or that it doesn't matter what color your computer is because you'll never own one or even see one, thin ties aren't in but if you must wear one at least make sure it matches your hat, men with long hair look like women and women wearing trousers instead of skirts look like men, and a carriage without a horse in front of it looks incomplete (at least put a horse figurehead on the front, so it doesn't freak people out).

      The unusual look might not be very relevant, if it's useful. If this size just isn't right for you, cool. But if your main concern is "sticking out," then you can always just wait a few years and let other people break society in. Perhaps this is Apple's way of saying that work has now finally been done.

    9. Re:In fairness ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Hey, you sound just like the fashion police

      LOL ... that, sir, is the first time I've been accused of anything like that.

      Please, do take it, but in the mean time, shut up.

      Go fuck yourself. ;-)

      Meanwhile, I'll be enjoying reading and watching vids on my "phone", which is really more of a e-reader+media player.

      You know, there are many of us who don't use our phones like that, and have no interest in it. At all.

      I don't have a data plan on my cell phone, it gets used for texting more than anything else (my HTC Desire is not actually very good as a phone without bluetooth). In fact, I'd have to go looking for it to know exactly where it is as the moment.

      If I need to travel with a device, I have my tablet. If I need more, I have my laptop. I have friends you can't really have a conversation with, because their face is always buried in their phone. So, yes, I'm behind the curve and plan on staying there.

      My point is that, by the time you're up into a 7" phablet, unless you are using speaker phone (in which case you're probably an annoying ass when out in public), or a bluetooth headset (which we used to consider annoying asses, but have adapted to it) ... holding a 7" phone up to your face looks pretty ridiculous. Anything bigger is going to look sillier. (And I also assume very uncomfortable to hold onto)

      It's a trade off or having a single device which has more utility. I get that with screens, bigger is better.

      But, thankfully, life hasn't forced me to be constantly tethered to a device like this.

      So, in the mean time, I will laugh at people holding a huge phone up to their face, and shake my head at people who can't be away from their phone for long enough to go to the bathroom. Because, really, nobody likes a Twitter Shitter.

      For me, I neither need nor want that kind of functionality. My wife, however, is stuck carrying around a cell phone so she can monitor her email. But that's at least better than being tethered to a desk.

      Don't worry, you'll get there...

      I sincerely hope not. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:In fairness ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it gets used for texting more than anything else

      Texting doesn't use data. MMS does (I think), but SMS does not. Side note, you are ALWAYS sending SMS. It is rolled into the communication protocol.

      If you were really like you say, you'd just have a flip phone and be done. I'm actually thinking you are finding out you really are a hipster. A lacking one... perhaps wannabe vs failure?

      Nobody said anything about speaker phones (I've never witnessed your scenario happen)... use bluetooth. Unless you don't like that. Nobody said anything about phones taking the place of a tablet... using your phone that you already have under normal cases should suffice for most. It just looks like you aren't thinking ahead and trying to justify your previous comments. Nobody said anything about phones and relationships. If your friends find their phones that intriguing, you need new friends. Perhaps true non-hipster ones. Do you live near any Amish folk?

      In summation, get a clam-shell phone without data. You (and everybody around you) will be much happier.

    11. Re:In fairness ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If you were really like you say, you'd just have a flip phone and be done.

      If it weren't for the better keyboard on my Android phone, I probably could. I liked my old Motorola Krazr ... long battery life, small to carry. But it sucked as a keyboard for texting. All I did is swap the SIM and be able to text better. But I've subsequently uninstalled all apps, and do not have access to data. So I could go back to my krazr and not actually have much of a difference.

      I'm actually thinking you are finding out you really are a hipster. A lacking one... perhaps wannabe vs failure?

      LOL ... fuck, it's high school all over again.

      I'll go with middle aged geek, with a waning interest in technology just for the sake of it. It's cool, has its purposes, but plays a very circumscribed role in my life these days.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:In fairness ... by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      Circumscribed? As in surrounds your entire life?

    13. Re:In fairness ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      More like, it occupies a bounded aspect of my life, stays within that, and doesn't spill into the rest of my life.

      That would be your definition #2:

      2. To limit narrowly; restrict.

      Which is exactly how I used it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:In fairness ... by bdenton42 · · Score: 1

      It is a lot smaller than a standard telephone handset... why is this somehow different? e.g. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0000...

    15. Re:In fairness ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a data plan on my cell phone

      Then why do you even have an iPhone? You're spending a lot of money for features you aren't able to use outside of WiFi-enabled locations.

    16. Re:In fairness ... by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      "holding a 7" phone up to your face looks pretty ridiculous"... Well, I feel less ridiculous the very few times I do that than if I had to carry a phone AND a tablet AND a laptop every time I travel. Plus I don't really care about ridiculous, like beauty it is mostly in the eye of the beholder.

      "unless you are using speaker phone or a bluetooth headset" I'm using a wired headset. Sorry if that's not fashion-approved.

      "But, thankfully, life hasn't forced me to be constantly tethered to a device like this." Well, if you prefer to be tethered to a stamp-size squint-box for fear of how others look at you, that's your prerogative. I advise you to gather a crowd next time you go buy... anything... and get their approval before any purchase.

      To give you a point of reference, a 6" screen (let alone my 7") is to a 4" screen what a 23" is to a 15" screen. I wouldn't go back to 15" on my desktop, I wouldn't go back to 4" for my phone.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    17. Re:In fairness ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So,...How tiny are their heads? In fact how little are all the folks posting that a 6" phone is too big. I have been bemused by the push toward thinner and lighter everything electronic. Are we a nation of tiny weaklings?
      That said, there is still choice to be had. not everyone should live with a Great Dane....

  3. Bigger is better for some, bigger... by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    ...is worse for others. Guess it really depends on how big your pockets are.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by static0verdrive · · Score: 1

      I'd agree, but besides one guy I know who wants to watch TV shows on the bus, EVERYONE else I know is complaining right now that there are no reasonably-sized phones available. Tablets are successful because they're tablets, not because they're big - and I would venture that MOST people don't want or need giant phones.

      "Phones come in booths now? Great! Now I don't have to carry around this stupid cell phone!" --Hermes Conrad

      --
      ========
      77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
    2. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Guess it really depends on how big your pockets are.

      I think some people have a purse to put the phone in, and some people have a holster to keep the phone outside their pocket. So it also depends on how people keep their phone...

    3. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by Ranbot · · Score: 2

      Guess it really depends on how big your pockets are.

      Wrong. For most people choosing phablets it has nothing to do with pocket size. It's mainly by consumers who are migrating their traditional desktop computing to their mobile devices and the tasks are just easier with a larger screen. Many people don't want to spend double for a phone and a tablet, so they opt for the compromise single-device phablet.

      For example, my 27-year old sister does not pay for cable/internet at home, but has a smartphone that she does most of her computing from. In the rare times she really needs a computer for something, she will use PCs at her work during her off-hours or drag out her old laptop at free Wi-Fi cafe. She does not have the disposable income for tablet, so a phablet is perfect for her.

    4. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it all comes down to the size of the hole you're sticking it in and how much pain you can tolerate. Oddly, I'm still referring to phones and pockets, here.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    5. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      But you can buy a Nexus 7 tablet ($229) and a $100 phone for less than the price of many smart phones or phablets. You don't really have to spend double. The phone will work completely fine for phone tasks like talking on the phone and sending text messages. The tablet will work better than most smartphones and phablets for actual computing stuff. You can even opt to just bring a phone if you don't think you'll need to do any computing where you're going. A $100 phone can even do some computing tasks like look up a map if you find yourself in a pinch.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, considering the iPhone 6 is breaking records for sales..

    7. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by technomom · · Score: 1

      But if you're traveling, that means you're carrying an extra device and extra chargers.

    8. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      whenever I see people with the belt cell phone holster I loooooooooooool.

    9. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      But you can buy a Nexus 7 tablet ($229) and a $100 phone for less than the price of many smart phones or phablets. You don't really have to spend double.

      That does not factor in costs for mobile data on two devices, which is typically much more expensive than the actual device. If someone only gets mobile data on one device then it limit functionality of the other device. One can tether/mobile hotspot to the connected device, but then they are carrying two devices around everywhere. Some people will choose to pay for and/or work around the issues of 2 devices [as millions of users already have], but some people will take the Phablet compromise [as millions of users already have].

    10. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      In most cases where you could carry a phablet it wouldn't be much of an inconvenience to carry a 7 inch tablet and a small phone. Certainly it would be less cumbersome than carrying a 6 inch phone everywhere you wanted to have your phone with you. When the options are either carry a 6 inch phone everywhere, or carry a 4 inch phone (or even smaller) everywhere and sometimes bring along my 7 inch tablet when I have the room, I'll choose to have 2 devices. At least then you have the option to not carry around a giant device and still be somewhat connected. With only a phablet, your options are carry around a 6 inch+ device or don't have a phone at all. There's plenty of places I go that I really don't want to take a phablet with me, but where having a phone would be really useful. Like going to the ski hill or on a bike ride.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    11. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      I'll choose to have 2 devices.

      That works for you and the market shows there are millions of people who agree with you, but the market also shows there are millions of people who would choose the single phablet option. There are costs and benefits to both and there's room in the market for both.

    12. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I think now that the 6 plus is available we'll see a lot more movement away from android to better options.

    13. Re:Bigger is better for some, bigger... by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      I think now that the 6 plus is available we'll see a lot more movement away from android to better options.

      I assume by "better" you mean Apple. Some people might switch to Apple, but my experience is that as long as people don't have a horrible Android experience (which to be fair, does happen sometimes) they typically don't go back to Apple. Switching from Android to Apple involves paying more for the device, losing or repurchasing Android apps, entering Apple's walled garden, and if they aren't familiar with iOS, then they have to learn that too. I know iOS is supposed to be very user friendly, but I've always been an Android user and when I have to use iOS I struggle doing basic functions that I'm accustomed to with Android...I'm sure iOS is good, it's just what you're used to. I'll probably get modded down for this, but I don't care...People that understand the tech in phones know that going from Android to Apple is like take a 2 year technological step back, but paying more for it.

      If you pay attention to the markets it's clear that the iPhone 6 Plus is reactionary to retain Apple customers who are considering phablets, particularly in overseas markets (China, Japan, Korea, etc.) where phablets adoption is much stronger than the US and Apple has seen big losses to Samsung.

  4. Big is the new Small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or something like that.

    They're making pants pockets bigger. Maybe people's hands and fingers too, although that's just a guess.

    1. Re:Big is the new Small by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You pretty much nailed it. What the summary failed to take into account was the most obvious factor: that the culture surrounding smartphones has changed.

      Two years ago when the Note launched, phablets looked ridiculous, the UIs weren't designed for screens that large, and reviewers who hadn't used them before didn't even know how to hold them properly. Those early ones really weren't that great, but the fact that the general population wasn't ready to accept them since they looked so out of place didn't help any either. Even so, enough people bought them that they stuck around and started to shift what people considered to be normal.

      Fast forward two years, and Samsung's continued push into the phablet space has made some major inroads. At this point, a 4" screen on a high-end phone is seen as small, UIs have done some catching up to be more usable on screens that large, the general population is more educated on how to use a screen that large, and people have begun to recognize the benefits of larger screens. Suddenly, they no longer look quite so ridiculous.

      I know as scientists and engineers we want to be able to say with certainty that "X is the best at Y", since things that are true should remain true. But the bigger truth here is that the world changes, and this is one of those instances. What made sense 2 years ago may not make sense today, simply because our perspectives and tastes have changed. Hell, if you can remember all the way back to 2007, you may even recall that the 3.5" screen on the original iPhone was thought to be pushing the limits of what was reasonable, given that it was practically twice the diagonal size of much of the competition it was going up against. The trend back then was to go as small and thin as possible, but the original iPhone forced us to shift our expectations and perceptions of what was normal.

      Thin is still a trend, but small isn't any more. Samsung successfully shifted that. It should come as no surprise then, that modern reviews would reflect that change in public perception, and would look more favorably on a large screen today than they did 2 years ago, regardless of who the manufacturer happens to be. And, in fact, that's exactly what's going on, given that Samsung's recent, large-screen phones have been stealing a lot of thunder from Apple, which is what necessitated this move on Apple's part in the first place.

  5. Yawn, markets change by hsmith · · Score: 0

    What do people expect Apple to say when all they are selling are the smaller phones? OH THATS A GREAT PHONE SAMSUNG. No, they are going to describe how theirs is better.

    Reviewers are shills for whoever is giving them free stuff so their reviews are useless.

    1. Re:Yawn, markets change by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, you should read it. Most of the ones that didn't like a previous phone for being to big don't like the Apple 6's size.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Yawn, markets change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think you should re-read it.

  6. what?!?! by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The press is biased towards Apple? You don't say...

    1. Re:what?!?! by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the reviews are pretty fair. Apple deserves credit for inventing the large phone.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:what?!?! by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except if you actually go back and read what the press said, there was a little bump of "wow, that's a big phone" for the Galaxy Note and S3 - which were large phones for the time - and then stopped mentioning it. In fact, the general concensus over the past two years is that the iPhones are too small now. If you look up the iPhone 5/S reviews by each of those sites, you'll see the same sorts of remarks. The Nexus 4 really set the benchmark at about 5 inches as far as the press were concerned.

      The premise put forward by the article is, to put it bluntly, unsupported by the facts.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:what?!?! by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So, what you're saying is... you didn't read the original reviews, the article or even the summary? The quotes are pretty clear.

      On the Galaxy:

      It’s still too big for a smartphone After testing it over the past week and a half, the awkwardness that came with carrying such a large, “notice me” phone outweighed the benefits of it, for me.

      – Lauren Goode

      Same person on the iPhone6:

      Maybe I’m getting old, and my eyes are getting worse. Or maybe I’m stuck in Apple’s reality-distortion field (help). But something strange happened this week. I started to like a phablet.

      – Lauren Goode

      Translation: Your new feature sux because it's not Apple! Oh... Apple did it to? Yay! I like it now!

    4. Re:what?!?! by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      are you kidding??? Has your head been in a rock for two years??? Samsung invented phablets like 3 years ago. read the other comments in this story!!!

    5. Re:what?!?! by praxis · · Score: 2

      You know, there was an appreciable amount of time and personal experiences that Lauren had between those two quotes. People do change their views and sometimes its for reasons you or they might not understand. Ascribing her change in liking Phablets to "Apple did it to? (sic)" is pretty presumptuous.

    6. Re:what?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in no way could Apple's implementation of software have changed the experience from what the Galaxy Note was in 2011.

      Don't be daft.

    7. Re:what?!?! by samwichse · · Score: 2

      This may be the most painful whoosh I've ever seen on Slashdot.

    8. Re:what?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is... you didn't read the original reviews, the article or even the summary? The quotes are pretty clear.

      I noticed you ignored the data that doesn't support your POV:

      2012: Galaxy Note
      The Galaxy Note’s 5.75-inch height and 3.25-inch width fit in my open palm, but without much leeway. Many women and even men won’t be so lucky. Even two-handed operation can be problematic. In vertical orientation, thumb-typing is quite comfortable on the larger-than-usual onscreen keyboard. But in horizontal orientation, I strained to reach the innermost keys with my thumbs, despite my large hands.
      – Galen Gruman

      2014: iPhone 6 Plus
      The iPhone 6 Plus is too big for me.
      – Galen Gruman

    9. Re:what?!?! by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      It was a joke :)

      That's why they're saying wooosh... Because the joke went over your head. It happens :)

    10. Re:what?!?! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I read the other reviews that the article did not cherry pick.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    11. Re:what?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, she's being an apple dick.

    12. Re:what?!?! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Translation: I didn't like a phone with a certain feature, and thought I'd never like one with that feature. However, I'm starting to like another phone with that feature. It would seem that the individual phone matters.

      Apple has a history of doing things in ways people* like, much more than their competitors. (MS Windows, before 8, was probably as good, but it took them much longer.) They also have a history of leaving features out when they can't implement them as well as they'd like, rather than put them in awkwardly. They tend not to put new features in just because they're in demand, or to get a competitive edge. They do screw up now and then, like anybody else, but their first use of feature X is likely to be better than the first X in the marketplace.

      *People, here, refers to a whole lot of people. The slashdot demographic is a reasonably large niche market, certainly worth catering to, but it's a niche market, and there's a whole lot more people that like different things.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  7. Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Sockatume · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These aren't reviews from "before ... the iPhone 6", they're exclusively reviews of the Galaxy Note and S3 - the first "phablets". Writers' tastes haven't changed because they're duplicitous hacks trying to find a way to hate Android; they've changed because of experience.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, come on, when it was a Samsung they were saying things like "it is the most useless phone" "I tried to get used to it for a week and could not" and yet, suddenly, when it has an apple logo "well it is a bit big, but it is great!"?

    2. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If by "suddenly" you mean "two years and dozens of four-to-six-inch-phones later", yes.

      That's less time than it took for the original iPhone to go from ridiculously oversized* to perfectly normal.

      *Ars Technica's review compares it unfavourably to the Razr.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The press is biased towards Apple? You don't say...

      Awwww.... everybody is being mean to Android... buhuhu. You're starting to sound like one of those perennially disappointed and increasingly bitter 'Linux on the Desktop' enthusiasts from way back in the day.

    4. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      No, they actually say they started liking phablets the moment Apple did one, it is not their experience with other phablets. The most clear quote (actually admitting it) is from Lauren Goode who said about the Note:

      It’s still too big for a smartphone After testing it over the past week and a half, the awkwardness that came with carrying such a large, “notice me” phone outweighed the benefits of it, for me.

      And then about the iPhone 6 plus:

      Maybe I’m getting old, and my eyes are getting worse. Or maybe I’m stuck in Apple’s reality-distortion field (help). But something strange happened this week. I started to like a phablet.

      And they feel comfortable making damning statements about a non Apple device, while saying the same thing as politely as possible for the iPhone. E.g. compare a TechCrunch quote on the Note:

      I found that it was really difficult to get comfortable with the device, never feeling like I had complete control over it as I would with a smaller phone.

      With that on the iPhone:

      the additional size makes for a less ‘perfect’ ergonomic quality, something the iPhone 6 definitely achieves

      The worst they can say about the iPhone 6 plus is "less perfect", while adding that the iPhone 6 IS perfect. Until one month ago, of course, the iPhone 5/5S was the ergonomically perfect one, while Samsung Galaxy S3/4/5 where awkwardly large. I guess perfection just follows Apple wherever they go. "Journalists" just follow right behind.

    5. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what sort of case you're trying to make here except "some tech writers don't like large-screened phones and are just about capable of tolerating Apple's one".

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Unless you read the same journalists' quotes about the Galaxy Note II, which pretty much say the same things that they allegedly would never say about a non-Apple phablet. Because it was about six months later and they were actually used to it.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by technomom · · Score: 1

      The S3 is a phablet? Who knew?

    8. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      A better comparison would be not with one of a larger phone or phablet from two years ago, but to compare to reviews of them just before the larger ones from Apple were announced. Personally I have no desire for a larger phone, but I can see how someone would be resistant to the jumbo size and then warm up to it after a while.

      Do I think many people are influenced by the Apple reality distortion field? Absolutely. I just don't think the linked article showed that reviewers changed their mind based on Apple releasing jumbo phones. Lumping in the release of the new Apple phones with 2 years of exposure to the Android versions doesn't make that point.

      If I cared enough I'd look for reviews from those same sources from 2014, not 2012. But really, I don't. I didn't rely on any of them when I bought my current phone, why would I care what they think about a phone I won't buy? (My interest in this was about accuracy and consistency in reporting, not in choosing a phone )

    9. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because three years of software improvements and UX design couldn't possibly change a reviewer's ability to get used to a larger screen.

      I'd bet they say the same stuff about the Galaxy S5 as well.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    10. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope they are just hypocritical dicks

  8. HEY HEY HEY! by RevWaldo · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's Phat Tablet!

    .

  9. The traditional response by dontbemad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This seems to be a typical sort of response from a media that tends to bias Apple products. I make no criticism of Apple with that remark, only those responsible for reviewing their products fairly. I get the feeling that a huge number of these reviewers, rather that being classical "tech lovers" if you will, are more prone to have a brand or ecosystem identity that drives their judgement about a given product or product family.

    This kind of trend is fairly common across all major phone manufacturers, across both iOS and Android, and also across Apple and Google themselves. It is why I rarely take a phone review seriously, be it for a phone that I actually am interested in or one that I'm not. Having information about specs and hardware is a good place to start when deciding between two pieces of technology, but past that, a huge amount of one's enjoyment of a device can come from external factors, such as previous brand investment, ecosystem size and saturation, and even things as "trivial" as what one's friends are using.

    I try not to be terribly upset when I see Apple product reviewers exhibiting these signs of bias, since a large number of Android (and perhaps even some windows phone?) reviewers do the same things. I read and watch these reviews as I would watch news about politics: with a boulder sized grain of salt. While some truth may be found somewhere in the reviewer's statements, they still can and do fall prey to human shortcomings that affects us all.

    1. Re:The traditional response by gwstuff · · Score: 0

      Yes, by playing to Apple's tune, they get invited to Apple's special events, get test devices, get insider information before everyone else, and sometimes even get their articles featured on Apple's website and in their presentations... all of this contributes to the overarching metric of a journalist's performance - pageviews.

      You rightly pointed out that Android reviewers have similar tie ups with Android manufacturers, so it's not the Apple bias that is to be lamented. It is only cited often because of the amount of Apple news in the press. What is to be lamented is how the 'free press' can be rounded up like a lot of sheep.

    2. Re:The traditional response by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      What is to be lamented is how the 'free press' can be rounded up like a lot of sheep.

      Wise words. It is frightening how the common man's only source of information about one or many topics can be so easily twisted to fit an agenda. And then when those same words are reversed, they continue to believe them as if gospel truth.

    3. Re:The traditional response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've always been at war with Eastasia

    4. Re:The traditional response by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      This kind of trend is fairly common across all major phone manufacturers, across both iOS and Android, and also across Apple and Google themselves. It is why I rarely take a phone review seriously, be it for a phone that I actually am interested in or one that I'm not.

      This kind of trend is fairly common across all tech manufacturers, across multiple platforms & ecosystems. Windows vs. Linux. Java vs.C++. Debian vs Ubuntu. Systemd vs "please for love of god use anything else"

      It's a good thing that people here are slashdot are the epitomy of honest / unbiased opinions. I can always trust comments on slashdot objectively evaluate tech without an personal slant.

      That being said, the article reads as a fantastic guide of reviewers to stay away from.

    5. Re:The traditional response by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Well, I remember everyone saying in 2012 that the Note was too large. Today, there are several people who have Note phones and went from a Note 2 to a Note 3.

      It's basically public acceptance - large phones were novel and not particularly easy to hold.

      Hell, I see people use their 7" tablets as phones! They have this huge monstrosity on their ear with the bottom sticking far out in front of their face and barely bale to hold onto their "phone".

      And yes, pocketability is a problem. It's why to counter having to put the phone in their pocket, people put it elsewhere. But that's a pain to hear if ring or dig it out if you get a text, so they invent smartwatches to serve as a small screen to your phone so you can have part of it on you to catch that IM or SMS or whatever.

      Now, one thing I see Apple doing (and Android finally copying) is "one handed mode" - Apple realizes there are situations where you may need to use your phone and your other hand is otherwise ... occupied (let's say it's holding the strap on public transit, or you're carrying shopping, other reasons are left as an exercise for the reader). So you double-tap the home button (tap, not press) and the top half slides down to let you reach. It's a decent implementation as well since you can pull down the notification drawer without repositioning.

      It is slightly clunky and you do lose the bottom half of the application that was displayed , but it works in the demos they have in the store and is somewhat usable. Better than moving your hands and repositioning the phone (which leads to inevitable dropping eventually).

    6. Re:The traditional response by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

      I can always trust comments on slashdot objectively evaluate tech without an personal slant.

      Can't tell if you're being sarcastic.

    7. Re:The traditional response by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The one are thing people do rely on reviews for is to decide if they will be okay long term with a larger phone.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: The traditional response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, some people use earpieces/microphones with their phones. So they aren't necessarily holding a huge phone to their head.

    9. Re:The traditional response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now, one thing I see Apple doing (and Android finally copying) is "one handed mode" - Apple realizes there are situations where you may need to use your phone and your other hand is otherwise ... occupied (let's say it's holding the strap on public transit, or you're carrying shopping, other reasons are left as an exercise for the reader). So you double-tap the home button (tap, not press) and the top half slides down to let you reach. It's a decent implementation as well since you can pull down the notification drawer without repositioning.

      Both Samsung and HTC have had a one-handed mode for a while now, so Android phones don't need to copy "Reachability Mode". It works differently from the iPhone 6/6Plus in that the whole display is shrunk down to allow easy access with one hand - the physical hardware buttons like volume +, volume -, recent apps, home and back are also replicated in the reduced display. Works quite well, though it looks a bit ugly since the display is scooched to one side/corner of the screen (you can select where it goes, depending on whether you are left- or right-handed). The iPhone one-handed mode is a bit more cumbersome in my opinion since it requires multiple sets of double taps when you are switching into an app to do things; see example cited here.

      FWIW, I own an S5 since I prefer a bigger phone/display and my wife owns a 5S. I do not use the one-handed mode on my S5 since I can reach the edges of the display without issues; however, I can see folks finding it useful.

    10. Re:The traditional response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tlhIngan ::"Now, one thing I see Apple doing (and Android finally copying) is "one handed mode" - Apple realizes there are situations where you may need to use your phone and your other hand is otherwise ... occupied"

      Weird, I have note 1, it's had a 1 handed mode for fucking ages, typical fucking apple wank pretending apple innovated!!!!.

    11. Re:The traditional response by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There really aren't all that many classical "tech lovers". A review site for them isn't going to be ideal for the general populace. Another thing is that we're talking about large ecosystems. It takes time to get proficient in an ecosystem, and if it's not your job or hobby to evaluate different ones you're likely to be prejudiced. Ideally, you'd want your reviewers to be proficient in the ecosystem of the product being reviewed and other ecosystems, but there's no real pressure for that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    12. Re:The traditional response by gwstuff · · Score: 1

      Interesting that my post was downvoted :-)

    13. Re:The traditional response by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      Just further abuse of Mod -1: Disagreement.

  10. I'm pleasantly surprised. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm pleasantly surprised by the number of people in the article that basically said the same thing in both reviews. I couple of people magically changed their tunes with the Apple 6, but not as many as I thought.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I'm pleasantly surprised. by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of those that changed their tune, they commented about trying to operate the larger device with one hand. Apple moved some things around to make easier. And, it's lighter and thinner than it's 2012 predecessors - a benefit of time and manufacturing processes. Machined metal vs plastic makes a difference as well in terms of how rigid the device is and how that feels in one's hands. Again, the benefit of time to review existing products and improved manufacturing processes.

      So, I didn't hear any particular fan-dom responses because of Apple vs Android. I heard that Apple's take on it was a little more refined. One would expect that over the course of two years. Samsung will do the same on their next iteration.

      Being said, I am a big guy (6' 1") with large hands. The 6+ still feels awkward to me. If I opt for one of the newer models, I would, likely, go with the straight 6 over the 6+. But, I am not due for an upgrade for another year. I can wait.

      Of the best new features I would like to see? Improved battery life.

    2. Re:I'm pleasantly surprised. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Speakign for myself, I would much rather carry around an iPhone 5s, but my eyes are getting worse with age, and now I can't use it without reading glasses. I can't speak for these whippersnappers, but I now welcome the larger screen, and I'm happy that there's a mode that makes what's displayed larger rather than more dense. It sucks getting old, but I suppose that's the goal.

    3. Re:I'm pleasantly surprised. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I just got a Oneplus One and wasn't quite sure how I'd like the screen size. I have to say that I really like the size, though it is definitely on the upper edge of usability. One thing I do like about it is that the keyboard doesn't feel like it is stealing so much screen real-estate, though it is perhaps getting to the upper-limit of swype-style keyboarding.

      I also am tall with large hands, and I imagine that is a definite factor. One thing I do notice is that if I'm in a one-handed situation I have to manipulate the phone a bit to get from the bottom of the screen to the top. Usually, though, I have a second hand free so that isn't a problem at all.

      I'm going to be interested in what impact the Apple move has on mid-sized tablets. I've seen even a lot of iOS users comment that they like tablets like the Nexus 7, while I never really saw a need for it and preferred the 10" format. I think that this may have been driven by the need for an intermediate size for people with really small phones like the past iPhones. My past Android phones were more in the 4" range but even so they were adequate enough for browsing/etc that I didn't feel the need to have another portable tablet that I could always have in a coat pocket/etc. Now that I have a 5.5" phone I REALLY don't need to carry around another tablet that is only 1.5" larger, and I'm wondering if the Apple move will take away another large segment of demand for this size.

    4. Re:I'm pleasantly surprised. by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      How old is your old? I'm 46...using a Nokia 1520 because it is damn near huge at 6". I can see things pretty well now...I can't go back to a smaller phone, because I just can't read anything on it!

      --
      No reason to lie.
    5. Re:I'm pleasantly surprised. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The swipe keyboard is the single biggest change that makes phablets usable, which is I'm sure why they copied it. I think the Apple layout is inferior though, especially for quick numerical input.

      Android had this stuff sorted out long ago. It's just that the reviewers are used to iOS so automatically feel a bit odd on Android, and attribute it to some kind of UX genius on Apple's part.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  11. big phone by rossdee · · Score: 1

    I have a Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    Its just small enough to fit in my pocket, but big enough screen to use as an ebook reader.
    It also has a microsd slot that will take a 64 gig card - big enough for my music collection.
    (I am probably not going to be buying much more music after Oct 1 since Amazon are going to start charging MN residents sales tax)

    1. Re:big phone by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      (I am probably not going to be buying much more music after Oct 1 since Amazon are going to start charging MN residents sales tax)

      srsly? the thing that will push you over the edge away from buying music will be 8% price increase? that's kind of lame dude.

      fyi in most states you still have to pay sales tax on items even when the tax isn't charged at the time of purchase. In CA there's a declaration form for total value of goods purchased but not taxed, and a calculation for the amount of additional tax owed at the end of the year. It's "voluntary", in a way, but so it filing any tax return - it's voluntary until it's not.

    2. Re:big phone by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Specifically, in Minnesota, if you buy more than several hundred dollars of things from out-of-state in an untaxed manner, you're supposed to file a use tax form and pay the amount of the sales tax yourself. They don't make it real easy (and I never did find a comparable form for buying things outside Hennepin County, which has its own sales tax), and pretty much nobody does it, and I've never heard of it being enforced, but it's the law.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  12. Just what apple does... by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1
    I feel like no one should be suprised. Apple just is always trying to time thing optimally. Just like with most of their products, they aren't the edge cutters. They wait for products to be accepted (larger phones, mp3 players, tablets) then produce their own stream lined model. It keeps from dealing with backlash and PR of having a device that has to be accepted by the general public. It's a pretty obvious ploy that has turned out quite good for them.

    It just makes sense for many reviewers to be turned off by initial massize screen of the samsung... but then it becomes part of the accepted norm so it's not such a big deal later on. It almost becomes an expectation.

    1. Re:Just what apple does... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I don't think this was timed optimally; Apple themselves were concerned last year that most of the market growth in premium handsets was in larger sizes, an area they didn't cover. The optimal time to launch a larger model would've been then, not a full year later.

      They missed the boat. Pleasantly, for people like me who like small handsets, but they missed it.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Just what apple does... by swb · · Score: 1

      There is something to be said for delays. It allows the internals to get that much better, allowing more horsepower to handle the larger screens as well as giving the human factor part of the interface time to figure out what works and doesn't.

    3. Re:Just what apple does... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      The optimal time to launch a larger model would've been then, not a full year later. They missed the boat.

      Yeah, to the tune of 10 million sales over the weekend. ;-)

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Just what apple does... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      That's right. Sales numbers are THE measure of success. Especially here on Slashdot.

    5. Re:Just what apple does... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Are you retarded?

      Apple is a for profit company that exists in order to make money, currently it does that by selling iphones and ipads and so on. So yes, sales numbers are THE measure of success.

    6. Re:Just what apple does... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I think we can all agree that ten million sales last year is better than ten million sales today.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Just what apple does... by technomom · · Score: 1

      No, they didn't plan it optimally. They got broadsided by Android capturing 85+% of the market, a lot of that led by Samsung's charge into phablets. They knew they had a problem and they fixed it. No need for spin here. They did the right thing.

    8. Re:Just what apple does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right. Sales numbers are THE measure of success. Especially here on Slashdot.

      You sound like one of those frustrated painters who claims that the only true art is the stuff that doesn't sell.

    9. Re:Just what apple does... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I think we can all agree that ten million sales last year is better than ten million sales today.

      You're right. Last year they had a measly 9 million in sales for the first weekend of the iPhone 5s.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    10. Re:Just what apple does... by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      No, they didn't plan it optimally. They got broadsided by Android capturing 85+% of the market, a lot of that led by Samsung's charge into phablets.

      The reason that Android got 85% of the market is not because of large screens but because they are on average much cheaper. If Apple wanted a large chunk of the Android market they would have been selling low end low margin phones and been as "successful" as all of the floundering Android manufacturers,

    11. Re:Just what apple does... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The tablets that existed before the iPhone were pretty much heavy expensive things (I've seen prices like $3K) running mainstream Windows XP and mainstream Windows XP applications. They also weren't generally accepted, although they were very useful in some niche applications. I'm going to suggest that, by providing a sub-$1K tablet that was light and ran a tablet-optimized OS and tablet-optimized apps, they did some serious innovation.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  13. Now it is made by apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From now will be called fapblet.

  14. whatever happened to "right tool for the job"? by zr · · Score: 1

    (eom)

  15. Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before switching to x86: x86 sucks ass! PowerPC all the way!

    After switching to x86: x86 is awesome! Glad we don't have PowerPC anymore!

    1. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by idontgno · · Score: 0

      Corollary: Anything done late by Apple wasn't cool until Apple did it.

      Corollary corollary: Unless Apple claims it was never done before Apple did it, objective reality notwithstanding. Because it didn't count, or the RDF makes the faithful forget, or "No true Scotsman", or whatever.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by david.emery · · Score: 1

      Well, for a long time the PowerPC had some real advantages over x86, particularly for floating point performance. However Motorola lost its edge there, and the big problem with PowerPC chips was their power consumption, making laptop design and battery life much more difficult.

      But that kind of sophistication is beyond most of the tech press, and I suspect beyond a lot of the people here who emote their hate for specific brands. (I admit to a very strong bias against Microsoft, so include myself in that set at least to some degree.)

    3. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by jpellino · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, it was a bit more complicated than that. At the outset PPC did outperform x86. Good reason to use it. x86 caught up and PPC development was clearly not going to be able to support notebook computing (which is why you never had a iBook G5). At that point it was a good business decision to switch. Apple even made it amazingly simple to migrate apps from PPC to x86 as long as you took their giant repeated hints to use xCode - something that Adobe just didn't pay attention to. Their nonsense was probably the biggest user-facing bump in the switchover.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    4. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by omems · · Score: 1

      It's not just Apple that gets this sort of response, it's any company that people have an irrational attachment to.
      People forget these are companies whose sole purpose is to make money and that will say anything to make that money. Of course they will change their minds and blaze forward with unnatural determination. To appear indecisive or even acknowledge a change is an admission of non-optimal corporate irresponsibility that no business (or politician, but I repeat myself) can afford to make.
      I don't know why it's news or why it's unexpected at this point.

    5. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is nothing if not pragmatic.

      When Apple adopted PPC, x86 did suck. This was the era of the 486 remember! The pentium had just launched, and the first pentiums were real dogs. They ran hot, cost a lot, were not really faster, and had that infamous math bug.

      PPC on the other hand was an advanced RISC processor with backing from IBM and other big players, support from microsoft, etc. There were prototype platforms for everything from game consoles to home computers to advanced workstations. PPC was based on IBM's big iron POWER processors so it scaled up to the server realm too. PPC systems had a real firmware system! Openfirmware to this day is in many ways superior to what x64 systems ship with. UEFI is not that great.

      Everyone really did think it was the future, and Apple was there first in the consumer space. They even had a brilliant emulator written that let them transition from 68k and let users keep their old software.

      Fast forward 10 years.. PPC never really got widely adopted outside Apple, some IBM workstations, and embedded applications. Motorola is all but gone in the consumer space, IBM clearly has no interest in developing more consumer processors.. But the very worst of all nobody is making mobile chips. Apple would never release a G5 laptop, and even adopted some freescale processors that were really made for embedded applications (And had infamous instruction incompatibility problems)

      They really had no choice but to switch because their processor platform evaporated out from underneath them. Fortunately they saw this coming and maintained a secret x86 fork of OSX until the time was right. The very nanosecond Intel dropped the shitty P4 arch, apple made the jump. The very first Core duo and core solo (The short lived predecessor to the still-usable-to-this-day core2) systems available to the public were from apple.

    6. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by vux984 · · Score: 1

      However Motorola lost its edge there, and the big problem with PowerPC chips was their power consumption, making laptop design and battery life much more difficult.

      Sort of. Its not that a low power PPC wasn't possible.

      The problem was that IBM et al couldn't be bothered to put in the R&D or fab capabilities to make a low power version of the PowerPC just for Apple laptops. It wasn't a priority for them, and the market was too small.

      Now you could argue they missed the boat, and that Apple has grown tremendously... but I'd argue that a big part of Apple's recent relevative success in computers is tied to them switching to x86 -- being able to run windows in VMs, being able to do bootcamp, being that much easier to port x86 code from other platforms over... are all what enabled a lot of people to really consider switching.

      Even if IBM had done a low power G5 and beyond for apple, its an open question whether nearly as many people would have considered switching to them. I know I, and many many others who wouldn't have bought a macbook pro if it had had anything but an x86 chipset.

    7. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by david.emery · · Score: 1

      Good points.

      I think the ability to run Windows applications was more of a psychological than practical advantage, particularly with the growth of web applications. VirtualPC ran pretty well on PowerPC for limited/occasional use (personal experience). With the exception of some (so-called) Web applications that require Active X controls (the worst offender being the S/MIME PKI module for Exchange WebMail), I haven't had to either BootCamp or VMWare/Parallels for the last 2-3 years.

      That being said, many companies (my current employer included) continue to be a Windows-only world, arguing cost efficiencies (and ignoring the investment in keeping Windows secure.) I worked around a problem with their corporate SharePoint by setting the Safari User Agent string to Firefox :-)

    8. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I'm a big proponent of the Mac and of many of Apple's products, but come on.... Unless you're talking about the childish "my computer can beat your computer!" comments that all of us computer geeks made as pre-teens? It's just not like that.

      Back in the PowerPC days, things were quite a bit different in the computer landscape. Motorola, on the whole, was greatly respected as a company capable of making very good processors. (The old 8-bit CPUs like the 6809e and later, the 16-bit 68000 series were considered FAR superior to the Intel stuff, with more logical and efficient instruction sets, etc.) When they made the "G4" CPUs for Apple, they had a speed advantage over comparable Intel offerings, depending on what tasks were being done. (For heavy math, they were on the inferior side ... but most Mac users weren't trying to do heavy math on one anyway.)

      When IBM started making the G5 PowerPC for Apple, there was a lot of hope out there. IBM made some big claims about where they could take that line of CPUs and were a big enough company with enough experience in the field so there was good reason to believe them. It looked like, maybe, Apple sided with a winner there. When that didn't pan out, Apple had no choice but to switch to Intel x86 (or AMD, which was probably a backup plan).

      So yeah.... it really was both a case of "Go PowerPC!" and later, "PowerPC sucks!" as things changed. Good on Apple for rolling with the changes instead of stubbornly sticking to something that was dying.

    9. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Some of us hate ALL brands. At which point our criticism is elevated to another level. Unfortunately too many people insist that everyone needs to seek refuge in one brand or another. To the point where they insist that define the parameters of discussion. I am typing this on a Windows phone (Nokia). It sucks in some ways. So do my Android phone and the iOS devices I've owned.

    10. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      x86 had surpassed PowerPC years before Apple considered the power issues in notebooks. When the first OS X builds came out, some people decided to try a biased test to see if an x86 CPU could run a *nix based Mac OS that was optimized for PowerPC at any tolerable speeds. The Intel chip they picked (not a top-tier, and much cheaper than any PowerPC chip) ran OS X dramatically faster than the hardware it was optimized for.

      After that test, Apple started talking about PowerPC not being able to fit their needs with portable devices.

    11. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      PPC was chosen because it was the simplest upgrade path from 680x0. I can't remember if the early ones were dual endian, but they were certainly big endian compatible. Same buses, same interfaces, similar support hardware, even similar datasheets since they were from Motorola. The Amiga went the same way for the same reason.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost like PowerPC was better than x86 at some point and then, when x86 became a better arch, they decided to make the switch. Re-evaluating your opinions based on new releases? HERESY!

    13. Re:Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      In the industry I work in, programmers and technical support persons all rely on proprietary software developed by the hardware manufacturers that we support, and ALL of that software is windows based.

      I see a lot of people in my industry using Mac laptops on-site for their duty's, but ALL of them are running Windows on it one way or another to make it possible.

      You might have a point with typical everyday office work, but face it, typical everyday office work can be done on an ARM tablet if needed, since it's mostly word processing and spreadsheets and web interfaces. Get much more technical than that, and you are stuck using the OS that your software flow is based around.

      Web applications have their place, but they don't and CAN'T replace everything, as many people need to use their computers where there is no access to the web. Not everyone is tethered to their cubical and PC with all-the-time internet connection.

  16. Phone size myopia by swb · · Score: 2

    They haven't released numbers yet, but the press reports seem to indicate that the 6 Plus demand is outstripping supply yet the chorus of people who think that even the 6 is too big let alone the 6 plus is as loud as ever. I think this is an interesting dichotomy.

    I think the 6 Plus is fine -- I find more screen better than less screen, even if the increased size limits one-handed usage. I don't think there's an "ideal" size for any phone unless you toss in some usage requirements, like one-handed use or pocket storage complaints. I know some people who would use a full-size iPad as a phone if they could because none of the one-handed use or pocket issues apply to them. I think it's just a matter of personal preference.

    I do think it's interesting that Tim Cook's Apple is responding to market demand instead of imposing a Jobsian design fascism. I also think that for a decent chunk of people, the 6 Plus is meant to take over some of the things they'd use a tablet for. I'm mostly happy with my iPad 3 (even with iOS8), but I think with a 6 Plus I'll reach for it less and put off upgrading it until it runs out of iOS updates.

    And I think a lot of people who want both but can't swing it financially will find a 6 Plus a reasonable universal device. This is what surprised me about the 6 Plus release as I'm pretty sure it will eat into iPad Mini sales and even some full-size iPad sales.

    What would be nice and I don't know if we'll ever get there for lots of reasons (technological and sales/marketing) would be a watch-sized device becoming the root device with the phone or tablet being the kind of screen/user interface, tethered to the phone for network access. That way you could pick your "phone" based on size preference, or none at all if all you wanted was bluetooth audio and phone calling.

    1. Re:Phone size myopia by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      What would be nice and I don't know if we'll ever get there for lots of reasons (technological and sales/marketing) would be a watch-sized device becoming the root device with the phone or tablet being the kind of screen/user interface, tethered to the phone for network access. That way you could pick your "phone" based on size preference, or none at all if all you wanted was bluetooth audio and phone calling.

      That is unlikely, barring some miraculous breakthrough in radio efficiency or battery capacity. The radio in the watch would drain the battery way too fast if it was constantly communicating with other devices.

      A lot of fun ideas about how one might use mobile devices fall flat as soon as you factor in the energy storage constraint.

    2. Re:Phone size myopia by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup. I think part of this is the whole surface-area vs volume relationship. Battery capacity is almost entirely a function of volume. When you have something like a phone which already has a considerable screen surface area just adding a fraction of a millimeter of thickness gives you a substantial amount of additional volume inside for more battery. On the other hand, when you're talking about a watch face that has to be the size of your wrist, adding a bit more thickness adds much less volume, and to really have a decent battery you start to get into something that looks like a cube that straps onto your wrist. If wrists were all the same size I guess you could start to have more of a wrap-around design. It would look super-ugly, but I guess another option would be a watch that adds an extra compartment on the other side of your wrist - no screen, just a big box for battery/components/etc. I guess you could stick a camera in there too if you wanted to and just hold you your wrist to shoot video out of the back of your wrist.

      If anybody is wincing at these kinds of highly-utilitarian product descriptions, that would explain why the phone still contains all the smarts.

    3. Re:Phone size myopia by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      There are actually Chinese noname watches that are basically fully fledged smartphones with most of what you'd expect from a smartphone in terms of features, including a camera. Example: http://www.dhgate.com/product/...|1016721942

      Good luck getting that battery to last you through the day!

    4. Re:Phone size myopia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the better way to do it would be a bluetooth headset with a watch-type device mainly for input and display which connect to a phone or tablet you keep in your pocket/backpack/briefcase safely away until the need for and convenience of a larger device would be more apparent. Also, keyboards and other devices would be swapped in as necessary and only where convenient.

    5. Re:Phone size myopia by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Your idea is not without precident; the iPad Mini essentially exists because Apple was losing marketshare to the smaller tablets everyone liked, regardless of Jobs' protestations that 10-inch was the perfect size. If there's new product that obviates yours, it might as well be you selling it. There was an argument going around the tech blogs maybe six months ago that tablets may be positioned as PC killers, but that they don't have much of a future; "kids these days", so to speak, aren't using PCs in the first place, so won't transition onto them. They're all cellular.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:Phone size myopia by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      If you go by preorders, all of the the 6+ models at verizon (16/64/128GB in the three colors) were multiple weeks out before the 6 models started to slip on delivery.

      As for cutting into tablet sales...my 5.5" LG G3 works well enough for surfing that I gave my iPad to my daughter. I just no longer have much use for it. It's not full featured like my Win8 based convertible, and it's not portable enough to justify carrying it with me many places just to surf or read email.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    7. Re:Phone size myopia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convinced that Apple is responding to demand for a larger screen than that they are running out of "new" features to use as bait for people to continue their relentless upgrade cycles.

    8. Re:Phone size myopia by swb · · Score: 1

      I've bought new releases because I always wanted a faster phone, my wife gets my year old model (making the annual upgrade marginally more justifiable) and "because I work in IT" (hey, my wife buys it..)

      But this time around money is a little tighter and the only feature I really cared about was phablet-sized screen, and wouldn't you know it, Apple delivered.

      I do think the smartphone as a concept is kind of running out of meaningful upgrades of any type. CPUs are plenty fast, screens are crazy high resolution and LTE speeds can often beat random wifi connections.

      Someone is going to have to bite the bullet and start making dockable smartphones that can drive laptops/desktops or something really a bigger leap.

    9. Re:Phone size myopia by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      true but then every time you connect to a wifi network you infect it with Chinese malware. just sayin.

  17. The problem of tech journalism.. by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

    Is that it's well... rudimentary and crude.

    Standard journalism often has to reflect on the articles they have written in the past in order to look at their viewpoints and editorial on subjects in the past, explain how those might have changed, and then reflect that in the new editorial they are writing.

    Perhaps it's not just tech journalism. It's probably just ALL journalistic standards that have basically gone down in the era of FOX news and infotainment, that we don't pretend to want that intellectual honesty that perhaps once was there. The press is complicit in most things for access -- it's true of Apple's press events (and how Walt Mossberg fawns over anything Apple does), as much as it is true of traditional press fawning over the sitting President in the hopes of better access.

    The Verge isn't at fault because they are Apple fanboys; we are at fault for not looking at them with a harsher eye. As Bill Clinton said, people are now more accepting than ever, unless they have a viewpoint they disagree with. And everybody LOVES Apple. It's just not cool not to (apparently).

    Of course I'm a weird guy with a Windows phone because I wanted a better camera (at the time), so what the hell do I know...

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  18. Reviews follow sales to get more eyeballs by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 3, Informative

    The original Galaxy Note got some pretty bad reviews, some even calling it a fad, due to its size. But then it sold like hot cakes, flying off the shelves.

    Then review sites learned ther lesson and gave the Note 2 a decent spin and gave it the top reviews it deserved. Now the LG G3 is getting all the 4.5-star reviews.

    It was always meant to be the other way around (i.e you read reviews to help you make an informed purchase), but sites need ad money and realized it's un-cool to hate on phablets.

    I replaced my old broken Note 2 with a tiny Nexus 5 and I'm suffering with the cramped 4.95" screen. Next time, I'm going medieval on screen size.

  19. Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have you actually tried them? I mean I understand not wanting a Note 4 or iPhone+,
    but have you actually tried phones in the Galaxy S5 class (~5")? The rounded back (which the iPhone 5 hasn't got) helps a lot.
    I was actually surprised how little you feel the phone considering it's size.

  20. I love them by Kokuyo · · Score: 2

    I went from a Galaxy Note 2 to a HTC One Max. And then I went and put an Otterbox around the thing.

    I carry it in my front pants pocket. It snags not more than any other rectangular deice (because it's always the corner that gets snagged by a fold) and I can actually use it to browse the web without unusable mobile versions of websites and without pinchzooming like a deranged person.

    I don't have to carry a second device, either, that needs a daily recharge... I could have been talked into carrying a phone and actual tablet if, and only if, there was a Nokia 6210, with nothing more than phone, sms, contact list, 3G/4G and Wifi Hotspot/Tethering capabilities. But such a thing does not exist, at least not at a price that would make you better off buying a smartphone all the same.

    I love the size... finally it doesn't feel like I have to pinch a teensy, tiny device between my not even that enormous fingers and be afraid of it slipping away. That's why I dig the Otterbox too, by the way. The HTC is so thin, I was constantly afraid of inadvertently flicking it through the room.

    YMMV, but I love these things to death. If I could have had the HTC with full metal body and twice as thick (and therefore with a battery in the 6Ah range), I would have bought that instead.

    1. Re:I love them by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      "I carry it in my front pants pocket. It snags not more than any other rectangular deice (because it's always the corner that gets snagged by a fold) and I can actually use it to browse the web without unusable mobile versions of websites and without pinchzooming like a deranged person."

      Exactly. I use chrome, youtube, maps, and text messaging at least 5x more than I use the actual phone app. My note2 is a little awkward to hold to me ear but, like I said, I'm rarely using the phone. These days, the phone feature is just an app that comes in handy sometimes vs the primary mode of operation.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    2. Re:I love them by jittles · · Score: 1

      See I prefer having the tablet and phone be separate devices so I don't kill my phone battery playing games or watching movies on trips. I rarely bring a tablet with me when I am just out and about.

  21. Different things for different people by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

    Exactly.

    Different people want different things.

    This is not news.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Different things for different people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's news to Apple

    2. Re:Different things for different people by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      It's news because Apple finally figured something out that their customers want. Options. Not everybody wants the same thing. Some people want a small phone that fits in their pocket. Others want a larger phone with a bigger screen.

    3. Re:Different things for different people by _xeno_ · · Score: 1, Troll

      Options. Not everybody wants the same thing. Some people want a small phone that fits in their pocket. Others want a larger phone with a bigger screen.

      Which is why Apple are giving people the choice between a larger phone, or an even larger phone. Because choices are important.

      If you liked the original iPhone size, Apple has nothing for you. Because your choice isn't important. Whatever Apple says you want, that's what you get.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    4. Re:Different things for different people by technomom · · Score: 1

      ...and kudos to them. I'll say it because lots of people are thinking it. Losing Steve Jobs may be the best thing to happen to Apple. This is the first generation of iPhone that I'm actually considering. I think it is about an "S" generation away from it being a good choice. Right now though, I won't be giving up my screen off/unplugged "OK Moto" function nor will I give up my programmed NFC tags.

    5. Re:Different things for different people by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1

      Which is why Apple are giving people the choice between a larger phone, or an even larger phone. Because choices are important.

      If you liked the original iPhone size, Apple has nothing for you. Because your choice isn't important. Whatever Apple says you want, that's what you get.

      If you liked the original iPhone size you can keep what you have - the new versions don't offer much in the way of new hardware (apart from size). I don't think it's coincidence, however, that Apple are releasing the Apple Watch and the Phablets around the same time. They want you to keep your phone in your pocket/purse and have quick access to data on your new (gold) wrist device.

    6. Re: Different things for different people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you liked the original iPhone size you can keep what you have - the new versions don't offer much in the way of new hardware (apart from size).

      Totally impractical. Can you imagine how exhausting it would be explaining to EVERY person who sees your phone that you in fact CAN afford to upgrade, but have chosen not to?

    7. Re:Different things for different people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when you have to upgrade and don't have room. Say... to iOS 8 for instance. ;)

    8. Re:Different things for different people by Cabriel · · Score: 1

      This just in: Peoples opinions can change over time! News at 11!

    9. Re:Different things for different people by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      ios8 has a "hey siri" function, and iphone 6 has NFC reader...

    10. Re:Different things for different people by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Whatever Apple says you want, that's what you get.

      Sadly, there are people out there that consider this a good thing. They don't want to think about what they want, they just want Apple to tell them what's best for them.

    11. Re:Different things for different people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So NFC is open to developers?

    12. Re: Different things for different people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work for anything but payments

    13. Re: Different things for different people by Rosyna · · Score: 0

      it has no utility for anything other than payments. The use scenarios other devices use NFC for (because they can't be used for payments due to carrier interference) are better handled by better technologies, like Bluetooth LE.

    14. Re:Different things for different people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Hey Siri" works only when the phone is charging unlike "OK Moto". This limits its utility significantly. Also, iPhone6 does not open up NFC to usage other than Apple Pay currently, so you cannot program the phone using NFC tags. Full disclaimer: I have had NFC on my Galaxy Nexus for 2+ years now, but don't use it much other than the initial foray using Google pay at local stores (it worked well enough - until Verizon pulled the plug on the app.) I found the NFC "touch pay" more of a novelty since compatible terminals were not available everywhere and you needed to carry around your credit card(s) around anyway. I can see this changing if the technology is widely adopted and readers became more of a rule rather than an exception, which may happen due to it being available on an iPhone...

    15. Re: Different things for different people by niftydude · · Score: 2

      it has no utility for anything other than payments. The use scenarios other devices use NFC for (because they can't be used for payments due to carrier interference) are better handled by better technologies, like Bluetooth LE.

      So you think that the NFC tag I have on my bedside drawer, that I can place my phone on when I'm ready to sleep and have it turn off my house lights would be better handled by Bluetooth LE or some better technology? Ditto for all the other tasks floating around that I handle with NFC tags?

      I doubt it. Please explain.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    16. Re:Different things for different people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think with their slogan being 'Think Different' they'd have figured this out by now

    17. Re:Different things for different people by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's not a completely bad thing, if my memory serves. I've read studies that indicated that large numbers of choices didn't seem to make people happy. When given a few good things to choose from, they tended to be more contented with their purchase.

      I doubt that this applies to things the chooser knows a lot about, but most people really don't know that much about smartphones. For them, buying whatever version of the latest iPhone is likely to make them more satisfied with their experience than choosing among a wide range of different phones. Also, Apple is very good at figuring out what people in their target market are going to like, sometimes better than most of the people themselves.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  22. Re:Fainting fanboi by BronsCon · · Score: 2

    Anyone using Wave Charging *did* buy a brick with the Apple logo on it.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  23. Hipsters are passe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things?

    They liked the new things that coincided with their generation hitting their prime. The new things as the next generation hits its prime, the new things that are different than "their" things, not so much.

    Skinny jeans are becoming passe, soon to be laughed at when seen in photos, "OMG, look at those pants, can you believe we/they wore those". At least for guys. Tight jeans for women will always be fashionable.

    Yes there will be die hards. Every generation has those too.

    Like if you had an iPad and an iPhone you were a hipster, but if you had an old Android and a Lenovo laptop you were a legitimate human being.

    Poor analogy. The iPhone vs Android thing is strongly correlated with zip code, in other words income. Its simply a matter of getting what you want vs getting what your finances force you to settle for. Sure there are a few who shriek about the "walled garden", a loud minority, sort of like Linux desktop users.

    Perhaps I'm being a little hard on the Linux users. Many of those at Linux conferences are carrying MacBooks.

    1. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Poor analogy. The iPhone vs Android thing is strongly correlated with zip code, in other words income. Its simply a matter of getting what you want vs getting what your finances force you to settle for. Sure there are a few who shriek about the "walled garden", a loud minority, sort of like Linux desktop users.

      I've never chosen my phone based solely on price. Most phones tend to be free or nearly so with their contract
      so price isn't a significant factor for most people. I also don't have much preference of android vs iphone. The
      reason I've always owned android and never owned iphone is because apple doesn't make a phone with a physical
      keyboard. Ironically, it looks like I will finally be switching to iphone because everyone else has also stopped
      manufacturing high-end phones with keyboards so by switching to iphone I at least have a large selection of
      keyboard cases to choose from.

    2. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by njnnja · · Score: 2

      Most phones tend to be free or nearly so with their contract so price isn't a significant factor for most people

      But the choices of subsidized phones are being determined by your selection of carrier, which people choose based largely on cost. If you have AT&T or Verizon, you are generally looking at the best tier of "free" phones, if you have something like MetroPCS, you are looking at a different tier of "free" phones, all running android. So price is a huge factor for most people in their phone choice, it's just indirectly through their choice of carrier.

    3. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things?

      They liked the new things that coincided with their generation hitting their prime.

      So, they'll like something any day now, then? We've kind of been waiting for them to hit their prime for a while now. I feel like Marisa Tomei in My Cousin Vinny, I've been waiting so long for their generation to hit their prime...

    4. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by xevioso · · Score: 2

      Hipster-hating has certainly hit its prime. You see comments insulting people who like things they deem cool all the time. People used to make fun of goths, yuppies, even geeks, and now they make fun of hipsters. It's the new cool thing. Which makes the hipster-haters hipsters.

    5. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have always made fun of hipsters. They were called yuppies in my generation.

    6. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm being a little hard on the Linux users. Many of those at Linux conferences are carrying MacBooks.

      I was this guy for a while. I like open source, but it's not my top priority. I just want a computer that lets me get done what I need to get done most effectively. For admining *nix boxes and diagnosing networks it's pretty helpful to be on a *nix box yourself, but which variety is not really important as they all tend to have the same basic tools available.

      A Mac laptop provides a *nix machine that is 100% supported by the manufacturer with a well-known OS and a good selection of both free and commercial applications. For a while they were better built than most too, my last Macbook Pro was the generation before the "unibody" models and only Thinkpads really compared as far as sturdiness. I haven't yet found a laptop that feels stiffer than one of the unibody models, though some of the PC vendors have adopted that design as well and are thus in the same range.

      These days I'm running a refurb Acer because the battery on the MBP wore out and I couldn't see putting more than a third of its remaining value in to a replacement on a Core 2 where the motherboard couldn't reliably handle 4GB RAM sticks (only 2+2 was officially supported, though 2+4 was reported to work with most sticks, 4+4 was not usable in most cases). Core i7, 8GB, 1080p, and 100% of the hardware works in Ubuntu 14.04 so it fits what I need in a laptop.

      Why anyone who doesn't need Final Cut would ever buy a Mac desktop I'm not really sure. The G5-like Mac Pro was intermittently price competitive with other workstations in dual-socket form but the new trash can model strikes me as the second coming of the G4 Cube.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    7. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With iOS 8 you will also have a variety of on-screen keyboard options. You're welcome.

    8. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by nobodie · · Score: 1

      I'm way too seriously old for this to be other than funny.
      Like Apple stuff in general, The last really great Apple product was the blue and white iMac in '98. That was not just agreat product, it was equal to PCs for five or six years after it's introduction. While PCs were moving at light speed improvement, our old iMac was equal to or ahead of anything else you could buy.
      But now... what are they showing us? Nuttin' Advertising and marketing hype about something that is old the year before it came out. And, as with most things, what people care about is the hype and the marketing and the buyer buy-in.

      When I point out that iPhones are now just "toy phones" to my students, they really don't get what I am talking about: they are made for children's hands.

      When I point out that you have to use two hands to use a "phablet" which is kind of silly, "phones" have traditionally been a one-hand operation they also don't get it.

      Why not? because they buy on two criteria: what has the hype at the moment, and what will make them look cool. Phone as fashion accessory, no wonder we want the new watches, they are obviously fashion.

      We have lost the battle of form vs function. Fashion has won.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    9. Re:Hipsters are passe ... by nobodie · · Score: 1

      you buy a phone on a contract plan? didn't learn math did you? or to recognize that when you get something for "free" you are paying twice the real price.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  24. Brought an iPhone 6 and think it's too big by DaphneDiane · · Score: 1

    I bought an iPhone 6 recently figuring I'd skip the obviously too big 6+. While I like most of the features I've found even the base 6 is a too big. My thumb doesn't even reach all the way across the bottom of the screen and only about half way to the far corner if I'm holding the phone in a good stable grip. Even reachability mode doesn't get everything in close enough. I wish that it shrunk the screen slightly as well. I find that I either have to carefully balance the phone or use two hands. I've already drop it a few times trying to reach the stuff just a bit to far, and the area between my thumb and rest of my hand hurt the first few days after I got the device from trying to force my thumb to reach across. To be honest I was expecting it to be a bit big as there is a small part of an iPhone 5 screen I can't reach without shifting the phone but that bothered me only occasionally. Going to stick this one out, but not sure I want another large phone, especially since I carry a tablet* with me most of the time. Granted I guess I have short hands, my thumb is almost 1.5" long.

    * - Okay, sometimes I carry up to 3 with me so that I have Android, iOS and Surface covered; as part of checking to see how stuff runs on different OSes. And yes tablets are much bigger, but they are two handed devices.

    1. Re:Brought an iPhone 6 and think it's too big by jittles · · Score: 1

      I bought an iPhone 6 recently figuring I'd skip the obviously too big 6+. While I like most of the features I've found even the base 6 is a too big. My thumb doesn't even reach all the way across the bottom of the screen and only about half way to the far corner if I'm holding the phone in a good stable grip. Even reachability mode doesn't get everything in close enough. I wish that it shrunk the screen slightly as well. I find that I either have to carefully balance the phone or use two hands. I've already drop it a few times trying to reach the stuff just a bit to far, and the area between my thumb and rest of my hand hurt the first few days after I got the device from trying to force my thumb to reach across. To be honest I was expecting it to be a bit big as there is a small part of an iPhone 5 screen I can't reach without shifting the phone but that bothered me only occasionally. Going to stick this one out, but not sure I want another large phone, especially since I carry a tablet* with me most of the time. Granted I guess I have short hands, my thumb is almost 1.5" long.

      * - Okay, sometimes I carry up to 3 with me so that I have Android, iOS and Surface covered; as part of checking to see how stuff runs on different OSes. And yes tablets are much bigger, but they are two handed devices.

      See for me I feel like the 6 is perfect. I can hold it in the palm of my hand and still reach every corner of the screen. I do think that Apple should have made a traditional screen size. I played with the 6+ yesterday and it's just way too huge even for me. I feel like a 7 foot tall person might like the size of the 6+. But if you're always using two hands on your phone, I guess it doesn't matter.

    2. Re:Brought an iPhone 6 and think it's too big by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 1

      I switched to a Note 2 from my old iPhone 3GS, because I wanted more screen real estate, and it was a huge adjustment. Took me about a month to get used to the size (mow the 3GS seems laughable). After almost two years I'm still not OK with Android, but it was worth the annoyance for the larger size. I'd give it a little time...particularly give it long enough to determine if you actually need your tablet any more. I certainly didn't.

    3. Re:Brought an iPhone 6 and think it's too big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really shouldn't be operating the phone while driving, the principal use-case where people care about operating the phone entirely one-handed.

    4. Re:Brought an iPhone 6 and think it's too big by DaphneDiane · · Score: 1

      Heh. No, for cars that's what do not distrub mode and hands free operation are for if absolutely necessary. I love that my car ( prius ) has a built in text option to respond "I am currently driving" in the bluetooth integration.

      There are lots of valid reasons to use a cellphone one handed. For example when shopping, it's much more convient to be able to pull up member cards etc. without having to sit everything down or shift it around. Using the phone on breaking while drinking, or eating, etc. I could type a very long list here of other uses... but I could care less about playing along ( though only slightly less, I did list a couple examples after all :P )

    5. Re:Brought an iPhone 6 and think it's too big by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      [...] I've found even the base 6 is a too big.

      [...] but not sure I want another large phone [...]

      You just bought it.

      Give it 2-4 weeks.

      As you would start taking advantage of the larger screen, you would get used to the size. Or not.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    6. Re:Brought an iPhone 6 and think it's too big by DaphneDiane · · Score: 1

      You just bought it.

      Give it 2-4 weeks.

      As you would start taking advantage of the larger screen, you would get used to the size. Or not.

      As I said I'm going to stick it out. Ended up using my 5 yesterday for a bit while recovering from 8.0.1 and it still seemed slightly big to me. For now I still find myself thinking more consciously about how to use it ( i.e. if I need to shift hands etc. ) than my old phone; but hopefully that will improve over time. I haven't had it slip from my hands as much the last couple of days which is big improvement.

  25. i have a galaxy note 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had a galaxy note 3 for the past year, and i've concluded that the larger size sucks. When the planets are aligned and I focus really hard, I can actually use one hand to deal with it, otherwise I'm sure to drop it.

    In the meantime I got an iphone 5s for work (my first apple anything) and I plan on getting an iphone 6 (in a few months), but not the plus. Had the bigger iphone been a little smaller than the note 3 i gladly would have gotten that. But larger!? Hell no..

  26. For the price of an iPhone, you could have both... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0

    >> driving force is consumers who want/need to do computing tasks with their phone, but can't afford or don't want to pay for a secondary tablet

    For the price of an iPhone, you could have two decent Android phones and a couple of cheap tablets.

  27. Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an HTC One Max that fits in the front pocket of Levis jeans fine. I don't know how you have an issue with an iPhone unless you're wearing spandex jeans.

  28. want vs settle? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    what you want vs getting what your finances force you to settle for

    These are not the only choices.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  29. Nokia N-Gage by meustrus · · Score: 1

    I think I'd rather hold a paperback novel to my head than a taco, though.

    --
    I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    1. Re:Nokia N-Gage by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      depends on the color of the taco

  30. there is one smaller but high-end android phone by Chirs · · Score: 1

    Sony Xperia Z3 Compact

    1. Re:there is one smaller but high-end android phone by static0verdrive · · Score: 1

      That sony sports a 4.6 inch screen! I don't want anything bigger than 3.5 - 4 inches... and reading a lot of other comments here I suspect I'm not alone. Adding "compact" to the name doesn't make it so.

      --
      ========
      77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
  31. Reality Distortion Field by meustrus · · Score: 1

    Maybe I’m getting old, and my eyes are getting worse. Or maybe I’m stuck in Apple’s reality-distortion field (help). But something strange happened this week. I started to like a phablet.
    – Lauren Goode

    This turn-around is nothing more than Apple's reality distortion field. Now that Apple has given in and is selling phablets, of course their entire marketing effort is focused on it. They will make us love it the same way they made us love everything else: the Apple fanboy rumor mill hyping the next big thing, hyping the big media event, where the Apple CEO stands up and tells us how awesome and exciting this is, describing in simple terms the design problems they were trying to solve and showing the solutions. An Apple keynote is basically a hyped up lecture on why the next Apple product is great, and if you buy one you get an A.

    Sure, we might be ready to give in to huge phones, but it seems to me that the change is really that Apple has thrown in the towel. Traditionally they haven't given the customer what the customer asked for; they tried to figure out what's actually best for the customer and sell that. Apparently, some marketing trends are just unstoppable.

    --
    I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    1. Re:Reality Distortion Field by mlk · · Score: 1

      Or they have figured out what is best for the customer, and it is what everyone else is providing.

      Personally I hope the 6C is closer to the size of the iPhone 4/5, as what is good is options. I love my big PDA (don't give a shit about phones and phablets), but I can see good reasons for others to want a smaller device.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  32. Pixels by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

    In 2012, the Note and S3 had the same number of pixels. The iPhone 6 also has the same now as those two did then. In contrast, the iPhone 6 Plus has full HD 1920x1080 resolution. You actually get something for the larger physical size! The 2012 Note was pointless.

    1. Re:Pixels by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      In 2012, the Note and S3 had the same number of pixels. The iPhone 6 also has the same now as those two did then. In contrast, the iPhone 6 Plus has full HD 1920x1080 resolution.You actually get something for the larger physical size!

      We are very happy for you. You have finally gotten something from iCupertino.

      Back in the day, Note 1's resolution was actually a typical resolution for an entry-level 10-12" laptop - 1280x800. Basically normal HD.

      Almost the same as, for example, early MacBook Airs. Or were they too totally unusable due to such incredibly low resolution? (On mucch larger screen, no less!)

      The 2012 Note was pointless.

      Except for those people who actually wanted to have a phone with a bigger screen. I see more glass wearer getting those as a phone they do not need glasses for. Bump up the font size - and you do not have to squint at the phone anymore, you do not have bring it closer to your face. And the on screen keyboard is finally of a usable size for fingers of a human hand. IOW, just like you say, pointless.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    2. Re:Pixels by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

      You have finally gotten something from iCupertino.

      Not me. I tend to shy away from Apple products. In fact, as an early adopter of smart phone technology in 2005 with the Audiovox 6700 PocketPC, after it died in 2009 I just camped out in a dumb phone for four years to avoid the keyboardless iPhone mania, and jumped back in in 2012 with the S3, which was ahead of its time then (and compensated for lack of keyboard with swipe-typing, which iPhone didn't get until very recently).

      If my S3 were to die today, though, it'd be a toss-up for me between getting a used S3 off eBay for $200 or $750 for an iPhone 6 Plus.

      I've never had trouble seeing small things (though these days glass are required), and I prefer the smaller screen of the S3 over the Note for privacy.

  33. Old style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I laugh at the 6+ just like I laugh at the old bricks
    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/08/31/article-1210159-063CF50E000005DC-828_468x638.jpg

  34. Price by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    Problem of the phablets is price. The iPhone 6+ is probably the most expensive phone ever. Galaxy Notes also tend to be more expensive than Galaxy S.

  35. Cook has no choice ..... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    He pretty much HAS to start responding to market demand, vs. dictating what he thinks people SHOULD want. He's not a visionary with a head full of tech ideas to roll out to the masses. He's a former supply chain management guy.

    Personally, I think Apple needs to find a "sweet spot" between the two, to find the greatest success. Jobs was a big believer in the concept that people don't really know what they need or want. You can survey them and they'll give you responses, but they're generally based around what they've already seen and already know exists.

    I think there's something to that, but it's less relevant when you're just revising existing products. That's what you've got here with the iPhone. Everyone knows what the product is and what it does, and it's gone through 6 major releases (and all the smaller interim updates like 3gs, 4s and 5s). It's best, at this point, to find out what its users (or potential users) want to see changed with it, and try to accommodate it

  36. And a tech review stops mid-fellatio by Chas · · Score: 1

    Fair? HAHAHA! You MUST be new!

    *Tech reviewer goes back to slobbing the Apple knob*

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  37. Re:For the price of an iPhone, you could have both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they can afford to pay for the service plan, but can't afford $200 for a Nexus 7? My only price consideration for purchasing a phone is how much the plan costs. The cost of the hardware is inconsequential. Over the roughly 3-year life of a phone, my service plan costs about $3,000.00.

  38. Re:For the price of an iPhone, you could have both by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

    yeah, but then you end up with several crappy devices in place of one device. winning?

  39. Re:For the price of an iPhone, you could have both by praxis · · Score: 1

    I looked around, and could not find two tablets and two phones that were $500 and "decent". Do you have some links?

  40. Re:For the price of an iPhone, you could have both by Ranbot · · Score: 1

    Counterpoints:
    1) For some people two devices is a hassle
    2) You're not factoring in the cost of mobile data plans for 2 devices vs 1. I know you can tether/mobile hotspot, but then you're back to point #1.
    3) For users already invested in the Apple garden of products, then what Android has to offer doesn't really factor into it. (Although I personally agree that Apple prices are outrageous, but the market seems to think otherwise)

  41. The REAL problem is NO small flagships by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that Apple has joined the phablet bandwagon, we have another problem: manufacturers are only offering their premium devices in phablet, or near-phablet, sizes. Want the "smaller" iphone? Sure, but you have to give up camera features. Most of the Android phones are in a similar boat - you can get a 4-4.5" screen phone, but you'll give up memory, or speed, or camera functionality, LTE, or any of a number of other features. Smaller screens mean lower price points and cutting corners.

    Wouldn't it be nice it you really could choose a 3.5-4" screen phone that did everything else the larger models did?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:The REAL problem is NO small flagships by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Laws of physics I'm afraid. A better camera needs a bigger lens and sensor, plus room for optical stabilisation hardware. More memory needs a bigger battery to keep it running all day.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:The REAL problem is NO small flagships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh? OIS wouldn't make the phone significantly wider. No "physics" related reason to limit it to phablet sizes.

      Memory consumption is a tiny part of most mobile phones, dwarfed by the power consumption of the screen, CPU, GPU, modem.

      And, a smaller phone can use a lower power GPU since it's pushing fewer pixels. This partially compensates for the smaller space available for battery.

      So, I don't really think there's any good technical reason to limit high performance to phablet sizes only.

  42. Re:Fainting fanboi by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

    you know, my wife and I saw the phones in the apple store and we didn't like them. they looked cheap. not because of the materials or build quality, but because they look like other cheap phones.

    I have an iphone 5. maybe later this year I'll upgrade to 5s, or maybe I'll keep the 5. I hope in coming years they won't abandon the original form factor.

  43. Phablets! by rlk · · Score: 1

    I'd have gotten the Galaxy Mega except that it's considerably inferior (less RAM, slower processor) to the Galaxy Note 2 that I wound up getting. I have it in an Otterbox Defender case that at least doubles, if not triples, the thickness of the phone.

    I have no difficulty holding and using it. I can do it 1-handed when I want for simple things like dialing, but I prefer 2-handed operation in general most of the time. A smaller phone would be very hard to use that way. Even the Note feels annoyingly cramped compare to my 10" tablet (HP Touchpad running CyanogenMod); the 15% bigger (linear) screen of the Mega would have been preferable. Dunno offhand whether there's an Otterbox-type case available for it; that's a dealbreaker.

  44. My experience with the Note 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not cutting edge. I got the Note 3 because my old ass Nexus was getting.. too old. My choice was a toss up between the LG G2 and the Note 3. The price through promotions was about the same at the time so I went with the Note 3.

    I am not someone that flaunts or plays the "look at what I have". The first month I had my Note 3 I got a lot of "What the hell is that thing" from friends and co workers. This was casual observation by someone seeing me using it. I just said, yeah it's kind of big but you get used to it and went about my business not furthering the discussion.

    After the first month or so that started to die down and in the past 6 months or so, not a single word from anyone about the size. People are getting used to seeing a larger phone.

    I have a $8 protective cover on it with a pull out kickstand and it works great for watching movies on the train/plane. There are places my old phones used to fit that this one does not like my front zippered pocket on my backpack and my bag under the seat on my bike. Oh well. When I pull out my Nexus or even my wife's LG G2, I think man, that thing is small. I used to use something that small? I'll never go back.

  45. The New Normal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has made bigger phones the new normal--thanks to quality design, materials, and craftsmanship and a catalog of a million apps that work well with the new devices, thanks to many thousands of dedicated developers.

  46. Re:For the price of an iPhone, you could have both by praxis · · Score: 1

    Even worse, he's talking about *four* devices (which I don't even think you can find four devices that sum up to under $650).

  47. Ill defined by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I've never been convinced it's well defined.

    It's not. It's basically an ill defined pejorative for "people who do things I don't like" with a dash of a superiority complex thrown in. They think the other person has a superiority complex so they beat them to the punch with their own. Basically if you call someone a hipster you are probably covering up your own insecurity and couldn't think of a more creative insult.

    1. Re:Ill defined by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      They think the other person has a superiority complex so they beat them to the punch with their own. Basically if you call someone a hipster you are probably covering up your own insecurity and couldn't think of a more creative insult.

      LOL, that sounds like a very hipster thing to say. Sounds very meta.

      Can I get this translated into the standard "nerd, jock, student council, and stoner metalhead" cool kids/dorks magic quadrant we used to have in the 80s?

      Unless it's a hipster thing to do that. In which case I'm pretty sure I've never qualified.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Ill defined by sjbe · · Score: 1

      LOL, that sounds like a very hipster thing to say. Sounds very meta.

      Is that meant to be a recursive insult because, you know... pot, kettle, black...

    3. Re:Ill defined by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Is that meant to be a recursive insult because, you know... pot, kettle, black...

      Yes, absolutely.

      It does seem to be a recursive definition based on who perceives whom to be a hipster and why. ;-)

      And trying to define it, either makes one a hipster (and therefore not a real hipster), or not a hipster (and therefore a real hipster), and then as soon as you become all smug and ironic about the fact that you are or are not a hipster you become one ... and then you get over the whole notion of hipster and the cycle starts all over again.

      Because there clearly is meant to be some smug irony in there somewhere. Or, not.

      As I said, very meta. ;-)

      Here on slashdot, most people I see using the term "hipster douchebag" are themselves hipster douchebags.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Ill defined by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      In other words, it's Hipsters all the way down. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  48. Prove it by sjbe · · Score: 1

    For the price of an iPhone, you could have two decent Android phones and a couple of cheap tablets.

    I'll bite. First question is which iPhone are we talking about here? 5, 5S, 6 or 6plus? With what memory capacity? Second, go ahead and prove it. Find me two "decent" (meaning similar specs to the iPhone) Android phones and two "cheap" tablets at unsubsidized prices that cost the same as an iPhone. Only restriction is that it has to be something that is actually useful because I cannot fathom any reason to buy something that will gather dust.

  49. Most customers really do have no idea by sjbe · · Score: 1

    He pretty much HAS to start responding to market demand, vs. dictating what he thinks people SHOULD want.

    If that were the case then he should start offering thicker phones with a bigger battery. The fact that companies like Mophie actually have a business model strongly indicates there is a demand out there for phones with enough batter to last more than half a day.

    Jobs was a big believer in the concept that people don't really know what they need or want.

    And he is largely correct. If I were to go around my office and ask people what they would like that would make their job better, I will largely get blank stares or some extremely modest improvement to something they were already doing like a more comfy chair. People are REALLY REALLY bad in general about being technology visionaries. Henry Ford said it best when he said "If I asked customers what they wanted they would answer a faster horse".

    Where this viewpoint is most often wrong is when you are talking about incrementally improving an existing product they are already familiar with. People often have well formed and informed opinions in that case. They can tell you that they like a bigger or smaller screen on a device they already know and use. They have NO idea if they will like something totally new (or seemingly new) like ApplePay.

  50. Bendable iPhone6 by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    Cool iPhone 6 Plus Feature Lets You Bend Phone Just by Sitting http://nymag.com/daily/intelli...

  51. Woooosh by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Better duck!

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  52. After the switch: It's faster but sucks by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    After switching to x86: x86 is awesome!

    My feeling at the time was that it was nice to have it be faster, but I still didn't like the mess underneath that was x86 instruction sets... but since I didn't have to deal with it that was OK.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  53. It's too big but I bought one by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I ordered the Six Monolith, even though I am quite sure it's too large.

    I write iOS applications for a living, and I need it for testing, so I will suffer the thing to have the newer form factor to test on.

    The one aspect where I'm thinking I'll like the size more and not less is for photography. For a long time I've been wishing they would put larger cameras into the iPad, now they have...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  54. I am an odd one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 4.3" phone and my wife a 5".

    They are both the same OS which is designed from the ground up to be a single handed phone. I find the 4.3" screen to be far superior granted the 5" phone is a much nicer phone. I can wait for Blackberry to refresh the Z10 to be a little nicer. Then I'll have an awesome phone to replace it.

  55. Mini iPhone 6s by ed1park · · Score: 3

    I would love one the size of a 4s. Is there a petition out there to support this sentiment?

  56. Once you go Apple you never go back Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has released over EIGHT iOS systems in even fewer years. Android in that period? One with four .point releases.

    Goes to show just how much Apple is playing catchup these days.

  57. Phablet? Seriously? by JonathanPDX · · Score: 1

    I guess I'll never understand the incessant, infantile need of some to combine terms into cutesie baby-talk terms.

    But why get upset about the size? If people like it, they'll buy it and use it. If not, it will die of its own accord.
    Better to offer a wide range of shapes and styles so at least there's some semblance of choice.

  58. Use what you like. by Bryan+Bytehead · · Score: 1

    This is (almost?) reminiscent of OS wars, laptop versus desktop versus tablet wars, and even portrait versus landscape wars.

    My first true smartphone was an original Note. Yeah, I can be behind the times. I use both hands to use it. In fact, I used both hands when I used a flip phone. I use both hands when I use my son's iPhone. After the Note died, I now use the Moto G, which is one of the smaller phones out there. Guess what? I still use both hands.

    I plan on getting the Note 4 or the Note Edge, just as soon as I can get both of them in my hands to check them out (and I know what the price of the Edge is going to be...).

    If you must use your phone with one hand, then by all means, get a smaller phone, the phone that fits your hand and your use.

    Phones the size of the Note fit my hands, and I'm rather used to the stylus as well, even if it didn't work with the Moto G. I've been happy with the Moto G, but I'm not liking the lack of some of the sensors and the lack of LTE, which I thought I could live without, has been something that has me wanting a new phone. So, a new Note will be in my future. The Edge intrigues me at the same time it screams that I probably won't use it anyway. But if the cost differential isn't that much, I'll go with it anyway.

    So a big phone is what I'm going choose as my marketing choice.

    Anybody else is free to make their own choice.

    --
    Bryan