Slashdot Mirror


After Dallas Ebola Diagnosis, CDC Raises Estimate of Patient's Possible Contacts

As reported by Bloomberg News, The Washington Post, and other outlets, the Liberian patient whose diagnosis of Ebola infection marks him as the first such case to have been first diagnosed within the United States may have had contact with more people than previously estimated, and 80 people in the Dallas area are now believed to have come into contact with him. While Bloomberg reports that this larger group of potential contacts is "being monitored for symptoms," the Washington Post's slightly later story says that, in keeping with the best current knowledge about Ebola's spread, "Dallas County Health and Human Services Director Zachary Thompson said that these [newly identified contacts] are not being watched or monitored and are not showing any symptoms of the illness. Only the immediate family members of the victim are being regularly monitored for Ebola symptoms; they've been ordered to stay at home and avoid contact with others."

258 comments

  1. Contacts by rossdee · · Score: 0

    I wear glasses, not contacts.

    1. Re:Contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, they were going to debrief him, but then they learned he was wearing boxers.

    2. Re:Contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drink from glasses, not wear them.

    3. Re:Contacts by pkinetics · · Score: 1

      commando is the only way to go

  2. I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movie by hsmith · · Score: 3, Informative

    Amazing how the government freaked out over H1N1 years ago and simply nothing happened. Yet, a real virus is on the move and "everything is a-ok" is the word from everyone.

    Yes yes, you only get it if you come in contact with feces, vomit, etc, but that perception is there now that it is in the US.

  3. Good luck Ebola-chan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good luck Ebola-chan!

  4. Doomsday Preppers heading for the bunker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't have a bunker, but I do have a solid supply of food and water and a generator with gasoline. If I have to, I can avoid most human contact for a month or more. I never actually believed it would come to this, though - it's like something out of a movie.

    1. Re:Doomsday Preppers heading for the bunker by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      No, it's really not. It's like something out of CDC planning materials. They're taking exactly the precautions that make sense to take.

    2. Re:Doomsday Preppers heading for the bunker by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You really are a complete and utter jazz mag..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Doomsday Preppers heading for the bunker by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Taking all the precautions huh. Is that why the hospital send him home for two days even though they knew he had recently come from West Africa? Sounds like they are screwing the pooch here.

    4. Re:Doomsday Preppers heading for the bunker by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I don't have a bunker, but I do have a solid supply of food and water and a generator with gasoline. If I have to, I can avoid most human contact for a month or more. I never actually believed it would come to this, though - it's like something out of a movie.

      See you in a month....

      BTW, I think they have essentially contained the problem for now. We will know for sure in 21 days.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:Doomsday Preppers heading for the bunker by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      With jazz hands?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:Doomsday Preppers heading for the bunker by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Modding this down? Really? Parent is not coming off as nutty at all. If ebola becomes established in the USA, figuring out how to avoid human contact for the incubation period is a perfectly sane thing to do.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    7. Re:Doomsday Preppers heading for the bunker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you hear that? It's the sound of Jazz musicians all over the world beating you both to death with saxophones, guitars, pianos dropped from cranes, etc. Sure, language changes; but some changes suck. BTW, Jazz musicians originated "suck" to describe something inferior. A good horn player was said to be able to "blow" the horn well. From that it was a logical leap that a bad player must be sucking.

  5. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    H1N1 was also a "real virus", whatever that means. The media is equally blowing American risk of Ebola out of proportion like they did H1N1, which actually managed to infect a largish number of Americans.

    There were 14,000 worldwide deaths from H1N1 2k9, 3,500 of which were in North America. This ebola breakout doesn't currently represent nearly that much risk to Americans, but it could be a lot worse if the epidemic continues to grow in western Africa.

  6. Freak out! by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok everyone! Time to freakout!
    Please ignore the fact that the majority of Africa has this under control, and the hardest hit areas are those with virtually no sanitation. This could be us!!! Did we mention Plagues are a harbinger of the apocalypse? Worry about your souls as well!

    Syria? ... nothing to see there, move along sheeple. Please remain distracted, it's for your own safety.

    1. Re:Freak out! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      No one is ignoring Syria. Jesus. Syria is continuing to make headline news even on our shitty-as-fuck over-sensationalized 24 hour news networks.

    2. Re:Freak out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they are continuing to ignore Benghazi. Clinton really muffed that one up.

    3. Re:Freak out! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      But they are continuing to ignore Benghazi. Clinton really muffed that one up.

      (In some totally unspecified way, that you promise implicates her personal negligence, but none of the several politically forced official investigations have had any semblance of showing.)

    4. Re: Freak out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter. Clinton will only become president if her corporate handlers make it so. Then we'll have the DLC corporate moderates in charge and can sweep out the left-loons partially in control now.

    5. Re:Freak out! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Everything has been about not freaking out an awareness.
      What the hell is your problem? Syria is in the news everyday.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re: Freak out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'DLC corporate moderates'
      If they are downloadable content, can't we just block them in the firewall?

    7. Re:Freak out! by gtall · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....I think most Americans not living under a rock know about Syria. Now, for the big question: What would you have us do about Syria? Think carefully now, no re-expression of existing proposed solutions, we all know those as well. The government is waiting breathlessly for your answer.

    8. Re:Freak out! by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Have us do? Why do we have to "do" anything? It's not our country. Those are not our people. Us "doing" things is precisely what got the middle east into the mess it's in now.

      Freely available info on wikipedia should give you an idea of how we go about "helping" in the middle east:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

      The majority of the horrible dictators, totalitarian governments and theological insanity that exists in that area of the world is a direct result of our activities there. We've done enough harm, it's time we stopped "helping"

  7. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    That plus enterovirus. We had a kid die recently but he had two concurrent infections, one of which was enterovirus. Now they're beating the panic drum.

  8. Kinda torn on this one by pla · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, anyone who gets it now will get the best medical care physically possible on the planet, though the currently available treatments don't have a high enough success rate to give me the warm-n'-fuzzies.

    On the other, we have three (known) pharmaceutical companies busting their butts to bring a cure to market, and I'd expect quite a few more putting huge resources into "fling everything at the wall and see what sticks" R&D. So in six months, we might actually have a high-success rate treatment for it. But, in six months we might have 1.5 billion people in who need it.

    Really a tough call... Better to get it now, or wait until it becomes a pandemic in the hopes a better treatment will exist.

    1. Re:Kinda torn on this one by ruir · · Score: 2

      We keep getting this scares, and still, no ban on flights. It seems they want to infect US and Europe in purpose.

    2. Re:Kinda torn on this one by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 1

      The treatment is purely supportive. As with all virii, the body needs to clear it out on its own. It will do so, if the organs don't fail before the immune system builds the necessary antibodies. The 'cures' being worked are anti-retrovirals that inhibit the viral replication, so the body can get the upper hand more quickly.

    3. Re:Kinda torn on this one by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ... The 'cures' being worked are anti-retrovirals that inhibit the viral replication,.

      Your spot on except its plain anti-virals; ebola is not a retrovirus

    4. Re:Kinda torn on this one by slashmydots · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're forgetting that anyone who gets it now is an idiot because they had direct contact with an infected person's bodily fluids. People who are idiots tend to accidentally kill themselves in a variety of ways so curing them from ebola wouldn't solve the problem. You'd need to cure them from being stupid and that hasn't been invented yet.

    5. Re:Kinda torn on this one by slimshady76 · · Score: 1

      So, it's a win-win situation for the pharma complex, right?

    6. Re:Kinda torn on this one by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "As with all virii,"
      nothing you say about this virus, or other viruses is worth reading once you use 'Virii'

      " are anti-retrovirals"
      see?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Kinda torn on this one by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Name one scare? Why are you banning flights for something that is this hard to spread? Why don't you want people with expertise and resource to fly in and help them?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re: Kinda torn on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shooting planes from West Africa out of the air befire they can land will only be effective if we can assure the chassis burns clean while in the air.

    9. Re:Kinda torn on this one by bobbied · · Score: 2

      We keep getting this scares, and still, no ban on flights. It seems they want to infect US and Europe in purpose.

      Oh please... Banning all flights? How's that going to help unless you totally ban travel to affected countries and how on earth are you going to enforce that?

      As this virus currently works, it is unlikely to be a serious problem here. I remember when AIDS was all the rage back in the 80's. Everybody was up in arms and freaked out. How did that turn out? Well, some died, but nothing close to the dire predictions happened. Ebola has even a lower risk profile (in it's current form).

      More people die in cars every day than have ever died from Ebola. TB kills tens of thousands each year, Ebola has killed no more than a few thousand in total. But we are all worried about Ebola... Go figure..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re: Kinda torn on this one by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Just use bigger bullets. Like nukes.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    11. Re:Kinda torn on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dick.

    12. Re:Kinda torn on this one by Wookact · · Score: 2

      Banning flights for the general populace does not necessarily include banning flights for relief workers. You knew that though.

    13. Re:Kinda torn on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cancer and Heart Disease are pretty high on that "Must Cure" list.. and we still aren't making much headway. Reality is most plagues have to burn themselves out. And this one would to.. At a 71% mortaility rate (which has nothing to do with sanitation) and 350 million in the US. That would reduce the population by 2/3rds if we're lucky, baring political moves or mistakes. People by their nature or not behaving rationally in their best interests, would probably push it further.

      It's about as bad as it could possibly get.

      We model diseases as "rational" and "independent" events, we do not take into account first world countries [importing] diseases due to humanitarian efforts.

      Gorillas are thought to be the intermediate [hosts] when the virus is dormant and not in bats, they tend to isolate themselves when infected to protect the rest.. humans are more social, and do not do that.. we would make it worse.

    14. Re:Kinda torn on this one by NeoNormal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're forgetting that anyone who gets it now is an idiot.

      Really? So a health worker that comes into contact with an Ebola patient that is undiagnosed and gets ill is an idiot?

    15. Re:Kinda torn on this one by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Flights into the hot zone are fine, it's the flights out that are worrisome. The number one rule with nasty infectious diseases is to maintain quarantine.

    16. Re:Kinda torn on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.independent.ie/world-news/africa/liberia-to-prosecute-us-ebola-patient-30633305.html

      It's not that difficult to spread, hence the hazmat suits and quarantine tents.

    17. Re:Kinda torn on this one by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Car wrecks don't spread the way a disease like Ebola can.
      A "quarantine" on non-critical return flights is in order from any country with an Ebola problem.
      If we can do this shit for terrorism we can damn right do it for Ebola.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    18. Re:Kinda torn on this one by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      The Big Mac is more dangerous than Ebola. But no McDonalds CEOs will ever go to prison.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    19. Re:Kinda torn on this one by bobbied · · Score: 1

      If we can do this shit for terrorism we can damn right do it for Ebola.

      There is you problem... Apparently we CAN'T do anything you suggest... To many PC rules and ACLU lawyers out there to enforce them.

      Case in point is the TSA. Literally powerless to actually stop a determined attack and ham strung by enough rules (no profiling, no bottles over this size, x-ray everybody's shoes etc) to make an dedicated middle manager blush. We get frisking of grandma in her wheelchair and 12 year old girls strip searched, but no real assurance that we are safe.

      You can't tell me a ban on air travel from Africa would be any different. Unless you just ban international travel and close the borders (and we already have proven we cannot do that) stuff like this will keep happening.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    20. Re:Kinda torn on this one by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      OH HELL YES! I worked at a hospital. If someone has an illness and you don't know what, the gloves and masks go on! Otherwise it's your own damn fault. You also aren't supposed to juggle used hypodermic needles to impress children in the children's ward.

  9. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by dc29A · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe blown out of proportion but Ebola is far more lethal virus than H1N1. Also, deaths were mostly people who were ill already or had other issues. Ebola doesn't discriminate. On the other hand, the dumb nurse/doctor who was told that the patient was in Liberia and had Ebola like symptoms and still sent the dude back home needs to get fired. Today. Now. Maybe he/she/it thought that Liberia was a town in Missouri.

  10. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually with the H1N1 much happened and much was done to prevent people from getting sick.
    Just because it din't become a massive media spectacle does not mean 'nothing happened', 360 people died.

    And nobody says everything is a-ok now.
    Yes there is less media attention because of the wars in Syria and Irak.
    But the US and many other countries are doing much to help the African countries most affected.
    http://online.wsj.com/articles/obama-plans-major-ebola-offensive-1410738096

  11. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Total mortality=lethality*infection rate

    There's no serious reason to believe that second variable has any hope of getting anywhere near thousands in the US.

  12. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing? My hospital was full of H1N1 patients and 3 died.

  13. Influenza is a serious risk by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Amazing how the government freaked out over H1N1 years ago and simply nothing happened. Yet, a real virus is on the move and "everything is a-ok" is the word from everyone.

    H1N1 is a "real virus" which has variants that have killed millions of people. Influenza has killed and has the potential to kill FAR more people than ebola is ever likely to. Read up on influenza pandemics of the past.

    The current ebola outbreak is a serious issue but it isn't what keeps epidemiologists awake at night.

    1. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by dargon · · Score: 1

      The current ebola outbreak is a serious issue but it isn't what keeps epidemiologists awake at night.

      Yes, this, however should Ebola ever mutate into an airborne variant, watch them freak out :)

    2. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a variety of reasons this isn't going to happen, but a big one is the lack of a mechanism making airborne a viable mechanic. If Ebola starts making people cough or comes anywhere near the lungs then maybe we should worry about that.

    3. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      If Ebola ever becomes airborne transmissible, or even worse, is airborne transmissible before symptoms appear, then it will be entirely correct to freak out. As in "Make peace with whatever heathen Gods you worship, for your doom is upon you." One small ray of hope - 40% survival rate, and the survivors are immune from re-infection.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    4. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The last panic justified flu outbreak was 100 years ago.

      Normally, the flu only kills that many people because you give it a long enough timeline. It's the proverbial turtle. It's nothing like Ebola or even more interesting strains of flu that can kill millions of people in a single outbreak.

      You're simply trying to distort the numbers to create a false sense of panic.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, I would rather worry about one virus trying to kill me, not two at the same time!

    6. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by CaptnZilog · · Score: 5, Funny

      The current ebola outbreak is a serious issue but it isn't what keeps epidemiologists awake at night.

      Yes, this, however should Ebola ever mutate into an airborne variant, watch them freak out :)

      You're talking the virus evolving (mutating) into a new variant.
      This is Texas, evolution doesn't happen there.

    7. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      You're talking the virus evolving (mutating) into a new variant. This is Texas, evolution doesn't happen there.

      That's ok, they can just call it intelligent design and claim it's God's wrath upon the wicked.

    8. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrationally, your joke filled me with the warm feelings safety and security for a whole second.

    9. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by FearTheDonut · · Score: 2

      Ordinarily, I wouldn't respond to an AC.. But, Ebola HAS mutated into an airborne form in the past. Look at some non-recent (as in, non-edited) posts about Ebola Reston. As I recall, it was an airborne strain of Ebola. Fortunately, when it mutated into an airborne form, it was no longer infectious in humans.

    10. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ebola Zaire, has transmitted airborne from swine to monkey as well. Interestingly, the swine had 0% fatality, monkey 100% in this study.

    11. Re:Influenza is a serious risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if it targets a group like "gay cancer" did.

  14. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by rwise2112 · · Score: 2
    --

    "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
  15. Do some research first please? by sjbe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe blown out of proportion but Ebola is far more lethal virus than H1N1.

    Variants of H1N1 have killed tens of millions of people. You should probably spend 30 seconds researching the issue before spouting off nonsense publicly.

    Also, deaths were mostly people who were ill already or had other issues.

    Again, demonstrably not true in previous H1N1 pandemics.

    1. Re:Do some research first please? by TheTerseOne · · Score: 5, Informative

      Saying that something is more lethal doesn't mean the same as saying it kills more people. What it means is that it is more "sufficient to cause death". So, while it's very true that more people have died from H1N1 than from EBOV, EBOV is still far more lethal.

      http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/est... says that between April 2009 and April 2010 there were 61M cases of H1N1 resulting in 12.5K deaths. WHO says that, so far, there are 7192 cases of EBOV in the West African outbreak, and 3286 deaths.

      I'll let you do the math.

      --
      "Newspapers: A tiny little part of the internet, printed out yesterday, and delivered to your house"
    2. Re:Do some research first please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You sir, are a fucking retard.

      H1N1, like all influenza variants is of mild lethality. While thousands die from influenza every year, the percentage that die of those who contract the virus is extremely low. The percentage of those who contract ebola that die, is extremely high. The people that die from influenza are people that have other, MORE SERIOUS health issues.

      You are the one spouting off nonsense publicly, and by doing so you are doing serious damage to those around you. If you still insist that you're right about this, I encourage you to contract ebola (the safer of the two viruses between that and H1N1) as a form of protest.

    3. Re:Do some research first please? by CaptnZilog · · Score: 1

      Saying that something is more lethal doesn't mean the same as saying it kills more people. What it means is that it is more "sufficient to cause death". So, while it's very true that more people have died from H1N1 than from EBOV, EBOV is still far more lethal.

      http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/est... says that between April 2009 and April 2010 there were 61M cases of H1N1 resulting in 12.5K deaths. WHO says that, so far, there are 7192 cases of EBOV in the West African outbreak, and 3286 deaths.

      I'll let you do the math.

      Exactly. Tens of millions of people get the flu (of many variants) each year, and many thousands die from it - but in general it is mostly the very young or elderly who don't have the immune systems to fight it off (or of any age those with other serious medical conditions, AIDS, going through cancer therapy, etc, with compromised immune systems).

      Ebola is different, even people with otherwise healthy immune systems are vulnerable. The flu kills a tiny fraction (less than 1%) of those who contract it... Ebola thus far has killed 50-80% of those who get it. Vast difference.

    4. Re:Do some research first please? by khallow · · Score: 1

      That's 61M cases and 12.5k deaths just in the US. Most of the rest of the world vastly underreports such things.

    5. Re:Do some research first please? by SydShamino · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Saying that something is more lethal doesn't mean the same as saying it kills more people.

      Who are you to say which is more lethal? It seems to me that H1N1's better transmission methods make it the more effective, if less efficient, killer than Ebola. So far H1N1 has thus proven itself to be more lethal, though of course Ebola might catch up.

      Lethal - "sufficient to cause death" or "capable of causing death" is a word with enough ambiguity in the definition to apply to either case. It does not exclusively mean "efficient at causing death once afflicted on someone" as you imply.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    6. Re:Do some research first please? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe blown out of proportion but Ebola is far more lethal virus than H1N1.

      Variants of H1N1 have killed tens of millions of people. You should probably spend 30 seconds researching the issue before spouting off nonsense publicly.

      And you should probably spend 30 seconds before you choose to deliberately mislead people or else spout off out of ignorance on the subject.

      1) The fact that other H1N1 strains have killed millions of people has little bearing on how lethal the particular, modern-day H1N1 strain they were referring to happens to be. "H1N1" is merely a subtype expressed using a classification technique that makes it easier to refer to flu strains, but we've had numerous H1N1-subtype strains over the years, some quite lethal, some not so much, and as the link I just shared indicates, many of the strains we're familiar with have gone extinct, even though the subtype that it belonged to still exists. Your implication is clearly that "H1N1" has killed millions of people, and it has...in much the same way that "white person" has killed millions of people. You can't just leave it at that; you have to be more specific, and once you are, you realize that the particular H1N1 strain they're talking about in this thread (the 2009 strain) wasn't actually that lethal in comparison to Ebola.

      2) You're clearly confused about what "lethal" means. Something is "more lethal" if it is more capable of causing death, not because it has actually caused more deaths, and it's a fact that Ebola is significantly more lethal than even the 1918 Spanish Flu, which is widely regarded as being one of the worst (50-90% mortality rate for Ebola vs. 10-20% mortality rate for Spanish Flu). Surely if you're on Slashdot you've heard about the LD50 for various substances and whatnot? The "L" stands for "lethal". It doesn't mean that that substance has killed more people than another substance. It just means that it is capable of doing so.

      Also, deaths were mostly people who were ill already or had other issues.

      Again, demonstrably not true in previous H1N1 pandemics.

      Again, you're linking to an entirely different strain that just happens to belong to the same subtype as a modern-day strain. The reason people panic about H1N1 strains today is because we know that because they belong to the same subtype, they are potentially very similar to the dangerous strains we've seen in the past and thus could very easily mutate into something that is as deadly as those strains...but that does not mean that they are dangerous strains like the Spanish Flu, nor that they are as lethal as it, nor that they exhibit the same characteristics as it, nor that your links to the Spanish Flu are in any way relevant or indicative of the 2009 H1N1 strain's traits. Pointing out that the Spanish Flu was indiscriminate in whom it killed in no way takes away from his claim that the 2009 H1N1 strain's deaths were primarily those who "were already ill or had other issues."

      Even so, in a cursory search, I couldn't find any evidence to support his claim either.

    7. Re:Do some research first please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've just walled yourself in with philosophy.

      Any day of the week, I'll take an H1N1 injection over an Ebola injection because, Ebola is vastly more capable of causing death. "Once contracted" is not a qualifier used for comparing HIV/Cancer/Polio or any other disease with the flu which is the comparison you're making. You're comparing a disease most aptly described as an accelerated AIDS on steroids in terms of contagion and physical destruction with the goddamned flu. Your only argument is that Ebola is not airborne, a good lot of the rest of us are much more concerned with eliminating the "if it goes airborne" by getting it out of human blood.

    8. Re:Do some research first please? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You're introducing ambiguity where there is none. "Lethal" has a well understood meaning, which is why we have measurements like LD50 values for toxic substances. Unless otherwise specified, "lethality" assumes that the item in which we're interested (e.g. virus, chemical, radiation, etc.) has already been introduced into the organism's environment, rather than that it needs to introduce itself in some way. All we do then is measure how likely death is to occur.

      Of course, we can still measure things like "lethality at 100m" for events like explosions or releases of chemical weapons. And you could add similar clarifications to include the transmissivity of an illness (e.g. "lethality after exposure to bodily fluids of the infected"), but "lethal", by itself, doesn't include those ideas.

    9. Re:Do some research first please? by CaptnZilog · · Score: 1

      2) You're clearly confused about what "lethal" means. Something is "more lethal" if it is more capable of causing death, not because it has actually caused more deaths, and it's a fact that Ebola is significantly more lethal than even the 1918 Spanish Flu, which is widely regarded as being one of the worst (50-90% mortality rate for Ebola vs. 10-20% mortality rate for Spanish Flu). Surely if you're on Slashdot you've heard about the LD50 for various substances and whatnot? The "L" stands for "lethal". It doesn't mean that that substance has killed more people than another substance. It just means that it is capable of doing so.

      Exactly. An atomic bomb is far more "lethal" than an AK-47, but far more people have been killed by AKs because they are far more common and used. Which would you rather take your chances against (if those were your only options)?

    10. Re:Do some research first please? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      If you were telling me that I was going to be exposed to either an atomic explosion or a few rounds from an AK-47 and I had to maximize my likelihood of living until I died of natural causes, you can bet that I'll take the less lethal but more deadly option, i.e. the AK-47.

      If you were telling me that I was in a world where one or the other would exist and I had to maximize my likelihood of living until I died of natural causes, I'd take the more lethal but less deadly option, i.e. the nuke.

    11. Re:Do some research first please? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 5, Informative

      "if it goes airborne"

      Just the other day, I thought to myself "How many viruses have we ever seen mutate to become airborne?"
      So I checked. Now, its a little tough to google right now, because the top million or so results are news articles screaming that ebola will go airborne and kill us all, but I did manage to find some solid articles on the subject stemming from a more scientific standpoint, and a less "WE ALL GONNA DIE" clickbait standpoint.
      What I learned is this:
      In the 100 or so years we have been really studying viruses, we have seen a virus mutate and change its infection vector exactly ZERO times.
      As it turns out, viruses are pretty specialized at what they do. Some, like the influenza virus, have nailed down the trait of surviving for long periods in aerosolized droplets of mucus that are so small that local air currents are more powerful than gravity, and have adapted to surviving in lung tissue very well. (airborne)
      Others, like say, ebola, are adapted to surviving in the liver and blood, and can survive for a bit of time outside the body, in much larger volumes of bodily fluids. (not airborne) The ebola virus does build up in the lung tissue the way influenza does, nor does it have the specialized structures that allow it to move into the mucosal secretions of the lungs, the way influenza does. (all of which are needed to be a successful airborne virus)
      Another thing influenza has going for it is that multiple variants of influenza can infect a single cell, and spawn forth a new variant of influenza. Apparently, this is not something ebola is capable of *at all* meaning it mutates at a much slower rate than influenza.
      The net takeaway from all this is, while the chances of ebola mutating and becoming airborne are non zero, the actual odds of its occurrence are vanishingly small.
      Long story short, viruses come in a lot of forms, and people are expecting the behavior of one to match up with the behavior of another, when in reality they are entirely different creatures. One article I read likened it to saying Cars fly, and Airplanes drive on the ground, where Ebola is a car, and Influenza is an Airplane. While the statement is not entirely false, because cars can fly short distances in special circumstances, and planes do taxi to the terminal, your not going to fly your Volkswagen to Paris from NY, and your not going to drive a boing 747 from Detroit to Houston on the highway. Specialized structures for specific purposes.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    12. Re:Do some research first please? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      More to the point its like being afraid of flying sharks. You could make a shark fly but it wouldn't be a particularly dangerous predator once you got it working.

    13. Re:Do some research first please? by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

      Valid points within the science we know, but it is probably wise to consider aspects outside of settled scientific knowledge:

      • So far, Ebola outbreaks were confined primarily to tropical regions of Sub-Saharan Africa; we will only just now be able to study how "well" the virus spreads "airborne", i.e. by commercial airlines, and we do not yet know what happens when the virus encounters a completely different set of hosts/environments/influences it wasn't exposed to so far.
      • While Gorillas are often associated with Ebola outbreaks, bats are considered the most likely natural reservoir of the EBOV. You'll probably have a hard time finding gorillas in your neighborhood, but bats ... . I'm not sure how relevant this might be, but once you have a rising number of infected people on a global scale, the buildup of new reservoirs is not unlikely.

      In the 100 or so years we have been really studying viruses, we have seen a virus mutate and change its infection vector exactly ZERO times.

      While this is probably true, the science we acquired during these 100 or so years is often based on epidemiological conditions and assumptions that no longer apply, or have changed dramatically, or which have been made considerably more complicated because of the way the world changed since the Spanish Flu -- not talking about those things we just kinda missed. Point being: aside from hemorrhagic fever making clickbait headlines right now, it's the same with influenza: we'd better not underestimate it, be it airborne, avian or whatnot.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    14. Re:Do some research first please? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      Oh I agree, we're better off stopping Ebola dead in its tracks before it makes inroads in more places. I don't mean for anyone to underestimate the seriousness of the disease by any means. I was merely pointing out how to much of the coverage of Ebola is scaremongering bullshit, with not enough real information on how to protect yourself. As they said in the movie 'Contagion' "Wash your hands. Never touch your face." That goes a long long way towards keeping a non-airborne disease out of you and protecting everyone else. I might add to that list the following,
      Don't lick any surface in a public place.
      Don't use cash. Paper money holds pathogens like a sponge. If you have a credit/debit card, get a prepaid one and reload it as needed.
      If your sick (with ANYTHING) stay home (don't go sharing that shit, we don't want it) Unless its hospital bad, then go to the hospital. If you go to the hospital and get meds (antibiotics, antivirals, anything) TAKE THE ENTIRE PRESCRIBED DOSE.
      that about covers it.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  16. Texas, land of the derp. by nimbius · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If any states residents contracted ebola, Id not be surprised if they were from Texas. We're talking about a state that thinks life begins at conception and rainfall will occur if you just pray for it. Its a wild, magical place where homosexuality can be cured but global warming is a hoax. A fantastic wonderland where Texas legislator Jodie Laubenberg thinks rape kits cause abortions and most residents think the president is a secret kenyan. at the end of the day in texas the miracle of life is no more complex than creation science saddleback rides on dinosaurs.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by Chrisq · · Score: 0

      If any states residents contracted ebola, Id not be surprised if they were from Texas. We're talking about a state that thinks life begins at conception and rainfall will occur if you just pray for it. Its a wild, magical place where homosexuality can be cured but global warming is a hoax. A fantastic wonderland where Texas legislator Jodie Laubenberg thinks rape kits cause abortions and most residents think the president is a secret kenyan. at the end of the day in texas the miracle of life is no more complex than creation science saddleback rides on dinosaurs.

      Lets just hope they don't try and cure it by the "laying on of hands".

    2. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Oh look, stereotypes. If there's one thing the ebola virus needs, it's more blame for its existance being laid on stereotypes. Definetly doesn't have enough of that in Africa. Nope.

      This patient is a (presumably black) Texas resident who was born and partially raised in Africa. They have about as much chance of conforming to the stereotypes you describe as feces does of being pink and sparkly.

    3. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

      Your coverage is glaringly lacking any mention of the batshit crazy governor.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by plopez · · Score: 2

      They did reject the AFA after all. Which would extend treatment to many people instead of turning them away for reasons of no insurance.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    5. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by plopez · · Score: 0

      And legislators and Judges. It is basically a one party rule theocracy in TX. Like Iran. Which is why I delete any emails with job offerings in TX without even reading them.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0

      Sure the government of Texas sucks balls(my state's government does too), but stereotypes are about as helpful for understanding a disease outbreak as cutting out the entrails of a goose and seeing how clean they are.

    7. Re: Texas, land of the derp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why spam us with this irrelevant drivel?

    8. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The (1st) missionary doctor that contracted Ebola because he was treating people in Africa is from Texas. Although he's feeling much better now.

      He's been giving blood so that serum can be made from it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

      Look for a job in Texas, then in that bastion of liberalism ruled by democrats for generations, Detroit. let us know how that goes. There is a reason the population is fleeing liberal wonderland for states like Texas.

    10. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by Holi · · Score: 1

      > They have about as much chance of conforming to the stereotypes you describe as feces does of being pink and sparkly.

      Ooohh, I had that, it wasn't fun.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    11. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any country's residents contracted Ebola, I'd not be surprised if they were from Africa. We're talking about a continent that thinks it's okay to eat bush meat, and that enlisting children into their militaries is a reasonable thing. Its a wild, magical place where homosexuality will get you killed, and global warming is irrelevant to the people who are trying to just scrape together enough pennies to survive under their largely corrupt, inefficient governments. A fantastic wonderland where women are raped and have their genitals mutilated, and most residents think that the spirits of their ancestors must be appeased lest they be cursed.

      Congratulations, you're a bigot.

    12. Re:Texas, land of the derp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that how they used to do it on Star Trek?

  17. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by alexander_686 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can you give us a cite?

    If I understand correctly, while there have been about 150 doctors and nurses who have died from the disease, none of them were wearing protective suits. In fact, all of them were working in 2nd tier clinics. All of these clinics had poor to no infection controls in place. Nobody has died in a major hospital which had infection controls in place. This strain of Ebola is not airborne – yet.

  18. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by snsh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A lot of people are directing outrage at the healthcare worker who dropped the ball, but what about the patient? He reportedly didn't tell the nurse/doctor "I just came here from Liberia a few days ago and was recently in contact with people who died of Ebola." which is what any sane person would have done. I'm guessing he did the opposite, and downplayed it like "Have you been to Africa? / Yes I used to live in Africa."

  19. Even though the virus is very dangerous . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Ebola is normally infectious Only through bodily fluids. This puts health workers more at risk. 2. It is also very sensitive to light, especially ultraviolet rays from direct sunlight, This relates back to #1 and is one reason it doesn't spread well once it gets in the atmosphere. This is stuff I learned from when I worked at the Centers for Disease control.

    1. Re:Even though the virus is very dangerous . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is stuff I learned from when I worked at the Centers for Disease control.

      So, was it you that got fired after taking video of Obama with your cell phone? Why didn't you get the gun out man?

    2. Re:Even though the virus is very dangerous . . . . by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      You mean *this strain* of ebola ....

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  20. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the freakout over H1N1 (and the resulting money and preventative measures) caused nothing to happen.

  21. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Not as amazing as you ignorance about what happened with H1N1.
    Hospitals around the country were filled to capacity, a lot of people died. It wold have been a lot worse without the H1N1 precautions that were taken.
    8.4% of ALL deaths in 2009 were from H1N1. It was an epidemic.It's considered an epidemic if more then 7.3% of deaths are caused by a disease.
    Bear in mnd that several state do not track death from influenza, so the number is actually higher.

    No, no one is saying everything is ok. The two things transmit and spread differently.
    Someone with H1N1 on the plane is contagious to everyone there.
    Someone with Ebola not showing symptoms is a danger to no one.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by peragrin · · Score: 2

    Ah but Ebola is easier to contain. You need clean water supply. And separate waste water processing. You need to physically isolate potential carriers and monitor them for two weeks.

    Africa struggles with providing clean water, proper watste water processing and physical isolation. When you drinking water comes from the same river as the one you shit in. You have issues.

    Over the next month you have to worry. If no more cases break out you are good.

    So have food delivered. Sit down and binge watch you tube cat videos. It will be over soon enough.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  23. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by geekoid · · Score: 1

    haha, no.

    " an estimated range of deaths from between 151,700 and 575,400 people who perished worldwide from 2009 H1N1 virus infection during the first year the virus circulated"

    " 80% of 2009 H1N1 deaths were in people younger than 65 years of age which differs from typical seasonal influenza epidemics during which 80-90% of deaths are estimated to occur in people 65 years of age and older"

    http://www.cdc.gov/flu/spotlig...
    http://www.thelancet.com/journ...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. Texas, land of the derp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what are you going to do about it?

  25. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Informing the public isn't the same as creating panic.

    People like you would have the whole world burning before deciding to tell people there is a fire.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. How could hospital miss the obvious? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Traveler from Liberia with high fever turned away for two days. Then that ridiculous hospital spokesman on TV trying to explain it away. The only lucky thing is the patient was probably too sick to walk anywhere and cut down on the number of contacts. I feel really safe with a health system as alert as this.

    1. Re:How could hospital miss the obvious? by plopez · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because it is TX. No insurance, no treatment. And they saw fit to reject the Affordable Care Act which would have expanded coverage. Smart move there....

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:How could hospital miss the obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering obamacare is the law of the land (all fifty states) and hospitals can't refuse service on the bases of insurance stop trolling.

    3. Re:How could hospital miss the obvious? by Wookact · · Score: 2

      They do refuse service if in their determination you are not in an emergency.

    4. Re:How could hospital miss the obvious? by hink · · Score: 1

      Considering obamacare is the law of the land (all fifty states) and hospitals can't refuse service on the bases of insurance stop trolling.

      Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA)
      "In 1986, Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure public access to emergency services regardless of ability to pay. Section 1867 of the Social Security Act imposes specific obligations on Medicare-participating hospitals that offer emergency services to provide a medical screening examination (MSE) when a request is made for examination or treatment for an emergency medical condition (EMC), including active labor, regardless of an individual's ability to pay. Hospitals are then required to provide STABILIZING [emphasis added] treatment for patients with EMCs. If a hospital is unable to stabilize a patient within its capability, or if the patient requests, an appropriate transfer should be implemented."

      Hospitals CAN and DO provide minimal treatment for "non-emergent" cases. Hence, the "take two of these and come back if it gets worse" treatment. Yes, logical forward-thinking people might conclude that "this person came from Africa, could be Ebola". However, this isn't TV, and a plucky nurse isn't going to get her hospital to take a person for an expensive admission "just in case it isn't a bad cold".
      MAYBE after the hysteria, that scenario might happen, especially in that city. Maybe not.

      --
      - speaking only for myself, as always
    5. Re:How could hospital miss the obvious? by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Because it is TX. No insurance, no treatment. And they saw fit to reject the Affordable Care Act which would have expanded coverage. Smart move there....

      Even before the ACA, if you showed up at the emergency room, they treated you with regard to your ability to pay. The ACA didn't change that one bit. Anybody gets treatment, insurance or not, even in Texas.

      What TX rejected was taking the money from the Fed for implementation of parts of the ACA. So the only real difference is where you go to sign up for the ACA. Instead of going to a Texas website, you go to HealthCare.gov if you live in Texas.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re:How could hospital miss the obvious? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Hence, the "take two of these and come back if it gets worse" treatment.

      My point exactly. If there is no insurance you get no detailed medical history taken, no thorough exam, no review by experienced clinicians, etc. It becomes a "do the bare minimum you can to comply with the law and move on" sort of health care.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    7. Re:How could hospital miss the obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real takeaway is this is how the lack of universal healthcare* hurts all of us. Because the hospital couldn't be assured they would be adequately compensated for properly treating the patient, they took a gamble on a low cost treatment. If you are against universal healthcare you need to be OK with how this went down.

      *Whether it is from the government UK-style or via some kind of universal insurance coverage.

    8. Re:How could hospital miss the obvious? by Trax · · Score: 1
      The replies below your brain-dead comment are spot on. Read a little bit more and get a better understanding before you speak up. It works in real life too!

      EMTALA provides treatment, stabilization, and management regardless of the ability to pay. Emergency physicians among others provide at least $150,000 / yr of uncompensated care to those that don't have insurance, those that won't get insurance, or cannot afford health care.

  27. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now serious reason to believe the infection rate will be in the thousands?

    How about your health care system sucks? According to the CDC as many as 1 in 4 people in the US were infected with H1N1. In contrast, in a third world country with a decent health care system, the infection rate was 1 in 1000.

  28. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    What actually stopped the H1N1 virus? Vaccines? Summer? I seriously don't remember them mentioning why it just sort of went away.

  29. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    Oh, I was citing the lab confirmed deaths, which estimates greatly exceed. You're right. Sorry for the massive understatement.

  30. Blindfolded, but can't see anything wrong... by Shoten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    are not being watched or monitored and are not showing any symptoms of the illness

    How the fuck can the latter be stated with any kind of confidence in the same sentence as the former?

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Blindfolded, but can't see anything wrong... by dkman · · Score: 1

      This is what I came to ask. It seems to defy all logic, but it is an official statement - so what did I really expect?

      --
      I refuse to sign
    2. Re:Blindfolded, but can't see anything wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are not being watched or monitored and are not showing any symptoms of the illness

      How the fuck can the latter be stated with any kind of confidence in the same sentence as the former?

      And remember, this is the same government that's being tight-lipped over enterovirus, which is already killing kids in the US.

      Kneel to the mighty state!

    3. Re:Blindfolded, but can't see anything wrong... by elistan · · Score: 1

      This is what I came to ask. It seems to defy all logic, but it is an official statement - so what did I really expect?

      Actually, it's not an official statement. It's something a reporter, Abby Phillip, wrote about something that was allegedly said. What the actual statement by Dallas County Health and Human Services Director Zachary Thompson to the reporter was, is unknown.

    4. Re:Blindfolded, but can't see anything wrong... by dkman · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about that. It seemed like there should have been an official statement.
      Reporters often don't know anything about what they're reporting on. Yet they try, %diety bless 'em.

      We shouldn't over react and trash them, we should try to educate them. Let them know why it's wrong and point them in the right direction. Nah, where's the fun in that...

      --
      I refuse to sign
    5. Re: Blindfolded, but can't see anything wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandatory schooling in feminist country.

    6. Re:Blindfolded, but can't see anything wrong... by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      Ebola is not a very subtle disease, and is quite obvious before you are infections.
      'If you get symptom x/y/z, report urgently to this number'.

  31. Thirteen...year olds by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

    House: Or, you're an idiot. (To patient) Are you a Slashdot user?

    Patient: What?

    House: Slashdot dot org. Do you read and post messages there?

    Patient: Yes?

    House: No human contact. The US is safe once again. Cameron, stop picking cases based on the bozos at the CDC.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  32. won't spread far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People in america have this wonderful cure. It's called soap.

  33. Don't worry by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I keep hearing that the reason it's so bad in Africa is that they are incompetent in handling it. Surely we're more competent at such things.

    Oh crap, now I'm worried!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re: Don't worry by frikken+lazerz · · Score: 1

      Nothing to worry about in USA. Now we have this wonderful thing called Obamacare *rolls eyes*

    2. Re:Don't worry by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of course wonders about the 150+ health care workers infected and mostly dead. Were they slathering on bodily fluids from victims? Doubtful.

    3. Re:Don't worry by FrozenToothbrush · · Score: 2

      There's a strange disconnect going on here in America over this. I remember years ago in the 90's, how horrible this disease was. Now it seems like we're treating a common cold? What we know is this: -People are trying to cover their ass. -Mistakes were made and possibly continue to be made by not treating this serious enough. -The media is hyping this, but they themselves are saying 'everything is ok', the media is ONLY about doom, gloom and sex these days so this alone should throw some red flags. We'll know in 1 month how bad this really is, what we can take away from the cdc and media is that everyone is responsible for themselves and their own safety.

    4. Re:Don't worry by hink · · Score: 2

      Nigeria managed to contain it.
      Admittedly they have seen Ebola before, but they seem to have a more modernized health care "infrastructure" (facilities) than the regions where Ebola is out of control. I would be willing to bet that the US has a much higher density of health care facilities with supplies and personnel.

      --
      - speaking only for myself, as always
    5. Re: Don't worry by Delwin · · Score: 1

      Obamacare means >7m people have health insurance that didn't. That's 7m people who are far more likely to seek medical attention when it's early enough to track everyone they've come into comtact with since they started showing symptoms. Not nothing to worry about, but it helps some.

    6. Re: Don't worry by link-error · · Score: 1

      What about the 5m+ that transferred when they lost their previous insurance?

      --
      -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
    7. Re:Don't worry by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Oh crap, now I'm worried!

      I was worried when the majority of people voted for Obama; TWICE! Bunch of fucking morons! Yeah, this will go well.

      Sorry, but you're all on your own when civilization falls apart.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  34. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Wookact · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Actually he told the nurse that he recently came from Liberia. I have seen it in a number of articles. I am guessing it is more likely the hospital thought him having Ebola was not probably, and didn't want to treat someone with no insurance.

    But "regretfully, that information was not fully communicated throughout the full team," said Dr. Mark Lester, executive vice president of Texas Health Resources.
    Duncan was sent home with painkillers and antibiotics, only to return in worse condition on September 28. That's when he was isolated.
    "It was a mistake. They dropped the ball," Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said of the miscommunication at the hospital.
    "You don't want to pile on them, but hopefully this will never happen again. ... The CDC has been vigorously emphasizing the need for a travel history."
    Gupta said this mishap doesn't make sense.
    "A nurse did ask the question, and he did respond that he was in Liberia, and that wasn't transmitted to people who were in charge of his care," he said. "There's no excuse for this."
    And one of Duncan's friends said he was the one who contacted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with concerns that the hospital wasn't moving quickly enough after Duncan's second hospital visit.
    But the hospital said the patient's condition "did not warrant admission" last week.

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/02/...

    "Didn't warrant admission" AKA "He wasnt sick enough for anyone to care, and we were to stupid to realize just how dangerous the situation could be." Heads need to roll for this.

  35. Re:Thank god its Dallas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god its Dallas ... they know how to keep the blacks segregated.

    Apparently not. This guy showed up at the hospital when his symptoms started and got sent home with antibiotics. So now there are 80 people who may have been exposed...

  36. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

    Heaven help me, I'm defending the US's healthcare system.

    Health care systems have very little to do with influenza infection rates. I like that you don't tell me which third world country.

  37. Government breeds panic by saying not to panic by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Our government thinks we're a bunch of impulsive automatons that need to be instructed when and how we need to worry. They try to control panic by metering out information, first telling citizens "nobody on the plane is at risk" and "the chance of infection spread is near zero" and then slowly releasing information to the contrary, like how there are now home-quarantined individuals and 80 more under observation. FYI government officials: Your strategy has the opposite effect because it undermines our confidence in your information and leaves us to our own devices and imagination about how to protect ourselves and our family.

    1. Re:Government breeds panic by saying not to panic by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you are right. The Office of Total Information Control is in charge of doling out information to control the people, a conspiracy like no other. Is it a coincidence no information showing U.S. Government involvement in WTC planning or execution has been leaked? I think not.

  38. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Gee, you have the facts from the media, and you are ready to fire someone?
    You are either an ass, or someone who thinks the media has all the facts.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    That flues are almost always seasonal, people develop immunities, and it goes into remission(not the proper medical term) until a new strain evolves(or an old strain like H1N1 has enough unexposed members of a population to spread again).

  40. well, that makes sense! by silfen · · Score: 1

    [The contacts] are not being watched or monitored and are not showing any symptoms of the illness

    Brilliant! We can make a lot of problems go away by simply not looking for them.

  41. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes perfect sense if the hospital is the infection point, which again makes a lot of sense with H1N1.

  42. Re:Thank god its Dallas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We don't treat your kind here, now go away."

  43. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 2

    IV treatment IV vitamin C with sodium ascorbate is a less known antiviral treatment, stonewalled out of conventional medicine for ca 75 years http://seanet.com/~alexs/ascor.... See also
    Injectable C http://injectablevitaminc.com/...
    Cathcart http://orthomolecular.org/libr...
    and Klenner. http://www.doctoryourself.com/...

    The more severe the virus, higher and more frequent doses used. As support for nasty viral illnesses overseas that have no vaccine, we also take zinc, 50,000 iu of vitamin D3 for 1-2 weeks, lysine and 200-400 mcg selenium. With Ebola, the real question will be when the last chance for a given level of IV vitamin C treatment (gram C/kg wt) 2-3-4 times per day will work, and when it will be too late - too little.

  44. Nuke it from orbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... or just wear a ribbon of awareness

  45. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Talk about a retard. The flu is a virus and as such is not something that even responds to current forms of medical treatment. You might be able to stop the spread of it with vaccines and extreme isolation but that's about it.

    The flu is transmissible BEFORE you manifest symptoms. You can be wandering around infecting friends and coworkers before you even know you are sick.

    Ebola is not like that.

    The flu also spreads much more easily from person to person.

    Two entirely different situations.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  46. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

    So if the mass vaccination of people stopped the spread of an infection then 'nothing happened', and obviously the vaccinations and precautions were a waste of time. That's some fine reasoning there.

  47. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by gwolf · · Score: 2

    I live in Mexico City.

    The initial fear and reaction was not because it was a known-deadly virus, but because it had not yet been established how contagious it would be, which vectors would it be dangerous on. The city was really weird, almost dead, for the first week of the outbreak — People feared overall to get out of their houses, there was a shortage of mouth-covers (that were later found to be basically useless). It took several weeks to get back to normal.

    Of course, with AH1N1 people started saying how it was blown out of proportion. I know some people who were conclusively diagnosed with the virus, and basically had to endure a bad flu but nothing else. I know second-hand of people who did die because of it, but they were all basically immuno-depressed or had preexisting respiratory diseases in some way.

    Ebola's growth vectors and mortality rates are known and studied. And yes, I'd expect stricter measures and care. But there is no point in comparing a known disease (maybe insufficiently studied, but 40-year-old anyway) and a new one.

  48. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Afty0r · · Score: 1

    H1N1 was the flu - flu makes a lot of money through flu shots, "treatments", symptom alleviation meds. By alerting the population, the sales of related product go through the roof. How many big pharma lobbyists do you think pushed the government to scare the population as much as possible in order to drive up sales?

    Ebola, on the other hand, does not have a wide array of products from big pharma that the population would be *likely* to go out and panic buy/stock up on. So no-one is telling the head honchos in government to get the bullhorn out. Consequently, no big noise...

  49. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by CaptnZilog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can you give us a cite?

    If I understand correctly, while there have been about 150 doctors and nurses who have died from the disease, none of them were wearing protective suits. In fact, all of them were working in 2nd tier clinics. All of these clinics had poor to no infection controls in place. Nobody has died in a major hospital which had infection controls in place. This strain of Ebola is not airborne – yet.

    Actually I think some of those were wearing some protective gear... but Africa is a hot climate. I was reading an article recently from a doctor there who commented how hot it gets in that gear, and you struggle even after an hour or two not to be wanting to 'wipe your brow' because of all the sweating you're doing in the suit (eyes, nose, mouth are vulnerable spots for contamination). And that was someone in the full-on "bunny suit" (totally sealed) - you can imagine the people who we've seen pictures of with only a 'riot helmet' face protection with a N95 mask under it and a Tyvek gown. And of course every time you walk out of the containment area you have to be disinfected...

  50. Re:Thank god its Dallas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apparently not. This guy showed up at the hospital when his symptoms started and got sent home with antibiotics. So now there are 80 people who may have been exposed..."

    So much wor "the best medical care of the world".

    My ass.

  51. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Informing the public isn't the same as creating a panic."

    A public where 60% believe in the existence of angels and people like Jenny McCarthy run wild, I'd say:

    Think of it as evolution in action.

  52. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all we need is it to mutate and survive in mosquito's.
    Or better yet, mutate and kill mosquito's.

  53. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

    Someone with H1N1 on the plane is contagious to everyone there.
    Someone with Ebola not showing symptoms is a danger to no one.

    Yes or No

    Would you fly to Liberia today, and shake hands with everyone not showing symptoms?

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  54. How does that work? by rangek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    these [newly identified contacts] are not being watched or monitored and are not showing any symptoms of the illness

    How does that work? If you are not watching or monitoring them how do you know they aren't showing any symptoms?

  55. Why aren't we stopping all traffic from Hot Zones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The virus evolves (http://theconversation.com/genetic-evolution-how-the-ebola-virus-changes-and-adapts-31525), it's shown to evolve quickly which means its communicability could go up.

    Right now it's death-rate is 50%: http://www.nationaljournal.com...

    This is a very big deal. Shouldn't we err on the side of caution at the very least?

  56. Re:Thank god its Dallas by EverlastingPhelps · · Score: 1

    Said by someone who has never been here, or you would know that Dallas is the least segregated big city in the country. http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010...

  57. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So have food delivered. Sit down and binge watch you tube cat videos. It will be over soon enough."

    But remember to order Chinese and not from the Liberian Pizza guy.
    Anyway, the Isis guy will cut your head off if SARS doesn't get you or the pig flu.

  58. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Wansu · · Score: 1

    Maybe blown out of proportion but Ebola is far more lethal virus than H1N1.

    Amen. I like my chances of surviving H1N1 a lot better than my chances of surviving Ebola.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  59. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes yes, you only get it if you come in contact with feces, vomit, etc, but that perception is there now that it is in the US.

    And sweat and saliva and other bodily fluids. And unlike "the flu", it goes right through your skin - you don't need to touch your mucous membranes at all (eyes, mouth, nose).

    And it looks like "the flu" at the beginning of the infection, when you can already infect others.

  60. Duncan Knew He Had Been Exposed Yet Still Returned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duncan knew he had been exposed. So he brought his diseased body to the USA rather than do the right thing, die alone in Liberia.

    He should be charged criminally. His was an incredibly selfish act.

  61. And like that, africa is frogotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job america way to make this your own!

  62. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Geste · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'But "regretfully, that information was not fully communicated throughout the full team," '

    My experience from working in ICU and ER years ago:

    • Nurse to Intern: "This guy has been in Liberia"
    • Nurse to Intern: "This guy has been in Liberia!"
    • Nurse to Intern: "This guy has been in Liberia!!"
    • Intern to Resident: "This guy has a fever."
    • Charge Nurse to Orderly: "Hey, can you put that guy in a chair so we can free up exam room four?"
    • Resident to Intern: "What do you suggest?"
    • Intern: "Ummmm, fluids and antibiotics?"
    • Resident: "Check."

    Can't know, but when I hear phrases like "full team", that's what I am reminded of. Very very unfortunate. Beyond all of the additional exposure, the guy didn't get the care he likely needed to have a chance at survival.

  63. Alomal-137 by swb · · Score: 0

    The purpose of this document is to provide a final, comprehensive study of the contributing factors and epidemiology of the Alomal-137 (A-137) pandemic. CDC-Anchorage will continue to update this report at Internet and Skynet locations as long as our facility remains operational. As we are the only American facility still online in the Northern Hemisphere (other operational pandemic investigations facilities include several Scandinavian installations, McMurdo Sound in Antarctica, and CDC-Guam), we have taken responsibility for providing all currently known information to any accessible electronic distribution medium. This report replaces all previous A-137 notices originating from this facility.

    This report is not a definitive version of the history of this epidemic; historical narrative provided in this report is purely the work of this office based on largely anecdotal evidence, with some hard factual data provided by many government and civilian agencies from around the world. The true nature and genesis of this disease will never be truly known; all the principal persons involved have been dead for over a year.

    Anyone who does read this report is encouraged to contact our facility; our electronic address is cdcalaska@cdc.worldnet.un.gov. We can also be reached by most telephone exchanges, cell phone, short-wave radio and commercial television broadcast at one of the numbers/frequencies printed on the last sheet of this document. We maintain continuous updates and informational broadcasts on BBC World Service, operating out of Bush House in London on standard BBC WS frequencies at twenty minutes past every hour. We encourage anyone who reads this report, especially persons living in North America, to contact us by any means available; however, we cannot accept refugees at our location. Our facility guards are authorized to use lethal force in turning away refugees. Do not approach our facility.

  64. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by gtall · · Score: 2

    From what I heard on the news (presumably this is correct), the nurse on station had determined the person had ebola like symptoms and noted it on his chart? well, s/he noted it on something. That fact was ignored and he was discharged.

    Also, the person bears some responsibility. He goes to Liberia, works with a known Ebola patient (another thing I read and presumably true), comes back and fails to tell his doctors this. He claims they didn't ask, which does not relieve him of the responsibility to tell them. Then he has the temerity to go home and come in contact with other family members and friends.

  65. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what the normal procedure is in American hospitals but at least in Finland where I live, you're 100 % the hospital's responsibility once you're there - i.e. they have to ask the right questions and even if you're dishonest with your answers they can still be held responsible, if it's something they "should" have noticed (which of course is relative). So if you go to the ER and staff ask if you've been drinking and you lie and say no and some nasty shit happens because drugs they administer have contraindications with the alcohol in your system it's a case of malpractice because they should rely on a blood sample and not a patient's word.

    I learnt this through a doctor that harshly criticized his colleagues for how they had handled me. When I got what seemed like just a cold with a very high fever, I went to the hospital and once I was in a bed there, a nurse asked me some basic questions and I mentioned that I have epilepsy. However, the shift changed and another nurse asked me some more and I just said that "I guess I told the other one everything already, I don't usually get this sick because I exercise and am fairly healthy so just let me sleep now". A while later a doctor comes in with the same (i.e. second) nurse and said that the tests and the x-ray showed that I have pneumonia and that I can decide myself if I want to stay or if I think I can manage at home because the fewer will go down with Paracetamol. I opted to go home because I didn't have my laptop with me and figured that I'll simply be too bored there. Now, later on I found out from my neurologist that that was utterly irresponsible by the hospital because a high fever increases the seizure risk substantially so they should have told me that I should stay. The fuckup was because of the shift change, the first nurse had evidently just asked me some questions to make me feel "welcome" and the doctor evidently only got the information I had given the second nurse, which was something like

  66. makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you realize it's a bunch of bureaucrats covering their asses trying to justify their own worth in the system.

  67. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, the dumb nurse/doctor who was told that the patient was in Liberia and had Ebola like symptoms and still sent the dude back home needs to get fired.

    Actually, according to everything I read, they were NOT told that the patient was in Liberia. However, what that person DID fail to do was to ASK the patient if they had been outside the country recently.

  68. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Wookact · · Score: 2

    I could see that being a possibility. If thats the situation people still need to be fired. Particularly the Intern.

  69. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    It is not so much that it is hot - which is a facotr - but that the system was not set up to handle something like this. Most of the reports I have heard have talked about nurses not being trained in infection control, hospitals running out of gloves, masks, disinfectant, etc.

  70. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why should the public believe the CDC. You're part of the Obama adminstration after all..." -- Fox news yesterday

    nope. that's not fanning any panic or conspiracy theories or anything,.

  71. "ordered to stay at home" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but are they actually going to do that?

  72. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    WHAT? You're claiming that one quarter of the US population caught the H1N1 virus?

    That's TOTAL AND UTTER BULLSHIT.

    Unless you're considering people who received a live vaccine to be "infected"...

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  73. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering my wife died of H1N1 here in the US, I don't feel they blew it out of proportion. Yes, she was part of the high risk community.

  74. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no, h1n1 is far more familiar than ebola.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1918_flu_pandemic

  75. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    H1N1 is a "real virus".

    And even though the case mortality rate of H1N1 is FAR lower than Ebola - the reason H1N1 is so scary is because it is FAR more contagious than Ebola.

    e.g. it is MUCH easier to keep an Ebola outbreak contained if your healthcare system is even remotely decent than it is to keep flu contained. It's pretty much a given that each year, 1-2 different strains of flu WILL spread globally, and even with vaccinations, that spread is inevitable because it's so damn contagious. Also, I BELIEVE that it is possible for someone to be contagious but not symptomatic with flu.

    With Ebola - I am fairly certain that you are not contagious unless symptomatic (which is where the comments about "zero risk of infection" on his flights comes from), and even when symptomatic, transmission requires direct contact with bodily fluids.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  76. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama administration scraps quarantine regulations

    The Obama administration has quietly scrapped plans to enact sweeping new federal quarantine regulations that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention touted four years ago as critical to protecting Americans from dangerous diseases spread by travelers.

    The regulations, proposed in 2005 during the Bush administration amid fears of avian flu, would have given the federal government additional powers to detain sick airline passengers and those exposed to certain diseases. ...

    I guess Ebola must be a JV virus...

  77. Stop treating it lightly. by thedarb · · Score: 2

    This isn't a disease to play around with. Hardcore mandatory quarantine all that have been possibly exposed. Not in their homes, but in a facility. Treat it as more communicable than it is, because it could change. If I was on a plane with that guy, I should expect to be held in quarantine. Asymptomatic or not, people still do contaminating behaviors all the time: coughs, sneezes, spit when they talk, wipe or pick their nose, poorly wash their hands (if at all), nervous sweat at take off or landings, etc etc.

    And... For goodness sake, stop people from travelling to and from Africa, would you please? Isolate that dang continent until this is over, as much as possible. The average Joe should not be able to get there, at all. And any medical personnel going there, mandatory quarantine before they can return. Anyone breaking these rules that causes the disease to spread should be tried for murder.

    Quit screwing around with ebola, or this is going to be the plague that took care of overpopulation... in a big way.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  78. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live where that hospital is... I could tell you a few stories about the place, but it is a dump. If this shit is going to get released to the wider public, this hospital is the most likely one it will happen at around here.

  79. Where's NSA tracking?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really they spend billion dollars to save us from terrorists, and they epically FAIL when their reason being can help?!?
    Useless

    1. Re:Where's NSA tracking?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You spelled TSA wrong, the should quarantining people recently having traveled to Liberia, instead of fondling tourists and taking their gizmos.

  80. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can't help but think his uninsured status played a part in him being rushed out the door. Hospitals in the US have a financial incentive to provide only the bare minimum legally-mandated treatment to uninsured patients, which usually means "keep them from dying if they start to die in front of you".

    Yesterday's USA Today article has a full quote, saying he was asked for his SSN, and responded that he was "visiting from Liberia and did not have one". SSNs are the things their collection agencies need to go after people for hundreds of thousands of dollars.

  81. Don't let the logical fallacies in that post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let the logical fallacies in that post keep you from laughing, idiots.

  82. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think you need more care than that. I think you wind up too weak to move and your caregivers need to gown up and know what they're doing. I think ICU level care is appropriate.

    Died of Ebola: Photos from the last three days of Marie Finda’s life

    http://imgur.com/a/PNXH6

    If you were sick with Ebola I would try very hard to get you to an ICU bed.

  83. Lethality is only half the story by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Contagiousness is far more important. If yxou have a virus which is 100% lethal, who cares if it is 0% contagious (beside the infected) ? That is why H1N1 is less lethal but is far more disruptive and dangerous.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Lethality is only half the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the point exactly, that efforts to contain and cure ebola are drawing scarce and precious resources from the much more deserving fight against the flu?

  84. Containment Real Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people in these stricken countries should not be allowed to leave their stricken countries. At the very least, the US Customs should have quarantined this man at the very moment he stepped off the plane. Something really stinks about this.

  85. Risk = Consequences X Likelihood X Prob of Detect by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Saying that something is more lethal doesn't mean the same as saying it kills more people.

    It's pretty clueless to worry only about lethality without considering the likelihood of transmission. Of course ebola is scary if you contract it or have a significant risk of contracting it. But frankly being worried about ebola is kind of like being worried about a shark attack. Scary as hell and you'll probably die if it happens but not something you should worry about much because the odds are so absurdly low.

    between April 2009 and April 2010 there were 61M cases of H1N1 resulting in 12.5K deaths. WHO says that, so far, there are 7192 cases of EBOV in the West African outbreak, and 3286 deaths.

    Unless you were actually in West Africa your chances of contracting ebola were and remain close to nil whereas your chances of contracting H1N1 were and are FAR higher no matter where you live. Risk = Consequences X Likelihood X Detectibility . Ebola has high consequences, very low likelihood (hard to transmit) and fairly high detectibility. H1N1 is more variable on the consequences though generally lower mortality rates but has much higher likelihood because it is more easily communicable and H1N1 has worse detectibility prior to infection. Occasionally strains of H1N1 mutate into something very deadly that can kill millions of people. There are strains of H1N1 that have infected virtually the entire global population and it does not always just kill the old and the infirm.

  86. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait... are you prepared to acknowledge that some third world countries have better health care systems than the US?

    Because otherwise I don't see how which third world country is relevant.

    And health care systems are relevant because that's how you educate people about transmission vectors and what can be done to prevent spreading the disease. When your health care system is almost disconnected from the government by design, then your public education campaigns do become a lot more difficult, because instead of a single coordinated effort, you end up with a myriad of private entities all communicating something slightly different. Right now, in Texas, people think they can get ebola from watching news about the case. You cannot get more disinformed than that.

  87. Don't be scared of what won't (probably) happen by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Tens of millions of people get the flu (of many variants) each year, and many thousands die from it - but in general it is mostly the very young or elderly who don't have the immune systems to fight it off

    That depends on what strain of H1N1 you are talking about. It's not a single virus and at times it has mutated into strains that are much more lethal. The pandemic in 1918 was notable in part because it tended to affect young healthy people. Epidemiologist don't worry about ebola too much. They worry a lot about pandemic influenza or Vancomycin resistant staph-aureus or any number of other diseases that are much tougher to contain.

    The flu kills a tiny fraction (less than 1%) of those who contract it...

    But it infects FAR more people. 1% of a very big number is a bigger deal than 50% of a very small number. The chances of you or I contracting ebola is a good approximation of zero. The chances of your or I contracting some strain of influenza is actually quite high. Worrying about ebola is kind of like worrying about a shark attack. Scary but absurdly unlikely to actually occur.

    1. Re:Don't be scared of what won't (probably) happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Epidemiologist don't worry about ebola too much." - [citation needed]

      Seriously, this is a ridiculous thing to say. Ebola has lethality, flu has contagion, when the flu garners lethality through mutation we get a party, right now ebola is as contagious as it has ever been - it's a party and it needs to be shut down.

    2. Re:Don't be scared of what won't (probably) happen by CaptnZilog · · Score: 1

      Tens of millions of people get the flu (of many variants) each year, and many thousands die from it - but in general it is mostly the very young or elderly who don't have the immune systems to fight it off

      That depends on what strain of H1N1 you are talking about. It's not a single virus and at times it has mutated into strains that are much more lethal. The pandemic in 1918 was notable in part because it tended to affect young healthy people. Epidemiologist don't worry about ebola too much. They worry a lot about pandemic influenza or Vancomycin resistant staph-aureus or any number of other diseases that are much tougher to contain.

      The flu kills a tiny fraction (less than 1%) of those who contract it...

      But it infects FAR more people. 1% of a very big number is a bigger deal than 50% of a very small number. The chances of you or I contracting ebola is a good approximation of zero. The chances of your or I contracting some strain of influenza is actually quite high. Worrying about ebola is kind of like worrying about a shark attack. Scary but absurdly unlikely to actually occur.

      I was talking about the flu, in general, not H1N1 in specific (there's lots of flu strains around).

      That being said, I'd take getting "infected" with the flu every year (I rarely get it) over getting infected with ebola even *once*. I stand a 1% chance of dying from the flu, even getting it every year for 3 decades I've got a pretty good chance of still being alive. I get ebola once, and I've got 50/50 odds or *less* of being alive in 3 months.

  88. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by TheTerseOne · · Score: 1

    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    Finland has it all.

    --
    "Newspapers: A tiny little part of the internet, printed out yesterday, and delivered to your house"
  89. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Geste · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I'd look to fire somebody higher-up. Communication issues like these are cultural and systemic -- organizational problems. I feel it is always a bit too easy to punish the front line folks without holding responsible higher-ups to any account.

  90. Worrying about the wrong things by sjbe · · Score: 2

    1) The fact that other H1N1 strains have killed millions of people has little bearing on how lethal the particular, modern-day H1N1 strain they were referring to happens to be

    H1N1 family viruses are constantly mutating and there is more than one. The notion that I should be more worried about ebola than H1N1 is frankly absurd because the odds of me contracting ebola is almost nil.

    you realize that the particular H1N1 strain they're talking about in this thread (the 2009 strain) wasn't actually that lethal in comparison to Ebola.

    Perhaps I'm not being clear. I don't really care much about a disease with 50%-80% mortality rates when the chance of infection is almost zero. I care a lot of about a disease with 1% mortality rates when the chance of infection is quite substantial.

    2) You're clearly confused about what "lethal" means.

    I'm not confused at all. I'm merely point out that people are panicking over the scary but very very unlikely disease when they really should worry about the less scary but far more likely one. If you happen to be in West Africa then by all means exercise appropriate caution. Otherwise it's absurd to get very worked up about it.

    Pointing out that the Spanish Flu was indiscriminate in whom it killed in no way takes away from his claim that the 2009 H1N1 strain's deaths were primarily those who "were already ill or had other issues."

    He cherry picked a bit of data to support his conclusion. The situation is more complicated than "50%+ mortality rates = OMG".

    1. Re:Worrying about the wrong things by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      The notion that I should be more worried about ebola than H1N1 is frankly absurd because the odds of me contracting ebola is almost nil.

      You've constructed a straw man in place of what I actually said. I said you misused the word "lethal", and that, as a result, you both misspoke and misunderstood the previous poster. I stand by that statement, since if you were using "lethal" to refer to the idea of how worried you should be about a disease, it's evident that you don't understand what the word means. Whether you should be more worried about disease X or disease Y is a separate, but related, issue which deals with a number of factors, only one of which is lethality. Transmissivity, proximity, and exposure are other factors that may come into play as well, for instance.

      Perhaps I'm not being clear. I don't really care much about a disease with 50%-80% mortality rates when the chance of infection is almost zero. I care a lot of about a disease with 1% mortality rates when the chance of infection is quite substantial.

      That's fine, and I have no problems with that, so long as you don't incorrectly try to contradict someone who is talking about lethality by pointing out that differences in transmissivity make one a greater threat than the other. Which is what you did.

      I'm not confused at all. I'm merely point out that people are panicking over the scary but very very unlikely disease when they really should worry about the less scary but far more likely one.

      Again, that's fine, so long as you use the right words to describe what you're talking about. You weren't, hence why I said you were confused about what "lethal" meant.

  91. Strawman arguments over infection by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Any day of the week, I'll take an H1N1 injection over an Ebola injection because, Ebola is vastly more capable of causing death.

    That my friend is a strawman argument. Of course you would rather take your chances with influenza over ebola if you were certain to be infected with one or the other but that scenario is absurd. You aren't certain to be infected with either one and the odds of infection are VASTLY different between the two. Unless you actually live in West Africa you should be FAR more concerned about the disease with a small mortality rate that infects huge populations than the disease with a 50%+ mortality rate that infects virtually no one. The current Ebola outbreak has affected approximately 0.0001% of the world's population.

    1. Re:Strawman arguments over infection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a fucking argument jackass. Ebola is fucking lethal as fuck, though not nearly as contagious as the flu. There's nothing else to this, your point is that the flu kills more at the end of the year - clever - who cares? As long as your definition of "virtually no one" is filthy cannibal africans, I suppose that speaks more to your opinion of the infected than your knowledge of the disease.

    2. Re:Strawman arguments over infection by CaptnZilog · · Score: 1

      Lets simplify this - you're looking to buy a new car, which would you rather buy...

      Car A is a commonly available car that only occasionally (1% of the time) gets into lethal accidents due to icy roads, traffic (other cars), etc, but overall statistics say you could probably drive it for 20 years ("into the ground") and never get into an accident.

      Car B is a rare type of vehicle, but frequently wheels fall off or the steering system fails and 50-80% of the time the accidents are fatal.

      So you are saying that because tens of thousands of people choose car A it is more dangerous than car B which maybe has only had a few thousand deaths due to it's rarity?

    3. Re:Strawman arguments over infection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you're yelling at each other is because you're both conflating the Case Fatality Rate (virulence), Mortality Rate, and Transmissibility.

      Case Fatality Rate is a measure of the lethality of the virus: (# of people who die from the disease) / (# of people who contracted it). Influenza has a fairly low CFR, Ebola has a fairly high CFR.

      Transmissibility is a measure of how easily a virus spreads from infected person to infected person. Rabies - a highly virulent virus, with a high Case Fatality Rate, has a very low transmissibility.

      Mortality Rate is largely a function of Transmissibility and CFR - the rate of death across a susceptible population. A highly transmissible virus with a high Case Fatality Rate will result in a high Mortality Rate. If either the transmissibility or the CFR are low, the mortality rate will also be (relatively) low.

    4. Re:Strawman arguments over infection by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      That analogy is completely broken.

      Car A (the flu car) needs to get into accidents pretty much every day, and has an overall lifetime chance of one of those being fatal of about 0.

      Car B (the ebola car) needs to have a lifetime chance of getting in an accident of just about 0, but the chance of that accident being fatal of 50-80%.

      It is hard to spread ebola. It's not a very contagious virus. Even direct exposure to it is unlikely to be infectious, except in cases of extreme viral load (someone cough literally into your mouth? Did you have sex with them? Did you *eat the fucking infected animal*?). It's not the flu where you can get it by walking in the same room as someone who has been breathing and is infected.

  92. But, but, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they said we'd be safe. They said it would never come here. I don't understand. It's almost like they lied through their fucking teeth.

  93. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Trax · · Score: 1

    Medicine was never, is, and never will be a perfectly sensitive or specific process and there will be near misses and misses such as this. I'm an emergency physician and there are a lot of moving pieces in an emergency department that are not controlled by the physician, nurse or others. Shit happens, deal with it, and move on. To say that the nurse or physician needs to be fired is out of line and irresponsible. How would you feel if someone were to say that we need to fire dc29A for this one bug in the line of code that causes a crash when we hit this corner case?

  94. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    Of course I'm prepared to acknowledge that assertion. That's irrelevant though, it's almost certain other qualities of the nation(such as plausibly being an island nation, or being completely unurbanized) are far more relevant for H1N1 infection rates.

  95. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry for your loss, but H1N1 hit only marginally harder than a typical flu season. The depth of your personal experience has little bearing on the overall net severity of the pandemic.

  96. Travel History by Digital+Ebola · · Score: 1

    People here in Dallas often forget we are a International Hub. We also have many foreign nationals. The entire incident is called "being caught off guard" and I'm hoping people can learn from this mishap, otherwise life is going to be weird for a while, at least if you work in medical.

    --
    "Network penetration is network engineering, in reverse."
  97. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Trax · · Score: 1

    Stop spewing crap if you don't know what they hell you are talking about! EMTALA is a federal mandate that any patient that presents to the emergency department regardless of ability to pay receives a medical screening examination, treatment, and management to stabilize the patient for either discharge, observation, or admission. Also, thanks for the retrospective look at how the physician and nurse dropped the ball when he first presented the first time to the ED. Everything is 100% accurate after the fact. Do you know how many people present to the ED with non-specific viral complaints? How do we know that he iterated / reiterated this fact to the physician that he saw during his first visit? My guess is that he didn't.

  98. Brooke Baldwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Love her massive thighs. (That's not important) very irresponsible in sAying the sheets at hospital were not changed after patient zero(usa) laid and vomited on them. Not all our property is owned by Pattels!
    Love you and bring Nolan back!

  99. "they've been ordered to stay at home" ?! by Prune · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So the government can force house arrest upon you against your will even though you've committed no crime? Land of the free, my ass. It's quite ironic that the average slashdot poster, who rushes to criticize government overreach and trampling of freedoms in the name of safety (how many times has Franklin's "They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety..." been quoted here?--countless!) sees nothing wrong with this example OF THE VERY SAME FUCKING THING! Talk about hypocrisy! I'm sure I'll get BS replies about thresholds etc. from people that forget that fundamental freedoms, such as freedom of mobility, are supposedly inviolable.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    1. Re:"they've been ordered to stay at home" ?! by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Um... hey. While I appreciate a good rant, it is wise to save it for where it matters.

      Regardless of what you think about freedoms, liberty, etc. The rest of humanity is best served by keeping your ass quarantined regardless of the form of government. Even in an anarchy, you will be quarantined... probably permanently. Nobody wants to die because of you if you are a disease carrier.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    2. Re:"they've been ordered to stay at home" ?! by Prune · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy. I'm not ranting, but you can't think logically. It's not a choice between restricting freedom and spreading the disease. One can move about without doing the latter--and while the risk is higher, it is doable. Spreading the disease requires at the very least proximity--which one can take steps to avoid while being ambulant--and for many diseases, direct contact is required. It's perfectly acceptable to have such actions restricted while one is a carrier, as they directly infringe on others' rights (indeed, unwanted contact is illegal anyways)**. But just being able to move about does not directly cause spread of the disease, and thus a restriction on that is unjustified, as there is only a modest increase in the chance of spreading the infection.

      **To elaborate further, one can count as unwanted contact that would have been unwanted had the other party known that the subject is infectious, which takes care of a situation where the other party otherwise allows the subject to get close to them because they were not notified of the subject's infectious status.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    3. Re:"they've been ordered to stay at home" ?! by shrimppesto · · Score: 1

      You sound surprised? It's called quarantine, and it's been around forever in all societies that are able to do it, including the United States. It ultimately boils down to the mobility rights of the infected, versus the rights of the rest of the (uninfected) population to be free from excessive risk of infection. Considering that this is Ebola we're talking about, many would agree that a certain degree of pragmatism is warranted here. All "supposedly inviolable" rights are subject to such limitations.

    4. Re:"they've been ordered to stay at home" ?! by Prune · · Score: 1

      I already preempted your argument in http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  100. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN is a propaganda machine, as is NPR, and they have been talking about it non-stop.

    It's been predicted for several years that the NWO will use a disease to control the population and implement martial law. Ebola is the perfect disease to do it. They can claim it's out of control, but we know how to control it. They can claim there is no cure, but we know there is. They will use it to control travel, food, water, medicine, communications, free speech and arms.

    Yes, it's a real threat, but the NWO has intentionally left our border open for 14 years, and have been working very hard to infringe on our constitutional rights, and turn our country into a fascist police state.

  101. Vacines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Folks, You know that Tylenol causes health problems, and Ibuprophen causes health problems. I can't recall which one exactly, but I believe one causes liver damage and the other causes kidney failure.

    After many decades of use, and taken billions of times, they know these problems exist, so why do you just believe that vacines are all just fine?

  102. Remember the Rules by zawarski · · Score: 0

    1."Cardio" 2."Double tap" 3."Beware of bathrooms" 4."Seatbelts" 6."Cast iron skillet" 7."Travel light" 8."Get a kickass partner" 12."Bounty paper towels" 15."Bowling Ball" 17."Don't be a Hero" 18."Limber up" 19."Ziploc bags" 21."Avoid strip clubs" 22."When in doubt, know your way out" 29."The buddy system" 31."Check the back seat" 32."Enjoy the little things" 33."Swiss army knife" 34."Clean socks" 48."Hygiene" 49."Always have backup"

  103. Mod Parent Up by FearTheDonut · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up... If I hadn't already have posted, I'd do it myself. An excellent question for doctors.

  104. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1N1 was also a "real virus", whatever that means.

    As someone that caught swine flu from a legit Mexican - bullshit. H1N1 was like a flu - it's nothing compared to something that makes you literally die shitting out your internal organs.

  105. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ebola has an incubation period prior to killing of 30 days. The person doesn't show ebola-like signs until the last 1-3 days. They are contagious from 7 days onward. You're armchair estimate is a bit off.

  106. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ebola can actually spread for weeks before any noticeable symptoms are present. The first 2-3 weeks are like a mild flu with sneezing, that's about it.

  107. Help me understand... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    Why we are even allowing flights to/from Ebola infected countries to continue?
    Why are are we taking the chance with this?

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  108. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Someone please confirm and site this please.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  109. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    I didn't provide any fucking estimate. It was a 2 sentence post. 2 sentences. There isn't much room for you to inject your imagined flawed assessment in there.

  110. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    As someone who's not so brain dead as to think the nationality of the transmission vector matters a god damn bit, shut the fuck up.

  111. The CIA + Jews runs your life and entire reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true. Once you realize this, everything in the world starts to make sense.

  112. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody can confirm it, because it's bullshit.

    http://www.who.int/mediacentre...

    The incubation period, that is, the time interval from infection with the virus to onset of symptoms is 2 to 21 days. Humans are not infectious until they develop symptoms. First symptoms are the sudden onset of fever fatigue, muscle pain, headache and sore throat. This is followed by vomiting, diarrhoea, rash, symptoms of impaired kidney and liver function, and in some cases, both internal and external bleeding (e.g. oozing from the gums, blood in the stools). Laboratory findings include low white blood cell and platelet counts and elevated liver enzymes.

    Incubation happens for a few days to a few weeks; until symptoms develop (i.e., incubation period ends, and you start feeling symptoms of the illness), you are not infecting others. You CAN however infect people for a few weeks after symptoms have disappeared, because the virus will still appear in body fluids (including semen) for nearly 2 months after the infection passes.

  113. Nuke it, nuke it, nuke it... by terjeber · · Score: 1

    FINALLY, we have a legitimate reason to nuke Texas!

  114. will they bill the ebola victim? by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    if you are infected with a deadly disease and set foot on an airplane with the intent to leave the country when you should be quarantined, is that a terrorist action?

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  115. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    The transmission vector has changed in the past. It will change in the future.

    Consider...doctors who knew what they were doing, wore protective suits and underwent decontamination procedures regularly still contracted the virus and several have died.

    So if you sat next to the guy on the plane, rode in the cab after he did, etc....No Worries! (cough cough...literally)

    You mean the male doctor who hugged the victim without protective gear? The female doctor who re-used protective clothing that wasn't properly washed because it's Liberia?

  116. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Talk about depressing. That last picture is the worst. The very worst.

  117. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1
    Just to make you feel better:
    http://www.who.int/mediacentre...

    Symptoms of Ebola virus disease

    The incubation period, that is, the time interval from infection with the virus to onset of symptoms is 2 to 21 days. Humans are not infectious until they develop symptoms. First symptoms are the sudden onset of fever fatigue, muscle pain, headache and sore throat. This is followed by vomiting, diarrhoea, rash, symptoms of impaired kidney and liver function, and in some cases, both internal and external bleeding (e.g. oozing from the gums, blood in the stools). Laboratory findings include low white blood cell and platelet counts and elevated liver enzymes.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  118. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by david_bonn · · Score: 1

    I agree completely.

    Emergency rooms aren't really set up to deal with flu-like symptoms. Which can be from a lot of causes other than travel to Liberia. I can easily imagine a situation where between the bloody messy auto accident and a gunshot wound and two or three heart attacks the dude with flu-like symptoms just slips through the cracks.

    When I took an EMT class so many years ago, one night a week I had to either ride around with a volunteer fire department or be at the emergency room of a small-town hospital. The amount of stuff that comes into the emergency room of a small-town hospital on Friday night would probably amaze you. I almost exhibit flu-like symptoms myself thinking about a big-city hospital.

    Which gets to the other catch here. The initial presentation of Ebola is "flu-like" symptoms. Most people are highly suggestible and can practically think themselves into such symptoms if they are panicked and freaked out about possibly being exposed to an extremely fatal disease. So I suspect we will have a wave of people from Dallas or from Dulles Airport or from the flights this idiot was on who think they might have been exposed turning up at emergency rooms, urgent care clinics, and even their own doctors thinking they have Ebola. It is going to be quite a sorting job finding the tiny number of people who really are sick. I really hope someone has a fast, reliable, and relatively inexpensive test kit for Ebola that can be rapidly deployed. Because we are going to need it. Not because I expect a lot of people to get Ebola, but finding those needles in a haystack of hypochondriacs is going to take some work.

  119. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the normal procedure is in American hospitals but at least in Finland where I live, you're 100 % the hospital's responsibility once you're there - i.e. they have to ask the right questions and even if you're dishonest with your answers they can still be held responsible, if it's something they "should" have noticed (which of course is relative). So if you go to the ER and staff ask if you've been drinking and you lie and say no and some nasty shit happens because drugs they administer have contraindications with the alcohol in your system it's a case of malpractice because they should rely on a blood sample and not a patient's word.

    From the perspective of one American, that sounds insane to me. Patients absolutely must share the responsibility for receiving proper care. Holding staff responsible for a patient who directly lies about their medical history is incredibly cruel to the staff and terribly inefficient because then it would logically mean staff must test for any and all potentially relevant conditions, genetic markers, chemicals, antibodies, bacterial cultures, etc. for every patient. That would be very costly to the system. If patients expect that society has an obligation to take care of them, doesn't it seem logical that the patient has a reciprocal obligation to society to be forthright in their medical history so as to free up as many of society's resources as possible for the next, potentially sicker, patient?

    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  120. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by charyou-tree · · Score: 1

    'But "regretfully, that information was not fully communicated throughout the full team," '

    My experience from working in ICU and ER years ago:

    • Nurse to Intern: "This guy has been in Liberia"
    • Nurse to Intern: "This guy has been in Liberia!"
    • Nurse to Intern: "This guy has been in Liberia!!"
    • Intern to Resident: "This guy has a fever."
    • Charge Nurse to Orderly: "Hey, can you put that guy in a chair so we can free up exam room four?"
    • Resident to Intern: "What do you suggest?"
    • Intern: "Ummmm, fluids and antibiotics?"
    • Resident: "Check."

    Can't know, but when I hear phrases like "full team", that's what I am reminded of. Very very unfortunate. Beyond all of the additional exposure, the guy didn't get the care he likely needed to have a chance at survival.

    Heh, could be. But, you've got to keep one thing firmly in mind when it comes to nurse:intern interactions: the average intern hears 6 pieces of bullshit from a nurse for every piece of important, accurate information.

    Next to a July intern, a confident seasoned nurse is the most dangerous person in the hospital.

  121. try 120 cases by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    okay, first: they HAVEN'T identified the length or method of transmissability, because it keeps spreading by surprise.

    second: we know that in Africa they have missed many cases. Therefore, 7000 actual cases would not be far off.

    Third, the world population is 7 million, so there are 2^20 doublings (at 23 days each) between now and total infection, at the current rate.

    Fourth, the US population, including illegals, is about 350 million. So by the math, you might guess that there was 350 cases in the US, but the actual rate of spread is probably initially faster than a 23-day doubling, but slower to enter the country. So a reasonable guestimate is that we might have 120 cases, about a third of 350, but with Dallas/CDC response, we'll rapidly catch that 350 number.

    In line with that, I'd estimate that in any state that has a lot of human commerce with Dallas (including Louisiana, Virginia, Oklahoma, and California), you could estimate the number of cases by dividing the state population by 3 million, more or less.

    In other words, we're in deep trouble already.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  122. oh, one more question by MickLinux · · Score: 2

    Of those 80 people, how many do you think work at the lochal grocery store, or a fast food restaurant? How many would be permitted to take time off for minor cold symptoms? How many could afford to do so?

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  123. Re: I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' mov by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Not fired. Quarantined. as is the case with the whole city. They need to take a one-month break, with robotic Amazon food and TP delivery on call.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  124. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Medical history, prescribed drugs etc. is just an SSN into the health care computer system away... You can decline having your history accessible to anybody by - every time tests are taken or you visit a clinic - not signing the permission to share between different clinics and hospitals and medical staff on a medical need basis (except the doctor that has entered those particular details about you and even in that case you can at any time request that it's deleted...). So if you want to mislead them about your medical history by doing that in advance or refusing to give your SSN and also give false information, it would no longer be something they "should" have noticed (hence it is relative, if they're responsible for it or not). The tricky area is I guess people who get high or intoxicated and manage to seem normal in that state. But sure, there might be some waste of resources if they're supposed to treat every patient as if he/she has Alzheimers and remembers nothing...

    My knowledge is based on a lot of personal experience with the system due to my epilepsy (luckily it has finally been under control with medication for a few years). Of course, maybe my neurologist exaggerated a little when he said "they were 100% responsible for you and it was pure luck that you didn't get a seizure at home" when bashing them and explaining things to me.

  125. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by khallow · · Score: 1

    Wait... are you prepared to acknowledge that some third world countries have better health care systems than the US?

    Because otherwise I don't see how which third world country is relevant.

    What's the point of this grandstanding? A claim was made. Back it up. Name the country that is mentioned in this statement: "In contrast, in a third world country with a decent health care system, the infection rate was 1 in 1000."

    Note that Europe didn't have significantly different infection rates than the US.

    And health care systems are relevant because that's how you educate people about transmission vectors and what can be done to prevent spreading the disease. When your health care system is almost disconnected from the government by design, then your public education campaigns do become a lot more difficult, because instead of a single coordinated effort, you end up with a myriad of private entities all communicating something slightly different. Right now, in Texas, people think they can get ebola from watching news about the case. You cannot get more disinformed than that.

    You do realize that there are public health services doing public education campaigns in the US? Your premises are wrong.

  126. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by khallow · · Score: 1

    It's worth noting that some if not most people who are infected with a normal flu are asymptomatic. The H1N1 flu apparently had an unusually high rate of asymptomatic infections. For example, this report implies infections were at least a factor of three higher than symptomatic infections due to the increased presence of antibodies.

  127. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by khallow · · Score: 1

    For example, Belgium, Spain, and Germany seemed to be hit pretty hard by H1N1 flu with higher "confirmed cases" per capita than the US.

  128. Ebola as a weapon for terrorists? by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    If I were an Al Queda or ISIS big shot and wanted to do some damage that would scare the crap out of people I would send 20 or 30 suicidal jihaddists to Liberia to get themselves exposed to ebola, then put them on planes to whatever western countries I didn't like. You have a couple weeks after exposure before you get sick- plenty of time to travel. Some would get stopped at the borders, but some would get through and be able to deliberately infect as many people as possible before becoming too sick to function. Maybe they don't even have to travel to the target countries- If they infect people in airports they can spread the virus all over the world very quickly.

    I am surprised I haven't heard any speculation about a scenario like this on the news- especially Fox "News".

  129. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone with H1N1 on the plane is contagious to everyone there.
    Someone with Ebola not showing symptoms is a danger to no one.

    Yes or No

    Would you fly to Liberia today, and shake hands with everyone not showing symptoms?

    No, and the reason is that I hate flying.
    Also, I won't shake hands with people to whom I've not been properly introduced.

  130. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many big pharma lobbyists do you think pushed the government to scare the population as much as possible in order to drive up sales?

    You are trying to make a statement by pretending to ask a question.
    The answer to your question is "none". Zero. nada. zilch.

  131. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by shrimppesto · · Score: 1
    Since an anecdote is worth a thousand data points, I would like to add in the perspective from those of us working in the hospitals during the H1N1 epidemic ...

    That shit was nuts. People were dying left and right from H1N1 in our ICUs. Some had multiple comorbidities and immunocompromised states; but MANY others were just young, healthy, yet unlucky people who developed life-threatening respiratory failure from it. Why it hits some people so badly, while giving others just a fever and some aches, who knows; but the families of those who suffered through these critical illnesses, of whom there were many, would vehemently disagree with your assessment that "nothing happened" from H1N1.

    Additionally, our hospitals were stretched to the absolute max, it felt like sheer mayhem for several months, and we saw the (frighteningly restricted) limits of our healthcare system's ability to cope with a large-scale epidemic.

    In conclusion... lots of bad things happened in the United States from the H1N1 epidemic, and you are lucky you didn't have to bear witness to, or suffer the consequences of, any of them. Others were not so lucky.

  132. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1N1 is a air borne virus which is much more dangerous to humans in its then form ie strain

    Ebola is more like HIV in that its not very hardy outside the host ie human body and requires the direct contact of fluids ie sex, touching the body fluids AND then getting those fluids in the new host's body thru mucus membranes, the eyes, or in an open wound.

    where the ebola outbreaks originate its until now been rural where the immediate family handles majority of supportive care when they get infected and the relatives process the dead victims and do the actual burial process and rites. Little to NO modern medical barriers, training, gear, etc are locally available and what is available is quickly depleted.

    In a modern industrialized country few if any citizens handle their medical care on their family's own ability and resources and they have little to no direct contact with a dead body. Medical examiners and funeral workers handle the remains almost exclusively.

    THUS direct exposure would usually only happen in the brief period when your sick enough to have visible symptoms ie when your contagious until you get too sick to be ambulatory which in the US you are 99.99% of the time gonna be in a hospital unless you live in back country Alaska.

    Im a 46 yo rurally raised American and while been around large numbers of dead farm and game animals -the only dead humans I have ever seen are on tv or film.

    As as long as the health authorities follow the protocols and the public follows what they are told this wont be a huge problem.

    Didnt help the Liberian male lied on intake forms when he was traveling where he failed to declare when asked if he had had contact with ebola patients/persons deceased from ebola while traveling abroad.

  133. Vote this one up! by Another+Mouse+Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't have any points to mod. :(

  134. Re:Thank god its Dallas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THey have to..Caucasions, with their pink skin and pansy immune systems ,are veritable storehouses of obscene blood diseases, such as porphyria, leukemia, haemophilia, etc.. and would likely infect everyone close to them, much worse than any African would, after catching ebola. So there..mr whitehood!

  135. Re: Thank god its Dallas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats why 95% of ebola patients are black.
    I call bullshit

  136. walking dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have you hear about the recent news of a few Ebola dead coming back to life?

  137. Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Well, that falls under "Unless you're considering people who received a live vaccine to be "infected"..." - since a live vaccine will cause antibodies to be present.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?