Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Old PC File Transfer Problem

An anonymous reader writes I have an old Compaq Contura Aero laptop from the nineties (20 Mhz, 12 Mb RAM, Windows 3.11, 16-bit, PCMCIA, COM, LPT, floppy) with 160 Mb drive that I would want to copy in full to a newer machine. The floppies are so unreliable — between Aero's PCMCIA floppy drive and USB floppy disk drive — that it is a total nightmare to try and do it; it just doesn't work. If that option is excluded, what else can I do? I have another old laptop with Windows XP (32-bit, PCMCIA, COM, LPT) that could be used; all other machines are too new and lack ports. Will be grateful for any ideas.

297 of 466 comments (clear)

  1. file transfer by pen-helm · · Score: 5, Informative

    There used to be a program called Laplink that would transfer between machines over a cable. You could get special parallel "Laplink cables," but perhaps a null-modem serial cable would also work. (Light googling suggests you can use a 7-wire, null-modem serial cable.)

    I see there is a laplink.com web site.

    Wikipedia says, in MS-DOS 6.0 (and PC DOS 5.02) there was something like it included: INTERSVR and INTERLNK. But it looks harder to use.

    1. Re:file transfer by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Winsock, TCP / IP and telenet.

      If it actually has a USB port, which seems doubtful given the presumptive specs - all you need is a flash drive of the smallest possible sort (160 MB!!).

      Check your cereal boxes.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:file transfer by disposable60 · · Score: 1

      What about a IDE-USB dongle? You may need the power supply - those older notebook drives were a bit much for USB power.
      I don't remember how hard it is to get to the HDD, though - that was a while ago.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    3. Re:file transfer by Comen · · Score: 1

      Yep I used to use Laplink back in the win3.1 days also, with just a standard 9 pin serial cable I think.
      I think pcanywhere or some company like that also made a program to do this and included a serial cable.

    4. Re:file transfer by jnik · · Score: 1

      I installed Windows 95 OSR2 on a machine without a CD-ROM drive over Interlink and a null modem cable. Took about fifteen hours, but did the trick. It's probably the best least-common-denominator option.

    5. Re:file transfer by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Probably faster to unplug the hard drive, order an adapter, and let UPS deliver it. The filesystem should be supported by any modern OS. If the disk works it will be a matter of browse and pluck.

    6. Re:file transfer by redback · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you arent running anything usb on the old machine, you are using usb to connect the hard drive of the old machine to a modern machine.

    7. Re:file transfer by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Yep, did that for a system still running windows 3.1!

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    8. Re:file transfer by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      The parallel port laplink cables also work. With the parallel ports set to ecp mode it's a lot faster than serial.

    9. Re: file transfer by gerf · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have one on the shelf next to me. Yawn. Email me if you'd like to borrow it.

    10. Re:file transfer by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > It's a machine before the TCP/IP and Internet times.

      I ran a machine like that with TCP/IP on the Internet. The main problem would be getting an ethernet port working on the thing but the software side of the equation is well covered.

      Been there. Did that.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:file transfer by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      there was nothing special about laplink cables, they really were just null modem cables. used to use them a lot back in the day, still even have my 232 breakout box somewhere which I used to use. having said that you are way overcomplicating this. just get a USB to IDE adapter. fast easy and no need for ports that probably don't even exist on his current machine.

    12. Re: file transfer by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 5, Informative

      It took me about 14 seconds to find one for $20 on Amazon. IDE or SATA hard drive, USB2 interface. Took me longer to type that than to find the enclosure. Could probably find one even cheaper if I took the time.

    13. Re:file transfer by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      Some of the IDE->USB kits on ebay come with a molex plugged UK 3 pin PSU, I'm sure if you're in the US you could get a 2 pin US one instead too.
      Some even come with a molex -> SATA power plug adapter too if they're IDE/SATA -> USB adapters, not that the article author would need that one in this particular case :)

    14. Re:file transfer by onproton · · Score: 5, Informative

      Regarding this idea: a couple of years back I bought this universal hard drive adaptor, since then it has gotten me out of quite a number of jams. After removing the drive, you can attach it to one of the adapter's IDE/PATA/SATA ports and directly access the files via a USB connection from the adapter - I'd say this is probably the least frustrating way to handle this situation.

    15. Re: file transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if it is an MFM or RLL controller?

    16. Re:file transfer by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Laplink might be a good choice. Another good choice, probably faster, would be to try to adapt the hard drive from the old machine to the new machine somehow.

      I'm assuming the hard drive is IDE. If that's the case, a USB-ATA adapter would do it, or another choice would be a SATA-ATA adapter.

      A third option (and the one I used to transfer files from my Amiga to my PC about 18 years ago) is to fire up a terminal progrom on both the old and new machines and connect them via their serial ports with a null-modem cable (Null modem cables are to serial what a crossover cable is to Ethernet). Then use a file transfer protocol like Zmodem to pass the data across the link. This one's pretty involved, though, so you will probably want to go with this one as a last resort.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    17. Re:file transfer by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

      But it looks harder to use.

      It was: It needed both boxes to run DOS 6.0 -- same version. Even so, results were not guaranteed.

      Laplink can negotiate its protocol over a std LPT Cable or Null Modem.

      I take out the drives and connect them to a modern box either with a PATA cable to the motherboard or via a USB\PATA connector to the modern box.

    18. Re:file transfer by Jobless+*topia · · Score: 1

      The new machines lack LPT ports? WTF kind of machine did you buy without an LPT port? A laptop, sure, a desktop? You have to look hard, even today to find a machine that doesn't have a printer port.

      Google for NUC or Chromebox, palm-sized desktop computers that lack printer, serial, VGA, and sometimes even DVI ports. Fortunately there are "modern" adapters for all these "old" ports.

    19. Re: file transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then it wouldn't be a 160GB drive. Just guessing, since my 40MB drive from 1990 wasn't even using that antique technology.

    20. Re:file transfer by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      The best solution I have found is to just pretend the old technology didn't exist. Bin your computer and forget you ever had it. I know it sounds like a cop out, but it worked for me.

    21. Re:file transfer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Regarding this idea: a couple of years back I bought this universal hard drive adaptor,

      same crap, 1/4 the price

      I mean, it's different crap, but it does the same job. Note all the included stuff so you can plug in anything. 2.5" PATA runs power off the adaptor, all else get run off the included adaptor.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re: file transfer by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      I have personally seen 200mb and larger ESDI drives in vintage PS/2 systems.

    23. Re:file transfer by blackicye · · Score: 1

      In addition to the above suggestion to get a USB to 2.5" IDE converter, if this is some old machine that is controlling a piece of industrial or scientific equipment, you could try using software like Acronis Trueimage to clone the contents of hard drive to the new(er) PC, and make it bootable.

    24. Re:file transfer by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Trumpet Winsock.

      Next question.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    25. Re: file transfer by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Informative

      you forgot to order the right Compaq IDE laptop header adapter. Whichever one it is for this model...

      Suddenly a Laplink cable and a VirtualBox running DOS with a detachable D: doesn't seem so awful bad. Move the image from the XP box via flash drive or network, mount it loopback and profit before lunch.

      http://www.pcxt-micro.com/dos-...

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    26. Re:file transfer by disambiguated · · Score: 1

      Does that come with a USB port? Because the laptop does have one. Seriously, wtf.

    27. Re:file transfer by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Where exactly would he plug this newfangled usb flash thing in at?

      The laptop will not have any USB ports.

    28. Re: file transfer by digsbo · · Score: 1

      Did ancient astronauts build those adapters?

    29. Re:file transfer by michaelmalak · · Score: 2

      That will work if the hard drive is IDE. If, however, the hard drive is RLL or MFM, then I personally would go the (expensive) route of buying a modern desktop PC with an ISA slot and an ISA MFM or RLL card. Reportedly from various message boards, "drivers are not needed" when using ISA MFM/RLL cards, and I've never tried it myself. But I'm guessing it's probably true for some version of Windows (e.g. Windows 98 or Windows 2000), which that computer vendor seems to specialize in.

    30. Re:file transfer by pla · · Score: 1

      It's a machine before the TCP/IP and Internet times.

      And?

      I remember the joy of using machines back then, and that convinced me of the awesomeness of Linux... Flat memory? Every device (with suitable physical capabilities) can act as storage, or network or an input method? Awesome!


      The "right" answer here, pull the drive. The second choice, install Linux to a FAT partition and tell it to use either SLIP or PLIP to talk to the outside world, then just transfer the files via RSync. Simple as that.

    31. Re:file transfer by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

      The new machines lack LPT ports? WTF kind of machine did you buy without an LPT port? A laptop, sure, a desktop? You have to look hard, even today to find a machine that doesn't have a printer port.

      Pretty much anything built in the last five or so years won't have serial or parallel ports. If you're lucky, you might have some headers on the motherboard that can be brought to the slot cage with connectors in brackets like what were common before ATX, but I've run across plenty of motherboards that don't even have those. Notebooks are even less likely to have them. This Dell Inspiron E1505 I'm typing on is a bit long in the tooth...main reason I'm keeping it going is its 15" 1680x1050 screen. No serial or parallel ports on it.

      When I saw a sufficiently-old notebook come through my office a while back that had a serial port on it, I hung onto it for talking to our switches and routers. I forget what model of HP it is, but it's old enough that it runs on an Athlon XP. It's probably the better part of 10 years old at this point. The last emerge -uND world took a couple of days to run, but it's fast enough to run Minicom and Firefox, and to do traffic captures from the switch: serial connection to the management port to enable SPAN, Ethernet to the SPAN port for capture, and WiFi to talk to the whole thing from my office instead of the server room.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    32. Re: file transfer by blackicye · · Score: 2

      If it's from the 90s it is highly unlikely to be MFM or RLL.

      Some flavor of SCSI would be the only possibility aside from IDE, but I'd serious doubt it.

    33. Re:file transfer by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      but what if the old machine doesn't have it? Be just as difficult to get Trumpet Winsock on an old machine as get files off of it.

    34. Re:file transfer by armanox · · Score: 1

      A laptop that old probably lacks a CD Drive...and if it has one I'm pretty sure it can't boot to CDROM.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    35. Re:file transfer by armanox · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at several machines that are near me right now - A Core 2 Quad, a Core 2 Duo (HP), a FX-8120, 2 third gen i5s and a first gen i7 (HP). Guess how many of them have serial or parallel ports? I just checked two more AMD boards that are sitting here as well (Sockets AM3 and AM3+) - no ports either.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    36. Re:file transfer by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      The new machines lack LPT ports? WTF kind of machine did you buy without an LPT port? A laptop, sure, a desktop? You have to look hard, even today to find a machine that doesn't have a printer port.

      What? Where the heck are you getting your computers from? Aside from industrial PC type boards I haven't seen a parallel port on the back panel in a decade. A few boards I had a while back came with the port on a header and an expansion slot bracket to bring it to the back if you wanted it, but it's long dead on the main ATX back panel section.

      I just checked on Newegg to verify I wasn't crazy and the only things they had with a native parallel port were thin clients and point-of-sale style kiosks. For everyone else there are cheap cards to add it and most higher end laptop docks seemed to offer it, but pretty much nothing resembling a normal modern computer has them anymore.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    37. Re: file transfer by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

      I dont know if you are serious or not--

      No. No ancient aliens. ESDI was in use in server equipment from that era. 200mb ESDI interface drives were pretty common inside IBM PS/2 series towers of that era.

      Specifically, found inside IBM PS/2 model 60 systems.
      http://ps-2.kev009.com/pcpartn...

      These featured an MCA ESDI hard disk interface in the later models. (Early models had MFM controllers.)

      If you suspect aliens, please inform the person selling this 680mb ESDI drive on Ebay.

      http://www.ebay.ca/itm/MICROSC...

      MFM and ESDI technology didn't get much beyond the 600-700mb before it was completely eliminated, but you CAN find drives that large with that interface type.

      No aliens involved.

    38. Re: file transfer by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Though I suppose the operative word here is "Laptop". You would be lucky to have a hard drive at all in early 90s portable equipment. Mid 90s equipment would be IDE.

      I have NEVER seen an MFM drive smaller than 3.5 inch form factor. However, I HAVE seen MFM to LPT enclosures for the 3.5 inch form factor intended for use with early 90s portables. It really was the dark ages back then. (They were REALLY RARE though.)

    39. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      Given the specified processor speed as 20MHz I'd say this is a 386SLC hence lacking a USB port.

      Only suggestion I have is finding someone with a 2.5" IDE adapter, an IDE to USB adapter (comes with a PSU usually), a set of screwdrivers and the patience to tear down your Compaq. I could do it, but a: I charge a fortune for such service, b: I don't know where you are.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    40. Re: file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      the Compaq Aero 3/20 is stocked with a 40MB 2.5"x1/6" drive. The 160 is an upgrade.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    41. Re: file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      it's not, it's IDE.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    42. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      problem: the 3/20 doesn't have USB or a CDROM.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    43. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 5, Funny

      laptops haven't had parallel ports since 2010. Serial ports went out around the same time. Firewire is hen's teeth as is PCMCIA/Cardbus, and finding something with an infrared port is like bottling unicorn farts.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    44. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      This. Is why I don't throw my old gear just because some PHB says it's "obsolete". It's obsolete when smoke pours out of it and I can't get the fucking fans to spin.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    45. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      eh?? I have an Asrock P4i65G Prescott P4 board next to me with an ECP parallel port on it. That's a 2006 vintage. (and blow me, it still works with the original processor I bought for it as well, a 2.66GHz P4)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    46. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      good idea but irrelevant as the equipment as described would indicate a 2.5" IDE drive.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    47. Re:file transfer by RandomShiz2 · · Score: 1

      Laplink was an over-priced solution even at the time. A standard null modem cable and zmodem (I've always used Telix). I just did this with a Gateway Colorbook, 300MB in just over 9 hours.

    48. Re:file transfer by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      The new machines lack LPT ports? WTF kind of machine did you buy without an LPT port? A laptop, sure, a desktop? You have to look hard, even today to find a machine that doesn't have a printer port.

      It isn't that hard -- Macs haven't had any sort of specialty printer port on any model that I'm aware of for at least 15 years now.

      Yaz

    49. Re:file transfer by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      anonymous reader says the floppies are dodgy. If she/he could load new software on it, he/she could copy the files off of the disk, too. The problem is to do it with the software and hardware as-is.

      Backing up a 160 meg drive to 1.44 meg floppies is gonna be time consuming. Best get a USB disk box that will fit a 2.5 form factor IDE hard drive and plug it into the USB port of a modern computer. The filesystem would be easily readable on just about anything, it'd be FAT16 for Win 3.x.

      Now, if the hard drive is damaged, you're screwed...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    50. Re: file transfer by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      The most ancient laptop I ever touched was a Compaq 386/16 with a 20MB 3.5" 1/2 height IDE drive. It sounds pretty much like the same, or probably the piece of crap I had was a predecessor. I do remember it was clearly a 20MB drive though. I swapped it for a regular desktop 40MB IDE that we had in the shop.

      Everything I found about that series says it's IDE. I couldn't find anything specifically saying the physical size, but I suspect it was a 3.5" drive. I seriously doubt it was RLL, MFM, ESDI, or anything more exotic. So he's wasting everyone's time asking rather than just opening it up and seeing "ooh, a IDE drive." Even if it was, he could go find some combination of adapters to use it. Anyone who's worked with stuff long has a box full of adapters and cards for exactly this. Well, I did ditch all my ancient cards on eBay a few years ago.

      I'd be surprised if the drive even spins though. Most of the time when I go to try ancient hardware, the drives don't spin, or spin enough, even though the owner remembers that it was working when they shut it off.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    51. Re: file transfer by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I remember using an external 3.5 floppy on the tablet version of the thinkpad in the early nineties, they were rare as hen's teeth back then. Laplink and similar tools were SOP for moving files on/off mobile devices.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    52. Re:file transfer by VernonNemitz · · Score: 1

      Here is a link to a PCMCIA ethernet adapter (out of stock, but the page is informative). Perhaps a used one could be obtained (borrowed?)

    53. Re:file transfer by rtayek · · Score: 1

      yes, you can buy the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L..., but be sure to get cables with both serial and parallel connectors and take a look at http://www.minuszerodegrees.ne... thanks

      --
      vice chair orange county java users group (ocjug.org).
    54. Re:file transfer by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      Okay - I'd go for a HD adaptor, or ethernet PCMCIA card, but really It'll only take hours, not days over RS232. Even at a paltry 19200 bits per second we're looking at 18.5 hours or so. If it can manage the dizzy heights of 57600 or even 115200, then that will be down to a little over 6 or even 3 hours.

    55. Re:file transfer by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Laplink also had a neat mode where it would install on the remote machine for you (which was useful for me, because it came on 3.5" floppies and one machine only had a 5.25" drive). The mechanism for this was quite interesting - you ran command.com on the remote machine machine, telling it to use com1 as the console device (something I hadn't been aware DOS could do). Then it would use the type command (similar to cat on UNIX systems) to write a stream of data from the standard input to a file and finally run that file.

      This obviously raises the question of why, when you have a serial console with working flow control, do you need laplink at all? If you have a null modem cable and a lot of patience, then you can always extract files by writing them to standard output and reading them off with a serial program - just make sure that you've correctly configured the UART first. If you're a bit paranoid, then running something like par2 first (I think there are DOS binaries and they're pretty small, though they may take a while on a 386) and you'll be able to recover small data errors.

      Copying 160MB over a serial connection won't be fast, but I'm assuming that this isn't urgent if it's been sitting on a 160MB disk for years without backups...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    56. Re:file transfer by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      uhhh.. it's actually very hard to find a modern motherboard which still has an LPT port..
      Most printers these days don't even have an LPT port anymore, and there are excellent LPT-USB cables.. My Dell Precision here at work which is about 3 years old, doesn't have an LPT port..

    57. Re:file transfer by beh · · Score: 1

      Hmm - there are PCMCIA card readers - used one for photography a long time ago...
      If you have memory cards you're using in a camera, see whether there is a PCMCIA card reader for that type of card (used compact flash at the time). In that case you could at least use stuff you mostly have already...

    58. Re:file transfer by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      This. Is why I don't throw my old gear just because some PHB says it's "obsolete". It's obsolete when smoke pours out of it and I can't get the fucking fans to spin.

      Same here. I have under my desk a Pentium III in a tower, with parallel, serial, USB, Ethernet, floppy, CD, DVD and a multi-boot set up of DOS, Win98, Win XP and Debian. I fired it up last week to run WordPerfect to retrieve some old documents from floppies.

      I think it was a couple of weeks ago that there was a warning that, looking back from the future, the present time will appear to be a digital dark age, with photos and documents lost in this way. Of course, some people don't give a toss.

    59. Re:file transfer by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      he can't use floppies to transfer the data from the Aero to a computer using a USB floppy drive because they have problems reading each other's disks. This is not uncommon when dealing with the older floppy disk technologies.

      I don't understand that. I used floppies for many years, and occasionally still do to retrieve old data, and very rarely had a problem. Also, a USB floppy drive is not "old technology" - the original floppy drives were all IDE.

      I recently had a campaign of getting any useful data off my collection of 3.25" floppies. I must have looked through about a hundred of them (I have hundreds more) and only one had failed; they had kept data for about 20 years. I even installed WordPerfect off floppies (new in 1991) in order to read some of the old documents.

      I believe that the problem arose with later floppies made, which were crap. Earlier ones made by IBM or 3M (which I had used) were fine until the Chinese undercut their prices. The Chinese ones (usually identified by bright colours and lack of branding) are the trouble.

    60. Re:file transfer by Megane · · Score: 1

      This might be tricky if the hard drive is pre-LBA. The easy way to check is to go into BIOS and see how the hard drives are defined. If there are cylinders/heads/sectors numbers, a USB adapter is probably not going to work. 160MB should be big enough to support LBA.

      And don't forget to get the adapter from standard 40-pin IDE to the 44-pin laptop IDE connector. (or get an IDE external laptop drive case, I know there's still a few on the shelf at Fry's)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    61. Re:file transfer by X10 · · Score: 1

      Laplink. Ah, the good old days.....

      --
      no, I don't have a sig
    62. Re: file transfer by steven.db.clark · · Score: 1

      You're crazy. I keep a stock of old 12V fans.

    63. Re: file transfer by steven.db.clark · · Score: 1

      The problem would be finding drivers.

    64. Re:file transfer by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      uhhh.. it's actually very hard to find a modern motherboard which still has an LPT port..
      No it isn't. I just looked at LGA1150 boards on newegg, sorted by price and found serveral with paralell ports on the first page.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    65. Re:file transfer by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      "modern desktop PC" is a slight exaggeration as the newest CPU they offer is ten years old, and buying a whole new PC just to copy data off an old one is a heavyweight solution at best.

    66. Re:file transfer by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      There is a slight problem with these adapters I have encountered. The USB to IDE chipset they are based on will not work with drives under about 1GB for some reason. They don't seem to support non-translated drives that rely on cylinder-head-sector style addressing. My solution is to find a 2.5 to 3.5" IDE plug adapter and a machine with a real parallel IDE port. I wouldn't trust a PATA to SATA adapter with this either. Laplink via serial is another option (NT based Windows don't work with the parallel cable), I have it on my Contura Aero 4/33c, mostly because it didn't come with the PCMCIA floppy drive. Ethernet cards can get messy if the machine is still running DOS, you have to mess with card and socket services, the old LAN Manager driver stack, plus have a PC Card that has DOS drivers.

    67. Re: file transfer by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      The Contura Aero uses standard 2.5" ATA hard drives.

    68. Re:file transfer by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Don't order it, go to your local computer repair shop.

      Who has one of those? Most of the local computer shops have been snuffed out by Best Buy and the Geek Squad. The few that survived that have been killed off by Amazon. You're likelihood of finding one anywhere that can help with older stuff is very very low.

      That said, you might have some luck with placing a want ad on craigslist. Every town has old codgers who use to work at (or run) said old computer shops and they have all the adapters for this stuff that you could ever want. Several years ago I used craigslist to acquire what were likely the last 5.25 (and 5.25 / 3.5 combo!) floppy drives in the county I lived in.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    69. Re:file transfer by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      The new machines lack LPT ports? WTF kind of machine did you buy without an LPT port? A laptop, sure, a desktop? You have to look hard, even today to find a machine that doesn't have a printer port.

      You haven't bought a computer recently, have you? A quick check of the top 10 motherboards sold by Amazon shows that not a single one has a parallel port (or serial port for that matter).

    70. Re:file transfer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust the power adapter. I've had them blow up two drives before. Just use an old ATA power supply....

      I just gone done throwing all of mine away (well, recycling them) because they don't have enough 12V to be useful for their size. The case did come loose from the power supply which came with my USB adaptor, but the power supply still works.

      My PC also has an external molex female on the card reader/USB hub that I installed. So I can plug a male to male molex power cable there, and use it to power external devices which I can then connect to the front panel. That's the most convenient option, although obviously a seriously bad drive could take my system down.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    71. Re:file transfer by ctrlshift · · Score: 1

      Who has one of those? Most of the local computer shops have been snuffed out by Best Buy and the Geek Squad. The few that survived that have been killed off by Amazon. You're likelihood of finding one anywhere that can help with older stuff is very very low.

      I'm RIGHT HERE!

    72. Re: file transfer by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The most ancient laptop I ever touched was a Compaq 386/16 with a 20MB 3.5" 1/2 height IDE drive.

      I can remember when the concept of a laptop with a hard drive was fabulously exotic.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    73. Re: file transfer by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      They could borrow my MFM controller card. Of course you'd need a USB to ISA adapter.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    74. Re: file transfer by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      I'd be surprised if the drive even spins though. Most of the time when I go to try ancient hardware, the drives don't spin, or spin enough, even though the owner remembers that it was working when they shut it off.

      I've heard the fix for that is to spin the entire drive while applying power; kind of nudge it along the platter's axis to get the bearings unstuck. It involves "open-case surgery," where you have the drive out of the case and free to move while you first apply power. Once it starts spinning, you'll want to power down and reinstall into the case so you don't knock it around while it's operating and damage it further.

    75. Re:file transfer by Grismar · · Score: 1

      If you have an old modem lying around, you can either call in on still existing service providers and do your thing online, or stick a modem in the other machine as well and call that. No specialized software required and unless you threw everything out, you're likely to own some old modems of you own this hardware.

    76. Re:file transfer by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Just use a null modem serial cable and Interlnk.exe.

      Not blazing fast, but reliable and easy with minimal investment.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    77. Re:file transfer by tao · · Score: 1

      2006 is almost a decade ago...

    78. Re:file transfer by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      eh?? I have an Asrock P4i65G Prescott P4 board next to me with an ECP parallel port on it. That's a 2006 vintage.

      You are correct, it looks like that board was released in March of 2006, but it really doesn't help the case that parallel ports aren't outdated when it was a legacy support board even when it was released. LGA775 had been out for 18 months at the time and the AGP slot just speaks for itself.

      (and blow me, it still works with the original processor I bought for it as well, a 2.66GHz P4)

      You might want to grab a Kill-a-Watt or similar and test your power consumption. Prescotts weren't exactly known for being efficient in the first place and a lot has changed in the CPU world since then. Anandtech's CPU Benchmark Database has the Pentium 4 HT 660 which is a year newer, a full gigahertz faster, and has twice the L2 as yours. When you factor for the clock difference, a 10 watt Celeron is pretty much just as fast in single threaded loads and since everything has multiple cores these days multithreaded performance will be a whole different world.

      With how cheaply you can get CPU power these days anything from the P4 era or older can be hard to justify keeping around both for power/heat reasons (particularly notable on Prescott chips) and performance. If you actually use that day-to-day I guarantee that a dual core chip would be practically a religious experience by now, not to mention if your electric costs are anything you care about it very well could save you enough to cover a lot of the upgrade price over the course of a few years.

      I'm not saying you need really awesome gear, just that even cheap hardware these days is hugely better than that. Until a few months ago I was running on a Phenom X6 1045 that cost me $90 brand new when I bought it over two years prior. It still did just fine for me day-to-day and I felt no need to upgrade. Yeah it's six cores, but an end-of-life chip that was sub-$100 when bought is by no means a monster build.

      We reached the point where for most day-to-day tasks you generally don't need any more performance some time ago, but that doesn't mean there's no reason to replace old hardware. I do contract IT work for a bunch of customers and at this point my line is Core 2 Duo. Anything older gets replaced when possible (made a lot easier by XP being EoLed with no security updates), anything newer gets upgraded to 4+GB of RAM and a strong recommendation of a SSD. Even a first-gen C2D is pretty hard to tell from a Core i7 in most desktop tasks if it has enough RAM and the SSD.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    79. Re:file transfer by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

      Bingo. Interlnk.exe and intersvr.exe came with DOS, and as such, are often already on the old computers hard drive. (This is really important if the floppy drive is unreliable.) They can also be copied over the serial lines with a copy command, so on the other end, you can run Windows XP or DosBox under Linux.

      Once the file system is under a pseudo-modern O/S, then you can use TCP/IP networking to copy it wherever you like.

    80. Re: file transfer by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Not sure why you got modded Funny. I for one think that was right neighborly of you.

    81. Re:file transfer by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Came in here exactly to say this. I bought one a few years ago and never had to fight with old ports again. Wonderful device.

    82. Re:file transfer by rjune · · Score: 1

      If I had Mod points, I would give you bonus points for an extraordinary memory. I've done a lot of upgrading and haven't done anything with RLL or MFM drives for 25 to 30 years. The only reason I remember, was that I was upgrading a friend's computer, had selected a hard drive and controller that was either MFM or RLL and a pushy salesperson tried to get me to select the other type (for a considerably higher cost.) This was back when you looked at print ads in computer magazines and called toll free numbers.

      Based on the time-frame I would think that the drive is IDE and a IDE/SATA to USB bridge would be the way to go.

    83. Re: file transfer by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Mid to late 80s you mean.

      When I say "Early 90s", I mean 1990 - 1992. (Mid 90s is 1993-1996, and late 90s is 1997-1999.)

      Remember, computer equipment was fabulously expensive back then. People would buy a computer and try to keep it chugging for awhile. Seeing HDD-less portables was a common occurrence in the early 90s, which is why there were peripheral makers who made drive enclosures to sit on the LPT port for them.

      I even have an example of such an early laptop.
      NEC Ultralte SX/20

      It debuted in 1991, and had a 40mb internal HDD. The PREVIOUS model released, The NEC Ultralite, was released just a few years earlier in 1988. That's late 80s, but was still commonly found in the early 90s. It did NOT feature an internal HDD, but was the first "Notebook" sized portable.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

      The comaq LTE came out a year later in 1989, with a 20mb drive.

      But again, remember-- those were brand new machines with big honking price tags. Only people with serious bankroll were cruising around with them. The older equipment stuck around awhile.

    84. Re: file transfer by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      You wont find MFM inside a portable, unless it was a custom job. MFM drives had to be "married" to a controller with a low-level format, which meant that if you changed out the drive, you had some work ahead of you. (easy if you know what to do, but i digress.) They also tended to be clunky, bulky, and power hungry.

      IDE drives were smaller, sleeker, integrated the drive controller right onto the drive (So you never had to low-level format ever again), and used a tiny fraction of the power.

      This whole tangent is making me feel old.

    85. Re:file transfer by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      Dell Latitude docking stations have serial and parallel ports.

    86. Re:file transfer by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      Often coupled with the Wildcat dialer when BBSes started offering internet.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    87. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      the Toughbooks are built to military specification. I know, I have two of them. One of them has been under a Challenger tank and is still running.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    88. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      and when was the last time you saw an Alienware box with a Dockstation port?

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    89. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I said "laptops haven't had parallel ports since 2010", fucktard.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    90. Re: file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      it's a bit late to be worrying about replacing the fan when the thing's on fire...

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    91. Re:file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      TL;DR. I keep it around because:
      a: it still works,
      b: it does what I need it to do,
      c: it happily also drives my RAID daughterboard, stack of six drives, DVDRW, optical interface, composite capture board, mixer board, and ten USB heads,
      d: has an ECP parallel port onboard and +5V RS232 on a rattail,
      e: I plain can't afford to be chucking the thing into landfill and forking out for new equipment because some marketing drone tries to convince me that it'll save me £0.25 over the next five years in electricity.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    92. Re: file transfer by hjf · · Score: 1

      TFA says 160MB. Which is reasonable considering the CPU is 20MHz

    93. Re: file transfer by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I used a DUN connectoid, but. Wildcat! was fun.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    94. Re:file transfer by antdude · · Score: 1

      I agree. He might be able to run it in a VM too. Why UPS though? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    95. Re:file transfer by antdude · · Score: 1

      I used http://www.amazon.com/Vantec-C... but it didn't work on my king ant's very old ProStar lappy's HDD. I had to use my friend's different brand and model device to work. He told me that not all of them will work too even on desktop HDDs. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    96. Re: file transfer by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      If it makes you feel better, I vaguely remember working with MFM drives. It's been long enough ago where I don't remember anything about how they work. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    97. Re:file transfer by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      The parallel port laplink cables also work. With the parallel ports set to ecp mode it's a lot faster than serial.

      I remember getting a session of Unreal Tournament going on a turbo parallel cable, back before I got to spend any money on real networking....

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    98. Re: file transfer by Smask · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Kaypro 10, with 10Mb Harddrive. In 1983 there weren't any other interfaces than MFM/RLL availlable. (Plus some exotics, like SCSI and ESDI.)

    99. Re: file transfer by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      The Kaypro 10 was a portable, not a laptop. :)

      The last time I saw anything like it, a friend got one for free, and was going to convert it into a portable PC. I don't think he ever did anything with it though. That's probably for the best.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    100. Re: file transfer by tobenemo32 · · Score: 1

      The drive is 160MB not GB as I understand it.

    101. Re:file transfer by toddestan · · Score: 2

      One of the problems is that those adapters only work with drives that can report their geometry to the bios so that it can auto-configure itself. If you have to go into the BIOS and type in the number of cylinders, landing zone, etc. then those adapters are useless. Luckily I have a 2.5" to 3.5" IDE adapter and no shortage of PCs that have PATA ports on the motherboard so I'd have no problems retrieving the data from that laptop.

    102. Re: file transfer by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Then you want to get the IDE to USB adapter. here is the one I use at the shop, works on everything and hassle free. 2.5, 3.5, IDE, SATA, don't matter it ALL is covered with this one. I've had it for a couple of years now, its a good one.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    103. Re: file transfer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      yes, I've got three of these: http://www.newegg.com/Product/... and two of these: http://www.addonics.com/produc...

      All my SATA gear is either caddied or goes through a Seagate Goflex SATA cradle I got with a 1TB drive in about 2010.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    104. Re: file transfer by smithmc · · Score: 1

      But not in a Compaq laptop, I'd bet more than a few bucks. PS/2 was a whole different ecosystem.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  2. Pull the disk by borcharc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get a ide controller and whatever adapter you may need and just plug the hd into your current workstation. Perhaps one of those usb -> ide deals would also be a easy answer. Why make it more complex then that?

    1. Re:Pull the disk by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Yes, I concur. I am a fan of the Rosewill USB 2.0 Adapter - RCW-608 - for IDE / SATA Device. Cheap, versatile, effective. Connect one of these to your average Linux box and doing data rescue operations from ancient hardware becomes as simple as pulling the drive out of the original machine.

    2. Re:Pull the disk by RogueLeaderX · · Score: 1

      Since I don't have any mod points want to add my voice to the chorus supporting this.

    3. Re:Pull the disk by evanh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a pretty good chance of that failing. Modern cheap SATA/USB to PATA adaptors only talk ATA. ATA over IDE is not the same protocol as the original IDE.

    4. Re:Pull the disk by peragrin · · Score: 1

      He needs to bribe me to sell my FireWire/usb ide hard drive enclosure.

      I accept cash. Plug the hard drive in, turn it on and plug into any USB port. The USB will. Be slow but faster and cheaper than any other method.

      So I accept beer, scotch, and redeaded women.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:Pull the disk by borcharc · · Score: 1

      some nerds just cant do something without making it 9000x harder then it needs to be

    6. Re:Pull the disk by namgge · · Score: 1

      I don't even see why there are so many other posts about Kermit, laplink, file transfers, PCMCIA, etc etc. Worst case is that the hard drive has a proprietary connector and you have to solder an adapter on.

      Because rule #1 when trying to get data off twenty-year-old hardware is "If it's working, mess with it as little as possible."

    7. Re:Pull the disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IDE (ATA) has the controller on the drive. The adapter is only a bridge to the ISA bus. In fact, you can even get an arduino to work with an IDE drive pretty easily.

    8. Re:Pull the disk by kc7cfk · · Score: 1

      Agreed. As a tech support specialist for an environment of around 2,000 PCs and laptops, this tool is the most valuable thing I have at my disposal. The one I have handles IDE (not much need for this anymore) and SATA. It has saved my bacon many times over the years and has more than paid for itself.

    9. Re:Pull the disk by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      So I accept beer, scotch, and redeaded women.

      Wow, you are one twisted individual :)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:Pull the disk by scrib · · Score: 1

      So use the old machine to power the drive up if you don't have the power connector for it. Like a jumper cable. Open the old machine and set it next to the new one. USB adapter to the new computer, power from the old. The old computer will just sit there failing to find a boot drive, and you don't have to open the new one up. An adapter as suggested is the best way to go.

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    11. Re:Pull the disk by Strangely+Familiar · · Score: 1

      I have an adapter like this and it works great on old hard drives I've had hanging around since the 90s. Takes care of old laptop drives and newer SATA drives. Even if it dosesn't happen to solve this particular problem, which it should, it will probably be useful for other tasks.

      --
      Join the IParty!
    12. Re:Pull the disk by caseih · · Score: 2

      Indeed this is the way to go. And I checked the specs; these laptops appear to have IDE drives in them. I can't believe how many people are proposing incredibly complex solutions such as finding a PCMCIA ethernet card and trying to use the old lanmanager protocol to copy files off. Or using a serial cable.

      Every slashdotter should have a IDE and SATA to USB adapter in their toolbox. They are dirt cheap (I own probably three I think) and they are always useful for doing data recovery. Most adapters you can buy today connect to SATA, normal IDE, and the 44-pin laptop IDE, and even come with a power supply.

      Before you try going down any of those other complex routes, do yourself a favor and go buy a rosewell one from NewEgg or any other vendor really. You'll probably use it more frequently than you think.

    13. Re:Pull the disk by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Heh heh. Now current workstation has the Monkey Virus!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    14. Re:Pull the disk by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Zombie chicks?

      Not sure if zombie is the right term here.
      1. Get dead woman (eg a corpse donated for scientific experimentation. You don't want to break the law do you?)
      2. Resurrect her or find female zombie. Either is pretty difficult but I would find a vampire.
      3. Kill resurrected woman or zombie (head shot for zombie type btw) - That is not illegal!
      4. Drink beer and scotch.
      5. Go all necrophiliac on the redeaded body.
      6. Enjoy.

      This reminds me of the hypothetical apocalyptic scenario when there are only vampires and zombies left on the planet. Who would win? My bet is on the zombies, but that would create a new specie - the Vampire Zombie which would eventually rule the world.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    15. Re:Pull the disk by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      The names tell that story too. IDE is Integrated Drive Electronics, and ATA is "AT Attachment" (ISA is the same thing as AT bus)

    16. Re:Pull the disk by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Serial cable is easy. No disassembly and there's built-in software in Windows (though you can use it to load better transfer software). The only thing there's to it is to select COM1 or COM2, baud rate and it takes many hours.

    17. Re:Pull the disk by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      uh... IDE was the original name, later changed to ATA. It is the SAME THING.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    18. Re:Pull the disk by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Get a ide controller and whatever adapter you may need and just plug the hd into your current workstation. Perhaps one of those usb -> ide deals would also be a easy answer. Why make it more complex then that?

      That doesn't work, usually.

      Modern USB-IDE adapters use LBA mode to access data but that mode is usually implemented on drives larger than 8.4GB or so.

      Smaller drives don't usually implement LBA mode and you have to talk to them in CHS mode, and very very very few USB-IDE adapters can talk this way.

      It'll look like it works, but nothing really happens.

      The best way (the way I did it) was find a PC with an IDE interface - but modern enough to have network adapters (or USB) or even run Linux or Windows. Then just slurp the data off the disk - even modern OSes still have the ability to talk CHS through the controller.

    19. Re:Pull the disk by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The USB interface is probably faster than the old drive anyway...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    20. Re:Pull the disk by evanh · · Score: 1

      I just looked up that laptop, it was a very late (1994) Win3 release so possibly is using an ATA compliant HDD. Anything older wouldn't have much chance.

    21. Re:Pull the disk by sithlord2 · · Score: 1

      Unless it's an RLL or MFM controller. Good luck finding a USB adapter for those.

      --
      ...You are over-qualified and under-paid. If we give you a raise, we will break the cosmic balance of the universe.
    22. Re:Pull the disk by Megane · · Score: 1

      Great, except he has a laptop drive, and I'll bet yours is for a regular 40-pin desktop drive.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    23. Re:Pull the disk by Megane · · Score: 1

      I think the main thing needed is LBA support. It's a bit hard to configure CHS on a device with no user interface. 160MB is probably large enough, any smaller might not be. It can be confirmed by going into the BIOS and seeing if the drive was configured with CHS or LBA (though it might still support LBA even if configured with CHS). Also, the adaptors generally don't have 44-pin laptop IDE connectors, so he'll either need to get an external case or a 40-to-44-pin adapter.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    24. Re:Pull the disk by rHBa · · Score: 1

      Is redeaded like a dead zombie?

    25. Re:Pull the disk by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      I have a $5 eBay USB to IDE/SATA thinggy
      I plugged my circa 1990 Seagate 40MB IDE PIO1 in it, it works fine.
      A null parallell can also be used with a soft like Total Commander, they have a DOS version that can communicate fine with one running in Windows.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    26. Re:Pull the disk by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      My desktop system is about 5-6 years old and it's got a built-in IDE controller, I just never used it. My suggestion would be to look on his current system (or find someone with a previous-gen desktop ), I bet there's an IDE controller there. Just turn off, plug in the IDE cabling, and fire it back up, copy over.
      Or am I the only one with a drawerful of IDE cables?

      And the whole "IDE has tricky settings" is a canard: if you have a single IDE (like, I suspect, this one) leave the pins on 'master'.

      --
      -Styopa
    27. Re:Pull the disk by InvisiBill · · Score: 1

      So use the old machine to power the drive up if you don't have the power connector for it. Like a jumper cable. Open the old machine and set it next to the new one. USB adapter to the new computer, power from the old. The old computer will just sit there failing to find a boot drive, and you don't have to open the new one up. An adapter as suggested is the best way to go.

      How do you suggest getting the old machine's power flowing through the 44-pin connector on the USB adapter?

      On desktop drives with separate connectors, it's a great plan. It doesn't really work on a laptop drive with a single combined connector though.

    28. Re:Pull the disk by Kevoco · · Score: 1

      I came here to recommend exactly This!

    29. Re:Pull the disk by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      yeah going by the information it's a 3/20 SL variation with a 2.5"x1/6" IDE (it'll have "IDE" stamped on it somewhere!), stocked with a 40MB. The 160 would be a factory optional upgrade.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    30. Re:Pull the disk by scrib · · Score: 1

      The USB adapters can power laptop drives. I've never had an issue with that.

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    31. Re:Pull the disk by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      And a Bipra brand rig worked a treat lately, when I decided to redo the Windows and install Linux on my netbook. I used the DVD drive out of a dead machine.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  3. Remove Drive and hook to USB by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    If the new computer has a USB port, they make devices that connect to many different old drive connectors and turn the drive into an external USB drive.

  4. Com port, 2-3,3-2,5-5 and use Zmodem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Com port, 2->3,3->2,5->5 and use Zmodem

    1. Re:Com port, 2-3,3-2,5-5 and use Zmodem by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Boy, does that take me back!

      Now get off my lawn!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Com port, 2-3,3-2,5-5 and use Zmodem by namgge · · Score: 1

      Or Kermit as an alternative to Zmodem.

    3. Re:Com port, 2-3,3-2,5-5 and use Zmodem by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Or sneakernet, which would be far faster in this scenario. It amazes me that people would be so unable to quite literally think outside the box that it wouldn't occur to some people that just pulling the drive (outside of the box, get it) and attaching it as a second drive to the new PC and copying it in system is the only way to do this that makes any sense.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  5. adaptor by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You could get a cheap IDE/SATA to USB adapter and pull out the drive. The adapter would still be of use since it also has an SATA port. Who knows, you may run into another occasion where the IDE is needed as well.

  6. usb adapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    pull the hard drive and get a USB adapter for it

  7. Pull the hard disk and USB connect it... by WolphFang · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pull the hard disk and USB connect it to the target machine ... The USB thingies are like dirt cheap ...

    --
    leather-dog muksihs
    Blog: @muksihs
    1. Re:Pull the hard disk and USB connect it... by Noryungi · · Score: 1

      Yup, USB connectors for IDE drive. Either that or use COM port to transfer files with good old crusty Windows hyperterminal. Make sure the COM port is set to the highest possible bandwidth.

      --
      The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    2. Re:Pull the hard disk and USB connect it... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      IIRC, old laptop HDDs weren't designed for easy replacement.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Pull the hard disk and USB connect it... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      True on that. Some of them were either hardwired into the board, and others used a flex cable with a custom HDD/power interface cable.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Pull the hard disk and USB connect it... by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      meh, you just didn't know old laptops. I could take any working laptop, tear it down and put it back together working. Without a teardown guide.

      (Hell, I wrote a teardown Bible for one of my clients, it's got TDGs for over a thousand different models)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  8. Remove drive and use an adaptor by rspott · · Score: 2

    http://www.frys.com/product/8129805

    http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=USI-2535SIU3

    Plug the USB cable into your new or modern computer and away you go.

    1. Re:Remove drive and use an adaptor by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Actually this is probably the best answer. I like this better than my own answer of using a serial link.

      I even have such an adapter, and didn't think of it.

    2. Re:Remove drive and use an adaptor by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I think I used this one. Looks like just about the same thing. It's probably identical inside.

      http://www.tigerdirect.com/app...

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  9. Number of optiosn by vux984 · · Score: 1

    with 160 Mb drive that I would want to copy in full to a newer machine.

    Pull the hard drive, and attach it to the new computer via a USB kit.

    Something like:

    http://www.amazon.com/Vantec-C...

    I'm not endorsing that kit in particular. I've had mixed experience with the quality of these kits... you get what you pay for. But it'll get the job done.

    1. Re:Number of optiosn by adolf · · Score: 1

      you get what you pay for

      If I charge for one item than someone else is charging for something that is functionally and internally identical, whose offering would present the better value: My expensive widget, or someone else's cheaper widget?

    2. Re:Number of optiosn by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Do I think the $10 unbranded one is cheap garbage with poor quality control? Yes.
      Could somebody slap a fancy sticker on it, and try and sell it for $25. Yes. So what? Would you like a cookie or something?

      Check the reviews... poor construction, falls apart, dead after minutes of use, power supply fails, fries drives, connections aren't snug...and even the "brand name ones" aren't exactly good. I'd expect to 10% disatisfied customers on a site like newegg. I'm seeing LOTs of products with HUNDREDS of reviews with 25%+ rating it 1 or 2 eggs. That's ABYSMAL.

      These things are cheap junk. If someone actually makes a GOOD one and stands behind it, I'd love to hear about it. Because I'd love to have a good one on my test bench that will reliably work with any drive I plug into it.

      As it is I plug them into the motherboard IDE socket on a test PC; and I have a laptop IDE adapter for it. That at least always works reliably if the hard drive isn't toast. Unlike these usb devices.

      For the article poster, especially if all he's got are laptops to work with, then get an IDE kit and cross your fingers, be prepared to exchange it, but it should get the job done. Just don't expect it work if you need it again a year from now.

    3. Re:Number of optiosn by adolf · · Score: 1

      Checking reviews is an idea that I'm already behind.

      But my point is simple: Only suckers and halfwits think that they "get what they pay for," as if price is some indicator of quality.

      (Which one of those are you?)

    4. Re:Number of optiosn by vux984 · · Score: 1

      as if price is some indicator of quality.

      I suppose its a one-way indicator. A high price doesn't mean its necessarily any good. But if the price is too low to pay for reasonable quality its going to be low quality.

    5. Re:Number of optiosn by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The problem with almost all of them is the power supply. Very few of them have anything close to a 2A power supply. And when they hit their limit, the output power decreases and crashes heads before the power supply dies altogether. Toshiba recently released some external 3.5" drives (with the drive included) where the power supply didn't even quite reach the power input requirements of the drive inside it or only had a margin of 0.1 to 0.2 amps.

      I've had good success either replacing the power supply with something with a higher amperage rating or if I'm really nervous I use the molex off an AT/ATX power supply for the power side and the adapter just for data.

      For laptop drives, you won't have much of an issue with a USB adapter - they don't use enough power to strain these things. But to be on the safe side, I would use a brand new one anyway just to make sure the power supply is still good.

  10. Pull the harddrive - adapters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are USB to 44 pin ide adapters. I am guessing by the description it uses a 44pin ide drive. There are also ways to do that through esata and whatnot but I find USB works better for old drives as sometimes they timeout with retries and USB->IDE bridges are more forgiving for that.

  11. HDD move by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

    If the laptop HDD isn't soldered in, and if you've got an IDE controller on your desktop, motherboard haul the drive out of the old laptop and plug it in to the desktop with a ribbon cable. Copy away!

  12. Two options by nhtshot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first option would be a PCMCIA ethernet card. Since you have 3.11, if you install a PCMCIA nic that has windows 3.11 drivers, you can simply use windows file sharing to copy everything. There's plenty of old nics on ebay.

    Second option is to use pkzip to zip up everything you want. Buy a null modem cable and transfer the zip files using x/y/zmodem. Windows 3.11 had a terminal program and the windows XP laptop will have hyper-terminal.

    The second option is much slower, but null modems are easier to find than pcmcia network cards with windows 3.11 drivers.

    1. Re:Two options by nhtshot · · Score: 1

      Regarding the PCMCIA, that old laptop probably predates cardbus. So, look for one that doesn't have the gold color near the connector.

      3com, Xircom and US Robotics are your best bet for ones that will have drivers available.

    2. Re:Two options by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this. Just borrowed an old 10/100 PCMCIA card from a friend to recover some nostalgia from long ago.

      Also there are PCMCIA hard drives if you have the two-unit slot. Depending on your bios those might not even need drivers.

      --
      --- Need web hosting?
    3. Re:Two options by Erioll · · Score: 1

      I agree, find SOME way to get that onto a local network, and that will be BY FAR the easiest way to do things. Maybe dig up an old ISA 10Mbps card on Ebay or something, as the original poster suggested if you can't find a suitable PCMCIA card.

      And combining with something said above, it's not difficult to find a usb->serial port device/cable (it's not just pin-out, so it's a device, not merely a cable). Pretty cheap. Same with a null-modem cable. Both together should run you in the range of $20-$40 or less. Then hook it directly up to whatever computer you want that has a USB cable, and get a terminal emulator (plenty available) and transfer.

      It CAN be done, but I'm with the parent that windows file sharing via ethernet is going to be the fastest by far.

    4. Re:Two options by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      I just happen to have a drawer full of Compaq Conturae. Neat little machines for their time. Haven't done anything with them for years except run automobile OBD diagnostics every year or two to find out why the Check Engine light is lit THIS time. And even that was superceded a few years ago by a USB OBD2 reader on a netbook. I pulled one of the Compaqs out and find that if has a Linksys EC2T Ethernet card in its' PCMCIA slot. I'm sure that WFWG 3.11 will do ethrnet file transfers given an appropriate driver. Maybe such a card can be found on eBay or some such. I think I recall that I had an early version of Slakware running on one of them at one point. No X windows -- too slow to be useful, but the console was OK.

      Another possibility is to remove the hard drive and connect it to another machine. It's been a loooooong time, but ISTR that it's just a bog standard 2.5 inch IDE drive and I think they still make adapters that should work with it.. I seem to recall that access to the drive was not all that difficult, just removing a few screws and separating the case. But It's been 15 years or so and it might be harder than I remember.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    5. Re:Two options by djrobxx · · Score: 1

      WFWG will do file transfers fine, just remember to enable the NetBEUI protocol on XP, because WFWG doesn't natively speak TCP/IP.

      http://support.microsoft.com/k...

      Failing that I'd probably try to get laplink (DOS has a built in version called INTERLNK/INTERSVR) going against a more modern machine with a real parallel port. The disk might get interesting (remember you need a FAT32 volume and DOS 7.1 or later). A USB stick might actually work if the BIOS presents it to DOS as a fixed disk.

    6. Re:Two options by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I'd be a little wary of USB/Serial adapaters. I've found a lot of them are really only designed to let you console into a Cisco or something. Start blasting them with Zmodem and they have an obnoxious tendency to lock up or even bluescreen your machine (even a Windows 7 machine). A better solution would be to find a medium-old desktop with a real Serial port on it an use a Null Modem cable there.

      PCMCIA Ethernet would be by far the best solution (although good luck on the drivers) if you can find someone who has a dusty old card sitting around on a shelf somewhere, preferably with the still hopefully good driver floppy. Look for cards that don't have the bumps on the top of the connector.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:Two options by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      Use Y or Z modem. Xmodem didn't have file resume capabilities. I can't believe I remember that.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
  13. Network file transfer by aXis100 · · Score: 1

    Windows 3.11 machines were capable of SMB file sharing over a network. You should be able to use an old PCMCIA ethernet card and install the Microsoft TCP stack (it wasn't installed by default), then see other computers over a workgroup.

    If that sounds too hard then serial transfer over null modem should be the easiest and I'm sure I did it many times myself back in the day. I cant remember what software I used to use, googling for Windows 3.11 serial file transfer shows lots of hits though.

    1. Re:Network file transfer by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
      You can get a pcmcia ehternet card used for pretty cheap. TCP stacks are/were (if I remember correctly) available from both Microsoft and third parties.

      If you don't get smb networking, then you can start up an FTP server on your recieving machine. (probably easier to do with a Linux box than WIndows)

      Run FTP, and connect to your recieving machine..
      ftp 192.168.2.8

      bin (( make sure you do the transfer in binary mode, not text mode ))
      then use mput to bulk transfer files.
      mput *.*
      If that blows up because of too many files, you may have to break it into pieces

      mput a*.*
      mput b*.*
      . . . . You pretty much have to do that for each folder (most ancient FTP clients won't mput recursively)

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    2. Re:Network file transfer by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1

      kermit is probably the best tool for doing serial file transfers.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  14. Yank the drive and connect via usb by Mr307 · · Score: 1

    Assuming its an old style 44pin micro ide or whatever its called.

    There are many IDE to USB doohickeys available that support SATA, 40pin and 44pin.

  15. Low tech solution by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    You could just get yourself one of these adaptors from Amazon then copy the files directly from one HD to another...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  16. Jeez, don't make this harder than it needs to be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Simple way:

    1. Open up old laptop. Run defrag program. Set it to show the entire blockmap for the old hard drive.
    2. Turn on new laptop's webcam, set it to stream output to a text file. Focus webcam on the blockmap from the defrag program on old computer.

    The webcam will read the contents of each block on the old laptop's HD and write it to the text file on the new laptop. Easy peasy.

  17. PLIP by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    Parallel line internet protocol. Get ahold of a floppy drive for your main PC and put a micro linux distro on it, including the module for the plip protocol. Then boot off the floppy. It'll take like 3 or 4 disks to hold the full kernel, but once you're there, you can rsync your drive to something else with a parallel port or a parallel port dongle.

    1. Re:PLIP by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      LapLink lets you use the parallel port without having to configure TCP/IP stuff. It's raw bytes, more like a really fast null modem cable.

      But why bother getting the right cables (I have some, easy to DIY, but you can't buy them off-the-shelf anymore) and software (some piracy required I imagine). Instead you can use RS232 at 115.2kbps. Google did the arithmetic and unit conversion for me:

      160 Megabytes) / (1125 (bytes / second)) = 1.64609053 days

      Zmodem is pretty slow, but ZedZap/8K-Zmodem is pretty quick and easy to find software that supports it for DOS, Win9x and Linux. If you do not require error detection and flow control, then Xmodem is fast. (recommend you use a null modem cable with flow control RTS/CTS wired, this is almost always wired correctly with off-the-shelf cables). Don't need a 16550 UART for this to work, an 8250 is adequate if you have flow control enabled.

      I'd highly recommend you send ZIP files over your link rather than uncompressed data. If you have enough disk space free, you can use pkzip's multivolume support and archive the entire disk into several managable files. (rar's is even easier to use than pkzip's)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:PLIP by hawguy · · Score: 1

      LapLink lets you use the parallel port without having to configure TCP/IP stuff. It's raw bytes, more like a really fast null modem cable.

      But why bother getting the right cables (I have some, easy to DIY, but you can't buy them off-the-shelf anymore) and software (some piracy required I imagine). Instead you can use RS232 at 115.2kbps. Google did the arithmetic and unit conversion for me:

      160 Megabytes) / (1125 (bytes / second)) = 1.64609053 days

      Zmodem is pretty slow, but ZedZap/8K-Zmodem is pretty quick and easy to find software that supports it for DOS, Win9x and Linux. If you do not require error detection and flow control, then Xmodem is fast. (recommend you use a null modem cable with flow control RTS/CTS wired, this is almost always wired correctly with off-the-shelf cables). Don't need a 16550 UART for this to work, an 8250 is adequate if you have flow control enabled.

      I'd highly recommend you send ZIP files over your link rather than uncompressed data. If you have enough disk space free, you can use pkzip's multivolume support and archive the entire disk into several managable files. (rar's is even easier to use than pkzip's)

      You're off by a factor of 10, 115kbs is around 11500 bytes/second. Even if his serial port can only handle 56kbs, he could transfer the data in less than 10 hours.

      Xmodem does do simple error checking with a single byte checksum on every packet (admittedly inferior to zmodem's crc32). Though for anything important, he should be able to find an md5 or even sha1 hash program that'll run on his system.

    3. Re:PLIP by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You're off by a factor of 10, 115kbs is around 11500 bytes/second.

      Ha! You're right. I was so intrigued with Google's calculator I forgot to check the basics. Trying again:

      (160 Megabytes) / (11 520 (bytes / second)) = 3.85802469 hours

      I think the checksum or CRC in the ZIP or RAR should be enough for him, it's going to be as good as whatever the firmware for that 160 MB harddrive uses, which is where the errors are most likely to occur. Xmodem and Zmodem are pretty good at detecting the common errors that occur over serial and modems, like truncation and dropped and duplicated bits.

      SLIP and rsync would be the least effort solution to get you some good MD5 hash introduced in the transfer. If he has an Ethernet PCMCIA card then that would be even faster to transfer, but I sometimes getting networking and stuff up on an old computer takes close to 3.9 hours. ;)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:PLIP by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You have to give Google some credit. Their calculator knows the difference between a KB, a Kb. And given that a Kilobit is 1024 bits, the math above is off by a bit. Giving Google the raw numbers:

      160MB / 115.2kbps = 3.08641975 hours

      Shaves almost another hour off the math.

    5. Re:PLIP by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      it takes about 10 clocks to transfer a byte over RS-232 in the most common configuration, 1 start bit, 8 data bits, 1 stop bit. So you can't use kbps here, because Google assumes there are 8 bits in a byte.

      3.9 Hours is still the correct number, when ignoring overhead for X/Y/ZModem.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:PLIP by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I should have realized that. I looked above and saw Kbps when it really should have been Kbd.

    7. Re:PLIP by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      We've spent more time discussing this than it would have taken for this guy to transfer his harddrive over.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    8. Re:PLIP by omnichad · · Score: 1

      But that wouldn't be convoluted or Rube Goldbergian or not. I figure about 40,000 full-screen QR codes ought to do the trick. He just needs to code a QR code generator and point a video camera at it.

    9. Re:PLIP by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      this decade old article shows how to transmit AM radio using your CRT. From there you only need to pulse the data and collect it on the other end using an AM radio attached to your sound card. I recommend Kansas City standard used for datacassettes as a good starting place for modulation over AM radio band.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    10. Re:PLIP by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You win. To further complicate things, this laptop doesn't have VGA out. So you first have to build an adapter to fit the docking station port:
      http://www.zenspider.com/~pwil...

    11. Re:PLIP by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Although, if he should do RAR, be sure to use the optional solid compression and error recovery.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  18. Web Server!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That laptop still has pretty decent specs. Instead of trying to get rid of it, you should install NetBSD and turn it into a webserver.

  19. Re:LapLink by raddan · · Score: 1

    Ditto the PCMCIA Ethernet. The trick may be finding drivers for such a card, but there are tons of cheap old PC cards on eBay.

  20. It's supposed to come with the machine, actually by hillbluffer · · Score: 1

    Did a quick Google, and found this:
    http://remember.the-aero.org/a...

  21. what I do by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Informative

    2.5 inch to 3.5 inch ide adapter, plug into computer copy

  22. CKermit by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    Zip everything. Null modem serial cable, CKermit on both ends. Done.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  23. Data transfer? by rsierpe · · Score: 1

    The easiest thing to do here is getting a usb to ide adapter, connect the old hdd, start to copy and then go get some nice cup of tea. The hdd will be slow as funk so it might take a an hour or two, but it's not big deal, just dont be cheap and get the bloody adapter from a chinese no-name on ebay. Just in case, to be on the safe side, make sure the hdd is EXTERNALLY fed. If there is not enough juice from our shiny new laptop's usb port for this, it will burn your port. Just that, its not more complicated than that, good luck :)

    1. Re:Data transfer? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It should take about a minute. The drive is rated for 4MB/s and it's only 177MB

    2. Re: Data transfer? by rsierpe · · Score: 1

      Nope, you are assuming the bottleneck is on usb, but it's on ye olde HDD itself, the bottleneck would be the disk itself and it's ultra slow controller. I did just that about 15 years ago when I migrated my stuff from my Pentium 60 MHz to my then new and shiny Pentium 200 mmx , and then again when I migrated to some bigger disk. I did it the painful way, set it up slave, my Psu sucked so got an old PC and got the juice from it and copied everything to my new HDD. It took me about 30 hours to move 1gb Today I know better and I also have better tools, but on 200x that was the best I could do so don't flame me :)

    3. Re: Data transfer? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Nope, if the bottleneck was USB, it would be in the order of a few seconds. 4MB/s is the interface speed of the hard drive that comes with the laptop mentioned.
      In practice, USB 2.0 speeds are in the order of 20MB/s - 10 seconds to transfer 177MB, assuming the hard drive is completely full.

      If you had two hard drives with PIO mode transfer on the same IDE bus, it would be painfully slow to copy between the two.

  24. something like this by steak · · Score: 1

    http://www.amazon.com/USB-SATA...

    and with a brand name like generic it must be good.

    1. Re:something like this by jambox · · Score: 1

      Made in China, oh yeah baby.

      --
      You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
  25. Old School Kermit by captjc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Null Modem serial cable and download a copy of Kermit. I recently had to do this to transfer software from Windows 7 to a PLC network card that for some reason was a 286 embedded PC running DOS. Worked fairly well.

    Kermit For Windows

    Kermit for DOS

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    1. Re:Old School Kermit by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Kermit isn't as easy as telix.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Old School Kermit by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Upvote the parent. If you were trying to do this in the early 90s, you'd have either physically moved the disk into a new computer -- and oldschool IDE has a bunch of surprises that will bite the unwary -- or used Kermit.

      Just be aware that your average '90s serial port probably won't work above 57 kilobit/sec, which means transferring 160 megabytes will take the better part of a day.

    3. Re:Old School Kermit by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Kermit is a good choice, should be able to do all he needs with no extra cost as long as he can cable 2 computers together.

      I specifically dislike those telling him to buy a UBS adapter for the old disk drive or other solutions that require spending money and waiting. I do have such an adapter, and a PCMCIA firewire card that would open other options for me, but they are not needed in this case.

      Another option that seems to be ignored is that XP computer he says he also has. At that vintage it likely has USB and Ethernet. I would try swapping the drive into that (if it isn't too thick to fit) and booting the XP computer with a Live Linux CD (the 3.11 Windows disk will likely not boot properly and would not have the needed drivers even if it did). Then from Linux you could easily write the 160 meg drive contents to a USB flash drive or transfer it across ethernet to the destination computer (I would do that with FTP but there are any number of options).

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    4. Re:Old School Kermit by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      115200 baud is likely. I think that's what the average "fast serial port" does.
      With a really old PC or something funky like an IBM PS/2, that's another problem. The PS/2 seems to supports 38400 baud but for some reason I made the transfer at 19200 baud now that's slow. But I did transfer doom2, that I compressed with ARJ before.

    5. Re:Old School Kermit by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Kermit works fine for transfers between DOS and linux. Easy or not, you can figure it out. What was easy about it is the availability.

    6. Re:Old School Kermit by adolf · · Score: 1

      But USB SATA/IDE adapters are dirt cheap, and are very handy devices to have kicking around. This article reminded me that I need a new one (I own two, but can't find either of them since the last move).

      If everyone had one of these that were ever interested in doing things like this, such questions wouldn't happen.

      Or geek art: Buy a (cheap!) used PCMCIA ethernet adapter for the old box. Transfer the stuff using Windows and said adapter with an XP machine as an intermediary, and done. (7 doesn't include IPX or Netbios, and 3.11 doesn't include SMB over TCP/IP, but XP can do both.)

      After that, re-purpose the old computer. Put an old copy of Slackware on the old laptop, install ncurses, and use the demo clock that ncurses includes. (Bonus points for also using NTP to make it an accurate clock, and for swapping the spinning hard drive for a CF card and a dirt-cheap 44-pin 2.5" IDE adapter.) Hang it on the wall. Use it for twitter feeds. (It uses very little power, especially without spinning rust -- these were the days of "heatsink? for what?")

    7. Re:Old School Kermit by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Hah, Kermit... Isn't that the oldest still supported software in the world ? Or something like that ? Brings back bad memories from the 80s. Didn't nc (Norton Commander) integrate some kind of file transfer over serial, probably based on Kermit ?

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    8. Re:Old School Kermit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Get a genuine FTDI USB serial port, or better still a real hardware serial port. They still make them on PCI-E cards, and they work just as well as the old ones even at high speeds.

      Having said that, the OP states his laptop has a serial port so it should be no problem to run it at 256 kbaud or above with a little error correction and a reasonable quality cable.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Old School Kermit by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't read the question. Linux is out of the question.

      The availability of telix also isn't a problem - I gave a link to it. Also, telix supports the xmodem, ymodem, and zmodem transfer protocols. The user interface is easy to understand, and it will work both on the old machine and in a dos box on the new(er) machine (or he could also download the windows version, or use (ugh) windows hyperterminal on the receiving end.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re:Old School Kermit by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Yep. v3 is slick. It did the job, had a simple user interface, easy configuration, and if you had a 16450 or 16550 uart in your serial port, supported 112,000 bps (which was amazing when dial-up was 2400 bps).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    11. Re:Old School Kermit by jittles · · Score: 1

      Kermit is a good choice, should be able to do all he needs with no extra cost as long as he can cable 2 computers together.

      I specifically dislike those telling him to buy a UBS adapter for the old disk drive or other solutions that require spending money and waiting. I do have such an adapter, and a PCMCIA firewire card that would open other options for me, but they are not needed in this case.

      Another option that seems to be ignored is that XP computer he says he also has. At that vintage it likely has USB and Ethernet. I would try swapping the drive into that (if it isn't too thick to fit) and booting the XP computer with a Live Linux CD (the 3.11 Windows disk will likely not boot properly and would not have the needed drivers even if it did). Then from Linux you could easily write the 160 meg drive contents to a USB flash drive or transfer it across ethernet to the destination computer (I would do that with FTP but there are any number of options).

      If he doesn't know that a NULL modem cable is a viable means of transfer, what makes you think he has a NULL modem cable at all? I would bet he's going to have to spend money or borrow a cable anyway.

    12. Re:Old School Kermit by Pope+Hagbard · · Score: 1

      It really depends on which UART the old computer's serial port has. It's not uncommon for something of that age to have a 16450 or 8250, which IIRC max out at 9600 bps. For the higher speeds you're talking about you'll need a 16550A or better at both ends.

    13. Re:Old School Kermit by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I have several SATA to IDE adapters with card, and my experience reading has been miserable. Better off if you can find an old external case, or best to cable it up like described above.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    14. Re:Old School Kermit by adolf · · Score: 1

      And the external case's USB - IDE chip inherently differs from an external adapter's USB - IDE chip...how, exactly?

    15. Re:Old School Kermit by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I thought Windows XP wouldn't give hardware access to the COM port to the DOS application, but it looks like I was wrong.

  26. Easy. by hey! · · Score: 1

    PCMCIA CF card reader, plus fat formatted CF card, plus USB CF card reader.

    Or about a thousand other ways.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  27. Paralell cable by leonbloy · · Score: 1

    By using the LPT port and a special (but not too rare or expensive) cable, you can transfer at about 50Kb/s If you can at least copy/software from a diskette, you could try with Total Commander, which has a Win 3.1 version (1.5Mb), and which include that functionality, very easy to use.

  28. Serial Cable by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    The Laplink idea was copied by Microsoft. If it has one of the more recent versions of XP, you can use a serial link.

    You did not say how recent the destination machine is. If it has a serial port and XP or 98, you can just use a null modem cable. If it's a newer machine, you will have to use a null modem cable AND a serial-to-usb cable or adapter on the newer end. Further, if you are on Windows 7 or later, you will have to install Virtual PC and then XP mode (both free from Microsoft), so you can run a virtual XP window.

    Then start up serial networking and transfer your data. One machine is 'host' and the other is 'client'.

  29. IDE/SATA-to-USB converter by LewekLeonek · · Score: 1

    Yep.. once again, IDE-to-USB adapter: https://www.google.ca/?#q=ide+... Just check the images on Google to see if there is a connector that matches the connector on the back of the hard drive. I remember that in some older laptops they have used the plug-in converters which may look like a part of the disk, but you can actually pull them off to get to the actual IDE connector. BTW: Order the universal(IDE/SATA)-to-USB converter so you can use it for other purposes in the future. Good luck!

  30. Easy way or fun way? by bigleague4040 · · Score: 1

    Easy way? What borcharc said. Just get an adapter like this one (http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/151451123963?lpid=82&chn=ps), pop the drive out, and you'll be good. If you'd like to have some fun, there's a few ways to do that too. I used to have to drag files off of my old ThinkPad 760c all the time. I had the 760 running Windows 95, though, which made things a little easier... For you, you can use INTERLNK with DOSBox on the XP machine (parallel or serial passthroughs for DOSBox can be set up with these DOSBox files- http://home.arcor.de/h-a-l-900.... You can find INTERLNK for use with DOSBox or your 3.1 machine if it's missing here- http://www.kime.net/directcc/d...)

    There's another way I found, using RAS, that I never used because I found it to be a bit complicated. If you'd like to play around with network shares in Windows 3.1, you're in for a treat! This page can show you how. http://www.kime.net/directcc/d...

    For any of this to work, you'll need either a serial or parallel cable. You'll also need a modicum of patience, which is something I do not possess. That's why my 760 is currently functioning as a stand for the monitor attached to my Y580. Happy trails!

  31. Laplink or null modem by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 1

    I think the biggest issue you'll run into is finding something that will work for the DOS/Win 3.11 device.

    See if you can rustle up a copy of Laplink with the LPT cables. It was designed for moving files in just this scenario; using the LPT cable was always a lot faster than serial, which topped out at 115kbps. Yes, that's kilobits per second, you young whippersnappers.

    If you can't find laplink, find (or build) yourself a null modem cable. Hook it between the two systems' COM ports, and fire up a basic transfer program that supports batch transfers (look for ZMODEM support).

  32. Pull the drive, access it directly by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    I had to do this recently for a really old computer, and the easiest and fastest method was to buy an IDE to USB adapter, pull the drive, connect it to the adapter, plug the USB side into a modern machine, and copy the files over.

    A family member had been putting every photo he or anyone else in his immediate family had ever taken, onto this really ancient computer that was old when he bought his first digital camera. Kids, grandkids, vacations, irreplaceable stuff. He brought the computer to me when it failed, asking if I could pull the photos. I thought his data was gone, but interestingly, in this case it wasn't the hard drive that had failed, but something else in the machine. (I didn't care what...) I pulled the drive, connected it to my machine, pulled the photos, burned them to several DVDs, marked the old drive with a sharpie, and put it on my backup shelf "just in case". Recycled the computer. About two hours work end to end, including trying to figure out how to remove the drive with no documentation for the machine.

    So, I wouldn't even bother trying to figure out some kind of historic file transfer protocol or how to handle ancient removable media. Assuming the drive interface doesn't predate IDE (also known as ATA or PATA), reading it directly is the way to go.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  33. Re:PaperBack by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Great idea! I'm sure he'll have no problem finding drivers for that solution! Bravo!

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  34. Re:LapLink by nbvb · · Score: 1

    Ooh, it finally just came to me -- XIRCOM Parallel-to-Ethernet adapter. Forgot about those puppies... they were badass back in the day.

  35. Or a vintage option by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    Maybe for some reason you want to constrain yourself to contemporaneous tech. D-Link made parallel port Ethernet adapters meant for use with laptops. I have a DE-620 that I've successfully used with Windows 3.11 on my Compaq LTE 386.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  36. Not Trying To Be Rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But like 80% of ask slashdots recently are questions that can be answered through only trivial amounts of Googling. What the hell is going on?

  37. PCMCIA by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    MS-DOS 6.0 and up have a built-in laplink program called INTERLINK (INTERLNK.EXE). This will require a parallel port on the destination computer.

    You can look for some PCMCIA cards that might help. I have seen a PCMCIA SCSI card that could be connected to a JAZ drive (1GB ZIP DISK), but finding that hardware could be difficult.

    Does your old laptop have an IRDA port? Almost nobody uses those anymore, but it might still be there....

  38. 2 ways (with variations) by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    The serial link has already been proposed - and that'd be my first choice (three wires, coil the ends of each one around a small nail, insulate with tape and carefully slide over the appropriate pins of the serial ports for cheap, one-time serial cable).

    My second choice would be to simply image the drive - from there you have two variations:-

    • mount the image and recover the data
    • convert the image into a virtual machine (use VirtualBox).

    I've had to do the same with several dozen boxes so I can keep supporting a chain of petrol stations that still use OS/2 and W3.1 to run all their inventory, training, wages, email, and accounting systems on old enterprise hardware. My first reaction was WTF, my second reaction was - holy crap, these guys made a smart decision years ago that still continues to work while saving them many thousands per install in hardware, software, training, and down-time. The customers only see the late POS and the cheap fuel prices. They've had various SOEs ready to roll-out as replacements since the early 90s - but so far they've proven correct in retaining what works.

  39. FTP/Trumper WInsock? by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Can you just run a FTP server on the new machine and FTP up the whole thing? http://www.k7tty.com/Utilities...

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  40. In Soviet Russia, Cable uses YOU! by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

    If you ask this question, you presumably have no following specific equipment needed for such operations: 44 to 40 pin HDD adapter, PCMCIA to Compact Flash adapter and PCMCIA network card. It's quite strange that you own the book for 20 years and have no such equipment (I live in Russia and I have all three. I prefer a PCMCIA to CF adapter and a 32-GB CF card since it gives me 32 GB of additional removable storage. There are LOTS of them on E-Bay and since all they are passive there is no place for problems. Then you can use any CF reader to move your data anywhere). So the least common denominator is either LPT or COM. Warning! You may want to boot from PCMCIA CF since it's sometimes possible that Windows does not recognize more than 1 GB of CF. So you may want to make it bootable.

    If you have a computer with both USB and LPT then make a Laplink LPT cable (2 DB-25M connectors and 11 wires), boot DOS from USB stick and use Laplink or Norton Commander Link to copy files to USB stick.

    If you have a computer with both USB and COM (even the newest ones usually have one hidden on m/b) then make a null modem cable and copy files with the same Norton Commander Link via COM. It's a loooooooooong procedure but it at least works.

    If you have no other computer with both USB and COM then the situation is more complicated. You will need to install somewhere any terminal host having a Z-modem capability, for instance, some Linux and rsz package (Have no idea about such host in Windows). Then use a USB to COM adapter and null-modem cable. Login to the host and use your preferred terminal program to do the work.

  41. Then install Linux on it by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    heh, back in 2000 I had an old greyscale Compaq laptop like that without a floppy drive or CDROM or USB. I managed to get Debian bootstrapped on it through the serial port!

    Used a DOS zmodem program to transfer a minimal linux rescue image to it and launched it with loadlin.exe . Then used that to re partition and resize the 120MB hdd with a 80MB partition for Debian. Then some how managed to loadlin the Debian installer image and convince it to install a few packages at a time from the little DOS partition. Once that was working nicely, I got lilo installed to the MBR, and finally got rid of DOS/Win3.11 .

    I think I eventually got the PCMCIA NIC and X working as well, but it was only really decent at running emacs from the console. I wrote a few reports on it and graphed stuff in octave and ran stuff through latex to produce ps2pdfs to print on campus. It was actually fairly effective at preventing me from wasting too much time playing Quake :P

  42. File transfer from old PC by AndyCanfield · · Score: 1

    I'd make sure to use zip; as I recall unzip has an automatic check on the format of the input. So if you copy W to X and X to Y it might come out wreong, but if you zip W to X.zip and try to unzip X.zip onto anything, it will warn you if there was some loss of bits in the intermediate medium X.

    A fall-back solution: e-mail the (zip) files to yourself. Of coures this assumes an internet connection on the old machine, but even an old dial-up modem can be used. This is how I get pictures off from my (new) Android phone. If you've got an RS-232 socket on the old machine you can hook both machines to a LAN router and transfer the files faster. Again, though, in call cases, use zip to provide confirmation of contants.

  43. Re:Use Total Commander transfer via LPT by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

    Neither book1 nor book2 are declared to have an USB or network. So transfer to the second book does not solve a problem.

  44. Seriously by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Did you try superuser.com and the like? Or is slashdot becoming a stackexchange clone?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  45. It's a compaq aero... hdd is ide 40 pin by Darkelf · · Score: 5, Informative

    5 seconds on Google verified this machine has no USB... tho it's age should make that obvious.

    It uses a standard 2.5" notebook hard drive, with the standard 40 pin IDE interface.

    If you don't want to pull the drive... Laplink cable is easiest.

    Pulling the drive is still a good, easy option, attach to a cheap usb interface.

    You also mentioned 16bit pcmcia... if we have a pc card NIC, access to Internet? The ftp xfer option is there too.

    --
    -Darkelf
  46. Re:Morons by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Sure if you have a week, to copy 160MB in 1.44MB chunks swapping floppies around 100+ times.

  47. Oldschool by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I used to keep a PCMCIA network adapter lying around for this kind of thing in my nerd toolkit but it's 2015, this is some seriously old gear you're working with here.

    I also no longer have laplink cables, either serial or parallel so I'm afraid the "pull the disk" suggestion is the best option.
    You could use a USB to IDE adapter (if your board doesn't have IDE)
    https://www.google.com.au/sear...

    Many of those come with 44pin laptop plugs regardless.
    If you're going to use your motherboard, you're going to want one of these suckers.
    https://www.google.com.au/sear...

    Luckily IDE has been around a hell of a long time and it's extremely unlikely it's older than IDE.
    This is probably going to be the easiest solution for you, serial / parallel could be quite fun and interesting but who has goddamn time for it? Just pull the disk.

  48. Floppy adapters by l3reakManX · · Score: 1

    If for some reason you don't or can't remove the HDD, there are a variety of floppy adapters - as in, things that actually *plug in* to the floppy disk slot itself. Something like this: http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-... Is relatively inexpensive. It only lists compatibility there back to Windows 95, but the website ( http://www.olympusamerica.com/... ) has software for Windows 3.1. The main difference seems to be that you can only use memory cards up to 32 megabytes. Don't just buy that link I posted without researching, though; you may have to buy an older model for proper 3.1 compatibility. I can't find any evidence of this but I'm also CERTAIN that there are crazy specialty devices that are basically floppy disks with cables coming out of the back of them that you can plug into a floppy drive and use them as an adapter to some other kind of interface. I really wish someone else could help back me up on that, because I really think it exists but I can't find anything, anywhere!

  49. You've got options... by digital+photo · · Score: 1

    PCMCIA:

    Get yourself a PCMCIA Compact flash adapter. You can copy your data to the compact flash drive. (requires drivers, so this may fail for you)

    You can also get a PCMCIA network card. Probably only 10mbit, but still more than enough. You have Windows 3.11, which was Windows For Workgroups. If TCP/IP wasn't installed on that version, you can download and install WinSock, an early TCP/IP socket stack for Windows. (requires drivers, so this may fail for you)

    Serial:

    You can do link between two computers and transfer over serial... but this requires the right software and the right drivers, so this may be out of the question for you.

    Emergency Boot Floppy:

    Use an emergency boot floppy and boot linux off of the network with a pcmcia network card. You can then mount the filesystem Read-only and copy over the network. (requires linux server, linux skills or someone who can do this for you)

    Extract the hard drive directly: (best option)

    Yank the hard drive. See what kind it is. Get the appropriate laptop drive adapter cable and relevant USB adapter. Plug that into a newer computer and transfer off the files.

    Of the options, the hard disk pull and copy option is really the best way to go, bar none. The only thing you would need to buy would be the right USB-to-laptop hard drive adapter. You can find them on amazon/ebay/etc. If you live near Sunnyvale, California, you can even stop by Weird Stuff and they might have it for a song.

  50. Iomega Zip Drive by acoustix · · Score: 1

    I used Iomega Zip drives back in the 90s to transfer large files between computers and backup data before I had a network. They made a parallel port drive, internal PATA, SCSI and USB version I think.

    If I remember correctly, the drivers were for DOS and had to be loaded before 3.1 was launched. It would be fun to try it again.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Iomega Zip Drive by uncle+slacky · · Score: 1

      I did this recently to revive to an old IBM laptop (an N33sx/16, i.e. pre-Thinkpad) with a dying floppy drive. I had two Zip drives, one USB, one parallel, so was able to transfer from a modern PC once I managed to install the DOS driver for the Zip drive via floppy. Of course it helped that there was still a functional DOS on the laptop from many years ago (DR-DOS 7.03 FTW!).

      --
      Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
  51. 2 methods by rssrss · · Score: 1

    Method 1:

    Buy, borrow, or steal a 2.5 inch IDE hard drive enclosure with USB ports. Remove the hard drive from your old laptop. Plug it into the enclosure. Connect the USB cable to you current computer. It should mount the external drive with no fuss. Copy the contents of the external drive to an internal drive or to the cloud.

    Method 2.

    In a strip mall somewhere near you is a small shop with a sign in the window that says something like PC repairs or laptop repairs. Take the old machine to the shop. For a small quantity of money the shop will put your data on a CR-Rom or a cloud portal.

    This method does not require screwdrivers or touching machinery.

    Given that you did not think of method 1 in a few seconds, you probably ought to use method 2. It is far more bullet proof.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  52. Direct connect the modems by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    Did it all the time; going from memory...

    I go for the dead simple, zip up all the files from the source

    Run a phone wire between the computerers, with the terminal call one from one (IIRC you have to disable dialtone check use ATX3 then ATD555)

    and on the other manual answer (ATA)

    you migh have to do half duplex (local echo) on the terminals IIR this was the quickest route for no fuss local communication

    once connected use the upload/download options on the terminals to start the file trnasfer

    then look on it in a few hours, it will just churn away till it's finished.

    It may be slow but it will complete as expected, and there is no special hardware, program or data cost.

    look at the bottom of this article on my machine to machine notes -
    http://www.portcommodore.com/d...

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Direct connect the modems by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Did it all the time; going from memory...

      I go for the dead simple, zip up all the files from the source

      Run a phone wire between the computerers, with the terminal call one from one (IIRC you have to disable dialtone check use ATX3 then ATD555)

      and on the other manual answer (ATA)

      you migh have to do half duplex (local echo) on the terminals IIR this was the quickest route for no fuss local communication

      once connected use the upload/download options on the terminals to start the file trnasfer

      then look on it in a few hours, it will just churn away till it's finished.

      It may be slow but it will complete as expected, and there is no special hardware, program or data cost.

      look at the bottom of this article on my machine to machine notes -
      http://www.portcommodore.com/d...

      I recommended Fastlynx and null modem cable elsewhere, as I think it's the best solution (especially speed over parralel cable), however I have done "phone line between the modems" before. No need for ATX3:

      ATD on one machine
      ATA on the other.

  53. Use CF card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can buy CF card and CF card PCMCIA adapter for under $20.

  54. COM link by hrimhari · · Score: 1

    Found this procedure: http://www.kime.net/directcc/d...

    You could link the oldest one to the less old through their COM ports.

    It may require access to Win 3.11 install disks tho.

    --
    http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
  55. Re:The GUI is so monumentally fucked up by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

    Okay, so it's not just me then. Does anyone know WTH Slashdot is trying to do now?

  56. Remember objective is to copy files not "computer" by dbIII · · Score: 2

    USB to IDE to get to the drive, or boot off an old linux root/boot floppy like Toms rootboot disk, and ftp, or whatever the files over to something else via the ethernet connection you didn't mention (maybe because it doesn't have one), or parallel you did mention (laplink). I'm sure many others have mentioned laplink for MSDOS.
    Remember you don't have to be in the native OS or even the native hardware when all you really want is the files on the disk.
    Another alternative, if there is an ethernet connection, is to go full knoppix - it isn't all that hard to run knoppix on one machine as a PXE server to boot up knoppix on a machine with no cdrom.

  57. $5 and a few days delivery by phorm · · Score: 1

    Just order one of these and hook the drive up to USB on the newer machine.

  58. easiest vs hardest. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    yeah by far the easiest is just take the harddisk and put it in a ide usb dongle(10$-30$ bucks).

    second easiest is to get INTERNET on the machine. it's not that hard or impossible, then just ftp the files over. you need to find a isa network card though. ebay should have plenty of them. also this is the best way if you intend to play some old games or what have you with it.

    third easiest, to get a null modem is also doable, the newer machine can use a usb serial dongle. if you don't find a null modem cable it's easy enough to make one from a serial cable. then use some program to transfer the files over that. it's just 20 megs so speed isn't a real problem.

    then there's possibilities of using some crap like ooold zipdrives etc. possibly a cdr drive as well but eh good luck with burning on that machine..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  59. Pcmcia + compact flash by grahamsz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Put a 64MB CF card in a CF to pcmcia adapter and Windows should see it has a hard disk.

    Then stick that in a modern card reader and you should be home free

    1. Re:Pcmcia + compact flash by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      Thinking back to this, you may have driver issues with this. If it's still in an OEM configuration then that'll probably be done for you by compaq, but on a clean DOS install i remember having to screw around installing cardsoft drivers to make it work.

      I did find a bunch of updates to compaqs pcmcia stuff here, which suggests there's probably something there by default too:
      http://ulihansen.kicks-ass.net...

  60. Re:WARNING: Do not pull the disk by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    this is FUD put out by an AC. Best ignored as he won't even put his name to it!

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  61. USB Serial Port Adapter for newer machine by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yes, you'll have to look up your old friend Kermit (or Xmodem/Ymodem/Zmodem, or maybe even UUCP), and it'll have to run for a few days unless you can get it to sync up at higher speeds like 115200, but it's not information you really need much faster than that.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:USB Serial Port Adapter for newer machine by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      USB serial port plus Zmodem and your good to go.
      I don't see the big issue.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  62. Old PCMCIA doesn't do Cardbus by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yes, folks, not all PCMCIA is the same. The newer ones support Cardbus cards; the older ones don't, and this machine is absolutely an older one. I've got a Pentium-75 laptop that only takes the original-flavored cards.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  63. FastLynx by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Fastlynx:
    https://sewelldirect.com/fastL...

    Get a serial null modem cable. You can use a USB-serial converter on a modern PC if you want. USB-LPT converters will not work. They are only for printers. 2 way data transfer won't work at all. Sewell sells packages with Serial and LPT null modem cables with the software.

    It can run anything from DOS to Windows 8 64 bit. There's a built in function to send the server program to a DOS machine over serial (using DOS MODE and CTTY commands), without using floppy or CD.

    Run the server on the DOS machine, connect on a modern Windows machine, and you can copy the whole HDD over.

    Sewell even has Windows versions of Interlnk. You can mount a 2GB FAT16 disk image on your modern PC, and have it show up as a drive on your antique machine.

  64. Re:Let me Count the Ways by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Use old ms-dos era program called laplink, or other such programs. Limit to say 19200 or at best 38400, taking roughly 22-12 hours for worst-case file by file copy. dosbox on newer machine could be used.

    -Use LPT port on machine, connect to cross over LPT cable on USB->LPT adapter, use laplink or other such program. dosbox or other on newmachine should do, use again laplink or other such software. May not be 100% compatible with all USB->LPT adapters.

    I've yet to see a USB-LPT adapter that can be used for ANYTHING other than a printer. 2 way data over LPT plays some serious tricks, so this is a non-starter.

    Instead of Laplink I use FastLynx:
    https://sewelldirect.com/fastL...

    It is compatible from DOS to Windows 8 64 bit (with USB-serial, or hardware LPT port)

  65. use PKZIP, ProComm, ZMODEM by CaptainPhoton · · Score: 1

    Use a null modem cable to connect the COM ports between the old PC and a new PC. On the new PC, you might need a USB to RS232 adapter.

    Get a copy of pkzip and zip each folder on your old PC. Install Procomm PLUS on your old PC. Run Procomm.

    On the new PC, open your favorite terminal program (Tera Term, HyperTerm, etc.)

    On old PC, send each file using XModem or ZModem in Procomm. On new PC, receive the file using the same protocol.

    This was the way we got our files from dial-up BBSes in 80s and early 90s. The transfer through the cable is actually easier since you don't have to dial through a modem.

    Cheers!

  66. I went though several Contura Aeros by don.g · · Score: 1

    They were neat little machines. I was still using one in 2001, running Linux.

    The easiest option is to use a null modem cable between the two PCs serial ports. For a file transfer app, I recommend Filelink which came with DR-DOS and therefore will be on the install disks for OpenDOS which you can download for free these days.

    You only need it on one PC, it can bootstrap itself over the null modem cable.

    The other option is to get a 2.5" IDE to USB adapter. You can get ones that do SATA too and will be useful in other situations in the future.

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  67. USB to IDE by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    I assume the drive in that laptop is IDE, so get a USB to IDE adapter and connect the drive directly to a newer machine.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  68. Re:NSA also suggests adapters that support MITM by CBravo · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia you are the Man From Middle

    --
    nosig today
  69. Easy - just use the internets by blang · · Score: 1

    Hook your machine up to your modem.
    Dial up to to America online.
    Upload the files to a gopher.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  70. Two easy options by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 2

    I have a Vantec USB2 universal disk adapter, it has connectors for IDE and SATA, with cables and power, for all the hard drives I've used since my last SCSI disk, this is the one I would use here. I picked mine up at Fry's many years ago, just as SATA disks had started to take over.

    The alternative has also been mentioned, using a LapLink style cable: These packages usually came with selfloading sw where you just had to enter a single single MODE command on the console of the old machine, then the SW would copy over an ascii type bootstrap program which would load the rest.

    I wrote a program to do this (the file transfer part) in the late eighties, in 1995 or so I also write a generic ascii executable generator using only those 70+ characters which the MIME mail standard specifies as transparent across all mail gateways and national encoding standards.

    Terje

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
  71. Re:Jeez, don't make this harder than it needs to b by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems like a lot of effort. I just get a serial cable and press my tongue against the TX pin. Then type "copy COM1:" on the source machine and open up Notepad on the target. By hovering my hand over the keyboard on the target the little electrical shocks from the serial port cause spasms that make my hand type the file out. It's slow and painful but some people like that.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  72. Just put the disk in another computer by loufoque · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why you'd need to buy an adapter at all.
    Just put the disk in another computer. All desktop motherboards still have IDE.

    1. Re:Just put the disk in another computer by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      No, they most certainly do not. My system is 5 years in age and has no IDE ports whatsoever, only USB, SATA, and e-SATA.

      My wife's is 1 year in age and also has no IDE.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  73. Been there done that... by Theedude · · Score: 1

    IDEA 1 You can zip your files and send them as attachments by emails if your Antique has any access to email... Sometimes, with DSL connections they provide a dial-up access to the internet. You could get perhaps just about 44000kbps IDEA 2 If you are not in a hurry, you can always use LPT1 ports with a Direct Parallel/LPT1 cable since both have LPT1. You might get a rate of just about 300kbps... 7 minutes to transfer... Used to do it with Windows 2000 but not sure if XP still can do that. I also used to play Unreal Tournament on LPT1 ports back in the days. hehehe Good old Teenage years...

    --
    ---- If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.
  74. Re:WARNING: Do not pull the disk by Megane · · Score: 1

    The drives were unrecoverable and just went "click click" when later mounted back in the original PCs.

    Even if your FUD was true, I don't think he particularly cares about putting it back into his Windows 3.1 386 laptop . I've never had anything like this happen, and I've done everything short of throwing drives in the air and juggling with them. Perhaps you're just "magneto-static" and shit breaks whenever you touch it.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  75. Re:Let me Count the Ways by Theedude · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I have tried it on W3.11 but W2000 to W2000 it was pretty decent. LPT >LTP

    --
    ---- If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.
  76. Re:Let me Count the Ways by Theedude · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I have NOT tried it on W3.11 but W2000 to W2000 it was pretty decent. LPT > LTP.

    --
    ---- If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.
  77. USB ATA adapter by gshegosh · · Score: 2

    You can get one for like 5$. Attach the HDD directly to the new computer and copy files over.

  78. Re:Jeez, don't make this harder than it needs to b by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if this is genius or insanity.

  79. Not interested, other than the psychology... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    If that option is excluded, what else can I do?

    Recycle it? It's not worth the power it's wasting.

    Besides, if you haven't needed the data on it and transferred it/used it since then, other than the geek dick measuring aspects of it, why in God's name are you doing this? More importantly, why are you bothering us about it? The mid-90's, as far as laptops go, might as well be the dark ages.

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:Not interested, other than the psychology... by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      . . . if you haven't needed the data on it and transferred it/used it since then, other than the geek dick measuring aspects of it, why in God's name are you doing this? More importantly, why are you bothering us about it? The mid-90's, as far as laptops go, might as well be the dark ages.

      It seems to me that there were many applications which, in the effort to become easier to use, have become less functional and/or actually harder to use (unless you happen to want to do the one thing which they assume you want to do in exactly the way they assumed it should be done). As a result, every once in a while I wind up plugging in one of my 15-20 year old machines to do a specific task. It then goes back on the shelf to wait until the next time it is needed.

      I know, the original post wasn't speaking of applications, he was looking for data. I was just giving another reason for old machines to exist.

      Now, Get off my lawn!

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  80. Just pull the drive by sabbede · · Score: 1

    and stick it in the destination machine. Easier than tracking down the cables to connect them directly.

  81. USB to IDE or Trumpet Winsock by TheCount22 · · Score: 2

    You best bet is to get the drive hooked up to a USB to IDE adapter and copy the files.

    If that doesn't work get and USB to RS232 cable and a NULL Modem Adapter and connect your two machines. Ideally you should setup Linux with pppd on the new computer. Run Trumpet Winsock on your old laptop and do a manual login and just hit ESC as soon as the terminal window shows up. Once that works install and ftp daemon on one of the two machines and a ftp client on the other side. Then just copy your files.

  82. Re:The GUI is so monumentally fucked up by Soulskill · · Score: 2

    We revamped the header and removed the left hand nav links, which hardly anybody used. There were some bugs introduced in the process, which we're now taking care of. That's pretty much it!

  83. DIY: IR serial by e70838 · · Score: 1

    Many recent computers have a build in IR receiver. You can build an IR emitter for the old computer (the schematic here may be helpful http://www.lirc.org/parallel.h...). I guess it would be very slow :-

  84. Worked for me by InvisiBill · · Score: 1

    This looks nearly identical to the one I bundled with a HDD for a few bucks back in '09. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812816014 It has worked great for me on many occasions. As stated, it might have problems if the HDD is especially power-hungry (check its label for power stats), but I expect it will most likely solve your problem pretty quickly, easily, and cheaply. On top of that, it's a good tool to have around for a variety of tasks related to working on random hard drives.

  85. Re:WARNING: Do not pull the disk by omnichad · · Score: 1

    It's the power supply on the cheap enclosures that's the problem - running the motors too weakly and crashing the heads. If you can use an AT/ATX power supply to power the drive and the USB adapter for the data you have a robust and clean power supply.

  86. Compact-Flash by Dr+J.+keeps+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    CF cards are IDE, but with a smaller pin-out. If you have an adapter between the laptop IDE and the CF form factor you might be able to either plug the HD into a newer box with a CF adapter or plug a CF card directly into the laptop (assuming there's a second slot... or possibly even slaved on to a single cable if there isn't).

    Personally I'd try PCMCIA ethernet because I still have a card or two in my basement, but who knows what crap you have.

    Really, though, I just want to say thank you to the poster for a problem that Slashdotters really care about.

    If any of you kiddies are interested in technology the NSA will have trouble getting at, I know of someone with a Contura laptop to sell you...

  87. Re:wiring up your own cable by pen-helm · · Score: 1

    I once wired up my own cable. It was 95% reliable. (A disaster.) I buy cables now.

  88. IR Blaster by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

    Look at this fool, trying to use wires and disks. Just IR blast it! It's the future!

  89. Re:Let me Count the Ways by Hymer · · Score: 1
    Why so complicated ?
    1. Remove HD from laptop
    2. connect HD to ata2USB converter
    3. read disk on any computer

    If it really is a 386 it has an IDE/ATA interface.

  90. I used to have one of those. by zelbinion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used to have that very laptop. So first, let me say:

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

    Okay, that's out of my system.

    No, wait...

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

    Okay, I'm done. Really.

    I can speak from direct experience on this one. I installed Redhad 5.0 on a Compaq Contura Aero back in the day (after downloading the entire distro over a 14.4 modem) so I had to solve this problem. Here are the issues:

    1. No CD-Rom drive. No internal drive, and no way to connect one externally.
    2. No USB ports
    3. No built-in ethernet port
    4. Only a single 16-bit PCMCIA type II slot (meaning it won't take those double-height PCMCIA hard drives IBM made back in the day.)
    5. You are dealing with Dos 6 (probably 6.2) and Windows 3.11, so you don't have a lot of built-in drivers and software for transferring files. Do you have Windows for Workgroups 3.11, or just Windows 3.11? It makes a difference. The 'for Workgroups' version has software for sharing files across a network. The regular version does not.

    Options:
    1. As other people have stated, your best option is probably an IDE 2.5" to USB adapter. Remove the drive, plug it into the adapter, and plug that into a modern USB-equipped computer. This will give you the fastest, most reliable way to transfer files.
    2. If option 1 isn't an option, you could try to find a PCMCIA to compact flash adapter. You will then need to find and install the drivers so that DOS can mount such a drive. I might still have those drivers on a disk somewhere, but it also might depend on the flavor of the adapter. Seems like you had to load a PCMCIA driver, and then a mass-storage driver on top of that, and then possibly a TSR to actually enumerate and mount the drive. I can't remember anymore, but there is some complexity to overcome. Of course, to get the drivers on to the laptop in the first place, you will either need to transfer them via floppy, or get a dial-up internet account somewhere and download them over the internet. (Good luck with the second option -- if you even have a browser already installed, it is probably Netscape 3 or 4, or IE 3 or 4 which might not be able to load whatever page you need to go to in order to download the drivers. FTP might be an option, but then you have to already have an FTP client installed. If you don't, you run into a bigger problem than before, since an FTP client or a web browser is going to be bigger than a set of PCMCIA drivers, and now how to do you get THAT on to the laptop? Transferring the drivers via floppy is probably your best option. You can buy a USB floppy drive that will work on modern computers if none of your other computers have floppy drives anymore. If for some reason a floppy drive isn't an option, then you'll need a null modem cable (more on this later)
    3. You could try to find a 16-bit PCMCIA ethernet adapter. (Try ebay.) Again, you'll run into the problem of how to get the drivers installed. Again, floppy is probably your best bet. This will probably only work if you have Windows for Workgroups 3.11. If you have the standard version, you won't have any built-in software for transferring files over a network. You could use FTP or something, but then you need to get the FTP software onto laptop in the first place. Again, you might be able to do this via floppy drive.
    4. Get an old parallel-connection ZIP drive off of ebay. You'll again need to install the drivers via floppy.
    5. Get a copy of laplink or interlink and a null modem serial cable. You will need to install the laplink/interlink software via floppy, and then you might need to buy and old computer that can still run DOS, since I don't know if you can get a copy of laplink or interlink that can still use a null modem cable on anything other than DOS. A Windows 95/98 machine should work though. I'm sure you could find something on craigslist for not much money. Transferring files over a null modem cable will be SLOW. VERY VERY SLOW. (This is how I had to install RedHat, so believe me, I KNOW.) So, if you ca

  91. USB-ATA may not work, try PCMCIA w/ PXE by rMortyH · · Score: 1

    I do this sort of thing a lot.
    I have found that a 160MB hard drive is probably too old to do the sort of autodetect that most USB-ATA adapters require. These were the days of entering the harddrive parameters in setup...

    The best bet for this is to get a PCMCIA network card that has PXE boot capability. Or, a PCMCIA card with a supported Etherboot binary on a floppy disk.
    Then boot into a diskless linux setup over the network, and transfer as needed. My oldest net boot image for this is Redhat 9. You might want an even older one, look at Redhat 5 or Slackware 3.3.

    This would be most painless because you can just transfer the whole thing over nfs. No messing around with hard drive parameters or matching up new and old hardware. No dealing with windows and dos network drivers beyond just etherboot, which has always worked great for me.

    Note that you can do wonders with the old Slackware 3.3 boot disks, boot.i and net.i, maybe pcmcia.i With a PCMCIA network card and the slackware floppies, you may be able to get to an NFS mount in only two or three floppies and no PXE boot. They're also super handy because they'll detect your hardware in that dinosaur and tell you what it is.

    If you stay in DOS land you'll have to zip up everything and transfer it with a terminal program, which works but requires lots of space and takes forever.
    Also getting networking to work on Windows 3.11 if it wasn't already set up long ago is a big pain and should be avoided.

    Best not to mess with the hardware or installed software on it at all. PXE is your friend!!

    =Rich

  92. File transfer by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    umm FTP...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  93. This is a problem? by doccus · · Score: 1

    Unless it's one of those 3 &1/2" harddrives there's plenty of older ATA enclosures you can drop the harddrive into..

    1. Re:This is a problem? by doccus · · Score: 1

      OOps.. I meant "unless it's one of those ne of those double *height* HDDs" . Brainfreeze.. sorry

  94. Similar to LapLink serial/parallel connection by alex-va · · Score: 1

    http://www.briggsoft.com/fmdos... File Maven (DOS) is an free DOS freeware file manager with high speed PC-to-PC file transfers via serial or parallel cable. The user interface features a dual directory display with pull-down menus, mouse support, hot keys, 50-line video support, and a choice of 10 pre-defined color schemes. Similar to LapLink.

  95. Kermie by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    And if FTP is too ordinary for you, or you only have 7 bits available in your cable, there's always Kermit.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  96. pull the harddrive by Jaqian4274 · · Score: 1

    Put it in an enclosure and should be able to copy the files

  97. How about a REALLY old hard drive? by groblewis · · Score: 1

    For the other graybeards out there, I have a Compaq SLT/286 "laptop" that I'd like to recover the files from the hard drive, a 40MB Conner Peripherals drive with what appears to be an early version of the IDE interface. The drive appears to work, and when I connect it to a Dell PC running Windows XP, it's recognized. But here's the kicker: I had partitioned it into two partitions (system and data), and the data partition was compressed with (as I recall) the disk compression driver included with DR-DOS 5. Is there any hope of retrieving the files on the data partition? I have the DR-DOS install floppies if that helps. I've considered trying to install DR-DOS on a virtual machine but don't really know how to make that work.

  98. Do it as we do it on Amigas by baderman · · Score: 1

    Oldie but Goldie Amigas 600 and 1200 are equipped with 16bit PCMCIA port. Very often used technique is using CF card in connection with CFCard reader like those: http://m.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html...

  99. Ethernet port by swschrad · · Score: 1

    if you have to, use WinFTP to barf over your filesystem to a new folder on your updated machine. then pick and choose, or just dump it all into a flash drive.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  100. Re:WARNING: Do not pull the disk by pz · · Score: 1

    Did you verify that the two clicking drives were working BEFORE you removed them?

    (I've never, ever had removal or re-installation of an old drive change its status, and I've surely done it more than a dozen times.)

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  101. CF card by DrYak · · Score: 1

    PCMCIA memory card might do it, if you could find one (or more) spare?

    Finding a real genuine PCMCIA memory card might be hard.
    But they are directly compatible with CF card.

    So using a dumb CF card to 16bit pc card adapter gives a way to copy the data out of the old machine.
    Then putting the CF card into any USB card reader (or in a pinch, a CF card to IDE adatper, as long as you pay attention to PIO vs UDMA) will help copying the data into a modern machine.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]