Slashdot Mirror


The X-Files To Return

An anonymous reader writes: Fox announced today that The X-Files will return with six new episodes. David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson will both reprise their roles as Mulder and Scully, respectively, and show creator Chris Carter will return as well. Production begins this summer, but air dates are not yet known. The X-Files originally started in 1993 and ran for 9 seasons, spawning two feature films and a short-lived spinoff called The Lone Gunmen. It won 16 Emmy awards and 5 Golden Globe awards before critical reception soured over the last few seasons. Carter said, "I think of it as a 13-year commercial break. The good news is the world has only gotten that much stranger, a perfect time to tell these six stories."

103 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. I want to believe... by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The money is out there, Scully..."

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:I want to believe... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      He already did that...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  2. Oh good.... by Punchcardz · · Score: 5, Funny

    So this time will it be headed somewhere with an endgame in mind, or will it simply be more filler because the writers have no idea how to make all the threads pay off in the end? I'm not bitter or anything.

    1. Re:Oh good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So this time will it be headed somewhere with an endgame in mind, or will it simply be more filler because the writers have no idea how to make all the threads pay off in the end?

      I'm not bitter or anything.

      This is like doing 6 episodes of Dallas after 30 years. Pointless.
      The world has marched on, and left the X-files in the nineties.

    2. Re:Oh good.... by meerling · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, after close to 20 years, they really should have their replacements take up the x-files. As it is, I have my doubts about Sculley being able to still be so dismissive of Mulders weirdo theories, and let's face it, at his age, Mulder just can't jump to conclusions the way he used to.

    3. Re:Oh good.... by es330td · · Score: 1

      I could see there being a good story basis in having them need to come back to look into something from the past. Think of it like the British show New Tricks, wherein the solution to the cases hinge on the retired detectives knowledge of the time in which the event occurred.

    4. Re:Oh good.... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always thought that the best episodes, were the ones that avoided the "dreaded main thread" . . . just show something weird, about some creepy-crawly critter, and do a bit of self satire.

      Those were the best.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Oh good.... by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      So change the dynamic a bit. Six episodes is a good amount of time to bring closure to that adversarial relationship that never really happened properly in the original show. In the end, Scully finally believes, and they set up a hook for the next generation / next iteration of the show with new blood. Could work.

    6. Re:Oh good.... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      The best one was, IMHO, War of the Coprophages.

      ---

      Mulder: Bambi also has a theory I've come to acro...
      Scully: Who?
      Mulder: Dr. Berenbaum. Anyway her theory is...
      Scully: Her name is Bambi?
      Mulder: Yeah. Both her parents were naturalists. Her theory is that UFO's are actually nocturnal insect swarms passing through electrical air fields.
      Scully: Her name is Bambi?

      ---

      Mulder: I'm just speculating here, but if extraterrestrial lifeforms do exist...
      Ivanov: Oh, there's no need for speculation, I believe they do.
      Mulder: And assuming that they're more technologically advanced than we are, and if your own ideas about the future of space exploration are correct, then...
      Ivanov: Then the interplanetary explorers of alien civilizations will likely be mechanical in nature. Yes. Anyone who thinks alien visitation will come not in the form of robots, but of living beings with big eyes and gray skin has been brainwashed by too much science-fiction.
      (Mulder looks away, shrugging slightly)

    7. Re:Oh good.... by AlvySinger · · Score: 2

      Darin Morgan FTW! Best X-Files writer. Only wrote a few episodes but all great (and personal I preferred the others to WotC) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...

    8. Re:Oh good.... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      as long as Gillian Anderson is in it thats all that matters. She was totally hot in "The Fall". Now she gets to go back to being a hot red head with a big rack. Sweet

    9. Re:Oh good.... by danomac · · Score: 1

      Mulder just can't jump to conclusions the way he used to.

      No, but he can be much more cynical. That could be amusing.

    10. Re:Oh good.... by bazorg · · Score: 3, Funny

      So Scully will step out of the shower and realise it was just a dream?

    11. Re:Oh good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I could see there being a good story basis in having them need to come back to look into something from the past. Think of it like the British show New Tricks, wherein the solution to the cases hinge on the retired detectives knowledge of the time in which the event occurred.

      The nineties were an era of innocence. Where the FBI were the good guys and 2-3 smoking men were the bad guys. This doesn't fly anymore. In this day and age the whole FBI/NSA/CIA are composed of crooks. Criminals, torturers you name it. The few good people that worked in those institutions were either ostricised or kicked out or put in prison ('cause leaking info to the american people is a treacherous thing). The meme "the truth is out there" is meaningless. So no I personally don't give a shit about Mulder and Scully in 2015.

    12. Re:Oh good.... by tchdab1 · · Score: 2

      They are 20 years older now and middle managers. Instead of tracking down actual abnormalities themselves, they spend their days in meetings wondering which of their other co-workers are aliens or supernatural.

    13. Re:Oh good.... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Best suggestion I heard for thow the series should end was Chris carter, with a flip chart, expaining how everything fits together.

    14. Re:Oh good.... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I could see there being a good story basis in having them need to come back to look into something from the past. Think of it like the British show New Tricks, wherein the solution to the cases hinge on the retired detectives knowledge of the time in which the event occurred.

      So does Mulder get to sing the theme tune?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Oh good.... by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      The nineties were an era of innocence

      Only someone born after the year 2000 could possibly say that with a straight face.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Oh good.... by Deagol · · Score: 1

      Reboots are old hat. Now we're *reviving* 1- to 2-decade old series.

      First, we hear Twin Peaks will get a new season in 2016. Then that recent Friends movie. Now X-Files. With any luck, we'll get new seasons of Millennium, Dark Angel, and Space: Above and Beyond.

      It could work, right?

    17. Re:Oh good.... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      This is like doing 6 episodes of Dallas after 30 years. Pointless.

      Except Dallas resumed for three whole seasons.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  3. the AARP-files by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    get those aliens off my lawn!

    1. Re:the AARP-files by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      get those aliens off my lawn!

      Sorry. Obama granted all of them amnesty, and they won't be deported to their home planet.

      Deal with having aliens on your lawn.

      Try bringing them out some lemonade, and trying to make friends with them . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:the AARP-files by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      You won't be laughing by 2024. :-)

    3. Re:the AARP-files by PPH · · Score: 1

      Ayy LMAO!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re: the AARP-files by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      He is well before that TOS / Harrison Ford old man event horizon.

      Is the "old man event horizon" caused by stars putting on a *lot* of weight as they age?

      In which case, I think Harrison Ford will escape that fate and simply turn into a white dwarf.

      Marlon Brando on the other hand- yes, he became supermassive in later years, and quite likely turned into a black hole. In fact, lots of people in the film industry were inadvertantly killed when they got too close. No-one noticed this because to outsiders they still appear to be hovering around the "Brando event horizon".

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  4. Now, do Firefly by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is really getting my hopes up for Firefly --- it's not impossible. I want to believe.

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

    1. Re:Now, do Firefly by John+Bokma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think a new series will bring back the magic, because the magic is for a (large?) part in our heads.

    2. Re:Now, do Firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But, but, if you still like Firefly, you hate women!

      Didn't you hear, because Adam Baldwin supports gamers, you're not allowed to like Firefly any more.

      Signed, SJWs

    3. Re:Now, do Firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The boat is missed on that one. All the actors have aged a bit and the chemistry wouldn't be the same. Are we going to have Summer Glau still playing a kid?

    4. Re:Now, do Firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's an actor - who cares about his political predilections?

      I'm old enough to remember when Bill Clinton first ran for president. All of these Hollywood types were jetting around the country, talking about how great he was - and all I could think was "why does anyone give a rat's ass what Morgan Fairchild thinks about politics?"

      Seriously, just enjoy them for their talent in their chosen profession... and ignore everything else. It works much better.

    5. Re:Now, do Firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, but unlike illiberal SJW brownshirts like yourself, RWNJ's like Baldwin aren't trying to dictate control over creative content they don't like.

    6. Re:Now, do Firefly by SumDog · · Score: 1

      Plus a lot of the characters were killed off in that movie

    7. Re:Now, do Firefly by antdude · · Score: 1

      But Firefly wasn't popular as The X-Files. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Now, do Firefly by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Since I had to look it up, and I can't be the only one, RWNJ is Right Wing Nut Job. And if an American is calling someone that, they're basically some sort of neo-Nazi.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Now, do Firefly by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      He's an actor - who cares about his political predilections?

      When people say this, it usually means the actor supports their political predilections.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Now, do Firefly by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      X-Files or Firefly? Keep in mind if you say the wrong one I'll have to kill you.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Now, do Firefly by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Both. I have no doubt a new X-Files will be a major disappointment for a lot of people because the previous episodes got better with age. Ditto for Firefly. And I think that "getting better with age" happens for a large part in our heads.

    12. Re:Now, do Firefly by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I watched Firefly again last year, it's as good as ever. That kind of show doesn't really age, and it is genuinely well written and acted.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Now, do Firefly by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      I agree, loved the series. But I also think that a new series would never live up to the original one. Love to be wrong on this, but my experience is that it rarely if ever does after a long hiatus. Doesn't mean that a return will be bad, though.

  5. Only decent episodes were the Darin Morgan ones by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There, I said it.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:Only decent episodes were the Darin Morgan ones by i+work+on+computers · · Score: 1

      Darin Morgan wrote only four episodes (and helped write a fifth), but all four of them are as good as the X-Files got. Sure, other writers had great episodes too, but they also had many stinkers.

  6. 6 Jose Chung episodes by i+work+on+computers · · Score: 1

    Jose Chung's From Here to the Bank
    Jose Chung's Botox Galore
    Jose Chung's Doesn't Hold Up
    Jose Chung's Some Things Are Better Left In The Past
    Jose Chung's What Did You Expect?

    1. Re:6 Jose Chung episodes by i+work+on+computers · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jose Chung's I Can't Count

  7. Why by mugetsu37 · · Score: 4, Funny

    David Duchovny why won't you love me?

    1. Re:Why by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Gillian Anderson will you ever stop getting hotter?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  8. Re:twin peaks by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

    2016 could prove to be a good year for David Duchovny

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  9. The Lone Gunmen are dead! by Java+Pimp · · Score: 3, Informative

    So I'm sure we won't be seeing them in any of the episodes.

    --
    Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
    Kull: She told me she was 19!
    1. Re:The Lone Gunmen are dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not actually true. There's a canonical Season 10 that was released as a comic book series. In the second issue, the Lone Gunmen are revealed to have faked their deaths; they're alive and well and operating out of a secret bunker accessed through their grave-site in Arlington.

    2. Re:The Lone Gunmen are dead! by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I did not know that. Though my original post was a (weak) attempt at referencing the infamous front page spoiler from 13 years ago.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
  10. I used to love X-Files ... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    I used to love X-Files until a friend spoiled it for me. He basically said that Mulder and Scully were basically witnesses to whatever mystery they were uncovering. Nothing would have changed if they weren't there. Sure, the random person would have lived or died, but it's not like they solved any big mysteries.

    And after I while I just got tired of the whole X-Files mythology.

    Besides, weren't the aliens supposed to have invaded by now?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:I used to love X-Files ... by zidium · · Score: 4, Informative

      The aliens' plan of releasing a sentient virus to, in effect, terraform human bodies into human/alien hybrids whom would have their consciousness downloaded... it got *seriously* disrupted when Mulder injected the antidote into the main colonization ship, at least a decade or two too early.

      Now, they would have to traverse the stars, and we have NO idea AT ALL if FTL travel is even possible in the X-Files universe (all of the alien vessels could have been coming from the Antarctic mothership), so maybe it will take them 20 years to get here? maybe 2,000? Maybe they have parked motherships in reserve 30 years away from Earth? who knows? :)

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    2. Re:I used to love X-Files ... by citizenr · · Score: 1

      I used to love X-Files until a friend spoiled it for me. He basically said that Mulder and Scully were basically witnesses to whatever mystery they were uncovering. Nothing would have changed if they weren't there. Sure, the random person would have lived or died, but it's not like they solved any big mysteries.

      Wait, if it wasnt for FBI arc would never had ended up in the warehouse. Diana and Fox collected and delivered the arc to the proper authorities for filing, like HEROES!

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    3. Re:I used to love X-Files ... by mitzoe · · Score: 1

      Then you probably don't like Raiders of the Lost Ark either, where the outcome of the movie is the same whether Indiana is in it or not.

  11. I'd rather they bring back Fringe... by bswarm · · Score: 2

    Along with the LSD tripping Dr. Walter Bishop. Much better series, except for the last season where it got ridiculous.

    1. Re:I'd rather they bring back Fringe... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Dr Walter Bishop has a new job in Sleepy Hollow

    2. Re:I'd rather they bring back Fringe... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Along with the LSD tripping Dr. Walter Bishop. Much better series, except for the last season where it got ridiculous.

      I really liked the last season of fringe it was like Xfiles and Halflife 2 had a baby.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  12. Unless this is filmed in Vancouver it will be... by nihilistcanada · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...utter garbage. The mood set by Vancouver's gloomy gray wet and cold winters was the perfect setting for the series. When they moved production to Los Angeles(thanks Tea Leoni !!!) it went to hell very quickly.

  13. Re:hymenizing us damaged our spirits? by meerling · · Score: 1

    Dude, I think your meds are off.

  14. Re:Ugh by meerling · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't mind a return of the series, either a reboot or an effective sequel. I just don't think it'll work with the old cast. Their stories were pretty much run into the ground about 2 decades ago. Have some new blood pick up the threads and what happens when they give them a tug.

  15. Fad over? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    Are aliens still a big thing? I thought that fad had kind of fizzled. We have got to the point where no camera footage with UFO's in will be believed because footage is so easy to fake now.

    Real dystopian world domination by corporations is being achieved one treaty at a time, but that doesn't make for a juicy story.

    I may watch it on one condition - they change the theme tune, it's annoying.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    1. Re:Fad over? by drkich · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's what the aliens want you to believe. They are just waiting till everyone is onto the next big thing before they invade.

    2. Re:Fad over? by PPH · · Score: 2

      Real dystopian world domination by corporations

      Corporations run by the lizard people.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Fad over? by eyenot · · Score: 1

      They should keep the original melody and syncopation, but they should play it in really whacked-out "80's b-movie" style metal guitar.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    4. Re:Fad over? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      Are aliens still a big thing?

      Aliens only featured in a minority of episodes*, and they were never the best ones. Episodes, I mean, not aliens.

      *yeah, I'm guessing, but I think I'm right.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Fad over? by citizenr · · Score: 2

      We have got to the point where no camera footage with UFO's in will be believed because footage is so easy to fake now.

      Meteor in the middle of nowhere in Russia? sure, we got clip of that.
      Plane crashing into a river in Taiwan? got one recorded from 30 meters away.
      We are living in a world with more than one video camera (cellphone) per person now, and there is a lot less 'ufo sighting' movies than ever.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    6. Re:Fad over? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      We are living in a world with more than one video camera (cellphone) per person now, and there is a lot less 'ufo sighting' movies than ever.

      Maybe this isn't true, there are half a million 'ufo sighting' videos on youtube, this one video is interesting:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      Includes congress people, senators etc.

      I don't think we need to worry about aliens, we're probably going to destroy the planet ourselves.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  16. Re:Ugh by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    JJ Abrams is actually scheduled to be a reboot of the comfort bubble in 2019.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  17. The Lone Gunmen could have been good... by darnkitten · · Score: 2

    ...if they had respected the characters and the world.

    It should have been a darkly comic thriller with a team that only managed to hold together because of the importance of what they were doing. Instead, "they" derailed the cast with Jimmy Bond (and also with Yves Harlow--what, they couldn't find a woman ANYWHERE who could become a functioning part the team?) and turned The Lone Gunmen into a shallow, slapstick-ridden mockery of its X-files version.

    Still disappointed after all these years.

  18. What about McGyver by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    It was almost as long ago. Or what about Quantum Leap, or Sliders. Sorry.. 911 changed everything, they said. I'll like it if they make good anti-american episodes that deal with real conspiracy theories.. That's what changed since 15 years ago, real conspiracies rather than wanking about UFOs. Does Mulder still wank himself or what. Eight seasons and he never made out with Scully because he's either gay, or a wanker or both.

    1. Re:What about McGyver by eyenot · · Score: 2

      There is a "new McGyver" project going, involving the original producer (or was it the original writer?)

      http://thenextmacgyver.com/

      A new Quantum Leap would be cool. There's a pretty cool John Maus song by the same title that's kind of about the same subject.

      If it's wanking you're concerned with, maybe you should do a google search for the images of Anderson (and Duchovny perhaps) that Rolling Stone did.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    2. Re:What about McGyver by eyenot · · Score: 1

      I forgot the photo shoots FHM did of Anderson, as well.

      Also, considering the stars basically stated publicly that they had some romance going on and had considered marriage, what does it matter if Mulder is getting any action with Scully? Duchovny was (maybe is) getting action with Anderson. The best thing the show could do is keep the tension high by not having the characters hook up.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    3. Re:What about McGyver by rhazz · · Score: 3, Informative

      My sister (huuuuge X-files fan) had a 5 foot poster of that Rolling Stones cover over her bed, pretty sure she wanked to it. I was never sure if it was David or Gillian she fancied.

    4. Re:What about McGyver by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he respected her.

      Nah, let's remain myopic.

    5. Re:What about McGyver by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Californication is the follow-on series anyway. Hank (Mulder), Karen (Scully), Becca (Scully's love child with either aliens or Mulder, no one knows)

      All it needs is some young Snowden-like stud (played by Tim Minchin!) to sweep Scully off her feet and make Fox jealous, all the while he's having a bit on the side with Walter Skinner's jailbait daughter. Melodrama at it's finest?

    6. Re:What about McGyver by swb · · Score: 1

      "Parallels" could have been a Sliders type show if it had been picked up as a series and not released as an edited-into-a-movie pilot only on Netflix.

      It was done by the guy who did "The Lost Room" which is probably one of the best things ever to appear on SciFi.

    7. Re:What about McGyver by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      A new Quantum Leap would be cool

      On the basis that sequels are the opposite in quality of the original, you may have a point.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  19. Re: twin peaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you being funny, or are you not aware that Twin Peaks is returning for a season on Showtime?

  20. Jumped the shark: No closure by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When X-Files originally aired it was fresh. 9 seasons later they just waffled back and forth with absolutely no closure.

    Fans got tired of Christ Carter not having any balls to commit one way or another.

    1. Re:Jumped the shark: No closure by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      That is why I've stopped watching after season 5.
      But it was indeed awesome at first.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  21. Re:twin peaks by StikyPad · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Twin Peaks is/was crap. I barely made it through all the melodramatic screaming and wailing in the first episode, and lines like "Diane, if you ever get up this way that cherry pie is worth a stop." I gave it two more episodes thinking, "this has to get good at some point," but it just didn't.

  22. Ugh. Let it die. by kuzb · · Score: 1

    It wasn't that good a show. Yes, it was better than most of what was on, but most of what was on was pretty horrible at the time too. In the most recent years shows like BSG, Breaking Bad, House of Cards, Walking Dead, Game of Thrones, Better Call Saul, and many others have set a whole new standard that X-Files couldn't even hope to measure up to. As for Duchovny , he was 10,000% better in Californication which had brilliant writing.

    X-Files just has a plot that goes nowhere fast, while the writers recycle the same half dozen situations in a loop, while slightly changing the conditions each time.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  23. 13 years later by dejaniv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a rainy night. Mulder is sitting in an empty low-lit bar. His head rests on his arms. There's few empty glasses on bar table in front of him. Broody country tones fill the space.

    Scully walks in with intention. She spots Mulder and shakes the rain off her coat. He doesn't see her as she walks over. She stops right beside him.

    Scully: "Your online dating profile says you're blond."
    Mulder (chuckles): "It's funny, you sound just like someone I knew long time a..."

    He lifts his head off of his arms and meets her eyes. His face expression changes into bewilderment.

    Mulder (whispers): "Scully?!"
    Scully: "Hello, cowboy. We're back!"

    (intro titles cut in, followed by commercials. Twitter explodes, Facebook explodes, Instagram explodes)

  24. Re:twin peaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Twin Peaks was one of those "right show at the right time" kind of thing. The country was in a weird state and no one really knew where we were going, nothing like Twin Peaks had ever been tried before so all the twists and turns were new and unusual. Not that I'm saying it's great TV today, but at the time it was something completely different and that's what made it interesting.

    Compared to TV today is very tame in comparison. the US was still weaning itself off westerns, detective shows and sitcoms and Twin Peaks was edgy in comparison. Quite a few shows we loved in the 80/90's are like that. they were great at the time but didn't really stand the test of time.

  25. Re:twin peaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's funny, because when the X-Files came out the general meme was "The X-Files is for people that can't handle Twin Peaks".

    The X-Files was much more formulaic, in its way. And I imagine its announced return now - coming a few months after we learned about Twin Peaks return - is not a matter of coincidental timing.

  26. What? There were two movies? by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    This is honestly the first time I have heard of a second movie. Just how bad was it?

  27. Re:What? There were two movies? by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    It was actually pretty good, but had nothing whatsoever to do with aliens. It was pretty much just a murder mystery.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  28. Re:Ugh. Let it die. by ADRA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    BSG was a rewrite of a terrible though nostalgic 70's TV show. X-Files for its time was pretty good. If they can reboot the franchise, why wouldn't the quality of the show improve in this case? Right, it doesn't fit your narrative.

    The fact that TV has gotten better is a testament to modern TV's higher standards, and we can all applaud that. As for if the show's any good, only time will tell. Flaming a production we know essentially nothing about seems a little disingenuous.

    --
    Bye!
  29. Re:twin peaks by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Compared to TV today is very tame in comparison. the US was still weaning itself off westerns, detective shows and sitcoms and Twin Peaks was edgy in comparison. Quite a few shows we loved in the 80/90's are like that. they were great at the time but didn't really stand the test of time.

    Just the fact that its episodes weren't self-contained, it's subject matter was the rape and murder of a teenage girl, and the fact that it had supernatural elements made it pretty revolutionary for 1990. Add to that David Lynch's signature weird style and it truly was ground-breaking for the time.

    The X-files, for all its hype, is pretty tame in comparison. Its episodes are almost entirely self-contained, for example. With the exception of a handful of mythology episodes, every episode begins and ends with the characters in exactly the same place. There are no real character arcs to speak of. By the end of the series Mulder is basically the same guy and Scully is SLIGHTLY less skeptical maybe. But that's about it. There are some great individual episodes (mostly the Darin Morgan ones), but taken as a whole it's a pretty conventional procedural detective show.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  30. Great show for kids; sad show for adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This was a great show when I was 14. As an adult, I look back and think about it, and I find it juvenile and stupid.

    I can't imagine being an adult and sitting down to watch the X-Files. The writing was pretty silly, and with the exception of the two actors (both of whom are pretty talented) the show is rather terrible.

    It's also vaguely sexist. They did an interesting role reversal by making Scully the rational one, but it turns out that she's wrong about the big picture. So men win again, as usual.

  31. The Lone Gunmen by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see X-Files again, but I really with The Lone Gunmen had never been canceled. That spinoff was the highlight of my week for a brief while.

  32. Re:Ugh. Let it die. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "set a whole new standard"

    Did you notice that all of your favorite shows are on cable, and most are the equivalent of R rated? So in other words, to you a high-quality show must include naked women, explosions, guns, blood, drug use, murder, sex, etc.

    Now try to write a TV show without any of that, to be aired on network TV. How good is the show you wrote? I didn't think so.

    From your rant, I'll assume you're under 30. Which means you now watch 90's PG-13 shows and compare them to today's R shows. OF COURSE the new ones are better! I love guns and tits too.

  33. The Burt Reynolds episode could have been a pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is a summary of the episode so good (and different) it could have been a spin off.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improbable_%28The_X-Files%29

    The Guardian listed "Improbable" as one of the "13 best X-Files episodes ever". UGO named God/Mr. Burt as one of the "Top 11 X-Files Monsters", noting that "as [series creator Chris Carter] imagines him, [God] is a benevolent deity, constantly prodding his creatures to look at the patterns before them, to see the overall plan that he's laid out. He's doomed to failure, and he knows it, though it doesn't stop him from trying".

  34. The Plot by sycodon · · Score: 2

    Scully and Mulder will have gone on a spacecraft into the past, which causes the unanticipated side affect of being 13 years older, somewhat plumper, and in need to cash.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  35. Hopefully logic and reason will win this time by ihaveamo · · Score: 1

    The skeptic in me hated the show - "Logic, Science & Reason" (Skully) always lost out to the "Supernatural & boogeyman" (Mulder). Imagine a show where, at the end, the weird supernatural was always explained by rationality. That's a show I'd like to watch, and it would be educational, too!. What I'm wanting is "Scooby Doo" endings - "The ghost/alien/monster was actually the Smoking Man!!!" - "And I would have got away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling FBI agents!!"

    1. Re:Hopefully logic and reason will win this time by Pfhorrest · · Score: 2

      Mulder and Scully didn't so much represent "supernatural" vs "logic, science, and reason" as they did paranormal vs mundane. A whole lot of the things Mulder thought were happening were things that could have had a naturalistic explanation that you could do science to understand if they actually were happening at all —they were just extraordinary things the likes of which would require extraordinary evidence to accept. Scully was rightly hesitant to accept such things without extraordinary evidence, but then, she also accepted supernatural things that are widely accepted and considered mundane, normal beliefs by society — her religious beliefs.

      That was actually my favorite thing about the show and something I thought, around (I think it was) the season seven finale, they were going to shift to exploring: the paranormalization of religion. Looking at religious beliefs as just as weird and extraordinary as the aliens and monsters Mulder was always on about, and possibly actually connected to those very same things, but at the same time all of it still rationally, naturalistically, scientifically explainable. But of course that would never fly, especially on Fox, and they chickened out and ignored it aside from some vague allusions to Mulder being Alien Jesus or something in the terrible last two seasons.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    2. Re:Hopefully logic and reason will win this time by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Imagine a show where, at the end, the weird supernatural was always explained by rationality. That's a show I'd like to watch, and it would be educational, too!.

      Castle is more or less that; although the show as a whole is not really to be taken seriously either so I'm not sure I'd call it educational... but at least it knows its not a serious show and doesn't take itself too seriously either.

      Unlike, say CSI which gradually turned from a fairly neat sherlock holms-ey style science based detective show at the very beginning to a really unwatchably bad soap opera with unbelievably bad science that took itself so seriously that the unbelievably bad science and general overall absurdity just couldn't be overlooked or forgiven.

  36. Come again? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    The nineties were an era of innocence. Where the FBI were the good guys and 2-3 smoking men were the bad guys. This doesn't fly anymore. In this day and age the whole FBI/NSA/CIA are composed of crooks. Criminals, torturers you name it.

    Huh? In the X-Files, once you got to a certain level in TPTB, everyone was a corrupt murderous Orwellian shitbag, or under the thumb of a corrupt murderous Orwellian shitbag.

    Nah, there's relevance to modern times, where candidates that run on promises of transparency and protecting whisteblowers (Obama) end up being the most secretive and punitive presidents of all time, respectively (again, Obama). When what passes for "the left" these days (Sanders, Warren) are active participants of America's Global War of Terror.

    No relevance at all.

  37. Re:twin peaks by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Twin Peaks is/was crap

    Compared with what? Shakespeare? Jersey Shore?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  38. Re:twin peaks by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Just the fact that its episodes weren't self-contained, it's subject matter was the rape and murder of a teenage girl, and the fact that it had supernatural elements made it pretty revolutionary for 1990.

    Not true at all. "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" had rape in the first episode, and much of his stuff involved the supernatural. It could easily be argued that he was the pioneer of the genre in television, a good 40 years before Twin Peaks. Of course, judging by our relative moderation points, people want to believe good things about Twin Peaks, and so they do. I guess that's the X-Files connection.

    As far as story arcs, the contemporary (to Twin Peaks) "Picket Fences" had all of the things you're describing as well. Incidentally, Picket Fences almost had an actual crossover with the X-Files. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    And I don't begrudge people who actually like Twin Peaks, even if I cannot fathom the reasons, but I do think it's more of a "it's good because people say it's good," phenomenon than anything else.

  39. Re:Embedded propaganda by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I suspect the new mini-series will have some sort of embedded sublimital leftist propaganda messages like most American TV shows have these days.

    I know, what with that and the fluoride in the water you might as well be living in Soviet China.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  40. MotW by psyclone · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Those "story arc avoiding episodes" are commonly referred to as the Monster of the Week and were always the most enjoyable X-Files episodes.

  41. Cigarette man by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    I'll do the Cigarette man part.

  42. X marks the Millennium spot! by unclefred · · Score: 1

    Bring back Millennium Carter it was better than the X-Files by Galaxy! What about this campaign to bring back Millennium being waged through Facebook and lance henriksen asking you over and over to make a movie out of Millennium but no answer from you!! You instead bring back the X-files hey and lets not talk about Harsh Realm, no one else is! X-Files become a convoluted joke but you stated Millennium while still making X-Files then could cope and handed over to Morgan and Wong (your best writers from the X-Files) to produce the second season of Millennium while you went back to the X-Files then came back for the third season of Millennium complaining your show had been hijacked and taken in an unintended direction damaging it viewer wise.. Original X-Files,too long,too drawn so became a pile of uninteresting garbage.