Slashdot Mirror


Tatooine Youth Suspected In Terrorist Attack

BeruHadItComing writes: Imperial investigators are still trying to piece together what happened in last week's horrifying terrorist attack on our largest orbital defense station. Over a million loyal citizens, scientists, and medical staff lost their lives in the grisly attack while the station was being put through training exercises near the Yavin system. Billions more are in mourning, while a number of powerful senators have renewed calls to increase defense spending. Initial reports have confirmed Rebel involvement, and officials are making inquiries about a young insurgent from Tatooine with known ties to religious fundamentalists.

112 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. Rebel scum by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think that's all that needs to be said.

    1. Re: Rebel scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When the hell did we build a orbital defence station?? No wonder I am getting taxed through the nose. Damn pollies wasting my hard earned cash!

    2. Re:Rebel scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that the Imperial Senate was dissolved already. More lies from the Imperial 1%!

    3. Re: Rebel scum by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm pretty sure he was going along with the joke.

    4. Re: Rebel scum by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      Meta-Whooosh!

      (or would that be a recursive whoosh?)

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    5. Re: Rebel scum by fisted · · Score: 1

      meta woooosh

  2. Sigh by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're not even trying.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah an April Fool's Joke is supposed to be subtle. Not that Slashdot has ever posted anything funny previously but this is seriously lame.

    2. Re:Sigh by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I agree .. reads like a bad Onion story.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Sigh by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder.

      Is the Onion printing strictly factual stories today?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:Sigh by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, this is the 2nd article on the homepage, so yeah, it does look like they are going with factual stories today.

    5. Re:Sigh by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Yeah an April Fool's Joke is supposed to be subtle. Not that Slashdot has ever posted anything funny previously but this is seriously lame.

      Apparently, double entendre is just too subtle for some people to grasp.

    6. Re:Sigh by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, two-dimensional shockwave? What?

    7. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OMGPONIES!!!! is still the only good April First thing /. has ever done

    8. Re:Sigh by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      At least the Empire doesn't hide behind faux altruism while selling to the bad guys, like Apple. They are the bad guys!

    9. Re:Sigh by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      I came here hoping for a least a chuckle. I honestly thought the joke was all the html/css/obfuscated javascript appearing on every page where advertisements should be.

    10. Re:Sigh by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      This is the only one of the April Fool's posts I thought was funny.

  3. April Fools by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 2

    Ahh.. that reminds me.. Time to wrap an elastic band around the rinse nozzle on the kitchen sink, maple syrup in the hair shampoo, Saran wrap across the toilet basin.

    1. Re:April Fools by KermodeBear · · Score: 2

      Yeah, today is the day the Internet becomes worthless for information.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    2. Re:April Fools by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Yeah, today is the day the Internet becomes worthless for information.

      Just today? Are YOU behind the times or what? And this on Slashdot...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:April Fools by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, today is the day the Internet becomes worthless for information.

      The upside is that means a decline in the serious MISinformation as well. That's sort of a win.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  4. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you're going to do April fools, at least be funny. Every year slashdot fails so hard on being funny on April 1st.

    1. Re:Yawn by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      Just put Slashdot in your hosts file until tomorrow. Today's going to be a groan-worthy day of Dice.com trying too hard to be funny.

    2. Re:Yawn by phayes · · Score: 1

      OMG Ponies! was funny even if it's been a loong time.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:Yawn by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      And that was 9 years ago. Everything before or since was 99.99% stinkers.

    4. Re:Yawn by plopez · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why there are so few women in tech

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    5. Re:Yawn by LaurenCates · · Score: 2

      Why, because it lacks ponies?

      Well, look, Equestria's not known for STEM. More for liberal arts than anything.

      STEM's big problem? No flying ponies.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    6. Re:Yawn by Livius · · Score: 1

      STEM's big problem? No flying ponies.

      Ironically a problem that only STEM can solve.

  5. But... by Reibisch · · Score: 2

    Wasn't the senate disbanded shortly before the attack?

    1. Re:But... by Livius · · Score: 1

      Journalism has really gone downhill.

  6. Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This happened a long time ago. Typical slashdot news timing.

    1. Re:Slow by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was far away, give light speed delay a chance man.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    2. Re:Slow by Dekonega · · Score: 1

      And far, far away...

    3. Re:Slow by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      What's that in parsecs?

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    4. Re:Slow by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      What's that in parsecs?

      Many... (waves hands) Ma...ny!
      8-)

  7. Islam apologism by Hashead · · Score: 1, Troll

    How about a story about how Islam is a religion of peace? That would be a funny April fools joke, although I guess it's been done to death already.

    1. Re:Islam apologism by Hashead · · Score: 1

      Or how about one about how Muslims don't hate jews and aren't prone to ridiculous conspiracy theories?

    2. Re:Islam apologism by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      How about a story about how Islam is a religion of peace? That would be a funny April fools joke, although I guess it's been done to death already.

      I see what you did there.

    3. Re:Islam apologism by Hashead · · Score: 1

      No, I think the real story is that it took 4 whole replies before someone conflated criticism of a religion with racism. Usually, it takes less than 3.

    4. Re:Islam apologism by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      oh, and maybe lose a couple hundred pounds.

      OK, we'll eject you into space. Checked that box.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    5. Re:Islam apologism by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      I lost 218 with this simple weight loss trick!

      And I earned 50K from home! Ask me how!

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    6. Re:Islam apologism by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

      Yeah and also how the massive swarm of muslim immigration to europe has nothing to do with rising violent crime and rape rates.

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    7. Re:Islam apologism by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      here I thought it had something to do with the increase in poverty.

    8. Re:Islam apologism by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

      Well, i cant speak for statistics in Europe, but I can say without a doubt that violent crime in america is much more heavily influenced by race than by poverty. As you can see here: http://kff.org/other/state-ind... for example, 27% of people living below the poverty line are black, compared to 10% being white. This means that blacks are 270% more likely to live in poverty than whites. Following so far?

      Now, according to DOJ statistics: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cj... blacks are responsible for more about 52% of all murders in the united states, with whites (including hispanics) accounting for 45%.

      Now as i am sure you are aware, blacks are a minority in America, accounting for only 12% of the population, and yet they are responsible for over half of the murders. What this means, is that a black person is nearly 8 times more likely to commit murder than any other person of any other race in America.

      Now, if you take the rate of murderers that are black and subtract from it the rate of blacks living in poverty, (800%-270%=530%) even if you supposed (wrongly) that every single black living in poverty is a murderer, then you are still left with the remaining blacks who dont live in poverty committing over 500% more murders than every other race in America combined.

      Poverty is not the leading factor in violent crime, race is. The poverty myth is nothing short of delusional or perhaps deceitful propaganda.

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
  8. Role models by Cyfun · · Score: 4, Funny

    I blame the parents. Where are they in all this?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dot slashes YOU!
    1. Re:Role models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, the dad was trying to stop him...

    2. Re:Role models by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      I've heard they're spending all their time doing outdoor barbecuing these days.

  9. Re:Wat? by rioki · · Score: 1

    No it's April...

  10. That's my cue. by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's my cue.

    Now to stop reading for over 24 hours while all the poor April Fool's junk slams the front page over and over.

    It's now an annual ritual. See you at the weekend, guys.

    1. Re:That's my cue. by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, come on. This is the good kind of April Fools story. The stories that could be true are pretty annoying when they come from real news sources, but this is firmly tongue-in-cheek.

    2. Re:That's my cue. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      I usually agree with you, but this is actually funny.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    3. Re:That's my cue. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And now it's time for the annual gripes from people with low tolerance for humor.

  11. same theme.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .. same day
    http://home.web.cern.ch/about/updates/2015/04/cern-researchers-confirm-existence-force

  12. BOTHAN LIVES MATTER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bothan lives matter!

  13. Racists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of all this forcephobia in the news and comments. It's the religion of feeling.

  14. 35:3:20 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! by BlacKSacrificE · · Score: 5, Funny

    OPEN YOUR EYES DROIDS!!

    --
    [Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
    1. Re:35:3:20 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! by gijoel · · Score: 1

      WAKE up NERFPLE, this DOCUMENTARY proves EVERYTHING!!!111!!11!1!!!

    2. Re:35:3:20 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      PROTON TORPEDOES CAN'T MELT SPACE STATIONS. Particularly ones the size of a small moon.

      You can clearly see from the footage that the station was destroyed from the inside. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

      Oh, and we're supposed to believe the official story that some magic proton torpedoes made it all the way from a tiny exhaust port to the reactor core? Have you seen the size of the exhaust ports on a Freedom Station? They're no bigger than a womp rat. Impossible to bulls-eye. Or are we to believe some magic force guided them in? Tell me another one.

      WAKE UP DROIDS!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:35:3:20 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Best comment of the day.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:35:3:20 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! by JQuazar · · Score: 1

      Agree, so classic!

  15. I've seen the evidence... by dekingster · · Score: 1
  16. Senators? The Senate was dissolved..... by RenegadeTempest · · Score: 1

    "The Imperial Senate will no longer be of any concern to us. I've just received word that the Emperor has dissolved the council permanently. The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away." Grand Moff Wilhuff Tarkin[src] 35.3.5 http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki...

  17. Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I doubt the rebel scum can pull off something like that. Proof?

    1. Who the hell designs something that big with a gaping 2-meter wide flaw in it?
    2. Lord Vader "conveniently" escapes any harm, "claims" he was attacked by some kind of garbage scow of a vessel.
    3. The rumour mill has it that the same contractor who built the thing (in the Hutt family, IIRC) siphoned off most of the money, and then planned with the Empire to blow it up to hide that fact.

    Forgetting, for the moment, of the whole "Vader was born on Tattoine, not Naboo" controversy (see "Birther Movement"), all this put together smells awfully bad. As someone who's smelled some pretty bad things (like the INSIDE of a Tauntaun), I can honestly say that the powers that be are lying to us all.

    Anon.

    P.S. Lord Vader is... a... s... arrrgh

    1. Re:Conspiracy! by Livius · · Score: 1

      He even claimed he was thrown clear because his wingman - an experienced combat pilot - struck his fighter because of distraction by one explosion.

  18. No. I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Read it again and replace the Star Wars references with real ones.

    Now consider that the good guys - the Jedi - are portrayed as the bad guys even though they are defending a planet from invaders.

    Now, think about our own news media and how our politicians portray countries and people. Now think of the movies "Red Dawn" and how American kids are doing exactly what peoples are doing overseas to coalition troops. Explain how are they different?

    I think this "story" is one of the most subversive things I have ever read on Slashdot.

    1. Re:No. I disagree. by Drethon · · Score: 2

      The winner writes the histories. This is new since when?

    2. Re:No. I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Geez, we barely read the titles most of the time, and now you want us to re-read TFS, reconsider it three different ways, and write an essay in response?

      Are you an English teacher, by any chance?

    3. Re:No. I disagree. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Remember the Star Wars prequels?

      I don't blame the population supporting the empire after seeing such darkness, corruption, incompetence, and ineptitude of Republican rule in the galaxy.

      They were the bad guys and it is mirroring the us senate today. Shoot! No technological innovations and economic malaise for thousands of years. Under the empire shit got done and the galaxy moved forward. The rebels were the ones killing people. Empire would leave you alone as long as you didn't destabilize or rebel the galaxy. Jedi can be twisted to religious fundamentalism too and supporting an outdated system like Is is does with a caliphate.

    4. Re:No. I disagree. by houghi · · Score: 1

      I remember when Red Dawn came out (the first one) that we discussed the differnce between freedom fighters and terrorists.
      The answer was history.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:No. I disagree. by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

      During the runup to the second Gulf War there was a story circulating about how The Empire was really the good guys and the Rebel Alliance was just a bunch of terrorists. The sad part was, in the logic of the time it was being sold by many as a serious argument. Not even a joke. Here's a link to it from 2002 in The Weekly Standard

      So yeah, this has already happened.

    6. Re:No. I disagree. by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I remember when Red Dawn came out (the first one) that we discussed the differnce between freedom fighters and terrorists. The answer was history.

      No, the answer is: look at what they're actually fighting for. "Freedom fighters" who fight for the opportunity to deny women the right to go to school, or to set up a regime where people who aren't willing to claim faithfulness to one single state religion are not freedom fighters. It really is that simple. US revolutionaries fought to be free from what was essentially a military dictatorship (the monarchy) that didn't provide some rather important freedom-related features (like those we see protected in our constitution). When freedom fighters are fighting for actual freedoms, then that's what they are. When "freedom fighters" are fighting to institute totalitarian rule (like, say, Che Guevara and company did) they're not freedom fighters at all. The Taliban aren't fighting for freedom, they're fighting to set up a ruthless medieval theocracy. Doesn't matter what they call themselves, it's what they do.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:No. I disagree. by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      I guess you're just going to brush aside the whole Alderaan thing, right?

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    8. Re:No. I disagree. by ScentCone · · Score: 1
      When the people who actually drag school teachers out of their classroom to shoot them in the head for teaching girls publish videos of doing so online to show how serious they are about it, you can claim "land grab" and "it's all fake" to your heart's content, but you'll know you're lying, just like the rest of us will know you're lying.

      And here in the US, we are told that women are denied the chance at education

      Who's "we" and who is doing the telling? There are more women in college then there are men. So, basically you're just blathering.

      we are a Christian nation

      They "land grabbing" revolutionaries you're complaining about fought, among other things, to tear down the form of government under which they were living ... one that DID establish a government-backed single religion. They were so opposed to that, in the form of the constitution's first amendment, they baked freedom from that ever happening again right into the nation's chartering document. Not that you've probably ever read it or anything.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re:No. I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Freedom fighters" who fight for the opportunity to deny women the right to go to school, or to set up a regime where people who aren't willing to claim faithfulness to one single state religion are not freedom fighters.

      So the Christian Right in America are terrorists then, plain and simple.

      They seek to deny people access to things which don't match their religion, they expect to force their beliefs on everybody, and they feel god is on their side. And they seek to use their religion as an excuse to deny freedoms to other people.

      When "freedom fighters" are fighting to institute totalitarian rule (like, say, Che Guevara and company did) they're not freedom fighters at all

      Then you are too fucking stupid to know anything about Che Guevara or the circumstances of the Cuban revolution. Cuba was already a fairly brutal dictatorship, only it was beholden to US commercial interests.

      Fuck, but you Americans are ignorant about history. America has put military dictatorships in place over democratically elected governments because those dictatorships were more convenient of friendly to US interests.

      Everything you write says you are too fucking ignorant on the topic to understand anything about it.

      America used to fund and train the Mujahadeen when they were fighting the Soviet Union. You idiots helped create this mess.

      Why must Americans be so stupid, and yet so convinced the crap they believe is true?

    10. Re:No. I disagree. by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 1

      The US revolutionaries fought for freedom for rich white men while enslaivng Africans and ignoring everyone else.

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    11. Re:No. I disagree. by tooyoung · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't believe that I'm actually reading an April Fools Day thread, much less commenting on one, but here goes....

      The difference between a terrorist and another type of combatant isn't history or what the group is fighting for. It is whether they target civilian populations or not and use terror as a tactic. The term terrorist has been rendered meaningless in recent times. Now we see "terrorist attack on army base". Targeting a military force is not terrorism, regardless of the group who does it.

    12. Re:No. I disagree. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      You sound like you should probably learn a little something about Che, Castro, and other latin American dissidents of the previous century, and what precisely led to their dissatisfaction and eventual rebellion. That's not to sugar-coat the man Che became and his eventual ruthlessness. But to dismiss them as simply wishing to establish totalitarianism shows total lack of knowledge of Cuba's history or the context of their revolution.

      Your knowledge of the revolution and the governance of England is also rather lacking.

      Also consider semantics: just because they aren't fighting for -YOUR- concept of freedom, doesn't mean they aren't fighting for freedom.
      American Freedom is not the only definition of freedom, in fact it's rather lacking in many ways.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    13. Re:No. I disagree. by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      Alderaan? You mean that accident with fracking? Totally nothing to do with the Empire! We warned them if they kept on doing what they were doing they'd end up like the Klingons and their moon Praxis, but did they listen? Nope! "Pure fiction!" they said!

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    14. Re:No. I disagree. by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      "Their" women?

      You don't ask "why are you so interested in those people" or "why are you so interested in that particular method of oppression".

      "Their women"? Sheesh....

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    15. Re:No. I disagree. by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      You really want to make the case that America of all countries has clean hands and a clean conscience in this dirty enterprise called war?

      Do you mean that when a huge undertaking involving actual, you know, human beings taking action in opposition to a monstrously violent totalitarian regime sometimes involves some of those human beings doing assholish things ... that therefore the side that's acting to prevent oppressive totalitarianism is wrong to fight it? You'd rather allow groups like ISIS, or people like Stalin, or fun outfits like the Khmer Rouge to just carry on being brutal across the board as part of their purpose and policy than risk deploying against them on the off chance that not every action taken to oppose them, by everyone involved in the fight, will pass your purity test? Better to let the house burn down than to risk having anyone involved in trying to put out the fire be a jerk, I guess.

      There is still hatred towards the Japanese over what they did

      Right. Because that's what they (the country of Japan) set out to do. Cruelty and torture and rape weren't the actions of a few idiots/asshats in the Japanese army, those things were the stated tactics, the official policy, from the top down. That wasn't assholishness by abberration, and prosecuted (a la the WV guards at Abu Ghraib), that was marching orders. Your need to confuse the difference between that, and things like what Japan systematically did in China, shows you to be either completely misguided, or simply trolling. The latter, most likely.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    16. Re:No. I disagree. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      just because they aren't fighting for -YOUR- concept of freedom, doesn't mean they aren't fighting for freedom

      Which is exactly why I cited examples where any rational person couldn't get it wrong. Nobody who is fighting for the power to take away other people's freedoms (say, of speech, assembly, religion, etc) is fighting for freedom. It's possible to objectively look at two different fights, and see where one is actually about freedom, and the other is about gaining power to deny freedom.

      Your knowledge of the revolution and the governance of England is also rather lacking.

      The governance of England (not to let it off the hook there, even so) was not the same as England's governance of the colonies. Don't tell me to learn more about it when you paint with a brush so broad you miss out on that reality. The Americans were fighting to be free of how England was ruling the colonies. Even if you consider the then-state-of-affairs in England to have been the model of freedom (plainly not true), the colonists did not enjoy the same liberties or representation.

      That's not to sugar-coat the man Che became and his eventual ruthlessness.

      "Became?" He started out that way, and didn't stop. He was no champion of a constitutional democracy. Didn't seek one, and didn't act to establish one. What he and dictators like Castro found to dislike about the regimes against which they rebelled has nothing to do with their vision for a totalitarian communist paradise. They set out to achieve what the Castros have been using violent oppression of their own people to preserve ever since.

      If they were ever about freedom, they wouldn't need to lock people away or simply kill them for speaking their minds.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    17. Re:No. I disagree. by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      I believe the phrase is: "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter..."

    18. Re:No. I disagree. by AgentElrond · · Score: 1

      It is whether they target civilian populations or not and use terror as a tactic.

      Hiroshima, August 6th, 1945.

      I've recently finished reading The Making of the Atomic Bomb (highly recommended). The more I look at the atomic bombing of Japan the more it looks like a pure act of terrorism. Further, it seems like atomic weapons have only two military uses: genocide and what you defined as terrorism. Deterrence skirts dangerously close to that definition too, and is in any case only effective against an enemy with convenient clusters of civilians.

      On a side note: much as I hate the existence of nuclear weapons, I know myself well enough that if I was a physicist in the 1930s and 40s as such incredible progress was being made I would not have been able to resist working on it, even on the bomb project itself. I would have found a way to sell it to myself. Makes me suspicious of reasons like "It'll shorten the war and save $large_number of $our_side lives"

    19. Re:No. I disagree. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      So the Christian Right in America are terrorists then, plain and simple.

      They seek to deny people access to things which don't match their religion, they expect to force their beliefs on everybody, and they feel god is on their side. And they seek to use their religion as an excuse to deny freedoms to other people.

      But for the most part, they *aren't* currently going out and killing other people en masse.

    20. Re:No. I disagree. by Livius · · Score: 1

      Your knowledge of the revolution and the governance of England is also rather lacking.

      Bear in mind that England ceased to have a government in 1707.

    21. Re:No. I disagree. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The US revolutionaries fought for freedom for rich white men while enslaivng Africans and ignoring everyone else.

      You might want to actually read some history. You know, just for fun. And so you can peek under the hood and see that things are wee bit more complicated than your cartoon villain version.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    22. Re:No. I disagree. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I mean don't you ever question why the treatment of women is always specified when describing the enemy?

      It's an excellent barometer of culture. Everyone has (or had) a mother. Hey look! Something we all have in common. So it provides a common perspective from which to evaluate how various cultures treat people. And cultures which stone women to death for having been raped are, objectively, less free than cultures that don't. One trots that example out because the vast majority of people with any sort of intellectual honesty can substitute at least one woman they're likely to know (perhaps their mom?) for the unknown woman in that scenario, and then examine their own reaction to it.

      I've noted "arab" has become a major porn category in the past 10 years

      Yeah, it's almost like a huge part of that culture has been increasing its access to the internet, and has been integrating with societies across Europe and North America. Shocking!

      but don't you think it's odd that war consistently has descriptions of women (always specifying a distinction between yours and theirs)

      No, the discussion generally revolves around the treatment of women, not "the women." Your inability to make the distinction is pretty telling.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    23. Re:No. I disagree. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I think this "story" is one of the most subversive things I have ever read on Slashdot.

      True, but that doesn't make it a good April's Fool.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    24. Re:No. I disagree. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      When "freedom fighters" are fighting to institute totalitarian rule (like, say, Che Guevara and company did)

      Or, depending on your viewpoint, when they fought to free their country from economic imperialism and foreeign corruption, and to introduce democracy instead of military dictatorship.

      It really does depend which side you're looking from.

      And the point about the Taliban is not that they want a medieval theocracy, but that they want a medieval theocracy in their own country. Do I want to live in a Taliban-run Afghanistan? No, but (a) I'm not an Afghan and (b) if I was, I'd probably prefer it to a massive foreign military presence.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:No. I disagree. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Do you mean that when a huge undertaking involving actual, you know, human beings taking action in opposition to a monstrously violent totalitarian regime sometimes involves some of those human beings doing assholish things ..

      The "there's always one or two rotten apples in a barrel" argument is only reasonable when they are genuine exceptions, and they are genuinely punished.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re:No. I disagree. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So the Christian Right in America are terrorists then, plain and simple.

      They seek to deny people access to things which don't match their religion, they expect to force their beliefs on everybody, and they feel god is on their side. And they seek to use their religion as an excuse to deny freedoms to other people.

      But for the most part, they *aren't* currently going out and killing other people en masse.

      A cynic might say that's because they don't need to in order to get their way.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:No. I disagree. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      And the point about the Taliban is not that they want a medieval theocracy, but that they want a medieval theocracy in their own country.

      Except, most of the Taliban are trying to set up a medieval theocracy in another country (read up on where that movement is from, who they are demographically, and where they are operating). And they're hip-deep in relations with outfits that are trying to spread the same thing throughout the middle east, and of course into and across Africa. There are distinct lines between some of these groups, but in other cases they and those they support or with whom they work make it pointless to try to separate them. Which is why today's slaughter by Al Shabab in Kenya is, in practical terms, right in line with the goals and efforts of the group you say is just trying to do their own thing in "their own country." That's a completely naive perspective on what they're all about.

      And no, it doesn't matter what side you're on. Oppressive regimes that jail or slaughter people for thinking the wrong way, or kill teachers for teaching girls to read, are only a "really depends on what side you're on" situation if you have a completely poisonous case of moral relativism. There's no "freedom" being fought for when the objective of the fight is to reduce freedom. You aren't really trotting out the "freedom means being free to prevent other people from being free" notion are you? Really?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    28. Re:No. I disagree. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The "there's always one or two rotten apples in a barrel" argument is only reasonable when they are genuine exceptions, and they are genuinely punished.

      You mean like we send them to jail, like we do? I'm glad you agree with me.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  19. I hate this day by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Because inevitably something is going to fool me and I'm going to feel stupid... I just want to go to bed and wake up tomorrow.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:I hate this day by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Because inevitably something is going to fool me

      Well, it's unlikely to be Slashdot with drivel like this.

      I just want to go to bed and wake up tomorrow.

      Ah, you didn't hear? They just discovered an error in the standard leap year calculation, so everyone has to skip April 2nd this year.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  20. Re:I hate April Fools Day by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Japan announced it was cancelling Christmas today. I was so happy until I remembered what the date is. Damn you, April Fools, for getting my hopes up.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  21. Not even accurate by dave420 · · Score: 1

    Aside from being desperately not funny, an attack on a military installation to stop it from destroying you is not a terrorist attack.

    Come on, Slashdot! You used to be better than this! Please show us you still are!

  22. Bad Nerd! by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Because: Star Wars, clever parody of a current blight on rational thinking, it's not Ponies, and Star Wars.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  23. damn punks by swschrad · · Score: 5, Funny

    at least we know nobody will be making a movie of this tragedy.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:damn punks by Adriax · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not make a movie? I'd be surprised if they didn't make atleast half a dozen movies glorifying the rebel scum.
      And games, books, costumes, ect...
      I expect callous exploitation of this senseless tragedy for A Long Time to come.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  24. The Case for the Empire by Megane · · Score: 2
    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  25. Re:Boring by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    "News Radio" did it better.

  26. Radicalization by Comboman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you do it right, you don't even need to change the references:

    Desert Youth Radicalized by Bearded Religious Zealot
    He seemed to others like a typical teen; having fun with his friends, going into town to pick up some power converters. But the boy's foster parents were worried he would follow a local anti-social, desert-dwelling hermit on some "damn fool ideological crusade". There are reports the old man may have lied to the youth about his birth father's involvement in the religious movement in order to gain his trust. From there, the two joined up with a couple of mercenary smugglers involved in human trafficking in an attempt to sneak past coalition blockades and gain access to military facilities. The old cleric apparently martyred himself in the initial attack on the base, which only strengthened the youth's resolve to follow in his mentor's footsteps. Even the mercenaries appear to have been radicalized, abandoning their business interests to join up with the movement.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Radicalization by Comboman · · Score: 1

      "I use them for smuggling. I never thought I'd be smuggling myself in 'em. "

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  27. Try googling 'propaganda' by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    You will be shocked to learn that it's not always accurate, or impartial. You might also notice that the same is often true of the media who delivers our news. We now return you to your April Foolery, hope that wasn't a buzz kill.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  28. A bit too close for comfort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tatooine is a real place in Tunisia (In the French dub, the planet is actually called "Tataouine", like the town)

    It is currently a hotbed of ISIS activity.

    Tunisia suffered a terrorist attack last month, with 22 dead.

    The satire in this post is bound to hit some nerves.

  29. OMGPONIES! by pvjr · · Score: 1

    You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

  30. Re:Continuity Error by Livius · · Score: 1

    The emperor dis[s]olved the Senate before the battle of Yavin, my understanding is that the regional governors now have direct control.

    Fine.

    "Billions more are in mourning, while a number of powerful ex-senators have renewed calls to increase defense spending."

    Then again, we don't know what solvent was used....

  31. Re:I hate April Fools Day by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    April Fools Day is a government conspiracy to force the public to change to a new government mandated calender! Don't drink the coolaid! Joking other people is helping the consiracy!

    No, not the US government. I think it was the Italian government, a long time ago... 8-)
    No Joke. 8-}

  32. Re:In related news by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    ... Meanwhile the NSA is excited to announce that a talented & mysterious outsider, Annakin Vader (Darth to his friends!) has been recruited to head up the agency. "It's an exciting time, a new leader for a new day" said the NSA communications representative.

    Um... You think you are just joking, don't you. 8-P

  33. Mind == Blown by SirGatez · · Score: 1

    This is by far the most awesome article I've ever ready on /. Please keep up the great work!

  34. It's all true! by iq145 · · Score: 1

    i was there! i witnessed it...