Slashdot Mirror
Ads Based On Browsing History Are Coming To All Firefox Users
An anonymous reader writes: Mozilla has announced plans to launch a feature called "Suggested Tiles," which will provide sponsored recommendations to visit certain websites when other websites show up in the user's new tab page. The tiles will begin to show up for beta channel users next week, and the company is asking for feedback. For testing purposes, users will only see Suggested Tiles "promoting Firefox for Android, Firefox Marketplace, and other Mozilla causes." It's not yet known what websites will show up on the tiles when the feature launches later this summer. The company says, "With Suggested Tiles, we want to show the world that it is possible to do relevant advertising and content recommendations while still respecting users’ privacy and giving them control over their data."
good bye Firefox. last nail in the coffin. I wanted to like it. I did. I still dislike Chrome's UI and the fact Google owns it.
Crap maybe I'll switch to Opera it's actually really really nice now as a UI.
https://developer.mozilla.org/...
Build Instructions
"If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
Why? Why do you rape us with this kind of shit? Is fucking with the UI (making the goddamn options menu a ugly mess of a webpage) and adding DRM codecs not enough?
Jesus christ on a stick. You can't find a way to suicide your market share faster.
How about no? How about some of us don't want advertising? How about you better give a mechanism to disable this crap?
What part of "not interested in your damned ads" is hard to understand?
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Remember when the Netscape web browser cost $40? Remember buying one? Me neither.
Looks like it's time to start uninstalling Firefox across all computers...
Not all, only those who cannot disable them.
And that might be the push needed for me to try out IceCat (formerly IceWeasel) https://www.gnu.org/software/g...
How is taking our browser history to serve ads respecting our privacy?
A search suggests they made $311 million in 2012, how much money is actually required to run Mozilla?
So this "feature" can be disabled by the user?
Or should we just disable auto-update and stick with version 38.0.1
I keep 0 history. Soon as my browser closes, history is wiped. So if this simply looks at my history and serves me adds based on it, then hypothetically this would not work on my system.
Of course if they look at other things (or FF stores info in some hidden super cookie) then I will be subject to adverts like everybody else.
To paraphrase the late Roger Ebert, "I loved, loved, loved, loved your new feature", says a board full of /. posters.
How can they be respecting my privacy seeing that such a feature would require that they have access to my browsing history. Even if (in theory) they aren't downloading my browsing history and it is my browser making the requests they can deduce what sites I must be browsing to request such "suggestions."
So if I mostly go to sites that involve sex with bowls of pasta and my browser were to request suggestions involving bowls of pasta porn it isn't much of stretch for them to guess what kind of sites I go to.
This shit pisses me off. I already use a VPN to keep my ISP from this sort of interference. Now it is my damn browser ratting on me.
How about a big fat no. Firefox already has a dropping market share and now it will drop by at least one more(me).
Just to be clear as to how much I value my privacy and don't want tracking. I use a VM for all services that I log into that goes through a separate VPN. Thus my day to day surfing is 100% separate from anything that has any logins. So any cookies/IP address that facebook, google, etc might have handed to me aren't available during my general web surfing.
I break zero laws yet I still want nobody tracking me as is my right.
Wow, they must really want people to switch to other browsers!
Ok, I see some commentators in nerd rage already. Relax. If you don't want to see top sites when you make a new tab, Mozilla provides instructions to disable them. It's just a couple of mouse clicks.
I read "targeted ads". But are those new ads, or it replace the old ones?
Elok
If this cannot be completely disabled, it will drive users to other browsers. There are growing numbers of people who do not want ANY ads at all while web browsing. Since I PAY for my bandwidth and it is capped, I demand to completely control what I see while browsing. That includes NOT seeing ads! None at all!
I delete all history and cookies and cache each time I log out. Although I like the technical aspect of tracing me and showing advertisement, as a consumer and user I detest it.
I detest it more than I like it. Or like Banksy says:
People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply youâ(TM)re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you.
You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity.
Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. Itâ(TM)s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head.
You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially donâ(TM)t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, donâ(TM)t even start asking for theirs.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
Before any of you goes dipshit insane about the ads, read these:
https://blog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2015/05/21/providing-a-valuable-platform-for-advertisers-content-publishers-and-users/
https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/2015/05/21/putting-our-data-privacy-principles-into-action/
On me, at least, it has the effect of making me less inclined to buy the advertised product.
I am using version 25.0 of FireFox for compatability reasons -- mostly so that I can continue to use the the Tree Style Tab (vertically arranged hierarchical tabs).
I remember when uTorrent added optional ads a few years ago. It was very light and simple to remove if you didn't want to see it. Now, the entire program is full of ads. Not saying that it's a slippery slope, but if people accept this with open arms then more browsers might start doing this.
"With Suggested Tiles, we want to show the world that it is possible to do relevant advertising and content recommendations while still respecting users' privacy and giving them control over their data."
First the advertisements will be optional. Then they won't be.
.
How long before the few remaining Firefox users realize that Mozilla is behaving like any other money-grabbing corporation?
Mozilla 1998: we want the internet to remain a free and open forum and in this spirit align our software to freedom and the user. the users choice and voice will be come top priority in our products, and we will write the mozilla 10 point manifesto to ensure we always take this into account.
Mozilla 2015: We want the internet to make payments on our car loans and help achieve the goal of replacing all 4 tires on the bentley twice a year. We believe, legitimately believe, that users want tiles to show them advertisements. we think they like having a video chat app in their browser and we want to make sure corporations understand what is possible when targeted advertising and a morally bankrupt moneytrain brand come together to abuse their users trust and appreciation. We are completely deaf to the fact that adblock and noscript exist and are extremely popular plugins for our hobbled shitwreck advertising platform masquerading as a browser. Hail satan.
Good people go to bed earlier.
Bad performance on multicore systems (locking problems still not investigated)
e10s nowhere to be seen (and current extensions won't work)
Servo still ages away
So lets add ads or make the gui more crappy every release until our userbase is gone. Is this the plan?
FORK or be a NORK!
It's time for a Firefox split. LibrieOffice split, and is doing quite well.
"With Suggested Tiles, we want to show the world that it is possible to do relevant advertising and content recommendations while still respecting users' privacy and giving them control over their data."
First the advertisements will be optional. Then they won't be.
.
How long before the few remaining Firefox users realize that Mozilla is behaving like any other money-grabbing corporation?
I haven't liked Firefox for some time now. But, I use it because it's the web browser I dislike the least.
Works with all Firefox extensions and won't sell you out.
palemoon.org
Banner Ads, Pop-up ads, Tile Ads, whatever you want to call them, all need to go away. Ads are where a majority of the code that inflict malware on unsuspecting users comes from. Web marketing firms receive thousands, if not millions of new ads all the time. Do you really think they have someone or even a group of people that sit and look thru the underlying code of every single ad they receive? From the day that ads started showing up on sites I have refused to click on them or found tools to block them: ADP, Ghostery, Blur, etc. I even refuse to click the text ads that show up in google searches. Advertising is not a beneficial method to gain my interest in a product. At least not on the internet.
It is enough work already to take meticulous care not to let my family know how much porn I watch. But when they start making targeted ads based on my browsing history, it'll pretty much be impossible for me to hide it.
Palemoon is branched off of Mozilla. I use it and it works well.
There are lots of options out there... you don't really need to stick with the Firefox vs chrome vs opera arguements.
I guess I'm in a beta channel, though I didn't know it. I've had suggestion tiles for a while now. I was so pissed when the "sponsored" tiles showed up unannounced.
Researching them showed me that you could turn them off. So I did, and I was moderately happy that I didn't see them anymore, but I felt that Mozilla was still collecting the data which angered me.
Not many days later, I received an update and bam! The sponsored tiles were back. I turned them off again. Again, I got another update and the tiles were back on again. SO it seems that I can't actually turn them off as each time I do, Mozilla turns them back off.
I find it especially ironic that one of the tiles advertises Mozilla's campaign against government monitoring with a blue tile; "is the U.S. government watching you?"
Anyway... I suffered through the bloat, the slowness, the UI changes and forced upgrades that I didn't want because Mozilla was better and "respected my privacy". But since that has now turned into hypocritical lip service, Mozilla offers no advantage at all over Chrome which is faster, feels much lighter and I have no doubts about my lack of privacy.
Fuck Firefox! It's over!
Come on people really? ~100 comments of butthurts and whining. Guess who was paying the bills in Mozilla? Yes your beloved Google. They stopped. But bills are still coming, so.
Most of you are acting like Firefox is your property or investment.
FOSS != free of charge.
think I using no-script and not crappy FF, sad to know !
Comment removed based on user account deletion
expect it to get worse.
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
All the web-rendering goodness of FireFox. Stable user interface. No suggested tiles. Available for Windows/Mac/Linux.
I'm still running LTS 10.0 (That's right) as it does exactly what I need, the only open security hole I've found still hadn't been fixed as of v:30.1 (blocked by noscript) and I don't like the direction they've been going. For an updated browser when I need it on Google, I use the Palemoon 64bit version and of course as I'm running WIn7, I have IE 10 available when I absolutely need it.
I don't like the various html5 features that allow even more annoying adds (hell I block most in the hosts file - Thanks MPC for the start) along with having Noscript configured in "Deny All" as the default instead of the "Allow All" everyone seems to want. Fuck that - it's my system and I'll allow scripts and such where I absoluetly need them. Not where everyone says I must use them.
It's gotten to the point that I'm no longer willing to use Linux due to the SystemD crap of a binary configuration - hell if I'm going to be forced to use that, then I'll simply run fucking Windows and have all the software I already have just work. Because of the crap about poorly designed features, I've begun looking into switching to FreeBSD - at least they have a solid engineering base and don't take the crap that has happened with SystemD due to their engineering team. Sorry Linus but you don't have the level of control needed to prevent System D hijacking the rest of the userland as it happens right now.
I'm OK with some ads as long as they are not obtrusive and obnoxious. So as long as the ad tiles in Firefox do not have flashing images, annoying sounds, autoplaying videos, popups, popunders, images moving across the whole screen, etc., and do not distribute all my personal data to everyone who pays for it, I do not object. People who do good work need some way to pay to keep the lights on.
I don't know any _user_ that wants this. This pretty much guarantees that I won't have Firefox anywhere.
Never really found a use for them. I have every new tab and window show up as a blank page so this won't bother me at all though I'm sad to see them take this approach. It appears that they are trying to do everything in their power to alienate what users they have remaining. Might have to start looking into a good alternative browser for the Mac.
Firefox gets its revenue from ads. Whether directly or indirectly, through first Google, then Yahoo, and now directly. They never seem to have enough revenue.
Wikipedia gets its revenue from donations. They occasionally have a beg bar at the top. They refuse to accept advertising. They always seem to have too much revenue.
I, for one, would much prefer to have an occasional beg bar in my Firefox and no ads, rather than ads and no beg bar.
(T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
Instructions are right here, few posts up.
http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7451877&cid=49750911
a little harsh when all you need to do is change preference in about:config:
browser.newtab.url to about:blank
done and done. the whole 'smart' newtab page is gone for good. that is one of the very nice things about firefox....... configurability..
the sec you inject shit of any kind into what i as one of the 60 people that freed this damn code for the world into im droping your use....
makes me sick that of the 60 or so of us that helped get the world free browsing , they are trying to wall you all in again
THAT'S RIGHT FIREFOX I HELPED GET COMMINICATOR 5 OUT TO THE WORLD, AND YOU DISGUST ME ...
Does anyone have a list of ip addresses / domaines, etc, that Firefox uses to do this kind of crap? Both the old sponsored tiles and this, as well as any other phone home stuff? I'd like to block this shit at the router. A quick search doesn't reveal much.
I'd switch, but Firefox + noscript + adblock + request policy is the only thing that keeps the "modern" web usable and safe a on semi-secure linux box
Well I guess Firefox has finally caved big time to privacy. In the end the bottom line always trumps anything else. Of course for me this is a natural course of action.
I never thought Mozilla had a valid business model and it was only Google that was propping up their broken model. Truth is, nothing wrong with open source but your products still have to make money. This ideal of being a model of volunteers and dedicated users is BS. No different then what Ubuntu had to do. Eventually because your products have to grow and expand you have to make revenue somehow. I wonder how many who will abandon Firefox now because of ads would have actually paid for Firefox in order to keep ads away? How many even gave a dime to Mozilla ever?
They only cure is to make sure that company doesn't get any of your money.
Suggested tiles will hereby be renamed as Smuttested tiles.
Will it be in Firefox v301 or v302?
...who complained about not seeing enough ads while browsing????
All the people complaining are missing the point: Adverstising is inevitable, and today advertising comes with massive privacy violations (especially tracking). Mozilla is developing a way to enable advertising without the privacy violations. If they succeed, imagine the dramatic increase in your privacy if vendors can deliver ads without tracking.
From TFA:
Mozilla is making a bold promise. âoeWith Suggested Tiles, we want to show the world that it is possible to do relevant advertising and content recommendations while still respecting usersâ(TM) privacy and giving them control over their data.â
And this is not just superficial security; they have really thought it through. For one thing, your browser history and the analytics that determine what ads to display stay on your computer. For more examples:
Because delivering such content to Firefox users can result in privacy issues, Mozilla has taken three steps to limit what information it collects:
1. A system of rules in place to limit what Mozilla or its partners can infer about users based on Tiles data. Each interest category must have a minimum of 5 URLs. Interest categories are constructed such that no single URL is significantly more likely to appear in a userâ(TM)s browsing history than any other URL in the category. Suggested Tiles also cannot be triggered based on combinations of URLs in the interest category.
2. While Tiles partners can suggest URLs to include, the companyâ(TM)s Content Services team actually defines the interest categories. A separate role on the team, which isnâ(TM)t involved in creating the interest categories, approves the final categories. Furthermore, interest categories are publicly available, stating the label of the bucket and the collection of URLs specified against it. The current interest categories are available in the source code here.
3. IP addresses are discarded within 7 days of collection and no other unique IDs associated with Tiles are collected. Only one Suggested Tile is included per new tab page, which prevents impression data from providing a more complete portrait of the userâ(TM)s history. Reports containing aggregate impression and click data (number of impressions, clicks, and so on) are only shared with partners. No individual data is provided to advertising clients.
For more, see these lnks:
https://blog.mozilla.org/priva...
https://blog.mozilla.org/advan...
Remember the days when your system could get p0wned the first time you visited a website in Internet Explorer? Well, thanks to technological advances by the Mozilla Corporation, you can now get p0wned by malware embedded in ads before you visit any website!
Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
Damnit, Google, finish adding Firefox-style tabs so I can ditch that piece of shit already.
This post prompted me to do some digging into FF privacy practices. This organization is not the safe haven for pure internet browsing that I once thought it to be. Check out https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1012123 to see how FF essentially tracks everything you do and never cedes its ability to harvest your information.
Also, for a number of months FF was scanning private IP blocks to supports it webRTC Hello feature, without providing any way to disable.
Cannot do Chrome. Cannot do FF. Does this actually make Explorer look like a good choice? Havent used Opera in years.
I miss being able to do a google search, and the first few hits were generally exactly what I wanted.
Yeah yeah, I know, "use google-fu", but it doesn't really work anymore, not as well as it used to. The marketing droids and advertisers have their whole SEO thing now where they're actively out to cheat google to get you to browse to their crappy blog or whatever instead. Searching for anything technical gives you the first few pages of marketing blogs that copy-paste each other's heavily buzzword-laden summary, squelching the actual reporter or researcher that has real information.
It is obnoxious. I've day dreamed of making a TLD (.awesome or something) that has one specific requirement -- anyone can register a domain as long as you sign an agreement that you will NEVER DISPLAY ADS. Well maybe, a couple other requirements to try to cut down on the copy-paste news cycle. But generally speaking, if you search only .awesome addresses, you know you're getting legit content. That's what I want. That's what I could do in the early days of the internet. The internet has been destroyed by rampant greed and commericalism. I want those early days of hackers (in the sense of open source contributors, not malicious ones), professors and enthusiasts to come back. Do I just not know where to find them online anymore?
I switched to Pale Moon when the tie in to Google came out, I was getting pretty tired of the constant destruction of the user interface in the name of new and improved anyway so I was already looking for alternatives. Firefox used to be a shining light in the wilderness, now, not so much. We'll see how long Pale Moon lasts against the new and improved bunch. Replaced Thunderbird too for similar reasons.
If word gets out that your VPN provider is messing with you, you easily switch to a different VPN provider.
If word gets out that your ISP is messing with you, you easily switch to OH WAIT both ISPs in your area do it.
So you're switching away from a browser that is still Free Software (which provides the ultimate configurability), the basis of variants (GNU IceCat, for example) that make it more convenient to respect your software freedom by only showing you Free addons by default, for a proprietary browser. And then you're getting lost in the weeds by debating the purported merits of one proprietor over another (Google vs. Opera) where you know so little about both such comparisons pale to what you give up by choosing any proprietary software.
I'd rather keep my software freedom, run more Free Software, and enjoy the wide variety of Free Software addons to help me keep browser privacy (NoScript, Priv3+, disabling Javascript-based clipboard manipulations, browser ID spoofing, and so on).
Digital Citizen
> Where do you think the million dollar super-star athlete salaries come from? Advertising.
This is provably not generally true. It depends a lot on the type of sport, but sponsorship money can be just a fraction of a pro athlete's income (whereas the majority could come from pay-per-view or ticket sales), or it can be a substantial part. Take Floyd Mayweather - the extraordinarily high paydays he makes come for the most part from PPV. No, I am not one who would pay to watch pro boxing, especially not Mayweather, but there are tens of millions who do.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
https://www.palemoon.org/
Click the link, and read. Browse the forum. They are very upfront about the fact that they are NOT Firefox, haven't been for some time, and never will be again. I think that fits the definition of "fork".
"Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
I certainly hope that Adblock Plus https://addons.mozilla.org/en-... will control this nonsense. I WILL NOT LOOK AT ADS IN MY BROWSER!
"But it's two-year-old level childish thinking at it's finest to think you can get all the free and subsidized stuff out here in the world without the advertising"
Well how about a subscription or money ? I value my privacy and not getting advertising more than anything else.
C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
visit randi.org
Advertising based on browsing history is the worst kind of advertising. All it is, is advertisements for the same product you already bought when you searched for it 2 weeks ago. Seriously, it's almost like recommendations on youtube. Youtube, I just watched 30 minutes of fail videos but I don't want to watch them again every day of my life, thanks.
But then I actually have to pay attention to the ads, in order to make a note of which companies to boycott!
Plus some of them are major national retailers that are fairly difficult to avoid without major inconvenience. I will not be aware of any alternative retailers, having not seen any ads for them!
https://support.mozilla.org/en...
If you have addons, you need to disable automatic updates also.
Are there not any projects to make a light weight browser? I'll pay for it gladly.
Firefox is out. Bye Bye. Uninstall.
All mozilla sites mapped to 127.0.0.1
So long and thanks for the ride.
I'm ready to get rich off the Firefox foundation the second my underage child gets an ad for an adult only site.
F-Off. Targeted ads are creepy and you're creepy for wanting them.
Mozilla could do more to make sure users are aware of the principled pragmatism that underlies this feature.
I could get behind it a bit more if they can develop it into a mechanism for third party web pages to use to present their advertising. That could provide a valuable and diverse revenue stream for Mozilla while also providing a way for conscientious website owners to earn ad revenue without having to compromise on their users' privacy.
I hope Vivaldi gets to a usable state, but I really doubt it will wind up where I was hoping Opera 13 might of gone. You still can't use (most) extensions, and it looks like their plan for tabs are singular stacks, which are damned near useless once you get used to the freedom and functionality of Tree Style Tabs. Sidewise for Chrome/Opera comes close, but has so many quirks and issues as it has to run in a separate window.
Sounds like it will save a lot of work. Now you don't have to load a website and scroll all the way to the bottom to find out the latest trick to pay off your mortgage and how much a local mom can earn!
Either that or 8 ads from 6 different stores for the TV I just bought, which seems to be a standard for 'targeted' ads :/
How about a switch for sites I might not be interested in? Probably much more interesting, lol.
Bullshit.
It's an open source product. It was not developed for advertisers. It was developed in spite of advertisers (as a fork to oppose the crap that AOL-branded Netscape had become), not for them.
Fuck off, Mozilla. A web browser is not, and never should be, "a platform for advertisers."
(obligatory Star Trek reference)
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
If you believe the privacy and security claims of a large corporation whose sole purpose is to make a profit, then you just haven't been paying attention to the real world. You can also take the "advertising is inevitable" crap and shove it back where it belongs. There is enough connectivity between people these days through social media that advertising as we know it should go away! If something is worth buying then you will find reviews for it somewhere or find out about it through word of mouth. There are plenty of product driven companies that don't do any advertising at all that are doing just fine. Some are more than a century old!
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Like if people needed yet another reason to ditch Firefox for Chrome. Only thing that kept in in Firefox these last 2 years was tab management (which true is much better in Firefox), but all the rest was so far behind Chrome (speed and the current crashes and halts in some pages... Amazon for instance which is widely reported) that I took the plunge and learned to live with without the tab management system.
Mozilla adding ads to tiles sucks but running a company is not free and even if they do add tile ads there's nothing to stop you from replacing that new tab or launch page. FVD and Super Start are both far superior new tab/launch pages.
If you really want to help stop this kind of shit donate to Mozilla instead of complaining about a free product that's not free to maintain.
It's all about transparency folks... and Mozilla is telling everybody exactly what they are doing... Same thing with Google... they post ad nauseum about what they are doing, and people still vibrate in place with outrage. If you don't want to use the product don't. No one is forcing you. The hilarious thing is people go on using Facebook and most of the time FB just does things without telling anyone until after the fact. People gripe about it but the number of FB customers keep growing at a healthy clip. Don't get me started on the shenanigans Microsoft pulls; and as far as yahoo is concerned their mail service is extremely distracting IMO with the way the ads pop up and flash, blink, etc.
To NOT use Firefox.
http://www.acetonestudio.com
time for another fork. ice weasel?
I have a local HTML file with links to all my frequently used websites as my homepage, And an add-on that automatically loads this local HTML file on new tabs. Will that still work?
"WE made the decision to OPT USERS OUT of all sponsored Tiles experiences if they have DNT=1 quite early on, as we believe that most DNT early adopters are seeking to opt out of all advertising experiences. "
They decided to OPT EVERYONE ELSE IN because they believe that everyone else is seeking to OPT IN to the Firefox advertising experience???
So, Mozilla opts us in based on THEIR beliefs and opts us out based on THEIR beliefs instead of just asking us in the first place. Yet they claim this is about respect for our privacy and choice!
Real folks know that "Do Not Track" means "Do not follow me around recording what I do." But Mozilla, as the surveillance marketing industry tried to formally define it, thinks "Do Not Track" means "Track me but don't let me know you're doing it by showing me ads that creep me out."
Tiles are nothing new; I immediately found them annoying and have always turned them off. These new "sponsored" tiles will only appear on the existing tiles page, which can still be turned off:
When you first launch Firefox, a message on the new tab page informs you what tiles are (with a link to a support page about how sponsored tiles work), promises that the feature abides by the Mozilla Privacy Policy, and reminds you that you can simply turn tiles off. If you do turn them off, you’ll get a blank new tab page and will avoid Firefox’s ads completely, including these upcoming suggested tiles.
So, it really doesn't matter.
I like firefox and will miss it. But no. There will be no custom advertising for me.
Once they start messing with you personally, the last fair deal has gone down. When they know you really need x, no one is going to sell it to you for less than double the usual price.
Yes, at that time websites also didn't have images, and about nobody could get to see one.
The images are Netscape fault, but I'd disagree about the ads. Are you blaming them on Netscape because of Javascript? If so, well, Javascript is indeed something Netscape must be ashamed for, but if they didn't do it somebody else would have done something worse (AKA VBScript).
Anyway, the web has ads because there are enough people to see them. Remove the people and the ads will go away, but there's nothing you can change on the software stack that'll get ride of them.
Rethinking email
Can adblock variants & ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (beyond malicious ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you by a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on any webbound app (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory use vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" to each on AdBlock or Ghostery doing all that let alone well!
APK
P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
Can adblock variants or ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (beyond malicious ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you by a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on any webbound app (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory use vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" to each on AdBlock or Ghostery doing all that let alone well!
APK
P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
Can adblock variants or ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (beyond malicious ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you by a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on any webbound app (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory use vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" to each on AdBlock or Ghostery doing all that let alone well!
APK
P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
That's the beauty of Firefox. If you don't like it, FORK it! Or just don't update, but that comes with risks of its own.
Remember Firefox WAS Netscape, and NCSA Mosaic before that. What will it be next, now that its creators have gone over to greed's dark-side, and decided to compromise users by being a source for the thing people hate the most on the internet?
Hate the most? Yep. Here's what denizens of the interwebs hate the most, in order:
1. ADS
This has so many sub-categories that I'll just use this one general catch-all. Includes flashing, seizure-inducing multicolor banners, punch the monkey, and e-mailed SPAM, etc.
2. Adolph Hitler
He'd be higher on the list, but there're a LOT of Neo-Nazis who love him on the net, plus all the people who pretend to hate him but who use his name and memory and to whom, therefore, he's too useful to hate as much as he otherwise could be hated.
This is a function of the nature of the internet. Conversations can go OOOOONNNNN on the internet for far longer than in real life. A corollary of Godwin's law is that if conversations in real life went on as long as they do on the internet, the law would apply to them TOO. If cocktail parties and conversations at them ran for days, weeks, or even months, eventually, SOMEONE would, in any conversation, bring up the Nazi's, or Hitler.
That's right, internet users hate ADVERTISEMENTS more than they hate Adolf Hitler, and now the folks at Mozilla who brought you Firefox are about to shoe-horn ADVERTISEMENTS down your throat at every opportunity.
What NAZI'S!
So yeah, all kidding aside, time to FORK Firefox. Shall we hold a naming contest?
Right out of the gate, I vote for FireFORK
#FORK-ADS!
Can adblock variants or ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (beyond malicious ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you by a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on any webbound app (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory use vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" to each on AdBlock or Ghostery doing all that let alone well!
APK
P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
Can adblock variants or ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (beyond malicious ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you by a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on any webbound app (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory use vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" to each on AdBlock or Ghostery doing all that let alone well!
APK
P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
Can adblock variants or ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (beyond malicious ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you by a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on any webbound app (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory use vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" to each on AdBlock or Ghostery doing all that let alone well!
APK
P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
Can adblock variants or ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (beyond malicious ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you by a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on any webbound app (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory use vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" to each on AdBlock or Ghostery doing all that let alone well!
APK
P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
You've officially pushed me to abandoning you completely this time, Mozilla. Probably a lot of others as well, judging by the comments here...and it's ENTIRELY justified. You've shot yourselves in the feet so many times with respect to Firefox that the company has nothing left below the knees at this point. You had a chance to start fresh and re-invent the browser as a light, functional speed-demon designed to protect user privacy...now it's a bloated mess and you're going to scan browser histories to target ads at end-users?
Good fucking riddance. You've been chasing Google's coat-tails for 5+ years trying to be Chrome and failing miserably, I officially now have no reason not to switch.
Not a fan of chrome. Has opera improved to the point of usability yet?
tia
Can adblock variants or ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (beyond malicious ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you by a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on any webbound app (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory use vs. addons
* ANSWER ="NO" to each on AdBlock or Ghostery doing all that let alone well!
APK
P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
> Ads Based On Browsing History Are Coming To All Firefox Users
Not this one. I've used Firefox forever. But if this can't be disabled easily, they're fucking gone.
Firefox freezes too much for my taste. Bye bye Firefox.
And this is when Mozilla Firefox dies.
Oh fuck off already
You're proving me right since YOU can't validly prove me wrong by validly technically disproving my points on hosts superiority to other "so-called 'solutions'"...
* :)
(... AND, that is TRULY, that...)
APK
P.S.=> "Onwards, & UPWARDS"... apk
I use hosts (vs. "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" etc.) http://news.slashdot.org/comme... + I use Opera's NATIVE "By Site Preferences" to 1st set a GLOBAL policy to NOT use these things on ALL sites by default:
1.) JavaScript
2.) Cookies
3.) IFrames/Frames
4.) Plugins (Only on DEMAND)
5.) Referrer Information
6.) Popup blocking on
7.) DO NOT TRACK set on
Opera beauty is it has ALWAYS had ALL OF THAT built-in natively (no addons necessary w/ their added overheads & resource costs + risks of the items in the list above (especially javascript's slowness & security risk)).
IF I need script for ABSOLUTE FULL FUNCTION on a site?
2nd, I turn on the prefs for THAT SITE ONLY by right-clicks on that page involved & activate ONLY what's needed for full function of that site only!
It "limits surface area" of attacks & for more speed + security & reliability!
I also use custom PAC files (like AdBlock variants really but more 'native' to the browser & WILL do a DNS lookup @ times) + a custom user CSS also!
BOTH shear off things hosts MAY not catch.
I use hosts mostly for blocking KNOWN bad sites or ads etc., but IF I miss a lookup (rare since I use mostly news aggregators like THIS site is)?
Then I use OpenDNS (filtered vs. threats & patched vs. Kaminsky redirect security flaws) for rare sub-4% times I miss a lookup since I put my fav. sites I spend MOST of my time @ on the TOPMOST entries of my custom hosts file, aiding speed & reliability vs. bushwhacked or downed DNS servers (both happen QUITE a lot))
APK
P.S.=> Works for added speed, security, reliability & anonymity online w/ less resources vs. browser addons in slower usermode + more messagepassing overheads inefficiencies doing FAR MORE w/ less - It's GOOD efficient engineering using what you natively have in an OS + a webbrowser... apk
"And the world wondered after the beast saying 'Who is like unto the beast, & who is able to make war with him'?" - Revelations Chapter 13 verse 3-4
It's certain no "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" & its variants, or even DNS servers locally installed fans can after this -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
One thing's also SURE on that note: It's been YOUR "APKOLYPSE" (misspelling & pun DEFINITELY intended after the above + the results here, lol!)...
AND?
I'm actually MORE like "The LORD of Hosts" https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... with rank after rank of protective power I can summon @ a word: Hosts!
PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:
"The image this title brings to mind is of a mighty military commander, one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power" via hosts/custom hosts files use...
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
APK
P.S.=> You have TRULY, massively failed - So, Thank-You (for making ME look GREAT & yourself by way of comparison? LMAO - well... "not so great")
... apk
It is clear from previous Mozilla discussions that their operation has become overrun by middle managers that don't actually do anything except fuck things up. I had my last straw with Firefox this week when it crashed on YouTube several times. It is kind of a relief to see this story; now I can leave and never look back.
Vendors don't WANT to deliver advertising without tracking. Or, perhaps some vendors do, but marketers most assuredly will not allow this to happen. Tracking gives marketers an incredible amount of information, but they use that information not merely to advertise more effectively to you personally (although that is done too). By studying what works on you and what works on everybody else, and what doesn't work, they are able to dial in the broader strokes of general advertising to make it more effective on everybody. Comparisons are not possible if unidentifiable subjects cannot be distinguished between those who are influenced to buy and those who aren't. The people who actively
Oops, forgot I had started another thought and submitted. Anyway, the people who actively suppress advertising are still in the minority.
Simple answer:
discontinued Internet Explorer.
Now users need another software to download a different browser,
and the Mozilla Firefox has heroically taken the place of discontinued IE.
Advertising != tracking.
I am ok with advertising through duckduckgo.com,
they provide search services without tracking me, and manage to be financially sustainable.
Why should browsers be different, and spy on users?
Firefox says they can respect users' privacy while snooping on their browsing history because the suggested webpages will be webpages the user actually wants to see. This is like one's mortgage-holder mandating you let them watch you shower so they can hand you the soap at the right moment, and calling that respect of your privacy.
what a bunch of hypocritical selllouts
i can hardly put into words how much i hate this kind of stuff. How dare they! Who do they think they are to "use" us like this? i'm sure almost everyone agrees...
Fork in 3... 2... 1...
See subject: Using less & doing more using what you already have natively: hosts + Opera to this day's the MOST flexible natively feature-laden browser there is!
NoScript's a browser addon I don't rib-on for inferiority (though it CAN be EASILY DETECTED FOR via native browser methods just as AdBlock & it's variants + Ghostery can denying you entry into a site IF they want to track you/advertise to you - just a fact, ClarityRay does it - IF you're not aware of 'em look 'em up!).
Extra effort's NOT something you're a stranger to - YOU use LINUX & that's a 'bit more effort' vs. Windows.
Nothing's a "magic bullet" by itself (not even hosts)!
Hosts does more for LESS from 1 single file you already have natively built-in to your IP stack itself running not in slower usermode but in faster/higher CPU serviced kernelmode by a highly priveleged & used subsystem!
Reason I don't "do" NoScript is for sites I need scripting on such as online tests, banking, ecommerce etc. (database access + cookie using ones) I set a "By Site" preference in Opera - vs. ALL others globally having all the items I noted turned RIGHT off since they slow you pose threats, & what-have-you.
Works for a LOT less overheads for both security, speed, & reliability (even added anonymity).
Regarding Windows (don't get me wrong - I've used Linux way, Way, WAY back in Slackware 1.02 circa 1994 & all summer long while I was touring Europe in 2010, on a laptop, just to 'see how the other 1/2 lives' - it's ok, but I came back to Windows due to being used to wares I use on it & am way familiar with):
I've been 'security-hardening' Windows since NT 3.51 came out actually (even DOS/Win3.x/9x before-during that timeframe too) -> Search "How to Secure Windows 2000/XP".
(95% or so of the results as topmost/1st page are mine: & they're "layered-security"/"defense-in-depth")
APK
P.S.=> It's NOT GOVERNMENT ITSELF but rather the "BIG MONEY 1%" behind them... apk