Slashdot Mirror


San Francisco Fiber Optic Cable Cutter Strikes Again

HughPickens.com writes: USA Today reports that the FBI is investigating at least 11 physical attacks on high-capacity Internet cables in California's San Francisco Bay Area dating back to at least July 6, 2014, including one early this week. "When it affects multiple companies and cities, it does become disturbing," says Special Agent Greg Wuthrich. "We definitely need the public's assistance." The pattern of attacks raises serious questions about the glaring vulnerability of critical Internet infrastructure, says JJ Thompson. "When it's situations that are scattered all in one geography, that raises the possibility that they are testing out capabilities, response times and impact," says Thompson. "That is a security person's nightmare."

Mark Peterson, a spokesman for Internet provider Wave Broadband, says an unspecified number of Sacramento-area customers were knocked offline by the latest attack. Peterson characterized the Tuesday attack as "coordinated" and said the company was working with Level 3 and Zayo to restore service. It's possible the vandals were dressed as telecommunications workers to avoid arousing suspicion, say FBI officials. Backup systems help cushion consumers from the worst of the attacks, meaning people may notice slower email or videos not playing, but may not have service completely disrupted. But repairs are costly and penalties are not stiff enough to deter would-be vandals. "There are flags and signs indicating to somebody who wants to do damage: This is where it is folks," says Richard Doherty. "It's a terrible social crime that affects thousands and millions of people."

198 comments

  1. I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Call the Cable Guy. He needs a friend anyway.

    1. Re:I know by jerk · · Score: 1

      It's Chip. Chip Douglas.

    2. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, just ignore it. It's only San Francisco, probably the shittiest city in the US.

    3. Re: I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Detroit would like to have a word

  2. Routing around by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At a large scale, the internet was designed to route around individual problems such as this.
    Can't this same principle be applied on a smaller scale?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Routing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure you understand the scale of the fiber being cut.

    2. Re: Routing around by drunk_punk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like routing software picked up the down link and shunted traffic to the backup link. But yeah, this is akin to trying to push a bowling ball through a garden hose... Sorry, couldn't think of a car analogy.

    3. Re: Routing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There should be both logical redundancy (take a different path) and physical redundancy (diversified paths on any one logical link). I've done backbone work for these and other major players.

      Of course, while much is, plenty isnt. Or you'll have documented A/B paths that shouldnt ever share a single point of failure but in reality run side-by-side for miles in places.

      And thanks to that, most never notice the dozens of fiber cuts/maint. activities that can occur on any large network every night.

      I always suspect an inside job on things like this. Sure, sometimes its a crackhead hunting for copper. But too many of these occur a just the perfect point of failure.. or people know which two runs to hit simultaneously.... and there are a lot of overworked, poorly treated and disgruntled employees in this field.

    4. Re:Routing around by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      That costs money, A basic requirement of N+1 redundancy where N is any shared hardware or physical path or capacity. It's pretty trivial to technically to route around this sort of thing it's a significant cost to install diverse routes, buy redundant gear etc etc.

      I just turned up a pair of divergent 10ge metro e links. The vendor terminated both of them on the same CPE gear. So with divergent entrances etc etc etc they literally hopped the fiber from entrance A telco room to entrance B telco room to reuse the CPE switch. Telcos are great at trying to save a buck (the CPE gear is probably a month maybe two MRC) while failing to make things reliable.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    5. Re: Routing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      How about this is like someone cutting a huge chunk out of a multi-lane interstate highway (say 5 lanes each direction) and traffic has to be re-routed using a local 2 lane route.

    6. Re: Routing around by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      more of a road analogy really

    7. Re: Routing around by kesuki · · Score: 2

      this is like a vandal slashing the tires on a city bus and having everyone go by taxi instead.

    8. Re: Routing around by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      Maybe losing a wheel. I'm sure you've seen videos (seems like they're always Russian) of some car driving down the road with one wheel missing. You can route around that kind of damage by balancing cargo to unload the missing wheel. Once you've lost 2 wheels on a 4 wheel car, no amount of routing is going to get you running again.

    9. Re: Routing around by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      That's because insurance in Russia says if you can prove it's not your fault, you don't have to pay anything. So it's in your best interest to have an inexpensive camera recording while you're driving. So yea, lots of interesting videos when your camera is constantly running. Same in the US (at least) where more bicyclists are getting GoPro cameras. Motorcyclists have had such things for years though. I've had a Sony HandyCam on my bike for 8 or 9 years, but mainly when I'm enjoying myself in the mountains so it's not on all the time. I saw one video a few years back where a car merged into a motorcyclist on the freeway and tried to say it was her fault. She had a camera that caught the entire thing and the merger was deemed at fault.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    10. Re: Routing around by bwohlgemuth · · Score: 2

      You mean where the telco designs out a fully redundant system (physically diverse entrances into different COs/POPs with layer 1 protection) and the customer says "whoa, that's expensive...I think I'll just order two circuits from two carrier and not tell anyone that I want those diverse..." It's not funny as this happens "all the damn time..."

      --
      Flamebait .sig for sale, low mileage, one owner only.
      Serious inquiries only.
    11. Re: Routing around by bwohlgemuth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed. Some of these cables are 600+ count fibers or are multiple bundles within the conduit.

      --
      Flamebait .sig for sale, low mileage, one owner only.
      Serious inquiries only.
    12. Re:Routing around by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Can't this same principle be applied on a smaller scale?

      It's not that it's physically impossible. It's that it already cost a lot of money to star-wire it, now you want everything to be looped, or to be in some sort of mesh topology. That means a lot of new trenches, a lot of new fiber, a lot of new repeaters and routers and money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Routing around by Bengie · · Score: 1

      When you have one back up route and both can be cut within hours but take longer than hours to fix, you'll have issues. Redundancy to handle fiber cuts are meant to manage the risk of accidental cuts, not targeted cuts.

    14. Re: Routing around by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Informative

      A ways back a broker got us a diagrammatic fiber map for a region (200x200 miles) so we could review options for siting a data center. With the limited level of detail and some driving around you can quickly detail things out. If you understand how common-trench utilities work, it isn't hard to determine sensitive areas.

      Just saying it doesn't take much inside information if you are willing to open a set of manholes in two locations and cut everything in and out at the same time.

      I am surprised though that more of the manholes aren't alarmed though. It is relatively easy to do, and for meet-me manholes we always had them on each bolt.

    15. Re:Routing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So the Internet was designed with resilience unless someone has a strong pair of garden shears?

      Just goes to show that security is 99.9% people just being nice and not wanting to fuck things up for the rest.

    16. Re: Routing around by I4ko · · Score: 1

      I guess the infrastructure building is actually getting subcontracted to 2 or 3 larger companies in the area. So their splicer guys kick back each other for overtime hours by walking in and cutting their buddies cables. Oligopoly at its best.

    17. Re: Routing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a good thing. I don't think that was what you meant.

    18. Re:Routing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest issue however is not all carriers operate on that logic. The one I am with has what they call an access POP south of the cut that feeds to their main POP north of the cut. It is not until the traffic hits the main pop that they have paid for access to multiple diverse trunks to route around issues. So if the access pop is cut off, all customers that are serviced by it go down. They could easily make the access pop a true pop by simply paying for access to a southbound line but that would kill their profits so they wont do it. So we got a second circuit with a company that does have a true pop south of where all this is happening and had no disruption on it.

    19. Re:Routing around by schnell · · Score: 5, Informative

      So the Internet was designed with resilience unless someone has a strong pair of garden shears?

      The Internet will do just fine. Your personal ability to access it, watch a movie or dial 911 will not.

      The big networks all have many data centers and diverse physical routing paths between them. But most people seemingly fail to realize that your house, your neighborhood - heck, maybe even your county if you're rural - probably does not. There is more than one physical path to get data from a colo facility in San Francisco to one in Seattle (even if it adds a lot of latency). There is probably only one physical way to get data to your house. Yes, even your cable provider and the telco almost certainly share a conduit somewhere near you. Mostly that's because there are simply a limited number of good rights of way to run fiber (frequently railroad tracks, gas pipelines, etc.) in any given area.

      And that's also because it makes doesn't make financial sense to spend the money to ensure that your house has two redundant cables coming out of it that take two separate paths out of your neighborhood to different COs, etc. That's true not just for houses but in many cases for cell towers, Central Offices and other telecom points of presence that make last-mile connections rather than backbone connections. So that's why a fiber cut is so bad - everyone served locally by that fiber will be out of luck, even if the Internet as a whole is not.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    20. Re: Routing around by thrig · · Score: 1

      ... or you buy those two redundant lines and then, some outage later, discover they run through the same Local Exchange Carrier. Good fun!

      My money is on a rogue backhoe for this one.

    21. Re:Routing around by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Can't this same principle be applied on a smaller scale?

      Yes, but are you willing to (roughly) double your internet bill to get that redundancy? If you are like most people, probably not.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    22. Re:Routing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Internet was designed with resilience unless someone has a strong pair of garden shears?

      Or trenches in the wrong place, or leaks BGP routes for half of Amazon, etc. There's a reason for that old joke about if you're lost in the middle of nowhere, just bury a little piece of fiber and a backhoe will show up within the hour. Shit like this happens all the time. It's only making news now because it appears to be deliberate and concentrated.

      The internet infrastructure is more fragile than most people understand, but given ~1hr and a few people flipping some switches, it's also a lot more resilient than most people can imagine. It's not as if the entire Left Coast lost all connectivity during any of these fiber cuts. The internet will absolutely route around damage, it always has, and it did in these cases. Nobody ever claimed that will happen in milliseconds.

    23. Re: Routing around by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      If I have the option I always pick 2 actual providers and stipulate the divergent fiber paths in the contracts.

      Mind you if I have my druthers I'm getting dark fiber so I can run my own C/DWDM over it in a metro setting.

      L1 Protected circuits are nice and all but the CPE box that binds them make it no longer fully redundant. So you still need two of them to let you L2/L3 redundant gear work properly.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    24. Re:Routing around by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't have to design things to prevent this kind of act. We've gone a long time without having idiots perpetrate this level of jackassery. Fiber being installed fairly recently compared to other utilities it just isn't practical to completely protect every inch of every run. We can do our best to protect it from backhoe cuts, but trying to make every inch physically inaccessible to a determined moron is not going to be feasible reality in may areas.

    25. Re:Routing around by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

      At a large scale, the internet was designed to route around individual problems such as this.
      Can't this same principle be applied on a smaller scale?

      Yes, it can. Just dig a whole bunch MORE trenches around the country at enormous cost.

      The SONET fiber networks were designed to be primarily intersecting rings. Most sites have fiber going in opposite directions (with a few having more than two fibers going off in more than two directions so it's not just ONE big, convoluted, ring.) This is built right into the signaling architecture: Bandwitdth slots are pre-assigned in both directions around the ring. Cut ONE fiber run and the signals that would have crossed the break are folded back at the boxes at each end of the break, run around the ring the other way, and get to where they're going after taking the long route. The switching is automatic and takes place in miliseconds. The ring approach means that the expensive cable runs are about a short and as separated as it's possible to make them.

      But cut the ring in TWO places and it partitions into two, unconnected, networks. To get from one to the other you have to hope there's another run between the two pieces, and there's enough switching where they join to reroute the traffic.

      IP WANs have, in some portions, also adopted the ring topology as they move to fiber, rather than sticking to the historic "network of intersecting trees" approach everywhere. That's partly because much of the long haul is done on formerly "dark fiber" laid down in bundles with the SONET rings from the great fiber buildout (or is carried in assigned bandwidth slots on the SONET networks themselves), partly because the same economics of achieving redundancy while minimizing costly digging apply to high-bandwidth networking regardless of the format of the traffic, and partly because routers that KNOW they're on a ring can reroute everything quickly when a fiber run fails, rather than rediscovering what's still alive and recomputing all the routing tables.

      = = = = =

      Personal note: Back when Pacific Bell was stringing its fibers around the San Francisco Bay Area, I was living in Palo Alto. They did their backbone as two rings. There was only one section, perhaps a mile long, where BOTH rings ran along the same route. It happened to go right past my house, with the big, many-manhole repeater vault right next to the house. (I used to daydream of running my own fiber the few feet into the vault. B-) The best I had available, in those pre-DSL days, were dialup with Telebit PEP modems (18-23 k half-duplex) and base-rate (128k) ISDN.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    26. Re:Routing around by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It has resiliance across the network. Outages in Sacramento has not distrupted the internet outside of Sacramento, Chile is still connected to Iceland. There was never a concept that every user would have multiple redundant connections.

    27. Re:Routing around by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      This all depends on the physical architecture used for the said circuit. I don't know how frequently SONET is used these days on HiCap and Tier-1 circuits, but if your network is designed using what is known in the industry as UPSR (Unidirectional Path Switched Ring), there is a redundant path on another circuit that can handle the traffic around the disabled / failed segments of a SONET ring. If the fibers were located (physically) close to each other (which is not a good, secure practice), then this would be a huge problem, and the segments within the failed portion of the ring would be "in-wrap" so segments at either end of the failed sections would still have signal, and therefore, service. Multiple fiber cuts, as were reported, might have been done to intentionally disable this in-built service protection of UPSR. If there were 3 cuts, as reported, this would had to have been a coordinated & direct attack on the carrier's infrastructure.

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    28. Re:Routing around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what these folks in CA are complaining about. The internet here in TX works just fine!

    29. Re:Routing around by doccus · · Score: 1

      I don't see anyone asking the obvious question.. Why? Now "vandals" might knock over a mailbox or cut the cable from the telephone pole to the house, but to use special cutting tools, dressing up as workers and using spy vs spy tactics isn't vandals anymore. SOMEBODY is pissed at these companies for going fiberoptic.. Maybe a suddenly out of work standard cable installer?

    30. Re:Routing around by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't have to design things to prevent this kind of act.

      That's debatable. But in the real world you do have to design against the random mis-placed back-hoe bucket, a truck going off the road and hitting a relay cabinet, a sperm whale attempting to mate with your undersea cable and good old lightning strikes. Which are sufficiently random that protecting around - or designing around - random damage is still pretty much necessary.

      I suspect that there has been insufficient paranoia in the people choosing the topology and physical layout of the cables. Putting all of your 100% redundancy in the same cable bundle doesn't give you redundancy against gross damage to that bundle, whereas running 50% of your capacity in a bundle down Main Street and 50% in a bundle going down Cross Boulevard provides service level protection up to events that take out both Main Street and Cross Boulevard. But that does increase your cabling installation, maintenance and repair costs appreciably, so I understand why PHBs do the Wrong Thing, even if their Dilberts tell them what the Right Thing is.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. False Flag by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't trust the feds one bit. Especially when they say "The pattern of attacks raises serious questions about the glaring vulnerability of critical Internet infrastructure". In other words they want more funding and more control over backbones. These saboteurs will never be caught.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:False Flag by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why don't we have a -1 crackpot mod.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not unfounded, read about Room 641A.

    3. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why don't we have a -1 crackpot mod.

      Because lately, yesterday's crackpot seems to be today's Snowden leak.

    4. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why don't we have a -1 crackpot mod.

      Because it's getting harder and harder to tell reality and crackpot theories apart.

    5. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First, Room 641A was a spying center so nothing to do with a false flag operation cutting cables.

      Secondly, just because a paranoid fantasy is not completely unfounded doesn't make it actually justified.

      Yes, it might be a false flag operation (p = 0.001). But if you say, "look here, this was clearly a false flag operation" you're a crackpot.

    6. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      saboteurs aka Reichstag fire setters

    7. Re:False Flag by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Honestly, things which 10 years ago would have been the domain of crackpots is now 100% fact.

      These days it seems like no matter how paranoid you are, what is really happening is even crazier.

      When law enforcement commits perjury in the form of parallel construction, when they withhold knowledge of their surveillance technology, when they lie about what they're doing without a warrant, when they lie about how many times a technology has led to an arrest .. honestly, it's hard to not assume shady dealings by a three letter agency.

      You can't make up stuff anymore which is as crazy as reality.

      And given that these guys have cut into everybody else's telecomms ... why wouldn't they be doing it here?

      It really is hard to dismiss "crackpot" these days, because the reality is shit like that is actually happening.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:False Flag by gtall · · Score: 2

      Damn, you caught them. It's a government conspiracy to...to...what was that again your imagination thought up?

    9. Re: False Flag by bwohlgemuth · · Score: 1

      Nope. Anyone with a shovel and a knowledge of these systems can cause all sorts of havoc. Cut the right fibers in the right places and you can make life miserable for a number of carriers. Especially for those running "slightly oversubscribed" IP networks.

      --
      Flamebait .sig for sale, low mileage, one owner only.
      Serious inquiries only.
    10. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we have a -1 crackpot mod.

      Because that would alienate all the crackpots that post at Slashdot. Have you seen how paranoid Slashdot's current user-base is?

    11. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To oppress video gamers!! Haha! *Hipster fists*

    12. Re:False Flag by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      "Honestly, things which 10 years ago would have been the domain of crackpots is now 100% fact."
      No. I keep hearing this but you guys must have lived on another planet. The fact that all governments sucked up just about all international communications dates back to the invention of the telegraph and maybe back to the mail.
      Any idea that they were not monitoring all clear text transmissions over the internet frankly I find just dumb. As far as meta data that was always up for grabs.
      False flag operations? That is in the realm of tin foil hats and crackpots. Frankly the rest of it is just common knowledge to anyone with a brain.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a government conspiracy to distract the cable guys (and local law enforcement) while some three-letter-agency (presumably not the FBI) or Chinese agent installs taps somewhere else on that same cable.

      Seriously, if you know that installing a tap is going to disrupt traffic, what better cover than to have an obvious cut apparantly made by some random vandal somewhere else on the same fiber? You fix your own tap and by the time the vandal cut is fixed, nobody is the wiser.

    14. Re:False Flag by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I have no idea if it was the government or not.

      I'm just no longer willing to dismiss out of hand that it was, and no longer wiling to accept the dismissal of the government being involved as crackpot.

      As I said, stuff which used to be tinfoil-hat-crazy is now pretty much a daily reality.

      Do I think they're beyond sowing some fear to be allowed to declare it under their control? Not even a little.

      In fact, given everything else we know has actually happened, it's disturbingly plausible.

      You simply can't be paranoid enough these days, because reality keeps trumping fantasy. And what used to sounds ridiculous is now pretty much established as fact.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    15. Re:False Flag by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      that sounds like...MOLE TALK! *blam* *blam!*

    16. Re:False Flag by Coren22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is this technology called OTDR:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      It allows you to tell down to the inch where a cable was cut. Common practice is to use it from both ends to make sure there are not multiple cuts. If you think someone could hide a splicing activity, you are deluding yourself.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:False Flag by swb · · Score: 1

      It's really not hard to think of increased Fed control over fiber being a cover for NSA tapping activity. If the FBI is monitoring your fiber and something goes down, it's easy to say "we're on the job, nothing got cut, you must have an error in your network".

      It used to be such ideas were tinfoil hat, but post-Snowden nothing seems tinfoil hat anymore.

    18. Re:False Flag by I4ko · · Score: 1

      I guess you are going to say that Obama will become a lifetime president by declaring a martial law and suspending the constitution and elections. At least that is what a rabbi told my last weekend is going to happen.

    19. Re: False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guessed wrong.

      Moron.

    20. Re:False Flag by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Well, should that happen, then all the people who have been demanding their 2nd amendment rights be recognized will know what to do.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    21. Re:False Flag by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      All moderations, positive or negative, are essentiallly crackpot mod points.

    22. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so you're suggesting the government isn't in the slightest interested in having more funding and/or control over the backbones?

      Contradicting the summary, a security person's *nightmare* is that their position is considered irrelevant and therefore cuttable. A security person's wet dream is the ability to suggest the terrorists are about to strike and therefore MORE FUNDING NOW! So which category does this fall into again?

    23. Re:False Flag by sjames · · Score: 1

      That just means you must make more than one cut to isolate the segment you're working on, or you have to get your splice in while the trucks are on the way to the decoy cut.

    24. Re:False Flag by caseih · · Score: 1

      I remember when people said that about GW Bush. Kind of funny. Guess that goes to show there's no real difference between the two teams and the fans that support them.

    25. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Those of us that believed it was "common knowledge" were dismissed as paranoid, and told to get some proof.

      Why are you so convinced false flag ops don't happen? Because it doesn't jibe with your sense of governmental ideals?

    26. Re:False Flag by cynicist · · Score: 1

      To scare people into thinking that the FBI is necessary for stability? It's not that weird. After all, we have evidence that this very same department encouraged unstable individuals to carry out terror plots so that they could stop them, presumably to confirm that terrorism is a persistent threat in the US and thereby justify their own jobs.

      I'm not saying that's the case here, just that I wouldn't be surprised if it's discovered that undercover FBI agents are helping root out these "domestic terrorists" who are "threatening critical national infrastructure"....

    27. Re:False Flag by BurgEnder · · Score: 1

      Not really to within an inch - even if the cut is in the same building as the point of test. In reality to within about 5 to 20 meters - assuming correct use of launch reels and higher-end test equipment (Exfo, JDSU).

    28. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you are going to say that Obama will become a lifetime president by declaring a martial law and suspending the constitution and elections. At least that is what a rabbi told my last weekend is going to happen.

      Ask him if he'd bet his life on it, with a "letter of the law" style vigilante murderer in the room to witness it.

      It's like the people who thought the world would end 12/12/12 or whatever. Offer to buy their house the day before for bottle of gin and have a notary and escrow guy standing by. You'll find they believe in that crap a lot less when they have to put up or shut up.

    29. Re:False Flag by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      Actually, the username of the poster you were responding to fits their post perfectly - at least, that's how *I* remembered Archie Bunker.

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    30. Re:False Flag by Agripa · · Score: 1

      False flag operations? That is in the realm of tin foil hats and crackpots. Frankly the rest of it is just common knowledge to anyone with a brain.

      Documents eventually released by the DOJ show that they BATFE was doing this in their operation Fast and Furious; one of their justifications for selling guns to Mexican criminals was to justify further gun control laws and expanded power for law enforcement. The FBI does the same thing by encouraging people who otherwise would not to commit "terrorist crimes"; in this case the FBI or their informants are doing most or all of the work.

    31. Re:False Flag by metaforest · · Score: 1

      The splice would be visible once the decoy cuts were patched. If the fiber crew is doing their job, they will see a new blip of attenuation and reelection loss right where your tap-splice is. It is good practice to maintain records of OTDR for every fiber run so that changes in the run can be spotted. Now, maintaining these records and actually looking at them when something weird happens to the network, is a different issue. Detecting a tap is trivial for someone who knows what they are doing.

    32. Re:False Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we have a -1 crackpot mod.

      What we really need is a -5 fascist right wing douche bag cocksucker mod,
      to prevent your retarded spew from being seen.

    33. Re:False Flag by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Wow that makes you sound like a reasonable person and not a crack pot at all. Your eloquent and logical arguments have convinced me.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. a terrible social crime... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    junkies might similarly claim that taking away their heroin is a dangerous social crime.

    1. Re:a terrible social crime... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      junkies might similarly claim that taking away their heroin is a dangerous social crime.

      And they'd be as guilty as you are at making that lame comparison. Yes, yes, we all know that there are some users out there for whom various content available via the Internet is like a drug, but to lump all Internet traffic into that category is beyond stupid.

  5. Terrible. by plover · · Score: 1

    "A terrible social crime". Sounds like he's mad because his wife couldn't read Facebook.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When an act of vandalism affects many thousands of people, it's pretty fucking serious. Many people and businesses have their telephone service over the fibre, others need net access for work. So get back under your bridge with all the other sanctimonious hipster twats, and do one.

    2. Re:Terrible. by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "When an act of vandalism affects many thousands of people, it's pretty fucking serious."

      It depends on how those many thousands are impacted. When biggest impact is not being able to download kitty videos at full speed, no, it is not "terrible". "Annoying" comes to mind, but not "terrible".

      "Many people and businesses have their telephone service over the fibre"

      Even if we accord at calling this "severe", severily impacting business is, well, "severe" at most, still not "terrible".

      Adjective inflation lets you without terms for really big things. If "people may notice slower email or videos not playing, but may not have service completely disrupted" is "a terrible crime" what does this leave to, say, 09/11attacks? "a terrible crime indeed, I really mean it"?

    3. Re:Terrible. by thedonger · · Score: 1

      "A terrible social crime". Sounds like he's mad because his wife couldn't read Facebook.

      Or he can't keep a boner when his redtube videos frequently pause for buffering.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    4. Re:Terrible. by WSOGMM · · Score: 2

      "A terrible social crime". Sounds like he's mad because his wife couldn't read Facebook.

      I experienced the outage all the way in the placer county area. My internet, phone and cable were affected since they all are run through wave broadband. Yes, having no internet for a day sucked, but it got me thinking. Those vandals cut a single line, and I effectively lost 3/4 of my modes of communication.

      I had my cell phone, so I was able to call and text. If a coordinated group of terrorists or a nation wanted to attack US soil, it wouldn't be that hard to cut out the people's communication. Our communication infrastructure might be more vulnerable than you think.

    5. Re:Terrible. by Twinbee · · Score: 0

      The 'minor annoyance' multiplied by millions of people makes this more serious than bank robbery, and even more serious than murder if you're forced to put a price on a life.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    6. Re:Terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on WHICH of the thousands matter (ie are rich, influential, or corporate entities).

    7. Re:Terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9/11 was neoconservative zionist treason...

    8. Re:Terrible. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Come on now, we all know which thousands matter.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:Terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adjective inflation also makes it easier to start crying for huge penalties for crimes that aren't all that terrible. I'm sure that was one of the content cartel's ploys when convincing the congress critters that downloading music should be a federal offense punishable by huge fines and jail time.

      captcha: deadness

    10. Re:Terrible. by sribe · · Score: 1

      Even if we accord at calling this "severe", severily impacting business is, well, "severe" at most, still not "terrible".

      You do realize that hospitals, just for one example, are businesses?

    11. Re:Terrible. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "You do realize that hospitals, just for one example, are businesses?"

      If emergency systems have nothing more secure than a single fiber system shared with everybody else, I'm inclined to share the blame with them, not only the vandals.

    12. Re:Terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'minor annoyance' multiplied by millions of people makes this more serious than bank robbery, and even more serious than murder if you're forced to put a price on a life.

      If I steal a penny from a billion people, it is, in absolute terms, the same as stealing $10million from one person. That's a pretty serious crime in most places.

      60*60*24*365*75 (assume a 75 year lifespan) ~2.4 billion seconds in a human lifetime. Cut it to a bit less than half for a nice even billion second value - half the people are older and have less to lose, etc. So the average length of a life remaining is a billion seconds, assuming modern civilized countries and medical care.

      So, in statistical terms, if you waste one single second of a billion people, that's the equivalent of a random murder. Making a million people wait 1,000 seconds, ~a quarter hour, that's the same as a murder. So if ten million people are inconvenienced by even two minutes, that's worse than simple murder.

      Fun Fact, the TSA requirements waste an extra hour of every flyer's life on every trip. Gotta show up early! There are almost a billion flyers in the USA alone, per year.

      Statistically, the TSA takes more lives each year than died on 9/11.

  6. Penalties aren't stiff enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because the problem here isn't that fiber runs and hubs across the nation are virtually without security and basic protections to save the telecoms costs (a padlock never stopped anyone) ...it's that we aren't giving out enough felony charges when we catch vandals.

    The fiber providers and tier 1 companies dont care, thats why its so easy to have these disruptions. As long as they can point the finger at someone else for outages, theyre happy to run their infrastructure as cheap and naked as humanly possible.

    1. Re:Penalties aren't stiff enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But .. but .. the internetz should be free! Why do I pay so much to the monopolie$? Let's just have Google string fiber everywhere and solve all out problems! They will have 24 hour armed drones posted every 500' and I'll pay less too!

  7. How did Rockefeller protect his pipe lines? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Rockefeller built up Standard Oil in the era of unfettered capitalism. It was a no holds barred fight. He had secret agreements with railroad companies to undercut his competition in transportation costs. As his oil competitors went bankrupt he picked their properties on the cheap. Then he bypassed the railroad companies by building his own pipelines to transport oil. He had enemies in the oil business, railroad business and his workers. His enemies hounded him for decades and eventually that billionaire was reduced to fleeing in a rickety car dodging federal subpoena. But they did not sabotage his pipelines.

    You could understand the railroad companies not sabotaging pipelines because the railroads too have long equally vulnerable railroads and they did not want to trigger retaliatory sabotage from Rockefeller. But his disgruntled bankrupt oil competitors, the labor they would not be above sabotage. It was really war. Carnegie hired the Pinkertons to kill agitating workers. His henchman was shot, and survived, by one of the workers. Corrupt sheriffs would break up labor organizers and the anger and hatred was mutual and ran very deep.

    Still, mile after mile of tin pipes traversing and crisscrossing Ohio, Western PA and later Indiana were left unmolested. How was that defended? How could one defend the fiber optic lines?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:How did Rockefeller protect his pipe lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big, big difference between an oil pipeline and an internet backbone. First, it's entirely possible to configure a network so that a cut fiber optic cable is automatically routed around. People would never even notice the switchover. Second, a cut fiber optic cable doesn't leak leak valuable and toxic product all over the ground or take weeks to repair.

      Anyway, this is small potatoes. If they really want to cause disruption they should figure out how to bring down power lines.

    2. Re: How did Rockefeller protect his pipe lines? by bwohlgemuth · · Score: 1

      Most power is redundant and the big places have backup power these days. Twenty years ago you could theoretically go without power for a day or two (POTS lines at least gave you a lifeline).

      --
      Flamebait .sig for sale, low mileage, one owner only.
      Serious inquiries only.
    3. Re:How did Rockefeller protect his pipe lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big, big difference between an oil pipeline and an internet backbone.

      When that internet backbone cable/fiber is running INSIDE of an empty oil pipeline, no there is exactly NO difference between an oil pipeline protecting oil and an oil pipeline protecting cabling.

      Both are oil pipelines protecting whatever is inside of them. Or as the rest of us say, the same thing.

      First, it's entirely possible to configure a network so that a cut fiber optic cable is automatically routed around. People would never even notice the switchover.

      How is a second equally vulnerable cable any more secure than the original vulnerable cable?
      And if you protect the second cable, why do you say cable #3 or above can't be protected the same way? Why couldn't you then decommission the original first unprotected cable after you have 2 or 3 more cables providing redundancy?

      Second, a cut fiber optic cable doesn't leak leak valuable and toxic product all over the ground or take weeks to repair.

      How would you know that however? Most everyone looking at an oil pipeline is going to simply assume that pipe contains OIL. Under what basis do you think someone not-in-the-know would assume that pipeline contains anything BUT oil, like the fiber optic cable we are talking about protecting?

      Hell, it is also equally possible (although pretty stupid for maintenance reasons) to have an optical cable in the pipeline and THEN start pumping oil through the pipe.
      In that case, absolutely YES breaking into the pipeline to get at the fiber would most definitely result in valuable and toxic oil product leaking all over the place taking weeks to repair.

    4. Re:How did Rockefeller protect his pipe lines? by NatasRevol · · Score: 0

      Still, mile after mile of tin pipes traversing and crisscrossing Ohio, Western PA and later Indiana were left unmolested. How was that defended? How could one defend the fiber optic lines?

      Some answers in your rant would be good.

      Otherwise, the answer is he had enemies who weren't that brutal. End of story.

      Times have changed.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re: How did Rockefeller protect his pipe lines? by afidel · · Score: 1

      I never understood why the FCC didn't require cellular providers to provide the same level of backup power to cell sites as we had with the traditional POTS system. Even if you wanted to argue that it was originally a marginal value added service it became quite evident before we expanded beyond the A&B provider AMPS system that cellular was likely to displace wireline as the predominant terminal method in the future. I know there would have been some limitations to site placement in urban areas if they required a large battery room and a generator hookup but it would have provided us with a much more robust system. Perhaps they should require it for the fixed wireless installs that the telcos want to use to replace POTS.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:How did Rockefeller protect his pipe lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing unionists didn't learn anything from the Pinkertons or they'd be busy flipping cars and setting them alight by now.

    7. Re: How did Rockefeller protect his pipe lines? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I never understood why the FCC didn't require cellular providers to provide the same level of backup power to cell sites as we had with the traditional POTS system. ... Perhaps they should require it for the fixed wireless installs that the telcos want to use to replace POTS.

      The FCC does not even require backup power for landline telephone service provided over cable or DSL infrastructure which replaces POTS.

  8. Motivation difficult to determine by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    While cutting cable to disable infrastructure could aid destabilization efforts in a thousand ways,

    the FBI might also be investigating thieves seeking copper.

    Go figure.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Motivation difficult to determine by thedonger · · Score: 2

      While cutting cable to disable infrastructure could aid destabilization efforts in a thousand ways,

      the FBI might also be investigating thieves seeking copper.

      Go figure.

      Or fiber optic Christmas tree enthusiasts seeking fiber.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:Motivation difficult to determine by I4ko · · Score: 1

      Thieves seeking copper usually arrive with a truck with a big winch and a bug cable drum. This is parked at one manhole where one of the cuts is going to happen, and the other cut happens between 1.5 and 3 miles down. The winch is used to pull the cable from underground and the drum quickly rolls it up. You can hide that in a refrigeration truck. That's how it happens in Eastern Europe at least. Point is, those are somewhat easy to spot.

    3. Re: Motivation difficult to determine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try looking at stock manipulation. this technique has been used before to large crippled businesses and short the stock.

    4. Re: Motivation difficult to determine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like stock manipulation rather than copper thieves.

  9. Nightmare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When it's situations that are scattered all in one geography, that raises the possibility that they are testing out capabilities, response times and impact," says Thompson. "That is a security person's nightmare."

    I call BS. This sort of thing is a security person's bread and butter. Why must they make everything sound like a catastrophe that leaves all the experts befuddled? Oh right... To promote laws that further eliminate the concept of privacy and freedom in exchange for the feeling of additional security...

  10. Someone doesn't like being left of the new economy by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Best guess on who it is ?
    Somebody that lost their job in IT because they were too old, didn't fit the diversity quota, or just had a SOB for a boss
    Someone who is sick of trying to pay rent in SF ?
    Criminal extortion scheme we haven't heard the details of yet ?

  11. Why? by valnar · · Score: 0

    This one I don't get. Other than maybe militant Amish people, who wants to kill the Internet in their own city? Wouldn't that just be hurting yourself?

    1. Re:Why? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      Terrorists. Because killing people is too high profile.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    2. Re:Why? by thedonger · · Score: 1

      Terrorists. Because killing people is too high profile.

      It's the gays! God warned us of this! Repent or we will all lose the ability to spread his word via the internet and we'll be vanquished back to soap boxes on street corners!

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
  12. Fake signs by aurizon · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need to immediately install 10,000 fake buried cable signs at scattered locations, and remove the real ones...

    1. Re:Fake signs by gtall · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It worked for Kansas, the band. As related by the band, when they were starting out they were to open for Aerosmith once. Steven Tyler had gotten a reputation for pulling the power cables to the amps if the opening band was doing too well, it might make Aerosmith look bad when they came on afterward. Kansas' stage manager had been informed of Tyler's antics, so he rigged up the amps to take power from the other side of the stage using hidden cables and put in fake cables to where all could see.

      So Kansas goes on and kills, Kansas was very hot, tight band. During the set, Tyler is pacing the sideline backstage getting more and more incensed. Kansas does one encore, Tyler is livid. They do a second encore and Tyler loses his brain cell and rips out the fake cables, which only pissed him off more since that didn't stop Kansas. After that song, Dave Hope, Kansas' bass player, threw down his bass and went to over to explain to Tyler using very colorful language what he was doing wrong. Dave Hope was a big guy back then so it was very impressive. Afterwards, other members of Aerosmith apologized to Kansas for Tyler's behavior.

    2. Re:Fake signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, good story. They could also remove the buried fiber signs they have(which looks like bragging anyway), that attract the saboteurs - it seems?

    3. Re:Fake signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Right next to land mines with a trigger mechanism that looks suspiciously like a section of fiber cabling.

      *snip* *BOOM*

      Sorted.

    4. Re:Fake signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "remove the buried fiber signs"

      Great idea, then when everyone else with a good reason to be digging (road crews, farmers, other utilities, etc) start hitting cables left and right it'll be fine? Perhaps just marking cables with generic warnings like "underground utility" instead of what specific utility it is might be acceptable but no marker at all would be foolish. Most areas do have specific agencies/departments that are supposed to be notified when legitimate underground work will be done so they can either mark or inform the utilities themselves to mark the appropriate lines, but it is disturbing how incomplete/inaccurate some of the records/understanding of the locations of these lines are.

    5. Re:Fake signs by aurizon · · Score: 1

      Hey, this is century 21. Gps lists. Digging utilities must provide information on where they dig to anyone who owns burried water, electricity, gas etc.

      What do they do now for all these utilities?

      I suspect the fiber signs were a form or bragging PR

    6. Re:Fake signs by aurizon · · Score: 1

      yes, the flames should roast them out

  13. This is why by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

    the death penalty is still needed. These acts aren't being done by some random, clueless junkie trying to sell copper to get their fix. The number and location shows someone, or someones, are deliberately cutting the fiber whether because they're t'rrists (unlikely), general vandals (possible) or some neo-luddite who thinks it's fun to screw around (possible).

    As the article relates, the penalties aren't severe enough. Well guess what is. . .

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re: This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The death penalty already doesn't work as a deterrent for crimes very likely to be caught with loads of evidence elements like murder. What makes you think that it would work for one far harder to catch?

    2. Re:This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could also be Russia or China doing it to fuck with the US because they're both kind of upset lately.

    3. Re:This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, jacknard.

    4. Re:This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think the appropriate action is to literally kill them? wtf is wrong with you?!

    5. Re: This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does cut down on repeat offenders though

    6. Re: This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mainly because it takes too long and most offenders never are executed. Bring out the firing squad on the day after the appeal is lost.

    7. Re: This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's badly implemented. Needs to be more widely used and swifter.

    8. Re:This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'murricah. That's what's wrong with him.

  14. Dat Explanation by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is possible they are dressed up as Telco workers, but given their knowledge of the fiber lines, they couldn't possibly BE Telco workers...

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  15. Which Is It? by pubwvj · · Score: 4, Funny

    "thousands and millions of people."

    Make up your mind.
    Which is it.
    Thousands or Millions?
    Why not throw Hundreds and Billions into that sentence.
    Might as well exaggerate all the way and confuse.

    1. Re:Which Is It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. Such an inflated sense of self-importance

      "It's a terrible social crime that affects thousands and millions of people."

      You know he wanted to use the T-word so badly here.

    2. Re:Which Is It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "thousands and millions of people."

      That's t thosand + m million people. It's all very exact. There could be some people converting epidemic at large in Bay area, perhaps an import from Germany.

    3. Re:Which Is It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget ones

  16. Slow internet? by Wowsers · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe it's the MPAA and RIAA latest attempt to stop people sharing copywritten material on the internet? Didn't they say they want to cut pirates off?

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  17. Not enough punishment by MikeRT · · Score: 0, Troll

    But repairs are costly and penalties are not stiff enough to deter would-be vandals.

    If the courts hadn't moved to declare hard labor "cruel and unusual" then it would be non issue. About six months of hard labor would be scarier to most low level offenders than five years in prison. Heck, in the South we could really amp it up just making them do chain gang duty with no bug repellant in the middle of the summer.

    1. Re: Not enough punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The south really misses their slaves, don't they?

    2. Re:Not enough punishment by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Heck, in the South we could really amp it up just making them do chain gang duty with no bug repellant in the middle of the summer.

      Hell, in the South, you could let them have the bug repellent. A chain gang in mid-summer is enough punishment for any crime.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:Not enough punishment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If the courts hadn't moved to declare hard labor "cruel and unusual" then it would be non issue.

      You are either for or against slavery.

      Heck, in the South we could really amp it up just making them do chain gang duty with no bug repellant in the middle of the summer.

      The South, eh? I guess we know which now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re: Not enough punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure. They're (still) trying to kill them all off.

    5. Re: Not enough punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and they're really gonna be pissed when they find out the flag is gone.

    6. Re:Not enough punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely not. I'd take six months of labor any day over the threat of rape, assault, and solitary confinement.

  18. Vandals? Yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a problem with calling this kind of coordinated events vandalism. I doubt highly that vandals would dress up like communication employee's and proceed to cut fiber optic cables and know how and where to do this. Besides this kind of act would be more sinister then monetary gain. Because this is a ongoing issue in multiple areas I would say you have a series of practice runs for a bigger attack of our internet system. Or you have a sophisticated group bent on causing major problems because they have a serious grudge about the internet. In either case this is way more then vandalism.

    1. Re:Vandals? Yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember, Fort Hood is "workplace violence," but a kid making a gun sign with his thumb and index finger at school is "making terroristic threats."

      Our government's priority is the criminalization of everyone and capitulation to the Caliphate.

  19. Similar crimes in Humboldt. by wezelboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A couple years ago, there were a series of fiber cuts in Humboldt County (300 mi. north of SF). They only targeted fiber owned by Suddenlink. The authorities suspected a telecom professional. A reward was offered, but they never caught the person. The cuts stopped after a couple months.

  20. Or it could be... by Fellon · · Score: 2

    When our local fiber run was cut through here, it ended up being ignorant copper thieves.

    --
    I did it all for the penguins!
  21. Probably a lone individual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who feels he has been wronged. This is how he gets back at the man. In a country with a degrading culture and society like the United States, and with an increase of government violating civilians, this sort of thing will become more and more common.

  22. Someone without Internet by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    As someone who has a fiber line running in front of their house (literally, there's a "Do Not Dig Here, Fiber" post at the bottom of my driveway), but has access to only DSL, I can't say it isn't tempting.

    1. Re:Someone without Internet by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That fiber could very well feed your local DSLAM, providing you your DSL...

    2. Re:Someone without Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1200v underground power and gas lines protecting my fiber. Try to dig, I dare you. Rule of thumb, never dig in the city.

    3. Re:Someone without Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And you haven't done an impromptu fiber switch install in your front yard yet? WTF. Get crackin'.

    4. Re:Someone without Internet by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      Only one way to find out (just kidding).

    5. Re:Someone without Internet by c · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain; I have fiber running down the edge of my property, and the best Internet I can get is fixed wireless.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    6. Re:Someone without Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chances are there is no signal on the fiber. At least here, most of them are dark. Companies needed to install these to get government subsidies, but it is not required to hook them up or otherwise use the fiber, you just have to put it there (some minimum distance) and be in the business of internet/telecom distribution.

  23. Mafia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay me $100,000 in cash or your cables will get cut on random occassions...

  24. "Slower email" by Lumpio- · · Score: 1

    Yes, that would be the primary indicator of trouble. *sigh*

  25. Fuck the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The FBI and NSA would know exactly who these people were, were they not spending all of their efforts keeping track of what I had for breakfast every morning and how many times I go to the ATM for cash.

    Fuck them.

  26. FIOS 100 Yards from my house Cant Get It by ZippyTheChicken · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in what might be considered a rural area by some but I am 5 miles from my state capitol. There are underground fiber lines going down the main highway and fiber up my road to about 100 yards from me.. I actually walked down and watched them snake it under a road with a pneumatic torpedo.. cant get it.. the guys who install cable are Russian Illegals hired by a third party contractor for Verizon .. I talked with them for a while .. If our country ever gets attacked a few well placed people in these third party contractor companies that don't get checked will be able to take out our whole country in hours. They will know every weak point.

  27. Re:Someone doesn't like being left of the new econ by gtall · · Score: 1

    You left out Aliens. Cue the Greek guy with the Electric Hair.

  28. Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not surprised by this. People are extremely angry at Government forcing things down people's throats, and at corporations for doing the same. Level 3 is one of the biggest offenders of internet throttling, so I have to wonder if the people behind the damage were pissed at Level 3.

    Ever wonder why your internet is so slow? Run a tracert and see how many of the hops take you through level 3 or a bunch of other networks. There is not enough competition on broadband providers, and they simply reroute traffic over somebody elses network in order to slow it down becuase it only goes as fast as the slowest link.

    On top of it all is vast amounts of censorship that is not supposed to exist in a free country. I'm glad the people behind it have not resorted to violence, but to you providers out there, you need to take a hard look at what YOU are doing to piss people off, because it's likely to expand. Although, they should be a little more inventive than just cutting some cables.

  29. Re: Someone doesn't like being left of the new eco by bwohlgemuth · · Score: 1

    Most likely a disgruntled field tech or contractor who likes making people miserable or a field crew who wants to make significant overtime.

    --
    Flamebait .sig for sale, low mileage, one owner only.
    Serious inquiries only.
  30. It is the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NSA needs a few hours of downtime to install their NARUS deep packet inspection gear

  31. Re: Someone doesn't like being left of the new eco by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Yep could easily see that.

  32. OK by koan · · Score: 2

    penalties are not stiff enough to deter would-be vandals.

    Yeah cutting cables is a bad thing, but these days I get nervous when I see that sort of talk because it's never as simple as increasing penalties for vandals, something else always gets added.

    "There are flags and signs indicating to somebody who wants to do damage: This is where it is folks," says Richard Doherty. "It's a terrible social crime that affects thousands and millions of people."

    I mean who talks like this? It sounds like someone that didn't rehearse their script enough.
    thousands and millions of people indeed.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  33. Again proof who they work for by houghi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am talking about the FBI : "When it affects multiple companies and cities, it does become disturbing,"

    What I read is "When it happens to citizens, we don't care."

    So apperently they cut of the wrong company or the wrong CEO and now they are disturbed. Before that? Meh.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Again proof who they work for by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Or alternatively, "Why don't you share your customer records and data with us. You have statutory immunity. It would be a shame if all of these fiber cuts which are affecting your operations and costing you money were not fully investigated."

  34. I know ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... where the fiber is going.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. NC Fiber Cut Last Week by jarich · · Score: 1

    There was a large Time Warner outage a week or two back... it was blamed on a fiber cut in DC (that fed this area). Makes me wonder if it's just a coincidence...

  36. Re:Someone doesn't like being left of the new econ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever notice how much that guy resembles Londo Mollari, ambassador for the Centauri Republic?

    It's no coincidence, I tell you.

  37. How is that possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I live all those cables (as well as electricity and whatnot) have been dug into the earth.

  38. Tell us about "AlmostAllAdsBlocked+" Coren22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & LMAO @ U, boy -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    FACT: "AlmostALLAdsBlocked+" is INFERIOR vs. hosts - hugely so!

    AB+ doesn't even DO what it's supposed to fully anymore being BRIBED http://finance.yahoo.com/news/... not to!

    AB+ doesn't do a FRACTION of what hosts do for more speed, security, reliability, + anonymity online!

    AB+ EATS 128mb of RAM (vs. hosts @ 11 *maybe* tops via my program with CURRENT data, the important kind vs. current threats + ads) http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    AB+ adds messagepassing overheads!

    AB+ operates in SLOWER usermode (vs. hosts in PnP kernelmode)

    AB+ creates huge CPU consumption!

    AB+ is also detectable by clarityray (via native browser methods) nullifying it (not hosts).

    ---

    I use what you already have that works & does more with LESS, no less - you by way of comparison? Pile on "MoAr" that doesn't do as nearly as much & what it's supposed to do, massively inefficiently no less (see above)?

    Ab+ NO LONGER DOES!

    * AFTER ALL THAT?

    AB+ = "better", Coren22?? LMAO - NO f'ing way!

    If you say it is, you are *TRULY* stupid & I'd reply saying "argue with the numbers" & facts above, from reputable sources & analysis proving my points for me!

    APK

    P.S.=> Gonna go "cry in your cereal" now, boy?

    (You ought to for being STUPID enough to use OR SUGGEST a blatantly INFERIOR solution! See above - it's fact & truth via reputable sources)... apk

    1. Re:Tell us about "AlmostAllAdsBlocked+" Coren22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do you do this? What has it ever gained you, and how is it worth making yourself a laughingstock?

  39. interesting note on punishment fitting the crime by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

    I've always thought that the punishment should be a combination of seriousness and how many people are affected. Then I think of the shoe bomber. Now every person getting on a plane in the US has to take off their shoes. Small amount of "damage" per person but wow did it impact a lot of people. Total passengers are ~800 million a year for the US. At 15 seconds per passenger and a life expectancy of ~80 years that is roughly 5 lifetimes wasted a year due to this guy. Since travelers continue to be impacted year after year I can only conclude that they probably couldn't torture him enough to ever break even on his damage.

  40. Re:I bet it's a NON-WHITE... by quantaman · · Score: 1

    Shame they didn't cut this AC's cable...

    --
    I stole this Sig
  41. It is some A-hole anti-gentrification moron by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

    Wah our rent is going up because of bad decisions by the housing commission, lets blame people that have good jobs in tech and force them out by destroying the internet connectivity in the city.

  42. Re:Coren22: Questions 4u... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of crackpots...

  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. Only pay landowner for days when oil flows by perpenso · · Score: 2

    Possibly because the Pinkertons would come in and beat/shoot people? Or, weren't these pipes generally running through private land. A simple tactic would be to align interests. The landowner only gets paid for days when the oil flows. Then the landowner would keep an eye out.

  45. Rail lines were vulnerable too, a glass houses thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarding the railroads, people with miles and miles of unprotected rail lines tend not to engage in industrial sabotage. They are just as vulnerable to such things.

  46. Re:Someone doesn't like being left of the new econ by JP205 · · Score: 1

    sea otters...

  47. Re:Someone doesn't like being left of the new econ by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    Or maybe someone who wanted a breather:

    The shift workers howled and laughed and were pelted, and broke ranks, and the jelly beans managed to work their way into the mechanism of the slidewalks after which there was a hideous scraping as the sound of a million fingernails rasped down a quarter of a million blackboards, followed by a coughing and a sputtering, and then the slidewalks all stopped and everyone was dumped thisawayandthataway in a jackstraw tumble, and still laughing and popping little jelly bean eggs of childish color into their mouths. It was a holiday, and a jollity, an absolute insanity, a giggle. But . ..

    The shift was delayed seven minutes.

    They did not get home for seven minutes.

    The master schedule was thrown off by seven minutes.

    Quotas were delayed by inoperative slidewalks for seven minutes.

    From 'Repent, Harlequin! Said the Ticktockman', Harlan Ellison.

  48. Hippie by irrational_design · · Score: 1

    This is San Fran - surely it must be a hippie wanting all those silicon valley weenies to get back to nature.

  49. Re:Someone doesn't like being left of the new econ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    99% chance it's one of the anti-gentrification nutbag hippies doing this.

  50. It's Ken Thompson by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Long-distance electrodes shot into the pinion pituitary glands of recent dead.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  51. Vandals? by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    There's no need to be racist about it.

    1. Re:Vandals? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      How is calling them vandals racist? It's applied very evenly among races.
      More PC crap.

      Probably a guy though. He can look forward to being arrested at some point, going to jail and getting his ass kicked a bunch of times.

  52. Speaking of "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" Coren22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject + "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * Keep "running" & evading fair questions Coren22 (yes, I know it's you replying by ac posts now too... lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Curious - how many "sockpuppet" fake accounts are you using to downmod my posts? apk

    1. Re:Speaking of "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" Coren22 by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Why is that so funny? You do it all the time, you lunatic. People down-mod your posts because they have absolutely nothing to do with the discussion. I know these are important things in your head, but out here in the real world they are trivial matters people just don't care about. Please. Get some help. You are wasting your life.

  53. Coren22 by ac replies = laughingstock of /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I'm not evading fair questions like you http://slashdot.org/comments.p... there (lmao)...

    * What's even more pitiful on YOUR part?

    You replying ac now pitifully attempting to "defend" yourself (pitifully transparent that).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're constantly evading answering simple questions I put to you making YOU you the biggest laughingstock there is that can't backup his bs - & THAT, is TRULY, that... lol!

    ... apk

    1. Re:Coren22 by ac replies = laughingstock of /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who imagines Comic Book Guy whenever I read APK posts?

    2. Re:Coren22 by ac replies = laughingstock of /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine Coren22's Forrest Gump after this http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    3. Re:Coren22 by ac replies = laughingstock of /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not Coren22, and you don't believe that I am.

      Now please answer the question that you have hypocritically evaded.

  54. Mmmmm by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Check response time?

    I'd rather think that one crew cuts the cable at some place and during that time a second crew installs a listening/delay device in a secondary location, that will be finished before the first cut can be repaired.

  55. Coren22: Questions 4u... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject, "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" - Can ab+ do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stops C&C communique
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stops C&C communique
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stops C&C communique
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get you past a dnsbl
    12.) Keep you off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) Give you easily controlled data
    16.) Do all that & block ads more efficiently in cpu + memory usage vs. addons

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each on ab+ doing it or as well + hosts = already on every device natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    Ab+'s 128mb memory inefficiency -> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).

    +

    ClarityRay defeats it dumping addons in use in a browser via native browser methods to do so!

    +

    Ab+'s paid to not do its job http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...

    Ab+ adds complexity + slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    ... apk

  56. Tell us about "AlmostAllAdsBlocked+" Coren22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & LMAO @ U, boy -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    FACT: "AlmostALLAdsBlocked+" is INFERIOR vs. hosts - hugely so!

    AB+ doesn't even DO what it's supposed to fully anymore being BRIBED http://finance.yahoo.com/news/... not to!

    AB+ doesn't do a FRACTION of what hosts do for more speed, security, reliability, + anonymity online!

    AB+ EATS 128mb of RAM (vs. hosts @ 11 *maybe* tops via my program with CURRENT data, the important kind vs. current threats + ads) http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    AB+ adds messagepassing overheads!

    AB+ operates in SLOWER usermode (vs. hosts in PnP kernelmode)

    AB+ creates huge CPU consumption!

    AB+ is also detectable by clarityray (via native browser methods) nullifying it (not hosts).

    ---

    I use what you already have that works & does more with LESS, no less - you by way of comparison? Pile on "MoAr" that doesn't do as nearly as much & what it's supposed to do, massively inefficiently no less (see above)?

    Ab+ NO LONGER DOES!

    * AFTER ALL THAT?

    AB+ = "better", Coren22?? LMAO - NO f'ing way!

    If you say it is, you are *TRULY* stupid & I'd reply saying "argue with the numbers" & facts above, from reputable sources & analysis proving my points for me!

    APK

    P.S.=> Gonna go "cry in your cereal" now, boy?

    (You ought to for being STUPID enough to use OR SUGGEST a blatantly INFERIOR solution! See above - it's fact & truth via reputable sources)... apk

  57. Catch them! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    The cutting process must take some time as the bundle is large and armored.

    The photodetectors receiving the light on each end of the fibers should be able to detect disturbances associated with the fiber being cut AS IT IS CUT. (If you physically disturb the fiber it affects the transmission efficiency.)

    With the appropriate automated analysis (time-delay reflectometry), police could be requested to deploy to the vandals' location before they have even finished cutting through the bundle.

    Alternatively, DHS' secret drones could have missiles on that spot in seconds. (I'm joking... or am I.)

    Just saying...

  58. Cui Bono? by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Contract telecom workers who rake in the overtime. Eventually you might see a series of evenly spaced cuts on long runs that are calculated so there is too much light loss, entire cable sections need replacement.

    The NSA, who is building out a massive dark fiber intercept network to shunt traffic to Utah and is using the outages as 'cover' as they install separate, secret drop-ins.

    Those who hate our freedoms. You know, those folks who keep ranting about those folks who hate our freedoms, and how you have to break eggs to make an omelet, and hey it's been a long time since we invaded another new country.

    Book Publishers and People who do know how to use the Internet. I should have listed them first. We must track down these people and watch them closely.

    The Amish Mafia and Inner Circle. Slowing the encroachment of microchips at home and abroad. You do not want to mess with these people.

    Starbucks. What do repair crews drink the most? Slam dunk! Well... oops, wait. We're talking about the global corporate giant that has built the world's largest IT single point of failure. This is either the cleverest, most insidious plot ever, perfect cover... or the dumbest.

    Lawyers and Insurance Companies. In general, and it's our own damned fault.

    Until things are so bad that a mob of concerned citizens gathers on the spur of the moment to surround, interrogate and hold telecom crews until they are vetted (or) swift and lethal vigilante justice is delivered... we cannot reasonably expect the world to suck less as time goes by.

    Trademarks used herein are sole property of their respective dark fantasies.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  59. Better than your "illogic logic", lmao... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dave420's "pot calling kettles black hypocrite finest" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    APK

    P.S.=> I notice none of my posts showing your TRUE MOTIVATIONS as a webmaster that doesn't want his ads blocked that I post to "give you a dose of your own medicine" & to expose your b.s. too in the same stroke (2 for the price of 1) @ stalking & harassing me get downmodded dave420 (you & your sockpuppets must've "run dry" of modpoints eh? Yes, lol!)!

    Yes - seeing as you're SO well loved around this site too -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    &

    "Lo & behold", here too http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    That's what people here think of YOU, Mr. webmaster that hates hosts files since they're far better than bribed slower far less efficient browser addons that do tons less than hosts too... apk

  60. What I post's nonsense dave420? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:

    "I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!

    Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!

    I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!

    (That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).

    ---

    "I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)

    I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!

    (You stalk/harass me instead!)

    OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):

    ---

    * QUESTION:

    DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?

    Answer it!

    As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie & You've been EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link just above, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> See Dave420 the "pot puffing clown" SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods via sockpuppets to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk

  61. Re:I bet it's a NON-WHITE... by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    We can always hope.