Slashdot Mirror


Software Devs Leaving Greece For Good, Finance Minister Resigns

New submitter TheHawke writes with this story from ZDNet about the exodus of software developers from Greece. "In the last three years, almost 80 percent of my friends, mostly developers, left Greece," software developer Panagiotis Kefalidis told ZDNet. "When I left for North America, my mother was not happy, but... it is what it is." It's not just the software developers quitting either. The Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis also resigned. A portion of his resignation announcement reads: "Soon after the announcement of the referendum results, I was made aware of a certain preference by some Eurogroup participants, and assorted ‘partners’, for my ‘absence’ from its meetings; an idea that the Prime Minister judged to be potentially helpful to him in reaching an agreement. For this reason I am leaving the Ministry of Finance today."

291 of 431 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah, software developers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Fuck those guys.

    1. Re: Yeah, software developers. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be redundant as they just voted to screw themselves far worse than you ever could. If

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re: Yeah, software developers. by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Yes, but at least they screw themselves now instead of being raped by foreigners.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  2. Good luck not paying taxes in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Welcome to America, here's your W-2, here's your 1040.

  3. News flash: employees in demand move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Umm, I lived in Vancouver Canada for 10 years as a software developer and me and most of my software developer friends ALSO moved to the US (I currently work for Apple, most work for Google or other local companies). Greek developers may have an extra incentive to move, but they are hardly unique.

    1. Re:News flash: employees in demand move by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I suspect you probably moved for very different reasons than Greek developers. In your case, it was probably because the housing costs in Vancouver (Canada) are insane.

    2. Re:News flash: employees in demand move by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Tell Tim to release a proper Mac mini for the next update.

    3. Re:News flash: employees in demand move by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And that's why he moved to Silicon Valley? The model place for affordable housing?? Really?

      Yes, really: SV prices are downright affordable compared to Vancouver's. In Vancouver, an actual crack house will cost you over $1M.

    4. Re:News flash: employees in demand move by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Hey now, those listings were taken in 2010. I'm sure the prices are much more reasonable now.

  4. Re:Outside help by Reemi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A developer working in Greece will pay taxes in Greece and spend most of his/her income in Greece.

    A developer leaving Greece will not pay income tax in Greece and IF he/she sends back any money it is nothing compared to what he/she would earn in Greece. Furthermore Greece paid the developers education in the expectation it would be a wise investment in the future (education == long term investment).

    Note, in case this developer is doing work for a foreign company, this adds to Greece export and the differences are even larger.

    Sorry, the helping out relatives story is not in the interest of Greece.

  5. Varoufakis and devs leaving are unconnected things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that you just mashed together in order to have a "technology" aspect of this story and justify the publication on Slashot.
    Anyway, the devs must leave because the tax they face on their revenue and insurance payments are very high compared to the US or other countries. Another reason why austerity has failed in Greece has put the economy in a death spiral.

  6. Economic turmoil does not breed confidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If was living in Greece now, and had marketable skills, I would be leaving too.

    If you can't even keep your banking sector from collapsing, what confidence should I have that you can run the rest of your economy.

    And Greece isn't exactly known for being a software development powerhouse anyway. I'm not sure I'd leave for the USA tho, I'd probably head to germany or france, or maybe join an Israeli startup (depending on how much risk I was willing to take).

    1. Re:Economic turmoil does not breed confidence by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And Greece isn't exactly known for being a software development powerhouse anyway.

      I've seen code written by them, so I completely understand why.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Economic turmoil does not breed confidence by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Yes, because we're all the same. Obviously...

    3. Re:Economic turmoil does not breed confidence by PRMan · · Score: 2

      It's all Greek to you?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:Economic turmoil does not breed confidence by bobbied · · Score: 1

      If was living in Greece now, and had marketable skills, I would be leaving too.

      I'd call you stupid if you where still in Greece myself....

      The writing has been on the wall for Greece for nearly 2 years. It has been obvious that Greece was trying the patience of it's creditors and that eventually they would all get tired of kicking the can down the road. If that wasn't enough for you, the last elected government's platform should have made it clear to everybody who was working in Greece that it was time to get out because the door was slamming shut very soon.

      If you are still there now, not only did you stupidly ignore what the world knew was coming, you are going to likely loose a bunch of cash you left in the bank and any real assets you hold are going to be nearly worthless for quite awhile. Also, inflation is going to make any cash left in your hands worth even less.

      Good luck leaving Greece now... Where it might be a good idea even still, you won't get out with anything because they won't let you take anything with you.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:Economic turmoil does not breed confidence by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Most code written anywhere is crap.

  7. Varoufakis by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's pretty clear Varoufakis was turfed by Tsipras because the only hope in hell Greece now has of negotiating a deal with the Troika and remaining in the Eurozone and even in the EU is not having that man by his side. The price of even talking about a new deal and further bailouts is Varoufakis's head, which has been delivered to Merkel on a silver platter. This referendum was completely about Tsipras's political survival, and having achieved that, Greek voters will now witness just how utterly irrelevant the referendum was.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Varoufakis by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My guess of they they'll turn in desperation to Putin, thinking he's going to help them (as he's going to promise). And he's going to screw them in ways they can't even imagine.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Varoufakis by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      NATO membership is going to be a problem.

      Can Putin even afford to pay as much as they are currently getting from NATO, particularly from the NATO troops stationed in Greece.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Varoufakis by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Putin can't afford to pay anything--Russia's broke too (if not quite as broke as Greece). But if they're stupid enough, the Greek government might not figure that out until it's too late.

    4. Re:Varoufakis by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Dropping out of the Euro, or even the EU, wouldn't be a problem.

      Turning to Putin for help, that would be a problem.

    5. Re:Varoufakis by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      My guess of they they'll turn in desperation to Putin, thinking he's going to help them (as he's going to promise). And he's going to screw them in ways they can't even imagine.

      There seems to be this common misconception that the Russia of today is in any way equivalent to the USSR of old... and Putin exploits this relentlessly. But it's simply not true, economically, politically, or militarily.

      The USA is far ahead of any other part of the world by every every measure: http://www.tradingeconomics.co...
      And to think of Russia as some kind of equal power to the US like they were back in the 60's is totally misleading.
      Despite its size, its ruthless lack of environmental and labor laws, and clear ambivalence to financial regulation, it's economy is 11th, on par with Canada. This is mostly due to rampant corruption that leads to Oligarchs bleeding the economy so dry it can't grow.

      Russia can't afford to help Greece. Greeces debt was $317 billion last I checked. That's 17% of Russia's entire GDP. Further, Greeces problems have nothing to do with the EU. Every year they fail to collect 90% of taxes. Let me say that again, 90% of taxes in Greece are never collected. THAT is their main problem. And that's before we get into the rampant government overspending on social programs, borrowing and so-on.

      Greece is doomed, the best thing for them was to follow the troika's advice, barring that? The need to find out what real 3rd world poverty feels like, so they can teach their children to never let this sort of thing happen again. Unfortunately that seems to be exactly what's going to happen. I feel a lot of empathy for the children of the people that voted for the governments they've had for the past 20yrs. Those children will suffer the most.

    6. Re:Varoufakis by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      I understand why the Euro don't want to deal with Varoufakis, he actually knows what he's talking about. But it sounds like Greek to them.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    7. Re:Varoufakis by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I wish Germany would be as broke as Russia is - with a government debt of only 17% of their GDP and a shitload of resources.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:Varoufakis by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Problem for Russia is that low debt ratio came about purely on high oil and gas prices. Those have evaporated leaving a black hole in the countries finances and no way to plug it other than borrowing, which is hard because their credit rating is now literally junk or cuts aka austerity.

      So while they may have a lower debt to GDP ratio than Germany they are in recession and no clear way to plug the hole other than a rise in oil and gas prices which looks increasingly unlikely.

    9. Re:Varoufakis by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Literally junk would be Greece. Russia has the same credit rating as Portugal, Croatia or Hungary (all three are EU countries by the way) and as soon as the Saudis stop their oil glut, oil will become more expensive again. And since Russia is accustomed to austerity, the recession would not be nearly as bitter as you think.

      They have a lot of problems, but being broke hasn't been one of them for a decade.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    10. Re:Varoufakis by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      ...same credit rating as Portugal, Croatia or Hungary...

      All paragons of financial solvency, for sure...

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    11. Re:Varoufakis by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      In worldwide comparison they are middle-ranking, thus far from being junk rated. And this was exactly my point.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    12. Re:Varoufakis by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't really have a dog in this race, and I don't want to get into a semantic quibble about the meaning of "junk," but according to Wikipedia, these countries do rate as "junk" investments.

      The "junk" rating is surprisingly (to me at least) high considering the name of the rating. S&P for example considers BB+ and below to be "junk" rated, and all the rest seem to concur.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    13. Re:Varoufakis by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Link please? I can not figure out which video that is. I like VICE and think they do great work while being mostly objective. However, I am about five years behind in keeping up with their stuff. The last bit about Russia that I saw, from VICE, was them going through an arms dealer and actually almost getting a nuclear weapon. They did not buy said weapon nor was it, IIRC, for sale exactly. It was in private hands it seemed and they were able to verify its existence somehow though it was off-camera. So, yeah, I would love a link if you have one handy. I am not sure what the hell to use as a search so I browsed and searched for the countries involved but did not find anything that looked like it was about what you are saying. I will try searching some more. Thanks.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re:Varoufakis by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If there are 317 million tax-paying people in the EU *and* they wanted to pay down the debt to cover Greece and help stave off inflation then they could all pay about €87/month for a year and be done with all of it. That is without any debt forgiveness. As the goal is to (ideally) keep the union going and healthy as well as to keep a healthy monetary system this might be something to consider. It could be structures to pay over five or even ten years. Over 10 years, not unreasonable with country-sized loans, that would be €9/mo and affordable to everyone. Spread out over the whole, and asking/forcing people to contribute, the pain is not so bad. Given the socialist nature of many of the EU countries this may actually work.

      Obviously this could be changed around a bit and whatnot but it seems like it may be a good idea to limit Euro value fluctuations. It may even make sense at the individual level? By paying their €9 every month for ten years they *may* be keeping their buying power at a steady limit instead of having to deal with inflation lowering their buying power. The diversity would mean less risks overall and more investments in the future - maybe. I am *not* an Economics Guru and my understanding is layman at best, laughable at worst, so I am open to correction on this. I also do not think we will find that many idealists when it comes down to it. I suspect any politician proposing such a thing will be a pariah from there on out.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    15. Re:Varoufakis by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Literally junk would be Greece. Russia has the same credit rating as Portugal, Croatia or Hungary (all three are EU countries by the way) and as soon as the Saudis stop their oil glut, oil will become more expensive again. And since Russia is accustomed to austerity, the recession would not be nearly as bitter as you think.

      They have a lot of problems, but being broke hasn't been one of them for a decade.

      Why do you think the Saudis will stop their oil glut? The last time they did that, competitors in the Middle East and from other regions (Canada, Russia) increased their supply and siphoned away much of the Saudi business. They don't want to make that mistake twice.

      You can only raise profits by decreasing supply and increasing prices if you control a market (regionally or globally). There are too many large players in the gas and oil business for the Saudis to have the influence they once had.

  8. 80% of his friends left the country? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    the percentages point to him.

  9. Re:Outside help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "A developer working in Greece will pay taxes in Greece"

    No he won't. That's why they're in this mess.

  10. Re:Outside help by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Unemployment is high in Greece. How about encouraging unemployed Greeks to move to Germany or France. Then they will have to pay the welfare, not the Greek government.

  11. Re:Outside help by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, the helping out relatives story is not in the interest of Greece.

    Unless, of course, your wife loves the money you send back and doesn't want you to come home.

    I had roommate's brother who came from the Philippines to do electronic assembly work in Silicon Valley. He hated the job but his wife didn't want him to come home. After a few years, he quit, returned home and got divorced. His wife spent every dime he ever made in the U.S.

  12. So long and thanks for smelling like fish by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Adios, suckers!" the Finance Minister screamed as he hit his secret eject button.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:So long and thanks for smelling like fish by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Well, let's just say that acting like an asshole didn't particularly improve Greece's situation and standing in the world.

    2. Re:So long and thanks for smelling like fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's exactly the point: Greece has for a very, very long time been a two party system, both equally guilty of the current mess, hence the reference to the "Republicrats". This minster of finance and the current regime are not related to them at all. Could they have done a better job? Probably. Could the rest of the EU handled the situation better? I could hardly see how they could have done any worse. Their actions reek of racism, colonialism among other things, supported by a concerto of propaganda and outright lies. A shameful display indeed.

      And btw, the problem isn't that they want to keep the Euro as such, it's among other things the horrendous state their institutions are in, and the fact that the main effect of the Euro is to prevent the Germans from pricing themselves out of the market with a ridiculously strong currency. The Euro creates tensions between strong economies and weak ones, and there is no way of easing them. And when the inequalities finally isn't manageable anymore, guess who suffers? Greece, or Germany.. Which I guess is the main reason why we see all this bullshit about early retirement, or the Greek people being inherently lazy and inferior: It's much easier and less dangerous to the big economies in the EU to sell those myths than admitting that the Euro is a failure and has built in faults which in its current state can not be mitigated.

      Finally, the rock and the hard place isn't the Euro or not, it's being ordered to shut down their already poor economy in the name of "austerity", which by the way nobody believes is the cure for this disease anymore, that thesis is completely discredited. (That it's still on the table is a matter of prestige and saving face for a lot of big wigs who bought into it because it reminded them of their household budget. It was so neat. Simple, easy to explain to the voters, and best of all, someone else's fault.) So the "troika" on one hand forces the Greeks to gut their economy, such as it is, while at the same time ordering them to pay back loans which they already have to loan money to pay off. This is textbook colonial power behaviour, and how on earth anyone could possibly believe that would play out in any other way than it has, is beyond the pale.

    3. Re:So long and thanks for smelling like fish by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      And the problems Greece is in is totally just related to him, and not decades upon decades of nepotism, corruption and mismanagement mainly perpetrated by the Greek versions of the Republicrats, who managed to get themselves voted out of power when the shit started to hit the fan.. You'd better be a good puppet now, and do better next time to blame the ones left with the mess and who refused to accept strangulation as a cure to brain hemorrhage.

      There is no Greek version of republicans. The most conservative party in that country are communists. If Hillary Clinton moved there she'd be running on getting the government out of your pocket book and church into schools.

    4. Re:So long and thanks for smelling like fish by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Varoufakis told it like it is. That's not being an asshole, that's being honest.

    5. Re:So long and thanks for smelling like fish by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      I do think it was in Greece's long term interest to essentially treat their loans as if it was a bank heist and keep the money. I don't know why people have trouble understanding this. Greece managed to steal literally billions from Germany and France and have gotten away with it completely. The Greek people, at least the ones who voted no, are all morally equivalent to bank robbers.

      People who lent money to them were just suckers and fools. Germany and France have been scammed. Try not lending money to people who obviously will never be able to pay it back or who at least have no real intention to do so. I mean duh. It was essentially aid rather than a loan. Just an issue of semantics at this point.

      What will happen to Greece now? In the short term it will be a mess, but once Greece realizes that money cannot magically materialize out of thin air, at least not the sort of money you can buy actual goods and services with, they will be better off and will be more likely to have a real future, a real economy. They are the same as the rest of us in their economic policies. They just have less productivity for their government to leech off of. To expect such policies to end in anything other than this outcome eventually is ridiculous. It's just simple logic or as the Puerto Rican Governor so famously said, "math".

      Greece was the canary in the coal mine. Keynesian borrow and spend economics never made sense. The same logic of living your life entirely from getting more and more credit cards has to end at some point. Greece and Puerto Rico are merely the most egregious examples and will be just the first to tell creditors to go fuck themselves and learn to stand up on their own feet or become the third world countries they so richly deserve to be (looking at you Greece and Puerto Rico). The sad part of this is after some time has passed the lenders with short memories will jump at the chance to lend money again to these people who again will borrow more and more money using one credit card to pay off another, until it all comes crashing down yet again. These dumb bankers never learn. Just look at Argentina.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    6. Re:So long and thanks for smelling like fish by tmjva · · Score: 1

      No that would have been "Yassou, suckers!"

      --
      Tracy Johnson
      Old fashioned text games hosted below:
      http://empire.openmpe.com/
      BT
  13. Re:They should just by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    What are these denbts of which you speak? I have never heard of this word.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  14. Re:Outside help by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

    be rich, or have a bitch. pick one.

  15. Democracy by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is the first time that I can think of that a population directly voted in the affirmative to collapse their economy.

    I hope that's just me being cynical, but I think that's what's on the way.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:Democracy by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1, Funny

      It happened in 2008 and 2012, too.

    2. Re:Democracy by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I am wrong, but it seems to me this is more about a population voting to recognize that their economy has already collapsed rather than attempting to continue veneering it over.

    3. Re:Democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A yes vote would also have destroyed their economy. The No vote was them flipping the bird to the autocrats in the EU who wanted them to make the austerity measures, which WERENT WORKING, even worse, hurting people for no positive result. Why am I not surprised that the so-called "libertarians" on slashdot are utterly opposed to the people of a country democratically persuing their own rational self interest?

    4. Re:Democracy by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what I can tell, nobody knows WTF it means.

      The Greek government thinks that the will of the people now means they have more leverage to negotiate.

      The problem is they're asking for handouts and free money from other governments who have to explain to their citizens Greek pensions are being funded by everybody else.

      Greece is essentially bankrupt, and wants more money. So either every other EU government is going to throw even more taxpayer money into the pit which is Greece's economy, or they're going to tell Greece to piss up a rope.

      This sounds like someone having their house foreclosed demanding the banks forgive their debt, lower their interest rate, and give them more money to pay bills.

      In other words, it sounds like the Greek government is living in a fantasy where everybody else pays for their society.

      And I'm not sure that's gonna happen.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Democracy by nnull · · Score: 1

      I think it's just a population that realizes no matter what your vote is, your country is pretty much screwed. Better to vote no and default, and start over.

    6. Re:Democracy by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      The Greek government thinks that the will of the people now means they have more leverage to negotiate.

      Well, in a sense they do.

      The argument is something like "we have $200 billion of your money and we ain't gonna give it back. If you ever want to see it again you better talk".

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Democracy by eulernet · · Score: 1

      In other words, it sounds like the Greek government is living in a fantasy where everybody else pays for their society.

      This sounds like the USA, where all the world economy is sustaining the dollar's value.

    8. Re:Democracy by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Honestly, from what I've been seeing ... it's more like "you're still not getting your money, we want you to forgive some of the debt, and we want you to give us even more money so we can pay other bills".

      I'd gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Only on Tuesday it's another hamburger, and can you loan me $20 until Thursday.

      That's not "negotiating", that's "sponging" or panhandling.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Democracy by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      By what measure do you figure the US economy collapsed itself in 2008 and 2012? The economy already was collapsing well before the election in 2008. By almost every economic measure I could find the economy is doing better now that what it was pre-2008. I'd say the actual damage was done in 2004 or 2006, not 2008 and 2012.

    10. Re:Democracy by bobbied · · Score: 2

      They mistakenly believed that "a better deal" would come because Greece was "too big to fail" as part of the euro.

      Personally, I don't think the vote bodes well for the people of Greece. It tells the creditors that the people don't/won't do what's necessary to repay the debts, and I don't think the creditors like that message because they won't get paid back. So the options are either just give Greece money and bail them out, or cut them loose from the euro. I don't think there is a political way that the other euro countries can just give Greece money, so that only leaves an implosion of the economy of Greece and a whole lot of pain and suffering for the least of the Greek people.

      So they voted for this "theory" of a better deal, but they will get what they fear most. They will be ejected from the euro, violence and suffering is on the way.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:Democracy by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      In other words, it sounds like the Greek government is living in a fantasy where everybody else pays for their society.

      This sounds like the USA, where all the world economy is sustaining the dollar's value.

      Except the USA isn't bankrupt, and there's plenty of people who don't mind investing in the US. Sure the country may be spending more than it gets through taxation, but everyone feels that the US fundamentals are good, and there are valuable assets in the country. And in general, the US economy is generally good.

      Greece, well, other than tourism and exports, doesn't have much. Their economic fundamentals are far weaker, and the only reason people were investing in Greece was to prevent their economy from collapsing. Unfortunately, Greece's economy is basically dead with very little economic output (mainly tourism, but even tourism is suffering because tourists need to bring cash, not credit or debit).

      By the time the US gets to the point where Greece is, the world has far bigger problems as in everyone else has screwed up quite badly.

    12. Re:Democracy by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      So did it collapse your economy when you started your Revolutionary War to get independence from the UK? I heard people did not want to pay taxes on tea to pay that were funneled to the British government or something. That these taxes were decided without input from American citizens. By your take on things the USA should still be part of the Commonwealth.

    13. Re:Democracy by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      LOL, mod up!

    14. Re:Democracy by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      At this point it's gone and everybody knows it. Nobody will loan them another penny.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Democracy by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Greece, well, other than tourism and exports, doesn't have much.

      Imports exceed exports almost 2:1. Greece should never have joined the zone. The gap is too wide to not have a currency that can adjust to the imbalance.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    16. Re:Democracy by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      This is the first time that I can think of that a population directly voted in the affirmative to collapse their economy.

      I hope that's just me being cynical, but I think that's what's on the way.

      No, it happens every election.
      But generally it works like this:
      Politicians lie, promise things that will destroy the economy to get votes.
      Voters say "Yay! Free stuff and no taxes!"
      Politicians get elected, then quickly forget all about those promises, because destroying the economy you actually live in is a terrible idea.

      This time however, politicians kept their word. They get to move to the US/EU after shit hits the fan... so... yea...

    17. Re:Democracy by CraigCruden · · Score: 1

      Democracy is not designed to produce better governance.... just hopefully one that more people have a vested interest and where bloody coups are not needed to change the government when they have become too corrupted to continue. Voters vote for collapsing their economies all the time, and sometimes the government actually co-operate....

    18. Re:Democracy by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > This is the first time that I can think of that a population directly voted in the affirmative to collapse their economy.

      You really should read more history.

    19. Re:Democracy by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > This is the first time that I can think of that a population directly voted in the affirmative to collapse their economy.

      In fact, that happens so often, political scientists have a term for it: "populism". It's very popular in some parts of the world.

      Mostly not in the /first/ world, admittedly.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    20. Re:Democracy by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

      They need to boot them out of the Euro, not the EU.

    21. Re:Democracy by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

      > This is the first time that I can think of that a population directly voted in the affirmative to collapse their economy.

      In fact, that happens so often, political scientists have a term for it: "populism". It's very popular in some parts of the world.

      Mostly not in the /first/ world, admittedly.

      In fact, that happens so often, political scientists have a term for it: "populism". It's very popular in some parts of the world.

      "populism". It's very popular

      I see what you did there.

    22. Re:Democracy by davydd · · Score: 1

      The problem is they're asking for handouts and free money from other governments who have to explain to their citizens Greek pensions are being funded by everybody else.
      Greece is essentially bankrupt, and wants more money. So either every other EU government is going to throw even more taxpayer money into the pit which is Greece's economy, or they're going to tell Greece to piss up a rope.

      You could not be more wrong. The current Greek government—and I draw a line here, to separate it from the two parties that shared power back and forth for the previous 40 years—does not want more loans, or more debt. They are emphatic about this. Instead, they want to a) restructure the existing official-sector debt that is due soon, moving it from one European program to another with longer payment schedules, and b) have the ability to decide how they will meet the fiscal targets agreed upon with Europe, and not have measures dictated to them by the same people and institutions that imposed the last sets of measures which erased 25% of the country's GDP and led to widespread poverty. Sounds quite reasonable to me.

      You could conceivably make the argument that low-interest loans with long repayment schedules constitutes "free money" from other European governments, and you would have a point. But there is also a certain cost to having a currency union that is intended to benefit all members, and that includes providing support to a member country that should be looked upon as a partner, rather than a prisoner.

      In other words, it sounds like the Greek government is living in a fantasy where everybody else pays for their society.

      Here's the thing. I live in Greece, and have for the last four years, all of which were under the heaviest of crisis conditions. I am not Greek; I'm Canadian, and coming from a relatively well-organized country, it makes me insane to see some of the laws and rules and conditions and taxes imposed in this country. I do not defend them at all: they are the products of 40 years of clientelistic mismanagement and corruption condoned and often instigated by the government. However, I have been listening to members of the current government—yes, the so-called radical leftists—for three years, to their proposals, their wishes to reform the country and its economy, their desire to remain a part of Europe and the Eurozone, and to become a constructive member of these institutions. Their integrity and commitment to democratic principles is unprecedented in modern Greek politics.

      If you had written that comment even six months ago, during the reign of the previous government coalition, I might have agreed to some extent. Unfortunately, this perception has been generated worldwide by the duplicity of the previous government, which agreed to conditions and measures with Europe and failed to implement them at home. But at the moment, when allocated bail-out funding from Europe has been withheld for a year... when the new Greek government actually refuses to agree to measures it will not implement just for the sake of political expediency... when it is pushing for an agreement that cuts spending, increases taxes, imposes privatization, seeks to reform the economy and eliminate bureaucracy, restarts investment and economic growth, and makes the debt load sustainable and repayable... it's the height of either cynicism or ignorance to suggest that the Greeks are just looking for a free ride on someone else's dime.

      Sadly, none of the media considers it worthwhile to report on what the Syriza government is actually saying, for two reasons, in my mind. One, because they've grown accustomed to the sight of (a different breed of) Greek politicians going back on their word, and assume from the get-go that all Greek politicians will try to duck reforms; and two, simply because the party's name literally translates to "Coalition of the Radical Left"—never mind that in Greek, "radical" still has the dictionary definition of "characterized by departure from tradition; innovative or progressive," with none of the associations of violence or extremism implied by the English word.

    23. Re:Democracy by davydd · · Score: 1

      It tells the creditors that the people don't/won't do what's necessary to repay the debts, and I don't think the creditors like that message because they won't get paid back.

      There's a different interpretation here in Greece. That interpretation says that the measures presented in the European proposal would make it impossible to repay the debts, ever, because it continues tax increases and spending cuts without factoring in economic growth or debt sustainability. The creditors don't like that message because it's telling them their solution is wrong, just as they were wrong in their forecasts about the damage previous rounds of austerity would do to the economy.

      So they voted for this "theory" of a better deal, but they will get what they fear most. They will be ejected from the euro, violence and suffering is on the way.

      The country cannot be ejected from the euro. It is legally impossible, and deliberately so, for a country to be kicked out. They could certainly be forced into withdrawing, if Europe via the ECB decides to allow the Greek banking system collapse. But imagine the reaction if, for example, in the United States all the other states decided to cut off all flow of currency to, say, Washington State, to cripple its banks and force it to leave the country. Such a decision, taken deliberately by the creditor institutions, would harm not only the wider European economy and the stability of the Eurozone, but endanger the European project itself. It would be a deliberate step towards unravelling the Union, a process not easily stopped.

    24. Re:Democracy by Xest · · Score: 1

      Joining the euro is a condition of being in the EU though, the UK is the only country with an explicit opt-out. New members have to join once certain conditions are met, and whilst countries like Sweden are dragging their feet they're still legal obligated to.

      So a backwards step away from the euro is effectively a violation of EU rules, which means out of the EU too.

    25. Re:Democracy by bobbied · · Score: 1

      We apparently don't differ on the facts, just perspective.

      I understand that the Greek people *think* there vote means something else and that they think being forced out of the euro is not possible, but I assure you that they are wrong on both counts.

      There is little political will in favor of bailing out Greece, except in Greece. Everybody knows (except the Greeks apparently) that such a bailout without further concessions from Greece will set off a slew of demands from the likes of Italy, Spain and other countries in the euro which in total would be a huge problem for ALL the countries in the euro. Problems big enough to end the euro, the Eurozone and put much of Europe back on the path to a regional conflict similar to what it was before both world wars.

      When a debtor says "No, I won't make any more changes to my budgets to satisfy you." to it's creditors, then what happens is the creditors say "Ok, we wont' loan you anymore money" and they force bankruptcy and write off the debt. In the case of Greece, this collapses their economy, crushes their banks, bankrupts the government and effectively isolates the country from the euro. The *ONLY* choice for Greece at that point is to withdraw from the euro, move to their own currency and hunker down to weather the decades long financial storm, violence and upheaval.

      So, even if the Greeks believe that they voted for something else, what they said to their creditors was quite clear.

      The real question here is how long will the Greek government stay in power and try to hold out for "a better deal". The longer this goes, the longer they refuse to make changes, the more likely this turns into an extremely violent and uncontrollable situation and the more damage will be done to Greece. I have a feeling that as the banks run out of currency and desperation sets in the people of Greece will start to realize what they really voted for isn't what they thought, but by then it will be too late.

      Austerity is coming to Greece, Make no mistake... The only question is will it be accepted by the people willingly, or forced onto them though external forces and internal violence.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    26. Re:Democracy by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the alternative is the exact same stuff that has fucked Greece over for years now. Greece would not be allowed to have a productive economy, because "austerity" sounds so good to self-important people who don't have to know what it does. Greece would have more debt that would take even longer to pay off, even if the Greek economy was allowed to recover.

      Under the circumstances, the Greek people decided to try something else, anything else. They do have leverage. There's billions of euros that are currently not likely to be paid back, the EU is not equipped to handle a failed national economy without enforceable borders, and kicking Greece out of the EU causes a lot more problems. I'm sure the EU can find a solution that's better for everyone than what they're trying now.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    27. Re:Democracy by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      So the real issue isn't money for Greece (its debts that could be easily absorbed by Europe)

      Considering it's forced countries to borrow from other creditors (since they couldn't afford it) at higher rates while enforced to lend at lower rates to Greece and required redefining GDP calculations to make it seem like they're running afloat (through defining that borrowed money as 'revenue generated'), I don't believe you really know what you are talking about.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    28. Re:Democracy by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Europe was torn by wars all over its history and it will happen again without the European Union.

      I think the EU will be the cause of the next European war, because it's politicians are so disconnected and are not accountable. If the EU were a bank, it would have been shut down 15 years ago when the creditors first started to refuse to sign off on the accounts. The corruption and dysfunction in the EU is terrifying.

      I don't want VAT (economists have shown that this is stagnating our economy), I don't want a single currency union (see current Greece situation), I don't want the common fisheries policy (environmental hell, over fishing), I don't want the free movement of people's (so racist, treating other countries, even our own colonies different over other people), I don't want European standards (some of which are so ridiculous it out prices us through regulation from being competitive with anyone else and does not take into account all the geographical differences and circumstances involved).

      Oh sure, we have free trade, but we can have free trade without the EU. After all, if Iceland can do it, there is no reason why we can't.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    29. Re:Democracy by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Imports: $60.5 billion
      Exports: $33.8 billion

      Difference: $26.7 billion

      so about that $7 billion...

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    30. Re:Democracy by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      It happened in 2008 and 2012, too.

      And that's why it collapsed.

      Oh, wait.

      That Obama, he can't do anything right. He tries to crater the economy and now it's better than it was when he took office.

    31. Re:Democracy by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

      Denmark also has an explicit opt out as I understand it. Plus you could make the booting out a temporary thing, with the understanding that once the greek economy stabilizes then they will be re-admitted to the euro. at the new exchange rate obviously.

  16. Re:Outside help by crypticedge · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Greek financial disaster came from refusal to pay taxes and constant reduction in tax enforcement. This is the end result of modern "fiscal conservatism" and why a socialist government so easily swept into power there. The people bailing are people who suspect Greece is about to come knocking and demanding what was due a long time ago but they refused to pay.

  17. You know what they say... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If you can't beat visa and "offshore" workers, become one.

  18. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thought the fact that they passed laws banning all ownership of firearms would get rid of the gun crime there? It worked in Australia.

  19. Re:Outside help by TWX · · Score: 1

    Probably because most people don't really like that much change in their lives. They have friends and family, they are familiar with the setting, and they may have real property or other financial commitment that would be very costly to leave behind or abandon. It can be hard on people moving between cities within a region, let along picking up everything they can hold on to and changing whole countries where law, language, and acceptance will be entirely different.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  20. Not for Greece, but for Italy and other countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you need more programmers, make it easier for US citizens to move and get work there. I'd gladly move there and work the same work I do now. Yeah it would mean more taxes and less of an "American" standard of living, but if I could swim in the the Mediterranean everyday, I'd go for it.

  21. Re:Outside help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Umm. A developer working in Greece didn't pay taxes in Greece - same as everyone else everyone else in that failed state. NO-ONE Paid taxes and everyone enjoyed state handouts paid by national debt.

    And no-one did anything for years despite it being obvious.

    Greece is fucked. So is the Euro. With luck it will end the lunatic Euro-dream too.

  22. Re:Outside help by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Or you know, have the balls to not send the money?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  23. Re:Outside help by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    It's easier to be a lazy bum in the Philippines than put up with the U.S. relatives who look down on him for being a lazy bum and expect him to get a job.

  24. Spending cuts one way or another by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This 'no' vote self-imposes the spending cut that Greece hates to see but the 'yes' vote also imposes the spending cut. There is no way to avoid a spending cut for Greece.

    Austerity is a strange word, it sounds sterile, it has strange connotations. The correct term is spending cuts.

    You cut spending if you cannot afford what you are spending on and when you cannot borrow to spend either and in case of chronic offenders the sooner the creditors realize what they are dealing with the healthier for everybody. It's healthier for the spender, who has to come to terms of the impossible situation he is in and it is healthier for the creditor, who will avoid losing even more money. It is healthier for the overall economy not to have welfare State system in the first place, to have people consume based on what they produce and not based on what can be taken from somebody else without any form of repayment.

    Real money does not come into being by magic, it is not printed into existence, it is not magically created on a computer. Real money is the result of productive activity, where the word 'productive' really means that something is being produced that others are voluntarily willing to trade for in a way that is sustainable for both, the producer and the consumer.

    The world has been playing with fire for the last 100 years with everybody being on fiat, it's been playing with a gigantic fire since the USD became uncontrollably inflationary due to it not being backed by any production (USA has been running half a Trillion USD trade deficit for over a decade now) nor by any money reserves (USD is not backed by gold, Nixon defaulted on the dollar back in 1971, and that's how these problems of inflationary policies and welfare state accelerated).

    USA has its own version of what is Greece experiencing right now, that's what 'debt ceiling' is. Many believe that USA can simply print bonds and sell them and get out of jail free, however this only works as long as somebody buys those bonds and the bond market is the biggest bubble of all. USA will have its own currency crisis and bonds are currency promised into the future, so that will also collapse.

    As Germany now refuses to just pour money into this bottomless pit called Greece, people will refuse to just pour money into the bottomless pit called USA and that will be even more interesting to observe.

    Everybody who tells you 'austerity does not work' are full of it. Austerity means you are not spending money you didn't earn and especially where it concerns consumption rather than investment, and ALL things that people want government to spend on are consumption and not investment, so the important distinction is this: government must be austere, only government austerity can reallocate the scarce resources to people, who will rebuild the economy.

    In the long run Greece is better off because of this spending cut, it will learn to live within its means and maybe to produce more and it will have a healthy economy. But like any alcoholic or drug addict apparently it will have to hit the rock bottom before it will reform.

    1. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The bold tag doesn't make your nonsense correct buddy. What's going on has nothing to do with the gold bug horse shit you're spouting. Fiat currency is here to stay and if you're Edison-like ability to completely misunderstand the concept is irrelevant to the Tesla-like power the Fiat currency based systems have.

      Crooked banks made bad loans to the crooked leaders than ran Greece, all because they thought the EU would bail out the country no matter what to protect the Euro. (And they'd make piles of money when it happened) Well, that didn't happen a whole lot of said crooked banks are facing a cascading collapse that will make the EU banking system more or less insolvent.

      Said bankers are laying in HARD to the rest of the EU leaders to basically economically rape Greece's citizens with comfortable euphemisms called "Austerity", spinning racists stories about lazy entitled citizens. The Greek citzens, for once, are doing something sensible. They threw out the previous government and are saying "We've decided not to pay for the mistakes of banks and Con men. Go fuck yourselfs."

      Get ready for a bank Collapse and a whole lotta nationalization. It worked for Iceland, after all.

    2. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by pipingguy · · Score: 2

      "Real money is the result of productive activity, where the word 'productive' really means that something is being produced that others are voluntarily willing to trade for in a way that is sustainable for both, the producer and the consumer."

      And the value of the work that humans do now has been reduced due to automation and robots, yet costs of living remain high (for the most part). Former blue collar workers were able to transition to "white collar" work (much of it of dubious value to begin with, and many jobs existed simply due to interdepartmental rivalries and empire-building activities of executives) decades ago, but now there's nowhere left to go as human knowledge, experience and skills are being built into software/hardware. Yes, there are/will be some jobs building and maintaining automated systems, but nowhere near the amount of jobs eliminated. It's not going to be pretty, the middle class will be much more than decimated and I foresee many ditches being dug and then refilled the next day...

    3. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Austerity is a strange word, it sounds sterile, it has strange connotations. The correct term is spending cuts.

      You cut spending if you cannot afford what you are spending on and when you cannot borrow to spend either and in case of chronic offenders the sooner the creditors realize what they are dealing with the healthier for everybody. It's healthier for the spender, who has to come to terms of the impossible situation he is in and it is healthier for the creditor, who will avoid losing even more money. It is healthier for the overall economy not to have welfare State system in the first place, to have people consume based on what they produce and not based on what can be taken from somebody else without any form of repayment.

      Another way to view it is that a loan time-shifts your earnings. Money that you would've made in the future is shifted in time to the present. The catch being that that money (plus some interest - payment for the time-shift) will be unavailable in the future. Basically how a cash advance works - you get your paycheck now 3 weeks after your previous pacheck, but you won't get your next one for 5 weeks instead of 4 weeks. You've time-shifted your paycheck one week earlier.

      In other words, "austerity" is self-imposed the moment you take a loan. It is not the people demanding you repay the loan who are imposing austerity on you. You imposed it on yourself the moment you decided to get the loan.

      I've tried to explain this to dozens of people, and only about a quarter seem to get it. The snapshot value of your bank account or your credit card balance at any point in time is not what matters. Heck, the time-average value of those two is not what matters either. What matters is their first derivative - the rate of change of those values. How much money you earn per month, how much you spend per month. Once you realize this, you understand that there's nothing to be gained by paying your bills one day before the due date (except for a negligible amount of interest). Whether you pay it the first day of the month or the last day of the month, the amount you pay per month is identical. And taking out a cash advance because you're "short of money" is actually more harmful to you in the long term (increases your expenses per month) than belt-tightening to get by until your regular paycheck arrives.

    4. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      When you have a run on the banks, it is too late for spending cuts to fix the problems. The stupidity here was that the debt repayment is unsustainable at 1.8x GDP. Greece got themselves into this, with the willing help of the EU, ECB, & IMF. All players are going to have to figure out a way to fix this... and of course the real problem isn't Greece but how the entire European Union functions.

      Quite honestly, I can't see any good resolution coming from this. If Greece is pushed out, the other PIIGS might end up the same way, and the Euro starts to look more like a currency shared by France and Germany, with a whole lot of angry people around them.

    5. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      From your comments, it's obvious that you don't understand what money is.

      Money is an IOU.

      That's it. There's nothing magic about it. The IOU issuer's ability to repay the IOU is the only thing in question. In this regard, the US and its dollars (IOU's printed in green and black, and again, not magic) are not going anywhere.

      A government, at its inception, has nothing but promises of infrastructure and protection. It buys its supplies with IOU's. Then it provides community infrastructure and military protection. This proves its worth and provides the "backing" for those IOU's. At the end of a set period of time (a "tax year", if you will), the IOU-holders are expected to forgive some of that debt. The government takes back some of its outstanding IOU's from each debtor. The cycle is complete and begins anew. Non-payers can expect to face a militarized force's demands for payment.

      If you layer on centuries of bureaucratic shortcuts and institutionalization of the mechanisms therein, you'll get what we have today. But it all started out with a very basic, very simple premise: a break-even business loan.

      Now, think about what the USA (or Greece) provides to its citizens. It provides governmental services. It deserves payment for those services in the form of forgiveness of its debt. If this year's payments don't cover the costs of next year's services, well, that's expansion and they should take out a bigger loan (print more IOU's). But if this year's payments don't cover the costs of this year's services, then they need to raise prices, use their military to make sure payment is collected, or both.

      The backing of a currency is not a physical resource, it's a measure of trust in the provider of said currency.

      This holds equally true for Bitcoin, which is why Bitcoin is going to be a quaint footnote in computing history in a few years. Nothing backs it. Math is discoverable and essentially worthless as a backing. It's like collecting tree leaves and calling them money. You can grab them from just about anywhere, and there's technically a finite number of them. But nobody's going to give you anything in trade for them. (Except maybe a damned good kicking, which you'll deserve.)

    6. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, what a funny comment.

      Money is
      1. Store of value.
      2. Means of exchange.
      3. Unit of account.

      I understand that it's way above your head, since you believe money to be CREATED by government, which is absolute, unadulterated, pure 100% nonsense that leads to disasters like Greece, like Zimbabwe, like USSR and hundreds of others.

      Government cannot create money any more than government can create anything and it does not create anything of any productive value and it shouldn't.

      Money comes into existence when new goods are produce that people are willing to exchange for, in that case money comes into existence through deflation of money supply with regards to the total productive output.

      Money comes into existence when people decide what it is that they actually want to exchange in and store value in and what is easy to count, divide, add, subtract, which is why gold is money.

      Money does not come into existence by any government magic or by any other form of magic, that is true, the only thing that government 'magic' (or fractional reserve magic for that reason) can do is take value from existing assets and redistribute it by lowering asset values. This trick really only works if the government has a monopoly on that type of asset, which is why government sets up counterfeiting laws that prohibit competition to the counterfeiting operations that government is running whenever it turns on the printing press.

      The real USD existed when in fact IT WAS AN IOU, it was a banknote issued by the bank who promised to deliver gold upon receiving the note.

      What governments do is not money creating, what governments do is price controls, exchange controls, inflation and theft, but they cannot create money. A government can dilute the value of all money in existence but it cannot create money, it cannot add net value into the system, it can only subtract net value.

      An organization that is capable of adding net value into the system runs a profitable business, not a government, which lives on coercion backed by deadly force.

      Anyway, I am sure this is either completely above your head and/or completely against your propaganda.

    7. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by monkeyxpress · · Score: 2, Insightful

      USA has its own version of what is Greece experiencing right now, that's what 'debt ceiling' is. Many believe that USA can simply print bonds and sell them and get out of jail free, however this only works as long as somebody buys those bonds and the bond market is the biggest bubble of all. USA will have its own currency crisis and bonds are currency promised into the future, so that will also collapse.

      That is what the austerians want you to believe. The reality is that the USA will never have trouble 'selling' its bonds, because the federal reserve just buys them if nobody else will or it wants to drive down interest rates. This is precisely how the fed controls interest rates normally, and is the basis for quantitative easing. There is no possibility of the USA having a problem with its bonds because it can keep printing money until the economy takes off (at which point it would just create inflation).

      The reason the austerians promote this message though, is that none of this comes for free. All this extra money will either cause an asset price bubble, which will wipe out all the savers money, or if that doesn't happen, massive inflation when the economy picks up. Either way savers are going to be paying for all that govt deficit spending in a macroeconomic rebalancing.

      And that is what this conflict is about. Essentially the fed, ECB, BoE are saying to savers go and spend your money, stop hoarding it. But savers are not listening so aggregate demand is still broken. The debate now is whether the govt just goes and starts spending their money through QE funded deficits until they get the message, or just puts its hands up in exasperation and leaves things to stagnate for 20 years like in Japan. Obviously what you think is the right answer depends on whether you are a saver or borrower, though there is a clear best answer for the economy in general.

    8. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

      We don't have a taxing problem. Receipts to the government are at all time highs. If we went back to the spending levels under Clinton we would be running massive surpluses and retiring debt. I don't recall people dying in the streets back then. No, we have a massive spending problem, and the growth in spending is mainly social spending, which is not even constitutional. Time to end the gravy train.

    9. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      The reality is that the USA will never have trouble 'selling' its bonds, because the federal reserve just buys them if nobody else will or it wants to drive down interest rates

      - I absolutely agree with you, which is why the bond collapse will happen as the result of the currency crisis, which will result from this inflation.

      Essentially the fed, ECB, BoE are saying to savers go and spend your money, stop hoarding it. But savers are not listening so aggregate demand is still broken.

      - of-course people don't want to spend on bonds and stocks that is the 'demand' we are talking about, let's be clear about it. People are not buying the bonds and stocks that governments want to see selling.

      The reality is that the inflationary policy is destroying the economy and a destroyed economy will collapse in its own right, the currency collapses because of the government spending that the mob wants and the economy collapses due to this gigantic misallocaiton of resources. The currency collapse triggers the bond market collapse, since bonds are currency promised in the future.

      Japan is stagnating specifically because it is inflating like the USA but its currency is NOT the so called 'reserve', and so the inflation that Japan is producing stays within its own borders, it's absorbing its own inflation and destroying its own economy.

      The USA is using the status of the 'reserve currency' to spread the misery around, spreading inflation is national past time, the biggest USA export is its inflation, which creates inflation everywhere else before taking home back to the USA. This is happening of-course anyway, it's manifesting itself as destruction of the productive sector, gigantic real unemployment, class warfare, bubbles in everything everywhere.

      The 0% Fed's interest rate for 7 years put USA economy on the inflationary needle and this drug will not be kicked without a huge collapse first, no junkie kicks his habit before hitting the rock bottom.

      The clear best answer for the economy in general is free market and removal of government from money and interest rate manipulation, abolition of the welfare state and restructuring of all debts. Whether saving is worth more than borrowing is a question to the healthy free market, something that USA lost long ago.

    10. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by quantaman · · Score: 1

      From your comments, it's obvious that you don't understand what money is.

      Money is an IOU.

      The backing of a currency is not a physical resource, it's a measure of trust in the provider of said currency.

      This holds equally true for Bitcoin, which is why Bitcoin is going to be a quaint footnote in computing history in a few years. Nothing backs it. Math is discoverable and essentially worthless as a backing. It's like collecting tree leaves and calling them money. You can grab them from just about anywhere, and there's technically a finite number of them. But nobody's going to give you anything in trade for them. (Except maybe a damned good kicking, which you'll deserve.)

      I don't think it necessarily follows that Bitcoin has no future as a currency. Instead trust coming from a government backing the value of the currency the trust comes from assurance in the number of Bitcoins in existence and the number of people using Bitcoins. That being said Greece is a perfect example of the problem with a Bitcoin backed economy as you can't devalue your Bitcoins if you run into debt trouble anymore than Greece can devalue the Euro.

      Though even if it doesn't succeed as a currency it sounds like Bitcoin might stick around as a payment system.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    11. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      You know and I know that "Robbing Paul to pay Peter" is not sustainable; the problem is most people will whine about the short-term excuse "But think of the children! and are too stupid to focus on long term stability at the expense of greed.

      This whole situation is similar to how banning forest fires ironically and paradoxically led to an increase in fires.

      * http://www.npr.org/2012/08/23/...

      I like your journal entry where you go over the USA Budget 2013 numbers ...

      * http://slashdot.org/journal/30...

      1. The total tax revenues for USA Federal government are 2.46 Trillion USD.
      2. The total expenses for USA Federal government are 3.8 Trillion USD.
      3. The interest payment on the outstanding public debt that is on the books is at least 360 Billion USD for the year based on the interest rate (which is manipulated by Federal reserve and other banks, but that's a separate subject matter).
      4. Social Security benefit payouts are budgeted as 882.7 Billion USD.
      5. Medicare for the year is budgeted at 523 Billion USD.
      6. Medicaid for the year is budgeted at 283 Billion USD.
      7. Other mandatory programs for the year is budgeted at 654 Billion USD.
      8. War will cost 525.4 Billion USD.

      So the total revenues are 2.46 Trillion USD, total expenses are 3.8 Trillion USD, the interes payment is 360 Billion USD.

      Agreed, that the US doesn't have a saving problem, it has a spending problem.

      The US is fucked. :-( It is not a matter of if but when.

    12. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Real money does not come into being by magic, it is not printed into existence, it is not magically created on a computer. Real money is the result of productive activity

      So basing your economy on shiny rocks? The Lakota Sioux thought the stuff was generally worthless and called it "the yellow metal that makes white people crazy" (no tribe in the Americas ever had a gold based currency). Good to see there's still some insanity left.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    13. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha ha ha, sure, you can believe in magic if you like, in this reality though we obey the laws of thermodynamics, especially conservation of energy and momentum. You cannot consume what you did not produce.

      Take an empty island, put 1,000,000 people on it and if they do not produce they will not eat. No amount of funny money printed by 'government' will solve that very basic issue of food and energy and shelter and other life necessities (and luxuries) not coming into existence just because you printed some candy wrappers.

    14. Re:Spending cuts one way or another by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You need to learn some macroeconomics. It's not a particularly solid field of study, but it at least makes seeing what happened easier.

      The fact is that the Greek per-capita GDP has dropped by nearly a third in seven years. The macroeconomic problems largely imposed by austerity (which has a strong tendency to shrink economies) have drastically cut Greece's ability to be productive, and plunged the country into an even worse economic mess.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  25. Re:Outside help by TWX · · Score: 2

    be rich, or have a bitch. pick one.

    Try not marrying someone whose goal in life is to be a housewife or otherwise taken care of. Marry someone that is accustomed to taking care of themselves. Trouble is, that trait is generally not initially obvious or especially sexy in of itself, and most people don't think with their brains when it comes to objectively evaluating those that they are sexually attracted to. I had plenty of girlfriends that ultimately weren't suitable to marriage before I found the right woman that knew how to manage her own life and its costs.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  26. Taking on the account, while letting the banks die by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Not being an economist, is it feasible in an way to loan the money to the people of Greece and let the greek banks die?

    Is Greece showing any real signs of wanting to address the problems of their economy and tax dodging?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  27. Re:Outside help by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    With luck it will end the lunatic Euro-dream too.

    World War II called and wants its lunatic Euro-dream back.

  28. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by jonnyj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously! Have you made any attempt to understand this problem?

    Former Greek governments borrowed the money, not bankers. Most of the money wasn't lent by bankers. The troika comprises the EU, the IMF and the European Central Bank - mostly politicians, not bankers.

    The current problem facing Greece is that no-one will lend them any more money. Even if 100% of their past debts were written off, current tax receipts are insufficient to meet current expenditure. Without more money from the people you mistakenly call bankers, austerity in Greece will become much worse.

    Put the blame where it really lies. Not with bankers, but with dishonest politicians and a delusional electorate who always believed someone else would pay their bills.

  29. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes Socialism...

    The banks are not the cause of the problem here, but the symptom of the sickness that's killing Greece (and countries in similar situations). Greek banks WILL fail. They don't have stacks of euros to stuff into the ATM's and the people of Greece are desperately trying to empty their accounts because everybody knows that if you leave your cash in the bank, you won't get it out. Everybody wants to be in hard currency, euros. The banks have run out.

    Ask yourself, how did Greece get to this point? Basically it's because they failed to make the most recent payment on their national debt. There isn't enough euros in the government coffers to make the payment, they defaulted and now they cannot borrow because nobody wants to lend them anything. Why is the government in Greece at this point? Because they SPENT money they didn't have and cannot raise. Normally countries just print more currency to pay loans, but you cannot do that when it's euros you need to print.

    So what did Greece spend all this money on? Early retirement for everybody and social programs. Socialism in leaning, if not actual practice is what has Greece into crushing debt.

    Greece is being crushed between the Eurozone and their debt, the debt that funded their social programs. The sad part though is that the people who will really pay for this are the poor, the people who didn't have the ability to move their assets OUT of Greece.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  30. Re:Taking on the account, while letting the banks by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Greek people don't need the capital. They have all the taxes they didn't pay.

    What they need is a solid currency. I suggest bitcoin.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  31. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

    No, it was socialism yet again proving that you cannot overspend and tax your way to prosperity. It's happened time after time and people like you still insist that it's a matter of not overspending / taxing enough.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  32. Re:Outside help by eulernet · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You are partly true, since it's a national sport to avoid taxes.
    I read that in one of the greek islands, a lot of taxi drivers were "officially" blind.

    The real problem is that Greece has to spend 13% of its GDP to pay for its retirees.
    It almost twice as much as other european countries, and it will gets worse because the population is older than most other countries, with a lot of unemployment for young ones (probably whose who are leaving the country).

    Since everybody wants to profit from the current system, I very much doubt that the problem will solve without cries.
    The IMF lost 1.6 billions of euros, so I also doubt that Europe will continue subsidizing the current system.

  33. Let them go, they will come back. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Movement from India to USA used to be a one way street. Indians come over, become hyphonated Americans, to borrow Jindal's phrase, and stay. That was the norm till about 2000. Then it began to change. Most of the top grads from IITs and IIMs, no longer are coming over. Those who came, many have left, returned back to India to start companies over there. The ones who came over, learnt the system here, some got US degrees, some did not, established connections, then lots of them returned.

    Not all of them returned, heck not even most of them returned. But risk-tolerance, ambition etc are not distributed uniformly, it follows the power law. So the 20% who returned took with them 80% of the risk-tolerance, ambition, entrepreneurship with them back to India.

    So let Greece give up euro for drachma, let drachma fall as low as INR. It will thrive on tourism, and the Greeks coming back to start companies a few years down the road.

    Germany has benefitted a lot by the economic union. Had Deutschmark stayed out of euro, its exports would have become so expensive no one could import them. 80% of Germany's exports are to rest of Europe. Capital would have naturally flowed to less expensive countries, and they would have the companies and employment restoring the balance. Greece leaving euro is going to be a bigger blow to Germany than to Greece.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Let them go, they will come back. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The 20% that returned were Brahmen who were tired of being _asked_ to to actual work. So they returned to India, where that won't be a problem.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Let them go, they will come back. by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Germany has benefitted a lot by the economic union.

      Germany has benefitted a lot due to the Hartz labor reforms. That is what brought down the unemployment rate, unlike what is happening in France/Greece/Italy/etc.

  34. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The poor really don't have assets. The people who will really pay is the people who aren't rich but not poor either. Those who have money they put away for their later years and other needs will lose it. I feel sorry for them but there is little hope and it's going to get worse. The US will be in the same place in a decade or so. I have a retirement I'll probably never see.

  35. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Hard to commit gun crime with a rock. Murder is less efficient but with a few whacks it's doable.

  36. Re:Outside help by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    I never understood the contempt and hatred for the Euro. A loose economic union to facilitate trade and further diplomatic relationships with member states to ensure that another WW doesn't occur in Europe seems like a laudable goal. These goals seemed to be designed around the causes of WW1 and WW2. It may not have been perfectly implemented but what is perfect version 1.0? The USA had to rewrite the Articles of Confederation for similar issues (having the federal government assume the war debts of the Revolutionary War was a contentious topic that was addressed with the Constitution, not AoC iirc).

    Could someone explain, why is the Euro seen as a bad thing? Perhaps, I am showing my age by asking this.

  37. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if 100% of their past debts were written off, current tax receipts are insufficient to meet current expenditure.

    That situation is exactly the same in the US (except the gap is about $500 billion right now, more than the entire Greek debt). The only reason that the US keeps going is that they control the lender (the Federal Reserve). At least they think they do.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  38. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by codealot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry, but you are incorrect. Greece reported a nearly 2 billion euro surplus in 2014, without taking interest payments into account. http://www.wsj.com/articles/greece-misses-target-on-budget-surplus-1421244654

    If their debt were wiped out today they would keep that money and need no further bailouts. Better yet they could go back to the Drachma and manage their currency with a combination of monetary and fiscal policy, just like every other sovereign nation in the developed world.

    You can't oversimplify the Greek situation as "socialism". There are plenty of examples of countries that are doing fine economically with policies that embrace social spending. The Greek situation is far more complex and involves politics and the Euro as much as anything else.

  39. Re:Outside help by bobbied · · Score: 1

    "A developer working in Greece will pay taxes in Greece"

    No he won't. That's why they're in this mess.

    He won't, but it's not the flight of labor out of Greece that's the cause of this problem. It's a symptom of the deep rooted issue that has doomed Greece to be crushed between their national debt and the Eurozone.

    The MESS is caused by the baby boom and Greece's liberal government funded pensions (we call it Social Security in the USA). The boomers are getting older, consuming more and more resources but having long sense retired produce nothing. That leaves fewer and fewer workers to collect taxes from in Greece, which forced more borrowing, higher taxes and dropping benefits. Of course, being in the Eurozone doesn't help, because if you want to leave Greece, it's easy to jump ship, especially if you are a young person who doesn't own property or have a family. But the problem that doomed Greece was demographics and simple math. You cannot promise to give out such generous benefits where there is no possible way to pay for them.

    The really scary part here is that Greece is but the tip of the iceberg, both in the Eurozone and in the world. Spain and Italy are both tittering on the edge and the disruption that is Greece's exit from the euro is likely enough to push them over too. With that many people in abject poverty, I suspect that violence will be nearly unavoidable.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  40. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by jonnyj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry, but you're out of date. The Greek government's primary surplus disappeared shortly after the election of the Syriza government.

  41. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    It highlights your agenda, that's about it.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  42. Re:Outside help by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Greek financial disaster came from refusal to live within their means and not run chronic deficits for decades on end. This is the end result of modern "borrow and spend" liberalism taken so far as to ruin the finances of Greece and exhaust the patience of the rest of Europe. The people bailing are the "children" spoken of when conservatives are heard to say we must not saddle our children with debt.

    The thing that is not said is that the reason we must not do this is not merely because it is morally reprehensible, which it is, but that the children simply won't pay it. Unless you are ready to erect gulags to enslave people you can't make them live their lives to fund your unlimited socialist dreams.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  43. Re:Sucks by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I agree with you to some extent. The individuals must make the group stronger though. People who can contribute but refuse to are getting to be a serious problem. Dead weight will kill any group. Paying taxes is important for everyone. Having a third of the population that pays no taxes will cause resentment as well as economic problems.

  44. Re:Outside help by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    > Furthermore Greece paid the developers education in the expectation it would be a wise investment in the future (education == long term investment).

    So what is your point with this? You want to bring back modern slavery? If you get an education paid by the state, you are not allowed to leave the state? Like in Soviet times?

    Or to localize it, how many people on Slashdot have had their employers pay for them to attend training, courses, even further their educations? Does that mean that those employees should be forced to pay back that education if they move to another company, or worse should they be prevented from leaving for X number of years to get the company their ROI? If the answer is no, then why even mention it about the Greek dev?

  45. Re:Sucks by mellon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem in the U.S. is not people who don't have skills. People have skills. The problem is that skills aren't valued. If you have skills, you will get paid shit. If you manipulate money, you will get paid a lot. This is why there's been such a geek brain drain into the financial industry. The U.S. does not value working for a living. We value gambling for a living.

  46. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Note not just socialism, but socialism *AND* cutting taxes low. They tried to have their cake and eat it too.

    Of course before the Euro, they might have been able to stumble over this while massively devaluing their currency, and it wouldn't have been as disruptively bad. EU members might just have too much sovereignty to share a currency.

  47. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by jonnyj · · Score: 2

    The Federal Reserve doesn't work like that. The USA can maintain its government deficit because enough people are willing to buy US government bonds. If, one day, people no longer trust it to repay its debts, there will be a financial meltdown the like of which the world has never yet seen.

  48. Re:Taking on the account, while letting the banks by PPH · · Score: 2

    Banking in the EU is pretty much borderless for the wealthy. Just open an account in a German or whatever bank. You might need to establish 'residence'. But that's not difficult to satisfy the requirements of regulations. For the middle class on down, its another matter. If the neighborhood banks and ATMs shut down, what are you going to do? Hopping on a plane or train for a weekly cash run is no problem for the rich. Not so much for everyone else.

    Any bank opening a branch (or ATM) inside Greece will expose themselves to local regulations and the economy. So there's not much chance of that happening. Not impossible, but not likely.

    The problem is: Who is going to loan money to the Greeks? Too much of the population is unemployed or dependant on govenment pensions or jobs. So there's no hope of getting paid back. The few who have good paying jobs (or wealth in-country) are going to be targeted for revenue to redistribute to those living off the public coffers.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  49. Re:Outside help by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Informative

    Women wanting to be housewives aren't the problem. The problem is a socieconomic setup that makes it difficult to support a family on one income unless you're relatively well qualified or otherwise independently wealthy. Very few of the acceptable latter day social philosophies have a reproductive strategy outside of mass private or public childcare facilities, which most responsible parents quite rightly find repugnant.

  50. Re:Outside help by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    For one thing, you'll have to learn a whole new language (and not a programming language!) if you move to France or Germany. And both of these languages are almost, but not entirely completely different from Greek. And there are other issues as well - from climate to different licensing requirements.

  51. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Educated young oeople were flooding out of Greece long before the current government took over. The present government's rise is a reaction to the death of the Greek economy, not the cause of it.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  52. Re:In other news by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Tell me about it! My fractions of Bitcoins are up nearly 25 cents!

  53. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Federal Reserve doesn't work like that. The USA can maintain its government deficit because enough people are willing to buy US government bonds. If, one day, people no longer trust it to repay its debts, there will be a financial meltdown the like of which the world has never yet seen.

    The largest purchaser of US bonds today is ... wait for it ... the Federal Reserve.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  54. Re:Sucks by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Not just a US problem. Edinburgh has a massive call centre outsourcer. Now we all know that call centres pay peanuts, because they don't really need skilled workers, but this one does, because it's a multilingual call centre. All of their staff are fluent in two, three or even four or more languages. They get about £500 more than the usual unskilled phone jockey per year, despite the huge efficiency savings made by not having to have individual call handlers on hand for each language even at slow times. And people say this is OK because of supply and demand.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  55. Re:Outside help by Reemi · · Score: 1

    So what is your point with this?

    I never stated this should not be allowed. The OP presented moving abroad as a positive thing, I made this statement to show that it is not in the interest of Greece. Every comapny expects/hopes for a return on their investment, there is no difference for countries/governments.

    Does that mean that those employees should be forced to pay back that education if they move to another company

    That is not uncommon in Europe when such training is extensive and expensive. It is often provided with a clause that if the employee is leaving the company within a x number of years, an equivalent share shall be reimbursed. Often this is happily paid by the new company the person will work for.

  56. Re:Outside help by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    But a developer not working in Greece won't make money for anyone, hence why they're all migrating to countries where there are jobs.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  57. Re:Outside help by Gamma747 · · Score: 1

    So if I lend you money, then you use the money to buy something from me, your debt shouldn't count?

  58. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Yes, the middle class will pay with money, but the poor will pay with their lives and suffering. As Greece collapses, those who have nothing and are dependent on the government will pay first. Starvation, violence and sickness will kill them. The middle class will just become poor...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  59. And so it begins.... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

    The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.

  60. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    GDP fell and unemployment is at 25%. A lot of people left the country. So tax receipts fell and the pensions system can no longer be sustained. So was this a problem with the pensions or a problem with a failed economy thanks to the measures of the troika?

  61. Re:Outside help by nikosdion · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm tired of listening to this. Let me tell you what happens when you're 100% legal and declare everything up to the last penny you get as a software developer. In 2012 I had 100,000 Euros income paid 86,000 Euros spent on taxes (income tax with surprisingly different brackets than last year, "temporary" property tax, "temporary special contribution" 4% on the total turnover, mandatory social security, 55% of your current income tax as downpayment for next year). The year before I made 74,000 Euros and paid "only" 50,000 or thereabouts. In return I got: no schools, no roads, no pension, more taxes, more family members depending on me to live. The more you work the less you make (unless you have an ever-shrinking business). Crazy? That's the Greek tax brackets for you.

    Meanwhile: I have to pay for my own hospital plan because in case I get sick I have to notify the public insurance carrier 15 days in advance of emergency surgery (no kidding!) or 3-4 months before booking an appointment with a doctor. I have to get an additional, expensive pension plan on top of the 350 Euros per month I am currently paying as mandatory social security because there will be no money when I'm 67 years old or have worked 40+ years to get the minimum pension of 700 Euros (nominal; actual payment after taxes and mandatory social security is around 480 Euros). I also need to set aside money to get the kids I'm planning on having to a private school because there are no teachers (not even substitutes) half of the time in the public schools.

    If you are wondering why people tax evade you have to first ask the questions: 1. how much does the state take in taxes and 2. what does the state offer for the money it takes from its citizens? If the answers are "most of your money" and "not that much at all" respectively it doesn't take a genius to see why you get an endemic tax evasion for free.

    Anyway. After three years of battling the system I gave up and moved away. My last tax filing in Greece was 2014 for my income in 2013. I am owed a 13,000 Euro tax return since August 10th, 2014. Of course it's NOT credited. And we're talking about money I have paid as a tax downpayment to the state since August 2013. They hold my money hostage for 2 years and they won't give it to me. Also, don't make the mistake of asking whether there's an interest rate for those two years. Don't be silly. There's not! Adding insult to injury I'm still a Greek tax citizen which means I get to pay taxes for the dividends I'm paid from my company abroad. Don't be ridiculous, of course they are NOT offset by the money the Greek state owes me! I have so far paid another 40+ thousand Euro taxes in these two years where the Greek state owes me the 13,000 Euro tax return.

    I understand all this sounds alien to you. Why so much taxation, why no services in return, why the state isn't punctual in paying back. Beats me, brothers and sisters. I have concluded that one must be outright insane to try and do business if they're born in Greece.

  62. Re:Outside help by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    No man. The people left the country because investment dropped off a cliff and unemployment climbed up at the same time taxes increased to counter receipt loss from what I just said before. Greece has been in a recessive death spiral since 2008.

  63. Re:Outside help by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you do it by creating money out of thin air - yes, it shouldn't count as much. And that's what Germany and France were essentially doing all along.

    And yes, I do have actual data to prove it: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/s...

    If you check the numbers in details, it turns out that almost half of the German economic growth during the 2002-2008 period is solely because of this debt export to the periphery.

  64. Re:Outside help by operagost · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how someone could call the citizen's refusal to pay taxes, and the government's refusal to collect them, "fiscal conservatism". This reads like an unholy mating of "1984" Newspeak and MSNBC talking heads. It's lawlessness. Fiscal conservatism would be low taxes and low spending-- "small government". That's just what it is; you don't have to agree with it, that's what it's called. But what they have is big (spending) government, yet an unwillingness to demand compliance from the citizens. Even the basement-dwelling internet Marxist understands that a welfare state must be funded.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  65. Re:Outside help by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    The problem is that it wasn't loose enough. Previous Greek governments were borrowing off the back of the Euro as though it were a national currency and using it to shore up the public finances rather than cracking down on tax dodges (and given that the ministers were all dodging taxes themselves, what else could you expect? In principle, I'm all for the Euro, but it was established without the appropriate checks and balances, and Greece is a result of that.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  66. Re:Outside help by Reemi · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    Companies, however, are experiencing a shortage of developers. "SEPE has undertaken recently an initiative to train 3,000 people, to fill this digital gap in Greece, and at the same time to certify another 3,000 Greek ICT professionals," the Federation's spokesperson told ZDNet.

    IT jobs are the sixth hardest ones to fill in Greece, according to ManpowerGroup's 2015 Talent Shortage Survey, with senior developers' gross monthly salary varying between €2,600 and €3,200.

    Please, do at least read the article before repeating popular misinformation.

  67. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    And yet the creditors want to lend them more money which they can't afford to pay back which continues their spiral into debt. Funny how that works.

  68. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by demachina · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You donâ(TM)t actually know what you are talking about do you.

    Most of the loans in question here were in fact loaned by German and French bankers to the Greeks prior to the 2008, Deutsche bank was one of the biggest. They could get somewhat higher returns loaning to Greece and they had some security because Greece was in the Eurozone. That security unravelled with the 2008 crash.

    The ECB, EU, IMF gave massive loans to Greece in 2010, and most of it immediately went to extricate the German and French banks from their bad greek loans. If the Greeks has defaulted on the original loans then there would have been a massive banking crisis in Germany and France. The 2010 EU bailout was to save their banks more than it was to help the Greeks.

    The Greeks just got more debt piled on top of too much debt and its totally destroyed their economy. Recently released IMF studies confirm the Greeks canâ(TM)t sustain their current debt load and it has to be restructed or they have to default. If they stay the current course with austerity and more and more bailout loans they are doomed.

    If the Greeks had been smart they would have exited the EU and defaulted on the debt in 2009 and the people who made the bad loans, the German and French bankers, would have paid the price. Instead they got off scot free.

    Iceland immediately defaulted in a similar situation, they had some short term pain but they rebounded, while the Greece has gotten nothing but worse and worse under the yoke of a corrupt European and global banking system.

    For banking and loans to work there is a simple rule, if you are foolish enough to make a bad loan to someone who probably wonâ(TM)t pay it back, then you pay the price when they default. Instead the people who make the bad loans (i.e. bankers) get to keep their bonuses profits and everyone else gets to pay for their stupidity, greed and corruption.

    --
    @de_machina
  69. Re:Outside help by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    If you lend me money so I can build an airport by paying to your company and then, when I cannot pay the debt back, you ask me to sell the same airport to you for a fraction of the cost at the same time you ask me to pay back the money you initially loaned me...

    What does that make you?

  70. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    So what hurt Ireland during the economic collapse was all that social spending...oh wait it was taking on the debt of the banks....

  71. Re:Outside help by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Greece spends 13% of its tax receipts to pay for retirees and 50% of its tax receipts to pay interest on debt.

    So which is the problem here?

  72. Re:Taking on the account, while letting the banks by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Not quite - it's more complex than that. To be sure having creditors lend more money instead of debt restructure did not help. Funny how in the U.S. we restructure the debt of wall street banks but we force everyone else to pay their debts at face value.

  73. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's usually what happens when you fire everyone, liquidate what's left and then proceed to have no further source of income: A large inflow of cash, followed by nothing.

  74. Re:Outside help by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    The problem is not the Euro its the way it was constructed.

    The current leadership is not interested in any fix since they profit from the current situation and allows them to boss other people around.

  75. Re:Outside help by operagost · · Score: 1

    So what is your point with this? You want to bring back modern slavery? If you get an education paid by the state, you are not allowed to leave the state? Like in Soviet times?

    It works in North Korea. OK, that's hyperbole, but someone has to counteract the usual "you mean like Somalia" bullshit every time someone says something remotely libertarian.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  76. Re:Outside help by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    take the trash to the bin. we dont need you leaving it here.

  77. Re:Outside help by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    "Unless you are ready to erect gulags to enslave people you can't make them live their lives to fund your unlimited socialist dreams."

    That's what robots are for!

  78. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, look at how awful countries like Norway and Sweden are with all their "nanny-state policies".... they only have the highest standards of living in the world.

  79. BS by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Something for nothing? Heck no, the EU creditors were not giving loans from the goodness of their hearts.

    Yes, the Greek Government is mostly at fault for this.. but so are the Greek people who keep voting in people making false promises. You know, the guys who claim that you can have all of these Government programs for "free".

    I really have no idea why you tried the ole cold war propaganda routine, but it does not make any sense here at all.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  80. Re:How agitation ends by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

    No. He has DOLLARS stashed somewhere from when he worked for Valve in Texas.

    He's too smart to stash his money in Euros.

  81. Re:BS by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    Let me repeat it: THE BUDGET OF GREECE IS BALANCED.

    Umm, then why do they need to borrow more money?

    Or are you talking "current accounts are balanced"? Which is to say, except for paying interest on your bonds/T-bills/whatever, your budget is balanced.

    Note that if you're making enough money to pay the bills, EXCEPT for the interest on your credit cards and mortgage, you're not really living with a "balanced" budget.

    And if you really have a balanced budget, you really shouldn't be needing to borrow money, nor should you have a hard time paying back your existing loans....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  82. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    That's socialism?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  83. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by ewibble · · Score: 1

    The only difference between Greece and the US is that the US can print more money, don't you remember every couple of years the US has a crisis where it is running out of money, their solution print more money (problem solve right?).

    I actually think that Greece should go bankrupt, sure it may be tough for a while but better that the whole country servicing debt indefinitely, which it cannot hope to repay.

    Actually it probably will not be that bad, they probably have industries that produce essentials. I don't even think trade will stop, sure they won't be able trade Dramas for goods and services but they will be able to trade those for Euros, or US dollars and then trade those Euros for other services. Markets are wonderful like that, they adapt.

    I think what the lenders are really worried about is what happens if Greece doesn't collapse, it will suddenly allow all those other poor countries that owe lots of money to contemplate doing the same thing.

    It may also teach people to stop lending to entities that cannot repay, when you lend money to people to take on the risk that they may not pay you back.

    Just like with an individual going bankrupt is not a desirable outcome, but is a better solution than living the rest of your life as a slave to your debt.

  84. Re:BS by erapert · · Score: 1

    Let me repeat it: THE BUDGET OF GREECE IS BALANCED. The problem is that creditors want MOAR BLOOD from Greece

    So you don't know the difference between "deficit" and "debt"?

  85. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most of the money wasn't lent by bankers.

    Yes, it actually was. The EU/IMF/ECB then bailed those banks out, for some inexplicable reason, by taking the debt off their hands. Neither group, bankers or EU, did risk analysis. If they did, Greece never would have been lent the money in the first place.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  86. Re:Coren22: Questions 4u... apk by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    So, hosts files will lead to Greece paying their Denbts?

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  87. Re:Outside help by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    > That is not uncommon in Europe when such training is extensive and expensive. It is often provided with a clause that if the employee is leaving the company within a x number of years, an equivalent share shall be reimbursed.

    To a North American that's a pretty alien concept. What happens if someone is terminated instead of choosing to leave? Seems like there could be some abuse there if there isn't a provision for only paying from voluntary departure.

  88. Re:Sucks by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Actually, this and parent skirt a real issue of employment, education, and welfare in the U.S.

    - We are permitting the illegal immigration of unskilled, under educated Central, South, and Latin American immigrants, along with Mexican immigrants, to come to American and compete for the worst jobs.

    - Despite lower employment, we continue to do this.

    - Even if we take up the challenge and offer education to these immigrants, they will only compete further up the social ladder. And more under educated will come, since we lack the will to control the influx.

    - English is not their preferred language. This not only costs in providing bilingual resources, but it causes resentment and risks discrimination.

    Some skills in America are valued, and intelligent people seek those skills, or they accept less value for the skills they do choose. Since manufacturing has largely left the US, those work skills (work as in physical labor) are not so much in demand. Information technology is taking up that slack, but those skills are too often found in legal immigrants under programs such as the H1B visa program, and Americans lose out again.

    The labor force participation rate is a telling statistic, dropping from 66+% in 2008 to 62.5% today. Those workers no longer in the workforce didn't just disappear. They are still eating, living somewhere, and are doing so at the expense of someone else. So long as we permit illegal immigration to continue largely uncontrolled, we keep adding workers to a marketplace that has too many already.

    Higher employment might make a number of other solutions to other problems possible, but in the current economic situation we are doomed to continue deficit spending and a further plunge into debt. No way out without the economy improving.

    And even then, the will to say 'no' to the hands out looking for a paycheck for nothing is critical. And unlikely to happen given the current political situation, either.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  89. Re:BS by Anubis350 · · Score: 2

    If you can't service your debt in addition to paying your normal operating bills your budget isn't balanced.

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  90. Re:Outside help by Cyberax · · Score: 2

    Because it takes guts to refuse a bad offer and most of European politicians are spineless amoebas. Including the previous Greek PM.

  91. Re:Outside help by Reemi · · Score: 1

    Those provisions in contracts are normally not valid when your contract is terminated my the employer.

    In a previous position, I was not allowed to take any position at a direct competitor or at any of our suppliers (within a 1 year time-frame). When I was made redundant, I received a letter from my former company addressed to any potential new employer that there were no legal issues in case they wanted to offer me a job.

    The letter itself was not required by law (the content was), but it made my life much easier.

  92. Re:BS by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Greece can even service the current debts if they are allowed to borrow at lower rates. That's essentially what the 'bailout' was - the ability to borrow at lower costs to re-finance the debts. Even simply extending the bailout program without imposing new austerity would have been enough to let Greece recover.

    And if we continue an analogy with a household, right now Greece has a steady job with enough income to cover the expenses for a fairly well-off lifestyle. However, it has also a crippling underwater mortgage. For a household the simplest way out of this would be a bankruptcy and a new start.

    But OK, suppose that we put the interests of the Holy German Empire on the front. The problem is, austerity actually HURTS the creditors by undermining Greek economy. There's really no reasons for austerity except for sadism of Merkel.

  93. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by fnj · · Score: 1

    If the Greeks had been smart they would have exited the EU...

    There is one little problem with that idea. There is no mechanism to "exit" the EU, just as there is no mechanism to kick a member out. Government tends to be like that (ask the Confederacy).

  94. Re:Outside help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Greece spends 13% of its tax receipts to pay for retirees and 50% of its tax receipts to pay interest on debt.

    So which is the problem here?

    When they borrowed the money what they are now paying interest on ... what did they spend that on? Maybe paying interest on the loans they wasted on booze and hookers doesn't deserve sympathy.

  95. Re:Outside help by slew · · Score: 1

    And both of these languages are almost, but not entirely completely different from Greek.

    You mean languages that you don't know aren't *greek* to you ;^)

  96. Re:Outside help by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When 51% are on the tit, democracy is over and done. Stick a fork in it.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  97. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    Social program such as an oversized pointless military? Yes that is a one of their problems.

  98. Re:Outside help by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    Much smarter then you sucker!

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  99. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by bobbied · · Score: 1

    The "problem" is the attitude that borrowing has no limits and that voting to keep the government doling out benefits it has no means to pay for is a good idea. The GDP fall and unemployment are unfortunate events, but they where impacted by the same policies that had the government borrowing. The Greek people voted for this (not just once, but many times), in large part, and thus are responsible for what's coming.

    However, this is not to discount the fact that being in the Euro has also been a problem, that Greece has paid for the mismanagement of the Eurozone too.

    IMHO, Greece (et all) are going to be squeezed between excessive debt and the Eurozone. Had Greece not gone on the Euro, or had they gone to austerity long before their creditors demanded it of them, we would all be talking about something else.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  100. Re:Outside help by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Read some history. Gulags it is. It's a leftest tradition.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  101. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Such stupid sarcasm...

    Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.

    A strong national defense is VITAL to the security of both the USA and the world. The last 200+ years of history show this to be true, and the graves of the dead are reminders of what happens when you forget your history.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  102. Re:Outside help by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Never had company sponsored training? Absent some details what the GP describes is common in America.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  103. Re:Outside help by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    I really can't parse this. Liberalism in Europe is right wing and yes Greece has suffered the idiocy of lowering taxes and expecting money to pop out of nowhere like the right wing liberals in the us does too. You call them libertarians though, but that is just pseudo french for liberal.

  104. Re:Outside help by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You do live in a democracy right? Why do you elect governments that perpetuate this nonsense?

    When a majority of citizens are receiving benefits from the state, why would they vote to curtail those payments the government can't really afford? It's much easier to instead tax the *producers* of society.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  105. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by luisdom · · Score: 1

    Insightful? Really? Just repeating something you saw on Fox news, that is.
    German and French banks were going to default because Greek banks were bankrupt. Here comes savior bce to lend the Greek government to bailout Greek banks. Private debt turned into public debt, with a shitload of military spending in the middle that went... Guess it, Germany and France.
    Greece problems comes from chronic corruption that fed a network of privileged closed to the governments, and troikas bailouts didn't put any stop to that, which demonstrates that they just want to keep pumping money out of Greece. Tsipras offered to cut military spending, and other cuts that were utterly dissmissed by the troika. They just wanted to cut social spending, to push their agenda, not to make Greece an economically viable state in the long term.

  106. Re:Outside help by bobbied · · Score: 1

    It's problems with debt pre-date 2008. The S&L crisis just induced a world wide recession that Greece could ill afford because even then it was tittering on the edge. The recession was the thing that pushed them over the cliff. But the seeds of this problem where sown decades ago, even before they entered the Eurozone.

    All we've done since then is to delay the problem... Well, we are out of road to kick the can down, and the Greek people just voted themselves over the cliff. This won't be pretty.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  107. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The Greek people doubt pay tax.
    All former governments were lying about the economy.
    instead of being in surplus or at most 3% deficit, the Greek economy had been running a 14% deficit.

    They have been lying from before they were ever let into the eu, they started lying because they wanted the euro so badly to lower the cost of borrowing.

    Why was the cost of borrowing so high? Greek people were really bad at paying their debts.

    The problem is the eu should never have let them in without a proper audit. They are only now getting what they deserve.

  108. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    Good luck keeping it while going bankrupt. The point anyway was that Greece has wasted money left AND right.

  109. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by luisdom · · Score: 1

    They may have to follow Ireland's example, that turned out very well, but they have to very big problems.
    - âoegrexitâ is necessary
    - they have to make people pay taxes they are not used to.

  110. Re:Outside help by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    You do live in a democracy right?

    Athens is credited as the birthplace of democracy even though only racially privileged landowners even had a vote. Guess what.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  111. Re:Sucks by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    "fookin"?!? Is that supposed to be a Scottish accent? You're a couple of hundred miles out, mate. Ignorance and bigotry are such common bedfellows...

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  112. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by MatthiasF · · Score: 4, Informative

    Norway has massive natural resource exports accounting for nearly 33% of GPD, imports half of what it exports and only 3 million people in the labor force. Sweden's GPD is also nearly 33% exports, slight trade imbalance in favor of exports and 5 million people in the labor force.

    Greece has 12% GPD from exports, imports twice as much as it exports and has only 5 million in the workforce.

    For perspective, the USA makes only 9% of GPD from exports (that includes the recent massive increase in gas and oil exports), imports 50% more than it exports and has 156 million people in the workforce.

    Norway and Sweden's success has nothing to do with political models and entirely to do with geography. If the Aegean had oil fields, Greece would be a socialist paradise too.

  113. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by jonnyj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're quite right that the first two bailouts primarily rescued Greece's creditors, but Greece already owed that money to someone. The losers in those transactions weren't the Greeks - the big losers European taxpayers who adopted the Greek government's debts.

    But you're very mistaken if you think that the biggest buyers of government debt are the banks. Pension funds, investment funds and insurance companies have far more cash to splash.

    You're also pretty ignorant if you claim that institutions perform no credit assessment of their investments. For traded bonds like government IOUs, that assessment is essentially outsourced to three credit reference agencies, Moody's, Standard and Poor's and Fitch. Those agencies are supposedly licenced and regulated but utterly failed to identify the risk with Greek debt ahead of the downturn. If you're looking for a scapegoat on the creditor side, they're a much better scapegoat than the banks.

    Blaming the banks is a lazy knee-jerk reaction that's not really grounded in fact. P.S. I'm not a banker.

  114. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't even think trade will stop, sure they won't be able trade Dramas for goods and services

    Comedies generally sell better.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  115. Re:Outside help by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Please, do at least read the article before repeating popular misinformation.

    Welcome to Slashdot. I can see from your number you've been here for some time, but when you immigrate, you should always try to integrate into the host society. RTFA? You are insulting my culture.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  116. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by demachina · · Score: 2

    Iâ(TM)m not blaming âoebankersâ exactly, Iâ(TM)m blaming people who loan money to people who are may or may not pay it back and when they dont get paid back they go running to their central banks or governments and demand they get made whole at the expense of everyone else. Same thing happened in the U.S. in 2009 with the TARP and assorted other bail outs.

    Yea the rating agencies really sucked especially leading up to the crash in 2008, but it doesnâ(TM)t relieve lenders of ultimate responsibility for their actions. If the credit ratings are wrong its the responsibility of the lender to figure this out, no one else.

    Lenders collect interest on their loans partially to cover the potential risk they wont get paid back, the higher that risk the higher the interest they collect. If they collect high interest rates on risky mortgages and then when someone defaults on them central banks and governments make them whole it creates massive moral hazard.

    If the Greeks were a bad risk prior to 2008, which they probably were, the interest rates they had to pay should have been higher and they would have been dissuaded from borrowing or lenders would have been dissuaded from lending to them. Instead the EU created a perverse system where risky borrowers (all of the PIIGS) got relatively cheap money and a lot of it and were incentivized to take as much of it as they could. The EU and the lenders are 100% to blame for this situation for throwing the money at them.

    The PIIGS shouldâ(TM)ve never entered an economic union with Germany in the first place, they had no chance of competing with Germany locked in to the same currency. It was a win win for Germany on all fronts.

    --
    @de_machina
  117. Re:Sucks by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Apparently you have never read the short story 'Harrison Bergeron'

    I thought he was a frequent contributor who writes stories that are as far from short as it's possible to be?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  118. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    The reason the U.S. can keep going is that the Fed can print money and lend it to the government. The Federal Reserve is not part of the government and makes money on the money it lends. The tax money you pay doesn't really go where you think it goes. Why do you think our money says "Federal Reserve Note" on the bills?

    And they don't answer to anybody. Politicians who try to control the Fed don't last very long.

    According to our Constitution the government is supposed to be the ones printing the money, not some non-governmental central bank. Central banks are evil and we never should allowed one to take control

    One of these days there will be a day of reckoning and it won't be pretty. I hope I'm dead before that happens.

  119. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by Zalbik · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Greeks just got more debt piled on top of too much debt and its totally destroyed their economy.

    A few additional interesting facts:

    1) The original cause of the Greek debt was due to the fact that greek labor costs were significantly higher than other EU nations. When they joined the EU, this caused a large trade deficit...leading to lower GDP and higher debt.

    2) Greece has always been somewhat left-leaning and rather than curtail spending during low income years, they actually increased spending by incurring more debt

    3) The government (with the help of some banks) "hid" their massive deficit spending through the use of credit default swaps. This made Greece appear to be a better investment than they actually were when other banks provided loans.

    4) Greece also historically has one of the highest rates of tax evasion

    All of the above contributed to the present crisis, not just "bad greek loans".

    Citations mostly from wikipedia, but plenty of similar info on the web.

  120. Re:Outside help by TWX · · Score: 1

    Socioeconomic times that allowed women to not generate income are the exception, not the norm. Before the Industrial Revolution both genders worked mostly out of the home or on the farm, and often their kids were also roped into work. Once the Industrial Revolution hit, many women continued to work from home while their husbands went to work in factories, if they themselves didn't also transition to factory life. Only the wealthy could afford for one spouse to not work. It is not reasonable to expect one unskilled or only moderately skilled worker to supply the economic resources for multiple people on average.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  121. Re:Taking on the account, while letting the banks by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Sounds like it's time to get people working the land again. I would hate to take a job that I wasn't happy with, but sometimes I suppose it is better than starving?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  122. Re:Outside help by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Being unemployed in Greece, then either they would be unemployed in Germany/France which doesn't require knowing the language. Or they'll get a get a job which doesn't require knowing the language.

    Or, get this, they already know German or French. Some people speak foreign languages you know.

  123. Re:Outside help by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 2

    actual interest payments are somewhere around 2.6% to 4.3% of GDP (depending on your calculation method)
    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6e55...

    greek tax revenue as a proportion of gdp is about 30%
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    so greek interest payments are approx 10% of tax receipts
    http://data.worldbank.org/indi...

  124. Re:Outside help by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    On the other hand living for a while in a foreign country can be a fantastic experience. I had a 2 of the best years of my life when I did it.

  125. Re:Sucks by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

    We just don't have the will to really go after companies for hiring illegal immigrants. Neither party does and just lets it happen. Do that and demand for labor will go up significantly. Wages will go up for certain professions and people will take those jobs. It'll work itself out naturally if we actually cared about enforcing immigration laws.

  126. Re:Outside help by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Isn't it pretty much how student loans work?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  127. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Educated young oeople were flooding out of Greece long before the current government took over.

    What, both of them?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  128. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Greece reported a nearly 2 billion euro surplus in 2014, without taking interest payments into account.

    I could take a cash advance on a credit card at 28%, put it in a deposit account at 1%, and generate a surplus without taking interest payments into account.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  129. Re:Outside help by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Why didn't you slip the tax inspectors a grand to certify you as earning 9,999.99 EUR (you don't pay any tax until you earn 10k) like everyone else did?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  130. Re:Outside help by TheSync · · Score: 1

    The MESS is caused by the baby boom and Greece's liberal government funded pensions

    I'd argue that this MESS is caused by the high level of labor and business regulation in Greece.

    Ireland got into a big debt crisis as well, but because it has a high level of economic freedom, it was able to exit its rescue program due to economic growth (despite "austerity").

    Spain has just begun to reform its labor and business regulations, and it is finally showing some return to economic growth

    Germany had the Hartz labor Reforms before the economic crisis, so it never needed a rescue.

    Greece remains last in the Eurozone in economic freedom rankings and highest in the Eurozone for corruption rankings.

  131. Re:Outside help by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    And lots of people have left Greece. But there are limits to that even in the US which doesn't have language barriers.

  132. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    They wont let the poor starve. Starving people are dangerous beyond belief. The Czars learned this too late to prevent their extinction. Basic subsistence really doesn't cost all that much. It's not really living, just an existence.

  133. Re:Outside help by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    I understand all this sounds alien to you. Why so much taxation, why no services in return, why the state isn't punctual in paying back

    No, not alien at all. That's very much the direction that the US is heading, primarily courtesy of progressives and Democrats.

  134. Re:Outside help by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    How about encouraging unemployed Greeks to move to Germany or France.

    That was what European integration was supposed to enable, and labor mobility is essential for a functioning integrated market.

    But labor mobility is pretty limited in Europe by vast cultural differences and differences in job requirements. Even if you manage to get a job in Germany as a Greek, you will always be treated as a second class citizen.

  135. Another good reason to point out ... by quax · · Score: 1

    ... how afraid my poor countrymen are of Varoufakis:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  136. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by complete+loony · · Score: 2

    That's a good description, but everyone is still missing the actual cause. Firstly, the European Union is founded on an ideology that doesn't allow for an economic crisis. Second, when the crisis hit in 2008, the Greek *private* sector *reduced* their bank borrowing. Their money supply shrank, velocity shrank too, jobs were lost, tax receipts went down. Their government debt ratio went up, not because they were borrowing more, but because GDP fell. But the Euro doesn't allow Greece to run a large deficit, nor to increase their debt level, so they can't stimulate their economy to prevent further job losses.

    The Greek government weren't in good shape before, but the combination of a crisis and the rules imposed by the Union have wiped them out.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  137. Re:Outside help by quax · · Score: 1

    Sounds like it's a basketcase all around.

  138. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by quax · · Score: 1

    This is unfortunately very true.

    Everybody who has money in Greek banks will in all likelihood get robed with the stroke of a pen.

  139. Now This Is An Interesting Problem by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    How to get that economy rolling again after it grinds to a halt. I'm thinking put everything for the next couple of years into farming and becoming self-sufficient, and start printing a crypto-drachma. This will look exactly like a regular drachma, except it will have the word "Crypto" in front of it. People with money eat that shit up. The Crypto-drachma will be backed with the full standing and reputation of the Greek government... and... um... did I mention it has the word "Crypto" in front of it? Say that enough and it will quickly become the pre-eminent currency of the world. Admittedly I know absolutely nothing about economics, but apparently neither did the people who got Greece into this.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  140. Re:They should just by ezdiy · · Score: 1

    just krautchan leaking, move along...

  141. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by devman · · Score: 1

    They are not exiting the EU, just the Eurozone. Countries can be in the EU without being on the Euro.

  142. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Yet every time someone want to rein in the spending in the US, we hear "we have a paying bills problem, not a spending problem."

    It's hard to correct course when you have a mindset that all spending is now set in stone (not counting the automatic increases each year.)

    And yes, the war in Iraq caused a lot of that but the idea that we can use this to justify every increase in debt is silly.

  143. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Social program such as an oversized pointless military? Yes that is a one of their problems.

    Do people really think that socialist countries will not have over-sized pointless militaries? The whole issue is that most things government run becomes oversized and useless.

  144. That does not add up by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Out of 100K income paying 86K tax is 86% taxation. The highest income bracket is ~40% taxation. You are either mixing up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Something certainly does not add up.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:That does not add up by thogard · · Score: 1

      40% plus 55% of that 40% for next years is 62K. If it is calculated as 22% on the first $25k, then he owed 35,300 in just income tax (or 54,715 if including the 55% prepay assuming no credit). If it is his own company does he pay both the employee and employer part of social security for another 44%. If that isn't progressive, he is up to 79% with those two taxes but that doesn't include any deductions. Or maybe with deductions, that could be 28k income tax with ss deduction, 15k for next year, 16k+28k for ss for 87k or 59k if part of the ss came from the company.
      I would guess that property taxes are also related to income either because of pensioner discounts or because people with more money tend to own more expensive houses which tend to be taxed higher.
      Also how much of the left over money was spent on things that was taxed at 6% or 23% for the VAT? That would add somewhere between 2.5k and 10k. So 60k before any special taxes doesn't make the other 16% unlikely.

  145. Re:Outside help by russotto · · Score: 1

    A developer working in Greece will pay taxes in Greece and spend most of his/her income in Greece.

    Wrong. No one pays taxes in Greece.

    A developer leaving Greece will not pay income tax in Greece and IF he/she sends back any money it is nothing compared to what he/she would earn in Greece

    And of course the money going back will be sent in cash or to a foreign account, because no one in their right minds is going to trust a Greek bank.

  146. Re:Outside help by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

    But not any better in spelling.

  147. Re:Outside help by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    I've had lots of company sponsored training, one company even paid for some university courses in my field that I requested. At no point in time were there any obligations or conditions put on receiving the education/training, save that the university courses I had to have a passing mark in or I'd need to reimburse the company for the cost of the courses. That was definitely not an issue.

  148. Re:Outside help by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Who said anything about labour? No requirements to be unemployed.

  149. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by gutnor · · Score: 1

    That is a silly argument like the finance minister of Greece saying "we can't go back to the drachma because we sold the presses". The EU would just create a law for the Greek exit on the spot and that's it.

    The reason there is no mechanism in place is a "political statement" that means we are in this together and we are serious about it, but in practice it is at best a technical details. The problem obviously is that that contradict the original political statement and that's the open door for countries to bail out and angry citizen requiring "bad member of the EU/EURO" to be let go.

    That is the risk - letting the Greek go probably means the end of the EURO - the fact that there is no mechanism is smoke and mirrors.

  150. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by davydd · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but you're out of date. The Greek government's primary surplus disappeared shortly after the election of the Syriza government.

    Sorry, but you're... inaccurate. The Greek government's primary surplus for Q1 2015 was €1.74 billion against a target of €119 million. This was achieved by collecting €1 billion more in tax in the month of March than had been expected. http://www.thetoc.gr/eng/econo...

  151. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by davydd · · Score: 1

    2) Greece has always been somewhat left-leaning and rather than curtail spending during low income years, they actually increased spending by incurring more debt

    Wow. That's an impressive ideological bias you're carrying there. True, Greek governments have increased spending in low-income years, and in high-income years, but Greece, like many countries, has alternated between left-leaning and right-leaning governments since the end of its dictatorship in 1974. It's a problem caused by a clientelistic state that got in the habit of purchasing votes, not by "lefties". It's worth noting that the current government, the one everyone rushes to label as "radical left", is the first and only to promise to tackle the clientelism and corruption, to commit to a balanced budget, and to deeply reform the way the economy works, taking advice from the OECD. But everyone's too busy talking about how "left" they are to notice.

    3) The government (with the help of some banks) "hid" their massive deficit spending through the use of credit default swaps. This made Greece appear to be a better investment than they actually were when other banks provided loans.

    So if I'm unemployed, but borrow a suit and tie and comb my hair before going to the bank to ask for money, it makes me a better investment? Do you think the banks and the Eurozone were unaware of Greece's financial trickery? Do you think maybe they should have looked into it a little deeper before lending billions? I really don't think there can be talk of reckless borrowing without a corresponding conversation about reckless lending.

    All of the above contributed to the present crisis, not just "bad greek loans".

    Yes and no. All of the above contributed to what would have been a Greek crisis. It had a rotten state and economy for 35 years when the global financial crisis happened, and when the bubble burst the problems were completely exposed. The piling of the largest loan in history onto the shoulders of an insolvent nation, accompanied by one of the harshest fiscal adjustments ever made, is what turned it from a Greek crisis into a European crisis. The willful denial of this by the Eurozone and other European leaders is what has contributed to making it a never-ending crisis.

  152. Re:Outside help by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Now look at that, we have found the one Greek who actually has paid his taxes. I think the reason why the state isn't punctual in paying back is that they are still stunned by the fact that somebody actually has paid his due.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  153. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by davydd · · Score: 1

    Note not just socialism, but socialism *AND* cutting taxes low.

    Honestly, where do people get this from? Greece is not "socialist". It alternated centre-left and centre-right governments for 40 years before the current "socialist" government, which is 100% opposed to the clientelistic practices of its predecessors.

    Cutting taxes low? Try these on for size: 23% sales tax. 26% corporate tax, which the current government wants to raise to 29%. High income tax, with the self-employed being taxed from the first euro of earnings. Massive employee and employer contributions for health and pension plans. An emergency "solidarity" tax introduced to raise money during the crisis. An emergency property tax levied on electricity bills, with the result that those who couldn't pay the tax had their electricity cut off. Greece is a heavily taxed nation, and with the burden of those taxes falling most heavily on the economically weakest, it is far from socialist.

  154. Re:Outside help by marsu_k · · Score: 1

    Might be that things are different now, but when I lived in Germany at the turn of the millennium, an EU citizen could be a "prospective employer" (that is, unemployed and looking for work) in another EU country for three months, after which one has to follow some local rules. At the time in Germany that meant getting a health insurance. Which, actually, was not that cheap. (Which also incidentally was the reason I got married - suddenly my health insurance, as I was working, covered my girlfriend as well, and my taxes dropped like 10%. Why not? So I guess you can say I got married for money. Once we left Germany the incentive to remain married didn't exist anymore.)

  155. Re:Outside help by marsu_k · · Score: 1

    s/employer/employee

  156. Re:Outside help by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

    That is the most wrong I heard this week. It's demographics 101: when you no longer present a burden to your home country's social services, health care, transportation, etc, and yet you still contribute to the economy by regularly sending disposable income home, it IS VERY GOOD for your home. Salary's are normally used in their own country of origin (where the money "sprouts" from), but in this case it is not, thus being much higher than the disposable income you would have at home, and it still pays full VAT for anything it is used for. Not to mention this money is like an injection that inflates the country's economy: it comes from absolutely no trade of goods. Money comes in, and only you got out temporarily.

    A developer working abroad will also eventually come back and spend his abroad-collected fortune on buying houses, cars, funding companies, etc etc. Together with the disposable income he regularly uses on home travels, family helping, and this post-emigration phase, this all translates in the total cost Greece put on his education providing EXPONENTIALLY HIGHER RETURN, than he would by just contributing in usual fashion to the GDP (i.e. working locally).

    In case you didn't notice, most countries restrict immigration (ppl in) for a reason, while most country governments incentivize or even preach in speeches emigration (ppl out). To their own citizens, really. The former is usually a bad practice because most governments are supposed to solve problems that create conditions for emigration (this wins them votes), but that doesn't prevent comfortable governments (fresh out of ellection) from speaking their mind, like portuguese Prime Minister Passos Coelho did, telling fresh out of college people to "leave their comfort zone".

    And don't forget one thing: your parent's payed for your education with their taxes. A good state system should be efficient enough that, with 1-3 children, 2 adults working an entire 40y of work life can provide enough tax revenue for children education, their retirement, and other social developments in their community. If it doesn't, something's wrong with the country, and the better thing to do is, once again, leave. For different reasons, yet valid ones too.

  157. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by delt0r · · Score: 1

    You really believe that surplus don't you. Here is a little trick I learned early in life. If someone lies all the time about something, like claiming they have money they don't, you shouldn't believe them because they are *lying* again.

    --
    If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  158. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by delt0r · · Score: 1

    If the Aegean had oil fields, Greece would be a socialist paradise too.

    More likely there would be far more war with turkey.

    --
    If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  159. Re:Outside help by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    It's the exact opposite in case of Greece, though religious zealots following the "all regulation is bad" religious movement will obviously try to present it to be otherwise even when lack of regulation is the key problem.

    You see, Greece's key issue is corruption. This corruption is cause by lack of regulation, which is caused by extremely wealthy, largely unregulated private industries such as shipping and tourism buying government people out wholesale to remove regulation even further.
    This in turn caused absurd situation where they not only don't pay any tax, but collect money from the state in various subsidies. They are effectively parasites of the state, riding free on combination of lack of regulation which would prevent such activity and corruption which they can use portion of this money siphoned from the people to encourage. Which they once again use to reduce regulation.

    The "overbearing regulation" often discussed in Greece is typically largely irrelevant regulation, such as certain state industries that wouldn't really survive otherwise anyway, like rail. Industries where the actual money is in Greece, such as shipping, are almost completely unregulated. That is why a significant part of the Eurogroup package is massive increase of regulation of said industries. Deregulation demands, which are often advertised in very specific parts of Western mass media mainly concerns those few industries that are essentially loss leaders and deregulating them would simply cause a massive infrastructural loss without any substantial benefits to the society in many cases.

    Other examples where regulation is considered to be needed to be increased rather than decreased are labour market. Eurogroup went all the way to clearly state that they want ILO to look at the Greek market, because it's so deregulated that it's impossible to police and tax.

  160. Re:Outside help by crypticedge · · Score: 1

    Libertarian communities are nothing but group think echo chambers led by the least educated members of the american population.

    You'd have to be mentally deficient to think the libertarian policy of "spend, but have no taxes" would work outside of imagination land.

  161. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by LordFoom · · Score: 1
    I think your understanding is incorrect. According to the independent:

    "A Jubilee study has shown that since 2010, the IMF, European governments and the European Central Bank has lent €252 billion to Greece. Over the same period, €232.9 billion has been spent on debt payments, bailing out Greek banks and paying ‘sweeteners’ to speculators to get them to accept the 2012 debt restructuring. This means less than 10% of the money has been used for anything else.

    Back in 2010, nearly all government debt was owed to private entities such as banks. Today 78 per cent is owed to the public sector, primarily people in other Eurozone countries, but also throughout the world through the IMF’s loans"

    http://www.independent.co.uk/n...

    If almost all government debt was held by private entities in 2010, but only 22% today, that says to me that the money was originally lent by bankers, who were then bailed out by public institutions, with very little going to Greece itself.

  162. Re:Outside help by crypticedge · · Score: 1

    If you ever read any "Marxist" writings, or the actual books on communism, you'd see that in them the removal of the state government is a stated end result. That's true communism though, something you Alex Jones loving loons never will understand. "Big government" was a conservative institution until Reagan convinced conservatives they should GIVE the government setup institutions to the people who already had the most. Not even charge for it, but have the government build it on the back of the people and hand it over to the people who already were at the top to run it privately. Conservatism is welfare for the rich at the expense of the whole nation. Conservatism is theft.

  163. Re:Outside help by crypticedge · · Score: 1

    "fiat currency" "Gold standard"

    Yep, you're a crazy person. Here's a hint, all currency is "fiat". Even gold. Gold only has a value that we assign to it, no more no less, as does every other currency standard ever conceived.

  164. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Norway and Sweden's success has nothing to do with political models and entirely to do with geography. If the Aegean had oil fields, Greece would be a socialist paradise too.

    Not even close. Sweden doesn't have one drop of oil, we have industry. And adding to that, the social programmes of Sweden are more expansive than our Norwegian brethren, who have oil. You see the Norwegians fund almost all their oil income into the world's largest and most well managed oil fund that is set up to last "indefinitely". They're most certainly not burning it. (The money. The majority of the oil most certainly burns).

    Also, the oil is a recent thing, barely thirty years old. (I am old enough to remember when Norway was "poor" and we used to go shopping for cheaper staples there), and guess what, Sweden's social programmes were even further ahead than the rest of Europe in particular, and the world in general.

    --
    Stefan Axelsson
  165. Re:Outside help by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I've heard of judging those in history by modern standards before, but this is stupid fucking slashdot commenter lunacy.

    And yet you replied anonymously, like the abject coward you are, because you knew what you were saying was stupid.

    Athens is the birthplace of democracy because it's the birthplace of democracy.

    They didn't have democracy. They had oligarchy. That's precisely what we have here in the USA now. I presume it's also what they have in greece, since it's what they've always had.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  166. Re:Outside help by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    So the US just got a little more breathing room since the famous 47% is now only 43%?

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  167. Re:Outside help by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    And Ayn Rand's dead ears just perked up. Atlas Shrugged, anyone?

    Liberals: "1984" and "Atlas Shrugged" where warnings, NOT instruction manuals.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  168. Re:Outside help by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    No, that doesn't work. In the EU, you claim your unemployment benefits in the country you last worked.

    It isn't clear whether countries like Germany are obligated to pay welfare under EU law, so obtaining benefits is likely to be difficult for out of work EU citizens coming to Germany. If a significant number of Greeks were doing this, it would simply mean that the laws would get changed and/or that Greece would get booted out of the EU entirely. Neither France nor Germany would be willing to pay welfare for people who didn't pay into their systems.

    Sorry, I hadn't realized how stupid your suggestion was and how ignorant you were of European rules.

  169. Re:Outside help by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I replied anonymously because I don't have an account, you idiot.

    Accounts are free, and you think I'm the idiot?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  170. Re:BS by s.petry · · Score: 1

    I would imagine the fact that Tsipras has had numerous face to face and phone meetings with Putin in both Greece and Russia in the last 6 months alone:

    So has Barack Obama, so has Angelina Merkel, John Kerry, David Cameron, etc, etc, etc... That is what heads of National Departments and Nations do because it's in their job description. Your reasoning is completely irrational.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  171. Re:Outside help by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Smart and good spelling are completely unrelated.

    Anybody who can only think of one way to spell a word, has no imagination.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  172. Re:Outside help by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Implicit assumption in your thinking is that government is efficient in spending it's money. It is not.

    A large part of the benefit of government spending goes to government employees and contractors, who don't work for shit and are typically overpaid. (Don't even bother pulling out 20 year old studies done by government workers. We all know they are pure BS.)

    If government work wasn't unduly profitable, why would so many people/unions/companies fight so hard for 'their share' of it?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  173. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by bobbied · · Score: 1

    They wont let the poor starve.

    I don't know who you think "they" are but it's not the government of Greece. The government has NO MONEY and has no way to raise any money. It cannot even print money. After the vote this weekend, they will have nearly zero economic activity to tax and have no income. So where they'd surely love to keep paying out on social programs, they simply will not be able to. The poor and retired will stop getting their benefits, many will die for lack of food, medication and basic medical care.

    Now if you are talking about humanitarian aid from OUTSIDE Greece, you might be right on that score. But the bulk of this assistance will NOT come from the government of Greece.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  174. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    The US prints dollars, the debt is in dollars. Think about your assertion and tell us how it could ever come to pass.

  175. Re:Sucks by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    My keyboard doesn't have characters for Scottish sounds.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  176. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but "The Turner Diaries" is just a wet dream, it has no basis in reality.

  177. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    The disparity in currency value allowed alot of people to make alot of money when Greece entered the EU.

  178. Re:Taking on the account, while letting the banks by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Who has that power over bitcoin?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  179. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    You can't let people starve. I reiterate, starving people are dangerous. If the government of Greece can't feed it's people that government will be swept away in an ocean of blood. Basic subsistence food is cheap. There is no reason for people anywhere to starve. Choices have to be made and I'm sure there are things that can be eliminated to free up funds. Obviously Greece will have to come off the Euro and print it's own money.

  180. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

    Iceland immediately defaulted in a similar situation, they had some short term pain but they rebounded.

    You know, I actually believed in this too, until recently, when a friend smelled bullshit and called me out on it. We actually went to look at some numbers, and Iceland's GDP is still nowhere near where it was in 2007. It grew 30% in 5 years, which is great, but it would still need to grow almost 30% again to reach 2007 levels. So they did, and are still paying for their default. I'll refrain from comparing the situation to that of Greece.

  181. Re:Sucks by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Not just skilled labor, labor in general. Capital has run amok.

  182. Re:Outside help by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Lets see. Join a failed currency and an failing political union, or retain national autonomy and self-determination?

    Have you seen the total shit coming out of Juncker and his cronies over the Greek situation? Apparently "protecting the people of Greece" is a 'betrayal' by the Greek PM.

    Forgive me for being a retard by preferring to betray the European superstate dream by opting the fuck out.

  183. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Ok.. Austerity AND violence are coming to Greece. Printing their own currency doesn't help this, at least in the short term. Nobody wants Greek money so they won't sell them anything for it and won't loan them anything else because they don't pay you back.

    Feeding people subsistence amounts of food will cost more than Greece can pay.

    Further, the ONLY real industry that Greece has that brings in foreign currency (tourism) is about to be totally decimated by riots and violence.

    Greece is about to be left in tatters and remanded to third world status, unless they reverse their minds and elect to accept austerity. All this brinkmanship going on is only doing grave damage to Greece.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  184. Sell! by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Do what counties used to do when short on funds, sell real estate!

    Russia sold Alaska, Napoloeon sold Louisiana, remember the Gadsen purchase?

    Aren't there some islands Russia are willing to buy for some southern Naval Bases? China would do it too, just to rub our noses in it. And they have cash!

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  185. The facts about Greece by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Excerpt:
    Too much of what has been reported in the U.S. media in these last, fraught weeks has echoed fulminations of the creditors that distort reality. Syriza has been painted as a party of the extreme left, with Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras’s government depicted as irresponsible and irreverent. This scorn comes from troika functionaries committed to enforcing utterly ruinous policies and whose behavior towards a democratically elected government has been insulting in the extreme.
    --- end excerpt ---

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

                    mark "libertarianoids - you're entitled to your opinions, you are *not* entitled to your facts"

  186. Re:Outside help by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    The big problem is that it prevents national economies from doing what they need to do in order to survive. If Germany was on marks, and Greece was on drachmas, we'd have seen the mark become worth more and more drachmas, and this would have allowed the economies to balance. Greece would attract German tourists, since their marks would go farther, and export more and import less. This would mean that Greece would go through a period of poverty, but it wouldn't distort the Greek economy. That would work.

    By mandating the same currency, without having more of a financial union, Greece lost an invaluable tool in managing its problems.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  187. Re:Outside help by KGIII · · Score: 1

    In 2012 I had 100,000 Euros income paid 86,000 Euros spent on taxes

    In 2007 I sold my business to a major government contractor, that is pretty much all they do - government contracts from food service to defense, for an eight-figure sum. My taxes were nowhere near your taxation rate and now they are even less, I pay less in capital gains taxes than I paid before. (I can afford an accountant and a lawyer now.) The only taxes that I pay "dearly" on are property taxes and I do get raped there. I really can not complain - I still pay less than I probably should.

    For those who would say that I should pay more... I pay exactly what is due and avoid any taxes possible. I donate as much as is reasonable instead. I consider it my same social spending only I get to spend it on feeding hungry people instead of bombing brown people.

    But, come on now... You spent an absurd amount on taxes, overall taxes, and that is not cool. Now if you were making a huge some of money, say 10,000,000 per year as some jackass CEO, then sure - the amount is still absurd but the overall amount that you'd keep is still acceptable. In your case? I do not blame you for being unhappy. That is simply unacceptable. The obvious result is that you, and others like you, will go elsewhere and the business will move elsewhere when and where it can unless they provide some very compelling reasons to stay. At those rates? I am going to need a daily supply of hookers and blow (and blackjack) on the government dime. Otherwise? I am taking my ball and I am going home. Fuck you and fuck your society (no, not you personally but the society you left) because I do not like my neighbor that much. Oh, I love my neighbor, so to speak, I just do not love him that much.

    You kept 14% of your income... I am shocked that you stayed as long as you did. You probably would have been better off being on welfare. It probably pays better. Note: I have no idea how Greece's welfare system works. I have been to Greece twice (I once stayed for six months while I did some work there) and never asked about the welfare system but I did deal with their government and, if that is any indication, you may well have been better off on welfare. (The myriad government agents that I consulted with were almost always different people, almost always had no idea what was going on, and were really difficult to contact.)

    Seriously... How did you manage to put up with that for as long as you did? Is it the only job you could get? Was there a compelling reason to do so such as a significant other? I'd need hookers, blow, and blackjack and I am not going to let them skimp on any of them.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  188. Re:Outside help by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Saved along with the attribution. Consider it stolen (though attributed) in some future conversation. It is almost shameful that nobody noticed your post and the value of it. So very true and so very overlooked. A gem in the rough, so to speak.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  189. Re:Outside help by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I found the one guy who was paying Grecian taxes. He is up-thread and paid pretty much all of his income in taxes (86% total taxation rate). He left. Assuming he was telling the truth, and I generally do make that assumption, he was the last tax payer and now Greece is truly screwed. I almost want to send Greece a check for like $50 to "help them out." Also, I think it would be cool to have the canceled check. Maybe we need to start a Kickstarter for Greece? Anyone who pays gets a copy of the cashed check. The three highest payers get to kick a Grecian politician in the nuts/vagina - their choice. If the amount paid is high enough they might just go for it.

    Maybe we can set it up so that a donation of $100,000 USD would net the payer the chance to kick the prime minister or president (or both) in the nuts while recording it for later playback on YouTube. I say it is far more useful than buying Bidden a car. On top of that, the politicians can show how much they love (or do not love) their country by their willingness to endure pain on behalf of their countrymen. It is bound to alter the elections in one way or another.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  190. Re:Outside help by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Neo-conservative Republicans are ashamed to be associated with the Republican political party. They have co-opted the Libertarian moniker, to the detriment and disgust of the party members who have no way of stopping them and are not organized well enough to compel them to change, and this has been a trend for at least ten years. It started happening during Bush's second campaign and continued to grow until a couple of years into that presidency. Until such a time most of us Libertarians (I am now a registered Independent/Green Party member - they are tied together in this state) actually advocated things like universal health care, taxes on businesses and wealthy, a reasonable tax rate all around, laws keeping our environment clean, etc...

    No, we did not advocate those things out of kindness, we advocated those things because they are more financially sound for long-term growth. Healthy people make better workers and an infrastructure to get them to work gets them to buy stuff. However we advocated personal freedoms such as the right to ingest what we choose even with the potential detriment of self-harm. A number of us disagreed with everything and disagreed with how we should do this while still siding on the personal liberties side of things. However, most of us were not maladjusted teens and old people who want to screw anybody over in their personal effort to gain wealth. Most of us were not Ayn Rand fans either.

    The reason I say things in the past tense is because that was the past. Today it has changed. The party has been taken over, the platform completely bastardized (not that it was ever that clear), and the vocal (I am not sure if they are a minority any more) bunch have put the party on a different path entirely. Libertarians used to be sane, usually to the left than the Democrats, and did not believe in some pure form of any political ideology because it is well known that no such thing can exist effectively now that we've grown past the tribal stage. We are not, or at least were not, advocates of anarchy (usually, there were some nutjobs), nor did we suggest that capitalism was the solution to everything or even most things. We did advocate state rights, personal liberties, and social responsibilities. We were in favor of things like, you know, a social safety-net. We were in favor of educating those on said nets so that they could become productive persons who could enjoy their liberties because liberties should be what everyone has and not just for the wealthy.

    That being said, it is not what the party really is or what the party is about. It is what is currently being thrown about in the party's name however. The Democrats are not defined by Obama nor are the Republicans defined by Bush. The Tea Party is not Libertarian. Greenpeace is not Democrats. I can not say who is in the majority now, I can only say that the nuts were once a vocal minority or even just a minority. Now they seem to be prevalent enough to make it so that I changed my party affiliation to more accurately represent my voting. My beliefs have not changed. I just do not like the platform as it seems to stand now. Of course the whole party is segmented and about as manageable as a herd of cats. It is hard enough to get a clear message out and much worse to actually get meaningful statistics. Most of us got stoned and forgot to fill out the survey. It is hard to remember the importance of voting when you're stoned.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  191. Re:Outside help by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I can not speak for the habits of Greece. I do not know and am unwilling to put out the effort of informing myself as it is not important to me nor does it alter what I am saying. However, avoiding taxes is legal and is the fiscally responsible thing to do. It is the responsibility of businesses and citizens to pay the least amount of taxes that they are legally obligated to pay. Tax avoidance is what you are meant to do and is well within the law in any country where I have earned money.

    Tax evasion is illegal and is morally reprehensible even if you do not agree with the manner in which your taxes are spent or feel that you are being taxed more than is proper. Tax evasion should not be tolerated and, if this is what is happening, should be investigated with the judged guilty parties being punished according to the laws of their country.

    Tax avoidance is very different than tax evasion. I avoid a lot of taxes by donating to charity. (I donate more than I can deduct actually. I do not donate for tax avoidance purposes, that is just an added benefit.) By structuring my income from capital gains (not illegal structuring) and making use of a limited liability corporation I am able to reduce the amount of taxes owed in a lawful manner which is ethical. That is perfectly legal and is something that one probably should do. Now if I have money in a safe deposit box in the Cayman Islands and I have a currier bring it to me in $9500 increments while also lugging a bunch of pre-paid debit cards in his suitcase then I am evading taxes and that is illegal and immoral.

    To clarify my own definitions: Morals do not change (though are not absolutely universal). Ethics are mutable, they can be changed for the situation. Cf. Situational Ethics.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  192. Re:Outside help by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Please, do at least read the article before repeating popular misinformation.

    Welcome to Slashdot. I can see from your number you've been here for some time, but when you immigrate, you should always try to integrate into the host society. RTFA? You are insulting my culture.

    I am pretty sure that this is the first time I think someone has been accused of being a racist for suggesting that another should RTFA. As a long-time reader of this site (though I did not join for quite a while) it brings a tear to my eye to see such. It is... It is beautiful!

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  193. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    The US prints dollars, the debt is in dollars. Think about your assertion and tell us how it could ever come to pass.

    Your premise is wrong. The US doesn't print dollars - it borrows them from the Federal Reserve.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  194. Re:Outside help by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    No, that doesn't work. In the EU, you claim your unemployment benefits in the country you last worked.

    That's absolutely not true. All benefits are paid by the country you are resident in.

    It isn't clear whether countries like Germany are obligated to pay welfare under EU law, so obtaining benefits is likely to be difficult for out of work EU citizens coming to Germany.

    It's perfectly clear. Germane or France or any other EU country have to pay benefits to any EU resident according to the same rules as they pay to a national resident.

    Sorry, I hadn't realized how stupid your suggestion was and how ignorant you were of European rules.

    I am European you ignorant American prick.

  195. Re:Outside help by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    This is the fundamental principle of the EU. People must be treated the same by a country no matter where in the EU they are from. So if Germany pay unemployment benefits but require healthcare payment from it's own citizens then that exactly what it must offer and require from any other EU citizen that is currently resident in Germany.

  196. Re:Outside help by marsu_k · · Score: 1

    I have to ask, have you actually ever lived in an EU country? Sure, there is the bureaucracy to get around, depending on the country. But there is not a single EU country where (despite what the populists will have you believe) one could effectively say "fukkit, I'm going to get provided by the government". If there were, there'd be not such a large Roma population begging in the streets during the summer, or they'd be rather stupid for not getting all that TLC from the government. As it is (this coming from a perspective of a Finn), the Roma remain a fringe. If it would be so easy for them to apply for social security, one would assume they'd do just that. Yet, they continue to beg (and to do various other crime, but I digress). Funny that, given that the EU should provide them no matter where they come from.

  197. Re:Outside help by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    It's perfectly clear. Germane or France or any other EU country have to pay benefits to any EU resident according to the same rules as they pay to a national resident.

    Really, do you pull this b.s. out of your ass? A minute with Google will show that you are wrong:

    http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wir...

    Since you are probably too uneducated to read German, let me help you with a translation for the most relevant section:

    For a stay of up to three months EU citizens need nothing more than a valid identity document. If a EU citizen wants to reside more than three months in another Member State, he must be a salaried employee or have his own business. If he does not have gainful employment he must have sufficient means to support himself and his family, so that he does not need to take advantage of welfare or other government benefits. In addition, his entire family is required to carry health insurance. These regulations are based on the 2004 EU Residency Directive intended to limit "social tourism" within the EU.

    I.e. the EU has rules in place specifically prohibiting what you recommend Greeks do.

    I am European you ignorant American prick.

    Being from Europe myself, I can indeed attest that both your understanding of politics and your conduct are typically European.

  198. Re:Outside help by TheSync · · Score: 1

    The OECD published 87 concrete recommendations for reducing administrative burdens in Greece, which are an unnecessary 3 billion Euro burden on Greek businesses annually.

    Some of the OECD suggestions include things like "simplify annual leave records", "streamline start-up notifications to the Labour Inspectorate for construction sites", "establish a clear VAT registration threshold at EUR 10 000", "remove inactive VAT taxable persons from the VAT register", "simplify the periodic VAT return", "Allow full electronic submission of all notifications to Registry (company changes and annual financial statements)", "simplify financial statements of small and micro companies","Streamline payment process for all GEMH notifications to allow payments without visiting an office", etc.

    Of course the OECD was not willing to say the most reasonable thing - Greece should have labor laws like the US. Fire people whenever you want, no crazy contracts, no crazy severance pay or vacations.

    We know that the Hartz Reforms on labor regulations is what brought German unemployment rates down from 10% in the early part of the 2000's and is why they survived the financial crisis so well.

    I concur that Greece ranks last in the Eurozone in Transparency International's corruption ratings. However I believe that corruption thrives when unclear and burdensome regulations make doing reasonable business impossible without paying someone off.

  199. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cr by Kester1964 · · Score: 1

    For banking and loans to work there is a simple rule, if you are foolish enough to make a bad loan to someone who probably won')t pay it back, then you pay the price when they default. Instead the people who make the bad loans (i.e. bankers) get to keep their bonuses profits and everyone else gets to pay for their stupidity, greed and corruption.

    This is a perfect example of moral hazard, and the bank executives should either be in jail, have their fortunes confiscated or both

  200. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Your the best kind of correct, "technically correct", but your still wrong.
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jo...

  201. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    The German and French banks are hardly private institutions. State banks etc.

    Private investors in Greek bonds already took a 'haircut'. Last time the deadbeats were bailed out.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  202. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    They can't dodge taxes and have their money in banks. So no. Their money is safe in a mattress, in hard assets or a Swiss bank.

    Greeks know their own politicians better than we do. They know BS when they hear it.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  203. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Nations don't take on the debt of their national banks. They own it from day one.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  204. Re:It's like Venezuela but without all the gun cri by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    It was always public greek debt, the only question is who the deadbeats owed money to. Went from German and French state banks to the euro zone central bank.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  205. Re:Outside help by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Just because someone is on the tit doesn't mean they stop what they were doing to pay the bills before the tit.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  206. Re: It's like Venezuela but without all the gun c by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    My point stands, the US cannot default on dollar debts.

  207. Re:Outside help by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    That would be because:
    1. US labour policies are abject failures designed to serve the top elites against everyone else. The only exception are equality portions of the law, which were enacted mainly after mass unrest and demonstrations related to those policies.
    Between the massive student debt bubble you have going, extreme difficulties people experience in work place and rise of "Walmartization" where so many people are doing jobs either for free or on minimal wage is not success for anyone but employer. And let's be honest here - US was one of the last Western countries in the world to give up institutionalized slavery, and slavery at least forced employers to take care of worker slaves to some degree.
    Modern US legislation has no such requirements. US is still to an extent riding on collective wealth it managed to amass in its golden 60s to 80s, but it's running out fast as shown by severe issues facing work force in US, even those employed.

    German policy is being largely retracted in many aspects because it managed to cause completely absurd situations such as working people who have to be on social security to survive, working families that cannot afford to have electricity and so on.

    Suggesting that it was workplace reforms rather than economic boom at the time that caused the German rise is hilariously absurd, essentially when you consider that reforms only hit the lowest strata of the society - it's still almost impossible to fire a worker in Germany, something that for example Nokia found out when they tried to close the last factory that was still making mobile phones in Germany back in late 2000s. It was a standard CDU-style reform sadly, fuck over the poorest, give money to the richest. Luckily the economic boom of 2001-2008 saved them from showing the worst consequences, which didn't hit until after 2008, such as masses of employed people who have to rely on social security, and Energiewende managing to score a successful double whammy on the same people where they couldn't even have electricity in their houses because of its rising prices.

    Suggesting that policy that causes people who are working to not be even able to afford electricity in a modern Western country is successful is... well, just says a lot about the one pronouncing the words. CDU ended up largely rolling back on many of the changes because of it.

    2. Greek workplace market in private sector is completely unregulated. That is much less regulation that even US. That is why OECD recommendations didn't make recommendations for workplace regulation in Greece. There aren't any to be made in terms of deregulating further because that would assume having any regulation that works in the first place. Outside the political hirings in public sector, which have nothing to do with labour policy and everything to do with massive corruption, Greek labour market is completely unregulated. It's the key problem because it's impossible to tax unregulated market like this. As a result, everyone just slips tax officials some fakelaki to say that they earn 9999.99EUR a year, incidentally lowest tax bracket which is 0% taxed.

    There was a post recently right here in this discussion where person was shocked as to why any of the devs, who are obviously private sector workers didn't just do that, just like everyone else does.

    Enacting proper regulation in workplace is one of the main recommendations of Eurogroup, which wants ILO to look at how to create a proper regulatory structure for Greek private sector and enact something that would actually enable government to tax private workers. This is one of the key problems in Greece today.

    Suggesting "deregulation" of such a system as a solution demonstrates a complete lack of comprehension of the topic. It's akin to suggesting that ship that doesn't have a hull yet could be made more mobile by stripping parts of its hull to make it lighter.

  208. Re:BS by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Let me repeat it: THE BUDGET OF GREECE IS BALANCED.

    Not if it doesn't have the money to pay debts. Debt payments are a government expense just as valid as roads, army, health care, pensions, or anything else that the government pays for. It's only when you remove debt payment that the budget becomes balanced.

  209. Re:Sucks by euroq · · Score: 1

    Saying that removing illegal immigrants will cause poor welfare Americans to start working in fields is like saying keeping the death penalty will stop people from killing each other. It's a conservative fantasy without any evidence (and actually evidence to the contrary).

    --
    Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
  210. Re:Outside help by euroq · · Score: 1

    Why is that semicolon in your signature?

    --
    Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.