Slashdot Mirror
Selfies Kill More People Than Shark Attacks
HughPickens.com writes: The Independent reports that so far this year more people have died while trying to take a 'selfie' than from shark attacks. So far, 12 people have lost their life while trying to take a photo of themselves but the number of people who have died as a result of a shark attack was only eight. Some recent selfie-fatalities: A 66-year-old tourist from Japan recently died after falling down some stairs while trying to take a photo at the Taj Mahal in India, a Mississippi woman was gored to death by a bison while visiting Yellowstone National Park, and in August a man trying to take a selfie was gored to death during a running of the bulls in Villaseca de la Sagra, Spain. Some groups have been trying to get on top of the wave. In June Disney banned selfie sticks in its amusement parks. And foreseeing the selfie crisis in a very specific way, New York State passed a bill in June 2014 to prohibit people from having their photo taken (or taking it themselves) while "hugging, patting or otherwise touching tigers."
... and selfie is just the causal action. Same way as surfing/swimming is the causal action in death by shark. Apples to Oranges.
How long till we see a tornado movie like shark-nado, but with deadly selfie sticks?
I'm so glad I now know that taking a selfie while swimming with sharks is not a good idea.
Next month on the Discovery Channel!
A deadly epidemic reaches around the globe and across cultures:
See it all on...
Selfie Week!
Somebody has to actually do it...
http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/sharkselfie.asp
If you get attacked by a shark take a selfie. That way your chance of death will be lower.
Sinning bitches!
First !!!
The less narcissistic pricks the better.
Seriously, while a couple of the accidents listed are acts of God and could have happened anyway, many of them, from the human gene pool perspective, deserved to die.
Putting a gun to your head while taking a picture? Turning your back on bulls and or bisons? Having to be told to NOT touch or hug tigers? I do agree with Disney on their policy however, as a selfie-stick on a ride is most likely to hurt somebody behind the person taking the shot.
Sorry, for the sake of the human species, these people should be allowed to remove themselves from the reproductive population.
Mimetics Inc. Twitter
n/a
added features;;; https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wmd+weather+deception ,,, yuk wonder we can even look at ourselves?
finally https://www.youtube.com/results?q=watching+the+watchers
The guy who posted this never bothered checking out his own links. If you read the story about the guy gored to death by a bull, he was filming two bulls fighting, not actually taking a selfie. Also, the bison death seems unrelated to selfies... so that would mean shark attacks come out ahead, yeh! The sharks win!
Selfies don't kill people.
People taking selfies kill people.
What are the chances a shark will die of a shark attack when it takes a selfie?
For journalists, a "selfie" is any photograph, apparently. Logic and semantics be damned, they're desperate to use the trendy new word.
There were more deaths via selfies than deaths on the moon this year.
that selfies have Jumped the Shark?
...I'll be here all week.
We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
she lifts oceans,, who believes she cannot use the same magnetic resonance to keep us breeding like bunnys since/until forever?
Fortunately for you, this is a tiger repellent comment.
Proof: Do you see any tigers modded-up in this comments section?
How many people have put themselves at risk of a shark death vs. a selfie death? Selfies are likely still safer when at-risk population size is known.
A shark attack is a direct mechanism of death — a thing that produces actual, physical harm. A selfie, on the other hand, is what health statisticians might classify as an “underlying mechanism” or an “intermediate mechanism,” depending on the exact circumstances: a thing that’s involved in, and maybe precipitates, an accident, but doesn’t actually cause any physical harm. (Unless your phone electrocutes you or something, but that’s a different situation.)
That may seem like a small distinction, but it’s actually pretty huge. Let’s turn to the World Health Organization to see how it breaks down the issue. WHO gives the example of a woman tripping over something on the floor and hitting her head on the counter; you’d never say that the thing on the floor killed her — that’s just the underlying mechanism. (Also, stupid.) The direct mechanism was hitting her head, just as in most “selfie deaths,” the direct mechanism is being struck by a car, falling down, what have you.
We could, for the sake of argument, compare the number of deaths from falling down the stairs to the number of deaths from shark attacks. Or we could compare the number of deaths while taking selfies to the number of deaths while swimming in the ocean.
But if we did that, we’d come to the boring conclusion that selfie-related deaths are total anomalies: a microscopic sliver of the big ole Death pie chart, scarcely even worth mentioning.
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
Yes, but terrorism!
Is this what we used to call DARWIN AWARD WINNERS!
Even before the Web, Usenet distributed texts yearly of the Darwin Awards, wonderful stories of people who took themselves out of the gene pool.
Selfies killing people?
Sound like a public service was performed.
If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
I don't need a multi million dollar study to determine that if you have factory ships taking out all of the fish from the local region then you are going to get more shark attacks as they look closer to shore for food.
Want less shark attacks, have less factory ships.
My ism, it's full of beliefs.
anyone got killed by a shark by a selfie? Darwins head would probably explode...
I endorse selfies. Selfies are the technological answer to what nature isn't capable of enforcing anymore: Natural Selection.
Every selfie death represents a cleaner gene pool of Humanity. The final solution with consent of the individual sourcing from stupidity.
ALL HAIL SELFIES
ALL HAIL SELFIES
Shoot they did a PSA sheet on it after some deaths:
http://www.theguardian.com/wor...
The little images are classic, my favorite is the person who appears to be jumping in front of a train while taking a selfie.
BlameBillCosby.com
Since we don't have large-scale wars, we need something else to cull the population of such imbeciles. Every little bit helps.
Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
Think of it as evolution in action.
So taking a picture while hugging a lion or jaguar is still ok? What about Ligers? This seems like way too specific of a law.
Just because we are able to cure many diseases that used to kill us doesn't mean evolution is halted. Yes, having a weak immune system is no longer lethal. But thankfully being too stupid to survive still is.
Don't try to mess with it. It can only improve the gene pool.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
>magnetic resonance
What about California? Do selfie sticks come with a warning that they may cause cancer?
I only look human.
My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
The statistic at hand - 12 people dead with phone in hand - doesn't take into account deaths that were caused by the sheer intention to take a selfie afterwards. The guy that recently fell from a 25m tall statue in Paris comes to mind... It's not just the act of having using a phone with a dangerous background that kills - sometimes the problem comes from getting to the place with that background. Problem, obviously, is the dead aren't here to talk about it anymore.
How many people died while trying to take a selfie with a shark? Is this considered a shark death, or a selfie death? Or do you count it in both columns?
I think I've seen this headline as clickbait before.
This seems disingenuous, if I were at risk of shark attack, I would much rather be armed with a large, expandable metal stick than with only my bare hands.
-- I was raised on the command line, bitch
A shark attack is a direct mechanism of death â" a thing that produces actual, physical harm. A selfie, on the other hand, is what health statisticians might classify as an âoeunderlying mechanismâ or an âoeintermediate mechanism,â depending on the exact circumstances: a thing thatâ(TM)s involved in, and maybe precipitates, an accident, but doesnâ(TM)t actually cause any physical harm. (Unless your phone electrocutes you or something, but thatâ(TM)s a different situation.)
The headline reads "Selfies Kill" but the summary clearly states that the story is about people who died while taking selfies. Just Another Old Guy indeed! ;-P
Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
Despite the hysteria, shark attacks are exceedingly rare. Enough so that entire years go by without a death. More people win the lottery than die from shark attacks. Lots more.
And also, the article is wrong. Nobody has ever died from taking a selfie. They died from a related or unrelated accident while taking or as a result from a selfie.
If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
OMG! Is this worse than NASCAR driving?
people_who_were_killed_by_clumsiness_while_taking_selfie = people_who_died_while_taking_selfie - people_who_were_KILLED_BY_selfie
people_who_died_while_taking_selfie=12
people_who_were_KILLED_BY_selfie=12
ergo, people_who_were_killed_by_clumsiness_while_taking_selfie=0
So if I take a selfie and die, at least I know it won't be my fault, due to clumsiness, staggeringly-shocking stupidity, bad conditions, bad luck, etc.
The example from the summary of the law passed in New York is a perfect example of lawmaking run amok. That lawmakers seriously spend their time working on laws like this whole leaving tons of others in committee is ridiculous.
One issue with that law is the bizarrely specific nature of it. But the other is the very existence of laws that are intended to prevent people from making stupid decisions that only affect them (nanny laws).
Do not take a selfie while being attacked by a shark.
Damn statistics.
If someone falls into the ocean while taking a selfie, and gets eaten by a shark, does that count as a selfie death or a shark death?
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
Is that shark with, or without friggin' laser?
Yawn.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Stupidity kills more people than shark attacks.
The root cause driving imbeciles to increase their risk of death with a superfluous action (selfie) during an already lethally dangerous maneuver is stupidity.
Selfnado 1, 2 and 3 then!
In related news, the government of India passed a law to prohibit people from having their photo taken (or taking it themselves) while "hugging, patting or otherwise touching the Statue of Liberty."
A new study shows that more people died while sleeping than from drunk driving. This proves that sleeping is more dangerous than drunk driving.
For the good of the human race we must allow selfies to continue.
Everyone who dies will raise the average IQ of the human race by a fraction.
It would be *criminal* to ban them from topping themselves for our benefit.
These sorts of articles that compare unrelated statistics are meaningless. It is relevant how many people die of selfies vs how many die of sharks vs how many die of lightning.
The woman in the Yellowstone case was "released with minor injuries." Why does the summary claim she was killed?
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/22/travel/yellowstone-woman-bison-attack-selfie/
Does this list also include people killed directly because of a selfie, or only people killed while attempting a selfie. A certain ISIS fighter's misguided social media post comes to mind.
Guy with the bull up on him, horn sticking out his chest, it's a shoo-in for selfie of the year.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
more people die from falling down the stairs than being hit by meteorites.
Where I can take all the tiger-selfies I want!
I took a selfie once but it was to see the clearance height of my 70L external frame backpack loaded up for a 5 day hike in winter. I ended up dropping the frame rails because snagging on tree limbs while ducking under them was troublesome. I know, I know... external frame packs are "vintage" and 70L is too much for just 5 days... Don't worry I have an internal frame 32L pack that I rock out the 3 other seasons, which I got down to 19.25lbs for wet-weather. All about that comfort.
Hashtag wayofftopic. That's how you hashtag right?