Slashdot Mirror


Alabama Man Sold a Priceless Apollo-Era Lunar Rover Protoype For Scrap Metal (vice.com)

Jason Koebler writes: An Alabama man allowed an Apollo-era lunar rover prototype to rot in his backyard before ultimately selling it to a junkyard for scrap metal last year, according to documents acquired from NASA as part of a Freedom of Information Act request. NASA spent much of 2014 attempting to acquire the priceless artifact for display in a museum, but it was ultimately destroyed before the agency could recover it.

138 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. I'll bite by kencurry · · Score: 3, Funny

    What the heck was he doing with a lunar rover prototype in Alabama?

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    1. Re:I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe something to do with Marshall Space Flight Center? It's in Alabama.

    2. Re:I'll bite by mitgib · · Score: 2
      Alabama is the home on the Marshall Space Flight Center

      In 1961, when President John F. Kennedy envisioned an American on the moon by the end of the decade, NASA turned to Marshall Space Flight Center to create the incredibly powerful rocket needed to turn this presidential vision into reality. Since its beginning in 1960, Marshall has provided the agency with mission-critical design, development and integration of the launch and space systems required for space operations, exploration, and scientific missions. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ma...

      --
      Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
    3. Re:I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      looking for intelligent life - apart from the 6 finger inbred retards that live there,

    4. Re:I'll bite by Solandri · · Score: 2
      From TFA:

      How did this person end up with the rover in the first place? It's unclear. NASA did not respond to a Motherboard request for more specifics, but an attorney quoted in the report noted that early Apollo prototypes were rarely tagged and often went missing.

      Also, the person who sold it for scrap inherited it when the "owner" (who presumably acquired it from NASA and knew its value) passed away. NASA dragged its feet contacting the new owner, who apparently didn't know its value.

    5. Re:I'll bite by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      The response is a nice copy and paste from the article but does not answer the question how the guy in Alabama ended up with the unit. That's more than a pencil or slide rule going missing, that's an 8 TON VEHICLE!

    6. Re:I'll bite by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      NASA dragged its feet contacting the new owner, who apparently didn't know its value.

      Sure NASA dragged it's feet. But I wonder if the historian walked over to the neighbor's house, knocked on the door, and mentioned that he though the guy had a piece of priceless artifact from NASA's history just sitting there. Even if the guy wasn't interested in contacting NASA right then, at least he would have known before he just scrapped it.

    7. Re:I'll bite by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Redstone/Huntsville was the Army missile development site for the German rocket scientists that were brought to the US as part of Operation Paperclip. Until Air Force took over missile development.

    8. Re:I'll bite by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      Obligatory xkcd comic.

      I love telling people we have the Nazis to thank for our space program.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    9. Re:I'll bite by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The response is a nice copy and paste from the article but does not answer the question how the guy in Alabama ended up with the unit. That's more than a pencil or slide rule going missing, that's an 8 TON VEHICLE!

      He was using it as a meth lab.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:I'll bite by lbmouse · · Score: 2

      "That's my Dad's shooting car. Just three more payments and it's ours."

    11. Re:I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot the rednecks. We have the Nazis and rednecks to thank for our space program.

    12. Re:I'll bite by wassomeyob · · Score: 1

      *whoosh*

      Double-whoosh

    13. Re:I'll bite by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 4, Funny

      He built it one piece at a time, and it didn't cost him a dime!

      --
      Rawr
    14. Re:I'll bite by TigerTime · · Score: 2

      Huntsville has a TON of NASA engineers and supporting cast. Auburn University has sent more astronauts to space than nearly any other university.

      Just because it's "Alabama" doesn't mean it's redneck. That's stereotyping at it's finest.

      The guy who died likely worked at NASA in the lunar program and possibly even designing the rovers. ...Frankly, it could have been this guy's: http://www.oanow.com/news/aubu...

    15. Re:I'll bite by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      Obligatory xkcd comic.

      I love telling people we have the Nazis to thank for our space program.

      And international criminal investigations/law enforcement. Interpol was run by SS generals for some years, including the likes of Reinhard Heydrich, the Butcher of Prague.

    16. Re: I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Why, in this age of political correctness and sensitivity, does nobody bat an eye at hate speech about people in the south?

    17. Re:I'll bite by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      What about the scrap yard workers? You'd think that somebody along the line would recognize such an icon of American history, and get the idea that it might be worth more than scrap. It just boggles the mind.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    18. Re:I'll bite by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 2

      including the likes of Reinhard Heydrich, the Butcher of Prague.

      Quit a feat, as he died in 1942

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    19. Re:I'll bite by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      And how does that prevent him from having been the head of Interpol?

    20. Re:I'll bite by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 2

      From wikipedia:

      "Following Anschluss in 1938, the organization fell under the control of Nazi Germany, and the Commission's headquarters were eventually moved to Berlin in 1942.[10] From 1938 to 1945, the presidents of Interpol included Otto Steinhäusl, Reinhard Heydrich........

      Who'd have thunk it......thanks...I thought you had him confused with Reinhard Gehlen or something....my bad

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    21. Re:I'll bite by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It was taken over by the Nazis, so that's to be expected. Now, if after the war Interpol had Nazi leadership, you'd have a point.

    22. Re:I'll bite by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Even with it under Nazi control, you'd expect it to have been run by Kripo (police) exclusively. Two of the Nazi-era leaders were (as well as being SS), but the other two were purely SS.

    23. Re:I'll bite by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      *whoosh*

      No, I think the fucking smiley face shows he was joking.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    24. Re: I'll bite by Coren22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just look at the treatment to Lee's battle flag recently, that is pure racism against the people who fought for state's rights. (hint, the average southerner had nothing to do with slavery, the slave owners were too wealthy to fight in the war).

      Racism is ok (to the Democrats) when it is white people that are the butt of the joke, they also don't like Asians for some reason, so making fun of natives of India, and China, is perfectly acceptable, but talk about how 90% of gang violence is black people, or that there are crimes being committed against the Hispanics crossing the border (as Trump did), and suddenly you are a terrible racist.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    25. Re:I'll bite by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      According to this site:

      http://www.astronautix.com/cra...

      It weighs 450 kg, a little less than half a ton. Maybe he disassembled it and shipped it home one piece at a time?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    26. Re: I'll bite by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Which joke? All of them?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    27. Re:I'll bite by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Even with it under Nazi control, you'd expect it to have been run by Kripo (police) exclusively. Two of the Nazi-era leaders were (as well as being SS), but the other two were purely SS.

      In Nazi Germany, everything was under Nazi control. The idea that organisations like the army, police or Universities were somehow free from Nazi influence is something that people in the army, police or Universities tried to push after WW2 ended, for obvious reasons like not wanting to be hanged for war crimes..

      Apparently, it turns out there were almost no Nazis in Germany at all.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    28. Re:I'll bite by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Just because it's "Alabama" doesn't mean it's redneck. That's stereotyping at it's finest.

      This should teach a useful lesson in tolerance to the citizens of that State.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    29. Re:I'll bite by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Depending on it's condition, it might have just looked like a backyard project or a "dune buggy" type vehicle. Based on the picture in the Motherboard link, I wouldn't have guessed it was a lunar rover prototype. Now maybe if it had NASA painted in giant letters across it...

    30. Re: I'll bite by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The secessions before the Civil War were because those states were afraid Lincoln would be able to restrict or abolish slavery. Secession was more or less popular depending heavily on whether there were more or fewer slave owners in the area. States' rights had very little to do with secession.

      The Civil War was not itself about slavery, although it was certainly a factor. The claim that the war was about slavery was very useful, in that most of the other countries that might intervene could not realistically fight for slavery. Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation was great diplomacy.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    31. Re:I'll bite by SKYNYRDFAN52 · · Score: 1

      WHAT A MORON . . What's this tool's name? Junior Samples Junior ?... . This borders on Criminal negligence And what about the DINGWA That Took it in for Scap? What was he thinking? He is just as guilty as the guy that sold it (.. Harry Jettison Lives ) and he didn't even have to go to the moon to get it for scrap metal Ha Ha.. But seriously folks NUFF SAID

    32. Re:I'll bite by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      It was looking for signs of intelligent life.

    33. Re:I'll bite by kmoser · · Score: 1

      Quit a feat, as he died in 1942

      ...or did he...?

    34. Re:I'll bite by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Assuming any of them - knew anything about US history - or perhaps were from the US - if a live person actually saw much - if he or she could speak English I think you're expecting too much.

  2. one joke, one explaination by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. up on blocks.
    2. Huntsville.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:one joke, one explaination by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:one joke, one explaination by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      What the heck was he doing with a lunar rover prototype in Alabama?

      1. up on blocks.
      2. Huntsville.

      Obligatory: "You might be a space redneck if ..."

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:one joke, one explaination by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 1

      True story:
      When I lived in Huntsville I was once stuck in traffic behind an old pickup truck with two bumper stickers. One was for a local country music station, but the second one read "My other vehicle is unmanned."

  3. He probably has a grudge by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    He probably has a grudge against NASA for proving that the Earth isn't flat.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:He probably has a grudge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You think it's funny to laugh about the 'ignorant' Alabama-man because it is easier than wrapping your brain around the fact that Alabama put man on the moon.

    2. Re:He probably has a grudge by putaro · · Score: 1

      Alabama and a bunch of former Nazis

    3. Re:He probably has a grudge by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And now they are putting Big Gulps and Twinkies into obese teenagers. http://www.businessinsider.com...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:He probably has a grudge by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1
      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  4. More relevant title by Rurik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NASA Agency Bureaucracy Lets Historic Antique Slip From Their Fingers

    If it didn't take them six months to reach out... Even a quick call "Hey, this is NASA. We heard you have one of our rovers. Could we just send someone over to verify?"

    1. Re:More relevant title by Krishnoid · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'd immediately know the call was fake. Now if it went, "Hey, this is Hollywood. We heard you have one of our rovers from the moon landing movie, and would like to buy it back ..."

    2. Re:More relevant title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No one with any authority in NASA cares about this kind of thing. It's been under the thumb of the anti-"space cowboy" crowd since Obama appeared. You don't take a leak as NASA without the blessing of a climate scientist today.

    3. Re:More relevant title by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      I think they'll get over it.

  5. Re:Well by tomhath · · Score: 1

    According to TFA is was worth "maybe $15,000 to $25,000,"

  6. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A glorified dune buggy is considered "priceless"? It's not like it went to the moon or anything.

    And clearly there were better models that should be even more priceless, since it was just a prototype.

    1. Re: Huh? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Just pointing out...

      The one that actually went to the moon stayed there.

      The rovers on the moon are priceless too... though are apparently worth less than the billions of dollars it would take to retrieve them.

  7. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by halivar · · Score: 2

    Who, the junkyard guy that considers the stuff in his junkyard to be... you know... junk? Or the NASA administrator that considered a historic relic under his care to be junk?

  8. How hard were they trying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When you can't outbid a scrap metal dealer (or, if you must, can't convince the scrap metal dealer in question to flip the item to you for a quick 100% profit), how much effort were you really putting into this?

    1. Re:How hard were they trying? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      When you can't outbid a scrap metal dealer (or, if you must, can't convince the scrap metal dealer in question to flip the item to you for a quick 100% profit), how much effort were you really putting into this?

      It's kind of hard to outbid a scrap dealer when you aren't aware of the sale.

  9. But that's a priceless Steinway! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1
    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  10. Just like Southpark episode by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Funny
  11. And... by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

    norhing of value was lost.

  12. Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like NASA. I like space exploration. However, I don't like NASA spending its limited time and resources to buy up antiques when it could be working on MORE space exploration.

    1. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by Aboroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is an extremely short-sighted viewpoint. Money isn't everything. First of all, if all you care about it direct funding from it, they would easily be able to monetize this by reselling it at auction. Putting it in a museum would enrich people's lives, which is invaluable. Having displays with things like this, are ways people get inspired to do what they can to help in space exploration, either through their own talents or with donations. These "antiques" could very well inspire the next generation of space explorers, which are kind of necessary because the ones we have now are expected to die at some point.

    2. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I like NASA. I like space exploration. However, I don't like NASA spending its limited time and resources to buy up antiques when it could be working on MORE space exploration.

      It's PR, which NASA has to do to secure funding - if you don't like NASA doing PR, then give them a guaranteed funding source that's not subject to the whims of the government that changes funding priorities every 4 years for projects that take decades to complete.

    3. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Yeah because the money they would spend on this item would fund more space explorations *eye roll*

    4. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by GlennC · · Score: 1

      That is an extremely short-sighted viewpoint. Money isn't everything.

      I'm afraid that statement doesn't make much sense to a great number of Americans these days.

      Anything over 90 days is long-term, and money is how we keep score...the one with the most wins.

      --
      Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
    5. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      They do the "space exploration" thing like, well, rocket scientists.

      They do the "management/administration" thing about as well as Margaret's Knitting Knook.

      --
      -Styopa
    6. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Well said, sir!

    7. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by hey! · · Score: 1

      What's more prototypes per se don't necessarily have any particular historical value; it depends on the role the specific prototype played in the program that led to the actual devices used. Without the documentation of what the particular hardware was for and how it was used, a device like that is a mere curiosity.

      For example 30 years ago I worked in a lab where about 10% of our floor space was taken up with a prototype manned Mars rover. It was by no means a serious essay on what would be required for an actual, practical Mars vehicle; our lab was a seismology lab and the vehicle was merely a platform for a massive spring-loaded plunger that smacked the ground, producing sound waves that could be collected and analyzed. The point was to show that such a device could successfully be used from a mobile platform; the platform itself had no real value; the only reason it had motors is, I think, that the engineers thought it would be cooler that way; it didn't really need to move on its own power. I'm sure that that particular rover has been scrapped by now and it was no loss to history.

      Which is not to say that this vehicle wasn't historically valuable. But it sounds very different from the rovers that were actually sent to the moon. Without knowing why we can't say whether this vehicle was priceless or worthless.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I disagree it's a waste of money. These artifacts inspire.

    9. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There is a fetishization of 'historical' stuff that has gone on for a long time in America.

      Nice older houses in many towns are labeled as 'Historic Homes' and tours go around the city to show them from time to time. I have to ask 'what that is historic happened in that house' and the plain truth is, it's just an old house. I love old houses and neighborhoods with old houses in them.

      But there has to be a limit, because we can't save everything as if it has 'historic value.' Most of the 'historic' things that are left simply didn't get scrapped.

    10. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help when many of those "historic homes" are just a couple of hundred years old. That's not really "historic" in any meaningful sense of the word.

    11. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Also, a lot of a the original documentation for the rovers and the design process has been lost over the years. It was a long time ago... So having a prototype on hand could be quite useful for designing new rovers.

      It's the same with a lot of hardware, e.g. the Saturn V. We couldn't just build a new one, we would have to reverse engineer a lot of it from the ones we have left over.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps one of the dozen or so prototypes scattered around in museums would serve the purpose rather than this 8000 lb 21 ft x 15 ft behemoth? This one didn't look anything like the real rovers, it was a test unit for a direction that wasn't taken.

      Here are the locations of the existing prototypes, I am sure the Smithsonian would allow some people to take measurements if needed to make a new one:
      http://www.collectspace.com/ub...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    13. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Money isn't everything.

      You're right, there's also power.

      And, except on slashdot, sex. With another person.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It's the same with a lot of hardware, e.g. the Saturn V. We couldn't just build a new one, we would have to reverse engineer a lot of it from the ones we have left over.

      It's the old IKEA problem. You never keep the instructions.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So what "inspired" the Apollo missions?

      Yuri Gagarin.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Sadly no. If 'Margaret's Knitting Knook' was run the way NASA was run it wouldn't be in business for very long. "Duuur lets save money by not buying in that new knitting shuttle to replace the old one that needs replacing... "

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    17. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Von Braun and Wiley Ley, plus maybe Disney and a few others..

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    18. Re:Not a loss - this is the correct outcome. by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Their current mission statement is muslim outreach, not space travel.

  13. Alabama Man... by r-diddly · · Score: 1

    ...is sure giving Florida Man a run for his money lately!

    1. Re:Alabama Man... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Is this anything like the phenomenon where if there is a natural disaster the on location news crew finds the dumbest guy within 100 miles to put on the air.

    2. Re:Alabama Man... by geeper · · Score: 1

      ..now that Kentucky Man is out of the running...being cleared of shooting the drone and all.

      --
      Error reading device 'Signature'. (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?
    3. Re:Alabama Man... by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

      He wasn't cleared. He was vindicated.

      --
      Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
    4. Re:Alabama Man... by KGIII · · Score: 2

      Nope. Not really. That whole area is its own special kind of special. I say that because I care - I do own a house in Florida and I have shared some of the many things I've seen there. Nope, they're definitely unique in some ways and this is one of those ways. It could be selection bias, I guess, but I don't think so.

      Put it this way... I own a house in PCB, the home of Spring Break - really. They have a week long period, out of sync with the rest of the country, that they call FAG week. FAG is "Florida, Alabama, and Georgia." They double down on the cops, take the jails and empty them by shipping them to the annex up in Destin, and call in special Beach Police. Not because they're violent or mean. They just do some really stupid things. When you hear about all the deaths during Spring Break - check the week that it happened. It was probably during FAG week.

      They do have alligators so, there's that. And manatees. My place is pretty close to a special area that they've got signs telling people that, "Molesting the Manatees is a Serious Offense."

      No, I am not kidding. I love the place. They've got character.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  14. Re:The best punishment . . . by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    The article clearly states that the guy who sold it inherited the item after the previous owner passed away.

    If he had never been told what it was, he probably just assumed it was some weird project from his relative (possibly parent) that was taking up space. It'd be something that one might would even throw away except that anything large and metallic has scrap value so basically you get paid for your "trash".

    My dad and uncle went through a lot of this after my grandfather passed away. Behind his house he had a ton (well, actually many, many tons) of old tractors, plows, cars, etc that after they broke he just tossed in the woods behind his house (still on his property - just off of the cleared portion). After my granddad passed away just in the process of cleaning up the place they hauled off pretty much all of it and took in quite a few thousand dollars in scrap value.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  15. Andy Griffith by tekrat · · Score: 2

    Andy had the right idea. Build a rocket, go to the moon, and bring back all the scrap NASA left behind. Can't get over how much this mirrors "Salvage 1".

    Now all we need is some Monohydrazine.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Andy Griffith by Dins · · Score: 1

      Thanks - now I'm having a major fit of nostalgia... I watched the hell out of that show when I was 9 or 10 and loved it. It all just seemed so simple - we'll just build a rocket out of scrap! That's it!

  16. No one is asking the important question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So how did the old owner come in possession of the lunar rover prototype ? This is the interesting question.
    What's next, hillbilly finds an old Mercury capsule in his backyard and NASA wants it back ?

    1. Re:No one is asking the important question... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      If all the scrap at NASA had to be 'preserved' we would have to clear out every building in D.C. that isn't the Smithsonian to store it all in.

      Hmmm, that's not a bad idea.

  17. Rocket City Rednecks? by tekrat · · Score: 2

    Huntsville Alabama is where they hid Von Braun so he wouldn't get lynched. As a result, a lot of Space Research happens there. See "Rocket City Rednecks", a bad reality TV show where some NASA engineer spends his weekends making dumb shit out of junk with his redneck buddies.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Rocket City Rednecks? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Huntsville Alabama is where they hid Von Braun so he wouldn't get lynched.

      They chose Huntsville because a nazi wouldn't stick out.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  18. no you didn't by publiclurker · · Score: 5, Funny

    America put a man on the moon, we just used your real estate so if anything went wrong, nothing important would be damaged.

    1. Re:no you didn't by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The Dead Kennedy's song is 'California Uber Alles' not anything about Alabama.

  19. Re:he is dead. by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Probably looked like some broken dune buggy project to them.

    I would think even in Alabama an all-electric dune buggy with 5-foot wheels would stand out a bit.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  20. Re:The best punishment . . . by snsh · · Score: 2

    If you've ever seen these lunar prototypes up close, you'd understand how it could get sold for scrap. Everything that was "space age" in the 1960's looks primitive today.

  21. The Bigger Tradegy by sycodon · · Score: 1

    ...is that there is not a current lunar lander model people can look at...as in circa 2015.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:The Bigger Tradegy by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Not unless they have reclining bucket seats.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re:The Bigger Tradegy by AJWM · · Score: 1

      This. Absolutely this. Very few people would give a rat's ass about an ancient prototype if we had rovers being driven around on the Moon today.

      --
      -- Alastair
    3. Re:The Bigger Tradegy by stridebird · · Score: 1

      It isn't. It's a tradegy. Pay attention.

    4. Re:The Bigger Tradegy by stridebird · · Score: 1

      It's not a tragedy

      Right. It's a tradegy. Or am I the only one who sees this?

    5. Re:The Bigger Tradegy by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      http://www.collectspace.com/ub...

      There appear to be many of them around, the Smithsonian Air and Space museum has one, and ironically Marshall in Huntsville, Alabama has one.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:The Bigger Tradegy by ABZB · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Such artifacts are to the future humans [in the broadest sense of 'human'] as the fire-making kit of the human[s] who started the whole fire thing. As the remains of the first cities that our species built. A thousand thousands years from now, our descendants will look to such things and call them by what they are - the start of the beginning of everything. There are a number of quite good works of science fiction that involve this very thing - plot aside, it boils down to the loss of such things, and terrible tragedy of losing the keepsake of humanity's youth forever.

  22. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Considering the percentage of people who still voted for Bush after he ignored six months of daily warnings of an impending attack and allowed the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history to take place, then compounded his incompetence by letting Bin Laden because he refused every request by troops on the ground for more troops to block Bin Laden's escape at Tora Bora, or the fact he then set out on an unprecedented lying campaign to justify invading and occupying Iraq which had nothing to do with the attacks, I will agree with you... You need no further proof that you can't fix stupid, and it isn't limited to Alabama.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  23. dibs! by lophophore · · Score: 1

    I call dibs on the ones on the moon.

    There's three of them up there, just waiting to be salvaged.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:dibs! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I'll pay you $1 million for one, on delivery to my front door.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:dibs! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'll pay 1,000,001. I'll even help you offload it into my garage - and I'll buy you beer. All the beer, and bacon, you can consume in a weekend.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  24. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GORTON: Now, since my yellow light is on, at this point my final question will be this: Assuming that the recommendations that you made on January 25th of 2001, based on Delenda, based on Blue Sky, including aid to the Northern Alliance, which had been an agenda item at this point for two and a half years without any action, assuming that there had been more Predator reconnaissance missions, assuming that that had all been adopted say on January 26th, year 2001, is there the remotest chance that it would have prevented 9/11?

    CLARKE: No.

    Richard Clarke's sworn testimony to the 9/11 commission. Clarke was President Clinton's terror czar. Too late by the time the Bush Administration took over. Per President Clinton's own terror czar. I know, facts and sworn testimony are always an issue when you have a political axe to grind...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  25. Re:The best punishment . . . by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    If you've ever seen these lunar prototypes up close, you'd understand how it could get sold for scrap. Everything that was "space age" in the 1960's looks primitive today.

    Yes, that. And in addition, it was a "prototype" and as such may have been just frame and wheels, which could be mistaken for just about anything. The first picture in the article looks nothing like the actual lunar rover other than having a stupid looking antenna on top. It looks like 1000s of other homemade dunebuggies.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  26. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Informative

    What axe? I'm stating a fact. Bush had six months of daily warnings of an impending attack, INCLUDING Clarke's own statement a few days after Bush was sworn into office, and a briefing statement titled, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike Inside the United States".

    Further, contrary to the lies of those in the Bush administration, the outgoing Clinton administration did leave them a comprehensive plan. We know this because it's been declassified.

    If you like, I can keep going with the facts which show a) Bush had been warned, many times, prior to the 9/11 attacks, both from the outgoing Clinton administration, Richard Clarke who spanned both administrations and daily briefings, b) Bush was warned one month before the attacks that Al Qaeda was planning to hijack planes to attack the U.S. and c) Bush ignored everything until the last second when, on 9/4, he finally had a meeting to discuss what Clarke and others had talked about months prior.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  27. spent much of 2014 attempting to acquire by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NASA spent much of 2014 attempting to acquire the priceless artifact for display in a museum

    Sounds like they didn't try too hard if they couldn't compete with a scrap yard.

    1. Re:spent much of 2014 attempting to acquire by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It also doesn't sound like it was 'priceless.' I wonder what the dude got for it.

    2. Re:spent much of 2014 attempting to acquire by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      NASA spent much of 2014 attempting to acquire the priceless artifact for display in a museum

      Sounds like they didn't try too hard if they couldn't compete with a scrap yard.

      The senate oversight committee is probably still deciding whether to approve NASA's first bid

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  28. Re: Well by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    It's illegal to sell some things like this (moon rocks, etc.). That either creates free (aka "black") market pressures, or for the fully law-abiding, incentives to dispose.

    It's like kidneys - there's both a massive abundance and a massive shortage because the price mechanism is made illegal in the market. As usual, people suffer and die when the politicians get involved.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  29. Already one in Huntsville by h.ross.perot · · Score: 1

    I remember one (A rover) in the Saturn V hall.

    --
    ... I'll have a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster with a side of Plutonium Nyborg ...
  30. That's no way to treat Hollywood props! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    [OUTRO... roll credits... R.E.M's "Man on the Moon" ...if you believed they put a man on the moon....
    ]

  31. The headline is all wrong! by cmeans · · Score: 4, Funny

    Should read..."Alabama Man Removes Junk from His Yard". Of course, no one would believe it.

  32. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Per Clarke - it was already too late to stop it. Nothing that could have been done based upon information available and recommendations/intelligence from the Clinton Administration. It's what Clarke stated in sworn testimony to Senator Gorton - copied above.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  33. Don't blame him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    unless he STOLE the rover, the fact that he has it, and NASA doesn't, probably means that nobody in NASA cared for 50 years.

    So don't be too hard on this guy just cause he didn't care -- after all, neither did NASA

    1. Re:Don't blame him by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, lots of stuff gets destroyed because nobody recognized the future value. Also, they thought they'd be going back. It probably was a pretty trivial piece of trash to them that took up space and an uncoordinated man named Donald kept stubbing his toe on it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  34. Re:The best punishment . . . by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    The Space Age itself looks primitive today, but some Space Nutters cling to the ancient ideas like a religion.

    You lack of faith disturbs me.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  35. Re:The best punishment . . . by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Your lack of an "r" disturbs me.

    I'm saving them for talk like a pi_ate day.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  36. Re:The best punishment . . . by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    Yes, that. And in addition, it was a "prototype" and as such may have been just frame and wheels, which could be mistaken for just about anything. The first picture in the article looks nothing like the actual lunar rover other than having a stupid looking antenna on top. It looks like 1000s of other homemade dunebuggies.

    If it looked like the picture in the article, I'd probably agree with you. However, FTA: The rover was apparently massive: NASA notes that the Local Scientific Survey Module, as it was called, "weighs more than 8,000 pounds, is 21-feet long, 15-feet wide and has 6 wheels with 5-foot diameters."

    I don't know of too many people who would build something like that at all, let alone for a homemade dune buggy.

  37. Re:he is dead. by KGIII · · Score: 1

    You, my friend, have never been to Alabama. Or Florida. Or Georgia. ;-)

    That whole little part of the country is its own sort of special. I have a house in Florida. I visit often. I am greatly amused. I am also easily amused. I'd not actually be surprised to see a moon rover going down the road in Alabama. What would surprise me is if it were the real one and not a mock-up. Hell, seeing a parade of the things wouldn't even make me bat an eye. I've seen swamp buggies (the platform type that are like ten feet tall) tooling down Rt. 98 in Panama City Beach. It's nowhere near the swamp, really. No, I'd not bat an eye.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  38. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    What is your sort doing in this discussion? You doubtless also believe that there was never a Moon Landing, so this 'lander' was just a prototype of a movie studio prop and not historic. The whole Federal Government is a conspiracy to steal your dollars.

    Perhaps find another place to peddle your idiotic conspiracy theories.

  39. Re: Well by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Well, moon rocks are illegal to sell. Scrap metal from NASA prototyping uses? We'd be buried in it if scrappers weren't allowed to sell it to China. That's probably where the scrap metal ended up, incidentally.

  40. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    How so? Nothing came through the baggage and the planes were hijacked with box cutters, which were an allowed carry-on. I used to travel with the pocket knife that lived in my pocket - I think the blade limit was something like 3 inches.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  41. Re:he is dead. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I would think even in Alabama an all-electric dune buggy with 5-foot wheels would stand out a bit.

    Yeah - they don't hanker to that commie electrical powered vehicle shit.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  42. SOLD by davesays · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who doesn't just ask the guy, "how much for that?" I know I would have if I knew what it was. For scrap value, just bust out the wallet; square up with NASA later or keep it if they don't. I always taught my kids to, at least, ask. You would be surprised what happens when you do. I could have had a rover or the country could have had a rover back, but either is better than scrap...

  43. Dude never by terrywirth5 · · Score: 1

    heard about the Internet or eBay in the neighborhood.

    1. Re: Dude never by terrywirth5 · · Score: 1

      Clarification: I heard that the dude did hear about eBay but thought it had something to do with fishing.

  44. Re:What do you expect from somone in Alabama ? by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Nah, they marry their (proper spelling, by the way) in the hills of West Virginia. And, oddly, Portugal. You can marry your sister in Portugal. :/ At least that's what the news said quite a while back - 'twas on Fark as I recall. No, I have no idea why. Well, no... I know why it was on Fark. I don't know why they allowed it. It was a rather specific amendment, as I recall.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  45. What about their foremost priority? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That's not what the head of NASA, Charles Bolden says. Mr. Bolden explains their top three priorities as:

    When I became the Nasa administrator, he [Obama] charged me with three things.
    One, he wanted me to help reinspire children to want to get into science and math;
    he wanted me to expand our international relationships;
    and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good

  46. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by labnet · · Score: 1

    So Bing,
    Which part of my narrative do you disagree with?
    Yes the moon landings were real.

    --
    46137
  47. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Per Clarke - it was already too late to stop it.

    More like per your slight-of-hand. Or didn't you think anyone would notice that you're using a quote about bombing Afghanistan when the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia to suggest that 911 couldn't have been stopped by the FBI?

  48. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by tsotha · · Score: 2

    So what? The government gets those kinds of warnings all the time. The president should not be trying to micromanage that kind of stuff.

  49. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Have you heard of lying to save face? You don't learn this in political school, it's just part of the basic entrance examination before you can even attend.

    Or do you think they would stand up and take responsibility? If so I have one thing to say "aaaaahahahahahahahahahahhaahha"

    Now show me evidence of the first conversation being "we're going to have an attack in 6 months but there's nothing we can do about it", because I've seen nothing of the sort.

  50. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by Coren22 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The invasion of Iraq was not about oil, that is a conspiracy theory, and is frankly so asinine as to be on the same level as the moon hoaxes. Saddam would have loved to sell the US oil, we were refusing to buy his oil, so he had to find other buyers. Before the attack on Iraq, Saddam was acting like he was building a nuclear weapon, and was refusing access to the nuclear inspectors to the sites that were suspected of being bomb making sites. It was a widely held belief by many in government that he really did have WMD, not just some rumor that originated with one person.

    http://politics.slashdot.org/c...

    This guy goes through and cites tons of quotes of people talking about the WMD including Clinton. Are you calling Clinton a liar?

    Saddam also had already previously shown that he was more than willing to use WMD of a different type when he gassed the Kurds, an ethnic group in the area that has been routinely put down by most countries in the area, including Turkey who is currently letting ISIS kill them due to their hatred of them.

    Stop acting like your total lack of knowledge about world affairs gives you the right to try and call Bush a liar. Learn history, look at the events surrounding the invasion of Iraq. But then again, you were probably a child when the invasion happened.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  51. Re: Well by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    It's illegal to sell some things like this (moon rocks, etc.). That either creates free (aka "black") market pressures, or for the fully law-abiding, incentives to dispose.

    It's like kidneys - there's both a massive abundance and a massive shortage because the price mechanism is made illegal in the market. As usual, people suffer and die when the politicians get involved.

    In addition, the anti-free market, statist "murder is a crime" laws artificially inflate the cost of hiring a hitman.

    Wanker.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  52. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by Lakitu · · Score: 1

    Per Clarke - it was already too late to stop it. Nothing that could have been done based upon information available and recommendations/intelligence from the Clinton Administration.

    You're completely misreading this testimony. It's not a question about if anything could have been done to prevent 9/11, it's a question of whether killing or capturing bin Laden would have prevented 9/11. Why would a hypothetical drone strike on OBL in July of 2001 have stopped 9/11 if the plan was already in progress and the hijackers were already in the US? What does that have to do with anything?

    It was only "too late" to prevent it in January 2001 if you think killing Osama bin Laden is the only possible thing that could have been done to stop the hijackings, unlike, say, arresting or killing the hijackers themselves, which would have assuredly stopped them from hijacking airplanes.

  53. They Found It. Not Destroyed! by IsNewToYou · · Score: 1

    http://motherboard.vice.com/re... The junk yard had kept it because they somewhat knew what it was.

  54. Re:Leave it to idiots.. by v1 · · Score: 1

    "they offered me everything but money"... "so I still have it".

    Owell. Wonder what his price is? If NASA doesn't want to cash him, maybe someone else will. If anything, barter for some of those "perks". $1000 for free lifetime tickets to usually off-limits NASA facilities would be a killer deal.

    or eBay it...

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.