Slashdot Mirror


Report Claims Microsoft Beat Apple in Online Tablet Sales for October (winbeta.org)

Eloking writes: Apple's iPad tablet ushered in the modern tablet era when it was introduced in 2010, and it's dominated tablet sales ever since. iPad sales have stagnated recently, but nevertheless Apple has maintained its lead in overall tablet market share. WinBeta received an early version of an upcoming report, '1010data Facts for Ecom Insights, January 2014 – October 2015' by the 101data Ecom Insights Panel, however, that indicates all of that might be changing as Microsoft assumes the mantle of best-selling tablet maker in terms of online sales in October.

239 comments

  1. They can't lead in market numbers forever by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At one point, everyone who wanted an iPad and is able to afford one will already have done so. After that, these people will only buy a new one to upgrade once in a while.

    1. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      True... and the main iPad didn't get an update this year... frankly it didn't really need one just yet...

      A year ago we replaced an iPad 3 and a iPad 4 with a pair of iPad Air 2s. That was a decent upgrade. My plan/hope is that these new units last us 5 years.

    2. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue with iPads is that the market is saturated. I gave a second gen iPad to a relative, which is slow, but usable. I also have a third gen iPad, which is decent. Both are still supported by iOS, and may not be fast, but they do the job.

      Buying an iPad Air wouldn't give me that much more functionality. The iPad Pro is fast... but with such a limited functionality OS as iOS, why bother? There isn't much the newer models have from a usability standpoint, except a few years of iOS updates, that the older models don't.

      How can Apple expand this market for iPads? Perhaps make them more friendly to be controllers for embedded products. Maybe make a model of iPad that would fundamentally not change its shape so third parties can use it for embedded tasks, be it kiosks, home automation, and other items.

      IMHO, Apple may still have a lot of shine to it, just because a lot of people replace their iPhones like clockwork. However, Apple seems to be stagnating. The AppleTV is lackluster, Macs are growing (mainly because Windows 10 is so crappy), but slow, and the Apple Watch is a flop [1]. There is interest in CarPlay, to the point where automakers either have CarPlay, or go bankrupt, but other than that, Apple seems to be hitting diminishing returns across the board.

      What Microsoft brings to the table is that their offerings (Surface Pros) can be docked, and be used as everyday Windows PCs, which gives a lot more variety of use cases. Their device can be used as a tablet, but it also can take the place of a laptop and even a desktop. An iPad can do basic things, but there are limits to what it can do, especially with workflow and running multiple applications at the same time.

      [1]: The only time I see the Apple Watch are people who have a lot of Apple stock and want to flaunt their toy. Most people prefer a watch that tells time, so a $200 Bulova does a lot more in that regard.

    3. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The reality distortion field generator is on the fritz. The yearly upgrade cycle business model is failing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didnt even release a successor to the iPad Air 2 this year. But I know you basically wait around Slashdot looking for pro apple articles to post your usual anti apple circle jerk drivel.

    5. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apple iPad did get an update... the latest iPad directly supports the new Apple stylus that they just came out with. but to my knowledge the update was not commercially available until November. It would be interesting, I think, to compare MS surface sales to Apple for November.

    6. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post you're replying to is an example of evidence the contrary. Moo seems about right.

      The wikipedia entry on confirmation bias isn't bad. I suggest reading it. Not for any particular reason, it's just good reading.

    7. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      The distortion field also allows them to confuse feeling superior about their purchase with the item having an overall lead in market share. WTF? They don't even have 25% market share now. The vast majority of tablets are not apple products, they're android. They play a silly game where they pretend the generic compatible devices are not of the same type as each other, so that they can feel bigger. lol

    8. Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is it even a fair comparison? Apple defined the market with their iPad, a pioneering product running their mobile OS. Microsoft enters, running a full non-crippled OS. It just doesn't seem right. A court should require Microsoft to run Windows CE so the products can compete on more equal terms.

    9. Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't the Apple Watch tell time? I had heard it didn't even need to be linked to an iPhone for that. Maybe I'm wrong...

    10. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think Apple really gives a shit if they sell more tablets than android makers do. Considering the outrageous mark up on iPads they make a ton of money. If Samsung is making 10 dollars off every tablet and Apple is clearing this kind of money....

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

      then apple doesn't need to sell more tablets.

    11. Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Op said main iPad. The iPad Pro is a different line.

    12. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      The reality distortion field generator is on the fritz. The yearly upgrade cycle business model is failing.

      The Reality Distortion field has been on the fritz since his holiness, The Steve, croaked.

      Steve was insistent on the 10" iPad, and 3.5" iPhone for maximum usability for their form factors.

      Now you have the iPad mini and iPhone 6 Plus competing to be the same size.

    13. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can't compare profit margins at the top and bottom of the market. Samsung have premium models that make huge profits and sell millions too, but they also have affordable models that cater to a different group of consumers.

      The fact that they make small profits on some products does not mean they aren't competing, it just means that they operate in a market that Apple ignores on top of their premium tablet business.

      In fact Apple has been expanding into Samsung's other markets, e.g. the large tablet market and the pen input market.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The RDF sees great use by Musk at Tesla. .

    15. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by exomondo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Now you have the iPad mini and iPhone 6 Plus competing to be the same size.

      I actually really like the iPhone 6 Plus and it was long overdue, yes it is naturally more awkward than it's predecessors but that's ok, the tradeoff is screensize which makes it MUCH more useful. Apple has a habit of lambasting things that its competitors are doing that it isn't yet doing, when they do that history has shown it is a sign it is something they are worried about and hurriedly working on themselves.

    16. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Apple is desperate to continue that yearly upgrade cycle, which is why they're now offering plans to encourage that behavior. I'm predicting that you're only going to see it continue for most people while smartphones are in an early growth market. Sure, there will always be the hardcore technologists for fanboys, but that will be a much smaller piece of the market.

      Remember how often we had to upgrade our PC hardware until the tech settled down after a few decades? Every couple of years, right? Now how often do we upgrade them? My four year old PC is still running the latest OSes and software and still feels plenty zippy. It's easily got years left of life in it.

      Tablets, I think, tended to peak a bit earlier than phones, but I think we're going to see a maturation of the smartphone market and a subsequent slowdown of the industry in general as people hold onto their phones longer than a year or two. I just don't see that trend lasting forever... eventually, phone-makers will hit a practical ceiling on how powerful your handheld supercomputer needs to be, or how many megapixels your camera can have, or how many interesting new gadgets they can cram in there. At that point, the length of support will be deciding factor in how long you can keep your phone, I suppose.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    17. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Who cares if they care? Them caring about other things doesn't make it true that they have the most market share. That's the distortion field causing cognitive dissonance when you hear something that sounds vaguely anti-apple, even if it turns out to be a neutral fact.

    18. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Dude "Built-in 27.3-watt-hour rechargeable lithium-polymer battery" http://www.apple.com/au/ipad-a..., the only way they will last five years is if you do not use them, the more you use them the quicker they will die. "Apple warrants the included hardware product and accessories against defects in materials and workmanship for one year from the date of original retail purchase. Apple does not warrant against normal wear and tear, nor damage caused by accident or abuse", this from their warranty page. So yeah your battery failing in months due to use, not even covered. So where are you getting five years from, with a built in battery guaranteed 100% to fail, the more you use it the quicker it will fail. Same goes for all the other purposefully designed to fail tablets, absofuckinglutely nothing to do with appearance and everything to do with designed obsolescence and letting psychopaths manage anything.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple watch is hardly a flop, i WILL ALWAYS have one from this day forward, they are time savers from having to look at the phone amd it can stay in my pocket while i glance at my watch without anyone knowing i got texted, emailed, called, or notified...

    20. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by samkass · · Score: 1

      You'll have to define "fail". I have iPad 2's from four years ago which still have many hours of battery life and have seen relatively heavy use. Perhaps not the 10 it had originally, but then neither does a Microsoft tablet. I think Apple considers a battery eligible for replacement if its capacity falls below 80% during warrantee or Apple Care period. Otherwise you have to pay $99 to have it swapped out.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    21. Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      What? You're saying a technology company released a product that was MORE complicated then it had to be? How do people even use it?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    22. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      How can Apple increase market share? If they had a removable battery, expandable memory, and allowed direct filesystem access, this geek may consider it.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    23. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Informative

      $99 to replace the battery in a 128GB iPad Air 2 in 3 years strikes me as a pretty reasonable price. It is about 12% of the cost of the device and it would restore it to like new condition.

      If the other option is spending $700 on a new one, $99 for a battery seems quite reasonable.

    24. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      What good is the most market share? It's how much money you make. Commodore Business Machines sold more computers their last year in business than ever before. Then went straight into bankruptcy. Tell me who's making all the profit?

    25. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Arkham · · Score: 1

      How can Apple increase market share? If they had a removable battery, expandable memory, and allowed direct filesystem access, this geek may consider it.

      None of these things will add even 1% market share. Not one person in my family could tell you how much RAM is in any device we own besides me (and on some of the tablets I couldn't tell you). We have five laptops, two desktops, four tablets, and four phones. Geeks are not the way to increase market share. They represent a microscopic fraction of a percent of all users.

      My wife uses an iPad 3. I got her an iPad Pro for Christmas. The things I am concerned about are printing, durability, battery life, and integration with the rest of the home ecosystem. Meanwhile my son's Windows 10 tablet just "lost" its wi-fi radio -- that has never, ever happened on any Apple product I have ever owned.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    26. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      My macbook had a battery that blew up, a nonfunctional internal RAM slot, and the touchpad click doesn't work any longer. So I guess it depends who you ask.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    27. Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a completely different experience. I upgraded my iPhone 5 to a 6+ and have hated it since day 2. I have been waiting for a 4" iPhone to return to upgrade. If Apple decides to bring it back, and it has sub premium specs, I would consider buying a used 5S.

    28. Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I had a completely different experience.

      No doubt, not everybody has the same size hands and same preferences. It's funny to look at the posts defending whatever screen size Apple is currently producing and even predicting that no other will ever exist. There's certainly no shortage of people out there defending the company's decisions based on their own made-up justifications - that actually turn out to be wrong.

    29. Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Op said main iPad. The iPad Pro is a different line.

      BS Dummy iDiot! iPad Mini / iPad Air / iPad Pro

    30. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by TWX · · Score: 1

      The reality distortion field generator is on the fritz. The yearly upgrade cycle business model is failing.

      It's been about four years since Steve Jobs died. I'm still not exactly sure how, but that man was very, very good at reading what the public wanted even before the public knew what it wanted, and to then act as a filter within the company to provide products that fit those wants. Apple without Steve Jobs struggled before when he was released from the company when they attempted to go low-cost and mass-market, and Apple without Steve Jobs now appears to be making design missteps that no longer lead what the public wants to the degree that it once did.

      I don't think that Apple will continue to stay in the position in the market that it once enjoyed. It will probably still have successful products, it will probably continue to remain profitable, but I expect that Apple will have more duds on average than it used to have. Hell, eventually it might even slip to being just another tech company albeit with its own software instead of with someone else's. We'll just have to see.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    31. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by jazzis · · Score: 1

      Mod up as Informative.

    32. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by larwe · · Score: 1

      On that metric, they will "fail" (but let's be careful about how we define that word) even if you do or don't use them - lithium rechargeable chemistry batteries all have a shelf life. Depending on how you define service life, they're rated from one to two years typically. Yes, they'll almost always still hold some charge after that, of course. This is why you never want to buy "new old stock" batteries for a laptop or cellphone - lithium batteries made ten years ago for your ancient ThinkPad will most likely be useless and need re-celling anyway.

    33. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't think Apple really gives a shit if they sell more tablets than android makers do."

      Probably not, but they surely DO care about 8 consequitive quarters of falling iPad sales (units & marketshare, both year-on-year).

      They are well aware of how exposed they would be if the iPhone N should fail and want to diversity their portfolio

    34. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      This from Apple "Your battery is designed to retain up to 80 per cent of its original capacity at 1,000 complete charge cycles. The one-year warranty includes service coverage for a defective battery". So 1000 full discharges and recharges, one year only covers defective and not designed failure. The more you use it, the quicker you lose it (mind you somehow you think it is evil to allow a user replaceable battery in the design). You must also pay for shipping if necessary, during which all your data will be deleted and never forget those are the rules today and not in a years time let alone five years. Your cheering being screwed over, while I am demanding user replaceable batteries at a fraction of the cost to the end user, just who are you looking out for.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    35. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by larwe · · Score: 1
      ISTM that Apple is offering finance options (basically) on their phones now because the carriers are all making "we don't want to subsidize devices any more" noises, and the market for premium priced flagship devices from any vendor is unsustainable at its current size unless _someone_ is offering what amounts to low-interest financing. As a sidebar, it's also why Apple is very keen to have an embedded carrier-neutral SIM in its phones - because if you're on contract to *Apple*, not your cell carrier, then you'll want the same carrier mobility that your friend with a $200 unlocked phone has.

      That whole change of subsidy philosophy on the carriers' part could very easily make a sea change in the hardware market. Even the people who can afford to drop $650 on a premium phone upfront experience sticker shock, especially since there are now many very credible phones on the market, unlocked, for $200 or less. It may be that we're going to see a combination of "purchase me on an instalment plan offered by the hardware vendor" a la Apple, plus a significant contraction of the flagship phone market in favor of devices in the middle of the price spectrum. Similarly to the PC market, not everybody actually *needs* a high end flagship, and if the "how much do I have to extract from my wallet to walk out of the store with a new phone" question gets rearranged with a much higher sticker on the flagship vs. midrange, more people may contemplate that fact before plunking down cash.

    36. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I don't play semantics I just go with reasonable rules https://www.accc.gov.au/busine.... Failure would be no longer fit for the purpose for which is was intended ie supplying a reasonable charge to allow reasonable use of the device. I know some countries are tougher on this, than those that blatantly favour corporate profits but I think they need to be even tougher and not be sucked down by corrupted foreign government influence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    37. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by larwe · · Score: 1

      Sure, I wasn't arguing with you on the question "is a tablet with zero battery life still useful as a tablet", I was stating that even if he put the tablet in a safe and only used it once a year, the battery will *still* die, because its lifespan is capped, regardless of how much or little he's using it. You can shorten the lifespan of a Li-poly battery significantly. You can't lengthen it significantly :)

    38. Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Op said main iPad. The iPad Pro is a different line.

      BS Dummy iDiot! iPad Mini / iPad Air / iPad Pro

      MacBook / MacBook Air / MacBook Pro
      Dell Inspiron / Dell XPS / Dell Alienware

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    39. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 2

      For years before Jobs death the RDF only really worked for Apple Haters. Their reality has long been at odds with actual reality.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    40. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by DrXym · · Score: 0
      It's not reasonable and Apple know it. Having to send off your tablet for days is an inconvenience particularly since you might not get your original device back. And its expensive too. It's just a cynical way to get people to buy new tablets instead of servicing their old ones.

      The practice of sealing batteries into devices or rendering them inaccessible should be banned purely on environmental grounds.

    41. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by peragrin · · Score: 1

      on a brad new device? windows 10 isn't 6 months old yet.

      My 2009 macbook doesn't have any issues and i use it every day.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    42. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have a device that can do most everything I could ever want.

      and that device would not be an iPad.

    43. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      Making a tablet with a user serviceable battery requires features that would increase the size and weight of the device as well as disrupt the clean lines. Sure, not by very much, but that is not Apple's thing. They build hardware that has a clean design and is thin and light at the cost of cost, both up front and in servicing. In any case, not many others make tablets that have user serviceable batteries either. Some are easier for mechanically inclined people, but not really designed for Joe Blow to replace his own battery.

    44. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No, it's not brand new... but I buy devices to last around 7-8 years. I have some Thinkpads around that are going on 10 years and they still work fine.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    45. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Whoever wrote the summary is fully in the distortion field though.

      Apple's iPad tablet ushered in the modern tablet era when it was introduced in 2010

      Not including all the tablets that were rare before the iPad was released (there were tons of Toshiba, Toughbooks, and other tablets that didn't sell well), there were many Android tablets before the iPad, discounting those takes quite some reality distortion.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    46. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is an OS, it comes on new devices, but can also be loaded on old devices. There is no indication of the age of the laptop being talked about, and frankly, hardware failures happen to all manufacturers, so holding one manufacturer responsible while claiming Apple is the holy grail just means a lack of experience, not a valid opinion on the matter.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    47. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA, I hope you're only using it for basic things, because there's already a bit of lag in the smoothness after a single update.

    48. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making stupid business decisions that bankrupts your company and hitting a record that may be irrelevant has little to do with each other.

    49. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Dude "Built-in 27.3-watt-hour rechargeable lithium-polymer battery" http://www.apple.com/au/ipad-a... [apple.com], the only way they will last five years is if you do not use them, the more you use them the quicker they will die.

      You're so full of it it isn't even funny.

      I have had an iPad 2 for at least 3 years. It gets used HEAVILY every single day. In fact, there probably isn't a day in which it gets LESS than 8 to 10 hours of use.

      I have seen absolutely NO degradation in battery life, nor increase in charging time, during all that time, period. I am sure that it MIGHT have lost maybe, MAYBE 10% of its capacity; but honestly, I'd pretty much have to take a stopwatch to it to tell. On the weekends, when it gets used morning to night, it easily makes it all the way through a day/evening/night cycle, and still has about 25% left.

      Honestly, it has exhibited the best "retention of battery-life" of any rechargeable device I have ever owned, hands-down.

    50. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's the reality distortion field talking. First, a 128GB iPad Air 2 is overpriced to begin with. Then you assume that the battery will last three years. Lithium batteries of the type fitted are good for around 500 cycles, so if you make heavy use of it you can expect it to need replacing in 18 months. So light use of your overpriced tablet only.

      $99 is rather a lot for a battery replacement, compared to what it costs if they just make the back removable. And it won't restore it to "like new", it will leave all the scratches and marks on it, and the inevitable iOS slowdowns too. You would be better off with either a cheaper battery replacement or spending half as much in the first place and upgrading after a couple of years to the latest model.

      And don't forget, originally Apple's police was "buy a new one". It was only after the "iPod's dirty secret" campaign that they relented.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      there were many Android tablets before the iPad, discounting those takes quite some reality distortion.

      No it doesn't. Calling them relevant is what really requires "reality distortion".

    52. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      How can Apple expand this market for iPads? Perhaps make them more friendly to be controllers for embedded products. Maybe make a model of iPad that would fundamentally not change its shape so third parties can use it for embedded tasks, be it kiosks, home automation, and other items.

      Apple well knows how nice the iPad would be for embedded control.

      If you remember "bendgate", there was an article that showed a behind-the-scenes look at Apple's destructive testing facility, where they torture their products to see what it takes to break them. At almost every testing station, they had an iPad mini embedded as the test-cell's controller.

    53. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      How can Apple increase market share? If they had a removable battery, expandable memory, and allowed direct filesystem access, this geek may consider it.

      Oh, boy, oh, boy, oh, boy!!!

      ONE more sale! Stop the presses! Redesign the product! Sir Fluffernutter HAS SPOKEN!!!

    54. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Overpriced is a subjective term. It is indeed expensive compared to some other choices, however it is the only option if you want an iOS device.

      As for the battery, that is true on the total cycles, but we don't discharge it completely each time and don't use it every day.

      We also don't require 10 hours of battery life, half of that is fine for us, so I return to my point, it should last is 5 years.

    55. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      My macbook had a battery that blew up, a nonfunctional internal RAM slot, and the touchpad click doesn't work any longer. So I guess it depends who you ask.

      The swollen battery and the touchpad non-click are related. The battery swells and presses-up against the bottom of the trackpad and keeps it from clicking. Replace the battery and all should be well again.

      As for the nonfunctional RAM slot, did you buy this offa Craigslist or something? Try using a pencil eraser on the fingers of the RAM module?

    56. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So, it was Apple's invention of the tablet in 2010 that caused the tablet revolution? You are an odd sort.

      For many years, Android tablets existed before the iPad, it was to the point that I knew many people who wondered why Apple didn't release one yet when the announcement came that the iPad was being released. Acting like Apple invented the tablet, and they were a niche product before Apple is what requires distorting reality, but I shouldn't expect anything different from someone with a handle of macs4all than to be an Apple fanboi.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    57. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Then by all means, you shouldn't buy an iPad.

    58. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      So, it was Apple's invention of the tablet in 2010 that caused the tablet revolution? You are an odd sort.

      For many years, Android tablets existed before the iPad, it was to the point that I knew many people who wondered why Apple didn't release one yet when the announcement came that the iPad was being released. Acting like Apple invented the tablet, and they were a niche product before Apple is what requires distorting reality, but I shouldn't expect anything different from someone with a handle of macs4all than to be an Apple fanboi.

      Apple DID invent the Tablet as we now know it. Ask Bill Gates.

      And how is the premise of your argument aided by the childish ad hominem attack?

    59. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No, I got it from a reputable, business-orientated shop. The battery was replaced, click didn't come back.

      Pencil eraser-- good call.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    60. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So, you are going to double down on that one. You feel that everything prior to the iPad did nothing to move the technology forward.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      All those devices that predated the iPad had nothing to do with the invention, and only the great Steve Jobs could have invented it. Yeah...reality distortion at work.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    61. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      They are getting a little ancy at Cupertino over the 9% drop in profit last year. Still they made so much damn money the last 5 years that it's unrealistic to think that kind of crazy profit can continue forever.

    62. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      No, I got it from a reputable, business-orientated shop. The battery was replaced, click didn't come back. Pencil eraser-- good call.

      Sometimes you have to mess-around a bit to get the click-thing to happen again.

      Pencil eraser. I'm showing my age with that as a diagnostic technique; but it does sometimes work... PINK not WHITE eraser, though!

    63. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      So, you are going to double down on that one. You feel that everything prior to the iPad did nothing to move the technology forward.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      All those devices that predated the iPad had nothing to do with the invention, and only the great Steve Jobs could have invented it. Yeah...reality distortion at work.

      You're damned right I'm going to "double down" on that! The entire population of the planet had from 1915 to 2010 to come up with a successful, USEFUL embodiment of a Tablet Computer. And they didn't.

      At least not until the iPad.

    64. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yeah well I'm old too because I'd just assumed you meant pink eraser!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    65. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Yeah well I'm old too because I'd just assumed you meant pink eraser!

      I remember the half & half erasers, with a pink end and a white end. The white eraser was the "ink" side, and was much more "gritty" than the pink (pencil) side...

    66. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by macs4all · · Score: 1

      No, I got it from a reputable, business-orientated shop. The battery was replaced, click didn't come back.

      Have you tried this?

    67. Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Didn't the post you replied to say that their iPad lasted longer than 3 years? Like, when they said:

      I have iPad 2's from four years ago which still have many hours of battery life and have seen relatively heavy use

      What's the point of quoting discharge cycles? They already said it was satisfactory. And, it's not like the battery fails after 500 or so charges - it just decreases capacity a bit.

  2. Surface is great by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course on slashdot it is a failure and no one is buying them. But in the real world they ate the number 2 generator of revenue for Microsoft and can run office and be managed via active directory for IT departments making them popular. The screen is Apple quality hardware

    1. Re:Surface is great by smallfries · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Played with one in a shop today, it was very disappointing. The pen is shit. Horrific lag, unpredictable latency. Tried the builtin software ("fresh paint"?), what a pile of crap. Every tool works like a tweaked airbrush from deluxe paint 2. No real sense of accuracy or control trying the various pencils.

      The reviews online have gushed over the interface, how much shilling is going on? Going to try the iPencil when it turns up here, but not expecting a huge inprovement over the surface. First-gen might get skipped here.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    2. Re:Surface is great by smallfries · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Whoops: forgot to say, obviously my main interest is sketching. The surface running windows ten shows what touch on a laptop should br. Very nice. Without a pen the ipad pro was just a really big ipad - bit pointless.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    3. Re:Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and yet the guys at penny arcade seem to use them for that purpose without a problem. One of you is lying.

    4. Re:Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    5. Re: Surface is great by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Surface and Windows Phones will sell very well to corporates with heavy investment in Microsoft tech because it integrates very well and the Surface can run all their proprietary software. Apple and Linux fanboys are completely incapable of understanding that the corporate world is never going to fully embrace something that doesn't allow them to take advantage of their huge investment in Windows.

    6. Re:Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The guys at penny-arcade are some of the biggest shills for Microsoft and have been for years. I don't know if they are paid in cash or merchandise, but they are not unbiased.

    7. Re:Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are corporate clients you're talking about. For individual users ... well, it doesn't matter how good the IT departments at work are.

      Despite the revenue, the number of gadgets is what makes or breaks a product. It's pointless to have a product at work if it doesn't relate to anything you have at home ...

      Look at Blackberry. Nice features, everybody who used it's gadgets praised them. Where is it now?

    8. Re:Surface is great by sexconker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      PA are known MS shills.
      They have been ever since the launch of the 360.

    9. Re:Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While technically correct, for consistency it should be your.

    10. Re: Surface is great by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't care. Why would I care if you or anyone else pisses their money away? I own a galaxy tab 2 that I picked up used and it works okay so I'm not buying into Apple's high priced tablet world but I have looked at them and they are better than anything Samsung makes and Samsung makes nicer hardware than the Surface tablets. I can see that if you are slaved to the windows world then sure, Surface is your thing. I own an Apple Mac Mini that I use for video work but I'm using Linux for general computing because it works great for that purpose. Apple makes a lot of money and there is a reason for it. It's style, quality and brand recognition are superior. You can bitch all you like about it but I know a lot of people that switched from windows to Mac computers because they got tired of constant, non-stop problems and when they found out that Macs just worked they bought in. They all kind of grimaced at the price but as one co-worker of mine stated just the other day, he's had zero problems in the year he's owned his iMac compared to hardly a month without having to fix his windows setup. He's now buying his daughter a very expensive Macbook for school. I'd never spend 1500 on a laptop, it's crazy. But then I know how to pick up a used Lenovo T420 and install Linux on it.

    11. Re:Surface is great by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      Yeah we all know anyone who likes a Microsoft product is a shill. It's just that sheer amount of money they have to pay off all those people *rolleyes*

    12. Re:Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOOOOOO goes the sexconker. MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

    13. Re:Surface is great by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Informative

      The pen is shit. Horrific lag, unpredictable latency.

      Couldn't disagree more. It's the best pen input device I've used that didn't need to be physically tethered to a computer, and the lag is quite predictable (really bad in hover, almost non existent when touching)

      Tried the builtin software ("fresh paint"?), what a pile of crap.

      This I agree with, wholeheartedly. Great little kids toy but even then only if they want to play with swishing colours together. It's garbage.

    14. Re:Surface is great by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Go somewhere you can compare the Apple pen to Samsung's pen. The Samsung one is far, far ahead in terms of latency and accuracy. I'm actually quite shocked that Apple would release it in that state, but I think like Apple Maps it was rushed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other solutions for sketching on a Windows/Mac/Linux/Solaris(?) that work well. I don't know the names of the brands, but professionals have been drawing on PC's all the way back since the late 80's. Microsoft nor Apple is new to this game. When you are really interested in sketching on PC, there are dedicated, good at one thing solutions already that don't require a hybrid not so good at sketching solution that is offered as the best invention since sliced bread.

    16. Re:Surface is great by SumDog · · Score: 1

      The pen was decent on the Surface Pro 2. I agree, it worked better when touching the tablet. Hovering it felt a little off and if I came in at a low angle from the bottom it'd be totally off.

      That being said, it's probably the best you're gonna get without getting a hard core Watcom drawing tablet. (I think they made some of the Surface Pros pens/digitizers didn't they?)

      But I don't draw, so I was just using it to struggle with Illustrator.

    17. Re: Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is so much more than the corporate world today. Many small businesses are complaining about the path Microsoft has taken. The recent army for sales people pushing people to the cloud is an example. Last Thursday the Microsoft log in was down all over Europe for at least 3 hours. That were millions of small business people who could no longer log in to their fantastic, productivity increasing, cheap, life changing new cloud thing. Most people don't even understand how it works, they just trust the sales people who sell something with a trustworthy name on it. I know enough small business who have moved away from a MS only network with a SMB server to a bring your own device approach with just a cheap file server that replicates data to an online back system that also enables people to work from home without requiring a license that costs multiple thousands per worker per year.

      It's different for the corporate world off course, but 80% of the work force works in small businesses. Even the baker, the plasterer, the blacksmith, the car sales man etc, ... need IT solutions. And the recent trend is a shift to 'flex workers', self employed workers who do multiple jobs. They don't need a Windows only network. They need a good phone. That is often a more expensive smart phone. That might be an Android, that might be an iPhone. It's less likely that is is a Windows phone. And really, those small companies can use office like productivity tools. But they don't need it on a phone (that than only works when you buy tools to turn it in a desktop, why not just buy a desktop instead?). Microsoft was the only choice for a long time. They no longer are the only choice. It just takes some time for a company that focuses on these small businesses to earn enough money to try to gain some market share in larger businesses and even the 'corporate world'.

    18. Re:Surface is great by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping to get one at one point. It can be a tablet, and also masquerade as a laptop when needed. And I can install legacy Wintel apps

      But it's tough to justify it given that w/ the same budgets, I could get a far superior spec'ed laptop from any of the other vendors - Dell, HP, Asus, Lenovo et al

    19. Re: Surface is great by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The Surface and Windows Phones will sell very well to corporates with heavy investment in Microsoft tech because it integrates very well and the Surface can run all their proprietary software. Apple and Linux fanboys are completely incapable of understanding that the corporate world is never going to fully embrace something that doesn't allow them to take advantage of their huge investment in Windows.

      With Windows Phone, there is the added advantage that if given to employees, it's likely to be used just for work purposes, since it misses much of the cool stuff that iPhones and Androids have that could tempt employees to repurpose them.

      That, and the fact that they would integrate so much better w/ Windows 10

    20. Re:Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are called pen displays from wacom, but they are not portable...

    21. Re:Surface is great by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      Like with Apple hardware you realize how crappy the other stuff is after using it. The price is because it has a screen like no other in the pc world which can be read in sunlight. It is very light and has high quality glass. Consider a high end phone with a $90 walmart tracphone? That is what it is like. You can install Linux as well and load your own keys in uefi. What I like us portability but do like my i7 desktop for real work

    22. Re: Surface is great by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I have a used T430 with linux mint. It's awesome. Just had to share.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    23. Re:Surface is great by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

      I have a SP2 and using the pen is like writing on paper, especially in apps like OneNote

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
    24. Re: Surface is great by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Linux runs good on lower grade hardware. On my T420 it hauls ass. I built a dual AMD 64 bit system back years ago when that was the hot thing. I put Mepis Linux on it and it was amazing. I had a friend come over and he was absolutely blown away. I've installed it on a lot of friends computers over the years and I only had 2 that went back to windows.

    25. Re:Surface is great by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Seriously? The entire post is pure BS. Shill much for Apple do we? Just about every reviewer who's worked with these disagree with you. I use it for PS all the time. Your statements are all nonsense.

    26. Re:Surface is great by nnull · · Score: 1

      Microsoft made a tablet people want. I don't want a tablet that's just a big glorified touch screen phone. I can write on the surface and OneNote has been an excellent note taking application for many many years. The thing also runs Windows applications just fine, especially cad software. Pretty much Microsoft has finally succeeded in making an excellent tablet by combing some of the Windows BS desktop tablet features and used it to make a nice tablet with a Windows desktop if needed. And it works pretty decently.

    27. Re: Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if MS can get off their asses and get WP8/10 to be compliant with Exchange security profiles. The issue below is preventing my employer (Fortune 20 company) from letting employees choose WP as their option.
      https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2464593

      Microsoft's own response to their KB? Essentially: "You're holding it wrong"

    28. Re: Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The Surface and Windows Phones will sell very well to corporates with heavy investment in Microsoft tech because it integrates very well and the Surface can run all their proprietary software. Apple and Linux fanboys are completely incapable of understanding that the corporate world is never going to fully embrace something that doesn't allow them to take advantage of their huge investment in Windows.

      I can tell you know shit all about the corporate world. No company is going to give out POS windows phones to their employee's. As for the Surface - that's also another device that not many use.

    29. Re: Surface is great by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      you've obviously not used the qhd screen from Dell.

    30. Re: Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on backing up his point. His point being that the Windows environment is a natural fit for enterprises that have windows environments and a lot of people can't grasp that. If you want to talk about consumer level decisions, that is something else entirely.

    31. Re: Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/poweredge-t430/pd

    32. Re:Surface is great by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Explain to me what is up with the lag. Completely unpredictable shifts in latency from zero to over a second. This was horrific - it completely ruins the interface.

      What is with the little diamond near the nib of the pen? It seems to track the pen reasonably well, but the actual ink from the tool misses that diamond by a few centimetres. If the tracking is there (diamond only seems to lag behind the nib by about a centimetre or so in fast strokes) , why is the actual drawing from the tool so far from that diamond, and so slow.

      I'm only explaining what I saw. If anyone thinks it is bullshit then head into a shop and try one. As for shilling for Apple - where have I said anything positive about the iPad Pro? That is another first-gen product that looks like it needs some tweaks.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    33. Re:Surface is great by smallfries · · Score: 1

      You are trying to describe a Wacom tablet. Had one, been there. It is lovely. But my interest is not sketching at a PC - I want something to replace a physical pad and pen.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    34. Re: Surface is great by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      Tell that to all the schools and corporations I work with on a daily basis who are buying Surface Pro and Surface Books by the truckload. They are perhaps the hottest selling single item I've seen in years on the client side.

      I'm glad I don't get paid on client though... the margins on that stuff are shit.

    35. Re: Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people who have constant problems are pretty much trying to self-justify their purchases.

      The people I see doing what you say often switch from the absolute bottom-of-the-barrel $200 laptops to $1,600. It's absolutely no wonder to anyone with a shred of common sense or logic that they're running into fewer problems: The BOTB laptop is going to be must less future-proof, more prone to failure due to all the corners they had to cut. I've also heard stories where people blame everything else for problems that were related to the laptop or ithing because they don't know any better or are completely deluded buying into the "it always works". Wifi is unreliable? Must be the router even though all other devices are working fine!

      My parents who are the furthest from being tech savvy rarely run into actual problems, and this is coming with an IBM (not Lenovo) T42 laptop still running XP...

    36. Re: Surface is great by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Linux would run great on that, but somehow I think amiga3D was talking about the Thinkpad, not the Dell.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    37. Re: Surface is great by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the Android or Apple phones all support Exchange security profiles...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    38. Re:Surface is great by RailRide · · Score: 1

      Up to SP2 are Wacom digitizers. SP3 and up are from Ntrig, a company MS acquired specifically for their digitizer tech

      Found this out while evaluating SP2/SP3 models as a "cheaper than a Cintiq" method of getting into all-digital drawing.

      ---PCJ.

    39. Re: Surface is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations gave up their investments in IBM and Xerox eventually as the trends changed. The same will happen to Microsoft and all the other currents. More and more is being ported to other operating systems and also moved to the "cloud", so too will corporations eventually be run by Generation Y and younger and they will demand that everything run on Chromebooks and iPads like it did in primary school and college.

    40. Re:Surface is great by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Wait ... a free bundled application isn't especially good? Madness!

    41. Re:Surface is great by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Wacom makes the Cintiq Companion, which is portable - it's basically a direct competitor to the Surface Pro. It's thicker and heavier and more expensive but it does have a better pen.

    42. Re: Surface is great by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      And that's why Apple doesn't sell BOTB boxes. The profit margin isn't high enough to make up for the aggravation. I know a lot of bad windows stories are actually due to shitty hardware. Not to mention that most cheap boxes carry a bunch of crapware by default which cripples the computer from the start. Still, it helps Apple make more money.

    43. Re: Surface is great by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the Android or Apple phones all support Exchange security profiles...

      I don't know about yours; but my iPhone 6 plus (and my iPhone 4s before it) both had no trouble hooking up to Office365 Mail (I think iOS even had a profile for it), including all my Folders, and I even get Exchange-based Calendar events.

      And all of this without doing anything but entering the logon for my Office365 account.

      I'm sure that there are some ultra-paranoid Exchange admins that can come up with security profiles that will choke most anything; but in my personal experience, I'd call the experience "seamless integration".

    44. Re: Surface is great by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      That isn't what a security profile is.

      Security profiles determine what you can do with attachments and stuff like that.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. Title is misleading....just read the summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "In terms of online sales [in the month of October]" hardly is MS beating Apple, even if true.

    Also, MS has a totally fresh tablet lineup. Most products have an uptick of sales when they refresh their lines.

    Oh, also, did I mention it's an early version of the report?

    A lot of reading between the lines here.

    1. Re:Title is misleading....just read the summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're also counting laptops with detachable screens as being tablets.

    2. Re:Title is misleading....just read the summary. by ranton · · Score: 1

      They're also counting laptops with detachable screens as being tablets.

      While I agree with the Surface Pro 4 being considered a tablet, I also agree calling the Surface Book a tablet is ridiculous. Not because it is basically a laptop with a detachable screen, but because that detachable screen cannot function like a tablet by itself. Its battery life as a tablet is only about three hours.

      I recently bought a Surface Pro 4, and was very tempted to go with the Surface Book because of the nicer screen. But three hours of detached battery life was just too little. If they could have doubled that I certainly would have gone with the Book. I understand why they couldn't deliver that kind of battery life, but it does mean the device simply cannot be thought of as a tablet in any way. It is a laptop with a touch screen.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Title is misleading....just read the summary. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Sorry but if it works without the keyboard? Its a tablet.

      While I'll never have one (found tablets to be rather useless compared to my netbook) I do have tons of experience dealing with customers laptops and the vast majority? Around 3 hours was what they wanted out of their laptops, anything above that was gravy. This makes sense as when was the last time you were away from an outlet for more than 3 hours?

      As for MSFT beating Apple with the Surface? Again not surprising as talking to those that have one they really love the things and since it runs a full Windows OS (instead of that dumbshit Windows RT) they can leverage all that third party Windows software. I know the main reason I'm given when people are trying to practically give away their tablets to me at the shop is "it doesn't run what I need it to" IE Windows software so for those that like the tablet form factor but want to be able to run the same software they run on their desktop? Its an easy sell.

      It does make me wonder if this will hurt Apple long term as there is a lot more people with Windows software they want to run than iOS software, perhaps this will spur Apple into making some sort of "MacTablet Pro" with a full OSX on it, I'm sure many here would just love to have a tablet running OSX.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Title is misleading....just read the summary. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I have a Winbook as well as an iPad.

      One major advantage the Winbook has is that I can download the official videos of music from YouTube using apps like YouTube Downloader, Hyper, et al. W/ the iPad, I have to buy it from the Store. Yeah, Groove too is a store, but at least on Windows, I have apps that allow me to download stuff that I can transfer b/w memory cards. Something that I can't do on the iPad.

      I do use the iPad for listening to Sirius radio when I'm not in the car, and also for doing FaceTime w/ family. That, and sometimes watching online videos. Somehow, some of the most important apps that are there on iOS are not there on Windows 10 - be it laptop or tablet

    5. Re:Title is misleading....just read the summary. by ranton · · Score: 1

      Sorry but if it works without the keyboard? Its a tablet.

      So all smart phones are tablets? The 60" smart monitor at work is a tablet? I'm not saying you are necessarily wrong by considering it a tablet, but your narrow definition of what makes something a tablet seems a bit silly.

      Around 3 hours was what they wanted out of their laptops, anything above that was gravy. This makes sense as when was the last time you were away from an outlet for more than 3 hours?

      Like them, I am fine with a "mobile desktop"-type laptop only having a few hours of battery life. But this isn't since I am worried about how long I will be away from an outlet, its because I am virtually never away from an outlet. Or a docking station for that matter. A computing device that is not meant to be glued to a docking station is a much different device than one which is truly meant to be mobile (in the modern sense, not the expectations of five years ago). Everyone I have ever talked to after using a laptop with 8+ hours of battery life has sworn off ever using a 3 hour battery laptop ever again.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    6. Re:Title is misleading....just read the summary. by larwe · · Score: 1

      When was I away from an outlet for more than 3 hours? Pretty much any time I'm flying, which is more or less once a week, and if am not in a class of service that has power outlets at the seat. While for many (most?) people laptops have become the new desktop, it's still true that there are people who spend significant time away from mains power.

    7. Re:Title is misleading....just read the summary. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      It does make me wonder if this will hurt Apple long term as there is a lot more people with Windows software they want to run than iOS software, perhaps this will spur Apple into making some sort of "MacTablet Pro" with a full OSX on it, I'm sure many here would just love to have a tablet running OSX.

      I agree with you.

      And despite Cook's protestations to the contrary, I would be flabbergasted if Apple is NOT working on an ARM port of OS X, or an OS X/iOS Hybrid, specifically to run on the iPad Pro. They just have too much experience in the platform-shift arena to not try it; plus OS X (nee NextStep) is easy to port.

      So, mark my words: This will be announced at the next WWDC. I would suspect that Apple will go the "Universal App"/"Fat Binary" route, rather than ditch Intel completely. THAT would be a ridiculously dumbass move!

      But remember, next WWDC: You heard it here first...

    8. Re:Title is misleading....just read the summary. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I have a Winbook as well as an iPad.

      One major advantage the Winbook has is that I can download the official videos of music from YouTube using apps like YouTube Downloader, Hyper, et al. W/ the iPad, I have to buy it from the Store. Yeah, Groove too is a store, but at least on Windows, I have apps that allow me to download stuff that I can transfer b/w memory cards. Something that I can't do on the iPad.

      No, of COURSE you can't do that with an iPad. NO App like YouTube Download exists for the iPad, nosiree!

      Oh, wait...

  4. Are they even in the same market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Surface line is priced and seems intended for the laptop market (going back to the original Tablet PCs). Apple doesn't want its iPads to be laptops, so they are not 100% the same.

    On the other hand, being more expensive than Apple and adding nothing new is not going to win them marketshare. Android competes on price and dominates in that category (though there are some cheaper Windows tablets, now).

    1. Re:Are they even in the same market? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Apple doesn't want its iPads to be laptops

      http://www.apple.com/shop/prod...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re: Are they even in the same market? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Mamas don't let your iPads grow up to be laptops...

  5. online orders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, with company procurement going totally digital, I bet that a single order from a large multinational would do that.

    What about in-store sales? Did MS approach 10% of Apple's table volume?

    1. Re: online orders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Simple explanation for increase Surface sales is that most IT departments are forcing them to users instead of a traditional Windows laptop. Most users don't care for them (over traditional laptop) but most also have no choice. These are typically shops who have no iPad deployed and feel the Surface means they are have addressed their mobile transition. These are also shops who have typically avoided iPhones also. So Surface sales cannibalizing Lenovo and HP laptop sales sure. Surface taking iPad share, not really. The iPad drives consumer tablet sales and those of more mature/larger enterprises who have deployed iOS devices for years as their standard solution.

    2. Re: online orders? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Why, are IT departments suddenly slush w/ cash? The Surfaces are several times more expensive than equivalent lesser brand laptops, including the likes of Dell and HP. And for most office uses, touch is irrelevant. Avoiding iPhones makes sense - there ain't much the iPhones bring to work environments - both Androids and Windows Phones make more sense.

      But I agree that Surfaces ain't stealing any marketshare from Apple. Just like in the 90s, when PowerMac sales didn't make any dent on Wintel - all it did was cannibalize Motorola's 68k sales. Similarly, people are sometimes going for Surfaces b'cos the hybrid aspect is particularly handy on planes.

      One thing about this though - the Surfaces - when capable of cellular connections on the go - currently accept only GSMs - Verizon or Sprint doesn't work w/ them. So people who are on either of the last 2 would gain nothing by getting a Surface

    3. Re: online orders? by larwe · · Score: 1

      This. Plus, corporates often *lease* their computers so they get a hardware refresh every two years, service plans baked into the lease cost, etc etc. Leases wouldn't show up as sales. I'd be pretty astonished if you could point me to a Fortune 100 (hell, even a Fortune 500) that has standardized on Surface as their mobile computer of choice.

    4. Re: online orders? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      It's not got so much to do with cash as it does have to do with the upper management at a corporation. I've seen this play out a LOT of times recently.

      First, the CEO gets a Surface Pro because he thinks he needs it. No, his use case doesn't really support it, but the IT department buys it because the CEO says he wants it. The CIO, CFO and COO all see the CEO carrying a Surface Pro and then they decide they need one too because they want to be just like him. Granted in some cases they actually do use them (the COO is often one I see properly using a Surface Pro in a meeting... ironically it's rarely the CIO). Then the managers below them decide they want them and IT is forced to buy them and so on.

      Now, the average user gets forced into a Surface Pro because IT wants to standardize. It makes deployment, repair and imaging a lot easier if you have lots and lots of the same computer. Updates pushed out to their users become simpler as well and so on... it's a trickle down effect but yes to the average user in a company it DOES tend to look like IT is forcing it because they want to.

      On a side note, it's worth noting that IT departments aren't necessarily flush with cash but aren't really all that poor either. Yes, most consumer grade laptops are cheap, but a company with its head screwed on straight never bought these anyway. I've rarely seen corporations spend less than $1500 on a laptop for any users because they go with larger memory, faster CPUs (mostly because of all the security software they need to install to be compliant with the corporation), then they buy 3 or 5 years of support instead of the 1 year that your sub-$1K laptops come with. Consumer grade laptops do NOT last very long in the hands of salesmen for example... trust me I've seen plenty of examples of companies who end up spending more on their consumer-grade replacements over 3 years than they would've spent on a good business-grade laptop in the first place.

      Surfaces are really well made and reliable. They are business-grade and are priced as such.

  6. Tablets will die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tablets only will eventually die off IMHO.

    Cell phones have already start cannibalizing the 6"-8" tablet market.

    Laptops and 8"+ will merge into a hybrid tablet/laptop device. The ones where the screen is removable and becomes a standalone tablet (they already exist). Hence the abomination that is the iPad pro that comes with iPen and iKeyboard, essentially making it a (very restricted) laptop.

    1. Re:Tablets will die off by Dracos · · Score: 2

      Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that.

      Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question. Yes, larger phones are intruding on the form factor, but more importantly the general tablet hype has faded away and people have realized that a tablet is not a replacement for a laptop. Vendors love tablets because they're essentially a reset button for software ecosystems: where they couldn't have a walled garden before, now they can.

      Touch is a regression in human interface design, and deep down every engineer knows it. To correct that, now we have tablets with keyboards and/or stylii. Jobs swore both of those things would never happen. But I think the reason why iOS gained cut+paste so late was because the only workable soluitons weren't as elegant as he wanted, and he was forced to relent and give the users a necessarily shitty workflow.

      Tablets occupy a very narrow market segment that, outside of vertical solutions for business, was doomed from the beginning. Either they'll get replaced by phablets or they'll evolve into netbooks.

    2. Re:Tablets will die off by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that.
      Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.

      Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Tablets will die off by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 2

      Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that. Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.

      Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.

      It's 1995 all over again. Apple target home users, who have a taste for new shiney and lead the sales curve, but don't have the appetite to continually upgrade or replace. Microsft target business users who are slower off the mark, but throw a lot more money around and do it on a regular cycle, for a lot longer periods.

    4. Re:Tablets will die off by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that.
      Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.

      Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.

      Agreed. Much like PC's / Laptops, Tablets (and smartphones) are starting to reach a mature, saturation point. A 3 year old model is still plenty useful. For some reason the tech industry feels that double digit growth is sustainable, and the only indication of success. That means if you sold 1 million units last year, you are a failure for selling 1.05 million this year, you need at least 1.1 million.

      For real, genuine work, it's hard to beat a PC (any OS) with dual screens, and a keyboard and mouse. However a tablet is hard to beat to leave on the coffee table and open up for a quick web search, or to watch downloaded movies on a flight (though I usually download the movies on a PC). More and more when I travel I leave my laptop at home, and rely on my tablet.

      A phone can run the same applications as the tablet, but on a more compact screen. Great to have always on you web access, mapping access, email access, mediocre camera, the ability to fireup Netflix for Chromecast, or even slightly more sophisticated apps, like having a graphing calculator on you at all times.

      At one time there were "home computers". These were basically appliances. You inserted the cartridge or diskette for the program you wanted, turned it on, and you were ready to go. Android and iOS better recreate this experience for home users than full blown OS's (Windows, Desktop Linux like Ubuntu or RedHat, and even OS X). For grandma, you really are better off giving her an iPad than a Desktop, but at an office, not so much.

    5. Re:Tablets will die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hence the abomination that is the iPad pro that comes with iPen and iKeyboard"

      Lol, no. You can add the smart keyboard to your iPad Pro for just $169 however though, and the Apple Pencil for just $99.

      (yes the apple website uses the just qualifier next to their $169 price for a keyboard and $99 price for the stylus)

      capcha: economy

    6. Re:Tablets will die off by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      For real, genuine work, it's hard to beat a PC (any OS) with dual screens, and a keyboard and mouse. However a tablet is hard to beat to leave on the coffee table and open up for a quick web search, or to watch downloaded movies on a flight (though I usually download the movies on a PC). More and more when I travel I leave my laptop at home, and rely on my tablet.

      I bought a used TF201 and a new old stock keyboard dock on deep deep discount, it didn't want to charge for about half a day but since then it's played ball. Aside from the low low resolution, it's the best of both worlds. I can open a SPICE, VNC, or RDP session to someplace relevant and use it very much like a real computer. But it also has great battery life, weighs nothing, takes up no space worth mentioning, and has totally passive cooling.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Tablets will die off by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I can open a SPICE, VNC, or RDP session to someplace relevant and use it very much like a real computer.

      Eg: The real computers at the other end of the line are still important.

    8. Re:Tablets will die off by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that. Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.

      Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.

      Not just that, people sometimes get free or subsidized tablets from their cellular carrier - Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile et al

    9. Re:Tablets will die off by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that.
      Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.

      Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.

      Agreed. Much like PC's / Laptops.

      But it seems like manufacturers didn't repeat the same "mistakes".
      Desktop PCs are fully upgradable and repairable. A bit less for laptops but that's still better than most tablets. Additionally, the software and hardware are independent provided you have the right drivers. As a result, you only need to change your PC when your hardware really is outdated. Something that doesn't happen much nowadays. With tablets they do everything in their power to make you change it every two years : sealed batteries, discontinued software updates, locked system...

    10. Re:Tablets will die off by larwe · · Score: 1
      For some reason the tech industry feels that double digit growth is sustainable, and the only indication of success.

      Absolutely - and, since this belief is never true because it would also require a double digit growth in personal disposable income, the tech industry is constantly under pressure to create new product categories of things people don't want, so that this new category can have a temporary growth spurt. 3D TV and smartwatches are two recent examples.

      At one time there were "home computers". These were basically appliances. You inserted the cartridge or diskette for the program you wanted

      Eh, not many people would agree with that characterization of "home computers" (in the sense that it was meant in the 1980s, which your mention of cartridges implies). Most people who owned a home computer in that era learned at least a little BASIC, and pretty much all of them learned at least some "command line" skills (even if the "command line" in question was using the BASIC interpreter in direct mode).

    11. Re: Tablets will die off by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      eh?

      Android 6 tablets look like they will be awesome.

      I think a lot of people are just holding off until we get something that isn't shit.

      who'd of thought it.

    12. Re:Tablets will die off by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You used "e.g." = exempli gratia = "for example".

      I think you actually want "i.e." = id est = "that is".

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    13. Re:Tablets will die off by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      I don't think tablets will die. But they will become a niche product, just as desktop computers as we knew them are becoming. None of our current computing devices will be the One Thing any more. People will choose between desktop, laptop, tablet, phone, and wearables depending on need and budget. At some future time we might see a One Thing again - perhaps a voice plus air-keyboard controlled HoloLens or a direct brain interface - or we may continue to have a multi-device ecosystem for the foreseeable future.

      Some tablet markets that will continue: tablets embedded as UI (like the Square Stand retail register), tablet-controlled audio and light mixers, digital drawing tools for artists, and cheap tablets that are used as e-readers and movie watching devices.

      Amazon's new Fire tablet (the $50 model) is leading the way in the last category, and encouraging it with the six pack deal they offered at launch. The digitally controlled home of the future might have a tablet that lives in each room, which would serve to control the lights and the entertainment hardware as well as being a media device in its own right. You would simply pick up the closest tablet when you want one rather than carrying a device.

    14. Re:Tablets will die off by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I know quite a few people who don't need a laptop. They'd be just as well off with an iPad, considering what they do with their computers. Better off, actually, as the iPad is safer from malware than laptops.

      There's far more non-geeks out there than there are geeks in here.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  7. Just So I'm Clear by swsuehr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If this is the case, which I won't concede, exactly how many of the Microsoft tablets are sitting in a warehouse somewhere, only "sold" in order to make the numbers look good?

    1. Re:Just So I'm Clear by tyme · · Score: 5, Informative

      The summary says "online sales" which means that we are probably NOT talking about "shipped" rather than "sold" numbers. However, these are numbers for October, which is all before the new iPads shipped (including the iPad Pro) so we are probably seeing some depression of iPad sales that will catch up in the November numbers (or not: if MS can maintain these sales numbers in November and December, then this would be quite interesting).

      --
      just a ghost in the machine.
    2. Re:Just So I'm Clear by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Online sales are direct to consumer. There's no warehouse middleman artificially inflating the numbers.

    3. Re:Just So I'm Clear by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that's not happening, but what I am observing is that businesses are jumping on the Surface bandwagon. And Business buy in bulk, and do it on a regular cycle. Apple really dropped the ball by not tagetting business users.
      I also notice at the airport security check, more and more other people are pulling out Surface Pros, so I believe they are making ground.
      I recall when the Macbook went Intel and everyone wanted one. We did evaluations at the time fro our next fleet replacement but Apple just wouldn't come to the party with any kind of enterprise support. So they lost our business, and I'm sure we weren't the only ones. That was about 7 or 8 years ago and from what I've seen they haven't changed their stance since. So they sat by and let MS eat their lunch.

    4. Re:Just So I'm Clear by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I just picked up a Surface Book in store recently after calling for about 2 weeks before they had any stock available, so I think they've had reasonably good sales or at least they don't have stock piling up in a warehouse somewhere. Of course that could also mean they didn't make enough units to keep up with the demand, so it's hard to say.

      Personally, I tend to lean towards the sales actually being good. Microsoft has finally managed to design a compelling product and get people interested in it. Beyond general market interest, I suspect that there have been a lot of Microsoft/Windows fans who have been waiting for this kind of moment and so they're getting a sales bump from that as well.

      I'll admit I jumped in mostly out of tech lust. The idea of a larger format tablet was interesting, but I already have an iPad so I wasn't keen on getting a Pro. The notebook/tablet hybrid concept was also a bit of a draw as I've never liked the cover style keyboards for tablets. It's by no means a perfect device and there is plenty of room for refinement, but Microsoft has done a good job executing for a change, so I'm hardly surprised that they're seeing some success as a result. Nadella is proving to be a good CEO for the company.

    5. Re:Just So I'm Clear by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      MS surface is a hot seller. Slashdotter remember 2012 with the 1st genration tablets with an ARM chip.

      Today the low end uses an ATOM and people are used to metro now. Yes Windows 8.1 is a joy to use on a touch screen. Not trolling but I speak as a user who loves the light portability and uses it for wiresharkING network connections at work.

      All my coworkers have bought them after 1st mocking them. Seriously the screen and corporate integration are tops. I won't buy a regular laptop again as a result of the build quality and portability. Things are changing and MS now longer has them sitting in whare houses now since their hardware is their 2nd biggest revenue generator.

    6. Re:Just So I'm Clear by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Surface devices have sold extremely well since the 2nd gen. As this are digital sales direct to consumer I would say precisely ZERO devices sold are sitting in a warehouse somewhere (unless someone working in a warehouse bought one).

    7. Re:Just So I'm Clear by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I recall when the Macbook went Intel and everyone wanted one. We did evaluations at the time fro our next fleet replacement but Apple just wouldn't come to the party with any kind of enterprise support. So they lost our business, and I'm sure we weren't the only ones. That was about 7 or 8 years ago and from what I've seen they haven't changed their stance since. So they sat by and let MS eat their lunch.

      First, I wouldn't say that MS has been eating Apple's lunch...

      Second, have you ever stopped to consider the number of people versus the number of "businesses"? I think Apple knows EXACTLY what it is doing.

    8. Re:Just So I'm Clear by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I also find "online sales" questionable. If you add non-online sales, what happens to the numbers?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Just So I'm Clear by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Second, have you ever stopped to consider the number of people versus the number of "businesses"? I think Apple knows EXACTLY what it is doing.

      Yes, Have you considered how many people work for a business of some kind? And how often a business replaces their device compared to an individual?
      Using my own case as an example, I still use the laptop at home I bought in 2008. In those 7 years I've had 5 different laptops from work.

  8. *online* sales? who cares? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I recall reading about when Pepsi overtook Coke. Everyone rejoiced. However, in actual fact, Coke still outsold Pepsi by a wide margin; the overtaking was in grocery store sales which they had managed to do by making the six-pack into an 8-pack for the same price and then measuring by total volume.

    And here we have a report that says MS outsold Apple in *online sales*. Hmmm. I suspect that Apple sells the majority, if not the vast majority, of their sales through retail chains. So when I read:

    "The report did not take in account customers who purchased their tablets in brick-and-mortar stores, such as Apple’s retail stores or Best Buy."

    Then basically I think this is even less of a mini-victory than Fortune posits. Pepsi anyone?

    1. Re:*online* sales? who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is that Android tablets have led the market both sales-wise and feature-wise for several years now.

    2. Re: *online* sales? who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the issue becomes blurred when you bear in mind that the whole basis of the iOS and it's origins with the iPod is selling sugar water to kids. Jobs went full Scully on that one. As the Mac slowly drifts toward iOS the truism continues to focus.

    3. Re:*online* sales? who cares? by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yup. This report is simply cherry picking one particular and declaring Microsoft the winner. Mind you, Apple does the same thing with its overpriced "boutique" smart devices.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:*online* sales? who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is it cherry picking online sales, it's cherry picking the month in which Microsoft released new devices, cherry picking the month before Apple released new devices, and choosing the scope very carefully (note, it includes laptops that can have the screen pull off).

      It's clearly just trying very hard to find some way in which MS is outselling Apple.

    5. Re:*online* sales? who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another AC here. Foot traffic in stores is a huge money maker for add-on sales and encouraging upgrades (and giving the old one to a grateful family member).

      I would like to see demographic numbers. I see a lot of grandparents using Apple and Android these days. Zilch on surface or Windows tablets. Personally, I would be an ideal use case for an Windows tablet, but my next devices are likely Android or Apple.

    6. Re:*online* sales? who cares? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Are we having Pepsi or Cherry Pepsi? I'm so confused!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re: *online* sales? who cares? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I just can't see ever using XCode on iOS. It's not actually using XCode that would be the issue, but switching between web browser, test app, etc would be a constant pain.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:*online* sales? who cares? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      The kicker is that the numbers seem to be for sales dollars, not units sold, so including the more expensive products like covertibles, reduces sales Of iPads and Linux tablets compared to Surface Pros and Surface Books. Also, tablets are ranked by brand, so all the Linux-based tablets get split up into smaller percentages (along with a few non-MS brand MS Windows-based tablets).

    9. Re: *online* sales? who cares? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Well the issue becomes blurred when you bear in mind that the whole basis of the iOS and it's origins with the iPod is selling sugar water to kids. Jobs went full Scully on that one. As the Mac slowly drifts toward iOS the truism continues to focus.

      That "OS X is becoming iOS" meme is becoming quite tired. OS X has adopted a FEW (very few!) interface-isms from iOS, and those are mostly because, for example, people switching back and forth find it easier to do things like SCROLL using the same directional gesture regardless of Tablet or Trackpad.

      But OS X is in NO danger of losing its familiar GUI. Things are adjusted slowly, rather than like what MS did with Windows 8, where they wholesale turned every-single GUI paradigm they had been using for DECADES on its ear, "just because".

  9. Online only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that Apple own an extensive, walk-in retail network and have their products on sale everywhere Microsoft has theirs, rather suggests that this might be cherrypicking.

    The iPad is not fabulous value for money. But if Microsoft aren't kicking their arses in supermarkets and the high street, then they aren't kicking their arses at all.

  10. The funny part. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a Surface pro... and I can not get myself to buy another. The huge problems with the Surface pro and how microsoft has told me "sucks to be you, reinstall the OS" means I have zero interest in walking down their road again. Not as long as they use low grade dog food chips like Marvell for their wireless networking.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:The funny part. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I had a problem with the wireless once. Turns out it was a windows problem and the refresh fixed it just fine. Otherwise zero hardware issues on my end. My partner had a problem with the pen on her Surface and after talking to tech support for a few minutes they sent her a new pen. (There was a facepalmingly funny moment where the tech support person asked her to hold a button combination on the surface which does a hard reset not realising she was running the chat session on it. Kudos that after booting up and logging into the website the sessions continued where it left off)

      On my second Surface now, the SP3. I can't bring myself to upgrade because it works just fine the way it is and the SP4 doesn't offer me $1000 more than what I have.

    2. Re:The funny part. by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      And that $1000 price tag is why the surface pro is not really a tablet from a sales point of view. It'll sell to corporate execs who want a light laptop - and for whom it matters that they have an obviously pricey toy to show off. Plus, these things will primarily be used as laptops to run desktop software. But that's the Mac Air market, not the iPad market - much less the Kindle Fire / $99 Android market.

      Microsoft can only hope that once they sell enough of these, devs will start writing tablet software for them. At that point, they might be able to play in the iPad's market - if that market still exists by then and hasn't been decimated by big screen phones. But even then, I guess Microsoft's phones could benefit. Though Android phones will still rule.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    3. Re:The funny part. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      The surface is just 699 and now has a quad core atom. It can run office and act as a tablet and no crappy scaled down mac office suit with a crappy ios. It is a real OS that can be used for both work and play. No laptop under 1000 is going to be good anyway in a sea of cheap plastic and garbage quality 1k screens.

    4. Re:The funny part. by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is that there really "isn't" an ipad market. ipad is just a media consumption device that is a great form factor and easy to use, beyond that it is a really awful device. Ultrabooks, hybrids like the surface and other tablet devices that allow you to be "productive" and provide a nice easy form factor to consume media have improved so much that buying an ipad doesn't really make sense anymore. I have watched where I work go from everyone having an ipad as an extra portable to device where it was hard not to see one a hundred times a day to now where I would be lucky if I see someone using one once in a week. While Surface devices, ultrabooks, hybrids et al you now see everywhere.

    5. Re:The funny part. by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Actually, the entry level model is only $499; it's the top end model with LTE that runs $699. You could even pick one up on Black Friday for $349 if you bought the type cover as well.

    6. Re:The funny part. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy. Any device manufacturer will do that to you if the base OS is compromised badly for any reason.

      Windows always has had the option to reinstall over top an existing OS to try to make a bad situation better, but sometimes something (you or otherwise) has fucked up something so bad it requires a reinstall.

      Seeing as you've not told anyone what the original problem was so we can collectively rage about it, I suspect the problem is you. I would suggest not buying a retail laptop with a desktop OS because entering an admin password just once at the wrong time will require you to reinstall.

  11. Hell, it's about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That people finally realized that ipads were just over sized iphones and were nothing more than toys, not good enough for actual business usage at all. At least with a windows tablet, you get the ENTIRE back catalog of applications that were ever made for Windows, which are more likely to work with businesses apps that were made 20 years ago.

    1. Re:Hell, it's about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I work in a University.

      I KNOW iPads are being used by Chemists, Physicists, Mathematicians, Statisticians, Biologists, Geneticists etc for a wide variety of tasks.

      I have a friend whose wife wrote her Masters thesis on an iPad using Pages (Ugh... why ???).

      These days limitations are not the hardware/software, they are the users who lack the imagination or willingness to use the tools available in new and imaginative ways.

      And trying to push software solutions from 20 years ago..... please.... the UIs sucked, they have so many limitations in them (data types, file sizes, data exchange, etc etc etc).

    2. Re:Hell, it's about time! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      People shouldn't have to use tools in new and imaginative ways. They should have tools that were made to do exactly what they want to do and use them. Those tools have mostly already been made.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Hell, it's about time! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      (and none of them are tablets)

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re:Hell, it's about time! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      People shouldn't have to use tools in new and imaginative ways. They should have tools that were made to do exactly what they want to do and use them. Those tools have mostly already been made.

      That would require omnipotence from every manufacturer in that they can design tools that everyone needs before anyone knows they need them. Sometimes the unexpected usage can lead to new tools and features. Take for example the common towel which jokingly is mentioned as being vital in The Hitchiker's Guide books. It has many other uses other than drying if you were in a survival situation.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:Hell, it's about time! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But that's just it.... Manufacturers aren't even trying. They're all following Apple, and apple seems to want to remove as many 'impediments and distractions' to the user, but in doing so they end up focusing on only common uses... Macs are best for browsing and email. Windows was the last commercial OS that was successful being the ideal tool for all people IMHO. Some modern linux variants are getting pretty good. Some are even better than windows in some ways because customizing your system with your apps is usually a matter of one package manager command.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:Hell, it's about time! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      They're all following Apple, and apple seems to want to remove as many 'impediments and distractions' to the user, but in doing so they end up focusing on only common uses.

      I see the main problem is that the UI is still somewhat limited. Touch does things that a keyboard and mouse cannot do well and vice versa. But at the moment, it is not precise enough for some work. Will using a pen help? In some aspects, yes and others no. Right now the approach seems to augment touch with voice. Direct neural controls may be the only way to get around the problem but I see that as more sci-fi.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  12. who has a tablet? by wnfJv8eC · · Score: 1

    that doesn't say much about tablet sales. I haven't seen a tablet in the hands of a human in months.

    1. Re:who has a tablet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and I've seen dozens of people using them. WHAT NOW?

    2. Re: who has a tablet? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      You have to leave your basement for that.

    3. Re:who has a tablet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, this night my mum walked into the basement to ask how she could review some music show she missed on TV. She show on TV that she could review them with the iPad App. I had to install it for her and start the show. A few hours later my dad wanted to do the same to review the sport show, I installed the App and started the show for him. These are the only two person I see in real life in my basement and 100% of them use tablets.

    4. Re:who has a tablet? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      TIME TO OPEN YOUR EYES NOW.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:who has a tablet? by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Erm, wot? Are you buried in a bunker or something? Tablets are ubiquitous.

      Heck, I currently have thirteen of them at home (a Surface Pro 4, a Surface Book, two HP Touchpads, a Fire HDX, a Fire HD 6, a Fire HD 6 Kids edition, and six of the new 7" Fire tablets). Granted, the Touchpads have been relegated to toy status (for playing with Open WebOS), and the six new tablets are Christmas gifts (with a couple being given to relatives).

      But in a family of six, we still have five tablets in regular use, and will have at least eight after the holidays.

  13. Increasingly difficult to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just tablets, but in InfoTech across the board. 5 years ago little new features were enough to spark mass consumer interest in upgrading, but nowadays it's a lot of the same shit, just marginally better. Most people don't buy a new TV every 2-3 years. The market is so ridiculously saturated.

    1. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Most people don't buy a new TV every 2-3 years yet .

    2. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      ..enter 'smart TVs'

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by larwe · · Score: 1

      Smart TVs are this whole argument all over again. They UNIVERSALLY suck compared to using a third party set top box, or using a content thrower/receiver like Chromecast and having a real, non-adware-infested, regularly-updated app on your smartphone or tablet. A good TV is a dumb screen that shows nice pictures and makes nice sound. The market for good TVs is saturated and prices have been driven down because there's not much difference between a $300 TV and a $600 TV of the same nominal specs, so TV manufacturers are trying to slice off a wedge of the set-top-box profits by essentially integrating a (really, really shitty) set-top box into their TVs.

    4. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Still no need to buy a new TV. I expect a TV to have a service life of at least 10 years, and perhaps 20 or more though some of that will be as a secondary set. In other words, you upgrade the set in the main home theater setup and move that one to a lesser location, continuing that process down the food chain until you run out of places to put additional displays. After that the lowest one on the chain falls off the edge and is discarded after each upgrade.

      Once the smart features in the TV become outdated as they inevitably will (they rarely get significant updates), you unplug them from the network, stop using the smart features, and buy a new Roku or Chromecast or Fire TV or Apple TV. A few years after that you buy another one.

    5. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      These days nearly every TV on the market (except for some very low end sets) has some smart features, so you can't completely avoid them. My advice is to ignore them when buying, and figure you're going to buy a set-top box either immediately or a year down the road.

      Very few TVs make nice sound; the built in speakers are mostly terrible. If you care about sound, plan to hook up something better: a surround system if you have the space, or at the very least a soundbar.

    6. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      and you think the average consumer will hold onto the TV years after they start getting 'UNKNOWN SERVICE' and 'HTML 404' errors all over the place, in multiple cells per screen. I don't know about that.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? My brother picked one up and it runs netflix and it loads pictures from remote devices. That's all he needs and it provides that.

      Real world interjects again.

    8. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by larwe · · Score: 1

      It runs Netflix today. A year from now when Netflix has some new encryption protocol or codec, good luck finding a firmware update from the TV manufacturer.

    9. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by larwe · · Score: 1

      Mmm, actually I'd go one stronger than that and suggest you never, ever enable any of the network connectivity features - don't attach it to your WiFi network, don't plug an Ethernet cable into it. The OSes and apps on those things are completely security unverified, and several of them have been proven to send very nasty quantities of information gleaned from your local network activities back to home base (besides serving you up advertising).

    10. Re:Increasingly difficult to innovate by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Won't always work. There have been cases where the original firmware is seriously flawed, and not just in ways that affect the smart features. In that case it would be necessary to connect the TV long enough to get the firmware update.

  14. Ms wins slow month wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marketing

  15. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the iPad has an iPod in it. The others don't, so they are different class of devices.

  16. that is non-contentious and boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shutup

  17. Extra, extra! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Controversial new study by before unknown Market Research Institute proves Apple is doomed! Institute makes name for itself! Factuality is irrelevant!

    Rerun of the movie first shown in 1977 can be seen at 11.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    1. Re:Extra, extra! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Apple is the new BSD, forever dying. Netcraft confirms it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Extra, extra! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Apple is the new BSD, forever dying. Netcraft confirms it.

      Don't you mean "Never before heard of competitor of Netcraft, forgotten next month, confirms it?"

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  18. tablets are useful for SOME things by godrik · · Score: 1

    Pretty much all devices can do everything. The question is really how good can one device be at one thing. Tablets are good for reading and that's pretty much it. I mostly use mine to read scientific article and annotate them. This is my killer usage of tablet. And I got the one with the most usable "pencil" in the market at the time. Samsung's note tablets were are the best at the time.

    I haven't tried Apple's version. But MS shot at it with the surface pro was a pretty good shot at it I found.

    I'd say that today, the best tablet with pencil is probably Microsoft's. Many usable "tablet style" software and once you plug their keyboard on it; it is also a reasonable replacement for a laptop.

    I am not surprised they are gaining market shares. They made the laptop/tablet hybrid many people wanted.

    1. Re:tablets are useful for SOME things by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The question is really how good can one device be at one thing.

      No the question is what can it do for me and is there something better that fits the scenario. The Surface Pro series is not the best tablet on the market, it's not the best laptop either. It is however the damn best device for a note taking hybrid tablet that can act as a fully function laptop when you need to device.

    2. Re:tablets are useful for SOME things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a surface is both a tablet and a laptop. Its purpose is to use it as a laptop when you need to be 'productive' and as a tablet when you want to 'goof off'. I use my tablet while I use my desktop. The tablet as a look up device, a reading device, a test device, a how to movie device, a separate calculator, an order some food device, a chat device, all while I'm working on my desktop without having to run multiple screens with a browser, a chat client, a mail client, a PDF, ....

      In my opinion a tablet should be a tablet and not a laptop. An all in one device can only be used for one thing at a time. And buying to table/laptop hybrids is a bit overkill if you ask me. I still prefer a desktop with a good keyboard and mouse and large screen with lots of memory and fast hard disk space to do my programming work, and I like to read API, browse forums, chat with colleagues on the iPad. I can use the note app to quickly copy from iPad to Desktop and back.

    3. Re:tablets are useful for SOME things by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Tablets are good for reading and that's pretty much it.

      For you. Tablets have a lot of usage in businesses besides reading. I take you don't own a small business like a coffee shop and handle credit card purchases. Tablets like the iPad are replacing bulkier POS cashier systems. Why? Well previously you needed a touchscreen monitor, a desktop, and a dedicated phone line. And that was just the hardware. Software was extra and not very replaceable in that you were stuck with what the hardware vendor supplies. Now you need a tablet, a device like a Square, and a wifi connection. The software comes free with the device. Don't like Square? Use another device and software.

      In some of the fancier restaurants, I've seen them use iPads/tablets as their wine list/menu. Why? Because the customer can see the current wine inventory. And many of them change their menus weekly or even daily so they don't have to print the menus.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:tablets are useful for SOME things by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Tablets are good for reading and that's pretty much it. I mostly use mine to read scientific article and annotate them. This is my killer usage of tablet.

      Reading -- definitely agree! But I would also add web surfing, and playing the occasional mobile game, when you aren't at the desktop.

      The Kindle sucks for reading with its crappy small 6" screen size. The kindle can't do anything else then read. If you're going to spend $140+, why not just spend the extra money buy a real tablet that can read AND do other stuff?

      * Kindle Paperwhite 1440x1080 @ 300 ppi 6" $139 has Ads (WTF!)
      * nVidia Shield Tablet 1920x1200 @ 275 ppi 8" 2 GB RAM, $399
      * iPad Air 2: 9.7", 2048x1536 px, @ 264 px/inch, $499
      * iPad Pro 2732x2048 @ 264 ppi 12.9", $799

      > the best tablet with pencil is probably Microsoft's.

      Disagree. Thew new iPad Pro is dam slick. Low latency, and some of the demo drawing apps are dam nice. I would encourage you to try it out.

  19. Brand awareness by freeze128 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Microsoft Surface is the official tablet of the NFL. You can see it used by officials and coaches in every televised game.... Yet the announcers don't know any better and call them "iPads".

    1. Re:Brand awareness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just watching an NFL game (well, sleeping through it, mostly) this afternoon and one of the talking heads on the sideline very plainly said something about the quarterback grabbing "a Surface tablet" at halftime and showing his wide receivers how he wanted things done.

    2. Re:Brand awareness by thegarbz · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This isn't brand awareness as much as mouth drooling fucking stupidity. I've seen all sorts of things call iPads, and yes that includes things that say "Surface" on them in clear text. That shouldn't be a praise for apple, that should be an out right failing grade for our species. Mind you it is 2015 and people still call the computer chassis the "hard drive" so I don't see us breaking out of this trend anytime soon.

    3. Re:Brand awareness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's the "official" tablet of the NFL. That's what 500 million / year gets you.

  20. First World News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Large multi-billion-dollar behemoth had a month where their sales were higher than another
    large multi-billion-dollar behemoth.

    Both are closed-source, think "intellectual property" is worth scorched-earth wars,
    fight many innovative firms like Samsung, Lenovo, Asus, etc.

    and have cult-followings.

    This is first-world "news". The rest of the universe looks at these two ugly pimples as
    good examples of how not to be.

    1. Re:First World News by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      This is first-world "news".

      We live in a first world country so what did you expect?

  21. Profit Margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question is profit margin and overall profit. I have a idea who is winning that rate, but it is only a guess

  22. iPad not so great after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two things killing Apple iPad sales. One is the lack of reasons to upgrade from one iPad model to the newest one. Second, the iPad is not so great after all, depending mostly on good apps to keep interest in the platform. Its a wonderful time consuming device for kids, and a OK second or third device for adults. But IOS is not a robust OS by any stretch and certainly its becoming a platform that users seem to adopted early on but have decided its not a primary device.
    Apple either needs to make the iPad do more, or accept what others said before the iPad. Tablets are not that great.

  23. One month.... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One month does not make a trend. If Microsoft can string multiple sequential months together, than this will be news. Until then, it only means that in this particular month, more Microsoft tablets were sold. Interesting, but nothing more than that.

  24. Are you sure you meant the Apple Pencil? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Go somewhere you can compare the Apple pen to Samsung's pen. The Samsung one is far, far ahead in terms of latency and accuracy.

    Did you mean the Microsoft stylus? Because everywhere I've read a review comparing the Apple Pencil to other current styluses, the Pencil was said to be far better... even over the Samsung.

    I'll get the Pencil in a few days so I'll be able to see for myself, but everyone I've talked to who has used one said zero lag (latency) and pretty much perfect accuracy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. Cannibalized sales? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Microsoft productivity pads are probably cannibalizing sales from the business executive laptops. Most of the shops that could support iOS devices have gone to Apple. But the shops that do not or could not support iOS were stuck carrying the business executive laptops. The Sony Vaio clones and Apple airbook clones. Those shops would switch to surface pad pro.

    Once bitten twice shy. Now a days most IT shops want to use only the set of Microsoft products that inter-operate with other systems, even if the walled garden built by Microsoft is quite good and cost effective.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  26. Apple stabbed with its own Pencil by lylefile · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And Microsoft will continue to dominate through the Christmas holiday. How do I know? I went into the Apple Store to buy an iPad Pro.
            Sales person: "Yes sir! We have them in stock!"
            Me: ::Pulls out wallet:: "Please add a Pencil to the order."
            Genius: "We'll ship a Pencil to you in 5-6 weeks"
            Me: ::Puts wallet away:: ::Leaves store::
    (Sometime later)
            Me: ::Typing this on my Surface Pro 4 and loving it!::

  27. I still remember the Intel switch by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, about lambasting things that its competitors are doing, there was a pretty crazy instance.
    It was during the switch to Intel CPUs. They were selling for a while both their older Power PC based line and their new Intel inside line, so they had, at the same time on their website for several months, both pages dedicated to proving how much faster the Power PCs were compared to the Pentium, and another set of pages at a different part of the site showing how much FASTER the Pentium was compared to the Power PC. They were even using the same benchmarks sometimes (with some fudging about of course, like enabling/disabling AltiVec to suit the desired result etc).
    It was so ridiculous, but it was even more ridiculous that nobody was really calling them on it. They claimed both sides of the coin with a straight face and it seems that most were drinking the kool-aid.
    To top it off, at that time (before the Intel Core 2), it is most likely that AMD had the fastest CPU, so both campaigns were BS...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:I still remember the Intel switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Apple switched to Intel, they switched to the new Core processor.

      That thing WAS a huge leap over the Pentium 4!

    2. Re:I still remember the Intel switch by geowar · · Score: 1

      The Intel switch wasn't about speed... it was about (mostly mobile) power (batteries).

    3. Re:I still remember the Intel switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything was a leap over the Pentium 4! But the GP is right, from before the start of the Pentium 4 era right until the Core 2, which was after Apple made the switch, AMD was in the lead and if Apple wanted the fastest they would have used Athlons.

  28. A couple of reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are a couple of reasons why: Adobe Creative Suite and Corel Painter.

  29. OK so compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap spyware tablets to get windows spyware involved with your daily regimen...

    OR

    overpriced walled garden ecosystem tablets to make you feel like any crowd at Starbucks will be driven to a fit of jealousy?

    Android wins.

    1. Re: OK so compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. Android-based devices for tablet computing tends to the more affordable.

    2. Re:OK so compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Windows 10 user I have no problems sending all my data and keystrokes to Microsoft because I am the product.

  30. Re: Not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in IT for a company that's a Microsoft house, and only 4% of our entire company staff uses the Surface with no plans to implement more in the future. 15% uses Apple Apple computers, 46% uses iPhones, 53% use Android devices, and less than 1% uses a Windows mobile phone. This is out of 4000+ employees.

  31. I guess I know the tiny flaw in the survey by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's an old one: they asked all the (online in this case) retailers for numbers, and added up all numbers reported. Only one major retailer didn't answer (and never does): Apple. Guess who sells most Apple gear?

    Next year: Amazon confirms - Nobody buys Apple TVs or Google Chromecasts!

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  32. As a longtime Apple fan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good. And I hope Microsoft continues to grow. Does this mean the iPad is conquered? No, of course not. But it is a step in the process of Microsoft gaining ground. But anyone who goes out into the market by trying to make a better product than Apple who succeeds deserves to win, and I hope Apple reacts back and makes an even better product.

    This is much better for consumers than a poorly-executed Samsung spec dump/retread. Microsoft put a lot of time into building a well-executed family of innovative devices and they deserve their success.

  33. Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People forget that large corporations purchase tablets for manufacturing/shipping divisions. I've seen iPads used for this with custom cases that have built-in barcode scanners, but we're moving to Surface Pro 3 tablets now for greater software flexibility (Office/Outlook, AS400, etc...).

  34. All Things Must Pass... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

    Like skin tight jeans, beards and huge cover-half-your-face glasses, the iPads dominance in tablets will pass.
    With it's atrocious interface and sky high price, the iPad is akin to the early days of paying for a bottle of water...

    Let the real tablets take their place at the table: Google, Samsung and Microsoft

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  35. All Figures Lie, and All Liars Figure... by macs4all · · Score: 1

    So, now we have some duelling Projections.

    This report says that iPad Pro will sell more in the first 3 months than all of the Surface sales combined.

    So now what?

    1. Re:All Figures Lie, and All Liars Figure... by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Three million units more than "total sales of the Microsoft Surface tablet range"? If they're talking quarterly sales, it's possible.

      On the other hand, Microsoft sold an estimate 2 million Surface tablets in their last fourth quarter. Before the Surface 3, before the Surface Pro 4, before the Surface Book. I'm not going to hazard to guess their sales this quarter, but given the introduction of three new products (and two new form factors), generally positive reviews, and holiday sales on the remaining Surface Pro 3 inventory, I would be surprised if they don't hit 3 million units (which is what 9to5mac is projecting for the iPad Pro).

  36. Makes sense by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    Unless I'm mistaken, isn't the Surface more comparable to an actual computer (in that it's able to install actual Windows software), whereas the iPad is more comparable to an oversized smart phone (in that you're restricted only to software in the app store)?

    1. Re:Makes sense by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The iPad Pro is indeed limited to software from Apple's App Store. That's less of a limitation than it used to be, and will become even less of one as developers start to specifically target the iPad Pro. But unless Apple relaxes the restrictions that severely limit the usefulness of any iDevice as a software development platform, it will continue to be a non-factor in that market.

      Two clauses in the Functionality section of the App Store guidelines (https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/) are the problem. They make it impossible to create a language compiler or interpreter for iOS, so the only feasible way to do any kind of software development would be a cloud-based environment. (This is why the versions of Chrome and Firefox for iOS must use Apple's Javascript engine, rather than using their own as they do on all other platforms.) The clauses:
      2.7 Apps that download code in any way or form will be rejected
      2.8 Apps that install or launch other executable code will be rejected

      Most Surface models are full fledged Windows computers that can run any Windows application, though desktop applications will be difficult to use unless you add a keyboard and a pointing device (mouse or trackpad). The only exceptions are the old Windows RT systems, the Surface and Surface 2. The Surface Pro line is competitive with Ultrabooks in performance; it falls short of the performance of desktop systems or performance-oriented laptops but it's fast enough for most users.

  37. Probably a short term thing by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Microsoft got a huge boost in October from the launch of the Surface Pro 4. Meanwhile, Apple fans looking for the next new thing had to wait until November for the iPad Pro launch. Expect the November numbers to show a big lead for Apple, even with the Surface 3 getting an assist from the Black Friday sale price, the first time any significant discount was offered on that tablet.

    The real question is what things will look like going forward. Will the Surface line be sufficiently popular to take a noticeable bite out of Apple? And on the sheer volume side, will Amazon's $50 tablet (discounted to $35 for Black Friday) run up big sales numbers?