Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Will Resume Pushing Windows 10 To Machines With Win7, 8.1 (computerworld.com)

LichtSpektren writes: After previously apologizing on October 16th for forcing Windows 10 on some users of Windows 7 and 8.1 via the Windows Update mechanism, Microsoft disabled the default update option for Windows 10, so that users eligible for the new OS would have to opt in manually. Gregg Keizer at ComputerWorld reports today that Microsoft will soon switch the default option back to "on" again, possibly as early as tomorrow's "Patch Tuesday" update. Users who do not want Windows 10 are strongly advised to turn off automatic updating to avoid accidentally installing the OS.

458 of 665 comments (clear)

  1. Not acceptable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I may just block all MS IPs in my router. I have software that won't work with Win10.

    1. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft now has Windows 7 users shutting off auto updates to stop this. They are getting the unintended consequences that any rational person should have seen coming a mile away. This is not going to go well for MS, and it would not surprise me if it ended up in court. They are basically turning the most used OS on the planet into an advertising platform with an app store built in. They were making a ton of money on the paid-for versions like 7, so I don't know why they let the bean counters talk them into switching revenue streams. If bundling IE got them in trouble with courts, there has to be a class action lawsuit in here somewhere, regardless of what is in the EULA.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    2. Re:Not acceptable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Changing the EULA after the fact for something material like this should make the EULA null and void in its entirety.

      But much like Sony, this is enough reason for me to never use MS products again, were I still using any.

      Captcha: takers

      speaks for itself

    3. Re: Not acceptable. by MobSwatter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the most successful Trojan horse award goes out to Micro$oft Windows.

    4. Re: Not acceptable. by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      Microsoft itself has also gained the award for the group of hackers that got me to contact a group of corporate class action litigators the fastest.

    5. Re:Not acceptable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are microsoft IPs?
      I have only Linux boxes in my home network, but still I would like to add these criminal-related IPs to the black list.

    6. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The most popular browser performs automatic updates every time you open it. A/V also updates their virus library automatically. I'm not suggesting the two are the same or that one is better than the other but the product does what it does. I honestly think far more damage is done from not updating and maybe that's what the reasoning was. I too often see tech people (myself included) linger on the details that on the large scale don't matter to most.

      Everything is worthy of a class action lawsuit if you spin it right but as far as I can tell most users have welcomed the change and don't give a damn about this unless its caused them issues with their PC. By now most users are used to the aggravation that comes with PCs which is why many avoid them by using tablets and mobile devices instead. Heck, I just had my OSMC on Pi 2 corrupt itself by installing updates.

      About a year ago I would have drilled MS for this, but instead because they've actually shown interest in working with it's users I'm more than ever willing to see what they'll do next. MS knew this change was going to be difficult but they forced it down our throats because they feel it's the right thing to do for the future the PCs. IMHO, doing nothing was definitively not the right thing to do.

    7. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see MS doing this for the sake of users, I see them doing it because they think this will provide greater revenue streams. There is not other explanation for them pushing a change to 10 so aggressively. They need as many eyes on the app store as possible, or it isn't going to pan out.

      Your instincts from a year ago were more on target.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    8. Re:Not acceptable. by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Microsoft now has Windows 7 users shutting off auto updates to stop this.

      I've had to shut off auto-updates for a very long time. My graduate students are VERY unhappy when they start a week-long model run and a few days later the computer has rebooted to install a needless update.

      Windows 10, as I understand it, makes this problem worse.

      I don't know what is in the mind of the Microsoft people. They finally get an OS that is stable enough it can run for a week without needing to be rebooted (or rebooting on its own) and they decide you have to reboot anyway.

    9. Re:Not acceptable. by omnichad · · Score: 2

      I don't know what is in the mind of the Microsoft people.

      It will sell more copies of/upgrades to Windows Pro than probably anything else will. Since that's the only version where you can turn off automatic updates. I don't know why CPU usage / system load isn't taken into account when scheduling even an automatic reboot.

    10. Re:Not acceptable. by mikael · · Score: 1

      If you look around the web forums, you will see that laptop owners have been pulling out the Windows 10 SSD drives from their laptops for two reasons; they don't like Windows 10, and they don't want to "wear out" the OS drive if they want to resell the laptop.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:Not acceptable. by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Tried it, hated it, went back to 7 and MS is still nagging me to downgrade to windows 10 (10 is no upgrade). What's with TFS's "will resume"? They never stopped. I'd go Linux-only except all the magazines demand a Word file, and Oo and Lo can't save one properly.

    12. Re:Not acceptable. by mikael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft tried to "harmonize" their smartphones with their desktops to have a consistent user interface. If Apple and Android smartphones have an "app store" where pre-tested applications are on sale, then so must Microsoft. Then Microsoft introduced that "live tiles" interface for their smartphones to match the App pages on smartphones. Therefore, the desktop must have one too. It can't be a separate application because users may not use it. So it must be bolted onto the desktop somewhere. The only practical place is in the start pullup menu.

      Since smartphones auto-update applications, then so must the desktop. One problem with desktop systems are the large botnets, malware, viruses with growth assisted by users who don't update regularly. So Microsoft decides the only solution is to forced every system to get "updates" at night. For hipsters, it's cool to suddenly discover "new features" on their phones in the morning. For anyone else who had project work running it is infuriating to suddenly find their work gone and the machine stuck in a update.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    13. Re: Not acceptable. by nomel · · Score: 1

      Or they want a unified user experience rather than the clusterfuck of UI experiences there are for the different versions, a single OS to support in the future, and everyone on that one OS so xp for 20 years doesn't happen again.

      Making things not suck is another way of making money, it just requires the business to use that very rare process of "thinking ahead".

    14. Re: Not acceptable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have switched off the updates due to this already.

    15. Re:Not acceptable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting to see what happens come July/August 2016 when the upgrade from free offer is no longer available. Will MS stop bugging me to upgrade or will my Windows 7 laptop just refuse to boot to anything but a screen with a link to purchase Windows 10?

    16. Re:Not acceptable. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      I do too. One title is called "Windows Media Center" and it's the only roll-your-own-DVR that works with Time Warner due to Time Warner's abuse of the CopyOnce CCI flag.

      Guess I'll never run Windows Update on that box ever again.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    17. Re:Not acceptable. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I'm likely a prime example of the 'unintended consequences' of their decisions: I'm still on XP, was going to go to 7 finally, but after all this, I'm going to Ubuntu instead and never looking back. I never really trusted them all that much to start with, and now it's clear they can't be trusted at all. Bye bye, Microsoft, I'll be laughing my ass off at you when you either get the living crap sued out of you, you go bankrupt, or both.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    18. Re:Not acceptable. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      None [of my Win 7 PCs] have forced it on to me. I just have to click decline every week or so

      So the default is the upgrade and you must decline repeatedly to avoid it? And you find that perfectly acceptable ?

      It is a pity that in being modded down as Troll (as you will be) you will slide down out of sight of many readers. It is a pity because to see an attitude like yours is itself an education in the strangeness of human nature. Unless of course you are trying to be funny.

    19. Re:Not acceptable. by Tharkkun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft now has Windows 7 users shutting off auto updates to stop this.

      I've had to shut off auto-updates for a very long time. My graduate students are VERY unhappy when they start a week-long model run and a few days later the computer has rebooted to install a needless update.

      Windows 10, as I understand it, makes this problem worse.

      I don't know what is in the mind of the Microsoft people. They finally get an OS that is stable enough it can run for a week without needing to be rebooted (or rebooting on its own) and they decide you have to reboot anyway.

      You should learn how to make a local policy which you can push to all machines. No business or school should be blindly using the automatic update schedule from Microsoft. Create your own so you don't have unnecessary loss of productivity and downtime. You can't blame Microsoft for this. They only want computers more secure.

    20. Re:Not acceptable. by Tharkkun · · Score: 4, Informative

      None [of my Win 7 PCs] have forced it on to me. I just have to click decline every week or so

      So the default is the upgrade and you must decline repeatedly to avoid it? And you find that perfectly acceptable ? It is a pity that in being modded down as Troll (as you will be) you will slide down out of sight of many readers. It is a pity because to see an attitude like yours is itself an education in the strangeness of human nature. Unless of course you are trying to be funny.

      You can also download a blocker from Microsoft.

    21. Re:Not acceptable. by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Tried it, hated it, went back to 7 and MS is still nagging me to downgrade to windows 10 (10 is no upgrade). What's with TFS's "will resume"? They never stopped. I'd go Linux-only except all the magazines demand a Word file, and Oo and Lo can't save one properly.

      It took me 30 seconds to google this. There's a registry setting to disable OS upgrades. Don't disgrace power users by being lazy. :) http://www.howtogeek.com/22855...

    22. Re:Not acceptable. by unixisc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This trend of trying to converge computers and mobile devices was stupid when it started, and still is. It's spread to website developers, where you have clowns suggest having a single site for both computers and mobile devices, rather than have different sites based on the device (like m.foo.com) That's the problem when you try to improve what's already optimal, if not perfect.

      In Apple's case, making OS X like iOS was totally needless - not only b'cos of the differences b/w Macbook Airs vs iPads, but also due to the fact that OS X is an OS on x64 (and PowerPC before that) and iOS is an OS on Apple's ARM compatible CPUs. Only technical reason I can think of to converge them is if Apple decided to make their laptops and desktops based on the A9s rather than Intel's core processors. Since they're not doing it, what was the point?

      In Microsoft's case, it was even more inexplicable. They had Windows 7, which was perfect. The right thing to have done would have been to make Windows 8 (w/o the desktop) for just the tablets and phones, and put the Windows 8 kernel under Windows 7. Ideally, brand them differently, like Apple did, or do something like KDE did. But even if not doing that, they should have just left Windows 7 as the interface for laptops, changing only the kernel beneath but leaving the userland unchanged. And maybe changing the model for application development.

      Something like the current Windows 10 interface would have been ideal for hybrids, but the original 7 and 8 could have stayed on their respective platforms

    23. Re:Not acceptable. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      I don't know what is in the mind of the Microsoft people. They finally get an OS that is stable enough it can run for a week

      Hold it there, you have answered your own question. Windows 7 would have been good enough for many people for many years to come (as Windows XP was), which means Microsoft would not have sold as many copies of new versions as they would have liked.

      So MS "upgrade" you to something crappy and at the same time steer you towards a rental business model by getting people accustomed to the idea of them controlling your PC or other device. Rental is their wet dream because it gives them predictable income for ever without necessarily having to develop anything new ever again.

      A bit unfair to MS to say about Win7 being stable enough to run for a week. You're maybe thinking of Win95 which, by Microsoft's own later admission, would have inevitably crashed after about 20 days (AFAIR), a fact that was never discovered by anyone at the time because it would always crash for some other reason long before it got to the 20 days.

    24. Re:Not acceptable. by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      They're also running out of features that both people and businesses will pay for in an upgrade. By changing revenue streams they gain the people who won't pay and make the clueless happy with a few cosmetic updates/bug fixes. The reality is though the window is wide open for Linux to come storming in if they can get their act together.

    25. Re:Not acceptable. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And I, for one, will not update to Win10 before Win7 goes out of extended support. There is just too much greed and disrespect for the user involved in it. With a bit of luck, Windows will be irrelevant by then anyways.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    26. Re:Not acceptable. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      They still view this as a desktop-only OS where the computer gets shit down daily. I had some computations running weeks for my PhD, and I never even considered using Windows for that. It was and still is still a glorified toy.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    27. Re:Not acceptable. by dpidcoe · · Score: 2

      I have 5 windows 7 machines, and of those one of them (a laptop) continues trying to force me to update to windows 10 to the point that it's already reserved several gb of the (very limited) ssd for the download. It's especially annoying because it'll attempt to resume the download at random times, and since it's a laptop it's not always on the most stable of internet connections.

      Two of my other machines have attempted to download it, but I actually use those enough that I spent the time scrubbing out all traces of the windows 10 advertising updates and blocking them as best I could. So far those machines haven't been bothered, but they're also a few months behind in normal updates (it's set to manual currently) so I can't say for sure how affected they are.

    28. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      That would be the best way for MS to kill it's end user business so I don't foresee any of that happening. They won't do it for the simple fact that to stay in the end user market you need to give products at no or very low charge with little to no inconvenience.

      MS tried to stick to a model (buy/own a product) that was antiquated by Google's model (ad supported). Google instead offers everything at no charge while making money off the ads they push in your face. Users have embraced this model (even if most claim they hate it). For that reason MS is changing it's offering by monetizing through ads + a cut of app sales. Some will argue that MS is late to the game but I believe they resisted the change because they though people would go back to owning software. Corporations still try to own software but it's becoming more difficult. As an IT leader it can be very difficult to find an ROI on a product you pay for on a monthly basis.

      So at the end of the day these changes are the result of what users want (not us the techies).

    29. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I don't see MS doing this for the sake of users, I see them doing it because they think this will provide greater revenue streams

      MS is doing what it needs to in order to maintain it's offering alive. The competition is undercutting them with a $0 up front cost. All they are doing is responding by going after the same revenue stream.

      Google employs the same strategy. Why is it ok for them to do it and be the most popular device choice but when MS does it it's a sin?
      I'm confused by the double standard.

    30. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      You have to be kidding. MS makes a computer operating system. Google is running a search engine. MS has a huge existing user base of desktop computer users. How is it not obvious that there are huge differences? I can't just go to another operating system the way I can go to a different search engine, like Duck-Duck-Go. I would need to wipe my hard drive and start over to go to a different OS.

      MS does not need to imitate, it could actually innovate. If it wanted to.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    31. Re:Not acceptable. by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what Microsoft would do if you deliberately reduced disk space to less than it needed for the upgrade.
      (1) Would it still download it?
      (2) Start the upgrade process?
      (3) What about if you made it so there was not enough space to download the Windows 10 update -- would it try anyway?
      (4) ...and fill up the drive?

      Any gross incompetence would make future class action lawsuits easier to win.

      Now I'm picturing a chron job that automatically fills up most of the drive just before Windows Update normally runs, as a counter-measure. With a second chron job that runs an hour after Windows Update to delete the temp files. Boy will this all be a world of fun!

      --
      I come here for the love
    32. Re:Not acceptable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's a professor, not an IT guy.
      It's why colleges have an IT department.
      You're yelling at the wrong person.

    33. Re:Not acceptable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Apple's case, making OS X like iOS was totally needless

      Huh? They're NOT the same. Some UI elements are converging a bit, but not the same exact interface on both, like Windows does/did.

      That's arguably why iPhone (and later the iPad) succeeded, long after e.g. Microsoft had tablets... because a DIFFERENT UI was used for the different type of hardware.

    34. Re:Not acceptable. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I doubt Windows as a desktop OS will be irrelevant by then, but at this point I'm wondering whether it will have changed strategy fundamentally and I suspect Microsoft will probably have changed leadership.

      The interesting question to me is whether by that time (a little over four years from now) trying to make money primarily via advertising and marketplace schemes will still be a viable strategy. It's hard to say as a technical person who knows a lot of other technical people, but the sense I get from not-so-technical friends is that these models are overstaying their welcome. Even non-geeks are getting fed up with the ads and tracking everywhere and starting to expect ad blocking and privacy features as standard. Even non-geeks are getting fed up with locked-in walled gardens and forced obsolescence of apps and the forced upgrade treadmill, too.

      I suspect Microsoft have made a strategic error in chasing after those models now. Just like the Internet and mobile, they're several years late to the party and everyone else is already thinking about leaving. The irony is that the most likely place for those customers to go to is back to a world where you pay real money for things that are actually good, and Microsoft could have been there waiting to welcome them home.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    35. Re:Not acceptable. by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      I have software that won't work with Win10.

      No you don't. Name it.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    36. Re:Not acceptable. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MS tried to stick to a model (buy/own a product) that was antiquated by Google's model (ad supported). Google instead offers everything at no charge while making money off the ads they push in your face. Users have embraced this model (even if most claim they hate it). For that reason MS is changing it's offering by monetizing through ads + a cut of app sales. Some will argue that MS is late to the game but I believe they resisted the change because they though people would go back to owning software.

      MS is in the process of killing themselves because they are unable to understand Google is a search engine and Windows is an operating system.

      So at the end of the day these changes are the result of what users want (not us the techies).

      Wrong, nobody wants it.

    37. Re:Not acceptable. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      MS is doing what it needs to in order to maintain it's offering alive. The competition is undercutting them with a $0 up front cost. All they are doing is responding by going after the same revenue stream.

      Google employs the same strategy. Why is it ok for them to do it and be the most popular device choice but when MS does it it's a sin?
      I'm confused by the double standard.

      I see this line of argument everywhere in this industry.

      Every indefensible action is justified by saying "they do it too".

      And god forbid you don't enumerate everyone and everything else that "does it too" you are accused of being a shill for god knows what or double standards.

      This industry is full of children who never got past that phase of crying "BUT MOOOOM... Johnny did it too!!!!!1!!!"

      There is NEVER a valid excuse for disrespecting your customers.

    38. Re:Not acceptable. by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      It would also thrash your ssd something terrible :P

    39. Re:Not acceptable. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I sense a bias towards Microsoft. This is clearly unacceptable behavior for any reasonably ethical company, yet you defend these actions.

    40. Re:Not acceptable. by Rudisaurus · · Score: 2

      You can't blame Microsoft for this. They only want computers more secure.

      That's all they want? You really think that?

      I call bullshit.

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    41. Re:Not acceptable. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      With antivirus you can almost always opt out, and yet their database upgrades are essential to the proper functioning of the key features. I've never seen an antivirus do more than request that you install or pay for a new upgrade itself (as separate from malware database updates). For Windows, you do not need to upgrade for the operating system to keep working properly. Nothing breaks if you don't upgrade it, you still get security updates if you opt out of Windows 10, etc. There is no valid comparison between an antivirus database upgrade and an operating system upgrade here.

      For Windows, doing nothing was the right approach when the only alternative they came up with was to ignore the users and go full steam ahead with their smartphone like operating system. Microsoft has a very long history of removing options from users, each new release has less customization ability. I've never seen any hint that they are willing to work with users except in the case of a major publicity backlash. Their whole attitude is that they are smarter than we are and we should just sit back and be grateful to accept their lame offerings. They know that there is nothing useful in Windows 10 that anyone on Windows 7 or 8.1 would want (Cortana? Give me a break), so they are resorting to unusual marketing tactics. This may be the right thing for the future of "Microsoft dominated PCs" but it is not the right thing for their customers.

    42. Re:Not acceptable. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Is anyone buying apps from the Microsoft store? The last I looked they were all amazingly stupid, broken, or stupid and broken. They're like smartphone apps but dumber (at least with a smartphone the mobility convenience is useful, but on a desktop to have an app that is not as good as the same thing on a web page is just silly. Maybe it makes sense on a tablet, but who cares about Windows on a tablet, and why should desktop users be punished because of it?

    43. Re:Not acceptable. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Who said it's ok for other companies? Apple gets away with it because it has a fanboy army. Google gets away with it because they're the anti-Microsoft.

      (and with my free or low cost OSX upgrades I have seen zero advertisements)

    44. Re:Not acceptable. by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Informative

      My smartphone most certainly does not auto-update anything.

    45. Re:Not acceptable. by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      I've used numerous computers for years and I've never shit down one yet. There's a small room not far from me that is meant for that kind of activity. I shudder to think what the inside of a computer would look like, much less smell like, after you've shit down it multiple times.

      Just joking!!

    46. Re: Not acceptable. by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      It's not. That's why you don't run consumer-grade Apple or Microsoft for mission-critical applications where "surprises" are not in the plan. And if you don't run it on the real stuff, why does your personal box need to be subjected to the same nonsense?

    47. Re:Not acceptable. by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      One of the forced-updated components has just appeared. Folks, block KB3112336:

      This update enables support for additional upgrade scenarios from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10, and provides a smoother experience when you have to retry an operating system upgrade because of certain failure conditions. This update also improves the ability of Microsoft to monitor the quality of the upgrade experience.

      I'm sure there'll be more to come...

    48. Re:Not acceptable. by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      MS is in the process of killing themselves because they are unable to understand Google is a search engine and Windows is an operating system.

      This is the perfect one-sentence expression of everything that's been wrong with Microsoft's Windows strategy in the last five years (at least).

    49. Re:Not acceptable. by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      There's a registry setting to disable OS upgrades.

      ... which random other parts of Windows quietly re-enable when you're not looking, sometimes as often as every few hours. So yes, it's optional and can be disabled, except that it's not, and can't.

    50. Re:Not acceptable. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      If you live in Canada or the EU, doing so make the EULA null and void. The user is required to be presented with a new agreement, and in some cases where collection of private information happens it still makes the new agreement void because you can't waive rights guaranteed under law. Not sure on the EU with that one though.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    51. Re:Not acceptable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, Windows 10 Pro does not allow you to shut off auto-updates. It just allows you to delay when they are applied, per-update (not as a general rule), up to a few weeks. Only Enterprise gives some (not complete) control over whether (not just when) the update gets applied.

    52. Re: Not acceptable. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Or they want a unified user experience rather than the clusterfuck of UI experiences there are for the different versions

      Find the control panel and burrow down to one of the admin tools to go through the full range of the clusterfuck of UI experiences still present on Win10. There's still a bit of NT 3.51 lurking inside.
      Based on that, does your suggestion make any sense at all?

    53. Re:Not acceptable. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I've had to shut off auto-updates for a very long time. My graduate students are VERY unhappy when they start a week-long model run and a few days later the computer has rebooted to install a needless update.

      If something takes so long why are they using something with as much overhead as MS Windows to run it? The oil and gas industries never left *nix for the time consuming stuff for that reason.

    54. Re:Not acceptable. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's spread to website developers

      My bank's site now has the transaction stuff appear in a small window with scrollbars as a consequence. A desktop user now has to scroll both down and across to be able to see the "cancel" and "ok" buttons.

    55. Re:Not acceptable. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Another way of looking at it:
      With all the malware, spam and popups out there there are many computers that get shit down daily.

    56. Re:Not acceptable. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Many places have point of sale laws. If the conditions of contract are not clearly established at the point of sale, they do not exist. This is reasonable because, you have the cost of shopping, going to the store, getting the product and returning home and in the case of software installation costs. Any agreement post the purchase is invalid, as in sound contractual terms, they should reimburse your costs associated with the purchase and the return, when you are presented new conditions that you disagree with. This includes documentation inside the box, let alone scattered across the internet. They are basically just putting up a legal bluff, in most countries they are screwed and they know it, they are just fending it off by giving a back door to you via their software to your government. They would lose a class action law suit if brought against them in the right jurisdiction, especially say the UK or Australia with far stronger consumer rights laws eg https://www.accc.gov.au/consum... (what American companies are allowed to get away with is just mind boggling, now wonder they wanted to force crappy laws US on Australia via the TPP, the Toilet Paper Protocol, named so for what it does to countries constitutions.)

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    57. Re:Not acceptable. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Really? You see no benefit of moving users to a more secure operating system other than making money from the store?

    58. Re:Not acceptable. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      "Nobody" wants it? Really? That's what you came up with?

      Hint: If you find yourself making generalisations, your argument probably needs work.

    59. Re:Not acceptable. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's almost as if you have no idea that Google provides a lot more than a search engine. Hint: they have their own operating systems, and that is directly comparable to Microsoft, who also sell operating systems.

      It's not 2001 any more. You've got a lot to catch up on.

    60. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      I was talking about Google's search engine, not the Chrome OS. Look, if you like the idea of an OS as a service with ads and tracking, great, but I don't. Lot's of people don't.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    61. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      They could have done the extra security without the user unfriendly forced updates and ads and tracking. When Windows 7 users are forced to shut off auto updates, that makes computers less secure, not more secure. I will never switch from an OS I own (Windows 7 ultimate) to one that is an ad driven service. You are welcome to.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    62. Re:Not acceptable. by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      where you have clowns suggest having a single site for both computers and mobile devices, rather than have different sites based on the device (like m.foo.com) That's the problem when you try to improve what's already optimal, if not perfect.

      It's really not that hard to have one website for desktop and mobile. My website design skills suck and I can make one website that looks and works well on both with Bootstrap.

      But when you have different offerings you are stuck with the mushy middle like the Google Nexus 7. Desktop websites aren't really always usable but mobile websites look weird on it. By default,, Chrome on Nexus sends a mobile browser user agent. A responsive website scales appropriately.

    63. Re:Not acceptable. by Liquid+Len · · Score: 1

      My graduate students are VERY unhappy when they start a week-long model run and a few days later the computer has rebooted to install a needless update.

      Well, unless there is a critical piece of software you absolutely require, have you considered that maybe Windows may not be the right OS for graduate students to use, especially for week-long runs ? Mine exclusively use linux for their scientific work (as I do), and I've been happily doing this for years.

    64. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      (and with my free or low cost OSX upgrades I have seen zero advertisements)

      Some free apps have adverts present. They also piggy back off on the store sales which in my opinion should be enough for MS too but I'm assuming they are offering their devs the opportunity to monetize their dev work. Can't blame MS for giving devs an opportunity to monetize their work while providing free services

    65. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      The are plenty of good applications. The fact that companies can easily distribute their PC software without having their own proprietary download site or installer makes it a much better experience for the users. Sure, the content on the app store isn't perfect yet but the ratings are coming in and soon you'll have a very nice eco system that is safer than downloading a random .exe off a site that adds it's malware to it.

    66. Re:Not acceptable. by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Then update your software.

    67. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      With antivirus you can almost always opt out,

      First off they made a mistake as quoted: "this was a mistake and we are removing the check".
      The only systems I've seen this happen on is the systems for which I had registered. I could not find anything confirming my finding other than my own experience with 5 PCs.

      From the article:

      Our own testing shows that, yes, the optional update is getting chosen by default, and that's not supposed to happen to optional updates.

      For those not wanting to make the switch to Windows 10 just yet, all is not lost; the installer does require human intervention to actually proceed

      So sounds like most here are crying over spilled milk since it didn't actually install automatically. People miss understand "push" with "force update".

      For Windows, doing nothing was the right approach when the only alternative they came up with was to ignore the users and go full steam ahead with their smartphone like operating system

      False, they used tones of user feedback as well as a voting system to decide what features to add, improve and remove. User feedback was a huge part of MS's success with Windows 10.

      Microsoft has a very long history of removing options from users, each new release has less customization ability.

      Also wrong. MS has been known to support legacy software and hardware for a very long time IMO to their own detriment. 16 bit apps are still supported in the 32 bit version of their OS and 32 bit in the 64 bit. There are banks and retail chains that run on 25 year old on Windows 7. So you claims of cancelling support is far fetched to say the least.

      I've never seen any hint that they are willing to work with users except in the case of a major publicity backlash

      It's ok that you aren't aware of the large support MS has gotten from it's users during Windows 10 BETA. This is where you get involved with any of their product. http://connect.microsoft.com/

      They know that there is nothing useful in Windows 10 that anyone on Windows 7 or 8.1 would want (Cortana? Give me a break), so they are resorting to unusual marketing tactics

      Better H/W support, better usage of h/w resources, better performance, much faster start time, integrated app store, Edge, IE support (for legacy), removal of the infernal Metro interface (available for those who like it or use a touch device). The list is actually very large. They finally removed Media Center and floppy drive support.

      I don't mean to be rude but you appear ill informed on Windows 10. It's ok for you to hate it but at least don't make it blind hatred.

    68. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Are you sober. I see no arguments, just rambling of a drunk hobo with a sign "save Jesus".

      There is NEVER a valid excuse for disrespecting your customers

      Your I'll informed on the issue. RTFA and come back when you know what your talking about.

    69. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 2

      MS is in the process of killing themselves because they are unable to understand Google is a search engine and Windows is an operating system.

      You opinion isn't fact. Their revenues tell a different story. They brought in 6 billions more in 2015 than in 2014. Stop grabbing fictional facts from your butt hole.

    70. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      You base your argument on incorrect facts? You just a Ill informed as he is. Lookup MS quarterly revenues on Google, Bing or whatever else you want to use. They all yield the same results clearly stating MS is doing better than ever.

    71. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      What about Android? You are commenting on a thread you don't even understand. MS has a marketing strategy that looks at what users do, not what they used to do.

      Today users search the web, install software, chat, talk, watch video, work, play... MS is saying all devices are equal with one OS across all of them. Desktop devices will have more power than hand held devices but the feel and capabilities won't be limited to desktop. IMO it's the right way to go because one device doesn't fit all but one highly compatible OS does. It's their best way to convince users to move over to their mobile platform.

    72. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

      MS is never going to make major inroads into the phone market, but they will lose more of their huge desktop customer base. They are about to lose me and I have been using their products since MS DOS.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    73. Re:Not acceptable. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      "Apps"? I have no apps on OSX. I have applications. There is no advertising anywhere on the OSX machine I use. Maybe on the apple store, but I never go there except for the "upgrade" tab, and I don't even have an apple ID and never will have one.

      Devs have always been able to monetize their work on Windows. We don't need some idiotic ad-centric model to support cheap ass broken apps There are millions of apps on smart phones, but only 10 are ever worth using. Why would we want to support those lame apps through the cesspool of the advertisement model? If you're on Windows you may as well use a web browser because all of the apps I ever saw on Windows did not work as well as the same thing done in a browser. Even the Bing on the web works better than the Bing app from Microsoft, it's as if Microsoft went out of its way to make the worst possible sample apps (but more likely assigned interns to write them).

    74. Re:Not acceptable. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Name one good "Metro" app. It has to be good, and it has to do more than the same thing in a web browser. Even Microsoft was not able to do this with its own sample apps.

    75. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...

      Look for yourself. There's plenty. They all work great on mobile and desktop. I used the facebook, Netflix, Kodi remote, games...

      Bunch of stuff that works great for touch and non touch.

      It has nothing to do with Metro.

    76. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Devs have always been able to monetize their work on Windows

      Low cost software is often pirated or simply replaced with larger packages that cost more but do more regardless of the user's actual needs.

      There are millions of apps on smart phones, but only 10 are ever worth using

      Another empty statement. Your on a roll

      Why would we want to support those lame apps through the cesspool of the advertisement model

      The review system takes good care of that. As the user base increase so does the cleanliness.

      If you're on Windows you may as well use a web browser because all of the apps I ever saw on Windows did not work as well as the same thing done in a browser

      You keep repeating yourself but it looks like you haven't used the app store in months. It's new so it's content is growing in quantity and quality. Netflix was crappy too when it first came out. Look at it now. You got to let it grow and by the looks of it you haven't looked at it since release in July.

      I won't argue that there are some apps that attempt to replace web sites and do a poor job at it (Android, IOS and Windows Mobile all have that problem) but there are also great news apps, money helpers, todos, calendars... and the list goes on.

      What I foresee is that all apps will be purchased from a central location no different than games on Steam. It's a great model that just works.

    77. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      MS is never going to make major inroads into the phone market, but they will lose more of their huge desktop customer base

      Your starting to sound like the previous MS CEO. "iPhones will never pickup pace".

      MS may be way behind in the mobile market but marketing shifts are expensive and take years to execute on. Considering their big push just started last year, I would bet it's too early to predict their future in mobile let alone their future all together. You sound very bitter at MS which makes me wonder why you bother using their products. Oh, let me think. You have no choice. Someone as angry as you would not force themselves to use a product unless it filled a niche they could not easily avoid.

    78. Re: Not acceptable. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      It's not. That's why you don't run consumer-grade Apple or Microsoft for mission-critical applications where "surprises" are not in the plan. And if you don't run it on the real stuff, why does your personal box need to be subjected to the same nonsense?

      Or, like with Windows, you simply turn OFF the Auto Updates in OS X in App Store Preferences. In fact, the control is somewhat more fine-grained than in Windows.

    79. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      I have used Windows since the first version for scientific manuscript and figure content production. I have about $20K worth of Windows software ranging from Adobe Creative Suite to ImagePro Plus from Media Cybernetics. I also use Office 2010 for manuscript production because most publishers require it.

      Yes I am very upset with a company I have supported for years. With Windows 8 it became apparent that they think desktops are going away. We have been in the so-called post-PC era for over a decade now, and there is no sign yet that desktops are going away because they are what people use to do work.

      I don't want an "OS as a service" that is designed for phones, and with ads and an app store. I also greatly dislike the loss of control over updates and the flat 2D look that was meant for mobile devices. So yes, I am very upset with a company that I have supported with my business for decades.

      Linux Mint is sounding better all the time, since I can run Windows programs in a virtual box. If that is where MS wants to drive its longtime customers, so be it.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    80. Re:Not acceptable. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Netflix was crappy too when it first came out. Look at it now.

      It's STILL crappy. Seriously, If Google was as lame a search tool as the Netflix front end on my TV, Alta Vista would still rule the internet.

    81. Re:Not acceptable. by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      A side from believing that Microsoft has long been lost since they really started losing market share in various spaces to a long list of vendors, products, and services and not being the company bringing new offerings to market first, it is a need to move to a better revenue model that is what motivates them now.

      Companies of all types and sizes sold something to a stream of customers. This model works as long as they keep coming in sufficient numbers. I think companies in the computer and even consumer electronics sectors eventually realized that there isn't a reliable need to replace. What we have now still serves the need. So, they needed to move to model such as subscription with a reliable revenue stream.

      Again, I think Microsoft is lost. They seem to approach business strategy by copying the models of other supposedly successful companies without consideration of long-term impact to both the customer and their own business. I believe a free model wrapped in ads, data gathering and selling, and app store cuts is not the right fit for a desktop operating system. I especially believe forcing a user to upgrade to Windows 10 is wrong and a mistake. They need to leave my Win7 install alone. I have used Win8 and Win10 and want neither.

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    82. Re: Not acceptable. by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      You apparently haven't spent enough time around or supporting end users that are both smart and unable to understand and do simple tasks on the computer. They are tools to most people. I was once surprised when an engineer, even the young ones that grew up with tech everywhere, needed help for something simple enough where only reasoning through was needed. I am no longer surprised, because it only comes easy mostly to those of us working in IT.

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    83. Re:Not acceptable. by goarilla · · Score: 1

      I have the feeling that it also sometimes wakes the machines from sleep to resume the download.

    84. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I think companies in the computer and even consumer electronics sectors eventually realized that there isn't a reliable need to replace

      I don't disagree with this but in many cases I find companies try to convince companies to stay on a subscription system for different reasons. Ultimately it's to fund the continued R&D on said software. The challenge comes when company or individual "A" is satisfied with the product features and no longer needs improvement but rather just security and bug updates as well as product support. Unfortunately software makers do no branch their projects that way because it adds a lot of overhead as well as complications to the development process.

      There are industries for which it's difficult to justify the larger fee but without it the company folds and the software support completely disappears. For that reason support programs make sense but they would not cover software upgrades which may be required for some support issues to be resolved.

      Seems that many users on /. think the subscription model is a way to gauge the customers. I tend to disagree. It's the means required to keep an entity alive so that the user base still has a place to get help from. An alternative is to open source the product but that also has it's issues. Unfortunately, most larger companies price their support programs with the intent of keeping the whole development team. That's what makes the model fail in many cases.

    85. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      With Windows 8 it became apparent that they think desktops are going away

      I think everybody agrees that Windows 8 was a mistake. MS gets it and that's why Windows 10 is the fix they needed. It's the OS that carries to all platforms while providing the best possible experience on each of the platforms. Windows 10 is just a easy to use on a desktop as Windows 7 with the added bonus of customizing your start menu. Want metro, then simply enable it. This caters to all users, not just touch base users.

      I don't want an "OS as a service" that is designed for phones, and with ads and an app store

      MS isn't going to force ads on you, the software makers are. Choose apps that don't have ads no different than on your phone. MS understand that corporate people pay for what they need. Home users tend to want things for free so they have to cater to them too otherwise they get pushed out of the market.

      Linux Mint is sounding better all the time, since I can run Windows programs in a virtual box. If that is where MS wants to drive its longtime customers, so be it

      Your a long time disgruntled customer so just do it. There's nothing wrong with that. I know plenty of people that enjoy the freedom from MS products. In my industry we can't avoid MS and we have no reason to either. The average cost of software per work station is less than $250 per year and that includes OS, office, Cad software, industry specific software and many more. That cost is a fraction of the cost of the hardware and a fraction of the cost of the labour so from a business standpoint, a drop in the bucket.

    86. Re:Not acceptable. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I have better things to do with my time than google how to fix Microsoft's fuckups.

    87. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      From my perspective as a long time computer builder/seller, and Windows user since version 1, I think that the Windows as a service is not going to please a lot of people unless MS is much more upfront about how they are going to make money from the OS (e.g., the extent of tracking, adware on the startmenu, telemetry uses beyond fixing issues, etc.). They also need to add an opt-out option to the Windows 10 icon because now you need to know enough about Windows to delete a specific update (KB3035583) to get rid of it and "opt-out". This is extremely user unfriendly by any standards.

      On top of that, the forced updates are causing problems, and that needs to be ended. Just today an update broke Microsoft's own email program Outlook with an update KB3114409. It happened to me today when I trusted MS and ran the updates manually. This "patch" forced Outlook into safe mode until the specific update was uninstalled. So this update would have been forced on people with Windows 10 until MS pulled it. See here.

      http://www.infoworld.com/artic...

      Windows is another experiment (Windows as a service with forced updates) and users are acting as guinea pigs. I can't afford to do that with my work computers.

      So go right ahead and use it if you want, but I will not. Many things would have to change, from the Metrofied start menu to the terrible 2D look that is so uncustomizable compared with Windows 7 to the forced updates. Apps are crap and I don't want or need them on my PC. PC Settings is a downgrade from Control Panel. I could go on and on, and if you again respond by trying to defend MS I'll just post my much longer, more detailed list of complaints for everyone to see.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    88. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      PS, I will join a class action lawsuit if one is initiated. I didn't agree to any W10 EULA, and almost had it installed on one of my computers. I spent a couple hours trying to fix the problems with Windows Update that the forced upgrade caused until I found GWX Control Panel.

      http://microsoftclassactionlaw...

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    89. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that class lawsuit. I've seen much worst lawsuits result in minimal payout in the form of a credit towards products of the defending company. D-Link has one for their mass defective firmware and resulted in a $10 discount coupon on the next purchase of a D-Link product.

      All the "possible damage" cases listed are a real joke and may as well be classified with "Coffee is hot?".

    90. Re:Not acceptable. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      You keep going about Windows as service but last I check (not long ago), MS had not said anything about a subscription service and they even confirmed that those who got the upgrade before the deadline were entitled to Windows 10 at no charge for life.

      Windows is another experiment (Windows as a service with forced updates) and users are acting as guinea pigs.

      In case you didn't notice, customers are ALWAYS guinea pigs. There is no one product you can name that has not at some point made their customers a guinea pig. You could argue some products come to market with tremendous amounts of QC before they hit the market (such as planes) but any day to day shit is prone to make you a guinea pig.

      PC Settings is a downgrade from Control Panel.

      There is still a control panel. It's just not in your face because unless you a tech doing tech stuff you don't need it. The same way root access on Android is hidden from view.

      I could go on and on, and if you again respond by trying to defend MS I'll just post my much longer, more detailed list of complaints for everyone to see.

      You're allowed to your opinion. Keep in mind that I've seen this exact response to every single version of Windows since /. is in existence. Guess what? Windows share of the desktop world is still 85% and that seems to change very little year to year. It's only competitor at the moment is Apple and they aren't interested in serving the corporate world.

    91. Re:Not acceptable. by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      Funny you say that after what happened with Windows 8.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    92. Re:Not acceptable. by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      It's spread to website developers, where you have clowns suggest having a single site for both computers and mobile devices, rather than have different sites based on the device (like m.foo.com)

      You are WAY behind the times (or do not work in web tech) if you think responsive websites can't handle mobile and desktop equally well (usually using a framework like Foundation or Bootstrap). It is true that there are a ton of crappy websites on the internet, but that has nothing to do with the capabilities of the technology.

  2. Screw the user by BigU+03C0mpin · · Score: 1

    Seems to be the modern business slogan.

    1. Re:Screw the user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Grishnakh asked: "If the user happily bends over and asks to be screwed, over and over, why shouldn't a business do so?"

      Because it is wrong?
      Because it is unethical?
      Because it is a poor business decision?
      etc.
      etc.
      Would any of those be good reason not to screw the customer?

    2. Re:Screw the user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No one is forcing anyone to use Windows. If you don't like these policies, stop using it.

      No problem. I'll just inform my employer and customers that we're no longer supporting windows, office, sql server, and they'll have to wait 10 years (without support) while we rewrite the whole application for Linux. That'll go over well.

    3. Re:Screw the user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it is wrong?

      According to you. If you don't like it, don't buy from that business. If you do buy from that business, you're just an enabler.

      Because it is unethical?

      According to you. And so what? Why does this matter?

      Because it is a poor business decision?

      Wrong. It's a good business decision. Do you see Microsoft's profits disappearing? I don't. People keep buying from them. So their strategy seems to be working, therefore it's a good thing for them to do.

      If your auto dealer installed a camera in your car to snoop on you, an when you complain they say "we updated the EULA", are you going to just accept it?

      It is not acceptable to do that in other industries. Why give Microsoft a pass?

    4. Re:Screw the user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Prepare your anus, here comes systemd.

    5. Re:Screw the user by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Compared to Windows 10, that's one smooth, silky, well lubed little french tickler. Who knows, you might even enjoy it!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Screw the user by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If your auto dealer installed a camera in your car to snoop on you, an when you complain they say "we updated the EULA", are you going to just accept it?

      It is not acceptable to do that in other industries. Why give Microsoft a pass?

      GM customers seemed happy to keep doing business with GM after they did just that (well, audio, not video) for OnStar - there were several incidents, from police snooping to bored operators.

      I'm OK with laws to enforce privacy, but it's a democracy and if most people don't care, well, we get the government we deserve. In the meantime, consumers also have a duty to stop doing business with assholes. Legal or not, when a company makes an asshole move like this, and you decide to keep doing business with them, well, decisions have consequences.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Screw the user by PRMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it is wrong?

      According to you. If you don't like it, don't buy from that business. If you do buy from that business, you're just an enabler.

      Because it is unethical?

      According to you. And so what? Why does this matter?

      Because it is a poor business decision?

      Wrong. It's a good business decision. Do you see Microsoft's profits disappearing? I don't. People keep buying from them. So their strategy seems to be working, therefore it's a good thing for them to do.

      According to everyone. It's wrong and unethical if you override someone else's will to do yours on something you don't own. The customer bought the computer and the OS. Overriding their will with their computer isn't an opinion, it's just flat-out wrong.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    8. Re:Screw the user by Quantus347 · · Score: 1

      If your auto dealer installed a camera in your car to snoop on you, an when you complain they say "we updated the EULA", are you going to just accept it?

      It is not acceptable to do that in other industries. Why give Microsoft a pass?

      GM customers seemed happy to keep doing business with GM after they did just that (well, audio, not video) for OnStar - there were several incidents, from police snooping to bored operators.

      I'm OK with laws to enforce privacy, but it's a democracy and if most people don't care, well, we get the government we deserve. In the meantime, consumers also have a duty to stop doing business with assholes. Legal or not, when a company makes an asshole move like this, and you decide to keep doing business with them, well, decisions have consequences.

      Well, that would be an option for almost any other industry. But this is the dominant Operating System on the entire planet. To walk away from Windows means either embracing Apple's Walled Garden approach, or delving into the tangled world of Linux. In either case there is a strong possibility that you'll be unable to use most of the Non-Microsoft software you own.

      In other words, they are holding your Software hostage by virtue of the culture of prevalent cross-platform incompatibility.

      --
      Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
    9. Re:Screw the user by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The customer bought the computer and the OS.

      Wrong. They licensed the OS. The customer does NOT own the OS. This has been made clear by licensing agreements and literally decades of precedent. If you don't trust the vendor you're licensing from, then why are you purchasing licensing from them?

    10. Re: Screw the user by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      I installed Linux Mint a few weeks ago on a cheap lenovo laptop. It Just Worked. Dual-boots with windows 8. Plays audio/media seamlessly by default. Doesn't freak out when you plug in a thumb drive (unlike windows!)

      My next PC will be linux-only, with windows in a VM for a playing with badly-written Word docs.

    11. Re:Screw the user by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong. They licensed the OS. The customer does NOT own the OS.

      I don't give a shit about what you or even some sell-out judge says. This is WRONG (morally and factually) and anyone who believes it should go fuck himself!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Screw the user by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't give a shit about what you or even some sell-out judge says. This is WRONG (morally and factually)

      Citation needed on the factually claim. There is literally decades of precedent supporting software licensing. You can believe whatever you want, but you just look like a lunatic when you claim things that are completely contrary to all the rest of society and the entire legal system we've been using for many decades (in regard to software).

      Honestly, this all sounds like a bunch of whiners complaining that the government needs to step in and make software vendors behave as they think they should. Have you forgotten that this government is all in favor of massive surveillance and spying on citizens? Or are you going to complain about that too, while continuing to elect politicians who support these programs?

    13. Re:Screw the user by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> have to wait 10 years (without support) while we rewrite the whole application for Linux. That'll go over well.

      It should have been done properly from the start. (or portably, to be precise)

      --
      aaaaaaa
    14. Re:Screw the user by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      No one is forcing anyone to use Windows. If you don't like these policies, stop using it.

      1) In the UK at least, it is not possible to buy a PC in the high street without Windows pre-installed and hence send money to Microsoft. You can get PC's with blank HDDs, but only from a few specialist bespoke suppliers to generally professional customers. As far as most users are concerned they are forced to use Windows. Any alternative to Windows on a PC will need installing by the user, and the vast majority of users are incapable of that. Slashdot readers excepted.

      2) I recall that this discussion is not about using Windows as opposed to an alternative like Linux, it is about the nature of the "upgrade" by default from Win7/8 to Win10. Essentially it is about those people who are happy using Windows 7. They don't want to stop using it; and having bought and paid for it they consider it is their right to keep using it as it is - and most sane people would agree with them whatever the EULA might say.

    15. Re:Screw the user by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      The customer does NOT own the OS. This has been made clear by licensing agreements

      They own the right to use it. To use the thing that they licensed, not something else.

      Suppose I give you a licence to shoot rabbits on my land, with no time limit. I cannot one day say that I am changing the licence from shooting rabbits on my land to shooting rats in my cellar, because the rabbit stuff was "only a licence".

      What you are claiming sounds like US law, which I understand is in the hands of corporates like Microsoft. None of this twaddle would stand up in a UK court of law.

    16. Re:Screw the user by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      To walk away from Windows means either embracing Apple's Walled Garden approach, or delving into the tangled world of Linux.

      No one ever said freedom was free or easy. If you want the convenience the Microsoft offers, then you need to put up with their abuse. If you don't like that, then be prepared for things to not be quite as convenient. Personally, Linux Mint works just great for my wife's computer; she doesn't have any trouble at all with it, except that it won't run Windows software. Since all she does is surf the web, use Facebook (ugh...), and watch videos with it, it serves her needs just fine. And so much stuff these days is web-based anyway, so your OS doesn't matter any more.

      If I demanded to run some Apple-only software like Garageband, I sure wouldn't be bitching and complaining about the high cost of Apple Macbooks or how much I hate OSX's UI; that's part of the deal. So I simply avoid Apple-only software.

    17. Re:Screw the user by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Suppose I give you a licence to shoot rabbits on my land, with no time limit. I cannot one day say that I am changing the licence from shooting rabbits on my land to shooting rats in my cellar, because the rabbit stuff was "only a licence".

      The rabbit-shooting license doesn't mean that you can't ever make any changes to your land, or that you can't sell the land to someone else, or subdivide it, or that rabbits will continue to inhabit that land.

      Your Windows license says you can use Windows as long as you like. It doesn't say that they have to continue supporting Windows 7/8, or that they can't push updates on you. They've simply updated you to the latest-and-greatest Windows.

    18. Re:Screw the user by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Citation needed on the factually claim. There is literally decades of precedent supporting software licensing.

      And all of that precedent nevertheless manages to be either incorrectly-reasoned or inapplicable, in conflict with a plain reading of the Uniform Commercial Code and/or Copyright Law. Also, Wikipedia states "The legal status of shrink wrap contracts in the US is somewhat unclear."

      Here's the gist:

      1. The UCC establishes that when an item is sold, the buyer owns it free and clear. (Subject to law, of course, but not subject to the whim of the seller.)
      2. Whether the product (henceforth referred to as my property) contains copyrighted software is irrelevant; I already acquired the right to use said copy of the software by virtue of buying it.
      3. In particular, I do not need any additional permissions from the copyright holder to make copies incidental to running the software (e.g. copying it into RAM); 17 USC 117 makes an explicit exception for that.
      4. In other words, after I hand my money over to the retailer, the transaction is over and I have no further obligation or relationship to the retailer (and I never had any relationship or obligation to the copyright holder, unless the retailer and copyright holder were the same entity).
      5. Because I have my property and all the rights under law necessary to use it as I see fit, I have no obligation to concede anything else to the copyright holder. License agreements, like any contract, must constitute an offer (aka "consideration") to be valid. Because the alleged-license only claims to offer me the rights I already have, it really offers nothing at all and thus is not a valid contract.
      6. Because of the preceding facts, any text the software presents to me or any button I have to click to use it is incidental, irrelevant, and does not constitute any sort of legal agreement whatsoever. The act of clicking a button labeled "I accept" at the bottom of a window labeled "license agreement" has no more legal significance than opening a book or putting the needle in the groove of a phonograph.

      To my knowledge, this is a line of reasoning which has never actually been tested in court. If you can cite a case where it was -- especially one decided at the appellate or higher level -- feel free to cite it.

      Now, if you want to argue that licenses for software which are agreed to before or concurrently as money is transacted (i.e., where it is acquired in a way that is genuinely different from a "sale") are valid, that's fine -- but that's a different situation. Also, if you want to argue that an EULA "offers" a warranty or tech support or something, I'll concede that too -- but will point out that the property owner is perfectly free to reject said warranty or whatever and still use his property.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    19. Re:Screw the user by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, this is a line of reasoning which has never actually been tested in court.

      Then I encourage you to hire a legal team and start suing software companies based on your legal theories, since you seem to feel you have the right to dictate to Microsoft how they should run their business and treat their customers. Good luck with that.

      Meanwhile, I'll simply opt out of using MS's products.

      The bottom line is that legality is determined by whoever wins in court, and that costs a lot of money. The smart way to deal with this situation is to opt out.

      Also, if you want to argue that an EULA "offers" a warranty or tech support or something, I'll concede that too -- but will point out that the property owner is perfectly free to reject said warranty or whatever and still use his property.

      You're free to reject MS's updates and spying. But they're under no obligation to make it easy for you; you'll need to block them at the firewall to be really sure. Again, the smart way is to simply opt out. Just like I'm not going to buy a car from a company that's known to make cars which turn into fireballs when rear-ended, I'm not going to use products from a software company that disrespects me and abuses me.

    20. Re:Screw the user by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Then I encourage you to hire a legal team and start suing software companies based on your legal theories, since you seem to feel you have the right to dictate to Microsoft how they should run their business and treat their customers. Good luck with that.

      I'm under the impression that -- given that I have no legal agreement with Microsoft -- I have no standing to sue them. Instead, I have to wait for them to sue me for my alleged violation of the alleged EULA, and that hasn't happened yet.

      You're free to reject MS's updates and spying. But they're under no obligation to make it easy for you; you'll need to block them at the firewall to be really sure. Again, the smart way is to simply opt out.

      I do block Microsoft at the firewall -- my router's firewall, not Windows', for obvious reasons -- and as a practical matter, I agree that boycotting is a reasonable individual course of action. (I'm also planning on switching back to Linux, but haven't gotten around to it yet.)

      However, I still (a) want to see my argument tested in court and (b) object to people (e.g. you) talking about software being "licensed, not sold" as if it's some sort of legal fait accompli, when it simply isn't.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    21. Re:Screw the user by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      The rabbit-shooting license doesn't mean that you can't ever make any changes to your land ......

      Changes to the land (such as building) might unavoidably create an adverse side effect on the rabbit shoots, but would legally require compensation to the licencee. OTOH, changes to someone's Win7 installation are entirely avoidable, even if Windows moves "ahead" to later versions, simply by MS leaving those Win7 installations alone.

      .... or that you can't sell the land to someone else, or subdivide it

      If you sold the land, the obligation to honour the licence would go to the new owner; in English law anyway - it's called a covenant.

      Your Windows license ....... doesn't say that they have to continue supporting Windows 7/8

      I was not expecting continued support - just MS to leave it alone.

      .. ....... or that they can't push updates on you.

      My rabbit shooting licence does not say the land owner can't tar and feather me.

    22. Re:Screw the user by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Leaving it alone is irresponsible: the vendor has an obligation to provide security updates. Not doing so is leaving you open to malware infections and breakins. MS merely chooses to update your system wholesale to the latest Windows version to stay up-to-date.

      Also, as I recall, it's entirely possible to disable all updates to Windows. It's just not set that way by default.

    23. Re:Screw the user by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Haha, yeah right. Corporations are so stupid they're not going to abandon Windows no matter what MS does to them.

    24. Re:Screw the user by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So your sense of entitlement trumps the law? Amazing. You might just want to calm down a bit.

    25. Re:Screw the user by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      If you think property rights (actual property rights, not Imaginary Property rights) are "entitlement," then you can go fuck yourself too! Using these kinds of legal shenanigans to make owners of property beholden to third-parties is nothing less than an attempt to destroy the foundation of our society and turn us all back into serfs (bound to corporations instead of the land, but serfs nonetheless), and I will not stand for it!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    26. Re:Screw the user by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft are giving you an entire OS for free, and people still find something to moan about. Just install it for goodness sake.

    27. Re:Screw the user by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You'll get no argument that decades of precedent don't make things right, or that IP law is a total mess.

      But the laws are codified and enforced, so you complaining about them isn't going to change them any time soon. And there's a world of difference between slavery, civil rights, etc. and software licensing. With software licensing, it's really really simple: if you don't like the deal you're offered, don't buy into it. There are alternatives.

      Or you can try suing Microsoft, and seeing how that goes. Good luck with that.

      Until then, Microsoft's lawyers and executives - like those of so many other companies - will continue to do unethical (and hence illegal) things in violation of fundamental rights arising under the highest law of the land, and will get away with it.

      They will as long as people continue to throw money at them despite all the abuse they get back. If people stopped doing that, these companies would go out of business. I don't know about you, but personally I haven't contributed anything to MS's coffers.

  3. I understand the consternation by melted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But I'm glad Microsoft is shedding legacy so aggressively. There's no way the OS will install itself automatically. It'll merely be downloaded to your machine (or machines). Install it if you want to, or don't, you still have choice.

    1. Re:I understand the consternation by truck_soccer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      agreed. The problem here is that 99 percent of windows users don't know how to read a message on a screen without clicking YES and DOWNLOAD NOW and YOUR PC HAS A VIRUS GIVE ME $400

    2. Re:I understand the consternation by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But Windows 10 contains SO MUCH LEGACY.

      It's just bigger and slower than Windows 7. :(

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:I understand the consternation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No the problem here is that this OS vendor thinks it's OK to force users to download gigabytes against their will.

    4. Re:I understand the consternation by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Informative

      Many users reported that they had no way to interrupt the installation, only to reschedule it or hard reboot.

    5. Re:I understand the consternation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not true, I actually watched it automatically download and then attempt to install itself with no user interaction.

    6. Re:I understand the consternation by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Shedding legacy" if fine. If that were all there were to it, MS could offer Win7 users an OPTIONAL update, which turns off various legacy functions that have exploits associated with them.

      That is not the case here. MS is pushing their telemetry. In effect, they want your machine to become a part of their cloud. That is unacceptable.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:I understand the consternation by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 auto downloaded to our work computers. However due to a glitch in Windows X it won't install and the installer crashes every time.

      The work machines are just remote terminals. Only a couple of people need actual desktop. ( we use Remote Desktop to keep sessions and work across days/ desks. And it makes life easier for backups)

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re:I understand the consternation by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's no way the OS will install itself automatically. It'll merely be downloaded to your machine (or machines).

      That is still unacceptable behavior. My workplace is in an area where Verizon has refused to upgrade the phone lines and Time Warner doesn't cover large chunks of each block. So most businesses are on crappy 1.0-1.5 Mbps DSL connections, with the fastest possible being just 3 Mbps. Combine that with each business having 3-10 computers and this automatic multi-gigabyte download behavior is completely unacceptable. Especially for the couple businesses who've resorted to cellular LTE Internet with extremely low data caps to try to get decent speed.

    9. Re:I understand the consternation by jimtheowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I only use my paid copy of Windows 7 on weekends for gaming. Regardless of what you think I deserve I feel entitled to voice my discontent when the vendor is acting as if he owns my machine. If you want to promote people moving off Windows entirely It might eventually happen, but I don't think that you are helping.

    10. Re:I understand the consternation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > It'll merely be downloaded to your machine

      Yup - it did this to me...
      On a machine that connects to the internet via a 3G dongle...
      With a 500MB/month data plan...

      Downloading both win8.1 and 10.0 (without asking) cost us in the region of 150 GBP.

    11. Re:I understand the consternation by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1: this infection defaults to enabled in the optional update list, it's trying to get installed 'by accident'. Trying very hard.

      2: it's burning 3Gb of my deliberately small C: partition and every time I deleted the installer it just downloaded it again.

      That's not looking like any sort of choice to me unless I revert the entire OS to an unsafe state without security updates. Given I don't have a clean ISO for Win8 with Bing that's going to be a challenge.

      They truly are scum.

    12. Re:I understand the consternation by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      1: this infection defaults to enabled in the optional update list, it's trying to get installed 'by accident'. Trying very hard.

      2: it's burning 3Gb of my deliberately small C: partition and every time I deleted the installer it just downloaded it again.

      That's not looking like any sort of choice to me unless I revert the entire OS to an unsafe state without security updates. Given I don't have a clean ISO for Win8 with Bing that's going to be a challenge.

      They truly are scum.

      You can use Windows 8 to make an ISO of itself for backup. See here: http://windows.microsoft.com/e...

    13. Re:I understand the consternation by johanw · · Score: 1

      "But I'm glad Microsoft is shedding legacy so aggressively."

      A dangerous course of action. "Legacy" (i.e. win23) is what keeping MS' market share large. Shred that and their market share vanishes. Windows Phone market share, in the lower single digits and shrinking, is a good example of that.

    14. Re:I understand the consternation by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 2

      ...which will include the GWX, Win Update and telemetry I want rid of.

    15. Re:I understand the consternation by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Informative

      Removing the telemetry in Windows 7 and 8.1 is possible if you know what you're doing (unlike Windows 10, at least so far). See here: https://gist.github.com/xvital...

    16. Re:I understand the consternation by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except Microsoft has already installed the windows 10 update without user input at least once. It could happen again any time.

      http://arstechnica.com/informa...

      "over the last couple of days, the situation seems to have become a little more aggressive. We've received a number of reports that people's systems are not merely downloading the installer but actually starting it up. Our own testing shows that, yes, the optional update is getting chosen by default, and that's not supposed to happen to optional updates."

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    17. Re:I understand the consternation by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But I'm glad Microsoft is shedding legacy so aggressively.

      I'm glad they are shedding their integrity so aggressively.

      There's no way the OS will install itself automatically. It'll merely be downloaded to your machine (or machines).

      Its great Microsoft pays our Internet bills and purchases hard disks for everyone.

    18. Re:I understand the consternation by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      I want you to be modded "+5 Sad Truth"

    19. Re:I understand the consternation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Startup of Win7 takes 2 seconds for me. That's fast enough, thank you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:I understand the consternation by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I watched it try so hard and desperate to download something, but couldn't for it could not create a folder called $windows.~BT

      There was a file by that name...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:I understand the consternation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many users reported that they had no way to interrupt the installation, only to reschedule it or hard reboot.

      I always thought hacking a computer to install malware that the user does not want was a crime?

    22. Re:I understand the consternation by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The problem isn't with what Microsoft is doing, as Google is doing it too, and Apple to a lesser extent. The problem is, that they have a legacy of being evil, one they continue to embrace and extend. Who here remembers their "Scroogle" marketing push? Well all that supposed good will is now gone, as they are doing the very thing they were chastising Google for, only worse.

      The thing of it is, this will lead to their eventual death, as they think this is still the 90's and that they have a monopoly.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    23. Re:I understand the consternation by armanox · · Score: 1

      For a business you should be using WSUS for your updates and your admins should block the Windows 10 update package.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    24. Re: I understand the consternation by melted · · Score: 1

      Would you rather live with shitty application ecosystem that has to support everything down to the lowest common denominator of Windows XP? They do make a significant effort to make this low impact. They only download over a wired connection, and deprioritize this traffic.

    25. Re:I understand the consternation by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I agree completely.

      Windows 10 on the same hardware I was running Windows 7. The UI of Windows 10 *feels* a lot snappier and the big 3D games I play perform just as well.

      It used to be that a new version of Windows would push the hardware envelope to the max and necessitate new hardware.

      I guess that hardware has leveled off somewhat.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    26. Re:I understand the consternation by The-Ixian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First rule in IT: Never put 100% stock in what users tell you. Always test for yourself.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    27. Re:I understand the consternation by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      If the computer is part of a Windows domain this update will never be installed and you will never see the "upgrade notification".

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    28. Re:I understand the consternation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You can voice your discontent all you want, but if you continue patronizing that vendor, then you're just a fool. The vendor *does* own the OS on your machine; that's the whole nature of software licensing. If you don't trust your vendor, then don't purchase licensing from them. This was made abundantly clear in the EULA you agreed to, and had every opportunity to back out of.

    29. Re:I understand the consternation by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sorry but that is BULLSHIT as I've had to clean several Windows 10 update infections off of users PCs and guess what? There was NO cancel, you could upgrade now, or upgrade later, but if you got it completely downloaded you got NO choice when it come to just saying "do not want".

      I only see that type of behavior on one other type of software...malware. I will now be disabling auto-updates and advising my customers to do the same and will instead be providing links to either WSUS Offline or Autopatcher. Its fucking disgusting that they would shove their shit into a system the OS requires to stay updated and I hope they are sued.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    30. Re:I understand the consternation by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Here ya go, just use this simple windows OS update blocker, no need to even install, just run it, and you too will never see Windows OS upgrade infections again...oh and you're welcome, old Hairy is glad to help ;-)

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    31. Re:I understand the consternation by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's just like electing a president. A third-party OS is not going to gain enough userbase to make it a worthy competitor. This is why we free market capitalism doesn't work - we need safeguards for consumers. Linux is only good for advanced users who don't need other commercial software.

    32. Re: I understand the consternation by nomel · · Score: 1

      Benchmarks?

      All that I can find are pretty negligible, especially since we're probably not at the equivalent of 10.1 yet.

    33. Re:I understand the consternation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The president thing is a bad analogy: we have crappy choices there because we have a rigged election system that mathematically prevents us from having any more choices. It's an unavoidable by-product of the first-past-the-post voting system: there can be only two. Other countries don't have that problem, because they have better voting systems.

      There's no rigging going on with OSes. People are free to choose between Windows, Mac, and a ridiculous number of Linux variants (many of them being far easier to install and maintain than Windows), plus a few others. If they continue to choose Windows despite MS's abuse, then they deserve whatever they get.

      How is free-market capitalism not working here? You seem to disagree with the choices of the majority, and you're telling them they're all wrong. If they like being spied on, who are you to tell them that's wrong?

    34. Re:I understand the consternation by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've never understood the boot time argument in the post-Windows Vista world. You do that, what, once a day, maybe? For most people that don't shut down or reboot unnecessarily, it's once a week or so. You just saved 30 seconds out of a week. Who gives a shit?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    35. Re:I understand the consternation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But you can not get the money back when the MS ruins a OS version user has bought and has been using for years.

      Yep, that's the problem with purchasing software licenses. Caveat emptor.

      Of course a sane user will not buy anything new from a vendor which treats its customers as MS nowadays does.

      Exactly, this is my whole point!!

    36. Re:I understand the consternation by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Except it was verified to be happening by ArsTechnica.

      Microsoft responded that they had "accidentally" set the behavior this way.

      Never put 100% stock in anything a corporation- much less Microsoft (serial liars since the last century)- say.

      Microsoft isn't all bad but they are massive scammers and have a long history of bald-faced lying and being caught lying.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    37. Re:I understand the consternation by stooo · · Score: 1

      Cool, let's disable updates altogether, and just let security holes wide open.
      What a nice advice....

      --
      aaaaaaa
    38. Re:I understand the consternation by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You still have a choice: you can leave this vendor and pick another vendor

      There was a multi-year long antitrust battle that Microsoft lost where the courts decided quite matter of fact that no, most people do not have that option.

    39. Re:I understand the consternation by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

      "But I'm glad Microsoft is shedding legacy so aggressively. There's no way the OS will install itself automatically. It'll merely be downloaded to your machine (or machines). Install it if you want to, or don't, you still have choice."

      Shill much?

      Microsoft has no business pushing 6GB down to our computers without having explicit, opt-in permission from the computer's owner. Some of us have limited bandwidth and other have limited free space on our hard drives. Further they have no business installing an always running nag with no option to tell it "no, thanks".

      I wonder how many computers they'll break with their plan to automatically install Windows 10 via Windows Update come next year? I know I've been busy reverting folks' computers for them so far.

      Microsoft's behavior with their "Get Windows Ten" campaign has been shameful, if not criminal!

    40. Re:I understand the consternation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So what? Do you happen to remember what the punishment was in that case? Oh yeah, there wasn't any.

      And that case was about them bundling IE and Windows; that's no longer applicable because so many people use Firefox and Chrome these days.

    41. Re:I understand the consternation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I found hitting the big red X in the corner works, but yeah the only options presented are 'Install Now' and 'Install Later'. Kinda a shit more IMO.

    42. Re:I understand the consternation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So what? Do you happen to remember what the punishment was in that case? Oh yeah, there wasn't any.

      I didn't say there was. I was just calling out your comment that you're free to chose a vendor. You're not. Not unless you build a computer yourself and then knowingly chose a platform that is not compatible with most of the common products on the market.

      I have software that doesn't run on Mac or Linux. I don't know of any computer store I can go to here where I can buy a computer which isn't pre-loaded with Windows, limiting myself only to buying Apple or a very tiny subset of Dell machines on the market.

      That's not an alternative. Not in my eyes, not in the eyes of the DoJ, not in the eyes of the EC. So you can say people have a choice all you want, but in the general case you're quite wrong.

    43. Re:I understand the consternation by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      So you really think that all the small business that have a mere half dozen machines should go through the gods-damned rigmarole of buying Windows Server from Microsoft, configuring it, securing it and connecting their machines to it, just so they don't have to deal with Microsoft forcing an OS change on them?

      ... By any chance do you work in Microsoft Sales?

    44. Re:I understand the consternation by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      That is still unacceptable behavior. My workplace is in an area where Verizon has refused to upgrade the phone lines and Time Warner doesn't cover large chunks of each block. So most businesses are on crappy 1.0-1.5 Mbps DSL connections, with the fastest possible being just 3 Mbps. Combine that with each business having 3-10 computers and this automatic multi-gigabyte download behavior is completely unacceptable. Especially for the couple businesses who've resorted to cellular LTE Internet with extremely low data caps to try to get decent speed.

      And Microsoft will respond the way they always do, "Have your domain admin go into Active Directory and set a group policy to prevent the download and installation of Win10."

    45. Re:I understand the consternation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I have software that doesn't run on Mac or Linux.

      It was your choice to purchase broken software.

      I don't know of any computer store I can go to here where I can buy a computer which isn't pre-loaded with Windows

      What is "here"? A local area? What kind of backwards person still buys computers at local shops? It's easy to buy computers without Windows online.

      That's not an alternative.

      Yes, it is an alternative. Just because it isn't served up on a silver platter for you doesn't mean you don't have alternatives. And seriously, buying computers locally? How idiotic.

      not in the eyes of the DoJ, not in the eyes of the EC.

      Bullshit. Show me where these entities have actually done anything to change MS's behavior. Some opinion written by a discredited judge is irrelevant.

    46. Re:I understand the consternation by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Trivial.. and one of many

      http://www.zdnet.com/article/m...

      "Admitting to its mistake, and adding that it would "comply immediately" with the European authorities, the software giant knew it would face an all but inevitable fine for failing to include the settlement-assured "browser choice" screen."

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    47. Re:I understand the consternation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.
      Just about every decent benchmark shows them to be neck and neck, with 7 coming up on top sometimes.
      10 might be faster in some specific cases, but "much faster" it is not, at all.

    48. Re:I understand the consternation by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      Which helps not at all when they all start downloading before any one of them are finished.

    49. Re:I understand the consternation by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      Except you will, as Microsoft keep adding ways to work around third party blockers. It doesn't work completely right now, for example, only mostly.

    50. Re:I understand the consternation by dfm3 · · Score: 1

      Note the 3-10 computers part. The GP is not talking about large corporate environments, but small businesses for which WSUS would be complete overkill. My wife's business has two employees, four computers, and does not have the time (or the expertise) to put up with this BS arms race against Microsoft just to keep their computers working the way they expect them to. Thankfully I know enough to help them stay ahead of the curve, but we'd switch away from Microsoft products entirely if their clients didn't require proprietary software that only runs in Windows.

    51. Re: I understand the consternation by allo · · Score: 1

      yes, i would.

    52. Re:I understand the consternation by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I can complain. And, I have stopped using their prototype products. The only use I have for Windows, is in virtual machines, for experimentation. And, I can still complain about unethical bullshit. It's my computer, my bandwidth, my data. The hardware store that sold me hammers, shovels, saws, etc doesn't have some right to follow me around to see how I use those tools. Microsoft has no right either.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    53. Re:I understand the consternation by kmoser · · Score: 1

      Thanks for filling up all my remaining hard drive space, Microsoft.

    54. Re:I understand the consternation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It was your choice to purchase broken software.

      No it wasn't. And there's no point arguing with me. I'm just one man on the internet. I'll let you argue with the DoJ and EC. They are the ones that decided this. I just agree with them.

      And seriously, buying computers locally? How idiotic.

      Yes because I'm in a foreign country with no credit card. How idiotic of me that I can't get a credit card due to local immigration rules for at least the first 6 months. I must be some kind of a moron to actually have a computer store within walking distance from my house that price matches online deals. Yet provides me with a brick and mortar store to return my stuff too if I have a warranty claim, and takes cash.

      Show me where these entities have actually done anything to change MS's behavior.

      Well if you think this has anything to do with the discussion I'm going to just go with you're a retard.

      Some opinion written by a discredited judge is irrelevant.

      Nope I take it back. You're upgraded to full retard.

    55. Re:I understand the consternation by doccus · · Score: 1

      Cool, let's disable updates altogether, and just let security holes wide open.
      What a nice advice....

      You can if you want. I'll stick with the unfortunately named "update blocker" which should have been referred to as "Windows OS Upgrade blocker" since what it actually does is make windows update wotk exactly like it did in Windows 7 again. PS THX Hairy...

    56. Re:I understand the consternation by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Businesses with 3-10 computers are unlikely to have admins, or for that matter someone who knows what WSUS is.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    57. Re:I understand the consternation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, you're the retard if you think some opinion by a judge matters one whit when there is ZERO enforcement action attached to the case. "Guilty" doesn't mean squat when there's nothing more than a slap on the wrist, moron.

      And yes, you're an idiot if you've never heard of a prepaid debit card.

    58. Re:I understand the consternation by raremediumwelldone · · Score: 1
      Thank you so much!

      My wife uses her PC to work from home (medical transcription) and she's currently on Windows 7. Her transcription software should work on Windows 10 just fine, but if she ran into problems... it's not currently supported on that OS. So she'd have to wipe her system and use the built-in restore partition to go back to Windows 7 and then re-install her work programs, etc.

      Which, when you have deadlines (minutes per week) to meet on 2 different contracts. would be a massive pain in the ass. Thank you again and take care.

    59. Re:I understand the consternation by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      Here ya go, just use this simple windows OS update blocker, no need to even install, just run it, and you too will never see Windows OS upgrade infections again...oh and you're welcome, old Hairy is glad to help ;-)

      I would never install an OS update blocker.

      I enjoy killing GWX.exe as the first thing I do after logging into my Windows 7 machine way too much

      Along with Adobe Creative Cloud.

      It gets my juices going in the morning

  4. Drop some acid... by vvaduva · · Score: 1

    Looks like Bill gates finally took Steve Jobs' advice and dropped some acid...

  5. Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

    I was contemplating upgrading recently. And I don't see any reason NOT to. System requirements are the same as 7 and 8.1.

    Any reason I should stop MS from upgrading me?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you have older hardware, you might have difficulties getting the drivers to work. Half of my Thinkpad X200's hardware wasn't working with Windows 10. Also Windows 10 is fugly compared to 7 and still feels like an early beta.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    2. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Revek · · Score: 1

      if you like being spied on and never knowing what they are doing to you're property it still doesn't add anything.

    3. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 phones home to over 100 different domains with your personal information. This cannot be turned off completely, except in the "Enterprise" edition (although some reports say it is still not possible there). Drivers will automatically update and the user cannot stop it; it can be delayed through some tricks, but the update will eventually happen.

    4. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Kargan · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
    5. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ads in the Start menu, Telemetry, possible hardware incompatibilities?

    6. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      Spyware, and the possibility that a W10 update will break something important.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any reason I should stop MS from upgrading me?

      Because if you were the customer, MS would be charging you for the privilege of purchasing their product.

      You are the product, and MS is trying to downgrade functional Win 7 machines (general-purpose computers that run software at the user's discretion and transmit telemetry only when the user misconfigures them) into telemetry-gathering nodes on something that is becoming increasingly-indistinguishable from what we used to call a botnet.

    8. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Telemetry". Good enough reason for you?

    9. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      I removed all the live tiles and now there is nothing but a huge empty space where they were supposed to be. I know there are alternatives to the classic start menu but I refuse to rely on a third party add on. This is something broken by design.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    10. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Yes and it takes til the 1st service pack and about 2 years before it's stable as in server versions base their kernels and services only after a service pack and a year after.

      Windows 8.1 is now being stable with it's updates not failing. 7 just worked. XP was funky until service pack 2 when it solidified. Windows 10 is as buggy as Vista. I am resisting upgrading until 10.1 next summer

    11. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Ugly in what way? The flyout on the start menu? The 2 pixel smaller windows borders? My W10 looks nearly identical in most operations to my W7 installation except for those two things.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    12. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh and, I hope you don't having anything Microsoft deems as "unacceptable" such as "pirated" software. ;-)

      Not to worry MS will just Uninstall your apps. I mean you did read the eula right?

    13. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 2

      In my case the Windows 10 disrupts or blocks a number of useful hacks that are used in games (Skyrim as example) like SKSE and the ENB Series. I understand that is an analog behavior of a virus (SKSE injects code on the Skyrim working memory), but in Windows 7 you have the option to authorize it while Windows 10 does not work or works erratically. Also, in my honest opinion the Windows 10 GUI is a total piece of shit but that's personal preference

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    14. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a developer, there are a great many screwy things that Windows 10 isn't compatible with. And I'm a Microsoft-stack developer!

      I have old-school Windows Mobile 6.5 apps to support. Visual Studio 2008 is still required to build these apps, and it's buggy as hell on Windows 10. It randomly resizes itself (maximize/minimize/restore window sizing operations), then when you put it back to what it was, it resizes all of the text. And it can even get into cycles of resizing the window progressively jacking the interface text size up to crazy sizes. Also, the November update to Windows 10 uninstalled the WinMo build targets from it. Fortunately, there's a "power toys" package (named like a bag of dildos) that fixes the build targets. But then, getting a WinMo device to actually talk to Win10 is a chore. You have to change settings on the device itself to get it to connect via USB. Only then can you get the settings correct in Windows Mobile Device Center (which is unsupported, incompatible, and practically guaranteed to uninstall itself next week) so that VS2008 can deploy to and debug in the WinMo device directly.

      SQL Server 2008 R2 is incompatible with Win10. Period. You have to explicitly ignore and dismiss/bypass about 3 or 4 warnings from Win10 in order to install the Business Intelligence Development Studio (a.k.a. SSRS tools) for VS2008, since that's part of the core SQL Server 2008 R2 installer. Again, this is needed to support legacy development projects that we're slowly sunsetting in favor of updated versions.

      If you have Win7, none of these affect you. Win7 is compatible with these legacy systems. It's also compatible with the latest ooh-shiny from MS as well. Win8 has a few problems, specifically with the Mobile Device Center, that are the same as Win10.

      But Win10 is a huge step backward in compatibility. To push it quietly onto a development machine is going to often result in a wipe-and-reinstall back to Win7, along with a lot of cursing and loss of confidence in selling Microsoft-stack technologies to future clients. It was bad enough that they stubbornly refused to update their tooling for Windows Mobile, which is widely used in ruggedized handheld devices (read: barcode scanners in warehouses and trucking depots). Now they're breaking compatibility with the old tools in their latest platform update. It's almost like they want to lose an entire market and piss off their most enduring cheerleaders in the process.

    15. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by waspleg · · Score: 2
    16. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Malizar · · Score: 1

      Well, I "upgraded" my Windows 8.1 laptop to Windows 10, and it kept loosing track of the Cortana or Taskbar programs and needing to be booted in safe mode to be recovered. I have since done a true upgrade to Ubuntu on it, everything works great and runs much faster.

    17. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      I found my upgrade to break the existing VMWare Player 6.x.x Bridged Networking. It would just turn off the connection entirely as it couldn't find a valid NIC. NAT networking was unaffected.

      A repair installation of Player fixed it, but shouldn't have been necessary. I'm not sure how other VMWare products are affected.

    18. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Ads in the Start menu

      Right click and remove them.

      Telemetry

      That can be minimized. Product activation and Windows Update themselves are forms of telemetry.

      possible hardware incompatibilities?

      The NVIDIA nForce incompatibility that the GWX app detected is working to my advantage, as it's keeping the Windows 10 installer from even started.

    19. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Any reason I should stop MS from upgrading me?

      Yes, because you need to schedule some time to take your computer to a place with unmetered Internet. Cellular and satellite ISPs tend to charge $5 to $15 per GB. Though you can undo a Windows 10 install, there's no way to undo the $15 or $45 obligation for a 3 GB download.

    20. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Oh and, I hope you don't having anything Microsoft deems as "unacceptable" such as "pirated" software. ;-)

      Not to worry MS will just Uninstall your apps. I mean you did read the eula right?

      No they won't. Microsoft is not doing the things they are doing.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    21. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      It depends. You will need/want to do a bit of fettling to shut down the phone-home telemetry. You should also be advised that installs to some older hardware might go spectacularly wrong. My parents tried installing to their 5 year old laptop and during the install process, the machine locked into what looked like an uninterruptible BSOD-restart loop. I had to travel 200 miles to their place and boot the thing from the Dell recovery partition to get things back to Win7. Later found out that the problem was caused by Win10 refusing to work with their graphics hardware - so the OS would BSOD when it tried to display the setup screen during install. There was no fix - Win10 will never be going on that machine.

      But if you have more recent hardware, don't mind disabling the telemetry and don't have any software that has specific incompatibilities with Win10 (there isn't much of this, but there's still some), then it's a pretty good OS. The UI is very pleasant, with some good upgrades over Win7 and none of the horrors of Win10. A few of the new features, like the Xbox One streaming, are genuinely good (if that's your bag).

      Plus if you're into gaming, the availability of DX12 will be a fairly big deal when we start seeing games that use it in anger early next year.

    22. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by praxis · · Score: 1

      Telemetry

      That can be minimized.

      Minimized is vague. Which parts can be turned off and which parts cannot? Also, why can they not be turned off?!

    23. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3, Informative

      Flat borders, ugly flat icons, tiles in the start menu.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    24. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by praxis · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not doing, but they say they can do it and ask you to agree to it. That's pretty bad. I also wouldn't agree to a contract that says a company can do X but trust us we won't. That's why I don't buy games on Steam "We can delete your account for any reason whenever we like" are bad terms of sale, in my book.

    25. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by toejam13 · · Score: 1

      If you have older hardware, you might have difficulties getting the drivers to work.

      One issue of note is the loss of the XDDM video driver subsystem that allowed video drivers from XP to be used on Vista and W7. Microsoft removed it from W8 and later OSes. So if a WDDM video driver was never released for your graphics chipset, you will be stuck with VESA SVGA video under W8 and W10.

      There are still a number of Pentium 4M and Pentium M laptops in use where this is an issue. I have an older Thinkpad that I use when on vacation and that the kids use at home that has the i855GME chipset. I have a friend that still uses her Inspiron 5100 that has an AMD Radeon 7500M chip. Neither will ever see a Microsoft OS newer than W7.

    26. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I think it's quite ugly myself, mostly because I hate the UI for "app store apps", and a lot of stuff I used moved there, at least by default. Also, the new start menu blows goats (but I can fix that). Matter of taste, really, but having the UI change forced on me pisses me off, and Windows used to at least give you the option to live in the past, UI-wise.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    27. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by armanox · · Score: 2

      Actually, while not pirated, the Windows 10 installer will uninstall applications it deems "incompatible," such as the Cisco VPN client.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    28. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Better stop using your iPhone or Android device because, guaranteed you have some app that is phoning home telemetry.

      Even if you don't have any apps, the OS is constantly in communication with the mothership looking for updates and sending information about you.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    29. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      You know that you send "telemetry" every time you visit a web page in the form of your IP address, user agent string and cookies, right?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    30. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2
    31. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      Windows Media Center which is required to record encrypted cable TV from a CableCARD was removed from Windows 10. If they auto-update my HTPC, all my recordings are useless as they're only playable from the machine they were recorded on. Also, I can then never record any more since media player is not available.

      --
      -SaNo
    32. Re: Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by nomel · · Score: 1

      I did, and I think it's great. I turned off all the big privacy issues that should keep ms from obviously spying on me. I just assume the rest, that are difficult to disable, are for the NSA. People forget that the NSA used to get in (at a minimum) with exploits. I'd much rather have a proper backdoor so the exploits can be found and fixed.

      Beyond ethical reasons, I just don't care about the NSA or MS getting a ping from my computer. If you think yours isn't vulnerable, then you probably spent man years securing it, don't do anything interesting, or are delusional.

    33. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2

      Buggy drivers are still a problem - last I checked, elite:dangerous + amd + win 10 was still a broken mess that works fine on 7 or 8.1. There have been numerous problems with the saitek X55 windows 10 driver. A number of old printers also no longer work.

      And of course, if you're using windows media centre, then installing windows 10 will murder it.

      That's just the broken stuff I know about from personal/friends experience, off the cuff. I'm sure there are many more. You've also got to factor the privacy implications of all the stuff windows 10 sends back in exchange for your 'free' upgrade.

      Windows 8.1 + startisback works fine, and I see no good reason to 'upgrade' any time soon.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    34. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by labnet · · Score: 1

      I run a PC in our cinema room dedicated to Windows media centre. WMC gets deleted on the upgrade. This PC has been popping up nags for Windows 10 but with no warning on what software it will DELETE in the process. MS, you suck.

      --
      46137
    35. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Knightsword · · Score: 1

      I have had no issues with running SKSE or ENB on Windows 10. Though I did copy over my Skyrim folder from a Windows 7 install and I do use Nexus Mod Manager to lunch the game.

    36. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Knightsword · · Score: 1

      The internet account is completely optional, you can skip that step during set up and it will create a local account as normal. If you did end up with a internet account and don't want it, you can always create a new local admin account and delete the internet one.

    37. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      But how is this different from any other OS?

      Look at the OSes that Microsoft Windows competes with- the Wii U dashboard and the PS4 dashboard. Granted, they don't spy as much, but they have very similar policies otherwise.

    38. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Holi · · Score: 1

      On my Surface Pro 2 I constantly lose my wifi adapter since upgrading to Win10. Not a big fan of waking up my pc to no network access.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    39. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Holi · · Score: 1

      Don't forget it ignores the hosts file with regards to the telemetry.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    40. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Holi · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between a webserver keeping a log of IP addresses it communicates with and your OS sending reports of usage patterns, installed software, hardware back to the mothership.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    41. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Just install ShutUp10, enable it and you're off to the races

    42. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      They can. Use ShutUp10. I did, and disabled everything except DRM, since I do download music online

    43. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Afraid not, a traffic analysis of Windows 10 shows that not only is it sending data when you turn on your cam, or talk on your mike, but apparently they left the keylogger on from the beta so you might as well have somebody from MSFT standing behind you with a camera and notepad. Care to try again AC?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    44. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      the machine locked into what looked like an uninterruptible BSOD-restart loop.

      This only surprises me a little, but whenever I've seen a Windows 10 upgrade fail with more than a couple reboots it automatically reverted to Windows 7.

    45. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      But if somebody chooses to upgrade to 10, which is what the GP is asking, then he's already said yes. The controversy in this thread is about forcing 7 and 8 users to upgrade to 10

    46. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      In my case the Windows 10 disrupts or blocks a number of useful hacks that are used in games (Skyrim as example) like SKSE and the ENB Series. I understand that is an analog behavior of a virus (SKSE injects code on the Skyrim working memory), but in Windows 7 you have the option to authorize it while Windows 10 does not work or works erratically. Also, in my honest opinion the Windows 10 GUI is a total piece of shit but that's personal preference

      http://www.softwareok.com/?sei...

    47. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You cannot be serious. Have you been living under a rock? Or maybe you are just a paid MS shill...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    48. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      When you say fugly, that's an understatement. I've never used Vista/7/8, but I switched to Linux instead. There's ONE software I need to use under Windows, so I run it in an XP virtual machine. But the last version does not work in XP, so I just installed Win10 pro in a VM. What a monstrosity.
      First you need to spend an entire hour clicking various [Do not send my personal data to MS] in 10 layer-deep trees of disorganized (purposely hidden?) settings.
      Then you have to get rid of all the tablet user interface (it's a PC, not a fucking toy).
      Then you have to try to make sense of the usre interface and try to make it more (impossible) or less look like the old but simple and efficient Win95 explorer window. The simple menus (File, Edit, Help...) are gone, instead you have a 150 pixel high mix of icons, unaligned text, non-clickable symbols, etc...
      The style itself is 'aesthetically pure' or some shit like that, meaning that some designer decided to get rid of the limits between graphical elements. Meaning you don't know anymore where you can click, what is a button or a mere decoration. Everything is offwhite and jumbled.
      Then the language. I can only purchase Win10 in my country's language. As most people know, you can debug only in English (try searching for error messages in other languages...). But there's an option inside to change the language. Great. After clicking it and 10 minutes later nothing happened (100% CPU), I killed it a few times. Finally overnight it installed. There was no feedback as to what was going on. And the result is a mix of two languages in the various interfaces.
      But wait, there's more. The aliasing on the fonts make your eyes bleed. There's an option to adjust it where you click on various choices, but they are ALL way worse than the default. WAY WORSE. XP had perfectly sharp fonts, why would I want fuzzy looking fonts with random dark groups of pixels inside them ?!?
      What a festering pile of steaming excrements.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    49. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by quonsar · · Score: 1

      You are also forced to have an internet account linked to it.

      no, actually you're not. but with that said, Win10 sucks the big hairy one.

    50. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > That can be minimized.

      The inability to disable telemetry is a giant problem. Windows even sends telemetry about its telemetry settings. It's absolutely ludicrous.

    51. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > Better stop using your iPhone or Android device because, guaranteed you have some app that is phoning home telemetry.

      1- My phone isn't my desktop, and they don't do the same things.
      2- Phone suck at privacy, that's not a reason for a desktop to start sucking too. Just because one thing sucks doesn't mean more things have to suck. That's retarded.
      3- You guarantee, eh? Well, lets talk about my iphone for a second. What's sending telemetry? Does my notes app? Does it send telemetry every time I launch an app? Like, which app is doing it? Is it the OS doing it? Is it at all reasonable to compare "ios and every possible ios application" to "a baseline Windows 10 install that alerts microsoft every time you run notepad"?

    52. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      This is an outright lie, and an attempt to normalize spying.

      The fact that I'm on slashdot is being transmitted to slashdot. It's not being transmitted to, say, Microsoft. The fact that I run notepad shouldn't be transmitted to Microsoft either.

      Remote connections are not telemetry- your post is factually incorrect.

    53. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > Buggy drivers are still a problem

      There are, but this will get addressed eventually. A friend at work accidentally upgraded to Windows 10 (and he's a computer security professional, lol!), and his big side effect so far has been that Star Wars: Battlefront works well for him now.

      Windows 10 should be avoided because of its massive privacy problems and lack of features- certain features that are intended but currently bugged will almost assuredly be worked out soon enough, but it will not stop the spying without a policy change at Microsoft, and it will not support removed features, such as the media center, without additional third party software that is expensive in most cases.

    54. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      I actually think they are WORSE than cellphones, but even if they are only "just as bad", it's a horrible step backwards.

    55. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by praxis · · Score: 1

      I meant "Also, why can they not be turned off without installing a third-party utility?" It should be an easy-to-find user setting.

    56. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Telemetry is simply a measurement of some kind that is sent back to a service that collects that information.

      Telemetry could be as simple as your device gathering any errors your system has encountered and sending that back to Microsoft to be analyzed for better compatibility in future updates or perhaps the number of updates you have installed versus what the server has available for you to download.

      Telemetry does not automatically mean that personal or identifying information about you or your device is being transmitted.

      So, yes, I guarantee that apps on your phone are sending telemetry all the time. The most obvious one is geo-location telemetry as measured by your GPS or by doing a geo-ip lookup.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    57. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Telemetry is any measurement sent to a remote host.

      My examples were flawed, you are right. I apologize.

      An IP address is not telemetry per se, but a cookie containing geo-location is.

      Telemetry can also be tracking information, which nearly every web page you visit is sending, not to the 1st party site owner, but to services like Google.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    58. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > Telemetry is simply a measurement of some kind that is sent back to a service that collects that information.

      Given that its usage in computers is EXTREMELY recent, telemetry means anything that they want.

      So, a measurement of some kind that is sent back to a service that collects information?

      I don't want that. You also give an example as "it could be as simple as". Well, I don't want that either. I don't want system errors (which leak information about what programs I use, and can leak RAM dumps too) transmitted remotely. It's a huge leak for some remote spybot to know when I'm likely to run programs, how much memory they are using, how long they run for, what paths they save to, etc. All the things you'd care about for debugging a problem are things you don't want to transmit on your actual personal box! Microsoft sniffing my RAM, keyboard, and mic, ostensibly to help themselves make a less shitty OS in the future, is absolutely not in my interest- and I'd be surprised if its in *anyone's* interest. Telemetry COULD send PII upstream- Microsoft certainly makes you agree to that in their EULA, because PII could easily be in any of the vast array of contacts, phone calls, emails, file system names, applications run, etc.

      Lets get back to your point- you are playing that same equivalence game I see a whole lot of. You said "I guarantee that apps on your phone are sending telemetry all the time". I told you I had an iphone, and asked you what is being sent upstream? Your example is geo-loc being transmitted when using GPS, or in a browser.

      This is not telemetry.

      If I choose to use a map service- and remember, I could be using apple maps, or google maps, or another third party- then of course, it does need access to my location. But in these cases, it doesn't send a bunch of data to some third party- and its not sending measurements about how I'm using the product, it's requesting maps and such *as needed to accomplish the task at hand*. That's not telemetry- that's just it doing its job. If I run notepad, it transmits that fact to Microsoft. If I run a web browser and go to Microsoft.com, that's not telemetry- that's me asking microsoft.com for data.

      Geo IP lookup is gated by an OS access screen in ios (and maybe Android, but I'm not sure). Geo-loc is also gated in general, so that a map app has to ask for that. It also doesn't transmit when not in use, and it doesn't talk to third parties.

      So, nope, no telemetry demonstrated yet.

    59. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      And the performance? Boris (the creator of ENB) warned more than once that the Windows 10 hinders certain tricks that he uses to make Skyrim perform better.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    60. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by allo · · Score: 1

      Its a privacy nightmare. Microsoft reserves every right to do with your data whatever they want and even to delete files / programs on your computer.

    61. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by allo · · Score: 1

      1) Its different to prior versions. win7 is much better
      2) Because others do not do better, it does not make right what win10 does.
      3) There is competition, which does better.

    62. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by allo · · Score: 1

      No chance. They use hardcoded ip addresses as part of their strategy to avoid being blocked.

    63. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by allo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this disables a lot, but there is a lot left over, which is not so easy to disable.

    64. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Windows even sends telemetry about its telemetry settings.

      I can't see how it could avoid that, as the server could guess the telemetry settings from the list of things that each client could send but does not.

    65. Re: Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Well, not every machine is assumed to be a client. There is no list, after all. Or there shouldn't be. Think of it this way: the ideal Windows box sends the same telemetry to Microsoft, as the default Debian install does. That is how mucb telemetry Microsoft needs.

    66. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, I was making a sarcastic joke. Windows 7 and frankly all other OSes don't do this. My joke is in two parts: First I'm making fun of the people who point to some privacy problem (usually with the default configuration of Android) and then pretend that what Microsoft is doing is ok. Second, I'm making fun of the people who can't switch to a real OS because of games, by pretending that Microsoft Windows has, as its main competitors, Sony's PS4 and Nintendo's Wii-U- the gag being that I don't even bother comparing to functional OSes, because Windows is so far gone, but has people who won't switch because of games.

      Apologies for the confusion, if the joke was funnier it would have been modded as such and would have been obvious :P

    67. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I just checked it out and it does not appear to be sufficient. It can only turn off the things you can turn off yourself in the interface. The nasty shit is the stuff you cannot turn off in the interface.

    68. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      What are the things it doesn't/can't turn off?

    69. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by yuhong · · Score: 1

      I think that can be turned off.

    70. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by yuhong · · Score: 1

      And it is not a keylogger either. Rather it sends "typing data" to MS. There is an option to turn it off.

    71. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Telemetry, keylogger, the thing that monitors for cracked programs, and who knows what else.

  6. Sticking With Windows 7 by ScottyKUtah · · Score: 1

    Windows 7 is working perfectly fine on the computer I use to play Civilization, and the computers the kids use for school work. I have ZERO interest in Windows 10. What part of "Fuck off and die" does Microsoft not understand?

    Glad my Linux machine doesn't try to automatically upgrade me to the next distro version.

    --
    He who laughs last is at 300 baud.
    1. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What part of "Fuck off and die" does Microsoft not understand?

      What part of "we control the source code and can make it do whatever we want" do you not understand? Unless you've disconnected your Windows PC from the internet altogether, or taken some radical steps in altering the OS, it can do whatever it wants, including updating to a new version that includes spyware. The only easy way to avoid that is to simply stop using this OS or any other software from this vendor.

      Glad my Linux machine doesn't try to automatically upgrade me to the next distro version.

      Right, that's because those vendors actually respect their users. If most users weren't such morons, they would only use products from vendors who respect them and treat them fairly. But instead, they keep running back to the vendor that abuses them. Sorry, but I just don't have any sympathy for people who willingly accept abuse.

    2. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Which *BSD or Linux forces OS and driver updates without giving the user the ability to stop it? Which *BSD or Linux monetizes the users' personal information by sending it to 100+ domains? Which *BSD or Linux ships with ads integrated into the GUI?

    3. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by prunus.avium · · Score: 1

      Which *BSD or Linux ships with ads integrated into the GUI?
      Reply to This

      Ubuntu.

    4. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by shentino · · Score: 1

      Many times the people making decisions are not the ones directly affected by them.

    5. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And when they do, users change distros to ones that align better with their beliefs and opinions.

    6. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "we control the source code and can make it do whatever we want"

      This is battle cry of some open source developers too. Firefox, gnome and systemd for example.

    7. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. If you're an IT employee, you're being paid to put up with whatever computing products your employer chooses to purchase. If you don't like it, go find another job. How your employer spends their money is no business of yours, as long as they continue to pay you the pay rate you both agreed to when you accepted the job.

    8. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If you don't like those things, you have choices. You can modify the source code to fit your needs and desires, or you can switch to an alternative. No one is forcing you to use Gnome; there's literally at least 6 mainstream alternatives available for it. No one's forcing you to use Firefox; lots of people use Chrome or Chromium. No one's forcing you to use systemd; several distros don't, or you can make your own distro if you have such a problem with it.

      You have a choice with Windows too. If you don't like it, don't use it, and switch to an alternative. You won't get your money back, but that's what you get for making a stupid purchasing decision. But no one's forcing you to continue using it.

    9. Re:Sticking With Windows 7 by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> Particularly Linux. They just haven't done anything you strongly disagree with yet.

      Not so.
      One of the most important rule in the kernel development is to never ever break user programs. Intentionally or not. It's a NoGo.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  7. I would install, but... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    So is Microsoft watching everything I type, listening in on everything, and recording every web site even if on Chrome or Chrome incognito?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:I would install, but... by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      You can block the spying if you put 100+ of the domains that Windows phones to (see here for a full list: https://github.com/WindowsLies...) on your router's firewall. If you don't, there's an integrated key logger, but I'm not sure if Microsoft co-opts the microphone to listen to everything.

    2. Re:I would install, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what luck! Microsoft pushed "Telemetry" updates to windows 8 and windows 7 so they're collecting that even if you DONT upgrade to windows 10, so you might as well get it over with.

    3. Re:I would install, but... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Why is turning off different from purging, other than occupying a bit of your disk space? Granted, it's critical if you have a Winbook w/ a mere 16GB of FLASH disk (not RAM), but other than that, if a third party software like ShutUp10 turns it off, do you think Microsoft can remotely turn it own again?

    4. Re:I would install, but... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > You can block the spying if you put 100+ of the domains that Windows phones to....

      I think this is an experiment to see how many hoops Windows users will jump through. A third party firewall to block over a hundred domains? What about when it requests by IP address directly? Everyone is like "run this giant script that we hopefully will maintain". It's nuts.

    5. Re:I would install, but... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      FUD. These do not install automatically for most users. Also, for example in Germany, listening to user actions without explicit and informed consent (and that means written from, a click will not do it) is punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:I would install, but... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Unimportant difference and irrelevant point.

      You can disable the spying in Windows 7 / 8. You cannot in Windows 10.

  8. Disable the Update by hand. by ArcadeNut · · Score: 5, Informative

    Add this to your registry and the Windows 10 update will go away...

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Gwx]
    "DisableGwx"=dword:00000001

    --
    Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    1. Re:Disable the Update by hand. by Mr_Trebuchet · · Score: 2

      No need to go as far as editing the registry. You can just uninstall Windows Update KB3035583. Just remember to "hide" it when it prompts you to update to it again.

    2. Re:Disable the Update by hand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using the DisableGwx registry key does not work anymore.
      It worked when Win10 first came out, but something smacked that down over a month ago.

      FYI: I have WIndows Update disabled and the service is stopped and we still go upgraded to Win10 without doing anything other than powering on the PC.

    3. Re:Disable the Update by hand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yes, but does it concern anyone other than me that you have to ask to not be punched in the face? This is why we have telemarketers. Because someone way back when thought it was ok to create a profit motive for any company to call people at home just because they have a phone. Now we have the do not call list that some companies respect more than others. The whole problem shouldn't even exist. I pay for a phone to be able to talk to friends and family. Not to be a marketing target. Similarly I pay for a computer, and the operating system on it to meet my needs not the needs of some corporation. It's about time that we as a community sent a clear and unambiguous message that we don't need them. They only exist because of us, and if they become sufficiently obnoxious we'll create our own solution that doesn't involve them.

      For people on a metered connection this could be very expensive just to download the update. It should not be by default, and Microsoft should be the one footing the bill when the user exceeds their data usage because of it. In my mind this is very obnoxious.

    4. Re:Disable the Update by hand. by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      FYI: I have WIndows Update disabled and the service is stopped and we still go upgraded to Win10 without doing anything other than powering on the PC.

      Which edition of Windows? I have Win7 Pro. Still not "updated" to Win10. (Though is an old PC that Dell claims is not supported by Win10. Don't know what won't work if it did get changed to Win7.)

      Win7 support ended in Jan. I don't that it is no longer supported. I still need it for a few applications that don't run correctly under Win8 or Win10. If my PC gets infected, I will just wipe it and re-install everything. The data for those applications is stored in CSV and HEX files, and I have data validation utilities that run under Linux, so I can detect corruption and revert to a back up if/when needed.

      I am working on getting Linux compatible alternatives in place for the "real" applications, though I might end up not being able to play the one game I play if I can't get it running on WINE.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  9. why isn't that illegal by Revek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are hocking their latest fair onto machines that are better off with the older operating system. Windows 10 doesn't offer any more functionality than windows 7 or 8.1. I don't need some crappy talking clippy to search for things for me. I don't need it, period.

    1. Re:why isn't that illegal by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      I am a big fan of Windows 10, but I still think this is a jerk move. Who do they think they are? Apple or something?

      So why are you a "big fan" of Windows 10? Will you still be, when an unstoppable update bricks your computer?

    2. Re:why isn't that illegal by Virtucon · · Score: 2

      It's legal because of the ToS you accepted when you installed the operating system and accepted automatic updates from Microsoft. Therefore you did it to yourself.

      My suggestion is to dump automatic updates and go to something like Autopatcher which avoids accepting things blindly on your behalf.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:why isn't that illegal by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Most people didn't install the OS. It came preinstalled on their computer. They never agreed to any EULA when they bought the machine.

    4. Re:why isn't that illegal by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Disconnect from your networks, wireless and wired. Even MS can't update a stand-alone computer. What do you mean, "not a viable option"?! :-)

    5. Re:why isn't that illegal by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes they did. Windows has always had a little splash screen that included weasel language allowing them to do this. If you don't like Windows Update, you can turn it off and not get Windows 10 pushed to you. The problem is now, how do you easily get security updates? That's what tools like Autopatcher are great and providing, especially if you're supporting a lot of machines without a Volume License (Corporate) Agreement.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    6. Re:why isn't that illegal by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't force updates on you.

      No, but they nag horribly. It pops up every day offering to update and you can only push it off by one day. At least Microsoft only does it for the Windows 10 update.

    7. Re:why isn't that illegal by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Pure bullshit in the civilized world (but likely true in the US). They cannot do "whatever they like" and they must continue to offer the service they have been paid for.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:why isn't that illegal by spyfrog · · Score: 1

      That splash screen isn't legally binding in my country. So no, you are wrong.

    9. Re:why isn't that illegal by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Wait, hold on. Is this a comparison between Windows and OS X, or a comparison between Windows and ios?

    10. Re:why isn't that illegal by allo · · Score: 1

      It is. Easy reasoning: You have no right at all to use the system. The license grants you the right under certain conditions. If you do not agree to the license, it is illegal for you to use the software. So your click on "accept" either accepts it, or you can be sued for using the software without accepting.

    11. Re:why isn't that illegal by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      What if I buy the computer used? Then I never agreed to anything, and the First Sale Doctrine applies.

  10. MS innovation! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Accidentally installing the OS." Now there's a computer problem that nobody would've predicted!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  11. But you consented! by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... when you click-through the sixteen page license agreement presented to you in 3 pt font in dark grey text on light grey background, some three years ago when you installed Win7. Right there on page fourteen, paragraph 4, sub paragraph 2, it said you agreed that the licensee (that's you) permits unscheduled, unannounced, update to the computer by the vendor, at vendor's sole discretion, with no recourse.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:But you consented! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just because a EULA says something doesn't mean that it is legally enforceable.

    2. Re:But you consented! by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Just because it's called EULA means you don't own the software.

      EULA means: you have a license to use it.

      Again: It's not your software, companies like Microsoft, Oracle and Apple owns their software.

      If you don't want that the only solutions are: Linux, BSD, etc.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    3. Re:But you consented! by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Just because a EULA says something doesn't mean that it is legally enforceable.

      EULA's have been enforced in courts many times. It's a fairy tale to believe it's not enforceable.

    4. Re:But you consented! by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, I didn't click through that agreement, the salesperson in the shop did, then insisted that I give them my hotmail address or let them create one for me before I could take the PC out of the shop. They eventually gave in and let me finish the rest of the initial setup at home after I threatened to call the credit card company and reverse the transaction they'd just put through on the grounds that they weren't handing over the product I'd just purchased.

  12. Re:Let's be clear by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sorry, you're mistaken. Read the comments on Ars Technica for the previous article: once the Windows 10 update was accidentally downloaded, it couldn't be stopped, only rescheduled. Some users had to go through the full update and then do the full regression back to Windows 7.

  13. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... how much of that is enforceable and will hold up in court?

    The more appropriate question would be: how much money is available to pay for the required legal professionals' services to uphold it (or successfully contest it). Which is normally more than the average middle-class citizen can muster, especially compared to Microsoft's available funds.

    The unfortunate reality is that the EULA by default stands until questioned, a court will not do that by its own volition and for free. Someone has to pay for that.

  14. To those saying it can't be installed accidentally by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My coworker left automatic updates on her computer (Windows 7 Professional). She left for the weekend Friday. Came back Monday and Windows 10 was installed.

    I have also read some comments on Ars Technica's article that some users could not find any way to interrupt the installation, only hard reboot, or wait for the full installation to finish and then regress back to 7.

  15. Re:Let's be clear by Bigbutt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep. That's where I was. I simply let it go and then tested my apps. Everything seems to still work but there wasn't a clean way to prevent the upgrade. I'm still checking some of the third tier apps I use (don't run very often but want to check) and can just reinstall Windows 7 if I find something horribly bad (yes, I have regular backups as well).

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  16. Re:Oh, ffs Microsoft by codeButcher · · Score: 2

    And also, my bandwidth not yours. Which is not uncapped or particularly cheap where I am at.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  17. Linux time! by kheldan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have an old Dell Pentium 4 laptop that's currently running Windows XP that I don't have anything important on; suggestions for a decent distro to put on it? Should also be good for a multi-core desktop, later on I need to build a replacement for the 10+ year old AMD Athlon 64-based desktop I have that's also still running XP.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Linux time! by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu MATE

    2. Re:Linux time! by kheldan · · Score: 1

      OK, not the first time I've heard that.. and the lovely part of this is I can try as many distros I want, the laptop in question is rarely used for anything.

      Know much about WINE? There is one piece of Windows-only software that is absolutely necessary for me: http://powertap.com/product/po... Think it'll run OK? I believe it's written in Java (yah yah I know, but there really isn't any other software I can use in this case).

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    3. Re:Linux time! by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      Just put your preferred distro on a live USB and test it. Alternatively, put your Windows 7 partition in a virtual machine, disconnect it from the Internet, and use it solely for your necessary software and Linux for everything else.

    4. Re:Linux time! by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I don't have Windows 7. I might have got a copy of Windows 7 before all this Windows 10 crap hit the fan, but if this is the way Microsoft is going to do business, then I'm done with them for good.

      I don't want to have to try to get XP to run in a virtual machine. Why can't I use WINE? I thought that's what it was for.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    5. Re:Linux time! by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      WINE's pretty good. Again, try it and see what happens. If it works fine, no problems. If it doesn't work for whatever reason, you still have alternatives.

    6. Re:Linux time! by kheldan · · Score: 1

      try it and see what happens

      That's the idea; as I said, I have an entire laptop that I can completely blow away and install whatever I want to on it, and not lose anything at all. The plan is to get used to using it on that (including learning my way around the nuts and bolts of the OS, like I do with MS products) before ever running it on any desktop box.

      Thanks for the suggestions. :-)

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    7. Re:Linux time! by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Running XP in a virtual machine isn't hard at all. It's worth your time and effort.

    8. Re:Linux time! by sydsavage · · Score: 1, Informative

      You may want to take a look at Elementary OS. It's ubuntu 14.04 based, and has a very nice looking interface. You can try it out before installing from cd or thumbdrive. It's pretty lightweight, so runs well on older hardware. They've admittedly taken some design cues from Apple, but it's not what I'd call an OS X clone.

      Also note there's a good chance that the current versions of Chrome may not work on your Pentium 4 if it lacks the LAHF instruction set. Chromium from the ubuntu repos is still working for now.

    9. Re:Linux time! by williamyf · · Score: 1

      Whatever you end up doing with that machine, do not forget to upgrade each and every firmware for which updates are available (Mandatory; BIOS/UEFI, graphics card, storage), Max Out the RAM (mandatory), put a SDD and maybe a better graphics card (if budget allows). After the BIOS updates, enable Hyperthreading on the P4. Since the machines are so old, go for 32Bit OSs (as this will improve your chances to get drivers)

      If you can put 2GB RAM (or more) on both machines (and perhaps a small SSD), the best upgrade path is Windows 10, or Windows 8.1 + ClassicShell (depending of course on Processor Instruction Support and Graphics card support).

      But Your Question was Specific to Liux, so, if you want a desktop, and the machines have reasonable good Specs, go for Ubuntu straight ahead. Is better to learn a standard distro, as both the general and specific knowledge that you gain will be transferable/useable in a work environment.

      If your machine has somewhat weaklish specs, go for CrunchBang!++ . At least you get a functional distro...

      If you want the opportunity to learn your way around a server (in particular with the desktop), go for CentOS 6.3 (the last supported version with 32 bits support).

      Best of luck.

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    10. Re:Linux time! by kheldan · · Score: 2

      Uh, I think you skimmed my original post; I'm DONE with Microsoft products, I don't want any more of them and their nonsense, treating my computer like they own it and not me, and spying on everything I do, forcing updates down my throat, etc. Additionally I'm not spending a dime on an old P4 laptop, it'll work fine the way it is or it won't work at all, but I think it'll be fine; no 'upgrading' anything, it has 2GB of RAM, if some average distro of Linux won't run in that then there's something seriously wrong with Linux. This 'Ubuntu' looks as good as anything else as a starting point. Also, it's a laptop, there are no 'upgrades' for anything anyway, it is what it is.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    11. Re:Linux time! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Does it have 64-bit? If yes, put in PC-BSD

    12. Re:Linux time! by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      If you are wanting to run Windows 7 from a VM? Get a copy of "Windows 7 Tiny", it runs all the software Windows 7 runs while taking less than a GB installed and uses less than 150Mb running the desktop, great for a VM. Its also great for those that need Windows but have older or weaker hardware, just for shits and giggles I tried it on a Sempron 1.8Ghz from 2003 and it ran faster than Puppy Linux, felt like it was on an SSD instead of an 80GB HDD it ran so fast.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Linux time! by messymerry · · Score: 1

      Mint is good. If you want a lighter distro, try LXLE...

      --
      Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
    14. Re:Linux time! by allo · · Score: 1

      I would not recommend distributions, where it's unclear how long they will be supported. elementary is a rather new small project, they may be gone next year. Debian will be there forever, Ubuntu seems to be here to stay as well.

    15. Re:Linux time! by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Tried insalling Ubuntu on it last night. After figuring out the FORCEPAE problem (it's actually a Pentium M, Dell Latitude D600) it looked like it would install -- but a minute or two after starting the install, the whole thing just locks up. :-/

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  18. Why? by johannesg · · Score: 1

    It's a simple enough question, and one for which I haven't yet seen any answer. Why? What is it in Windows 10 that makes it so desirable for _Microsoft_ to _give away_?

    Remember, if you are not paying for a service, it is because you are the _product_.

    1. Re:Why? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      They're making money from the 100+ domains that they use your computer to phone home to. Plus the integrated ads in the start menu, and the app store (which they swindle some tech unsavvy people to buy DVD codecs and Solitaire from, unfortunately).

    2. Re:Why? by Akili · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I actually have an idea about this. This is purely opinion, but I think it's all about Microsoft's App store.

      Apple is making buckets of money from their App store. Microsoft sees this, concludes it is unacceptable, and wants to get that money for itself, or at least as much of it as possible.

      Now, Windows 8 and 8.1 had the App store, but 8 - while perhaps not a marketing disaster like Vista - still doesn't sit well with people. Windows 7 is well-liked, but there's no App store. Therefore: Upgrade everyone to Windows 10 for free, and wait for money to start rolling in via app purchases, in-menu advertisements, and other benefits. Maybe they can even sell telemetry data to marketing firms, depending on how much they wash it and how close they want to toe a legal line about turning over such information to third parties.

      I've yet to hear any better explanation.

    3. Re:Why? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      My guess is they don't want to have to support Windows 7 and 8 any longer than they have to. Windows XP was supported until 2014, 7 years after it's predecessor was released. If they can a high enough percentage of people to migrate away from Windows 7/8, then they can stop supporting them faster. If 95% of people are no longer using the old OS, then it's much easier to say they are cutting off support for the old versions. If they make upgrades free going forward, they can support just the newest version, and still get licensing fees from new computers which are sold. They won't be able to make money from people paying for upgrades, but very few people paid for upgrades on old computers anyway.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Why? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      The same thing everybody makes money from these days: ads, analytics, access to your data, and the attempt to further lock you into their platform.

      Microsoft have decided that your computer is now their computer, and that they will decide what happens to it.

      Windows 10 is the point at which Microsoft decides to openly state they don't give a crap what their "customers" want.

      Welcome to the future, where corporate interests means they have more control over the products you buy than you do.

      I figure Microsoft is going to create Linux and Mac users as everyone gets pissed off and leaves.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  19. Re:Legal? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By the time a case makes it to court, the damage is done. Your computer is "upgraded", Windows telemetry knows everything that is on your machine, and all your secrets are public. Not to mention, that half of your software no longer works, because of compatibility issues.

    It gets harder and harder for me to understand why so many people stay on Microsoft operating systems.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  20. Re:Let's be clear by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    Yep. That's where I was. I simply let it go and then tested my apps. Everything seems to still work but there wasn't a clean way to prevent the upgrade. I'm still checking some of the third tier apps I use (don't run very often but want to check) and can just reinstall Windows 7 if I find something horribly bad (yes, I have regular backups as well).

    [John]

    See here: http://www.howtogeek.com/22072...

  21. Re:Let's be clear by squiggleslash · · Score: 1, Troll

    I've been through the upgrade process twice now. I also have a PC that Microsoft was pestering me for a long time to upgrade. It's simply not true that you can go ahead and install Windows 10 without user intervention. (Additionally, how do you "accidentally download" something that's already downloaded? That's a major complaint most of us have about GWX, it downloads Windows 10 without asking us, filling up around 5Gb of our disks.)

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  22. Done in by EULA by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 2

    ... and the binding arbitration clause that's now present in millions of EULA?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Done in by EULA by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      ... and the binding arbitration clause that's now present in millions of EULA?

      Ain't it funny to watch thedissemblingc and tap-dancing? Let's keep badgering the shills - their getting entertaining now.

      Though it is pretty hard to beat "They aren't doing what they said they would do, ant peopl report that they are doing because they wouldn't do that, and besides, why would they do that and your Grandma came over last night and updated your computers to Windows ten , but you must not have been paying attention.

      What's the next scenario, shills?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Done in by EULA by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not binding in most countries.

  23. Big problem for my lab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I run a laboratory. The control software and the equipment are only rated for Windows 7. I have had to be vigilant about this because an upgrade would screw up $400,000 worth of analytical equipment. I now have to run updates manually and review each one. I wish they'd understand that sometimes you just can't upgrade.

    1. Re:Big problem for my lab by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      If you have half a million dollars of equipment which was certified to run on a specific build of Windows 7, you'd be the worlds dumbest administrator to have windows update turned on. Actually, that goes for any operating system you're running - Linux and OSX, too. If you're hardware depends on a know, fixed installation you never, ever upgrade anything without a pre-test regimen. Any patch to the OS or drivers can result in a failure or conflict with your mission critical system.

      Perhaps if you understood configuration management you'd know that.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Big problem for my lab by ewhac · · Score: 1

      I run a laboratory. The control software and the equipment are only rated for Windows 7. I have had to be vigilant about this because an upgrade would screw up $400,000 worth of analytical equipment.

      I hope you have mounted scratch monkeys...

  24. And this announcement comes on Pearl Harbor day. by waspleg · · Score: 1

    How appropriate.

  25. Re:Legal? by geekmux · · Score: 1

    By the time a case makes it to court, the damage is done. Your computer is "upgraded", Windows telemetry knows everything that is on your machine, and all your secrets are public. Not to mention, that half of your software no longer works, because of compatibility issues.

    Good! At that point, you've had years to document and rack up damages to your person or business because of an upgrade you didn't want that caused all sorts of problems for software you paid for that is no longer working, all being driven down during a time when Microsoft still fully supports Windows 7.

    It gets harder and harder for me to understand why so many people stay on Microsoft operating systems.

    If you think that user base is stubborn, let me tell you about a little company called Oracle...

  26. Re:Let's be clear by LichtSpektren · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're mistaken. My coworker came back from the weekend (this was in September I think) and found her Windows 7 Pro machine to have Windows 10 on it.

  27. You will be assimilated by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    NOW can we put the "Bill as Borg" icon back for Microsoft, Dice?

    1. Re:You will be assimilated by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It seems it's hard for a company to change its personality overnight. The Gates Jerkiness survives in the culture and leader selection process.

      Once a Borg, always a Borg.

    2. Re: You will be assimilated by LocutusOfBorg1 · · Score: 1

      Resistance is futile

  28. Re:Legal? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Well when the judge get's free Xboxes for his kids he may look MS way

  29. Re:Is this actually legal? Piece meal removal of 7 by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    AC has often lied to us - but, if this is true, I love it!

    "I have students every day saying they want macs and even a few who are big fans of linux."

    Push them, man. Teach them some critical thinking. Get all of your students to question authority. WTF has happened to us? We, as a nation, have just come to accept corporate brain washing?

    PUSH THEM!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  30. Re:Let's be clear by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Like the sibling, I would go with "Someone did this for them". The installation process asks questions throughout the install, before, during, and after. You cannot proceed with the install without answering the questions.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  31. Re:Let's be clear by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right, somebody broke into our locked office building just to maliciously update our OSes? It happened on her computer because her updates were set to "Install updated automatically (recommended)". Perhaps your settings are different. But lots of users have reported Windows 10 installing without any user interaction whatsoever.

  32. Re:APK APK APK by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, you can't. Windows bypasses its hosts file when contacting Microsoft domains hardcoded into the OS. You have to block the domains from the router (or maybe a third-party firewall would do the trick).

  33. Re:Let's be clear by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    Like the sibling, I would go with "Someone did this for them". The installation process asks questions throughout the install, before, during, and after. You cannot proceed with the install without answering the questions.

    I'm not sure what else to tell you. Maybe eventually somebody will make a recording of Windows 10 installing itself, but until then, your assurances fly in the face of my experience, and the reports of several people.

  34. Re:Let's be clear by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    Like the sibling, I would go with "Someone did this for them". The installation process asks questions throughout the install, before, during, and after. You cannot proceed with the install without answering the questions.

    I'm not sure what else to tell you. Maybe eventually somebody will make a recording of Windows 10 installing itself, but until then, your assurances fly in the face of my experience, and the reports of several people.

    Addendum: do you realize that Microsoft admitted that this was occurring two months ago?

  35. Microsoft should be the Cap overages for this mess by mrmaster · · Score: 1

    I'm out $30 due to cap overages because it kept screwing up the download process.

  36. Re:Microsoft should be the Cap overages for this m by mrmaster · · Score: 1

    Wow..that was some bad English. I tried to write Microsoft should pay for any ISP overages caused by the downloads.

  37. Re:Let's be clear by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    "Your" experience is second hand, and appears to be someone playing a practical joke upon a co-worker. The "reports of several people" seems dubious too.

    I have my own direct experience of how the install works, I've done it twice. Given actual, first hand, experience of three machines - two installed, one not - given the fact millions of people would be protesting if there had ever been a period whereby Windows 10 "installed itself" without bringing up a single cancellable dialog, and given the severe legal situation Microsoft would be in if it ever tried to pull this stunt, I would seriously advice you to locate the practical joker in your office.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  38. Re:Let's be clear by LichtSpektren · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Your" experience is second hand, and appears to be someone playing a practical joke upon a co-worker. The "reports of several people" seems dubious too.

    I have my own direct experience of how the install works, I've done it twice. Given actual, first hand, experience of three machines - two installed, one not - given the fact millions of people would be protesting if there had ever been a period whereby Windows 10 "installed itself" without bringing up a single cancellable dialog, and given the severe legal situation Microsoft would be in if it ever tried to pull this stunt, I would seriously advice you to locate the practical joker in your office.

    Oh, like the severe legal situation Microsoft would be in if they downloaded 12 GB (or however much it is) without asking the user? Or sending their personal information to 100+ domains without the ability to turn it off? Yeah, they admitted they were doing this and that too.

    But keep telling yourself that there is a ghost that is floating to peoples' computers and maliciously installing operating systems on them. Microsoft already apologized two months ago for doing what you're denying is occurring.

  39. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? Yes by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    Yes, there is a very big downside to upgrading for certain license owners. Anyone who owns a retail license or Win7 or Win8.x and upgrades now only owns an OEM license for Win10. This has important ramifications. The retail license owners are not tied to a particular motherboard, and can upgrade their system hardware and reinstall their operating system. OEM licenses are tied directly to your motherboard. If you motherboard fails or you upgrade, you need to buy a new OEM license.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  40. This is Nadella of Borg by johanw · · Score: 1

    Your computers will be assimilated. Resistence is futile. All your computers will be made to service us.

  41. Re:Not acceptable. I have a Ceton CableCard Tuner by ZippyTheChicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One very important thing for me is a Ceton CableCard Tuner I have to record shows with Media Center.. Media Center was originally in Windows 10 Preview then they intentionally removed it.. and then they disabled Netflix from working in older versions of MediaCenter... Microsoft is working with comcast to restrict home users ability to record TV Content over Cable and Antenna.. Comcast and Cox have already started converting their Set Top Boxes to IP based streaming boxes which will not allow you to locally record tv content... The FCC and many cases along the way say we have the right to record TV Content for our own use and Archive but now with Microsoft doing away with DVD support and Media Center.. we no longer have that ability.. Its going to be like trying to capture a Hulu.com TV show.. it will be close to impossible if not impossible within 5 years.. this is blatant collusion and criminal activity to require people who pay for content either on Cable or Antenna by watching commercials to stream any rerun or later viewing of a show from a service like netflix hulu or comcasts own streaming service instead of letting the User record content as has been legal since the VCR.. Today it is now illegal to transfer content from DVDs to your computer in England and other European countries.. they want us to pay them for every viewing of every show even if its a 10 year old rerun of friends.. and if you haven't noticed there are no new good shows being produced... Comcast is not only a distributor of content.. they own TV Networks and Movie Studios and Microsoft has had a relationship with them since Gates invested a billion dollars in them back in the 1990's .... Its corrupt... most likely criminal.. and definitely evil

  42. Re:Let's be clear by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    and can just reinstall Windows 7 if I find something horribly bad (yes, I have regular backups as well).

    [John]

    Yeah - "Just"

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  43. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You know that T-Shirt that says: Cool Story Bro! ? Assume I'm wearing a shirt like that right now, but that it says Anecdote rather then Story; that will help you get the most from the following:

    "It gets harder and harder for me to understand why so many people stay on Microsoft operating systems.

    Because half your software not working is better than 99% of your software AND some important hardware not working?
    I got fed up with the malware and advertising bullshit MS was pushing this summer and installed Linux on one of my machines, with the intention of going full Linux in the near future.Two months later and I was back to Windows. Wifi problems, video problems, a more limited application selection..."

    Seriously, it is kind of a cool anecdote, because it shows how a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. You basically didn't stop to think: Hey, is this fair? Is this a fair comparison?. Of course, it isn't. Not at all. Allow me to elaborate.

    A professional installed and configured a customized version of Windows on your system (Maybe you didn't know that an engineering team configured a custom version of Windows with all the right drivers, etc?.) Then an amateur tried to installed and configure Linux, and not surprisingly was unsuccessful (thus the WiFi and video "problems", and inability to run your Windows applications with WINE/Codeweaver Crossover.) It boggles the mind that you think that could pass as a fair comparison. True, there are some Windows applications that won't work with Crossover, but it is highly unlikely you use those, or you never would have made the switch (e.g. You' would already know Photoshop and AutoCAD aren't available for Linux.)

    My assumption is that you are a troll (who else would claim that 99% of your software won't work if you use Linux?), but maybe I'm wrong, and even if I'm not at least other people can learn a little something (like the existence of Crossover) as a consequence of your post now, whereas there was absolutely nothing to learn from yours directly, and a significant danger someone would get a tingle in their confirmation bias gland.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  44. existing installed software by BenBoy · · Score: 1

    Man, this is going to have a lot of unintentionally surprising effects. In my own software shop, we're definitely testing new versions in a Windows 10 environment, but any number of users are (for perfectly good reason) using old releases. I don't know of any reason our older releases *won't* run on 10, but it's completely untested ...

  45. Re: Legal? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    Inbthe corporate world it's because they have millions of dollars tied up in Microsoft software. In the consumer world it's because the alternatives are more expensive (Apple) or don't support all your software and hardware (any of the free Unixes). You think there wouldn't have been a mass exodus away from Windows if the alternatives did what users wanted.

  46. Re:Let's be clear by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The blunder is already that they force a download of multiple gigabytes onto the users. Some of us are on metered links, especially when using any kind of wireless internet connection via a cell phone provider. 3.something gigabytes is pretty much what some users may use per month, simply because they chose their plan according to their needs. Not Microsoft's!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  47. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, because Judge's don't really make that much, so $350 to $1000 dollars worth of commodity hardware is more than enough to sway them in the direction of risking their reputation, career, and jail time.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  48. Re:Let's be clear by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Right, somebody broke into our locked office building just to maliciously update our OSes? It happened on her computer because her updates were set to "Install updated automatically (recommended)". Perhaps your settings are different. But lots of users have reported Windows 10 installing without any user interaction whatsoever.

    Fuggidaboudit! These shills wil just continut to deny reality until you give up. They'll tell you that Microsoft does nothing of th sort, that You don't have to opt out of their key logger, and there isn't even a keyloggewr, and besides, they won't use the kelogger that they dont have that you don't have to opt out of.

    Microsoft has been doing you have no choice updates since Windows 8 days, even though they haven't, and even if they id it must have been me in a trance or the neighbor breaking into th ehouse and figuring out our passwords and telling it to update.

    Shills? It's really time for you to come up with better lies. The old ones are sounding a little pathetic these days.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  49. Re:Let's be clear by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Like the sibling, I would go with "Someone did this for them". The installation process asks questions throughout the install, before, during, and after. You cannot proceed with the install without answering the questions.

    Absolutely. I found one of the neighbors in my house, who got past the security systems, deduced my passphrase, booted my computer and installed Windows 10.

    Sounds legit!

    So shill, why are you calling all of these people liars?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  50. Not Nice, Microsoft by williamyf · · Score: 2

    While I am Sold to the Win10 new ways* , I understand why some other people (minority or not, but VERY vocal) are opposed to it. So it is NOT NICE from Microsoft to push so hard for Win10.

    Had they had a gentler touch from the beginning, we wouldn't see all this pushback, and all this cottage industry of tips and tricks and apps to disable the upgrade...

    You harvest the tempests you sowed...

    *full disclosure, my main machines are macs, some legacy win laptops and all my bootcamp partitions are going to Win10*

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  51. How to avoid it (at least for now) by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's the old "how to disable cookies in Firefox (was it, I think?)" trick again.

    MS tries to create a folder called C:\$windows.~BT to download its installer files into. Create a file by that name and, well, no way to create a folder by that name or dump the files somewhere. Installer croaks, aborts download, bullet dodged.

    Of course MS will eventually catch on and close that loophole, but it should be good to let us survive another patch day.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  52. Re:Let's be clear by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what else to tell you. Maybe eventually somebody will make a recording of Windows 10 installing itself, but until then, your assurances fly in the face of my experience, and the reports of several people.

    Addendum: do you realize that Microsoft admitted that this was occurring two months ago?

    He probably deny's all of the "features" of W10, like the keylogger, the password sharing, and phoning home with things you told them not to after having to opt out of them eh, squiggleslash?

    It gets pretty freaky when people tell you you did not see something you saw, or experienced something you experienced. And continue to do so even when proven wrong, as noted by the very company they are shilling for. Kind of like trying to force cognitive dissonance on you.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  53. No iOS rollbacks by Immerial · · Score: 1

    Apple sucks in the rollback department for iOS. You install the 'latest and greatest' on your phone, find your phone runs slower... guess what, you can't rollback.

  54. Re:Legal? by tepples · · Score: 1

    True, there are some Windows applications that won't work with Crossover, but it is highly unlikely you use those, or you never would have made the switch

    In other words, "Get a Mac already." Because a lot of the popular stuff known not to work in Wine is also available native for OS X, such as Photoshop and iTunes Store.

  55. Ubuntu Unity Amazon shopping lens by tepples · · Score: 1

    Which *BSD or Linux monetizes the users' personal information by sending it to 100+ domains?

    Perhaps not 100, but anyone who can remember the Ubuntu Unity Amazon shopping lens and related controversies knows that the GNU/Linux market is not entirely free of privacy intrusions.

    1. Re:Ubuntu Unity Amazon shopping lens by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Right, and that's why so many people abandoned Ubuntu when that happened, and migrated to other distros.

      Not a problem.

      But in Windows-land, people just sit around and bitch and complain, while continuing to send their money to Microsoft. (And don't forget, how much money did the Ubuntu users actually pay for using Ubuntu? Probably zero.)

    2. Re:Ubuntu Unity Amazon shopping lens by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > the GNU/Linux market is not entirely free of privacy intrusions

      Whereas the Windows market consists of nothing but.

      There's a ton of distros. The top one by desktop numbers is (probably) Mint, which has no such drama. If you point to ONE distro with ONE issue (and a really easy one to disable, by the way), what does that mean? Call me when there's a hundred windows distros to pick from and the Windows 10 crap is happening to just ONE of them.

    3. Re:Ubuntu Unity Amazon shopping lens by tepples · · Score: 1

      But in Windows-land, people just sit around and bitch and complain, while continuing to send their money to Microsoft.

      This is probably because a lot of businesses are so invested in Windows that sending a small amount of money to Microsoft would be less expensive than either A. sending a larger amount of money to the ReactOS project to bring it up to parity with Windows in the areas about which the business cares, or B. spending a larger amount of money switching to an existing non-Microsoft stack on all of its own systems while somehow retaining interoperability with its suppliers that use a Microsoft stack (e.g. files in .xlsm, .mdb, or .accdb format).

  56. Re:Download now, install later! (next 5 days) by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    This morning when I logged in, I got a dialog "Upgrade Now" or "Download Now" but it had the X button to close the dialog so I did.

    I'm sure when I come to visit on Christmas, my mother will have windows 10 ("but it didn't give me a choice!")

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  57. Re:Let's be clear by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Oh, like the severe legal situation Microsoft would be in if they downloaded 12 GB (or however much it is) without asking the user?

    It's nowhere near 12Gb, but yes, there's a world of difference between using up more disk space and actually replacing their current relatively light weight operating system that runs the applications they have installed with one likely to fail at many applications that requires oodles more memory. In other words, rendering many, many, computers unusable for the purpose with which they're used.

    But keep telling yourself that there is a ghost that is floating to peoples' computers and maliciously installing operating systems on them.

    That's your position, not mine, except you've called the Ghost Microsoft. I have no idea who installed Windows 10 on your co-workers PC, but I know that someone did and you've decided - rather than using Occam's Razor - to instead blame Microsoft because Microsoft sucks, right?

    You don't seem to be bothered with the facts here. You've apparently never installed Windows 10, and thus are blissfully unaware that it asks questions before it starts installing.

    I have run it. I actually know what I'm talking about. Between the legal situation and actual experience, I know your interpretation of events is utterly absurd.

    I'll await that video, thanks. Just an FYI: it'll never come.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  58. Re: Legal? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    Inbthe corporate world it's because they have millions of dollars tied up in Microsoft software

    More likely it is because of stuff like:

    - Software (you got that one)
    - Group policy
    - Built-in deployment tools
    - Built-in administration tools
    - Wizard configurations that make it almost brain-dead easy to set up complex systems (Exchange, IIS, SQL, etc)

    In the consumer world it's because the alternatives are more expensive (Apple) or don't support all your software and hardware (any of the free Unixes).

    You pretty much nailed it here, except I would also include PC gaming as a big driver for consumer use of Windows (Xbox is Windows after all).

    In addition, Windows is pretty easy to use and stuff Just Works for the most part.

    Basically, on the consumer side, if stuff works well enough to do what you want then who really cares about a little telemetry going back to the mother ship? Especially if it is only used to make your experience better and improve the product.

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  59. Re:Let's be clear by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Also add the bricking reports on reddit to the unasked update reports on Arstechnica.

    You can't revert if the update kills your computer. Some people have had to reinstall from media (couldn't use the on disk backup partition).

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  60. They got me by watermark · · Score: 2

    Button said, "Download now and install later". What they meant was "Download now and install when it's done downloading".

  61. Re:Not acceptable. I have a Ceton CableCard Tuner by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is working with comcast to restrict home users ability to record TV Content over Cable and Antenna.

    That's not really even Microsoft. That's the CableCard standard (record/copy flags). And it's the only reason why Windows was able to implement CableCard compatibility. This is why I only watch/record Broadcast TV, which I can get via antenna unencrypted and unencumbered and record with MythTV.

    Comcast and Cox have already started converting their Set Top Boxes to IP based streaming boxes

    And this is because cable companies thought even CableCard was too permissive... And this was the only exemption the FCC really approved to the CableCard requirement.

    Today it is now illegal to transfer content from DVDs to your computer in England and other European countries.

    And in the US. It's called the DMCA.

  62. I can't disable auto updates bcos of vpn by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Our company vpn runs a virus scan on my home computer before letting me log in through vpn. If auto updates to the OS are disabled, or if I don't have one of the approved anti-virus product installed, or if the firewall is not on, it would not let me use vpn. So turning off auto update is not an option. If the vpn still works after this forced update, I will use the desktop only for VPN. Everything else is on my chromebook anyway

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:I can't disable auto updates bcos of vpn by allo · · Score: 1

      turn updates on, start vpn, turn updates off before they start doing anything.

  63. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    No, in other words use Linux, save $1000 bucks, and avoid vendor lock-in. If you are one of the very few people who need* Photoshop or another application available for OS X but not Linux, then sure, get a Mac. For the other 99% of the population Linux is awesome, if installed and configured by a competent Linux professional.

    * Most people who "need" photoshop don't really need it. They just don't want to deal with the learning curve for a new tool, such as The GIMP. The only people who need it are those doing press work that requires CMYK, etc.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  64. Re:Legal? by Whatanut · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a great deal of assumption in your post. Mostly that the person installing linux is incompetent and the windows machine was installed by some highly trained tech. Both assumptions that may or may not be correct.

    I've been around this stuff since the days of slackware 1.0. I've enjoyed the days of Windows 3.0 when it was usually faster to just do something at a command line than it was to start up that turd. I've been through KDE, GNOME, Enlightenment and various other window managers. I'm currently a Mac person simply because when I finally got into it a few years ago my reaction was "This is what I've been trying to get linux to be for years!!!".

    Do I curse at windows? Yes
    Do I curse at linux? Yes
    Do I curse at my Mac? Yes

    Each of them has their pain points. But trying to argue that linux is perfectly suitable replacement for windows is asinine. And quite frankly ignorant. There are still many rough edges to the linux world that the majority of users simply don't have the time or expertise to put up with.

    --

    yvan eht nioj
  65. Re:Let's be clear by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Who do you work for? Apple? Google? Just curious, you seem to be very keen on calling me a "shill" despite my history of (usually modded down) criticism of Windows 10, some of which is even in the message this posted. Yes, I'm sure I'm being paid by Microsoft for posting that Windows 10 is shitty, bug ridden, and unresponsive, in virtually every thread where it's relevant. Hey, Microsoft, where's my fucking cash? Did you give it to Ol Olsoc? If so, can you tell him to give me my money?

    I haven't called anyone a liar yet, but I'm getting close. The responses I'm getting to my original comment are simply impossible: as I've said, I've actually run the installer twice. It asks questions before installation. There's no way in hell to get around that. The questions are asked. The installer waits.

    So whatever it is that supposedly happened to those claiming Windows 10 installed all by themselves, it wasn't anything to do with the standard GWX installer. Maybe it was people yessing dialog boxes to death and then claiming "It installed all by itself" once they realized that, oops, maybe they shouldn't have. Or, as I said, perhaps some jerk in the same office was playing a practical joke.

    Or yeah, maybe Microsoft released two versions of the installer, a special superdooper automated one that actually controls the mouse and has it click its own buttons that is installed only on, like, ten machines out there, and a different one for every other Windows user in the world.

    Because that conspiracy theory makes way more sense than "A user fucked up or had a joke played on them."

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  66. Re:Legal? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    It gets harder and harder for me to understand why so many people stay on Microsoft operating systems.

    I'm stuck supporting Windows and/or Mac because my wife's photography business cannot function well without Adobe Creative Suite.

    And please, don't bother saying Gimp or Darktable. I won't bother explaining this choice; the factors are extensively discussed elsewhere.

  67. Microsoft lied when they said it was an accident by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's claimed their previous attempt at forcing Win10 updates by converting it from an 'Optional' to 'Recommended' update was an accident. With this latest news that obviously was a lie. Microsoft did that as a trial balloon. Looks like that balloon has landed.

  68. Re:Legal? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    thus the WiFi and video "problems"

    The reason for wifi problems in Linux was due to there being no open source drivers for so many wireless chips. The only way to make them work is to run the Windows drivers via NDISWrapper. A skilled professional is going to have a long road ahead of them to fix that in Linux.

  69. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "There seems to be a great deal of assumption in your post. Mostly that the person installing linux is incompetent and the windows machine was installed by some highly trained tech. "

    I have made Zero assumptions. You don't seem to understand that when you buy a PC from the store, the image on the hard drive is a custom image. Engineers for ASUS, Lenovo, HP, et. al. create them in house. This isn't an assumption. It is a fact. Now, on to the other proveable fact that you mistook as an assumption. It is a fact that this person was not qualified to install and configure Linux on a professional level. This is evidenced by his WiFi and Video issues. I have been installing various Linux distributions for more than a decade, on hundreds of machines. I can assure you that there are solutions to the problems but they sometimes require some knowledge and skill with Linux. Also, the OP openly stated that "he finally .... tried Linux". I don't care if he designed his own 2048 Core C/GPU and wrote an OS for it to run his custom neural network. That still means he is not competent with Linux, as his own testimony confirms.

    I didn't read the rest of your post. When someone gets things that far wrong out of the gate, I abandon all hope that things are going to get better from there.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  70. Re:Let's be clear by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    Well I do have a CentOS 7 disk in addition to the Windows disk. Since I do game (Rocksmith), I am somewhat limited in my options; Microsoft, Apple, or Sony. At least as far as gaming is concerned.

    I am right on the cusp of playing guitar without using the Windows partition but I still pop in now and then.

    On the plus side, the flakiness of Firefox in Windows 10 is about the same level of flakiness of Firefox in CentOS (the nVidia drivers in both places I imagine) so other than Rocksmith and Carmageddon, using one or the other just depends on which one I select on boot.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  71. Cure has become worse than disease by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    The only good reason to enable Windows updates was to receive security fixes. Now that Microsoft is pushing spying malware to machines the lesser of the two evils is to accept not receiving any updates.

  72. Re:Is there a downside to upgrading to 10? Yes by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    Logically, if you get tricked into downloading a thing, you are now an Original Equipment Manufacturer. This is simple, people, come on.

  73. KB3035583 by ewhac · · Score: 1

    I have KB3035583 uninstalled and hidden, which is the systray spammer and download tool for Win 10. As far as anyone knows, will this be enough to keep Win 10 from trying to sneak into my machine?

    1. Re:KB3035583 by Megane · · Score: 1

      In my limited experience, it will become un-hidden when they create a newer "version" of the KB3035583 update.

      The only way you can be completely sure is by turning off downloads completely.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  74. Re:Legal? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I still have two uses for Windows:
    1. Games. Yes, many of these can be played on Linux now, but the drivers are still shit, and take a performance hit universally over what you get on Windows.
    2. Windows Media Center. It's one of the few things Microsoft actually did well, so they had to kill it. Unfortunately, it's the only DVR software I can use with Time Warner, because Time Warner are asshats and abuse the shit out of the 'CopyOnce' CCI flag, so everything that legally can be encrypted, is.

    If there was a solution for #2 that didn't include some snarky "just stop watching TV" horseshit, I'd live with the performance gap of #1 just to be done with Microsoft.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  75. It's the cable co's comcast is the most evil one by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    It's the cable co's comcast is the most evil one.

    They have high rent fees that are about $9-$15+ for each box.

    Cable cards can cost $6-$10 outlet -$2.50 for using your own hardware + $1.50-$2.50 card rent.

    They turned off CLEAR QAM when other still have it on.

    also the poorest HD line up. overbuilds and small systems have more HD.

  76. Re:Legal? by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    By the time a case makes it to court, the damage is done. Your computer is "upgraded", Windows telemetry knows everything that is on your machine, and all your secrets are public. Not to mention, that half of your software no longer works, because of compatibility issues.

    It gets harder and harder for me to understand why so many people stay on Microsoft operating systems.

    No. This change is resuming the push of the OS to your system. Approximately 3 GB. It *does not* automatically execute the update.

  77. Re:Let's be clear by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    You're mistaken. My coworker came back from the weekend (this was in September I think) and found her Windows 7 Pro machine to have Windows 10 on it.

    Why did your company not install the Windows 10 blocker? We pushed this to every machine, 125k end user pc's before the upgrades started happening. Also most Business PC's are not eligible for the upgrade per your corporate licensing so these companies should be taking action to prevent the upgrades.

  78. Re:Let's be clear by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    Right, somebody broke into our locked office building just to maliciously update our OSes? It happened on her computer because her updates were set to "Install updated automatically (recommended)". Perhaps your settings are different. But lots of users have reported Windows 10 installing without any user interaction whatsoever.

    The more likely story is this. User thought it would be cool to upgrade and after it was complete realized many of your internal applications didn't run with the latest IE or web browser. So instead of admitting it they claim it automatically upgraded. 17 years in IT says they lied.

  79. Re:Legal? by Whatanut · · Score: 1

    Incorrect. You absolutley have made assumptions. Starting with the idea that the computer with windows was factory installed.

    Again, quite possibly a correct assumption.

    You're complete disregard of the rest of my post is pointless. The fact is, linux can be be a bitch and is not suited for everyone. Period.

    --

    yvan eht nioj
  80. Re:Let's be clear by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    "Your" experience is second hand, and appears to be someone playing a practical joke upon a co-worker. The "reports of several people" seems dubious too.

    I have my own direct experience of how the install works, I've done it twice. Given actual, first hand, experience of three machines - two installed, one not - given the fact millions of people would be protesting if there had ever been a period whereby Windows 10 "installed itself" without bringing up a single cancellable dialog, and given the severe legal situation Microsoft would be in if it ever tried to pull this stunt, I would seriously advice you to locate the practical joker in your office.

    Oh, like the severe legal situation Microsoft would be in if they downloaded 12 GB (or however much it is) without asking the user? Or sending their personal information to 100+ domains without the ability to turn it off? Yeah, they admitted they were doing this and that too. But keep telling yourself that there is a ghost that is floating to peoples' computers and maliciously installing operating systems on them. Microsoft already apologized two months ago for doing what you're denying is occurring.

    3GB.

  81. Re:Let's be clear by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    Like the sibling, I would go with "Someone did this for them". The installation process asks questions throughout the install, before, during, and after. You cannot proceed with the install without answering the questions.

    Absolutely. I found one of the neighbors in my house, who got past the security systems, deduced my passphrase, booted my computer and installed Windows 10.

    Sounds legit!

    So shill, why are you calling all of these people liars?

    People fib all the time once they realize they made a poor decision. Maybe they were drunk? Not paying attention. How do you think Malware walks by people so easily? You're really giving people more credit than they deserve.

  82. Re:Let's be clear by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    So do this:
    1. Reschedule for "later"
    2. Delete the C:\$Windows.~BT folder and all of it's contents
    3. Create a file at C:\$Windows.~BT so that the automatic downloader cannot create the directory to download that shit into. It will error and die.
    4. Continue using your legacy version of Windows.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  83. Re:APK APK APK by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    You have to block the domains at the router, and the IPs at the router I think too.

  84. Microsoft App Store by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Only problem is that there are hardly any apps in the store. Or let me put it another way - most of the apps you find there are apps very specific to other countries, like Brazil or India or something else. As an example, on iOS or Android, if I download the Olive Garden app, I can make a to-go order from the Olive Garden nearest me. If I download the one on the Windows Store, I get something in Portugese that would work well if I were Brazilian. Nothing against Brazil, but Microsoft's app store hardly has what I need.

    Aside from a laptop, I have a Winbook, which I'd like to use w/ apps that I don't always use w/ my phone. Things like Yelp! or Fandango. Now, those 2 are available on Windows Phone 8.1, as well as Windows 10 Mobile, but if I search for them on my Winbook, I'm told that they're not compatible w/ that device (since the originals are ARM and that device is an x86). Defeats the purpose of having a Windows tablet that does anything other than what current Wintel laptops do. And speaking of Windows 10 Mobile, most of the apps that are there on iOS or Android - like Vonage, RetailMeNot, Lyft, et al are just not there on the Windows Store. Which is a pity. Most of the apps in the MS store are mediocre apps in and off themselves, many written abroad and hardly vetted by Microsoft.

    The only reason Windows 10 is useful at all is that one can in the traditional way either install legacy Wintel software from CDs/DVDs or download them from websites - something that's not always an option w/ either OS X or iOS or Android or ChromeOS. In other words, no advantage over Windows 7. The UI is an advantage over Windows 8.x in that it doesn't kick open your desktop when it's not needed.

    1. Re:Microsoft App Store by Akili · · Score: 1

      Oh, I won't deny that. They're having the same app shortage with their mobile platform, too.

      But Microsoft is good about not being realistic with some of their approaches. They saw the popularity of the iPod and iTunes and created the Zune, now defunct. They see Apple's app store and they want that money, too. Giving away Windows 10 for free allows them to set that foundation. Because not only is it free - as this very article states, they're actively trying to push it on everyone. That's rather novel behavior for them. We have to fight to not install this update. Apple's made OS X updates for free, but never with this kind of forced-upgrade pressure.

      Microsoft's motivations always come down to money via market dominance. Given that Windows and Office are (generally speaking) their prime sources of income, when they decide to give away a full update of Windows for free... then there's another way they intend to recover that money. The app store, sparse though it may be right now, is the most reasonable conclusion I've been able to draw. After all, if their app store suddenly fills up with apps but the majority of their users are on Windows 7, that's a lot of lost sales.

      Get the App store on everyone's system first, and that's a major obstacle overcome. Unlike the present vicious-circle failure of trying to push a new mobile ecosystem, there's a huge and entrenched Windows market already. Now they can promise app developers all of these extra eyeballs via Windows 10.

  85. Re:Legal? by stooo · · Score: 1

    >>The reason for wifi problems in Linux was due to there being no open source drivers for so many wireless chips.
    Your statistics seem to be old, or broken.
    On the approx 30 random laptops I installed linux in the last 3 years, all of them had working Wifi, out of the box.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  86. Re:Legal? by tepples · · Score: 1

    For the other 99% of the population Linux is awesome, if installed and configured by a competent Linux professional.

    How would one go about finding a local GNU/Linux professional? Are Linux user groups still a thing in the fourth quarter of 2015?

    Most people who "need" photoshop don't really need it. They just don't want to deal with the learning curve for a new tool, such as The GIMP.

    Or, just as likely, they don't want to deal with retraining their entire team from Photoshop to GIMP so that they can collaborate in XCF instead of PSD. Besides, GIMP reportedly won't get adjustment layers any time before 3.2. (In Photoshop, an adjustment layer is a layer that makes a copy of what's below it, applies a filter, and automatically updates itself whenever anything below the layer changes.)

  87. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  88. Re: Is this actually legal? Piece meal removal of by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

    Funny how those "pushing" for change are rarely the ones PAYING for the change. How much would it cost to switch from generic PCs to Macs? Even with Apple's "get them hooked early" education discounts, that has to be an expensive switch.

    Besides, children are children. They just want what is cool and shiny, not what's best for the task at hand.

  89. Re:Legal? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Wrong context. I'm talking about the reasons why ones that are broken are broken, completely disregarding all the working chips. Which is why I used past tense, because it's mostly a solved problem anyway.

  90. Re:Legal? by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

    Your post is an excellent example of why linux never got the market share it really should have. Instead of attempting to fix the problem (or hell, even just expressing sympathy), you attack the person talking about the problem and go so far as to call them a troll. Video and wifi are notorious for not working out of the box on various linux distros (yes, we know it's the hardware vendors fault in a lot of cases), there's no harm in acknowledging it. By insulting the people who encounter these kinds of issues, you drive away a lot of potential users and reinforce the perception that these issues aren't going to be fixed anytime in the near future.

  91. Re:Let's be clear by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Who do you work for? Apple? Google?

    Myself.

    I've done seven machines now, and Microsoft has been doing everything automatically with no input from me despite my settings. All Windows 10 Professional. An 8th is a Mac with Windows 7 in Bootcamp that I have to fight with them to keep it from installing and updating because it's a mid 2011 model, and will need a lot of experimenting to see if it will work because Apple doesn't support W10 in bootcamp that far back. So call me a liar. Makes not one bit of difference to what I and others have been experiencing.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  92. Re:Can't use Win10 by stooo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps by giving you a reason to try your software on Wine.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  93. We need WINE so we can stop the winning by cryingpoet · · Score: 1

    I cannot help but think that if WINE (Wine Is Not an Emulator) fully supported Microsoft Office that many people could switch to their Linux flavor of choice and be done with it. Many games run under WINE already so I think support for Office is what we are really waiting for. How much funding would it take to get full support for two Office version to WORK?

    I know LibreOffice and AbiWord are comparable alternatives, but a Pinto and a Lambogini Diablo are comparable. Both are cars with four wheels, but they do not quite measure up. How much funding would it take to make LibreOffice measure up?

    1. Re:We need WINE so we can stop the winning by cryingpoet · · Score: 1

      I meant whining not winning

  94. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    NDIS Wrapper hasn't been required for years, so it is already clear that you are doing it wrong. The fact that there are no Open Source drivers is a complete non-issue, as all the major cards have drivers provided by the manufacturer. If you knew what you were doing you would have copied the firmware for your card to /lib/firmware and told Linux to use it. Go ahead. Name the card you claim requires NDIS Wrapper, and I'll show you the instructions for configuring it properly.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  95. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    What a nut.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  96. Re:Legal? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    You're the one who said

    thus the WiFi and video "problems"

    What wifi problems is anyone having now that this is all over? You claimed it required an expert, but that was the only time that was ever true.

  97. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "That's kind of the point. Until it can be installed by Joe Blow off the street without having the work through 10+ shitty online guides, most of which don't work, it's not ready for prime time"

    So you are saying Windows isn't ready for prime time then? Because I can assure you that Joe Blow won't be any more successful configuring a stock Windows install properly. Also, it seems it will surprise you to know, Joe Blow can't rebuild an engine or create hybrid strains of various vegetable items.

    " As others pointed out, the WiFi driver in particular was the nail in the coffin. It's simply not supported, "

    Please, pray tell us, what card is this. Please boot a live Linux DVD and show us the output of lspci (Google it if you don't know what lspci is)

    " I'm partly on your side, here. I'd love to ditch MS, but the alternatives don't work for me."

    It is a shame we didn't meet in person, as you sound sincere, and I would love to prove to you that the issues you are having are all solvable by an experienced Linux professional (starting with picking the best distribution to use), which brings up another question ... which distribution and version did you try (please tell me it wasn't / let me guess it was / Ubuntu)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  98. Re: Is this actually legal? Piece meal removal of by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Generic PC's are perfectly suitable for running Linux and BSD. Basically, same price as the Windows PC's commonly available on the market, minus the Microsoft tax.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  99. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "How would one go about finding a local GNU/Linux professional? Are Linux user groups still a thing in the fourth quarter of 2015?"

    How would you find a doctor? I mean, there aren't any Doctor User's Groups in 2015 are there?

    Actually, your chances are much higher than finding a qualified Windows professional. Everybody's brother-in-law, nephew and aunt is a Windows "expert" and the percentage of people who claim to be experts that are not is much higher with Windows. Don't get me wrong. They really think "try rebooting" and "re-install Windows if that doesn't work" are the correct two steps to solving any Windows issue. They are sincerely ignorant. They're the Geek Squad! .

    I'm sure you aren't going to do it (and I don't blame you), if you posted the city in which you lived I bet I could ferret one out for you. I'd even call him and quiz him to make sure he knew his stuff before replying back with the contact info for the guy (or gal.)

    "Or, just as likely, they don't want to deal with retraining their entire team from Photoshop to GIMP"

    How could you possibly not realize I already said that? Pay attention to the word they in They don't want to ... That words indicates a single person, or an entire team. Of course, it isn't much more costly to train an OMG Entire TEAM!!!! than it is to train an individual. Indeed, there can be a win in that more people working together helps everyone discover tricks, etc. faster.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  100. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "You assume he didn't build the PC from parts and throw a bog-standard (though possibly OEM-licensed) generic Windows installation on it."

    No. I was able to properly infer that. It has been confirmed by the OP. Of course, iot is pretty clear that you are a troll, too, with statements like this:

    I still find Windows to be a much more capable system for nearly everything that needs a user interface, which is most things."

    The UI is so configurable in Linux that people usually think I have a mac, then they see it is a Lenovo and they just stand their scratching their head going WTF??? If your Linux system doesn't look and function far, far better than a Windows machine you're doing it wrong. Fucking Metro and no Start Menu is better than KDE with Multiple Desktops and 3D effects properly configured? You are either a troll, or just woefully under-informed (I'd use the "i" word, but people don't know that it means essentially the same thing and tend to automatically click on "Flamebait" or "Troll" in true true Pavlovian fashion - never mind that "Flamebait" and "Troll" aren't synonyms)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  101. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
    I didn't attack anyone. You need to grow as pair of testicles.

    " Instead of attempting to fix the problem"

    How do I fix an anecdote? Whatever problems the guy created for himself, he has long since gone back to Windows per his anecdote, so what would I fix? Actually though, if you look more closely at this thread, you will see that I have offered to do exactly that for anyone who will provide the information necessary to do so, so I guess there goes your argument on that front.

    "Video and wifi are notorious for not working out of the box on various linux distros (yes, we know it's the hardware vendors fault in a lot of cases), there's no harm in acknowledging it."

    I don't know what distribution you are using, but every one I have used for the last several years has had support if you know what you are doing. A lot of distributions require to enable a "non-free" repository, but this is very basic Linux knowledge. I would say anyone who can't get a WiFi card working by properly configuring their system post-install isn't qualified to install and configure a Linux system any more than they were qualified to install and configure a Windows system the first time they got their hands on one.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  102. When you see that dreaded systray icon... by shihonage · · Score: 1

    ... go to Task Manager, find its filesystem location. Terminate running process. Remove all permissions from .exe in the filesystem.

    It's the only way to be sure.

  103. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
    Are you intentionally being an idiot? Would you care to post something that doesn't appear to be composed by a drunk person?

    "What wifi problems is anyone having now that this is all over? You claimed it required an expert, but that was the only time that was ever true."

    That doesn't actually make any sense. I didn't "claim" anything. I stated facts. You can easily verify them with a new software tool that I predict everyone will be using some day.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  104. Re:Legal? by tepples · · Score: 1

    How would you find a doctor?

    Finding a doctor is something that someone in your family is more likely to know how to do than finding someone to help your organization throw Windows out the window.

    if you posted the city in which you lived I bet I could ferret one out for you.

    I'm not interested in you doing the work for me in the Fort Wayne, Indiana, area in particular, as much as documenting the process of finding a Linux professional so that others reading this can repeat the process in their own cities.

    Pay attention to the word they

    I misread they (plural) as its homophone they (animate genderless singular). I apologize. My point was that if one person on a graphic design team needs Photoshop, everyone probably does for file format round tripping reasons.

  105. Debian Popcon by tepples · · Score: 1

    And I'd bet Mint got a big boost from Amazongate.

    In any case, Debian and its descendants (including Ubuntu and Mint) optionally collect telemetry through popularity-contest, ostensibly to help their maintainers prioritize resources. What's the difference between Popcon and Windows 10 telemetry?

    1. Re:Debian Popcon by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Source of popcon can be examined - and for those unwilling/unable to do so, popcon is documented in much more detail than Microsoft's telemetry business. The ability to view decrypted communication before it is sent to mothership adds to the credibility of popcon.

      Not to mention popcon can be very easily disabled.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  106. Re:Legal? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

    It gets harder and harder for me to understand why so many people stay on Microsoft operating systems.

    That's cause you are an irrational zealot. You try to spread FUD about compatibility issues and Windows in general.

    Take a Linux executable from 10 years ago from any distro any see how well it runs on a current release of Ubuntu. Now do the same with a Windows 95 executable. I bet only one of them will run correctly.

    I'm going to be accused of being a shill or something, but it's amazing t me to see people on Slashdot spreading FUD, no matter the topic. For shame.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  107. Re:Legal? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

    Go back to claiming to be a software engineer, you damn troll. No one cares what you think.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  108. Re: Legal? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    A professional installed and configured a customized version of Windows on your system...and an amateur tried to installed and configure Linux, and not surprisingly was unsuccessful

    This is you claiming. It's unlikely the main reason for the lack of success was not being an expert (even if an expert may be able to overcome some problems).

  109. Windows 10 marketing strategy. and then... by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

    Users: I'd like Windows 7.

    Microsoft: and then...?

    Uers: Just Windows 7.

    Microsoft: and then...?

    Users: no and then!

    Microsoft: and then...?

  110. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    So the process is you post your location to Slashdot, and maybe someone knows the answer. You have heard of the site Slashdot, right. Would you like my help finding one in Fort Wayne, Indiana? There is no getting around it. You can pick a "Linux Doctor" in your area the way most people do; i.e. either you find one in your area and assume he is probably competent, then try him out and if he isn't, then you look for another one, or you ask around for recommendations. Obviously, YMMV on the second one. Lots of newspapers have sections where you can ask for such recommendations. You simply need to be resourceful. Unless of course you are a Linux expert, in which case you can call them and test their skill level, which is what I am offering to do. Yes tepples. For you. I am willing to do that for you. Why? Because I'm a magnanimous individual bursting with altruism and pro-Linux fervor! ;-)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  111. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    ROTFLMAO. This from a guy who thinks late-binding is what he gets when his Dominatrix is behind schedule.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  112. Re: Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    That is completely contradictory. This is your argument phrased in a way that hopefully makes it more clear to you why you are an idiot. "An Expert could have solved the problems, and he couldn't solve the problems, but the main reason he couldn't was not an inability! How dare you say being an expert has anything to do with it? Just because an expert could get it to work easily and he couldn't do it at all! The nerve of some people forming such an absurd conclusion!" Yeah. Way to go.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  113. Re: Legal? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    However you phrased whatever that was makes no sense. In fact, if I were to rate it on a scale, it would get an absolute zero.

  114. Re: Legal? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    P.S. ability != expert

  115. Re: Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "P.S. ability != expert"

    This is why you are so confused. You simply lack basic logical facilities. I mean, if you did you would know that ability is certainly a subset of expert. I mean, wouldn't you agree that not everyone with ability is an expert, but every expert has ability? Maybe you are not a software developer? That would explain why you didn't know that there are other relationships besides ==.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  116. Merry Christmas! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    Who says Microsoft doesn't give away stuff?

    You know, in the past year I've done a few Linux installs and the (non-techie) users are happier with the alternative.

    Maybe 2016 will be the year of the Linux Desktop.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Merry Christmas! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, between the new gnome and wayland there are plenty of efforts to make sure that 2016 is not going to be the year of the linux desktop. If you install a distro from 2013 on the other hand it will just work.

    2. Re:Merry Christmas! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      I hear you there, as much as MS is shooting themselves in the foot seems like a lot of Linux distros have been doing the same thing.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  117. Re:Legal? by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

    I didn't attack anyone. You need to grow as pair of testicles.

    Not only is that sentence by itself self-contradictory, but it's completely untrue. You implied he's dumb because certain hardware didn't work on linux (in reality this is the fault of the manufacturer and/or the linux community), and called him a troll for daring to say something truthful but negative about your OS.

  118. It's time by frrubi · · Score: 1

    I recently switched to Linux, and I couldn't be happier. I'm no computer guru, quite the contrary actually, so I chose Linuxmint. In any event, they've made Linux so user friendly and easy to utilize that I really can't see why everyone can't make the switch.

  119. Automatic Install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had it download automatically to my C:\ root. It then started popups asking if I wanted to install now or later. These popups stole focus and minimized everything else. Some apps do not want to minimize. In the interest of my work apps not crashing when force minimized, I clicked later. It immediately started installing. I rebooted. I tried a few times to get around this. Regardless of whether I click now or later, it starts installing immediately.

  120. Global Mother Fucking Spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/08/microsoft-has-no-plans-to-tell-us-whats-in-windows-patches/
    http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/09/leaks-show-that-microsoft-writes-release-notes-so-why-cant-it-publish-them/

    https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.html
    http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again-3569376/
    http://www.networkworld.com/article/2956574/microsoft-subnet/windows-10-privacy-spyware-settings-user-agreement.html

    http://www.technobuffalo.com/2013/08/22/nsa-windows-8-exploit/
    http://www.technobuffalo.com/2013/07/11/microsoft-gave-the-nsa-direct-backdoor-access-to-outlook-skype/
    http://winsupersite.com/windows-10/how-stop-windows-10-upgrade-downloading-your-system
    http://www.extremetech.com/computing/195592-with-windows-10-microsoft-could-move-to-a-subscription-based-model
    http://www.extremetech.com/computing/205320-microsoft-windows-10-will-be-the-last-version-of-windows
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GU5uv28a3I
    http://techrights.org/2015/07/31/vista-10-anticompetitive/
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwRYyWn7BEo
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gghj03J_ri0
    http://localghost.org/posts/a-traffic-analysis-of-windows-10
    http://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/28/microsoft-intensifies-data-collection-on-windows-7-and-8-systems/

    THESE
    https://gitlab.com/windowslies/blockwindows
    ^(have to un-comment the #'s on two url's in the hosts file per latest change) LOOK, NOTICE THIS
    https://senk9.wordpress.com/checklists/windows-10-privacy-checklist/
    ^Applies to 7/8/8.1 too.

  121. Deepthroat Windows10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How is Microsoft going to make bold claims of mass adoption if they don't force it down your throat?

  122. Re:It's time by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem isn't the OS, but the software on the OS. LibreOffice may not be fully compatible with MS Office docs or spreadsheets, and gnucash isn't Quicken.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  123. Re:APK APK APK by allo · · Score: 1

    And you'll never be sure to catch all, when a sneaky update brings new spy urls.

  124. I wants Windows 10, but can't install it by Ryan+McLaughlin · · Score: 1

    I actually want Windows 10, and have tried to install it several times, but when the installer boots it says the resolution of my monitor (1280 x 1024) is not supported. Microsoft, please fix this so I can use your software.

    1. Re:I wants Windows 10, but can't install it by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The latest update - that allows me more tiles on a screen - doesn't install on my Winbook. Hope this is addressed as well

  125. Re:Let's be clear by Painted · · Score: 1

    Whoa, everybody, we've got a badass over here, he's installed windows 10 TWICE. Therefore he is clearly an expert on all things Windows 10, and anything you say that differs from him clearly shows YOU are wrong.

    --
    http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
  126. Re:Legal? by solidraven · · Score: 1

    Actually a lot of software is windows only if you want it to truly work. I'm a heavy user of CAD software (electronics mixed with mechanics), I need cisco VPN and Citrix to work together smoothly, and our toolchains consist out of programs written (badly) by vendors who often have no competition at all. So support is non-existent to sum it up shortly. Then you have artwork conversion for manufacturing which is a nightmare in its own right. ( Not to mention some equipment still runs NT 4 which can be very picky about file systems.) Migrating to Windows 10 would be a nightmare, but Linux would be impossible. And even if I could get it to work in WINE the graphics support in Linux is so sketchy that the performance would make it useless. I can already get a Windows server on its knees with AutoCAD and Altium, what do you think would happen if I were to run it through WINE? And I hardly think I'm a lonely case. Additionally the hardware compatibility beyond Windows 7 and in Linux is a disaster, Imagine accessing a GBIP bus or PLC card on Windows 10 or in Linux. The humorous statement "the computer says no" comes to mind.

  127. Re:Legal? by solidraven · · Score: 1

    Not to mention a toddler could design a better UI than the GIMP team... For being graphics editing software it sure could use a touch of a graphics designer in that department. Then again it is a GNU related project I suppose, which goes a long way explaining why its a piece of condensed misery that doesn't support things the competitors have for 10+ years.

  128. Home-built PCs immune to Win10 upgrade by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

    My PC is one that I installed a legal copy of Windows 7 Professional myself. It has no system reserved position, apparently. So the Win 10 upgrader looks for the system reserved partition it expected to find on a store-bought preload, doesn't find it and informs me that my system can't be updated. Fine! But please stop offering the upgrade then. You already know you can't do it. I wonder if I bought a box of Win10 if it would upgrade. Probably not. We had a house fire and my Win7 DVD was damaged. I have it, but it probably isn't readable.

    --
    Only boring people are ever bored.
  129. OSX has a great track record by fibrewire · · Score: 1

    Never in the history of OSX did the operating system break compatibility with all of its existing software intentionally. In fact, when Apple shifted to a different x86 cpu, they provided tools which let someone run software from A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURE TO MAINTAIN COMPATIBILITY. Last time I checked, Microsoft has never done anything like this, as their business model has been "Buy all new stuff so we can fuck you out of it in two to three years"

    1. Re:OSX has a great track record by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has "compatibility mode" but it's not perfect and neither was Rosetta.

  130. Re:Lookee what I found on my PC by rl117 · · Score: 1

    I've seen this too, it's definitely fishy and underhanded. The crazy thing about all this is that its main effect is to destroy my already limited trust in Microsoft. Before I at least trusted that, even if occasionally broken, the updates were at least generally beneficial and I had recommended updates installed automatically. I no longer have any trust that my machine is my own and that I'll be able to continue to use it. I already had to manually clean up and hide all the updates which trigger upgrades; what a waste of my time. And who knows how long it will last. I don't want to have to research and vet every update.

    The other crazy thing is that if they hadn't forced the telemetry, cortana, and forced updates, I'd have been perfectly happy to upgrade to Windows 10 months ago. Merely having clear and obvious options to fully disable them all would have been sufficient. And some real transparency over what's really being collected. It's just too much to accept. There's no way they have any business collecting this information--I simply won't be allowing it.

    So an own goal for MS here. As it is, as I type this I'm installing Windows 7 in a VM, where it can live safely off the net, and be snapshotted and backed up, and exist indefinitely whatever MS may do in the future. Daft that it's come to this, but it's entirely self-inflicted. Strange that they seemingly want to kill of any serious use of their stuff.

  131. Re:Let's be clear by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    "simply impossible" is a very strong phrase, and telling people what must have happened on that basis is iffy at best. Calling people liars because of your religious beliefs about Microsoft software is simply wrong.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  132. Re:Download now, install later! (next 5 days) by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    When something really unexpected happens on my computer, I freeze. I don't touch anything. Then I look at what's happened and try to figure out a good solution.

    Good habit to get into.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  133. i'm still waiting.... by xuvetyn · · Score: 1

    for a notification to "upgrade" either of my 2 machines.

    --
    alive to the universe, dead to the world
  134. Re:Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    No. You don't seem to understand. Said hardware works fine "on" Linux. I don't know of a single major NIC that isn't supported by Linux. Can you name one? I didn't think so. Apology accepted.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  135. Re: Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    That's fine. I give your humour a -273.15

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  136. Re: Legal? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Still awaiting a response on this one, subchad

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  137. Re:Lega by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    > Sorry to nit pick but those are consoles not gp computers

    Well, none of them can run a simple bash script, so they are all roughly equal in functionality. And the only reason anyone stays with Windows is because of the games, right? I mean, come on- you can't seriously expect Windows to do the work of a Linux distro, right? Windows is a toy OS that runs some games, like the Wii U and the PS4 dashboards.

  138. Re:Legal? by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

    Just how oblivious are you? Some zero-effort googling shows a chipset on a lenovo that wasn't supported: http://www.linux.org/threads/t...
    And a good number of common wireless cards (broadcom specifically?) are "supported" but usually require a weekend of wading through various forum posts and how-to guides of dubious quality in order to get the thing to cooperate.

    I've yet to install linux on a laptop that didn't have issues with either the wireless and/or the wired ethernet that required jumping through quite a few hoops to make work.