Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Cancels Stewart Alsop's Tesla Order Over Complaints About Launch Event

New submitter umafuckit writes: Blogger Stewart Alsop wrote an open letter to Elon Musk following a supposedly badly run launch event for the Model X. Alsop complained that the event started almost 2 hours late and was unable to test drive the car (for which has put down a deposit). In response, Musk cancelled Alsop's pre-order saying "Must be a slow news day if denying service to a super rude customer gets this much attention." Alsop, who is known not just for his prolific blogging but for his role as a founding partner at VC firm Alsop Louie Partners, compares his treatment by Tesla to that of BMW, about which he's also said some unflattering things as a customer.

339 comments

  1. Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Poetic justice.

    1. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by azav · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. It looks like a dick move on Elon's part. I like Elon, but it looks like Stewart was in the right here and Elon's looking kind of petty, making an overly harsh personal response instead of addressing the issue with the man like a decent human.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    2. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stewart lead with an "overly harsh personal response" and was met with a prompt ending of a business relationship. He equated this with BMW not asking for the car back, but then, he was already their customer. Elon headed him off at the pass and cut this "potential" nightmare customer off from the beginning. Selling him the car would only have opened the floodgates of whining.

    3. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It may or may not be a dick move, but this guy Alsop is a pretentious, whiny douche, so let's just call it karma.

    4. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Racemaniac · · Score: 5, Informative

      I read his post, and i don't see how it's overly harsh... if i went to some hyped up introduction of a new car, and it starts nearly 2 hours late, and i'm number 1300+ in line for mere 5 cars to have a "testdrive" in it... that's ridiculous >_.

    5. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by fourthrail16309 · · Score: 1

      100%

    6. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 2

      Apparently bio-defense mode can't protect you from "affluenza"... so good on Elon for shutting him down.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    7. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alsop complained that the event was unable to test drive the car for which has put down a deposit? Che?

    8. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I read Stewart's blog post and it really didn't sound like he did anything wrong. It sounds like Tesla fucked up the event and Elon is too full of himself to admit it, so he childishly cancelled the order.

    9. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by jcr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Is that you, Elon? Just want to let you know that you've made a complete ass of yourself.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    10. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ever been to Disneyland on a holiday? If so, did you "rage quit" the place when you weren't first in line to ride your favorite ride the one time that day, and didn't want to wait 2+ hrs to get on it, and then demand to get your ticket price refunded back to you?

    11. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stewart lead with an "overly harsh personal response" and was met with a prompt ending of a business relationship.

      I'd be inclined to agree with Racemaniac that it didn't come across as overly harsh. Nor did I consider it overly personal.

      Was this the whining of an entitled rich guy? Perhaps a little- I won't entirely dismiss the possibility, but I'm not entirely convinced; it was undeniably critical, but he still obviously had enthusiasm for the product.

      But regardless- and correct me if I've misunderstood your intent here- your response comes over as a variant of the "people exercising their rights in a free market == no right to criticism".

      Musk is- of course- entitled to cancel this guy's order (i.e. end the business "relationship") for pretty much any reason not prohibited by law, but that doesn't excuse him from being criticised for doing so, especially if it appears petty to some.

      In all honesty, Musk comes across as no better than, (and just as entitled as), the guy making the complaint. He knows he can afford to be dismissive of a few of his rich customers for somewhat petty reasons if they say something that stings him personally, even if it's somewhat justified. He's got a product with a lot of buzz surrounding it, for which there's likely to be more demand than availability in the foreseeable future.

      The fact that Musk can get away with being dismissive and petty doesn't change the fact he's being dismissive and petty, though!

      He doesn't strike me as "one of us but with more power" telling a spoilt rich customer where to go (to the cheering of the crowds enjoying their vicarious revenge.) Rather, he comes across as someone stung by (not entirely warranted) criticism, prickly enough to take it even more personally than it was and in a position where he didn't have to take that sort of crap from some uppity customer, then dismiss it with mild contempt not-really-masquerading as feigned disinterest.

      (Disclaimer; if anyone is going to take this as a defence of entitled rich tossers, you don't know me very well. I'm just not buying that the customer was quite as bad as he's made out nor that Musk is any better.)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If Justice, it would be direct normal justice.

      Poetic justice is where the persons own actions come back to harm them in an unexpected way, that would not have been Just if it had happened intentionally, but was totally their own fault. It also generally requires the lack of direct justice.

      In this case there is none of that. At all. There is cause, and direct effect.

      Assholes of the world need to be prepared for when they encounter another asshole. If you said mean shit about him, or complained about his product, he might refuse to sell it to you. Your money just might not spend the same. If you want to be an asshole to somebody, buy you covet their product, make sure that you're an important customer and that the other guy is more greedy than asshole. If you're just a regular customer, with a larger platform to be an ass, and he's also an ass, he's going to take that battle and win it. On your chosen terms. No more name-brand cheesypoofs for you, sucker.

      As a consumer my thinking is, if you don't like it, don't covet it. And if your time was important, you wouldn't be hanging out at a product launch event and complaining that you had to schmooze for 2 hours before the event started; you'd have had something better to do even if it had started on time. People who are into that stuff sleep outdoors in single file waiting to get in, if it is an interesting enough product. I'd understand being upset about a 2 hour delay if the event was "lunch, today." But a product launch?! Newsflash, that is not a serious event with a strict time schedule. Most of the people there are at work, and most of them are doing that event for their whole workday. So unless it ran late, nobody should care. I think this guy was in the same boat, but he likes to cheat and leave early because he typed out n words already. So he was mad his all-day assignment took the same amount of "all day" that it took for everybody else.

      And no test drive? Dude, there is a waiting list for this product, and you were on the waiting list. Stop pretending you're special. You're not. Now you know. I'll bet all the "regular Joe" rich guys on the waiting list are really happy to see that; needy journalists don't need to be in front of them in line. Bad PR to the 99%, perhaps, but what percent of them are on the Tesla waiting list? Good PR to rich guys who are quietly letting their money sit in line for them.

    13. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Alsop played the press trump card; he was in tech media when most readers here were in diapers. And while Alsop's Real Soon Now tag line to empty vendor promises was nice, there is a species of human that uses their seeming bully pulpit to get stuff, then castigate it for whatever fun that might lead to.

      Musk could have played along with this sort of ruse, or just flipped him off. So he flipped him off. Brinksmanship is a game the rich can play.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    14. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The most ridiculous part is to be one of 1300+ people in line for a carnival ride that seats 5 and also thinking you should be one of the people that gets to ride... combined with needy complaints about sticking to a schedule. If he likes schedules, he should instantly see that nobody on a schedule should even approach the ride line or expect to get a test drive.

      Why is he more deserving of a test drive? It seems to me that those who were willing to wait patiently for something they might not get to do are the ones who deserve doing it, if they get the lucky number or wait long enough.

    15. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Aighearach · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No grandpa, that was just an opossum. Nap time, take your meds.

      I'm not going to scroll up to see what you were replying to, but if you have to pretend that somebody is somebody else in order to dismiss whatever they said... you probably secretly agreed with them, but wanted to say something nasty anyways.

      What an ass.

    16. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Funny

      The most deserving ones are obviously those who showed up two weeks early and pitched a tent to be first in line. Also they're wearing their Elon Musk fan club tee-shirt and cosplay as a Tesla Model X at every event that will allow them in. And that includes the strip mall near their home in Dubuque, Iowa.

    17. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Ever been to Disneyland on a holiday? If so, did you "rage quit" the place when you weren't first in line to ride your favorite ride the one time that day, and didn't want to wait 2+ hrs to get on it, and then demand to get your ticket price refunded back to you?

      I'm willing to bet you would find a few Disney customers that pissed when you mandate a $5000 deposit be made before visiting the park.

      Let's stop trying to compare apples to watermelons now.

    18. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Dogtanian · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Musk could have played along with this sort of ruse, or just flipped him off. So he flipped him off. Brinksmanship is a game the rich can play.

      That was kind of my point, though. I just see another rich and powerful guy who took some not-entirely-unwarranted criticism very personally (#) and being in a rich and powerful enough position, took his petty revenge against another sort-of-but-nowhere-near-as-rich guy. I appreciate that it's sometimes nice to see the stereotypical "arrogant BMW driving tosser" get their comeuppance and that Musk's fan following might be inclined to see it that way, but I'm pretty sceptical.

      There's nothing to indicate that he was doing it for the reasons you gave nor protecting his employees from the customer from hell as others suggested.

      On the contrary, it sounds like he knew he had more than enough fawning customers to fill his order books such that he could get away with this- and I suspect the endless adulation may have made him less tolerant to any form of criticism. But that in itself doesn't make Alsop the entitled-customer-from-hell as some seem to think.

      (#) If the criticism was taken as personal, it was as much because Musk presents himself as the "face"- as well as the owner- of the company. I don't see that the criticism was excessively personal beyond that.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    19. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, I do believe in protecting my employees from actual abuse. If a customer actually abused someone who worked for me and there were no extenuating circumstances, I'd terminate the relationship if it were at all feasible. But criticism isn't the same is abuse. Expressing your unhappiness with service isn't abuse. Even though those things might make some people feel bad -- feel as if they were receiving abuse -- that doesn't makeit abuse.

      Abuse is by definition unreasonable and inexcusable.

      For many years I spent nearly half my time traveling, and needless to say I learned to take air travel itinerary mess-ups in stride. Missed my connecting flight? Well, put me on the next flight. No more flights there today? OK make sure the hotel you put me in is reasonable. Lost my luggage? Well when you find it here's where to send it. What I found hard to take were the reactions of my fellow passengers to bad news. I don't mean just reacting angrily to bad news, because that's understandable. I don't get angry because having been through this all before and I know it always works out OK in the end, but it's excusable for people who aren't so accustomed to air travel to react badly to bad news. What's not excusable is them reacting angrily then not backing down. There's nothing the person behind the counter can do to make the problem go away instantly, so no purpose can possibly be served by berating them. What's more your venting is delaying service to people who may need it more urgently than you do. That is abusive behavior.

      I have to say that this particular incident has definitely lowered my admiration for Musk and Tesla. A company has to be able to deal with criticism and unhappy customers. Everybody screws up some time, and if a company can't deal with an unhappy customer then it's not a company that anyone would be wise to do business with.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    20. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And yet, so did everyone else that was there, and they weren't doing the piss-and-moan. Why is this guy special and deserving of better treatment than everyone else?

      Fuck him and his entitlement complex.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    21. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by supremebob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be careful... he might buy Slashdot just to have your account suspended.

    22. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Alsop became a VC and entrepreneur after starting the DEMO conferences, which gave him early insight into what goes well, and not, in product development. He's not a king maker, but he understands how both kings are made-- and destroyed.

      Musk's deflection of Alsop's order didn't stanch Alsop's love, because Alsop's not in the love business. Instead, a wounded Alsop has made the flatulence well-known, long after the scent is dead, hence the bully pulpit citation.

      If you or I were to yelp/etc the crap out of the chosen Model ? it would make nary a difference. But Alsop's imprimatur on such a review would be one more battle for Musk, who currently is fighting many of them. Like I said: this is a game rich men play.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    23. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I can say that if I ever went to Disneyland and the lines were so long that the park closed before I could partake in any of their attractions, I'd be pretty pissed off. But then again, Disneyland also limits the maximum number of people allowed in the park at any one time to ensure this doesn't happen.

    24. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would lol.

    25. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Junta · · Score: 2

      He complained that the whole event started late, not that it started late just for him. He did rage quit at seeing his number to test drive, without bothering to find out how much *time* that would mean and just assumed the worst, so that part was silly. They might have 1 car or they might have had 1,000 for all he knew.

      Other than that, it was a pretty unreasonable entitled tone for a rant, but the concrete gripes didn't suggest he wanted a better event for *just* him, but that he thought poorly of the event in general. The two hour start delay seems like a valid gripe, though the other 90% of his griping seems very whiny subjective opinions culminating in him running off without knowing the time window and just making something else. But it didn't seem to be demanding preferential treatment.

      Note that this cancellation probably will just make him whine harder.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    26. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Elon Musk basically said, "No soup for you!" which is his right.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    27. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than just coming right out with the nasty, you unwashed loon.

    28. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Informative

      NO, because a Disney employee would have intervened before that happened. I have heard enough stories to know that Disney is the master of customer service.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    29. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Indeed, being the most deserving of some vapid frivolity is not a high aspiration.

      But what does that say about those who are offended at not having been treated as being even more deserving of said vapid frivolity?

      The good honest hayseed who camps out for 2 weeks using up 4 years of vacation time... good for them. I wouldn't want them to vacation in the same place as me anyways, it would get crowded. Freedom isn't only important for people doing something important. It reminds me of the song Graceland.

    30. Re: Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Which is what Musk did. Alsop could have waited the two hours, or rescheduled for another day. Shit happens. We're not talking about weeks (I'm STILL waiting for my replacement company car, 2 weeks after it was "shipped" to the dealer...... and it's a fucking dodge journey), we're taking about 2 hours. How many of the other 1300 customers are bitching so hard they aren't worth the trouble to sell to?

    31. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      hyped up introduction of a new car, and it starts nearly 2 hours late

      Hyped up? Like the difference between 30 minutes and two hours?

      Or maybe just some princess whining because he didn't make it to the top of a queue of 1300+ to be one of 5 able to test drive? But I'm a venture capitalist with an over-inflated ego - I should be first, my time is important!

    32. Re: Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my respect went up for the same reasons you indicate. Some douchebag decided he was pissed because a problem arose, and decided to publicly drop the hammer on Tesla. In response, Musk decided to sell to the next customer in line.

      Imagine just how giggly you'd be if Delta told your irate flyer to stand aside while they helped the polite customers (such as yourself). "Sir, please return to the back of the line after you've composed yourself."

      Fuck. Yeah. Respect.

    33. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      What's the common factor in this guy having trouble with BMW and Tesla?

      Maybe it's him.

      Or maybe car companies in general are just jerks.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    34. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between a legitimate sense of entitlement and a false sense of entitlement, and the adjective "entitled" is used for both. I would argue that Stewart has a false sense of entitlement for the things he feels he was denied, and Elon has a legitimate sense of entitlement to run his company the way he sees fit.

    35. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really. It looks like a dick move on Elon's part. I like Elon, but it looks like Stewart was in the right here and Elon's looking kind of petty, making an overly harsh personal response instead of addressing the issue with the man like a decent human.

      Actually Elon is looking good for doing this. A little bit of schadenfreude. The blogger looks like a complete idiot for:
      1. Thinking he's the king because he put down a 100% cancellable deposit.
      2. Thinking he's the king and writing to Elon Musk.
      3. Thinking anyone agrees with his silly little blog.

      Elon Musk (who I'm actually a bit critical of) did the right thing here and it is his prerogative as a business owner. I can sympathise here because when I ran a business, often it was smarter to throw out the whiny, complaining, arrogant customers because they would monopolise my time with their irrational complaints. You think this is no big deal, but in a small store with only one or two staff (including myself, the owner) one person taking up my time for no good reason means that customers, paying customers walk out the door for a very good reason (getting no service). So early on in my business career I learned that is was smarter to cut a toxic customer than to keep them. Sure they'd leave shouting "You've just lost a customer, you'll be out of business in a week" however in reality, I'd be making money by serving other customers and they'll be back in the very next week buying something else. Only 3 people received a permaban from my store, I'm a harsh businessman, but also a fair one.

      Elon is in the same boat. The number of people who want a Tesla far exceeds the number of people who pay attention to this guys blog. The guy was hoping to take advantage of the Streisand effect, but instead the Streisand effect turned on him and just got more positive press for Musk and Tesla. I take it you're the kind of person who's never run a business and believes that "the customer is always right". I can tell you've never run a business because you think that most customers are:
      a) right.
      b) decent human beings
      c) rational.
      You couldn't be more wrong on all counts. Customers are, by and large, irrational, arrogant, insufferable beings who are almost never right and if you disagree with this statement then chances are that you are one of those customers.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    36. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stewart lead with an "overly harsh personal response""

      Rubbish. The post was reasonable, and quite measured under the circumstances. If Elon Musk considers this a "super rude customer" he really has no idea and should avoid selling to the public. This was nothing more than yet another childish and petty response to mild criticism. There is no way Tesla will successfully move from selling limited numbers of expensive high end toys to mass market manufacturer without a serious attitude adjustment (or more likely, a layer of shielding established between Musk and the public). This action has made me wary about buying a Model 3, it doesn't bode well for after sales support. I think maybe it best to not take the chance and skip Tesla for now and wait for one of the more grown up manufacturers to release a competing product.

    37. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that there was 1300 people in line for 5 cars means...

      they don't need your whiny bitchy blogger money. piss off.

    38. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I owned the business ... I'd do it too.

    39. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Trogre · · Score: 1

      The good honest hayseed who camps out for 2 weeks using up 4 years of vacation time

      4.... years vacation time?

      Do you live in China?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    40. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ever been to Disneyland on a holiday? If so, did you "rage quit" the place when you weren't first in line to ride your favorite ride the one time that day,

      No. But then, I'm not Stewart Alsop. He's the ragequitting douche. Musk is Disneyland escorting him off the property because he's causing a scene.

    41. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Was it on an unedited blog? A "review" that is nothing but a rant about not being able to even use the item to be reviewed is a non-story that would normally not be published.

    42. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like Elon.

      You've obviously never lived and work in South Africa and actually gotten to know these people. You wouldn't like them so much. Truth be told, Elon isn't likeable. He just makes expensive electric cars that nerds think are cool. As a person... well, again.... South Africa.

    43. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What entitlement? He gave $5000, He went, they were two hours late, He left, He wrote. Elon cried and was an ass.

    44. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, everyone has the right to behave like an asshole, but it's questionable whether you should when you're running a business. Most businesses want to give the impression that they care about the customer and will take action address their concerns. This gives the impression that if customers have issues with their Telsa then Musk will simply tell them to fuck off.

    45. Re: Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only whining around here is when people find out that Elon Musk isn't the selfless, perfect God-like human being they worship constantly.

    46. Re: Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. This is not how to operate a business nor treat a customer.

    47. Re: Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are clearly USA vacation numbers.

    48. Re: Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'd love to take this opportunity to insult Elon Musk a little more, I'll go a different route here:

      The problem isn't Elon acting like a toddler in not handling someone not fawning all over him like people on Slashdot do. That part is merely amusing.

      The real problem is that Tesla is, for now, the cool company with the waiting list. That won't always be the case, and when companies like that fall even a little bit out of favor (which they always do) they fall much harder if they spent their time in the sun acting arrogantly and acting like people are lucky to be able to overpay them.

      The real problem here is that regular people who work for Tesla see this and they'll feel a little more entitled to be a little rude, a little arrogant, a little not so nice with a customer they don't like. Only it likely won't be as bad and certainly won't be as public as Musk's response. It will, however, poison the culture and make people think that's ok and it will be--until Tesla isn't the new cool kid with the best toys anymore. That's how companies rot.

      Bars and restaurants have a much shorter cycle of this than manufacturers so it's interesting to observe them. You see this behavior and the resulting failures all the time. It happens to longer cycle businesses too. A CEO should know better, but then companies where the CEO makes himself or herself the center of attention usually don't end well anyway.

    49. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      He should have been made to wait much longer. If you compare the size of a Tesla car with that of an iPhone and if you consider the lines of people forming in front of the Apple store and the waiting times involved every time a new model is released, well, he should've been made to wait in line a few weeks! Bad marketing! Baaaaaaaaaaad!

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    50. Re: Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by operator_error · · Score: 1

      Alsop didn't get to take home a Tesla X because he's not one of the cool kids. Jaden Smith is one of the cool kids and it looks like he took one away. http://m.tmz.com/#article/2016...

    51. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by SomeoneFromBelgium · · Score: 1

      Well, as one of those customers that rarely complains, I suppose I should be glad that a real loudmouth like Alsop isn't getting his way.

      Strangely, I'm not. It's not like I think Alsop is right. It's just that it seems to me that Elon's action is as much a knee jerk reaction as the original post of Alsop.

      I compare it to when you look at a movie where the hero is bullied by some guy, and you think: "I hope he kicks his stupid ass".
      If in the next scene he does exactly that, you are bound to think "ugh, that was uglier than I thought"

    52. Re: Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      This is the most succinct and on-point summary of the situation that anyone's posted yet...

    53. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      "Working class" Americans often get one week of vacation per year, starting the first calendar year after the first complete year. And most of those jobs are not lifelong jobs. Plus, many workers will have temporary status for their first year or so, which doesn't count towards vacation.

      It was more fact than hyperbole, though to be fair most of the people camping outside like that work mid-level office jobs and get two weeks of vacation a year, prorated from when they're officially hired which is usually three months after starting the job as a temporary worker.

      In China only 14% of workers took a paid vacation at all in the past three years, regardless of rules that purport to require five days per year.

      The US economy isn't stronger and more resilient than Europe's just because we have a pretty flag. We have the highest worker productivity in the world, and we don't even have the newest or most updated machinery. We just work harder, and more hours.

    54. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you're wrong Musk looks like a petty entitled douche, he's only getting a free-ride since he seems to have dug up Job's mouldering corpse to get his hands on the RDF

    55. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by DigMarx · · Score: 1

      We have the highest worker productivity in the world, and we don't even have the newest or most updated machinery. We just work harder, and more hours.

      Nope. Norway, Luxembourg and Ireland all have higher GDP/hour worked. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.as...

    56. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Holy crap you're serious! It's little wonder then why Americans are so dependent on coffee, antidepressants and psychologists. I don't see how anyone can maintain a healthy work/life balance with those sorts of demands unless their working day is very short or long weekends are the norm.

      Where I live all full time workers are entitled to four weeks annual leave, with some employers giving their staff a fifth week. Plus a certain number of days sick leave, but it's considered fraudulent to take those unless you're actually sick. Not unreasonable I think.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    57. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that, so no. Your statement has 0% possibility of refuting what I said. Try again. If you didn't even re-phrase it to pretend that it is the same thing as what I said, you won't even convince me that you understood what I said; much less that your insight is superior.

      Also, to change my opinion I warn you that you'll need to be using 30 year charts, not just 1 year where the accounting games gave certain countries inflated numbers that year. And I won't consider numbers that plot and scheme to include passive banking income as "worker productivity," because it isn't. Those profits aren't even "workers" in that phrase. Dollars are not workers, humans are workers.

      There are other countries you could make a case for being #1, but they aren't Norway, Luxembourg or Ireland.

    58. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It's little wonder then why Americans are so dependent on coffee, antidepressants and psychologists.

      No, that is your tee-vee. Also known as a "boob tube." Don't believe everything it tells you. Also, the anti-coffee nonsense has been consistently disproved by science for decades. Coffee is good for you, and it is not strongly addictive.

      The people who take a lot of anti-depressants are mostly the people whose private lives consist mostly of watching television. Without drugs, it would be an empty life. It has nothing at all to do with their work. If they work more hours, they will be happier, not the reverse.

      As for psychologists, that is more of a European thing. It isn't even easy to find one here. Few people go for that nonsense. Way more common here are traditional "counselors," who simply listen, and talk to somebody in a supportive way. Working class people can't afford counseling, and often wouldn't even have time off during the right hours to schedule it! 1 session would cost 2 days wages for the working class. That is about 2 hours for a middle class professional.

      I don't see how anyone can maintain a healthy work/life balance with those sorts of demands unless their working day is very short or long weekends are the norm.

      Where I live all full time workers are entitled to four weeks annual leave, with some employers giving their staff a fifth week. Plus a certain number of days sick leave, but it's considered fraudulent to take those unless you're actually sick. Not unreasonable I think.

      Right, you don't imagine workers who enjoy working hard. You can only imagine workers who just want to go home early, or stay home. Here we have workers for whom working hard is a moral issue; they agreed to be a laborer, and so be good at their position in life is to labor enthusiastically. You presume that to work harder or be more dedicated they must be less happy; what if they have increased sense of self, sense of place, because they are truly more dedicated to their toiling? Many of these workers keep working after they reach retirement age, and receive reduced pension payments because they're still working, but refuse to stop working even thought they're effectively throwing away half their wages; why? Because they enjoy working, they don't want to retire. They're already living the life they value, day after day.

      You find it shocking that they only get a tiny bit of paid vacation, but many of them refuse to take it. What would they do, sit in a chair all week and be bored? I've seen workers forced to take a 1 week vacation hang out in the break room at work for most of the week, because that is where they want to be! With their team, their comrades, at work.

      People who want a life/work balance don't work as laborers. But don't assume our laborers are their by mistake. The idea that workers would be more productive by being given a worse lot is funny; no, they're more productive because they believe in themselves, in their role in society. Extra time off is for people who don't believe in their role, and they'll never be the most productive even when they're doing a good job.

      Most of the rich people also work a lot, also believe in their role, are highly productive at their hoarding activities, and take lots of "working vacations" where they don't actually take a single day off but they're working from the beach with a phone and laptop, and can take breaks to pose for photos with their families, who are actually vacationing.

      Think about it; these are the people Europe drove out because they weren't willing to conform. Maybe conformists are less productive? Conformists see a dreamer staring out the window instead of looking busy, and think they're lazy. They don't see them toil all weekend building whatever they were dreaming of.

    59. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I haven't replied to my own comment in years, but I couldn't let my their/there mistake stand unchallenged. Shame on me!

    60. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I somehow doubt it was over the post alone. After all, the post was back in September. Do you really think Elon Musk is simultaneously petty enough to do that for a critical review alone but also scatterbrained enough that he forgot about his revenge for almost 5 months? That's the main detail that makes Alsop's claims about the reason as to his cancelled order sound false. And do you really think super-petty Elon Musk would characterize something like that as "rude customer"? Or would he have made up something that sounded more condescending like "If you don't appreciate the vehicle, you don't deserve one." Instead he called him a "rude customer" which seems a little off-note for a comment in response to someone writing a bad review 4 months ago.

      The fact that Alsop felt the need to write this big, whiny post about it (after his original whiny post which amounts to "Why was I not special at the launch event!?!?") suggests that the reasons go beyond one post, he was informed of that personally, and that he felt the need to get ahead of any rumors that I'm sure are now leaking around Silicon Valley about what he did.

      I have no basis for this, but my guess is the sense of aggrieved entitlement that characterized the first post probably resulting in him repeatedly contacting Tesla and berating some unfortunate employee when they wouldn't connect him directly to Elon Musk solely so that he could bitch.

      Wasn't Alsop the guy who tried to get Apple to pay out a dividend to investors (of which he was one) by writing a whining, transparently self-interested op-ed? Has anyone checked if Alsop has been short-selling Tesla stock over the last few days?

      Whatever. Rich douchenozzles having a petty public feud just reinforces that they are douchenozzles.

    61. Re:Bet Alsop isn't used to being fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh oh..Judging from the overly forgiving attitude of some posters, and yes the customer IS always right, 'Steve Job's disease' ( willingness to unaccountably forgive even the most egregious behaviour), is rearing its ugly , follower of Reverand Moon-like head.

  2. Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surprise, surprise. Being rude to a company results in bad service from that company. Hardly news except that it was Tesla that was the victim. Maybe the blogger has learned his lesson, but probably not.

    1. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Corporations are not people and should not ever be offended. Being rude to a company should not affect the way the company does business or whom it does business with. It is just Musk being a douche, because he's becoming arrogant.

    2. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you to say what a corporation can or cannot do, and how they should handle their business? I suppose you think you know better than Elon Musk, huh?

    3. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bullshit. A company is people. If you're rude to people you should expect the same in response.

      Don't be an ass hat.

    4. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just like BMW was a douche before that, right? And presumably Mercedes will be shortly. "management reserves the right to refuse service" has never been more aptly applied

    5. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When a company is rude to its customers, they drift off to the competition, unless it's a locked up market, like cable, airlines or medicine. So why shouldn't it work the other way around?

    6. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Corporations are not people, and cannot be offended, that is true (although the courts in the US would disagree)

      However, corporations are run BY people, who can be offended, and control the actions of the corporation. If I was the CEO of a corp, and a potential customer was rude to me (or my staff) I have the option to refuse their business. I see this as no different than that of a 7-11 clerk throwing someone out because they are being rude.

      Just because you happen to be the CEO of a large corp that builds cars does NOT mean you have to blindly accept every order and take abuse from everyone and everyone.

      It's perfectly within Musk's right to refuse this guy's business. And it's within our rights to decide which side of this dispute we'd prefer to side with and then act appropriately. No one is (or can) force anyone else to do business with each other. Musk isn't forcing you to buy his cars, nor can you force him to sell you one.

    7. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Corporations are not people and should not ever be offended

      Sure. Which part of "Dear ElonMusk: You should be ashamed of yourself" was addressed at a corporation, exactly?

      Being rude to a company should not affect the way the company does business or whom it does business with. It is just Musk being a douche, because he's becoming arrogant.

      You realize CS and PR cost money, right? There is such a thing as a negative value customer.

    8. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh please, this is stupid. Corporations are not people, but they're run by people, and some corporations have more control by their founder than others. Tesla is a good example of this: it's really Elon's baby, so of course he's going to take things personally.

      Also, an outspoken blogger can be bad for publicity if he's already proven himself to be a giant whiner, and it's likely he's going to bitch and complain about your product after he gets it in his hands. Better to just not sell him the product and avoid the bad press.

      Personally, there's no way I'd sell a product of mine to someone that I know is going to go online and trash it. Contrary to the old saying "there's no such thing as bad press", there really is. Bad reviews are not good for sales.

    9. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you drive down the share price of a company, the company's first responsibility is to prevent you from continuing to do that. Elon chose a short-term PR hit rather than giving Alsop an excuse for long-term bad publicity. Plus, anything Alsop says from now on about Tesla will be perceived as Alsop just being pissy about having his car canceled. And then there is the fact that Tesla can't deliver all the Model X cars already ordered while still maintaining quality, so most customers are going to have much longer than expected waits anyway -- better to give the cars to the people that won't bitch about them.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    10. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's delusional. Corporations are run by people. If someone is an asshole to one of those people, he's likely to get kicked out as a customer.

      That's the real world.

    11. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you assume he was actually rude to the company and that the company wasn't rude to him?

      He had a shitty experience and complained about it in one of the few ways that gets attention. Then Musk basically rage quit on him because he didn't like that someone was complaining.

      Complaining != rude customer
      But
      Shitty service == Shitty service

      I think you guys might just be a little to up Elon Musks ass to have clear judgement on this one. From everything I can see, Musk is being a much larger douche than Alsop. Musk is just a man, Tesla isn't special, untwist your panties and settle the fuck down

      Tesla did not meet expectations, pretty big ones I might add, for the event. This isn't some random blogger just ranting, this IS A PAYING customer, or was a paying customer until Musk's little rage quit at him.

      This is pretty typical Musk, he acts like a 2 year old when he doesn't get his way ... actually, thats incorrect, my two year old at least takes himself to the corner when he has a rage quit moment.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've probably seen signs in stores that say "We reserve the right to refuse service to any one". Guys like Alsop are why those signs exist. Companies can choose not to do business with you every bit as much as you can choose not to do business with them.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    13. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this IS A PAYING customer

      So were the others and yet they are not complaining. Just because you are a paying customer does not mean you have to be treated like a special snow flake by the company.

      It was Alsop's right to complain just as it is Elon's right to refuse business.

    14. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People who say what GP says either don't have a job or haven't ever worked with actual customers before.

      I am a person, and I work for a corporation. And just because I work for a corporation doesn't mean customers have the right to treat me like shit. Corporations I've worked at almost always have provisions where if a customer is obviously unruly and harassing you then you can refuse to provide service to them and you won't get any shit for it from either HR or your boss. In fact you might even get bonus points if you diffuse the situation with good tact while still not providing any services.

    15. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I complain about a company publicly, I do so with the expectation of never doing business with them again, or with any future relationships being affected by that public complaint.

      If I want to make a complaint that does not permanently destroy or severely harm a relationship with a company, I make that complaint to the company directly. If it's a large company and the division or department or section that I'm having problems with isn't addressing the issues, I see if that company has a public or customer relations group, and I address it through them. The way it works is that those people notify department heads, or directors, or sometimes even corporate officers of the nature of the complaints, and then those individuals deal with the subordinates that have been complained-about. From my perspective I don't care how the company fixes it, I only care that the company fixes it.

      I also have something of a minimum threshold before it's worth complaining in this fashion. The last time I made such a complaint, the franchise failed to disclose extra costs, failed to keep me informed of the progress of the work, and failed to create documentation of the work, essentially providing zero proof of exactly what they did and what the original conditions were that they were hired to address. As such, the franchise owner refunded my money, and given how the work done has proven ineffective it's for the best that he did so.

      If this guy had a problem with the Tesla event he should have taken it up privately with them first. Given that he already has a history with auto brands I am not surprised in the slightest that they chose to terminate business with him while the issue is very small, as the profit from him as a customer is well offset by the damage that he's proven he will attempt to do if things don't satisfy his expectations, nor will he even attempt to use private means to address problems before he starts a public campaign.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    16. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow AC.. Look at all the Elon Mush nutswingers in here.. You'd think they'd all be getting fellatio from Mr. Musk by their replies.

    17. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Is it within your rights as CEO to refuse service to black people, if black people offend you?

    18. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Alsop didn't attack and offend the company, he attacked Musk. Besides, as it's been pointed out, Steve Jobs acted in similar fashion and that sort of personality was what pushed Apple to being the #1 company in the world. This is a lesson for Alsop. Talk shit, get hit (with a cancellation).

    19. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the meme goes, "If you run into an asshole, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole." This guy keeps running into car companies that don't want to do business with him. After reading his actual words, I'm not at all surprised.

    20. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprise, surprise. Being rude to a company results in bad service from that company. Hardly news except that it was Tesla that was the victim. Maybe the blogger has learned his lesson, but probably not.

      Sure, I'm looking at this on the surface (as in TFS), but it would certainly appear that Tesla has some fucking culpability here (kicking off two hours late for starters), so perhaps the rest of us could learn a lesson here when it comes to labeling a "victim".

    21. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by ZipK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a person, and I buy from a corporation. And just because I buy from a corporation doesn't mean the employees have the right to treat me like shit. Corporations I've bought from almost always have provisions where if the corporation treats you poorly and fails to live up to the expectations they set then you get an even-handed response to your complaint and the corporation attempts to repair the relationship with the customer and institute changes to avoid such a situation in the future.

    22. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Surprise, surprise. Being rude to a company results in bad service from that company. Hardly news except that it was Tesla that was the victim. Maybe the blogger has learned his lesson, but probably not.

      So if I complain about FB are they justified in cancelling my account? What if I complain about my ISP who's also the local backbone, do I get kicked off the Internet?

      Corporations can have a lot of power over their customers, you shouldn't have to worry about censoring yourself because the CEO is a dick who might pursue a personal vendetta.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    23. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Being an asshat isn't a protected class, being black is. So no, it isn't within the right of the CEO to refuse service to black people. You can if the black person is an asshat.

    24. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure as fuck don't think he knows better than me.

      You can worship this latest crop of pretty boy celebrity CEOs like Zuckerberg and Musk as your new god-kings, but I think he's a douchebag.

    25. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a load of bullshit. Musk showed up more than an hour late. It doesn't take a special snowflake to be pissed off by that level of half-assed unprofessional behavior.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    26. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Holi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The employees have every right to treat you like shit. Just because they work for some corporation doesn't mean they lose their rights. They have just as much right as I do to treat you like the total dick bag you seem to be (I'm kidding, just proving a point). Corporations are under no law to have customer relations departments to try and satisfy customers. Some do and some don't, it depends on how much they care about customer retention. I am guessing Musk could care less if this rich asshole is his customer.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    27. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by mitcheli · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    28. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by mitcheli · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. And to further add to the comment, I'd say that by freeing up the car that would be sent to the blogger who would trash it, Tesla freed up a car to be sent to someone who'd appreciate it. All a matter of priorities.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    29. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by sexconker · · Score: 1

      PR hit?
      Anything that keeps Elon Musk's name in the new is good for Elon Musk.

    30. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was late... So what? Other paying customers were waiting and yet they didn't make a pretentious internet rage blog post telling Musk how he should feel or how to run his business.

      Unprofessional behavior can cut both ways. Alsops had every right to rant on the internet about his feelings of the event. Musk had every right to cancel his order based off Alsops rant.

      Again, he wasn't the only paying customer. Why should I or Musk care about ONE paying customer among thousands (that will probably be never satisfied given the rant and BMW history)?

    31. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Maybe the blogger has learned his lesson, but probably not.

      At least some percent of his readers learned his lesson, though. ;)

    32. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume he was actually rude to the company and that the company wasn't rude to him?

      No assumptions needed, he blogged it.

    33. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Indeed, there were 1300+ other snowflakes in line! He wasn't just a special snowflake, he was supposed to be the most special snowflake. And indeed, he might have been the most special person there. Elon certainly ended up providing special treatment. Nobody else got kicked off the waiting list, he wins!

    34. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alsop didn't attack and offend the company, he attacked Musk. Besides, as it's been pointed out, Steve Jobs acted in similar fashion and that sort of personality was what pushed Apple to being the #1 company in the world. This is a lesson for Alsop. Talk shit, get hit (with a cancellation).

      Steve Jobs acted in a similar fashion? I wasn't aware that Apple keynotes or events would regularly start two hours late.

      The only lesson anyone needs to learn here is to fucking be on time, and understand you DO owe your audience an apology when you're not.

      And arrogant pricks running companies need to understand that, because they certainly would not appreciate or accept it being done to them.

    35. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      And likewise, if you have to "censor yourself" to keep from being an asshat towards companies whose products you covet, you're probably a dick and the CEO should have an assistant put you on a list of people not to do business with, because risk.

      He's not a customer, and they don't have power over him. Contrary to your implication, their act of not doing business with him prevents him from being a customer, and prevents them from having any power over him at all. He doesn't have to worry about anything.

      Also, luxury cars are not necessities. There might not be any moral angle at all to be outraged about, because Freedom. Tesla presumably deserves Freedom as much as anybody else. They can choose. They made no demands of him; there is no retaliation for not doing what they say, or any other type of "control" tactic. There is simply them exercising a choice that is theirs to make.

    36. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he was supposed to be the most special snowflake

      This could be a Disney movie; the most special snowflake of all special snowflakes trying to fit in with other special snow flakes but none are as special as the most special snowflake. Ah, good times.

    37. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Yea ... 'keeps running into' == all 2 of the times its happened ...

      If you aren't surprised then you have the same problem I was originally referring to, you have your head too far up Musks ask to have an opinion in this matter.

      How do I know you have your head too far up Musk's ass?

      You're sitting here saying that someone is a asshole because they complained that an event started 2 hours late ... and that Musk himself showed up an hour late! You should have been there though, you'd probably fit right in with all the whacky nut jobs chanting and cheering like it was a sporting event and Musk was their home team.

      Stop worshipping Musk and you'll have a different opinion on the event.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    38. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      Corporations are not people and should not ever be offended. Being rude to a company should not affect the way the company does business or whom it does business with. It is just Musk being a douche, because he's becoming arrogant.

      Except the OPEN LETTER was not to Tesla but to ELON MUSK. Musk responded with a personalized response. "You don't like our work ? FINE! We won't sell it to you. Bye have a nice life.

    39. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by barc0001 · · Score: 2

      > Steve Jobs acted in a similar fashion?

      http://www.insidemacgames.com/news/story.php?ArticleID=370

      Read that and tell me SteveO was the reasonable one there.

    40. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Elon will die alone surrounded by people he can buy. Like Howard Hughes did.

    41. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Stop worshipping Musk

      This is Slashdot. It's not a nerd site anymore. It's a lickspittle worship site for dot.com hypemeisters like Musk.

    42. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by quantaman · · Score: 1

      And likewise, if you have to "censor yourself" to keep from being an asshat towards companies whose products you covet, you're probably a dick and the CEO should have an assistant put you on a list of people not to do business with, because risk.

      Which is why I respond with criticizing the company so they don't feel so free to retaliate against people criticizing them.

      He's not a customer, and they don't have power over him. Contrary to your implication, their act of not doing business with him prevents him from being a customer, and prevents them from having any power over him at all.

      A major company who has a product you want has power over you whether you have a business relationship with them or not, that's why you pay them for the product. This is more true if there's not many companies providing that product. To re-iterate my previous example, if an ISP says they won't sell to me because I said something bad about them that's a pretty severe consequence for me.

      And in this case there was a business relationship as evidenced by the $5k he gave Tesla and the hours he spent driving to, and attending, the event in question.

      Also, luxury cars are not necessities. There might not be any moral angle at all to be outraged about, because Freedom. Tesla presumably deserves Freedom as much as anybody else. They can choose. They made no demands of him; there is no retaliation for not doing what they say, or any other type of "control" tactic. There is simply them exercising a choice that is theirs to make.

      If I were a Tesla customer who's currently on the waiting list and experienced some really crappy treatment by Tesla (which if the blog post is to be believed, these customers did) then I think I'd be a lot more hesitant about airing my complaints publicly. So they are actually making implicit demands about what their current customers say and have demonstrated it by retaliating against one of those customers to broke this rule.

      And did you actually read the blog post? It wasn't actually that rude and if it was accurate and I'd gone to that event I'd probably by a little pissed off at the experience.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    43. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Actually, TFA says that this guy was a douche many times over to BMW, and they never said they were taking the car back. That's the point he was trying to make.

      Never mind that BMW probably deals with orders of magnitudes more douchebags then Tesla does, so it's just a regular thing for them. Same as Audi, Mercedes, Infiniti, Acura, Jaguar, etc. Douchebags come with the territory of selling luxury cars.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    44. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It's within my rights as CEO to refuse service to a black / white / brown / old / young / gay / straight / christian / jewish / muslim / female / male person if I'm refusing service for a legitimate reason that has nothing to do with any of those things. Like, for example, if they are being a whiny twat because I didn't adjust my entire company's launch event to fit his schedule, and allow him to cut to the front of the line above any and every other paying customer also in attendance because he feels entitled.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    45. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are incorrect, for whatever that is worth.

    46. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It was late... So what? Other paying customers were waiting and yet they didn't make a pretentious internet rage blog post telling Musk how he should feel or how to run his business.

      And you know this how, exactly? Have you actually checked?

      Even if a bunch of them complained... unless they have some sort of a well-known online presence, it's unlikely anyone would notice.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    47. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Junta · · Score: 1

      Being rude about an event is not being rude to the people (though he might have been rude in person too, but no one is claiming that). If people are not free to vent about things the companies they want to do business with do poorly, then that does not bode well for the company.

      Now if the dude called out specific individuals with personal attacks or even just specifically called out someone for not doing a good job, ok. But he griped about the overall execution of the event.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    48. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Junta · · Score: 1

      Yes, but refusing to have a a customer in a high profile venue also has negative PR cost.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    49. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Being rude to a company should not affect the way the company does business or whom it does business with

      No a corporation is a for-profit entity. A rude customer from the onset is a good indication of a problem in the future which may cause sales issues, say for example bad press by open letters.

      Reminds me of my partner who used to work at a coffee shop. Customers were given one chance to order. If they ordered a latte and then complained there was froth on it, or similar such people ordering the wrong thing then she'd refund the money and tell the customer to go somewhere else, no we won't attempt to remake your order since you don't know what you want or what you're ordering, go bug someone else, NEXT!

      Coddling people is an approach for customer poor businesses, not corporations with huge backorders on products and customers lined up waiting to be served.

    50. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That sounds to me like an ATI exec that might have broken an NDA, actually.

    51. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly my point. Teslas are not cheap, so the expectations on the customer's side are very high. You let them wait 2 hours (time is precious to rich people), don't apologize and don't let them test drive the car they already put a deposit down for, you at least owe them an apology. Being butt-hurt about it and firing the customer is not professional behavior. I don't know if Tesla has shareholders, but as the CEO you are primarily responsible for keeping your shareholders happy. There is no room for personal animosities.

    52. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but was the response/tantrum by Steve Jobs an appropriate response to someone letting a bit of info slip in a late night interview? I really don't think so. That's the sort of thing you expect in grade school, not between multinational corporations.

    53. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It is just silly nonsense that misunderstands rights and prerogatives.

      If a restaurant kicks you out for saying [REDACTED] in their business in front of other customers, that is not censorship. It is them choosing the speech they endorse or appear to endorse. There is no censorship, because Tesla doesn't have an obligation to provide a platform for anybody to speak. Them responding to negative speech by exercising their own prerogatives, that isn't censorship; that is in fact the value of speech that is protected when free speech is protected!

      This idea that consequences for your speech in your relationships in the community somehow implies that speech isn't free, it is just wrong and stupid.

      Nobody is controlling anybody's speech or actions here. You're free to say whatever you want, and enter into any business relationships with other people who are willing to do business with you. Likewise, others are free not to do business with you. And you are free not to do business with them. Nobody is being controlled; nobody is being forced to buy a Tesla; nobody is being put in a situation where having a Tesla is a de-facto necessity.

      If somebody on the pre-order list is made uncomfortable, it is their own darn fault. They should have already canceled their order. They can still go now and cancel; any continued discomfort is totally on them. And any censorship is self-censorship that nobody asked them to engage in.

    54. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know this how, exactly? Have you actually checked?

      I haven't seen anyone else get their order canceled from this event. Haven't seen any complaints. Do you have evidence to the contrary? If so link it.

      Even if a bunch of them complained... unless they have some sort of a well-known online presence, it's unlikely anyone would notice.

      Seems like we have one pretentious example from someone that has a history of an inability to be satisfied. I'll wait to see if you can provide other examples.

    55. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he had shit to do, pleb

    56. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by quantaman · · Score: 2

      It is just silly nonsense that misunderstands rights and prerogatives.

      If a restaurant kicks you out for saying [REDACTED] in their business in front of other customers, that is not censorship.

      I didn't say it was censorship, I said it was pushing people to self-censo, ie intimidating them into silence.

      There is no censorship, because Tesla doesn't have an obligation to provide a platform for anybody to speak.

      They weren't providing a platform or venue for anybody to speak, your restaurant analogy doesn't apply.

      Them responding to negative speech by exercising their own prerogatives, that isn't censorship; that is in fact the value of speech that is protected when free speech is protected!

      A private company doing it isn't government censorship, but it can be still be censorship. In fact if reddit bans a really offensive forum that can be both censorship and the right thing to do.

      Of course since Telsa wasn't providing the platform for the speech it wasn't censorship.

      This idea that consequences for your speech in your relationships in the community somehow implies that speech isn't free, it is just wrong and stupid.

      And the consequence of Elon Musks behaviour is I'm now giving it bad PR.

      Nobody is controlling anybody's speech or actions here.

      Well Elon Musk is trying to, he's saying that he doesn't care if you already reserved a car, if you publicly criticize something about the company he'll take away your pre-order spot.

      You're free to say whatever you want, and enter into any business relationships with other people who are willing to do business with you.

      And I argue that you should be less willing to do business with Elon Musk because he's going to try and control what you say about him.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    57. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprise, surprise. Being rude to a company results in bad service from that company. Hardly news except that it was Tesla that was the victim. Maybe the blogger has learned his lesson, but probably not.

      Next up - Alsop walks into a restaurant, without a reservation, and loudly tells the staff that there will be hell to pay if he and his party of drunken boorish mates are not promptly seated, fed, and satisfied.

      Stifled laughter in the kitchen precedes Alsop's tummy troubles the next day....

    58. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a company is legally a PERSON, with the same rights as you or me with none of the downsides. Look it up!

    59. Re: Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He already received the bmw though, so they couldn't not sell it to him. I'm willing to bet that if he had acted that way to bmw beforehand they would have done the same.

    60. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if I complain about FB are they justified in cancelling my account?

      oh my GOD, could you imagine how much better the world would be if Facebook did that to anyone who complained? :)

    61. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      Tesla the company (an abstract concept) literally can't be offended. Elon is the head of Tesla and used his position right a wrong from his point of view. Was it vindictive? Probably, but there is also an element of "Why should this ungrateful prick get one of my cars, when someone else more appreciative would love to have it."

      He no doubt estimated the cost in negative publicity (it might even be positive publicity), and decided that cancelling this guy's order was worth it.

      It's not like Elon slashed Stewart's tires. All he did was decide not to sell him a car.

      I think people can take "The customer is always right" a little too literally, and lose sight of what they are actually entitled to.

    62. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Actually they do have the right to treat you like shit. And you have the right to treat them like shit. It is just common courtesy not to exercise this right all the time.

      Corporations frequently try to repair relationships with disgruntled customers (even the ones who are wrong), because it usually makes better business sense to do so. This doesn't mean are required to. If making the customer happy is not profitable even in the long term (e.g. the customer won't be happy unless the company does something very costly), then you shouldn't be surprised if they decide no to repair the relationship.

      In fact I think the calculation made was that holding a position on the Model X pre-order line is considered a privilege, and revoking this privilege reinforces that. It makes everyone else who gets one feel like what they bought from Tesla is valuable.

      I think it was a brilliant business move that a lot of other corporations are not nimble enough to make.

    63. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      You should make your own car.

    64. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      And if this had been done by GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Mazda, etc., people would be cheering the guy on and yelling shit at the other auto companies. Fanboyism run amok.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    65. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. You are just allowed to refuse service *because* they are black. CEOs can be racist. Customers can be black *and* offensive. If the racist CEO refuses service to an offensive (beyond their blackness) black person, that's fine.

      There is a specific law against refusing service to protected classes of people. Assholes are not one of those protected classes. You can be black, but if you are also an asshole, then the asshole part of you can be denied service, and this part ruins it for the black part of you which would have otherwise been protected.

    66. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Some people will view Tesla negatively because of it, some will view Tesla positively because of it. There is no law of business that says that the net PR cost must be negative.

    67. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not like there can be only one asshole. Furthermore, it depends why he was late. IF he was late because he just doesn't give a fuck about making people wait, then he's an asshole. Why was he late? I have no idea. People are late for all kinds of reasons good and bad. Writing a shitty open letter also makes you an asshole. What are the circumstances that cause someone to write a shitty letter other than being an asshole? Death in the family? Brain tumor? No clue, but I'm willing to bet it's just that he's an asshole with a false sense of entitlement.

    68. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those companies sell through dealers. That abstracts these issues away from the manufacturer.

    69. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "couldn't care less..."

    70. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by waferbuster · · Score: 1

      Rosebud....

      --
      I'm an individual! Just like everyone else!
    71. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I am a person, and I buy from a corporation. And just because I buy from a corporation doesn't mean the employees have the right to treat me like shit.

      Of course they do. It might not be good business, but the Soup Nazi has every right to be a dick if he so chooses, and you have every right to not buy his soup.

    72. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Complaining != rude customer

      Not always, but it depends on how you complain. I only got as far as the title of the open letter before deciding the guy is a douche "Dear Elon Musk, You should be ashamed of yourself. It’s bad enough that your event producers couldn’t actually produce an event...".
      I write complaint letters to companies all the time (yep, I'm that guy), but they're always constructive and full of advice and recommendations, not petty abuse. More often than not I get free stuff from those companies for giving them feedback. This guy wasn't that, he was a jerk and got what he deserved.

    73. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless, your presence on FB is compelling others to leave FB, they won't deactivate your account. You *are* FB's product, dumbass.

    74. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I doubt his complaints made it to the CEO of BMW either or addressed it to him personally, telling him he should be "ashamed", so that's another point of difference.

    75. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume he was actually rude to the company

      He was actually rude to Musk instead, saying he should be ashamed etc etc.
      That is a bit different to what you have assumed.
      Would you like to try again now that you have something a little closer to the actual situation to base your comment on?

    76. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by backwardsposter · · Score: 1

      Facebook is social media and their customers are advertisers, we are their product. So really, it's more like if an advertiser starts badmouthing facebook, and yes I'd expect them to stop doing business with that advertiser.

    77. Re: Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Fanboism, my ass; Tesla gets more respect than those bloated, bureaucratic entities you mentioned because Tesla earned that respect.

    78. Re: Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Elon Musk you should be ashamed of yourself". It is not about Tesla as far as i read this. But how would I know? English is my third language. Maybe a native speaker can clarify if what I see here is true.

    79. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      He's not doing anything to try to "control" anybody. Control is before you do something. If you're an asshole to him, he might be an asshole back; there is no attempt at control there.

      If you say nasty things, he won't want you around. That isn't control, that is natural consequences of your speech. That is him being free, not him trying to control you.

      The implication that he should alter his behavior is the only attempt at control. Nobody else is trying to control anybody. Both sides are exercising freedom in this. The only control freaks are among the pundits.

    80. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can refuse service to anyone for any reason.

    81. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good point. I could be remembering wrong as all searches for "Alsop" just bring up pages and pages of this story, but isn't Alsop the guy who tried to get Apple to pay investors a dividend (ie, pay him a dividend) from their huge pile of cash by writing a whiny op-ed?

      So cancelling the order of an entitled whiner who has shown a willingness to try and manipulate companies into doing what he wants by writing self-interested op-eds? Sounds like a smart move. And good business.

    82. Re:Lightning Strikes Twice with Entitled Customer by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Facebook might not be the best example here as you are not the customer merely a part of the product. You have no contract with them, and they have absolutely no obligation to you. FB can cancel your account at any time for no reason and you would have no legal recourse.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  3. Good for Tesla! by Vorl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it's good that he got his order canceled. If you are going to complain in an "open letter", you are pretty much just attention seeking. If you wanted to help the company out or support it in a positive light, you would have kept your issues between you and the company. I also agree that it must be a slow news day.

    1. Re:Good for Tesla! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      VCs are some of the worst people on the planet personality wise

      the whiny blog is par for the course

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:Good for Tesla! by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I think it's good that he got his order canceled. If you are going to complain in an "open letter", you are pretty much just attention seeking. If you wanted to help the company out or support it in a positive light, you would have kept your issues between you and the company. I also agree that it must be a slow news day.

      Why is it my responsibility to help the company out and support it in a positive light?

      If a public company treats me badly at a PR event why can't I make my complaint in public?

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:Good for Tesla! by MTEK · · Score: 1

      In your title, if you replaced "Tesla" with "Comcast", I'm wondering if your comment would be as popular.

    4. Re:Good for Tesla! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention whore, that Mr. Blogger is, and he got brought up short.

    5. Re:Good for Tesla! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing that this got modded up on a site notorious for people bitching for just about any reason under the sun with no desire to actually cooperate with the companies they're bitching about.

      Oh, that's right, this is Tesla. Things are different. Right?

      You have a right to bitch if you're spending an average of 80k on a product and promises are made. I expect better from a "luxury" brand. Fucktards here cry like a bitch when they pay 8.50 to see a movie and someone dares to cough during it... that shit alone makes breaking the law justified.

    6. Re:Good for Tesla! by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      The letter isn't directed at the company Tesla Motors; He addressed it to Elon Musk (who responded in kind).

    7. Re:Good for Tesla! by quantaman · · Score: 1

      The letter isn't directed at the company Tesla Motors; He addressed it to Elon Musk (who responded in kind).

      It was addressed to Musk in his role as Tesla's Chairman & CEO.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    8. Re: Good for Tesla! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he responded in that capacity. That's what you meant right?

      Elon does what Elon does.

  4. Safe Spaces to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Quick, Elon Musk needs a safe space!

    If that's his definition of a rude customer, then... fuck Tesla.

    1. Re:Safe Spaces to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick, Elon Musk needs a safe space!

      If that's his definition of a rude customer, then... fuck Tesla.

      Let's not confuse the issues. There is nothing wrong with someone having a safe space. Almost every parent tells their children not to swear at home and tries to keep other people polite in the house. It's fine and good. In the case of companies, where they don't have any monopoly or effective monopoly (as in the case of a cartel) it should also be fine for them to chose their customers.

      What's wrong is when generally open public grouping, such as a non-profit open source foundation, or a University, which has a duty to the entire society, starts to select which people it will deal with on the basis of their non criminal non directly harmful views.

    2. Re:Safe Spaces to the rescue! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it is easier if you just hate the things you cannot have. ;)

      He doesn't need a "safe space," he has the power to make the decision he wanted to make. You seem to somewhat misunderstand the personality traits that are accused when talking pejoratively about people wanting "safe spaces." It isn't talking about empowered people successfully maintaining their preferred conditions by exercising their known prerogatives.

      There are other completely different presumed negative personality traits associated with that. Theory of mind, stock up now you're running low.

  5. Nightmare customer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If he can't get satisfaction at Tesla or BMW, I suspect this is an impossible person to deal with. Musk saw the writing on the wall, and cut this guy loose before he bought the car and made claims against the company for all kinds of ridiculous and petty shit.

    1. Re:Nightmare customer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or in the words of Nixon.. "Let's cut this turd loose!"

    2. Re:Nightmare customer! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      He should just buy a used mercedes from a local lot, and insist on paying double. And insist on paying his mechanic double. They'll be so impressed they'll give him the level or personalized service that his condition requires.

    3. Re:Nightmare customer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're paying for a "luxury" brand you get to bitch about petty shit. If Musk doesn't like it maybe he shouldn't toot his own horn about customer service.

      My guess is that Tesla is losing it's shit right about now. Things are going south and Musk only had a small army of fanboys who can't afford his product to lean on.

  6. Ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No coup for you.

    1. Re:Ha ha by s13g3 · · Score: 4, Informative
      "No coupe for you."

      FTFY.

      --
      "Inveniemus Viam Aut Faciemus" 'We will find a way... Or we will make one!' --Hannibal of Carthage
    2. Re:Ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VWhhoooosshhhhh!!!

    3. Re:Ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't a coup[e] have 2 doors? The pic in TFA has 4 doors.

    4. Re:Ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A coupe is defined as a vehicle with greater than 23 cu. feet of space in a rear passenger seating area.

      So, there have been four-door coupes, and two-door sedans. The definition of coupe or sedan is not dependant on the number of doors.

    5. Re:Ha ha by mjwx · · Score: 1

      "No coupe for you."

      FTFY.

      The Model X is an SUV.

      This is more evidence in Musk's favour as all SUV drivers are complete douchebags.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Ha ha by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The Model X is an SUV.

      It doesn't seem that long ago when some poster here had a rant along the lines of "electric and hybrid cars are useless until they come as an SUV".
      We've seen another "haha solar lightbulb" moment arrive as technology catches up with those who mock it and even their supposedly stupid strawman ideas prove to be practical.

  7. Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know what; as long as this "critic" was refunded his deposit, then I am all in favour of this.

    Ray Crock's principle of "The Customer is always right" is great until the customer comes to believe that this should be the case every time. As soon as that's the case it is an unrealistically high car to set on a customer service experience, because instead of "errors are always in the customers favour" the customer views it as, "if a mistake was made, I am due a large payout or extra swag" leading us to a society of complainers form the start.

    If someone has a customer service problem, take it through the right channels, then, if it is unresolved, by all means, take to the twitter with your complaints. Unfortunately, I think a great deal of people skip over the middle step.

    These people are the worlds assholes, and unless they are fired as customers, their behavior is only emboldened.

    1. Re:Good! by torkus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He's mad that out of 3000 (or was it 5000) people he was #1344 in line to test drive.

      Boo hoo. That means you're still ahead of at least half of the people. Sure, 1000+ people aren't going to get to test drive a car in one night...we get that. Why exactly does he feel that entitled and special that, of all the other thousands of people who put down a deposit, he should be a priority?

      I'd bet he is (well, was) the 1344th person to put a deposit on the X.

      Folks like to use privilege and entitlement as dirty words these days...well THIS is a PERFECT example. Some peoples business is not worth taking, case and point.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    2. Re:Good! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Ray Crock's principle of "The Customer is always right" is great until the customer comes to believe that this should be the case every time. As soon as that's the case it is an unrealistically high car to set on a customer service experience, because instead of "errors are always in the customers favour" the customer views it as, "if a mistake was made, I am due a large payout or extra swag" leading us to a society of complainers form the start.

      It gets especially bad once the customers start yelling and being rude to the employees. At that point, sometimes you need to push them out the door.
      In some cases companies encourage it though, by giving attention to the loudest yeller, and ignoring people who are polite.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will always take complaints about certain companies to Twitter first, as I have learned (from trial and error) that those companies do not respond otherwise.

      The shortlist:
      Centurylink
      Comcast
      AT&T
      Verizon

      Every time I contact customer service I am disappointed. UNTIL I bitch on Twitter, then all of a sudden my service suddenly works, repairmen show up, excess billing is reversed, and I actually (usually) get a fucking apology.

      That I have to bitch publicly in order to get a response says something about the way that corporations view their customers.

    4. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's mad that out of 3000 (or was it 5000) people he was #1344 in line to test drive.

      Lie.

    5. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. See how easy that is?

    6. Re:Good! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Ray Crock's principle of "The Customer is always right"

      was referring to the customer always being right about what they want. They're seldom right about whether or not they should get it. The hospitality and restaurant industries are the only fields where it applies almost unilaterally, where the customer must be made to fee as comfortable as possible during their interaction with your company. Beyond that, you advertise what you're offering and the customer gets to decide if they want it or not, with few exceptions. That's the philosophy by which I run my business, and my clients tend to agree with it; I work in a competitive market, if they didn't like it, they'd go elsewhere.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re:Good! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > Ray Crock's principle of "The Customer is always right" is great until the customer comes to believe that this should be the case every time.

      That's precisely the problem -- when a customer has "unreasonable" expectations, or entitled, then there is no way the company can satisfy the customer.

      There has to be a middle ground between the relationship of the Company and Customer.

      * The company needs to listen to constructive criticism, AND follow up on it. Ignoring your customers means you don't respect them.
      * The customer needs to convey information in a respectful manner, and not being awhiny self-entitled little shit making a mountain over every mole hole.

      Microsoft, you paying attention?

    8. Re:Good! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      "The Customer is always right" is for the peons. It is correct within context; customer-facing workers should be trained in helping customers feel important, and they should be giving a good-faith effort to make the customer happy.

      However, the business owner has different concerns and prerogatives. I forget which (also famous) book it is in, but some other famous guy said that, "Success is being able to choose who you do business with." For many business owners, the financial freedom they get from owning their own business has more value to them than the money itself; the money is just a detail of the way that we structure business, it is not an end in itself. Many business owners want to balance between different benefits of ownership; profit, certainly, but also freedom and security. Many business owners are trying to amass wealth not because they "need more money," but because the more money they have the deeper their financial security and freedom. Others care more about their lifestyle. Others care about not having to suffer fools, and the freedom granted to them by being able to refuse to do business with some asshole.

      And they're still going to insist that their employees consider the customer to always be right. After all, if they decide somebody isn't a customer, they just tell the workers that and they know instantly that the person is no longer right and needs to leave the premises. ;)

    9. Re:Good! by hey! · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in the general case; an important corollary to "the customer is always right" is that you really need to choose your customers wisely. But in this case the person complaining has a point. A customer has a right to expect prompt and timely service, or at least an apology if circumstances preclude that. If the customer doesn't accept a suitable apology then it's worth considering whether to "fire" him as somebody who just refuses to be pleased. And only then.

      Now if you're offering the customer bargain basement prices you might reasonably hold yourself to a somewhat relaxed standard. But if you're charging top dollar it's unrealistic to expect customers to accept anything less than exemplary service.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much easier for me, because mine was correct.

    11. Re:Good! by bgarcia · · Score: 1

      Some peoples business is not worth taking, case and point.

      GAH!

      Case in point

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    12. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He's mad that out of 3000 (or was it 5000) people he was #1344 in line to test drive."

      No he's mad at:
      1. The event started over an hour late, without even the slightest attempt to apologise, nor was any other courtesy extended, such as providing reasonable food, etc when delayed.
      2. The expected presentation was amateurish and not targeted at the audience
      3. The expectation set by the invitation was not delivered, causing the visitor to waste time. While it was true you could touch a Model X, no mention was made about large queues, limited number of displays, etc. He probably had limited time, eg work early the next day, and the time he had was wasted by the host.

      This whole thing probably would have been prevented if Musk had just done the common courtesy of apologising for the late start, and offering to start the model display overlapping the presentation.

      But instead Musk had to double down on the rudeness and accuse the customer of the one being rude, then pettily cancel their order.

      It doesn't matter what you think of Alsop, his complaint may have been a little entitled, but it wasn't unreasonable. However Musk's response definitely wasn't unreasonable. He could have easily taken the moral high ground with a qualified apology and some spin, but instead decided to be the bigger dick. There's no defending Musk over this.

    13. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So proof, much wow.

    14. Re:Good! by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ray Crock's principle of "The Customer is always right" is great until the customer comes to believe that this should be the case every time.

      I'm sure we've all experienced them before. I remember this stupid bitch at a touristy location begging for the operator of a Segway hire place to let her young children have a go (rules were you had to be over 12). So after being bullied, the operator gives in (these kids looked about 6 or 7), but only to be barraged again because they can't find a helmet to fit her kid's tiny heads. The operator puts on the smallest helmets which just hang over the kids faces obstructing their vision, so the women is now complaining loudly that they shouldn't have to wear helmets because they don't fit.
      Never underestimate the stupidity of some people. Elon gave this guy what he deserves.

    15. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ray Crock's principle of "The Customer is always right" ...

      Ray KROC.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      But you're the customer, spell it however the fuck you want.

  8. A BMW customer? by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why am I not surprised that he's also a BMW driver/customer? He might as well get "stuck up, rich douchebag" tattooed on his forehead.

    1. Re:A BMW customer? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Is the test you have to take to prove you're a major-league douchebag still mandatory before they'll let you buy a new BMW? I haven't check lately... (and I keep flunking the test!)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:A BMW customer? by blind+biker · · Score: 1
      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    3. Re:A BMW customer? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      > I keep flunking the test!

      There's your problem - you're supposed to refuse the test altogether as being something for "little people". The only way to win is not to play.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:A BMW customer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drive a BMW. It's a 20-year-old 3-series. It's a very nice car. Handles awesome, good power, awesome efficiency/MPG considering, and one of very few cars models that are actually driver-focused, easy to see out of and the controls easy to access.

      I paid $3500. Does that make me a rich douchbag?

    5. Re:A BMW customer? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You must be pretty douchey if you keep taking a test to check the level. Even worse, you were trying to get into a BMW!

      I don't like seeing BMWs on the road; they drive 20MPH faster than everybody else on the freeway, on the highway they'll pass me and slow down to 5 MPH slower than I was going when they passed, because they realized they don't know the road and get nervous in the front position, and then in town they drive 10MPH slower than everybody else, because they're not going anywhere they're just driving around hoping somebody will see them driving a BMW.

    6. Re:A BMW customer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, BMW customers are really "stuck up, middle class douchebags" who paid more money than they should have for a car, so they can appear to be "stuck up, rich douchebags".

    7. Re:A BMW customer? by Headrick · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between a porcupine and a BMW driver?

      A porcupine has pricks on the outside.

    8. Re:A BMW customer? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Why am I not surprised that he's also a BMW driver/customer? He might as well get "stuck up, rich douchebag" tattooed on his forehead.

      Whilst I dont disagree with the tattoo idea, you dont need to be rich or a douchebag to get a BMW these days. You can get a 228i for US$32,000 and a 235i for US$42,000. These aren't even close to being the base model which is the 220i (or 116i in Europe), that being said the 228i would be the cheapest bimmer I'd buy because the x20i's and diesels are crap to drive.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:A BMW customer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the highway they'll pass me and slow down to 5 MPH slower than I was going when they passed, because they realized they don't know the road and get nervous in the front position

      I don't think that's the reasoning because that suggests an unrealistic level of introspection and competence. I think that they pass you to "win" and then slow down because there's nobody else to beat ahead of you. The fact that passing you and then slowing down pisses you off is a bonus "win", too. If you were to attempt to overtake them, they would undoubtedly speed up to prevent it and then slow back down once you were back in your place behind them.

  9. But the launch event did suck by DrXym · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I watched the video of it and Musk may well have held it in a monkey enclosure. I've never seen an audience react like that, hooting and howling over every word he said. The car is nice I guess but the audience reaction was ridiculous.

    1. Re:But the launch event did suck by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Even if it did suck, it's no reason to be an absolutely asshole about it. I mean, this is worse than the kind of stuff my wife bitches about - "Boo hoo, somebody was late starting the party," "I usually don't eat dinner until 7:30 and they didn't bother to serve me food so I'm all hangry", "I didn't get to see the cake because I was so mad that I left 8 minutes after it started"

      I mean, damn - has this stuck up rich kid never been to an event with the proels before? Shit doesn't always start at your convenience. j

      Was it a dick move to cancel the reservation? Maybe. But he deserved it.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:But the launch event did suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think its ok that you get jerked around for two hours and not given the opportunity to complete the purpose of your visit, something you had put down money for? I wonder how you would feel if you didn't have Elon's cock in your mouth most of the time. Elon is not a god and his company shouldn't get a magic pass when they fuck up.

    3. Re:But the launch event did suck by DrXym · · Score: 2

      Maybe the guy's an asshole, maybe not. Either way the event still sucked. I bet it sucked more in person being stuck there waiting nearly 2 hours for it to happen.

    4. Re:But the launch event did suck by wjcofkc · · Score: 4, Informative

      After reading reading, "hooting and howling over every word he said", I went and watched it myself expecting to be able to come back and call bullshit over an exaggeration.

      Nope, your description was accurate. It was actually kind of strange.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    5. Re:But the launch event did suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading reading, "hooting and howling over every word he said", I went and watched it myself expecting to be able to come back and call bullshit over an exaggeration. Nope, your description was accurate. It was actually kind of strange.

      Yeah, Musk's presentation skills suck. He needs to go back to Satan and get a soul refund for his faulty Jobs demon.

    6. Re:But the launch event did suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true believers (AKA fanatics) in action. Musk appears to be losing touch with reality due to being surrounded by them.
      When mild criticism is taken as a grave personal attack from a "super rude customer", you know the viewpoint has been warped.

    7. Re:But the launch event did suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it was, it's dweebs jerking off over "tech" cars in a market where they're paid to generate hype (ad-clicks). Musk lets in his most prized sycophants for PR events. It's no different from Jobs and banning off anyone that's remotely nonplussed.

  10. Re: Waahhh rich people problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Waaahhh waaahhhh I spent my money on beer, drugs, cigarettes, lottery tickets, and spinning hubcaps.... Waaaahhhhh waaahhhhh now I'm poor and stupid and whiney and voting for Bernie Sanders waaahhh

  11. I never heard of Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...punishing a customer they don't like.

    1. Re:I never heard of Ford by james_shoemaker · · Score: 1

      Ford rarely deals directly with customers, they have a dealer network to deal with customers.

    2. Re:I never heard of Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. And I'm (genuinely) sure they punish dealerships (their 'customers') regularly.

    3. Re:I never heard of Ford by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      That's because they only punish the ones they like. It's why they're called "Ford owners."

      *ducks*

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:I never heard of Ford by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, on the other hand, punishes EVERY customer... by shipping them the product they ordered!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:I never heard of Ford by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The traditional carmakers, as the other poster noted, don't deal directly with customers. Instead, they have a bunch of corrupt dealerships in between, which screw over the customers as much as they can, and are generally not well-liked. So the stealerships get most of the bad reviews and complaints, rather than the carmaker.

      So if Ford doesn't like you, they really have no way to prevent a sale of their car to you, because they have no control over the dealerships. But if your local dealership doesn't like you because you trash them in the local press, don't be surprised if they refuse to sell you a car. And Ford won't have any control over that either.

    6. Re:I never heard of Ford by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Apples and oranges. I'd be surprised if dealers who wanted a Saleen Mustang on their floor could get one if they were jerks with their Ford rep.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    7. Re:I never heard of Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dealerships "punish" customers all the time. Come in too often with (valid) complaints under warranty? You get blacklisted.

    8. Re:I never heard of Ford by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Enzo Ferrari would only sell to certain customers...

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    9. Re:I never heard of Ford by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I never heard of Ford having a waiting list to get one of their cars, either.

      If Ford refused to sell you a car, they would sell one less car.

      If Tesla refuses to sell you a car, they still sell the exact same number of cars.

    10. Re:I never heard of Ford by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      My Nissan was assembled by Ford, and they did a great job as far as I can tell.

      I'm just glad it was engineered in Japan.

    11. Re:I never heard of Ford by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Microsoft even tries to punish non-customers. Back in `99 they sent me a free pre-release copy of Windows 2000 Advanced Server blahblah, trying to get me to sell it to my clients. (I was a linux/unix database consultant at the time)

      Awesomest coffee coaster I ever had, it lasted years. Those cheap AOL cds start flaking after just a couple years. Windows Server provided a stable platform for my coffee for almost a decade, with no downtime.

      The one time I'm really glad I didn't read the manual, I just dove in and implemented the solution in the most obvious way. Disaster averted!

    12. Re:I never heard of Ford by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, on the other hand, punishes EVERY customer... by shipping them the product they ordered!

      And in thee case of windows 10 by shipping them a product they did not order.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    13. Re:I never heard of Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to wait in line to purchase a new Lambo or a new Ferarri. And they can (and DO) say not to some people. Get over it.

  12. Agreed, Alsop was just attention whoring by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If you wanted to help the company out or support it in a positive light, you would have kept your issues between you and the company.

    A-yup. If you actually read his open letter, he comes on like a hard-on right away, telling Musk what he should do and how he should do it, and he ends by telling Musk that he should show some class. I'd tell him to go fuck himself and that I didn't need him as a customer, too.

    âoeDear @ElonMusk,â Alsop wrote in Mondayâ(TM)s post. âoeThank you for reaching out to me. I heard from our phone conversation that you feel that my post, âDear @ElonMusk: You should be ashamed of yourself,â(TM) was a personal attack on you.

    Lolwaffles. It sure looks like one to me. If he wanted to address Tesla Motors, perhaps he should have done so. One of the costs of celebrity is that people will pay attention to what you say. If Alsop wanted a Model X, he bloody sure well should have watched his words. Now he'll have to watch other people drive his car.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Agreed, Alsop was just attention whoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> he comes on like a hard-on right away, telling Musk what he should do and how he should do it, and he ends by telling Musk that he should show some class.
      That's what investors do.

    2. Re:Agreed, Alsop was just attention whoring by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's what investors do.

      A preorder of a car is not an investment in a company any more than funding something through kickstarter makes you an investor. Investors have rights, you're just a customer.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. No Tesla for you! by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gee, not one, but two companies with waiting lists to buy their luxury cars declined to go out of their way to pamper your spoiled ass?

    Notice a pattern here, Stewart?

    1. Re:No Tesla for you! by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Obviously you've never heard the adage "If you keep having the same problem with different people, then maybe you are the problem^H^H^H^H^H victim of a vast conspiracy to undermine your privilege as God's chosen dipshit."

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:No Tesla for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, not one, but two companies with waiting lists to buy their luxury cars declined to go out of their way to pamper your spoiled ass?

      Notice a pattern here, Stewart?

      Humans sit around and wait for Elon "Guns N Roses" Musk to arrive two hours late, and some get pissed about it. Go figure.

      Try pulling that move 10 more times and see if you find a pattern of human intolerance. Humans don't like it when other humans waste their time. Not exactly a shocking revelation, and is something "Axl" should have been well aware of when addressing the entitled elite.

    3. Re:No Tesla for you! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      dunno..

      you order something that expensive, get invitation to a launch event hinted that you might able to be see what you're signed up to buy(!) and maybe even test drive it(!) and then the launch event is fucked up.

      cancelling the frigging order because of that is super fucked up though. musk suddenly is scared of bad reviews or what?

      especially since eh, isn't the whole product late as fuck too?

      dunno who the f buys something like this with no reviews and no test drive - and obviously cancelling orders based on bad rap is just a signal that he doesn't think he can meet the production quotas anyways in a timely fashion.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  14. Negative Feedback is Important by thechemic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Negative feedback is important to understand the areas of opportunity where your business might be improved. I think setting the precedent that you'll be stung by Tesla if you complain isn't sending the right message.

    From a marketing perspective, free advertising!

    --
    Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
    1. Re:Negative Feedback is Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The precedent set is "don't make outlandish, incorrect, derogatory statements about Tesla without giving us a chance to address your concerns first".

      Right message!

    2. Re:Negative Feedback is Important by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Negative feedback is important to understand the areas of opportunity where your business might be improved.

      Improve what? Pampering the little angry man is not going to resolve the massive backlog of orders. Man I wish I were in a position where someone felt the need to advise me on how to improve my customer service when I already can't build products fast enough to feed the demand. /sarcasm.

      I actually applaud Musk for this. He saw something that got negative attention for Tesla, axed it, and brought remaining customers one step closer to getting their product. My partner used to run a very busy cafe and she had no time for complaints. A complaint got you a refund and then you were shown the door. No repeat business. For every customer she would spend time apologising to, two more would walk away because the line got to long and people wanted their damn caffeine NOW!

    3. Re:Negative Feedback is Important by stooo · · Score: 2

      Yes, negative feedback is absolutely a major factor in system stability.

      But if the phase margin is too small, there will be a large overshoot at one frequency. That's what happened here between these two guys, there was an over-response induced by the feedback loop because the feedback guy was not considering he puts too much negative feedback to a guy with a big gain....

      Solution : reduce the negative feedback in the future.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  15. Okay, Princess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am a princess, and I demand to be treated as such"
      - Stewart Alsop

    1. Re:Okay, Princess by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A proper Princess would never have attempted to receive a place in line, or associated a number handed to an assistant with herself in order to get mad about getting the wrong number. Or expected to need to be at the event at a time that some underling had liked and written in a book titled "schedule." And if Elon Musk isn't the Monarch, then who would ask what time he had said he intended to arrive? It isn't like they have a battle planned together, or something. Maybe he was late by having arrived after the Princess, but that would be a different complaint and she wouldn't need to invoke a fake schedule to enforce it.

      He has a lot to learn, he might even need to re-attend Finishing School.

  16. dear slashdot management by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 0

    This sort of article deserves a D-

    1. Re:dear slashdot management by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked! You're saying there is actually _management_ at slashdot?!?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:dear slashdot management by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Timothy has a new boss

    3. Re:dear slashdot management by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Just wondering are there any other editors there any more? Because it looks like Timmys been chained to his desk night and day with only the occasional post from whiplash our new corporate overlord.

      Timmy, did whiplash kill the other editors? you can tell us.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  17. Reminds me of an old saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If one person seems like an asshole to you, he's probably an asshole. If lots of people seem like assholes to you, you're the asshole.

  18. Sounds good. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Companies generally reserve the right to refuse to serve customers who are causing a disturbance.

    This individual caused a disturbance prior to receiving his product. Refund his deposit and have him go elsewhere.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  19. Might be illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you think about it, preordering a product is a financial transaction. You're exchanging money (the $5000 deposit) for a place in line. While the amount the deposit costs doesn't usually change over time, the earlier you preorder, the bigger the risk you are taking because the promised product may never arrive. So in return for this transaction, you get an earlier place in line. Tesla gains money and a large number of preorders has a "signaling" effect to other buyers, increasing interest in the product.

    In actual monetary value, Stewart's preorder slot is now worth more than $5000. If he could auction the slot off, people would be willing to pay a premium so they can have their Model X sooner.

    Anyways, by canceling the order, Tesla has deprived Stewart of his property, and he might be forced to turn to the courts to be made whole. I'm not a lawyer, I know the property loss is true in real economic terms but no doubt the actual interpretation of the law is a different story.

    1. Re:Might be illegal by thechemic · · Score: 1

      If he decides to sue, I'm sure it will be Slashdot's next big "technology" headline.

      --
      Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
    2. Re:Might be illegal by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure ANY company would have had lawyer's preview any preorder contract to make sure the company could cancel the order and refund the money at any time with no reason without incurring any liability. Musk in particular isn't stupid.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Might be illegal by DrXym · · Score: 4, Informative
      A person in the UK recently won a court case for something similar. He preordered a Porsche car, paid a deposit and then the dealer bumped him from the queue and sold the car to someone else. He sued for breach of contract, the judge agreed and awarded him the difference between what the car cost at the time and what it would be worth now.

      I guess if someone could argue that the deposit was a contract (and better yet that losing the preorder meant a financial loss) then they could probably sue successfully.

    4. Re:Might be illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubtful- You think Musk got as far as he did without giving him options in the Deposit terms of Service to cancel deposits

    5. Re:Might be illegal by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Musk in particular isn't stupid.

      Not being stupid doesn't mean he isn't impetuous.

      He's also extremely rich, and if the guy sues, Musk won't be dealing with it or even feel the consequences.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:Might be illegal by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'm not a lawyer

      It shows. If Tesla refunds the money somebody paid, then they have not received any "consideration" (pay, or equivalent) and any presumed contract under which you believe you have been harmed is invalid, and not enforceable anyways.

      You would have to have a contract provision already in place when you made the pre-order that says they can't refund it. Nobody offers pre-orders with that type of condition. What if a natural disaster destroys their factory, or a war breaks out and they can't source rubber for a few years? Pre-orders are always cancelable. If there is a penalty, it is almost always only the customer that would pay a penalty for canceling. That is the privilege of pre-ordering; you could also just wait until the item is actually for sale.

      Pre-order in the US also has special rules, similar to custom made-to-order products, and are not regulated under the same types of expectations that available-for-order products are. The type of claim you presume is not going to fly. It is the customer that takes on that sort of risk before delivery in the case of both pre-order and made-to-order. Pre-made, ready to order products create legal obligations when you accept the money, or in the case of credit card payments, when you finalize the payment. But custom and pre-order those obligations don't kick in until delivery. It is worth understanding if you ever plan to pre-order something. There is no need to go through the mental anguish of (incorrectly) thinking your rights have been trampled, when you can instead just learn the rules and read the fine print and not have inflated expectations.

      It is an important business principle to understand. If you're willing to give back all of what was given to you, you can usually end the relationship. If you want to give back part, you can't. If you want to keep the part that is the same as your expenses, then the other party might sue you on some weird harm theory like you present. But giving back the whole payment, so that you have received no consideration, that frees you from the asshole completely.

    7. Re:Might be illegal by grahamwest · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much the definition of a contract. Consideration (e.g. money) in exchange for service. If the contract has a clause saying the seller can refund the deposit and cancel the order, then the buyer agreed to that and too bad.

      However, there is also civil law regarding business - the Uniform Commercial Code in the USA. That law preempts contract terms. The question then becomes, does the UCC forbid those kind of clauses. A little research leads me to believe it does not. That would make sense since companies like Gamestop cancel pre-orders all the time.

      Given all that, Tesla are within their rights to say, "too bad, here's your money back".

      --
      Graham
    8. Re:Might be illegal by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      In the US we have specific rules for pre-orders. They're not generic contracts. They're the same as custom made-to-order products. It isn't a sale until delivery, and it isn't a contract separately from the sale unless the customer is paying more for the right of pre-order. If they get bumped from a discount list, then they haven't paid extra for anything, and they never became a customer by buying the product.

      In your link, he didn't have a pre-order. He had a deposit for sale of an existing product that the store had not yet received delivery of. He paid the deposit to the local dealer, not to a company actually making the product. And the company doesn't custom-make products to the dealer's specification. The dealer can only sell products that exist; they can't pre-sell a product that is not for sale yet, by definition. The manufacterer is who can sell a product that doesn't yet exist; except they can't sell it, they can only pre-sell it. It isn't sold until delivery though. And the product in question was also not being made-to-order, it was just supposed to be the first one they received. Basically, that situation would be a "back order" legally in the US, regardless of what words the customer and dealer use. Back orders can't always be canceled without cause, if a payment has been accepted.

      Back orders are different than pre-orders, because mail order has been a big thing for a long time, and it is a traditional avenue of consumer abuse. So there are detailed extant rules.

  20. Re: Waahhh rich people problems by bulled · · Score: 1

    It is interesting to me that I cannot tell if you are a Republican or a supporter of Hillary Clinton. I suppose that speaks volumes about the Clinton campaign.

  21. better off without it by JustNiz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thats an insane price for that car. Its all just a marketing fad.
    Personally I think musk did him a favour and he's better off without it.

    1. Re:better off without it by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      What part of the Economics 101 principle of Supply and Demand do you not understand? Also, I suspect these cars contain about $30,000 worth of batteries, so good luck making a cheaper one.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:better off without it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been told we will all 3D print our cars at home with raw materials from space. Do yuo doubt this, Luddite??

    3. Re:better off without it by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Tesla is a fad like iPod's were a fad. Soon it will be normal.

      This is not in any way an endorsement of Tesla. Frankly, this stunt says to me that Musk is a whiny little bitch. Criticism is necessary for product improvement, no matter how stupid it is. If you smack the ban-hammer on any slight then that's just a sign of weakness and vulnerability... and it's unlikely you will get useful feedback in the future.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    4. Re:better off without it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of the Economics 101 principle of Supply and Demand do you not understand? Also, I suspect these cars contain about $30,000 worth of batteries, so good luck making a cheaper one.

      Speaking of cheaper, Elon's gonna need a lot more than luck if he intends to keep selling cars.

      99% of customers he's alienating right now because of price, which if that doesn't change, he'll be nothing but a boutique car dealer, and the fad will die off.

    5. Re:better off without it by edtice1559 · · Score: 0

      No wireless. Less range than a Suburban. Lame.

    6. Re:better off without it by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I completely understand the concept of supply and demand.
      My point was that the current demand is based on a marketing fad, not on actual value.
      Even assuming you're right (which I doubt) about the cost to Tesla of the batteries alone being 30k per car, at 132k you're still paying over 100k for the rest of the car, which is insane.

    7. Re:better off without it by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      You can do a high quality DIY conversion with similar range for under 15K, using all new parts. No, they don't have $30k in batteries. But yes, the batteries cost more than a brand new Kia.

    8. Re:better off without it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been told that, at any time, by anyone ever.

      Your beloved Space Nutters do not exist. You will never find one.

    9. Re:better off without it by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> you're still paying over 100k for the rest of the car, which is insane.
      No, it's a fair deal for amortizing the many hundreds of millions of R&D, invest, etc... you have to put in a product that is built in small quantities.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    10. Re:better off without it by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      And the high demand is not causing the price to go up because of price controls. So it's quite possible to get the car at below cost, especially if you are an early adopter. The Playstation 3 was sold at a loss for several years, because Sony was assuming that they would eventually be able to produce them more cheaply, and they wanted the benefit of price stability.

      Market value, cost, and price are not always in sync.

    11. Re:better off without it by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      It *could* be a sign of weakness. Or it could be a brilliant business decision. In any case I wouldn't consider this open letter to be *useful* feedback. It doesn't take a PR mastermind to figure out that people don't like having their time wasted. People like to feel important, and wasting their time works against this.

      By the same token revoking this guy's order makes everyone else who is still getting their Model X feel more important because they are getting this thing that is privilege that could have been revoked.

  22. Legal requirement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the things about harassment is that you as an employer are liable for 3rd parties harassing your employees because you have a duty towards your employees.

    So if Musk has any reason to believe based on this guy's behavior that this guy will be harassing his employees, he actually has a legal obligation to kick this guy to the curb.

    1. Re:Legal requirement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What a refreshing change from companies who are willing to destroy their employees to save a sale

    2. Re:Legal requirement? by Hylandr · · Score: 2

      This needs to be modded up. Props for the boss that stood up to shit customers. PROPS.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    3. Re:Legal requirement? by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So if Musk has any reason to believe based on this guy's behavior that this guy will be harassing his employees, he actually has a legal obligation to kick this guy to the curb.

      Yeah... no. I don't honestly see anything so far to indicate it was coming anywhere near that, let alone approaching the point where it would become a legal issue.

      Can't predict what the guy would be like in the future, but a bit of slightly (at most) and not entirely unwarranted entitled-rich-guy criticism doesn't suggest that so far.

      Let's be honest; Musk responded that way because he could get away with it, but it doesn't mean he was doing it for legal (or noble) reasons, just that he was in a position where he could afford to do that in response to something that obviously got under his skin.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re: Legal requirement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. It boils down to supply and demand. My company sells megaprinters. If your company wants to buy one, you prove to us you can do what it takes to provide power, operators, finances, and safety. If you can't do any if this, or otherwise piss off the powers that be, you can go to our competitor, and we'll go to yours.

      Right of refusal is a pretty big deal in ultra high end markets.

    5. Re:Legal requirement? by DerekLyons · · Score: 0

      One of the things about harassment is that you as an employer are liable for 3rd parties harassing your employees because you have a duty towards your employees.

      So if Musk has any reason to believe based on this guy's behavior that this guy will be harassing his employees, he actually has a legal obligation to kick this guy to the curb.

      No, he doesn't have a legal obligation to kick to the curb someone who he believes might at sometime in the future harass employees.

      What we're seeing here isn't Musk protecting his employees - but Musk's ego lashing out at a critic while at the same time putting himself in a positive spotlight (again) to the vast enjoyment of his legion of fanboys. (And some of the defenses of Musk's action here by said fanboys are amazing - if a politician used such flimsy and screwball logic, he'd be skewered. But it's just another day in the life of a fanboy.)

    6. Re: Legal requirement? by ytene · · Score: 0

      I am not sure that this is universally applicable. For example, in the UK we just had a case reported in which a Christian-run cake-decorating business was taken to court and successfully prosecuted for declining to decorate a cake for a same-sex couple. In that case the law decided that a refusal to serve constituted discrimination. I cite this example because we have to be very careful that deny-to-supply does not become discrimination (even though I would concede it happens far more frequently in other industries). There is a useful expression for cases like this: "The law may upset reason, but reason may not upset the law...", meaning that no matter how reasonable or justified a course of action can be, if it can be shown to breach an act and be, for example, discriminatory, then that heralds a world of hurt for the service provider... As a non-lawyer this always strikes me as weird, because if a vendor chose not to deal with me for some random reason, I would conclude they are not worth my custom and simply walk away. In this case, maybe you had to be there...

    7. Re: Legal requirement? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      As I already commented, it's about "supply and demand" insofar as Musk knows there is more demand than cars he's likely to be able to manufacture, so he can get away with dismissing customers like that. But I don't think that was the reason for the cancellation itself.

      I'm not sure what the remainder or your paragraph has to do with "supply and demand" though, unless you're saying that you can dictate to your customers because there's more demand from them than you produce? I'm not in your industry, I wouldn't know.

      No-one's claiming that Musk doesn't have right of refusal. However, if he does do that for what some may consider personal or petty reasons- which he's entitled to do- others are still free to point out or criticise that. Also, we're talking about cars here- pretty expensive ones outside the price range of anyone who isn't at least moderately "rich" by US standards, but still just cars and not stupidly-rich-Saudi-Price-only-five-were-ever-made-price-level ones either.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:Legal requirement? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I did note one thing in the launch. When the guy handed him the keys, Elon stopped to look him in the eyes and say thankyou, before moving on with the rest of the launch. As for the cancelled order, with so many customers waiting for the chance, that car could likely be sold ten times over.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Legal requirement? by baegucb · · Score: 1

      In the late 90s, the owner of a company worked for, we didn't have the time for and owner didn't have the patience to deal with a customer. So he quoted $2,000 for me to fix a problem. Customer said yes, and a few hours later problem was fixed. If a customer is not happy, imho they can move on. Owner is always right, if customer doesn't lose money and wasn't discriminated against, he should move on.

    10. Re: Legal requirement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how the law works in the UK specifically, but it's not unusual that protected classes like age, race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation might be protected from discrimination, while discriminating based on other things is OK. Like being fat or short or dying your hair or wearing a bow tie, etc. Or more acceptably, giving rude customers the boot ("we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone*" *as long as it's not solely because they are a member of a protected class).

      Of course, determining whether a business discriminated against someone based on their belonging to a protected class can be tricky. Did you discriminate against a customer because they were acting like an asshole, or because they were an obnoxious asshole who's Catholic? Do you treat all obnoxious customers the same, or do you treat obnoxious men differently from obnoxious women?

    11. Re:Legal requirement? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nope. Musk's actions are reasonable regardless of your fanboyhood. If a customer pisses you off, fire them. There have even been books written about firing your customers.

      It just happens when you fire a blogger, he goes out of his way to try to make your reasonable action look unreasonable, thus proving that the customer deserved firing.

    12. Re:Legal requirement? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Nope. Musk's actions are reasonable regardless of your fanboyhood.

      Nope. "Firing" a critic (who is completely correct about your fuckups) is in no way reasonable. It's childish and petty.

      And thank you for so eloquently proving my point.

    13. Re:Legal requirement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he said ^

    14. Re:Legal requirement? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't care about this issue enough to compare the blogger's report of the event to others, but base on the comments here, either you are lying (so far the *only* person I've seen who asserted the blogger was factually accurate) or the people in the many posts pointing out the factual errors in the blogger's complaints are lying. I'll let you guess which side I'm on in that point.

      And I already know you are a liar, because you implied I'm a fanboy. I have no care at all about Musk or his endeavors. The only fanboy here is you. If one can be a negative fanboy.

    15. Re:Legal requirement? by Lew-the-nerd · · Score: 1

      Sorry I don't have any mod points to mod this up. I read the referenced articles, the open letter, searched for the original blog about BMW. Whatever the inferred tone, the facts seem to speak for themselves about the event being late and poorly planned and the BMW being screwed up. Elon Fanboys need to take a step back.

    16. Re:Legal requirement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did Musk stew over this for 4 months and then finally decide to take action now? Or is Alsop leaving out actions he took in the intervening months that led to this point? Is it more realistic to assume that it slowly ate away at Musk for months until he finally lost it and cancelled the order or that the guy who wrote the tone deaf entitled initial post continued to be an entitled whining asshole for 4 months to the point that Musk decided to take action now?

      The story as it currently stands makes no sense from any perspective unless there's missing information. And given that one guy decided to create this long post and then use his PR guys to shotgun it out (as shown by the fact that you cannot get anything from searching "Alsop" besides several pages all pointing to this story in basically every news outlet on the web, including ones that don't normally deal in tech) and the other just gave a short twitter response despite the fact that Alsop's version of events seems to indicate that Elon Musk has been planning this for months, I'm willing to bet Musk is the one who probably has more to the story that we don't know.

  23. Blogger Entitlement Syndrome by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I blog, therefore I demand. When I don't get, I blog even more.

    1. Re:Blogger Entitlement Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't even have a blog.

  24. Alsop is a blow hard. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Honestly all he has ever been is a spoiled brat that has temper tantrums. He tries to stir up crap like this to try desperately to keep his name relevant.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  25. Re: That guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. This Muskie moron is so typical. He hates us and u just know he's a racist since he from south africua

  26. IMO, valid complaints by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just getting blown up into a bigger deal than it should be because one crowd is eager to defend Tesla Motors against any negative press, while the other is eager to make Musk look like an arrogant jerk (a la the late Steve Jobs).

    The way I see it though, Stewart Alsop didn't really bring up any complaints that weren't valid. He's right... Who starts a product launch event over an hour late and doesn't even acknowledge they ran behind? And really, it's poor planning at best to promise participants a test drive when you clearly have too many people signed up for one than you can accommodate. (He said he had number 1,344? Come on! You might not get through that many people in an entire day at an auto show -- much less an event at night that already started an hour late!)

    If Tesla wants to cancel his pre-order, fine. Maybe that helps send a message that they won't be pushed around by people making a lot of demands, and that will help them eliminate some problem customers. But I think it also shows some of us that their leader isn't very good at taking criticism. That's unfortunate because the ability to do so helps make a better product and improve customer service.

    1. Re:IMO, valid complaints by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The funny part of the conflict is that most of the people who are ready to defend Tesla really don't care if Elon Musk is an arrogant jerk, or not.

      The CEOs that aren't arrogant jerks are mostly just greedy bastards, or incompetent nincompoops.

      The complaints are funny; who do you expect to be at a "product launch event?" Why would that be on a tight schedule? Most of the people there are from out of town, aren't actually in a hurry to leave the event, are interested enough in it to actually be there in person, and are going to be nearby drinking afterwards with other participants.

      Has he ever been to an auto show? Or a rock concert? Those are the types of events that are similar. It is not a serious event, it is a type of party that is put on for the company to interact with the most dedicated fan-customers. Have you ever been to a sports "fan appreciation event?" Casual fans that only want to attend if they can meet a celebrity with an under 2 hour wait... maybe they should have better things to do, right? These events are for people who want to spend their day waiting around to maybe get an autograph. If you're not willing to wait in line for 2 hours to NOT get to the front of the line before the celebrity leaves, you're in the wrong place. People that get to the front of that line often are putting their whole day into the event, and liking it. They might have slept outside the door last night.

    2. Re:IMO, valid complaints by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I think it's more that they feel that Elon Musk has in some sense earned the right to be a jerk, and this blogger hasn't. I tend to agree.

    3. Re:IMO, valid complaints by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The way I see it though, Stewart Alsop didn't really bring up any complaints that weren't valid

      Also Musk reacted in a perfectly valid way to an open letter that started by telling him that he should be personally ashamed.

      Valid complaints expressed very publicly in a very insulting manner tend to cause a different reaction to valid complaints not hidden under a pile of insults. Insults tend to get noticed more than anything of worth that is delivered with them.

    4. Re:IMO, valid complaints by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      He's right... Who starts a product launch event over an hour late and doesn't even acknowledge they ran behind?

      Everyone does. It takes more than 30 seconds to check in 3,000 people and get them sitting down in an auditorium. When they said, show up at 7:30 PM sharp, that doesn't mean that the event starts at 7:30 PM. This isn't to say that the event didn't run behind, but saying that the event started over an hour late because it began at 8:45 PM is somewhat misleading.

      Also, the blog post got really personal really fast. The guy could have made many of the same arguments without making it a personal attack on Elon Musk. And he could have done it privately first. After all, if you have a complaint, you deal with the manager, you email, or you call, and you try to attempt to remedy the situation through a private communication. You don't start immediately taking out your blow horn and start launching personal attacks at someone.

  27. Re: That guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allsuck is a well know complainer so he must be one of their kind.

  28. Editor of Infoworld? by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this guy the editor of Infoworld during the heyday of Bob Cringley? I remember reading his columns, and he seemed to be a reasonable person then. I wonder what happened?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Editor of Infoworld? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Typically nothing would have made it to press without someone else looking at it.
      Thus whiny non-articles would be seen as a total waste of space and cut.

  29. Roll with the punches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musk has done some amazing things, but he and his associated companies need to learn to take a little criticism as well. Just look at the Top Gear debacle, all that headache over a show that goes out of its way to make sure the audience knows they and their "reviews" shouldn't be taken seriously.

  30. If Alsop is going to brag about his . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Alsop is going to brag about his press credentials ("It’s funny because I wasn’t acting in my old role as a press pundit") maybe he shouldn't misspell "misled" ("I feel like I was mislead and mistreated.").

  31. The customer is NOT always right by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Corporations are not people and should not ever be offended

    Corporations are staffed by people who routinely are (and often should be) offended by rude and self important customers. There is no such thing as being rude to a corporation because corporations as you rightly point out are not people and you can only be rude to people. If you interact with a corporation you are interacting with the people who work there and it is quite possible to offend those people with your behavior. If you think it is acceptable to be rude to someone merely because they are a representative of that company then you are a jerk.

    Being rude to a company should not affect the way the company does business or whom it does business with.

    Clearly you have never had a business relationship. Most people are fine and when they have issues they can be reasoned with. Some small percentage customers cannot be pleased no matter what you do. Sometimes the right thing to do is to (figuratively) fire the customer. I've had customers of my company that were excessively difficult, demanding, expensive and sometimes extremely rude. I once fired a customer for making lewd remarks to one of my female employees. One of the dumbest things ever said in the business world is that "the customer is always right". Believing that is a great way to go out of business.

    1. Re:The customer is NOT always right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you interact with a corporation you are interacting with the people who work there and it is quite possible to offend those people with your behavior. If you think it is acceptable to be rude to someone merely because they are a representative of that company then you are a jerk...Some small percentage [of] customers cannot be pleased no matter what you do. Sometimes the right thing to do is to (figuratively) fire the customer.

      I agree that, based solely on what I know of him from this report, Alsop seems like he's kind of a turd. And I admire Musk possibly more than any other businessman in history.

      But I don't think I can support the cancellation of the pre-order. Because if this kind of behavior is deemed acceptable, what's to keep Comcast or EA or [other terrible company] from retaliating against the customer when they speak out against them in the press? I don't want to live in that world--though I suppose perhaps I already do.

  32. both ways by phorm · · Score: 2

    And in this case, negative feedback is perhaps providing an important feedback to the customer: If you're being difficult and attention-seeking, perhaps it won't work out how you had planned.

    Of course since the response seems to be more attention-seeking, I suppose the lesson was NOT learned.

  33. TESLA DID NOTHING WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Join the prosperous work camps of Mars, just don't be rude about the long hours and lack of food or Musk will shut off your air supply.

  34. What an idiot by dhaen · · Score: 1

    That.

  35. Just as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tesla x is pretty ugly., For that kind of money, there's a lot better choices.

  36. Context dependent, some literally deserve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not necessarily yelling, which is always counterproductive, but certainly being rude. Wait, did I just defend this guy? Fuck no. What I am saying is just because a person is being rude, doesn't mean he or she is the devil or wrong or undeserving of attention. Companies have a lot of shitty, truly unjustifiable policies; and their employees do a lot of shit. You need to take some responsibility for the behavior of the customer in the face of some shitty event. They bear some, but cannot bear all. Further a lot of people consider being told their wrong to be "rude" - and that's all they report to anyone. Be wary of these people. Try not to hire them.

  37. old article? by jlv · · Score: 4, Informative

    Alsop's "open letter" is from Sep 30, 2015. The order cancellation happened now?

    1. Re:old article? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well the company does have a massively huge backlog of orders, chances are Musk's inbox is equally backlogged.

  38. Potential Asshole Customer by LeonPierre · · Score: 2

    He sounds like the typical asshole customer that loves to invoke the threat of lawyers on the smallest of whims every time something does not go their way.

    People like that and the lawyers that take their money deserve exactly what's coming to them. Don't like the service that you're getting: do it your own damn self.

    If your outlook and ability to run a company is so much better build your own damn car, fix your own electronics, do your own work.

    No amount of money is worth a shitty customer.

    --
    "If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet"
  39. Re: Waahhh rich people problems by zlives · · Score: 1

    i would suggest Hillary supporter since there was no mention of walls...
    however also no mention of guns or religion so could be republican...
    a troll well done either way :)

  40. Is that legal? by yes-but-no · · Score: 1

    I thought to do business in a society (I mean developed/modern one) you can't discriminate a customer. Just because someone's behavior is not agreeable to you, how can you deny him the right to purchase your product?

    1. Re:Is that legal? by Higaran · · Score: 1

      Yes you can, this type of situation is not praised on a regular basis, it does happen all the time. Usually it is just some drunk unruly guy gets kicked out of a bar, no one cares about that. If you do something at a store, and they deam it inappropriate and you get banned from the premises, then it's really not that different.

    2. Re:Is that legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, when was "entitled douchebag" added to the list of protected classes?

    3. Re:Is that legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can - as long as it's not due to some specific criteria, like race, religion, gender...

  41. Musk isn't Perfect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be? The ever pandering slashdot crowd's savior/messiah isn't perfect? It IS true!

  42. Thankyou. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporations are not people and should not ever be offended. Being rude to a company should not affect the way the company does business or whom it does business with. It is just Musk being a douche, because he's becoming arrogant.

    First, I would never put a deposit down on anything without knowing exactly what I am getting - that includes getting a test drive. No test drive, no money.

    Secondly, I read this guys open letter, I didn't think is was rude at all. But that's become the excuse for poor customer service these days; label the customer as "rude" and dismiss them.

    Lastly, I see a lot of comments about "rude" customers should be just dismissed. Well, when I PAY money and do not get the service I PAID FOR, I try to work it out - I ask ever so nicely that butter doesn't melt on my mouth if there's something that can be done.
    Unfortunately in our society, the customer is to be exploited and abused. We're replaceable. Musk has got customers coming out of his ears.
    Putting my MBA hat on, Musk is brilliant. He should be awarded an MBA by Harvard for his business prowess and ethics.

  43. Disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While companies may have the right to do this, this is troubling regardless of how "rude" the future critic might have been. I do want to hear from such people and not just the fan boys. This guy was not disruptive, he just complained about a badly manged event. I am more surprised that others did not complaint. May be they are all scared of not getting a Tesla.

  44. Sets a great precedent for AT&T, Comcast, etc. by jmcbain · · Score: 1

    Surprise, surprise. Being rude to a company results in bad service from that company. Hardly news except that it was [AT&T / Comcast / insert any company] that was the victim. Maybe the entitled customer has learned his lesson, but probably not.

    Wrong message to send to corporations.

  45. What's good for the goose... by westlake · · Score: 1

    Reading these posts, I can't help wondering how the geek would respond if someone at Microsoft were to cancel an order for a Surface laptop because its CEO thought a blogger was too persistent, too visible and too annoying a critic.

  46. Doubtful many people know Alsop by cshotton · · Score: 2

    It'd be interesting to know how many people here who are flaming Tesla actually know Stewart Alsop from his heyday in the '90s. Likely not many. The guy was used to throwing his (considerable) weight around the tech industry for a long time, expecting his every whim and complaint to be kowtowed to by the industry because he controlled a powerful industry trade rag. Now, as a print media has-been, he is frustrated because he can't snap is fingers and have a company leap into action. So, he pitches a petulant rant online and expects Elon (who was surely on the short end of Alsop's rants in his PayPal days) to leap up and do his bidding. Screw that! I applaud Musk heartily for shutting down the troll. As a happy Tesla owner, I sure wouldn't want to see an unending stream of attitude spewing forth into the Tesla forms from this guy.

    --

    Shut up and eat your vegetables!!!
  47. Re: Waahhh rich people problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It speaks volumes about what a partisan dipshit you are, not so much about anybody else.

  48. Uh, consider this. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

    Corporations are not people and should not ever be offended. Being rude to a company should not affect the way the company does business or whom it does business with. It is just Musk being a douche, because he's becoming arrogant.

    When you are rude to a company, you are rude to the employees. Good managers and owners cut off shitty customers from the start to avoid that kind of shit from happening (which can have terrible consequences down the road - I have witnessed this. The customer is not always right.).

    I am not saying this is exactly what happened in the story. I'm simply giving you a counter-argument to the above statement of yours.

  49. After Musk was 2 hours late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To hell with this other asshole, but Musk isn't exactly innocent in this exchange. It's a fucking awful precedent to set after he (Musk) was the first to screw up.

  50. Big data is coming folks. Are we ready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we are really going with, corps have the right to refuse service to individuals for being a blogger. I suppose they de facto do, but... this is a good thing?

    Sure he is a jerk, maybe. But do we really want to say sit down shut up if you don't want to be on the corporate shit list.

    And soon people will really need to not piss off supermarkets, or companies with ties to supermarkets.

  51. Not that I was very likely to buy a Tesla, but... by rthille · · Score: 1

    Not that I was very likely to buy a Tesla, but I never would now. Between the CEO with his nickers in a twist over a blog entry and their ability to remote-control their cars, I've completely lost interest in owning one.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  52. Trigger warning! by lhowaf · · Score: 1

    Is this a follow-on to the John Cleese/Political Correctness article? It does provide examples of hyper-sensitive arseholes...

    Also, is this supposed to change anybody's buying habits or , well, anything?

  53. Exactly by SB5407 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    His Tesla post was clearly a personal attack on Elon. Run the numbers and it's obvious. His BMW post used about fifty I statements (as in "I noticed..., "I feel...", etc.). It used about only eight BMW statements (as in "BMW insisted...", "BMW tried...", etc.)

    His Tesla post used about twenty five Elon statements (as in "Dear Elon, you should be ashamed...", "You should have...", etc.). But it used about only twenty two I statements ("I was excited...", "I was angry...", etc.)

    In other words, his Tesla post singled Elon out three times more than BMW in the BMW post. At the same time, he used "I feel" and similar statements only half as much. As you can see, Stewart's post was clearly much more about Elon the person ("You screwed up") than about Stewart the customer ("I drove...", "I feel...").

  54. Hope it happens to you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next time you are wronged, you should get such treatment.

  55. First world problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First world problems

  56. Musk doesn'r understand. by jondeanmack · · Score: 0

    Me thinks Elon Musk doesn't understand that the customer is always correct. He may be mentally ill believing he can close shop and the remaining assets belong to him. Some other retailers may also be similarly mentally ill. Hey mentally ill, how's that gun to protect your supposed assets? Shot yourself in the foot yet?

  57. Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone works to earn a certain amount of money, they are legally allowed to purchase anything being sold for less than or equal to that amount of money. Otherwise the person who earned the money could have put the same amount of effort earning the money into building a weapon, which is a no no.

    1. Re:Money. by jondeanmack · · Score: 0

      Somebody might be surprised just how big a bomb could be built for the price of a Tesla.

  58. Stewart Alsop is a moron with cars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone seen his form - An utter idiotic, moaning moron.

    You might think Musk is a jerk, and I'm sure he can be, but at least he is a jerk that does constructive things in our society. Stewart Alsop is just a child with money and a mouth.

  59. E! Musk Does Not Control My Bank Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a very good thing!

    Fuck Musk!

  60. Why Is Elon Musk Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has a 350 billion strong army of Vergoons ready to destroy Earth, if his penis twitches to the East, and all inhabitants including bacteria.

    Z

  61. A deal is a two way thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A deal is made when each person receives something that they think is worth more than what they give in return. (Adam Smith)

    Just because we label one 'customer' and one 'supplier' doesn't mean either of them has a right to be openly rude, unreasonably critical or disparaging about the other.

  62. Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell is that insightful. Musk eliminated a threat to his perfectly crafted PR posture. Nothing at all with doing anything except making himself look perfect. It's a blog post, not yelling at customer service.

  63. No shoes no service by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It's not a government service paid for by the community so Elon can deal or not deal with people as he wishes. Consumer protection laws only come into force when the deal is done. Cancellation and refund is fair even for the most petty of reasons.

  64. Christ, what an asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is about the 10th time that I have heard of Elon Musk being a jerk or asshole in one way or another. At this point I will never consider buying a Tesla, nor will I ever suggest it to anyone else.

  65. Jerks shouldn't be able to buy royal treatment by m76 · · Score: 1

    I love it when these self infatuated jerks get handed the wrong end of the stick.

    So money can't buy everything after all.

  66. mmm... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    Someone who has been treated badly and been metaphorically kicked out the door does not write a follow up like this, which sounds more like a marketing blurb:

    "I had outlined in the original post how excited I was at the prospect of owning a Tesla, especially the Model X and especially the configuration I ultimately ordered-the P90D in red with black leather seats and the Ludicrous Speed option."

    Raises doubts for me for the whole story.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  67. The rule with assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you walk down the street and bump into one as shore, it's probably him. If you walk down the street and bump into them constantly, it's probably you.

  68. Something is missing from the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So a somewhat-famous rich dude whines about not being pampered at an event. Internets pick it up and Elon Musk gets hurt and angry. What is missing is the answer to "What exactly got him angry enough?". We know he can take criticism but what is special about this one?