Slashdot Mirror


Slysoft (of AnyDVD Fame) Closes After Increased International Pressure By AACS (myce.com)

jlp2097 writes: It looks like the recent activities by Hollywood studios and the AACS LA finally led to the closing of Slysoft Inc, creator of the popular AnyDVD HD tool for creating personal backups of BluRay/DVD/etc. Slysoft Inc's website confirms the closing due to "recent regulatory requirements". The final nail in the coffin has also been confirmed with slightly more details in their forum: "this is final. Slysoft is gone." Sad to see them go — it looks like legitimate buyers of BluRays will now have to find other sources for backing up their property to HTPCs and NASes.

193 comments

  1. I'm surpised they made it this far by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 1

    I'm astonished that they lasted as long as they did. They always seemed to avoid trouble with a certain stylish insouciance.

    Ironically, though, I never bought it, rather I just got cracked copies off kickasstorrents.

    1. Re:I'm surpised they made it this far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the new word to add to lexicon. Now to dictionary it. :)

    2. Re:I'm surpised they made it this far by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      But those cracked copies of new Blu-Ray titles will begin to dry up now. The people who created them were probably using AnyDVD to make them, or perhaps DVDFab which is sure to be the next target of the AACS. (Actually DVDFab has already been targeted; they were forced to modify the version sold to US customers to remove the ability to actually copy Blu-Ray discs.

    3. Re:I'm surpised they made it this far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well nouned!

    4. Re: I'm surpised they made it this far by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Clearly you enjoy being fired for DMCA violations way more than I do.

  2. Bummer by fishscene · · Score: 2

    Well that's a bummer. Who's going to take up the torch against the terrorists? Is there another program that does something similar?

    1. Re:Bummer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      DVDFab is still going strong.

  3. Write to your elected representatives by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Point out this case to them. Point out the total value to the economy of things like the iPod and other personal digital music players. Point out that this is vastly more than the total music and movie industries combined. Point out that laws surrounding DRM have ensured that no one could release a portable movie player that let you rip your DVDs / BluRays and so an entire industry has been unable to exist. Ask them why they hate job creation so much.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I gathered from a recent post, a bluray reader, makemkv, and the likes of an encoder like handbrake are all you need anyways. I wouldn't buy a dvd of any nature with regards to movies in any event. I could be wrong though as I have yet to buy an m-disc player. Anyone chime in on this?

    2. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point out what you want. They won't listen. Money talks and shit walks: we walk.

    3. Re:Write to your elected representatives by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would your elected representatives give a crap about what you say? You don't make campaign contributions, you just vote for them. The campaign contributions and other legal bribes are what controls the real power.

      They know exactly who they work for, and it sure as hell isn't you. They don't care about job creation, they care about corporate profits.

      This is why the US government is letting the copyright cartels write significant chunks of treaties like the TPP ... the US government is most assuredly doing the bidding of these corporations.

      Make no mistake about it, they're not working for you or your interests.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what planet you're from, but here in Murica, the RIAA and other corporations own our elected representatives. #KillaryForPresident

    5. Re:Write to your elected representatives by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And then the media companies will counter with a big pile of campaign donation cash and a request for even more stringent DRM, high per-stream royalty rates, mandatory anti-piracy payments, and other pro-industry policies. Do you think your local politician will listen to you or that big bag of cash?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:Write to your elected representatives by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. It's not like you're presented with a wide range of choices at the voting booth; the anti-corporate, anti-TPP candidates have a very difficult time getting anywhere. It's utterly amazing that Bernie and Trump are doing as well as they have (both are anti-TPP), but the establishment on both sides is doing everything it can to shut them down and make sure one of their chosen ones, Bush, Rubio, or Hillary, is guaranteed the election. (Of course, after the establishment gave him $100 million to spend on his campaign, Bush finally threw in the towel recently.)

      Even if an anti-TPP candidate wins the Presidency, he'll still have to contend with a Congress full of corporate tools.

    7. Re: Write to your elected representatives by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      How to I combine those tools to make a proper ISO copy of my DVDs and Blurays?

    8. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the downstream tools require something to first read the content sans encryption, e.g. AnyDVD.

    9. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not it's not really enough. I bought a lifetime subscription to the product because it was cheaper than buying several different DVD drives to deal with the asinine region locks. Most of the German and Mandarin language DVDs that I use for study aren't available in other regions, which meant that I can't even watch them without separate drives.

    10. Re: Write to your elected representatives by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Informative

      .isos are overkill. Just get the movie data any way you can and store it on a network share. A hell of a lot easier than dealing with optical burning. If you arent burning to optical, then you dont need isos.

      --
      Good-bye
    11. Re:Write to your elected representatives by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      Actually... the reduction in cost from buying and re-buying the same media again and again *is* a path to job creation. The "you paid $20 for the DVD, and now you'll pay $20 for a DVD that plays on your iPod, and $20 for a license to play your $20 DVD on your Mac, and $20 again for a license to watch the DVD on your phone via Amazon" thing just prices a single good at $100 when the cost isn't actually higher. Instead of paying $300 for a device to play a copy of a DVD you dumped to an SD card, you have to pay $300 and then an extra $20 per DVD you dump to that SD card, and the device maker has to have its own infrastructure and legal agreements to sell you an additional copy of that DVD so they can make sure it's locked to your device.

      This all sounds like a good way to make up bullshit jobs (which don't really exist--obviously, the jobs in question would be there to get around regulatory hurdles and make the company a profit), except that consumers don't magically have an extra $2,000 to spend on all these duplicate DVDs. Those jobs vanish away, and anything the consumer *does* buy tends to funnel mostly into licensing fees going up to the content creator--they have to make their money, and target per-unit rather than an amortization, since eliminating the lossy side of a loss-gain net positive average gets you bigger profits--which means the money is going to inefficient corporate profits instead of jobs.

      As much as corporate profits aren't evil, pouring additional profits into a corporation's bottom line at the expense of wage jobs is a good way to increase unemployment. It's just slow and inefficient: it doesn't erase the money, but it does slow down the creation of buying power demand, making sure new jobs don't pop up quite as quickly, while not slowing down the elimination of old jobs as we find ways to do more with less labor time. When you eliminate 200,000 jobs per year and only create 120,000 jobs per year, unemployment starts growing; when you eliminate 200,000 jobs per year and create 200,000 jobs per year, you hold to a nice, stable unemployment rate. It's a factor of time.

      This is one of the very few cases where someone says "job creation" and isn't completely fucking wrong about jobs actually being created by the mechanism they're focusing on.

    12. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what m-disc has to do with this. M-disc is disk storage technology, as in longer lasting data on an optical disk.

    13. Re:Write to your elected representatives by wwalker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except for Bernie Sanders. Do yourself a favor and go google top corporate contributors for him and compare to Hillary. And make your own conclusions.

    14. Re:Write to your elected representatives by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      If a thousand letters flood in this month about a particular campaign point, it's likely that a large chunk of the population has been angered into action. That large chunk is probably 0.0000001%; and we know they're only the tiniest fraction of a population who find the point meaningful. If they're so up in arms as to start sending letters, it means there's a *lot* of people out there who are going to perk up if you start speaking about the issue, and raise pitch forks if you start pushing back against their will.

      A handful of letters on one topic when there's no such noise coming your way about another topic means a sizable number of voters are thinking about that topic, even though only a few have decided to do something about it. You should probably pay attention if you don't want to lose the next election despite the six billion dollars of campaign contributions Exxon-Mobil sent you this year.

    15. Re: Write to your elected representatives by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      .isos are overkill. Just get the movie data any way you can and store it on a network share. A hell of a lot easier than dealing with optical burning. If you arent burning to optical, then you dont need isos.

      How do you preserve the DVD extras/menus with this option?

    16. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      .isos are overkill. Just get the movie data any way you can and store it on a network share. A hell of a lot easier than dealing with optical burning. If you arent burning to optical, then you dont need isos.

      If you want the menus, easter eggs, and features that come with the movie, then yes, an ISO is the way to go. I archive all my DVDs (and recently, BluRays) as ISOs because I enjoy said features.

    17. Re: Write to your elected representatives by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I dont. I really dont care about the menus and such. You can get the extras and put them in the same folder as the main movie. If you label them properly most media software will include it in the library alongside the movie. To me, the main feature is the most important part, followed by subtitles, cover art, and then extras, trailers etc.

      --
      Good-bye
    18. Re: Write to your elected representatives by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      In terms of encryption, DVDs are quite unremarkable. Any number of tools will allow you to access the contents of a DVD in unencrypted form.

      Generating a DVD ISO is a very low bar.

      BluRays are a bit more tricky. The encryption is less primitive and countermeasures are still rapidly evolving.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    19. Re: Write to your elected representatives by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see. And I understand where that covers 95% of people's use cases. I really want to back up the original product, disk space be damned, so AnyDVD was a good tool for me, and I'm not sure what to use as a replacement.

    20. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For actual DVDs it's an absolute non-issue. There are tools like dvdbackup that do it.
      For BluRay?
      The easiest way to do a 1:1 copy is to simply do a 1:1 copy. If you can get your hands on the decoding key (almost) any OpenSource player can still play that copy.

    21. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best answer I have come up with so far is Netflix (the disk service, although I have the streaming service, the selection is sadly limited). I don't buy anything and I know I'm not buying anything, and although they don't back up the disks, they do have the inherent "backup" of redundancy - they have to purchase more than just one copy of all but the most obscure titles to be able to serve their customers in a reasonable timeframe, and the disk library is huge.

      I know that's not the answer you're looking for, but I can't bring myself to "purchase" what is now essentially a rental, anyway. Actually worse than a rental, since many blu-ray's have unskippable advertising now.

    22. Re: Write to your elected representatives by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

      .isos are overkill. Just get the movie data any way you can and store it on a network share. A hell of a lot easier than dealing with optical burning. If you arent burning to optical, then you dont need isos.

      How do you preserve the DVD extras/menus with this option?

      Who cares about the menus and other crap? The menus serve no purpose when you're serving everything up through something like Kodi or Plex. If there's some "making-of" featurette or whatever that you can't live without for a particular movie, rip it and store it alongside the movie.

      MakeMKV works pretty well for ripping both DVD and Blu-ray. It'll rip audio and video as-is (subs, too, if you need them) and dump them into a file that you can either serve up as-is or crunch it down further with HandBrake.

      Also, unlike AnyDVD, MakeMKV works on Linux.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    23. Re: Write to your elected representatives by BLKMGK · · Score: 2

      This package or possibly one of their others should help you. This one is likely what I'll be grabbing as it most closely mirrors the functionality I needed from Slysoft but they have other packages too.

      http://www.dvdfab.cn/passkey-f...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    24. Re:Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the TPP comes into effect mandating jail time for copyright infringement, does that apply to politicians too? Could get interesting.

    25. Re: Write to your elected representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be naive, of course not. One law for the king and his ministers, and another one for the small folk.

    26. Re:Write to your elected representatives by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised at how little it takes. A tiny proportion of the population ever bothers to contact their representatives. There was a Slashdot article a couple of years back about how many letters it took for an issue to come to a congressperson's attention. For a representative, it was only double figures, for a senator it was triple digits.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. If that's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They should just open source the product before they go :)

    1. Re:If that's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter, dead format. Seriously, the first time grandmas blue-ray chose not to play a new disk because it needed firmware update, it was pushed aside and the old format DVD's were the ones getting purchased.

    2. Re: If that's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I don't get what the fuss of blue ray is anyway. And 3D is just dumb. DVD works just fine for viewing movies. There is a huge difference between VHS and DVD. There is a miniscule difference between DVD and blue ray. And with DVD I can still rip copies just fine. Did it before anydvd and will continue to do so of my version of anydvd stops working

    3. Re: If that's true... by JazzLad · · Score: 2

      Doesn't matter, dead format. Seriously, the first time grandmas blue-ray chose not to play a new disk because it needed firmware update, it was pushed aside and the old format DVD's were the ones getting purchased.

      There is a miniscule difference between DVD and blue ray

      For Grandma, sure, but for those of us with great vision and nice TVs, there is a huge difference.

      And 3D is just dumb.

      Yup, this we can agree on.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    4. Re:If that's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a disc, disC, not a disk, disK, learn the fucking difference before you make yourself look worse.

      Disc, is derived from the word discus, a flying disc known for its circular disc shape. A disk is shorthand for diskette, a cross between a disc and a cassette, known for its rectangular box shape.

    5. Re:If that's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely wrong on the origin and usage of both words. Good job.

  5. BSD by IgnitusBoyone · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, if they can't make money off it anymore we will gladly accept it uploaded to git hub.

    --
    Momento Mori
    1. Re:BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I was thinking about this. I mean they'll probably sell off to some 3rd party in eastern Europe but if I was closing shop like this I'd give the ultimate middle finger and dump the source code somewhere public.

    2. Re: BSD by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      You would see source code patched into existing open source project, new forks created, and users having more choice virtually overnight.

      If you can't capitalize on it, may as well make it worth everyone's while.

    3. Re:BSD by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was going to say. Since they're being forced out of business, they should stick it to The Man and open-source their code.

    4. Re:BSD by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Alas "The Man" will probably be fine with that. The entire point of Blu-Ray's access control features (vs DVDs) is that they can be constantly changing. AnyDVD in the public domain might cause a temporary blip in copying, but over time would become irrelevant.

      I'd still like them to do it though. F--- Blu-ray.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it would still be useful for people looking to avoid region restrictions on DVDs as those don't change.

    6. Re:BSD by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It was a cat and mouse game. In its current form it won't be much use and relied on a steady stream of new keys being cracked. This software isn't worth much without the method of acquiring keys.

  6. What a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess we'll have to rip our DVDs the old-fashioned way: with every other program out there, including AnyDVD's torrent copies.

  7. MakeMKV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    MakeMKV. You're welcome.

    1. Re:MakeMKV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bummer Cinavia removal isn't baked in.

    2. Re:MakeMKV by phoenix0783 · · Score: 1

      I thought that wasn't possible without completely mucking up the audio track?

    3. Re:MakeMKV by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      beta and time-limited to 60 days

    4. Re:MakeMKV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what? make it yourself.

    5. Re:MakeMKV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be free? Slysoft's products were also paid-for.

      I use MakeMKV for ripping BluRays and it's great (and cross platform). The only downside is that it struggles with the obfuscated playlists that producers are adding these days. AnyDVD used to be quite good at picking out the correct playlist from the 50 crap ones.

    6. Re:MakeMKV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not time-limited if you buy it, just like I have and just like I bought SlySoft. If people don't purchase, how can they continue supporting our cause? I bet cash flow for SlySoft was getting pretty low. Seems like a lot of people like it better to just sit around and complain while our freedoms are taken away. Put money where your heart is!

    7. Re:MakeMKV by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      beta

      Works.

      time-limited to 60 days

      I've been using it for years. Every now and then it tells me it's too old, but I just download the new version, reinstall it and it's back.

      That might change one day, but until then it's a perfectly good solution.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    8. Re:MakeMKV by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Anydvd wasn't free either.

    9. Re:MakeMKV by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to, however once the crack for AACS is discovered, a blu-ray ripping software sounds trivial, much like a file archiver or a FTP client. If WinZIP stop existing I hope people will recommend 7-zip as an alternative, not a paying solution such as WinRAR which offer no advantage.

    10. Re:MakeMKV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MakeMKV. You're welcome.

      MakeMKV doesn't preserve menus, easter eggs, and other special features that some of us enjoy having on our DVDs and BluRays. Some of are collectors and not after only the film it self.

    11. Re:MakeMKV by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Not if you buy it.

    12. Re:MakeMKV by The+Snowman · · Score: 2

      MakeMKV is free and not time-limited for DVDs, but costs money and has a time-limited demo available for Blu-rays.

      MakeMKV contains both freeware and shareware functionality. You may use MakeMKV to convert or stream DVD and AVCHD discs for free, as much as you want. Converting or streaming Blu-ray discs is shareware functionality. You can use shareware functionality for free during 30-days trial period. If you like MakeMKV and you want to use it after your 30-days trial version expires, you need to purchase a registration key.

      source

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    13. Re:MakeMKV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how you find that page, but it is not linked (in any way I could see) from the main page.
      Look at the bottom of http://www.makemkv.com/download/
      You'll see that you are technically right in that you'll have to download an new version every 60 days and that at any time they might stop offering a free version, but in practice it is free for now.

    14. Re:MakeMKV by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Yet the download page says:

      MakeMKV BETA has several major restrictions.

              Program is time-limited -- it will stop functioning after 60 days. You can always download the latest version from makemkv.com that will reset the expiration date. ...
              Blu-ray and DVD discs are fully supported. ...

      Aside from restrictions above, the program is fully functional. Produced MKV files are not degraded in any way and have no time or usage restrictions.

      The AC above me claims that the page you linked to can't be navigated to from any other page.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    15. Re:MakeMKV by robathome · · Score: 1

      MakeMKV decrypts the source, de-muxes the selected streams, and re-muxes them into a single MKV file. No transcoding. It will alter the video stream (generally by dropping frames) so that it stays in sync with audio tracks. This is typically active on titles that use seamless branching and contain overlapping video timestamps at branch transitions.

      I maintain an optical subscription to Netflix solely because a lot of major titles just aren't available for streaming. I rip BR disks via MakeMKV and send 'em back. I shove them through Handbrake to make them all nice for playback to my various endpoints, copy the resulting MKVs to a NAS, and serve them via Plex to wireless Rokus. When I'm done watching, I delete the title.

      Been in this mode for quite a while. Video, audio, and subtitles are not a problem. The only thing I had to find out the hard way was that Roku devices will just not reliably handle passthrough DTS-HD/MA audio tracks, so you're stuck with plain DTS as the highest fidelity sound.

      --

      At 3 A.M. you can see people's auras; at five you can see their contrails...
    16. Re:MakeMKV by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      Wrong, it is in Beta and the developers allow for infinite free updates to the trial license while it remains in beta. Only when the beta is over will anyone need to pay for a license. To update an expired trial license, go to the official MakeMKV forums > News and Announcements > "MakeMKV is free while in beta" thread: http://www.makemkv.com/forum2/...

      The latest trial key is available there.

      "As stated on a main page all features of MakeMKV are free while program is in beta. You may purchase the full activation key if you like the program and want to show your support, but you also may use the temporary beta key."

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    17. Re:MakeMKV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MakeMKV can preserve those things for Blu-ray, but not DVD. Use the "backup" mode.

  8. RIAA shooting themselves in the foot again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many PCs (including my own HTPC) running software such as XBMC and MediaPortal depend on slysoft to play legit BluRay discs. I guess next time they update the BluRay encryption, I'll just have to download a pirate copy instead, because I won't be able to play the legit discs.

    1. Re:RIAA shooting themselves in the foot again by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      I lost the stupid blu ray player software CD the came with my blu-ray player years ago. A couple of major computer crashes resulted in total loss and reload of my main drive. Only way I can play my blu-ray movies on my PC was via Slysoft.

    2. Re: RIAA shooting themselves in the foot again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      About what? Neither XBMC nor MediaPortal can play encrypted DVDs or BluRays natively, they require something else to decrypt the discs, and that something is anydvd hd. Future, and in fact some present, discs can only be decoded by anydvd by accessing an online database, which no longer works as of today. My information is just plain facts.

    3. Re:RIAA shooting themselves in the foot again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're lucky that it worked for a while because my experience is even worse. I tried the blu-ray player software that came with my computer and it complained that the connection to my monitor wasn't secure. I gave up at that point and I hope that the industry realizes that they lost many potential blu-ray sales from me.

    4. Re: RIAA shooting themselves in the foot again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kodi or Kodibuntu if you use the distribution comes with deCSS on the linux side. You're only screwed running them on Windows. Bluray however is very spotty on linux.

    5. Re:RIAA shooting themselves in the foot again by Kohlrabi82 · · Score: 1

      I believe that the studios and AACS are actively trying to destroy BD now, because with streaming and online sales they can control your content access and consumption far better, and they can cut out the middle-men and meat-space in the process. Taking the abilty for PC users to make use of their BD drives and discs is one way to ensure that.

  9. Go nuclear: Free software download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have offered Hollywood the final finger: Upload a free version of their software everywhere that they could and post it on every torrent tracker they could find. Having 100M downloads of AnyDVD freeware floating around on the web might teach the greedy bastards a thing or two, and essentially defeat the point of legally harassing companies like this going forward.

    1. Re: Go nuclear: Free software download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can talk when it's your life on the line.

    2. Re:Go nuclear: Free software download by ChumpusRex2003 · · Score: 4, Informative

      But that wouldn't really achieve much. The main feature of Slysoft's solution, was not the software itself (which is certainly impressive) but the fact that they would update the software with new encryption keys every few weeks, often within days of a new encryption key being used.

      AACS has a huge inventory of keys which can be used. Slysoft had managed to find an exploit in either a hardware or software player, which allowed them to extract the key when a newly released disc requested a previously unknown key ID.

    3. Re: Go nuclear: Free software download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Looks like we were hacked at the last second, on noes"

    4. Re: Go nuclear: Free software download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All hail the armchair cyberwarrior of the universe, whose pants smell of shit.

  10. Linux is your friend in legal backups by evolutionary · · Score: 5, Informative

    While you can argue piracy, the USA it is perfectly legal to make backup copies of commercial media you legitimately own. Very important for owners of old DVD, VHS tapes, laser disks and so on. Once nice thing about linux is it's a lot harder to just "shut down" because it's world wide and the USA is the most anal when it comes to copying laws. It's inverse is China where it's apparently unfashionable NOT to copy things..(and in many cases sell the copies..). Anyway, there are reasonable policies when it comes to backups of things we purchase but in the USA, the business are trying to require people to purchases their media more than once if possible. We gotta rethink these IP laws as they don't encourage innovation as much as they promote lazy fat cats to just rest on the laurels of a single creation for not only their lifetime, but the lifetime of their descendants.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you? Anti-new-economy?

      Don't you know the new USA new economy is the one where nobody does anything except extract rent from everyone else?

    2. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by evolutionary · · Score: 1

      First, answering the second question, I guess yes but.... The "new USA economy" is actually the OLD economy. The Brits sent out colonists with that exact purpose in mind and the same for India (which they did with great success for awhile). The difference is in the USA we went "wild, wild west" and in truth never went back, especially in the sense we tend to do everything through legalized extortion. (or illegal in many cases but conveniently "ignored" by authorities) I consider IP laws a new government revenue generator (think IP Real Estate) similar to selling of property that was in essence stolen from the natives who were original here.As I implied before, they need to be redone. It's actually becoming a liability for the government now ironically.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    3. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If that's what it is then yes, I'm very much opposed to an economy that brings no value to the table. Such an economy is doomed to fail in the long run because it will be pushed aside by a more dynamic one.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by sexconker · · Score: 0

      While you can argue piracy, the USA it is perfectly legal to make backup copies of commercial media you legitimately own.

      No it isn't. You have the right to make a backup or archival copy, but they have to be backup or archival copies only. You cannot actually use them as long as your original is intact. (And no, you can't sell the original and use the backup.)

      Further, you cannot make a backup or archival copy if doing so requires the circumvention of a copy-protection scheme. So for nearly every single commercially-released DVD/BluRay/etc., making a copy is illegal under the DMCA.

      Copy it anyway. Fuck the DMCA. If you relied on AnyDVD and need a quick simple alternative, look at DVDFab.

    5. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Government doesn't need revenue generators, because it already kinda owns everything. Rather IP is a mean of redistributing power to people who aren't government(yet).

    6. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely untrue. The courts have long deemed time and format shifting fair use. Your nonsense about "archival purposes" is just that, nonsense.

      Breaking the encryption does violate the DMCA, but that is a different matter.

    7. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      Agree - the only thing he's right about is that you can't make a backup and sell or giveaway the original while keeping the backup. You're allowed to circumvent copy protection all you want - but you're not allowed to distribute the circumvention. That's probably what slysoft (and I purchased anydvd a few years ago) got caught up in.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    8. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      While you are right, you miss the fact that this is an ENCRYPTION law problem, not a fair use/backup problem. Sony v. Universal is very clear that a backup is a backup is a backup, but it is trumped by the DMCA. You can copy unencrypted DVDs (they exist) for personal backups to your hearts content.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      While you can argue piracy, the USA it is perfectly legal to make backup copies of commercial media you legitimately own.

      Translation - "I'm not a lawyer, so what I say is completely right from a legal standpoint because I say so."

      The DMCA actually explicitly forbids you from making backups of many commercial media, although not all commercial media fits the definition of what isn't allowed. However, since the courts haven't ruled very much on this subject for non-infringing (ie. home use only) copies and the few rulings to date have been extremely negative to the "I can legally copy anything I buy" crowd, I can only say that you are certainly welcome to test your legal "theory" in court and I hope you are right, but I'm not betting on it.

    10. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Circumventing copy-protection is illegal under the DMCA. It trumps 'fair use'.

    11. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is still a gray area. It has never been tested in court whether or not the DMCA can override fair use.

    12. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DMCA does NOT make backing up commercial media illegal. That is still fair use. The DMCA makes breaking the encryption illegal.

      "I can legally copy anything I buy" crowd
      Um, yeah, that has been tested in court may times. The supreme court has already ruled that time and format shifting are legal. The right of first sale and first use say I can make as many copies as I want. I just can distribute them.

    13. Re:Linux is your friend in legal backups by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I think you're conflating the law and the EULAs. EULAs do generally forbid having more than one 'active' copy at a time but the law makes no distinction - people have licenses, and that's all that matters (aside from that DMCA wrinkle...)

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  11. You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "buyers of BluRays ... backing up their property"

    Buyers of any media, at all, don't own anything but a limited right to enjoy such media until the storm-troopers say they don't.

    Get with the program pops.

    1. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entitlement crowd thinks everything should be free. They have no concept of how many people make a living creating their entertainment - they only care that they are entertained.

    2. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Liar.

      Purchasers of content on media like BR simply want to be able to enjoy that media when, where and how they want and not be tied to TVs attached to BR players ramming 20 minutes of fucking commercials down their throat before they get to see what they actually bought the disk for.

      And they want to safeguard the content on the disk that they paid for against the hazards of the fragile media that is being forced on them.

    3. Re:You must be new here by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The commercials say "own it on Blu-Ray today" but the laws (bought and paid for by the entertainment industry) say "pay for a limited license to view the material as defined by the large entertainment companies and which can be revoked if they feel like it... today!"

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:You must be new here by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I start caring about Hollywood as soon as they give a fuck about me being able to actually view their crap without jumping through 100 hoops for no other reason than "we can make you".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:You must be new here by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

      This isn't "Hey, I want to download HOT NEW MOVIE for free instead of paying for it." It's "Hey, I bought a Blu-Ray of HOT NEW MOVIE but would like to view it on my computer, my tablet, my phone, etc. Why can't I rip the file and use it for my own use?"

      Yes, some people will use the rips to upload them for others (totally illegal), but we shouldn't ban technology based on "some people will use it for illegal stuff." If we did that, then all computers would be banned on the premise that some people use them to commit crimes.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no no. You don't get to watch the content that is on that BR anywhere you want. If you want to watch on your computer too, you need to buy a copy for the computer and tablet and phones, you need to pay to stream those and pay every time you stream them.

      How else are the entertainment industry going to make billions and billions of dollars some of which they need to lobby the government to tighten the noose even tighter around your scrawny little neck?

    7. Re:You must be new here by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      If the MPAA works anything like the RIAA, very little if any of the money you pay for your discs ends up in the actual artists' pockets.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    8. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not be tied to TVs attached to BR players ramming 20 minutes of fucking commercials down their throat before they get to see what they actually bought the disk for.

      Does your TV not have a mute button? You don't really have to watch those commercials -- you can ignore them with audio muted. Or are you looking for an excuse to pirate movies?

    9. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm entitled to use the copies of things that I've paid for. I've been using AnyDVD to allow me to play the discs I've bought to load on my drive. Without the software it's impossible for me to do that as I've got DVDs from China, Germany and the US. They're all legal copies that I've paid for, but I may have to resort to piracy as I'm not buying 3 different DVD drives just because the MAFIAA wants to region restrict things and then not even bother to sell them in America.

      Why should Chinese made DVDs of Chinese made TV and movies be restricted from viewing in the US? It makes no sense. Even just Mandarin language dubbed versions of movies aren't available in the US in most cases forcing people to import the copies as we can't buy them here. I'd love to buy them locally and not have to wait weeks for the copies to arrive.

    10. Re:You must be new here by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I bought AnyDVD, and completely support SlySoft... I never once copied a DVD or BluRay in violation of any copyright laws. I agree there are far too many people who simply want stuff for free, but that doesn't mean AnyDVD wasn't a great product that worked well for legitimate uses.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    11. Re:You must be new here by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      NO. The content on the disc is paid for licensed. Commercials bring no value. Give me the movie for free and I'll consider it OK to have to push the mute button on the commercials. Besides that, I'll get Cheetos dust on my fancy NSA sponsored smart-remote....

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    12. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you not entertained?

    13. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.. Merely looking for the premium experience they paid for. Premium experiences are commercial free.

    14. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you circumvented copy-protection, you were in violation of the DMCA.

    15. Re:You must be new here by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Are we having nominations for most retarded comment of the week? You should be right up there.

      This is a tool for people that have a legal copy already.

      There is no "entitlement" here except the basic expectations that come with property ownership.

      You are simply advocating the position where only corporations have rights and the rest of us mere peasants aren't entitled to personal property right any more.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:You must be new here by dissy · · Score: 1

      The entitlement crowd thinks everything should be free. They have no concept of how many people make a living creating their entertainment - they only care that they are entertained.

      Please to explain why me paying $60 to $120 per DVD and BluRay a few hundred times over makes you interpret me as being entitled to free stuff?

    17. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if anyone has tried a false advertising lawsuit against them?

    18. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about control.

      Lets say you buy the disc. Then you rip a copy for yourself. You want to save disc space, so you lower the quality from 1080p to 720p, drop the sound from 7.2 to mono, take out all the extras (subtitles, alternative languages, etc), remove trailers before the movie. Now let's say you DON'T share online, only use for personal, home use.

      Someone comes over to watch the new blu-ray and watches on your htpc. They see a crappy picture, poor sound and no extras. They immediately think the movie is crap and never buy it, because it's no good.

      That's one issue, they tried to address this by offering a downloadable, sandboxed version of movies with blu-ray purchases (ultraviolet). This gives you access to a copy of the movie in the quality they want you to have, but not something you keep.

    19. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "entitlement" can be simply added to any filters anyone has, anywhere. even if it's valid criticism it's going to be followed by a reactionaryly very narrow view of the world.

    20. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to say exactly the same thing.

  12. Re:Should have used APPS instead of LUDDITE Blu-Ra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're the moo prick, aren't you. moo was better. (still shite).

  13. Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a licensed user, but failed to download the 2/15/2016 update. Does anyone know if there is a download mirror?

    1. Re:Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      techspot had it as of recently: http://www.techspot.com/downloads/468-anydvd.html

    2. Re:Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you - it had been 3 years since I'd actually saved a version to my archived application directory.

    3. Re:Mirror? by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      I know I downloaded a copy pretty recently. I don't know if it was the last version though. I just had a feeling not too long ago that I should go grab this while it was still running (I believe there was a previous story on /. just a couple weeks ago that talked about DRM and RIAA/MPAA suing them all out of business).

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  14. How long by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Unitl a "cracked" version is all over the torrents?

    1. Re:How long by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Invent a time machine and go back years. It's been cracked since the first time they started charging money.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:How long by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't in finding a version (though I own[ed] a perpetual license), it's in getting the key updates to rip new BR discs.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:How long by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Rhetorical questions usually get the best answers :)

    4. Re:How long by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt that will remain a problem for long...

    5. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off?

  15. Virtual Clone Drive? by aristofeles · · Score: 1

    Please can someone post a (no-malware) mirror installer?

    1. Re:Virtual Clone Drive? by BenJeremy · · Score: 2

      Here's the latest I got, a week or so ago: https://mega.nz/#!O5NBkJZR!9AYwKr4lTSOauP5pgMXC-T4dF7KqpwhpBz9KwT_pcKw

      This is an absolutely "must have" tool, and it's free.

    2. Re:Virtual Clone Drive? by americamatrix · · Score: 3, Interesting
      https://www.elby.ch/en/product... - This is the underlying tech/driver for VCD from Slysoft.

      Thanks,

      -americamatrix

    3. Re:Virtual Clone Drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtual Clone Drive wasn't SlySoft's: http://elby.ch/

    4. Re:Virtual Clone Drive? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Well, the Internet Archive has copies of it.

      The only thing is it has an older version of AnyDVD HD and a couple of other programs, too.

      https://web.archive.org/web/20...

  16. probably more illegal conduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is probably the result of illegal conduct, either by members of the US legal profession, or US businesses, or the US government. We've seen many examples of similar illegal conduct by such people. It's time for that to stop.

    Any form of reasonable conduct is protected in US law under the highest law in the land, the Bill of Rights, as part of the 9th Amendment, where reasonable is defined in the eyes of the people. This includes making copies under reasonable circumstances, and thus protects tools that support doing this, whether or not those tools are free or commercial, and whether or not they are made in the USA. For any member of the US government, or any US professional, or any US based-business, to take actions to the contrary is thus a violation of US law, whether or not those actions take place in another country.

    If any such people were involved in this action, then I accuse them of illegal conduct. For the legal professionals, such conduct is a violation of their oaths to uphold the law, immediately and permanently disqualifying them from engaging in the practice of law: attempting to paid as legal professionals for having participated in this action constitutes fraud. Similarly, for US government officials to have participated in this action immediately and permanently disqualifies them from holding any position of public trust or responsibility: for these individuals to attempt to continue to get paid as government officials, or accrue pension or benefits also constitutes fraud. Any member of the US government that knowingly keeps such people employed becomes an accessory to the original violation.

    The right to reasonable conduct provides protection for individuals in many situations where they might otherwise be forced to hire the protection of a lawyer. As such, this right not only applies on its own, but also follows from the 9th Amendment right to ethical practice of law (certainly an universal and inalienable right in any society based on the rule of law).

    As with violations of other rights "retained by the people", the normal rules for immunity and right to pardon do not apply. There can be no rights retained by or reserved to the people if any entity of government can allow violation of such rights (whether by law, or precedent, or by preventing penalties from applying in the case of such violations - proof by contradiction).

    The US legal profession, as a class in society, is of course in a position of multiple ethical conflicts of interest with respect to recognizing rights retained by the people: any laws, rules, orders, or precedents that would allow US people to participate in such an action not only exist in violation of the Bill of Rights, but can be presumed to represent unethical practice of law.

    Further, if US people were involved as described above, then this is an attempt to deny the public rights granted to them by federal law, specifically "Fair Use" rights. As in other cases where businesses have attempted to do this, an appropriate penalty is for those businesses to lose the copyrights that were only granted subject to compliance with US law.

    Further, a right to long term public oversight over US government, over the practice of law, and over US-based business arises under the 9th Amendment: as such, any agreement or policy that would keep secret participation in this matter by US government officials, US lawyers, or US businesses is also illegal.

  17. Write them checks by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Money talks and bullshit walks. You don't get anything by writing letters.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Write them checks by idontgno · · Score: 1

      You don't get anything by writing letters.

      That's not really fair. Getting put onto a watchlist for disloyalty to the United Corporate States of America, Inc. qualifies as "getting something".

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Write them checks by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Money talks and bullshit walks. You don't get anything by writing letters.

      You don't get anything by just giving up and doing nothing, either.

  18. Cynicism by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish I had mod points to give the parent poster. I'm so sick of the "it won't do any good" cynicism posts like those above. You know what REALLY won't do any good? Sitting on your ass doing nothing except crying "woe is us" on Slashdot.

    Do you know how we got to the point where a lot of elected officials don't care what people think? People sitting around grousing about how elected officials don't care what they think. It's a self-fulfilling prophesy. If you're going to simply tune out of everything going on and not care or hold people to any standards, then really, why should anyone care what you think? I know if I were an elected politician, I wouldn't give a damn what people think who don't bother to let me know, or even vote. Why would I even waste my time?

    I vote in every election and primary I can. I do write to my Congresscritters. I tell my friends what I think about stuff going on and the people who are in and running for office. And yeah, sometimes it doesn't do any good, especially being a liberal in the Bible Belt South. But you know what? At least I'm trying. At least I'm not just whining about problems. And sometimes, people actually do make a difference, especially at a local level. You don't have to save the world, you just have to care. If you don't, then it sucks to be you, but stop trying to piss on the parade of those who do.

    By the way, for those of you in the "it doesn't make a difference" crowd, by all means, keep sitting on your asses. Your apathy gives people like me disproportionate say over things going on, so you know, thank you very much for that.

    1. Re:Cynicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what REALLY won't do any good? Sitting on your ass doing nothing except crying "woe is us" on Slashdot.

      That's why I'm getting off my ass and voting TRUMP. It's going to be glorious...

    2. Re:Cynicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what REALLY won't do any good?

      Yes. Voting for people like Hillary, Cruz or Rubot or the other empty suit statists. Elect Trump or Bernie; everyone else is bought and paid for.

      We need a bomb thrower. Someone that throws a bomb every day until the system bleeds from every orifice.

    3. Re:Cynicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do have a nice letter from my Congresscritter pretty much calling me a thief and a low-life because I asked him not to vote for SOPA/PIPA. However, the people over in China and Russia who told the US that blocking sites would be construed similar to a naval blockade, and an act of war, put a kibosh on that legislation... something no amount of US citizens could do.

      However, paper letters... YES, physical paper letters, do a good thing. It is a lot harder to make a physical object disappear than brain dead petitions or E-mails.

    4. Re:Cynicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. I wish I had mod points!

    5. Re:Cynicism by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      Do you know how we got to the point where a lot of elected officials don't care what people think? People sitting around grousing about how elected officials don't care what they think. It's a self-fulfilling prophesy.

      This certainly sounds great, but in reality caring and trying to change things won't work, or at least not in the USA. Why? Several reasons.
      1) The guys with money can simply buy elected officials with legal campaign contributions. The wonderful Supreme Court made this legal, carrying not or being too stupid to understand the ramifications of the decision.
      2) The vast majority of Americans simply vote on party preference for everything. Maybe 20% or at most 30% of voters actually examine the issues and consider candidates of both parties. I can't convince my neighbor to care about this if the person who supports fixing it isn't of the party my neighbor votes for.

  19. Not the source code, but how to generate a key by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 4, Informative

    Decoding both DVD and BD are "known things". AnyDVD was not the only product doing it.

    Two important parts to doing BD, though - One is having a valid key to get past the AACS, and being able to replace it when a version of AACS comes out that revokes your current key. If your key has been added to the revoked list, simply putting a disk in the drive with that version of the list essentially "bricks" the drive for reading ANY Bluray disks until you change your key.

    The second is being able to implement the BD+ interpreter to fix up deliberate errors introduced into the video... And it changes periodically.

    Where the companies that sell such products get their "market lock-in" is keeping up these changes. AACS is easier than BD+, from what I read, because you don't always have to change your key when a new AACS revocation list comes out, but the BD+ programming can and does change multiple times per month.

    1. Re:Not the source code, but how to generate a key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What other products were removing the region coding from the discs? I'm pissed at them because I bought lifetime updates not so long ago and it looks like they're going to be walking away with my money.

    2. Re:Not the source code, but how to generate a key by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I'm pissed because I was just thinking the other day I should get a newer version that supports Blu-Ray (the version I have is years old and only works on DVD). Yes, I realize there are alternatives, but AnyDVD was just easy... put the disc in the drive, and that's that. He who hesitates is lost, I guess.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Not the source code, but how to generate a key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The second is being able to implement the BD+ interpreter to fix up deliberate errors introduced into the video... And it changes periodically."

      Wait, they're doing the same crap they used to do with DVDs -- introducing standard-breaking errors as DRM?

      When are these studios going to realize all this nonsense does is annoy people who legitimately purchase their product? I'm so sick of this run-around. I bought the damned disc. Let me use the thing the way I want if I have a media server. And, no, proprietary, network-required player software doesn't compare to having a proper, local, HD copy.

      Worst case, with "perfect" DRM, people will point a video camera at a good TV showing the output from the Blu-Ray player and then torrent that.

    4. Re:Not the source code, but how to generate a key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anydvd for blue ray simply stole keys from firmware of hardware players and other software players. They never broke blue ray encryption. They went to a country where doing it was legal, then sold the product to people overseas. So it was the users braking the laws, never Anysoft.

      This worked quite well for them, however, as you will see in their forums, they were repeatedly caught out when new blue rays wouldn't work until they issued an update (ie. Got a new stolen key).

    5. Re:Not the source code, but how to generate a key by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      No, these are not "standard-breaking" errors, as this is how the standard for blueray is written. The blueray disk include interpreter bytecode that can read these memory values, derive decryption keys & decode blocks of video. The rest of the video is encrypted with AACS.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  20. Aren't there alternatives? by nikhilhs · · Score: 1

    What was so illegal about this software? There seems to be a bunch of options for ripping BLue Ray and DVDs, as well as extracting video files.

  21. Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition come by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition come back + alot more HB1's to take our jobs as well.

  22. Damn shame by malditaenvidia · · Score: 1

    Virtual clone drive was the only image mounting program worth a damn on windows.

    1. Re:Damn shame by izat · · Score: 2

      WinCDEmu is a nice open-source alternative.

  23. Increases piracy by Solandri · · Score: 2

    I buy the blu-ray of a movie I like, then download it off a pirate website. I don't even own a blu-ray player. It's just that I have a home media server and would prefer to have movies in a format I can stream throughout my house. But Hollywood insists on only letting you stream movies over the Internet. No simple way to have a local copy which plays on all my devices.

    At first I borrowed a friend's BD drive and tried ripping the blu-rays and re-encoding the movies to a smaller size (raw rip of the LotR trilogy was nearly 200 GB). After struggling with merging the two-disc parts into one movie file and keeping subtitles synchronized, I threw in the towel and just downloaded it from a pirate site. Someone much better at video encoding than I had already licked those problems, plus his encode was smaller yet higher quality than mine.

    So I ditched my plans to buy my own BD drive for ripping, and now I just pirate the movies after buying the blu-ray. Though I'm not sure you can really call it pirating, since I own the blu-ray which by Hollywood's insistence that I'm buying a license not a copy means I'm licensed to own and view the content. What does Hollywood think will happen to folks who used Slysoft's software to rip their own discs now? If the lack of updates means the software won't be able to rip future blu-ray releases, those folks are going to start doing what I'm doing - buying the blu-ray and downloading the movie from a pirate site. Only some of them won't be as honest as me and will quickly realize they don't really need to buy the blu-ray in the first place.

    BTW, this inverts the backup argument. The blu-ray disc becomes my backup copy, safely stored in its case. Heck, I haven't even removed the shrinkwrap off of most of them. Though I prefer to think of them as a physical certificate of the license to the movie, and my backup would be downloading the movie off the net again.

    1. Re:Increases piracy by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just want to point out that DOWNLOADING the file is absolutely legal under Sony V Universal since you own a legal copy. Its the UPLOADING that gets you in trouble. If you DL directly from an HTTP/FTP site, no problem 100% legal., but if you use a torrent, that can be a problem unless you zero out your upload completely.

      I went the same route as you giving up on optical, i wanted pristine disc rips, but its simply too much hassle when the scene people have it down cold.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Increases piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still pirating, though technically the person that uploads it to you and allows you to download it is the one infringing their copyright. You might be committing imaginary property theft, but I'm not aware of that particular charge ever being upheld (though honestly I haven't looked in a long time).

      Either way it's still piracy in the colloquial sense. Buying the BD grants you license to watch that particular BD on a compatible device. The one you download is a different instance of the movie and not covered by your BD purchase, because the licensing on the BD specifically gives you no rights to "the movie" as a concept or idea. Morally you may believe you compensated them for LOTR and downloading another copy is the same thing you paid for, but by the fine print you paid them for one copy and then got an additional copy that you have no rights to.

      I think your "retail as a sealed backup copy" idea could technically be used as evidence that you could not have made the copy from the movie you paid for, and any electronic copy must therefore be in violation.

    3. Re:Increases piracy by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I buy the blu-ray of a movie I like, then download it off a pirate website. I don't even own a blu-ray player. It's just that I have a home media server and would prefer to have movies in a format I can stream throughout my house. But Hollywood insists on only letting you stream movies over the Internet. No simple way to have a local copy which plays on all my devices.

      I gotta say UR DOING IT WRONG.

      If you're buying the discs you can just rip them with direct stream copying using MakeMKV. Then you get full blu-ray quality instead of some encoder's interpretation of "great picture and sound". This also keeps you off torrents, so you wont get targeted for any extortion attempts (even if it's legal for you to download the movie since you own the disc, the movie studios can lock you up in court for so long you lose even if you win). And ripping your own purchased copy to get versions for your personal use is going to look more legal than what you're doing to start with.

    4. Re:Increases piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I buy the blu-ray of a movie I like, then download it off a pirate website.

      I do the exact same thing. Except the buy the bluray part. That step is optional.

    5. Re:Increases piracy by theendlessnow · · Score: 2

      I buy the blu-ray of a movie I like, then download it off a pirate website.

      Which is a violation...even if it sounds like a legit thing to do.

      I don't even own a blu-ray player. It's just that I have a home media server and would prefer to have movies in a format I can stream throughout my house. But Hollywood insists on only letting you stream movies over the Internet. No simple way to have a local copy which plays on all my devices.

      Current decoding DVD or Blu-ray is a Federal crime in the USA.

      At first I borrowed a friend's BD drive and tried ripping the blu-rays and re-encoding the movies to a smaller size (raw rip of the LotR trilogy was nearly 200 GB). After struggling with merging the two-disc parts into one movie file and keeping subtitles synchronized, I threw in the towel and just downloaded it from a pirate site. Someone much better at video encoding than I had already licked those problems, plus his encode was smaller yet higher quality than mine.

      Either way it was a violation.

      So I ditched my plans to buy my own BD drive for ripping, and now I just pirate the movies after buying the blu-ray. Though I'm not sure you can really call it pirating, since I own the blu-ray which by Hollywood's insistence that I'm buying a license not a copy means I'm licensed to own and view the content.

      Not quite. With a Blu-ray the idea is that it is played in a licensed Blu-ray device because in truth, they still want control of your playback rights and even the ability to revoke it at will.

      What does Hollywood think will happen to folks who used Slysoft's software to rip their own discs now? If the lack of updates means the software won't be able to rip future blu-ray releases, those folks are going to start doing what I'm doing - buying the blu-ray and downloading the movie from a pirate site. Only some of them won't be as honest as me and will quickly realize they don't really need to buy the blu-ray in the first place.

      Not everybody is willing to break the law at any cost to get their own way though. I'm not saying your scenario won't happen though.

      BTW, this inverts the backup argument. The blu-ray disc becomes my backup copy, safely stored in its case. Heck, I haven't even removed the shrinkwrap off of most of them. Though I prefer to think of them as a physical certificate of the license to the movie, and my backup would be downloading the movie off the net again.

      Your actual Blu-rays are legal of course, you're just not exercising your right to view them on an authorized playback device. Since you're targeting non-authorized playback, either ripped or downloaded from the net... those copies, even of media for which you have physical discs, is in violation.

      Country needs a big fix. Sure make copying and distributing Blu-rays and DVDs illegal... I get it. But we (those with backup servers or media servers) should not have to commit a Federal Crime to watch what we own. It's insane.

    6. Re:Increases piracy by rworne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Downloading content you could otherwise rip via fair use or space shifting is not legal.

      See MP3.com and their cloud service which looks a lot like today's Apple's iTunes Match:

      Buy a CD, pop it in your computer, download MP3's from MP3.com without having to rip and encode.

      They lost because essentially having someone else rip your CD's for you requires permission from the copyright owner. That cost MP3.com $53.4 million.

      UMG v. MP3.com

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    7. Re:Increases piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Illegal for the distributor, probably not illegal for the downloader.

    8. Re:Increases piracy by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Legal for the downloader, not legal for the uploader. Sony v Universal and subsequent rulings say a 'backup is a backup is a backup', it doesnt matter where it comes from. This has been tested quite thoroughly. MP3.com 'made available' copyrighted works without permission of the copyright holder, which is the legal tripwire. Downloading is not 'making available'.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:Increases piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely wrong. Both downloading and uploading would be illegal. I don't know where people got the idea that just distribution was illegal. Also, there is no "making available" right reserved in copyright law. That is just something that the media companies dreamed up.

  24. possession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, this all goes back to first sale theory and possession.
    If I buy something, I own it. To copy, alter, gift.
    This applied until the EULAs had the "licensing' clause.... and the courts upheld the 'licensing' clause.
    For software.
    Then Hollywood lawyers and some programmers ( they are guilty also ) came up with DRM
    and keys for holding hostage anyone who 'might' copy something, even for backup or educational use ( Fair use ).
    For movies and songs.
    Now 'they' are going after any tools to break their locks. ( they are Hollywood, US Government, and some millionaires and billionaires).
    The congressmen are already bought, FBI also, laws have been passed, so it is too late.
    Only a Furion can stop this. Or The Joker.
    Or maybe a religious movement - OH! The televangelists have been bought also? Damn!

    1. Re:possession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The software engineers who developed the DRM for Hollywood (I know them),
      were paid each US $250,000,000.00 and receive free lifetime medial for themselves
      and their immediate family; paid up college tuition for their children. It was a team of
      20 people, managers and support people.

      At least that's what should have been paid - if I were asked to do a job with such
      socially damaging implications, that's about my price point. If they worked for anything
      less, they're fools...

      CAP === 'subtree'

    2. Re:possession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I buy something, I own it. To copy, alter, gift.

      Bzzzt! Quite wrong! Let me make a car analogy to illustrate. If you buy a Ford truck, you are allowed to drive it, park it etc. You may NOT duplicate the truck and gift a copy to your friends or family.

      Also, your ownership is limited to using the truck. Reverse engineering the design is illegal. Ford owns the copyrights and patents related to the truck and is the only true owner of that truck.

    3. Re:possession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is NO law again duplicating a truck.
      There is NO law again reverse engineering a design.
      Copyrights and patents are NOT owned by Ford, as they are not property. They are (supposed to be) limited monopolies granted by law.
      The right of first sale says that once they sell me the truck, I can do whatever I want with it, including reselling, renting, or tearing it apart to see how it works.

  25. Interesting thought. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how far can they pursue this route and kill off fair use before they end up killing off demand for their product and their industry as a whole in this day and age?

    I mean 40 years ago, they had a pretty die hard lock on stuff as the costs made it too expensive make much of anything like Movies or Music but now, that isn't the case anymore and it is getting cheaper and cheaper to replace them and the industry by the year.

    As it stands, they are fighting copying Blu-Rays and such with DRM, they are attempting to fight streaming companies attempts to replace the set-top box. If they truly get what they want in this day,I think they will end up killing off most of the demand for their products as a whole since people will lack format shifting capabilities or be locked into annoying limitations like forcing you to watch a warning or 15 minutes of previews every time you put in your movie.

    As it stands, I don't even have a DVD or Blu-Ray player in my living, what I have is a Blu-Ray drive in my computer, a copy of Handbreak and a 2 Terabyte Hard drive to put them on so I can keep my copies safe from the kids and allow me to watch it when I want to, how I want to along with Hulu Plus (Got this one for free) to watch the TV shows as they come out and Netflix just because I love the service and back catalog.

    If I can't format shift the movies, I don't get them, just that simple and if either Netflix or Hulu starts getting too bad off following them, I can just as easily drop them as well.

    1. Re:Interesting thought. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have already started killing demand for their product. I think that is a big contributor to the gaming industry these days. I can spend $60 on a game and easily get 40 to 60 hours of entertainment out of it but if I spend $30 on a bluray I only get 2 hours. It is a crappy deal and is reserved for very few movies these days.

      It is the same formula for Netflix and Amazon Prime. The only good news is that I don't have to buy as many new drives since my Media NAS isn't growing nearly as fast these days.

  26. Re:A vote for Bernie is a vote for Trump by ewibble · · Score: 1

    This is the same logic that means you are stuck with a two party system, (the stooge on the left or the stooge on the right) don't vote for the independent, that is like throwing away your vote. Vote for the person you believe in most, it is not like vote counts for that much anyway. If enough people buy into this nonsense it becomes true. If Donald Trump has a personality you either like or hate, if you hate him you will vote for anyone who runs against him.

  27. Wait, so they want us to pirate the movies? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    If we can no longer make legal backups of our own discs, the only feasible alternative is to just pirate them all. No DRM, no ads, no unskippable crap... no bullshit. If the disc is damaged, just burn it again... or, keep the video file as part of a digital media library and gain the ability to stream it from anywhere. I see 0 value in physical media anymore.

    1. Re:Wait, so they want us to pirate the movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They defenitely don't want us to buy DVD and BluRay media anymore

  28. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would probably miss this software if I ever had or used it, but it's not the case. I don't care about copying DVDs or anything. I care about stomping on dogs. When I see a dog, I stomp on it. Dogs bark, bite and piss on car tires. That's why I stomp on dogs. I stomp them flat. Stomp stomp stomp.

  29. Doesn't Disney add copy protection? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    They used to. When I used to bother ( before I could just buy digital copies and Steam) it was a constant battle between them and slysoft. Maybe they don't bother anymore.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  30. Re:Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition co by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with pre-existing conditions? It's not insurance if you are able to wait to buy it until after you need it.

    I can't wait for my house to catch on fire then call the insurance company and demand they cover my house. And if I lose my house with everything I own in it, it can greatly destroy my ability to care for my self and family.

    Hillary will also add a lot more HB1 visas too. Really, the ones most likely not to do it are Trump, Sanders, and Cruz

  31. Re:A vote for Bernie is a vote for Trump by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    It's funny that people represent a long standing senator as some sort of "man of the people". He's as much part of the establishment as anyone. Regardless of his politics and his campaign slogans, he's simply not what he's pretending to be.

    If you really want to vote for a 3rd party candidate, than just do that. Don't pretend the Senator from Vermont is some sort of maverick outsider.

    See Ted Cruz for an example of "maverick outsider" senator. He's what that really looks like and it isn't pretty.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  32. Re:A vote for Bernie is a vote for Trump by JackieBrown · · Score: 0

    Hilary has corporate donors because she has to work within the f*cked up electoral system we have (thank you Citizens United and a gutless, pro-corporate supreme court).

    That was done in large parts to even the playing field against big union campaign money. If the democrats hadn't capitalized on that money for the past 40 years, Citizens United would never have had to be implemented.

  33. Re:Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition co by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Bush, Rubio ... + alot more HB1's to take our jobs as well.

    With the democrats, we won't even need to have that program once they start legalizing anyone that crosses our border.

  34. sue the mpaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to see every owner of a DVD and blueray file a class action against the MPAA

  35. blue balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not but media you cannot copy.
    Let that shit sit on the shelf and collect dust.
    Let them take that blue ray shit and shove it up their asses sideways.

  36. Boycott Hollywood!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Let Hollywood know you are boycotting their products until they let you use the content you legally purchased, e.g., ripping a DVD or BluRay to make a backup or upload to your NAS to play on your Wifi-enabled TV or iPad.
    2. Stop buying all Hollywood products: CDs, DVDs, BluRays, movie theatre tickets, etc.
    3. Use only *legal* alternatives to buying these products, e.g.,
        a. Go to your local public library to borrow CDs, DVDs, BluRays, etc.
        b. Organize a "swap" to swap CDs, DVDs, BluRays, etc. with your family, friends and co-workers.
        c. Patronize flea markets, garage sales, and used book/cd/dvd dealers to buy these products second-hand
    4. Create your own content and share on sites like YouTube. Or donate to groups who make such content such as the ones making StarTrek fan films.
    5. Create a website to encourage more people to boycott, and post on https://www.reddit.com/r/boycotthollywood
    6. Forget about trying to influence your politicians: They're bought and paid for by Hollywood... At least until you deprive Hollywood of enough revenue that they can no longer afford to buy political influence!

  37. Re: Should have used APPS instead of LUDDITE Blu-R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave him alone. The apps guy is funny, damn it!

  38. slow clap by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

    Well done AACS! You have managed to crush a product that allowed people to rip DVDs in an age when DVDs are obsolete. Unfortunately, you've also crushed a product that is completely legal and allows us to mount DVDs that we have legitimately downloaded from software vendors! You have absolutely succeeded at the wrong goals entirely.

    1. Re:slow clap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. In fact, on the key reason I avoid blu-ray in favour of plain old DVDs is the ability to rip the content in a reliable way for my media pc (the disc is a transport (to my house) and backup medium/shelf decoration, nothing more). So essentially this DRM shit has killed any desire I had to purchase the very product they are trying to promote.

      Still I can't complain. Time was I wasted significant amounts of money of videos, tapes, CDs, DVDs and other things I rarely watched or listened to. Now I go to the very occasional movie, buy the occasional TV series on the cheaper of the two media left, and get outside more to spend the money I save on other things. So I'm happier, healthier, and better off!

  39. Step 1: Move libertarians to NH 2: Independence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is why I've joined the Free State Project. We're getting to 20,000 signers and 10% have already moved. In the years to come we'll have the first libertarian state where the goal of those in power will be to abolish laws rather than create them. It's pro individual-liberty anti-big-government. It might seem cold hearted to throw people out on the street, but that isn't the goal of libertarians. The goal is to keep government out of our lives. We can house those who are impoverished, feed the needy, and take care of ourselves without the government. The problem isn't that we can't do those things. The problem is government has taken away our abilities to do these things voluntarily. I can't afford to send my kid to a private school when the government steals a significant portion of my income that would've allowed me to do so. While the libertarian might prefer to abolish the public school system that isn't necessarily the same thing as ending the guarantees on education. A government could very selectively guarantee loans to those below the poverty line and relieve that debt at a particular future date should a person never be in a position to pay it back within a reasonable amount of time. There could be a 20 year period to pay back a 20 year debt after which that debt becomes the liability of the state.

  40. Netflix DVD and Redbox death by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 1

    If this holds up and there is no comeback, look for Netflix DVD and Redbox revenue to dry up faster.

    Let's face it streaming video is nice, but the studios frack it up with there contracts that cause content to disappear from Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, etc. It is the absolute worst customer experience to add something to your watch list only to find it gone when you go back to watch it.

  41. Ripping Software Architecture Proposal by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 1

    Slysoft should release a new version that has a plug-in architecture.
    - the new version (as sold) will only rip unprotected DVD/BDs
    - 3rd parties (cough, cough) can distribute plug-ins that have the decryption functionality

    Ideally those plug-ins will be open sourced and given freely on the web.

  42. Re:Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition co by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's wrong with pre-existing conditions? It's not insurance if you are able to wait to buy it until after you need it.

    Because health insurance isn't like other insurance. If you have to change jobs, that means you need to change insurance, so now suddenly the new insurance doesn't have to cover the old condition? That's bullshit. That's why they outlawed it. The root of the problem is tying health insurance to employment, but I don't see the Repugs trying to fix that either.

  43. Re:Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So are you're blind.

  44. Re:Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition co by sjames · · Score: 1

    If we weren't so busy trying to make insurance magically make outrageously expensive healthcare somehow magically affordable, perhaps it wouldn't be so important (just cover all citizens and be done with it), but pre-existing conditions frequently left people un-covered or trapped in a terrible job.

    Alas, none of the republicans would be at all interested in joining the civilized world or even pushing back against the highest medical costs in the world.

    While in theory the libertarians should try addressing the problem by removing the prescription and other laws so that someone might try to take care of it themselves or roll the dice with someone that doesn't have the expensive certification, in practice I don't hear a peep out of them about that anymore.

  45. Re:Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition co by sjames · · Score: 1

    With the threat of deportation removed, the foreign workers will soon begin demanding reasonable American pay for an American job.

  46. Causes of piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 - If you can't rip it to use how you please, what is the point in paying for it? (And if you can rip it, somehow you are a criminal.)

    2 - If you pay for it, you are providing cash that can be used (buying laws, lawyers for suing) against you.

  47. Re:Bush, Rubio will have pre existing condition co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One of the 'P's in HIPPA is portability. When you left your old insurance, you would get a certificate of prior coverage which you would give to the new insurance company, which would block the pre-existing condition and waiting period bullshit. Though if you happened to have a diagnosis before you had any insurance, you were still fucked.

  48. DVDFab by Ryan+McLaughlin · · Score: 1

    I think DVDFab is going to see a huge surge in sales. Too bad they don't have stock I can buy.