Slashdot Mirror


The White House Finally Got Color Printers (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes an article on Gizmodo: Everyone loves an upgrade -- even POTUS. The New York Times reports that the White House has recently undergone a technological transformation, though it may not sound too impressive to many of us: Its employees are now equipped with modern laptops, iPhones and even... color printers. [...] Employees have new computers with "fast, solid-state drives and modern processors," according to the newspaper, along with color printers. There's a new phone system and many staff now tote iPhones. The Wi-Fi has been upgraded, so it's now fast enough to live-stream video. And security has been increased too, with a new software system for managing visitors and a chip-based card system which is used by staffers instead of passwords.

82 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. A chip based card system by Righ · · Score: 1

    instead of passwords. Sweet.

    1. Re:A chip based card system by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's chip and PIN -- not as bad as the summary made it sound.

    2. Re:A chip based card system by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Probably a PIV card for two-factor authentication.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIPS_201

    3. Re:A chip based card system by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Probably a PIV card for two-factor authentication.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIPS_201

      Probably given that is pretty much the government standard for most machines, at least on the non-classified network.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    4. Re:A chip based card system by I4ko · · Score: 1

      With the certificate policies and the SCVP validation policies you can secure almost any network. The PACS and other access control will know what to look for. You still need to type a password to unlock the private key, and you still may be required to enter a second level password after the PIV authenticates you to a user ID only.

  2. Where was the hardware made? by mi · · Score: 1

    The new equipment better be made in the US and carefully examined by the folks like NSA afterwards. White House remains home to the most powerful man on the planet — both militarily and commercially.

    It is the highest-value target for a very large number of people and even a printer can be used creatively by spies.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Where was the hardware made? by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

      this is probably for non-secure work. the classified gear has it's own separate network and their own standards

    2. Re:Where was the hardware made? by mi · · Score: 1

      this is probably for non-secure work

      I don't think anything done at the White House can be considered "non-secure".

      For example, when Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin met in 1945, Soviet doctors were analyzing the foreign leaders excrement daily. This was, how Stalin learned, Roosevelt does not have much longer to live... A similar analysis was done on Chairman Mao.

      Bet you would've ridiculed an attempt to classify shit until you've read this...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Where was the hardware made? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Queue the "Opps I lost the emails" v2.0.

      I doubt that will ever happen again after the Bush Administration lost 22 million emails.

      The Bush White House email controversy surfaced in 2007 during the controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available, because they were sent via a non-government domain hosted on an email server not controlled by the federal government. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978, and the Hatch Act. Over 5 million emails may have been lost. Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove emails, leading to damaging allegations. In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy

    4. Re:Where was the hardware made? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Creatively? effortlessly. HP laser printers can run code to spy on things, and if someone was able to slap a tiny extra board in there each printer could simply capture the print job and send it elsewhere disguised as harmless packets or sit and wait for the printer to be returned on it's lease to give up it's goodies, or transmit out of band, etc....

      Copy machines were compromised like this a LOT. Just read the NSA archives on what they have found in our embassy's around the world as well as american offices.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Where was the hardware made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You Hillary shills know no bounds.

    6. Re:Where was the hardware made? by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Secure or unsecure it's all commercial grade equipment. There are procedures to secure such as per the requirements of the network involved but there is not a special US one manufacturer of such equipment. HP is most common printer found but they don't hold a monopoly, I've seen Cannon, Lexmark and others. A classified network has no connection to the Unclass networks, and Higher level networks have no connection to lower networks. Airgapping (authorized and unauthorized) does happen but network separation and very heavy monitoring keeps things mostly secure.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    7. Re:Where was the hardware made? by kuzb · · Score: 1

      Well they're using iphones, so there goes that theory.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    8. Re:Where was the hardware made? by mi · · Score: 1

      Well they're using iphones, so there goes that theory.

      Maybe, Apple did a special run in an American facility just for the White House (and, maybe, some other agencies)? Or, maybe, NSA did it for them — as they've once made a special Blackberry...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    9. Re:Where was the hardware made? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I doubt that will ever happen again after the Bush Administration lost 22 million emails.

      Good thing he's not running for president. That sort of thing should disqualify a person... assuming Bush sent the emails in question and was the one who had the server set up, anyway.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:Where was the hardware made? by brainstem · · Score: 2

      probably just to sprinkle them around, like your apostrophe's.

    11. Re:Where was the hardware made? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      All you had to do is look at Roosevelt and figure out he was pretty ill. If doctors could establish your health status from excrement, you would be mailing a bag of shit to your insurance company instead of the company giving you shit all of the time because you are trying to spend their precious money.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:Where was the hardware made? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I can't wait until Slashdot gets Unicode. Imagine the possibilities.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:Where was the hardware made? by jofas · · Score: 1

      You spelled 'cthulhu' wrong. Unless you were referring to a Mexican dessert, in which case you also spelled it wrong.

    14. Re:Where was the hardware made? by jofas · · Score: 1

      Lol wat. Do you know what air-gapping is?

    15. Re:Where was the hardware made? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Odd metonym, using the name of the security barrier to name the technique to breach that barrier.

      Back in my day, we called the breaching technique "sneaker-net". Of course, we only did it when it was authorized. :)

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    16. Re:Where was the hardware made? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      These are probably specially ordered. The normal ones print little yellow dots that let law enforcement identify the source of print outs. You can bet the Whitehouse ones have that disabled.

      Fully vetted and spyware/backdoors removed by the NSA no doubt.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Where was the hardware made? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I think the AC was referring to the context in which you posted. Paraphrasing:
      Them: "Hillary did it."
      You: "So did Bush!"

      It's quite reasonable that your comment could be construed as a defense of Hillary. That was my assumption.

      I happen to think Bush is almost a model of how not to run a government. That Hillary did the same thing as him does not reflect well on her at all.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re:Where was the hardware made? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That Hillary did the same thing as him does not reflect well on her at all.

      When Hillary set up her server, it was legit under existing policy at that time. But her purpose was the same as the Bush administration: to hide emails from outside parties.

    19. Re:Where was the hardware made? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It gets into the weeds a bit, but it was legit so long as she didn't send anything classified. Of course, since she was largely responsible for classifying documents...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    20. Re:Where was the hardware made? by tibit · · Score: 1

      The printer on a secure network has no connection to the public internet. There is no routing between the secure and insecure networks. So, the printer can't use the network it's plugged to by wire. It would need to leak data via a cellular modem. Easy to do. Not every secure location jams the good old cell networks.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    21. Re:Where was the hardware made? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      They can - here in Oz there's a free test kit mailed out to everyone over 50 (55?) every couple of years.

      You put this piece of paper in the toilet, do your business on it, swirl a swab through the turds, put the swab in a tube, seal the tube, mail it back, post paid. Oh, and flush the paper - it's designed to break down in the system.

      It's a screening test for bowel cancer, and it's been effective enough for the govt to continue funding it.

      All that poo in the post, no wonder Aus Post workers look grumpy.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    22. Re:Where was the hardware made? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      I imagine the White House is swept regularly, and that any source not on the "approved" list would be quickly identified.

      If it's your job to sweep the offices for bugs, you're going to pay special attention to anything electrical. That was my job, once and briefly in the 80s - pay special attention to the phone and fax, we were told. Update that to this century, and pay special attention to all the technology.

      It's also possible that the White House has its own cell/s and anything trying to "call out" would have to go through those cells, or that nearby cells are programmed to not accept anything originating from that location. Triangulation is already used to locate you (roughly) via your phone. They might even use stingray-like technology to identify unauthorised devices.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    23. Re:Where was the hardware made? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      If Bush sent 22 million emails, he didn't have time to be President. It's hard to believe the whole administration could have sent that many emails.

      Hey, I'm glad the White House finally got color printers. Now they can print those rainbow flags they're so fond of lately.

    24. Re:Where was the hardware made? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      If Bush sent 22 million emails, he didn't have time to be President.

      He was a big fan of forwarding emails to everybody on his contacts list.

    25. Re:Where was the hardware made? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I can easily see an administrator leaking the documents for profit, political gain of their party, or fodder for smear tactics.

      From a different article I've read a while back, the email server was set up to avoid that exact scenario.

    26. Re: Where was the hardware made? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      hrm - no cracked firmware yet? My printer is so stupid the very last thing I expect it has is signed firmware.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  3. iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Finally, iPhones, now that the FBI has a way to hack into them it should be a piece of cake to find out what our white house is up to these days.

    The irony of equipping government with the exact same hardware you are trying to weaken security for hasn't sunk into them yet, has it?

    1. Re:iPhones by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt that the White House bought iPhone 5Cs, I would expect that they bought new phones rather than used phones.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  4. Keep believing that. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . . as there are plenty of examples of classified, air-gapped systems leaking data to unclassified systems. To the point that there are standard procedures for a "spill" of classified data onto networks at lower levels of classification.

    1. Re:Keep believing that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      . . . . as there are plenty of examples of classified, air-gapped systems leaking data to unclassified systems.

      Like when Hillary Clinton told her staff to remove the classified label from a document and send it to her by an insecure system?

      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/st...

      http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/08/...

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

  5. But are these printers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... super extra special, or do they insert yellow tracking dots like everyone else's?

    The rest of the teknologee has similar problems these days: Firmware even containing entire OSes running with more privileges than the OS you see before you, everything calling home, and so on, and so forth. Me, paranoid? No, we know these things happen. I'm asking if the white house managed to get special treatment on this. Probably not, though. Can't wait to see them getting blind-sided by policies they instituted themselves, as happened with the printers at least.

    1. Re:But are these printers... by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't/wouldn't the govt supply contract include requirements for special firmware/drivers? A manufacturer includes "yellow dot" routines, or phone home/remote update routines in its normal software, it wouldn't have to spend a lot of money removing that code for a customised "govt approved" firmware/driver package. Otherwise they miss out on lucrative govt supply contracts. All the other equipment is wiped/formatted when the lease is up, why couldn't a printer be given a firmware update before disposal?

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  6. setting the trap by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    by uploading the bait

  7. Next WH advance will be to not use printers at all by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why are they printing stuff when they all have laptops and tablets?

  8. Truth-vs-fiction: which is more realistic? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    I remember in House of Cards, the president wasn't allowed to use his game console. (Well, he could have it, but it wasn't about to be given any sort of network access.) But that was a TV show, and here's real life: where basically the same thing (iPhone) is allowed.

    TV takes things too seriously. If real life, government is all "meh, whatever."

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Truth-vs-fiction: which is more realistic? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      In real life, government is all "meh, whatever."

      ...if you're really important or have a cosy relationship with whoever might otherwise make your life difficult. Whim also helps. Currently the federal government doesn't care as much about pot as it could, and enforces the laws for that more arbitrarily than it might have otherwise.

      Additionally it might help to avoid being:

      • a conservative leaning non-profit,
      • Hillary Clinton,
      • a former and unfavorable politician who committed a crime and was not a President,
      • a former and unfavorable President who committed a crime without a VP willing to pardon you when you get caught,

      And for the catchall:

      • poor.
  9. Will they trash it if a Republican wins? by tomhath · · Score: 2

    The way the Clinton staffers did when they left?

    1. Re:Will they trash it if a Republican wins? by Etcetera · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, that turned out to be a myth. I'm sure some pranks happened, but relatively little, compared to the normal and routine wear and tear in offices.

      Well, except not: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02360.pdf

      Damage, theft, vandalism, and pranks occurred in the White House
      complex during the 2001 presidential transition. Incidents such as the
      removal of keys from computer keyboards; the theft of various items; the
      leaving of certain voice mail messages, signs, and written messages; and
      the placing of glue on desk drawers clearly were intentional acts. However,
      it was unknown whether other observations, such as broken furniture,
      were the result of intentional acts, when and how they occurred, or who
      may have been responsible for them.

    2. Re:Will they trash it if a Republican wins? by johncandale · · Score: 2

      thats what fucktard Bush gets for losing the electatoral college and the popular vote and not conceding.

  10. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by captaindomon · · Score: 1

    We've been promised the paperless revolution for like 20 years now. But paper has been around for thousands of years and isn't going anywhere soon. For example, there is a huge amount of ceremony around the president signing legislation on paper. Even the pens he uses become mementos. Judging from my office, paper isn't going anywhere very soon.

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
  11. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    We've been promised the paperless revolution for like 20 years now. But paper has been around for thousands of years and isn't going anywhere soon.

    I work in government IT. We're so paperless that I have to bring in my own pens and Post-It notes. We do get a paper calendar handed out at the beginning of each year.

  12. About 5 years ago by waspleg · · Score: 1

    I went to a meeting about going paperless. The first thing my boss did was go around and hand everyone a pamphlet about how we were going paperless.

    While it's probably less printing than it was before there is still quite a lot of printing where I work, as in cases of printer paper and dozens of cartridges per year.

  13. This will cost extra for no reason by houghi · · Score: 1

    99% of the stuff that needs to be printed does not need color. Most likely the machines are leased and not owned. That means most likely payment per print. Color is more expensive that black and white.

    That is why a lot of companies print default in black and more are using a code to print, so no unneeded prints are sitting useless at the printer.

    So not having color printers is not really an issue.

    That said, what might have been happened is that the lease was up and a new lease was signed. Newer printers (when looking at the same specs) will be cheaper than older ones and that way color could be cheaper than what they paid before.

    However a black and white printer would still be cheaper than a color printer even if the new color one is cheaper than the old b/w one.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:This will cost extra for no reason by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      99% of the stuff that needs to be printed does not need color.

      Are you kidding? Have you ever seen a Powerpoint presentation printed in B&W? It's horrible. All of those important colored bars, dots and lines just blend into a sea of low contrast grey. It's bad enough when the data is just financial reports from a Fortune 500 company, but this is the highest level of the US government.

      Just think if somebody printed out a map of the Middle East in B&W. It would be hard to differentiate borders - you might end up starting WWIII because you blew up the wrong country.

      No, color in this case is cheap. The world has too many shades of grey as it is.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:This will cost extra for no reason by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Have you ever seen a Powerpoint presentation? It's horrible.

      FTFY

    3. Re:This will cost extra for no reason by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      99% of the stuff that needs to be printed does not need color.

      Are you kidding? Have you ever seen a Powerpoint presentation printed in B&W? It's horrible. All of those important colored bars, dots and lines just blend into a sea of low contrast grey. It's bad enough when the data is just financial reports from a Fortune 500 company, but this is the highest level of the US government.

      Just think if somebody printed out a map of the Middle East in B&W. It would be hard to differentiate borders - you might end up starting WWIII because you blew up the wrong country.

      No, color in this case is cheap. The world has too many shades of grey as it is.

      except that every printed thing ends up being copied on a b&w copier and disseminated sooner or later by somebody or other.
      the wise author chooses fills, brightness etc. for charts so that items are still distinguishable when copied grayscale, even if less immediately so.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  14. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    We've been promised the paperless revolution for like 20 years now. But paper has been around for thousands of years and isn't going anywhere soon. For example, there is a huge amount of ceremony around the president signing legislation on paper. Even the pens he uses become mementos. Judging from my office, paper isn't going anywhere very soon.

    Actually, the paperless revolution was supposed to happen at least 30 years ago - the promise probably being made 40 years ago with the arrival of personal computers. (20 years ago was 1996).

    The irony of the situation is that offices are consuming more paper than ever before - even more than before the promise of the paperless office.

    Yes, we don't have inter office memos and such, but it's more than made up for by the fact people print out a lot of documentation and because it's often sent out electronically, instead of sharing one printed copy, everyone gets their own, so one document which may be displayed on a slide for everyone to read is suddenly printed 3-4 times.

  15. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    Yup...paperless doesn't really often work for me.

    Especially, if I have some documentation that I'll refer to more than a couple of times, I prefer to have a dead tree copy of it.

    I often make notes and doodle in the margins of the dead tree copies, and when I need to remember where something was, I can "see" these doodles and notations in my head, and know what document it was in and where I put it....

    I just can't track and as readily remember things like that on digital copies....to me, much harder to find things on a screen, especially with so many web pages of documentation buried on tons of little pages, rather than longer pages with more related info.

    I guess it is something that varies between person to person....but I"ve always been this way. When I was in college and HS...during tests, I could close my eyes, and "see" in my minds eye my pages in my notebooks and text books where I'd written notes or doodles...and turn he pages in my head to get to where the answers were....sure did help.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  16. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

    "The paperless office is as about as realistic as the paperless toilet!" - Keith Davidson

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
  17. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    We've been promised the paperless revolution for like 20 years now.

    Ah, kids.

    When I was in elementary school in the late 1960s, my teacher talked about how companies like Weyerhaeuser and Georgia Pacific were worried that - thanks to computers - they'd be driven out of business within the next decade or so.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  18. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    I work in government IT. We're so paperless that I have to bring in my own pens and Post-It notes. We do get a paper calendar handed out at the beginning of each year.

    It must differ according to local policy.

    I work for the DoD at a large west-coast military base. My office alone uses a full pallet of paper a year. I myself order several boxes of pens, and other assorted office products such as yellow legal pads, steno pads, bound log books, cases of post-its... We have a budget of around $15k a year for "office supplies"...

    I'm sorry, but the concept of a "paperless office" is not practical in a great number of situations.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  19. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    Some positions require getting work done, other positions require pushing paperwork. :)

    Hey, it is a DoD job...

    Thin Skinned response: Some positions require both, you insensitive clod...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  20. Re:Is it secure? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Hopefully it's not all off-the-shelf stuff that's potentially riddled with Chinese back-doors and leaks classified information like a sieve.

    No, they are riddled with American back doors. Much better.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  21. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

    It wont be long before we automate @#$ wiping. We'll have machines that can get up there and do a better job than any human, and won't use paper. Ultimately, this will be detrimental to the economy due to the loss of all those @%$ wiping jobs.

    --
    Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
  22. upgrade over the stopgap by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    the previous stopgap measure was temperamental and made strange sounds.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  23. Re:And hacked by the Chinese in 3...2...1... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Old analog tech sometimes has advantages. Why do you think the Navy still requires sailors to learn to navigate with a sextant?

    Time travel.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  24. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by citylivin · · Score: 1

    Really? your office doesn't use paper anymore? i would love to hear what industry that is in!

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  25. Re:WiFi? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    In terms of sensitive data, I wouldn't trust a VPN over wi-fi for this level of security. Chances are Wi-Fi can be used with standard unclassified, and even medium security type of information. There is a lot of standard boring work going on too. It isn't all Top Secret huge decisions going across. A lot of it would be things like requesting time off from work, making sure the payroll is done, setting up an appointment for a weekly meeting with others.... That stuff VPN over Wi-Fi would be good enough. If someone would do the effort in hacking the VPN the value of the data would be rather minimal. I expect real secure data is still under a closed wired network.
    If they were smart, there wouldn't be a connection to the internet, however my experience probably will say otherwise.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  26. Classifying excrement by mi · · Score: 1

    If doctors could establish your health status from excrement [...]

    Are you really trying to dispute the utility of stool and urine analysis to medical diagnosis?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  27. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Paper mill

  28. The security step function by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    When we buy a new printer or communications device, we have no need to think about that device in context with everything else we have. But in a high-security situation, it's probably easier to qualify whole integrating sets of upgraded technology at once than to go through the vetting process for each device in isolation.

  29. Re:And hacked by the Chinese in 3...2...1... by steveg · · Score: 1

    I don't think "still" is the word you mean. "Again" comes closer. As I recall, they just started that back up again.

    --
    Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  30. Re:WiFi? by Orestesx · · Score: 2

    What good is a computer that is not connected to the internet? I see this suggestion all the time to air gap important stuff. But how do you expect to get anything interesting on or off the computer? Sure, if it's blueprints for an atomic bomb or missile launch codes, then air gap it. But what about intelligence briefings that need to be reviewed? Documents regarding military strategy? If people can't access this stuff, then it might as well not exist.

  31. Re:That's no help. by mi · · Score: 1

    Modern processors generally have hardware-level "remote administration" back doors built in

    Please, pardon my ignorance, but this is the first time I hear about it. Could you share a couple of links, please? Thank you.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  32. Re:And hacked by the Chinese in 3...2...1... by Niddix · · Score: 1

    They US Navy actually stopped teaching celestial navigation around 1995 and only recently started teaching it again. https://nakedsecurity.sophos.c...

  33. Re:Nice try by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You Obamabots and Hill people are very deceptive.

    Meanwhile, you're conveniently overlooking former Bush appointees Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice for also having retroactively classified emails on personal devices. Why?

    The emails were discovered during a State Department review of the email practices of the past five secretaries of state. It found that Powell received two emails that were classified and that the "immediate staff" working for Rice received 10 emails that were classified.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/04/politics/hillary-clinton-email-classified-colin-powell-condoleezza-rice/

  34. Re:That's no help. by korgitser · · Score: 1
    --
    FCKGW 09F9 42
  35. Re:That's no help. by mi · · Score: 1

    Ah, that... Well, it is done through TCP/IP — and is thus trivially controlled... Not a concern — certainly not, when NSA is helping you.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  36. Surely by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Surely that's printers of color

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  37. Re:Next WH advance will be to not use printers at by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Somehow I'm not surprised that even the whitehouse is victim to the bureaucracy and slow speed of the GSA (or whomever administers theirs systems) and its IT contractors.

    We just got "new" computers in my lab.
    64bit Athlon's running at 1.5GHz, and a whopping 3GB of RAM.
    It absolutely screams compared to what it replaced: a 1.2GHz Athlon 32bit that had only 2GB of RAM.

    As to printers, we're still using some b/w HP laser workhorses that are ~20 years old.
    Near as I can tell the maintenance has never been performed on them. They jam regularly, hang daily.
    We might get replacements in the next year they tell us. But they said that 5 years ago too.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  38. Re:Nice try by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    As opposed to instructing staffers to remove classification markings and resend the content.

    What was the content? Talking points for a Sunday morning TV show. Much of the information was already in the public domain.

  39. Re:Nice try by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Also HUMINT, which is marked TOP SECRET//HCS

    https://www.google.com/search?...

    You know, the kind of stuff that leads to people dying in many countries?

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  40. Re:I heard they had color printers in 2009 by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    That is funny, I would have modded you up.

    Unfortunately, somebody can't take a joke and modded you down for it.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  41. Re:Nice try by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You know, the kind of stuff that leads to people dying in many countries?

    How many people are CONFIRMED DEAD from [Hillary | Marco | Ted]'s leaks to the news media?

    *crickets*

    That's what I thought.

  42. Re:Nice try by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Because the government will totally talk about things marked as TOP SECRET in the news media. If the leaks led to deaths, it would be hushed up, not screamed about in the news media.

    You know, kind of like in mission impossible, they will disavow you if you are captured. The US government doesn't talk about these things as it could lead to the outing of other projects and methods.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  43. Re:Nice try by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Because the government will totally talk about things marked as TOP SECRET in the news media.

    Not the government, elected officials. Remember when Vice President Dick Cheney revealed Valarie Plame's identity as a CIA agent?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plame_affair#Dick_Cheney