Slashdot Mirror


In China, Fears That Pokemon Go May Aid Locating Military Bases (reuters.com)

The sleeper hit success title Pokemon Go is preventing many people in China from sleeping properly. Although the game isn't officially available in the world's largest smartphone market, some people fear it could become a Trojan horse for "offensive action by the United States and Japan," according to a report by Reuters. "Don't play Pokemon GO!!!" said user Pitaorenzhe on Chinese microblogging site Weibo. "It's so the U.S. and Japan can explore China's secret bases!" From the article: The conspiracy theory is that Japan's Nintendo, which part owns the Pokemon franchise, and America's Google can work out where Chinese military bases are by seeing where users can't go to capture Pokemon characters. The game relies on Google services such as Maps. The theory is that if Nintendo places rare Pokemon in areas where they see players aren't going, and nobody attempts to capture the creature, it can be deduced that the location has restricted access and could be a military zone. "Then, when war breaks out, Japan and the U.S. can easily target their guided missiles, and China will have been destroyed by the invasion of a Japanese-American game," said a social media post circulated on Weibo. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said he was unaware of reports that the game could be a security risk and that he didn't have time to play with such things. He gave no further details.

124 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. When? by irrational_design · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When war breaks out?! Is this a common belief in China? Or are these just the Chinese equivalent of the American-survivalist sub culture?

    1. Re:When? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I read that the same way.

      As to the point of the article... Don't secret base employees play Pokémon Go as well?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:When? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing many of those bases don't allow cell phones on the premises, which if you think about it is also a pretty big tell.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:When? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      What I don't get about the rant.
      We know where the bases are. So we send the population to the bases so we can know where the bases are so we can bomb them?
      Or is the Big Bad America just trying to increase civilian casualty.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:When? by lgw · · Score: 2

      Maybe the people are just unclear about the idea of satellite photography? This is the popular press, after all, they might simply not realize that's how it works these days..

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re: When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The chinese people wont go to war with is until world of warcraft goes under.

    6. Re:When? by aralin · · Score: 1

      That is why they are preparing. If their economy will grow much faster than ours, we will have every incentive to do so...

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    7. Re:When? by hoggoth · · Score: 2

      > We would turn mainland China into an endless sea of molten glass tinged with various organic impurities near the major population centers.

      I see you've been to Guangdong.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    8. Re:When? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      We know where the bases are. So we send the population to the bases so we can know where the bases are so we can bomb them?

      I think the point is that we don't know where the bases are, but Pokemon GO assets are geo-scattered semi-randomly. If they end up in places that are easily accessed by the public, they will get "found." If they end up in interesting-looking locations and are never found, that's a hint that no civilians are supposed to know about/go to those places.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ok, I'll tell you my view, even though it's a big country, with each person having their own viewpoint, so this is partial at best.

      When I was in China, I mentioned to my Chinese teacher, "I don't like war." The teacher was confused, and responded, "Well, that doesn't matter. War is something that happens." Remember that unlike Europe or Japan, in China they never had the hippy anti-war protest movement. Think of how we in the west came to the conclusion that war is bad, and you'll see that China doesn't really have that experience. How they viewed WW2 is completely different: it was an invasion from foreigners.

      Second thing: although China is ostensibly communist, their worldview is more imperialist: they call themselves the "middle country", maps in China have China right in the center. On TV they have all these dramas and movies that take place in the old imperial times, when war was something that happened and even a way to win glory. The government is composed of hereditary "princelings" with rivalries who depose each other and fight, much like royalty. If you want to understand China today, the ancient imperial system of Legalism (fa jia) is the best way to understand it.

      Third point: in the west, we've completely moved on from colonialism. We decided it was a bad idea, and frankly it doesn't provide economic benefit anymore. China doesn't realize that. From 1850 to 1900, they were embarrassingly dominated by western powers, who came in, and sold them opium in exchange for silver. Then Japan came in, and started colonizing them, killing many people. During the Korean war (which is within living memory), the US army entered China. Finally, Mao+communism defeated the westerners, pushed America back, and gave China something to be proud of with their country. But it was a hard fight, and the Chinese view the west as someone who wants to colonize them if they can.

      Fourth point: Building on that, when westerners protect Taiwan, try to install democracy in Hong Kong (which was still colonized 20 years ago), or protest about Tibet, the Chinese see that as attempts from western colonizers to control, and humiliate China. Again, they don't realize we've moved on from colonization, and we're happy to be partners with them. The idea of "protecting the democratic freedoms of the Taiwanese people" makes no sense to them. Why would we do that?

      Fifth point: we've had constant military struggles against China. Bill Clinton sent a battleship to patrol the ocean between Taiwan and China, for example, and Bush had some spy plane issues, and Obama has sent patrols into the south China sea. These are low grade, and even cool displays of power, but they are militaristic nonetheless. Frankly, it is unethical for China to claim the South China sea at the expense of all its neighbors, and it's foolish for China to try to force Taiwan to join them (the Taiwanese don't trust China, because China treated Hong Kong really badly: taking away their freedoms).

      Sixth point: Freedom is only something you recognize when you don't have it. Most Chinese people are free to say anything they want, because they don't want to say forbidden things. But we recognize that their lack of freedom is going to hurt them in the future, and hope that they learn to respect their freedoms.

    10. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The degree of naivety in combination with paranoia rivals what I see with conspiracy theorists here in the US. We have had spy satellites with the capability of photographing license plates for a long time, and they think we don't know where ALL of their bases are? wow.

    11. Re:When? by PPH · · Score: 1

      China was biding it's time and would 'soon' attack and take down the USA

      But then Foxconn won't be getting the next iPhone contract. And no more Chinese exchange students either.

      Chinese Generals are all preparing for war with the USA.

      That's their job. To be prepared for a time when diplomacy might break down.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    12. Re:When? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You are correct.... except those survivalists are in positions of power and are all really fucking insane.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's also worth examining some myths we have about war in the west:

      *) War is always terrible - No, it has terrible parts, but it also has brilliant, exciting, and fun parts. Winston Churchill said, "Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result." The strategy, the victory, the pursuit: these things are portrayed on tv in China more often than here.

      *) Only rich elites want to go to war - No, throughout history, commoners have wanted war too, to gain riches, prestige, land, and because it's fun. When Napoleon returned from exile, his soldiers greeted him joyfully.

      *) War is always caused by religion - No, war is caused by ideology, or by greed, or by fear. Plenty of historical examples of all of those.

      *) War is over - no, it's not. We don't want it.

    14. Re:When? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      As to the point of the article... Don't secret base employees play Pokémon Go as well?

      Yeah, if they think their soldiers aren't playing it... they're deluded.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    15. Re:When? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Remember that unlike Europe or Japan, in China they never had the hippy anti-war protest movement.

      To be fair... we also need to remember that Japan has invaded China - many times. We westerners tend to believe war is something remote, and unlikely due to our modern mindset and sophistication - but, in truth, World War Two happened in a world not much different than the current one.

      (Overall I agree with you though)

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    16. Re:When? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Like that will stop anyone from "going there" to collect their idiotic pokemon. They'll just turn on mock locations and travel around the world while sitting on the sofa. (people are *ALREADY* doing that, btw.)

      Plus, this is dumb way to select targets. You're going to be bombing lots of empty buildings, warehouses, entire ghost cities, etc.

    17. Re:When? by erapert · · Score: 2

      China also has many more males than females.
      What do young bucks like to do, especially to gain female approval? War.

    18. Re:When? by kqs · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. We likely can find the bases via Google Maps. Also, any place without Pokemon Go players could be a secret base, but it also could be a forest with no people, a lake, a toxic waste dump, a poor farming community without electricity, or maybe just a location without cell service (the US seems to have a few of those). This would be one of the most useless and ineffective ways of finding secret bases that I could possibly come up with.

    19. Re:When? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      the Chinese see that as attempts from western colonizers to control, and humiliate China... Again, they don't realize we've moved on from colonization, and we're happy to be partners with them

      And how do you know if that (to control or colonize) is not true? Do you work for the CIA?

      Look around the world, the only real competitor to the US (and its puppet Western allies) is China. Just think about that if one day Chinese Yuan succeeds becoming a real competitor to the USD and that most other countries are willing to trade everything include petroleum in RMB and accumulate RMBs as reserved, we would be much more like Greece. And all our allies would become theirs.

      That's why we care about their political suppression so much. If China is irrelevant, we would care them as much as we care about Zimbabwe. If we truly want them to be our partner, we would care as much as we care about those same issues in Saudi Arabia or now Vietnam. (We did, back in 1970s, but not now. See below.)

      it's foolish for China to try to force Taiwan to join them (the Taiwanese don't trust China

      Yeah, Taiwan should forget that we betrayed them back in the 1970s when we made China, along with Afgan and bin Laden, allies to fight the Soviets, and start trusting us again, so they can be our puppet too.

    20. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had the privilege of talking to two Chinese Communist party members in their twenties/thirties in the past few months while visiting China. They asked me what I thought about the Japanese occupied islands,and the warmongering. I said a worthless island is a stupid thing to go to war over. He responded that WWI started over less.

      He went on to explain that war with Japan was inevitable, as if a course of nature. He wasn't excited about it, but not worried, either. He didn't agree when I said that war is a terrible thing to resort to. I was surprised, because he was otherwise a very happy and agreeable person.

      When I asked about US involvement, he said that the USA would certainly support China: because of our strong ties.

    21. Re:When? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      It's one dataset. Combine it with others ("Forest locations", "Lakes", etc) you can narrow things down a bit...

    22. Re:When? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      I had a history teacher who said world history could be summed up in 2 questions: "Where's the money? (i.e., economic)", and "Who succeeds the king? (i.e. power). The rest (Religion, etc) is just for show.

    23. Re:When? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      To be fair... we also need to remember that Japan has invaded China - many times

      Just in the late 1500s, right? (ww2 also, of course)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  2. Obvious Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just make all soldiers play Pokemon Go. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Obvious Solution by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      So then Google knows who works at those bases...

    2. Re:Obvious Solution by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Just make all soldiers play Pokemon Go

      So then Nintendo and Google can now collect video from inside the "secret bases" when the players use the AR play?

  3. Wait, let me get this straight... by halivar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One single Chinese microblogger with a tin foil hat advances crackpot theory and actual Chinese official can't be bothered to even talk about, and it makes front page of Slashdot?

    Shit, guys, lemme tell you 'bout some CHEMTRAILS!

    1. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The sad part is that this was reported by Reuters.

    2. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Shit, guys, lemme tell you 'bout some CHEMTRAILS!

      Do you mean the ones put up by the illuminati? Or the ones by the Lizard people?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by halivar · · Score: 1

      Lemme blow your mind, here: YES.

    4. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Well... since I know that the Lizard people only inhabit the Hollow Earth... I am going with Illuminati...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    5. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Solandri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To be fair, I think Google now knows how they're going to get "street view" pictures of all the streets and pathways where they weren't able to send Google Cars to photograph.

    6. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      We're IN the Hollow Earth, man.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    7. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      One single Chinese microblogger with a tin foil hat advances crackpot theory and actual Chinese official can't be bothered to even talk about, and it makes front page of Slashdot?

      It's always nice to have confirmation that every culture has its crackpots, and they all post on the Internet.

    8. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by butchersong · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering why he's assuming Nintendo has access to any data or what the Japanese have to do with this. All they did so far as I understand is license Pokemon to Niantic labs.

    9. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      Yeah, must be a hell of a slow day at Reuters, ne? Isn't there a coup or something they could cover?

      Although I must admit the theory is .. interesting :-)

  4. Like Satellites Don't Work Over China? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's not their military that scaring the shit out of people, it's their fucking way they do business.

    1. Re:Like Satellites Don't Work Over China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shut up and drink your melamine.

    2. Re:Like Satellites Don't Work Over China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The air pollution in China is an effective screen and blocks the satellites. See China, pollution is your friend. Keep belching out that crap. My kids need their plastic McDonalds crap toys.

  5. You can make fun of China all you want... by HBI · · Score: 1, Informative

    But Boeing and the USG have already banned the application for all employees, government or civilian.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re: You can make fun of China all you want... by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      That's because it enables the camera by default and can be used to exfiltrate data. Confidential or Classified information stops for no Rhyhorn.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
  6. Yeah. Right. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The US and Google need a stupid game to find army bases. Right.

    Oh how did the US ever find Soviet nuclear silos without being able to get the Russkies to play some video games...?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Lu Kang doesn't play Pokemon by Kargan · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said he was unaware of reports that the game could be a security risk and that he didn't have time to play with such things.

    Of course he doesn't, too busy trying to fight his way through the tournament and take out Shao Khan.

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
    1. Re:Lu Kang doesn't play Pokemon by dottrap · · Score: 1

      Though Chun Li has been focusing turtle (half-shell) evolution.

      Seriously.
      https://groups.google.com/foru...

  8. Umm, satellites? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    Is there really someone so ignorant that they think the locations of anything visible to the sky is unknown? Seriously?

    Or is this just more hatemongering aimed at a game that's actually getting kids (and adults) outside and walking around? Oh, the humanity! People are actually exercising and talking to their neighbors!!!!

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re: Umm, satellites? by halivar · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US doesn't get its satellite surveillance from Google Earth.

    2. Re: Umm, satellites? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Oh, so the US government cannot see it then? That will put the Chinese' mind at ease.

    3. Re:Umm, satellites? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Satellite imagery can't tell you everything. In this case you might see a building that you suspect might be some kind of military installation, but you're not sure. Pokemon Go usage would probably be a half decent datapoint, but could be confounded by things like civilian employers who don't like their employees goofing off. Realistically, the US probably just monitors which places have government or military cell phones frequenting them.

    4. Re: Umm, satellites? by halivar · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to make any kind of threat analysis. That's a whole Intelligence specialty I'm not trained it. I was simply pointing out that Google is not a significant source of surveillance info compared to spy satellites.

    5. Re:Umm, satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I dunno, its actually a pretty clever plan. Areas with specific mobile device bans would be pretty unusual and this would definitely highlight them. For example in the US most military locations have the same kind of ban, privately owned phones can't be taken into sensitive areas at all. Surely the US has a good deal of threat intelligence from both satellite data, and from actual informants, as to where the secret bunkers are that they need to bomb, but this layer of data could be useful in its own right.

    6. Re:Umm, satellites? by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      Or is this just more hatemongering aimed at a game that's actually getting kids (and adults) outside and walking around? Oh, the humanity! People are actually exercising and talking to their neighbors!!!!

      I think it's because the game is from Nintendo, which is a Japanese Company.

    7. Re: Umm, satellites? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Well, I doubt that Google would do so at the behest of China's government considering that Google gave them the finger and walked away from their market a few years ago, rather than censor and spy on their users.

      And, as someone else pointed out, the government doesn't get its military intel from Google.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    8. Re: Umm, satellites? by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      There is no outer space. The sky is a closed, sealed, waterproof dome.

      Nonsense! Given the amount of rain we see, you can hardly call the sky dome waterproof!

  9. what about satellites? by cfa22 · · Score: 1

    and they're not worried about satellite imagery?

  10. Google !== Baidu by tomxor · · Score: 1

    Just because large businesses in China are at the knees of government doesn't mean it's the same in other countries... In fact it appears to be the other way around in America.

    1. Re:Google !== Baidu by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      What are you, like 15?

    2. Re:Google !== Baidu by tomxor · · Score: 1

      cos ad hominem always works.

  11. Unless you are Hillary Clinton... by HBI · · Score: 5, Funny

    She can play all the Pokemon Go she wants.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Unless you are Hillary Clinton... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that's what Hillary was doing while Secretary of State. It certainly explains all the flying to other countries....

    2. Re:Unless you are Hillary Clinton... by _xeno_ · · Score: 2

      I don't think you can "come under sniper fire" in Pokemon, even if it is imaginary, so it must have been some other game she was playing.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  12. Google is already tracking them by mveloso · · Score: 1

    It's stupid that the Chinese government is afraid of Pokemon Go since Google/Android is already tracking them.

  13. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That wasn't said by a leader. That was said by some random loser who posts things on the Internet. You know what THOSE people are like!

  14. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by HBI · · Score: 1

    I think you should re-evaluate. I think the Chinese are very astute, in this and in other things...

    What materially changed since 1939 that prevents war? (correct answer is nothing)

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  15. Up next... by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chinese government creates new arm of military tasked with collecting all Pokemon Go characters located in military bases.

    1. Re:Up next... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Chinese government creates new arm of military tasked with collecting all Pokemon Go characters located in military bases.

      Call them, say, Team Rocket.

    2. Re:Up next... by watermark · · Score: 1

      Us simple folk have a shorter name for "Pokemon go characters", we call them "pokemon".

  16. It may not have been their intention... by manu144x · · Score: 2

    Imagine having an army of idiots precisely mapping with their smartphone GPS's huge areas in countries, virtually for free, on their own time and with their own equipment.

    If it wasn't used initially, I am sure after this huge success the black suits have surely contacted nintendo with an offer to access and use all that data. It's not conspiracy theory, it's exactly what happened with Facebook. After it became mainstream and it's potential was noticed, one of the investors is the CIA R&D arm.

    It's no secret, the same people who funded face recognition technology startups, license plate recognition, mapping, and who knows what else.

    I think it was called IN-Q-Tel or something.

  17. Re:Dumb dumbs and here's your secret areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The better option is to just log into the Signalling System No. 7 (SS7), also known as C7 in the UK or CCSS7 in the US, using all the phone numbers in the world to track this type of location stuff during work and non-work hours. Once you have the areas where people don't go and a select few go but only repeat-visitors, then you can guess where all these bases are with almost certainty -- especially when the base commanders and higher ups keep visiting all the other bases during work hours, cross over of secret base areas without anyone else going there.

    No games or map apps required, just a cell phone Base Station ID and Location database and a few weeks of data can show you where the entire population works and sleeps (and sleeps around).

    These little "trackers" we all love to buy leak so much information about our lives, it is amazing that anyone things they have privacy or "secrets"... doh!

  18. So hard to see from above by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    This seems absurd. Military bases are not invisible. Planes, drones and satellites watch them all the time. The Chinese are just messing with the minds of their military people for some unknown propaganda reason..

  19. Clarification by HBI · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a misconception. Military bases permit cell phones. When passing into SCIFs or classified briefing rooms, you are required to get rid of your cellphones into lock boxes. If you like your battery, you turn it off or put it in airplane mode before doing so.

    There are some buildings that are all-classified that require you to not have a phone along, but this would be a "building", not a whole base.

    In the field, most people have a cell phone on them for basic communications, and they are rarely collected - only when someone has a bug up their ass about it.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Clarification by subanark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but what about "Secret" "Chinese" bases, that might have a different policy. On the other hand, knowing China, they will have strict rules that prohibit this, but no one will follow them.

    2. Re:Clarification by HBI · · Score: 2

      The US military also has strict rules that are bent and broken regularly in regards to wireless devices. One IA officer I knew actually yelled at me for leaving my cell phone at home, "How am I going to get in touch with you? Go get it!" when I was trying to think security and follow the rules.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:Clarification by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      if this base is outdoors on the surface of the planet..... it's not secret. even google earth has enough resolution to easily spot anything the size of a gas station on the surface of the planet and identify it. a "secret base" would be obvious as hell.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Clarification by boristdog · · Score: 2

      Ah, so you've been to China.

      I loved the fact that there were x-ray machines and people with scanner wands at all major train and subway stations (and airports, of course). I soon realized that usually none of this equipment was even powered up, but they still ran the wand over you and your bags through the scanners anyway. I would purposely leave metal things in my pockets and the scanners never went off.

    5. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Depends how they do it, if you want it secret then make it underground or hide it within something else that isn't secret. NORAD would be very hard to spot from a satellite, it's really the unusual traffic to it that would give it away. Storing your tanks in caves or the like would be fairly easy, and the only thing giving that away would be the unusual traffic. Also if you do secret work inside a regular office building it can be easily hidden, it has twenty offices, one is called XY-group and it's really a secret front for your military offices.

    6. Re: Clarification by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      The obvious point is that the signal can get lost in the noise. School children in the US often are required to turn off phones or temporarily surrender them. Confusing a military base with a school would be tragic. Although I imagine that American companies collect enough data to tell the difference.

    7. Re:Clarification by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Manning walked in with a Lady Gaga CD; erased the contents; walked out with the store.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    8. Re:Clarification by kqs · · Score: 1

      The US military also has strict rules that are bent and broken regularly in regards to wireless devices. One IA officer I knew actually yelled at me for leaving my cell phone at home, "How am I going to get in touch with you? Go get it!" when I was trying to think security and follow the rules.

      Can't be. I've been told that every single person who breaks any of the government's security policies is immediately punished, unless they are named Hillary which just proves that she blackmailed the FBI. People regularly break the rules and don't get punished? Unpossible!

      Sorry, had to say that. Yeah, I never worked for the government (military or otherwise) but since every other human I know would ignore rules which were inconvenient and hard-to-enforce, seems like military folks would do so too. Contractors, OTOH, I know well, and they'll ignore any rules, even those which are helpful and easy-to-enforce.

    9. Re:Clarification by HBI · · Score: 1

      Vis a vis Hillary, what she did was pretty blatant and if I tried it, i'd get silver bracelets and a stay in Club Fed. But yes, the more mundane rules get flouted regularly because it makes things hard to do, like get in touch with critical personnel when you need them.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    10. Re:Clarification by kqs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I mean. Nobody can seem to find a case where someone who mishandled classified material but did not leak it ended up in jail. The closest recent case seems to be Petraeus, who actively gave/leaked classified material to a journalist. In fact, Comey even said: "In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: [various things]. We do not see those things here."

      I do agree that Hillary is treated very differently than anyone else. For anyone else, people would see the recommendations and say "oh well, I thought her actions were more serious, and I'm unhappy with the result, but I guess it's closed; I assume the FBI is more of an expert on the law than I am." For Hillary, I expect at least 4 more years of hearings, select committees, accusations, insinuations, leaks, conspiracy theories, and all the rest of the circus. And little evidence of crimes and no convictions, either because she is a criminal mastermind who makes Lex Luthor seem like an idiot, or because she is, well, kinda an asshole but innocent of serious crimes.

      I know I won't convince you or anyone else. Once we "know" something, we won't let new evidence change what we believe. But I'm still saddened. There are so many valid reasons to hate Hillary, but most folks fixate on the invalid ones.

    11. Re:Clarification by HBI · · Score: 1

      What she did was "spill" classified data onto an unclassified, public system.

      The proper fix for a spill is to confiscate every computer that the spilled data is on and wipe it. You can find the processes in Army Regulation 25-2 "Information Assurance". The reg was written as it is to comply with the extant laws covering classified data as well as the Privacy Act.

      Spillage is a big deal.

      She signed SF 312, in which the penalties for this kind of mishandling of classified information are covered.

      Belief that she should have gotten away with it is bogus. Her crime was evident, Comey wimped out, as usual for him.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  20. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by XXongo · · Score: 1

    What materially changed since 1939 that prevents war? (correct answer is nothing)

    Correct answer is the fact that mainland China now has a single unified government (not a patchwork of semi-independent warlords and factions) with a large mliitary that is very, very well equipped by the standards of 1939.

    I really don't think Japan can walk in and declare Manchuria a client state anymore.

  21. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    This is 2016. The last thing *any* country is gonna do is blow up their source of cheap manufacturing.

    The economic argument against war.....that we won't hurt our own economic interests. Nope, throughout history, people have been willing to hurt their own economic interests to go to war. Most notably in World War 1: before world war 1, people were making the same kinds of arguments you just did: that the economies are too entertwined, the war would be too painful for everyone. And they were right: it was painful, but they destroyed their lives anyway.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  22. ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even better, read the credits :)

    "(Reporting by Beijing Newsroom and Shanghai Newsroom; Additional reporting by Megha Rajagopalan, Ben Blanchard, Jake Spring and Jeremy Wagstaff; Editing by Ian Geoghegan and Raju Gopalakrishnan)"

    So it took 2 newsrooms and 4 additional reporters plus 2 editors to write this insightful story of the reason behind it :O ...and a microblogging site? Reuters doesn't have any other sources left?

  23. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by HBI · · Score: 1

    China is a state with 1.3 billion people and can barely feed itself. Its population is barely held together by jingoistic propaganda against its natural impulses for greater self-rule.

    It wouldn't take much of an interdiction campaign to reduce it to a rebellious shambles.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  24. Wow. Just... Wow. by pla · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, and people make fun of "preppers" in the US?

    Guess what, China - The US already has high-res satellite imagery of every base, outpost, cave, and jeep (or whatever brand) you own.

    It would better serve the Earth's (and your own, as inhabitants thereof) needs if you focused more on not spewing crackpot bullshit like TFA, than worrying about whether or not we notice your target practice city-grids out in the middle of nowhere based on kids not crawling around them looking for pokestuff.

  25. Sort of true by mu51c10rd · · Score: 4, Funny

    If my morning commute is any indication, most of the Pokemon Go players would have no idea they are on a secret military base...

  26. Know nothings and China by sjbe · · Score: 1

    China is a state with 1.3 billion people and can barely feed itself.

    You haven't been to China have you? I have and your description doesn't come close. To anyone who has been there you sound like an ignorant imbecile.

    1. Re:Know nothings and China by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And you out yourself as someone else who's obviously never been there.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  27. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Read "The Better Angels of our Nature" by Stephen Pinker.

    The answer to your question is that lots of things have changed since 1939 (or 1039 for that matter) and while the exact details of the mechanics may not be precisely clear, the incidence of interstate and civil war, genocide, other killings by governments, terrorism and murder have all decreased dramatically.

    Factors that appear to make it unlikely for states to go to war with each other are one or both being democracies, a strong reliance on international trade, and membership in international organizations. While China isn't really a democracy, the US is (mostly) and both rely very heavily on international trade and are members of a great number of international organizations.

  28. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We could give two shits about cheap manufacturing. The world only cares about China's rare earth elements just like how they only care about oil or the middle east would have been a parking lot ages ago.

  29. IMPLYING by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Implying that U.S. and Japanese intelligence services don't already know where all of China's military bases and assets are at any given time -- and vice-versa.

    Nothing to see here, kids.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  30. Here's my shot at a crackpot theory by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    I bet Google is kicking itself that it sent out those camera-laden streetview cars, instead of publishing an augmented reality game that also could send location and direction-marked camera captures back to the server.

    That's not to say that they don't have a finger in the pie with the company that published the game, or perhaps more indirectly via the Android platform.

    Since I have already established that shotguns seem to work against drones, I'll next try if they can make pokemons go away - or at least pokemon go players...

    And don't forget that the above sentences may be full of irony and satire.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  31. It makes sense by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    China is worried that the rest of the world is trying to do to them what they are trying to do to the rest of the world.

  32. A solution too simple for the Chinese government.. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    Know the solution to that, China? It's really simple, China. Want to know what it is, China?

    Hey, China, allow your soldiers to play Pokemon GO on-base in their off time.

    Problem solved.

    Or, you know, don't try to screw us over and we won't have reason to invade you and, thus, won't need to know where your bases are in order to target them.

    Either (or both) of those will work.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  33. Turn the tables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey China, All your base are belong to US.

  34. Sweet new military job: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine all the people vying to be the official classified Pokemon catcher to nullify this clear and present danger to the Chinese military.

    Sgt.: "Private Chang, why didn't you report for KP?"

    Pvt.: "I had to catch a Ratata that was in the nuclear launch communications center."

    Sgt.: "Very well. Carry on."

  35. Obligatory by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    All your bases are belong to us...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  36. The Pokemon Montecarlo Reconnaissance Operation by garompeta · · Score: 1

    It suddenly doesn't sound that crazy of an idea.
    Distribute pokemons randomly in vast numbers across all continental China, clusters of uncaught pokemons will eventually appear. Filter out the ones appearing over water, and investigate the rest.

  37. The world is not rainbows by Texmaize · · Score: 2

    One of the things I very enjoyed about college was meeting people from other countries, and learning a little about them. Something that struck me was despite what TV, my liberal professors, and fellow American students were telling me, other cultures and perspectives really do exist, and few of them actually follow the school of thought that is being popularized in the U.S. We tend to take a very parochial, Euro-centric view of the world. So, while multi-culurism is preached, what is really meant is just the one that agrees with Euro-liberalism. There are other ideas, many that are in direct conflict with ours.

    For example, China. China is a very conservative country, that has a value system going back thousands of years. They have withstood several invasions, and their culture proved stronger, ultimately subverting their would be conquerers. They are very proud of this. They view the West insistence that only their values matter and are correct as a profound intrusion and disgustingly arrogant. They value family. We no longer do. They value structure and order; we clearly do not. They see the collective as important, we seem fixated celebrating the rebel. They think the majority should set the tone of commerce and culture. We have....well, read the news. Most of all, they teach their kids to love their country. For some reason, we have made it cool to be self loathing

    The net result is that they think of us as the enemy. As an extension, the believe war will come because the leftist philosophies of the lest simply cannot leave others alone. If you stop and think about it, this is the main driving force behind Muslim aggression and other little rebellions around the world. They do not follow the party line, and deeply understand that they are being threatened.

    So, I guess I am trying to say is that the world is a tough place. There are competing ideas and ways people want to organize their societies. The views that many on these forums hold as unchallenged and sacrosanct create enemies and alienate people. Is your world view really so limited that you are surprised by this?I

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
  38. Don't play Pokemon Go! by lkcl · · Score: 1

    "Don't play Pokemon GO!!!" said user {insert microblogger's name here} on {insert country of origin here} microblogging site. "It's so the U.S. and Japan can explore {insert country of origin}'s secret bases!"

  39. The great trojan pokemon conspiracy by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Woo hoo hoo. That is such a hilariously pathetic level of paranoid insecurity. That really made my day.

    Seriously do we still have this level of middle ages paranoid national fervor? Lighten up and catch some monsters.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:The great trojan pokemon conspiracy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Seriously do we still have this level of middle ages paranoid national fervor?

      I don't know - has Trump weighed in on Pokemon Go yet?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  40. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by HBI · · Score: 1

    I haven't read Pinker's book but I disagree entirely, based on your summary. If you had cited MAD doctrine and the likelihood of nuclear release, I would have agreed as far as that went. Not that it stops war, but it makes it more likely to involve non-state actors and insurgencies that cannot be clearly traced to a nuclear state. The actual frequency of war itself doesn't seem to have abated much, though.

    That said, it's on my reading list.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  41. Silly people, we don't use guided missiles by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    We use hunt and seek pop up drone packs that the Chinese don't even know are there.

    Now those do use the Poke database, but that's just a coincidence.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  42. Just because you're paranoid... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

    ...doesn't mean they aren't out to get you!

    But yeah, sometimes you're just paranoid.

  43. Oh China... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2
    What I don't get about the rant...

    Oh, there are numerous flaws with this line of thinking. Why would the US & Japan, both of who poses advanced spy satellite technology need to get video game data to try to collect info on military bases? You think that they don't already have that info?

    Moreover, why would we want to attack a country with a huge population, and massive standing land army? Isn't there some sort of old saying about land wars in Asia? I thought our plan was to just seduce them with freedom and material goods and let them toss out their own government because they think it sucks. You know, say like eastern Europe and Russia?

    At this point, it should be pretty obvious that the US isn't really interested in what other countries do with their governments as long as they don't engage in wars of conquest or wholesale slaughter of their own people, so I just wonder what this person is thinking.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  44. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    The trends Pinker talks about have been statistically consistent over at least the last thousand years, and not just in war. Do you think the number of murders has gone down because of MAD? The number of third world genocides? Incidence of terrorism?

  45. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by HBI · · Score: 1

    The trends Pinker talks about have been statistically consistent over at least the last thousand years, and not just in war. Do you think the number of murders has gone down because of MAD? The number of third world genocides? Incidence of terrorism?

    Absolutely not in terms of murder, third world genocides and terrorism - probably quite the opposite given the financial and military support of certain global powers for certain movements to cause trouble for their perceived enemies. Behind every incident of terrorism is a government funded movement. "Which government?" is the question.

    If Pinker goes back a thousand years, the issue of the change in human minds over that time comes up. Feudal systems were very bloody by their nature. I have heard people theorize that the human brain has altered over time and our perceptions are different than those from a thousand years ago. That said, I read Caesar's Commentaries, and he doesn't sound all that different from Napoleon, Bismarck or Sherman in terms of his perceptions. Or, for that matter, from twentieth century military figures.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  46. Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    If Pokemon Go relies on Google Maps, players in China can expect to wind up in the river... https://twitter.com/isonno/sta...

    1. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I thought you could not use Google Maps at all in China.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    2. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You can if you have mobile data through a non-Chinese carrier and you don't mind paying the international roaming charges.

      Or so I hear.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I've always switched to China Unicom when there. I assumed that the infrastructure was the same and the same blocks would apply. I guess the OP reference might have some sort of VPN also.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    4. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      At least that's the case in Guangzhou--perhaps it has something to do with its proximity to HK.

      Certain hotels that mostly cater to Rather Important People also don't filter. The KingRand in Beijing being one such example, if you can afford it. (Normally would be way out of reach for me, but I knew somebody who knew somebody who arranged a steep discount and a Gold Member Card guaranteeing me the same discount in future. Alas, I don't normally go to Beijing except to pass through it on the way to/from Guangzhou.)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I'll try it when in Kunming next month, thanks.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  47. Already divulging Chinese military secrets! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Ha! Pokemon Go has now revealed the existence of cloaked Chinese military bases that aren't visible on satellite images like all of the world's other military bases!

    (Half-seriously - maybe they have bases hidden under dummy neighborhoods like the US had during WW2, and this could indeed reveal them through apparently suburban neighborhoods in which nobody hunts Pokemon?)

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  48. This headline no verb (or subject?) by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    In China, what do fears-that-Pokemon-Go-may-aid-in-locating-military-bases do?

    Alternatively, in China, who fears that Pokemon Go may aid in locating military bases?

    The headline lacks either a verb (if the fears are the subject) or a subject (if fearing is the verb).

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    1. Re:This headline no verb (or subject?) by danaris · · Score: 1

      Most correctly, it's "In China, there are fears that..."

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
  49. So all the chinese need to do to counter this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is buy a few hundred to thousand cell phones, load pokemon go on it, and then spoof, or run security personnel through 'sanitized' environments to make those ultra-secure places appear boring and normal so that rare pokemon don't end up there?

    Seems like a simple counter-intelligence fix to augmented reality games. Hell if you have the hacker resources, like china, nk, etc do, you could even spoof the IO to the cell phones, or run virtualized android instances to spoof the data without ever having to physically move out in the field. Do that enough, especially if you throw in lots of deserted areas your civilians don't normally visit either, and you can have plenty of bogus data to overshadow things.

    That said: This presumes all bases have 'public' cell reception/data access. Is that true? If not, then none of those areas would show up visited by pokemon go anyways, since it is an online game, as far as I know. So if all the ultra rare pokemon end up in cell dead zones, either a blackmarket will appear to use portable cellular basestations to reach those areas, or satellite internet and wifi to connect to go servers and harvest dead zones for rare pokemon. Either sounds extremely negligent on Nintendo's part. They should have mapped pokemon only within a public map of cell station radiuses to ensure the relative safety of their consumers.

    That said I think this is really just more propaganda from China trying to slap their tiny dick in Japans equally flat face. I'd say they should try making love, not war, but that just seems to lead to 'War and rape' when you offer the suggestion to East Asians :)

  50. WTF ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... just walk around until you hear the handgun racking and ship the coordinates up.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  51. Ludicrous by dottrap · · Score: 1

    Ridiculous. We all know Pokemon is a plot to get children to bomb Pearl Harbor. South Park already proved it.

  52. One crazy is news? by melting_clock · · Score: 1

    I'd agree that this is a funny story but one conspiracy theorist does not seem like news. It looks more like viral marketing for a game... There are crazies everywhere, with irrational views on many things but ignoring them is generally the best option.

    Anyway, Google is just trying to make is easier for Chinese soldiers to find their way back to the secret bases with Maps.

  53. On the other hand by dynamo · · Score: 1

    Or if the chinese are really that worried, they can order their military people to play pokemon go to make it seem like it's not a base.