Slashdot Mirror


Soylent Coffee: Nootropics, Fat, Carbs, Protein -- But Will It Give You The Toots? (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via Ars Technica: Soylent has ventured in a new direction with its latest beverage: breakfast. Called Coffiest, the new offering has the same ingredient makeup, nutritional mix, and 47/33/20 percent fat/carb/protein calorie distribution as the 2.0 premixed version, but it also adds coffee flavoring, 150mg of caffeine per serving, and 75mg of the nootropic L-Theanine. According to Soylent founder Rob Rhinehart, a bottle of Coffiest supplies the drinker with about 400 kilocalories and about 20 percent of the daily recommended values for "all essential vitamins and minerals." "A lot of people are skipping breakfast," Rhinehart told Ars in a phone interview. "We wanted to provide a convenient and also really tasty option for them to enjoy in the morning." Additionally, the company will also be releasing a nutrition bar, called the Soylent Bar. This one will deliver 250 kilocalories per bar, and has a macronutrient breakdown of 38/43/19 percent fat/carb/protein. "Coffee flavor is extremely complex," Rhinehart told Ars. "The direction I gave was a little bit of a more darker, richer roast it's a little darker coffee. A little bit of cocoa powder, just a barely perceptible amount, but it rounds out the flavor nicely." "It was a huge challenge to develop a coffee flavor that would survive processing," he continued. "You can't take any risks with health or safety, so we have to eliminate any sources of contamination from the product and that involves heat. So we had some great food scientists and flavor scientists work out a flavor system that combines natural coffee extracts with an artificial flavor system. And it turned out pretty great." As for the toots, neither Coffiest nor the Soylent Bar will cause consumers to erupt with "horse-killing farts," a complaint made by many of Soylent's customers as well as Ars Technica writer Lee Hutchinson. For those interested in Soylent's latest concoction, Coffiest is available for purchase today at the Soylent site for about $40 for a pack of 12 servings (or $37.05 with a recurring subscription). The Soylent Bar will launch later for about $2 per bar. You can view Coffiest's nutrition facts here.

148 comments

  1. Is it green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The obvious SF reference: is it green?

    1. Re:Is it green? by 4im · · Score: 2

      Never mind the color - is it people?

    2. Re:Is it green? by rgbatduke · · Score: 5, Informative

      You missed the better SF reference. Coffiest is from The Space Merchants, by Pohl and Kornbluth, and it is one of the most brilliant satires of the modern progression towards multinational corporate world control ever written. Highly recommended...

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    3. Re:Is it green? by show+me+altoids · · Score: 3, Informative

      There were many different flavors of soylent, it's just that the green one tasted best, was highest in demand, and happened to be made of people.

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    4. Re:Is it green? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Worse! It's light-roast coffee.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Is it green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even if it was a product that I would normally want to eat, it would be difficult (at best) for me to trust this company after seeing the movie Soylent Green! That a producer of any type of food-like product would choose that name is really creepy.

    6. Re:Is it green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Worse! It's light-roast coffee."

      Made out of lightly roasted people.

    7. Re:Is it green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were many different flavors of soylent, it's just that the green one tasted best, was highest in demand, and happened to be made of people.

      Also, it's a surprise there are people in it because the name Soylent is SF short for it's ingredients: Soy and Lentils

    8. Re:Is it green? by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn you! Damn you all to hell - you just ruined the movie for me!

    9. Re:Is it green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Green Tea

    10. Re:Is it green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But - and here's what makes this campaign truly great, in my estimation - each sample of Coffiest contains three milligrams of a simple alkaloid. Nothing harmful. But definitely habit-forming. After ten weeks the customer is hooked for life. It would cost him at least five thousand dollars for a cure, so it's simpler for him to go right on drinking Coffiest - three cups with every meal and a pot beside his bed at night, just as it says on the jar."

  2. Slashdot has become Slashad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame!

  3. Is Fred Pohl still alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess he came up with Coffiest, a hilarious product in a hilariously dark novel...

    1. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by cbelt3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right. And these idiots used the name of a completely addictive beverage that, once hooked, condemns the drinker to a lifetime of consumerism ? I've heard of tongue in cheek, but jeez... why not just name it Liquid Heroin and be done with it ?

      ""...here's what makes this campaign great in my estimation - each sample of Coffiest contains three milligrams of a simple alkaloid. Nothing harmful. But definitely habit-forming. After ten weeks the customer is hooked for life. It would cost him at least five thousand dollars for a cure, so it's simpler for him to go right on drinking Coffiest - three cups with every meal and a pot beside his bed at night, just as it says on the jar.""

    2. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about coffee or some other ingredient?

    3. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fred Pohl died approximately three years ago.

    4. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I think it might be a reference to heroin, but it's hard to tell since so many plant-derived compounds are alkaloids (including caffeine and nicotine).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by chthon · · Score: 1

      So, yeah, how long until they come up with "Soylent Green"?

    6. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by cmiller173 · · Score: 2

      I think they are talking about a fictional product from the 1952 novel The Space Merchants by Frederik Pohl, after which the real product in the OP was named.

    7. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Ohhhhh, nevermind - it's a quote from a book: "The Space Merchant" by Frederik Pohl and Cyril M. Kornbluth.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clearing that up!

    9. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm slow.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Add in some Mocha Green Tea powder!

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    11. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Given that their original product also uses a science fiction reference that would be seen as negative were it not being used ironically, it's not surprising that they named the new one Coffiest.

  4. I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I won't buy Soylent's products because of the tiny, tiny chance that the company is run by psychopaths who thought "I've got a cool idea - let's make food products out of rendered fat from cadavers ... and just for the icing on the cake, we'll call it 'Soylent' - because it would be a hip joke and no one would ever believe we'd *really* do it."

    1. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative

      I won't buy Soylent's products because of the tiny, tiny chance that the company is run by psychopaths

      Do you mean like this guy? Soylent CEO charged over illegal shipping container his neighbors hate

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I won't buy Soylent's products because of the tiny, tiny chance that the company is run by psychopaths

      Well, the company IS run by people who thought that the only real problem with food is that it tastes good, can be shared with people you love over a meal, and takes effort to create. They decided to solve all these "problems" with soylent.

      So yeah, I'd say people who see food as just fuel as having something wrong with them. Psychopath might be a bit strong though.

    3. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by nine-times · · Score: 2

      Well yeah, it's not like they can test for that. It's literally impossible for modern science to tell the difference between human fat and oat/rice/soy products.

    4. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eccentric, absolutely. Rude, definitely. But psychopath? Not enough data for a meaningful answer.

      Myself, I'm ambivalent about zoning laws. On one hand, some degree of cooperation is a necessary for a functional society. On the other hand, the USA is supposed to be all about individual freedom. "Live free or die." and all that.

      And even the specific charges don't give us much to go on...

      Robert Rose Rhinehart Jr., the owner of a parcel of land located at 2936 N. Ashland Avenue, was charged with four criminal counts including construction and grading without permits; zoning code violations and failure to comply with orders from the Department of Building and Safety. If convicted, Rhinehart could face up to two years in jail and $4,000 in fines. Arraignment is scheduled for September 7, 2016 in Division 47.

    5. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arguably, most "working" people in the real world have one available meal slot per day (dinner) that can be spent relaxing with family, enjoying "real" food, unless they take time away from other things to go out of their way to prepare breakfast/lunch as well. Considering the only real alternative to something like soylent is generally fast food or other garbage (pastries, snacks, etc), I find it rather closed-minded to paint the people behind the company with the brush of having "something wrong with them".

      That's coming from someone who hasn't even tried the stuff, because I prefer "real food" myself.

    6. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and apparently the shipping container has been removed and Rob Rhinehart has issued a public apology on his "Mostly Harmless" blog.

      Without knowing anything at all about the situation. I wonder if, coming the southern United States, Rob Rhinehart wasn't fully tuned into the zoning and construction culture in Southern California - where land is ridiculously expensive and people get pretty uptight about some pretty small things.

    7. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Shrug. Protein is protein.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    8. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do you often find yourself on your knees in front of men?

    9. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so you want to live in a nanny stay full of California NIMBYs? Go fuck yourself with an ax, commie.

  5. Coffee Flavored Soy? by Eosi · · Score: 1

    This sounds interesting, but what about the growing number of people are allergic to Soy? They sure could not consume this.

    1. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This sounds interesting, but what about the growing number of people are allergic to Soy? They sure could not consume this.

      I can't digest soy, and I make sure to bring that up every chance I get, but the answer for people who are allergic to soy is the same as every other food: eat something else. HTH, HAND.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wat? Almost nobody has soy allergy

    3. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I can't digest soy, and I make sure to bring that up every chance I get,

      if you want to stop bringing it up, then stop trying to eat it.

    4. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

      Soy shouldn't really be eaten by middle aged and older men. It messes your testosterone up.

    5. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      drinkypoo is too much of a precious little snowflake to take the high road and do what's right for himself. He needs everyone's attention or he'll wither like a flower in the desert. That's why he posts to Slashdot about 20 times a day. He needs the attention more than he needs to do something to make his own life more enriching without the praise of others.

    6. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soy shouldn't really be eaten by *any human* whatsoever. It messes up all sorts of hormone pathways. Soy formula causes girls to enter puberty as early as 5 years old. Soy is a weed--not a food.
      If it's toxic to eat raw, processing doesn't make it safe.
      If it's safe to eat raw, prepare/cook it however you like--it's still safe.

    7. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This sounds interesting, but what about the growing number of people are allergic to Soy?

      They can eat people instead.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      There is not much actual soy in Soylent.

      It is a protein extract, so one of the hormone precursors that cause the hormone issues.

      Not that middle aged or older men really have much testosterone anyway.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    9. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that middle aged or older men really have much testosterone anyway.

      Healthy ones should.

    10. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Megol · · Score: 2

      Soy have been used as human food for a long time (before written history) without problems - so you are wrong.
      Many kinds of food that really are toxic can be safe to eat when cooked (some mushrooms, some meats) - so you are wrong again.
      The third claim depends on how you define safe, but is in general false as e.g. acrylamide is created when heating starch above a certain temperature - yet another wrong claim.

      0/3 - care to play again?

    11. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soy have been used as human food for a long time (before written history) without problems - so you are wrong.

      a) how do you know. Apart from anything else, all the people from that time that used it are dead.

      b) Soy used in the East is mostly fermented (e.g. in Tofu) which gets rid of the bad stuff.

    12. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      drinkypoo is too much of a precious little snowflake to take the high road and do what's right for himself.

      Is that why I posted a comment about doing what's right for oneself?

      He needs everyone's attention or he'll wither like a flower in the desert.

      That might be true. But then, why does anyone post to Slashdot (or other public comment sites), ever? It's only for attention.

      That's why he posts to Slashdot about 20 times a day.

      I know this seems arduous to you, but I can type more than ten words per minute. To me, posting to Slashdot is no more work than chatting with a friend.

      He needs the attention more than he needs to do something to make his own life more enriching without the praise of others.

      So, what is it about you that makes you need to bring others down, without even associating your identity? It simply makes you feel better when other people feel worse? That's an unfortunate feedback loop which does explain a significant percentage of Slashdot comments.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Soy allergies are common enough that soy is one of the potential allergens that must be specially called out on food packaging. The full list: milk, eggs, fish, Crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, and soybeans.

  6. Why do they add cocoa to everthing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's my migraine trigger and that sucks!

    1. Re:Why do they add cocoa to everthing? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Because it makes things taste better, and is harmless in the vast majority of people ? And chances are, it's not the cocoa per se, but the theobromine in the cocoa. . .

  7. Defying gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did the soylent thing once to try it out, and I like coffee, so this is interesting to me but I couldn't get past the gravity defying coffee pot picture on their website long enough to be able to read about it.

  8. kilocalories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    400,000 calories per serving?

    1. Re:kilocalories? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      With using some memory tech at 50 picojoule per written bit, how much is that in Libraries of Congress?

    2. Re:kilocalories? by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      No need to be nasty about it.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    3. Re:kilocalories? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, jackass.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:kilocalories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a pleasure, asshole.

    5. Re:kilocalories? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Food "calories" are always kilocalories as the term is used in physics. A calorie was originally defined as the amount of thermal energy required to raise the temperature of one gram of water by one degree Celsuis; a kilocalorie will raise the temperature of one kilogram of water by the same degree. (The calorie is no longer a primary unit and is now officially defined as 4.184 joules.) Once upon a time food calories were spelled with a capital C (which was also at one time the convention in physics for kilocalories) but that fell by the wayside over the years. American usage normally just calls them calories, but in Europe you see references to kilocalories or kcal.

  9. Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Wasn't his original thing on soylent that he didn't care about taste and had no interest in food? Why is "getting the flavor right" now suddenly important. Surely the whole point of his venture is perverted by making something taste like coffee rather than fish oil and whatever the hell else goes into it.

    1. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because they already cracked the nut of being nutritionally complete? They can move onto further refinements. They're running a business, not some weak open source project that gets to "good enough" and then everyone walks away leaving it to stagnate so some other commercial offering can pop up based on the same project..

    2. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't his original thing on soylent that he didn't care about taste and had no interest in food? Why is "getting the flavor right" now suddenly important. Surely the whole point of his venture is perverted by making something taste like coffee rather than fish oil and whatever the hell else goes into it.

      Customers.

  10. Is direct headline snarfing from Ars OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll admit I don't know the nuance of plagiarism vs summary well enough to say, but it doesn't seem right that the exact text of Ars' article on soylent coffee has been copied here word for word:

    "Soylent Coffee: Nootropics, fat, carbs, protein—but will it give you the toots?"

    I know it's attributed, but... we can't come up with something clever on our own? Just seems dodgy.

    1. Re:Is direct headline snarfing from Ars OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's BeauHD, the master of automated posts. Do you something expect more?

  11. Consolidated them for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this affect APPS? Nobody is going to be a millennial fucking snowflake. How does this affect anyone at all? Can anyone explain why this matters? Now, I know you'll censor my post to -1 to avoid the APPS and pretend like millennial snowflakes don’t exist. But it's an important question: why do APPS or millennial snowflakes matter at all? Can anyone explain how this affects APPS? I think not! But I expect to be censored to -1 almost instantly.

    SNOWFLAKES!

    1. Re:Consolidated them for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could do a ride-along on your drive-by rant; but what does APPS stand for? Is there an app for that?

  12. Nein danke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No thanks. I'm an old programmer. Three cups of coffee and a cigarette are all the breakfast I need !

    1. Re:Nein danke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep smoking and you won't be an old programmer for much longer...

  13. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "horse-killing farts" is a rather loose standard. I'm thinking "cubicle clearing fart" would be more useful.

    1. Re:well by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Agreed. As a city-boy, I've never been in a position to kill horses. I have, however, cleared my share of cubicals.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: "horse-killing farts," I thought that was a feature? Why did they take the feature out?

      I want the feature back!

    3. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so easy to turn it into a standard - you need to be able to apply it equally in offices from Burkina Faso to downtown LA. You'll need to regulate the cubicle floor area, possibly with adjustment factors for square Vs rectangular; allow for cubicle wall height; possibly have a still-air requirement, so no open windows or powerful air-conditioning. Standardise the air temperature. Is the fart emanating from one seated in a chair, in which case there would be a slower delivery through to the open cubicle (hmmm, how about activated charcoal filters in the seat squab?). These are all questions that need to be addressed.

  14. eat real food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with eating real food? How the goddamn lazy do you need to be to drink this crap?

    Here is a hint people, learn how to cook.

    1. Re:eat real food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought Soylent once to try. My interest was not about being lazy, but instead I thought Soylent would be good to store in an emergency stash in case of disaster.

    2. Re:eat real food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. CEO will tell you, at nauseating length what's wrong with it, and everything else.

      First, I never cook. I am all for self reliance but repeating the same labor over and over for the sake of existence is the realm of robots. I utilize soylent only at home and go out to eat when craving company or flavor. This eliminates a panoply of expensive tools and rotting ingredients I would need to spend an unconscionable amount of time sourcing, preparing, and cleaning. It also gives me an incentive to explore the city’s fine restaurants and ask friends out to eat. In fact, I find soylent has made me more social when it comes to food. ... Getting rid of my fridge was one of the greatest days of my life. Nevermore will I listen to that damn compressor moan.

      I have not set foot in a grocery store in years. Nevermore will I bumble through endless confusing aisles like a pack-donkey searching for feed while the smell of rotting flesh fills my nostrils and fluorescent lights sear my eyeballs and sappy love songs torture my ears. Grocery shopping is a multisensory living nightmare. There are services that will make someone else do it for me but I cannot in good conscience force a fellow soul through this gauntlet.

    3. Re:eat real food by Megol · · Score: 1

      I wonder where he used to shop as in civilized countries there should be no rotting flesh at all? Sounds like one of the fanatically uninformed vegans, those that claim that meat rots in the intestines...

  15. Horse Killing by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Farts? As reported by Arse Technica writer Lee Hutchinson...

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Horse Killing by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Forget Arse Technica - this should have been reported here instead?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  16. Food from Matrix ? by ze_jua · · Score: 1

    But we are inside The Matrix, we deserve well cooked beef piece...!

  17. Clickwhoring Slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have we fallen this low?

  18. fostering a generation that cant cook. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dont mind meal replacements. there are several used institutionally and in hospitals that never get this much publicity but have been around for years. My biggest concern however is our growing dependence upon multinational and branded consumer food companies to provide replacements for basic food staples. most americans already rely implicitly on betty crocker and stouffers to fill in the blanks of their culinary Repertoire. For the past 20 years most thanksgivings in america have been an olympic feast of multibillion dollar corporate sponsored brands of pre-cooked, processed foods that emerge at the supermarket shelf unaccountably and ubiquitously.

    Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry? could they prepare porridge or vegetables, or even remember how to cook dry beans? Does soylent foster an even greater social divide in the 21st century by short-circuiting the social past-time of cooking and eating together? how will this generation cope when there is no soylent?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry? could they prepare porridge or vegetables, or even remember how to cook dry beans?

      I got to break it to you, statistically everyone has been doing this wrong for ever. They soak the beans, which is stupid, and they don't use a haybox cooker, which is even more stupid if you're not using a pressure cooker. But you're right, nobody knows how to cook any more. I've been the better cook in the majority of my relationships, which was very sad up until this one; I'm with a chef now and my cooking game has really improved over the last decade.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I dont mind meal replacements. there are several used institutionally and in hospitals that never get this much publicity but have been around for years. My biggest concern however is our growing dependence upon multinational and branded consumer food companies to provide replacements for basic food staples. most americans already rely implicitly on betty crocker and stouffers to fill in the blanks of their culinary Repertoire. For the past 20 years most thanksgivings in america have been an olympic feast of multibillion dollar corporate sponsored brands of pre-cooked, processed foods that emerge at the supermarket shelf unaccountably and ubiquitously. Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry? could they prepare porridge or vegetables, or even remember how to cook dry beans? Does soylent foster an even greater social divide in the 21st century by short-circuiting the social past-time of cooking and eating together? how will this generation cope when there is no soylent?

      Almost no one can start a fire with a flint nor build a workable bow or arrow tips anymore. Almost now one knows how weave their own fabric, nor preserve meats with salt, beneficial molds, fermentation or smoking. Almost no one can make antiseptics out of urine, bile and herbs.

      And you know what, we are fine. Unless we are waiting for an asteroid strike, the zombie apocalypse or some other shit that collapses human civilization, we will be fine.

    3. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got to break it to you, statistically everyone has been doing this wrong for ever. They soak the beans, which is stupid, and they don't use a haybox cooker, which is even more stupid if you're not using a pressure cooker

      I don't see how any method of cooking beans is 'wrong', only different. The only error one could make is to not bring certain varieties up to the proper temp for 15 or so minutes to break down the phytohaemagglutnins but unless you're using an old slow cooker it is often done by default.

      Otherwise, I can empathize with the part of being the only one in the relationship with cooking skills.

    4. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by cmseagle · · Score: 1

      If I don't know how to cook something I can find a step-by-step video or article telling me exactly how. Thanks to the internet, this knowledge isn't lost forever even if the required skills are a bit rusty. If this generation isn't cooking, I think it's more because they don't want to, not because they can't.

    5. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Hodr · · Score: 1

      My grandmother used to say "Betty Crocker didn't spend a million dollars developing a cake mix that makes shit cakes". I think her point was that it's easy and good enough, so why bother doing it "from scratch".

    6. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All young adults seem to prefer hitting fast food or boxed meals for awhile, but it seems that Millennials are particularly resistant to learning how to cook. Even those that are willing will rely on something like Plated or Blue Apron, because they need some Instructables-style handholding.

      Excuses range from "I'm working too hard to have time to cook" or "I'm too poor to buy groceries" even though both of these take more time and money than actually cooking does.

    7. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry?

      The "Soylent generation", as you call them learned this sort of behavior from their parents. The processed food movement started in the 1950s and 1960s with crap like TV Dinners. Look at some of the recipe's from that era. They're mostly really disgusting convenience food where you throw together a bunch of cans and frozen stuff into a pot, and eat it. It's not really all that substantially different from Soylent. The US have been a food wasteland for a long, long time. When I was growing up, we used to call this crap http://www.shopwell.com/kraft-parmesan-cheese-grated-original/cheese-shredded/p/2100061530 "Parmesan cheese"

      Personally I think we're actually moving away from this crap, and people are wanting better, more flavorful food. This soylent crap is just the last gasp stop of the horrible movement that overtook the US over the last 50 years.

    8. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why not remove all uncertainty and just buy a ready-made cake?

    9. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't see how any method of cooking beans is 'wrong', only different.

      Some people feel the need to have to assert that there way of doing things is the ONLY correct way. It seems like not soaking the beans does offer some different flavor to the beans, and changes the texture. Whether you like the flavor is obviously a matter of preference. I've tried both, and I like the soaked beans better.

      Here's someone who actually bothered to try all the different suggestions, many of which didn't offer much difference in flavor. Good read even if you don't care about soaking/non-soaking.

      http://www.latimes.com/food/dailydish/la-dd-dont-soak-dried-beans-20140911-story.html

    10. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      My biggest concern however is our growing dependence upon multinational and branded consumer food companies to provide replacements

      FWIW, Soylent is Open Source:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    11. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its.. Not that hard.

      I ate packaged microwave crap and didn't exercise until I was 30.

      With the help of google, the butcher, the produce isle, and the knobs on my stove I saved a lot of money. Also started cycling instead of playing WoW.

      Lost 130 lbs.

    12. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Coming from personal experience, it depends on the parents. If they value cooking and eating as a family, so will the kid. If they value McDonalds, so will the kid.

      I always had meals with my folks and they taught me how to cook early on. "If you like to eat, you need to learn to cook."

      Later on in bachelor life I started having Soylent as a cheap breakfast substitute. Partially since it's fast and easy, partially since I can make it in a blender and have a weeks worth of breakfast, and since cereal or oatmeal would have me hungry by 10. At least I could survive until lunch with a soylent breakfast.

      Now married life means I'm not doing that nearly as often as before and I'm right back to cooking and eating with the family.

    13. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Almost no one can start a fire with a flint nor build a workable bow or arrow tips anymore. Almost now one knows how weave their own fabric, nor preserve meats with salt, beneficial molds, fermentation or smoking. Almost no one can make antiseptics out of urine, bile and herbs.

      And you know what, we are fine.

      Well, yeah, "we are fine," except we have an unprecedented obesity epidemic which has significant social, economic, and environmental costs.

      Don't get me wrong: I'm not some "natural foods" nutter. On the other hand, we are in fact literally "what we eat." Our bodies gain nutrition and rebuild themselves from the food we eat.

      I'm NOT blaming the obesity epidemic just on "processed foods," though it's hard to believe that there aren't SOME aspects of them which contribute to it. Processed foods are often created to maximize certain flavor responses that trick our bodies and metabolisms in various ways. Companies that are driven by profit have little reason to "tone down" such tendencies, but they have significant motivation to try to get consumers to buy their stuff more. And thus we get excess sugar and fat and whatever added to more stuff which isn't really necessary, but some focus tasting group liked the stuff 2% more, which could generate more sales. Meanwhile, if you were baking the same product at home yourself, you might look at the recipe and say, "Huh... they want me to add HOW much oil!?!"

      Obviously whenever obesity comes up we'll get a huge debate about personal responsibility, motivation, etc. And that's important. But bad eating habits are also a function of biological effects, cravings driven by various chemicals (which are in turn stimulated in different ways by the foods we consume), etc.

      Is home cooking a "cure-all" for any of this? No. But it's one good place to start thinking about what could be done better. While the loss of other skills like your examples may have minor impacts, I'd wager to say that the loss of cooking knowledge combined with the trust we have in large-scale industrial food processing has the potential for a much greater impact on us (i.e., quite literally the stuff that makes up our bodies) than the other things you mention.

    14. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      If I don't know how to cook something I can find a step-by-step video or article telling me exactly how. Thanks to the internet, this knowledge isn't lost forever even if the required skills are a bit rusty. If this generation isn't cooking, I think it's more because they don't want to, not because they can't.

      While I agree with your sentiment in general, I also think we've seen a marked decrease in the value of learned and practiced skills in the past decade or so, particularly with the growth of the internet.

      There's this sense that "I can always just look up X online" which leads us to think anything is possible, just a click away. On the other hand, a lot of stuff benefits from practice over time. I have a science background and know all sorts of stuff about how important measuring with care is, and precision of technique, etc., but I've been cooking for decades and still find myself falling short occasionally when I try a new recipe or cook a new food I haven't worked with before.

      You can watch all the videos on Youtube that you want, but often I find it takes at least 3 or 4 times making a dish until I get it to the quality level I'm satisfied with... and I learn a lot along the way.

      And this is from someone who cooks and bakes on a regular basis, so I have experience to troubleshoot and figure out a lot of stuff when things go wrong. When I first started baking bread (maybe 15 years ago), I was just "stumbling in the dark" for a long time. No one in my family had much experience with bread-baking. I read all I could find in books, searching the internet (which even back then had tons of resources and forums), etc. And with all of that, I'd say it probably took about 3 or 4 years of experimentation along with reading and re-reading various sources before I feel like I could make passable bread in lots of varieties (I have a pretty high standard) and troubleshoot problems efficiently.

      If I were working with a master bread-baker, I have no doubt that I probably could pick all of that up in a few months instead. And that's the real loss here. Yes, we have information online that stores up knowledge, but there are all sorts of little details that go into developing skills that simply can't be explained in a 5-minute step-by-step video, particularly for people who don't have any cooking background to begin with. Years ago, you'd just work with your mother in the kitchen as you were growing up, and she'd just gradually correct those errors and hone your skills without you even realizing it, and magically you'd pick up all this implicit knowledge about cooking.

      As with just about anything, basic cooking is pretty easy, and there are plenty of dishes that are "idiot-proof" to make. But there's a lot of stuff that goes into learning a skill over periods of time... and thus, yes, I'd say that more people today CAN'T cook in the sense that it would take them many years to get to a skill level of their grandmother or whatever. People also "don't want to" play the bassoon or the trombone, but they also CAN'T -- they might watch videos or step-by-step instructions online, but it will still take many months or years of practice to develop sufficient skills.

    15. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      My grandmother used to say "Betty Crocker didn't spend a million dollars developing a cake mix that makes shit cakes". I think her point was that it's easy and good enough, so why bother doing it "from scratch".

      I guess it depends on what your standards for "good enough" are. Cake mixes are fine if you like what they taste like -- they tend to have a few distinctive textures (depending on type and flavor). But there's only so much you can do with a mix that you dump together in two steps and just add eggs and water (maybe oil). There are certain textures you can only get from creaming together butter and sugar for several minutes. There are certain textures you can only get by slowly adding eggs one-at-a-time while whipping, or by whipping egg whites separately or whatever. Certain flavors are fresher in cakes made with certain ingredients (rather than in a dry mix). Etc.

      I'm NOT saying cake mixes are bad -- my favorite cake when I was a little kid was made from a box by my grandmother, who added some sliced strawberries and topped with Cool-Whip mixed with strawberries. But they are limited. Other techniques and ingredients open other possibilities... and it's also easier to tweak a "from scratch" recipe to get the exact results you want. (Perhaps more relevant to GP's point, making a variety of cakes from scratch also teaches you how to tweak a recipe to get what you want, whereas if you just have a packet or two of "stuff" to dump together with some water, it's much harder to imagine how to do things differently to "fix" your cake the way you want.)

    16. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by hey! · · Score: 1

      The whole concept of branding is to create intangible value. It's profitable because the marginal cost to the vendor is zero, but you the consumer pay a premium in cold hard cash for what objectively speaking is nothing.

      I never buy anything that claims to have a "proprietary formula", because that's exactly the same kind of intangible value ploy. "Proprietary" and "evidence-based" are mutually exclusive adjectives. Anything with a sound foundation in science can be reproduced by anyone with access to scientific literature. If it's "proprietary" it's cooked up by a crackpot or charlatan.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    17. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry? could they prepare porridge or vegetables, or even remember how to cook dry beans? Does soylent foster an even greater social divide in the 21st century by short-circuiting the social past-time of cooking and eating together? how will this generation cope when there is no soylent?

      Hmm, I wonder if your question goes deep enough. How many people know how food is produced? Or even gathered? It's one thing to not know how tyrian purple is made, but when the only thing you know about making bread is grinding an Englishman's bones, maybe you're in trouble.

      There is no expectation now for most people to be anywhere near a farm, even growing your own fruits and vegetables may be unknown, though the various grocery stores are still stocking plants for growing in the spring, however that may be tempered by them being hybrids and not likely to sustain growth. Still, I an get seeds if I want them. I'm just not sure it's enough, only a few of my neighbors bother and I doubt their children care.

      And I live in Suburbia, the people who live in Apartment Complexes may have no such exposure or opportunity at all.

      Oh well, at least maybe I can pretend Pokemon Go will get people to understand the complexities of hunting, right?

    18. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry?

      "Soylent Generation"? Really? This site is the only place where I occasionally hear about this Soylent stuff. I'm pretty sure that the people who don't cook at all are a minority, even among the laziest of Millenials.

    19. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is home cooking a "cure-all" for any of this? No. But it's one good place to start thinking about what could be done better. While the loss of other skills like your examples may have minor impacts, I'd wager to say that the loss of cooking knowledge combined with the trust we have in large-scale industrial food processing has the potential for a much greater impact on us (i.e., quite literally the stuff that makes up our bodies) than the other things you mention.

      Home cooking isn't even a cure any for this.

      An aunt of mine used to home cook an order of magnitude more food than needed, and included dishes like bacon wrapped green beans.
      There's nothing intrinsically healthy about home cooked meals.

    20. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all the examples you gave, the modern products are far better and cheaper.

      But that simply isn't true with food. Knowing how to make your own food from raw ingredients creates better tasting, healthier food. The reason being that food has a fairly short shelf life, compared to say Mr. Clean. You can extend the shelf life of food, but at a great cost to taste. It's very hard to make food that's good, good for you, inexpensive, and can last for months.

      If through some magic technology you could somehow industrialize food, while preserving all the quality and nutrition, you'd be right. But until someone invents a time stasis field, where time literally stops, it's not going to happen.

    21. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont mind meal replacements. there are several used institutionally and in hospitals that never get this much publicity but have been around for years

      Sure, there's usually a whole aisle of Ensure related products in the local supermarket. But Soylent does have some advantages. It's vegan - which is good for those who are concerned about the ethics of milk production - or who are just plain lactose intolerant. And Soylent arguably has a better ratio of sugars and starches and proteins. The Ensure related products tend to have more sugar than is ideal from the perspective of basic nutrition. So...not a miracle product...but arguably significantly better for routine meal replacement than the other easily available commercial alternatives.

    22. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by ruir · · Score: 1

      This thread seems to be getting more of an informercial to get around adblockers the more I read of it.

    23. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      And you know what, we are fine. Unless we are waiting for an asteroid strike, the zombie apocalypse or some other shit that collapses human civilization, we will be fine.

      As a child, I wondered why the average person did not know this stuff. It forces us to be dependent on others if we do not know it... as an adult, it seems like a conspiracy. How can you be free if you are ultimately dependent on society for your survival?

      Don't get me wrong, I think the benefits that society brings are extremely useful and desirable; however, I should have the ability to say, "fuck off" without dying.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  19. Do the toots explain King Ass Ripper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've wondered how the King can fart so much all the time.

  20. Outdated nutrition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhh yes, the belief that a handful of chemically synthesized/isolated compounds is all that is necessary to be healthy and thrive. On top of that old "breakfast is the most important meal of the day" adage.

    Truly a innovative, cutting-edge and forward-looking company.

  21. Serious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will this effect your stool? Wouldn't it be extremely compact? If so, I imagine it would be painful going to the washroom.

  22. Avoid this crap by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    Seriously, why the heck would you ever bother with this?

    Nutrition is partly about Macro nutrients and A LOT about micro nutrients. This shit has virtually no micro nutrients. You can survive on bread and water only as well but it's not healthy.

    The elephant in the room is the source of protein, soy. Soy LOWERS your testosterone levels. It directly impacts testosterone in men why the fuck would a man want to consume this shit?

    Here's a fast healthy breakfast; whole grain bread, sunny-side up egg, slice of tomato on top. Done.

    The egg has a certain integrity as is, meaning it will not mix with oil. If you scramble it or make it into an omelette it will absorb the cooking oil.

    Whole grain bread is healthier, the less processed the better. (Processed whole grain is often powdered which defeats the point.)

    Tomato, it has...but the point is micro nutrients.Veg, fruit, fresh meat etc have micronutrients.

    Every food product you see about promoting health says what? "As part of a healthy lifestyle and balanced diet" because the product you see in the ad is not what makes you healthy it's a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle that does it. Not fucking Soylent.

    Now commit to exercising today and never think about eating powdered liquid again. -wanna lose wait? EAT LESS CALORIES THAN YOU EXPEND.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:Avoid this crap by Zanadou · · Score: 1

      -wanna lose wait?

      Get busy?

    2. Re:Avoid this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am sorry but in no world is a piece of toast a single egg and then a single slice of tomato going to be enough food for breakfast. I get it, its probably healthier, I get it you need to consume less then your output if you want to loose weight, but my lunch is at 1 in the afternoon. a piece of bread, an egg and just a slice of tomato isn't enough food for a 8 year old.

      You turn away alot of people who need to eat healthier when you absolutely minimize the portion sizes to minuscule proportions.
      1 slice of whole grained bread, toasted: 65 calories
      1 egg, fried: 92 calories
      1 (thick) slice of tomato: 5 calories.

      162 calories is NOT ENOUGH FOR BREAKFAST. Eating a breakfast like that will guarentee snacking later, which defeats the point.
      Source: http://www.thecaloriecounter.com

    3. Re:Avoid this crap by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I am sorry but in no world is a piece of toast a single egg and then a single slice of tomato going to be enough food for breakfast. I get it, its probably healthier, I get it you need to consume less then your output if you want to loose weight, but my lunch is at 1 in the afternoon. a piece of bread, an egg and just a slice of tomato isn't enough food for a 8 year old.

      You turn away alot of people who need to eat healthier when you absolutely minimize the portion sizes to minuscule proportions. 1 slice of whole grained bread, toasted: 65 calories 1 egg, fried: 92 calories 1 (thick) slice of tomato: 5 calories.

      162 calories is NOT ENOUGH FOR BREAKFAST. Eating a breakfast like that will guarentee snacking later, which defeats the point. Source: http://www.thecaloriecounter.c...

      And that is why you add rashers, mushrooms, potato cakes, beans, coffee and OJ for a full English Breakfast!

    4. Re:Avoid this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The elephant in the room is the source of protein, soy. Soy LOWERS your testosterone levels. It directly impacts testosterone in men why the fuck would a man want to consume this shit?

      Too much testosterone causes male pattern baldness.

  23. Soy Protein = Avoid by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a once in a blue moon thing to eat/drink, these Soylent products are alright. However, I drink a cup of coffee every day. I shudder to think what the estrogenic effects of consuming vast amounts of soy protein daily are. Not to mention the other terrible ingredients listed in there. Maltodextrin is a simple sugar. Why not use a sugar like turbinado?

    You'd be better off getting a casein/whey protein shake and mixing it with fruit, some nut butter (hehe), and some fibrous substance like psyllium as a meal replacement drink. Sure it's not vegan or lactose tolerant, but who really cares what vegans feel.

    I'll pass on this.

    1. Re:Soy Protein = Avoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but who really cares what vegans feel.

      Somewhere there is a Vegan vibrating with anger so hard that they just phased through the floor.

    2. Re:Soy Protein = Avoid by Megol · · Score: 2

      As a once in a blue moon thing to eat/drink, these Soylent products are alright. However, I drink a cup of coffee every day. I shudder to think what the estrogenic effects of consuming vast amounts of soy protein daily are.

      If only we had some control population where consumption of soy products of different kinds are common so that we could see short and long term effects ... Oh, we have! Soy use is ancient.

      Not to mention the other terrible ingredients listed in there. Maltodextrin is a simple sugar. Why not use a sugar like turbinado?

      You mean "dirty" simple sugars are better than "clean" ones? Are you one of those "raw" fanatics?

      You'd be better off getting a casein/whey protein shake and mixing it with fruit, some nut butter (hehe), and some fibrous substance like psyllium as a meal replacement drink. Sure it's not vegan or lactose tolerant, but who really cares what vegans feel.

      I'll pass on this.

      Citation needed! Why would that be better?

    3. Re: Soy Protein = Avoid by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should look into the methodology of your little experiment. Let me help you with that: soy proteins come from unfermented soy. All soy products in Asian cuisine are fermented. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=fermented...

    4. Re: Soy Protein = Avoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for tofu. And soy beans, soy flour. Those are unfermented.

  24. Bachelor Chow by clifwlkr · · Score: 2

    I mean really, we aren't that far off from it when we start eating this kind of heavily processed food. Why not just mix this stuff into solids and throw it in a bag and eat it out of a bowl?

    It is not that hard to cook simple meals. Heck, cook up a big pot of something on one day, and eat leftovers if you are short on time. At least you know what is in it, and it is going to be much, much cheaper. I just cooked up a big pot of Himalayan bahl dat (lentils) and some spiced rice last night and I would be surprised if it took me 15 minutes of effort. I now have a healthy breakfast (this is actually what the Himalayans eat) for the week that costs me about 3 dollars. Throw a piece of chicken on the grill. How long does that take?

    I am really surprised this kind of over processed food is even slightly popular in this day and age.

    1. Re: Bachelor Chow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dyslexic? You mean Dal (lentils) Bhat (rice)?

    2. Re: Bachelor Chow by clifwlkr · · Score: 1

      It's early, don't be so picky :-)

    3. Re:Bachelor Chow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of poor people don't have kitchens, or fridges, or access to even BUY the raw ingredients of which you speak.
      In addition, they don't own cutlery or pots, and they certainly don't have a grill to cook their chicken on.
      Poor people don't have savings to attain the lifestyle that you find so "obvious".

      Consider yourself fortunate, and try not to look down on the "others".

  25. Not for people working with math! by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    As Paul Erdos said: "A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems".
    I wonder what would come out after drinking Coffiest...

    1. Re:Not for people working with math! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      String theory...

  26. Will it get me addicted to Popsi? by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and then cigarettes that make me drink more Coffiest which in turn makes me drink more Popsi and the Cycle of Consumption completes (doesn't anyone get the reference? am I just too old?)

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  27. This isn't a coincidence... by VAXcat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gotta love them using the name Coffiest. It's a name from a Frederik Pohl and Cyril Kornbluth science fiction book that lampooned marketing and consumers, "The Space Merchants". Here's a quote... "...here's what makes this campaign great in my estimation - each sample of Coffiest contains three milligrams of a simple alkaloid. Nothing harmful. But definitely habit-forming. After ten weeks the customer is hooked for life. It would cost him at least five thousand dollars for a cure, so it's simpler for him to go right on drinking Coffiest - three cups with every meal and a pot beside his bed at night, just as it says on the jar."

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  28. Soylent! Because over-priced nutritional by retchdog · · Score: 1

    Soylent, bringing specious scientific claims to nerds, because over-priced nutritional supplements aren't just for ignorant mouth-breathers anymore!

    Buy your own protein powder and caffeine. Add some l-theanine if you want, whatever.

    The last group of people who had food powder marketed to them so they could be more efficient for their overlords was housewives in the 1950s, and you don't have to be a feminist to see how fucking terrible their lives were.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    1. Re:Soylent! Because over-priced nutritional by ze_jua · · Score: 3, Funny

      You idiot. It's Got Electrolytes.

  29. Nice by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Just the thing to wash down my Soylent Green.

  30. Drinking Sugars by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    I understand that this has proteins and is somewhat balanced but really, adult humans shouldn't be drinking ANY digestible carbs. Carbs should come from solid food, preferably in complex form.

    Digestible carbs from liquids are handled differently in the body than they are in solid form, they are more readily available for breakdown and digestion. The occasional fruit juice or milk isn't going to kill you, but make a habit of drinking carbs every day (such as this breakfast drink) and you could be harming your kidneys.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Drinking Sugars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sugar in the morning isn't that bad for you.
      It wakes you up quicker when you are more likely to actually be active, negating a large amount of the impact of sudden blood sugar increases since it is being used just as quickly as it is being absorbed. (ideally, unless you are a desk-job, in which case lol bye)

      Although I do agree with you that they shouldn't be consuming high amounts of any simple sugars or carbs in general.
      Carbs is one you want to have slow-release through the day.
      Caffeine is a better instant boost, or a B vitamin megadose, or both in reduced amounts.

      The bar would be preferable to a drink. A bar and drink where the carbs are only in the bar would be the most ideal situation.
      Who wants to just drink their breakfast? Sounds boring. Give me something to chew and drink and it would be far more interesting.
      Breakfast is my largest meal and I like it that way. (no lunch, dinner is now a small lunch-tier deal you would see at a typical eatery, few items, nothing complex. Never felt better)

      Thing is, this is only really going to apply to people that are horribly unhealthy in the first place.
      They won't change their ways regardless of dying 15 times a second with strokes and heart attacks.
      I've tried to get people to change their ways, but they are just awful. Their early deaths.

    2. Re:Drinking Sugars by Megol · · Score: 1

      I understand that this has proteins and is somewhat balanced but really, adult humans shouldn't be drinking ANY digestible carbs. Carbs should come from solid food, preferably in complex form.

      Digestible carbs from liquids are handled differently in the body than they are in solid form, they are more readily available for breakdown and digestion. The occasional fruit juice or milk isn't going to kill you, but make a habit of drinking carbs every day (such as this breakfast drink) and you could be harming your kidneys.

      Is it amateur night or what? Consumption of too much sugars can harm ones kidneys - but only if one first get diabetes and even then it is indirect (capillaries getting plugged due to high levels of blood sugar, kidneys eyes etc. are sensitive to such damage). A healthy adult would have no problem as long as they eat/drink enough but not exaggerate (-> diabetes).

  31. Yes... by no1nose · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a gut-bomb.

  32. Shame 2 by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Make a product and sell it for 10 times the cost of the ingredients. Sell to people who don't know how to spend money carefully.

    1. Re:Shame 2 by RelaxedTension · · Score: 1

      $4.00 for a nutritionally complete meal and you're bitching about the price? That's less than the cost of an actual coffee in most places now.

      I think you misunderstood the price.

    2. Re:Shame 2 by PixelPusher1532 · · Score: 2

      I understand your point, you are talking about way overpriced coffee shops. However, most places I buy coffee it is about $10 for a 24oz can. Makes about 20 pots containing 10 cups each. So about $0.05 / cup.

    3. Re:Shame 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, most places I buy coffee it is about $10 for a 24oz can. Makes about 20 pots containing 10 cups each. So about $0.05 / cup.

      No, you don't understand his point, obviously. His point is that it is nutritionally balanced, unlike a cup of coffee, which CAN cost as much as the nutritionally balanced food.

      Your telling us, "But I get my coffee for 5 cents per cup!" is meaningless here, as your coffee is no more nutritionally balanced than the cup of overpriced coffee.

      So thank you, for contributing nothing to the conversation, while demonstrating your own profound lack of reading comprehension.

    4. Re:Shame 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coffee in a can... eww.

    5. Re:Shame 2 by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      $4.00 for a nutritionally complete meal and you're bitching about the price?

      It seems highly implausible that there is a single blend of ingredients that is "nutritionally complete" for all humans. Different people have different genes, different gut flora, different lifestyles, and live in different environments.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  33. stealth ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should've been marked as an ad I think.

  34. Meh. Snake oil. by hey! · · Score: 1

    I prefer food. I'm not a meat-and-potatoes man, mind you, but I'd definitely take a rare steak, baked potato and cup of freshly-ground Columbian Supremo over this. Or tea if there were compelling data that theanine was really all that useful. A salmon steak and a cup of tea is actually a typical lunch for me.

    The words "proprietary blend" smack of branding. The advantage is bound to be the placebo effect, for which they hope to charge me a premium. If there is empirical evidence you can point to on Google Scholar or PubMed that a particular mix of nutrients is special. then I'll blend it myself and save the branding premium.

    If you're going to try to hack your brain, be a hacker, not a consumer.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  35. EAT REAL FOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget this shit and just eat real food. It's not 'nutritionally complete', it's NOT good for you, and you shouldn't ingest it. REAL food is good for you, tastier, more safisfying, healthier, and if done correctly, CHEAPER. You're not going to impress you date with your mad Soylent-mixing skills; if you want your date to ingest something with that appearance, taste, and consistency, you have a source built right into your own body, bro -- but you won't convince her to avail herself of it by feeding her Soylent. GET REAL and stay that way.

  36. 400 Kilocalories ? by Rollgunner · · Score: 1

    Did I miss something there ? Have they changed what a calorie is ? Last I checked the recommended daily intake of calories was 1800 or so. 400 kilocalories would be well over 200 day's worth.

    1. Re:400 Kilocalories ? by captaindomon · · Score: 1
      That comment in the original article made me chuckle. Although it is technically correct and OK to use the term kilocalorie for food measurements, everyone in the world shortens it to "Calorie". But using the correct official term makes things sound more scientific-y and awesome-nerd.

      https://www.nutrition.gov/what...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    2. Re:400 Kilocalories ? by snax · · Score: 1

      Food label Calories, and the ones in the daily recommendations, are in fact kcals.

    3. Re:400 Kilocalories ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The recommended daily intake of calories is 1800-2000 kcal (for children and women)

      Just that the popular press thinks that 1 kcal = 1 calorie. Off by a thousand.

    4. Re:400 Kilocalories ? by Megol · · Score: 1

      I don't and the food industry doesn't. If anybody would do a write-up on anything listing nutritional values and use "calorie" instead of "kcal" etc. I would think they didn't know what they were doing.

  37. Doing nootropics wrong by volt4ire · · Score: 1

    Their “coffee” is only using half the recommended L-theanine to caffeine ratio for increasing focus without causing jitters. At such a low L-theanine dose it seems like it’s just thrown so they can hit the “nootropics” marketing checkbox, and makes me question their other claims of meeting daily values for “all essential vitamins and minerals”.

  38. "The Toots"? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    Are you five years old? Use real words if you want to be taken seriously.

  39. Proudly made with GMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this line is on their website. Tnx but no tnx.