Slashdot Mirror


Soylent Coffee: Nootropics, Fat, Carbs, Protein -- But Will It Give You The Toots? (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via Ars Technica: Soylent has ventured in a new direction with its latest beverage: breakfast. Called Coffiest, the new offering has the same ingredient makeup, nutritional mix, and 47/33/20 percent fat/carb/protein calorie distribution as the 2.0 premixed version, but it also adds coffee flavoring, 150mg of caffeine per serving, and 75mg of the nootropic L-Theanine. According to Soylent founder Rob Rhinehart, a bottle of Coffiest supplies the drinker with about 400 kilocalories and about 20 percent of the daily recommended values for "all essential vitamins and minerals." "A lot of people are skipping breakfast," Rhinehart told Ars in a phone interview. "We wanted to provide a convenient and also really tasty option for them to enjoy in the morning." Additionally, the company will also be releasing a nutrition bar, called the Soylent Bar. This one will deliver 250 kilocalories per bar, and has a macronutrient breakdown of 38/43/19 percent fat/carb/protein. "Coffee flavor is extremely complex," Rhinehart told Ars. "The direction I gave was a little bit of a more darker, richer roast it's a little darker coffee. A little bit of cocoa powder, just a barely perceptible amount, but it rounds out the flavor nicely." "It was a huge challenge to develop a coffee flavor that would survive processing," he continued. "You can't take any risks with health or safety, so we have to eliminate any sources of contamination from the product and that involves heat. So we had some great food scientists and flavor scientists work out a flavor system that combines natural coffee extracts with an artificial flavor system. And it turned out pretty great." As for the toots, neither Coffiest nor the Soylent Bar will cause consumers to erupt with "horse-killing farts," a complaint made by many of Soylent's customers as well as Ars Technica writer Lee Hutchinson. For those interested in Soylent's latest concoction, Coffiest is available for purchase today at the Soylent site for about $40 for a pack of 12 servings (or $37.05 with a recurring subscription). The Soylent Bar will launch later for about $2 per bar. You can view Coffiest's nutrition facts here.

88 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Is it green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The obvious SF reference: is it green?

    1. Re:Is it green? by 4im · · Score: 2

      Never mind the color - is it people?

    2. Re:Is it green? by rgbatduke · · Score: 5, Informative

      You missed the better SF reference. Coffiest is from The Space Merchants, by Pohl and Kornbluth, and it is one of the most brilliant satires of the modern progression towards multinational corporate world control ever written. Highly recommended...

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    3. Re:Is it green? by show+me+altoids · · Score: 3, Informative

      There were many different flavors of soylent, it's just that the green one tasted best, was highest in demand, and happened to be made of people.

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    4. Re:Is it green? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Worse! It's light-roast coffee.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Is it green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even if it was a product that I would normally want to eat, it would be difficult (at best) for me to trust this company after seeing the movie Soylent Green! That a producer of any type of food-like product would choose that name is really creepy.

    6. Re:Is it green? by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn you! Damn you all to hell - you just ruined the movie for me!

  2. Is Fred Pohl still alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess he came up with Coffiest, a hilarious product in a hilariously dark novel...

    1. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by cbelt3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right. And these idiots used the name of a completely addictive beverage that, once hooked, condemns the drinker to a lifetime of consumerism ? I've heard of tongue in cheek, but jeez... why not just name it Liquid Heroin and be done with it ?

      ""...here's what makes this campaign great in my estimation - each sample of Coffiest contains three milligrams of a simple alkaloid. Nothing harmful. But definitely habit-forming. After ten weeks the customer is hooked for life. It would cost him at least five thousand dollars for a cure, so it's simpler for him to go right on drinking Coffiest - three cups with every meal and a pot beside his bed at night, just as it says on the jar.""

    2. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I think it might be a reference to heroin, but it's hard to tell since so many plant-derived compounds are alkaloids (including caffeine and nicotine).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by chthon · · Score: 1

      So, yeah, how long until they come up with "Soylent Green"?

    4. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by cmiller173 · · Score: 2

      I think they are talking about a fictional product from the 1952 novel The Space Merchants by Frederik Pohl, after which the real product in the OP was named.

    5. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Ohhhhh, nevermind - it's a quote from a book: "The Space Merchant" by Frederik Pohl and Cyril M. Kornbluth.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm slow.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Add in some Mocha Green Tea powder!

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    8. Re:Is Fred Pohl still alive? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Given that their original product also uses a science fiction reference that would be seen as negative were it not being used ironically, it's not surprising that they named the new one Coffiest.

  3. I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I won't buy Soylent's products because of the tiny, tiny chance that the company is run by psychopaths who thought "I've got a cool idea - let's make food products out of rendered fat from cadavers ... and just for the icing on the cake, we'll call it 'Soylent' - because it would be a hip joke and no one would ever believe we'd *really* do it."

    1. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative

      I won't buy Soylent's products because of the tiny, tiny chance that the company is run by psychopaths

      Do you mean like this guy? Soylent CEO charged over illegal shipping container his neighbors hate

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I won't buy Soylent's products because of the tiny, tiny chance that the company is run by psychopaths

      Well, the company IS run by people who thought that the only real problem with food is that it tastes good, can be shared with people you love over a meal, and takes effort to create. They decided to solve all these "problems" with soylent.

      So yeah, I'd say people who see food as just fuel as having something wrong with them. Psychopath might be a bit strong though.

    3. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by nine-times · · Score: 2

      Well yeah, it's not like they can test for that. It's literally impossible for modern science to tell the difference between human fat and oat/rice/soy products.

    4. Re:I'll Be the First to Admit It by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Shrug. Protein is protein.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  4. Coffee Flavored Soy? by Eosi · · Score: 1

    This sounds interesting, but what about the growing number of people are allergic to Soy? They sure could not consume this.

    1. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This sounds interesting, but what about the growing number of people are allergic to Soy? They sure could not consume this.

      I can't digest soy, and I make sure to bring that up every chance I get, but the answer for people who are allergic to soy is the same as every other food: eat something else. HTH, HAND.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I can't digest soy, and I make sure to bring that up every chance I get,

      if you want to stop bringing it up, then stop trying to eat it.

    3. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

      Soy shouldn't really be eaten by middle aged and older men. It messes your testosterone up.

    4. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This sounds interesting, but what about the growing number of people are allergic to Soy?

      They can eat people instead.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      There is not much actual soy in Soylent.

      It is a protein extract, so one of the hormone precursors that cause the hormone issues.

      Not that middle aged or older men really have much testosterone anyway.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Megol · · Score: 2

      Soy have been used as human food for a long time (before written history) without problems - so you are wrong.
      Many kinds of food that really are toxic can be safe to eat when cooked (some mushrooms, some meats) - so you are wrong again.
      The third claim depends on how you define safe, but is in general false as e.g. acrylamide is created when heating starch above a certain temperature - yet another wrong claim.

      0/3 - care to play again?

    7. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      drinkypoo is too much of a precious little snowflake to take the high road and do what's right for himself.

      Is that why I posted a comment about doing what's right for oneself?

      He needs everyone's attention or he'll wither like a flower in the desert.

      That might be true. But then, why does anyone post to Slashdot (or other public comment sites), ever? It's only for attention.

      That's why he posts to Slashdot about 20 times a day.

      I know this seems arduous to you, but I can type more than ten words per minute. To me, posting to Slashdot is no more work than chatting with a friend.

      He needs the attention more than he needs to do something to make his own life more enriching without the praise of others.

      So, what is it about you that makes you need to bring others down, without even associating your identity? It simply makes you feel better when other people feel worse? That's an unfortunate feedback loop which does explain a significant percentage of Slashdot comments.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Coffee Flavored Soy? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Soy allergies are common enough that soy is one of the potential allergens that must be specially called out on food packaging. The full list: milk, eggs, fish, Crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, and soybeans.

  5. Why do they add cocoa to everthing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's my migraine trigger and that sucks!

    1. Re:Why do they add cocoa to everthing? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Because it makes things taste better, and is harmless in the vast majority of people ? And chances are, it's not the cocoa per se, but the theobromine in the cocoa. . .

  6. Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Wasn't his original thing on soylent that he didn't care about taste and had no interest in food? Why is "getting the flavor right" now suddenly important. Surely the whole point of his venture is perverted by making something taste like coffee rather than fish oil and whatever the hell else goes into it.

    1. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because they already cracked the nut of being nutritionally complete? They can move onto further refinements. They're running a business, not some weak open source project that gets to "good enough" and then everyone walks away leaving it to stagnate so some other commercial offering can pop up based on the same project..

  7. Nein danke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No thanks. I'm an old programmer. Three cups of coffee and a cigarette are all the breakfast I need !

  8. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "horse-killing farts" is a rather loose standard. I'm thinking "cubicle clearing fart" would be more useful.

    1. Re:well by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Agreed. As a city-boy, I've never been in a position to kill horses. I have, however, cleared my share of cubicals.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  9. Horse Killing by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Farts? As reported by Arse Technica writer Lee Hutchinson...

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Horse Killing by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Forget Arse Technica - this should have been reported here instead?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  10. Food from Matrix ? by ze_jua · · Score: 1

    But we are inside The Matrix, we deserve well cooked beef piece...!

  11. fostering a generation that cant cook. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dont mind meal replacements. there are several used institutionally and in hospitals that never get this much publicity but have been around for years. My biggest concern however is our growing dependence upon multinational and branded consumer food companies to provide replacements for basic food staples. most americans already rely implicitly on betty crocker and stouffers to fill in the blanks of their culinary Repertoire. For the past 20 years most thanksgivings in america have been an olympic feast of multibillion dollar corporate sponsored brands of pre-cooked, processed foods that emerge at the supermarket shelf unaccountably and ubiquitously.

    Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry? could they prepare porridge or vegetables, or even remember how to cook dry beans? Does soylent foster an even greater social divide in the 21st century by short-circuiting the social past-time of cooking and eating together? how will this generation cope when there is no soylent?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry? could they prepare porridge or vegetables, or even remember how to cook dry beans?

      I got to break it to you, statistically everyone has been doing this wrong for ever. They soak the beans, which is stupid, and they don't use a haybox cooker, which is even more stupid if you're not using a pressure cooker. But you're right, nobody knows how to cook any more. I've been the better cook in the majority of my relationships, which was very sad up until this one; I'm with a chef now and my cooking game has really improved over the last decade.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I dont mind meal replacements. there are several used institutionally and in hospitals that never get this much publicity but have been around for years. My biggest concern however is our growing dependence upon multinational and branded consumer food companies to provide replacements for basic food staples. most americans already rely implicitly on betty crocker and stouffers to fill in the blanks of their culinary Repertoire. For the past 20 years most thanksgivings in america have been an olympic feast of multibillion dollar corporate sponsored brands of pre-cooked, processed foods that emerge at the supermarket shelf unaccountably and ubiquitously. Will the soylent generation know how to steam rice, or properly cook poultry? could they prepare porridge or vegetables, or even remember how to cook dry beans? Does soylent foster an even greater social divide in the 21st century by short-circuiting the social past-time of cooking and eating together? how will this generation cope when there is no soylent?

      Almost no one can start a fire with a flint nor build a workable bow or arrow tips anymore. Almost now one knows how weave their own fabric, nor preserve meats with salt, beneficial molds, fermentation or smoking. Almost no one can make antiseptics out of urine, bile and herbs.

      And you know what, we are fine. Unless we are waiting for an asteroid strike, the zombie apocalypse or some other shit that collapses human civilization, we will be fine.

    3. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by cmseagle · · Score: 1

      If I don't know how to cook something I can find a step-by-step video or article telling me exactly how. Thanks to the internet, this knowledge isn't lost forever even if the required skills are a bit rusty. If this generation isn't cooking, I think it's more because they don't want to, not because they can't.

    4. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Hodr · · Score: 1

      My grandmother used to say "Betty Crocker didn't spend a million dollars developing a cake mix that makes shit cakes". I think her point was that it's easy and good enough, so why bother doing it "from scratch".

    5. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't see how any method of cooking beans is 'wrong', only different.

      Some people feel the need to have to assert that there way of doing things is the ONLY correct way. It seems like not soaking the beans does offer some different flavor to the beans, and changes the texture. Whether you like the flavor is obviously a matter of preference. I've tried both, and I like the soaked beans better.

      Here's someone who actually bothered to try all the different suggestions, many of which didn't offer much difference in flavor. Good read even if you don't care about soaking/non-soaking.

      http://www.latimes.com/food/dailydish/la-dd-dont-soak-dried-beans-20140911-story.html

    6. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      My biggest concern however is our growing dependence upon multinational and branded consumer food companies to provide replacements

      FWIW, Soylent is Open Source:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    7. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Coming from personal experience, it depends on the parents. If they value cooking and eating as a family, so will the kid. If they value McDonalds, so will the kid.

      I always had meals with my folks and they taught me how to cook early on. "If you like to eat, you need to learn to cook."

      Later on in bachelor life I started having Soylent as a cheap breakfast substitute. Partially since it's fast and easy, partially since I can make it in a blender and have a weeks worth of breakfast, and since cereal or oatmeal would have me hungry by 10. At least I could survive until lunch with a soylent breakfast.

      Now married life means I'm not doing that nearly as often as before and I'm right back to cooking and eating with the family.

    8. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Almost no one can start a fire with a flint nor build a workable bow or arrow tips anymore. Almost now one knows how weave their own fabric, nor preserve meats with salt, beneficial molds, fermentation or smoking. Almost no one can make antiseptics out of urine, bile and herbs.

      And you know what, we are fine.

      Well, yeah, "we are fine," except we have an unprecedented obesity epidemic which has significant social, economic, and environmental costs.

      Don't get me wrong: I'm not some "natural foods" nutter. On the other hand, we are in fact literally "what we eat." Our bodies gain nutrition and rebuild themselves from the food we eat.

      I'm NOT blaming the obesity epidemic just on "processed foods," though it's hard to believe that there aren't SOME aspects of them which contribute to it. Processed foods are often created to maximize certain flavor responses that trick our bodies and metabolisms in various ways. Companies that are driven by profit have little reason to "tone down" such tendencies, but they have significant motivation to try to get consumers to buy their stuff more. And thus we get excess sugar and fat and whatever added to more stuff which isn't really necessary, but some focus tasting group liked the stuff 2% more, which could generate more sales. Meanwhile, if you were baking the same product at home yourself, you might look at the recipe and say, "Huh... they want me to add HOW much oil!?!"

      Obviously whenever obesity comes up we'll get a huge debate about personal responsibility, motivation, etc. And that's important. But bad eating habits are also a function of biological effects, cravings driven by various chemicals (which are in turn stimulated in different ways by the foods we consume), etc.

      Is home cooking a "cure-all" for any of this? No. But it's one good place to start thinking about what could be done better. While the loss of other skills like your examples may have minor impacts, I'd wager to say that the loss of cooking knowledge combined with the trust we have in large-scale industrial food processing has the potential for a much greater impact on us (i.e., quite literally the stuff that makes up our bodies) than the other things you mention.

    9. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      If I don't know how to cook something I can find a step-by-step video or article telling me exactly how. Thanks to the internet, this knowledge isn't lost forever even if the required skills are a bit rusty. If this generation isn't cooking, I think it's more because they don't want to, not because they can't.

      While I agree with your sentiment in general, I also think we've seen a marked decrease in the value of learned and practiced skills in the past decade or so, particularly with the growth of the internet.

      There's this sense that "I can always just look up X online" which leads us to think anything is possible, just a click away. On the other hand, a lot of stuff benefits from practice over time. I have a science background and know all sorts of stuff about how important measuring with care is, and precision of technique, etc., but I've been cooking for decades and still find myself falling short occasionally when I try a new recipe or cook a new food I haven't worked with before.

      You can watch all the videos on Youtube that you want, but often I find it takes at least 3 or 4 times making a dish until I get it to the quality level I'm satisfied with... and I learn a lot along the way.

      And this is from someone who cooks and bakes on a regular basis, so I have experience to troubleshoot and figure out a lot of stuff when things go wrong. When I first started baking bread (maybe 15 years ago), I was just "stumbling in the dark" for a long time. No one in my family had much experience with bread-baking. I read all I could find in books, searching the internet (which even back then had tons of resources and forums), etc. And with all of that, I'd say it probably took about 3 or 4 years of experimentation along with reading and re-reading various sources before I feel like I could make passable bread in lots of varieties (I have a pretty high standard) and troubleshoot problems efficiently.

      If I were working with a master bread-baker, I have no doubt that I probably could pick all of that up in a few months instead. And that's the real loss here. Yes, we have information online that stores up knowledge, but there are all sorts of little details that go into developing skills that simply can't be explained in a 5-minute step-by-step video, particularly for people who don't have any cooking background to begin with. Years ago, you'd just work with your mother in the kitchen as you were growing up, and she'd just gradually correct those errors and hone your skills without you even realizing it, and magically you'd pick up all this implicit knowledge about cooking.

      As with just about anything, basic cooking is pretty easy, and there are plenty of dishes that are "idiot-proof" to make. But there's a lot of stuff that goes into learning a skill over periods of time... and thus, yes, I'd say that more people today CAN'T cook in the sense that it would take them many years to get to a skill level of their grandmother or whatever. People also "don't want to" play the bassoon or the trombone, but they also CAN'T -- they might watch videos or step-by-step instructions online, but it will still take many months or years of practice to develop sufficient skills.

    10. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      My grandmother used to say "Betty Crocker didn't spend a million dollars developing a cake mix that makes shit cakes". I think her point was that it's easy and good enough, so why bother doing it "from scratch".

      I guess it depends on what your standards for "good enough" are. Cake mixes are fine if you like what they taste like -- they tend to have a few distinctive textures (depending on type and flavor). But there's only so much you can do with a mix that you dump together in two steps and just add eggs and water (maybe oil). There are certain textures you can only get from creaming together butter and sugar for several minutes. There are certain textures you can only get by slowly adding eggs one-at-a-time while whipping, or by whipping egg whites separately or whatever. Certain flavors are fresher in cakes made with certain ingredients (rather than in a dry mix). Etc.

      I'm NOT saying cake mixes are bad -- my favorite cake when I was a little kid was made from a box by my grandmother, who added some sliced strawberries and topped with Cool-Whip mixed with strawberries. But they are limited. Other techniques and ingredients open other possibilities... and it's also easier to tweak a "from scratch" recipe to get the exact results you want. (Perhaps more relevant to GP's point, making a variety of cakes from scratch also teaches you how to tweak a recipe to get what you want, whereas if you just have a packet or two of "stuff" to dump together with some water, it's much harder to imagine how to do things differently to "fix" your cake the way you want.)

    11. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by hey! · · Score: 1

      The whole concept of branding is to create intangible value. It's profitable because the marginal cost to the vendor is zero, but you the consumer pay a premium in cold hard cash for what objectively speaking is nothing.

      I never buy anything that claims to have a "proprietary formula", because that's exactly the same kind of intangible value ploy. "Proprietary" and "evidence-based" are mutually exclusive adjectives. Anything with a sound foundation in science can be reproduced by anyone with access to scientific literature. If it's "proprietary" it's cooked up by a crackpot or charlatan.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by ruir · · Score: 1

      This thread seems to be getting more of an informercial to get around adblockers the more I read of it.

    13. Re:fostering a generation that cant cook. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      And you know what, we are fine. Unless we are waiting for an asteroid strike, the zombie apocalypse or some other shit that collapses human civilization, we will be fine.

      As a child, I wondered why the average person did not know this stuff. It forces us to be dependent on others if we do not know it... as an adult, it seems like a conspiracy. How can you be free if you are ultimately dependent on society for your survival?

      Don't get me wrong, I think the benefits that society brings are extremely useful and desirable; however, I should have the ability to say, "fuck off" without dying.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  12. Re:kilocalories? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    With using some memory tech at 50 picojoule per written bit, how much is that in Libraries of Congress?

  13. Avoid this crap by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    Seriously, why the heck would you ever bother with this?

    Nutrition is partly about Macro nutrients and A LOT about micro nutrients. This shit has virtually no micro nutrients. You can survive on bread and water only as well but it's not healthy.

    The elephant in the room is the source of protein, soy. Soy LOWERS your testosterone levels. It directly impacts testosterone in men why the fuck would a man want to consume this shit?

    Here's a fast healthy breakfast; whole grain bread, sunny-side up egg, slice of tomato on top. Done.

    The egg has a certain integrity as is, meaning it will not mix with oil. If you scramble it or make it into an omelette it will absorb the cooking oil.

    Whole grain bread is healthier, the less processed the better. (Processed whole grain is often powdered which defeats the point.)

    Tomato, it has...but the point is micro nutrients.Veg, fruit, fresh meat etc have micronutrients.

    Every food product you see about promoting health says what? "As part of a healthy lifestyle and balanced diet" because the product you see in the ad is not what makes you healthy it's a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle that does it. Not fucking Soylent.

    Now commit to exercising today and never think about eating powdered liquid again. -wanna lose wait? EAT LESS CALORIES THAN YOU EXPEND.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:Avoid this crap by Zanadou · · Score: 1

      -wanna lose wait?

      Get busy?

    2. Re:Avoid this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am sorry but in no world is a piece of toast a single egg and then a single slice of tomato going to be enough food for breakfast. I get it, its probably healthier, I get it you need to consume less then your output if you want to loose weight, but my lunch is at 1 in the afternoon. a piece of bread, an egg and just a slice of tomato isn't enough food for a 8 year old.

      You turn away alot of people who need to eat healthier when you absolutely minimize the portion sizes to minuscule proportions.
      1 slice of whole grained bread, toasted: 65 calories
      1 egg, fried: 92 calories
      1 (thick) slice of tomato: 5 calories.

      162 calories is NOT ENOUGH FOR BREAKFAST. Eating a breakfast like that will guarentee snacking later, which defeats the point.
      Source: http://www.thecaloriecounter.com

    3. Re:Avoid this crap by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I am sorry but in no world is a piece of toast a single egg and then a single slice of tomato going to be enough food for breakfast. I get it, its probably healthier, I get it you need to consume less then your output if you want to loose weight, but my lunch is at 1 in the afternoon. a piece of bread, an egg and just a slice of tomato isn't enough food for a 8 year old.

      You turn away alot of people who need to eat healthier when you absolutely minimize the portion sizes to minuscule proportions. 1 slice of whole grained bread, toasted: 65 calories 1 egg, fried: 92 calories 1 (thick) slice of tomato: 5 calories.

      162 calories is NOT ENOUGH FOR BREAKFAST. Eating a breakfast like that will guarentee snacking later, which defeats the point. Source: http://www.thecaloriecounter.c...

      And that is why you add rashers, mushrooms, potato cakes, beans, coffee and OJ for a full English Breakfast!

  14. Re:kilocalories? by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

    No need to be nasty about it.

    --
    Love sees no species.
  15. Soy Protein = Avoid by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a once in a blue moon thing to eat/drink, these Soylent products are alright. However, I drink a cup of coffee every day. I shudder to think what the estrogenic effects of consuming vast amounts of soy protein daily are. Not to mention the other terrible ingredients listed in there. Maltodextrin is a simple sugar. Why not use a sugar like turbinado?

    You'd be better off getting a casein/whey protein shake and mixing it with fruit, some nut butter (hehe), and some fibrous substance like psyllium as a meal replacement drink. Sure it's not vegan or lactose tolerant, but who really cares what vegans feel.

    I'll pass on this.

    1. Re:Soy Protein = Avoid by Megol · · Score: 2

      As a once in a blue moon thing to eat/drink, these Soylent products are alright. However, I drink a cup of coffee every day. I shudder to think what the estrogenic effects of consuming vast amounts of soy protein daily are.

      If only we had some control population where consumption of soy products of different kinds are common so that we could see short and long term effects ... Oh, we have! Soy use is ancient.

      Not to mention the other terrible ingredients listed in there. Maltodextrin is a simple sugar. Why not use a sugar like turbinado?

      You mean "dirty" simple sugars are better than "clean" ones? Are you one of those "raw" fanatics?

      You'd be better off getting a casein/whey protein shake and mixing it with fruit, some nut butter (hehe), and some fibrous substance like psyllium as a meal replacement drink. Sure it's not vegan or lactose tolerant, but who really cares what vegans feel.

      I'll pass on this.

      Citation needed! Why would that be better?

    2. Re: Soy Protein = Avoid by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should look into the methodology of your little experiment. Let me help you with that: soy proteins come from unfermented soy. All soy products in Asian cuisine are fermented. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=fermented...

  16. Bachelor Chow by clifwlkr · · Score: 2

    I mean really, we aren't that far off from it when we start eating this kind of heavily processed food. Why not just mix this stuff into solids and throw it in a bag and eat it out of a bowl?

    It is not that hard to cook simple meals. Heck, cook up a big pot of something on one day, and eat leftovers if you are short on time. At least you know what is in it, and it is going to be much, much cheaper. I just cooked up a big pot of Himalayan bahl dat (lentils) and some spiced rice last night and I would be surprised if it took me 15 minutes of effort. I now have a healthy breakfast (this is actually what the Himalayans eat) for the week that costs me about 3 dollars. Throw a piece of chicken on the grill. How long does that take?

    I am really surprised this kind of over processed food is even slightly popular in this day and age.

    1. Re: Bachelor Chow by clifwlkr · · Score: 1

      It's early, don't be so picky :-)

  17. Not for people working with math! by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    As Paul Erdos said: "A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems".
    I wonder what would come out after drinking Coffiest...

  18. Will it get me addicted to Popsi? by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and then cigarettes that make me drink more Coffiest which in turn makes me drink more Popsi and the Cycle of Consumption completes (doesn't anyone get the reference? am I just too old?)

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. This isn't a coincidence... by VAXcat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gotta love them using the name Coffiest. It's a name from a Frederik Pohl and Cyril Kornbluth science fiction book that lampooned marketing and consumers, "The Space Merchants". Here's a quote... "...here's what makes this campaign great in my estimation - each sample of Coffiest contains three milligrams of a simple alkaloid. Nothing harmful. But definitely habit-forming. After ten weeks the customer is hooked for life. It would cost him at least five thousand dollars for a cure, so it's simpler for him to go right on drinking Coffiest - three cups with every meal and a pot beside his bed at night, just as it says on the jar."

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  20. Soylent! Because over-priced nutritional by retchdog · · Score: 1

    Soylent, bringing specious scientific claims to nerds, because over-priced nutritional supplements aren't just for ignorant mouth-breathers anymore!

    Buy your own protein powder and caffeine. Add some l-theanine if you want, whatever.

    The last group of people who had food powder marketed to them so they could be more efficient for their overlords was housewives in the 1950s, and you don't have to be a feminist to see how fucking terrible their lives were.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    1. Re:Soylent! Because over-priced nutritional by ze_jua · · Score: 3, Funny

      You idiot. It's Got Electrolytes.

  21. Nice by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Just the thing to wash down my Soylent Green.

  22. Re:kilocalories? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Thanks, jackass.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  23. Drinking Sugars by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    I understand that this has proteins and is somewhat balanced but really, adult humans shouldn't be drinking ANY digestible carbs. Carbs should come from solid food, preferably in complex form.

    Digestible carbs from liquids are handled differently in the body than they are in solid form, they are more readily available for breakdown and digestion. The occasional fruit juice or milk isn't going to kill you, but make a habit of drinking carbs every day (such as this breakfast drink) and you could be harming your kidneys.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Drinking Sugars by Megol · · Score: 1

      I understand that this has proteins and is somewhat balanced but really, adult humans shouldn't be drinking ANY digestible carbs. Carbs should come from solid food, preferably in complex form.

      Digestible carbs from liquids are handled differently in the body than they are in solid form, they are more readily available for breakdown and digestion. The occasional fruit juice or milk isn't going to kill you, but make a habit of drinking carbs every day (such as this breakfast drink) and you could be harming your kidneys.

      Is it amateur night or what? Consumption of too much sugars can harm ones kidneys - but only if one first get diabetes and even then it is indirect (capillaries getting plugged due to high levels of blood sugar, kidneys eyes etc. are sensitive to such damage). A healthy adult would have no problem as long as they eat/drink enough but not exaggerate (-> diabetes).

  24. Yes... by no1nose · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a gut-bomb.

  25. Shame 2 by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Make a product and sell it for 10 times the cost of the ingredients. Sell to people who don't know how to spend money carefully.

    1. Re:Shame 2 by RelaxedTension · · Score: 1

      $4.00 for a nutritionally complete meal and you're bitching about the price? That's less than the cost of an actual coffee in most places now.

      I think you misunderstood the price.

    2. Re:Shame 2 by PixelPusher1532 · · Score: 2

      I understand your point, you are talking about way overpriced coffee shops. However, most places I buy coffee it is about $10 for a 24oz can. Makes about 20 pots containing 10 cups each. So about $0.05 / cup.

    3. Re:Shame 2 by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      $4.00 for a nutritionally complete meal and you're bitching about the price?

      It seems highly implausible that there is a single blend of ingredients that is "nutritionally complete" for all humans. Different people have different genes, different gut flora, different lifestyles, and live in different environments.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  26. Meh. Snake oil. by hey! · · Score: 1

    I prefer food. I'm not a meat-and-potatoes man, mind you, but I'd definitely take a rare steak, baked potato and cup of freshly-ground Columbian Supremo over this. Or tea if there were compelling data that theanine was really all that useful. A salmon steak and a cup of tea is actually a typical lunch for me.

    The words "proprietary blend" smack of branding. The advantage is bound to be the placebo effect, for which they hope to charge me a premium. If there is empirical evidence you can point to on Google Scholar or PubMed that a particular mix of nutrients is special. then I'll blend it myself and save the branding premium.

    If you're going to try to hack your brain, be a hacker, not a consumer.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  27. 400 Kilocalories ? by Rollgunner · · Score: 1

    Did I miss something there ? Have they changed what a calorie is ? Last I checked the recommended daily intake of calories was 1800 or so. 400 kilocalories would be well over 200 day's worth.

    1. Re:400 Kilocalories ? by captaindomon · · Score: 1
      That comment in the original article made me chuckle. Although it is technically correct and OK to use the term kilocalorie for food measurements, everyone in the world shortens it to "Calorie". But using the correct official term makes things sound more scientific-y and awesome-nerd.

      https://www.nutrition.gov/what...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    2. Re:400 Kilocalories ? by snax · · Score: 1

      Food label Calories, and the ones in the daily recommendations, are in fact kcals.

    3. Re:400 Kilocalories ? by Megol · · Score: 1

      I don't and the food industry doesn't. If anybody would do a write-up on anything listing nutritional values and use "calorie" instead of "kcal" etc. I would think they didn't know what they were doing.

  28. Doing nootropics wrong by volt4ire · · Score: 1

    Their “coffee” is only using half the recommended L-theanine to caffeine ratio for increasing focus without causing jitters. At such a low L-theanine dose it seems like it’s just thrown so they can hit the “nootropics” marketing checkbox, and makes me question their other claims of meeting daily values for “all essential vitamins and minerals”.

  29. Re:eat real food by Megol · · Score: 1

    I wonder where he used to shop as in civilized countries there should be no rotting flesh at all? Sounds like one of the fanatically uninformed vegans, those that claim that meat rots in the intestines...

  30. "The Toots"? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    Are you five years old? Use real words if you want to be taken seriously.

  31. Re:kilocalories? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Food "calories" are always kilocalories as the term is used in physics. A calorie was originally defined as the amount of thermal energy required to raise the temperature of one gram of water by one degree Celsuis; a kilocalorie will raise the temperature of one kilogram of water by the same degree. (The calorie is no longer a primary unit and is now officially defined as 4.184 joules.) Once upon a time food calories were spelled with a capital C (which was also at one time the convention in physics for kilocalories) but that fell by the wayside over the years. American usage normally just calls them calories, but in Europe you see references to kilocalories or kcal.