Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Fined For Not Providing Border Agents Smartphone Password (www.cbc.ca)

Reader da_foz writes: A Canadian was reentering Canada when he was arrested and charged with hindering or obstructing border officials. At the time traces of cocaine were found on his bags and he was carrying $5,000 in cash. He provided his smartphone to border agents as requested, however refused to provide the password. Canada Border Services Agency officials asked for Philippon's smartphone and its password. From a report: "He handed over his BlackBerry but refused to disclose the code to access the phone. Philippon was arrested and charged under the federal Customs Act, accused of hindering or obstructing border officials." It is unclear if he provided the password while agreeing to the fine.

276 comments

  1. Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are those the ones that you rent rooms to?

    1. Re:Boarder Agents by Krakadoom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, they were waterboarding agents, but with the drought and all.

    2. Re:Boarder Agents by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, I think they are the ones that you plead the third to. Unfortunately in Canada one might not have the same protections.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:Boarder Agents by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm, original submission spells it correctly, but the headline doesn't. Another case of semiliterate editors at /.?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:Boarder Agents by ls671 · · Score: 1

      There is just a simple keystroke typo. It should have read broader .

      The broader agents work for the broader agency , a very broad agency. See details here:

      https://link.springer.com/arti...
       

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    5. Re:Boarder Agents by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In other words, he'd have done a better job w/ copy/paste than he did trying to type it himself?

    6. Re:Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but with the drought and all.

      No wonder they wanted money and access to the lives of others.

    7. Re:Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, Boarder Agents' only job is to catch the Surf Ninjas.

    8. Re: Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In canader eh we spell it bourder.

    9. Re:Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get the punchline, what do balloons have to do with anything?

    10. Re: Boarder Agents by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      Or bourdeaux? Or boudoir?

    11. Re:Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's the great white north. If not for their boards, how else are those guys supposed to get around? Snow's great today, bruh!

    12. Re:Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, boarder agents are the ones who hit Slashdot article posters on the head with a wooden board to punish them for all the fricking obvious typos they make.

    13. Re:Boarder Agents by lgw · · Score: 2

      Unusually for XKCD, it's a multi-comic arc. Go back a couple.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re: Boarder Agents by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think Bordeaux agents are the guys you wine about...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    15. Re:Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well would you look at that, Part 3, thanks. :-)

    16. Re:Boarder Agents by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      A multi-comic arc, eh? Why did he do that? What's his angle?

    17. Re:Boarder Agents by sabbede · · Score: 1

      That's how you know they aren't the American agents. Boarder agents would violate the 3rd Amendment.

    18. Re: Boarder Agents by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      In Canada you can't be compelled to give evidence against yourself. This is the case in most Western countries. Whether this applies to keys to locks or passwords to computers or smartphones, I'm not sure.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    19. Re: Boarder Agents by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      By the time you replied, the massive typo in the headline ("boarder" instead of "border") had finally been corrected (after several hours on the front page no less). The typo is why I brought up the xkcd strip on the third amendment; when it is corrected it becomes a less exciting matter of the fifth amendment instead. I would certainly expect the fifth exists in some form in Canada but whether the third does as well I'm not sure.

      Sorry you were a little late to the party...

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    20. Re: Boarder Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To a certain degree, you can say he is off on a tangent...

      Puns are bad.

      Wait a minute!

      I am not proud of those.

  2. $5K is just fine by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    for the fine. wink and a nod

    1. Re:$5K is just fine by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      That was my question too. Can Canadian cops steal cash from people without filing charges the way our cops can, or do people have rights up there? Or did they resort to the idea of "Fine - $5000?"

    2. Re:$5K is just fine by gordguide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They might have confiscated the cash, but then would have had to prove in court that the money was proceeds of crime. Failing that, they would have to give the money back.

      You don't have to declare any amount of cash below $C10,000, so I'm not sure what grounds they would have to confiscate the money, but they might have wanted to harass this person, and in that case deprive him of the money for a few months until the courts ordered it returned.

      As for the cocaine residue, it's not illegal in Canada to have used drugs while visiting another country. The ion scanners they use can detect and identify extremely minuscule traces of many substances (not just drugs) but that does not mean the quantity would be enough to lay a charge. An ion scan, by itself, is not admissible evidence; you need a more definite test from a crime lab, which requires a larger quantity.

      Really, the fine is essentially the only form of official sanction they had at their disposal. The only interesting part is they used it.

      The OP wonders if he offered the password as well as received the fine. I seriously doubt it ... there are no misdemeanor charges they could have offered to plea down to, and they didn't drop the charge, so I'm pretty sure he kept the password to himself.

      If he hadn't, there would not be a story in the first place, I suspect the charge would have been stayed (dropped, but can be re-introduced within one year) or dropped entirely (cannot be charged again with the same offence for the same incident).

  3. Speeling is a lost skill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Boarder Agents?

  4. Carrying cash has been a crime for a century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After all, if you have it on you, they can't track it! Heads explode when you compare this to the vitriolic hatred of economists for capital controls.

    "Traces of cocaine" -- traces of cocaine can be found on almost 90% of circulating US currency.

    Likewise, they can ask for your phone, sure, but if they ask you to unlock it they can fuck right off. And they in turn can choose to tell you, too, to fuck right off. It's the prerogative of a border agent.

    1. Re:Carrying cash has been a crime for a century by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      I don't know why there isn't some sort of a feature like a bogus password I could give to someone that would appear to show a plain vanilla OS installation - just my contacts and some fake innocuous texts. No email access or apps beyond a standard load of fake ones.

      A password that wipes the device would be helpful, but one that betrays nothing while still giving the illusion of compliance would be more helpful.

    2. Re:Carrying cash has been a crime for a century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a fantastic idea!

    3. Re:Carrying cash has been a crime for a century by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "And they in turn can choose to tell you, too, to fuck right off. It's the prerogative of a border agent"

      In general it is not permissible for border agents to refuse entry to a citizen of the country he is entering.(*)

      This was a Canadian, entering Canada, coming up against canadian border agents.

      (*) There are some countries like this, but we tend to call those "repressive regiemes", not "western democracies"

    4. Re:Carrying cash has been a crime for a century by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      The concept of duress passwords has been around for a long time and they do exist on phones if you care to set them up.

      30 years ago access cards we had as telco employees had secondary duress codes. If you entered them the doors will still open, but red lights would be flashing in the security centre.

      After one "unfortunate incident", it was decided that using the codes would open doors you wouldn't normally get through - not that it mattered if the attackers had mugged the cleaning staff as their cards opened everything and tended not to need codes.

  5. Agents? by I4ko · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Are those agents that tie you down to a board with leather straps and proceed to repetitively submerge you into a vat of cold water?

    1. Re:Agents? by plopez · · Score: 1

      you wish

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Agents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No theses were Canadians. The ones with boarding as a standard practice would be watching boArder from the other side.

    3. Re:Agents? by c · · Score: 2

      No, no, it's Canada. They just keep repeating questions and commands, but without "please" or "sorry".

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    4. Re:Agents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are those agents that tie you down to a board with leather straps and proceed to repetitively submerge you into a vat of cold water?

      Only if you're lucky. If not, they use a vat of cold maple syrup...

    5. Re:Agents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No theses were Canadians.

      That's libelous. Canadians go to graduate school too.

    6. Re:Agents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Americans. Close, but not quite there.

      Incidentally, they don't "repetitively submerge you into a vat of cold water." They put you on a stretcher-like board at an angle, then pour water onto your face so that it's literally going into your nostrils and mouth to "simulate" drowning. They repeat this process until they've either killed the interviewee or they say whatever the fascists tell them to, at which point they're probably killed anyway.

      Land of the free, folks.

  6. Re:Found the LUDDITE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The luddite is "manish" but we already knew that

  7. Boarder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Like a water boarder??

    1. Re:Boarder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, snow boarders.

      You know how those Canadians love their winter sports.

  8. What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And a person's password can be at least in part defined by what they are thinking about while they provide the password? Even if laws existed to force you to comply with law enforcement when they ask for access to your device, if a computer can read your state of mind, it could potentially be configured to disregard entry attempts if your attempt to access was not sincere (that is, you were doing so only under duress, or compulsion by another party), and I am pretty sure that no law could ever be created that requires you to *think* in a certain way.

    1. Re: What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually there are such laws: in Europe thoughtcrime (extreme political heterodoxy) is taken very seriously. You can think as you should or... Oh, sorry: there aren't any other options.

    2. Re: What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why are duress passwords not a standard feature at this point?

    3. Re: What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Why are duress passwords not a standard feature at this point?

      Uh, probably for the same reason bulletproof vests aren't hanging on runway models in New York despite the gun violence in America; 0.0000001% of citizens have ever had a need for one.

    4. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by NetNed · · Score: 1

      So I take it you've never heard of "pre crime"?

    5. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      it could potentially be configured to disregard entry attempts if your attempt to access was not sincere

      That problem is already solved.

      My old Android LG G2 for instance allows me to login under a different profile based on the particular pattern/password I am using. This is handy if you have multiple girlfriends (not that I even have one yet, but I am speaking hypothetically, so let's say I do get one girlfriend, and then a second one). If they see your password/pattern, they're under the illusion that it is your main password, so they can snoop all they want using that same password, and the system doesn't give them a clue that they're in a particular profile.

      Of course, you can disable apps and functionality for each particular profile you have on that phone, and that part can be handy if you're loaning your phone to a kid, or to a perfect stranger, but then of course, it may become obvious that they're using a crippled profile if too much standard functionality is missing from it.

      And for your laptop, you just need to carry around a Linux laptop, or a Chromebook. What are they going to do? Fine you for not having access to all the accounts on your machine? Or fine you for using your Chromebook in Incognito mode?

      As to the traces of cocaine, I don't think that's fair. Almost all US currency has traces of cocaine on it and I assume it's the same with Canadian currency. And if he carried cash in his bag, then obviously their spectrometer is going to find traces of cocaine in it. It would be weird if they didn't.

      As to the $5,000 cash (whether it's US dollars or Canadian dollars), I don't see why that's even relevant. It's well under the legal limit and a drug mule would probably carry 50+ times that amount anyway. What do the Canadian authorities want anyway? If they tell their Canadian citizens not to carry cash when crossing the US border, US border officials will find that suspicious and may turn them around back to Canada. It's going to be damned if you do, or damned if you don't.

    6. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      if your attempt to access was not sincere (that is, you were doing so only under duress, or compulsion by another party

      Let's get employers on this right now. Sorry, boss! I can't do that work for you, because I don't want to.

    7. Re: What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I the android priv can be set u to wipe the encryption key if the wrong password is entered 10 times. Instead of giving them a duress password, you just give them a random password 10 times. The advantage is that it also works as a very effective brute-force preventer.

    8. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Authoritarian cocksucker spotted.

    9. Re: What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by Kiffer · · Score: 1

      How much money do the American officials expect you to have on you?
      I remember the first time I flew to Las Vegas, I had a few hundred dollars and a some Euros, the official seemed suspicious, "is that all? Do you think that will be enough for your stay?"
      So I said "yeah, well, that's all the cash I have but I have my bank and credit cards so I mean technically I have all my money" which seemed to satisfy him.

      Everytime I've flown to the States they've been interested in whether I have enough cash money for my stay.

    10. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That's a duress password, which is wholly different to what I am talking about. If the person happens to know the password you're trying to pass off as legit is a duress password, then that method will not work. The mechanism I am describing is such that if you *TRIED* to cooperate with a request to unlock your system for somebody else that you really didn't want to access your system, then it simply would not work because you were doing so under duress. The only way it would work is you actually wanted to access your system for reasons that you genuinely believed were from your own desire to do so. If a person knows that you have this kind of protection on your data, even if laws exist that force you to comply with their demands, they cannot say you are obstructing any investigation when you do everything that they ask and it doesn't work.

    11. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The lack of a working mind reading machine is the only roadblock to thoughtcrime laws. I expect once they get that they will pass laws of "Planning a crime".

    12. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      So every time your girlfriend nags you to hurry up and order pizza it won't? That could be an issue. As for desire to log in, i'm sure they could drug you up with something that would make cooperation seem reasonable.

    13. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Drugs? Possibly... but being drugged up can produce an altered state of mind that would probably be no more difficult to detect than being under any other kind of duress.

    14. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that machines can be fallible, and even in a realm where you could be prosecuted for merely thinking the wrong thing, it would still be unjust to prosecute someone for something they are alleged to have been thinking when there is no substantiated proof of it. Ultimately, the only evidence of actual intent that any just court can use to substantiate an allegation is physical action.

    15. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      No, that's not quite a duress password. That's girlfriend #1 password, or that's girlfriend #2 password. Each password just logs into a different account (but it does it quickly and seamlessly so that the person doesn't know they're login in to a different account). For instance, you could have a picture of your girlfriend #1 as the wallpaper when you unlock your phone with your first password. The email app would lead to one particular email client that girlfriend #2 doesn't know about. The gallery would only contain pictures of girlfriend #1, but not #2. The text app would only contain texts that you sent to girlfriend #1. Etc.

    16. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      This is handy if you have multiple girlfriends (not that I even have one yet, but I am speaking hypothetically,

      This goes without saying...

    17. Re: What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Everytime I've flown to the States they've been interested in whether I have enough cash money for my stay.

      On my very first solo trip to the US, the very inquisitive and suspicious immmigration officer became extremely friendly and wished me a nice trip once he saw that I had plenty of money for my trip

    18. Re:What happens when wetware bcomes a thing? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it only works if the person you are "unlocking" it for doesn't know about the other passwords. With the mechanism I described, the more that they know about the security mechanisms that you have in place, the more they will realize the futility of trying to obtain the password by any means.

  9. let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they sprinkled a little bit of crack cocaine on top of his clothing

    was he black?

  10. Anything that touches money has drug residue on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How was this drug residue found? Most police field test kits are very sensitive and can detect a positive result on anything that has come into contact with money. It has been shown that just about all money has some amount of drug residue on it because contaminated bills get put into automated counting machines which flips them at high speed spreading contaminated particles over an entire stack of bills and the machine itself.

    The fact this guy was carrying so much cash could have been the source of the contamination and should not be indicative of illegal behavior by itself.

    This very scenario could happen to anyone to force you to cough up passwords.

  11. Fake "Panic" keys by DatbeDank · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like a good feature for Alfresco would be a fake PIN or password that sends you to a dummy account with minimum if anything available. Android already supports multiple user profiles, maybe treat the lock screen as a log in as well.

    1. Re:Fake "Panic" keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dummy account which has a start up program listed that wipes all the data. For example logging in as root from the graphical login in, might call:
      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda5
      where sda5 is /home

      Thus giving the root password seems compliant, but is a safeguard. The program should also wipe its own existence.

    2. Re:Fake "Panic" keys by omnichad · · Score: 2

      That seems like a tedious way to go about it. Why not just delete the encryption key so it's over instantly?

    3. Re:Fake "Panic" keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must provide the illusion of compliance.

      "I only use root on my computer. There is no other account. I want to comply fully with your warranted demands."

    4. Re:Fake "Panic" keys by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Sorry meant Android!!! ***

  12. A Blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carrying a blackberry in this day and age is a finable offense in itself!

    1. Re:A Blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only for an American.

    2. Re:A Blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy wasn't an American, nor what he in America when it happened. I like in Ireland and haven't seen a blackberry in years.

  13. Canadian Border Guards... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    I had a coworker who went to Canada on business. Because he looked like a goddamn hippie with blond hair in a pony tail, he expected trouble at the border. When the border guard gave him the evil eye over his passport, he handed over his honorable discharge papers from the U.S. Army. The border guard let him through without further incident.

    1. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion they find the few anomalous a-hole Canadians, and give them jobs as border agents.
      I remember one really nice one, the rest have been jerks.

    2. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      After visiting Niagra falls about 3 years ago (we drove from Detroit across Ontatrio) with my family and my wife's family (Japanese), I got held up at the border.

      It must have looked a bit strange for me, a white guy, to be in the car with 3 Asians and 2 young children. My wife speaks English well but the Canadian accent threw her off. She was giving answers to questions that were not being asked.

      I was convinced I was going to be detained for suspicion of human trafficking. Luckily after about 10 minutes (and numerous glares from the border guards) they let us continue on.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by swb · · Score: 1

      I rode my motorcycle around Lake Superior 20 years ago and didn't get any trouble crossing into Canada at the Grand Portage, MN crossing, other than some questions about whether I had any weapons.

      But when I ran into the duty free pickup office, I saw some really unhappy looking college age kids.

      They were in a parking lot with a Chevy Suburban completely opened up and what looked like an entire week's worth of camping equipment and supplies COMPLETELY spread out in the parking lot. They were sitting on the pavement about 20 feet from their car and stuff while Canadian border agents went through everything. I wasn't sure if the Canucks found something they didn't like, or just thought it looked like fun to detail their packing job.

      Ironically, getting back into the US at Sault St. Marie involved more questioning about my US status than I would have been expected. The guy didn't care about my excess duty free smokes or liquor (although how much extra can you have on a motorcycle?), but boy he was sure interested to make sure I was an American.

    4. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My buddy, honourable discharge after many years in the marines, no record, gets the whole "treatment" every time. Your friend's lucky, but mine got the wannabe-cop.

    5. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience some years back. We went to Canada with my brother-in-law and his family. One the way back the agent asked us some rudimentary questions and then asked "And which one of you was born outside the US?" We sat there stunned for a few minutes because none of us were born outside the US and we were all trying to think of what we might have said to lead to this belief. Finally, we tentatively answered "none of us" and were allowed to pass.

      It was the weirdest experience. It was as if the agent thought that one of us would raise his/her hand and say "I was born outside of the US and am trying to sneak in to commit massive acts of terrorism - oops, you caught me!"

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by tdailey · · Score: 2

      She was giving answers to questions that were not being asked.

      Don't do this. They'll suspect that you're trying to fluff your answers with distracting information. Roll down all windows when you enter the inspection area. Especially if you have passengers. Only answer questions that are directed to you. Most questions will be asked to the driver of the car. But when they ask the passenger directly for what citizenship they are or in what country they were born (not always the same answer) don't attempt to answer for them.

    7. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do it again, run counterclockwise. Most of the drugs and other contraband comes in on the east end, so naturally that side is pickier coming in to the US.

    8. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe being a border agent makes you into an a-hole

    9. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      That was probably a random check. I used to live in Point Roberts so had to cross the border a lot (2-6 times a day). The border guard can send you in the line for a more thorough search if they suspect something, but every now and then the computer randomly flags you for a search. It happened to me twice in 2 years on the Canadian side, once on the U.S. side (which was half-hearted when they found out I lived in Point Roberts and was entering mainland Washington to do some shopping). (It's also happened once while flying into the U.S. from Europe - I had checked off nothing to declare, but the computer flagged me so they sent me over to Agriculture and opened up all my bags. The border guard was even apologized for the delay, explaining the computer randomly requires them to send people for a more thorough Customs search.)

      They go through everything in your car. For me that was mostly stuff in the glove compartment and center console. Most of it was receipts for gas and fast food that I had never thrown away, but they read through each and everyone one of them one at a time. So I made sure to clean all that junk out of the car after my first search to reduce my wait if I was flagged again (my second random search only took about 20 minutes because of this). If you've got a Suburban packed with camping supplies, it's going to be a long and messy search.

      In general, the wait to enter the U.S. is longer and the border guards stricter than when entering Canada.

    10. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I'm a Canadian who once went on a day trip to Buffalo, NY on a lark with two of my daughters.

      I myself look like a goddamn hippie with blond hair in a pony tail. I expected to get grilled like fuck for being a single man with two cute little girls in the back seat.

      US Customs guy just pointed out that I hadn't actually signed my passport, that I should probably do that, and to enjoy my visit.

      Guess what? You don't hear about the millions of people who don't get hassled at the border. You hear about the one who does.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    11. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he handed over his honorable discharge papers from the U.S. Army.

      I have always wondered how would a Canadian border guard behave when presented despicable discharge papers..

    12. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by tdailey · · Score: 1

      . It was as if the agent thought that one of us would raise his/her hand and say "I was born outside of the US and am trying to sneak in to commit massive acts of terrorism - oops, you caught me!"

      That's exactly what they were doing. They purposely asked an unusual question that you wouldn't have a rehearsed answer for. People trying to hide facts often answer questions from authority with positive answers, wanting to show co-operation. Had a person truly been born outside of the USA, that would not have necessarily been bad; you don't have to be born in the USA to be a US citizen. But by phrasing the question the way they did, the agent made it sound like a positive, rewarding thing to reveal.

    13. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      I find that getting into Canada is no problem: they just ask the standard questions and wave us through. It's coming back into our country that's a PITA. At least in Buffalo. Fuck-tards at that border act like we're top-level ISIS leaders. Though it tickles me that they dress like they're going into combat just to sit in a booth.

    14. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant that she misunderstood the questions that were being asked.

    15. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

      I flew to Canada once and I look like a perfectly normal face of white privilege. What I wasn't prepared for was ... questions. Like actual probing questions. Actually to be fair I wasn't really prepared for Canada at all because the exchange went like this:

      Guard: What are you here for?
      Me: Holiday.
      G: What are you doing on holiday?
      M: (thinking wtf?) Skiing with a friend.
      G: Which mountain?
      M: (WTF?) I don't know you have a lot of them.
      G: You're going skiing but you don't know where?
      M: My friend lives here I assume he knows.
      G: Where's your friend live?
      M: I don't know, somewhere near Vancouver.
      G: Do you know the address?
      M: No.
      G: What's his name and phone number?
      M: *says name* and I don't know his phone number.
      G: You don't know know what you're doing here, your friend's address, or his phone number? Just how are you going to meet him?
      M: Well I'm hoping he's just through that door *pointing towards the customs exit*.
      G: If he's not?
      M: I'm going to get my laptop out, find some internet access, open up gmail and write the nastiest email with the worst possible language I can think of hit send.
      G: ....
      M: Then I'll have lunch and figure out the rest from there.
      G: *Starts laughing, hands me my passport and points towards the customs exit* Enjoy your holiday.

      That disorganised chaotic start really set the tone for my entire make it up as you go holiday.

    16. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nagoya Falls, eh ?
      Had that problem myself.

    17. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by torkus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've gone into Canada a handfull of times over the last year and had similar.

      They customs agents going into Canada typically ask some pointed questions - nothing onerous but things that usually catch you off guard. It's enough to throw someone actualy doing things wrong for a loop and give them easy justification for a detailed search/etc.

      I'm going on vacation to visit a friend...i'm invarilably asked either who are they/name, where I know them from, where i'll be staying, or what we're planning to do.

      The one time I said I was on business they wanted to know who i worked for, who i was meeting, where, etc. which was amusing since I have a Canadian office for my own company I was going to and two dozen people to meet with. She didn't really care, but was testing to see if it was a basic story/lie of if there were some facts behind it.

      It's acutally proven psychology (though it requires *gasp* training) and probably 100x more effective than the rape-i-scan machines are for preventing Bad Things from happening.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    18. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by swb · · Score: 1

      Not sure I'd make that specific trip again -- the Canadian side was awesome, but Northern Michigan was a snooze.

      I'm kind of curious what the border patrol psychology is on motorcyclists.

      On one hand, if you were a stereotypical "outlaw Harley" type I could see where you would be under great suspicion due to the association with outlaw bikers and drugs.

      On the other hand, what kind of drug volume can you expect to hide on a motorcycle and where are you going to hide it? Besides personal use quantities, there's no decent place to hide anything. Most fuel tanks aren't even big enough to hide much and the rest of a bike is either easily searched (saddlebags and other compartments) or unlikely to yield much storage (frame tubing or other sealed assemblies). I suppose there's the flat out getting away with a couple of kilos of highly refined powder which could be superficially hidden from obvious sight, but still.

    19. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I go on a camping trip to the desert for Burning Man every year. Talked with some Canadians there that said they never have any problem bringing all their gear to BM, it is the return trip that they always get searched on. They say they always find it amusing because anyone that has been to BM will tell you when you leave there, everything you own will be covered in this gray dust. And things are usually not very neatly packed, just tossed into a trailer.
      So what always seems to be a rookie border guard gets to unpack every dusty piece of gear in the vehicles while the other boarder guards and the travelers watch. By the end the guard who is searching is completely covered in playa dust. The Canadian burners assumed it was some sort of initiation ritual.

    20. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 3

      Well, when the BP/INS/TSA/customs/whatever goons do their jobs correctly and respectfully and don't falsely accuse you, either explicitly or implicitly, of wrongdoing or otherwise abuse their "au-thor-i-tah"; it *shouldn't* be a noteworthy occasion to be reported on. That's the way it should occur every... single... goddamn... time!

      When they harass, wrongly accuse, or in any other way abuse their position; they bloody well should be taken to task and not just be publicly vilified, but professionally punished as well.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    21. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      Well, there should be a corollary to the axion that "power corrupts"; along the lines of "positions with power attract the corrupt who wish to abuse it.". I find both to be equally true.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    22. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If you travel, eventually you'll get the evil eye from some border agent or another. That's just how it goes.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I've been hassled for going into Canada looking like a hippie.

      On the other hand, my brother-in-law looks like Osama bin Laden when he lets himself go. He never got hassled flying in and out of DC.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I got grief while LEAVING a country once because I had too much electronics in my bag. I was carrying everyone's gear. Someone else had the liquids and such.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    25. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 2

      The first line of Canadian border guards is trained to ask unexpected and misleading questions. The first few times I went through without a problem, as I naturally engaged in the conversation and, probably, showed expected surprised reactions to the probing. That would be like the grandparent poster explaining how'd he find his friend.

      After a couple years I got tired of the game and answered, but shortly. Like: - What are you doing in Canada? - I live here. - Where do you live? - Waterloo. - What do you do in Canada? - See my residence permit, it says I'm a spouse of a student. That's it. - Do you work? - My residence permit does not require me to work, sir. - (starts getting annoyed) Are you working? - Yes. - What do you do? - I'm a university professor. - What do you teach? - My contract does not require me to lecture. I do research. (I later learned to skip this one. Professors teach, everyone knows that.) - What do you research? - Physics. - Where are you coming from? - (name of the country I've been on the flight from). - What did you do there? - It was a business trip, sir. - What business? - University business, sir. - Are you bringing any goods with you? - No sir, just as I have stated in my declaration. - Why? - It was a business trip sir, I did not have time to buy.

      After the above, I usually ended up in the immigration office, then a full customs search of my bags. The immigration office would admit me, sometimes with a farewell statement "You are not (sounding) frendly. But that's okay".

      Eventually I decided to find out what was triggering the searches, and whether I was at a real risk of not being admitted home after one of my numerous business trips. I requested at the first check to be routed to the immigration, and had a long conversation with the immigration officer. I asked to clarify things. The Canadian officer asked me lots of questions, explained the law permitted them to deny me entry (because I didn't have permanent residency) but they saw no reason to do that, and stamped my passport. Then the female officer switched language and told me in clear Russian, which I translate here: "When a weird-looking bloke in a t-shirt with long hair and discheveled beard says he's a professor, we have to investigate". Well, these reasons are not something I can fix :).

      This is the only country where I'm regularly interrogated at the border. In Europe and the rest of the world, the guards either silently look at my visas and ask nothing, or ask 1-2 quick questions about the duration and purpose of the trip. Customs have never been interested in searching my usual luggage. To me, Canada is a stark contrast to the rest of the world.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    26. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      As the AC pointed out, she mis-understood the questions since English is her 2nd language. And I really couldn't just look over and ask her to stop talking, that would make it even more suspicious.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    27. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      It’s like the story of the guy who goes accross the border on his Harley every other day. He’s been doing this for five years solid, and the border agent feels something, but can’t pin it down, and, of course, any search is always negative.

      So, after 5 years, the border agent pleads "allright, I know you’re up to something. Please, I can’t handle it anymore. What are you smuggling?"

      — Motorcyles.

    28. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      6 months after 9/11, I go to the US with a friend, riding shotgun. At the border, the immigration agent did not even look at my face, even though my father looks just like Saddam Hussein. Total stop time? 30 seconds, and that includes looking in the trunk where there was a single 12-pack of beer for the friend we were going to visit.

      The most trouble I ever had was when I was on the train, without a return ticket, going for a long week-end to meet a friend and drive up with him. When he saw I had more than enough cash, he told me to have a nice trip.

      I once crossed along by car with 2 French citizens, and we had to go inside. Once they saw my medicare card (we didn’t need a passport back then - this was in June 2001), they totally lost interest with me, only being mildly amused when the French guys bursted out laughing at the "Are you a member of a terrorist organization" on the immigration form they had to fill

      But the best was when I was regularly travelling with European diplomats with diplomatic passports, those crossings simply took no time at all.

    29. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      My father looks like Saddam Hussein, and the only time he was hassled (on a tour bus), the older agent he was sent to for "further checking" told him "oh, that [young] agent is just batshit crazy, sorry about that"

    30. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Canadian here. It’s the same thing. Border agents are revenue collection agents, so they look for taxable items.

      The only time I was sent for secondary screening, I had declared two bottles of wine. I had the good fortune to queue behind some black guy with sugar cane in his suitcase, so when it was my turn, the girl said "well, it’s okay, but next time, you’ll know that you’re just allowed one bottle"

    31. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Hear hear!

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    32. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The "whom are you visiting" and "where you're staying" questions are run of the mill when visiting another country. A foreigner visiting US will often hear the same. Which is why, when you actually are visiting someone, it's common to ask them to write an invitation letter in advance detailing all this - usually makes it much faster when you show it.

    33. Re:Canadian Border Guards... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Shortly after we got married, we were coming back from Canada, and the customs agent asked my wife her name, which (being a little nervous) she got wrong, immediately correcting herself. Then the agent asked the dread question "Where are you from?" My wife traveled around several states when growing up, and the question is a bit ambiguous, so she gave more than one answer. Fortunately, the agent asked everyone else in the car, got consistent responses, and let us go.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  14. He Pleaded Guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's worth noting (and the summary misses this) that he pleaded guilty, and was then given the fine. This trial date has been a long time coming. It's a shame that the Canadian Law won't be inspected more vigorously on this point.

    1. Re:He Pleaded Guilty by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Thereby giving the /. reader the impression that here was an innocent guy travelling w/ $5 grand in cash and some cocaine traces, and who was fined simply for refusing to give the passcode of his phone. Good job, Manish!!!

    2. Re:He Pleaded Guilty by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with travelling with $5k in cash.

      What? To be a good citizen we must pay 3rd parties to transfer money for us?

    3. Re:He Pleaded Guilty by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      5K really isn't that much money either in terms of drug transactions or in general. The notion that it is, is why so many people end up victims of forfeiture. Unwitting dupes continue perpetrating the myth that cash equals drug dealer.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:He Pleaded Guilty by NotAPK · · Score: 2

      I agree. There seems to be a "war on cash". Unsurprising considering the banking industry benefits from every single transaction.

  15. The ensuing case will be dismissed by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2

    In Canada, under sections 7 and 11(c) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadians have the right to remain silent during both interrogation and trial.

    Open and shut case here.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ahhh...his Mirand-eh rights.

    2. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Is that settled case law in Canada where not revealing a password is filed under the right to remain silent? Here in the states there have been multiple cases, under different circumstances, that go both ways regarding key disclosure laws.

    3. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by lawaetf1 · · Score: 1

      The US technically has the same but if you're within something like 100 miles of the border (which includes the coastline) you are in a "speical" area where your rights are flimsy. https://www.aclu.org/constitut...

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    4. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Border being any coastline or international airport, too. So pretty much everywhere in the US is fucked if they feel like playing games.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      I mean, it's quite simple. You have the right, in Canada, to be silent. End of discussion.

      The US has a similar law but the Supreme Court of Canada takes the Charter very seriously (should it get that far).

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    6. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by Maxwell · · Score: 1
      He wasn't in Canada. He was at the border, not admitted. Different set of rights apply.

      He pled guilty BTW

      .

    7. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "He pled guilty BTW"

      He pled guilty to some bullshit charge about obstructing an officer's ability to search his person. Don't make it sound like he pled guilty to drug possession or that his money was in any way illegally obtained.

      Now I'm speculating: he was probably led to believe that if he pled guilty he could peacefully go on his way. He did so. Then they slammed him with the fine. Cops lie.

    8. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They requested his password, but what if instead they asked him to unlock his phone? Does "the right to be silent" apply in this case? I don't see how it's the end of discussion.

    9. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      They might demand you write it down or enter it. Having a two stage password, keycode followed by audible password might stop that (right to remain silent).

    10. Re:The ensuing case will be dismissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first paragraph of the Canadian "Charter" of "Rights" and "Freedoms" states

      The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

      So the only true word in the title of the document is "Canadian".

  16. NEVER give out your passwords by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never, ever give out your passwords to any "law enforcement" (the reason for the quotes will be clear)

    - It's ridiculously easy to plant evidence on a cellphone or PC;
    - Your password can be used later for industrial espionage;
    - There is no guarantee that the law officer would really be a law enforcement officer or that he is honest and therefore not going to use your passwords for dishonest activities;

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    1. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Archfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This just follows the old saying never volunteer anything. There are procedures and policies in place both to protect your rights and to ensure the validity of any investigation. Make sure that they are followed to the letter.

      I back my device up everyday. I'd really like an app that would allow me to volunteer a 'password' that would institute a full device wipe should it be invoked, that way I could 'comply' with the demand while not compromising my data at all.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    2. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Failure to allow US Customs access to your electronic devices is grounds for them to seize the device. Just a warning.

    3. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      In this case I have two options: Destroy the device and then give it to the Customs (just to make the point clear to him) or not traveling to a country with laws so absurd. Believe it or not I'm a perfectly honest citizen and I respect the laws, but you will never see me visiting the US.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    4. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Or a third, less radical option that crossed my mind now, though it would be really annoying... If there is no way to avoid travel to the US, then I would leave all and any electronic equipment at home. Or the retarded officer would arrest me now for not having any electronic?

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    5. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      You can set most smartphones to wipe after N incorrect password entries; if you use auto backup it should be no big deal if you set it to something low like 2 or 3...

    6. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Better yet, have a burner phone with no pictures, whatever. It only takes a couple minutes to setup your email accounts once you're done with the fuckwits at customs. Before you land, delete your email accounts. Let Mr. Doofus customs agent inspect a blank phone, wish him a nice day, walk outside, reconfigure email, etc.

    7. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by sl149q · · Score: 1

      Slightly harder to set up but possibly easier in the long run...

      Have a burner iCloud (assuming iPhone) account set up with appropriate dummy gmail accounts subscribed to some innocuous mailing lists. Have that available as a "backup" for your phone.

      When you need to cross the border, backup your phone, restore from the burner iCloud account. If you need to hand out your password don't worry about it. Nothing there to look at.

      After the border just restore from your actual iCloud.

    8. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      - It's ridiculously easy to plant evidence on a cellphone or PC;

      If this is your concern then you've lost the game before you've even started playing.

    9. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Or just don't store suspicious things on your phone. There's plenty of cloud storage services out there, not to mention you can just setup a file host yourself in whatever country you feel like.

      I mean if you have a legitimate worry about them trying to plant evidence on your or something then sure, just giving them access to a clean phone could still be problematic.. but 99.99999% of people aren't important enough to warrant that level of paranoia.

      Most of those border guards see thousands of people per day so unless there's some reason you think you stand out from the crowd (celebrities, politicians, etc.. or if you're already under suspicion for something technology-related) you probably don't have to worry too much about being framed.

      Remember its as easy, if not easier, to plant physical evidence if they're just looking to frame you in general rather than for something specifically related to your phone or online presence.

    10. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 2

      A bit of context: Here on Brazil the verage Joe (you, me, etc) do not really have rights, as we say here "lei no Brasil é só para inglês ver" ("law on Brazil is just make-believe"). If you cross the path of someone rich/powerful you die or they make your life become a hell, but as is necessary to maintain the illusion of a democratic/civilized country so they make laws like that of the US customs and then plant evidence (or worse) for you to be considered a "dangerous criminal" and so you can be "disappeared" without too many questions.

      Point is, you do not need to look suspicious, you just need to pass in front of an "authority" that is in a powertrip.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    11. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      They need not be computer experts, just a stupid and/or corrupt cop (have several here) and a corrupt and/or stupid judge (almost all of then here), the police officer will swear that absurd thing on your phone "had always been there" and the judge will believe without question, and you will be arrested. The only way to try to avoid it is the police officer not have access to your phone or you do not even have a phone to begin with.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    12. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and they can have the device. And, they can deal with my organization's security department. And they can later answer questions as to why they were attempting to access Protected Health Information in violation of multiple laws, none of which give them exemptions, special jurisdiction, or privileged access.

      Not. My. Problem!

      Yeah, I know, they'll try to detain me and pressure me and all the intimidation stuff. There's a line here and they may not cross it, no matter what bullshit their supervisor told them! In fact I'd dearly love to see Border Services brought up on charges of accessing PHI, just to teach them a lesson. It wouldn't even matter if they were convicted. A short, sharp slap across the metaphorical face would be good for the border security theatre we all put up with.

    13. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      I'd like to give the appearance of cooperation. Whether right or wrong, I prefer not to spend the day in custody, and even if they are out of line, Customs and Border patrol are one of the last places where even if you are right, you will still lose fighting them in the short term for sure. I live in AZ and going to and from Mexico frequently has taught me that lesson the hard way. Four hours at the border getting vetted and undergoing repeated questioning, only to be released in the end is still a huge pain in the colon. If I had a 'password' that I could supply them at their insistence that appeared to work but actually wiped the device clean I could make a case for having cooperated to the letter of their request.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    14. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Never, ever give out your passwords to any "law enforcement" (the reason for the quotes will be clear)

       

      Very easy to say, but when you're risking your family's holiday over it, or your job, or your Christmas, or one time per year that you get to spend time with your parents. Principles are great and all, but if you're visiting a foreign country you have no rights, and the cost for you to piss them off is ridiculously large where the border official has no risk at all. The system needs new rules, and we take pressure off when we say "oh just don't give out your password, it's easy".

    15. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "... I'd dearly love to see Border Services brought up on charges ... "

      So, under your rule of law, border agents can not look at anything because it may have "Protected Health Information"?

    16. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "but if you're visiting a foreign country you have no rights"

      And as a society we accept this?

      Why?

    17. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      "but if you're visiting a foreign country you have no rights"

      And as a society we accept this?

      Why?

      Good question - but I think it's because we're don't often actually have to deal with it personally. Most people who are hit by it are 'foreign' and therefore don't immediately matter.

    18. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wiping the device would be risky if you want to give the appearance of complying. Better would be an alternate password that gives them access to a dummy account that is good enough to look legit while not containing or giving access to content owned by the main profile.

    19. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should lobby the Canadian Government to fix itself then. Might want to pass it along to the UK as well.

    20. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by dryeo · · Score: 1

      but if you're visiting a foreign country you have no rights

      The Canadian Charter of Freedoms specifically says that almost all the same rights apply to everyone in the country. Exceptions being the right to vote and hold office in a legislature, which are reserved to citizens and mobility rights, which are reserved to citizens, including the right to leave and reenter the country, and permanent residents. Equality rights are limited to individuals, eg not corporations etc.
      You'll find that most countries constitutions are similar but many residents believe it they only apply to citizens. Of course the border is a grey zone as you haven't entered the country yet.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    21. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Interesting stance of "appearance for cooperation" :).

      I cross the Canadian border a lot, just be direct and honest and I've never had a real problem. The worst was a situation (entering US, of course) where they rifled through my car and made me go in the building to talk to them, an hour later was back on the road. That one was triggered by one of my travelling companions.

      I would say 15% of the CBSA and 50% of the US CBP are douches. The good news is if you get an a-hole and sent for further scrutiny, there's still a 50/50 chance the second line of questioners aren't out to ruin your day. And the good ones are *really good*; they talk to you without any hint of interrogation, almost like a co-worker asking "how was your trip". And these guys are probably the ones who actually catch the bad players because they get your guard down, rather than the Guantanamo interrogator wannabes.

    22. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Only applies when "Inside" the country. The border is not inside the country.

    23. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Reread my last sentence.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    24. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can set most smartphones to wipe after N incorrect password entries; if you use auto backup it should be no big deal if you set it to something low like 2 or 3...

      I'd like to do that, but from time to time my 5 year old gets ahold of it (I do try to keep it where he has no access), and starts punching numbers.

    25. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wiping the device would be risky if you want to give the appearance of complying. Better would be an alternate password that gives them access to a dummy account that is good enough to look legit while not containing or giving access to content owned by the main profile.

      A combination of the two would be best. Load into a dummy account that has a few numbers for contacts and little else, just enough to be plausible. Silently wipe the other account in the background.

    26. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every human being is born with rights. Some governments may infringe upon them, but they cannot give or take rights.

    27. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is no guarantee that the law officer ..." would use it for a sex toy and create a bio-hazard.

    28. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      In fact I'd dearly love to see Border Services brought up on charges of accessing PHI

      And how can you be allowed to have PHI on your own phone?

    29. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Inputting the password for them should be the response you give the officers. They actually do not need to know what your password is.

      Otherwise, by that thinking the following should be true and just as harmful if not followed:
      - Never ever give your documents to a bank for a mortgage approval
      - Never ever go out to a restaurant
      - Never ever leave your car with a mechanic
      - Never ever let someone do surgery on you

      You hand over documents to untrustworthy people all the time
      You eat food that could be poisoned
      You leave you car with people who may or may not have even graduated and would easily accept a few dollars to sabotage your vehicle
      You leave you life in the hands of doctors and surgeons

      At some point you need to trust someone. What does it take for authorities to actually have a shot at doing their jobs. Cocain and $5000 cash is enough suspicion to dig further. Remember one thing, you don't need to cross borders and it's not your god given right to enter/exit as you please.

    30. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      If the border agent asks you to "unlock your device". Then providing them with a password that wipes the devices is complying with their request, as long as it also unlocks your device.

    31. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      This concern is a little paranoid but here it is anyways. If the border security folks are at all clever about their jobs they will be using a tool that clones an image of the device before attempting to unlock it. In the event you give them an unlock code and it results in a different image from their clone then they will possibly make the conclusion that you caused them to destroy evidence. Depending on what you are doing and what they might decide to suspect you of having done, destroying evidence could either be very much in your favor or ruin your life.

    32. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, 2 things:

      1). No, I didn't say that. However if they are told there is PHI present, then yes. You see how that works? They are informed, upon which they must alter course;
      2). It's not "my rule of law". Nice try, don't even. I am bound legally to take strong measures to defend the PHI in my custody. That's the issue so bugger off with your "crazy Kaczynski type dude imagines his rules affect everyone".

    33. Re:NEVER give out your passwords by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Which I covered in my final sentence -- if they really want to plant something on you, they can just do it with physical evidence and not have to worry about breaking into your phone and convincing you to give up your password and whatever else, and with a hell of a lot less risk that there will be a log created that they don't notice or forget to clean up that would catch them out.

  17. Traces of cocaine? by Bruinwar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are traces of cocaine the same as the "we smelled marijuana"? Was the cash found first, then they somehow found some "traces of cocaine"?

    --
    SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
    1. Re:Traces of cocaine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They probably use the same testing kit as the Orlando police.

    2. Re:Traces of cocaine? by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering there is research indicating that almost all US currency has traces of cocaine on it then it wouldn't be very hard for them to claim that.

    3. Re:Traces of cocaine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he is a criminal!
      didn't you hear what the nice men in the black suits said?

    4. Re:Traces of cocaine? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      There are traces of cocaine in my wallet because I use a card machine every now and again

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  18. who owns it by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    I was talking about this with a guy named Vlad who was getting sent by the Germans to Russia to destroy their economy.

    Vlad told me the government owns it all anyway and generously allows mere citizens to access it.

    So, nothing to see here I guess.

  19. heading gets more comments than the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Are the Headings "Write-only" (so they can never be spell corrected?)

    1. Re:heading gets more comments than the story... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Dunno, but it is a bit tiresome when a typo results in having to scroll over halfway down the page before you get to a comment that deals with the actual substance of the story.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  20. I just did this! by haxhia · · Score: 0

    I guess I lucked out as I just came back to Canada through Vancouver and denied to give the agent my computer and phone passwords. He said he could keep them if he saw fit and hand them over to "other agencies" to crack them.

  21. Good! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't provide any password to a border agent, or really anyone who doesn't need it.

    My company is currently in the process of designing a special TPM style product that makes it very near impossible to enter a devices without being the one intended for reception. Well solutions like this do exist, ours is going to be fairly open, cheap and allow it to interface to almost device to which someone can write a low level kernel based driver. With our device, it makes it impossible to access the contents of anything on the device under encryption due to how the data is stored and decrypted. Without access to the exact key which is paired to the device under encryption, you may as well wipe the device because except in exceptional cases, where multiple keys are warranted, there is no other way in the device under encryption.

    I'm bringing this up for this exact kind of situation, well traveling you can keep your data fully encrypted, have one of our keys at home, with the data it encrypted being unavailable physically until you arrive home, and you could carry a second key which can decrypt any data marked for use between the two keys or just the data encrypted well traveling, with the only way to view the date, to be in possession of a key physically, think very small USB thumb drive.

    If the border needs access, they can get access themselves. You're not stopping them by giving your phone, and you're not stopping them by refusing to give up a password or encryption key, you're simply protecting your right against possible self incrimination, and if the border patrol is actually qualified in the first place to do a job that would be require decryption information on a phone, they should be able to do it regardless of what you put on it. I know that's a ridiculous statement, but it works. You shouldn't have to provide access to your personal data, to anyone. If anyone wants access, they can get access themselves without you.

    I even once gave the border an entire database encrypted with our key solution, told them how it was encrypted and that the key for decryption was already sitting at an office in the US, so even if I wanted to get the data, I couldn't, they had no choice but to let me travel. You're not blacking anything by refused to decrypt data or let them into the system. In our case, we're going to the Nth degree and making it a physical problem, where it doesn't matter if you know the password, because it's point to point tied down.

    I support anyone who refused to give up access, it's the right thing to do, the access isn't theirs and if it is, they can enter it themselves.

    1. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, but what if you want to sayunlock your phone to check your e-mails? :p

    2. Re:Good! by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Someone should introduce you to a $5 wrench... :)

      If they have physical access to the device, physical access to you, and you're not important enough to end up in the news, then they have all the power...

      I'm not saying I agree with it, I'm telling you how the world works...

    3. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just don't think you won't take the fall for it though. If you're carrying data without a means to decrypt it then it's not really much different to carrying a bag for someone else that you can't open. If there are drugs in that bag then *you* are going to jail. The encryption means it's harder for them to prove there are "drugs" but that won't stop them setting fire to everyone involved as a show of force and authority. They're gonna set fire to you to make a point.

      Better: Don't agree to carry data for your employer. Same as you wouldn't agree to carry a locked suitcase for your employer. If they want to move that stuff they can move it through logistics.

    4. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd point out that as much as I support the notion of protecting your rights, it's a pretty well established point that Border Guards can refuse you entry for all sorts of reasons and can detain you for pretty extended periods of times, along with things like fines as pointed out. It'd be more straightforward if one could provide a second password or otherwise unlock one's phone to a dummy account (which regularly updates the access/modification times on some common documents).

      We should all fight for our right to privacy, but most people aren't in a position to really do anything substantial about it. For them, they should have more viable options to protect their privacy when law enforcement decides to ignore their rights.

    5. Re:Good! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Of course :P but I was just ignoring that angle.

    6. Re:Good! by kruug · · Score: 1

      Passwords are covered under the 5th amendment, assuming USA: http://arstechnica.com/tech-po... Big reason to avoid using bio-metric locks.

    7. Re:Good! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Except if I wanted to give you a device for a while, but protect all the information on it, I can just ship you a device, I keep the key device and now all my data is protected from you, something passwords are really bad at.

    8. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except in exceptional cases, where multiple keys are warranted

      and there's your scheme's fatal flaw.

    9. Re:Good! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      they had no choice but to let me travel

      How did you get to that conclusion? If someone is forcing you to divulge something against your will and your rights then what's preventing them from stopping you from travelling?

      They are breaking the law but they must let me go because they legally need to? That is a game that can't be won.

    10. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an exception there. Under international law no country can refuse entry to its citizens for any reason. They can arrest you as soon as you enter, but they can't refuse entry. As an American I can be refused entry to any country other than the US, but the US must allow me entry. It's a law of common sense, if they don't allow me entry, then where do they send me? It just makes more sense to allow entry, arrest and get on with it.

    11. Re:Good! by apraetor · · Score: 1

      That's a false analogy because physical objects like bags and intangible objects like data structures are not direct parallels. You can duplicate data, for one thing. Data also can't explode and harm people standing near the storage device, or poison people. Data is only meaningful/useful when consumed by people or machines. Encrypted data on a storage device has no greater agency than data traveling down fiber -- none at all. I REALLY don't understand what you are talking about with your proscriptions on carrying data or locked suitcases for employers. Have you never heard of professional couriers? Though again, it's irrelevant, since you're failing to comprehend important fundamental differences between *information* and *physical objects*.

    12. Re:Good! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      A company I used to work for had a system such as that. Whenever anyone travelled, they were issued a temporary laptop, with two partitions on the HD. The first was unencrypted and contained the OS, some basic applications (but critically, NOT email), and a VPN client. The second was encrypted and contained the important applications and any company data. We'd bought a solution such that the user never had the key to decrypt the other partition. Rather, he'd VPN in, and the key would be provided over the tunnel, stored in RAM, never paged out to swap, and used to access the encrypted data. By some voodoo possible with XP but not Vista and above, (And no, I have no idea what solution they switched to after the upgrade to 7.) if the VPN client quit or termed the connection, the key would be removed from RAM and the data drive once again would become so much gibberish. IT was simply informed of the travel arrangements and suspended the employee's VPN access for the duration and until they were safely checked into their hotel or field office. So there was no way the the Airport SecurityGoons could get access, even if the employee were beaten with the $2 wrench from that xkcd cartoon.

      Laptops are cheap... trivially so... compared to the data that they contain. That data belongs to the company. And if the ASGs think they have a legitimate need to see it; they can goto a real LEO who can goto a real judge who can issue a real subpoena; which company could and would fight. Otherwise, they can go piss off.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    13. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure we can build this with VeraCrypt and a smart bootloader.

    14. Re:Good! by kruug · · Score: 1

      Right, but the government cannot force you to disclose your password. They can, though, force you to unlock a device that is protected via bio-metrics, such as the fingerprint reader on your phone or laptop.

    15. Re:Good! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      I had paper work letting let through to the end point, I was being nice by talking to them in the first place, which I didn't have to, but I had time to kill.

    16. Re:Good! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      True but if the device which can unlock it, is sitting in another place, even country, they can't force that.

    17. Re:Good! by kruug · · Score: 1

      Ah...Gotcha. I wasn't quite sure what you were getting at before, but the rewording helped.

    18. Re:Good! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Yeah. 90% of it is easy and I can think of a good way to replicate. The thing that required XP, because UAC in Vista broke it, was the bit where the key was kept in RAM, not swapped, and purged if the VPN connection was broken. I'm not sure how I'd replicate that on my own. And a cursory check would indicate VeraCrypt doesn't do it.

      It's my understanding that when Windows 7 came along, MS had fixed what Vista broke and the they were able to get an updated solution that works similarly. But that was after I left the company

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    19. Re:Good! by gangien · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. You have virtually no rights at the border.

    20. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry sir we will have to keep the device, you will be able to come and collect it once we asses a criminal offence has not been committed

    21. Re:Good! by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      So they can install spyware (unencrypted partition), but not directly access your data- until you log in and their spyware gets access.

    22. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a Singapore company and was carrying a laptop with full-disk encryption provided by BestCrypt (Specifically BIOS pre-boot authentication with a hardware eToken PRO HSM) but I didn't have the HSM USB device with me to boot into Windows. I was held for 12 hours at LAX. It doesn't stop them, they don't care about excuses. The only thing that works is a full hidden OS (VeraCrypt: Hidden Operating System)

    23. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time for Space Probe defenses.

      You encrypt before you cross the border.
      Device reports it is in time lock mode and inaccessible.
      The partial key is xxxxxxxxx which must be joined to a future key that will be emailed in 48 hours unless the USB stick located in Canada is used to override the lock. Lost contact will mean the password will be emailed in 30 days time unless a third party prevents this..
       

    24. Re:Good! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      if the ASGs think they have a legitimate need to see it; they can goto a real LEO

      ASGs are REAL LEOs. They are more than real LEOs, because they don’t need probable cause to search you.

  22. room 101 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    you go to room 101 the last guy cracked in 5 days.,

  23. Meet the $5 wrench by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Why are duress passwords not a standard feature at this point?

    Because they are useless once the party causing the duress becomes aware that such a thing exists.

    Agent: "Give me your password"
    You: "Here you go"
    Agent: Clubs you with a wrench. "Give me your REAL password, smartass"
    You: ...

    1. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why are duress passwords not a standard feature at this point?

      Because they are useless once the party causing the duress becomes aware that such a thing exists.

      Agent: "Give me your password"
      You: "Here you go"
      Agent: Clubs you with a wrench. "Give me your REAL password, smartass"
      You: ...

      Well, the concept behind a duress password is that they have to actually try the one you give them to verify it, and once they enter a duress password further attempts to get a real one are useless. (note, there's no reason you can't have arbitrarily many duress passwords, so they'll never be sure that the Xth unique password you divulge is the real one.)

      If the duress password summons the authorities or destroys the device than, asking for your password is pointless as they know that even if you do give them the real one they won't be able to verify that without risking the device's destruction, or exposing their attempt.

      The problem arises when the people breaking in ARE the authorities, as then they don't care if the phone calls the cops, and they will nail you with obstruction and destroying evidence if the device self destructs. In that case it's safer to try the "I forgot" or "I plead the 5th (or local equivalent)" gambit.

    2. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by magarity · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agent: Clubs you with a wrench. "Give me your REAL password, smartass"
      You: ...

      That's why my password is "I'll never tell, you bastards!"

    3. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Well, the concept behind a duress password is that they have to actually try the one you give them to verify it, and once they enter a duress password further attempts to get a real one are useless.

      So they don't enter one until they've beaten you up for an arbitrarily long time. Long enough to have some confidence you aren't lying to them. How well do you think you will hold up under torture? I'm betting not so well.

      (note, there's no reason you can't have arbitrarily many duress passwords, so they'll never be sure that the Xth unique password you divulge is the real one.)

      There is also no reason they cannot make your life a (barely) living hell for an arbitrarily long time. Better be sure whatever you are protecting is worth your life or your freedom because that's what it might cost you.

      The problem arises when the people breaking in ARE the authorities, as then they don't care if the phone calls the cops, and they will nail you with obstruction and destroying evidence if the device self destructs. In that case it's safer to try the "I forgot" or "I plead the 5th (or local equivalent)" gambit.

      Ask the people imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay how well that worked for them. It's adorable that you think your options are any better with "the authorities" than with some random bad guy.

    4. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better be sure whatever you are protecting is worth your life or your freedom because that's what it might cost you.

      What you are trying to protect is your freedom. If you're going to lose it one way or another, it seems better to lose it by standing up for yourself.

    5. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by bankman · · Score: 4, Funny

      *smack* "Where's the comma!" *smack*

      --
      I feel so sig.
    6. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      What you are trying to protect is your freedom. If you're going to lose it

      That statement and the singular pronoun implies you think "freedom" is an atomic concept. I.e., that any freedom lost is a loss of all freedom.

      This is a particularly zealous definition, and that's not a judgement, just a fact. Many people, I think, would consider the loss of "freedom" in having a border agent look at their phone's contents and find nothing to be something significantly different than the loss of "freedom" involved in being incarcerated because they didn't allow them to look.

      "If you are going to lose it one way or another" means you put "look at phone messages" in the same loss of freedom category as "you sleep there and you eat what we give you and you live with 20 other people you don't particularly like or even trust, and no, we don't give you HBO. And here's your new roommate, Bubba. Bubba don't like many people. You're lucky, he really likes you".

    7. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't bother. The device self-destructed.

    8. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im guessing he meant the freedom of them not looking into your phone...

      Either you give up your password(give up your freedom of not having dink fucks in your phone)

      Or they throw you in jail and send your phone to the NSA to crack and you lose your freedom (your freedom of not having dink fucks in your phone)

    9. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I am talking about something entirely different from a duress password... I am talking about a mechanism where they can know absolutely every secret you have about accessing it and still will not be able access the content because the password must still be provided by you, and you must enter it while not under duress of someone you don't actually want to access whatever is being protected by the mechanism. Torturing you wouldn't accomplish anything because all that would do is make the duress even *more* obvious to a detector that reads your state of mind while you provide a password. The *only* way they would be able to make you unlock the system for them is to somehow entirely convince you entirely that your intentions and theirs are in agreement, and to somehow make it so that you have *NO* compunction about giving them access.

    10. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not make me use enhanced interrogation techniques...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ7CExDmWBM

    11. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      That statement and the singular pronoun implies you think "freedom" is an atomic concept. I.e., that any freedom lost is a loss of all freedom.

      That's an implication I did not intend.

      "If you are going to lose it one way or another" means you put "look at phone messages" in the same loss of freedom category as "you sleep there [...]

      I don't at all. They are both very serious limitations, but are different in type and time scales. My point is that they are both losses. Whether or not you should buckle under over access to your phone does not necessarily depend on there being anything of value on the phone. It could very well depend on how much you're willing to put up with constantly increasing government abuse of which this is just one small part.

      Deciding that this isn't a hill you're willing to defend is perfectly rational, as you point out. However, deciding it is such a hill is no less rational, and choosing to do so is also fighting for freedom.

    12. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      Mod points, coffee spitake, etc. Nice one.

    13. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by slashrio · · Score: 1

      So why didn't they use the wrench in this case?

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    14. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      My point is that they are both losses.

      Yes, they are, but you put them in the same class when you say if you are going to experience one of them, you might as well go all the way and get the other. If one of them is more significant than the other then you don't want to say "in for a penny, in for a pound". If you're going to lose it one way or the other, and you think letting border agents look at your phone isn't as serious a loss as being put in prison, AND YOU ARE GOING TO LOSE ANYWAY, then why would you not mitigate the loss by taking the lesser one?

      Yeah, Gandhi made great gains by not taking "the lesser one". If you think you're going to have the same results as Gandhi by refusing to let a border agent look at your phone, well, it doesn't seem to be working out that way for anyone who does it.

      Whether or not you should buckle under over access to your phone does not necessarily depend on there being anything of value on the phone.

      I know. It depends on whether you can win in any way by not buckling under, and whether the cost of not buckling under is more than doing it. If you happen to have a folder full of CP that would put you in prison as a CP offender if a border agent saw it, then of course you choose the lower cost option of refusing.

      The point is, the assumption is you are going to lose. You get to choose how much you lose. "You might as well" implies no difference. "As well."

      As for someone asking "why Bubba"? It's a well-known meme that gets the point across quickly. That's why. If you want to use a different name, fine.

    15. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Torturing you wouldn't accomplish anything because all that would do is make the duress even *more* obvious to a detector that reads your state of mind while you provide a password.

      My ten year old child is bleeding to death from a trip through a plate glass window, and I need to call 911. WHY WON'T MY FUCKING PHONE UNLOCK! GOD DAMN IT! UNLOCK YOU WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT! WHY DON'T YOU ACCEPT MY PASSWORD?

      Do people need to carry a couple of ludes with them all the time so they can use their phone when they are in an agitated or stressful state? "Keep the pressure on your artery Billy until the ludes kick in and I can call for help ... it will only be 15 minutes or so..."

    16. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Cracking passwords was fun back in the day.
      "Fuck you"... what's you're password - "Fuck you". ... and so on.
      Some women's passwords were the most fun. A window into what they were really thinking.

    17. Re:Meet the $5 wrench by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Bad example. You do not need to unlock your phone or bypass any kind of lock screen in order to call emergency services in the first place.

    18. Re: Meet the $5 wrench by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correcting them but are confusing freedom for liberty. They are not synonyms.

  24. Other ones by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I figured he must have been sitting in a boat being towed in.

    Or else the agents were all women and the submitter badly misspelled "broad".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. Need "alternate password" features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An alternate password could be used to give more limited device access, or execute actions such as immediately wipe device, etc.

    1. Re: Need "alternate password" features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having the limited password to be undetectable would be desired. Such as having a variable storage segment choosing both random data that contains both encrypted data and actual random data, and no way of knowing the percentage of what is unused random data and what is encrypted data.

    2. Re: Need "alternate password" features by apraetor · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Hidden Partition feature of TrueCrypt is particularly useful in this regard. Once configured and the OS set-up finished you'll have two decryption keys. One for secure use, and one for the Border Patrol. There's no way to prove how many keys can decrypt the data, nor can it be proved that more than 1 key exists. Basically, you can plausibly deny the existence of any key other than the one you give to the Border Patrol, and they can't prove different.

    3. Re: Need "alternate password" features by allo · · Score: 1

      And nothing is wiped on a read-only image of your drive.

    4. Re: Need "alternate password" features by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Better yet, importing pr0n is illegal in Canada, so you put a big honking folder labelled "pr0n" on the desktop, and you only put SFW Swimsuit Issue pictures on it, and enjoy the border agent wasting hours going through every single one of them

    5. Re: Need "alternate password" features by mark-t · · Score: 1

      What would be even better is if you could plausibly deny the ability to give them the password at all either because you do not have it, or know it, or you are otherwise technologically prohibited from accessing the system outside of certain locations or environments that cannot be otherwise replicated by you or a border guard.

  26. Re:Found the LUDDITE. by D00MSlayer · · Score: 0

    Is there a particularly sane reason you're so obsessed with apps?

  27. There goes the Canada option... by mi2 · · Score: 1

    Where are the Illiberals going to flee now, should a Republican win elections?

    --
    Why is my real account disabled?
    1. Re:There goes the Canada option... by Kierthos · · Score: 2

      With Trump as the Republican nominee, I don't think we need to worry about that for another four years.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:There goes the Canada option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      venezuela. it is the fruit of progressive labors...

    3. Re:There goes the Canada option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only four? She didn't come this far or pay all them dues for one measly term.

      The "vote counters" will ensure our tradition of 2 term clowns keeps the carnival rolling. However, it is yet to be seen if she can keep up the legacy of twice as bad as the last, of which her hubby was the first! And we thought slick willy was bad. Hold onto your hats, whether Trump is done by fault or intent, he's not even going to get in for a tour of the White House.

    4. Re:There goes the Canada option... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      They aren't. You know the ones who said they'd leave the country if Obama was elected? I'm still waiting, guys.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:There goes the Canada option... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope you're trolling here.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  28. Copy Cat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Canada, I know that you look up to us like some kind of big brother of big brothering but if you could just stop copying us that would be great, if you keep just copying everything we do I'm going to tell England!

  29. I know this is Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I thought for US you are not required to even speak to the border agent.

    1. Re:I know this is Canada by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Just like he's not required to speak to you. He can just take all your stuff and nod to the cops to slap the handcuffs on you.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:I know this is Canada by PPH · · Score: 1

      No hablo Ingles.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  30. Hindering an investigation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, in these cases, it sounds like the border agents has sufficient cause to investigate, given that this person had traces of cocaine on them.

    However, how easy would it be for me to dust you with cocaine, knowing that you're ahead of me in line, to divert the attention of the authorities.

    In either case, I'm sorry, I am NOT giving you my password to my phone, and before I even enter the airport, I'm going to turn my phone off, forcing it to require the password (and not my fingerprint).

    Which leads to another question: should we even be using biometric data to unlock our phones? I'm starting to think not, and given that I rarely use my thumbprint anyways, I should just probably turn that all off.

    1. Re:Hindering an investigation... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Traces?

      Almost all US currency has traces of cocaine on it.

      Fact.

      Try again.

      Was the cocaine hiding inside the smartphone?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  31. good luck with that. by lophophore · · Score: 1

    Good luck trying this with U.S. ICE and/or CBP. There are no good outcomes.

    * You could be interrogated for hours
    * You could be arrested
    * You could be refused entry
    * Your device could be seized

    "I don't know the password" will likely get your device seized.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:good luck with that. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      IIRC you can't be refused entry if you are returning to your home country. You can be arrested and go straight to jail, but they can't turn you away.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:good luck with that. by kruug · · Score: 1

      "I don't know the password" will likely get your device seized.

      "I don't know the password" falls under the 5th amendment right, assuming you're in the USA: http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...

    3. Re:good luck with that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really see no point I any of this. Cross with a blank drive, download your data encrypted remotely.

    4. Re:good luck with that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amendments are not valid at the border.
      or within 200 km of the border.

    5. Re:good luck with that. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Canadians have a stronger Constitutional Right to Privacy than Americans do, actually.

      But if it's an American going to Canada ... oops

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    6. Re:good luck with that. by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      IIRC you can't be refused entry if you are returning to your home country. You can be arrested and go straight to jail, but they can't turn you away.

      You're right. So what? What if you aren't returning home? International travel is a core part of life for many people, jobs and family span countries. When you're visiting your partner's parents for Christmas, or doing a crucial deal with a client, that all easily happens in a country that isn't your own.

    7. Re:good luck with that. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      This case was about Canadians trying to enter Canada.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:good luck with that. by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      This case was about Canadians trying to enter Canada.

      Indeed - but do you think that's relevant? Like, would the officials treat foreign travellers better?

    9. Re:good luck with that. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      No, 'On advice of counsel, I invoke my fifth amendment rights' falls under the 5th. "I forgot my password" is willfully lying to law enforcement.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    10. Re:good luck with that. by kruug · · Score: 1

      Also, "I invoke my 5th Amendment Rights to not share my password with law enforcement".

    11. Re:good luck with that. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      No, then you're giving away too much information.

      "I want my lawyer" and "Am I free to go?"

      Note that in Canada, it's different. We'd invoke Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. You can still be compelled by statute to answer, but those answers can't then be used against you.

      http://www.slaw.ca/2011/10/07/...

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    12. Re:good luck with that. by lophophore · · Score: 1

      Nope. Not really. Because you have willingly interacted with enforcement agents, your rights are different. Suggest you read this: https://www.eff.org/wp/defendi...

      Here's the pertinent part:

      "If a border agent asks you to provide an account password or encryption passphrase or to decrypt data stored on your device, you don’t have to comply. Only a judge can force you to reveal information to the government, and only to the extent that you do not have a valid Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.38

      However, if you refuse to provide information or assistance upon request, the border agent may seize your device for further inspection or consider you uncooperative, which the agent may take into consideration when deciding whether to allow you to enter the United States."

      The case cited in the Ars Technica article is a different situation because the plaintiff/defendant unwillingly interacted with law enforcement. By approaching the US Border and "willingly" interacting with CBP and/or ICE you give up a certain amount of rights. Same is true with a TSA checkpoint.

      So... "Good luck with that!"

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    13. Re:good luck with that. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I don't think a border agent can prevent a US citizen from entering the country.

      As a foreign national trying to enter the US, you're absolutely right. The border agent can ask you to dance, riverdance style, while singing 'God Bless America,' and deny you if your foot work isn't up to par. But I meant specifically an American attempting to reenter the country. They can still get fucked with, don't get me wrong, but the rules are different.

      Then there's that whole 'The border is 100 miles deep' thing America likes to claim.....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    14. Re:good luck with that. by lophophore · · Score: 1

      A US CBP Agent absolutely can prevent a U.S. Citizen from entering the country. So can a ICE officer. But more likely they will call your device "contraband" and seize it, and you may be subject to extensive "interviews." (read: interrogation).

      Remember that CBP has a long memory -- if you do anything off-color, you will be flagged for extra attention forevermore. Argue with them once and you'll be on their shit list forever. Don't declare something and get called on it and you'll be on their shit list forever.

      It is best not to fuck with immigration officials.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    15. Re:good luck with that. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure they can't. The Constitution, not to mention international law, still have some meaning.

      Sure, they might arrest you on the spot, but they still have to let you in to your own country.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  32. Re:Anything that touches money has drug residue on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed in those bordercontrol reality tv shows that people coming from cities like Amsterdam are under less scrutiny when they test positive for drugs particle, because 90% of the people will have those.

  33. take some classes manishs by eyenot · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of this "manishs" person not having a better grasp of English, but also authoring 90% of the /. links I follow here from Twitter. The embarrassments are mounting for whoever it is -- if they CAN be embarrassed. I dunno. Some of the articles posted seem possessed of a political slant suggesting a personality of really odd affect.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    1. Re:take some classes manishs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manish's english is pretty good; way better than the average American. What you're rankled at is the quirks of his writing style, which is dialectically a mix of American English and Indian Standard English as might fit an intelligent, educated immigrant to your shores. The quirks come from Indian Standard English, which is a genuinely fun, poetic, lyrical dialect (repetition for emphasis, words that have switched from singular to plural in amusing and illuminating ways, rhythmic constructs). Seriously, look it up and marvel at the flexibility of english.

      Anyway you're American, right? So you are complaining about his grasp of American English.

      Which is about on a level, linguistically speaking; the two branches forked at about the same time. So get over it.

      Signed,
      An English Person.

  34. Shyaw! by ichthus · · Score: 1

    So, like... DUDE. I'm not just a boarder, bro. I'm a boarder AGENT. Shyaw! So, like... ya gotta give me yer password, bro. Cuz, if you don't, I will TOTALLY fine yer ass, dude.

    --
    sig: sauer
  35. Border lockout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we put the phone in a mode that refuses to unlock when near a border?

  36. It was a Blackberry... by ControlsGeek · · Score: 1

    It was a Blackberry, don't they already have the password? That's what everyone is led to believe by the phone fetish trolls.

  37. Don't do this by Solandri · · Score: 1

    If you have anything that you need to keep away from prying border patrol eyes, leave it at home. If you need to access it while abroad, put it on your home computer, set up a VPN server on your router, and while you're abroad just VPN in and use remote desktop or VNC to access it.

    The entire rights situation is very murky at the border because technically you're not yet on U.S. soil until you pass Customs and Immigration. The SCotUS has ruled multiple times that U.S. Constitutional protections do not apply outside of U.S. soil (which is why Bush put a prison at Guantanamo - it is a U.S. base but on Cuban soil).

    If you try to play cute tricks with CBP like your encryption key thing, even if they let you in they'll probably flag your file in their database. From then on, EVERY TIME you try to enter the country again, you'll get to enjoy a 1-3 hour delay while they scrutinize everything about you because of the flag. A German friend of mine was dating a U.S. citizen so was visiting frequently and spending a lot of time here. One of the border guards suspected the dating was a cover story and he was secretly working in the U.S. and flagged him in the database. From then on, every time he tried to enter the U.S. it was a multi-hour circus as they put him into an interrogation room and questioned him. It finally ended when he married the girl and became a U.S. citizen.

  38. All the canadian boArder agents need to do... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    ... is ask the Canadian Mounted Police.
    http://www.theverge.com/2016/4...
    But hey, 5000 bucks bonus.

  39. PRESUME IT'S A LIE (FBI) (FBI) (FBI) [singing] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dang it!!!!1 Foiled again!!!1

    This is like that one time at band camp when Apple wouldn't give the FBI their passwords.

    All we need is more Slashdot FBI news. This will fix everything. Get them all into black Escalades ASAP and don't forget the cheap sunglasses.

    Sale @ Nordstrom Rack too.

  40. $500 fine?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you assume he is an evil cocaine dealer, the only impact is a $500 fine!??! Ya, that's a very effective deterrence.

  41. You got to be firm by Foundryman · · Score: 1

    Like I was with our IT guys. Fools thought I'd just give them my password when they asked for it. Told them to go screw themselves.
    They respected me for standing my ground. Why the very next day when I couldn't get logged into my computer they were very understanding and reset my password for me even after I'd been so harsh with them the day before.

  42. I for one defend Boarder rites! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Snow bunnies have Canadian Rights too!

    That said, if you were a Canadian, you'd be entitled to tell them to stuff it.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  43. If you're worried... by Macdude · · Score: 1

    1. Backup phone
    2. Wipe Phone
    3. Travel
    4. Restore phone from backup.

    Repeat on the return trip.

    --
    "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
  44. A much better summary by gordguide · · Score: 1

    A much better summary is found here:
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/alain-philippon-phone-password-case-powers-of-border-agents-and-police-differ-1.2983841

    Apologies for the poor formatting of the link, but for some reason /. fights me on this.

  45. Re:Anything that touches money has drug residue on by compro01 · · Score: 1

    Most police field tests are utter bullshit and will product a positive result off of air.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  46. FedEx Your Phone To Yourself by stoicio · · Score: 1

    If you really need your phone, spend the cash and FedEx it to yourself each direction.

    Otherwise, get a prepaid phone at your destination and discard it before you leave.

  47. prepare to repel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boarders! or is it borders?

  48. A different view by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    You need 2 passwords to your phone. Both log into your phone, but the second one lets you see/use a private folder. You give them the first and everything looks real because it is- file dates look good, games get played, email is there, texting files ok- except that some stuff is missing that they don't know about. Better than a duress password, because there is no way to identify it as a duress password.

    1. Re:A different view by slashrio · · Score: 1

      THIS deniability has a high plausibility. :)

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    2. Re: A different view by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Logging should also be activated when the "innocent" password is provided. Clandestine recording of law enforcement's stomping around in your device as well as possible attempts to sprinkle digital cocaine in your phone could come in handy later.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  49. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is unclear if he provided the password while agreeing to the fine.

    Like anyone ever does?

  50. So, why did they think they had the right? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    It's legal to take cash across the border. Traces of cocaine isn't the same as possessing cocaine. If he had originally crossed to traffic drugs, they missed their rightfully chance to detain him. For all they know, a coke fiend sneezed on his luggage.

  51. Blackberry + cocaine = Sales Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt this person works as a Sales agent for some medium-large size corporation. They all have addictions of one sort or another and cling to their Blackberry's due to how easy it is to reply to email and maintain their own contact lists.

  52. Don’t Keep Your Valuable Data On Your Person by terrab0t · · Score: 1

    As others have said, even when they are legally in the wrong border security agents can still ruin your day or your entire trip—they can easily make you miss your domestic connecting flight. They can also keep your equipment for years—as they are doing in this very case. The simplest strategy is to not have any kind of valuable data on your electronic devices when you cross the border. You can send all of your data via the internet. Don't carry it on your person where you have to suffer harassment to protect it.

    Your devices should look completely normal while containing no personal information about you. You should be able to hand them over to a border security agent and give a working password that has no relation to your usual one. When they log in, they should see a device with no personal information of any kind. No photos, no incoming text messages, no emails, no documents, no web browser history, etc.

    A few people have suggested a dummy password that logs into a restricted access dummy account. That's risky. If they take your phone or laptop into another room for an hour they may discover that it has inaccessible data on it and the usual harassment will ensue. Setting your phone to wipe itself after three failed password attempts may work, but only if they can log in with the correct password after it’s been wiped and see what looks like a normal, working phone.

    You have to do it every time, but wiping and preparing your devices before crossing the border is the most effective solution.

    On a side note, my phone is a bit of a problem. So long as the SIM is in it, it will receive any incoming calls or text messages. I can wipe those just before I go through customs, but the agents can read anything that comes in while they have the phone. I could hide the SIM somewhere in my luggage, but then I'd have a suspicious phone and they might find the SIM and get angry. I guess the best strategy is to leave your SIM at home and buy a temporary phone plan and SIM at your destination.

  53. Re:the prerogative of a border agent by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Canadian border agents can say fuck off to a returning Canadian citizen? That's new to me...

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  54. Re:Bubba by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Geez, why does always this 'Bubba' turn up in law enforcement discussions?
    Is that another type of godwin, a bubba-win or so?

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  55. Re: bullet proof vests... by slashrio · · Score: 1

    ...are prohibited items. Mere possession can bring you in big, very big trouble.
    Gee, I wonder why they enacted *that law...

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  56. Re:stressless password entry by slashrio · · Score: 1

    "Relax! You motherfucker! RELAX!"

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  57. Re:coming from cities like Amsterdam by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Twice I noticed in the newspaper that someone coming from Amsterdam and travelling through airports like Dubai, Qatar, had to stay there for a few years for that very same reason. In prison, that is.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  58. Re:wipes all the data by slashrio · · Score: 1

    It would be much less complicated to back up your phone to a trusted, secure and only known to you, location and wipe it before you enter oppressive countries like the USA, Canada, and then re-sync it once you're out of the constitution free zone. My God what a mess. You still call it 'the land of the brave and the free'?

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  59. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to find this site interesting and amusing, now it's seems to be a bunch of smart alecs trying to out bullshit each other good bye