Slashdot Mirror


Google To Drop Nexus Brand Name, Move Away From Stock Android (theverge.com)

tripleevenfall quotes a report from The Verge: Google's newest smartphones won't be Nexus devices after all. According to Android Central, Google is dropping the Nexus branding with its two upcoming, HTC-made smartphones. Instead, the company is expected to market the devices under a different name and to lean heavily on the Google brand in the process. This shift is more than just symbolic. The report states Google will load the devices with a special version of Android Nougat, as opposed to the standard "vanilla" version of the operating system that's shipped on past and current Nexus devices. Android Police reported earlier this month that Google may remove the Nexus branding from its upcoming smartphones and replace it with a "G" logo. It's too early to tell which direction Google is taking with its upcoming Android Nougat smartphones. Google has spent years marketing the Nexus brand as a hardware entity, while Google has reserved its own name for software services.

203 comments

  1. JUMP THE SHARK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's over!!

    Yours,
    The Fat Lady (singing)

    1. Re:JUMP THE SHARK! by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 1

      It does appear that Google is abandoning all the things that made it so widely, if not universally, beloved. Letting their devs spend work time on passion projects. The dream of one day, however far in the future, ditching Comcast for Google Fiber. Phones and tablets that are, if not cruftware-free, at least set a minimum baseline for cruftware. They even pulled an Oracle with that Nest thing, buying an energetic indie startup and then almost immediately killing it dead for no real reason at all.

      What the eff? Why is this all happening now? What's changed? Did they stop making All the Money? Are the founders going through menopause? Was Google secretly run by a group of elves whose spirit tree just died?

    2. Re:JUMP THE SHARK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does appear that Google is abandoning all the things that made it so widely, if not universally, beloved. Letting their devs spend work time on passion projects. The dream of one day, however far in the future, ditching Comcast for Google Fiber. Phones and tablets that are, if not cruftware-free, at least set a minimum baseline for cruftware. They even pulled an Oracle with that Nest thing, buying an energetic indie startup and then almost immediately killing it dead for no real reason at all.

      What the eff? Why is this all happening now? What's changed? Did they stop making All the Money? Are the founders going through menopause? Was Google secretly run by a group of elves whose spirit tree just died?

      All they have to do now is kill off Gmail and Google Docs, and they'll be set.

    3. Re:JUMP THE SHARK! by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      What the eff? Why is this all happening now? What's changed? Did they stop making All the Money? Are the founders going through menopause? Was Google secretly run by a group of elves whose spirit tree just died?

      One word: monopoly.
      Best way to avoid it, have proof of things you did that negated it, so you're not the DIRECT monopoly, but still bringing in buttloads of cash.

  2. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We want to load up our devices with even more shit that nobody wants or needs, and make it even harder for you to remove it."

    Don't be evil my ass.

    1. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no indication whatsoever as to what the changes would be, but it would not be in Google's interest to make a significant change in direction from previous Nexus devices, since most people who buy them do so because they want a) a bloatware-free phone with stock Android, and b) timely updates.

      I suspect whatever modifications they do make to the OS for these forthcoming phones, it won't involve adding a lot of bloat. Perhaps they want to support some unique hardware features that they're going to add to these phones, that don't need to be supported in stock Android. Who knows.

    2. Re:Translation: by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Looks to me like Google have changed policy. Rather than Nexus being an example for other manufacturers to follow, it looks like Google want to be in full control of Android. Expect features that no one else is allowed to have.

    3. Re:Translation: by rockout · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's still just a rumor site reporting this. Everybody calm the fuck down.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    4. Re:Translation: by disposable60 · · Score: 1

      I just want them to unify the SD storage and the embedded so I don't have to shuffle stuff around every time an app wants an update. It'd be nice to be able to delete the shovelware, but I'll settle for being able to get it out of my way.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    5. Re:Translation: by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Well if Google wants to get into a dick-measuring contest with the iPhone then other manufacturers will take up the slack of missing features:

      Audio jack (to be removed in iPhone 7), FM Radio, removal battery, SD Card, robust cheap black plastic housing that doesn't require a stylish case.

      Cheaper *is* better.

    6. Re:Translation: by mjwx · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's still just a rumor site reporting this. Everybody calm the fuck down.

      Easy there tiger, sounds like you're not familiar with the way Slashdot works.

      When rumoursite.com publishes a slightly negative rumour of an upcoming Apple product, everyone is like "Apple are such visionaries, removing buttons and speakers are such brilliance and wow, I'm going to cream myself over this for months".

      However when it's an Android rumour everyone is like "Holy Squirrelballs am I angry. How dare they think of ADDING things to Android" and then you would hear the gnashing of teeth as they start to gnaw their desks in a fit of rage.

      In a few months when the device is released, the rumours were forgotten as they were found to be untrue, except for Apple fanboys who will still cling to any negative reports about Android no matter how untrue they are.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Translation: by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      This is already a feature in Android as of Marshmallow, which allows you to have the traditional removable SD card format, or essentially set it up on LVM and roll it into your phone's internal volume group. Recommended with fast cards only.

    8. Re:Translation: by Alumoi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aha, features like no boot unloking, no rooting, no adblocking, no means to block tracking.

    9. Re:Translation: by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Google has never done this in the past, why would they start now? Plus I only intend to get one of these devices if they are rootable. If they are it means even if there's no vanilla version to flash, you can manually wipe the offensive apps from /system easily enough if you want.

    10. Re:Translation: by Monoman · · Score: 1

      tldr; "We need to make more money"

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    11. Re: Translation: by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, most people buy Nexus devices for the lack of bloatware and the security updates. I'm thinking that they might add additional experimental/dev features that aren't going to be a stock Android feature, as opposed to meaningless apps.

    12. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad that feature is the dumbest idea since not including an SD card in the first place. Would you run 2 non-identical disks in a raid0? Would you run ANY disks in a raid0? Would anyone sane?

      You know what actually makes sense? Insert SD card:

      "where would you like to mount this SD card?

      1) /sdcard/
      2) /sdcard/Music
      3) /sdcard/Movies
      4) Enter custom mountpoint:

    13. Re:Translation: by gtall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have that backwards, when rumoursite.com publishes a slightly negative article on an upcoming Apple product, the Apple haters go into transports of delight declaring this validates their beliefs they told us years before when no one would believe them.
       

    14. Re:Translation: by ninthbit · · Score: 1

      I only intend to get one of these devices if they are rootable.

      Ditto here. The reason I moved from the Galaxy Note to a Nexus 6 was because the newer Notes were locked up tight. If Google wants to pull a BS move and lock the phone and install garbage, so be it. I'll just do my research and find a Xiaomi model, or some other unlocked cheap brand that has the screen size I want and be done with it.

      All I need is a big screen, enough RAM, and a fast CPU. Now that LTE is on all the cheaper devices, there are no killer "features" I need hardware wise (looking at you fingerprint readers and heart monitors). I still rock/love my Nexus 6. I'd buy a used one before anything else currently on the market, I haven't found a better screen and that's all I really care about.

    15. Re:Translation: by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      That is Google's core business after all.

      Never forget that.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    16. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only nerds would think either of these options would be a good idea.

    17. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moddded you both up because you are both right

    18. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nexus devices are already full of Google's crapware. And it has been impossible to remove them for a long time. This is just a cosmetical move, Nexus devices are already worse than Samsung ones.

    19. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How bout just /home/

    20. Re:Translation: by rockout · · Score: 1

      thanks for your offtopic rant about how much you hate Apple and Android fanbois, which translates as "see how much cooler I am than all of them?"

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    21. Re:Translation: by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      This is already a feature in Android as of Marshmallow, which allows you to have the traditional removable SD card format, or essentially set it up on LVM and roll it into your phone's internal volume group. Recommended with fast cards only.

      Too bad it only half works. I have apps move themselves back to the phone storage when they update all the time. Or just vanish, needing to be reinstalled and reconfigured.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    22. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This x1000.

    23. Re:Translation: by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is this not in their interest? Why should Google give two shits about what Nexus users want, especially as far as having a bloatware-free phone?

      If you're one of these people who wants a bloatware-free phone, what are your options? Right now, it's to get an iPhone, get a Nexus, or use an alternative ROM like CyanogenMod. Presumably, people who really like Nexus really don't want an iPhone for various reasons, or else they would already have one; I think it's safe to assume that these people are invested in the Android ecosystem and want to stay away from the Apple ecosystem. So that leaves Nexus and CM. If they were technically skilled and comfortable with doing things like rooting phones and installing alt-ROMs, they probably would have just gone that route already, since you can get much better phones that way (like the Galaxy S series, with removable batteries up to S5 and expandable storage and the best screens available, plus excellent availability of spare parts). So Nexus users appear to be people who don't like Apple, and aren't comfortable with or don't want the hassle of the DIY approach that CM offers; they want something they can just buy off-the-shelf and have a bloatware-free, stock Android experience phone with timely updates.

      Now Google is removing that. So what are these people going to do?

      I don't think any of them are moving to iPhone. Maybe a select few will finally decide to take the CM plunge. But the rest are just going to get the new bloated-up "G" phone, and any others will just get some other Android phone. Either way, Google wins, as they get to push more bloatware and spying on the users and increase profits.

      This is no different from everyone bitching and complaining about Windows 10 and how it's bad for MS's customers. It's good for MS because the customers aren't going to go anywhere, they're just going to complain and then bend over.

    24. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one more reason not to buy Nexus phones: no long term support guaranteed.

    25. Re:Translation: by tepples · · Score: 1

      Does this mean Google will make Android incompatible with VPNs? It'd have to, because rootless tracking blockers appear to the operating system as VPN clients.

    26. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never forget, never surrender!

    27. Re:Translation: by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      SD card, I've had phones with and without them, and for the life of me, I can't figure out why I miss it when it isn't there, and never install one when I do have that ability. I've come to the conclusion that I only want the ability, not that I'll ever use it ... just in case. Meh

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    28. Re:Translation: by sacrilicious · · Score: 3, Funny

      How is this not in their interest? Why should Google give two shits about what Nexus users want, especially as far as having a bloatware-free phone?

      Because they don't want to drive more people to alternative roms.

      This is no different from everyone bitching and complaining about Windows 10... the customers aren't going to go anywhere, they're just going to complain and then bend over.

      Speak for yourself, ankle-grabber.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    29. Re:Translation: by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      When rumoursite.com publishes a slightly negative rumour of an upcoming Apple product, everyone is like "Apple are such visionaries, removing buttons and speakers are such brilliance and wow, I'm going to cream myself over this for months".

      You must have missed the headphone jack palava where the internet went on a near meltdown over the completely unsubstantiated and unconfirmed rumour that Apple were going to drop the headphone jack.

      If iPhone 7 comes with a headphone jack, then several hundred of megabytes of wailing and screeching will have been written for absolutely no point.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    30. Re:Translation: by non0score · · Score: 1

      I hope you do know that the black plastic case is exactly why your phone hits thermal limits way faster than a metal case, and proceeds to clock the fuck down and tanks in performance. The only thing I'd agree to in your list is the audio jack, and I'll have to wait for the official announcement to know.

    31. Re:Translation: by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      a) a bloatware-free phone with stock Android

      That's like saying someone's less of a rapist than Bill Cosby.

      I've got a low end Samsung that has loads of crap I can't delete, but it's all got Google's name on it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet not.
      Google have seen that it's it a tiny majority of folk who really care about the supposed advantages that nexus brought to mobile devices.
      The new range will be more expensive,have bloatware,more spying and because their from HTC,possibly locked bootloaders etc..
      Google are only interested in one thing,cash,they are going to do what HTC did,forget about your current loyal repeat customers and just churn out the same kind of rubbish that everyone else (samsung) does,aim at a bigger buyer base and just have to make more trips to the bank to pay the extra profits in,problem has been for HTC that it didn't work because their phones always had at least one major compromise in hardware to try and make even more profit even though their ultra high priceing has led directly to lower sales,that's why they have had to go backwards,to their old xda days and just make other people's designed phones,just like they did to get their start in the smartphone world..

    33. Re:Translation: by swillden · · Score: 1

      Aha, features like no boot unloking, no rooting, no adblocking, no means to block tracking.

      Google's devices have always had unlockable bootloaders, unlike the rest of the industry.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    34. Re:Translation: by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      SD card, I've had phones with and without them, and for the life of me, I can't figure out why I miss it when it isn't there, and never install one when I do have that ability. I've come to the conclusion that I only want the ability, not that I'll ever use it ... just in case. Meh

      The people who want SD cards in their phones want it for one of two reasons:
      1. Music - Some of us still actually buy music and keep it for future listening instead of paying each month to a streaming surface. Those of us who do this, need storage space.
      2. Photos/Videos - Some like to use their phones to take pictures. It's a pain to move photos and videos via any software or cloud solution. It's a tonne easier to simply pull out a SD card and copy the files to you laptop/desktop.

      The cost of buying the higher end phone with more memory would be fine if it wasn't for the fact that the manufacturers charge at least 4x as much as it would cost to buy a SD card. Plus, you can add memory by simply buying a larger SD card. To expand your phone storage on a phone without an external SD card slot, you have to buy a whole new phone....

    35. Re:Translation: by whh3 · · Score: 1

      I know that this is not insightful or interesting or modworthy, but I am so mad at the prospect of Google's actions here that I am taking the time to post.

      The *only* reason that I bought a) an Android-based device and b) a Nexus is because I value a "pure" option. I have been fooled by Google several times already -- the Galaxy Nexus and the Nexus 5 -- when they decided that they were no longer going to support software updates on those devices. That decision has forced me to upgrade earlier than I originally planned. However, I bit the bullet because I knew that I could get something comparable (sw-wise) with better hardware performance.

      This change, however, might be the straw that breaks this camel's back. I hope that I/we are wrong about their plans for the upcoming device. I've been looking forward to this new release but now I am really apprehensive.

      Will

      --
      remove nospam. to email!
    36. Re:Translation: by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I remember when I needed the additional capacity provided by the SD Card.

      These days the phone has adequate storage. I don't need to back up all 400 of my Youtube videos on it; an SD Card just isn't needed.

      My current phone does have a slot for one, it just wasn't a factor in my decision to buy it.

    37. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So what are these people going to do?

      Wait for the all-powerful magic "free market" to solve their problems!

    38. Re:Translation: by ryanmc1 · · Score: 2

      I stopped buying Nexus phones a while ago when they jacked up their prices. I switched to OnePlus. It is an excellent phone with a nearly stock android experience. I am s still using the OnePlus One, and might upgrade to the OnePlus Four if they put a 4k screen on it.

    39. Re:Translation: by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't lock the bootloader, like on verizon phones, I don't care what it comes out of the box running. But I won't buy it if I can't root it. Unlike most Android fanboys, I WOULD go back to iPhone if they take that away from me.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    40. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have clearly removed "don't be evil" from their branding. Draw your own conclusions.

    41. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point why wouldn't they just buy whatever the latest galaxy phone is instead? If you're going to be stuck with a phone full of bloat you might as well at least get a good one?

    42. Re:Translation: by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      "We want to load up our devices with even more shit that nobody wants or needs, and make it even harder for you to remove it."

      Don't be evil my ass.

      But Judge, EVERYBODY'S doing it! Waaaah

    43. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a nexus 6 because I felt lonely and thought is always listening feature would give me some company

    44. Re:Translation: by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      ...So what are these people going to do?

      I don't think any of them are moving to iPhone. Maybe a select few will finally decide to take the CM plunge. But the rest are just going to get the new bloated-up "G" phone, and any others will just get some other Android phone...

      If I were a brain at Google, it seems like a good means to a void-of-warranty excuse-maker. More may want to root and block ads or, like you said, CM-it. Either way, warranty is voided and overall cost is reduced. Plus you make a good point about adding extra crap to spy with more. I'm on the fence.

    45. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "If iPhone 7 comes with a headphone jack, then several hundred of megabytes of wailing and screeching will have been written for absolutely no point."

      You've been to /. before right? 'megabytes of wailing and screeching' is all that it is.

    46. Re:Translation: by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      ...This is no different from everyone bitching and complaining about Windows 10... the customers aren't going to go anywhere, they're just going to complain and then bend over.

      Speak for yourself, ankle-grabber.

      Agreed. Shh.. don't tell anyone, but I'm researching a move of all users at my company to Linux with only one Windows machine for Windows-only applications we need to use for our line of work; RDP box, of course.

      MS, you lost with the Windows 10 BS. Google started it, but you could have kept more business by being a pseudo-defector.

    47. Re:Translation: by Shadow+IT+Ninja · · Score: 1

      While you are probably right, I have no problem it this as long as Google continues to offer terms of service which allow rooting and replacement of the OS with an alternative such as CyanogenMod. Current Nexus models are among the easiest to set up with CyanogenMod because you don't actually have to crack them to do it. There is also much less risk of bricking the device.

    48. Re:Translation: by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I stopped buying Nexus phones a while ago when they jacked up their prices. I switched to OnePlus. It is an excellent phone with a nearly stock android experience. I am s still using the OnePlus One, and might upgrade to the OnePlus Four if they put a 4k screen on it.

      My Nexus 6 is more than enough for my needs. I treat it nicely and it still looks new. If Google puts a self-destruct mechanism into unlocked bootloader Nexus 6 phones (or any other BS that encourages hardware "upgrade") and I lose this phone, I'm not getting another. I'm getting a mobile phone-phone and using a Linux-loaded tablet.

    49. Re:Translation: by Shadow+IT+Ninja · · Score: 1

      TFA doesn't say that. Like you, I also worry that the change could mean an end of Google allowing rooting and boot unlocking but there is no specific indication that I am aware of yet that this will happen. So it's just speculation unless you have another source.

    50. Re:Translation: by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Nobody thinks the free market is "all-powerful" or "magic". It could solve their problems, if they're willing to pay more for a phone like that and make that known to companies. But, like everything else, the market is limited to what information people have. Companies usually won't make a product if they don't know that people want it.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    51. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great comments. You touched on the exact reason I went Nexus instead of CyanogenMod. It isn't because I can't mod my phone to get a more vanilla android, but I just didn't want the hassle. Even more it was easier to dev on an OS that was closer to what I would expect other android devices to be able to handle. Alphabet is killing Google.

    52. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for your offtopic rant about how much you hate Apple and Android fanbois, which translates as "see how much cooler I am than all of them?"

      And thanks for your even further offtopic rant about his offtopic rant which translates to "see how much cooler than him you are"...

      Which means *I* am even cooler than you!

    53. Re:Translation: by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Music ... Between all the online streaming sources available, why? Eclectic tastes? Online Streaming has really opened up my sources considerably, something a stock library cannot do.

      Photos? That's what my Camera is for. I don't take a lot of photos with my phone, because it is really inadequate compared to a real camera.

      Videos? Same as Photos. My Camera does way better video than my phone. In the times I do need to snap a video, I live stream it in case I get arrested for video taping it .. and SD doesn't cut it for security.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    54. Re:Translation: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The other problem is the size of the market:

      If there's 300 million people happy to buy your phone with bloatware because they're stupid and don't care and don't know any better (and attempts to educate them fail) and are unwilling to pay extra for a bloatware-free version, and there's 20,000 people who want to buy your phone but without bloatware, guess who the company is going to listen to? It usually isn't worth it for companies to cater to small niche customer groups, even if they're willing to pay more. With some things, some smaller and more agile competitor can come in and cater to these customers, but that only works in some instances. Not many people are willing to spend ten times as much for a phone just to have a bloatware-free version (and those who are buy a Vertu, but these are people who can afford Ferraris and Bentleys), and with smartphones, it's not really a market where a competitor can seriously make something that rivals what a company like Samsung can make. (The Vertu phones appear to have the electronics outsourced to Nokia or some other larger maker, so they're not doing it all in-house.)

    55. Re:Translation: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's my attitude. And you can try out CyanogenMod on one of these, as the Samsung flagship phones are usually the best for running alternative ROMs due to their popularity and top-grade hardware.

    56. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might also be that they are going to split up Android a bit more.
      With the claims and investigations in Russia, the EU and possibly the US about monopoly abuse by pushing Google services with the Play store, they might just want to make the distinction between Android (the operating system, have at it) and their software (Music, Play, Books, etc..) more clear.

      And this new device will have both Android as well as the Google services.

    57. Re:Translation: by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      That's also a good point - generally, you can't make all that many different versions of products, especially when they're not super expensive - so you design around the major demands as much as you can.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    58. Re:Translation: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So, you got pissed that they offer the Nexus 5X for $349, and went to the OnePlus that sells a $399 phone.

      It seems you didn't look too critically at that decision.

      https://store.google.com/categ...
      https://oneplus.net/oneplus-3

      Also, what idiot would put a 4k display into a 5 inch screen? What is the point? I can't even use my 15.4" 4k display at native resolution, I have to blow up everything by 200% (I think) to even be able to read it, what would be the point of blowing everything up by 600%, you aren't getting better detail at that resolution, it is just like the megapixel wars, pointless.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    59. Re:Translation: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I doubt rooting the phone would be any help, Google doesn't put media card slots into their branded phones, so you would have nowhere to load the roms from if you decided to switch to Cyanogen.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    60. Re:Translation: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      In the US at least, they cannot void the warranty for you replacing the software, it just voids the software warranty.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    61. Re:Translation: by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      In the US at least, they cannot void the warranty for you replacing the software, it just voids the software warranty.

      Must have changed. My last phone (heck, I don't even remember what it was at this point; my Nexus 6 has survived and been good for so long!) had a hardware-triggered flag it set in the base firmware that indicated that the phone had been unlocked (hence, modified from factory locked image). This couldn't be reset to look like the phone was unmodified unless you downloaded an app (at the time it was free but ended up costing a lot of money because they realized people really needed it). I don't remember the app's name, either! Ringing a bell with anyone?

      I had to exchange the phone because somehow it got set to "hick mode", basically where it stayed connected to a tower for as long as possible until it absolutely couldn't anymore before trying to hop to another. It was some flaw in the hardware or the modem firmware. Not sure because a reload of ALL images on the phone didn't correct it. Note: it started doing it after visiting a relative in TN, hence "hick mode" ~= "country area with few-but-strong towers that are very far apart on mountain tops mode". That made things not work very well when I returned to my "greater-Cincinnati with lots of towers all over the freaking place" area. It would stay connected to a distant tower and even have data speeds so low it was nearly unusable for data until I moved far enough away from whatever tower that was. Then, it would connect to the nearest tower at the time, but when I returned to the area where I was (working or living) at the time, it would be back to crap data speed because I was far away from the tower I used to correct it. Weird, eh? Obviously it's a function that the cell site hardware manufacturers / Motorola / ATT / any of the two together used to auto-set phones to "hick mode" to prevent the device from constantly trying to connect to a stronger tower when out in the country where all towers were weak, relatively speaking, but the strongest of the weak could change if you move an inch in any direction (EM fields are fun). That's why I give it the strong name of "hick mode".

      AT&T said they were aware of some kind of a problem that made that happen but weren't sure what exactly did it because very few phones were returned after having it happen, but all were phones that were normally in a city-type area and then traveled out to the less-populated country area, and back to city again. There was no known fix at the time. Since I had to exchange the phone for a replacement, I had to use this app to reset the "user unlocked it code" before I went in to do the exchange with a freshly-installed factory image, because warranty was voided if this code was > 00.

      I wouldn't call that a software warranty, given the context. Hence, wondering where you get this term from. I'm not being an ass; please trust me. I'm just wondering.

    62. Re:Translation: by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      ADB debugger, the way I currently do it now.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    63. Re:Translation: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Last time I played around with Cyanogen, you had to load the rom from SD card in order to burn it to the internal flash. Without any kind of SD slot, I am unsure of where you would store the image in order to load it onto the phone.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    64. Re:Translation: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      If it was more recent, I would take the issue to the Better Business Bureau. There may be other things you could do as well, like the FTC. It is illegal, but I am not sure who oversees the warranty things like that.

      It looks like this Wikipedia entry actually has the remedies that can be used:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    65. Re:Translation: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      While researching this more, I found this article explaining the issue and reasoning:

      http://motherboard.vice.com/re...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    66. Re:Translation: by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      While researching this more, I found this article explaining the issue and reasoning:

      http://motherboard.vice.com/re...

      Thank you. I was sifting through legal documentation and trying to find out where I had an opportunity to work around the loosely-worded portion "... or by unreasonable use..."

      You are a gentleman and a scholar. Etc. etc. Thanks.

    67. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you do that if you want to flash from recovery, like Clockworkmod or TWRP. Using Android Debugging Bridge (ADB) you flash the firmware straight to NAND via USB connection to a computer.

    68. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were to take a stab at guessing, the phone you had was either a Galaxy S2 or S3, and the app you downloaded was TriangleAway.

    69. Re: Translation: by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      S3, TriangleAway, yes! Thank you, Anonymous person who probably won't read this. :D

    70. Re: Translation: by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, ok, that is what I was missing.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    71. Re:Translation: by piojo · · Score: 1

      At this point why wouldn't they just buy whatever the latest galaxy phone is instead? If you're going to be stuck with a phone full of bloat you might as well at least get a good one?

      Bad buttons. If they want me to press and hold stiff hardware buttons before they take action after a 800 ms delay, they should pay me for that job. I'd use any phone before Samsung, possibly even an iPhone.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    72. Re:Translation: by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Music- data costs. I have a plan where I pay 10 dollars per GB. I generally use under 1 GB per month. Why stream and pay if I already have the music I want?

      Photos- I threw out my camera 3 phones ago. I don't want to carry extra hardware, and the difference in quality is negligible given I almost never take photos and I'm a mediocre photographer with no interest in getting better. I have no reason to ever buy a camera again. I actually have more accidental screenshots in my photos directory than I have purposely taken photos.

      videos- see photos.

      That said- my few photos I do take are synched to the web instantly for backup, and I have plenty of storage for music without an SD card.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    73. Re:Translation: by Polyneikos · · Score: 1

      You might have already realized this if you've thought about it since posting, but I suspect he was referring to the time when they went from the Nexus 5 at $399 to the Nexus 6 at $699. That was the same year that the OnePlus One was released. (2014)

    74. Re:Translation: by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I went from a 32GB Moto X (2013) to a 16GB Nexus 5X (2015?) and I have to say, am I constantly running out of photo space on my phone. And I only take a couple photos a day on vacation. That extra 16GB makes a tremendous difference. If there was an option to get the Nexus 5X with an SD card, I would take it, and just swap in new SD cards when they got full, and rotate through them at a leisurely pace.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  3. Well this sucks ... by Monoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have owned two Nexus7 tablets. I still have the second one and use it every day. It is getting a bit old but I haven't replaced it because they stopped making the 7 in favor of the larger 9 which is too expensive. The 7 was a great bloat-free device at a great price ($200 ish). I was hoping Google would reintroduce the 7 but I guess those hopes are lost. Time to start looking at some replacement candidates. Suggestions?

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    1. Re:Well this sucks ... by TheReal_sabret00the · · Score: 2

      Get yourself a Nvidia Shield K1 tablet. It's everything the Nexus 7 iterations should've been.

    2. Re:Well this sucks ... by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Custom firmware will make most brandname hardware work well.
      It's the lack of excessive preinstalled malware that made Nexus devices special.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Well this sucks ... by guises · · Score: 1

      I'll second this. I've got a Shield (identical to the K1 except it comes with a stylus) and it's very nice. I'm not really on the tablet bandwagon, they still feel like kinda useless ancillary devices, but the Shield Tablet is better than I would otherwise have hoped for at that price point. I really like the stylus too, wish more manufacturers would take advantage of that.

    4. Re:Well this sucks ... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Their website says:

      *Out of stock

    5. Re:Well this sucks ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if u want something for the long term go with windows or a stable open source project

      Google sucks the big one if you are considering full lifecycle, stability and total longevity - prob why Amazon and MS overtake them as serious business cloud providers.

    6. Re:Well this sucks ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have owned two Nexus7 tablets. I still have the second one and use it every day. It is getting a bit old but I haven't replaced it because they stopped making the 7 in favor of the larger 9 which is too expensive. The 7 was a great bloat-free device at a great price ($200 ish).

      I presume you are literally talking about the second one, the Nexus 7 2nd, because the Nexus 7 1st was poop.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Well this sucks ... by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Today you can buy Nvidia Shield K1 8inch tablet for around 200USD. It's a almost two year old model, but it came out originally with kickass specs and cost 400USD. In 2016, it's a good value.

      For something more high end, consider the 2016 Galaxy Tab S3 which is going to be announced any week now.

    8. Re:Well this sucks ... by Monoman · · Score: 1

      Yes. I had the first one for a year and it was fine. Got the 2nd gen and sold the first get.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    9. Re:Well this sucks ... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      If current trends continue, 7" will be a phone size in the near future.

    10. Re:Well this sucks ... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      Amazon will have them in 5 days:

      https://www.amazon.com/NVIDIA-...

    11. Re:Well this sucks ... by ausekilis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not that it's entirely bloat-free, but the Samsung Galaxy Note series are pretty nice and can sometimes be found on Woot or other such sales sites. I have the 2014 edition and use it as a small digital sketchbook and e-reader, which I picked up for $300 on Woot a while back.

      Sure, it's Samsung and has some of the Samsung-specific apps, but many can be disabled and/or shoved into a "bloatware" folder and ignored. Plus the tablet takes a MicroSD card so you can greatly expand the storage space, I think up to 64GB.

    12. Re:Well this sucks ... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I still have the original Nexus 7. It survived a bad fall - the case detached at the screen, but with careful pushing I managed to place it back. This tablet is fantastic and still does all I need.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    13. Re:Well this sucks ... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Maybe Apple will have to hire tailors for their release day.

    14. Re:Well this sucks ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am still using Nexus 7 (1st gen). The software is obviously 5.1.1 but it started to get sluggish at around 5.0.
      It has been very sluggish for a year now and it decided to turn off the wifi when the device is sleeping (might be related to the original battery it still has).
      But other than for it taking 1..5 minutes after waking it from sleep, it still works OK.

    15. Re:Well this sucks ... by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      I've got a 7 and a 10. I don't have interest in a 9. When I want big, I want big (10 is almost too small). And when I just want to read, the 7 is the perfect size. You'd think they'd want me to buy multiple tablets, rather than trying to come up with a one-size-fits-all approach.

    16. Re:Well this sucks ... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I like the Samsung sketch/note application on those too. But I agree, it's a shame you can't uninstall the other Samsung shovelware.

    17. Re:Well this sucks ... by zephvark · · Score: 1

      I had the original Nexus 7. It just stopped working. It wasn't much missed, as I had the second version also... which dropped a few feet and decided to stop working. Looked perfect. Wouldn't turn on.

      For $200-ish, those were mighty fragile toys.

    18. Re:Well this sucks ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is it might be a one of a kind flagship, I think nvidia is not interested into giving it a successor as it sells follow up chips for Google Pixel and Nintendo instead.

    19. Re:Well this sucks ... by TheReal_sabret00the · · Score: 1

      To be fair, they've already followed it up. The K1 is the second iteration.

  4. root by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope it's still easy to unlock boot and root.

  5. isn't it already like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nexus "stock" Android is AOSP + Google stuff (i.e., libraries and Google apps I don't want and mostly disable).
    What's the difference, beside s/Nexus/G ?

  6. Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After hearing great things upon great things of the Nexus series, I went out and got a 5x last year. Can't say i was dissapointed, monthly updates, no bloatware. It's like i actually got a device to work FOR me, and not try to push every single service some manager in the basement came up with in order to feel they are doing their job(im looking at you samsung and everyone else). Its a phone, I use it for travel and music and internet, and the odd call or text, and it completes these tasks perfectly.

    1. Re:Damnit by Tx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So what's your problem? There's no reason to believe that other than changing the branding, there's going to be any major change in direction. They probably want to drive some slightly more interesting hardware designs, as the Nexus phones have become a little boring.

      I had a Nexus S back in the day (still in a drawer somewhere actually), with the contoured Super AMOLED screen; that was an interesting and distinctive phone at the time. By comparison, there's not much exciting about my Nexus 5, it's a good phone at a decent price, but that's as exciting as it gets. So if they're going to make things more interesting again with the hardware, I'm all for it.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re: Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the Nexus 5. Its power button broke in a very common way that a large percentage of phones broke. I got a Nexus 5x. Terribly disappointed. The 5x had no hdmi out option, no miracast option, no wireless charging, cost 50 dollars more and all I got was a crappy fingerprint sensor. The 5x was no upgrade. I just got a oneplus 3 for my son (6g ram 64g int dual sim) for the same price as the Nexus 5x. Google stopped and value. End of an era I guess. I'm one lost customer (worth 5 family phones I manage).

    3. Re: Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't bring up the chromecast. What a hacked solution. That was a terrible downgrade too. Used to work on small hotspots without external access such as on a cruise or camping or travelling/presenting. Could serve up local content. Now the devices wont work without external internet nanny phone home. Idiotic. Chromecast used to be fine but the broke it and used it as an excuse solutiin to no hdmi options on the nexus 5x. They botched this one.

    4. Re: Damnit by omnichad · · Score: 1

      no miracast option

      That's an Android-wide change. They removed that because they want you to use a Chromecast.

    5. Re:Damnit by FrankHaynes · · Score: 2

      You know what I find "exciting" in a phone? Something that actually works. A phone that
      - has good sounding transmit and receive audio,
      - is mechanically sound so something stupid like a 10 cent power button doesn't make it a brick,
      - has a decent viewable screen.

      You can have your exciting "keeping up with the Samsungs" features, thank you very much. That's just chasing a feather in the wind.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    6. Re:Damnit by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      Have.. I mean, have you used any Samsung products lately? I own a Nexus 5, Nexus 6P, Samsung Galaxy S6, S7 and Note 7 (I do a lot of hardware testing). They are all rock solid, but the most rock solid is the S7 and Note 7. Without question, they are very well made devices, and stand up to a lot more than the Huawei 6P. The LG Nexus 5 is pretty solid, but there are problems especially with the power button (a problem that plagued older Samsung phones).

      So when I see comments like this, I can only picture some luddite tightly gripping his Nexus 4 screaming about quality without ever having tried a new phone and just hating on it in principal.

    7. Re:Damnit by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      Not lately, no. I've been Ludditely gripping my ancient Samsung Galaxy S2 because I've modded it to suit my needs, it works, and don't want to go through the pain of mastering a new phone unless it will be a game-changer for me. That's why I have to find reviews and evaluations that cut through the noise of shiny new features and get to the meat of the matter to find out if the phone works *as a phone* and can withstand daily use.

      If I were to get something other than a Nexus it would be a Samsung based on the build quality of this S2 and reports from others over the different models they have put out.

      But I will be doing plenty of research first to ensure that it suits my needs. I have not begun that search yet, but if Google releases their next iteration of the Nexus/Gphone this October (based on their historic pattern) I will have to begin that search in earnest.

      Nexus is a brand, not a specific device. Google contracts with whatever manufacturer gives them what they want so any given model could be good or it could be crap, sure enough. My comments were not referring to any particular model, just pointing out what matters to me instead of breathlessly drooling over a new iPhone because it's an iPhone or a new Nexus just because it's a Nexus like so many do.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    8. Re:Damnit by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      I love the Nexus 5. I've literally thrown it at a rock before (Accidentally, if that makes sense) and concrete, no damage at all (Though I am using a rubber/plastic case).

      The camera is a complete potato, but aside from that it still works perfectly. The camera is the only reason I would ever want to upgrade.

    9. Re:Damnit by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I think it's a bit early to call the S7 or Note 7 the most rock solid phones--when I talk about durability, I mean that over a 2-4 year period, and these've only been out a few months/weeks. You may yet be right, but I still think you might be jumping the gun a little.

    10. Re:Damnit by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Aaaaand now there's a global recall on every single one.

  7. "I have to get me a Google phone" thought nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is a well known brand, but has Google ever made something other than the search engine that people are proud to have and use? As far as I can tell, Android is a negative brand: It's defined by the things it doesn't do, i.e. lock you into a walled garden.

  8. So, no free image uploads after all then? by Cryophallion · · Score: 1

    http://www.androidpolice.com/2...

    I loved putting mods with aosp on my phones, and I was actually thinking about a nexus next (although Google constantly deciding not to include a removable battery and at times a microsd card turned me off to them previously).

    I'm all for rebranding... But the nexus line was actually good branding for them. I don't see a need for it. Then again, most branding people and designers sometimes find it a bit too easy to switch things up in case it could be better...

    But there goes all that free photo storage. I knew it was too good to be true.

  9. Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The only reason I bought the Nexus devices was because of the vanilla version of Android. So where does that leave me? Is Cyanogen still evil too? Any good alternative after market firmware?

    1. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Flip phones!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by guacamole · · Score: 2

      The Oneplus brand smartphones come with a very basic Android ROM, and they're actually a better value than Google Nexus.

    3. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

      The OnePlus One was a better value, but the Two was pretty clearly lacking in the bang-for-the-buck catagory. The Three is better than the Two, but missing some key features IMHO.

    4. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by guacamole · · Score: 1

      What features? Everything is great. If you mean sd card slot, most people can do just fine with 64GB it already has.

    5. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu?
      Anyway, I have a Firefox OS 1.3 phone and you needed Windows to flash it (!). By the time I was about ready to boot Windows and spend an hour fucking with the phone and files to upgrade it (waiting for a late stage build of Firefox OS 2.5 specifically, so the more I waited the better it would be), Mozilla just axed the whole thing and daily community builds for that specific phone even stopped.
      So : fuck that whole shit.

      get a fanless laptop with Pentium N3700 (Braswell Atom) and a dumbphone?

    6. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Wireless charging

    7. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackberry makes good fairly stock Android devices.

    8. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      What's wrong with Cyanogen, besides the annoyance and difficulty of finding a phone it works well on, rooting it, etc. (i.e., it's not an out-of-the-box thing)?

      If you're talking about CyanogenOS, that's different from CyanogenMod.

    9. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 64GB version is 70 bucks more for 48 more GB of space with no possibility of ever upgrading.

      A 64GB micro SD card gives you 64 more GB of space for less than 20 bucks. And of course you can upgrade if you ever need to.

      This is exactly what people are talking about when they say "features", and "lacking in bang-for-the-buck".

    10. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The only reason I bought the Nexus devices was because of the vanilla version of Android. So where does that leave me? Is Cyanogen still evil too? Any good alternative after market firmware?

      What is "Vanilla?"

      The definition of Vanilla was the look and feel of the phone that came from Google. How does that change if Google's phone now starts adding value added features that aren't part of core Android?

      To me "Vanilla" was like saying copying popular features that other OSes had long before it was standard in Android.

    11. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by ryanmc1 · · Score: 0

      They partnered with Microsoft and preload all the Microsoft apps. I have a OnePlus One and every time I get an OS update they reinstall all the Microsoft apps, and I have to uninstall them. At least I have the option to uninstall.

    12. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      size isn't the point of the removable memory, it's to have the data independent of the device, to have alternate roms or os to boot to on volumes not visable to the android platform. Like free speech and privacy, most people can do just fine without but to take it away for all is a little suspect.

    13. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Incorrect.

      As I said before, CyanogenMod and CyanogenOS are two different things. From my quick google search, what you're talking about does not apply to CyanogenMod, which is entirely open-source. The OnePlus One uses CyanogenOS.

      This is like complaining about Google's telemetry in the Chromium browser (i.e., it doesn't exist, that's in Chrome).

    14. Re:Vanilla is the only flavor I like by Shadow+IT+Ninja · · Score: 1

      CyanogenMod is still an open source, clean version of Android. They are also going to offer Cyanogen OS which will include additions, especially from Microsoft. They are doing this on the side to make some money.

  10. Fucking sick of Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Android has become a fucking nightmare.

    I run a lot of apps. Restricting movement of apps to SD SUCKS and has been the bane of my existence.

    I've had 2 LG G4 phones die (not bootloop but dead wifi/bluetooth). The first time it was as straight replacement. The second replacement was a saga involving being illegally moved off my phone plan etc. I digress.

    What gets me is the process to set the thing up once you get it back. The second replacement was on Marshmallow not Lollipop and LG have decided not to include adoptable storage as an option. So I can have less on my new phone than I did on my old. I tried to use adb to get adoptable storage working, and it did, but the first time I had copied from the old phone's profile and there was an obscure error any time I tried to look at apps or storage. So Reset. The second time I moved all my apps to the adoptable storage and blam. Slow reboot loop. Third attempt I gave up on adoptable storage.

    You wanna change branding Google? I suggest you ditch naming your versions after desserts and start naming them after sexually transmitted diseases., Android Syphilis. Android Genital Warts. Android Gonorrhea. Android Chlamydia

    Oh and FUCK YOU GOOGLE.

    1. Re:Fucking sick of Android by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I still use an LG G2 and it's a great phone for its age. G4 by all accounts I've read was an awful phone. Sometimes good manufacturers make terrible products (like OnePlus Two, or LG G4).

      This isn't Android's fault. This is the fault of LG in this case.

      That said, I like your STD naming system. Android Blue Waffles could be a dessert or an STD name.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Fucking sick of Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got an LG G3 and the biggest problem I have is the screen won't unlock reliably (wasn't like that when I bought it). I mean, sometimes I'm trying to unlock it for a couple minutes. Or I can't end a call I'm on because the screen is locked. I've tried cleaning the sensors but it hasn't helped. Tried several apps for unlocking the screen with a shake or a hotkey but those can't do it. Hopefully LG Support gets back to me and gives me some sort of solution, otherwise this will be my first and last LG phone which would be sad as I like its other features.

    3. Re:Fucking sick of Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The G4 is a terrible phone. Gets stupidly hot doing anything and battery lasts about 4 hours on standby. Had it too long to get a refund so now it's in a drawer as an emergency spare. Basically we're down to two manufacturers, Apple and Samsung. Everything else new is garbage.

    4. Re:Fucking sick of Android by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      It sounds like all your issues are with LG and/or your carrier, not Google/Android proper.

    5. Re:Fucking sick of Android by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like all your issues are with LG and/or your carrier, not Google/Android prope

      And that's the problem. I expect my Windows computer to work like a Windows computer regardless of the manufacturer or the seller. I also expect to get updates directly from MS without having to wait on the OEM and the seller. Why should Android be any different?

    6. Re:Fucking sick of Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a counterpoint i love my G4. It's a little large for my tastes but otherwise has been awesome.

    7. Re:Fucking sick of Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same phone here, rooted and debloated, etc., and it's still very usable these days. Battery life is worse, though I'm not sure if that's due to Lollipop, or natural degradation of battery life despite adherence to proper charging best practices. I've been hoping for an official update to at least a more patched version of Android for this handset for a while now, but reality dictates that if I don't upgrade soon (considering the current Nexus line for Google Fi), I'll go to Cyanogenmod or something similar.

    8. Re: Fucking sick of Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just told us why you don't like LG. What's your beef with Google or Android?

    9. Re:Fucking sick of Android by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      And you can get updates from Google...for the apps that Google directly controls. You don't necessarily get driver updates for all your hardware from Microsoft. Your hardware OEMs may give drivers to Microsoft for convenience, but they still come form the OEM. Any 3rd party software or enhancements that the OEM and/or seller puts on your computer doesn't come from Microsoft, it comes from the OEM, seller, or 3rd party.

      I understand what you're saying, and I think Google is moving more in that direction trying to modularize things so that they can provide updates for critical OS while still allowing individual manufacturers to customize the OS so that it's also unique to them.

      There's advantages and disadvantages to how Android and iOS are set up. Android offers variety but at the expense of long term support across manufacturers, iOS offers consistency and long term support, but minimal variety.

    10. Re:Fucking sick of Android by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      And you can get updates from Google...for the apps that Google directly controls. You don't necessarily get driver updates for all your hardware from Microsoft.

      I also get OS updates and security patches from MS -- regardless of vendor. Microsoft takes it on itself to provide drivers for the most popular hardware. Apple abandoned my 2006 Core Duo Mac Mini when Mac OS went 64 bit only, but I was able to pop in a Windows 7 disk, install it and all of my hardware was recognized -- without any drivers from Apple.

      As far as "3rd party enhancements", if I do end up with crapware on my computer -- I wouldn't, I buy computers from the MS store or the business line of computers -- I can always download a clean Windows image and have a fresh PC install using my MSDN license..

  11. Reference devices? by Misagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand the reason for going away from "vanilla" Android.
    Wasn't the point of the Google Nexus line to produce reference implementations of devices for the Android operating system, to show to other brands by competing with them which minimum features and specifications that Google thought that Android devices should have?

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Reference devices? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      They probably mean that they will support hardware specific to that phone. In the past they have always provided APIs that anyone can use for things like the fingerprint sensor and camera features. Maybe they are planning to allow some stuff that is unique to their phones and not supported elsewhere.

      My guess would be it is related to VR and 3D mapping.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Reference devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also google fi capability (one sim, works anywhere in the world).

    3. Re:Reference devices? by swillden · · Score: 2

      I don't understand the reason for going away from "vanilla" Android.

      Keep in mind that these are rumors, not product announcements.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Reference devices? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm inclined to disbelieve the story because of this. Developers use Nexuses (Nexi?) as a reference platform, and manufacturers know that if their device doesn't run something a Nexus does, then the fault lies with them.

      Completely eradicating Nexus and the concept of a base platform (contrary to myth, the Nexus doesn't run "Stock Android", but "Stock Android with Google's recommended extensions") would make many of the issues Google has been trying to fix a major headache again.

      It's possible that Google intends to release the G branded phones in parallel to the Nexus devices, or that the G branded phones will be reference platforms after all. But the story as written seems improbable.


      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Reference devices? by fermion · · Score: 2
      That was back when Google thought that their smartphone would have enough market penetration and be broad enough that it would make Google a lot of direct and indirect money. Now the market is segmented into Apple, which rakes in most of the profit, and Samsung, which is Android, who sells most of the devices. Google itself no longer has the control it once had, even though it has tightened up the Android license.

      The massive Android ecosystem which would have enriched Google with a monopoly on mobile device like MS had on the desktop never emerged. The reference device idea, which was to spearhead such an ecosystem, turned into an actual competitor that help kill the widespread use. If Google is in fact going to fork Android, give a lesser product that treat other device OEM as competitors, that might really kill Android as a competitor. I don't know where Samsung could go for an OS, but recall that many dominant phone OS have fallen over a very short period of time.

      Also remember that most consumers are buying Samsung, or to a lesser extent Amazon products, not Android.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  12. G-phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G like G-man or G-phone?
    Government phone .... you know, for better espionage ...

    1. Re:G-phone by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 0

      The vibrator works on the G-Spot if you strap it in your G-String.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  13. Chocolate Teapot by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 5, Funny

    This, combined with the gutting of Google Fiber, reminds us yet again that Google is akin to having a hot but crazy lover; really exciting until one day you wake up on fire.

    1. Re:Chocolate Teapot by ninthbit · · Score: 1

      This seems appropriate here:

      Barney Stinson's Vickie Mendoza Diagonal / Hot Crazy Scale
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Chocolate Teapot by phorm · · Score: 1

      You don't really wake up on fire, but you do have to start worrying if burns when you pee...

  14. Android annoyances by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Android has become a fucking nightmare.

    I own an android tablet but frankly I find most Android devices to be more of a PITA than I prefer to deal with. Most of them come with crapware or annoying custom versions that usually don't improve things. I'm not an Apple fanboi but at least for a phone usually I find iOS less headache inducing. When I upgrade my phone all my stuff migrates with minimal to zero problems. Buy an new phone, sign in and all my stuff downloads just like I expect it to. It does most of what I want without getting in my way. Not perfect but fine. The android phones I've used have been an irritation to put it mildly. Plus each vendor does it differently which has no benefit to me. Getting my stuff from one phone to another is a crapshoot, especially if I change vendors. There are some things I like from certain vendors but it's hard to trust that it will remain consistent over time. Plus Android devices too often never get updates which again is of no benefit to me.

    I respect that some people want some features Apple doesn't offer (replaceable batteries, SD storage, etc) or that they don't like the interface or the company. No product is perfect for everyone. But personally I want a nice but relatively simple device for the one I carry around everywhere. So far Apple has fit my needs the best. I'd drop them in a heartbeat if that were to change but so far it's been fine.

    1. Re:Android annoyances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you've never used an Android phone.

      Buy new phone. Log into Google. Wait 5 minutes. Enjoy all your programs downloaded and ready to go.

      It's only been doing this for the last 6 or 7 years though. It's possible you just used an old version and have no justifiable reason to enter this conversation.

  15. Pointless by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google initially built its reputation by offering vanilla Android at affordable prices and that made Nexus 4 and 5 hugely popular devices.

    Then for some reasons they decided to compete with Samsung and other big players by offering the largely insipid (in terms of features) Nexus 6 and it's not like this phone tanked, but it was several times less popular than the preceding Nexuses.

    With the Nexus 5x and 6p Google seemingly lost the remainder of common sense by offering them at the prices comparable to first tier smartphones like Galaxy S6 or Note 5.

    Perhaps Google needs to return to its roots instead of offering barebone phones (no SD slot, no removable battery, no dual sim support, very basic camera setup) for very high prices, since we already have companies which out-android'ed Google: I'm talking about ZTE Axon 7 and OnePlus 3.

    1. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids these days, ignorant of history. Google built Android's reputation on HTC G1, and then the Motorolla solidified it with the Droid line. The Nexus is a relatively recent thing and outside enthusiast circles hasn't ever made much of an impact.

    2. Re:Pointless by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      With the Nexus 5x and 6p Google seemingly lost the remainder of common sense by offering them at the prices comparable to first tier smartphones like Galaxy S6 or Note 5.

      Earlier this year I bought my two 32GB Nexus 5X for $290 and $320 IIRC. Now they can be found for $240 new.

      Where are you finding a Galaxy S6 at a comparable price? The S6 still doesn't retail for what the Nexus 5X retailed 8 months ago and is at least $100 more expensive than what you can find the 5X now.

    3. Re:Pointless by guacamole · · Score: 1

      The fact that some vendors are having "backdoor sales" blowouts of the less than one year old Nexus 5X smartphones (often though ebay) simply proves that Nexus 5X was ridiculously overprices. Just consider these two specs and the price: 2GB of RAM, 16GB of storage, almost 400USD MSRP. Shocking. Granted, I will still buy a google Nexus device over a carrier branded/locked garbage like LG or Samsung phones, but such pricing is not sustainable considering the presence of the Chinese startups like Onepus.

      That's why I am not worried much about what google does. I can always fall back to Oneplus Three, Honor 8 or whatever else replaces those.

    4. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This spring, I bought my 32GB 5X for $250 directly from Google.

    5. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T... considering the presence of the Chinese startups like Onepus.

      That's why I am not worried much about what google does. I can always fall back to Oneplus Three, Honor 8 or whatever else replaces those.

      With a straight data dump back to the chinese government. no thanks.

    6. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to a straight data dump back to the US government... which is intercepted and passed to the Chinese government by the firmware on the chips used in the US governments routers...

  16. Re:"I have to get me a Google phone" thought nobod by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Google is a well known brand, but has Google ever made something other than the search engine that people are proud to have and use? As far as I can tell, Android is a negative brand: It's defined by the things it doesn't do, i.e. lock you into a walled garden.

    I prefer Android to Apple. Both do a good job and there's not really much difference but I do prefer Android.

      Google has lots of products I use. Gmail, Google Maps, Google Voice, Google Drive, Google Photos, Google Labotomy

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  17. Google Nexus = shit build quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Nexus because I thought you can't go wrong with Google. What a chunk of Smegma! The USB connection is so loose and flakey transfer speeds are disgustingly slow. https://www.google.com/search?...

    Call it what you want Google, any hardware you're associated with isn't trustworthy. Stick to Search. Only thing you're good at.

    1. Re:Google Nexus = shit build quality by Cederic · · Score: 1

      That's odd, all three of my nexus branded phones are still working fine - power buttons, usb ports, everything.

      Maybe you've been unlucky or possibly it's a wetware issue.

  18. Nexus phone with vanilla Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason why I stuck with Android. Oh well...

  19. Profoundly Stupid Move? by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's entirely possible that I'm misunderstanding Google's strategy here, but if the summary is correct (the summary contains the vast majority of the article, which, yes, I read), this is a profoundly idiotic move on Google's part. Not necessarily dropping the Nexus name, as that's very minor, but moving away from stock Android. One of the primary appeals of the Nexus was the complete and total lack of crapware.

    I'm going to reserve final judgment until I see more of what Google is doing with its phone brand, as I have a hard time believing that Google's Android division is being run by morons.

    There must be more to this than the story indicates.

    1. Re:Profoundly Stupid Move? by swillden · · Score: 1

      There must be more to this than the story indicates.

      Or less. This is just a rumor.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Profoundly Stupid Move? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hard time believing that Google's Android division is being run by morons

      I don't know why you have such a hard time with that, as it's certainly staffed with morons. Speaking of... I wonder why Google's fawning little lackey, swillden, hasn't popped up to defend their honor yet.

  20. Google should address Android security by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Android's huge problem these days is the number of unpatched devices "out there" because the OEMs don't want to patch those devices and, when the OEMs do patch, the incredible slowness of getting the devices patched and upgraded.

    .
    The proposal under discussion on this thread has no benefit to mitigating those two problems that Android has.

    Why is google putting Android security and upgrades in the low-priority queue?

    1. Re:Google should address Android security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this like complaining about how Linus needs to get the team going to patch all the security flaws in the old Linux kernels that are deployed in older devices and distros that the manufacturers don't want to update? Android is the software, it gets updates. Manufacturers and carriers choose not to update. If you don't want to have an outdated and potentially insecure device, get one from a manufacturer with a track record of having timely updates. It's not that hard, there aren't that many.

    2. Re:Google should address Android security by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that because the manufacturers and carriers are slow to push out updates (if they bother at all), it reflects badly on Android as a whole. Google obviously doesn't want that.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  21. No more Android stuff for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually had two Nexus 7's myself and they were very good. I decided to buy a Asus ZenPad 8 and I can definitely say 6.0 is shit. Slowest POS for a quad cpu I have ever experienced. Last update made it even worse. My old iPad Mini 2 is way faster than the Asus. Google is just failing at a lot of things lately.

  22. Re: "I have to get me a Google phone" thought nobo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I googled all of that and all I found was open.

  23. AOSP, unlocked bootloader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I can't compile my own (unmodified) AOSP ROM as easily as I can now, and install it, I guess I'll have to get a OP3 or something.

    If I can and the new devices don't "feature" some other stupid anti-user choices, Google can do whatever it wants with it's own ROM and I can just go on running xposed and microg.

  24. Because they're going with HTC, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    I rooted my last HTC, (a Desire 510), but it was kind of a 'partial root'. It gave me root access, and I could do things like manipulate system files and run a firewall that requires root. But I couldn't delete crapps like Facebook, Twitter; or rather, I could, but they'd magically reappear after the next hard boot. I tried changing file permissions, and even set immutable, but a hard boot over-rode the perms and restored the original files. I needed to get the phone into "S-OFF" mode, but apparently that wasn't possible with that model. So I never really had full root priveleges.

    It wouldn't surprise me in the least if Google's new HTC phones either couldn't be fully rooted, or couldn't be rooted at all - especially with Google's attitude getting worse and worse. I really wish Firefox and/or Ubuntu had managed to become viable alternatives to Android.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Because they're going with HTC, by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      It just looks like behavior from squashfs and friends. If you wanted to delete system files on your router or live CD permanently, you would have to flash a new firmware image or burn a new live CD, even if you're running as the root account.
      What I'm saying thus is, this crap is to be expected.

      Can you run a script as root on startup that "deletes" the so-called apps? I would settle with that.

    2. Re:Because they're going with HTC, by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Can't you just freeze that crapps. They will still be there but inactive : no launcher button and no background task. They will still take a bit of space but if they are in /system and you don't update them, it is probably won't affect you in any way.

  25. TFA is not even an article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great job linking to the Verge who is just rehashing a rumor article from somewhere else.

  26. It's a shame by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 1

    When they came up with don't be evil, I think they meant it in good faith, it was naive and it was impossible, like pacts to be best friends forever, but at some level the people at the top there believed in this with respect to their muddled conception of evil.

    So this is disappointing. Nexus was at the very least a huge bone to the tech community, and was pretty much the last man standing against a snowcrash vision of the mobile space. It was rooting friendly, and the majority of users kept it hooked into google services anyways.

    So now yeah, they will end this because while a rooting friendly, stock android, top of the line, phone may be a service to the tech community or even to modern humanity itself, it isn't strictly in Google's interests so they will squash it. I am waiting for the day when all phones will be rooting hostile, and for the day that they get really good at enforcing that.

    But in the grand scheme of things, maybe this is trivial in comparison to the evil that is silicon valley's increasing interest in using their gate-keeping positions to control/advance political/social narratives and affect elections.

  27. Re:"I have to get me a Google phone" thought nobod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read that as "Google Lobotomy".

    Having thought about it I do believe that you've misspelled that product name.

  28. Anything to do with the new Blade Runner film? by IRGlover · · Score: 1

    With a new Blade Runner film, I wonder if the name change is partly to distance itself from that - the Nexus name is a homage to the android models in the film, after all. Or maybe it has just run its course, it becomes harder to have distinctive model names for consumers when you just name it after the screen size in inches.

    Alternatively, it is probably part of some evil scheme for Google/Alphabet to spy on us and control our lives by adapting the information we encounter until we are just robotic slaves ready to do the corporation's evil bidding!!!!1!1!!! or something.

    1. Re:Anything to do with the new Blade Runner film? by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's just a name change: http://www.theverge.com/2016/6...

  29. Re:"I have to get me a Google phone" thought nobod by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    It was a joke. Yes, I meant Lobotomy.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  30. Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether you agree or not, it sure seems to me to be tyical Google: acquire or ouright steal your competitor's stuff, create something of a toehold through dubious practices, walk away leaving abandonware in the wake of it all after people are heaviky invested in it. Lather, rinse, repeat. This has been their M.O. Since the late 90s, Microsoft *wishes* it could have been half as evil. I suppose it might even contain a modicum of redemption if they gave a rat's ass about their users, but they don't. :/ If I were a shareholder, I'd punch them in the face as it WILL crash eventually, time is not forgiving.

  31. Timely security updates by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

    Literally the only reason I recommend Nexus devices is because their security update policy is codified and public: monthly security updates for the life of the device (which is listed here: https://support.google.com/nex... ).

    As long as they're still doing that, and keep the bootloader unlockable, the Nexus is still really the only smartphone worth owning. (Yes, Samsung currently does monthly security updates as well, but that's a matter of policy, not a promise to their customers; they could change their policy at any time.)

    1. Re:Timely security updates by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      The doddering old man named Google could just as easily break this "promise" whenever it chose to. Or just "forget" its promise as doddering old men are wont to do. What are you gonna do about it?

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
  32. Re:"I have to get me a Google phone" thought nobod by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you some kind of Apple fanboy or something?

    Yes, Google has made some other big winners: the two biggest ones are GMail and Google Maps. GMail's been going great for over 10 years now (though they pushed through a crappy UI change a while back, but everyone's been making crappy UIs now for some time, including Apple with their buttons that don't look like buttons), and Maps is unparalleled as a platform that provides both mapping, turn-by-turn navigation, plus a business directory, so I can do a search for "greek restaurant" in some unfamiliar city I'm in, find a place nearby, look at reviews to make sure I won't get food poisoning, and then have it navigate me there, all within one convenient app.

    They also have Hangouts Dialer, which lets me make free VoIP calls, and a lot of people seem to like Google Voice.

    They do have a serious problem with abandoning products, so don't make yourself too dependent on them if it's not one of their big flagship products (search, Gmail, Maps), since they do have a history of pulling the rug out.

    As for Android being a "negative brand", that's just plain stupid. It has some serious flaws to be sure, but it's the *only* viable competitor to iPhone, which has gigantic problems of its own.

  33. Eh. by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

    I feel like they're going for what they had when they owned Motorola. Basically stock Android with Google Apps and a few extras (like enhanced camera apps and the like.)

    As long as they don't do things like bundle "special offers" as non-removable systems apps and continue with the Nexus update policy, I don't really see it as a problem. (New versions for at least 18 months, security updates for at least 36 months.)

    Hopefully, this time, they won't sell it all to Lenovo.

  34. Re:"I have to get me a Google phone" thought nobod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    last time I looked apple was morel locked in

  35. Re:"I have to get me a Google phone" thought nobod by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Damn you! I have coffee all over my keyboard!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  36. disappointing, but not surprising by ninjagin · · Score: 1

    I have had three Google reference phones, and all have performed pretty well. I like having bone-stock vanilla Android A LOT, and it eventually let me to adopting Project Fi (which has been pretty good, altogether!). So, naturally, I'm a bit bummed that the days of reference Andriod phones are coming to an end. I hope that there's still some kind of Google-preferred offering to upgrade to when my Nexus 6 gets tired, with a reasonably stock flavor of ANdriod. Since Google is my cell provider, I'll just go to whatever they are pointing to. All the same, I can see how having to keep competitive in the handset space was probably not something they were prepared to do, so I understand it.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  37. Bad Power Button Placement by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    The only reason I didn't stick with Nexus after my 4, was the idiotic decision to place the power button, right under your index finger, where you're holding the phone. I'd say a good 80% of the times I turned that phone on or off were unintentional.

    There aren't many phones that still place it on top, but that was pretty my only requirement for my next phone. Getting tired of all the different models pretty much just being clones of the same crappy design. A little variety would be nice.

  38. Consistency is key by CptLoRes · · Score: 2

    They way Google is behaving is it any wonder that people are starting to mistrust their services and products? How can you rely on something when you know it's just a matter of time before they radically change or discontinue..

  39. Cue Huawei, Xiaomi, BLU..... by gosand · · Score: 1

    I think this is a big opportunity for some of the up and coming brands to grab some market share.
    I have a BLU Life One X and I am not sure how "vanilla" it is, but it's definitely not bloated. It's affordable ($150) has good specs, dual sim, and is unlocked.
    Why would I want an iPhone or Nexus?

    It's kind of a shame that people only think there are a couple of choices when it comes to phones.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  40. name change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the next product will be called Hatchery instead.

  41. Their Moto brand ain't that hot. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    I had the Moto 3 for a few days finding it's battery was hard wired in. Sometimes you just need to pull the battery to fix an error. And it was very bare application wise, good thing not so much stuff you'll never use, bad thing as a simple bar code scanner is handy to have, and only the ones supplied by the manufacture (paid version) work well or at all.

    5 Mpix selfi (second) camera, a bit over kill on that one, but I've always liked Motorola's products. The Xoom tablet was very nice and at 10.5" the perfect size.

    My Moto3 wouldn't call out from my location and one can see the cell tower from here (not that it's the one used), and had to return it. Just before exchanging it I tried it one last time and it worked; but I didn't live in that city.

    Motorola's ToS was very specific in that any info it collected would stay with them and not shared, I LOL'd, Motorola being owned by Google.

  42. Wrong Name Being Dropped by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Screw the focus on dropping the Nexus name. The name they should be dropping is YouTube Red. After all, no matter how their pointy haired folk try to spin it, it will always be easily confused with the already preexisting Redtube.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. gPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not gPhone?