Slashdot Mirror
Ask Slashdot: What Are Anonymous Ways To Pay For Goods and Services?
Long-time Slashdot reader mspohr submitted a report a couple of days ago from Richard Stallman via The Guardian, which argues that we should be able to pay for news anonymously. "Online newspapers and magazines have come to depend, for their income, on a system of advertising and surveillance, which is both annoying and unjust... What they ought to do instead is give us a truly anonymous way to pay." In response to that report, an anonymous Slashdot reader writes: There was a recent article posted here on Slashdot about Richard Stallman and his attempt to make paying for online content anonymous. The corollary to that question is: What are the remaining ways to pay for stuff -- in the "real" world and online -- that are truly anonymous? Even cash can be tracked, but what about other methods? Have we completely given up on anonymous payments? No more anonymous/numbered bank accounts, no more pre-paid/virtual bank cards in Europe (just happened recently), for that matter no more prepaid phone numbers (you have to register the number in Europe)? What is left after we had let the politicos run rampant with forced registrations of all payment services?
The only way.
Barter sexual favors
especially with ammunition. .22LR is gold.
Just kidding. Nobody bothers with that monopoly money.
Did you ever have to take a dump real bad, so bad you barely made it to the toilet .. and then you sit down on the toilet seat, HARD, and your nutsac is just at the right angle that you squash it against the hard seat? Holy fuck that hurts.
Cash? Ever heard of it? You can exchange goods and services for it, and i cant be easily tracked digitally unless they scan each bill.
If you're not a gang member doing huge drug deals or a genuine tinfoil-hat schizo, cash is anonymous enough to satisfy even the most rabid privacy fetishist.
Unless you first repeal all the anti-money laundering laws, otherwise any truly anon services will become money laundering channels -- you set up a anon store selling stuff, then use crime money to buy stuff from another anon seller to sell in your store. At the price of running the store, now all money you received from your buyer are now legit.
is this not why hard currency was invented in the first place?
Buy a bitcoin mining rig, mine some bitcoin behind tor, spend the bitcoin (behind tor & a VPN paid for with some of that bitcoin). Tricky and time consuming, nut (I am told) works for buying porn / drugs / hitmen etc.
Here are a few ideas as to how you pay for something anonymously:
1. Cash (never truely anonymous unless you get someone else to buy it for you or wear a mask, disguise or something!)
2. Visa Gift Cards (may require a shipping address in which case you might want to get a disposable post box or use a friend's house)
3. Bitcoin
However, an interesting point tied to the transaction is how do you receive goods anonymously?
In person: Get someone to receive it for you, wear a mask or disguise
Via shipping/delivery: get a disposable address (e.g. mailboxes etc..., ship to a friend's house, hotel/motel you are staying at).
I guess the reason that there aren't so many options is mostly not a lot of people care if someone knows what they bought and in some cases you actually want them to know (e.g. for a warranty).
I just fax them cash. I keep it along with the fax confirmation sheet as a evidence that I paid.
Same to you. You sound like a stalinist apologetic..
You know, that paper money you referred to as cash isn't hard currency; it's fiat currency.
Let's hope the faith we have in the government continue unabated.
---
Government was a lot like a religion, but lately it felt a lot closer to a cult.
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
so there's that
Payment is optional, but can be mailed in through a remailing service.
Some claim that this brings more attention to yourself, but I disagree. Especially it you cover your tracks.
https://news.slashdot.org/story/16/09/06/2123220/new-snowden-leaks-reveal-more-about-nsa-satellite-eavesdropping
1) Buy a prepaid visa with cash
2) Use a library PC to create an Amazon account
3) Ship the merchandise to an Amazon Locker.
You might be interested to know that there's a funny name for you too: "Victim."
Oddly, statistics show the opposite: the more guns you have, the more likely you are to die by being shot.
Most of that, of course, is suicide-- having guns around turns a brief bad moment into a permanent problem for somebody else-- but even subtracting that, gun owners are more likely to be victims than non gun owners.
(the non-gun owners are likely to back away from a confrontation. The gun owners are somewhat more likely to walk into one.
But "Whitetrash gun nuts" and "victims" are overlapping categories.
That "statistic" is fatally flawed due to the data being about people who were shot. It doesn't include the people who weren't shot (which is almost everyone).
It all depends on how anonymous you're talking. For most things I've always found that cash works quite well.
However, some stores are getting nosy so you may have to use a phony name, the zip code for a neighboring city, and a phone number of someone you don't like or know is disconnected. Most clerks don't really care what they put on the form as they are being order to collect this info by their managers. You learn fairly quickly which stores you can tell you are not interested in their "mailers" and which you have to give false information to.
False. Canadian data show that suicide rates are *not* affected by easy access to firearm, which remains constant post gun control laws.
Monero (http://getmonero.org) is the most private existing cryptocurrency. It is similar to Bitcoin but based on an entirely distinct codebase (CryptoNote). It uses ring-signatures to obscure who is sending the payment, stealth addresses to obscure the recipient, and "Ring Confidential Transactions" to obscure the amount being paid. Soon it will use i2p to hide the IP address of the sender.
Monero is mostly traded on Poloniex.com but can also be acquired for Bitcoin on http://shapeshift.io or using the decentralized p2p exchange https://BitSquare.io
Cash is part of billion dollar drug and gun trades run by large governments. Cash is king. They will never do away with some form of it.
You can support your local newspaper by actually buying one.
You never expect irony, do you?
Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
@iyfwrestling
Wouldn't the statistical number of people who were shot which selected from among only those who were shot be 100%?
A statistical measure of the percentage of people who were shot who own guns isn't necessarily flawed on it's face. I'll grant that taken on it's own, it's not very meaningful. However, if the percentage of gun ownership among shooting victims is higher than the percentage of gun ownership in the general population, you just might have a correlation.
Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
The biggest problem with mass anonymous payment is that it will facilitate criminal transactions. The people most to watch would be the people receiving those payments ie electronically stealing that money and then anonymously paying themselves. Want true anonymous services, do it for free, do it voluntarily and no money need change hands.
Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
Right. Gun assisted suicide is probably the method of choice when they are available, but the real cause of suicide is suicidal tendencies. There are still quite a few relatively easy ways to kill yourself, even without a gun.
The bad part about lack of anonymity in our transactions is that Big Data actually gets us some reasonable legal use cases for privacy like why should my credit card company and everyone they share data with know what kind of porn I buy or what books I read or whether I go out to lunch often and who knows what kind of automated algorithms farther down the chain might do with that info like deny me employment surreptitiously.
I think unfortunately the cat is out of the bag in terms of protecting that kind of data from widespread sharing and mining. The only thing that we can really do now is legislate transparency in how its used (like credit reports) and prohibit discriminatory practices based on it.
Unfortunately financial privacy's primary use case is tax evasion, criminal purchases, and money laundering. I think it is better that we reform laws against consensual crimes like recreational drug use and respect freedom of speech/belief/press as a basic human right and not just count on bad laws being difficult to enforce.
You might be interested to know that there's a funny name for you too: "Victim."
Oddly, statistics show the opposite: the more guns you have, the more likely you are to die by being shot. Most of that, of course, is suicide-- having guns around turns a brief bad moment into a permanent problem for somebody else-- but even subtracting that, gun owners are more likely to be victims than non gun owners. (the non-gun owners are likely to back away from a confrontation. The gun owners are somewhat more likely to walk into one. But "Whitetrash gun nuts" and "victims" are overlapping categories.
An Australian study after the big gun ban showed that even having a gun in the house was associated with a higher incidence of suicide, even if the gun wasn't the method used. Something about the psychology of gun owners or the environment in which they're living?
Canada is a relatively healthy society, compared to the US. Plus, they have universal health care, which means universal MENTAL HEALTH CARE.
You are welcome on my lawn.
But those ways aren't used nearly as often. and they're not nearly as lethal. Some of the most common means of attempting suicides have a success rate of around 5-10%. Very nearly 70% of all successful suicides are with a firearm. Not the number of attempts mind you, but the number of successes. All those other "relatively easy" ways to commit suicide are very often unsuccessful, and that means those people have a chance to get help. Firearm suicides are successful just about 90% of the time, which means a gun owner having a very bad day might be dead when if they didn't have ready access to a gun, they'd still be alive. And if they're still alive, they are very unlikely to die of suicide later.
High-gun ownership states have suicide rates just about double that of low-gun ownership states.
Oh yeah, people who attempt suicide and are unsuccessful are unlikely (less than 10%) to die by suicide later. But since only about 10% of gun-related suicide attempts survive, it's too late for them. Now put all that together for yourself.
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/m...
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/m...
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/m...
You are welcome on my lawn.
And that correlation could be caused by any number of things not related to the safety or lack thereof imparted by gun ownership. For example, people who know they are in more dangerous situations or neighborhoods might choose to arm themselves more often than people in less dangerous situations. It could be a coincidental correlation, like the way the number of tricorn-wearing pirates is inversely related to average global temperature. Without additional data, it's difficult to say.
Where BitCoin is not anonymous, prepaid cards are not anonymous, and even cash is not really anonymous there have been people working on this problem: Zero Proofs. Where Monero and Dash try to fix yesterdays mixers they can't ever truly make things anonymous. For that we need math and that's what the researchers from a variety of academic institutions began working on with Zero Cash. Zero Cash is implemented in Z.Cash and other crypto currencies could eventually adopt. But for now Z.Cash will be the answer to the anonymity problem as the first crypto currency to implement a proper mathematically secure solution to anonymity in crypto currencies. I've been following this since before Z.Cash's existence (when it was a mathematical problem to be solved rather than an implementation one) and it's a very exciting development. The Zcash genesis block will launch in 50 days.
no.. it's not really like that.. mental health care is very hard to get In Canada. It is possible but its more based on who you know. Once you get it its usually 5 minute meetings asking about drug side effects.
https://www.brave.com/
For obvious reasons, governments of this world don't like anonymous payments. They have always and everywhere pushed hard to ensure that payments, and especially large payments, are either not anonymous or dreadfully inconvenient. There has recently been momentum gathering among governments and the academics who serve as their advisors, to begin eliminating large denomination paper currency. They want to get rid of the 100 US Dollar, 500 Euro and 1000 Swiss Franc notes first, followed by the lower denominations like the 50 US Dollar and 50 Pound Sterling. This has a number of advantages from the government's point of view:
1. Large transactions become completely impractical when people are relegated to 20 US Dollar bills and smaller with similar situations in other currencies. This makes life hard on criminals, who depend heavily upon cash, and others whom the governments of this world dislike. Terrorists, for example. This has the side effect of destroying the privacy of ordinary citizens, but governments no longer care about that if they ever really did.
2. If no large bills are available it becomes much harder to stuff cash under your mattress. This opens up new monetary possibilities, such as negative interest rates where your bank balance is always losing value bit by bit and you have no effective relief by converting to cash in large amounts.
3. Because large purchases are no longer practical to make in cash, the government brings even more economic activity into their sphere of taxes and influence. Privacy evaporates in this cash poor world as people are forced to make most purchases electronically and not with small cash bills which will gradually be supplied in ever smaller amounts by the governments of this world.
Wow, that sounds almost unbelievable. I would have thought that the result would have been just the opposite. Oh wait, it was. As multiple studies have shown.
Cash in a brown paper envelope. If it's good enough for our politicians then it's good enough for me.
I make all my questionable purchases using bull sperm. It's like liquid gold.
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazi...
Use that method
The summary asks if there is a truly anonymous way to pay for news. I say, turn it around. Is there a truly anonymous way of getting your news for FREE?
There are none, or at least none that are both anonymous and efficient:
- Coins are anonymous, hard to counterfeit (or rather not cost effective to), but you can't pay for online things with them.
- Banknotes have serial numbers and are undeniably traceable, however you can do a fair amount of "laundering" to disguise the origin, and that's been going on for a century. It's easily made non-anonymous.
- Direct Deposit is pseudo-anonymous. Usually the sender can remain anonymous, but this only works in countries where a "deposit-only" account number can be used (eg Australia) and is easily made non-anonymous.
- Paypal, and such are not anonymous in even the slightest. If you've ever had a paypal account, Paypal knows who you are, where you live, and every place you've ever lived since it's inception.
- Bitcoin, Dogecoin, etc are designed to not be anonymous. The fact that people need to cash out to be able to use it domestically pretty much ensures that it's not anonymous.
So how do you pay for things while remaining anonymous? The answer to that is, you don't. If it were possible, all the drug, weapons, and people smugglers would be using it. The key is rather to trade one service for another. Answering a quiz, or letting ads run works for smaller publications. For larger more top-heavy publications, this is pretty much not going to happen, because "news" isn't valuable unless it's exclusive, and nobody is going to pay for a subscription to a news site when there is another that is free (eg many news sites just republish AP news to back-fill the rest of their content.)
You want to pay for "news" ?
It has to be said (though granted, I do not know yet if it has actually already been said)...
Cash, grass, or ass.
This space unintentionally left blank.
In places with heavy gun control they are. Just off the top of my head, asphyxiation either by rope (hanging - reliable even when done quite poorly) or oxygen displacement (carbon monoxide - popular in some countries with high automobile ownership rates) are extremely reliable and effective. So are falls from sufficient heights and drowning (tie one end of a rope around your neck, the other end through a cinder block, then jump into a body of water and it's highly unlikely you'd survive either the fall or the water). Another method off the top of my head (but probably a rather uncomfortable way to go) is to go into a small enclosed space (closet, car, etc) and pour bleach and ammonia into a bucket (produces chlorine gas). Going out with a bang is also possible if you fill a structure with gas, then open a window and provide a flame/spark.
If you think you need a gun to kill yourself, you're clearly not that committed.
Mr Vaz?
Many of the supposed "suicide methods" are used by attention seekers. Especially females. Things like blood loss from wrist slitting, while alarming to the viewer, are unlikely to result in death. Likewise for most overdoses. If you correct for these, almost everyone that sets out to commit suicide is successful with whatever tools they have at hand. The fact a firearm is almost always successful is more a function of simplicity and the fact those that employ them are serious about it.
Are you a Stallmanist apologist?
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
High-gun ownership states have suicide rates just about double that of low-gun ownership states.
I think that might have something to do with the fact that most high gun ownership states are sexually repressive, high-poverty shitholes. The reason for high gun ownership in these states is cultural tradition that I don't feel like dissecting at the moment, but It's pretty obvious that the causation isn't flowing in the direction you imply.
Some of the most common means of attempting suicides have a success rate of around 5-10%.
And people do tend to realize, at least on a subconscious level, that guns are serious business wereas pills aren't so much.
The most important stat here is ease of gun purchase vs. overall suicide rate. The USA is well known for having some of the most liberal gun purchasing laws among all first world nations (even in blue states, it's really not hard at all. In those states, it's primarily the carry permits that can be tricky to get.) and our suicide level is a depressing... 50th. We're below nations like: Japan, South Korea, the Czech republic, Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovenia, Russia, Serbia, Iceland, Finland, Belgium, France...
You'll notice that those are all highly or medium-highly developed countries. Many of them have social safety nets that put ours to shame. Several of them are highly religious, and several of them are highly non-religious.
The one thing that they all have in common, I believe, is that it's harder to buy a gun and bullets in any of them than it is in most places in America.
The real argument with guns is violent crime rate. There's a real debate to be had there. The people who bring up suicide rate are not only being disingenuous by omitting the most important statistic (USA is merely 50th in the world, and that's omitting many countries where the reporting is subpar) but they are pandering to the most pathetic kind of unthinking nanny state impulse:
First off, do you or don't you support the right to die for people who are terminally ill? Just out of curiosity. Second, do you know what are even more effective than guns? Hydrogen sulfide generated through common household products or carbon monoxide from charcoal briquettes. As long as your tank is big and your bag doesn't have a hole in it, even helium is far more likely to work, and would be entirely painless. And I can easily think of a half a dozen more ways that don't suffer from the lingering question marks that gunshots do. Unless or until the entire internet becomes highly censored, you simply can't keep these techniques a secret any more.
Some of the most common means of attempting suicides have a success rate of around 5-10%.
That's because those "methods" are chosen by those that do not really wish to die. If someone really wants to commit suicide then they will chose a method that will be effective if done properly and they will almost certainly do it properly barring accidental failure. The extremely low success rates you point to are indicative of people who are extremely poor at planning, who may be impulsive (see poor planning), or who are simply not serious about terminating their existence and want some attention.
Most of these methods takes planning. Someone who is thinking about killing themselves in time even if just a few minutes can cause them to change their mind.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
However health care in Canada isn't as advanced as it is in the US. Also there is far more red tape to try to get treated.
I am not saying that the US is perfect however there are pluses and minuses to both systems.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
You can pay with monero. It is safe. Major dark markets already support it.
The first is obvious. It is cash. It is used almost everywhere. It is pretty well accepted and the usage is legal. Even Homer knows that money can be exchanged for goods and services.
Sex is the second one. It is accepted on many places, but not always and it will be highly dependable on request and demand. If it is legal will depend on where you are. Some can get higher grades, promotions, housing or even drinks,.
Theft is the third one. This only in one way and it is illegal if you want it to be anonymous. It can become legal if you have traces, like being a large company or a bank.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
So you take that serial number tracked cash from the ATM, and drive over to Walmart or a gun store or a porn shop and buy some shit. Do you think those places are quarantining the cash from each purchase and recording the serial numbers and locking it all down to create a chain of evidence for the feds to find later? Are you really that fucked up? Might as well believe every new $100 bill has a super-secret magic RFID tag that broadcasts its location on radio frequencies only the CIA can monitor. That's about as credible a threat.
statistics show the opposite: the more guns you have, the more likely you are to die by being shot.
That's not what they show.
Most of that, of course, is suicide-- having guns around turns a brief bad moment into a permanent problem for somebody else-- but even subtracting that, gun owners are more likely to be victims than non gun owners.
I bought a handgun not because I wanted to go shoot people, but because I was worried about being harmed by a specific person who was a relative. Calling the cops would have been useless, and only exacerbated the situation. People who are more likely to be attacked are more likely to choose to own guns. If I'm risking a stabbing, it doesn't matter if I risk losing control of my gun and getting shot. It would hardly leave me worse off than being shot. It takes fifteen minutes to even get to my house and it's on a winding road so going faster in an ambulance is not an option. If I wind up on the financial hook for a life flight, I might as well just commit suicide because I'll be in debt for eternity.
Guns prevent crime every day, but just doing so is illegal ("brandishing") so the law discourages an accurate accounting.
I don't care if guns make suicide "easier". Sorry, but I really don't. So a few more people kill themselves. Whoopee. Taking the guns out might reduce the suicide rate slightly, and in exchange we get to be surrounded by more people who don't really want to be here. If we want to reduce suicide rates substantially, we're going to have to make some serious changes to our society. I'm all in favor of that, but removing the guns won't produce the change you're looking for. It will produce a whole lot of them which you aren't, though.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
And? You want to kill yourself, do it. The world is better off without weaklings of your kind.
False. Canadian data show that suicide rates are *not* affected by easy access to firearm, which remains constant post gun control laws.
Does the Canadian data show that's the case in Canada or everywhere?
Wanna buy a shirt?
https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
Governments can do what they want the way they want with no accountability whatsoever. They don't need cash. It's the little people whom they want brought to heel. And it will happen.
America has the best and most advanced health care in the world, but only if you are rich. Average Americans may as well live in a third world country for the quality of care received. So yes, Canada has a less advanced health care system that consistently gives better results than the American system (on average).
If it works for you, I've no objection.
You are welcome on my lawn.
You were doing really well until you dropped that red herring.
Fewer than 2% of suicides are due to terminal illness.
You are welcome on my lawn.
I specifically attached a "just out of curiosity" to that bit. It's a side tangent I choose not to fully explore in the interests of brevity, but it was relevant to the larger (but still secondary) point I was making about the suicide argument being a pathetic and doomed-to-fail appeal to a nanny state mentality.
The government clearly has a role in preventing people from harming each other (and in that area, you have a reasonable although not bulletproof argument that gun availability is causing significant suffering in America.) The government's role in preventing people from harming themselves is much less obvious. I think it sets a worrying precedent and is doomed to failure anyway because, as I said, there are plenty of other highly effective methods of suicide (or other kinds of self-harm) that the government cannot realistically combat.
Bitcoins. (I thought this might be obvious or even implied by the original article.)
..bitcoin + tor or something like that ? hmmmmmmmm....
Buy some pre-paid mastercards. They sell them at any home depot or lowes or grocery chain. Pay in cash. Done. Now you have a card with $200 on it. Anonymous. Use it online or where ever.
Buy a pre-paid phone, use your new pre-paid card. Now you have a burner phone. Enjoy.
statistics show the opposite: the more guns you have, the more likely you are to die by being shot.
That's not what they show.
Uh, that's exactly what the parent poster's links show. Care to back your assertion up with something besides, say, assertion? Let me quote the abstract from the first link:
"The analyses found positive associations between gun availability and gun suicide rates and no evidence of displacement to other methods."
Frankly, I'm not going to bother reading the second link if you can't be bothered to actually refute the clear language of something cited against you.
Not an anonymous way to pay for things, but it is still possible to get news and information anonymously through good old AM/FM Radio. I think the neo-liberal complex is going to try to dismantle it in the coming years by trying to make us pay for streaming subscriptions, which makes me incredibly sad, and I think we should try to prevent it.
Correlation is not causation.
I live in one of the states you are referring to. My state has a very high gun ownership rate. We also have a very high suicide rate. However, very few of these suicides are committed with a firearm. The majority are drug overdose.
There is no state in the US where intentional suicides by drug overdose outnumber suicide by firearm.
You're bullshitting.
You are welcome on my lawn.
I mean, come on, guys - smarter than average? WTF?!?!
So if other methods aren't as lethal as a firearm, wouldn't you want to maintain access to firearms to a) provide a means for suicidal people from maiming themselves severely and permanently, b) allow them to ease their suffering in as humane a fashion as possible?
If people are going to try to kill themselves for real, they're just going to do it. Reducing the margin of error and making it easier seems like the more civilized way to do this, don't you think?
~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
Tying a rope around a high point and then around your neck takes planning? Could have fooled me. My brother did it in seconds while severely intoxicated and died.
It isn't like guns don't need planning, either. My uncle bought a gun after passing a background check and long waiting period in CA, then drove it across state lines, had some nice meals with family, wrote some big checks he left places for his siblings, sent his will to everyone, then quietly went out behind the house and shot himself in the head. It was the only one he ever bought and he was 60 years old. Long-term unemployment, in spite of being set for life due to savings and investments, was unbearable for him.
I could do almost all of these in minutes at my condo; only one would require a short trip to a nearby bridge. I don't have guns, but I have rope, I have heavy objects, I could fall 5 stories, I have gas coming in for my fireplace, and I could even start my car in my garage with the door closed.
Use the Intertubes.
Yours In Peace,
K. Trout
Let me ask that another way: If you had a depressed loved one who was suicidal, would you give them a firearm? Remember, only a tiny fraction of suicides are terminally or chronically ill
You are welcome on my lawn.
Problem: Appearance of no non-cash payment methods being available
Solution: Zcash (Bitcoin-like alternative with Zero-Knowledge Proofs; Immune to whitelisting/greylisting/fascistlisting)
Snowden: Anonymous ‘Zcash’ Could Solve Bitcoin Surveillance Risks
Dr. Scott!
I made a contribution to an organization I like and added a note that I didn't want them to call or release my name. It was with a check and didn't include a phone number. They looked up my phone number and started calling me for donation. What I found particularly irksome is that they proceeded to sell or exchange my name and phone number to dozens of other organizations and I was getting calls every day from people begging me for money. Because of this I don't give money to many charities except when I can give cash in person. (Such as at my grocery store where you can buy bags of food to donate to the local food bank, but usually only around Thanksgiving or Christmas.)
I've been thinking about going to the Post Office and buying a money order and mailing it to the public TV station but haven't gotten around to it. When I make a modest donation to a non-profit or a charity I want the money to go to the cause, not to paying for more fundraising.
Anonymous (if you do it right) and saves you money at the same time. There's the moral dilemma, of course, but if you're paying for something anonymously you must be a terrorist anyway, so...
I mean, come on, guys - smarter than average? WTF?!?!
Believe it or not, people aren't born knowing everything. Sometimes smart people need to ask someone who knows something to share that knowledge.
/. ? Did you not learn calculus in school (presuming that you did) by listening to a smart person share his/her knowledge?
For example, what if TFA were about calculus? Then you said something like "come on, guys, don't you know calculus??? You're supposed to be smart!! WTF?!?!" Are you as smart as Leibnitz and Newton that you came up with calculus before you even started posting on
WTF does this have to do with "what are anonymous ways to pay for goods and services"?!
And WTF ( WHY the frick) was it moderated "Informative?"
Guns and methods of suicide have JACK to do with anonymous ways to pay for good and services! What has happened to slashdot?
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
Waht the FRICK does this have to do with "what are anonymous ways to pay for goods and services"?!
And WHY the frick was it moderated "Informative?"
Guns and methods of suicide have NOTHING to do with anonymous ways to pay for good and services! What has happened to slashdot moderation lately?
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
You have to follow the thread to understand. Do you require every conversation you have to only be on one topic? And when have Slashdot comments EVER been about sticking slavishly to the topic in the story?
Quit your bitching. If you want to do something about it, you should call the Slashdot Moderation Support 800-number and give them hell. Be sure to give them my UID number as a reference. They've always been very helpful over there, although there's sometimes a bit of a language barrier since the call center is in Bhutan.
You are welcome on my lawn.
Well if it really is that big of a deal...
Rest stops, gas stations, and bars sometimes have those little dispensers for condoms in the restrooms (so no fear of being on camera). Just drop in a few quarters. I don't know why that's so embarrassing anyway. If you're buying them, it means you're the one getting laid, not the cashier.
I came out of the Nazi German era and am therefore perfectly conscience of attacks upon privacy. This generation knows very little, if not completely ignorant of that era, and I guard my life completely. I use encryption and nyms and remailers in all communications. Go ahead with your standard accusation of being paranoid. If you want a good idea of what was going on back in Nazi Germany, read the lengthy, brilliant book "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich". People today don't know or see the grave dangers of government, especially liberal governments. Like reporters in Central and South American countries that helped despots rise to power, you will end up shocked and crying about how you stood behind their rise to power, just before they turn and murder you.
Cash + trusted straw man... Pre-loaded credit card (paid with cash)...
Say that to the few hundreds patient of former Coquitlam mental hospital, which are now on the streets ...
Canada. That being said, this is a false argument, because you are going to re-use gun-control data from other countries to justify your own policy decision... which by your own logic does not apply.
the problem is that if you end up shooting someone in a defensive situation, that shooting is gonna full parent's statistics against gun...
And my point is that this is a question that doesn't need to be asked, especially by somebody familiar with this site, and most especially by "long time reader" and frequent submitter, mspohr, considering his 6-digit UID and comment history. That kind of UID tells me he's been hanging around here for the past 15 years.
He seems like a reasonably intelligent guy. Smarter than average? Meh.
Hell, I'm not in IT, (or even any scienctific field, for that matter), and I can tell you that bartering, or cash (including precious metals/gems) are the only two forms that don't leave a trail, so they are the only two that have the potential to even be anonymous.
An' there ain't nobody done learned me that by no schooling.
Almost any tire seller has nitrogen to fill your tires with. Breathing pure nitrogen is a surefire painless way to die.
BAN NITROGEN NOW!
(yes, my eyes are rolling)
"Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
I don't want to ban guns. I've been a gun owner for over 35 years. They should just be harder to get. Like nitrogen.
Why don't you see if it's easier to get pure nitrogen or a handgun?
You are welcome on my lawn.