Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: What Are Your Favorite Technology Books and Novels?

It can be a nonfiction book, or a fictional narrative where technology plays a key role. I recently started to read 'The Rise of the Robots' by Martin Ford. It talks about how robots are threatening mass unemployment more than they ever did before. I also found Andrew Blum's 'Tubes: A Journey to the Center of the Internet' quite insightful. I would like to read 'The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century's On-line Pioneers'.

What are some of your favorite tech-centric books? And which book are you currently reading, or recently finished?

126 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Daemon by Daniel Suarez by fatnlazy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    along with his follow-up Freedom.

    --
    Yep, that's what I said.
    1. Re:Daemon by Daniel Suarez by azneto · · Score: 1

      Amazing book!

    2. Re:Daemon by Daniel Suarez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those are both great. If you have not done so, check out Kill Decision. It's all about autonomous drones in combat. Interesting and scary stuff, just like Deamon.

    3. Re:Daemon by Daniel Suarez by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those books were garbage. I'm actually surprised anyone on slashdot liked them. Cheesy poorly written action books with all the tech so stupidly wrong it's offensive to anyone who knows how computers work.

      I have a theory that power and accessibility in books are largely orthogonal. Power comes from having something to say that resonates with someone. Accessibility from from craft. Sometimes you read a book and it passes through your head effortlessly without making a ripple or leaving a trace. That's a very, well written book with nothing interesting to say.

      When a book's message and themes hit you in the right spot, you can't see its faults. Lord of the Rings is a brilliant book, but it's a hot mess (with a sprinkling of sublime bits) all the way up to the Council of Elrond. That's painfully obvious for someone who is not getting into the book as he reads it. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone is likewise a brilliant book with serious first-novel-itis. And we all know how dreadful the dialog and scene pacing in Twilight is -- but the people who love that book don't. And it's OK. Had Twilight been better written, it might have found a larger audience; but it found a large enough audience, and if they enjoy the book I'm not going rub their nose in its faults.

      If there's one thing I can't stand, it's prigs who try to make people ashamed for liking things that they think are bad. If you read hard enough, everything starts looking bad. Someone in my book club recently disparaged a potential novel as "Gun sci-fi". I knew exactly what he meant, and I suspect that book is not for me; but there are people out there who want to read that stuff and if they enjoy it, good for them. Sure it looks better to them than it does to me, but there's stuff I like that they probably would find ridiculous too.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Daemon by Daniel Suarez by jrincayc · · Score: 1

      I thought Kill Decision was great, but Daemon and Freedom were only okay.

  2. Neal Asher's Polity/Cormac Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Neal Asher's Polity/Cormac Series starting with Gridlinked.

  3. Physics books by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    I like reading physics books. Many, if not most, are predictable to one degree or another but once in a while someone actually tries to resolve some of the most common and egregious physics problems. Frank Close and Lee Smolin come to mind.

    --
    I come here for the love
  4. Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    IMO modern sci-fi has been "dumbed" down to just action flicks. Originally, "classic" Sci-Fi dealt with the _social_ issues and problems that technology created. We got some amazing stories.

    Everything by:

    * Isaac Asimov -- especially Foundation series.
    * Robert A. Heinlein
    * Arthur C. Clarke

    Is A+.

    There are also plenty of Feynman videos on YouTube. Fascinating just to listen to him. He's the true skeptic -- an open mind and willing to _explore_ issues.

    Buy why limit this to just novels though?? For modern decent sci-fi TV would include:

    * Continuum
    * Firefly
    * Fringe
    * Lost
    * Star Trek: The Next Generation
    * X-Files

    Isn't that the whole point of good Sci-Fi -- to light our imagination with possibilities?

    Not the "Time Travel' Deus Ex Machina so much modern sci-fi crap resorts to.

    1. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by cecurry · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said. Along with Feynman videos, he wrote several great autobiographical accounts of his life that are spectacular reads.

    2. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Punko · · Score: 1

      Science Fiction (to me) has always boiled down to deal with the question "what does it mean to be human?".

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    3. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by justthinkit · · Score: 2

      I particularly agree with your mention of Isaac Asimov in general, and his Foundation series in particular.

      Recently I've been working on an extended project that involves reading a lot of quotes about science from a lot of people. The result of filtering through almost 10,000 quotes is a resounding +1 for Asimov. And G.K. Chesterton.

      --
      I come here for the love
    4. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by XXongo · · Score: 2

      IMO modern sci-fi has been "dumbed" down to just action flicks.

      Modern sci-fi is not entirely dumbed-down action flicks; you just have to be a little choosy and spend some time looking. I loved the book The Martian, which has a lot of technology in it (the movie was a bit dumbed down compared to the book, but not entirely). A little older, I also liked Mars Crossing, another sci fi novel about Mars with a lot of realistic details.

      Other than those, check out the revelation space series by Alastair Reynolds, an astrophysicist who writes mostly space-opera material, but still holding to the laws of physics. Oh, and Vernor Vinge for hard-SF space opera too, of course. And if you want mind-blowing physics, check out Greg Egan.

    5. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Science Fiction (to me) has always boiled down to deal with the question "what does it mean to be human?".

      That pretty much describes all good drama, too. To me, science fiction is any story that uses an alternative setting that is different from our own so that it can deal with the question above in a way that makes people think rather than causing them to have a knee-jerk reaction that makes them stop thinking, as it would if the same story were set in the present universe and at the present time.

      Additionally, if anything happens that can't currently happen, it has to result from a plausible evolution of technology (i.e. not magic), and it generally should not be set in the past (i.e. not historical fiction) unless it involves some sort of alternate timeline or something.

      As for good sci-fi, I've always been a fan of the Hitchhiker's series. It pokes fun at the world we live in, and is set in the context of an alternate future where Earth has been bulldozed to make room for an intergalactic superhighway. Of course, it is also pretty snarky. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Strider- · · Score: 1

      I loved the book The Martian, which has a lot of technology in it (the movie was a bit dumbed down compared to the book, but not entirely).

      My only problem with "The Martian" is that the premise for him being marooned on Mars (at least in the film) is completely bogus. Mars has 1% of the atmospheric pressure of earth, there's absolutely no way that a dust storm could cause anything like the effects it had in the movie. It certainly could not lift rocks, never mind knocking over a rocket.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    7. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Strider- · · Score: 1

      I'd also add "The Expanse" to this list, both the TV Series and the novel series, and don't forget the new Battlestar Galactica.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    8. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the whole point of good Sci-Fi -- to light our imagination with possibilities?

      That's true of all fiction. The problem with science fiction is that its fans lose track of the "fiction" part and start thinking what they read is real or possible.

    9. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Jason1729 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm nto sure why you want to look at cheesy dumbed down action shows that make a mockery of sci-fi and and then ask why TV is excluded.

      Take a look at the Honor Harrington or Lost Fleet series. They try vey hard to get the physics perfect, but it's all about the human/social issues. The Troy Rising trilogy by John Ringo is also excellent and very much about the people.

    10. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Aside from the new Battlestar Galactica (2004) or Continuum (2012) I haven't seen any _good_ Sci-Fi. Pickings have been pretty slim.

      Definitely going to check out recommendations. Thanks !

    11. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the film but I was thinking something along those lines last night looking at some images of a rocky cliff on Mars from Curiousity. All those sharp edges instead of the worn rounded rocks seen in places with a lot of blowing sand on Earth.

    12. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      "The Expanse" on TV has excitement but they should have got someone who has at least heard of the Apollo space program to look over the script. "We've only got two hours of air in this fucking enormous space" and a few other bits where plot depended on physics being wrong was a bit annoying at times.

    13. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the Honor Harrington

      I think I'd rather read Hornblower despite it lacking the magic cat.

    14. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      <quote>

      <quote><p>I loved the book The Martian, which has a lot of technology in it (the movie was a bit dumbed down compared to the book, but not entirely).</p></quote>

      <p>My only problem with "The Martian" is that the premise for him being marooned on Mars (at least in the film) is completely bogus. Mars has 1% of the atmospheric pressure of earth, there's absolutely no way that a dust storm could cause anything like the effects it had in the movie. It certainly could not lift rocks, never mind knocking over a rocket.</p></quote>

      Yet the story acknowledges the very thin atmosphere when Watney removes the front nose cover of the Ares 4 MAV to shed weight and puts a tarp over the hole.

    15. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      * Isaac Asimov -- especially Foundation series. * Robert A. Heinlein * Arthur C. Clarke

      Is A+.

      I read them as a child. I recently started rereading some of them and noticed/remembered a couple of things...

      Heinleins politics were questionable in some places and awful in others. Despite, for example, Startship Troopers, Red Planet and Number of the Beast approvingly showing un-admirable traits, I enjoy them and recommend them to all.

      Asimov wasn't so political but he did seem to unwittingly subscribed to US "Manifest Destiny" and rarely considers any other parts of humanity except, perhaps, a British style aristocracy.

      Clarke was a bit more of a globalist. Hopefully, he will have annoyed a few people with his inherent approval of multinational activity and even things like the UN.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    16. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by djcopi · · Score: 1

      I don't read a lot of sci-fi, but as far as classics go I really enjoyed Dune by Frank Herbert. Never read any of the sequels, though. I also liked another "Martian" book, Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein. Regarding newer books, I really, really enjoyed The Martian by Andy Weir. I didn't see the movie because I didn't want it to ruin the book for me. I also liked Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson, but I read another of his novels and didn't like it at all.

    17. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      IMO modern sci-fi has been "dumbed" down to just action flicks. Originally, "classic" Sci-Fi dealt with the _social_ issues and problems that technology created. We got some amazing stories.

      You might enjoy 2312 from Kim Stanley Robinson.

      You might enjoy the previous books from the Red Mars trilogy as well, but I've been having some hard time with them. I'm definitely recommending 2312, but somehow, at least reading them in this order, I feel that the trilogy feels like plethora of extras in a good movie. A history of sorts, of how the stage for 2312 was built.

      Iain M. Banks also would fit the 'light our imagination with possibilities' theme. Perhaps not so much with social issues.

      --
      It is what it is.
    18. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Jason1729 · · Score: 2

      Hornblower is excellent, but female Hornblower in space fits this thread better. And the Harrington books do have the sci-fi aspect down perfectly.

    19. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The author (Andy Weir) acknowledged that the dust storm wouldn't have had the effects it did. He said he had to have a way to strand Watney, and chose a dust storm as the only plausible way to do so. Also, the ending scene you mention actually did have issues with too much atmosphere, that was the whole reason that the MAV didn't reach the right speed and missed the rendezvous.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    20. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      When I read Starship Troopers, I took it as mostly a parody. I don't think that he was seriously glorifying the military mindset offered in the book.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    21. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out SevenEves, Stephenson did a pretty good job in taking today's technology, and expanding it a bit to write a great story.

      Some of his other books though can be pretty hard to get through, such as the Baroque Cycle, but I really enjoy Cryptonomicon and Diamond Age.

      The Martian movie was pretty good when put next to the book. There of course isn't as much explanation of what is going on, but they get it pretty right. I would recommend seeing it, it was worth the cost to me, and my kids enjoyed it too.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    22. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Just like the (first) movie then.

    23. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "IMO modern sci-fi has been "dumbed" down to just action flicks. Originally, "classic" Sci-Fi dealt with the _social_ issues and problems that technology created. We got some amazing stories."

      All is not lost. Neal Stephenson still lives.

    24. Re:Classic Sci-Fi Books .. but why just novels? by ananamouse · · Score: 1

      The last season of Voyager contained many stand out episodes.

  5. Old, but great read by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 1

    The Adolescence of P1.

    1. Re:Old, but great read by aklinux · · Score: 1

      One of my favorites. I would like to find a new copy, though. Mine is a paperback given to me by a friend back in the early 1980s. I have to be very careful when I read it now.

  6. Nonfiction by cecurry · · Score: 5, Informative

    - Soul of a New Machine by Tracy Kidder - What the Dormouse Said: How the Sixties Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer Industry by John Markoff

    1. Re:Nonfiction by brausch · · Score: 1

      I loved the Kidder book. I was a customer of Data General during that time and the book captured the development of the MV-series beautifully.

      --
      "Almost every wise saying has an opposite one, no less wise, to balance it." - George Santayana
    2. Re:Nonfiction by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Soul of a New Machine is possibly also the best book available on managing programmers.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Nonfiction by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      My fourth grade teacher brought in Reader's Digest magazines for her class and had them in back for anyone who wanted to read them. I read Soul of a New Machine and liked it so much that I found the real book in the library and read it. I then had to get my EE degree so 'that I could do something similar with my life. Almost twenty years later I was randomly wandering around the bowels of my factory taking a break from a years long death march project and there behind a glass window in the corner of a computer room was a blue and yellow DG Eclipse still in operation. It was cathartic.

  7. Stephensons by 101percent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the introduction of things like "every student gets an ipad" and young people literally not even owning a laptop, I think Stephenson's In The Beginning was the Command Line is probably his most valuable work that becomes more precious every year.

    1. Re:Stephensons by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2
      And it's still available for free (in a zipped TXT file!) here.

      His image of the various vehicles representing OSes is indelibly burned into my brain, as is his vision of Apple as a sort of free-thinking "commune populated by sandal-wearing, peace-sign flashing flower children" that turns out to be a facade, run by a bunch of control freaks who want to dictate your every move. (And before some Apple defenders get ready to attack me, note that Stephenson insults just about everybody in the essay. But the digs at Apple are just the most entertaining and revealing, particularly given that this was written before iPads, iPods, and even OS X.)

  8. UNIX Power Tools by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    UNIX Power Tools by JPeek et al from O'Reilly. This ought to be the bible, the required reading, for anyone into UNIX or similar systems, just IMHO. I have a very worn and dog-eared copy of the 2nd edition and I still use it 16 yrs later... its that good. Absolutely timeless classic of the genre.

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:UNIX Power Tools by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah that is a good one! I've got a very old edition now too (2nd?) it's still good enough that there's not a real need to get a later one (I don't know if there are later ones).

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  9. Cybersecurity Canon by Gandalf360 · · Score: 2

    If you're just looking for something to read that is technical, the folks at Palo Alto have put together a good list of books as "canon" for the security industry. Worth a look anyway.

    https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/threat-research/cybercanon

    --
    -- Don't make me replace you with a small shell script.
  10. Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson by ytene · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Although his later works (such as Anathem) felt like they went off the edge of the world, Cryptonomicon combines a clever story, a prescient look at the emerging internet age, and some thoughtful nods to encryption schemes, all in a decent story. IMHO one of his best, and a good all-round sci-fi yarn...

    1. Re:Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It IS his best, with Snowcrash a close second. I read Cryptonomicon in 12 hours and it was difficult to see it finish. A brilliant book and still very prescient because the book was so forward thinking. I also like In the Beginning was the Command Line. Reamde wasn't bad, but there was not enough "tech" talk in the book for my liking. I'd like the see Cryptonomicon made into a film.

    2. Re:Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson by lgw · · Score: 1

      Reamde is great. He totally overcomes his inability at pacing, and this story of a problem that just keeps getting worse and bigger is his first "page-turner" since Snow Crash.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'd like the see Cryptonomicon made into a film.

      IMHO it would need a TV series since a major point of it is that there is so much going on and connections between the things. Cutting it back into a movie would mean throwing a lot away.

    4. Re:Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson by AntiSol · · Score: 1

      +1 for Cryptonomicon. It's magnificent.

    5. Re:Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson by greggman · · Score: 1

      When does it effing start? I read 330 pages in AND NOTHING HAD HAPPENED YET! I gave up!

    6. Re:Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      Same here. Seems like some authors just write to write down words,

  11. Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs by 101percent · · Score: 1

    SICP is still around and is now under a Creative Commons license.

  12. Martian Chronicles by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Martian Chronicles are at the top of my list. Maybe not exactly realistic, but a great read.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  13. Hacker fic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anything by Cory Doctorow! He even gives out some free ebooks of his on his website. Cory Doctorow is full of win!

    1. Re:Hacker fic by Jason1729 · · Score: 2

      Cory Doctorow is a nut who will never let the story get in the way of the political agenda he wants to spew. His trash is unreadable.

      And I notice you need to post as AC to plug the loser.

    2. Re:Hacker fic by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Not at all. I'm saying his writing is trash because he allows the political agenda to destroy it. He doesn't has the skill to write what he's trying to and comes off as a babbling lunatic.

  14. Millenium tetralogy, by far by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    Love the approach of having a geek, socially dysfunctional girl kick the butt of the CIA or other high profile criminals / businesses with so much ease, and being so resourceful. Even though everything is not always totally realistic, I like the storyline. And I'm still looking for a way to transfer a few million from an oversea crook to my own account that I opened under a false ID too...

  15. The Way Things Work by wickerprints · · Score: 2

    https://www.amazon.com/Way-Thi...

    Originally published in 1988, it was one of the books that sparked my interest in engineering and science as a child. The illustrations were both fascinating and informative without being too technical, and at times funny.

  16. I vote for The Cuckoo's Egg by sconeu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cliff Stoll's account of how he tracked the CCC hackers is a very good read.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re: I vote for The Cuckoo's Egg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      +1 for The Cuckoo's Egg

      Excellent intro to hacking. Required reading for university IT Security

    2. Re:I vote for The Cuckoo's Egg by NoSalt · · Score: 1

      I recommend this book to almost everybody.

  17. The Soul of a new Machine by ControlsGeek · · Score: 2

    Tracy Kidders book is most memorable.

    1. Re:The Soul of a new Machine by ci4 · · Score: 1

      Likewise. This got me into VAXen all those years ago... I have to reread it one of these days.

    2. Re:The Soul of a new Machine by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I was already into computers with my friend's dad's trs-80, but it got me into engineering.

  18. Germa, Guns and Steel by McLae · · Score: 1

    Also, The Wages of Destruction. Best analysis of why Germany did not have the economy to win WW2, and how they tried anyway. That and mismanagement of the Luftwaffe and the DRG. Examples of how stupid leaders can pull a country down a black hole.

  19. Stating the Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't go wrong with some Neal Stephenson. Started reading Snow Crash 2 years ago on a recommendation, just finished going through Zodiac, Diamond age, Cryptonomicom, Interface and The Baroque Cycle.

    Granted, Zodiac is more an environmentalist manifesto than techno-thriller (and Baroque Cycle is more political/economical than technical), but otherwise his books are fantastic and my praise just adds to the mountain of accolades he already has.

    1. Re:Stating the Obvious by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      SeveneveS just recently came out, it is a pretty good read as well.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  20. History of Bell Labs and Intel by natsmith9 · · Score: 2

    Two of my favorite books that I've read this year were about Bell Labs (The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the great age of American innovation) and the history of Intel (The Intel Trinity).

    1. Re:History of Bell Labs and Intel by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      In that genre, Turing's Cathedral by George Dyson is also quit good.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  21. Richard Stallman by 101percent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Stallman's Free Software, Free Society if you're too lazy to connect to gnu.org/philosophy. Say what you will, but rms is simply a legend and too important to overlook whether or not you agree or disagree with his views.

    1. Re:Richard Stallman by 101percent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He is more consistently more correct than anyone else in technology. His early research with Sussman is also still relevant. And his code Emacs is still the most non-trivial ported FOSS software in existence. He's certainly going to be relevant for the next several decades.

    2. Re:Richard Stallman by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      His code is also very nice code.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Richard Stallman by 101percent · · Score: 1

      I won't say you're completely wrong, but I believe you would agree that Free Software has precipitated some of these advances. I believe it is important enough to be cherished and protected, however intact the movement is decades from now, to me it is important that it simply exist. Future generations should understand Free Software, agree or disagree, in order to think clearly about the ways they interact and live their lives. If Freedom is not something you cherish, then sure give it up, but do so knowingly and move on. However I respect and realize the contribution of those who chose to help spread Freedom because the benefits they have provided to society are valuable.

  22. Soul of a New Machine, Masters of Doom by ChesterRafoon · · Score: 1

    Both are absolutely first rate. Also add "The Supermen", which is a great overview of the Supercomputer industry back in its heyday.

  23. Physics, math, Social by recharged95 · · Score: 2

    Chaos

    One of the inspirations for me in pursuing education in Chaos Theory (and applications of course).

  24. Time Travel by kencurry · · Score: 1

    "Dark Matter", Blake Crouch - this is really not time travel but Many Worlds of quantum physics, played out in fictional drama. Didn't really care for it. Technical parts were so-so, but mostly, too many "bad guys" ( won't give a spoiler ) kills necessary plot climax.
    "Timeline" Michael Crichton - One of my favorites. Enough tech to properly suspend disbelief, coupled with good midieval historical content and great plot line. Movie sucked but book is a must-read.

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  25. The Mythical Manmonth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its still Mythical after all these years and ten major releases of Microsoft Project.

  26. The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect by Roger Will by azneto · · Score: 2
  27. Ra, a hard science fiction book about magic by penguinoid · · Score: 1
    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  28. The Sun in the Church by g01d4 · · Score: 1

    By John L. Heilbron. Fascinating history and he's not afraid of using a little math - which alas too many are.

  29. The Adolescence of P-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Adolescence of P-1, by Thomas J. Ryan (1977), virus and AI set in 1974-1977 on IBM Mainframes of the day. Now get off my lawn!

  30. The Drift Wars by Brett James by berchca · · Score: 1

    Creepy futurism buried in intense action:

    https://www.amazon.com/Drift-Wars-Brett-James/dp/0985086424/

  31. Culture books from the late Iain M Banks by shanen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Basically daunted by the topic, but I read a lot of books. Started with classic SF such as Heinlein and Asimov, but trying to pick the best is an overwhelming challenge. I do see mention of those two above, but Iain M Banks seems to be missing. His Culture books are ultimately optimistic about the future in the same way that Star Trek is. Too well written to dismiss as space opera, though grandiose enough.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  32. The Expanse series by Kethinov · · Score: 1, Informative

    I didn't think good sci-fi was getting made anymore until I came across The Expanse. The novels are terrific (especially the 5th novel) and Syfy's TV adaptation is surprisingly good as well. Both are worth a look.

    The premise is a near-future sci-fi setting with as little magic tech as possible. Almost all sci-fi tech in the story consists of reasonable derivations of current technology. Newtonian physics in space is respected. There's no inertial dampeners. There are no relativity-busting star drives. Gravity in space is through rotation or constant acceleration. And the story is solid.

    It's up there with BSG and Firefly in terms of emphasis on depicting space realistically (by comparison to the looser realism of Star Trek/Farscape/Stargate/etc anyway). I still enjoy BSG's and Firefly's stories and characters a bit more, but The Expanse is far superior in terms of scientific accuracy.

    Notably, for any Game of Thrones fans out there, George RR Martin is a fan of The Expanse and it is frequently referred to as the Game of Thrones of sci-fi.

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    1. Re:The Expanse series by nyet · · Score: 1

      You really should read the Culture novels.

  33. Gödel, Escher, Bach by gsliepen · · Score: 2

    By Douglas Hofstadter.

  34. Dune by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2

    It's a unique work regarding tech because of its absence. The entire society could have incredible technology, but they choose not to. It's Amish, for lack of a better way of describing it. They know it exists, but they decided that they didn't want it. With only a few exceptions. Dibs and dabs of incredible tech such as interstellar travel and sheilding technology and poison snoopers, but for the most part they eschew the rest and try to develop people rather than machines. A totally unique approach to technology in the future. What if it gets bigger than we're comfortable with, and we simply decide to do away with it for our own good? I think Frank Herbert was the first person to really explore that question in depth.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  35. How 'Bout Sci-Fi Romance? by GTRacer · · Score: 1

    Silver Metal Lover, by Tanith Lee. Human and android fall in love and deal with that, and regular life in a typical urban setting. Lots of social-issue philosophising underneath the solid characters and romance.

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  36. algorithms to live by by mtaht · · Score: 1

    just came out.

  37. Godel Escher Bach : hofstadter by maitas · · Score: 1

    My favorite book

    1. Re:Godel Escher Bach : hofstadter by ArmchairAstronomer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yet another vote for Gödel, Escher & Bach. I was blown away when I read it. It is now my favorite non-fiction book by far. I go back and re-read at least one chapter every year just for fun.

  38. Do not answer!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The mere fact of confessing you're actually engaging in the practice of "reading books" (where book != text meant to instruct and indoctrinate the reader into accepting their socioeconomic condition and conform) is enough to brand you a subversive and put you on a watchlist. Feign ignorance! It's the only way to be safe.

  39. Nanotechnology? by Lotus456 · · Score: 2

    I really enjoyed Eric Drexler's seminal work, "Engines of Creation," even if he was off the mark about timelines and how nanotech would evolve. Philip Ball's "Designing the Molecular World" is enlightening too.

    --
    "It's a good computer... for I to BM on!" - apologies to Triumph, the insult comic dog
    1. Re:Nanotechnology? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      I really enjoyed Eric Drexler's seminal work, "Engines of Creation," even if he was off the mark about timelines and how nanotech would evolve.

      His second book, Nanosystems, has a lot more realism in it.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  40. Cory Doctorow by A10Mechanic · · Score: 2

    When Sysadmins Ruled the Earth, by Cory Doctorow. It has an interesting take on the chaos of something catastrophic happening, and the human condition. That's as far as I can go without spoilers...

  41. Umm by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

    GPL and its sequels LGPL and AGPL by GNU

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  42. Superintellience: Paths, Dangers, Strategies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The most in-depth and compelling examination of the possible manner in which strong AI can arise and the consequences that I am aware of. Very well written, argued, and thought through.

    https://www.amazon.com/Superintelligence-Dangers-Strategies-Nick-Bostrom/dp/0198739834/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1473715473&sr=8-1&keywords=superintelligence

    1. Re:Superintellience: Paths, Dangers, Strategies by Meneth · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

  43. The story about PING, what else ? by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 2

    Don't be fooled from the innocent aspect: as it has been pointed out by the first reviewer, this book gives through allegories a dramatized explaination of UNIX networking. Highly recommeded! This nice book has been reviewed here on Slashdot some time ago.

  44. The Education of a Computer Guy... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
    1. Read The Soul of a New Machine by Tracy Kidder.
    2. Read Computer Lib/Dream Machines by Ted Nelson
    3. Read Godel, Escher, Bach... by Hofstader
    4. Go to college and learn enough math to read The Art of Computer Programming by Knuth
    --
    That is all.
  45. One Jump Ahead by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    It is the story of the developer of the checkers program that beat the world champion and the story of the matches between them.

    A very interesting read.

  46. Surely You Must Be Joking Mr. Feynman by hambone142 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An entertaining book on Richard Feynman's pranks and interests.

    1. Re:Surely You Must Be Joking Mr. Feynman by bcarson · · Score: 1

      Fantastic book, but it's simply Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!

    2. Re:Surely You Must Be Joking Mr. Feynman by elistan · · Score: 1

      An entertaining book on Richard Feynman's pranks and interests.

      Yep, that along with What Do You Care What Other People Think? and Tuva or Bust!. Plus James Gleik's Genius about Feynmen. I also liked Gleik's Chaos and am currently reading his The Information.

      For fiction, I like Alastair Renolds' House of Suns and Vernor Vinge's A Fire Upon The Deep.

  47. Do Novellas count? True Names by Vernor Vinge by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    True Names is an amazingly prescient work.

    It clearly presents full-blown world-wide Internetworking, Virtual Reality, A.I. agents, hacker/cracker cabals, cyberwarfare, and a number of other important concepts (one of which I won't mention to avoid a major spoiler) - as the fundamental and necessary background for a rollicking good story.

    Published in 1981!

    Vinge, considered a seminal work of the cyberpunk genre. It is one of the earliest stories to present a fully fleshed-out concept of cyberspace, which would later be central to cyberpunk. The story also contains elements of transhumanism, anarchism, and even hints about The Singularity.

    True Names first brought Vinge to prominence as a science fiction writer. It also inspired many real-life hackers and computer scientists; a 2001 book about the novella, True Names: And the Opening of the Cyberspace Frontier, included essays by Danny Hillis, Marvin Minsky, Mark Pesce, Richard Stallman and others.[1] It was awarded the Prometheus Hall of Fame Award in 2007.

    So (much like Star Trek communicators inspiring the clamshell cellphone), True Names may have actually inspired and/or helped define the form of some of the key components of today's information technology.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  48. Re:Bitcoin Apocalypse by major.tal · · Score: 1

    Oops - logged in now. Please read!

  49. Here is mine. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    “A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell System The Early Years (1875-1925)”.

    Teaser available here.

  50. All the IPv6 books.... by unixisc · · Score: 2

    All the IPv6 books from O'Reilly & Associates. Also, an old favorite of mine - Unix Haters' Handbook

  51. Culture novels by nyet · · Score: 1

    Iain M. Banks

  52. We're talking Tech, not Science, right? by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And not literary sophistication, right?

    If we're talking pure joy of tech, for me it has to be EE Doc Smith's SPACEHOUNDS OF THE IPC, originally published in Hugo Gernsback's AMAZING STORIES in 1931.

    Now remember for readers in 1931 radio was high tech. Ever build a crystal radio set? Did you wonder what the point was? Well if you were a kid in the early 20s, with a wooden plank, a spool of wire, and a hunk of galena, you could build yourself the most advanced, high tech communication instrument on the planet. When the story was published in 1931, the hottest new tech was the vacuum tube radio. This took a few more premanunfactured parts -- the vacuum tubes obviousl, but still if you were ambitious and clever with your hands and could solder wires and cut and bend sheet metal, you still could build the most sophisticated communication receiver on the planet.

    The story takes place in a high tech future that seems plausible for someone in '31. There is regular spaceliner service between Earth and Mars. Interesting side note -- these spaceliners operate by a kind of remotely broadcasted power, and use that to power their reactionless drives. If you were *very* sophisticated at the time, you would realize this avoids all the rocket equation related implausibilities of ships that have to carry the reaction mass to maintain constant acceleration. The ships are guided by beacon stations (radio of course!), but the station keepers have been getting sloppy, so the line sends their best computer (a *person* of course!) to pin their ears back.

    The liner is attacked by an alien spaceship, cut apart, and towed in pieces to Jupiter.It is built in many small airtight compartments (like an OCEAN liner) so most of the people are still alive, including our hero who is stuck in small piece with a beautiful (yay) rich (double yay) girl. He manages to escape (I forget how), and they crash on Ganymede, which turns out to be just like Earth but with lower gravity.

    Now here's the problem: the line is building a new supership; if they only knew everyone was being held at the moons of Jupiter they could rescue them. But as far as they know the liner just disappeared.

    So what our hero and is lovely, plucky helpmate must do is something familiar to every red-blooded Depression era nerd: BUILD A RADIO SET! Only they've got nothing; they've got to work their way up from paleolithic tech all the way up to (their) present, figuring out how to smelt metal, blow glass, generate electricity, and reverse engineer the very latest high tech vacuum tube.

    This kind of story represents a way of imagining the future of tech that we we never be able to believe in again; one in which a single heroically brilliant nerd can really master everything from banging the rocks together all the way up to the very cutting edge. You can imagine the hero of this book figuring out how to melt silica and blow glass, but you couldn't imagine him improvising a chip fab.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  53. Rationality from AI to Zombies by jrincayc · · Score: 1

    My favorite new tech book is Rationality from AI to Zombies by Eliezer Yudkowsky:
    https://intelligence.org/ratio...
    (or as a usable but not always perfect TeX document: https://github.com/jrincayc/ra... )

  54. Commodore books by AntiSol · · Score: 2

    The Commodore 64 User's Guide - taught me my first programming language.
    The Commodore 64 Technical reference guide - a riveting sequel.

  55. The Art of Computer Programming by aglider · · Score: 1

    Which is also science and passion.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  56. The Adolescence of P-1 by ScottKin · · Score: 1

    "The Adolescence of P-1" by Thomas J. Ryan - a good read, even today.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
  57. Non fiction? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    In non fiction, Horowitz & Hill: The Art of Electronics. I got the third edition recently (the only edition I own) and it's just fantastic! Mackay's information theory and inference book is also a great fireside read. Despite it's many detractors, I've always been partial to numerical recipes as well. All those three are great books in a conversational style aimed at technical types but without assuming any particular expertise in the field.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  58. Surveillance and climate by Burz · · Score: 1

    Spook Country by William Gibson (fiction)
    Dragnet Nation by Julia Angwin (non-fiction)

    also...
    Under A Green Sky by Peter D. Ward, Ph. D.
    This one is paleontology, non-fiction about the greenhouse effect and the Permian extinction. A good read!

  59. The Making of the Atomic Bomb by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    by Richard Rhodes

  60. Gibson & Stephenson by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    The Books by William Gibson and Neal Stephenson make for good technology novels and giving some insights into the present and near future.
    From Gibson I'd recommend the Bridge Triology and the Neuromancer/Sprawl Triology.

    From Neal Stepheson I'd recommend Snow Crash, The Diamond Age and Reamde.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  61. Mostly non-fiction.... by QuasiRob · · Score: 1

    The Difference Engine by William Gibson, Bruce Sterling

    In the Beginning... Was the Command Line by Neal Stephenson

    Mother Earth Mother Board - https://www.wired.com/1996/12/... also by Neal Stephenson (actually, anything by him)

    The Victorian Internet is also worth reading.

    Bad Science by Ben Goldacre

    --
    If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done?
  62. Player Piano by JRV31 · · Score: 1

    by Kurt Vonnegut

  63. Daniel suarez - Kill Decision by btroy · · Score: 1

    Yes, I found Daemon and Freedom great books.

    Kill Decision - makes me think about autonomous decisions and really fits with what society is thinking doing now.

  64. Comment by WallyL · · Score: 1

    Negroponte's Being Digital . It was assigned reading in college. I thought it was incredibly interesting. It predicted the rise of voice-controlled personal assistants like siri or cortana that can help you do things you could do in person like send a text message.

  65. Ghost in the Wires by t8z5h3 · · Score: 1

    Ghost in the Wires: My Adventures as the World's Most Wanted Hacker by Kevin Mitnick

  66. KIdder: Soul of a New machine by abmw · · Score: 1

    Was nonfiction a nono? Well, then: Tracy KIdder: Soul of a New machine

  67. CyberPunk MasterPieces - by DavidFawcett · · Score: 1

    Neal Stephenson's SnowCrash and of Course William Gibson's Sprawl trilogy- Neuromancer, Mona Lisa Overdrive, and Count Zero

  68. I keep a list :) by Change · · Score: 1

    I try to update this regularly.

    * The Hyperion series by Dan Simmons is AMAZING. I think my favorite.
    * The Martian by Andy Wier. MacGyver on Mars. What's not to love? Actually pretty technically accurate, near-future Mars mission goes bad, one crew member is left for dead and stranded.
    * Peter Watts writes some good hard scifi...the Rifters series is pretty awesome, dealing with psychologically damaged people whose trauma makes them adapted for deep-sea work, and Blindsight, which has a crew led by a genetically resurrected vampire on a spacecraft off to visit a recently detected distant object. I wasn’t so much a fan of the follow-up to Blindsight though (Echopraxia).
    * Altered Carbon by Richard K. Morgan is some great cyberpunk noir. There are two more books with the same main character (Broken Angels and Woken Furies) but I think the first one is the best.
    * The Laundry Files series by Charles Stross. British humor/Lovecraftian horror. The main character is a systems administrator/necromancer for a secret British government agency that deals with the nightmares beyond reality.
    * Singularity Sky and Iron Sunrise, also by Charles Stross, but these are hard scifi rather than comedy/horror.
    * Dresden Files by Jim Butcher. Not scifi, urban fantasy, but fun reads.
    * William Gibson pretty much defines cyberpunk...Neuromancer, and the Sprawl trilogy are pretty much required reading.
    * Then if William Gibson didn't take himself so seriously, you would get Snowcrash by Neal Stephenson. The main character is named Hiro Protagonist...yeah, it gets sillier from there. But it's a fantastic read, one of my favorites. Also: Diamond Age (nanotechnology future), Cryptonomicon (contemporary treasure hunt/crypto/startup), Seveneves (near future apocalypse)
    * Mira Grant's Feed series, because who doesn't love zombies. Avoid the Parasitology series though, gargantuan plot holes I couldn’t get past.
    * The Zones of Thought books by Vernor Vinge are darn good. A Deepness in the Sky, and A Fire Upon the Deep. Same universe, different storylines and characters though.
    * Eon by Greg Bear is good. Starts out vaguely Rama-esque, but changes up quite a bit shortly in.
    * Foundation series by Asimov, classics. Also I, Robot (just pretend the movie didn’t happen)
    * Little Brother by Cory Doctorow is a subversive YA novel that I couldn't tear myself away from and read in a single sitting. Also see the sequel, Homeland.
    * Along the subversive vein, Daemon and Freedom(TM) by Daniel Suarez.
    * Pretty much anything from Philip K. Dick. He wrote about insanity quite well, because he himself was crazy.
    * Peter F. Hamilton writes some pretty fluffy space opera stuff, it's fun if you don't look at it too deeply.
    * Space Eldritch and Space Eldritch II are collections of short Lovecraftian scifi horror stories. Some GREAT stuff in there. I wish a few of them were fleshed out into full novels or series.
    * Signal To Noise and A Signal Shattered by Eric S. Nylund, nice hard scifi.
    * Kiln People by David Brin, interesting thoughts about continuity of self by copying your consciousness into 24-hour expiring clay golems and downloading their memories back to your real body after.
    * Dune (Frank Herbert). Far-future scifi wrapped around a deep core of political intrigue.
    * The Expanse series (James S.A. Corey), some good conspiracy-driven space opera that actually mostly pays attention to physics.

  69. Re:Manna by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    Not really sharp, no.