Slashdot Mirror


Upcoming Blade Runner Sequel Gets a Title: Blade Runner 2049 (theverge.com)

The sequel to Ridley Scott's 1982 sci-fi classic "Blade Runner" is officially titled "Blade Runner 2049." Harris Ford is confirmed to be returning as Rick Deckard. Other stars include Ryan Gosling, Jared Leto, Robin Wright, Dave Bautista and Lennie James. The Verge reports: There's a hashtag included in the press release, of course (#BladeRunner2049), but other than that there's little else revealed about the story itself. There is a new picture out, however, with Scott, Villeneuve, Gosling, and Harrison Ford chatting over some Blade Runner weaponry. Whether you like or hate the new title will most likely depend on how excited you are about knowing the exact year that the new film takes place. The original was set in 2019, so it's good that they're tacking on an extra 30 years because the Los Angeles of today really doesn't look anything like the dystopian vision Scott wowed audiences with way back when. But hey -- there's still time. Blade Runner 2049 is scheduled to arrive in theaters on October 6th, 2017.

136 comments

  1. Really excited about this by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

    San Francisco Rush 2049 was hella fun, so I anticipate this will be a really top-notch entertainment.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re: Really excited about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who the fuck is Harris Ford?

    2. Re: Really excited about this by The_Rook · · Score: 5, Funny

      what the hell is an aluminum falcon?

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
    3. Re: Really excited about this by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      what the hell is an aluminum falcon?

      That's what you put on the top of your aluminium Christmas tree.

    4. Re: Really excited about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That belongs in a private collection!

    5. Re:Really excited about this by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Yes! Came here for this comment...first post, not bad.

    6. Re: Really excited about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Who the fuck is Harris Ford?

      http://www.harrisford.com/

      Sales and service!

    7. Re: Really excited about this by Meski · · Score: 1

      Some relation of Ford Prefect. And a replicant. I wonder if they'll rename them to be the Pixel series?

  2. 2049 still has firearms? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    maybe firearms go digital/electronic or something besides analog gunpowder.

    1. Re:2049 still has firearms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gunpowder is digital. boom or no boom...

    2. Re:2049 still has firearms? by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      Smokeless powder is pretty efficient. Hard to improve on that, though not impossible I'm sure.

    3. Re:2049 still has firearms? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Your keen eye can look at those movie props and tell that they use rounds containing "analog gunpowder", huh? Can you tell from the pixels?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    4. Re:2049 still has firearms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TNT.

    5. Re:2049 still has firearms? by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      I'm Dynamite.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
  3. Maybe, maybe not by youngone · · Score: 1
    A hashtag tells us not much really.

    Bladerunner is probably my favourite Science Fiction movie but if they call it "Bladerunner 2049" I probably won't bother.

    (Well I might grab a torrent once the DVD is released).

    1. Re:Maybe, maybe not by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. Buying into the hype is just setting yourself up for disappointment. Even if everybody *loves* it, I'll wait until it's been out on DVD for a while before I watch it.

      Hollywood is out of ideas. All they're capable of is doing a bad job rehashing things we used to love.

    2. Re:Maybe, maybe not by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Well I might grab a torrent once the DVD is released).

      Yup. Anything deemed not worth paying for is stuff you're allowed to steal. It's right there in the constitution.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Maybe, maybe not by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Those shite cash in reboots are just getting worse and worse at least the king of crap reboots Jar Jar Abrams is no involved but that title is just so 'B' grade, ugh.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Copying is not theft

      Stealing a thing leaves one less left
      Copying it makes one thing more
      That's what copying's for!

    5. Re: Maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dare you to tell that to the face of the judge who will sentence you to a lifetime of debt slavery.

    6. Re:Maybe, maybe not by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Until you change the law, IP theft is theft. I'm pretty sure if you tried to capitalize on a great idea you had, you'd be pissed if someone came along and stole it, and then claimed they did you no harm.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    7. Re:Maybe, maybe not by gnick · · Score: 1

      I'll wait until it's been out on DVD for a while before I watch it.

      If you wait long, you'll have to choose from the "Workprint," the "Theatrical Cut," the "International Cut," the "Director's Cut," and the "Final Cut."

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    8. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      No, it really isn't.

      They use the word theft a lot with the masses, but you're never charged with theft.

    9. Re:Maybe, maybe not by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Crap, you're right. They'll probably cut the original introduction and put in some lame one that explains the whole story or something stupid like that, and then add really bad CGI of Jabba the Hutt in some random scene arguing with Rick Deckard about money he's owed.

    10. Re:Maybe, maybe not by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Now you're just nit-picking. If you prefer, then, it's OK to commit copyright infringement when you deem something not worthy. Better?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    11. Re:Maybe, maybe not by doggo · · Score: 1

      "Jar Jar Abrams"?! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That's awesome! I'm stealing that. Er, I'm quoting you!.

    12. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, actually. More accurate.

    13. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not nitpicking. There is a big difference between taking a thing and making a thing.

      Another word for copying is "reproduction," which means you produce something as part of the process. That's not the same as stealing something (depriving someone of their property).

      I don't expect you'll be convinced, but at least you'll be aware of the distinction the next time the argument arises (which it inevitably does on these kind of stories).

    14. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's right. You get charged with "copyright infringement", NOT theft. Get educated.

    15. Re:Maybe, maybe not by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Seriously WTF? dude https://www.google.com.au/sear..., 19,900 results and that's using quotes and ooh look a whole bunch of images and even video's, talk about slow to the party. Just to be clear, you will not be stealing it from me, as I most definitely did not originate it but well boo hoo, sucks to be yoo.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  4. BAAH!!! by avandesande · · Score: 1

    No Rutger Hauer?

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:BAAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you get Harris Ford?

    2. Re:BAAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears...in...rain. Time to die.

      There's the star of the movie, and then there's the star of the movie. To be fair, Roy dies. No Rutger.

    3. Re:BAAH!!! by EnsilZah · · Score: 2

      I don't think his character survived the first one, something to do with the main plot.

      Seriously though, he's great and all, and I'm sure they could have come up with some excuse that they had a bunch of copies of the Roy Batty model and they actually had a life extension procedure for him or they aged him for some purpose, but I'd rather they didn't do a rehash of all the same characters just for the sake of nostalgia.

      Hey I have an idea, maybe Gosling is Deckard's son in this one, and he kills and drops him into some deep chasm because he has daddy issues.

    4. Re:BAAH!!! by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      No Rutger Hauer?

      only if you dig him up

    5. Re:BAAH!!! by dwywit · · Score: 2

      I thought of a plot line a while ago, when the sequel was announced, that Hauer could be involved as the now-aged human that the Roy Batty model was based on. That would give the scriptwriter/s free reign to make his character whatever they wanted - he wouldn't have to be "Roy Batty". I don't recall anything from the first movie that said Tyrell didn't use real humans as development models for the replicants.

      Wouldn't it make sense to start with the DNA of a human, and modify it, rather than try to build a replicant "from the ground up"?

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    6. Re:BAAH!!! by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part where Roy died?

    7. Re:BAAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was part of the plot of Blade Runner 2: the edge of Human, but K.W. Jeter, published in 1998.

    8. Re:BAAH!!! by swb · · Score: 1

      Batty would have died anyway even if he didn't die at the end of Blade Runner.

      I would think the death of Dr. Tyrell, and possibly Sebastian, would have been a problem for further development of replicants.

    9. Re:BAAH!!! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      In the sequel, the Tyrell Corporation meets its downfall. After Eldon gets his eyeballs pushed inside out, the company is managed for four years by a replicant of Carly Fiorina. As a result the replicants refuse to work unless constantly supplied with overpriced genuine Tyrell superpower refill cartridges.

    10. Re:BAAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think his character survived the first one, something to do with the main plot.

      yeah, theres no way they could possibly come up with a feasible way for an actor to reappear in a Movie when hes played a CYBORG, I mean, everyone knows they are totally unique and impossible to copy, amirite?

    11. Re:BAAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it would make more sense to use the DNA from multiple people, taking the best genes from each. Kind of like what they did with agent 47 / "Tobias Reaper".

    12. Re:BAAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to see Kurt Russell make an appearance as Todd from the Blade Runner sidequel Soldier.

    13. Re:BAAH!!! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Let's assume Roy Batty was such a replicant, and they made another one without the age defect

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  5. The waiting is just by fsagx · · Score: 3, Funny

    driving me batty

    1. Re:The waiting is just by shadowknot · · Score: 1

      Don't be such a pris!

    2. Re:The waiting is just by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Don't be such a pris!

      Well he didn't make a gaff, so that's something to chew over.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:The waiting is just by fsagx · · Score: 1

      I'm barely holden it together!

    4. Re: The waiting is just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zhora fool for playing this game.

    5. Re: The waiting is just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'S a bastion of bad puns.

  6. Harris Ford by Fwipp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh cool, I loved his work in St Wars!

    1. Re:Harris Ford by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Saint Wars? "I bless you my son" "I know"

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Harris Ford by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Saint Wars:

      "Luke, I am the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost!"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Harris Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atheist Luke: "Noooooooo, that's impossible!"

    4. Re:Harris Ford by WallyL · · Score: 3, Funny

      I find your lack of faith, disturbing!

    5. Re:Harris Ford by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      So that means Darth Vader is a Jesuit...

      That actually kinda makes sense!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Harris Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well actually if you wait long enough, you see Anakin, Yoda, and Obi-Wan as the father, the son, and the holy ghost. At least I remember that scene in ROTJ.

    7. Re:Harris Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong movie. That was from Vatican Strikes Back.

  7. Already fucked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already fucked with that hack Jared Leto in it. FFS.

    1. Re:Already fucked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you rather they cast an Atreides instead?

  8. Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I've tried to watch the first movie several times, I fall asleep every time.

  9. No Sean Young? :( by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Besides, he's a Replicant, and they die after four years.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  10. Philip K. who? by pr0t0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, totally. When I think of a classic cinematic science fiction masterpiece, with an amazing score and even more amazing soliloquy at the end making us confront what it means to be human, I don't think Blade Runner. I'm thinking maybe something staring The Rock, where he's an ace starfighter pilot, but one day his ten year old nephew stows away aboard his ship and hilarity and action ensues. Maybe they land on a planet inhabited by enemy sentient dinosaurs, but there's a really cute young one that befriends the nephew for even more hi-jinks.

    Yeah. THAT'S science fiction right there.

    LOL. He said "Dick".

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    1. Re:Philip K. who? by camg188 · · Score: 1

      Well, there were replicants...
      and that's pretty much where the movie diverges from the book.

  11. Will he be in a wheelchair? by fnj · · Score: 1

    How old will Harrison Ford be in 2049?

  12. What is the appeal? by irrational_design · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm in my mid-40s, but I had never watched Blade Runner until very recently when I heard they were making a sequel. To be honest I did think it was a very good movie and I don't understand why a sequel is being made. Is most of the appeal some sort of nostalgia? What am I missing?

    1. Re:What is the appeal? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Harrison ford needs the $$$$

      First indiana jones then star wars, now blade runner.

    2. Re:What is the appeal? by click2005 · · Score: 1

      Hollywood is run by profit-obsessed idiots who would rather pour $200m into a piss-poor fan-service sequel or remake/re-imagine that will make them $210m than spend $20m and take a chance on something new.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    3. Re:What is the appeal? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      After Indiana Jones and Star Wars, I think it's fair to say that he doesn't need to money. Good for him though, I'm glad he gets to cash in at the end of his career, I think he deserves it.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    4. Re:What is the appeal? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Q. What am I missing?

      A. Greed.
      All Upcoming Movie Remakes/ Reboots (2016 - 2020)

      e.g.
      Apparently there are placeholders for

              Avatar 2 (2018)
              Avatar 3 (2020)
              Avatar 4 (2022)
              Avatar 5 (2023)

      --
      Redditards: A downvote is NOT to be used as "I disagree"

    5. Re:What is the appeal? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      You must not be aware of the new stuff coming out. I heard there's a Spider Man movie coming soon that's unrelated to any others. And I'm pretty sure that Robert Downey Jr. is contracted for at least 29 more superhero movies. If that's not original content, I don't know what is.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    6. Re:What is the appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After Indiana Jones and Star Wars, I think it's fair to say that he doesn't need to money. Good for him though, I'm glad he gets to cash in at the end of his career, I think he deserves it.

      Need...? No, there's no need. Want however...

    7. Re:What is the appeal? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      It's real Sci-Fi, not Sci-Fantasy like most movies.

      About 10 years ago, someone surveyed scientists and engineers and BR was voted the best SF nivie.

    8. Re:What is the appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so right. No one knows the pain & hardship Harrison Ford has gone through, as an actor. He completely deserves it. Him. Not the billions of people who toil on necessary but soul-crushing jobs, they don't deserve anything. Not people who risk their lives daily. Those people are a dime a dozen and so can go to hell, but a pampered actor who has already made more money than any of us can even conceive of, let alone earn....he deserves more money.

    9. Re:What is the appeal? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    10. Re:What is the appeal? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      And the movie whose tv commercial traumatized me and so many others for life, Suspiria

    11. Re:What is the appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friend: "There's a new Superman movie coming out."
      Me: "Again? How many times are they going to rehash that."
      Friend: "The villain isn't Lex Luthor."
      Me: "I'm there!"

    12. Re:What is the appeal? by lxs · · Score: 1

      That's a long and depressing read.
      Time to shut down Hollywood for good.

    13. Re:What is the appeal? by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      I prefer the book myself (but then I'm a Philip K Dick fan). I think that the film was definitely of its time though, and a lot of what made it original and unique at the time are just standard fare now. You have to remember it was definitely in on the ground floor of the whole dark and gritty dsytopian cyberpunk thing.

      I would also guess that if you haven't watched it until recently then its probably not your kind of film anyway.

    14. Re:What is the appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      made more money than any of us can even conceive of

      I don't know about that. I can "conceive" quite a bit.

    15. Re:What is the appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick up a book.

  13. Boy by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    is it going to suck.

    1. Re:Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truly sad thing is, no matter how bad it is, it still won't be worse than the book.

      Philip K Dick had some great ideas, but his writing rarely did them justice.

    2. Re: Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, Blade Runner was far superior to Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, usually it is the other way around; the film maker screws up your vision from the book

  14. Re:No Sean Young? :( by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    So, he's a Replicant. Replicate another.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  15. 2048 missing sequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess I missed Blade Runner 2 through Blade Runner 2048. Worth binging on Netflix?

    1. Re:2048 missing sequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Robotron: 2048?

    2. Re:2048 missing sequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Cyberball 2072.

      Now THAT is a movie I'd pay to see! :D

  16. Love me some Harris by chuckugly · · Score: 2

    Harris Ford. Harris? Fire an editor. Seriously.

    1. Re:Love me some Harris by darkitecture · · Score: 1

      If a tree falls in the middle of the forest and there's nobody around to hear it, does it make a sound?

      If a story is posted on Slashdot and an editor doesn't edit it, is the editor really an editor?

      hashtag existentialism

    2. Re:Love me some Harris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The editor has a name. It's BeauHD.

    3. Re:Love me some Harris by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If a tree falls in the middle of the forest and there's nobody around to hear it, does it make a sound?

      Pretty much depends on how you define 'sound', right?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  17. Hopefully it will have better lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried watching the first one a few times, but could never make it past 30 minutes because I couldn't see anything.

  18. Hollywood replicants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hollywood replicants are easy to spot. They cost considerably more than the real thing, are hyped for months, and suck.

  19. Death on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, the broadcast television networks censored the death scenes.
    apparently it was disturbing to the parents of children (even though children are busy killing each other in the streets.)

  20. Will this solve the Decker mystery? by cmeans · · Score: 2

    Given how old Ford is, and assuming they don't use some crappy CGI to make him look young, this should put to bed the theory that Decker was a replicant. Though I guess they could spin it that he's wearing makeup etc. Hopefully, they'll just tie up the loose end.

    1. Re:Will this solve the Decker mystery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ridley Scott, while a genius, is also a moron for propogating this garbage just to drive interest and sales in the recuts (like Lucas). Deckard was CLEARLY not a replicant, especially so emotionally advanced, that he gets his ass handed to him multiple times by real replicants. The whole point of the movie is his emotionless character is weak, and the replicants are "more human than human". Hence, Batty's beautiful soliquoy at the end, and a dozen other examples. If Deckard was a replicant, the movie turns into trite garbage, on the other hand, it's the top 2 scifi movies ever made with a close tie to 2001 if he's not./rant

    2. Re:Will this solve the Decker mystery? by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      If Deckard was a replicant, the movie turns into trite garbage, on the other hand, it's the top 2 scifi movies ever made with a close tie to 2001

      Space Oddessy 2001 was the boringest scifi movie ever made.
      You are right about Deckard, though. Part of the story is pointing out our mortality, and showing that even though we (and Deckard) are not replicants, our lives are not much longer than theirs.
      Oh, and let me tell you about my mother..........

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Will this solve the Decker mystery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was so excited when I heard Ridley Scott was going to re-visit the Alien universe.

      Then I saw Prometheus and I swore I'd never pay money to see another one of his 'films.'

      Then a friend talked me into seeing The Martian, and I pivoted 180 degrees again and now I'm SO CONFUSED!!

      P.S. who is "Decker?"

    4. Re:Will this solve the Decker mystery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      2001 is slow and methodical, and the whole is greater than the sum of the scenes. I believe this explains the philosophy pretty well. Basically, that movie is about man's evolution from ape to become space-fairing men (metaphorically killing God in the process) and become ubermen (the star child). Heady stuff...

    5. Re:Will this solve the Decker mystery? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      ok, 2001 gets credit for being philosophical, but BladeRunner is too, and manages to be engaging at the same time (Big Lebowski is philosophical, too)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Will this solve the Decker mystery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh? No, Deckard clearly was a replicant. The little foil origami was a message to indicate so. He was an older model, designed for different duties, but absolutely a replicant. If you don't think so I can only presume you thought the movie was a sequence of random nonsense most of the time.

    7. Re:Will this solve the Decker mystery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Uh? No, Deckard clearly was a replicant. The little foil origami was a message to indicate so.

      Only in the Director's Cut, where Ridley inserted the nonsensical "unicorn dream" to indicate that Gaff knew what was in Deckard's head.

      I distinctly remember people debating when the movie first came out what the symbolism of the origami was. IIRC the leading theory was that he knew Rachael was special and unique, i.e. like a unicorn. It didn't refer to Deckard at all.

      Also: to me and many other fans, the debate over whether Deckard is a replicant is fruitless, because the point is that there is no longer any significant difference between humans and replicants.

  21. Fire an editor. by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot. There is no expectation that editors will even read what they post, let alone check for accuracy. Based on seeing the same editors post error riddled stuff over and over, they are never fired either. If any do get fired, I want the job next. I've always wanted a job that involved no manual labor and no mental labor.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  22. Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hollywood needs to grow a pair, take a small risk, and start making original movies again. The constant recycling of old film franchises as a cynical cash grab is boring and tiresome, and leaves a permanent stain on history that can't be ignored (Star Wars is the obvious example).

    Just leave Blade Runner alone. It doesn't need a sequel.

    1. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not sequel, the phrase is soft reboot (google it)

    2. Re:Please don't by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Hollywood needs to grow a pair, take a small risk, and start making original movies again.

      They will, when people start paying for them.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also how about giving some chance to the hundreds new kids who graduate from schools of arts and films every year instead of making rich the same freaking guy simply because he can deliver neutralized and castrated sparking films.

    4. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Correction: They might try it, if people stop paying for the rehashes.

    5. Re:Please don't by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      No, they already make original movies, and if you go to any film festival, you can see them (of varying quality). If those start making money, Hollywood will definitely notice.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. [Oblig fogie jokes] Re:Will he be in a wheelchair? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    How old will Harrison Ford be in 2049?

    He'll be fighting off evil replicant nurses with bedpans.

    "Back when I was a young whipper-snapper, I'd fuck nurses like you until you short-circuited, and you'd love it!"

  24. Re:No Sean Young? :( by reboot246 · · Score: 0

    Without Sean Young (or equivalent eye candy) it won't be worth watching.
    Besides, I really want to know what happened to her character.

  25. I have finally learned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took me a long time (being rather thick I suppose), but after Star Wars, The Matrix, Highlander, etc. etc., I finally learned to never, ever, see a sequel/prequel to a great movie (or series in the Case of Star Wars) when such a prequel or sequel could RUIN the previous experience. I will never see this movie, regardless of reviews. The next Pacific Rim? Sure! The next Avatar? Absolutely. Why? Because those movies are pure fun, and that's all. It's matters little (or nothing) if sequels / prequels trod on the cannon, retcon all the hell over the place, make no sense, or have terrible acting, writing or directing. None of those things would actually ruin the originals. But Blade Runner? It's just too good, too damn perfect, to ever risk seeing the sequel.

  26. Not too far off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Los Angeles of today really doesn't look anything like the dystopian vision Scott wowed audiences with way back when

    Yeah, Blade Runner had better public transit.

    1. Re:Not too far off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bryant was the kind of cop who used to call black men 'níggers.'"

      Evidently there are no black people in L.A. in 2019?

  27. Will we have the clear plastic raincoat by mallyn · · Score: 2

    I watched BRI (blade runner 1) many times just for that scene! In fact, I made my own clear plastic raincoat that looks like the one in the movie!

    --
    Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
  28. Attack on Titan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie so sucked I lost interest in the TV series which was some of the best manga I a long time.

  29. It it the deluxe model of the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aluminum Mallard.

    Because seriously Roger Wilco was a far bigger badass for surviving all those games, given what a lazy klutz he was! :)

    1. Re:It it the deluxe model of the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered what happened to the Aluminum Mallard. Roger just left it sitting outside of that bar on Magmetheus.

  30. omnious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this going to be like the excelent Bluesbrothers 2000?

  31. Do androids dream of electric sheep? by camg188 · · Score: 1

    Maybe this one will actually follow the story of the Philip K Dick book the first one was supposed to be based on.

    1. Re:Do androids dream of electric sheep? by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      Maybe this one will actually follow the story of the Philip K Dick book the first one was supposed to be based on.

      Maybe this one will actually follow the K W Jeter screenplay that the first one was supposed to be based on.

  32. Wonder what Bill Hogue & Bounty Bob think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, at least Bill Hogue... Bounty Bob is a fictional character.
    I can't be the only one who thought of this reference.... ? Excellent game of it's time. Use your google-fu!

  33. Please be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully they make a worthy sequel and do little damage to the original.

    Still can't bring myself to watch the remake of Total Recall. Some directors/producers just have no appreciation for the classics.

  34. No Vangelis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is Blade Runner without Vangelis?

    1. Re:No Vangelis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      If they want me in the theater, they'd better get Vangelis to do the soundtrack again.

  35. Diversity? by houghi · · Score: 1

    I hope they do as much diversity as they did with Ghostbusters, because that worked out great.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  36. My Film by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 2

    I'm going to write and make a film called "Film of the Year - 5 Stars". It can't fail to become a hit with a name like that.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  37. Cooool! by PvtVoid · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the scene with Deckard in the refrigerator.

    1. Re:Cooool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shakes? I get 'em too. Chocolate, vanilla, strawberry... it's part of the business."

  38. Re:No Sean Young? :( by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Besides, he's a Replicant, and they die after four years.

    She has no time limit, in my own head canon, he doesn't either. "More human than human is our motto." Why manufacture limited replicants when you can just release pre-programed replicants into the wild with the needed desire and skills to provide for themselves and then produce and train more, new replicants? The Bladerunner world is having issues. Animals are in short supply and so are humans. There are so few humans that they need to encourage them with helper replicants to even move off world. If humans are in that short of supply, why not just cut them out and move out replicants to preform all the jobs? In the long term, they may be all that are left.

  39. As masterful as Prometheus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all remember how masterful Prometheus was as a sequel to Alien. That went over as well. I am sure that the Blade Runner sequel will be just as great. Prometheus had such great attention to detail, what a work of art it was. Stanley Kubrick is rolling over in envy in his grave with envy.

  40. Hopefully it will be at least as good as..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this!

    I'm expecting either the best film ever made or something in which all executives at the studio should be lined up against the wall. Either/or, please - make it great or make it suck, just don't make it ordinary.

  41. #BladeRunner2049 by SSI_Steve · · Score: 1

    Are we sure 2049 isn't actually the release date? Has this joke been made already?

  42. Needs more electric sheep by Lotus456 · · Score: 1

    I would have thought they'd call it "Blade Runner 2: Electric Sheep Boogaloo."

    --
    "It's a good computer... for I to BM on!" - apologies to Triumph, the insult comic dog
  43. 2049 because ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They used 2049 because the actors look 30 years older now.