Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Is Crashing (businessinsider.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Bitcoin is getting smashed. The cryptocurrency was down 18% to about $892 per coin as of 8:17 a.m. ET on Thursday. It is the biggest drop in two years. Earlier this week, on its first trading day of the new year, Bitcoin crossed above the $1,000 mark for the first time since 2013, but it has now tumbled below that level.

296 comments

  1. Previous article by buchner.johannes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    https://news.slashdot.org/stor...
    Probably a lot of people took the news of a 1000$ high as a chance to sell now?

    --
    NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    1. Re:Previous article by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More like a pump and dump scheme I would guess.

    2. Re:Previous article by buchner.johannes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both articles actually state that Bitcoin strongly anti correlates with the yuan.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    3. Re:Previous article by knightghost · · Score: 0

      Interesting given that most mining is done in China with subsidized electricity.

    4. Re:Previous article by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the second it dropped below $900, people started buying and pushed it to $975... Look up "Profit Taking" "Rebound" and "Correction" to see why this happens and how it happens in stocks and other investments all the time. Essentially, a lot of people had sell orders at $1100 that started a dip. A lot of day traders dumped when it dipped causing a big drop. But a lot had buy orders if it went below $900, and that floor caused the day traders to jump in and push it up further.

    5. Re:Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      More like a pump and dump scheme I would guess.

      Your comment implies that this phenomenon suddenly labels bitcoin as some sort of ponzi scheme that would make PT Barnum laugh with joy when in reality damn near any other currency in the world is backed with the same level of hype, hope, and bullshit.

      Oh, and speaking of hype and bullshit, since it's back over $950, this is hardly a "crash".

    6. Re:Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://news.slashdot.org/stor...
      Probably a lot of people took the news of a 1000$ high as a chance to sell now?

      Since it is largely controlled by chinese, should we be surprised that it si not longer a market driven force ??

      http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303847804579478490358996038

    7. Re:Previous article by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Probably a lot of people took the news of a 1000$ high as a chance to sell now?

      or the many ransomware owners changed their BC to $$..

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    8. Re: Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So EXACTLY LIKE ANY OTHER KIND OF INVESTMENT? Fuck, I'm sick of stupid people. Please die.

    9. Re: Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have more people living in poverty, but their middle class is bigger than the entire US population.

    10. Re:Previous article by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      China is in a huge bubble, smart Chinese are desperate to get their capital out. Capital controls never work for long.

      The 'ghost cities' in China are all owned by Chinese citizens, who traditionally love to own * real estate. In China a condo that has never been occupied is worth more that a condo that has (strange, but somewhat understandable as rents are nowhere close to mortgage payments). The average person with money in China is sitting on assets that are overvalued by a factor of at least 5. As more and more of them realize this, bitcoin pricing will become more volatile. The 'grey market international cash flow' share of bitcoin ownership (think of it as a flux though) is increasing vs the 'investor/speculator' shares.

      * 70 year lease, own...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re: Previous article by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese middle class is about a third the size of the US population and very slightly larger than the US middle class.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re: Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like yuor mom!

    13. Re:Previous article by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      I think this is closer to the truth. It wasn't people saying "hey, the news says bitcoin is high, I should sell". It was people setting up automated buy and sell orders based on specific value amounts. The problem was that everyone seems to have picked the exact same numbers.

    14. Re:Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://news.slashdot.org/stor...
      Probably a lot of people took the news of a 1000$ high as a chance to sell now?

      I know I did. I sold the day before yesterday for a tidy profit.
      If it hits $300, I'll buy it again.

    15. Re: Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its just related to the yuan. People who invest in BT know this and really dont care about volatile swings that happen when yuan rises or falls.

    16. Re:Previous article by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      And the second it dropped below $900, people started buying and pushed it to $975... Look up "Profit Taking" "Rebound" and "Correction" to see why this happens and how it happens in stocks and other investments all the time. Essentially, a lot of people had sell orders at $1100 that started a dip. A lot of day traders dumped when it dipped causing a big drop. But a lot had buy orders if it went below $900, and that floor caused the day traders to jump in and push it up further.

      When I first glanced at the headline I thought there was something major going on, since if Slashdot were reporting on bitcoin value it must be serious. Nope, of course not, just a correction that was bound to come sooner than later. It's still going strong, and while it will continue to be a wild ride, I can't see it really "crashing" any time soon, no matter what the OP suggests. I got back in months ago at $800ish, took profit at $975, and rebought again at $890. Big swings, as we've always seen, but not unexpected.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    17. Re:Previous article by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Really? Where?

      The TVA is still subsidizing electricity?

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    18. Re:Previous article by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      If it drops back down to 200 you might be right. But, take a look at the chart. It moved to 400 and stayed there for a few months. Then 600 and stayed there for a few months. Now it climbed fast to over 1000 and it dropped what? Back to 950? Oooh. So very bad. Even if it goes back to 650? So what. 650 is still a great floor.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    19. Re: Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look, more anti-China trash talking. Are you Japanese by any chance?

    20. Re: Previous article by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that glass heart. Telling truths is not 'trash talking'.

      Do you dispute any of my factual statements?

      Don't be so proud you let your life's savings disappear when your nation's bubble pops.

      China is a babe in the capitalist woods and has screwed the pooch, using (monetary policy/currency manipulation) to maintain 100% industrial utilization while not considering deeper issues or any other metrics.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    21. Re: Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a housing bubble in China right now, that isn't China bashing, it's the fucking truth you 50Â gutter person.

    22. Re: Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Factor of 5 could do with some citation.

    23. Re:Previous article by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      Seriously. This is just bitcoin being bitcoin. It always does this.
      At least it didn't get Goxed this time around!

    24. Re:Previous article by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Interesting given that most mining is done in China with subsidized electricity.

      Not to mention China's fairly lax environmental laws, so you can dump your mine tailings and spoil wherever you like without having to worry about the consequences.

    25. Re:Previous article by syntotic · · Score: 1

      Mmh? I am not believed or am ignored. Chinese do NOT have MONEY in their genetic makeup. They will abandon it at the least opportunity save for the Occidental Civilization. Then it seems the idea of a different kind of money does have some paradoxical effect! But it worries me that I was inquiring whether they used a programming technique from my code, last time I took a peek. No answer, but then query might have become rumor.

    26. Re: Previous article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the Chinese invented paper money, right?

    27. Re:Previous article by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      People who love bitcoin buy it as a gift for the holidays. Receivers sell as soon as they can.

      Later people kick themselves when it reaches $2000 during the next xmas rush.

  2. Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now it's at 954

    1. Re:Up by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Almost like people have never seen speculative corrections before...

    2. Re:Up by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      no no no. This a speculative correction 'of an internet something'

      It's TOTALLY BRAND NEW!

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    3. Re:Up by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Lol!

  3. Hahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So what?

    1. Re:Hahahahaha by Mitreya · · Score: 2

      So what?

      Well, the article's goal is either to spike Bitcoin further or to try and delay the fall because they are not done dumping it.

      I cannot tell which one because TFA thinks that they are important enough to make me turn off ad-blocker or convince me to get ad-light(??) access for less money. But nowdays even with ad blocker, some websites manage to play video with obnoxious sound or freeze the browser, so I am too afraid to turn it off and see the real web.

      So lots of fascinating discussion topics.

    2. Re:Hahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what you're talking about with the ad stuff. AdBlock Latitude blocks it just fine without compromising the page. It might help that I have NoScript (51 scripts, 1 object) and RequestPolicy (56 requests) helping out. Maybe you should try defending more of your browser's attack surface and you wouldn't have trouble.

      On a less "meta" and more on-topic note, it's Business Insider. They're just a dead-tree magazine turned web "magazine". Reading their analysis, it's actually pretty sound. It's probably written by a bot. Most of its content is factual and is a parroting of the statistics applying to BTC conversion rates over recent months. There is a minor bit at the end speculating about the cause of the noticeable change in conversion rate between BTC and everything else. That part might have been added by "Akin Oyedele", who has his picture on the byline. This article is most likely not intentionally part of a pump-and-dump, though it may be contributing to someone else's efforts to do so.

    3. Re:Hahahahaha by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you're talking about with the ad stuff.

      you clicked in the link on summary, right?

    4. Re:Hahahahaha by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      blocks it just fine without compromising the page

      "here in my machine it works, sir!" (this kind of "argument" shows up from time to time here on my work [a software development area]...)

    5. Re:Hahahahaha by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is off the lowest levels of its plunge on Thursday, which was the worst in two years.

      The cryptocurrency is down 13% to $985.68 per coin as of 11:10 a.m. ET on Thursday. It earlier fell by about 20%.

      Earlier this week, on its first trading day of the new year, bitcoin crossed above the $1,000 mark for the first time since 2013, but it has now tumbled below that level.

      From the end of September through Wednesday - just before the plunge - bitcoin gained nearly 100%. It was supported by renewed interest from China, where money rushed out of the country as its currency, the yuan, continued to weaken.

      But on Thursday the yuan witnessed its biggest two-day rise since record keeping began in 2010. This happened amid the government's efforts to stop outflows from the country and after overnight borrowing costs in Hong Kong surged to a record as high as 100%. That squeezed investors who had bet that the currency would fall.

      The yuan's rise is also pressuring the US dollar, which fell against other major currencies.

      SEE ALSO: The ruble is surging to its highest level since July 2015

      Hey, at least Putin's stock is going up; wonder who's invested bigly in him?

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  4. Volatility by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin is a great way to make a lot of money or lose a lot of money if you don't mind taking a gamble or being very patient. It will inevitably rise and fall like crazy.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Volatility by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is a great way to make a lot of money or lose a lot of money if you don't mind taking a gamble or being very patient. It will inevitably rise and fall like crazy.

      One of the reasons that Bitcoin is (supposedly) Good is the stability in its supply, that it can't be diluted by evil government and made valueless. But since nobody is looking after it, it is vulnerable to horrible fluxations way worse than anything than properly managed fiat currency does. Bitcoin as a means of transfer, fine, but Bitcoin as a value store, terrrrriiible.

    2. Re:Volatility by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      Only if you look at it in very short terms. Over long term it is actually quite stable other then occasional speculative peaks which are easy to avoid. You could see this one coming at Christmas. And today (If you were watching) was the bitcoin sale at $900.

    3. Re:Volatility by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Good is the stability in its supply, that it can't be diluted by evil government and made valueless.

      Lol, I wouldn't bet on that. I may not be able to articulate how they could do it, but I would also never claim that it's immune to them finding a way to fiddle with the value of bitcoin.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Volatility by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Only if you look at it in very short terms. Over long term it is actually quite stable other then occasional speculative peaks which are easy to avoid. You could see this one coming at Christmas. And today (If you were watching) was the bitcoin sale at $900.

      For pretend money, Bitcoin is not so unstable. Compared to real money, it is extremely unstable. It is only ideological blinkers that prevent people from seeing it that way.

    5. Re:Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe currency should be used for transfer and not storing value in the first place, since it is, after all, inherently valueless :P

    6. Re:Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes ideological blinkers to view different currencies as "real" or "unreal". It is all just numbers on a ledger and it's value is derived from our beliefs.

    7. Re:Volatility by helga+the+viking · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile in the real world most people have seen or know about a government accounting statement... 'Evil' or not: https://www.fms.treas.gov/dts/... There's your stable supply of USD there. Subtract X trillion from an infinite set. Thats a lot more stable than X CPU/GPU cycles to get a crypto commodity which is algorithmically pegged at a rising rate of change to your computers ability to 'mine' it.

    8. Re:Volatility by helga+the+viking · · Score: 1

      the 'fiddle' is its market value. Markets being rational, stable, predictable ;-)

    9. Re:Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, I wouldn't bet on that. I may not be able to articulate how they could do it, but I would also never claim that it's immune to them finding a way to fiddle with the value of bitcoin.

        Bitcoin has a market cap of about $20 billion, even at current prices.

      That's within the realm of a rich investor's ability to manipulate the market (c.f. Hunt Brothers and the silver market).

    10. Re:Volatility by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      it's value is derived from our beliefs.

      Well, USD are largely valuable because of beliefs, but also because most US real estate has property taxes that must be paid in USD, or the property is taken away. Also, US and State taxes, even on bartered items, must be sent in in USD. Also, gas taxes. And so it goes, and so it goes. Sure, the ultimate value of a currency is faith, but there are real things you can buy from governments in a single currency. And those real things matter.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    11. Re:Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you look at it in very short terms. Over long term

      There hasn't BEEN a "long term" yet, so you can't say anything about its long term value. All you can do is attempt to extrapolate based on the short term performance.

    12. Re:Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fed's balance sheet is trillions more and is more representative, but even the Fed is a small fraction of the total world dollar supply. See https://secure.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-how-much-money-exists-in-the-entire-world-in-one-chart-2015-12-18

      Even updating bitcoin from $5 billion at the time the chart was made to $20 billion, it is still a drop in the $1 quadrillion bucket of world capital.

    13. Re:Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "most US real estate has property taxes that must be paid in USD, or the property is taken away. Also, US and State taxes, even on bartered items, must be sent in in USD. Also, gas taxes. And so it goes, and so it goes. Sure, the ultimate value of a currency is faith, but there are real things you can buy from governments in a single currency. And those real things matter."

      The volume of dollar-denominated assets far exceeds these "real things". The vast majority of US dollar-denominated capital in the world is outside of US regulatory authority, in international banks (shadow banks). The chartalist view of the taxation value of money ignores the 90% of money that is not taxed and circulates outside of sovereign regulatory capture.

  5. Rebounding already by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    $950 as of this comment. These articles are always out of date.

    1. Re:Rebounding already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not $950 anymore. These comments are always out of date!!

    2. Re:Rebounding already by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait, it's back at $950, so the comment is back in date.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Rebounding already by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      Even a stopped clock shows the right time twice a day.

    4. Re: Rebounding already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it is a digital clock.

  6. Maybe just profit taking? by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really think that a lot of folks had just said "oh 1k maybe time to "cash in"...

    I bet it rebounds and will go through some oscillations every time it crosses 1k until folks get used to the idea that it can go to /higher than 1k then it will creep up and probably take a dip at 1.5k and/or 2k

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
    1. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      I bet it rebounds and will go through some oscillations every time it crosses 1k until folks get used to the idea that it can go to /higher than 1k then it will creep up and probably take a dip at 1.5k and/or 2k

      The way to bet is to buy some :)

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    2. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reason is because of other currencies (Yuan in this case). http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/01/05/unexpected-yuan-gains-affect-global-markets-bitcoin-price/

    3. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by mccalli · · Score: 1

      It always amused me that the first thing this brave new world of decentralised control recreated was....currency and commodity speculation. They're being introduced to the idea of support and resistance levels, all standard stuff. The difference with crypto is that the volatility resulting from these swings is enormous.

    4. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by vvaduva · · Score: 2

      This is the most likely scenario. The market is a beautiful thing...probably several big whales decided to cash out, meaning the supply spiked causing the price to go down. The ignorance of looking at a 24 hour 17% drop vs a 300% 12 month raise is astounding. I would think most people who understand financial markets would not be this ignorant to call this a "crash"

    5. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by swillden · · Score: 1

      The difference with crypto is that the volatility resulting from these swings is enormous.

      That's not a "crypto" difference; it's a normal characteristic of commodities that typically trade in low volumes. If bitcoins were being bought and sold in large quantities by many big institutional investors, with lots of focus on identifying and exploiting arbitrage opportunities, the volatility would be reduced.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The ignorance of looking at a 24 hour 17% drop vs a 300% 12 month raise is astounding. I would think most people who understand financial markets would not be this ignorant to call this a "crash"

      For someone accusing others of being "ignorant" of financial markets, you sure have a funny way of reporting statistics. You do realize that IF you had a 300% gain, then a 75% loss would completely erase it, right? When talking about percentage gains this large, it usually helps to talk in terms of actual numerical gains or at least how much of a loss you have COMPARED TO the gain (in real numbers).

      According to the first search hit I found, a year ago Bitcoin was at around $432. Yesterday, that site reported it as $1135. That's a 162% gain, not 300%. As I write this, Bitcoin is around $950. That's is indeed somewhere around a 16-17% loss in 24 hours.

      But, from a clearer perspective on how we relate those two percentages, the gain for the past year was about $700. The overnight loss is so far around $185. In other words, Bitcoin lost OVER A QUARTER OF ITS YEARLY GAIN OVERNIGHT.

      Is it back where it was a year ago? No. But trying to pretend that this is a minimal loss by juxtaposing numbers like 300 and 17 is disingenuous at best.

      Should "people who understand financial markets" be worried at such a turn of events? Probably not. Because people who understand financial markets know that Bitcoin is right now a really bizarre investment subject to the whims of "pump and dump" investors, and there's still a lot of value locked up in some early investors who could completely crash the market if they decided to jump ship.

      So, anyone "who understands financial markets" probably expects Bitcoin to be this volatile -- probably even more so. Whether a person "who understands financial markets" would consider Bitcoin a sound investment is a different question.

    7. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      That is only going to change when a big (evil) bank with cozy connections to all those big bad gov'ts decide to weigh in and help Bitcoin succeed. So far, one of the surest ways to lose you Bitcoin is to trust it to a Bitcoin exchange, where it will likely disappear with all the earmarks of an inside job. Mtgox is the obvious example, but it was far from the first and not the last.

    8. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by myNameIsNotImportant · · Score: 1

      > The ignorance of looking at a 24 hour 17% drop vs a 300% 12 month raise is astounding. I would think most people who understand financial markets would not be this ignorant to call this a "crash"

      You think wrong. For *any* asset type a 17% drop in 24hrs is most definitely a crash.

    9. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by myNameIsNotImportant · · Score: 1

      ...What you're failing to consider is the time scale of these changes / effect of compounding.

      +300% over 250 days is on avg +0.44% daily:

      >> (exp(log(3)/250) - 1) * 100
      ans =
                0.44041189055799
      >>

    10. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happens almost weekly with gasoline prices, and nobody so much as bats an eye.

    11. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Why would any bank want Bitcoin to succeed? They would rather their own digital currency come out and take off.

    12. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price is fast approaching lows not seen since... December 29, 2016. Shit, its a full run on the market!!!!

    13. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Unless it drops further, I think I would classify the high point as a spike. Bitcoin is currently trading at about the same level it was two weeks ago.

      Last time Bitcoin was at $1,000, it eventually crashed to around $200, but that was precipitated by the implosion of MtGox and a couple of other high profile failures.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    14. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      Gasoline prices (at the pump) are regulated in many places.

    15. Re:Maybe just profit taking? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's in the best interests of a lot of people that Bitcoin does not get big. If it does, that leaves a lot of early entrants fabulously wealthy. It's more appealing to go to a digital currency that doesn't have the initial hoarding problem.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  7. Slashdot effect 2.0 by rmdingler · · Score: 0
    Hmmm... digital currency peaks, then crashes after Slashdot article.

    Nerd goes, "Wait, my Bitcoin is worth what?!?!"

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Slashdot effect 2.0 by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aaaand.... it's gone.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    2. Re:Slashdot effect 2.0 by BozoForPresident · · Score: 1

      Yeah - it's gone back over $1000. Bitchiz.

    3. Re:Slashdot effect 2.0 by antdude · · Score: 1

      "I like turtles."

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  8. Not only that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But if you look at bitcoin historically, it ALWAYS does this after a 200 dollar surge. It ramps up as hype rises for whatever reason, then crashes back to 20-50 dollars above the previous average mark.

    Personally I think we are seeing long term market manipulation at work here, but as long as it had long periods of stability between rises and crashes it is still overall as good a medium of exchange (not savings!) as any other currency, physical (as in minted coinage) or imaginary (as in both fiat and virtual currencies, since neither is in practice backed by anything more tangible than belief in their superiority.)

  9. Re:Bitcoin is always crashing. by Maritz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Number of instances of word "bitcoin" in your comment about a Bitcoin article: 0.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  10. Bitcoin is dead by vvaduva · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is it...Bitoin is dead!! It's up 300% over the last 12 months but down 18% over the last 24 hours. It's fucked! Bitcoin is dead!! What idiots use this crap??

    1. Re:Bitcoin is dead by JcMorin · · Score: 1

      It's called volatility, bitcoin is used for buying something real every 35 sec just on BitPay platform.

    2. Re:Bitcoin is dead by vvaduva · · Score: 2

      Yeah...I use my Shift Coinbase card all the time to buy dinner, pay bills or whatever I feel like using it for. I don't understand the ignorance people here display towards BTC.

    3. Re:Bitcoin is dead by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      you can buy these idiots with an discount of 18% now, sir!

    4. Re:Bitcoin is dead by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your post, I had not heard of the Shift Coinbase card before. What advantages do you feel it has over a typical Visa?

    5. Re:Bitcoin is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you live in the US? Are you tracking your gains and losses every time you use that card? Truth is, every time you buy dinner you are potentially realizing a capital gain and are subject to capital gains tax. Be careful.

    6. Re:Bitcoin is dead by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's going to make for one heck of a tax form, as your cost basis and BTC/USD value at time of sale will be needed for every transaction.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Bitcoin is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the best part is the random value of the card. Bitcoin's volatility makes it adequate for illegal transactions, but a poor choice for anything that should be legally taxed.

    8. Re:Bitcoin is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol no.

      If GP lives in the USA then any receipts needed will be in USD. If GP must submit "income" or "loss" from BTC variation, then it's $gain = (BTC remaining in account)*(BTC to USD rate at filing time)-(USD in)+(USD out). Super simple arithmetic.

    9. Re:Bitcoin is dead by lgw · · Score: 1

      In the US, every sale of BTC is taxable, so you must provide a sales price and cost basis. If you have 100 CC charges, that's a 100 line spreadsheet for taxes. Not exactly convenient. OTOH, if the CC provider gave you all of that in a report: much easier.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Bitcoin is dead by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Don't you also have to note when you acquired the bitcoin and when you spent it, to know what taxes you pay? There's a time limit before which appreciation is taxed as regular income in the US, and after which it's subject to capital gains tax. I would rather not have to worry about tax differences between paying for something yesterday and today.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:Bitcoin is dead by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's still a bit unclear how BTC will be taxed (new tax law is never settled until there's a court case that can set precedent on corner cases). If it's taxed as a collectable (like gold coins), then it's a 28% rate regardless, which really sucks. If it's taxed as an investment (or currency) then you get significantly lower long term capital gains, worth keeping track of.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  11. OMG back to $929!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not news. If I wanted to know what the BTC value is I'd not check on /.

  12. Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    Buy it to speculate (ie gamble).

    1. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by grnbrg · · Score: 2

      All investment is a gamble. And with Bitcoin, like any other investment -- don't risk more than you are prepared to lose completely.

    2. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Buy it to speculate (ie gamble).

      The problem with Bitcoin as a speculative investment is the lack of liquidity. Unlike other markets it is not easy to buy and sell large amounts at will, in addition there seems to be no put and call options available. As a result, while it is a highly speculative investment it is not an easy one to actually invest in as a speculator; unless you are just doing trivial amounts of money.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be desirable, not being able to buy large amounts at a time.
      If it is not possible to buy huge swathes of BitCoin, then it makes BitCoin less susceptible to market manipulation.
      A lot of 'real' (bad choice of words maybe) currencies are subject to market manipulation.

    4. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any asset is a gamble. Don't own any asset you aren't prepared to lose completely.

    5. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by myNameIsNotImportant · · Score: 1

      If your investment is a gamble, it's not an investment, it's a gamble.

    6. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      I'm really kicking myself for not speculating another $10k into BTC when it was down around $225.

    7. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make any sense; nobody knows the future.

    8. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All investment is risk, but that's different from what people normally mean by gamble. Sure any investment bears risks such as global nuclear war, government/societal collapse, alien invasion, and so on, but the unexpected death of the investor is a higher risk than those sorts of things. Any investment is a risk somewhere on the scale between short-term US treasuries, and loaning money to a heroin addict, but that doesn't mean all risks are similar.

      Also, volatility and risk are different things. At this point for BTC, I'd be much more concerned about its volatility than the risk it would go to 0, making it speculative regardless.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      I'm really kicking myself for not speculating another $10k into BTC when it was down around $225.

      Hah! I remember the first time it hit $20. I sold 5 BTC and thought I was a genius!

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    10. Re:Don't buy bitcoin for an investment. by infolation · · Score: 1

      But, in three years, when 1 BTC = $4,444, you might also be really kicking yourself for not speculating another $10k into BTC when it was down around $1,000.

      '2020' hindsight etc.

  13. Fair Comparison by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    You might want to at least make a reference as to how other currencies are doing against the dollar, as well as state what time period the 18% drop was over...a day...a month...a year???

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:Fair Comparison by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      as well as state what time period the 18% drop was over...a day...a month...a year???

      Um I know that this is /. but it's genuinely lame to not have read TFS that only contains 4 sentences and states

      Earlier this week, on its first trading day of the new year, Bitcoin crossed above the $1,000 mark for the first time since 2013, but it has now tumbled below that level.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  14. How to Short Bitcoin for the Win, Alex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How do you short it?

    1. Re: How to Short Bitcoin for the Win, Alex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitfinex offers short sales.

    2. Re: How to Short Bitcoin for the Win, Alex by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Well a short sale is pretty risky for most investors. Unlimited losses are kind of scary. If you want to short something and you're not highly experienced, look to buy puts. At least that keeps a lid on maximum losses.

    3. Re: How to Short Bitcoin for the Win, Alex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use stop loss sells in general as well. Puts like all options have theta decay

    4. Re: How to Short Bitcoin for the Win, Alex by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      there is a maximum loss on a short too.
      It's the point at which you are totally insolvent and declare Ch11. ;)

      Granted that's a shitty spot to be in, but it is dischargeable via bankruptcy.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re: How to Short Bitcoin for the Win, Alex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlimited losses assuming you don't have a trigger limit to get out of your short position at say a full loss (if the price somehow doubles). Smart investors would certainly be doing that (and the odds of radical upswings to the tune of 100% are so uncommon that the risk is pretty on par with getting eaten by a shark)

  15. Big profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet it's risen another $100 since this article was posted. Is the same source reporting on that? The author seems to be gleefully reporting the dips but ignoring the rises. You would have made a big profit if you bought it when it was "being smashed" and sold it today.

  16. Don't you see what Potter's doing? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He isn't selling, he's BUYING!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Don't you see what Potter's doing? by locotx · · Score: 1

      "...now we gotta stick together on this!" - George Bailey

    2. Re:Don't you see what Potter's doing? by locotx · · Score: 1

      "...get in there and SELL!!" - Duke Brothers

    3. Re:Don't you see what Potter's doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a moment there I thought you said Pottering is buying.

      That would mean that Bitcoin is a piece of crap but everybody follows his lead anyway. Which would mean it would go up.

      I think I need another beer before making decisions. Make that instead of making decisions.

    4. Re: Don't you see what Potter's doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They call him Mister Poettering!

    5. Re: Don't you see what Potter's doing? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Make that Reichsmarschall.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. This stuff makes me feel old by Gilgaron · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At work I get dollars for labor, which can be used to procure goods and services. I could also use my computer sitting at home to do nothing and save electricity, fold proteins for the good of mankind, or generate numbers that for some reason can be used to procure goods and services? Usually when you get value for no reason it is part of a Ponzi scheme. Does Bitcoin hold any value because it also seems to be a decent way to launder money?

    1. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by jwhyche · · Score: 0

      Does Bitcoin hold any value because it also seems to be a decent way to launder money?

      Bitcoin holds value the same way all modern currency have value. It has value because some people say it has value. So as long as its worth something to someone it will hold that value.

      But I would like to note unlike digital currency has a use after people lose faith in it. You can still wipe your ass with it.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    2. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      At work I get dollars for labor, which can be used to procure goods and services. I could also use my computer sitting at home to do nothing and save electricity, fold proteins for the good of mankind, or generate numbers that for some reason can be used to procure goods and services?

      Instead of welfare, we should just give all the unemployed computers for Bitcoin mining.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To answer a small part of your overall question, when you leave your computer at home mining Bitcoin it's actually contributing to running the network that supports Bitcoin, acting as part of the distributed log of transactions. That's why mining earns money, it's providing a service to users of the currency

      I'm sure others can better answer the overall question of why does the currency itself have value

    4. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Mike · · Score: 1

      What real/inherent value do your paper dollars hold?

      You do realize that it's a fiat currency back by nothing, and infinitely manipulated by its creator, the Federal Reserve, right? You may be able to buy stuff with it now, but that won't always be the case (and indeed there's ample evidence that it won't be the case for much longer).

      BTC, on the other hand, is finite and not easily manipulated like fiat currency.

      So while the market cap of BTC is very small, which will inevitably result in seeming instability in its early years (i.e. now), it'll seem tame by comparison when you witness the instability coming to your favorite fiat currency.

    5. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      > when you witness the instability coming to your favorite fiat currency

      I'm always impressed when people say things that people have been saying forever, but they're convinced that they're right, this time.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    6. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by davidwr · · Score: 2

      Fiat currency does have one advantage over bitcoin: It is almost always legal tender for paying current and past-due domestic debts, including tax debts.

      There are of couse exceptions - minor coinage is typically legal tender for only small amounts, a particular bank note can by de-monitized like India just did, an entire currency can be scrapped as Zimbabwe did a few years ago, and some highly-regulated countries have government-run "hard currency stores" for tourists that won't accept local currency (e.g. the old Soviet Union).

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    7. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Ah, I didn't realize that part was distributed. That makes some more sense then what I was envisioning... something like finding new prime numbers or whatever.

    8. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Mike · · Score: 2

      I should say the same thing.

      Every fiat currency that has ever existed since time immemorial has crashed and burned. It's even happened several times in US history.

      But somehow this time it won't?

    9. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I suppose it is mostly just on the strength of the government... not that gold is any less silly... come to think of it, though, since to use for most important purposes, like buying food or housing, one must trade the Bitcons for dollars first, perhaps I need to think of Bitcoin more like bartering home crafts. If I imagine a 3D printer whirring away instead of a CPU it makes more sense even though it comes down to the same thing.

    10. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Mike · · Score: 1

      I'm 100% confident that BTC (or some similar cryptocurrency) will long outlast the dollar or any other fiat currency.

    11. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by fbobraga · · Score: 0

      you are really old...

    12. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Fiat currency does have one advantage over bitcoin: It is almost always legal tender for paying current and past-due domestic debts, including tax debts.

      And there's this: If my house payment is $1000, it'll be $1000 in a fiat currency like US dollars, period.

      But how much will that be in Bitcoin today or tomorrow or next week? Maybe it'll be 1 Bitcoin, or maybe it'll be 1.5 Bitcoins, and so on. It's similar to gold or silver or any variable commodity in that the "value" can vary widely from day to day. But my house payment will be $1000 US dollars regardless of the price of gold or silver or bitcoin or whatever.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    13. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by magarity · · Score: 1

      Instead of welfare, we should just give all the unemployed computers for Bitcoin mining.

      I'll vote for this if said computers are powered by exercise bikes and treadmills.

    14. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by helga+the+viking · · Score: 1

      by 'people' you mean tax collectors. Ultimately currency hold value because the currency issuer can hire police to put you in jail if you use it and dont pay Tax. bitcoin is not a 'currency'

    15. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice. Solve obesity epidemic and unemployment in one move... mostly because of all the heart attacks when folks try to earn their coins.

    16. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Usually when you get value for no reason it is part of a Ponzi scheme.

      People mine gold and diamonds, despite there the fact that we already have large stockpiles of them.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    17. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by davidwr · · Score: 1

      But my house payment will be $1000 US dollars

      The loan-payout portion is fixed if it's a fixed-rate home loan. The insurance, property taxes, neighborhood association fees, and other costs most people think about when they talk about a "house payment" are typically variable. If the dollar suffers inflation, or if the local taxing authority just raises taxes for whatever reason, your total payment will go up.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    18. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by RockyMountain · · Score: 1

      > my house payment is $1000, it'll be $1000 in a fiat currency like US dollars, period.
      > But my house payment will be $1000 US dollars regardless of the price of gold or silver or bitcoin or whatever.

      It's only "fixed" in dollars, because you negotiated in dollars when you took out the mortgage. (I'm not suggesting you had a choice, of course).

      It's not "fixed" in any other fiat currency. Your $1000/mo mortgage payment still changes from month to month when measured in Euros, Yuan, Pounds, Shekels, Wampum, or Micronesian Rai stones.

      So, I don't think this argument illustrates any fundamental fiat-vs-bitcoin difference.
      It only illustrates the pragmatic point that currency amounts specified in a contract have to be bound to a particular currency in order to make the contract unambiguous. That chosen currency (whether fiat or bitcoin) is only "special" in the context of that particular contract.

    19. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by helga+the+viking · · Score: 1

      i want what you're smoking.

    20. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by jdunn14 · · Score: 1

      True, but as a portion of my payment all those things total just under 20%. Even if taxes went up 20%, and people would be up in arms about that, it's still less than a 4% change in my monthly payment. These BC fluctuations are a whole different ball game.

    21. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Mike · · Score: 1

      Historical context, along with technological literacy, goes a long way to clearly perceiving reality.

    22. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      It'll be $1000 worth of Bitcoin.

      What does it matter if that's 1 BTC or 1.5 BTC? It's still $1000 of BTC. Bitcoin is for making payments, not for storing money or fixing your prices against (you want a currency for those, not a payment network).

    23. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The loan-payout portion is fixed if it's a fixed-rate home loan. The insurance, property taxes, neighborhood association fees, and other costs most people think about when they talk about a "house payment" are typically variable.

      Yes, it's a fixed-rate loan like the majority of home loans. But, even if taxes and insurance and "other costs" (whatever those unspecified things may be) went up drastically, my house payment wouldn't go up to, say, $2000 a month.

      But if I had all my money in Bitcoin, who knows what it would be? Maybe my payment would be 0.75 Bitcoin, or maybe it would be 3 Bitcoins. Maybe it would be 10 bitcoins.

      And by the way, even if taxes and insurance and "other costs" went up, that rise in cost would still have to be paid in Bitcoin, which could potentially make it even worse for me.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    24. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      It'll be $1000 worth of Bitcoin.

      What does it matter if that's 1 BTC or 1.5 BTC?

      Seriously? It matters a shitload if the price of bitcoin drops. Suddenly a whole lot of my money is *gone*, unlike with dollars.

      Lets say that one bitcoin is worth $1000 and my house payment is also $1000.

      If I have 20 bitcoin in my wallet, I can make 20 house payments...but if the value of bitcoin drops to $500, now I can only make 10 house payments. See the problem?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    25. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So has gold and every other commodity. Fiat currencies actually have quite a good record compared to currencies with "intrinsic value" -- you may remember that the US abandoned the gold standard to *increase* the stability of the currency after being faced with crippling price instability from gold. (Precious metal based currencies have always had their share of catastrophic problems: see the Spanish hyperinflation in the 1500s for a particularly notable, but far from unique, example). Which has worked: you will notice that the price of gold has fluctuated wildly over the last decade, but prices for most things have been stable at the percent level.

    26. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah: you're trying to use Bitcoin to store value. Bitcoin is for moving your savings around, not for storing them. You don't keep 20 BTC in your wallet, you keep $20k in it and then use the Bitcoin network to move $1k per payment. It makes no odds whether that's 1 BTC or 2 BTC at the time of payment.

    27. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Mike · · Score: 1

      Of course the stated reason for leaving the gold standard was instability, but it's utter nonsense. $100 in 1812 purchased roughly the same amount of goods in 1912. But then the Fed took over, and a fake gold standard began, which was then completely dropped by Nixon in 1971. Now the dollar has about 4 cents of buying power compared to 100 years ago.

      The real reason for abandoning the gold standard, of course, was so that government could fund it's ever-increasing budgets. Inflation is a great way to tax people with out "raising taxes". Simply steal from your money's purchasing power.

    28. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Does Bitcoin hold any value because it also seems to be a decent way to launder money?

      question asked, and answered.

    29. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vote parent up.

      "Miners" actually insert new transactions into Bitcoin's distributed ledger. They currently get Bitcoin for performing this task. As time goes on, and as new Bitcoins become more and more scarce, an ever-growing portion of their reward will be transaction fees.

    30. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you have obligations in USD, it's really handy to have income and saving in USD. I have a friend with obligations in both USD and Yen, and he occasionally struggles to maintain a balance of USD/Yen income and savings, to avoid any nasty currency shocks.

      It's quite bad to have your income and savings in a currency that has a volatile exchange rate with the one you have obligations in - even if you're making gains some in the exchange rate.

      This is the difference-in-kind in BTC - it's hugely volatile. That makes it basically useless as a currency for savings, unless your alternative is a currency that's actually collapsing right now.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm very sure some cryptocurrency will outlast some fiat currency, and vice versa. But the USD in particular is safer than BTC in particular.

      Not to mention, I have fixed obligation in USD. That's not going to change any time soon. Thus I want my income and savings in USD, so that I don't find myself unable to meet those obligations due to daily exchange rate volatility.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    32. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by BozoForPresident · · Score: 1

      OP, it doesn't matter that you don't get Bitcoin - or even that you don't understand what money laundering actually entails. It just means that your financial literacy is mediocre.

    33. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by RockyMountain · · Score: 1

      Agreed with all of the above. Slight topic drift follows...

      I've never bought or sold a Bitcoin, because they don't seem to offer any use case that I care about.

      Certainly not investment. Not even under the banner of "speculation" -- that's not in my temperament (I don't like playing with the highly volatile)
      And not money-laundering either. What little money I do possess is sparkling clean, and not in need of any laundering.

      But, is the following a useful use-case for Bitcoin?

      Can you use Bitcoin useful as an interim currency to send money between family members in different countries? The sender would buy bit-coin in say dollars, send it electronically to the receiver, who would almost immediately sell it in euros, say. The Bitcoins would be held for a short enough time that hopefully the volatility would not be an unacceptable risk. Perhaps just minutes.

      I would be interested in that use model, perhaps. I don't care about anonymity per-se, as the transfers would all be legal and well within regulatory limits. But, purely as a way to avoid dealing with foreign-exchange departments in banks, which I can tell you from experience are VERY very slow, complicated, and expensive. Seems like a Bitcoin-based transfer would essentially be self-directed, with nobody other than the sender and receiver having to play an active role.

      Thoughts?

    34. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by lgw · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin as a payment/transfer system seems to be its primary use, from what I can see.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    35. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by ThluksatorStrauch · · Score: 1

      Yes, Bitcoin can be used for exactly this scenario. Allowing people to transfer money who are not able to use banking systems at all or who are punished with big fees.

    36. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i want what you're smoking.

      That'll be 0.035 BTC, please. Please use my public key to encrypt your address.

    37. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are folding with FoldingCoin team and receive a token of reward on the Bitcoin blockchain!

    38. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the US dollar never changes, even like now when it's at a 14 year high, it stays the same... It's like your house debt is based in the currency you use to pay it with. Get a mortgage in another currency (or bitcoin) and see that it's not as stable as you think.

    39. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Usually when you get value for no reason it is part of a Ponzi scheme."

      The universe is the ultimate Ponzi scheme?

    40. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the Spanish hyperinflation in the 1500s"

      2% inflation per year is hyperinflation now? See http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/spgold.htm

    41. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now the dollar has about 4 cents of buying power compared to 100 years ago."

      " Inflation is a great way to tax people with out "raising taxes". Simply steal from your money's purchasing power."

      You are not taking into account that the increasing money supply was accompanied by increasing GDP per capita. In 1913 $20 could buy a suit but the GDP per capita was $400 so the suit cost 5% of average annual income. 5% of today's average annual income is $2500, and you can buy a great suit for that. Thus real purchasing power has increased.

      See "income value" and "economic value" calculations of $20 in 1913 at https://www.measuringworth.com/uscompare/relativevalue.php . Economic value is close to $10k.

      Another thing: if you buried $100 in 1913 and dug it up today it would be worth many times the face value of the $20. Thus currencies appreciate over time.

    42. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ultimately currency hold value because the currency issuer can hire police to put you in jail if you use it and dont pay Tax."

      Most, like 90%, of US Dollars is not taxed because it is outside US tax jurisdiction.

    43. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if the banks decide to undercut Bitcoin for international transfers they can. Their processes are potentially much more efficient. One advantage of Bitcoin could be that it forces banks to make account-to-account-anywhere transfers cheaper and easier.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    44. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is an asset, meaning that you have to keep the accounting on buying it when for what price and selling (including paying for things with it) it when and for what price. This will yield a gain or loss in USD, and that affects your adjusted gross income for tax purposes. It's easier to use dollars in the US, since there's no accounting involved.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    45. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Thing is, somebody has to hold the Bitcoin. If you have it in your wallet, you're taking the risk and possible gain if Bitcoin changes in value. If you buy it from an exchange when you want to transfer money, somebody else is taking the risk, and businesses charge when they take on risks. If Bitcoin were stable relative to the dollar, that's not much risk, but if it's volatile there's more risk and exchanges will have to charge more for their services.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    46. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Every fiat currency that has ever existed since time immemorial has crashed and burned.

      False. There's plenty that haven't cashed and burned, including the US dollar, the Euro, and the pound. It could be that they're going to crash and burn sometime, but that's at least not obvious.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    47. Re:This stuff makes me feel old by Mike · · Score: 1

      Seriously?

      It should be obvious that my statement implicitly excludes current fiat currencies.

      However if you look at what caused the destruction of all previous fiat currencies, and the current policies and actions with current fiat currency problems, the same path is being followed. There's little reason to think that "this time it's different".

    48. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah: you're trying to use Bitcoin to store value. Bitcoin is for moving your savings around, not for storing them.

      Think about what you've just said. Seriously...just think about it for a moment.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    49. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      You're right, high volatility isn't good for payments either, but there's a huge difference in the risk to a company that's actively trading (who only need stability on a timescale of days) vs somebody trying to store bitcoin for multiple years.

      In practice fees for payments over Bitcoin are currently a few percent, which is comparable to the fees for non-Bitcoin payment methods and suggests that the risk is manageable at the moment.

    50. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      I've thought about it.

      ...I'm not sure what that was supposed to accomplish though. Me thinking isn't going to change Bitcoin's design.

    51. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah: you're trying to use Bitcoin to store value. Bitcoin is for moving your savings around, not for storing them.

      I prefer a bank, so if it gets robbed then I still get my money back no matter what.

      Storing value is one of the primary functions of any currency, except bitcoin apparently.

      And yes, the volatility of bitcoin matters to me, since I would prefer not to see any significant amount of my savings disappear overnight due to fluctuations in the perceived value of bitcoin.

      My point is that if the value of bitcoin drops from $1000 to $500, now I can only make 1/2 of the number of house payments I could before. That doesn't happen with dollars. A thousand dollars will always make my house payment irrespective of anything else.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    52. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      I think possibly you're the one that needs to think about what I said, particularly the bit where I pointed out that Bitcoin isn't for storing money but rather for moving it around. It's not meant to function as a currency, it's meant to function as a replacement to services like Paypal.

      You're right that Bitcoin makes a bad currency, but that's largely because it's not meant to be a currency in the first place.

    53. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I pointed out that Bitcoin isn't for storing money but rather for moving it around. It's not meant to function as a currency,

      Really? It's not meant to function as a currency? If you type "what is bitcoin" into Google, here's what you get:

      bitcoin
            a type of digital currency in which encryption techniques are used to regulate the generation of units of currency and verify the transfer of funds, operating independently of a central bank.

      From Coindesk:

      Bitcoin is a form of digital currency, created and held electronically.

      From CNNMoney:

      Bitcoin is a new currency that was created in 2009....

      From Bitcoin.org:

      Bitcoin is an innovative payment network and a new kind of money.

      So umm yeah, it's considered to be currency. You can search on all sorts of variations of a definition of bitcoins, and 99.99999999% say it's a currency. And one of the primary things any currency is used for is "storing money". That's what it does.

      -

      You're right that Bitcoin makes a bad currency,

      You're right, but not for the reasons you give.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    54. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      Or you can read Nakamoto's paper which says things like "What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party." -- and which then goes on to describe a system which solves that problem.

    55. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      "What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party."

      Sounds like a currency to me, and apparently to damn near everyone else who's ever used it:

      It can be stored, sent, transferred, or saved.
      It holds some value and can be used to buy and sell things.
      It's a form of payment.
      It can satisfy a debt, and it can increase or decrease in value according to market forces.

      If that's not currency then perhaps we should change all the dictionaries or else tell all the bitcoin users that they're "doing it wrong".

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    56. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      All of those things are true of stocks too. Does that make stocks a currency? I don't see many people treating them like one.

    57. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      All of those things are true of stocks too. Does that make stocks a currency? I don't see many people treating them like one.

      It's true of a lot of things. The difference is that 99.9999999999% of bitcoin users will tell you that bitcoin is a currency AND they use it like one. So either there has been a total failure of getting the idea of what bitcoin is across to its users, or it's a currency.

      Frankly, I can't find a page that says that bitcoin is not a currency. I'm sure there are some out there but I'm also sure I could find pages that state the Moon is hollow.

      If it's not for storing money, am I supposed to constantly be converting my bitcoins back and forth to "real" money or gold or bullets or tulips or whatever? What good is it if I can't use it to store some value?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    58. Re: This stuff makes me feel old by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I can find you more than 7 millipeople that will say otherwise. Or you can look at the paper that I linked, which outright says as much in the abstract and then does in fact go on to design a system for making payments but not one for being a general currency.

      Yes, you should generally be converting to or from Bitcoin into your local currency (although the actual conversion might be handled for you by someone else, depending on how you're doing things). It's useful for making payments to people -- I'm fairly sure that was more or less the first thing I said in this discussion.

  18. You are doing it wrong by snookiex · · Score: 0

    I understand that BC is not a "widely accepted" currency and odds are that you have to cash-in eventually, but the point of Bitcoin is to become an alternate way to ease the trade of goods and services, and it should be used like that. Trying to convert it into "real" money misses the point completely. I think that if people have bitcoins, they should use them only to replace conventional currency in their transactions, not to try to convert them.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
    1. Re: You are doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too unstable. I'm not going to accept bitcoins for goods I sell when their value could be half by the end of the day.

    2. Re:You are doing it wrong by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

      I understand that BC is not a "widely accepted" currency and odds are that you have to cash-in eventually, but the point of Bitcoin is to become an alternate way to ease the trade of goods and services, and it should be used like that. Trying to convert it into "real" money misses the point completely. I think that if people have bitcoins, they should use them only to replace conventional currency in their transactions, not to try to convert them.

      It's not a usable currency because one of the points of currency is a value store - a way of 'keeping score'. To do that it must have a relatively stable value, which is demonstrably doesn't. Bitcoin is a gambling mechanism, and a way of hiding transactions, but it is not a usable currency.

    3. Re: You are doing it wrong by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      It's too unstable. I'm not going to accept bitcoins for goods I sell when their value could be half by the end of the day.

      Name one time it has done this for more then one day. (There is only one in the entire history, and it took a few years to get all the value back)

    4. Re: You are doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any currency that can swing double digits is too unstable for me to trust.

    5. Re:You are doing it wrong by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      If you look at currency markets, neither does the Dollar. But since all of the goods we use are measured in dollars, we do not see it. (Unless you buy from AliBaba a lot)

    6. Re: You are doing it wrong by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Better not use Dollars then. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    7. Re:You are doing it wrong by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      If you dislike the instability in the USD, you would hate Bitcoin for being vastly worst. But most Bitcoin supporters have their ideological blinkers screwed on too tight to see the topic honestly.

    8. Re: You are doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cute that you think of that as a remotely close comparison.

    9. Re:You are doing it wrong by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      It's a payment network. It wasn't designed as a replacement to the dollar but rather as a replacement to Paypal. As such it shouldn't be too surprising that it doesn't make a good currency; it's just not designed for that.

    10. Re:You are doing it wrong by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      It's a payment network. It wasn't designed as a replacement to the dollar but rather as a replacement to Paypal. As such it shouldn't be too surprising that it doesn't make a good currency; it's just not designed for that.

      It's a shame that it's not that good at that either, transaction confirmation times often are faaar to long.

    11. Re:You are doing it wrong by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      No, I am saying that currency exchange, ANY currency exchange, has large fluctuations. Most people do not see it, however, because they never exchange currency.

    12. Re:You are doing it wrong by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you're doing. Buying a coffee on your morning commute... yeah. Buying something online that'll get delivered from China? It's no problem for that.

      At least complaints about the confirmation speed are relevant complaints, unlike most of what I see on Slashdot...

    13. Re:You are doing it wrong by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It's not a usable currency because one of the points of currency is a value store - a way of 'keeping score'.

      Except money pretty much universally sucks as a value store. If you don't want to lose money because of inflation you have to invest them. Even putting them in the bank is investing them so the bank can lend it out to others, the risk has just been insured out of it. We keep money because of the overhead, risk and capital binding of doing anything else. If you want a savings account somebody should probably set up a BTC to index fund bridge or to gold or some other easily traded valuable. If you have money to spare, you buy shares and if you need money you sell shares and in your BTC wallet is just your spending cash. Then it doesn't matter so much if it's just your spending cash fluctuating wildly and effectively you're not dealing with any other currency. For really big trades like buying a house you could first do a swap for shares or gold then sell those off slowly so you don't get hit with a huge one day swing.

      I think it's important to realize that most currencies that have gone to hell have done so because the government was printing tons of money causing hyperinflation. Bitcoin is all over the place, it'll soar and crash and soar and crash and if it'll do more or less of one or the other is anyone's guess. But just volatility is fairly easily beaten by statistics, maybe it's unusual that sometimes you end up paying $90 or $110 instead of $100 but if they both happen then 10 times down the road you've probably paid $1000 +/- $30. It's worse for stability if you lose every time like with hyperinflation, then everybody wants to spend their cash as soon as humanly possible. If you're holding Bitcoins you're a speculator, if you hold cash during hyperinflation you're an idiot.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:You are doing it wrong by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      I understand that BC is not a "widely accepted" currency and odds are that you have to cash-in eventually, but the point of Bitcoin is to become an alternate way to ease the trade of goods and services, and it should be used like that. Trying to convert it into "real" money misses the point completely. I think that if people have bitcoins, they should use them only to replace conventional currency in their transactions, not to try to convert them.

      It is especially useful for people in parts of the world where access to traditional banks and payment systems is poor. Much like the Hawala system in Muslim countries, BTC is a quick, reliable way for people working or living abroad to send money home to family members.

      Example: you're Somali, working abroad for a construction company. You would have a hard time opening a bank account in many foreign countries, but you can visit a hawala broker and have money in your wife's hands in a couple of days. BTC works for that, too, and lots of people use it that way, whether on their own or indirectly. Converting it to other currencies is not missing anything, as it is well suited to transferring money internationally. Not sure why you think people should only use certain currencies in certain ways.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    15. Re:You are doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "most currencies that have gone to hell have done so because the government was printing tons of money causing hyperinflation"

      No; most currencies have gone to hell because everyone wanted to exchange those currencies for US Dollars as fast as possible. Weimar's hyperinflation was caused by a lack of US Dollars; after WWII the US gave away Marshall Plan dollars so the US Dollar shortage did not become as acute.

      Zimbabwe's hyperinflation was caused by a shortage of US Dollars. After dollarization of Zimbabwe, there is still a shortage of US Dollars and now there is deflation, which is just as bad, or worse, as the previous hyperinflation. It's better to have a lot of money to buy bread, than to have no money to buy bread.

      Venezuela's hyperinflation is caused by a lack of US Dollars. If the Fed opened up an unlimited swap line with Venezuela's central bank, as the Fed has with the ECB and four other central banks, Venezuela's shortages would be over because there is no physical scarcity causing shortages of food in Venezuela. There is purely a shortage of US Dollars in Venezuela.

    16. Re:You are doing it wrong by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      And I am saying, for all practical purposes, you are wrong.

      Not seeing the fluctuations is a significant practical positive because it makes a theoretical problem a non-problem, but it is a price that Bitcoin users cannot avoid.

      Furthermore, Bitcoin has fluctuation that are very large when compared to major currencies. Whether we want to say the USD has small fluctuations and Bitcoin has large fluctuations, or we want to say the USD has large fluctuations and Bitcoin has immense fluctuations, it boils down to the same thing.

    17. Re:You are doing it wrong by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Cash is not a good investment strategy, but I usually have less than 1% of my liquid assets in cash or the equivalent. I know how much goes into my checking account a month, as a general rule, and I know how much comes out. If I didn't know to within 20% what my account balance was going to be, my financial life would be more complicated.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  19. Who cares? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 2

    Since when is bitcoin's instability news?

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe since its inception.

  20. Last time it was at $892 was 10 days ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It was at $230 just 15 months ago. That's one mighty crash.

  21. Paper currency is too dull by T.E.D. · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know what traditional currency like the Dollar was really missing? All the excitement of the random wild value fluctuations inherent in a dot-com stock! I for one find it tedious and boring to walk up to the checkout line in a retailer or grocery store already knowing that I have sufficient funds to pay for my purchase. Yawn.

    1. Re:Paper currency is too dull by phorm · · Score: 1

      Well, if you want a widely fluctuating traditional/fiat currency, you could always move to Canada (or bank in Canadian dollars)

    2. Re:Paper currency is too dull by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Buy some Bolivars? Then you can haul them to market in a wheel barrow and get some exercise while you're at it!

    3. Re:Paper currency is too dull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got your random wild fluctuations right here. That chart shows the value of the US dollar measured against a "basket" of other currencies. As you can see, the dollars in your wallet fluctuate every day, sometimes wildly, even though you can't see it.

    4. Re:Paper currency is too dull by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Buy some Bolivars? Then you can haul them to market in a wheel barrow and get some exercise while you're at it!

      Bah. Those only ever fluctuate in one direction! Where' the gambling-like adrenaline fix of not knowing until the moment of transaction if a $200-value purchase will end up being essentially free, or soak up your entire life savings?

    5. Re:Paper currency is too dull by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      If you want to compare BTC to traditional currencies, maybe the strongest, most accepted, and most stable one is not the best one to choose. Besides, if widespread sale of goods was conducted in BTC, and it were utilized the same way as USD, the fluctuations would not be a daily concern the same way they are if you are only looking at exchange rates.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    6. Re:Paper currency is too dull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone wants US Dollars, that's why bitcoin's convertibility to US Dollars is so important. Private obligations are overwhelmingly in US Dollars worldwide, most of them outside of US tax jurisdiction.

  22. Bitcoin is hilarious... by MindPrison · · Score: 2

    I've always seen bitcoin as I've seen Pirate Bay. Bitcoins biggest selling point afaik was that you could pay anonymously, and anonymous pay is good for the black/dark marked. For the same reason, I can't just walk down to my local bank and say "1$ bitcoin, please!".

    The dilemma starts when you're selling something, and want the money into normal money you can actually pay your utility bills with.

    Also, the bitcoin to me also seem like the "poor man's fake gold reserve", if you believe it is worth something, then it is worth what you pay, so essentially the value of the bitcoin could go fictively up and down all the time, and if you sell it at the right time (if anyone is willing to buy when the value is high), then what do you do with the money? In Sweden you'd have to prove where the money comes from if it is a sum over 10K SEK. Otherwise the bank wont heed it and say no to your money because it doesn't come from any known source to them. They claim this is to prevent drug trafficing, but we (the citizens) know all too well that this is a plot from the gov. to control all the money and tax even already taxed second-hand sales, whatever you sell - we want a cut.

    So all regular citizens really can do - is to lean back and watch the online show called "Bitcoin raises/loses value/dives/jumps" whatever....

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by vvaduva · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot....stop talking. I pay bills and buy lunch with Bitcoin all the time.

    2. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by Dwedit · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin isn't anonymous, everyone can see the full transaction history for your ID number. They just can't go from ID number to Name. But if you do anything like even post a bitcoin link on a web page, then you've provided enough information to find out your transaction history.

    3. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by MindPrison · · Score: 2

      Just because that is your possibility in the place you live, doesn't mean it is possible for everyone around. And if all that you can resort to is name calling to strengthen your argument, then I'm not the idiot.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    4. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by Mike · · Score: 1

      Sounds like "MindPrison" is a fitting name for this person.

    5. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by houstonbofh · · Score: 0

      But you can anonymise that history easy enough with some work and time.

    6. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that is the case for almost all paper currencies?

      Really, you didn't?

      Please walk into your local grocery store and offer to pay in Yen. If you live in Japan, offer to pay in Euros.

      Let me know if they accept it.

      At least bitcoin can be used to buy groceries in most parts of the world, even if it is only accepted in a few stores in each country.

      Idiot.

    7. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could easily buy bitcoins and sell them for profit and file the capital gains tax. Stop rationalizing your lack of initiative.

    8. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      ... easy enough with some work and time.

      ~ Yogi Berra

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    9. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pehaps you don't realise it, but Bitcoin is quote mainstream for payments in large parts of the world. Not just for scary illegal stuff but for mundane everyday transactions. I sold a car for bitcoins, buy groceries with it, have used bitcoins to pay rent. Really, it is ubiquitous at this point.

    10. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why bitcoin laundry exists.

    11. Re:Bitcoin is hilarious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1FiXyonNxaNPyZQD7LLpagthw51w8cXLFb

  23. Please, no more "Bitcoin Rocket/Crash" headlines by eamacnaghten · · Score: 1

    I get a little board of "Bitcoin is rocketing" or "Bitcoin is crashing" headlines. Niether is true, and never was. Bitcoin is in effect a (virtual) commodity, but with a much lower cap than others such as gold. This means that small things, like Brexit, or the fall of the Chinese Yuan, or the discontinuation of Indian cash bank notes and such will effect the price in a major way, with the inevitable exageration of the market by speculators, followed by the resulting corrections when these minor bubbles burst. This means Bitcoin value in effect goes up and down like a yo-yo. However, bitcoin is sound. The commodity aspect is there and is secure, so it will never go back to zero or anything. The general movement of Bitcoin is up at a gradual pace with a few whooshes in either direction as described above. It is not, nor ever has been, a guaranteed wealth creator nor a crashing pudsey/pyramid scheme.

    --

    Web Sig: Eddy Currents

  24. FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUD.

    1. Re:FUD? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      you must be new here...

  25. 88% more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    18% down? That's still 82% short of what I would like to see.
    The vast majority of purposes bitcoin is used for are not just illegal, but utterly undesirable. Release payments for ransomware, rental for botnets, and the likes.
    It can't go down soon enough.

  26. Profit taking by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    To be expected.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  27. Merry New Year! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Dukes were trying to corner the Bitcoin market, but Winthorp and Billy Ray beat them at their own game.

    1. Re:Merry New Year! by locotx · · Score: 1

      Looking good Lewis !!!

  28. FOX NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot, the Fox News of the tech world.

    Sensationalist. Useless.

  29. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the imaginary product that isn't worth anything is worth less than it was. Hi, I'm a Nigerian Prince, and I have this box of numbers... would you like to buy them? I'll sell them with all my interest in this bridge over San Francisco Bay...

  30. Unstable "currency" by davidwr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A useful currency is stable for the time you hold it.

    If you are a merchant that takes bitcoin but sells it for local currency by the end of the day, you need intra-day stability.

    If you are holding it as a currency for days or weeks at a time, you need short-term stability.

    If you are holding it as a currency for longer, you need medium- or long-term stability.

    On the other hand, if you are buying it as an investment, like a stock, or as a speculative "investment" (aka "gambling") then in addition to a long-term upward trend, you want instability so you can benefit from dollar-cost averaging as you buy and "dollar cost averaging in reverse" - selling a fixed amount of BC every day - when you eventually sell.

    Of course, if you are a day trader who depends on intra-day changes in value, you want short-term instability and either a knack for timing the market right or a dose of good luck to keep from coming out in the red that day.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Unstable "currency" by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

      Econ 101 called, Money has 3 properties:
      1. Store of value
      2. Medium of exchange
      3. Unit of account

      Currently bitcoins value is too variable to be a unit of account.
      Where it is accepted it is a very good medium of exchange with low transaction costs.
      It is used as a store of value - There are many countries where bitcoins medium term stability is better than the local currency.

      So bitcoin has 2 out of the 3 requirements for a currency and it may with time gain the 3rd.

    2. Re:Unstable "currency" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money is now a ticketing system. C. H. Douglas called ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._H._Douglas#Social_Credit

    3. Re:Unstable "currency" by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Except that someone is going to have the Bitcoin for a period of time. If I use it on a transaction basis, I'm buying Bitcoin and transferring it. I have to buy it from somebody who holds Bitcoin over a period of time, and that business is going to be very interested in value fluctuation. It will have to allow for all sorts of fluctuations. If the price goes down on a short-term basis, they have to deal with people who buy their Bitcoin and don't immediately dump it back into the system, and if the price is low they need more Bitcoin to cover individual transactions. There's a lot of risks.

      Businesses charge for risks they take. The whole insurance industry is a lot of companies accepting cash from you to take over your financial risks. It can be lucrative. The more risk, the more charge.

      Therefore, even if you use Bitcoin as an immediate transaction, you'll be paying for its fluctuations.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  31. Color me shocked! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    World's lowest volume currency has high volatility. Who'd a thunk it?

    --
    That is all.
  32. WOW - Good Time To Buy Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW - How is this different from a trip to the local casino?

    1. Re:WOW - Good Time To Buy Bitcoin by fateblossom · · Score: 1

      You usually get free drinks at the casino when you are gamling. :-)

  33. Now is the time! by e432776 · · Score: 1

    I have been waiting to pay my ransomware at just such a moment! I just need to hurry an

  34. Other blockchains are more interesting by xtal · · Score: 1

    e.g. Ethereum.

    The shady exchanges are the problem with all of the cryptocurrencies. The biggest asset would be a very easy way to facilitate a micropayment via bitcoin; the current exchange mechanisms make this hard or impossible for average folks.

    Ultimately a blockchain (and the resulting currency) will need to be backed by a nation state to have validity. Political notions aside, that's when things will get interesting. If Bitcoin ever gained any traction it will be put down by force.

    Other blockchains provide easier ability to develop applications and thus provide real utility, and the concept of putting a value on distributed hash calculation to actually do interesting things is a neat one.

    One thing has been validated by Bitcoin, however - the concept works.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Other blockchains are more interesting by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what you think "put down by force" would look like.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    2. Re:Other blockchains are more interesting by xtal · · Score: 1

      Raid exchanges. Seize records. Apply tax law to freeze accounts.Pass laws making it illegal to trade in bitcoin. Put a few people in prison for 10 years.

      QED.

      Precedent exists for all these things. Read up on e-Gold.

      --
      ..don't panic
    3. Re:Other blockchains are more interesting by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As far as the government is concerned, Bitcoin is a commodity, and the government has not made it illegal to trade in grain or copper. The government does require that profits and losses be accounted for, and that money laundering be avoided. The US government will not raid exchanges unless they think something illegal is going on, same as a coal exchange. There's no laws against using foreign currency; it's less convenient because the accounting has to be in dollars, and because it's easier to spend dollars than yen around here.

      There's reasons why I don't expect Bitcoin to become really successful, but government intervention isn't one of them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  35. Bitcoin is for suckers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gold is the GUARANTEED investment option to PROTECT YOUR MONEY! That's right, GOLD! The original non-fiat currency!

  36. The time is now! by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 1

    Buy your Bitcoins now, before it crashes further!

    1. Re:The time is now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy your Bitcoins now, before it crashes further!

      YeAaAH!!! so I can loose more mo, wait what?

  37. Its a comoddity not a currency. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin is mined its an exchange of computing cycles for a token of work.
    Juxtapose:
    A currency is taxed, can be made scarce/abundant by a score keeper (government) changing its fiscal stance. A currency can be exchanged for currency bearing the issuers interest (Treasury bonds). It comes with a banking system with ONE set rate of interest from which all other entities can create deposits greater than or equal to that rate.

    How many times does this have to happen before people get the message.

    Its a commodity backed by a great transaction verification system (Blockchain) but whats a commodity's intrinsic worth when its just used CPU/GPU cycles.

    Calling it currency is inadequate its volatile because its a risky commodity and that will be volatile on markets which are by their mathematical nature inefficient and unstable.

    1. Re:Its a comoddity not a currency. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A currency is taxed, can be made scarce/abundant by a score keeper (government) changing its fiscal stance. A currency can be exchanged for currency bearing the issuers interest (Treasury bonds). It comes with a banking system with ONE set rate of interest from which all other entities can create deposits greater than or equal to that rate."

      You neglect the private financial sector, which can create credit at will, with or without the Fed, because private money markets and Eurodollar money markets are outside the Fed's regulatory authority. The scarcity of money/credit is a psychological decision by the private sector, which reserves the right to create as much balance sheet space as it feels it needs for itself, while restricting credit to others, in a crisis, say, where scarcity thinking seizes control in the labile little brains of traders.

      Markets have been setting interest rates negative in currency swaps starting in 2008 and persisting beyond all economists' predictions because arbitrage should enforce Covered Interest Parity. And yet it isn't. The simplistic economic model of foreign exchange, interest, and arbitrage breaks down in the real world, in the foreign exchange market, which is $80 trillion if you look up the BIS Statistics website. Markets are putting a premium on future dollars because future dollars are worth more than current dollars. The well-documented persistent breakdown of Covered Interest Parity is an indication that the US Dollar gets stronger the more US dollars are created. The Quantity Theory of Money is dead. Long Live the Quantity Theory of Money!

  38. Useful perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.ft.com/content/b5d66ed8-d1b3-11e6-b06b-680c49b4b4c0

  39. money by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    While there are currency speculators, "investing" in a currency is generally not a sensible thing to do. You don't keep wealth in cash, which produces nothing, you invest it in something productive that yields a return.

    Bitcoin, like money, is a short term means for conducting business transactions, nothing more.

    1. Re:money by helga+the+viking · · Score: 1

      People do FOREX trades based on flows of government fiscal policy, interest rates and taxation flows often. Presumably these are linked to real 'investment' eg: when any arm of the US government spends USD to buy literally anything it wants in the currency it issues. Indeed your criticism is more of currency market hysteria which Bitcoin more prone to or this slashdot article would not be here. eg: brexit http://www.smh.com.au/business... http://uk.businessinsider.com/...

    2. Re:money by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      People do FOREX trades based on flows of government fiscal policy, interest rates and taxation flows often. Presumably these are linked to real 'investment' eg: when any arm of the US government spends USD to buy literally anything it wants in the currency it issues

      As I was saying, you can certainly profit from currency speculation, and you may even provide a value through arbitrage, but that is a miniscule part of the overall economy and requires very specialized knowledge. Furthermore, you are at constant risk from arbitrary and self-destructive political decisions. Therefore, currency speculation isn't a reasonable thing to do for most people.

      Hence, the sensible thing to do with money is to spend it on stuff that produces more stuff, i.e., invest it in hardware, people, or shares in hardware or people.

  40. Re:Please, no more "Bitcoin Rocket/Crash" headline by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

    Thats not true either, it will go to zero once quantum computing makes current crypto algorithms obsolete. By then new quantum crypto currency will replace it.

    Give it some decades and always pay attention to the development of quantum computing to take a good guess when to leave. For the short/middle term it should be fine tho.

    --
    Artix
    Your Linux, your init.
  41. Bitcoin is maturing ... by PPH · · Score: 0

    ... as an asset. Just like stocks and bonds. Where the talking heads on the nightly business news try to spin stories about every random lurch in the DJIA, Slashdot is serving that function for Bitcoin.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  42. No, it's not by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

    My bet is that someone decided to cash out a lot of bitcoins (up to tens of thousands) which swayed the market however it's already recovering - as of this moment bitcoin is trading at $985 at BitMex (the largest USD bitcoin exchange).

    As for the Chinese yuan getting stronger - I call it BS. It hasn't become 10% more valuable, more like 1% at the most, yet bitcoin has suddenly lost ~30% (~1100->~880) of its value in a matter of a an hour(!). Nope. These two events seem to be related but one didn't cause the other one.

    1. Re:No, it's not by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

      It's been already noted on several occasions that very large bitcoin purchases/sell outs significantly alter bitcoin's price because people still don't believe in it like they for instance trust fiat money, so whenever they see major fluctuations they start to panic and exacerbate whatever trend is currently in effect. This explains almost every time when bitcoin has lost/gain its value.

      Bitcoin is a currency of pure faith (there's no bank/government or any financial entity behind it) and only when a number of agents using it increases 10-100fold or more, it'll probably become stabler.

    2. Re:No, it's not by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not a matter of faith one way or the other, it's a matter of control.

      Money is always money because AND ONLY because people have faith in it. That's just as true for dollars as it is for bitcoins. The difference is that bitcoins are designed to have no central authority. This is a huge advantage for people who have reason to distrust central authorities (e.g. people trading in contraband, people who trust authorities per se).

      On the other hand, not having a central authority means there is nobody to step in to prop up the value of the currency during inflation or curb the value of currency during deflation. This means people treat bitcoins like growth stocks. They expect the value to appreciate in the long term but be volatile in the short term.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:No, it's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize that e.g. Christianity is based on a well-specified, open-source algorithm.

  43. Coming back up, for now by Humbubba · · Score: 1

    It is volatile. Just checked coindesk.com, and Bitcoin is going back and forth. - $990.87 at 11:00 am (EST) 1/5/2017.

  44. And it's back !!! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    yawn. ;-)

  45. Did /. get used for pump & dump? by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    It just occurred to me that /. just got used in a pump & dump scheme. Penny market emails that go out all the time --- "this stock is a big mover"... blah blah.

    "hey look BTC is down" Was that supposed to evoke sells or buys - I'll never know. But advertising on /. is now free !!!

    1. Re:Did /. get used for pump & dump? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      but that email was true, it made a "YUGE!" move, downward. Also, not a penny of money was lost, for every person that made money there was someone that lost money. zero sum game.

  46. Bitcoin is over valued by randomErr · · Score: 1

    RIght now the main things fueling BitCoin's value is India's deflation currency correction and worries about Trump's administration. Within the year I look for both issues to stabilize. BitCoin will drop down around $350 / coin.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Bitcoin is over valued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish, it's much more likely Chinese people trying to get out of Yuan now that the govt there has cracked down even stronger on its people buying up $US. It will drop down a bit when they cash out to another currency, but that will happen slower and not all at once.

  47. Re:Please, no more "Bitcoin Rocket/Crash" headline by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

    I don't expect quantum computing to make an impact in the next 20 years, even with a gigantic breakthrough. I could be wrong, and I hope I am, but the world record for (proper) quantum factoring is still 21=3*7, right? And that was 2012. The previous record of 15=3*5 had been standing since the 2001. And the interval between advances doesn't seem, to me, to be getting any shorter. To put it another way, the difficulties in scaling the systems to more qubits seem to be increasing at least as fast as we are improving our techniques for building coherent devices.

    At any rate, it is pretty much trivial to replace the signature algorithm with a quantum-hard one when the time comes. Under some circumstances, it can even be done without allocating any of the reserved opcodes.

    We can do the same thing with the work function (hashing) too, but my read is that even with a giant breakthrough in factoring, hashing faces absolutely no danger from quantum attacks within my lifetime, probably the lifetime of my grandchildren. I know it sounds arrogant to say that today, but some discussions of hashing and quantum computing led me to read the literature, and that really opened my eyes to the difficulties. I can elaborate if desired.

    Oh, and even a successful quantum attack on ECDSA only works against the current system if it can be done within a few minutes, at least when people are protecting their keys properly by not re-using them. A quantum attack on hashing would strip that protection, of course.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
  48. Re:Bitcoin is always crashing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you not read the comment's subject, you fucking imbecile?

  49. Re: Bitcoin is always crashing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject and comment aren't synonyms you clueless brat.

  50. 1st Million coins by Holi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As long as Satoshi still controls the first million bitcoins I fear it cannot be taken seriously as the creator has the power to single handily effect the market. No bank or government is going to back something where 1 individual has set themselves up with such disruptive power.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:1st Million coins by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      As long as Satoshi still controls the first million bitcoins I fear it cannot be taken seriously as the creator has the power to single handily effect the market. No bank or government is going to back something where 1 individual has set themselves up with such disruptive power.

      6% of the market (and dropping) is not that much of a concern. And it has been argued that Satoshi does not in fact hold that much.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    2. Re:1st Million coins by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The US M0 money supply right now is about 3.7 trillion dollars. If Bitcoin were to expand to cover the US economy, 1% of it would be worth $37 billion. That's an awful lot of money for one individual to make by kicking something into motion and disappearing. The fact that a lot of Bitcoin are held by people who invested early is going to be a big drag on its general acceptance.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:1st Million coins by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      the creator has the power to ... effect the market

      Well, yes, by definition. What perhaps is more relevant to your argument is that the creator has the power to affect the market.

      single handily

      Sorry, out of snark for now. Try again later.

    4. Re:1st Million coins by Holi · · Score: 1

      Damn. I enjoy good snark.

      I congratulate you on your ability to call out my horrendous spelling and grammar.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  51. Sounds like someone did a pump-and-dump... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    And /. contributed to the scam with its last article on BitCoin. Stupid.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  52. Re: Bitcoin is always crashing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you new, here? That is the slashdot way.

  53. Obama said he would take action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And he did

    1. Re:Obama said he would take action by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      And he did

      He sold all his bitcoins to cause a crash?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Obama said he would take action by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Sorry forgot the obligatory:

      Thanks Obama!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  54. Why stock markets crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest you to read this book:
    http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7341.html

    1. Re:Why stock markets crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better read this book and understand that treating bitcoin as an "investment" is basically guaranteed to make you poorer.

  55. Why is this even a thing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I wanted currency that had its value constantly change I would invest in Pecos... Plus anything that enables ransomware authors is no bueno...

  56. Re: Bitcoin is always crashing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course they're not. a subject is a part of a comment, not a synonym for comment. just like a title is a part of an article, not the synonym for article. just like head is a part of a body, not a synonym for body. you sir are the best kind of stupid. one that will never realize he is stupid, but does live in a virtual world where he is smarter. this provides hours of entertainment for everyone around them. thank you clown.

    I ordered a coffee and popped a lactaid pill before adding some milk to it. this little kid who had a bit of melted chocolate right under his decided to educate me. He said he knows what I took, and it's because milk makes me gassy. His mom used to take those pills. Then she stopped, and started asking the starbucks guy for different milk. You see, there are several types of grass. Regular grass and soy grass. If you feed the cow soy grass, it makes this thing called Soy Milk.

    I thanked the little boy for the information with a wide smile and gave him a random business card I had in my pocket. I said to give it to his dad - his dad should give me a call. The kid asked why. I pointed out to the kid that while he is sound asleep at night, his father often comes into the room quietly and puts his weewee in the kid's mouth - while sitting on his face backwards. Last night daddy had a lot of food and took a big big poop before he went to visit the sleeping boy. Daddy's shit is under your nose son. Sweet dreams tonight.

  57. Inverse relationship to Yuan by NotARealUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Welcome to currency trading. The reason your grandparents did not bet the farm on currency is because of the wild swings. Somebody gains big and somebody loses big here. These sort of swings in currency are exactly how George Soros made his fortunes. I do not think the current swing indicates good or bad days ahead for BitCoin. It only indicates that it is being used for huge profits by some.

    Here is a little explanation of what just happened:
    One of the biggest emerging Bitcoin markets is in China. China's Yuan has been weak and even a small percentage of investors moving their Yuan investments in and out of Bitcoin can cause the market to fluctuate greatly. China's Yuan is much bigger than Bitcoin, so relatively small waves in China really rock the boats in the Bitcoin world. There was a spike in Yuan value, and some investors assumed better days ahead for China and cashed out bitcoins for Yuan. As you can see from the current charts, investors now saw cheap Bitcoin and are buying those again.

    1. Re:Inverse relationship to Yuan by neoRUR · · Score: 1

      Yes when you have a global currency, then there are many more factors to take into account for the value of that currency.

    2. Re:Inverse relationship to Yuan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a highly deflationary currency, not some fiat printed on paper at will.

  58. New Law Takes Effect by chiefcrash · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the crash has something to do with Ransomware suddenly becoming illegal in California?

    I mean, it's not like people would use bitcoin for *illegal* activities, right?

    --
    Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
  59. How Bitcoin Really Works by aristotheron · · Score: 0

    It's for drugs. The supply is mostly controlled by drug cartels. The demand is mostly from people who want to party.

    New Year's passes. Everyone is partied out and thinking holy thoughts about getting a promotion. No one buys bitcoin.
    Summer comes. Price wobbles around here and there, but mostly the demand for drugs is constant. Price is low.
    Fall approaches. Main harvest time. Shelves appear frequently in the price graphs as cartels parcel out payments to producers of drugs and they foolishly cash all their coins in at once.

    Every year this happens.
    Every year the hotshots who watch wall street movies think they figured it out, and every year they totally mess up their estimations for demand.

    TL;DR buy bitcoin in spring and summer, sell bitcoin before christmas, roll around in 10-50%

  60. To those that submitted and accepted this 'story' by BozoForPresident · · Score: 2

    I expect so much more from this crowd. Did you honestly not know that Bitcoin (and the general crypto market) was slowly trending higher during the end of 2016 and that, even after this latest price spike and correction, it has still gained compared to as little as a week ago? Seriously, you guys, if you can't manages a tiny little bit more journalistic integrity than that, go fuck yourselves.

  61. Um, what? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin crossed above the $1,000 mark for the first time since 2013, but it has now tumbled below that level.

    I just checked and it's $965. Last time I checked (which was a few months ago) it was ~$600.

  62. It's a terrible investment, but it works as money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are stupid. I've not lost any money with BitCoin and I've been accepting it because my business lends itself to it for years and BitCoins has real value is saving my 3% over credit cards as well as eliminates any concern over charge backs.

    In the short term its stable enough for long enough periods of time not to really matter. I know roughly what I have at any given time. In the long term I've made a bit more because BitCoin goes up even if it can fluctuate downward at times. hmm reminds be of holding any hard currencies including AUD and CAN $$$ and even USD. My "losses" are less than the gains overall and it would be unlikely anybody who ignores its value and uses it regularly would see any different.

    BitCoin is a terrible investment, but it works fine for transferring value, even to the extent it open up new markets for us and saves us money relative to taking credit cards. At the same time I'm not investing in any currency either. I invest in things I know will make me money. I want my investments to reliably double in value.

  63. Bitcoin has died 119 times by xororand · · Score: 2

    The pointless article is still on the front page and Bitcoin is already back over $1000.

    Bitcoin has died 119 times so far.
    https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin...

    1. Re:Bitcoin has died 119 times by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Back down below 900 now.

      Who said bitcoin is volatile?

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  64. the old pump n dump scam.. still going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yup

  65. Told you so on the last puff piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin is totally controlled by criminal elements as a pump and dump scam. You have just been fleeced again. Time to get more so you can be robbed again. You are sooo clever.

  66. Almost Prescient by Cardcaptor_RLH85 · · Score: 1

    I feel almost prescient in the fact that I converted most of my BTC into goods by making purchases just before 4 AM EST. I made a bit of positive cash flow and didn't end up involved in the crash. It worked out for me.

  67. Re:Bitcoin is always crashing. by Maritz · · Score: 1

    You think a comment and a subject title are the same thing, and you're calling someone else an imbecile. Heheh.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.