Slashdot Mirror


Labor Department Sues Oracle For Paying White Men More (usatoday.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from USA Today: Oracle is being sued by the Labor Department for paying white men more than their counterparts and for favoring Asian workers when recruiting and hiring for technical roles. The administrative lawsuit is the latest from the Labor Department to take aim at the human resources practices of major technology companies. The Labor Department warned the lawsuit could cost Oracle hundreds of millions in federal contracts. Oracle makes software and hardware used by the federal government. "The complaint is politically motivated, based on false allegations, and wholly without merit," Oracle spokesman Deborah Hellinger said in a statement. "Oracle values diversity and inclusion, and is a responsible equal opportunity and affirmative action employer. Our hiring and pay decisions are non-discriminatory and made based on legitimate business factors including experience and merit." The lawsuit is the result of an Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs review of Oracle's equal employment opportunity practices, the Labor Department said. According to the lawsuit, Oracle America paid white male workers more, leading to pay discrimination against women, African American and Asian employees. The Labor Department also accused Oracle of favoring Asians for product development and other technical roles, resulting in discrimination against non-Asian applicants. Oracle refused to comply with the Labor Department's investigation, which began in 2014, such as refusing to provide compensation data for all employees, complete hiring data for certain business lines and employee complaints of discrimination, according to the federal agency.

184 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. So Oracle discriminated by Kartu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Against Asians, but at the same time, on different aspect, against everyone else in favor of Asians.
    That's quite discriminatory indeed, albeit, not quite logical.

    1. Re:So Oracle discriminated by Kartu · · Score: 1

      Another notable (discrimination) fact:
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

    2. Re:So Oracle discriminated by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      This is what happens when you base your definition of 'discrimination' on statistics rather then any real facts.
      It helps if you use a definition of 'discrimination' that includes 'sub conscious wholly unintentional acts' as discrimination.
      Basically if you don't meet the labor departments hiring quota's you can expect to get in trouble regardless of the reality on the ground of who is actually qualified and interested in working for you.

      Has someone actually claimed they were discriminated against?

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    3. Re:So Oracle discriminated by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems they want to hire more Asians, BUT pay them less, for whatever reason or perception.

    4. Re:So Oracle discriminated by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is true that the article is written poorly, but Oracle is in fact discriminating against everybody. This is true of many companies.

      The way it works is simple:
      The managers are racist. They pay X group more - usually white men.

      But the company does not WANT to pay a lot of money. So the Hiring managers are told to actively find people that are not white men. Then they offer these hiring less money.

      To work like this it requires a wide spread racism among hiring companies combined with a slightly desperate population.

      Honestly, if they stop there, it's not that bad. They sift off the cream of desperate people, helping them out. Theoretically the company would end up dominated by the disadvantaged group.

      But it doesn't stop. What happens next is the real problem, internal discrimination.:

      When it comes time to promote people, they only promote the X group (white men). After all. those were the people getting paid the most and who, because of internal discrimination, were given both the best opportunities and the most credit.

      So you end up with a racist company paying X group more, while proudly proclaiming how many minorities they hire - even while they underpay them.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    5. Re:So Oracle discriminated by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      We don't know because that is one of the things in the last sentence of the post that they refused to release...

      Oracle refused to comply with the Labor Department's investigation, which began in 2014, such as refusing to provide compensation data for all employees, complete hiring data for certain business lines and employee complaints of discrimination, according to the federal agency.

    6. Re:So Oracle discriminated by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      That's why co's like visa workers: they often DO work harder and longer because the money they receive goes further. They are building up a nest egg such that they want to get as much as possible during their short stint, and so avoid anything that may get them terminated. The world is lopsided.

    7. Re:So Oracle discriminated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Work is the only place you can safely escape from your wife.

    8. Re: So Oracle discriminated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've worked at two of the large tech companes and it certainly hasn't worked your hypothetical way at all.

      My last managers in reverse order: chinese, female, indian, gay asian, British dude (while expat in london).

      People can claim white racism all day but I'll pay good money the next time I get on a tech conference call and literally everyone in the call isn't Indian.

    9. Re:So Oracle discriminated by ghoul · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Asians is code word for Indians. The key thing about Indians is the Indians coming to the US are coming from the top levels of Indian society. They are not used to being the underdog. Rather they are used to being the boss so they rise fast in a meritocracy as they do not have any hangups like US born minorities holding them back. Indians are also pretty racist. India itself has multiple ethnic groups and people favour their own ethnic group. When Indians get into hiring manager positions they hire Indians only as far as possible that too from their own ethnic group. They will hire a white if they cant get a sutable Indian. They will hardly ever hire a black or latino due to the Indian fetish for fair skin they thinks whites are smarter. However Indians dont discriminate between men and women when hiring. If Oracle is having mostly Asian aka Indian hires it means that Indians have reached middle management in Oracle and controlling the hiring. At the same time the old school whites still left are probably the critical folks or those who know where the skeletons are buried so they are paid far higher than the norm (In fact this whole case is probably because one of these folks felt they were not getting enough to keep shut about the skeletons)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    10. Re:So Oracle discriminated by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Visa workers are well aware that they are being exploited. They are working till they can get their GCs and then do their own share of discrimination against the next wave of immigrants. Thats the American way. America's success is built on the exploitation of successive waves of immigrants. Every immigrant gets exploited and his/her American born children grow up to exploit the next wave of immigrant.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    11. Re: So Oracle discriminated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No proof of anything you are saying but it does fit the narrative

      The one thing that is true is hiring through h1 visa to get lower cost employees . Dont think the race matters just the cost .

    12. Re: So Oracle discriminated by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We have to vote for a person, not specific positions. While I generally agree with him on visa workers, there are many other things I don't. And he says really obnoxious things.

      Also, it's not about "those leftists". Conservatives and GOP have been happy to give businesses what they want to make a profit, including exploitable and cheap visa workers, and in many cases "illegals".

      Lefties have been somewhat more likely to complain about visa worker issues than righties over the years in my observation. Overall, Trump is a generally centrist, by the way.

    13. Re:So Oracle discriminated by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I worked at sun for about 5 years and was let go when oracle bought sun.

      I worked at the menlo park main campus. I am older than 50 and I'm white. during my 5 years there, I got good reviews and was the main guy for one of the products (software) that ships on sun servers.

      all you have to do is walk around the outside of any major silicon valley campus and you'll see the same thing over and over. yes, its mostly indian and we all know this, even though the media does not want to outright say it.

      and I'm 90% certain that I was let go because all the rest of my group was indian and I was making a good salary there.

      it happens to me at almost every place I'm at, these days. the inevitable firing when the numbers from the company go downward and they need a quick 'profit boost' by letting go of the senior and well-paid engineers. this rarely happens to the indians, though.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    14. Re:So Oracle discriminated by ghoul · · Score: 1

      High risk high reward. Who would you rather be? Underpaid but safe as firing you makes the average salary go up or overpaid but have a target on your back. I prefer overpaid. I can always get a new job and as most HR managers have no idea of how to offer comp they look at last salary and base the offer off it

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    15. Re: So Oracle discriminated by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Most H1Bs in the valley are paid 90-120K. 100K will not be an adequate wall. Companies will raise their salaries by 10%.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    16. Re:So Oracle discriminated by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

      Not every difference can be blamed on discrimination. A married man has to support his wife and children, typically, therefore has the need to earn more, and will sacrifice more to do it, in terms of working longer hours, or even backstabbing coworkers in order to get promoted.

    17. Re:So Oracle discriminated by jittles · · Score: 1

      I worked at sun for about 5 years and was let go when oracle bought sun.

      I worked at the menlo park main campus. I am older than 50 and I'm white. during my 5 years there, I got good reviews and was the main guy for one of the products (software) that ships on sun servers.

      all you have to do is walk around the outside of any major silicon valley campus and you'll see the same thing over and over. yes, its mostly indian and we all know this, even though the media does not want to outright say it.

      and I'm 90% certain that I was let go because all the rest of my group was indian and I was making a good salary there.

      it happens to me at almost every place I'm at, these days. the inevitable firing when the numbers from the company go downward and they need a quick 'profit boost' by letting go of the senior and well-paid engineers. this rarely happens to the indians, though.

      Speaking of the large Indian population - when did KSJO become a Bollywood station???

    18. Re:So Oracle discriminated by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Really? You've never met a woman that's retired? None of your acquaintances have taken maternity leave or opted to spend their child's early years at home? You don't know any students? You don't know any divorcees?

      Do you know any women at all?

    19. Re:So Oracle discriminated by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      It's the famous and highly complex two-way discrimination.

      It's so uncommon because it requires that you focus your discrimination across the board.

    20. Re:So Oracle discriminated by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Statistics are real facts, guy.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by jimmifett · · Score: 1

    This is a load of claptrap. You don't hire to fill quotas unless you're government. You hire the best candidate to do a job.

    You pay what the market is willing to bear and what that employee negotiates.

    If an employee doesn't ask for raises outside of normal performance increases, thats on the employee.

    also, First Post

    1. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      This is a load of claptrap. You don't hire to fill quotas unless you're government. You hire the best candidate to do a job.

      You pay what the market is willing to bear and what that employee negotiates.

      Unless you don't...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We're a government contractor. We hire to fill unpublished quotas that we must meet to ensure that DOL doesn't sue us. Sucks that you taxpayers have to pay more, but that's how the game is played. However, it works out great for keeping highly productive minorities, because we pay them amazingly. DOL is fucking stupid and accepts average pay, so a few people we want to pay well get overpaid to bring the average up.

      Yes, it's dirty, corrupt and shitty, but that's DOL. It also hurts a lot of good people, who get the stigma of being a minority hire. We try to overpay them to get past that, but we still get the "she's only an software engineer 5 because she's a woman" bullshit, even though that part isn't true.

    3. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by jimmifett · · Score: 2

      Well, if the employee doesn't like what they are offered, or think they can get more elsewhere, damn, they can either negotiate or go elsewhere. Nothing *forcing* them to stay.

    4. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      claptrap. You don't hire to fill quotas ... You hire the best candidate to do a job.

      I've been in the work-world long enough to know that social factors play a large role in actual hiring decisions/preferences. Humans are social animals and tribal by nature/habit.

      We like to THINK we are objective, but in practice we are not. We unconsciously prefer people who think like and have a background similar to ourselves. We don't want mental-world-view-mismatches that take us out of our comfort zone.

      Once I inadvertently got the results of my own job interview due to a mix-up. The hiring manager stated, "Tablizer [alias] is technically competent and experienced, but has no personality. He is a stick-in-the-mud. We want somebody more interesting." [paraphrased]

    5. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but remember, diversity is YOUR strength!

    6. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by networkBoy · · Score: 2

      You don't hire to fill quotas unless you're government. You hire the best candidate to do a job.

      Tell that to Intel Corp. and their "diversity initiative". Managers were essentially* barred from hiring men unless from a distinct minority (black, hispanic, american indian).

      *I don't believe there is written directive to this end, but more than one manager told me directly that this was the case and that it was not uncertain that their own performance reviews depended on their "diversity".

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    7. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a load of claptrap. You don't hire to fill quotas unless you're government. You hire the best candidate to do a job.

      You pay what the market is willing to bear and what that employee negotiates.

      If an employee doesn't ask for raises outside of normal performance increases, thats on the employee.

      And that's where the government takes issue. Workers of equal skill should get paid roughly the same wages. It's why the government has such arcane employment ranks - your current rank is based on your skill, and within that rank, there's a guideline to pay ranges. So if you're a software developer 3, there may be a +/- $3000/year variance - a slightly weaker SD3 may get less than the average, a slightly stronger one more. If you aren't skilled enough to make it to the higher level, you can move within the range. But once you get promoted, your pay jumps to within the new range.

      That's how they judge equality. They recognize people have different skills and they group them so the group roughly has the same wage. If you're a good negotiator, maybe you get a couple thousand dollars more. Either way, it's a small variation.

      Even if all you do is hire the best of the best, they slot somewhere in the scale, and thus get paid roughly the same.

      The whole 'negotiate your salary" thing is a scam by managers who know employees generally are powerless and thus weaker in negotiations from the get-go. It's the same as why everyone says to not tell anyone what you're paid - again, a scam to lower wages. (Everyone's afraid they're the ones who are overpaid, while in reality, open wages tends to bring wages up as people at the lower end start asking questions

      It's not a foolproof system. It cannot identify that someone is say, a SD3 when they really are ranked lower, and are SD3 just because some manager promoted them because they were white. Though such skill imbalances tend to make themselves well known rather quickly.

    8. Re: Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's also bizarre to use your slashdot handle on an application.

    9. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Because Asian and White males are ignored.
      They won't blow the whistle because they saw what happened to people like me (and a couple others) who dared to not agree with the progrom. One was a quite Sr manager who simply had enough and sent a blistering email to executive management, direct management, and his staff.

      Yes it's illegal.
      No you can't prove it.
      Yes I talked to a lawyer.
      Yes I followed his advice to walk away (he gave compelling reasons, and there was *lots* more to my case than just this).
      Yes I took the money that was on the table in exchange for waiving my right to sue. (not to be a witness though, so if someone else were to speak out I could testify).

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re: Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I'm the father of Bobby Tables.

    11. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Minority have it better here than in any other countries.

      I don't know why this is used as a justification for bad behavior so often. (And probably not true.)

      "I only beat my wife half as often as you do."

    12. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Indeed. USA voted for an interesting president.

    13. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is your solution? Give them privilege over our own peoples because YOU need to prove that you are not racist?

      Where is the limit? Will complete national bankruptcy satisfy you? Or this must go on until the complete extermination of Whites peoples?

    14. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Having seen a lot of government waste, I would rather pay employees extra salary than spend $100 on a hammer or get upcharged on IT purchases 200% because you have to buy from a shady middleman instead of directly from the manufacturer.

    15. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Will complete national bankruptcy satisfy you?

      That's obvious drama-queening there.

      Maybe we can try different ways to encourage diversity, such as tax breaks for having balance. Lawsuits may indeed be too blunt an instrument; let's try more carrots and less sticks.

    16. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If we leave it as is, the dominant culture will suppress secondary cultures and give each other favors in the work-place.

      And I didn't mention immigration. Where did that come from?

    17. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We can mitigate the negative effects to some degree via quotas and statistical monitoring. It ain't perfect, but it's a matter of balancing pro's and cons.

    18. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      implement fascism

      I suspect we have different definitions of "fascism", which I don't want to delve into here.

      Good luck firing Jews that exceed their quota

      What specifically is this in reference to? I would note that quotas should be based on what's available in the workforce. For example, if group X gets 20% more college degrees in finance, then we should realistically expect 20% more of group X in finance careers.

      good luck firing 87% of the Blacks (13% in the US) employees at the all Black Entertainment Television.

      I'm sure the laws can work out some exceptions, such as entertainment or political shows catering to specific ethnic groups, at least for the parts of the business that relate to cultural issues.

      Drawing perfect lines in the sand may be unrealistic, but that's civilization: compromising and cutting deals to keep the peace.

    19. Re:Merit over Intersectionalist Bingo Quotas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You haven't identified companies where this is actually the case. The mega-rich investors usually are the owner.

  3. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's no contradiction in the two statements. The few white males they do hire are being given higher pay, but the majority of the jobs are going to lower-paid Asian workers.

  4. Uh, can I apply now? by tginouye · · Score: 2

    I'm half white, and half Japanese. Does that mean I'll get the job AND get paid more? If so, sign me up! I even live in the East Bay, so I'm local!

    1. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it means you're Shrodinger's Minority just like I am. In every day ending in "y" you pick up the magical hate dice and wait to find out if you're an oppressed minority, or a majority that needs to be discriminated against.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'm half white, and half Japanese. Does that mean I'll get the job AND get paid more?

      No, it means you'll get paid more, but spend the difference on anime pillows and Pocky.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      > No, it means you'll get paid more, but spend the difference on anime pillows and Pocky.

      I hope that was intended as a joke, but that stereotype was pretty crass.

    4. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      [did I fit in all the alt-right cliches? if I missed any, let me know and I'll try again.]

      Only in showing that like most people in the left who subscribe to the PCness, claims of anti-hate speech, bigotry and so on. That you're perfectly fine in using it against anyone who doesn't follow your ideology.

      Haven't quite figured it out yet have you?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      You seem to believe that this election will unleash new bigotry. You might even be right, with respect to people like the 4 who kidnapped the disabled man in Chicago.

      But that aside, your side lost not because people suddenly love bigotry, but because the Left lacks any awareness of how bigoted it has become.

    6. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by tginouye · · Score: 1

      Darn! I guess I should start working on pulling the race card more, that way I'll fit the stereotype! Here I thought I was supposed to work hard and let my results get me places. Why did I ever listen to my elders. Also, more seriously, I know what you mean about the claims of hate speech etc, I live in Oakland, and it's pretty bad here, to the point where I can barely complain about anything without a quick retort of "What, is it because I'm black?". (No, it's because you're an idiot, and I am just following company policy/guidelines)

    7. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by tginouye · · Score: 1

      I'm less for the Anime pillows, but the Pocky sounds delicious. I've been snacking on my Botan Rice Candy recently while waiting for baseball season.

    8. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Here I thought I was supposed to work hard and let my results get me places.

      Nah. Now you can just game the system. The left pushed "diversity hires" really hard, so now all you have to do is claim to be "gender fluid" or state you're Trans. Maybe be male today, female tomorrow and it's all good. Just like that guy in Australia. Maybe toss in some "trans-racial" claims like you're native and see? It's so easy to do it. And if they refuse to hire you, just start screaming they're racist/sexist/bigoted or whichever and state you're being discriminated against. At this point? I fully support fucking with the entire thing and crashing it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:Uh, can I apply now? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Try the Pocky with almonds, if you haven't. It's good.

  5. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

    Those are not mutually exclusive options...

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  6. Monday by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    Don't worry Oracle. You only have to weather this storm until Monday.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  7. Bogus priorities by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oracle values diversity and inclusion

    That's bullshit. It ought to value their software's reliability and performance instead. Nothing else.

    If that means, hiring more (or less) Asians/Blacks/Whites/Purples — so be it.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re: Bogus priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think that says more about who they hire than any one race.

      Of course, after thirty+ years on tech it's hard not to be racist since every Chinese and Indian coworker I've worked with was just useless.

    2. Re:Bogus priorities by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A bit Machiavellian, isn't it? Anything is fine as long as the software turns out good.

      In any case, the law is pretty clear that there are other considerations.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Bogus priorities by mi · · Score: 1

      the law is pretty clear that there are other considerations.

      Citation needed.

      Please, cite the law, that requires companies to hire based on any sorts of quotas.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Bogus priorities by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      Asians/Blacks/Whites/Purples

      That's racist!!!

    5. Re:Bogus priorities by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There are no quotas, that's just crazy talk. I've told you many times that there are no quotas, and they are not desirable. Try to keep up.

      I was referring to anti-discrimination laws. Yes, it might cost you a little more to employ someone who needs some aids to do their job, but you can't use that as a reason to favour another candidate. It might affect your software if you employ a woman of child baring age and she decided to have one, but you can't use that as a reason to favour another candidate.

      How do you form such a strong opinion and not know even the most basic facts about the subject?!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Bogus priorities by mi · · Score: 1

      I was referring to anti-discrimination laws.

      I ask you once again for a citation... Which law is it, which specifically makes it illegal for White men to be paid more?

      Anti-discrimination laws make it illegal for race to be a consideration, when making hiring or compensation decisions. As long as you don't do that, your Whites may still end up paid better. Yes, some Social Justice busy-bodies would take such statistics and claim them to be evidence of racism. They do make a lot of noise, and the current boss of the Labor Department (one more day, baby!) seems to share their persuasion, but there is no evidence supporting that position. Neither of:

      • Whites are paid more; nor
      • Blacks are incarcerated more;

      are in themselves proof of racism.

      if you employ a woman of child bearing age

      TFA is about race. Try to keep up.

      How do you form such a strong opinion and not know even the most basic facts about the subject?!

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:Bogus priorities by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit. It ought to value their software's reliability and performance instead. Nothing else.

      Oracle values their bottom line and their shareholders, nothing more nothing less. Often being a good corporate citizen is part of this priority. You can't shit on everyone endlessly and get endless growth as a result of that. Not in the west anyway.

    8. Re:Bogus priorities by robinsc · · Score: 1

      Word!

      --
      Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/robinsaikatchatterjee
  8. Oracle refused to comply with the Labor Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't comply with an investigation. Refused to cooperate, maybe?

  9. Are they counting personnel on H1B visas? by mmell · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Also - are they comparing current wages or starting wages? It's an unfortunate truth that many organizations have more Caucasian Males making more because they were hired back when companies could (and were even expected to) hire white men. This also accounts for (some of) the disparity in management roles.

    I'm sorry, but changing (or choosing to enforce) the current rules does not magically level the playing field. If it did, minorities would long ago have stopped complaining that the system is rigged against them. Then again, the situation I've just described does leave itself open to manipulation by the "good ol' boy's club".

    I'd be more interested in knowing if job tenure was considered in analyzing the pay differential that the DOL alleges they've discovered.

    1. Re:Are they counting personnel on H1B visas? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You can't have it both ways. The industry can't be ageist and heavily biased against older people while at the same time having wage structures based on decades old biases.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re: Are they counting personnel on H1B visas? by mmell · · Score: 1

      Hey . . . Don't tell me, tell the DOL.

  10. Re:Oracle is clear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I personally would never hire one of them. All they do at work is troll on slashdot!

  11. would be more credible by superwiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they filed before the election instead of the day before inauguration of a President from the opposing party. Once again, if Trump drops the suit, he is racist. If Trump wins the suit, it's Trump persecuting the tech sector while Obama protected minority rights. Who are these jokers kidding?

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:would be more credible by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It says right in the summary that the investigation has been going on for years already. And the timing makes little difference here, and if Trump gets involved it would be a scandal for many reasons unrelated to race.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:would be more credible by superwiz · · Score: 1

      It says right in the summary that the investigation has been going on for years already. And the timing makes little difference here, and if Trump gets involved it would be a scandal for many reasons unrelated to race.

      Well, by all means, then they must be appalled (appalled!) that there is gambling... I mean DISCRIMINATION going on there. Clearly, they had enough evidence create a sham, but not enough to charge, and they had it a while ago and just decided to deploy it at the very moment when it would be most politically damaging to the incoming administration.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  12. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    What part of "Both" is too tough?

  13. Re:Purely coincidence by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Considering the many MONTHS of discovery...no

  14. Re:One Small Problem by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    If you stop climbing the greasy pole to [...] go home early to see the kids

    Single dad here: *yup*.
    Ultimately cost me a good job because blokes are not expected to care for their kids. Had I been a woman needing a flexible schedule no one would have dared to make a fuss.

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  15. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    No, white guys do that too. Beaners are the janitors.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  16. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here we go...

    #OnlyBlackLivesMatter!

    The Democrat creed: We must promote intersectional bullshit in order to foment racial and ethnic tensions, divide the population into groups all trying to out-victim the other, then use that to stay in power in collusion with banksters. To make sure that works, we must excoriate any member of a victim class who dares to leave the thought plantation.

  17. Service industry by dristoph · · Score: 1

    Can we get some attention on Shesha Lounge, a local hookah bar here in Wichita which forces its staff to clock out before they begin closing/cleaning the store and then requires them to stay for a mandatory and unpaid staff meeting that sometimes goes on for hours? In general, I've seen that illegal labor practices abound in the service industry, it's almost expected.

    1. Re:Service industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You might wish to consider contacting the Kansas Department of Labor. Hope this helps. -PCP

  18. I did by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The response is correct: "The complaint is politically motivated, based on false allegations, and wholly without merit."

    Merit is the biggest modifier in people's pay, and has been for decades. Equal opportunity has been the law several decades now. More women graduate college than men, and have been superior in terms of years of education for quite some time now. The Gender pay gap has been debunked so often that I honestly question the sanity of people who continue to argue that it exists. US Department of Labor data shows that women make more than men with the same qualifications and work habits, not less.

    Simple questions answer the issue easily. If women work for less than men, why does any company run by a man hire a man? I'm really tired of this leftist religion being crammed down everyone's throats. Yes, it has become a religion.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:I did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Depends on which stats you include and which you exclude. If you take all women vs. all men, you'll likely prove your point. If you include all factors to create apple to apple comparisons, it is not true. The feminist groups will then argue that women should not be punished for taking time off for raising kids or not being able to work extra hours, etc. But why should men (and women who do not have those conflicts) that work more hours (quality hours not just quantity) not be rewarded for their extra productivity? That's where the chosen statistics and gap comes to be. Normalize and the gap goes away.

    2. Re:I did by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Nobody has debunked the gender pay gap, they just give more granular descriptions of it.

      Eg. "Men get paid X% more on the dollar than women. X = A + B + C + D + E + F + ... + Z. A is explained by the percent of women who pause their careers for 7 years to have babies. B is explained by the pipeline issue where undeniable institutional sexism of the late 70s broke the pipeline meaning that there are fewer qualified 65 year old women in the workforce than 65 year old men. C is some contraindication where women actually get paid more for some reason in isolation, but is smaller than any other factor. D is due to the fact that fewer women graduate as doctors or engineers or lawyers, traditionally well-paid professions, than men. [blah blah blah]. Z has no strong explanation but falls in the margin of error."

      Such an explanation doesn't debunk the gender pay gap, it describes it, and in some cases there's something to look deeper into (why do fewer women graduate as doctors or engineers or lawyers when more women graduate overall? And for that matter, why aren't more men graduating? These things can go both ways...).

    3. Re: I did by jcr · · Score: 1

      They're under the impression that Oracle has been discriminating against pretty much everybody in one area or the other.

      Bullshit. They're under the impression that Oracle was likely to roll over and take it in the ass just to avoid the bad publicity.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:I did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry but it's been debunked many many times, in many publications and studies. But it's not popular to say so.

      People cherry pick data to prove their confirmation bias on topics like this anyway. So it's pointless to debate any topic that the left wing has grabbed onto. They will just shift the discussion or insult you. They have become mindless drones beholden to a religious like zeal for anything that opposes the right, no matter how bizarre or illogical.

    5. Re:I did by Raenex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody has debunked the gender pay gap

      They debunked the myth that women were getting paid less than men for doing the same job.

    6. Re: I did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Public school outcomes is another area . Black children do worse than white children overall . But both black and white children of the same socioeconomic background do about the same . Mama had kids with three difference men , kids do poorly in school regardless of race

    7. Re:I did by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, I think we can ALL make this little argument go away here quickly.

      Let's all start going along with the PC/SJW ideology and start with the concept that it is just basically *WRONG* to be a white guy.

      If you just start with the correct premise, this all becomes very easy to deal with.....

      [rolls eyes].

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re: I did by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      What is truly amazing to me is that any white people still worked at Oracle. I just figured that that lying dumb ass in charge went Walter White obtaining H1B liers.

    9. Re:I did by PoopMonkey · · Score: 1

      It started out as the gender wage gap, but what it means is constantly changing depending on who is having what conversation since it's bullshit. The original claim is that women make 74-77 cents on the dollar for for every job compared to men. Unfortunately, that number is all men averaged against all women. When this is pointed out, there's handwaiving and accusations of misogyny. That is what the gender pay gap is. Any other definition is a deflection. It also ignores childless women outearning men in the same age bracket. They also ignore cases where women are paid 25 times more (not 25 percent more, 25 times more) than men in the same line of work.

    10. Re:I did by cats-paw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's something at the department of labor that directly contradicts what you just said.

      https://blog.dol.gov/2013/06/0...

      now i know that the fact that this is on the actualy DoL website is a problem for you, you didn't have it foxsplained to you on oreally or something. i'll wait for you to tell me how they're lying, i'm not actually reading it correctly , blah blah blah.

      yeah- so the thing that gets me about you right wing nut jobs is how you so very consistently flat out lie.

      and you do it because it works really well.

      especially on this site.

      and always with the leftist religion thing. is that some new libertarian right wing meme that i missed ?

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
    11. Re: I did by cryptizard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your problem is that you think this all happens in a vacuum. If you are born in a neighborhood where half the houses are abandoned and you don't get consistent access to food, you won't have the luxury of making good life choices. It is a perpetuating cycle that started with slavery and continued with segregation. Tough to pull yourself up by your bootstraps when you can't afford shoes.

    12. Re: I did by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      And apparently they think the same thing about Google ?

      So er... who do you think they consider tough ? What, do you need to change the company's mission statement "America ! FUCK YEAH!" to be scary enough ?

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    13. Re:I did by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >The feminist groups will then argue that women should not be punished for taking time off for raising kids or not being able to work extra hours, etc.
      You left out the most important part of the argument: BECAUSE SOCIETY DEMANDS THAT THEY DO.

      Hell fixing that benefits MEN to. Suddenly - ME wanting to not work such long hours so I can spend time with MY kid should not be a reason to punish me either.

      Why should the rest of us have to be compared to a few workaholic mentally ill morons with no life ? We work to live, they live to work - and no we should NOT be rewarding that because it's killing them AND us.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    14. Re:I did by dywolf · · Score: 1

      do you actually believe all that bs?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    15. Re:I did by s.petry · · Score: 1

      A BLOG by a Politically motivated Person != FACTS Collected for analysis by the Department of Labor. It never ceases to amaze me how you left wing nut jobs fail to use facts in any argument and continually prop up opinions biased to your causes as "evidence." In fact you continually deny facts exist and have claimed facts are biased to gender and race.

      FACT: MORE WOMEN THAN MEN ARE EARNING DEGREES! Are going to now claim "not enough STEM" indicating that you want to revoke a woman's choice in degree fields and force her into a STEM job instead of the degree of her choosing?

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    16. Re: I did by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Tough to pull yourself up by your bootstraps when you can't afford shoes.

      Yet somehow my parents managed it. Clearly they fucked up and didn't blame everybody else for their situation, and instead worked to improve it - and assure that their kids also adopted that attitude.

    17. Re:I did by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Having a kid is your choice. Noone is forcing you. Demanding that you get paid the same as someone that works harder and/or longer than you can because you *wanted* to have a child is the very soul of feeling entitled.

      You get paid according to what you can deliver, not according to what you want. It's the only way a national economy could ever work.

    18. Re: I did by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I see you're a fan of the oppression Olympics. Good man.

      Let's not forget that every white male alive today is personally responsible for slavery and every rape ever committed. Btw, are Asians white now or not? I missed the last meeting.

    19. Re:I did by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Come on now, you know he can't answer that question. It requires the use of logic and requires a minimum level of intelligence to understand.

    20. Re:I did by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Such an explanation doesn't debunk the gender pay gap, it describes it, and in some cases there's something to look deeper into (why do fewer women graduate as doctors or engineers or lawyers when more women graduate overall? And for that matter, why aren't more men graduating? These things can go both ways...).

      I'll spell it out for you since you are obviously not capable of rational thought.
      They make different choices.

    21. Re: I did by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Did I say impossible? No. Some people do it obviously. That doesn't mean that everyone is capable of it and we shouldn't act like it is no big deal. Why is it so hard for people to acknowledge that maybe other people had it harder than them, and it doesn't hurt anyone to offer a helping hand every once in a while.

    22. Re: I did by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Did I say any of that? Do you really not see a different between personally taking responsibility for slavery and acknowledging that maybe some other people had a tougher time than you and it is okay to give them a hand?

    23. Re: I did by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Sure, people have it tough. Don't be expecting sympathy for "oh woe is me" or "I did it because I was poor"

      No, very few people have no choices in life.

    24. Re:I did by EmptyHead · · Score: 1

      Cute, and hey let all stop having kids because its our "choice". When our population implodes, we'll just bring in a bunch of third worlders like Europe does. What could possibly go wrong with that. Don't hate the breeders dude, as long as they aren't overdoing it, they are guaranteeing a future for humanity. BTW, its time to move out of your mom's basement and discover this awesome new concept called "A LIFE".

    25. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Women, on the average, make less than men. This is a gender pay gap, and there are reasons for it. Some of the important reasons have nothing to do with direct discrimination against women.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re: I did by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      Exactly how did your parents manage it? Hard work? Poor people in general seem to work a lot harder than I do. Unusual talent? Luck? There's a difference between a solution that works for some people and a solution that works for most people.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    27. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      And said nothing about whether women make less because they're pushed away from higher-paying jobs. "The same job" can cover up a lot of problems. This can happen whether or not anyone is intentionally discriminating against women.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    28. Re:I did by Raenex · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. Studies have born out that women have different interests than men, and they make different choices, including focusing on raising a family, less interest in tech jobs, more interest in social work, less interest in hazardous jobs, etc. But instead of just letting women make their own choices and letting the free market do its thing, you'd rather have the heavy hand of government looking at quotas.

    29. Re:I did by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Yeah... you know what happens when you don't discourage your thinking ?

      Japan, Japan happens. Aging population, young people who don't date or have sex because they all work 18 hours a day - because anybody who doesn't loses their job. Meanwhile the pension plan is going bankrupt because there are too many old people drawing from it and not enough young people paying in.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    30. Re: I did by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      What happened to you as a child that caused you to be incapable of empathy?

    31. Re:I did by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Except the US is doing this, Europe is doing this, Australia, Africa, the whole damn thing. And only Japan is having this problem. How would you argue that Japan is what happens when every other country is free of those issues?

    32. Re:I did by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Wow, I seem to have struck a nerve here.

      You have masterfully combined both entitled millenial and angsty teenager in one humorous package. Thank you.

    33. Re:I did by silentcoder · · Score: 2

      Because every other country has active measures in society to combat that pressure from companies. And in the others they are at least partially successful. Not entirely - much of Europe is having the exact same problem as Japan though at an earlier stage and not as severe yet. That's one reason it's ridiculous of Europe not to welcome the refugees with open arms - they desperately need an influx of able-bodied young people to keep their economies working.
      The US is earlier on the same road, mostly thanks to the immigrants Trump wants to kick out - without them, the US would be a lot further along. Already the US is worried that they can't sustain social security when people are living longer and there isn't a fast enough inflow of young people to fund it.

      Japan is the furthest along that road, and thus gets to serve as the great big warning sign of where that road leads, but you're an idiot if you think those other places aren't on the exact same road and measurably moving forward on it. They are moving slower because of policies designed to combat this corporate pressure. Those policies, however, are being steadily eroded - which will accelerate the trip.

      They need to be significantly strengthened if you want to change course. That means things like paid family leave, maternity leave with job protection, paternity leave with job protection, good (and affordable) childcare options - so that people don't have to choose between life and work.
      A healthy society needs people who work to live. When everybody lives to work - that society is doomed.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    34. Re:I did by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Because every other country has active measures in society to combat that pressure from companies. And in the others they are at least partially successful. Not entirely - much of Europe is having the exact same problem as Japan though at an earlier stage and not as severe yet. That's one reason it's ridiculous of Europe not to welcome the refugees with open arms - they desperately need an influx of able-bodied young people to keep their economies working.

      Every other country... That sounds like a sweeping generalization without any knowledge or data to support it. Let's have a look at working hours to see how far along Japan is. Here, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.a...

      Turns out Japan is more lenient on working hours than USA, on par with Italy, and far nicer than Greece or Mexico. So, your hypothesis would mean birthrates in the US should be below that of Japan, birthrates in Italy should be on par, and birthrates in Greece/Mexico should be much lower than Japan.

      How does that play out? Let's check http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.... or more directly https://www.cia.gov/library/pu... . The US is above Japan, so that didn't align, Italy is even, so that's correct, Greece is even, so that's wrong, and Mexico is way higher, which is again, wrong. Your hypothesis was highly inconsistent with the data.

      Japan is the furthest along that road, and thus gets to serve as the great big warning sign of where that road leads, but you're an idiot if you think those other places aren't on the exact same road and measurably moving forward on it. They are moving slower because of policies designed to combat this corporate pressure. Those policies, however, are being steadily eroded - which will accelerate the trip.

      Or, perhaps the idiot is the one that makes absurd claims that contradict the known data?

      They need to be significantly strengthened if you want to change course. That means things like paid family leave, maternity leave with job protection, paternity leave with job protection, good (and affordable) childcare options - so that people don't have to choose between life and work.
      A healthy society needs people who work to live. When everybody lives to work - that society is doomed.

      Sweden and Norway both have all of those and more, along with some of the lowest working hours in the world. And where are they on the fertility graph? Below Mexico, which is not known as a champion of employee protections.

      At this point we should entertain the notion that you are incorrect, and that the numbers we see fit much much much better to the graph of economic development and wellbeing, i.e. rich people have fewer babies while poor people have more.

    35. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of social pressure to make certain choices, and that starts real young. Of course, if you think that anyone who disagrees with you is pushing for heavy-handed government programs, you're going to miss the nuances.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    36. Re:I did by Raenex · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of social pressure to make certain choices, and that starts real young.

      There are also biological impulses too, as studies have shown. Women are free to make their own choices.

      Of course, if you think that anyone who disagrees with you is pushing for heavy-handed government programs, you're going to miss the nuances.

      We're commenting on a story about the labor department suing Oracle over this identity politics bullshit. It's one of the political planks of the "progressives". Even Obama has made it an issue. Oh, but no, I'm sure you are totally against government interference in this area.

    37. Re: I did by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Aspergers, although medical research suggests this arises prior to birth rather than in childhood.

    38. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      And why do they do that? Are women feeling pushed into different choices? Would we all be happier if we encouraged different choices?

      Seriously, women face different choices with different social pressures than they used to. This stuff is at least partly cultural, and there's no reason to assume that we've gotten the culture to some optimum point. It's almost certain that people a century from now will look back on US society of 2017 and saying how much it's improved since then.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    39. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      indicating that you want to revoke a woman's choice in degree fields

      You're assuming that women make the STEM/not-STEM choice completely freely and without social pressures making one choice or another difficult. If there are pressures against a woman going into STEM, it isn't an entirely free choice.

      Seriously, can't you tell the difference between making sure women have good choices available and forcing them into things?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    40. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's the only way a national economy could ever work.

      Showing that you have no imagination, no knowledge of history, and no knowledge of what's actually happening in the world. For most people, their pay depends more on how expensive it would be to replace them than what they deliver.

      Seriously, we need children in society. Right now, fertility rates in most developed countries are below replacement level, which suggests to me that having and raising children is useful to society. Bearing and raising children is hard work.

      You probably want to have a functioning economy when you retire. To keep the economy functioning over that time, people are going to have to continue to have children. If you intend to rely on other people making certain expensive choices, you've got a big entitlement complex there. You are being a defector in a large Prisoner's Dilemma game.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    41. Re:I did by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Showing that you have no imagination, no knowledge of history, and no knowledge of what's actually happening in the world. For most people, their pay depends more on how expensive it would be to replace them than what they deliver.

      Then please, show me one functional economy where the employees do not get paid as little as possible. Show me where the worth of the employee does not determine the salary + benefits of that employee.
      Or could it be that your entire argument depends on you being petty?

      Seriously, we need children in society. Right now, fertility rates in most developed countries are below replacement level, which suggests to me that having and raising children is useful to society. Bearing and raising children is hard work.

      This just might be the most obvious and unnecessary thing I have ever read.

      You probably want to have a functioning economy when you retire. To keep the economy functioning over that time, people are going to have to continue to have children. If you intend to rely on other people making certain expensive choices, you've got a big entitlement complex there. You are being a defector in a large Prisoner's Dilemma game.

      I don't rely on them having children any more than they rely on me working and paying taxes they can benefit from. How you can mangle things in your head to consider it entitled is amazing though, well done.

    42. Re:I did by s.petry · · Score: 1

      There is no social pressure taking women out of STEM degrees, women are free to make their own degree choices and do so. Just like men. Fact: Assessment tests for promising areas of study are not gender specific. Countless men are given the same results as women for the same reasons and choose their degree choices by those tests. Numerous men do not pursue STEM degrees for the same reasons as women.

      So unless you wish to claim that somehow a number 2 pencil and piece of paper can be bigoted, stop repeating propaganda which is easily dismissed as irrational nonsense. If you are not smart enough to figure out that you are repeating propaganda, or the irrationality of paper and pencil being biased, consider drinking heavy amounts of Thorazine.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    43. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It used to be fairly common in some companies in the 1950s for employees to ask for, and get, raises when they got married and had children.

      You admit that having children is necessary for society and your well-being. You then expect others to raise children at their own expense. Do you really believe that you should be able to count on strangers spending effort and money for your own well-being?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    44. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There is no social pressure taking women out of STEM degrees

      Sez you. Proof by blatant assertion. You don't even seem to think you might be wrong when making a blanket statement about the culture of a large country.

      There are women who have been made uncomfortable in STEM classes, or told not to take them, or just faced a lack or cooperation. There are people (me included) who didn't sign up for the career the paper-and-pencil tests (that were made by people making various assumptions) said we were best for.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    45. Re:I did by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      By denying social pressures as a confounding issue, you're assuming that we've got the nature-nurture thing exactly right, and I don't believe that. Everybody's free to make their own choices. As an extreme, when a robber sticks a gun in your face and demands your wallet, you're free to insult his or her mother. It may not be a good choice, but it's a free one. As a lesser extreme, a person who is deliberately made uncomfortable in certain classes is likely not to take them. Is that a free choice?

      We're commenting on a story in which Oracle is suspected of breaking the law by practicing identity politics in employment matters. Paying someone more because that person resembles you in some way, rather than because that person creates certain value and will cost a certain amount to replace, is identity politics.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    46. Re:I did by Raenex · · Score: 1

      By denying social pressures as a confounding issue, you're assuming that we've got the nature-nurture thing exactly right, and I don't believe that.

      I believe equal opportunities are there, and using unequal outcomes as de facto evidence that social and governmental pressure must be brought to bear to bring about equal outcomes is a problem in itself.

      a person who is deliberately made uncomfortable in certain classes is likely not to take them

      There were a handful of women in the tech/science classes I took. They were in no way made to feel unconformable, especially deliberately. Rather, by pretending women aren't welcome there and it's some kind of scary thing, it's the fear mongers who are sending out the wrong message.

      We're commenting on a story in which Oracle is suspected of breaking the law by practicing identity politics in employment matters.

      Right, as I said, "the heavy hand of government looking at quotas".

      Paying someone more because that person resembles you in some way

      You don't know that's what happened here.

    47. Re:I did by robinsc · · Score: 1

      "That's one reason it's ridiculous of Europe not to welcome the refugees with open arms - they desperately need an influx of able-bodied young people to keep their economies working."

      1. Young people are not the only refugees
      2. What guarantee thatthe terrorists arn't mixed in with the refugees
      3. What guarantee that the refugees will look for honest work .

      --
      Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/robinsaikatchatterjee
    48. Re:I did by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >1. Young people are not the only refugees
      But they are the majority. The VAST Majority - people who are not able-bodied rarely survive the crossing (or even attempt it).

      >2. What guarantee thatthe terrorists arn't mixed in with the refugees
      Who gives a fuck ? How many could there be who gets through the extremely strenuous UN refugee vetting process AND the local country vetting processes ? Seriously - it's not WORTH it for the terrorists to try - it takes years, why do that when you can just recruit locals already IN those countries - who aren't getting vetted because nobody vets natural-born citizens. So let's say a few get in, how many people could they realistically kill ? 20 ? 50 ? Lets assume all of them are as successful as the most successful attacks in Europe have been (the vast majority are nowhere near that)... 500 ? A thousand ? Do you know what the name is for somebody who would kill millions of people to save a thousand ? A fucking terrorist. Do you know what you call somebody who would kill millions of people just for looking different (or believing in a different religion) to save a thousand who looks like himself ? A fucking NAZI terrorist. That's what you are advocating for. NAZI terrorism. You have a few insane people who are actively working to commit genocide on their own people... and you are advocating that we actually HELP them do that because you're scared if we don't they may get a few of ours as well. Fuck that shit. That is not something any sane person would do.

      >3. What guarantee that the refugees will look for honest work .
      Every economic study ever. The history of every large migration in history. They always do. These people are fleeing for their lives, they are not coming on a fucking welfare holiday. They are not even economic migrants. They are skilled, mostly highly educated, people fleeing for their lives. In fact, if anything, the odds are BETTER than usual. You know why ? BECAUSE THEY ARE REFUGEES ! They are the people who were able to get OUT of those warzones, a process that takes more than just ingenuity... it costs money, LOTS of money. These are the people who, in their home countries, had high-paying skilled jobs. You really think these doctors, lawyers and engineers are going to get to Europe and choose to live on a welfare allowance a single day longer than they have to ? It's amazing how the same people who complain about "stealing our jobs" can SIMULTANEOUSLY believe that people of foreign descent are too lazy to work... There has NEVER been a case in HISTORY where migration was not a nett economic gain for the host country. Migrants also do not take jobs - on average, by every measurable metric, every migrant CREATES 4 to 6 jobs.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  19. Re:Litigation by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    fyi you don't have to have an engineering background to be hire for an engineering job...

  20. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    Asians are either considered white or not, depending on the narrative they are pushing. Same as beaners.

    Lumping all Asians together is silly. The people of Iran and northern India have more in common genetically, linguistically and culturally with Europe than they do with East Asia. Many Indian-Americans will tick "South Asian" if that is an option, but will select "White" if that is the only alternative to "Asian", because that is where they feel they belong

  21. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Republican creed: We must promote intersectional bullshit in order to foment racial and ethnic tensions, divide the population into groups all trying to out-victim the other, then use that to stay in power in collusion with banksters. To make sure that works, we must excoriate any member of a victim class who dares not to vote against their own interests.

    FTFY - AKA, The southern strategy.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

  22. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I would be very surprised if Oracle haven't already gotten rid of any expensive dead weight and the ones that have remained are there for good reason.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  23. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Beaners are the janitors.

    So are white guys who go to lunch at Taco Bell and come back to the office.

  24. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The **Democrat** creed...

    Create the KKK

    "Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and black Republican leaders. Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal–the reestablishment of white supremacy–fulfilled through **Democratic** victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s"

    Fixed THAT for ya...
    http://www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klan

  25. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    The Republicrat Creed, divide and conquer, who gives a shit about liberty.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  26. Re: Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by Your.Master · · Score: 1

    In the United States, Asian as a racial or ethnic identifier usually means what I grew up calling East Asian. Which covers, among other countries, China and Japan.

  27. Re:Oracle is clear. by lgw · · Score: 1

    Oracle is a meritocracy.

    You misspelled "mediocracy".

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  28. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by ghoul · · Score: 1

    read the article... idiot!

    I did . It doesnt say anything clear. Also using a swear word does not make your point any more valid

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  29. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by asdfman2000 · · Score: 2

    Slashdot should fully support this, but as usual accusations of racism triggered most of the posters and mods. This angle is probably the best way you can fight back against H1B abuse, but the programmed Pavlovian response is hard to overcome.

    Or perhaps most of us would rather problems with H1B abuse be solved directly rather than through underhanded identity politics. That way madness lies.

  30. By Asians does that include Indians? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    That's about 90% of the folks I see in tech roles these days, so it'd be interesting if this changed anything. And it's not that they're paying whites more, they're paying everybody else _less_. It's subtle, but believe me, there's a difference.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  31. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by ranton · · Score: 1

    Make up your mind. Which is it? They are paying more to white males or discriminating against white males by preferring Asian workers?

    Oracle has not been complying with requests for information, so the Labor Department is suing them so they can get this information during discovery. They are probably suing them for multiple offenses so they can get a more broad set of information during this process. At least that is my guess based on the information in the article.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  32. Re:The Whites-Only House by sobachatina · · Score: 1

    Love this. Out of curiosity what makes a black person not count as a black person? Just by disagreeing with you or is it more nuanced than that?

    Used to hear the same kind of thing about Clarence Thomas. Apparently it is problematic for stereotypes if there are non-white republicans.

    Standard disclaimer: I affiliate with neither party and despise the hypocrisy from both.

  33. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    Both!

  34. Re: Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    Malaysia isn't in East Asia.

    I think most Malaysians would be surprised to hear that. The boundary between "South Asia" and "East Asia" is generally considered to be the Naf River, which is Bengali on the west bank and Burmese on the east bank. Malaysia is much further to the east, and some parts of Malaysia are further east than Hong Kong.

  35. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    I would bet my last dollar that quite of few of those 'Asians' (so why is it Asians versus 'white people' rather than Europeans). are paid quite a lot more than they seem to be. So where is that extra money coming from, why from those foreign agencies who hire and train them, just before they apply for the job working on US computer infrastructure. I'll bet there are so many secret features buried so deep they will never be able to find them all, US corporate greed serving the US as always, as cheaply as possible to maximise profits and fuck the consequences.

    Nobody trusts the US any more, not one tiny little bit and as such they all will be looking to place sleeper agents as deeply as possible in US digital infrastructure, no just agents, the software and hardware they insert into US digital infrastructure that remains long after the agent has left and this will have been going on for some time. Thanks US corporate greed, revenge for the NSAs shenanigans in other countries would not be possible without you.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  36. Asian parent wants to know by Larryish · · Score: 1

    Why did you eat honey that was made by B's? B is inferior, next time get honey from a hive of A's.

  37. Re:So just out of curiosity by ruir · · Score: 1

    Will do you help an incompetent person and enable those said person to build a fake CV.... what are you trying to achieve, maybe her being the boss of your department in the near future because of management quotas on sex and race?

  38. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trump's popularity with white males was in no small part because he appealed to their sense of victimhood. Jobs stolen by immigrants, minorities given priority at their expense, constantly accused of being racist and sexist. It's standard alt-right doctrine, and the narrative running through everything of Breitbart which we know is Trump's favourite source of news (being a prolific tweeter has some benefits).

    That's the right's creed now. White men are oppressed, so should vote for a white male bigot like Trump who will look out for them. All progressive policies, all attempts to eliminate racism and sexism are just schemes to oppress white people and silence free speech, and the vast SJW army must be defeated by electing someone like Trump who doesn't give a shit about imitating disabled reporters or grabbing women by the genitals. The establishment itself is reverse-racist! Quick, appoint some white supremacists to his staff!

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  39. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    A big part of the problem is that race and wealth correlate strongly in the USA and the rhetoric from the Democrats has been about race and not poverty, even though the latter is the real problem. This leaves people who are both poor and white feeling that the party only cares about poverty when it happens to black people and, worse, that it feels middle class black people deserve more help than poor white ones. This is made even worse by the fact that there's a black President: clearly being black isn't a complete barrier to success, but being born poor often is.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  40. Lets hear it by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    When a similar case was brought against google a while ago, a bunch of people here defended the company and their refusal to hand over compensation data - so let's hear it, will you defend the prime evil of tech as well ? Will you felate Ellison like you slobbered on Schmidt ? Or is refusing to cooperate into an investigation of your own compliance with the law only heroic when google does it ?

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  41. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know that Trump has four, that's right FOUR senior cabinet members who are ex-Goldman Sachs ? Tell me again how republicans don't suck bankster cock.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  42. Interesting timing. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    A big case right before the administration changes?

  43. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After all, the reason that most of the old Confederacy now votes for Republicans is because the people there are broadly tolerant, and accepting of diversity, having fully rejected their history of slaveholding and Jim Crow.

  44. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Really? Did you read the dates of that strategy. Do you hold the democrats to how they stood in the 60's and 70s?

    And that article is a great example of bias so thanks for linking it so I can point to it on the next wikipedia article.

    "Reagan's campaigns used racially coded rhetoric, making attacks on the "welfare state" and leveraging resentment towards affirmative action."
    Trying to find secret meanings in words just to support your theory is the epitome of dishonesty. Teh whole article is layered with that.

  45. Important Note: Asian = Indian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to clarify that for the non-IT people that visit Slashdot and are not aware of the gross racism going on in corporate America to replace IT employees of all backgrounds and religions with people that fit a single racial profile. Worst example I have seen to date was at HSBC where they bring in 1,500-3,000 Indians a year to do all of their database development. They skirt around H1-B limitations by hiring Indians in India then import them under regular travel programs for the maximum 90 days then ship'em back and bring in another batch.

  46. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Trying to find secret meanings in words just to support your theory is the epitome of dishonesty.

    The statement you quoted is entirely factual. Republicans have used racial dog whistles ("Willie Horton!"), attacked the welfare state (but not corporate welfare) and leveraged resentment against affirmative action ("political correctness") for decades. The Trump administration will be no different.

  47. Re:Litigation by temcat · · Score: 1

    Perhaps anything more complex than that is too complex for a leftist mind.

  48. Lack of Diversity is Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've had the unconscious bias training and all the other stuff. Apparently, increasing diversity makes everything better, you cannot question this, it is the approved narrative, so it must be true. Therefore, all of these businesses such as facebook, google, oracle; you know the ones that are primarily composed of white and asian men, well these companies will never succeed because they lack the required diversity. These companies deserve our pity.

  49. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    "A big part of the problem is that race and wealth correlate strongly in the USA"

    Wealth and sociopathy go hand in hand more convincingly though. Rich black people tend to be just as nasty as rich white ones and both groups tend to be equal opportunity in their sociopathy.

  50. It is probably true all around the tech industry by bearvarine · · Score: 1

    True story: A while back I was hired at $95K to come in and rescue a tiny tech startup that had lost its star software developer. Not only did I do software development, I also helped with management activities, one of which was to recruit a second software developer. I found a recent Masters Degree graduate from the local university (Taiwanese national) who was happy to take the job at $70K. Fast forward one year later, the company was still struggling, and the owner laid me off and kept the Taiwanese developer. Honestly I don't think its a racist thing; its just that foreigners and recent arrivees are often much more willing to work harder for less money than locals. Companies would naturally hire lower cost workers if they can do the job.

  51. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by Cederic · · Score: 2

    You must have the luxury of not being an Oracle customer.

  52. I'm not always on Oracle's side but... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    in this case I am. These sorts of "show us your labor stats" demands are nothing more than shakedowns from the PC crowd. We already have plenty of reverse discrimination laws in place - none of which give any weight to merit when it comes to job placement decisions. These laws are purely based on quotas but the backers of these laws will never use the term "quota".

    In many cases, a woman or a minority IS the best candidate for the job. But that suitability should be based SOLELY on merit.

    If a woman shows up for a job interview and she is 7 months pregnant is it discrimination to not hire her, knowing that in a month she will be on maternity leave for 3 or 4 months? I don't think so.

    If a non-white applies for a job and english is not their first language and communication is a key skill (as it is in many jobs) is it discrimination to not hire that person? Again, I don't think so.

    So when labor laws require quotas from this group or that group we are, by definition, causing the following:
    1) The exclusion of qualified while males, who might have been hired for the position if not for the quotas.
    2) Lowering standards to accommodate otherwise under qualified candidates.
    3) Resentment among current staff, due to items 1 & 2.

    I actually applaud Oracle for standing up to this sort of extortion. Personally I wish more companies would.

  53. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    The statement you quoted is entirely factual. Republicans have used racial dog whistles ("Willie Horton!")

    And so have Democrats. Heck, the last KKK member that was in the senate was a democrat and the only reason he is out is because he died (Robert Byrd). Some people suck.

    The statement about the welfare state is not a racial coded one which is what the quote said.

    If you have no concerns assuming people are talking in code, then I am sure you will "successfully" find whatever you want when judging people.

  54. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

    Or could it be that many slashdotters don't feel two wrongs make a right?

  55. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    And so have Democrats.

    Got any examples?

  56. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure that the number of people alive today who have owned slaves is vanishingly small.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  57. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    The Trump administration will be no different.

    That is kind of funny, since as recently as 6 years ago Trump was a member of the DNC.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com...

    But sure, let's hold up Trump as the absolute peak of racism. The man who didn't speak out against any race (black, white and asian are races, muslim and hispanic are not).

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  58. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Did you read the next sentence?

  59. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Jobs stolen by immigrants,

    You forgot the illegal in that statement. No one has problems with immigrants, it is the ones who illegally overstay visas or illegally cross borders many people have problems with. After all, in farming country, unless you are an illegal, you are unemployable to pick fruits and veggies.

    minorities given priority at their expense,

    That is because equal opportunity laws are inherently racist. When a poor black person gets priority over a poor white person, it is racism, as you only care about the color of the black person's skin.

    constantly accused of being racist and sexist.

    You got me there, I am tired of this overused and false assesment of everyone who supports the republicans. It is a lie, or a missunderstanding of the meaning of these words. After all, Trump promoted exactly 0 racist policies, but was constantly called racist.

    It's standard alt-right doctrine, and the narrative running through everything of Breitbart which we know is Trump's favourite source of news (being a prolific tweeter has some benefits).

    It is a standard of the downtrodden to speak out against injustice, and the people who are putting the boots on other's necks. This is why the DNC has been failing recently, most of their policies are racist and are designed to push some down to give priority to others.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  60. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Did you read the next sentence?

    Your entire comment didn't make sense.

  61. Re:Schitzophrenic Labor Dept. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    When did idiot become a swear word? Though I suppose you could be speaking about article...

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  62. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    But sure, let's hold up Trump as the absolute peak of racism.

    I wrote Trump administration, not Trump himself. His cabinet picks and followers are the peak of racism. As for Trump himself, his outreach to black people from safe white neighborhoods was too funny.

  63. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    I missed the distinction in your statement, my apologies. I can't say I know anything about his cabinet, only the stances the (soon to be) president himself took.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  64. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I can't say I know anything about his cabinet, only the stances the (soon to be) president himself took.

    As one political commentator wrote, the swamp alligators (cabinet picks) are changing team shirts from Obama to Trump and that's about it.

  65. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Quoting myself "Heck, the last KKK member that was in the senate was a democrat and the only reason he is out is because he died (Robert Byrd)."

  66. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Quoting myself "Heck, the last KKK member that was in the senate was a democrat and the only reason he is out is because he died (Robert Byrd)."

    Democratic Senator Robert Byrd renounced being a Klansman and became a respected member of the civil rights movement. Maybe you're thinking of former Democratic and Republican Senator Storm Thurmond who had a child with a black maid and never renounced segregation?

  67. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Actually, in the UK most of the hate is directed to perfectly legal immigrants from other EU countries. The illegal aspect in the US is just a weak justification, if they were legal people would still blame them.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  68. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    One, we were talking about the US. You specifically talk about Trump.
    Two, we will never know if people would still blame legal immigrants, but as that isn't happening currently in the US with the 2 million legal immigrants we take in every year, I think you are full of it.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  69. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    What about H1B then? Legal immigrants, but widely blamed and reviled.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  70. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    And you contend that organizations never change in 150 years? Or 100 years (Democrats pushed civil rights legislation through shortly before 1966).

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  71. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    No one has problems with immigrants,

    That conflicts with my experience. The anger I've seen directed at immigrants has been primarily against legal ones (although that may well vary by region). There's similar antagonism over sending jobs abroad, and that's perfectly legal.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  72. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Trump's popularity with white males was in no small part because he appealed to their sense of victimhood. Jobs stolen by immigrants, minorities given priority at their expense, constantly accused of being racist and sexist. It's standard alt-right doctrine, and the narrative running through everything of Breitbart which we know is Trump's favourite source of news (being a prolific tweeter has some benefits).

    Take your head out of your ass. Look around. Trump won because of minorities including women, blacks, hispanics and so on. People that realized Hillary is just a despot puppet of Soros. She lost Bigly in this election. As for victimhood, did you check out the BS with the woman march for Saturday? It was started by white women, quickly degraded as black women and others claimed they were even more victims and of course no other victim can understand this. What a joke. Even the Washington Post made a joke by featuring the march with pink, and a male symbol. Alt-right? What a joke as well. Fascism is leftist, not right. Obviously you have no idea about the difference between a fascist, socialist and a communist. They hate each other by the way.

    That's the right's creed now. White men are oppressed, so should vote for a white male bigot like Trump who will look out for them. All progressive policies, all attempts to eliminate racism and sexism are just schemes to oppress white people and silence free speech, and the vast SJW army must be defeated by electing someone like Trump who doesn't give a shit about imitating disabled reporters or grabbing women by the genitals. The establishment itself is reverse-racist! Quick, appoint some white supremacists to his staff!

    Ok, first of all you realize he never actually grabbed a woman's crotch, nor has he appointed any white supremacists, right? The Democrats had an actual KKK Grand Dragon named Senator Byrd. Served for years. That was OK because he was a Democrat, somehow. This was recently, Hillary was giving him tongue kiss. Democrats keep minorities on their government plantation and that's the problem. Eventually they run out of other people's money. That's where we are today, about 21T in debt thanks to Obama and the Democrats.

  73. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    No. I was thinking of Robert Byrd who did his best to continue segregation until political reasons forced his to pretend to change. And pretend was all it was. You just had to listen to the man.

    Quick google search would show you that
    http://www.azquotes.com/author...

    Democrat Senator Reid is the same way (but he is bat-shit crazy so I almost want to give him a pass.)
    http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITI... He made these comments in 2008, long after Thurmond dies (so much more recent.)

  74. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    I don't think people have a problem with the H1B people themselves, but with the abuses of the system. If the system was working as it was meant, they wouldn't be taking any jobs away as they would be doing jobs that literally no one else could do, so it wouldn't be an issue. Unfortunately, instead, the system is being abused to replace people in jobs, which is actually illegal, but never prosecuted.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  75. Re:White Power Rangers...ASSEMBLE! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    And pretend was all it was.

    If you're on the public stage, it's all pretend. I've always find it interesting that people expect a politician to be the same in public as they are at home. I'm a different person on Slashdot than I am at the office than I am at home. To quote Shakespeare: "The entire world is a stage."

    Democrat Senator Reid is the same way (but he is bat-shit crazy so I almost want to give him a pass.)

    Reid had a valid point about Obama being biracial. If Obama's skin tone was jet black, it's very unlikely that he would have gotten elected POTUS. It's called colorism.

    http://racerelations.about.com/od/understandingrac1/a/What-Is-Colorism.htm

    Slave-owners were partial to light-skinned slaves because they were often family members. Slave-owners frequently forced slave women into sexual intercourse, and light-skinned offspring were the telltale signs of these sexual assaults. While slave-owners did not officially recognize their mixed-race children as blood, they gave them privileges that dark-skinned slaves did not enjoy. Accordingly, light skin came to be viewed as an asset among the slave community.