Slashdot Mirror


A New Video Shows Uber CEO Travis Kalanick Arguing With a Driver Over Fares (bloomberg.com)

A new video published by Bloomberg shows Uber CEO Travis Kalanick arguing with an Uber driver over fares. It all started when one of Kalanick's "companions" appears to say that she's heard that Uber is having a hard year. Bloomberg reports: That pleasant conversation between Kalanick and his friends in the back of an Uber Black? It devolved into a heated argument over Uber's fares between the CEO and his driver, Fawzi Kamel, who then turned over a dashboard recording of the conversation to Bloomberg. Kamel, 37, has been driving for Uber since 2011 and wants to draw attention to the plight of Uber drivers. The video shows off Kalanick's pugnacious personality and short temper, which may cause some investors to question whether he has the disposition to lead a $69 billion company with a footprint that spans the globe. Uber declined to comment on the video. Here's part of the conversation:
Travis Kalanick: "So we are reducing the number of black cars in the next few months."
Fawzi Kamel: "It's good."
Kalanick: "You probably saw some email."
Kamel: "I saw the email [says] it starts in May. But you're raising the standards and dropping the prices."
Kalanick: "We're not dropping the prices on black."
Kamel: "But in general."
Kalanick: "In general but we have competitors. Otherwise we'd be out of business."
Kamel: "Competitors? You had the business model in your hands you could have the prices you want but you choose to buy everybody a ride."

You can read the transcript of the conversation here via Recode.

UPDATE 2/28/17: Uber CEO Travis Kalanick has issued "a profound apology."

187 comments

  1. The long, slow downfall has begun by quonset · · Score: 3

    Wasn't there a recent story about how Uber is doomed?

    Oh right, here it is.

    1. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by monkeyzoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hit job?! The media barely has time to cover all the crappy things Uber does because there are so damn many of them!

      What?! So this shows the CEO is an A-hole?! Never could have known that before!

      Uber’s 10 Worst Actions—Threats, Lies, Sexism & Shady Business Deals
      http://observer.com/2016/02/ub... [observer.com]

      Anticompetitive and dishonest business practices against rivals.

      Using their geolocation data to harassing and personally threaten journalists who didn't cover them favorably.

      Exploiting workers, not only as contractors but by enticing them to enter into exploitative financial agreements.

      Rampant corporate sexism and misogyn from the CEO on down.

    2. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link got broke. Think you meant this one...
      http://observer.com/2016/02/ubers-10-worst-actions-threats-lies-sexism-shady-business-deals/

      Good article. Crazy, evil company.

    3. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah, they are quite possibly doomed. The billions in VC money they are burning through will eventually run out. I'm still puzzled as to how such a shitty business model and hedging a huge bet on self driving cars coming along sooner rather than later can be valued at 70billion$ or what ever it is.

    4. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I have 0 doubt that they are being crappy. However, it went from 'oh that taxi thing' to a story every few days.

      I will give you an alternative to what is going on https://www.google.com/#q=uber+trump+connection&*

      He distanced himself from Trump but that was not enough for them.

      It *looks* like a hitjob. Not saying it is. It does resemble one though.

      Rampant corporate sexism and misogyn from the CEO on down.
      Which makes it to my eyes look even MORE like a hitjob. As associating people to being misogynist is one of the new ways to tear people down. (see gamergate). Something like that is usually handled internally and cleaned up with policies, HR visits, and 'training'. Not usually aired out in the open.

    5. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wasn't there a recent story about how Uber is doomed?

      Maybe we should calling them, "Übel", instead of "Über" . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First day on your new team, your boss tells you by office chat that he is in an open relationship with his boyfriend, and that he is having a hard time time finding partners, hint hint. You take screenshots to human resources, but they decline to take action because your boss is a "high performer" and it is his "first offense". Does that sound like "pretty much every corporation"? Go read this blog if you want to learn more. Although you may question the veracity of the account, since none of it has been or will ever be proven in a court of law, keep in mind that this women is taking a huge professional risk publishing this story her work experience at Uber. She could be sued for libel if any of it is wrong.

    7. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by mellon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, because nobody anywhere ever in a position of power was actually misogynist. Puhleeze. Speaking as a 50-year-old former misogynist, I can tell you that it all seems perfectly reasonable until one day you wake up and realize that you were being a complete self-involved asshole. But kids these days, they never listen. They have to see it for themselves.

    8. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by monkeyzoo · · Score: 2

      Something like that is usually handled internally and cleaned up with policies, HR visits, and 'training'.

      Exactly! Unless the CEO is the one fostering a climate of misogyny and sexual harassment, as years of worth of data now suggests.

    9. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm mad because Uber uses fraudulent, sabotaging, or at the least despicable business practices to thwart their competitors and intimidate reporters. (Read the article so I don't have to repeat the facts.) Couple this with their abhorrent corporate and individual behavior at the executive level, and you have the recipe for a uniquely "evil" company.

    10. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hit job? Who made the CEO act like a jackass to one of his emplo^H^H^H^H^Hcontractors?

    11. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty much every corporation.

      So, the old "everybody does it" defense. That is baloney. Every big company has some unethical employees, but many companies have a basic culture of ethical responsibility. Uber is far worse than average, and the problem starts at the top. Travis Kalanick makes even Larry Ellison seem like a nice guy.

      Disclaimer: I didn't watch the video.

    12. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by RCL · · Score: 1

      Isn't Uber "Over" in German anyway? Kinda prophetic.

    13. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      I don't think it's that meaning of "over". I think that it really means "above".

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why the US as a country is doomed. I feel sorry for some of the people living there.

    15. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that pretty much every CEO is an A-hole and they pretty much all should be cast out of society?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    16. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't Uber "Over" in German anyway? Kinda prophetic.

      In English, "Over" can mean "above" or it can mean "finished". The German word "Uber" shares only the first meaning, but it can also mean "superior".

      These sorts of unshared dual meanings are one of the things that makes machine translation difficult. For instance, in Chinese the word "kai" can mean "open" and it can also mean "turn on". So when a native Chinese speaker is learning English, they will sometimes ask someone to "open the light". This can be especially confusing since the English phrase "close the switch" when properly translated to Chinese is "open the switch".

    17. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, like in "Ubermensch", which is what we European are compared to everybody else. We're superior, we brought the only true civilization to the whole world, get over it.

    18. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I despise Uber and I despise Kalanick. That said, this specific video is a hit piece. I watched it, and there's really very little to complain about. The argument isn't heated until the very end, when he just raises his tone a bit and gets out of the car.

      Is Kalanick more or less lying? Well yeah, he's basically a con man. But there's nothing in this video that would make me think he's not suited to be a CEO. The personal responsibility bit shows that he's just like every other "just world" rich asshole, but that seems to go hand-in-hand with being a CEO these days.

    19. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by stealth_finger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ....well, yeah?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    20. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah this is starting to look like a hit job. An 'uber did X' story every 2-3 days. Anyone willing to dig and see the connections? Too lazy myself to do it. But it smells 'odd' and put on.

      Until recently almost all the Uber stories were presented as "cool disruptive Uber blocked by boring old laws yet again". This is just part of a correction to the overwhelmingly gushing treatment Uber have had here up to now.

      And, of course, I must be a shill for the legendary and all-powerful Taxi Cartel for daring to criticise Uber.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    21. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's that meaning of "over". I think that it really means "above".

      I don't remember much from GCSE german but basic directions is one thing and uber die brucke is over the bridge, so its uber 9000 and all that.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    22. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Uber. I love how they rip off the Drivers to give us consumers a better deal.

      It's like benefiting off child labour in third world countries. I love paying just 20% for 95% of the quality. If you think Walmart and Amazon an't ripping off their suppliers to bring you the discounts you a naive. Uber is just the next great American institution that's gonna be the assholes for our sake!

      It's awesome! If you hate cab Drivers, then you should love Uber because they turned the tables around.

      If Uber Drivers live like kings then whose getting ripped off? Yes the customers. Don't tell me win win.

    23. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody always gets ripped off at some point. For Larry Ellison they rip off their customers so they are assholes. Uber? They rip of their agents... who cares.

      Since when did you feel bad for car dealers who had to resort to slimy tactics because the car companies rip them off.

      Yet Uber Drivers continue to drive and car dealers keep selling cars.... it just shows there are always people with less options than getting ripped off. If Unber didn't rip them off they would be homeless and leeching off your taxes.

    24. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oracle employee here. Yes, they're greedy bastards, but they are also pretty meticulous about following the law when they know there's no likely way around it. I am fairly sure that the sort of thing that Fowler's complained about at Uber would not be tolerated for long here. If nothing else, lawsuits, threats of same, and lots of ugliness being speculated on in the media are generally not good for business, and the folks who run this outfit are smart enough to see this.

    25. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The word is "Ãoeber". Uber is not a German word.

    26. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I looks like it being a 'hitjob' is your preferred view, so just go with it. You'll be able to cobble together enough things that align with that to relieve any cognitive dissonance.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    27. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Okay, thank god. For a second there I thought we might have a CEO infestation.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    28. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by dinfinity · · Score: 2

      Neither is "Ãoeber".

    29. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that doesn't look bad at all! The driver is making baseless claims and blaming the driver for his bad financial management and the pissed off CEO call his bullshit. The driver then post the video of the private conversation publicly. The driver is an asshole.

    30. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel this is a non-story. Pretty normal everyday exchange between two people.

      So one of them uttered a strong word "bullshit"? Whoa!

      Then he even dared to continue by saying: "You know what, some people don't like to take responsibility for their own shit. They blame everything in their life on somebody else. Good luck!" The absolute madman!

      This is a hit job if I've ever saw one.

    31. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by monkeyzoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree! This video doesn't seem anywhere near as horrifying as many other things Kalanik has done.

      And yet, he issued this statement in response:
      "My job as your leader is to leadand that starts with behaving in a way that makes us all proud. That is not what I did, and it cannot be explained away. It’s clear this video is a reflection of me—and the criticism we’ve received is a stark reminder that I must fundamentally change as a leader and grow up. This is the first time I’ve been willing to admit that"

      Really?! He never thought calling his company "Boob-er" revealed his need to grow up?

      It's obviously an empty apology stemming from the heat he is feeling these days on all fronts.

    32. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      By that logic, Trump's twitter feed is also a hit job. There's a new bit of idiocy up there every 2-3 days (hours), after all.

    33. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can it be any more obvious that the Media is running hitjobs on Uber?

    34. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one point, Uber funded a start up to report on journalists and media corruption. It was a few years ago, but they've had it in for the guy ever since.

      I really don't give a shit about Uber. Never ordered one and probably never will. But seriously, fuck the Media.

    35. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much every corporation.

      So, the old "everybody does it" defense. That is baloney. Every big company has some unethical employees, but many companies have a basic culture of ethical responsibility. Uber is far worse than average, and the problem starts at the top. Travis Kalanick makes even Larry Ellison seem like a nice guy.

      Disclaimer: I didn't watch the video.

      Might not mean that as a defense and more of, "why is this such news."

    36. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      This isn't unique to Chinese. I knew a native Italian speaker whose English was otherwise quite good but he would always ask one to "Open the light." And he definitely didn't know any Chinese.

    37. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The German word is Ueber, or spelt w/ U-umlaut, if this stupid site could allow UTC-8 characters

    38. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You incorrectly concluded that fact is a defense. At no point was that claim made.

    39. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're Trump cult nuts and trolls who started posting here regularly because /. made the mistake of posting a few articles related to Trump. They think this is all "fake news" BS because the Uber CEO dared to join the team Trump put together of tech company leaders. Yet, for some reason all of the other CEOs involved in that haven't had the "fake news" media run "hit jobs" on them. All of the allegations against him also fit into their narrative that men with power in companies are angels who never do anything wrong, it's all fake allegations from SJWs/feminists/leftists.

    40. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UTC-8 characters

      When did the Pacific Timezone get it's own character set?

    41. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uber is doomed because they're losing 2 billion dollars American money a year, and are subsidizing up to 40% of each ride with investor money.

      They're praying they can get to self driving nirvana before they run out of cash, but no one thinks that will happen. Their business model is unsustainable.

      If they'd have stayed as just an actual "ride sharing" app they'd be fine, connect rider going to Denver with guy driving to Denver, take a nickel off of every connection, but they got it in their heads to go all disrupt and shit.

      I cringe more when I hear the word disrupt than I do when I hear the word cloud, and the word cloud can cause me actual physical pain.

    42. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      they decline to take action because your boss is a "high performer" and it is his "first offense".

      And then you find out that there have been many complaints before yours, and many complaints after yours, and every time it was his "first offense", meaning HR was lying to you.

    43. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      There's an anti-Uber story every 2-3 days now it seems. Now, I've always hated Uber and been shitting on them for years on /. because I think the "sharing economy" is a scam, but this looks like a coordinated media hit to me. Either Uber really is just the most god-awful shithole in every way imaginable and everyone just suddenly now realized it...or somebody's got it out for them.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    44. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      We're doomed because in our country a car driver can publicly shame a CEO and bring international attention to bad business practices? Oh, the horror! The end is near! The end is near!

    45. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many snowflake characters. So many.

    46. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why should you? This is slashdot after all!

    47. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look I know you and I disagree on my 'hitjob' assessment. Yet here is another one on this very site. https://apple.slashdot.org/sto...

      They may be a *terrible* company to work for. Yet this sudden wave of article after article *feels* like a hitjob to me. That particular article is along the lines of 'no one uses them anymore dont be uncool'.

      I have 0 skin in the game with them. Hell I do not even have their app installed. I have never even USED them. It just looks odd to me. I did not care about them a few months ago. Why would I suddenly start caring about them? Yet the news is telling me I should get outraged at a company that has bad management practices. I know I should 'care'. But really for a company that I have 0 to do with I can't.

      Mark my words you will be see more of these negative articles on them.

    48. Re:The long, slow downfall has begun by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but "over the bridge" does not use the same meaning of "over" as "Uber is over".

      "Uber is over" uses this definition:
      (esp. of an event) finished, completed, or ended:
      Iâ(TM)ll be glad when the meeting is over.
      The game was over by 5 oâ(TM)clock.
      I'm worried about the test, but at least it will be all over (= completely finished)in an hour.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    49. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ditto

    50. Re: The long, slow downfall has begun by monkeyzoo · · Score: 1

      Funny because I just saw that Slashdot article too and thought of "you," whoever you are. :-)
      I agree there seems to be an increase here in coverage/visibility of Uber's shittiness all of a sudden.
      Maybe Slashdot editors are deciding they now want to rank negative Uber pieces higher in the inclusion criteria?

      As for the broader media, well, I feel it's about time. I've been sick of seeing all this Uber is soooooo greeeeeaaaaat coverage for so long and such minimal coverage of their atrocious management. It's years overdue, IMO.

  2. grand plan by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought Uber's single goal was to put all possible forms of transportation out of business and essentially become a gatekeeper that will exact a toll from people who need to travel around and be mobile.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:grand plan by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gees, no, where it the money in that. The goal is to create the illusion of profitability to pump and dump in an IPO and wander off a scamming billionaire. This with the full backing of the psychopathic banskters who control the US government.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:grand plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, right, because Saudi Arabia doesn't extract a toll from everyone who need to travel around and be mobile right now? Spare me.

    3. Re:grand plan by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I thought Uber's single goal was to put all possible forms of transportation out of business and essentially become a gatekeeper that will exact a toll from people who need to travel around and be mobile.

      I think their goal is best summed up by their corporate motto: "Be Evil".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:grand plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. They missed the boat there. Too much ego.

  3. once you go black by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Funny

    you never....drop the price?

  4. No by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    The video shows off Kalanick's pugnacious personality and short temper, which may cause some investors to question whether he has the disposition to lead a $69 billion company with a footprint that spans the globe.

    "Pleasant temperament" doesn't seem to be a requirement for being CEO.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The threshold of fuckedness. The CEO is rarely below that level so the best response to any criticism is usually "fuck you".

      That's always the problem though, the people in the highest echelons of the org have zero reason to stay there beyond collecting a tasty phat paycheck - the kind of monthly paychecks that's equal to 100 annual paychecks. They don't have to care, and they don't have to make excuses. "Fuck You" money.

      If they fail they collect a severance package that's probably many times your lifetime earnings, and that's if they FAIL. I wish I could be paid that much for not doing my job. These are the same people that know when the company is going down the shitter and bail with the proceeds before anyone else realizes what's going on (and you won't get your last two paychecks, sorry).

    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is being a cunt, but apparently he is.

    3. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This quote is great:

      Driver: “Good luck to you too I know that you aren’t going to go far.”

    4. Re:No by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      The video shows off Kalanick's pugnacious personality and short temper, which may cause some investors to question whether he has the disposition to lead a $69 billion company with a footprint that spans the globe.

      "Pleasant temperament" doesn't seem to be a requirement for being CEO.

      If you watch the video linked in the article...Kalanick is getting a ride - he gets to the end, and the driver strikes up a conversation with him. The driver starts getting riled up about fares dropping and (car purchases?) or something, which cost him "minus seven thousand" - so I'm assuming his car has negative equity or something.

      Point being, Kalanick disagrees with the driver over "black" - asks for examples...and the driver gets loud and ...well, I'd call it shouting. CEO guy gets irritated, tries to be heard over the driver shouting at him, then exits the car with a "Good luck."

      If I had been him, I would have been like, "DUDE! It doesn't matter whether I'm the CEO or not - treat your passengers with respect and courtesy. You're fired."

    5. Re:No by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The video shows off Kalanick's pugnacious personality and short temper, which may cause some investors to question whether he has the disposition to lead a $69 billion company with a footprint that spans the globe.

      "Pleasant temperament" doesn't seem to be a requirement for being CEO.

      The point about being a CEO is that you are supposed to sublimate your more sociopathic tendencies in the pursuit of profit. Wasting energy on arguing with your minions is a clear sign that your priorities are not straight, this is why Uber's CEO now has to admit that he needs leadership training.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:No by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You're fired."

      That would've been a tacit acknowledgement that Uber employees are indeed such, with resultant legal and financial commitments unavoidable for Uber.

      Probably best for him that he didn't say that.

  5. This is why TRUMP is PRESIDENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    There NEEDS to be an AMERICAN behind that wheel. The UNGRATEFUL ILLEGULLS want the world!

    1. Re:This is why TRUMP is PRESIDENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Good joke.
      I like the way you pretended not to be able to spell.

  6. Plight? Gimme a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The plight of uber drivers? With their compulsory employment? I got tired of working for my employer and when I met with my director who was asking for my feedback on how we could bring back employee morale, he told me that my ideas were all good and on point, but our VP would never agree... so I looked for employment elsewhere. I voluntarily severed my relationship with the company and established a new one, again under voluntary terms. There are workers in the UAE who have their passports held where they are technically indentured servants, and we've got this guy somehow bitching about his voluntary employment terms?

    1. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by sinij · · Score: 0

      Much worse, some drivers apparently were forced against their will to spend $97,000 on a limo that couldn't be used for any other purpose or could not be sold. This is how evil Uber is.

    2. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are indentured. As a UberBlack driver, he has a lease with Uber. That's the $97,000 he's talking about.

    3. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Considering the lied about lease terms and cancelling their leases can cost them thousands....

    4. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I quite agree w/ this. Looking at the transcript, I came upon this gem from Kamel:

      But people are not trusting you anymore. Do you think people will buy cars anymore? ... I lost $97,000 because of you. I'm bankrupt because of you. You keep changing every day. You keep changing every day.

      Since he did not elaborate, I'm assuming that the only way he did it was spend $97,000 on a car. $97,000? To use as a cab?If you have the money to buy a $97,000 car, you are too rich to need to raise money from Uber, and if you do, you'll trash the value of your car in no time. If you need to earn your living doing Uber or Lyft and you don't have a car, you look for one below $20k, maybe a second hand car, and then use that for your needs.

      Was Fawzi from one of those Gulf countries: it didn't say. If yeah, you'd be right: in those countries, passports are surrendered to the employers and one can't get that back easily if one wants to quit and go back home.

    5. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Are you saying they lied about the lease terms, meaning that what they said about the lease terms was different than the actual lease terms? And then people signed up for the lease without reading the actual lease terms?

    6. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      If you lease an apartment, are you indentured to the property owner? This is as stupid as college brats complaining that they're in debt for six figures. Don't sign something that you think is too expensive. You have that option. If more people did it, those contracts would become more reasonable by necessity. What you can't do is agree to something and then complain that it's unfair. You opted in to that arrangement!

    7. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Landlords don't put out comprehensive advertising campaigns to convince people that apartments will make money for the tenants.

    8. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      If you believe anything in advertising you've got bigger problems.

    9. Re:Plight? Gimme a break by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Sure. Thre's always the choice of spending a lifetime doing jobs that don't require a college education instead.

      Come back when you learn the concept of a Hobson's Choice.

  7. Then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you don't like it then don't drive for Uber.

    1. Re:Then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're suckered into a lease agreement, which is essentially and subtly agreeing to become a slave.

    2. Re:Then quit. by yes-but-no · · Score: 0

      So being dumb to sign at the dotted line is somehow world's fault?

    3. Re:Then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, but he was blaming the CEO, talking to the con artist himself, not blaming the world.

    4. Re:Then quit. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Do you read and understand all the terms in every contract that you agree to?

      If not, then are they dumb for the fact that Uber lied to the drivers?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Then quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far be it from me to seemingly take the side of the poster child for the douchebag economy but, yes, I read *every* contract that I agree to. Furthermore, the Uber contract that the driver signed was not done so under duress. [Signing something under duress in the U.S. would be something akin to the release forms a person may be asked to sign as he is rushed into the emergency room at a hospital for treatment of a critical injury. He doesn't have time to read through the pages and pages of the contract.] The Uber driver had plenty of time to read through the contract and, if necessary, hire an attorney to review the contract. If he's not happy with the terms of the contract, he has no one to blame but himself unless the terms of the contract are somehow illegal.

      This entire nonsense of, "I didn't read the contract! The terms shouldn't apply to me!" was one of the lame excuses offered by foolish borrowers who got massacred in the 2008 housing bubble bust. Had they read the terms of the contract, the mortgage brokers and banks would have had a much more difficult time perpetrating their fraud.

    6. Re:Then quit. by yes-but-no · · Score: 1

      More than my personal choice, I would say 'never sign'. That's it. If you can manage living that way, you can be in peace. If you really really need to sign ensure you are not entering into a trap. Since man descended from the trees, one man will exploit another; the smarter one doing it on the dumber one. You can't blame the world or call someone lied. Either you improve your intelligence else become a slave to someone who chose to become so (intelligent)

  8. And then suddenly by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    An uber driver finds he's been removed as a driver and blacklisted.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  9. I read the transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Uber driver: “But people are not trusting you anymore. Do you think people will buy cars anymore? ... I lost $97,000 because of you. I'm bankrupt because of you. You keep changing every day. You keep changing every day.”

    Not surprised the Uber CEO got the shits. The driver was blaming him for his misfortune and saying 'people don't trust him'. As soon as you say that that why would the CEO continue to want to discuss with him? The driver just said he doesn't trust him. If he's bankrupt why is he continuing to drive?

    1. Re:I read the transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's continuing to drive because he has to pay off the huge sub-prime loan he has with Uber for the car he's required to have in order to drive for UberBLACK. Uber gets drivers to sign the lease, based on expected fares and possibility to profit, then Uber changes the fare structure. In the transcript, the driver complains about the change to the minimum fare.

      I'm not surprised he got the shits either, but sometimes a boss has gotta hear the truth from the guys who work the line. Drivers have good reason to be angry, and here the driver was angry at the one guy who can fix the problem.

    2. Re:I read the transcript by lucm · · Score: 1

      the driver was angry at the one guy who can fix the problem.

      The guy can't fix the problem, their business model is not sustainable. Uber is currently losing about 3 billions per year. That's 20x more money than Twitter is losing. and about half the profit Facebook is making.

      Now how do you dig yourself out of a 3 billion dollar hole? Their bet is automated cars but so far it's not looking good.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:I read the transcript by sinij · · Score: 1

      Uber is currently losing about 3 billions per year.

      I could somewhat justify complaints if Uber was making record profits while screwing over small guys. Instead, they are both equally screwed and are on the same train to bankruptcy.

    4. Re:I read the transcript by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      If he's bankrupt why is he continuing to drive?

      He's continuing to drive because he has a $97,000 loan on a limo to pay off. By bankrupt he probably meant that the driving is not paying enough to pay the debt. It's effectively indentured at that stage.

    5. Re:I read the transcript by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      How the hell are they making a loss at all, let alone $3 billion? They are running an app. That's cheap. All the risk of buying cars and paying drivers is offloaded to the drivers themselves. Uber takes a cut of every ride regardless of whether the driver is up or down on the deal.

    6. Re:I read the transcript by lucm · · Score: 1

      The bulk of it is spent on their drivers. But look there's a nice analysis of their losses here:

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/b...

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  10. The apology is enough to make you vomit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only thing he's sorry about is the fact he got CAUGHT. If there was no video, he certainly would NOT feel "ashamed", and the need to "grow up", and that driver would probably be finished. But his bitch-ass got caught, now he's sorry. What a douche.

    1. Re:The apology is enough to make you vomit. by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Oh for the love of mod points...

    2. Re:The apology is enough to make you vomit. by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      Character is indeed an important attribute to good leadership. Something the valley seems to be lacking more and more.

      No matter what he says or how many PR firms he enlists it will not change who he is at his core.
      Thoughts lead to actions, actions repeated over time lead to habits, habits build character. This is not something that can change on a whim.

  11. No Seatbelt by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Looks like even in his private life he can't help but break the rules and be unsafe.

  12. I don't see anything wrong with what he said by sinij · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read linked article, and nothing in the transcript there stands out as wrong. You buy a $100K car to run Uber?! Take responsibility for your actions if it doesn't work out.

    Yes, Uber shits on everyone. Yes, Uber isn't socially responsible company. No, in this case CEO wasn't wrong in pointing out that it was driver, and not Uber that f-up.

    1. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You buy a $100K car to run Uber?! Take responsibility for your actions if it doesn't work out.

      Depends - if you buy the $100K car because of representations made by Uber, then yes, Uber would have a case to answer for. (In some jurisdictions, you can actually sue for things like that- although I don't know how easily or if it would really work.) Of course, you would have do your own due diligence too.

    2. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. It's because the CEO directed his company to lie to drivers in order to get $100k leases signed that the drivers are so pissed. Uber is a ponzi scheme.

    3. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Luthair · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slightly over a month ago they were fined by the FTC for lying about the money drivers earn, lying about vehicle financing rates, lying about lease terms. Seeing a pattern here?

    4. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fined. Wow. How terrible.

      You know when one of us peasants makes those kinds of lies, it's called fraud, and we end up in prison.

    5. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I read linked article, and nothing in the transcript there stands out as wrong. You buy a $100K car to run Uber?! Take responsibility for your actions if it doesn't work out.

      Yes, Uber shits on everyone. Yes, Uber isn't socially responsible company. No, in this case CEO wasn't wrong in pointing out that it was driver, and not Uber that f-up.

      That defence works for most scams as well, so what if it's a bad deal? You shoulda seen it, Buyer beware.

      The problem here is Uber's business model, and UberBlack really exacerbates it.

      Since the driver has to supply the vehicle (and for UberBlack they probably have to buy or lease one) it means they're taking a huge investment upon themselves.

      But then they don't have a lot of control over how that investment performs, Uber does. If Uber lowers the rate (as may have happened, it's unclear) you're suddenly getting a pay cut, or even if Uber has another PR disaster that drives away customers it's going to eat into your pay, and you don't have a lot of options other than abandoning your investment entirely.

      That's the whole problem with this concept of Uber drivers and contractors. Sure they have flexible hours, but they don't have the job mobility of other contractors. The driver wasn't mad at Kalanick because Uber dropped their fares, he was mad at Kalanick because Uber told him it would be a great idea to buy a luxury car and be an UberBlack driver, but then Uber didn't deliver the business he needed to recover his investment. But he's still stuck being an UberBlack driver because he bought a really expensive luxury car and there's nothing else he can do to try and recover the investment.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re: I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's why there are peasants, nobility and kings. Sucks to be in the wrong category. Sucks to be you. There are already too many peasants and they should have learned by now that there is no way out of their condition and that the situation will only be getting worse. I would consider the painless alternative if I were in their shoes, because their fabled "revolution" is not going to happen. Ever. If they even think about rebellion they will be found and neutralized. If they actually attempt to revolt, the retribution will be massive, merciless and absolutely disproportionate with no targeting limitations at all. The rabble will die in a storm of fire and steel. Anyone even suspected of aiding and abetting the rabble-rousers in any way will suffer life-altering consequences for themselves and their families. The One Percenters do not need the unwashed anymore.

    7. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's possible to both take personal responsibility and also take issue with con artists. Yes, if you get conned it's partly your fault, but the con artist should also be stopped, punished, exposed, etc.

    8. Re: I don't see anything wrong with what he said by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      The One Percenters do not need the unwashed anymore.

      You need some pool of people able to work for you and buy your products. Other One Percenters aren't going to be eating in McDonalds and driving taxis for fun.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re: I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Profound stuff.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    10. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      I read linked article, and nothing in the transcript there stands out as wrong. You buy a $100K car to run Uber?! Take responsibility for your actions if it doesn't work out. Yes, Uber shits on everyone. Yes, Uber isn't socially responsible company. No, in this case CEO wasn't wrong in pointing out that it was driver, and not Uber that f-up.

      You and I seem to be the only ones who picked up on this. If you as one person are dumb enough to invest $100,000 in one car and hope to make it up driving for Uber, well, you just may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer.

    11. Re: I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The One Percenters do not need the unwashed anymore.

      Oh bullshit. The unwashed masses grow their food, staff their police and military, and maintain all their expensive toys.

    12. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by sinij · · Score: 0

      Do you have to use $100K car to drive for UberBlack? Are the only acceptable cars exclusively available through Uber? I don't think so.

      Google tells me that car requirements are as follows:
      1.Sedan or full-size SUV. 2.Black exterior and interior.
      3.Vehicle should be at least 2010 or newer.
      4.Must seat at least four passengers

      Here is a reasonable way to go about driving for UberBlack.
      1. Buy used reliable large sedan. For example, Lexus LS 460. Kelly Blue Book tells me 2012 Lexus LS 460 L is $28,827.
      2. Start driving.
      2a. If it doesn't work out, sell the car and move on.
      2b. If it doesn't work out, keep driving the car, since there is no crazy depreciation on 2012.

      The real issue is not that UberBlack is a bad deal. It might or might not be. I don't really know. The real issue that buying $100K car is a bad deal no matter what you intend to do with it. New $100K car will take 20% hit driving it off the lot. This is eye-watering $20K just to take delivery. How a cab driver could possibly afford such expense?!

    13. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by stdarg · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This seems like a situation where a bunch of people who already hate Uber are continuing to hate Uber. I don't see the problem here.

    14. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by stdarg · · Score: 2

      But then they don't have a lot of control over how that investment performs, Uber does. If Uber lowers the rate (as may have happened, it's unclear) you're suddenly getting a pay cut

      Nobody has more control than that over how their investment performs. You see that right? Hey Warren Buffett just said people should invest in a low cost index fund.... but if I follow his advice, I might lose money. I don't control the S&P 500's performance.

      Furthermore, why do you think the driver is fully reliant on Uber? I did a quick search and found http://therideshareguy.com/how...

      Excerpt:

      If you currently only drive for one TNC, you may be wondering why you would ever want to complicate your life by running two services at once. Well, running two apps at the same time actually increases your chances of getting a request and in turn will increase your earnings.

      Can you explain to me why that's wrong? He goes on to say you should also sign up for a delivery service since those tend to have peak traffic times that complement ride sharing.

    15. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by epine · · Score: 1

      Nobody has more control than that over how their investment performs.

      Hmmm. Where have I heard that refrain recently?

      Nobody knew health care could be so complicated.

      Actually, some of us (dare I speak here for more than myself?) do know the score on both fronts—such as the difference between productive capital and investment equity.

      News flash, brother: any damn fool with quality prescription eyewear knows (A) that the American healthcare delivery system is so damn complex it could make your head explode in three easy lessons; and (B) that it's kind of extra end-of-tree-limb precarious to make a productive capital outlay where you have no direct or indirect price control of your end-product.

      We have a very large market sectors where there are strong regulatory restrictions/impossible-to-ignore interactions on selling price (the two most obvious are medical services and agriculture). The end result is that the producers in most of these sectors are lobbied up to the hilt.

      Just watch the fat fly when the lever is wrested:

      Tim Hortons' extra-large trouble trouble — 2010

      Everyone I know is in the same boat: used to regard Tim's as a decent lunch stop on a long drive (sandwiches were value, and you were going to pay for a coffee anyway) and now regard Tim's as just another disappointing rat hole of race-for-the-bottom strip-mall generica. ("Everyone I know" is not an unbiased sample, it universally includes people with quality prescription eyewear who sometimes cook at home.)

    16. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by Cederic · · Score: 1

      This is eye-watering $20K just to take delivery. How a cab driver could possibly afford such expense?!

      Without wishing to comment on the specific individual involved, cab drivers generally can be understood to be in a low paid job with shitty hours. I interpret this as meaning that well paid jobs with more sensible hours are beyond their capabilities, and from that infer that they may not be amongst the intellectual elites of the world.

      Why the fuck do you think it's reasonable to lie to such people and mislead them into a debt they're going to struggle terribly to pay off?

      A cab driver can't easily afford that expense at all. That makes it even less acceptable to encourage them to take it on.

    17. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by sinij · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck do you think it's reasonable to lie to such people and mislead them into a debt they're going to struggle terribly to pay off?

      This is entirely separate argument from the specific conversation that happened between UberBlack driver and Uber CEO.

      The argument was that Uber CEO should not lower pricing, because doing so makes it impossible to pay off $100K car loans. It is not about appropriateness of making such $100K loans to subprime drivers or any deception that took place in the process of securing loans. For all we know, UberBlack driver paid all-cash for the car. The topic was never brought up.

    18. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by sinij · · Score: 1

      Slightly over a month ago they were fined by the FTC for lying about the money drivers earn, lying about vehicle financing rates, lying about lease terms. Seeing a pattern here?

      Let me turn it around on you. Do you think the driver has any responsibility over his decision to borrow $100K on a quickly depreciating asset to engage in no-guarantees gig? That is, your position is that he had no agency whatsoever over this. Along the lines of getting colorectal cancer - one day you wake up in pain and turns out you have $100K loan and you now have to drive UberBlack?

    19. Re:I don't see anything wrong with what he said by quantaman · · Score: 1

      But then they don't have a lot of control over how that investment performs, Uber does. If Uber lowers the rate (as may have happened, it's unclear) you're suddenly getting a pay cut

      Nobody has more control than that over how their investment performs. You see that right? Hey Warren Buffett just said people should invest in a low cost index fund.... but if I follow his advice, I might lose money. I don't control the S&P 500's performance.

      You have the option to sell your stocks and re-invest, if the driver sells his car he's taking a huge loss on the asset.

      Furthermore, why do you think the driver is fully reliant on Uber? I did a quick search and found http://therideshareguy.com/how...

      You're assuming that Lyft is in his city and has similar usage.

      You're also overlooking that UberBlack, the service in question, has higher rates that help compensate for the cost of the higher-end vehicles. Given the investment he made Lyft may not be sufficient to cover his investment.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  13. Investors? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    The video shows off Kalanick's pugnacious personality and short temper, which may cause some investors to question whether he has the disposition to lead a $69 billion company with a footprint that spans the globe.

    I thought investors loved assholes, given the number of them that are (supposedly) running major companies.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Investors? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      I thought investors loved assholes

      No, investors like greedy, competent, intelligent psychopaths whose interests are aligned with their own. They don't like assholes who fuck people over without making them and the asshole money.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Investors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Investors don't care one way or the other whether a CEO is an arsehole, you invest to make money. Quite a lot of people are arseholes, CEO's are just people but their actions tend to be far more visible.

  14. Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> may cause some investors to question whether he has the disposition to lead a $69 billion company with a footprint that spans the globe.

    > "Pleasant temperament" doesn't seem to be a requirement for being CEO.

    I think the issue here isn't pleasant or unpleasant, but losing his cool a bit in a situation that shouldn't get a mature leader riled up. There's a time when being a dick might be the right move, when a smart person might *decide* to be aggressive. It doesn't look like he *chose* that as a tactic in this case, rather he lost his cool, he let emotions dictate his actions in an immature way. That's not the guy you want handling a billion dollar business deal - someone who will screw up a major deal because it's annoyed about some inconsequential thing. I want the opposite in a leader - John F. Kennedy very much kept his cool during the Cuban missile crisis, and possibly prevented World War 3 by being cool, calm, and collected - though not at all wimpy.

    Anyway, back to "pleasant disposition". It seems to me that being pleasant isn't a strict rrequirement, but it does help. There *is* a type of effective leader who might be described as "brutally honest", "clear", "no bullshit", or "tough". MOST CEOs who are successful over the long term aren't the tough type, though. MOST are very easy to get along with, they are the type of people that inspire loyalty in the people they work with, the kinds of people board members want to work with, and make friends with all different kinds of powerful people who can make deals happen. You don't make a billion dollar deal with Ford by being a dick to the Ford people and pissing off the Ford CEO. Contrast Obama and Trump - Obama is likeable (even though I disagree with him) and became CEO of the country. This a year after he himself said it would be irresponsible for him to run for president because he had no relevant experience or qualifications - but people *liked* him. People were surprised Trump even got the R nomination. Trump is "tough", "says what he means without sugar-coating it", "asshole". That type occasionally rises to the top, but likeable is more often found on top.

    It appears that the Uber CEO may understand that this is a weakness for him, that for him to continue as CEO and be successful, he needs to not be a prick in the future. Here's what he wrote on his email to all Uber employees:

    Team -

    By now I'm sure youâ(TM)ve seen the video where I treated an Uber driver disrespectfully. To say that I am ashamed is an extreme understatement. My job as your leader is to lead...and that starts with behaving in a way that makes us all proud. That is not what I did, and it cannot be explained away.

    Itâ(TM)s clear this video is a reflection of meâ"and the criticism weâ(TM)ve received is a stark reminder that I must fundamentally change as a leader and grow up. This is the first time Iâ(TM)ve been willing to admit that I need leadership help and I intend to get it.

    I want to profoundly apologize to Fawzi, as well as the driver and rider community, and to the Uber team.

    1. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      If he actually learns from this and changes, then he will be an example of an incredibly good CEO. How many of us don't have interpersonal flaws? Someone who notices problems and improves is rare indeed.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by dbIII · · Score: 1
      There's praising a great leader, which is fine, but then there is being misleading about on of their mistakes - not cool.

      John F. Kennedy very much kept his cool during the Cuban missile crisis, and possibly prevented World War 3 by being cool, calm, and collected - though not at all wimpy.

      WTF? It was a mad scramble to accept the second deal in case a third was worse. It was a long list of fuckups that among other things resulted in the death of a U2 pilot who was only there to add to some sabre rattling.
      Kennedy did a lot of good things but the Cuban missile crisis was a result of very stupid brinkmanship. It was so stupid that the fiction of a conspiracy in an X-Men movie seems more credible than the posturing that actually happened.

      Betting that Russian leaders who had lived through WW2 would not be prepared to throw away millions of lives in another conflict was beyond stupid. The Russians knew that Kennedy would fold right from the start because he was not prepared to sacrifice millions of Americans while the Russians had already been through that and were prepared to go through it over again.

      As another example, there are a lot of good things to say about Churchill but nobody praises him for his Gallipolli plan. The Cuban missile crisis was not Kennedy's best work.

    3. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The Cuban missile crisis was not Kennedy's best work.

      What was, then?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Ask the cheerleader for him not me.

    5. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      For a lot of us that are natural assholes, it isn't a matter that you might "decide" to be aggressive for some purpose, but rather just that it is a casual situation away from work and it is just a personal luxury to argue with some moron. Obviously the moron is consenting to argue, so what is the problem? For me that is what it comes down to. If I feel like somebody is being an asshole, I assume that means I have permission to be one too.

      If they were only pretending they wanted an argument, just to make a video, hopefully they'll spell my name right.

      The only reason he cares is because they're getting reading to push out new policies that are bad for drivers. The only reason this is a story is because he was arguing with a driver for his company, not because he was arguing with some cab driver in general. If the same video was made but he was in a yellow cab arguing with that driver, nobody would even complain. Actually, they would say the driver was the asshole.

    6. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by Sun · · Score: 1

      Yes and no

      This email sounds sincere, which is, indeed, a good sign. On the other hand, this is the third time Uber has come up in similar context over the past month. Taking this long to notice such a severe problem is not a very good sign at all.

      Let's hope that part of that help he said he'll seek, he'll also work on improving the improvement process

      Shachar

    7. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, given that I never interact with this man, it makes no difference whether he changes or not. Maybe the board will get rid of him. Yawn.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actually, they would say the driver was the asshole."
      Seriously, what are you smoking?

      The CEO comes out saying: "Buddy we are downsizing you." That's pretty aggressive already, then the driver decides to tell he is dealing with 100K debt... To some douche that earns a 100k+ for breakfast.

      The only reason the CEO issued an apology is because he was caught on video...

      I would like for less asshole behavior please, especially if you are in a luxury white male billionaire position.

    9. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This email sounds sincere, which is, indeed, a good sign.

      Yes, it does indeed sound sincere. The PR consultant that wrote it deserves every dollar he was paid.

    10. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by Sun · · Score: 1

      It's, of course, possible you're right. My experience, however, is that PRs don't get the leeway to write such emails if the CEOs have not realized there is a genuine problem.

    11. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      It was a long list of fuckups that among other things resulted in the death of a U2 pilot who was only there to add to some sabre rattling. Kennedy did a lot of good things but the Cuban missile crisis was a result of very stupid brinkmanship.

      Are you talking about Powers? Because he didn't die and was shot down on Eisenhowers's watch, but other than that. Or was another U2 shot down that I'm not aware of?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    12. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Apparently there was, never mind.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    13. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      If he actually learns from this and changes, then he will be an example of an incredibly good CEO. How many of us don't have interpersonal flaws? Someone who notices problems and improves is rare indeed.

      This is the "reformed child rapist" school of logic, which has a fairly obvious counter-argument.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      As another example, there are a lot of good things to say about Churchill but nobody praises him for his Gallipolli plan. The Cuban missile crisis was not Kennedy's best work.

      Gallipoli resulted in the ultimately futile deaths of tens of thousands of men. The Cuban missile crisis averted WW3. I don't see how that is a valid comparison.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by Megol · · Score: 5, Informative

      Averted WWIII? Now that is a stupid and wholly incorrect way to put it, let me put the main points down and if you are interested to some reading:

      . The US placed nuclear missiles close to the USSR border on the territory of an ally.
      . The soviets didn't like that. not. one. bit.
      . So they arranged to place their missiles on the territory of one of their allies, close to the USA border.
      . They built missile bases on Cuba.
      . They began transporting missiles to those bases.

      . The US freaks out and want to sink ships legally sailing on international waters, bomb Cuba and a lot of other shit.
      . This is reported in media as if the USSR want to start a war (they didn't) and it is an incredible provocation (doing something that the US already had in place).

      . After a while the US secretly agrees to withdraw their missiles from the USSR border and the USSR says "okay, that's what we wanted in the first place" and turns their ships around.

      . This is painted as a win for the WESTERN WORLD against the eeeevil COMMUNIST CONSPIRACY and that the USSR weakened when shown the STRENGTH of the FREE WORLD. In reality the US fucked up and then tried to either start a war or do serious international crimes against other states.

      The ones that could have caused WWIII was the USA leadership and military. Anybody sane would realize that trying to make decapitation strikes possible against the enemy in a MAD world is... well, mad. That the USSR wouldn't try to change that state by doing something similar is beyond stupid.

    16. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Fucking Monroe.

      I hate the cult of celebrity, but she was genuinely quite something.

    17. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      An excellent use of rhetoric: comparing him to a child rapist has a huge emotional impact. It's notable that you didn't actually make a point. Your post is all rhetoric, and omits any rational point. Nicely done.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    18. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that Khrushchev lost his job over this.

      sr

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    19. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that Khrushchev lost his job over this.

      sr

      Especially since he kept his job until October 1964 and the Cuban missile crisis was over on 28th October 1962.
      What is interesting (not really, just annoying I suppose) is "raymorris" claiming that Khrushchev lost his job over this despite the two years that he led the USSR after the Cuban missile crisis.

    20. Re:Two personality types of long-term success CEOs by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Worse, he is basing that on Andrei Gromyko's words; not a biased source interested in heaping all the blame on Kruschev, no sir, of course not.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  15. Re:Fwazi Kamel smells like one too. by lobro1 · · Score: 1

    yikes..tell us how you really feel, you snarky bigot.

    --
    money doesn't talk... it swears - Bob Dylan
  16. There is competition and it is vicious by mi · · Score: 0

    Kamel: "Competitors? You had the business model in your hands you could have the prices you want but you choose to buy everybody a ride."

    What? That's just idiotic. Of course, Uber had competition — even before the rise of Lyft, they had taxis to compete with. And, in some cities, the "limos" or "black cars".

    Personally, I forswore Uber, when they hired David Plouffe — the jerk, that helped impose an incompetent nincompoop on our country for eight years — who started spamming the customers (such as myself) with bullshit like how "Uber helps minority drivers" (I imagine, it must've been a hit with the pro-Obama crowd!) So, from then on I always start with Lyft, when searching for a ride.

    But now, seeing this evident ganging-up on Uber, maybe, I'll try to use them first again...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:There is competition and it is vicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody gives a fuck if you use Uber about your obsession with Obama. Wouldn't want you labouring under a misapprehension.

  17. Let's see... by bferrell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uber's corporate philosophy is do it and if you get caught, say you're sorry... And keep doing it.

    His "apology" seems as if it may be worthless

  18. Re:Always about black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's overrated, and now I'm off-topic...

  19. This is all just a bad dream by wakeboarder · · Score: 1

    Maybe Kalanick will wake up tomorrow to a news story that all this bad PR is all a plot by Lyft to destroy Uber. Oh wait, all of the bad PR is actively being generated by those associated with Uber.

  20. The media brigade has started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both can be true.

    I'm sure there are a lot of corporations that do crappy things. I'm also sure that they don't brigade every company looking for bad things to report. Take that NYT article from a bit ago, they had exactly one person who would put their name to the allegations and alleged that there were 30 anonymous witnesses and lots of private documents & interviews, not a one of which they showed us any part of. I don't know about you, but that sets off all kinds of red flags for me. So many witnesses and secret evidence, but nothing whatsoever they can show us.

    Anyhow, they can take their complaints to court. If they can't, or won't, I honestly don't give a damn what they report. I won't bother listening.

  21. That's nice, but... by LaughingRadish · · Score: 1

    That's nice that Kalanick apologized. Now when will he raise the rates to a sensible level that provides a decent return, yet still remains competitive with standard taxi services? Going way way lower than standard taxi fares is stupid.

  22. Burning that VC money by RubberDogBone · · Score: 5, Informative

    The driver is 100% right. Uber has set the fares so low, it is very hard to break even, much less make money. Under $3 to carry someone across town is not paying for anything. It's bullshit.

    At the same time, they are onboarding hundreds of new drivers every single week in my city. So they have tons of drivers competing with tons of drivers and everybody is losing money on damn pool rides. The worst thing is these new drivers are lured in with Uber fuel cards and Uber car leases they can get, but the fact is, you have to pay Uber for all that shit first before you make a dime. So if you lease a car from them, you are in the hole for $200 or more a week, before you turn the key and burn gas and your time.

    When I drove for Uber, it was very rare that I made $200 a week working 8 hours a day. The money wasn't there, once pool went live. So if I leased a car from Uber, I would owe my soul to the company store into infinity and not make a dime. My lawyer does bankruptcies and she says she sees tons of clueless Uber drivers who got into these leases promised a way to make them pay and then they find out there is NO way to make the lease payment and keep the car fueled, much less make any take home money.

    As long as clueless new drivers show up with dollar signs in their eyes, Uber will be happy to put them on the roads and ensure neither the existing drivers nor the new ones make anything.

    This will eventually fix the low fare issues as drivers just quit and new ones stop signing up. But then Uber will probably be entirely irrelevant anyway.

    Right now, Uber still sends me messages begging me to hit the road and drive. Guarantees of $20-40 an hour for making ONE trip per given hour. All sorts of promotions promising to double my earnings if I recruit someone else to drive. Who pays for this? Investor cash. Watch it burnnnnn.

    I would be tempted to drive for $20 to $40 an hour and make that one required trip, but I hate Uber so much at this point I don't give a shit. I am DONE driving for them. They can ripoff somebody else.

    --
    Sig for hire.
    1. Re:Burning that VC money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Amway.

    2. Re:Burning that VC money by kvishalk · · Score: 2

      Even in India, Uber and Ola are competing with each other at the cost of drivers profits. ~50 cars every month are confiscated because drivers were unable to pay the EMI for the loan. There was no need of such low pricing. Moderate pricing would work. The drivers have teamed up and are protesting.

    3. Re:Burning that VC money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is almost as if all the rules and regulations for the taxi system is there for a reason ......

    4. Re:Burning that VC money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 dollars is what it costs to go 'across town' here via a "ride sharing" company.. but then, "town" is only about 2 miles from end-to-end... and you wait for the ride at least as long as it would have taken to *walk* the distance.

    5. Re:Burning that VC money by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      EMI = Equal Monthly Installment.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:Burning that VC money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a nice job running the department of education is in his future. Check.

  23. Kalanick is the *perfect* Republican. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You know what, some people don't like to take responsibility for their own shit. They blame everything in their life on somebody else. Good luck!"

  24. Uber as a concept was great by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The sad thing is that Uber as a concept was a great idea, but it has slowly spiraled into an evil disaster of a company. It is very likely rotten from the top, and if I were a shareholder, I would kick this CEO to the curb and find someone who was both competent and fair to clean house and shape up the company. Uber has been on the wrong side of so many stories lately. I suspect that their strategy is to try and hold on and keep marketshare until they can introduce autonomous driving cars, which will net them massive profits and let them kick all those pesky "contractor" drivers to the curb.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:Uber as a concept was great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Uber as a concept is not a "great idea." Uber intentionally walked into existing communities and tried to break into the field of commercial transportation, an industry where outside of a huge metropolis is a barely-hand-to-mouth industry. And literally break into it. (At least it was in the days when I was a cabbie. I LOVED cab driving and would still be doing it if there was a way to make a sustainable living at it in a medium-sized city.) They have disrupted the somewhat tenous hold on life of many of those who had been barely scraping by. And before you say, "Good, that's progress, get used to it," really consider for a minute about whether that *is* good, or not. Every time you use Uber, or Lyft, or whatever and a part time driver picks you up, you have just taken food out of the mouth of someone who's trying to do that for a full time living.
      You can crow about protectionism and the high price of medallions in the metropoli which use them. But that was a system that came about to protect an uneasy balance between trying to make transport regulated and ethical while allowing for profit. In a *local* context. It balanced safety - requiring an identified and identifiable driver and company to be responsible and carry appropriate insurance and be scrutinizable for fraud and ripoff dealings - with allowing a company some margin of relatively risk-manageable profit. And Uber thought they could just walk in and ignore all that.
      It was a "great idea" for the nouveaux riche of the 2010s: rock star developers, server salespeople, and people thinking one can make money by pumping up a New Internet Bubble, a Great and Grand One, and make someone else pay for all the expenses of it, that would mysteriously not repeat the mistakes of the previous one. (The previous one being too much money in search of too little real development and innovation.)
      But great? No. Disruption is not great in and of itself, sorry.

  25. Just waiting to get rid of the biggest expense... by bkk_diesel · · Score: 1

    Uber's objective now has only to be to stay in the market long enough that they can get rid of their biggest cost: drivers.

    If they can keep the show running until the self driving car becomes commonplace they'll have it made. In the meantime it doesn't matter if their current drivers are making money or not, so long as there are new people willing to sign up to replace those who have become disenchanted with the system/ rate of pay.

  26. Driver was being an Asshole by ghoul · · Score: 2

    Saying they started at 20 dollar and are now down to 3.75 is totally bullshit. 20 is a pomotion for the first hour you drive. Noone expects the promotional rate to last forever. This is not Sirius XM.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  27. That right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take responsibility for your actions if it doesn't work out.

    Considering the misrepresentation done by Uber (and Lyft), the responsible thing to do is sue.

  28. Re:Always about black by Maritz · · Score: 1

    black niigger

    You see, it's redundancy like this that keeps up the hateful myth that racists are dumb as fuck. Stop it!

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  29. Re:Fwazi Kamel smells like one too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time you wonder why no-one likes you, have a think on this kind of thing.

  30. Re:Fwazi Kamel smells like one too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best rant I've read today!

  31. Re: Always about black by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    To be fair to the [ignorant] racist... I've met a few white ones. ;)

  32. There were US leaders pushing a Kennedy to war by raymorris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > The US freaks out and want to sink ships legally sailing on international waters, bomb Cuba and a lot of other shit. ...
    > The ones that could have caused WWIII was the USA leadership and military.

    Absolutely, there were high-ranking leaders, military, intelligence, and civilian leaders, who very much wanted to escalate the situation. Air strikes on Cuba were favored by many of Kennedy's advisors. My understanding, both from open sources and personal conversations with my uncle, an air force colonel who was involved, is that the people who wanted to escalate the situation were stopped by President Kennedy, with the advice of his brother. Another president may well have allowed the Pentagon to escalate the situation. A particularly timid president might have allowed the missiles to stay. According to my uncle, and many people who have studied the situation, President Kennedy went against the advice of almost everyone (other than his brother) by ordering them (in no uncertain terms) not to bomb or otherwise escalate the situation. Kruschev's foreign minister, Andrei Gromyko, agrees with the general consensus that Kennedy amd his ambassador also expertly manipulated Kruschev into a situation where he had to remove the missiles and couldn't demand much in return. That's agreed by both Soviet and American leaders involved (though Kruschev himself didn't admit he was outfoxed).

    1. Re:There were US leaders pushing a Kennedy to war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The missiles in turkey was removed a few months later...

    2. Re:There were US leaders pushing a Kennedy to war by mvdwege · · Score: 2

      couldn't demand much in return

      So the USA removed their Jupiter missiles from Turkey out of the goodness of their heart? Pull the other one, it's got bells on.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    3. Re: There were US leaders pushing a Kennedy to war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also listened to that radio lab podcast episode!

    4. Re:There were US leaders pushing a Kennedy to war by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Andrei Gromyko, agrees with the general consensus that Kennedy amd his ambassador also expertly manipulated Kruschev into a situation

      Expertly manipulated him into offering a deal and then offering a WORSE deal the next day? Now that's some manipulation.

      Pointless sabre rattling against a country that has already demonstrated that they are prepared to sacrifice millions of their people's lives is something beyond stupid - yet it happened. There is no way to "win" in such a situation.

      though Kruschev himself didn't admit he was outfoxed

      Because he wasn't. Kennedy took things to the brink and then found he shouldn't have been playing chicken with the USSR.
      Kennedy did a lot of great things but there's no point putting forward revisionist history to build him up even more. The Cuba missile crisis was a massive fuckup and from records of the time there was a lot of running around like headless chickens - a President who kept his cool wouldn't have ended up in that mess in the first place.

  33. Well he is not wrong by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Uber has no differentiating factors from Lyft or Taxis besides price, and the driver is free to also or exclusively drive for Lyft. One could argue that the company should find ways to distinguish itself (electric cars? some special driver skills?) and upsell (food and beverage service?). But these things do not just happen overnight.

  34. OMFG! - Tempest In A Teapot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an outrage.

    Feelings...

    Harrumpph!

    I find it amusingly ironic that the same millennial SJW that propelled Uber to fame and fortune, along with their absolute certainty that existing taxi/limo services and their regulating government boards should be eliminated at any cost, are now going to crush Uber for not being granola eating puppies.

  35. Say it ain't so by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    What!, an arrogant CEO of an arrogant corporation that enables private drivers to jeopardize their insurance to steal fares and is named after a word that indicates it is better than is arrogant to a employee who is not an employee. Say it ain't so Joe, say it ain't so...

  36. Please, don't hate by mi · · Score: 1

    Nobody gives a fuck if you use Uber about your obsession with Obama.

    Wow. So much anger and hate for someone, who professes to "not give a fuck"... Not just downmod, but shitpost underneath to vent it all — then spend the night with a bowl of cookies and ice-cream sobbing, how could someone be so unkind to Obama?...

    So sad...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  37. Replaced Jupiter missiles with Polaris. Politburo by raymorris · · Score: 2

    More specifically, the US proceeded with what they had already planned before the events in Cuba - replacing Jupiter missiles in Cuba with Polaris nuclear ballistic missiles. The Politburo got rid of Kruschev soon after because despite the fact that they didn't know the Jupiters were going to be removed anyway, they still saw that the USSR got the worst of the deal.

    Chief of Staff USAF General Curtis LeMay and others didn't want to make that deal - they strongly encouraged Kennedy to invade Cuba. In fact, there were several "accidents" that could have escalated the situation to full-scale war, such as dropping depth charges on a Soviet sub armed with nuclear missiles, and a U2 under LeMay's command "accidentally" flying over the Soviet Union. It's curious that while the military generals wanted war, the people under their command were accidentally doing things likely to trigger war.

  38. ...a profound apology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry I got caught is not really an apology, is it?

  39. Right, the 'profound' aplogy again by codr4life · · Score: 1

    Sorry Travis; once an asshole, always an asshole; all the leadership training in the world isn't going to change that. You're 40 years old, how long would you have us waiting? Even brother J. was on your tail in noting that bad trees don't give good fruit. Claiming 'profound' for PR-bullshit like this when you're in that kind of mess is just another nail in the coffin. https://github.com/codr4life/v...

  40. Crazy bad mileage by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    This Lexus has an eight cylinder engine and purportedly does 16 city mpg, 24 mpg on highway.
    Maybe that's expected but for a pseudo minimum wage fake-job this is much. High end cars like these might depreciate so much in part because they have high running costs.
    I suspect four cylinders are enough to drive people around, there are new sedans with four-cylinder turbo gasoline too.

  41. Re:Replaced Jupiter missiles with Polaris. Politbu by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Politburo got rid of Kruschev soon after

    Two years later is "soon after"? Is this some sort of pathetic debating game to you where the truth does not matter?
    Also among those incidents why didn't you mention the U2 pilot who gave his life for his country when he was shot down over Cuba? That's a larger potential trigger than anything you mentioned.

  42. Sure, let's address Major Anderson by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > Also among those incidents why didn't you mention the U2 pilot who gave his life for his country when he was shot down over Cuba?

    Sure, let's address Major Anderson. Before Major Andersen took off, the Joint Chiefs decided that if he were shot down, they wouldn't hold another meeting, they would attack immediately. You can listen to the tapes if you want, but essentially they reasoned that Cuba didn't have the capability to shoot down a U2, so if he was shot down, that would mean the Soviets decided to shoot him down, and that would be causus belli in their minds.

    They didn't know that a) the Soviet orders were to fire on groups of planes (an invasion force), but to not fire on single planes and b) the Cubans had the capability to down a U2 (flying a predictable path).

    Anyway, he waa shot down and as the Joint Chiefs prepared the order to attack Kennedy stopped them, saying it was possible that the Kremlin hadn't authorized the shoot-down. (Kennedy was right, we later learned).

    You seem to be confusing Kennedy with the Joint Chiefs (and pretty much everyone else in the room), who would have done air strikes amd probably an amphibious assault had Kennedy not stopped them. You might find it interesting to listen to the Oval Office tapes.

  43. Going after the soft targer by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes - a history lesson I could have given myself - why bother.
    The important bit - two years later is "soon after"? Why did you do that? Was it a mistake or deliberate? If it was a mistake why are you avoiding addressing that, and if it was deliberate - get a fucking life!!!!