Slashdot Mirror
Chinese, European Space Agencies In Talks To Build a Moon Base (techcrunch.com)
ESA's Pal Hvistendahl has confirmed via Bloomberg that Chinese and European space agencies are talking with one another about plans to build a base on the moon. The discussions "involve working together to build a human-occupied 'moon village' from which both agencies can potentially launch Mars missions, conduct research, and possibly explore commercial mining and tourism projects," reports TechCrunch. From the report: China's upcoming projects in space include a mission to collect samples from the moon via an uncrewed craft by the end of this year, and to also launch an exploratory mission to the far side of the moon next year, with the similar aim of returning samples for study. The ESA's collaboration with China thus far include participating in the study of those returned samples, and potentially sending a European astronaut to the Chinese space station (which is currently unoccupied) at some future date.
Seriously?
It seems obvious that will come one day or the other. Just watch 2001: A Space Odyssey
Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
Space exploration is both dangerous and expensive. By working together it will save on costs and reduce the dangers inherent with building 2 separate things. The americans stuffed up by not letting the chinese work with them on the ISS.... but at the same time they allowed the russians... wtf?
Interestingly, while the chinese and americans don't cooperate on the ISS, the chinese can dock with the ISS because the interlocks were built by the russians for their Soyuz rockets which the chinese use too so who knows maybe one day the chinese space station and the ISS or its replacement will join up too. But probably not the ISS since its old and probably infested with superbugs like the previous space station.
There has been a slow, but steadily increasing approach between China and Europe for the last couple of decades, in many ways: trade agreements, Chinese interest in European education and scientific development, even what could be the first, tenuous signs of political alignment. One of the reasons, in my view, is simply that Europe isn't the US - America has for many years employed a very aggressive rhetoric against China, where Europe has been more moderate, and it does seem to have left a lasting impression. On that background, I don't think it is at all surprising that they will build a Moon base together. I think it is great that China shows leadership and determination in this hugely important area; sure, it stings a bit that we in the West aren't in the lead, but I'm sure the Chinese will allow America to take part, when they are ready to commit to it.
The US has spent decades keeping China closed out from space. The "International Space Station" is really the "Anyone except China Space Station".
Its possible that this new development may end up turning that on its head -- the US won't work with China in Space, but just as much as China can't join any US-led project, it also means that the US will not be able to join in any Chinese project. If the Europeans and others are joining those projects, the US is going to find themselves out in the cold.
The US has been very dogmatic about that rule, but I wonder how long they're going to be able to hold on it if everyone else is collaborating?
This is true. The US has burned some bridges with it's foreign policy regarding China. But, before we lament what that means for future opportunities, it's worth recalling why; from the outright theft of IP, to humanitarian concerns regarding political prisoners, religious persecution, Tibet, freedom of navigation in the Global Commons that is the South China Sea, and including their tolerance for the North Korean situation. China may become a player in space exploration, that's unavoidable at this point, but that doesn't mean the US should regret the hard lines it's taken over the years.
Europe doesn't like Chinese taking control, so they quit
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/309829-dems-propose-historical-park-on-the-moon/
Better ask the British for permission first.
The S.H.A.D.O. maintains a MoonBase as one of its first lines of defence against UFOs. This MoonBase is located in the Sea of Tranquillity and is in constant communication with the S.I.D., or Space Intruder Detector, and three interceptors are maintained there in a state of almost-constant standby.
Already built:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
still enjoy that old game
Nice. But to be fair, the bill seems to be about declaring the landing site a national park, not actually building something there. That article even mentions that only the artifacts would be declared as such, which makes more sense as the moon is not US territory.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
On the moon we're going to build a YMCA!!!!!!! He he he; exclaimed the hardhat guy.
The Moon on the other hand is 2 weeks away.
And yet Apollo made it there in 2 & a bit days!
Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.
Yep. Awful WiFi.
Before they start throwing rocks at us.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
The Moon on the other hand is 2 weeks away.
And yet Apollo made it there in 2 & a bit days!
Well duh! That was 50 years years ago. Traffic is hell these days.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
We are so far away from a "moon base" it is ridiculous. Simply supplying it would be a nightmare. Never might actually getting there, never mind actually constructing something, never mind about a million other things... I don't see it happening in my lifetime.
i'm not impressed with Trump, but come on. In less than 100 days he's responsible for NASA not having a vision or funding and not doing manned missions outside of LEO since Apollo? Other countries have goals in space, they've come to the realization that meeting those goals no longer HAS to involve NASA expertise. That's not a situation of Trump's making. I think you can find plenty to pin on him, but not this.
They figure out how to deal with the abrasive moon dust? What are the advantages of a moon base vs an orbiting space station?
At least the EU and the PRC are putting all that money they saved on the International (sic) Space Station that the US paid the lion share for and are putting it to good use.
All Your Bases Are Belong to Us!
"There is no dark side of the moon, really....."
Some British AltRock Band members might disagree, they live very well from income that dark side of the moon provides.
Well, to be fair...I *was* quoting the very last utterance off that album....
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
Huh? Didn't Trumpy declare that Americans will land on Mars during his presidency?
And Obama declared "been there" with regards to a return to the moon. Instead he chose to give NASA a mandate to get to Mars. Something NASA knew was not feasible given current funding levels. I would prefer a lasting stepping stone on the moon to a publicity stunt on Mars. People climbing Everest have various base camps. You acclimate, you learn, you have a reasonable chance for help. Only an idiot would make a one shot attempt at Everest OR Mars, but man it sure sounds cool when the cameras are rolling.
Earth-Moon L1 space station .... :p
No, Trump is responsible for gutting the current year NASA budget. You are responsible for not understanding the value and necessity of the research done since Apollo.
Gutting the perpetually underfunded NASA budget? I'd see it more as Trump telling congress, "if you're not going to spend the money it takes to do the mission, you get no more money for manned flight".
Anyway, I never said there was no value post Apollo from NASA, only that manned flight has been stagnant in LEO since the mid 1970s. Most people would say that the advances and research done since then should make travel beyond LEO MORE attainable. We should be able to go back to the moon at lower cost in real dollars than it cost in 1968. Sadly, that's not the case. While we may have all kinds of amazing advances, NASA seems to feel that the only way to put men in space is still the cost is no object approach. I would suggest that in the last 3 decades, NASA has been the beneficiary of advances in materials and technology more often than it has been the catalyst.
The cutting edge at NASA is unmanned exploration. Nothing wrong with that, but you can't expect other countries with manned space flight ambitions to just sit idly until the US and NASA get around to doing something again. There's a spirit to the guys in the unmanned programs that has been lost, or killed, on the manned side.
Nope, NASA is still the benefactor.
Nobody goes there anymore -- it's too crowded.