Slashdot Mirror


US Law Allows Low H-1B Wages; Just Look At Apple (networkworld.com)

An anonymous reader writes: If you work at Apple's One Infinite Loop headquarters in Cupertino as a computer programmer on an H-1B visa, you can can be paid as little as $52,229. That's peanuts in Silicon Valley. Average wages for a programmer in Santa Clara County are more than $93,000 a year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, the U.S. government will approve visa applications for Silicon Valley programmers at $52,229 -- and, in fact, did so for hundreds of potential visa holders at Apple alone. To be clear, this doesn't mean there are hundreds of programmers at Apple working for that paltry sum. Apple submitted a form to the U.S. saying it was planning on hiring 150 computer programmers beginning June 14 at this wage. But it's not doing that. Instead, this is a paperwork exercise by immigration attorneys to give an employer -- in this case, Apple -- maximum latitude with the H-1B laws. The forms-submittal process doesn't always reflect actual hiring goals or wage levels. Apple didn't want to comment for the story, but it did confirm some things. It says it hires on the basis on qualifications and that all employees -- visa holders and U.S. workers alike -- are paid equitably and it conducts internal studies to back this up. There are bonuses on top of base pay. Apple may not be paying low wages to H-1B workers, but it can pay low wages to visa workers if it wanted. This fact is at the heart of the H-1B battle.

138 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. Explanation by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple's next generation replacement for macOS, tvOS, and iOS will be written in PHP.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Explanation by sycodon · · Score: 2

      In one continuous line.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re:Explanation by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      15 years ago, Apple hired me on an H1B, and my starting salary was $140k, then they paid everything to convert my H1B to a green card. None of this includes joining and yearly bonus stock options (at the time, RSU's these days) or yearly cash bonuses. They also paid relocation and first few months of rent in a pre-arranged location.

      I'm not special. There were several dozen of us in the (weekly) new-employee orientation meeting, most of whom were s/w engineers.

      Oh, and I (or rather, my small company, that Apple bought) wrote ILM's digital asset management system for films like Star Wars (ep1), James Bond films, digital commercials etc. mostly in PHP. That sold for $40k/pop... Indeed, just like any language, it's possible to write crap code in PHP, but used properly it's a powerful tool.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    3. Re:Explanation by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      A 'digital asset management system' keeps track of all the assets, like the cameras, PCs, copying machines, folding chairs, power drills, ladders, forklifts, etc. Correct?

    4. Re:Explanation by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      TL;DR: Not really.

      I'm guessing that's more of an "asset management system". Ours was orientated around the video. As cameras roll, we digitised the footage by tapping into the tape deck monitor output, we had RFID tags on each tape, and we had LTC/VITC timecode from the deck. We therefore had a unique reference for every frame laid down, as it was laid down (ie: there was zero ingest time, which was - and still is to a large extent - an issue with asset management systems).

      The system then sent each frame to a centralised database server that had a webserver on it, and I wrote a streaming (ok, this part was in C :) server and a streaming player for Linux, Mac, and Windows that understood our custom streaming format. There wasn't anything complicated about the format, it was basically motion-JPEG data served from an HTTP interface, so the player would send the URL "http://asset-server/tape-rdid/timecode-from/timecode-to" and get an application/octet-stream back which was each file (common headers stripped), where a file was an individual frame in JPEG form.

      What this let people do was record out in the desert, and have their digital dailies sent back via a satellite upload to home base via rsync, and the team at home base could "see" (we only supported quarter-res images at the time, the internet wasn't as fast as it is now) the footage, reliably locate frames on tapes, and discuss/annotate/create EDL (edit display-list, basically a set of timecode-timecode ranges) sequences and play around with it as if they had the tapes right there, even if it was at a low resolution.

      On a more prosaic all-in-house system, the act of using a Discreet Inferno or Flame system (which controlled the tape decks in a post-production suite) would automatically log footage into our system, so the non-artist types could use our "virtual VTR" system to review and create play-lists which could then be sent to the machine room with the certainty that what they'd composed in their web-browser would be what ended up on the tape that would later be delivered to clients. This freed up a lot of the tape-deck use which could then be put to more profitable use by the post-house.

      There was at least one time when I got a angry phone call from a client who claimed our system was screwing things up. They'd created their EDL for the client using our system and then sent the job to the tape room to be generated, and of course creating that new tape would automatically log the new footage into the system (because it was writing to a tape in a monitored tape deck). They looked at the output footage of the generated tape in their browser, and it wasn't right. After a bit of tracking things down, it turned out the tape room had inserted the wrong master tape, so we saved them the indignity/embarrassment of sending footage from a *competing* client out the door. That alone, in the eyes of the director, was worth the cost of the system.

      We had similar procedures for rendered footage from 3D systems (Shake etc. at the time). Again, everything was collated into shots/scenes etc. on the database server. We had rules that would be applied to directories full of frames that would parse out sequences from arbitrary filenames that were differentiated only by a frame number in the filename. That's actually harder than it looks - there is *no* standard naming convention across post-houses :) I separated out the code into a library, wrote a small commandline utility called 'seqls' which was *very* popular for parsing out a directory of 10,000 files into a string like 'shot-id.capture.1-10000.tiff' ...

      All of this is (I'm sure, I haven't kept up to date) commonplace today, but it was pretty revolutionary at the time. I'd say about 90% of the code was PHP, there were various system daemons in C, there were video players for the major platforms in C/C++ and there was a kernel driver for the linux box in C that handled the incoming video, digitised the audio, and digitised the LTC

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  2. Sounds like indentured servitude by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Government benefits from importing cheap labor. Rich landowners (now corporations) benefit from cheap labor. History is replete with rich people trying to get richer by importing slaves and/or indentured servants.

    It never works out well for society in the long run, but in the long run you're dead anyways, so might as well make some more money and bribe some more gov't officials while you're here, right?

    Doesn't matter which political party is in power, doesn't matter whether a politician is a leftist or a rightist, they ALWAYS import more cheap labor... because they want to benefit the rich (and by extension, themselves). Trump ran a campaign saying he will put a stop to this, and now that he's in power he's already he's backpedaling. He's just turning into Clinton Lite. I'll bet you large sums that if Bernie was elected, right about now he will be finding excuses to import more cheap labor too.

    1. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      Indentured servitude isn't far off. When someone's status in the US is H1, first off they aren't considered a resident of the country. So while they can do something like get a driver's license, they have a lot of problems trying to get loans or credit cards, housing, or even go to school. They have no bargaining power with their employer, they don't have any leverage to ask for a raise or any other benefits because if the employer fires them then they have to leave the country now. My wife doesn't work in tech, but she's here on an H1-B and it's been a nightmare for her. We're trying to get her status changed so that she's a resident but that process is slow and opaque. For the time being she can't even travel either, she can't go home to see her family. If she leaves the country then her petition for status adjustment is considered abandoned and the process starts over. Trump isn't making the situation any easier with his executive orders.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      For wanting to get rid of politicians?

      The only reason some of them are still alive is just that they ain't worth the jail time.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That may be true, but what other choice was there?

      On one hand, you had a politician who openly and proudly proclaimed she will import as much cheap labor as possible. And was well known for having gone from being dead broke to a net worth of $100 million, pretty much exclusively from political cronyism (no one really believes Wall street bankers gave her $500,000 per speech because she had a pleasant voice)

      On the other hand, you had a guy who so far has not taken any political bribes, and who said he will put a stop to this. So it was a choice between someone who you know with a 100% certainty will do something bad, versus someone who might do it but at least he's saying he won't.

    4. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      Consumers pay wages, as the revenue pays your wage.

      Trade tends to improve wealth. I've done the analysis for eliminating Chinese imports of pants and it's pretty hard to not net-loose American jobs unless you pay about minimum wage; that's not the problem, though. The loss or gain of unemployment statistic will buff itself out with labor force growth in a few short years (like 1-3). In all cases, however, you end up with more than doubling the cost of pants--meaning consumers are able to buy less stuff.

      Think about what happens when you have a place like Silicon Valley where people pull $150k salaries, and you have to buy a product that takes some hours of work to produce. It's fortunate that technology cuts out so much of the actual labor--that way there aren't as many wage-hours sunk in per delivered good, and we don't have to pay all those wages.

      Ultimately, lowering the product of wage times labor means a reduction in prices. Making goods at a lower cost allows you to target broader markets, which lowers the barrier for entry into a market. This increases competition and causes smaller net profit margins. In the case of Apple specifically, they want to position themselves as a luxury good provider, narrowing their market to gain wide margins--the broader market for the iPhone, for example, is smart phones, and Android phones pull one hell of a narrow margin across the board compared to iPhones.

      The net effect across all markets is a lowering of costs, lowering of prices, and increase in accessibility of goods. That means wealth among the full span of incomes: the lowest- and middle-class consumers benefit from this.

      Understanding all of that requires a grasp of history and an ability to actually look at what happens in the real world, though. Most people prefer to live in a politically-driven fantasy.

    5. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would anyone bribe a president that dispenses highly classified data for free? Plus I'm sure there are bribes, they are just obscured in business dealings.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Jzanu · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The American consumer buys more of everything than they really need. Unless they are all out there buying pants and completely wearing them out before they buy new pants, there is lots of room for them to simply pay more for the pants and use them longer. This goes for most products. The problem is that Americans can't get over buying the next new shiny/trendy thing. Again, not the end of the world if they are forced to by way of higher prices.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2

      Good point.

      Lincoln was a Republican but not exactly a free trade idealog. He would do things contrary to subscribed political ideologies if he felt it would better serve the interest of the people.

      "If I give my wife twenty Dollars, to buy a cloak and she brings one made in free-trade England, we have the cloak but England has the twenty dollars; while if she buys a cloak made in the protected United Slates, we have the cloak and the twenty dollars."

    9. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Actually it isn't that simple. Price competition exists in every market. That includes the labor market. There are many highly intelligent people all over the world who would happily work for far less than $93000. It really is an insane amount of money for a relatively easy (from an intellectual pov) job. American workers who make that much really are in a union like situation where for whatever reason the price of their labor is being kept artificially high. Obviously some (the ones with jobs) American programmers are happy with the situation, but the whole thing is completely inefficient and crazy. If a corporation were overcharging that much for a product or service they would not be looked at in a favorable light.

      I am an American citizen and I would happily code for $20000 per year because I love it. It is fun. No one has to pay me 5 times that much. That is just insane. No I don't live in Silicon Valley. So I don't have to pay $5000/month in rent or whatever. No one is forcing anyone to live in such a ridiculously expensive place where I guess only very rich people can afford to be and if corporations are basing their work operations there then I have no sympathy for them. They are just being stupid. Another example of corporate inefficiency and irrationality. They may as well set up in Manhattan or something. How can they possibly compete with an operation located somewhere with a more sane cost of living? They can't but I guess they don't care. If you absolutely must have your offices in RichPersonVille where only the rich can afford to live then I guess you have to be willing to pay people enough so that they are rich as well. And yes $93000/year is 'rich' by any reasonable standard. What I am getting at is that foreigners are not the only enemy of such a high cost of labor. Other Americans are as well.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    10. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The classification thing is bullshit. The CIA works for the President. NOt the other way round. If the President wants to share some information with a foreign power because it will help the USA he can do it. Who decides what is best for USA? Not the CIA. Not CNN. The people do and they select a representative to do it for them. Its called the President. All this outrage is basically undemocratic.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    11. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      Your value system of "they should just buy less" isn't universal. You may think it's a good idea to reduce global economic activity (i.e. buy less stuff) but others, especially those working in any market remotely associated with clothing (retail, marketing, shipping, textiles) who want jobs obviously want consumers to buy more.

      It's what I tell my mom every time she complains about how much tech gadgets Americans buy (old Chinese lady). Global economics doesn't hit home until I tell her "I wouldn't have a job if that were the case".

    12. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      That's great, except 1) it erodes all sense of checks and balances in US democracy, and 2) it gives more power to Trump than any US president ever. In the lead up to the election many people said that Trump wouldn't really be able to take advantage of the presidency because of these checks and balances. Now here we are, the American public is renting his property for the privilege of him using it, paying for expensive vacations, and who knows what else once he puts someone in charge of the CIA who will be his monkey puppet.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    13. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, you had a guy who so far has not taken any political bribes

      It's kinda difficult to take a political bribe when you're not a politician. However, Trump openly bragged about giving political bribes, making it clear he was 100% corrupt.

      So it was a choice between someone who you know with a 100% certainty will do something bad, versus someone who might do it but at least he's saying he won't.

      Trump never said he wouldn't, he made it clear he was perfectly OK with bribery!

      Clinton was just another politician. She wasn't especially corrupt, the worst anyone could say about her that wasn't a blatant distortion was that she was quite happy to get paid huge sums of money for making private speeches to Wall Street. There's never been anything specific anyone could point at that Clinton did in response to getting paid to make speeches, beyond the speeches themselves. Clinton endured a 25 year long smear campaign which threw mud constantly at her, making almost every allegation of wrongdoing against her suspicious and likely false.

      Trump? I'm struggling to understand why anyone would think he wasn't going to take bribes. It sounds like a lot of people were so blinded by their hatred of Clinton that they choose to project in Trump a trust that was wholly misplaced, rather than looking at his words and history over 30-40 years, showing him as one of the nation's biggest sleezeballs.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    14. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Government benefits from importing cheap labor. Rich landowners (now corporations) benefit from cheap labor. History is replete with rich people trying to get richer by importing slaves and/or indentured servants.

      It never works out well for society in the long run, but in the long run you're dead anyways, so might as well make some more money and bribe some more gov't officials while you're here, right?

      Doesn't matter which political party is in power, doesn't matter whether a politician is a leftist or a rightist, they ALWAYS import more cheap labor... because they want to benefit the rich (and by extension, themselves). Trump ran a campaign saying he will put a stop to this, and now that he's in power he's already he's backpedaling. He's just turning into Clinton Lite. I'll bet you large sums that if Bernie was elected, right about now he will be finding excuses to import more cheap labor too.

      The US is a country of immigrants. When new immigrants come in, the pre-existing immigrants generally find themselves on a higher rung of the economic ladder. Everyone here before is in a slightly better position. This is often not a quick process, and can take several generations. These immigrants, while cheaper than existing workers, are generally considered to be a net benefit at some point. Some immigration is good. Nobody today would seriously argue that Irish immigrants to the US in the 1860s-1920s are a long-term drag on the economy. Determining how much immigration is manageable / desirable, and controlling the influx of immigrants to that level is a difficult problem.

      Placing an addition rung at the bottom of the ladder, which is how I view the H1B program, is not the same thing and has different effects.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    15. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by sabri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The president doesn't get to arbitrarily break laws, or communicate sensitive information to hostile foreign powers. What next, you will defend him selling the blueprints for the nuclear submarines, complete with highlighted weak points?

      I'm far from a fan of the current president. However, as the chief of the Executive Branch, the President (this, the previous, or the next one) has the ultimate authority over his subordinates. The CIA, FBI and NSA all report to the President, and as such POTUS has the authority to declassify any information he (or she) wishes to, and share it with whomever he feels is needed.

      Remember that you have no idea what is going on. Maybe those blueprints for nuclear submarines are exchanged for hyperdrives, or the removal of nuclear warheads from Cuba. We don't know, and we have to trust the elected President. If we can't trust this one, we should not have elected him.

      And for the record, I did not vote for him.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    16. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      They're economizing their time. They could spend hours repairing their clothes, or buy new clothes when theirs start to fray. My clothes fray after a couple years and need replacement or reconstruction.

      Here's the thing: I spent $18 on a shirt from China. I don't want to spend $157 on a shirt from America 2 years later when that shirt has a small hole worn in it from being worn two days a week and washed once per week. I also don't want to spend $15 on a spool of thread that's going to last forever, $900 on a sewing machine that can stitch way better than I can hand stitch, and 20-30 minutes doing patch work on my clothing every few weeks (I did that for a while--with $3 spools of thread in 5 colors matched to the clothes and a $120 sewing machine largely made in China, with patch work at least once a month).

      Somewhere, a spending habit has to go away. Domestic shipping and its support goes away with it. A reduction in item scans (at 980 scans per hour) means retail cashier jobs go away.

    17. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Being the final authority doesn't mean he is allowed to operate unilaterally. All it means is if someone in the CIA is confused about it and no one else in the CIA knows the answer, they ask the president.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    18. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Read my words. Most people are done with that shirt before it has a hole in it, because of the perception that it is out of style. Plus even my cheapest T-shirts last 5-7 years, and I have cats that tear into them frequently.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    19. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Your analysis ignores that those lower wages paid to workers also reduce the purchasing power of those workers, who are also your customers.

      So while the device may be cheaper in absolute dollars, it's still "expensive" thanks to lower overall pay.

      That's the problem with applying microeconomics to macroeconomics - The former is an open system and the latter is mostly a closed system (imports & exports make up a tiny fraction of US GDP, so you're mostly selling from US companies to US consumers).

      Your analysis requires someone else to pay high enough wages to sell your product. When you drive down wages across the board, there is no one else paying those higher wages.

    20. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Bingo, that's it. You win slashdot for today.

      Oh, and BTW for the original headline- what is "Allowed by law" and what is "allowed by overworked bureaucrats bribed under the table" are two vastly different things.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    21. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The fact that there are greater than zero H-1Bs brought into the country to do what you do AUTOMATICALLY means you are a scarce resource, and the market dictates you should charge higher prices for your work.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    22. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And it wasn't even the CIA's intelligence- it came from the Israelis.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      That's what we get for electing people over the age of 60.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    24. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The last clothing store I went to had one person working the floor and register. Are they going to staff with 1/3 of a person? They will be making the same profit, so what will be their motivation to cut their poor person into pieces?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    25. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by ghoul · · Score: 1

      You are talking about Special interests not Checks and Balances. Why is it Ok to share intelligence with Israel but not with Russia? Trump has been very open in his campaign that he will move away from the policy of confrontation with Russia and the people selected him. Maybe the people want Russia to be an ally rather than a bugaboo used to justify the employment of thousands of highly paid "Analysts" and "Talking Heads" . Are you surprised that these analysts and talking heads are doing everything in their power to prevent a rapproachment with Russia - after all they are fighting for their jobs, their private school tuitions and their Country club memberships.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    26. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Every nation looks out for its own interests. Israelis would share US shared intelligence if it helped their national cause. e.g. They are helping Al Qaeda in Syria because it keeps Syria unstable and no threat to Israel. This is even though they know Al Qaeda attacked the US on 9/11. If it is in US interests to get Russian cooperation against ISIS by sharing intelligence so be it. If this burns an Israeli spy tough luck. A judgement call has to be made that is the benefit worth the loss. The President is basically hired to make these calls. The CIAs job is to provide the information and let the President make the decisions. Now if as it is emerging the CIA did not brief the President on the source of the intelligence so that he could not make the right decision someone at the CIA needs to get fired.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    27. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Clinton endured a 25 year long smear campaign

      Lucky Trump, nobody is smearing him, huh! Everything we've ever heard about Hillary is a smear, everything we have heard about Trump is probably true.

      making almost every allegation of wrongdoing against her suspicious and likely false

      The email server thing has absolutely been proven true. She took affirmative action to have all her SecState emails sent to a server under her physical control. Then she gave three different answers, all provably lies, about why she did it. So obv she did it just so she could evade FOIA requests. So she did a bad thing for very bad reasons. (Aren't Democrats supposed to be in favor of transparency in government?)

      Based on some news stories I read, I'm convinced that at least a few people are dead now because of secrets transmitted to her insecure server. Hillary apologists say "there is no evidence her server was hacked" so I can't prove this to their satisfaction, but it's proven to mine.

      Hillarys email server was one thousand times worse than Watergate. "Nixon lied, nobody died" heh.

      It sounds like a lot of people were so blinded by their hatred of Clinton that they choose to project in Trump a trust that was wholly misplaced

      I trusted Hillary to continue the Obama legacy of growing and weaponizing government. I voted for Trump on the hopes that he would act like a wrecking ball and smash down a lot of the Federal government. IMHO we have way too much government at all levels and the solution is to have less.

      I don't particularly like or trust Trump. The best thing about him is that he's an outsider and already rich, so he isn't connected into the web of DC insiders. I hope he will leave government smaller than it was when he was elected. I know he will leave government smaller than it would have been had Hillary been elected.

      I'm pissed off that Trump hasn't fired more people, like Lois Lerner, yet. You don't need to tell me that Trump isn't perfect.

      Sometimes people are not so much voting FOR a candidate as voting AGAINST the other candidate. That's what it was for Trump, so don't bother wondering why everyone trusts Trump so much.

    28. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 2

      Clinton was just another politician. She wasn't especially corrupt...

      I can only guess at your definition of corrupt.

    29. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by sabri · · Score: 1

      However, as the chief of the Executive Branch, the President (this, the previous, or the next one) has the ultimate authority over his subordinates. The CIA, FBI and NSA all report to the President, and as such POTUS has the authority to declassify any information he (or she) wishes to, and share it with whomever he feels is needed.

      Ha!, I think the Time Magazine read my comment: http://time.com/4780593/presid...

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    30. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by dbIII · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you had a guy who so far has not taken any political bribes

      Perhaps not US ones, and offering bribes is a different collection of stories that would probably span many volumes about many places, eg.New Jersey "deals" with politicians to get things done etc. The one offering inducements to Castro was especially amusing - who would have thought Casto would be honest enough to both turn it down and not use it as an excuse to crow about the evils of American capitalism?
      The guy is slime and only in it to screw you over.

    31. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by dbIII · · Score: 1

      All this outrage is basically undemocratic.

      Hang on, being annoyed about a President acting like an absolute monarch is undemocratic? Please explain.
      Would you have put up with Obama doing this?

    32. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Why is it Ok to share intelligence with Israel but not with Russia?

      Go ask your Dad.
      I'm serious. If you really have so little grasp on how events of the last few decades have shaped things today perhaps you should talk to someone who has seen those events unfold.

      That line is something I never expected to read from a "conservative" American and it kind of shows how all values and all lessons of the past are considered of less worth than incumbency. It should be more than just doing anything at all so your team can win - it should be about what values they represent when they are in place to do the job.

    33. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The ones in jail are a good benchmark.
      Of course you knew that but just wanted to throw mud at someone who is now politically irrelevant and is almost certain to never hold another political office for the rest of her life. Why bother? It's over and you got a Manchurian Candidate instead of business as usual.

    34. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "Clinton endured a 25 year long smear campaign"

      Actually, it's been at least 43 years. She was a junior counsel on the legal team advising the House about impeaching Nixon.

    35. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Posting as anon coward for saying things out loud which people may not want to say:
      We distrust Clinton because she stayed with her husband for seeking power.
      This goes strongly against women's role stereotypes, honesty stereotypes, and displays a craving for power that we somehow (???) don't expect from leaders.

    36. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by mtmiller100 · · Score: 1

      you hit the nail on the head

    37. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The "Cold War" was used to justify a massive MIC for many years. After it was over instead of getting a peace dividend Bush got us involved in Iraq which led to 9/11 which led to the never ending "Wr on Terror". All Bugaboos to keep us scared and generate employment for "Analysts". I am not a Trump supporter. If anything I supported Sanders but I am loving how the Washington establishment is squirming when then trough of slop is being pulled away. CNN and WP feed at the same special interests trough.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    38. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Read my words: they'll purchase fewer things, which means fewer jobs.

    39. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Revenue drives jobs, not units sold.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    40. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Your analysis ignores that those lower wages paid to workers also reduce the purchasing power of those workers

      Not really. Everyone can't be a higher-paid worker; you get inflation that way. To be clear: if we double everyone's wage, then everyone gets $10,000 instead of $5,000, and they get it for the same hours worked; to pay that wage, the price of products must double; and thus everyone spends the same hours worked on a product and has the same purchasing power. No change.

      Wage inequality is a matter of marginalization: some portion of the population has less buying power than some other portion. If you raise that portion of the population's buying power, then you reduce the buying power of the rest of the market.

      In practice, this means that raising a subset of 10% of wages by 10% makes those wage earners 9% richer, while making the other 90% poorer by 1%. You lose .1% and gain .099%, a net loss of .001%. Shrug.

      The main impact is the shrinking of a market: that big 90% span is mostly able to afford a service--say 70% of the market can afford it. Now you've adjusted it in such a way that the service is 30% more-expensive. People who didn't get the wage adjustment are less-capable of buying it; the ones barely on the demand curve will fall off it, and so the jobs supporting that product are reduced by that much. Maybe 55% of your market can afford it.

      If you move a middle-class $60,000 job market to SF and get a middle-class $140,000 job market, then you impact the entire lower market segment flatly, to no real gain anywhere (SF is already a high-wage, expensive locale). If we're talking about a minimum wage increase, then the bottom part of your market gets 9% richer; in the above hypothetical, those people are facing a product that they couldn't afford before, they're 9% richer, and the product costs 30% more, so they still can't afford it. That means you get an actual reduction in ability of them to purchase that product in particular (they can purchase other products which weren't affected).

      In other words: raising a subset of wages without raising all wages just concentrates wealth into fewer hands. You get a reduction of overall purchasing power, and an increase in purchasing power in fewer hands.

      When you drive down wages across the board, there is no one else paying those higher wages.

      When you drive down wages across the board, you get simple deflation.

      Now, you ignored two major factors.

      The first is that Silicone Valley, San Francisco, and other high-cost areas are faced with prolific economic rent. For example: landlords are taking immense profit margins charging $4,000 for an apartment that would cost $600 in another area. The difference isn't all profit margins: maintenance workers charge higher rates to those landlords, so some of that revenue stream goes to expenses. They might make 50% or 80% profit margins instead of 33%, rather than taking 200%-300% profits, because all the service providers have also jacked up their prices.

      In other words: we're concentrating wealth into the hands of landlords, landlord service providers, and the like. The actual workers also have a decent take, since they're still taking home enough to buy a $50,000 car instead of a $25,000 car like we do here on the east coast; and they're still just somewhat-upper-middle-class and not a full 2x as rich as those of us making $60k over here. Richer, yes, just also faced with more parasites sucking them dry.

      Second, these jobs produce products purchased by a majority. That, again, means that a tiny, tiny fraction of people are recipients of the personal wages involved here, and a massive proportion of people are impacted down the line. That's the problem with applying microeconomics to macroeconomics problems: you have a distorted myopia on lowerin

    41. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      False.

      A cashier scans 980 items per hour; scan 2,000 items instead of 3,000 and you only need 2 cashiers.

      A 40-foot truck carries 20,000 pairs of pants or 20,000 jackets. If you sell 20,000,000 jackets per week, you need 1,000 trucks driving between the distribution centers and the retail centers each week; if you sell 10,000 jackets per week, you only need 500 trucks driving those deliveries per week.

      Fewer trucks driven means fewer inventory workers unloading the trucks onto store shelves. It means fewer warehouse workers loading and unloading pallets into trucks.

      Moving less product means fewer cashiers and stockers. If in an area you reduce the load by 50%, you can just close 50% of your stores, meaning infrastructure support to maintain the building, deliver electricity, and provide Internet connectivity goes away. Since we don't need as much of such infrastructure support, somebody's sitting idle and getting paid; fire him, because he does nothing, and we're not receiving a revenue stream to pay him since we're not selling products which he would be making if we actually need him.

    42. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      Anecdote != data.

      For every clothing store that's struggling, there's an Amazon/Walmart/Kohls. Not to mention Etsy and the various farmers market-style street vendors.

    43. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Why is it Ok to share intelligence with Israel but not with Russia?

      That's nowhere near being the right question. Trump openly passed on information from Israel that could identify an agent and get that agent killed. That's not OK, and it wouldn't be OK to pass on information the other way.

      There's lots of things Trump could do to ease tensions with Russia. Doing something that drastically erodes our current allies' trust in us, and makes sure they're not going to share information like that again with us, is not a good idea.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    44. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The impression I got from GP is that he thought writing software was relatively easy, which leads me to believe GP doesn't know what he's talking about. Most people calling field X "easy" have too little experience with or knowledge of X to know its difficulties.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    45. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Ah yes - "end of history" and all that shit.
      It is shit because people who were in the middle of all that history you think is irrelevant are calling the shots in some places today.

      I am not a Trump supporter

      I didn't say you were. Kind of interesting to see that denial come from nowhere.



      Here's a little thing to ponder "end of history" boy - Putin (whose KGB history you've decided is irrelevant) has Josef Stalin's library in his office (with copious notes by Stalin inside every volume) and shows it off to visitors. By that he certainly doesn't want to ignore history. Now take Israel - are you seriously going to suggest that the government there is going to ignore history?

      We are still in the middle of a pile of ongoing shit that makes it so that Israel is not ready to cuddle up to as close an ally of Assad's Syria as Putin is.
      You Dad should have told you a bit about things like that when you were growing up.

    46. Re:Sounds like indentured servitude by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Thats bullshit. Even if Trump passed info which could help identify an Israeli agent why would that agent get killed. Russia is not going to leak it to ISIS. In case you havnt noticed Russia is fighting ISIS and large number of Israeli jews are Russian anyway. Israel is an ally of Russia as well.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  3. A lesson in spinning by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    The cost of living in the bay area is demonstrably bananas ( that's the technical term ). By offering depressed wages, they're simply trying to do their part to make the bay area more affordable to the common man. :D

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re: A lesson in spinning by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But there is a shortage of STEMs with 20+ years experience willing to work for 40k a year. It's absolutely impossible to find any.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re: A lesson in spinning by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The H1-bs just cram 5 people into a one bedroom apartment.

      Not realistically. At best, three people (two in bedroom and one in living room). The days of 20 people sharing one room is long gone.

    3. Re: A lesson in spinning by N!k0N · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You forgot "on a platform that is only 5 years old" ;)

    4. Re:A lesson in spinning by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The cost of living in the bay area is demonstrably bananas ( that's the technical term ).

      That price is paid by a whole lot of people for reasons of their own. Therefore, the bay area offers living conditions that people value very highly.

      Fundamentally, the price paid for something in a reasonably free market is not likely to be bananas, because it's a price that two parties agree on because each thinks it benefits themselves.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Draining the Swamp by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    Luckily, all this H-1B abuse will be a thing of the past, once Trump "drains the swamp".

    If only he could get all those press alligators off his back...

    #meetthenewboss

  5. *YAWN* by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    Yea, we already know this. It would be better to report that the H1B program is either dismantled at most or at least fix it to where things like this no longer happen.

  6. Re:They make less than I do... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The problem with these Laws is Location and cost of living is different across the country.
    55K in a rural area. Is enough for a modest home, and a acre or two of land. Where you income can take care of a family of 4.
    Or if you move to a different location, 55k you will be at poverty.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  7. Immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about we just allow these H1B candidates to immigrate? Then they can be citizens and pay taxes on whatever salary they accept. They might even buy some foreclosed houses.

    1. Re:Immigration by Jzanu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about we just allow these H1B candidates to immigrate? Then they can be citizens and pay taxes on whatever salary they accept. They might even buy some foreclosed houses.

      That is the most practical solution ending the problem of visa-based slavery, but I doubt the Americans will ever do it. They idolize Saudi Arabia and the UAE for their greater materialism, and wish to inculcate the same mistreatment of workers - especially "foreign" workers. That allows their politicians to wag the dog and blame the other for the systemic economic problems they fail to address.

  8. L is more abused than H1-B by magarity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    L visas let the employer pay the foreign employee's home town wage for up to a year while in the US. When I lived in China for a couple of years I interviewed with the local IBM office about database consulting. They wanted to fly me to the US on an L visa while paying the local wage of about $1K USD which would be OK there in town but not in L.A. The hiring manager assured me on the 3rd level interview that they did it all the time and it was no problem. Then I mentioned that as a US citizen I couldn't be sent on any kind of visa and I couldn't work in the US for sub-minimum wage. He hung up and I couldn't get him to answer when I called back. Since they wanted to hire and send me immediately but an L visa requires a prior year of employment, minimum, they were obviously quite handy at lying on the paperwork. Think about this the next time big blue sends in a consultant from another country.

  9. Hire wages aren't enough by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    there's training. An H1-B comes from a country where the cost of living is a fraction of mine. You could triple those wages and they'd still be a good value for the money.

    The program needs to be shut down. It was created to solve a labor shortage that never existed. Companies just don't want to train. If you want to work in America you invest in America. If you don't like it you can leave. We've got plenty of everything anyone would want.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Hire wages aren't enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NO! DO NOT SHUT THIS DOWN!

      There is a little known program that allows rural and inner-city medical facilities to recruit doctors on J1 visas and convert those visas to H1-B. Without this program these facilities would have no hope of hiring physicians. This is the Conrad 30 Waiver Program.
      (https://www.uscis.gov/working-united-states/students-and-exchange-visitors/conrad-30-waiver-program)

      Keep the H1-B program. Limit the numbers of H1-B visas that tech corporations can use. Microsoft, HP, Apple, and others ALWAYS hog the visas and keep medical professionals out of the country.

  10. And Apple is run by good 1%er Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just like the rest of Silicon Valley.

    Fundraisers for Crooked Hillary, pink slips for US workers.

    The motto of the leaders of the Democratic Party: "Billions for me, welfare for thee (all the better to keep you voting for me!)."

  11. Raise the wage by byteherder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If companies would be required to pay at least $120,000 as one bill in the House requires, all the H1b problems go away.

    Tech companies don't want to do this.

    Why don't we just bring back slavery? It would be more honest.

    1. Re:Raise the wage by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Why don't we just bring back slavery? It would be more honest.

      This is even more insidious than slavery because they have tricked people into begging for these shitty jobs and thus working their asses off to keep the job. To make the deal even sweeter for companies, they don't have to provide housing for them and when they don't/can't work as hard as they used to, you just send them back and get another.

      Modern wage slavery is diabolical.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:Raise the wage by swillden · · Score: 1
      This is even more insidious than slavery because they have tricked people into begging for these shitty jobs

      You're getting more than a little hyperbolic. Do you know any H1-B employees? They aren't tricked, they knew what they were doing and nearly all of them not only would but will do it again. There are problems with the system, sure, but wild claims like yours really don't help your case, they just encourage people to dismiss you out of hand.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Raise the wage by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley says it is hiring the best engineers. Why are they almost all Indians?

      We should be studying Indian culture and the Indian education system to determine what is superior about their culture and education so that we can replication their success in the United States. Americans need to become more like the Indians in order for us to succeed in the world engineering market.

  12. Healthcare in the US does that too. by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    How many people in the US are staying at jobs they hate because they're terrified of losing health care coverage? ACA lessened that, so no wonder Republicans are desperate to scrap it. Can't have the plebes thinking they can just quit on bad employers, can we?

  13. i call bullshit by zr · · Score: 1

    h1b visas are transferrable. if your skills are worth $2k/y more than you're paid (roughly cost of transfer, if that) you can find a better paying job within a couple of weeks.

  14. True story by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I worked with a lady at a Fast Food restaurant when I was a kid who only stayed because her husband's Meds were paid by her health insurance. The owner caught wind and started working her 60+ hours a week on Salary. So yeah, our health care system gets abused for exactly that purpose.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:True story by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Yep, and I bet that owner justified it all in his head that she was getting more "value" out of the insurance so it's still cheaper for her to work 20 more hours a week than to pay for the meds out of pocket at another job. So he's actually doing her a favor!

  15. How do you survive? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Do they expect you to find a second full time job or be supported by family? I could see that happening. Especially if it was being used as a road to immigration.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  16. Obligatory slashdot editing joke by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

    This is sensationalist bullshit. Apple is not hiring software engineers in the valley for anywhere close to $52k. Infosys, Tata, et al. import bargain basement engineers. Apple is bringing in the top talent, and those people have no problem finding another employer to sponsor their H-1B if they want to job hop.

    As a software engineer, I want H-1B engineers to come work at Apple in the valley. They start or strengthen companies here which then leads to more demand for engineers, and that's a huge plus to my mobility and pay. If they didn't, they would be starting companies back home which does me fuck all good.

    1. Re:Obligatory slashdot editing joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As an H1B visa holder, I wish more people thought like this - or at the very least, didn't look at H1Bs with a jaundiced eye. "Land of the free, home of the brave" my foot! I make more than the minimum wage everyone on this discussion has asked for, and then some. I have a US Masters, I have patents to my name - and yet, everywhere I go, I feel looked down upon simply because I happen to be on a visa. My family experiences this too. And before some smartypants says go back, let me remind you - it isn't easy to uproot your family, let alone twice. It is stressful and disturbing. I make plenty of money, I do clever work - but if I had a chance of a do-over, I wouldn't have come here on an H1B visa. Ranting here isn't going to solve my problems - but I hope that someone reads this and modifies their behaviour towards H1Bs - we are people too, and how your government and companies behave isn't our fault.

    2. Re:Obligatory slashdot editing joke by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But your fight is really the same as every one else's... if there weren't so many people coming over on a visa that are poorly trained, then your problem goes away eventually.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Obligatory slashdot editing joke by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry you're looked down upon by so many. I work with several H1B holders and while I don't like the practices that caused the situation, I can't help but like most of the people involved. I always want to get to know them, better understand their cultures, families, religions, and more. It helps me broaden my own perspective on the world. I try hard to pronounce their names properly, I try to include them in activities.

      Why is it so hard for so many humans to treat other humans as though they are human?

    4. Re:Obligatory slashdot editing joke by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      " it isn't easy to uproot your family, let alone twice. It is stressful and disturbing."

      And it is almost always an error that isn't worth the compensation.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Obligatory slashdot editing joke by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Why is "the best talent" almost always Indian? Which Indian companies should we be afraid of out competing our American companies?

  17. A minimum wage would solve this problem by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If H-1B visas really are used to hire the best, brightest, and most rare talents - then a minimum wage of $150k/year should be no problem.

    This would solve the problem instantly.

    However, I suspect that instead of asking for larger H-1B visa caps, most H-1B visas would go unused.

  18. I mentioned this elsewhere by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but $120k isn't nearly enough. Training is expensive, and these people come pre-trained on the cheap thanks to the crazy low cost of living in their countries (supported by a massive underclass, no safety net and no environmental or employee protections).

    These are suppose to be the best and brightest the world has to offer. Either that or employees that are so desperately needed that training isn't an option. Start at $300k/yr and adjust for double inflation (so they can't cheat there too). That's about what a PH D in a profitable field makes, right?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I mentioned this elsewhere by dj245 · · Score: 3, Informative

      but $120k isn't nearly enough. Training is expensive, and these people come pre-trained on the cheap thanks to the crazy low cost of living in their countries (supported by a massive underclass, no safety net and no environmental or employee protections). These are suppose to be the best and brightest the world has to offer. Either that or employees that are so desperately needed that training isn't an option. Start at $300k/yr and adjust for double inflation (so they can't cheat there too). That's about what a PH D in a profitable field makes, right?

      I think $120k, with control for future inflation, is about right. I have worked for several international companies. They all invariably needed to bring in compliance officers, liaisons to the home office, and similar positions. You really need someone with experience and clout back at the home country. A local person, even one fluent in the language, is not an effective advocate. There would only be a couple of these types of roles in the $100-150k range, all the other employees would be locals (but paid similarly). $300k is too high and would put a damper on investment and hinder international business.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  19. BS by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    "Apple didn't want to comment for the story, but it did confirm some things. It says it hires on the basis on qualifications and that all employees -- visa holders and U.S. workers alike -- are paid equitably and it conducts internal studies to back this up."

    Apple and SV in general are so full of it, if it were a meritocracy then they would not need H1B maggots.
    This is why Cisco, Apple, Microsoft look like they belong in a suburb of Mumbai.

    1. Re:BS by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      The racism bleeds through so much. The vast majority of employees in SV are not H1B; they're US citizens. And they are roughly 50% white (lower than national average by a whole lot). Source: http://fortune.com/2015/07/30/...

      So no, it doesn't look like "a suburb of Mumbai". Though yes, there are a lot of Indian and Chinese workers here (again, mostly either permanent residents or US citizens). But that, of course, didn't stop you from from assuming they're "all H1B imports".

    2. Re:BS by thunderclees · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't be a moron.
      Your source is poor because they are pandering to those who are hiring maggot labor.

      H1B has a serious problem with diversity With H-1B visa, diversity doesn’t apply - In computer occupations, India dominates H-1B visa use. .

  20. Re: Let companies bid by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    It should be at least a wage HIGHER than the local market wage. Because that's how the market is supposed to work. If you cannot draw people in at the current wage, then you pay more.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  21. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Are you going to be able to retire?

    That's what the side business is for. Once it's generating significant cash flow, I can pay myself a salary, contribute 100% pre-tax to a qualified retirement plan, and, with corporate matching, put in $54K per year. That's a lot more than you can do with a 401K ($18K per year) and IRA ($5K per year).

  22. Simple solution - an AUCTION not a LOTTERY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The current method favors BIG companies that can buy a lot of ticket so the lottery. They want 150 people, they buy 300 tickets and they get a chunk of the visas.
    A small company that wants 1 or 2 PHDs gets a couple tickets and it is blind luck if they get the visas. They may be willing to pay top dollar for the best person.
    However the lottery favors those buying the most tickets.
    If it was set up as an auction, the small company could bid up for the super skills they need. The big companies would be fighting over the remaining slots.
    It would also help fight collusion. Small new players would be better able to get the talents that they are looking for.
    These "Super skilled and specialized" people it is meant for, would be more likely to get the visa rather than some random winner for a bit contracting firm.

  23. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I make four times as much working for a Fortune 500,

    Good for you!

    [...] but I don't fix printers all day either.

    Neither do I!

    Face it, you are the IT equivalent of a janitor.

    No, I'm a senior system admin with responsibility for 80K workstations. I create tickets for the local techs to work on.

    [...] we don't mop the floors [...]

    Neither do I!

    Now go fix printer 2C-HPTreeDestroyer.

    Call 1-800-IBM-HELP for assistance (you must be 21+ to call).

  24. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    So that side hustle you have going on must involve reminding the kids to buckle their seat belts before the Super Himalaya starts moving. Nice...

    Content creation. If I can sell it today, I can sell it for the next 30 yeas.

  25. You don't say? by Dracos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Low wages is the entire point of the H1B program.

  26. Fix this! by Rastl · · Score: 2

    Visas should only be allowed for positions posted with a salary of $250,000 or higher. There's plenty of qualified and/or trainable talent for jobs under that level.

    Placement companies should get 1% of the annual take home pay for the candidate upon retention. One payment, one time.

    By taking away the low cost incentive to the hiring companies and the huge profit from the consulting company the visa program will dwindle pretty quickly.

    1. Re:Fix this! by Cederic · · Score: 2

      You appear to have completely, totally and embarrassingly missed his point.

      If the skillset is that fucking hard to find then it's worth $250k. If you want to pay less, train someone.

      You don't have to pay local staff $250k, you can hire them for less. You just can't use the fact that they wont join you to write cobol for a lower salary than they can get in Michigan using modern tools to justify importing foreign labour.

  27. Depends on where the worker is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This wage assumes the worker is located in Silicon Valley but what if that is not the case? Say they are hiring H1B visa holders who are working out of some remote location? That wage would be quite suitable in say, Omaha. The danger in all this H1B visa dust up is that many of these companies could simply choose to have these people work in their home nations flying them in for meetings only when needed. Thus pulling the rug out from under the Silicon Valley real estate market.

  28. How did the ACA not make that worse?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    How many people in the US are staying at jobs they hate because they're terrified of losing health care coverage? ACA lessened that

    The ACA took away the option for catastrophic insurance the poor could get, for a fairly low premium.

    Now trough ACA you get the same $8k deductible for a policy but for a monthly payment that is 10x (or 100x) as much as what you use to pay for the same deductible...

    How is that "lessened"? Now there is even more fear to losing insurance. I feel that personally, before I didn't really care but now losing my current insurance arrangement wold be disaster financially speaking.

    The Republicans are not "desperate" to scrap anything. They are dragging feet because lots of them feel like the whole thing will die on its own (which is true). However that would cause a lot of suffering and death, so the Republicans are trying to push through SOME fixes which Democrats are blocking (seemingly preferring pain and death as long as it happens under a Republican president).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How did the ACA not make that worse?? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      So maybe I am not up on the nuance of the problems facing some of ACA users. Regardless, the basic point stands. In the US, unlike most of the other developed nations, your medical care is closely linked to your employment which makes job mobility that much harder. It makes it more difficult to report employers for small (or large) violations for fear of reprisal that will affect that medical care. Agreed?

    2. Re:How did the ACA not make that worse?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      So maybe I am not up on the nuance of the problems facing some of ACA users.

      "Some" being "the vast majority".

      A huge reason Trump won is that all of the people forced into the ACA are up on the "nuances" of being shafted by private luxury insurance they are forced to purchase. Not much different than forcing the poor to buy a new Mercedes every year. At least that would get them to an emergency room for free.

      . It makes it more difficult to report employers for small (or large) violations for fear of reprisal that will affect that medical care.

      Can't really agree with that assessment because if you are fired you can just go on Cobra until your next job or the lawsuit comes through. Cobra used to be thought of as expensive but compared to the ACA...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:How did the ACA not make that worse?? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      And if you quit, and can't afford to pay for COBRA, or get fired and same?

      See up here in Canada, we pay out of pocket... er.. zero dollars per month for healthcare coverage. If we're employed associated taxes are taken, if we're not, then nothing extra out of pocket. So when switching jobs or thinking of just quitting because your work environment is awful, healthcare coverage doesn't even come into the thought process.

  29. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Then why haven't you already gotten a better one instead of reminding Slashdot daily about your low salary?

    Because I'm on a five year mission to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before.

    (Let's see which pre-written excuse he uses this time.)

    You didn't see that one coming.

  30. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Back when I was in IT support I made more while being responsible for a couple hundred machines at most.

    The local site techs are responsible for ~1,500 systems each.

    If anything you say is true not only are you seriously underpaid but you're also in serious denial about it.

    This is my first job as a system administrator. All my fellow system administrators also make $50K+ (the national average for family of four). I just happened to live in a more expensive region.

  31. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You are officially the lowest paid senior system admin in the country. I'm calling Guinness.

    Yes and no. "Senior" is in reference to my 20+ years technical career. I've been system admin for nearly three years. When I go for my next job, I expect recruiters and hiring managers to low ball me on salary.

  32. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Yes, you are a the embodiment of a karmic nut punch, creimer.

    Been there, done that.

  33. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You are getting low-balled.

    When you don't have a four-year degree, that's typically the case.

  34. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You are a junior/mid level sysadmin, who happens to be old.

    I'm quite young. Most of my coworkers are in their 60's and 70's.

  35. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Why do I need to call IBM for help with my HP printer?

    Call the number and find out.

    I hope this is not the advice you give to your lusers.

    When I worked the IBM Help Desk, we gave out that phone number to annoying users. They called back shocked — SHOCKED! — to find out that IBM operated a sex phone line (IBM stopped using the phone number in the 1980's). We would apologized and give them the current help desk number.

  36. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    That's a mighty big "IF," friend. It also assumes that the market for it will remain for the next 30 years, which is another big "IF".

    There's no "IF" about it. I make more money from ebook sales than I do from first serial right sales to anthologies. The virtual shelves have no expiration date. If I maintain this side business while working a regular job for 30 years , I'll have significant royalty income in retirement

    Which piece of yours would you consider your best? Which are you proudest of?

    On the fiction side, it would be "The Giggling Mongoose: Scarlet Hearts". My bestselling essay is, "Death At A Hell's Angels' Funeral: Driving Past The Memories "

    The $0.99 price model is dead. I'm in the process of revamping my catalog by consolidating titles, getting new cover art commissioned, and raising the prices to $1.99. I'll be releasing new titles next year.

  37. No, it isn't by shaitand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "but it can pay low wages to visa workers if it wanted. This fact is at the heart of the H-1B battle."

    No. This battle is not just about the wages paid the H-1B workers, it is allowing allowing there to be any H-1B workers if there are US workers who could perform the task at any price or do so with reasonable training (in high tech environments new employees generally need up to 12 months to get up to full speed).

    H1B workers should not be allowed in to keep current wage levels, to reduce leverage skilled employees have in the local free market, and certainly not to replace/displace local workers. H1B workers are for when local talent does not exist. Period. The same is also true of the back door using accelerated degrees from foreign nations to get student student visas for US grad schools. US schools might be willing to sell out since these students pay max tuition and US companies having programs which then pay for/reimburse the education costs might make this feasible but it isn't in the overall interest of the United States.

  38. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    No wonder why you are making shit for pay with a level of professionalism like that.

    I think you misunderstand the nature of IT Support. I'm not paid to be nice to the users. I'm paid to get the job done. If a user wants to make my job difficult, I can return the favor and suffer no consequences. Why? Because the user got in the way of getting the job done. At the end of the day, that's the only thing management cares about.

  39. Re:They make less than I do... by bondsbw · · Score: 2

    Then why not move to that rural area?

    Because Silicon Valley offers perks that might make it worth living in poverty. Maybe it's the access to infrastructure, better job conditions, better health care, better career prospects, nicer weather, better beaches, etc.

    I don't get all those things where I live (Alabama). I telework, so I could move to the bay area and nothing about my job would change. But my employer isn't going to provide a higher wage for the same work. No employer would, nor should they be forced to.

    Everybody talks about cost-of-living. They never seem to talk about perks-of-living.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  40. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Sometimes getting what you are worth is simply a matter of ASKING for it.

    If you'll note, I'm a contractor. Negotiation is a luxury. The choice is to take a job at the specified rate or find a job somewhere else. Since this is a five-year contract, I'm in a much better position to negotiate for a $100K+ per year job. But I do expect recruiters and hiring managers to low-ball since the last 30+ positions I had prior to the five-year contract were short-term contracts (i.e., four hours to one year).

  41. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Then why not move to that rural area?

    I'm trying to negotiate moving to a low cost area but my employer is reluctant to let me go from Silicon Valley. They have an extremely hard time finding people to fill the positions here. They don't want to pay the average $108K per year salary because workers in New York City, Washington, D.C., and elsewhere will want a pay increase. I'm not moving anywhere unless I have a job to go to.

    Because Silicon Valley offers perks that might make it worth living in poverty.

    I was born and raised here. My parents were born in the middle of the Great Depression, knew what poverty was, and lived a modest lifestyle (not that mother didn't try to spend every dime). I live a modest lifestyle in Silicon Valley, save 20% of my income, and I'm content with what I have. Just because I have no desire to own two Tesla cars at the same time doesn't mean I'm living in poverty.

  42. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You don't GROVEL for a job. Have some self-respect.

    Were you out of work for two years because of the Great Recession?

    Did you take a job with a moving company to work 20 hours per month for six months while hiring managers told you were overqualified for minimum wage jobs and recruiters told you were unemployable for everything else?

    Did you file for Chapter Seven bankruptcy and end up with only $25 in your checking account?

    Did you spend two years working seven days a week, taking whatever job that came along to support yourself?

  43. And I still make less... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am in Santa Clara on a TN visa. I work for a company in Mexico but perform the actual software engineering work in the US.

    I make 49k a year, granted, the company pays for my rent and utility bills, but I am liable for taxes in both Mexico and the US.

    There are worse visas than the H1B and there are worse companies than Apple or the big tech companies. Focus the hate on the companies that operate like a human trafficking mafia instead...

  44. Re:They make less than I do... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Dude, sometimes the hardest you work for the lowest pay, the more they push you down. If you lowball your prices all the time then clients will start to think you suck at your work and be even more derisive.

    I've seen it happen.

  45. Re:There's a simple solution guys. by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

    I want my Government to control immigration and gun laws to keep nut jobs like you out of my country.

    --
    New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  46. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    How do I get the phone sex? All I got offered was a Caribbean cruise. :(

    May have changed in the last ten years. I've never personally tried it. Not my thing.

  47. Distorted reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Level I prevailing wages are only for entry-level applications. They are not that popular with H1B sponsorships because you usually don't go through the trouble to sponsor a visa for someone unproven. And, after one or two years you'll have to pay Level II, so using Level I benchmark is misleading. Overall, Level II and III are much more popular with sponsorships.

    Sunnyvale: Level 1 / 2 / 3 / 4: $52,229 / $73,091 / $93,933 / $114,795
    SF: Level 1 / 2 / 3 / 4: $67,974 / $88,026 / $108,077 / $128,128

    Are these below market? Most likely. But if we're comparing to the "average" of $93k / year, they are not far off.

  48. If H1-B program is for super genius. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If H1-B program is for super genius then they should be paid super genius money. There are a lot of American kids with 100K College loans that can't get a job because of H1-B visa people.

  49. Re:They make less than I do... by bondsbw · · Score: 1

    I'm not moving anywhere unless I have a job to go to.

    Right, this is what I meant by the perk of "better career prospects".

    Just because I have no desire to own two Tesla cars at the same time doesn't mean I'm living in poverty.

    Of course not. The talk about poverty was in response to the previous post, in no way asserting that everyone who lives in Silicon Valley is poor.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  50. It was the best of jobs, it was the worst of jobs. by LesserWeevil · · Score: 1

    Discussing the H-1b visa program with a visa holder at my workplace yielded some odd data; he was near the bottom of his class at Central University of Gujarat, he was hired not knowing what he was being asked to do when he arrived, his 'BS degree' in IT took 2 years and he makes less than $50k per year. Likely a good deal for him, but I doubt his employer is getting even what they paid for and his co-workers are pretty dubious as well.

  51. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The talk about poverty was in response to the previous post, in no way asserting that everyone who lives in Silicon Valley is poor.

    But this is Slashdot. If you can't afford x number of whatever, than you're a poor schmuck.

  52. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    When the CEO has trouble, you never consider that at all.

    Most Fortune 500 companies have a separate executive IT staff to service their needs. The only time I ever interact with executives is when they're praising me for getting the job done — and then letting me go because I completed the contract three months ahead of schedule.

  53. enough with the H1-Bs by mtmiller100 · · Score: 1

    The program was a good solution to the problem of not having enough home-grown talent for the rapidly growing tech sector. But we are now graduating tons of tech talent, and this program has devolved into a form of indentured servitude, so these big companies don't have to pay market-driven wages to American citizens.

  54. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    This place is for us [...]

    Slashdot is an open forum. You should try Reddit. They may have a Beavis and Butthead forum that you and your friends can join, as it's obvious that none of you have graduated from high school to adulthood.

  55. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Sorry "brah" - nothing we here can relate to.

    You need to get out more and meet people outside of your socioeconomic strata.

  56. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    And all this while fielding 8 calls a day from 200 recruiters! While going to Stanford for your PhD in printer repair!

    While banging your momma trying to get the VCR to stop flashing 12:00 all the time.

  57. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    No wonder you get paid so bad when you got fired a lot.

    The only job I've ever been fired from was when I worked in construction with my father and punched the boss's grandson in the mouth.

  58. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Do you walk up to random groups of people talking, join their conversation, and then don't leave when they tell you to fuck off?

    A homeless person introduced himself to me at the bus stop. We shook hands, talked for a few minutes, and I gave him a few bucks to buy coffee at the 7-11 behind the bus stop.

  59. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    this specific forum is limited to a specific socioeconomic strata and the iq range.

    I represent the low end of IT and the high end of IQ. ;)

  60. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Replies that have zero to do with what he is replying to.

    Just like your replies to my comments.

  61. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    "Perl - never heard of it."

    I don't understand this obsession with Perl.

  62. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Perl is common knowledge, even if you think it's a shitty, outdated programming language.

    I don't have an opinion on Perl because I've never used Perl. Not personally, not professionally.

    All your posts are either stupid or responding to people who make fun of you, why are you here?

    This is only a problem for topics concerning politics, where an asshat falsely accused me of shooting him for six weeks, and IT, where a handful of asshats are drunk posting late at night. I don't have this problem in any other topic on Slashdot.

  63. Re:They make less than I do... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Because the user got in the way of getting the job done.

    Exactly which job are you talking about? Typically, IT is a support function, there to support users in doing their jobs. Your user is almost certainly doing a job of more direct benefit to the company. When your user calls you, it's because said user is having difficulties doing his or her job, so it's your responsibility to assist the user, so the user's job gets done. Instead, you waste the user's time, which interferes with getting the job done, and likely offend the user or get the user in trouble, You are being a liability, not an asset.

    What you described sounded like an internal help desk. If it's external, you're offending customers while wasting their time.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  64. Re:They make less than I do... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    We're very nice people.

    Keep telling yourself that. Someday it might even become true.

  65. Re:They make less than I do... by EmptyHead · · Score: 1

    LMFAO, you know you could work some extra hours with housekeeping to supplement your income. Janitors working for the Metro make about 5 times what you do once overtime is factored in. Sounds like you already have building keys so should be good to go! Sell it to your boss as a corporate money saving idea. At what you're being paid, the illegal alien janitor they have now probably costs more. Oh! Even better, by getting rid of Pedro, they decrease the risk of identity theft. He's probably been going through the bins looking for ways to get docs for his friends and family, after all.

  66. Re:They make less than I do... by EmptyHead · · Score: 1

    Have you noticed that Creimer never seems to get mad? Even when you're bombarding him with non-stop insults. I wonder if he's a bot, responding deadpan with slightly relevant responses to key words in your monologue. ---Or, even better. AC is also Creimer talking to himself as some form of release?!?