Slashdot Mirror


Chicago To Make Future Plans a Graduation Requirement (thehill.com)

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanual's recently approved plan will require high school students show their plans for the future before obtaining their diploma. "Students will soon have to show that they've secured a job or received a letter of acceptance to college, a trade apprenticeship, a gap year program or the military in order to graduate," reports The Hill. From the report: "We are going to help kids have a plan, because they're going to need it to succeed," Emanuel told the Post. "You cannot have kids think that 12th grade is done." But critics say the district may not be able to provide mentoring to help needy students when the rule takes effect in 2020. "It sounds good on paper, but the problem is that when you've cut the number of counselors in schools, when you've cut the kind of services that kids need, who is going to do this work?" Karen Lewis, president of the Chicago Teachers Union, told the Post. "If you've done the work to earn a diploma, then you should get a diploma. Because if you don't, you are forcing kids into more poverty."

214 of 399 comments (clear)

  1. Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanual's recently approved plan will require high school students show their plans for the future before obtaining their diploma.

    One of those "means well" but it's not going to work as well as he thinks. I remember even I straight out of high school wasn't absolutely sure what I was going to do.

    1. Re:Means well, but... by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Need a high school diploma to get a decent job, but can't get the diploma until you have a job. How to make more burger flippers.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell, I finished high school 23 years ago and I still am not sure what I want to do. I've had wildly varying and interesting jobs that have taken me all over the world and I wouldn't trade that for anything.

    3. Re:Means well, but... by Darinbob · · Score: 3

      I knew a lot of people in high school whose plan was to get married. Honest. Then there were those who stayed home to help care for ailing family.

      If they only needed to articulate a plan this would be ok, but to actually have secured a job, training, college, etc, that's suddenly very difficult. The economy sucks right now, and it may very well suck even more in the future if employment rates fall. What do you do if all of your job applications are rejected? You can't even get going on a job while still actively studying in high school, no one's going to let you skip class to go to a job interview, and if you start job hunting early who's going to want to hire someone who can't start until summer?

      Then the catch-22 of not being able to get a job without diploma in hand, and can't get a diploma without the job offer in writing.

      Maybe best bet if grades are decent is get a spot at a junior college as tuition is still cheap and you don't have to actually attend once you get the high school diploma. But if the grades are good enough to normally graduate from high school, but not good enough to get in a JC (a C- average) then what?

      I never heard of a gap year program. Everyone I know who did gap year just did it with no plan and certainly no formal program, and they did the gap year precisely because they had no plan.

      Maybe what this requirement will do is increase the number of people taking the GED test.

    4. Re:Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rahm Emanual isn't exactly known for thinking these kinds of things through. This is why Chicago has turned into a complete shithole. When a crowd of people hear shots fired there, they scream and hit the deck, but then after a few seconds they just get back up and resume what they were doing like nothing happened. Why? Because eventually you just get used to random gunfire happening all the time.

    5. Re:Means well, but... by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      schools work with employers, especially ones filling apprentice type jobs with on-the-job training

      Oh you mean unpaid internships? Yeah sure, if you're going to give me some slaves for 6 months or a year I'm sure I can find work for them. Do you think employers will "work with schools" out of the kindness of their hearts? Where's the profit in that? There are hundreds if not thousands of candidates for any job opening. It's not hard for an employer to find employees. Why should I even take the time to set up some sort of "program"? Unless of course, you're going to promise me suckers who are told that their "experience" is their salary.

      Amazing how the US is behind absolutely everyone else in terms of laws that actually protect workers.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Means well, but... by blindseer · · Score: 2

      No, a high school diploma is worthless. And I don't mean that people are looking for a college degree to get a job.

      I've found there are quite a number of means to prove your value to an employer. There's a lot of high school equivalency tests out there. Places offer what is essentially an IQ test for showing reading, 'riting, 'rithmatic to potential employers. A lot of these tests are "free" in that the state will pay for it for anyone that qualifies for welfare or unemployment insurance. There's the SAT and ACT for college entrance. Colleges don't care that you have a high school diploma, if you score well enough on an entrance test then you can get in. This is especially true if you've done some high school, even if you didn't graduate, give them a transcript showing decent grades in math, sciences, and such. The high school might withhold your diploma but I'm pretty sure they have to show you your grades.

      Colleges and employers know what high schools actually teach their students. A diploma from a shit school isn't worth the paper it's printed on. I'm pretty sure that the Chicago public school system is full of shit schools.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    7. Re:Means well, but... by Calydor · · Score: 2

      What are you talking about? It's a perfect plan!

      If you get a job you get a high school diploma.
      If you don't get a job you enter the High School Dropout statistic instead.

      This way statistics can more easily point to the fact that getting an education (which can be really expensive with student loans etc.) is the only way to get a job. Stay in school, kids!

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    8. Re:Means well, but... by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      > How to make more burger flippers.

      Robots are getting passed over for diplomas now? Seriously, there aren't gonna *be* burger flipping jobs in the near future...

    9. Re:Means well, but... by dwillden · · Score: 2

      Great points, personally I'd bet that this rule results in the local community colleges see a jump in the number of HS Seniors who come in and pay their $25 enrollment fee, just so they can show that they have been accepted to a college. But who then don't actually enroll in any classes.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    10. Re:Means well, but... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Plans can be somewhat small-scale. "I am going to college". Not sure where, not sure what I'll study, etc. Or possibly, "I'm going to get a job as a waiter." Something besides, "I'm going to spend a lot more time playing video games now that I don't have to go to school anymore."

    11. Re:Means well, but... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know who did gap year just did it with no plan and certainly no formal program, and they did the gap year precisely because they had no plan.

      It's called a deferment, that is the entire extent of the "gap year program", you ask for your admission to be deferred to the following year for whatever reason.

      --
      Ken
    12. Re:Means well, but... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Amazing how the US is behind absolutely everyone else in terms of laws that actually protect workers.

      Brush up on US employment law, it's become very, very hard for employers to offer unpaid internships anymore, no smart employer even considers such an option - the legal risk and penalties are too great under current employment law.

      --
      Ken
    13. Re:Means well, but... by kenh · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the Chicago public school system is full of shit schools.

      You forget, before becoming President, Barrack Obama worked to improve the Chicago Public School System, along with his neighborhood domestic terrorist Bill Ayers - they should be palaces of higher learning!

      --
      Ken
  2. Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This seems ass-backwards. Let's hold students back because we don't want to hold them back. Isn't the point to successfully get out of "school" (not drop out) as soon as possible? Won't this just lead to more dropouts?

    1. Re:Ass-backwards? by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The goal is to keep more cattle in the academia industrial complex because the massive debt they accumulate, and the years they waste not entering the workforce, help the corporate masters strengthen their grip.

    2. Re:Ass-backwards? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Probably depends on a bunch of variables. Like how much value a diploma actually adds over a dropout for one. I'm revealing my privilege, but I have no idea whether these days graduating high school actually gets you any better job than not having one does.

      If out of a hundred students, ten more students drop out with this rule, but ten more have a next step lined up, that depends on the value of a diploma. If it's "nothing" then that's a great trade. If dropout is absolutely unemployable forever while a diploma is middle class, then that's an awful trade. Probably somewhere between.

    3. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I for one welcome our new corporate overlords! -- Been a Meme since the 90's on slashdot bub.

      BTW, go look up a guy by the name of John Taylor Gatto; he's got a really heady 5hr long interview up on youtube, one of the best read people you'll ever find. The point of public schooling is to constrain creativity by prolonging childhood for as long as possible. Why do you need a 6 year masters degree to teach kindergarden? The only possible explanation is intentional indocrination by teachers unions looking to further enrich themselves at everyone elses expense. This entire article has the smell of a Rahm, the master of povery traps, having a tantrum over how badly his running of his city is going. Chicago's the only City in the US where population is dropping and people are trying to escape.

    4. Re:Ass-backwards? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      It's not paranoia if they're really out to get you.

    5. Re:Ass-backwards? by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately "they" in this "corporate masters" case are lots of different entities each with their plans and motivations. That is distinctly not a conspiracy.

      This is my take:

      If the Democrats were good people, they wouldnt have to pretend so hard to be good people, and thus wouldnt suggest such a stupid asinine thing as withholding someones diploma from them for obviously fucked up virtue-signaling reasons. This guys plan is actively harmful. He is punching the citizens while pretending that its a good thing.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    6. Re:Ass-backwards? by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most people don't pay anything for public K-12 education outside a registration fee and sometimes to play a sport or join a club.

      Yeah, its never been funded out of most peoples property taxes... oh wait... its almost entirely funded from most peoples property taxes.

      Local property tax rates are always highly dependent on the ratio of people to schools within the township or county.

      Now its time to shut the fuck up about shit you dont know anything about. K? TX.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    7. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a degree. I have as much debt as 1 year of employment. I am sure it will inflate to something like 3 years of employment adding in interest over the long haul.

      I get paid twice as much as I did before I had the degree. I should move to another company and position this year and get a 50% pay raise due to the transition to a more business/leadership focused role.

      So let's see here. Let's normalize this thing.

      Per HS diploma employment year I would normally have, I will make 3x as much. My debt is a 2x amount of my high school-only wage, which inflate to 6x over time due to interest.

      Let's say I would just put 20 years in at each wage, and I don't factor in wage growth. 20 years at 1x = 20. 20 years at 3x = 60 - 6 = 54.

      So for every 20 high school-level wage years, I could have 54 for getting my degree. What a terrible deal for me right?!

      If you then chose to factor in wage growth over time for each scenario, that makes it even more lucrative for me. But please do stay out of school, you really lucked out avoiding that huge burden of debt you can pay off if you don't get a degree in art history.

      Relevant captcha: retail

    8. Re:Ass-backwards? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      BTW, he's full of crap.

    9. Re:Ass-backwards? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      BTW, go look up a guy by the name of John Taylor Gatto; he's got a really heady 5hr long interview up on youtube, one of the best read people you'll ever find.

      You are not allowed to cite John Taylor Gatto. Why not? Because he says in so many words that "citations are a game that academics play". That's what you get (from his assistant) when you ask him for some citations so that you can cite what he says with a clear conscience. Well, that means that citing his shit-show is invalid. Sorry-not-sorry. You clearly didn't check up on your citation there, because it's not peer reviewed. It's anti-peer review.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Ass-backwards? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      as much as I dislike corporate conspiracy loonies, in this case he does have a point: 1) you either have to enroll into a "gap program" which I guess is more counseling or some shit like that or work practice for free etc bullshit, 2) enroll in the military. 3) get a job 4) get admitted to an university(not entirely sure if you have to pay for it as well).

      like it is not that far off from starting to have mandatory work practice in walmart and mcd (or just straight up pay mit for extra courses) in order to graduate.

      look.. it all just sounds stupid. you fucking need to have graduated your high school to get a good shot at any of them! and I really can see some guy thinking they should "steer" people into these options, without thinking that people might have to, you know, graduated high school and seen their diploma/grades before getting on with it.

      HOW THE FUCK DO YOU GET ADMITTED TO UNIVERSITY WITHOUT GRADUATING HIGH SCHOOL ANYWAYS!?!? seriously, throw me a bone here. with 30 000 of cash? yes I realize that you can apply probably during the last spring of your high school, but that's with the expectation that you graduate and your final grades(in my country anyways) that are in the paper you graduate with affect admittance...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    11. Re:Ass-backwards? by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      If the Democrats were good people, they wouldnt have to pretend so hard to be good people, and thus wouldnt suggest such a stupid asinine thing as withholding someones diploma from them for obviously fucked up virtue-signaling reasons. This guys plan is actively harmful. He is punching the citizens while pretending that its a good thing.

      Students: "Your 'schools' are educationally-meaningless daycare and indoctrination centers filled with chaos, political-correctness, and violence, we don't care whether we 'graduate' from such shitholes."

      Rahm Emanual: "You're making us look bad! Beatings will continue until morale improves!"

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    12. Re:Ass-backwards? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      And these "cattle" end up knowing more than you and can hold a good job better than you, mister im-still-stuck-at-9.75-in-walmart.

      I don't work at WalMart. I also don't make that little.

    13. Re:Ass-backwards? by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      That is distinctly not a conspiracy.

      You're right. It's not. But it's a bad thing nonetheless.

    14. Re:Ass-backwards? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible plan. Fortunately it's probably not true either.

      First, TFA is just a shell that is repeating the original WaPo source with a right-wing spin on it. I suggest reading that link instead.

      Second, all it appears to be is that they need a "plan". No requirements for what that plan will be, how realistic it is etc. So to get out of it, just write "I'm going to become an astronaut" on the form and you are good to graduate. Really, the bar seems to be so incredibly low that the only rational conclusion is that it isn't a bar at all, at least not for the students, it's just to make the schools dedicate some resources to helping the students decide what to do.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Ass-backwards? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      In other words, he's advocating for you to think for yourself?

      No, he's advocating for you to ignore the entire wealth of human knowledge and history.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Ass-backwards? by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Right... so I suppose the folks who run the school are being bribed by... someone?

      Or, you know, maybe you're just spouting conspiratorial nonsense.

    17. Re:Ass-backwards? by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2

      declining tax revenue's
      manditory 401k contributions
      government employee's
      college degree's
      government employee's
      live within the munincipality

      I'm sorry to see the education system has failed you, but if you can't get simple spelling and punctuation right do you expect people to take your analysis of a complex issue seriously?

      --

      Enigma

    18. Re:Ass-backwards? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Really? I pay a 1.1% property tax, that money is factored into my mortgage. I didn't purchase a property that would have payments more than I could afford.

      I could have been more clear and said most students pay almost nothing for K-12 education. That was in response to the GP talking about students amassing huge debt going to school, which is not the case until post-secondary degrees are sought.

      I'm sorry you couldn't comprehend that and that you're some bitter hermit that lashes out at others. So how about you take your right hand, reach around to your bum, and yank that stick out.
      K thx bye.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    19. Re:Ass-backwards? by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Just say you plan to graduate and then protest for liberal causes. You might graduate with honors.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    20. Re:Ass-backwards? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You give them debt, age, and desperation.
      Then they'll beg to work for minimum wage, part time, with no benefits. Hell, some of them will fight to the death for an unpaid internship.

    21. Re:Ass-backwards? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Good people can make bad decisions, particularly in some sort of bureaucracy or other organization. This looks like a bad idea to me, but there's at least a germ of a good idea in there.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    22. Re:Ass-backwards? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I assume that an acceptance conditional on getting the high school diploma would work to get the diploma issued. Where I live, you generally apply to colleges (if you're going to) in your senior year of high school, so you can start college in the same year you finish high school, and so colleges don't need your last semester's grades and will issue conditional acceptances. This isn't a problem here.

      I don't know about Chicago apprenticeship programs, but I doubt all that many students go directly into one of those, and they may want the diploma first. Getting a job is going to be easier with a diploma. Getting a job when the employers think you're going to quit immediately after getting the diploma is going to be harder. I don't know what the Armed Forces are looking for nowadays, or what a "gap year" is.

      It's still a stupid idea, just not quite as stupid as you said.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    23. Re:Ass-backwards? by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      You need to do more research into why the world is so fucked up DD. There ARE way-too-powerful people out there who want us, and our children, enslaved to their desires whether by soft or hard mechanisms.
        "The love of money is the root of all evil."

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  3. Its funny how the detractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its funny how the detractors of this scheme have identified that there will be problems, the thing about having a process is that you can identify the problems and address them appropriately, which will be substantially better than the status quo.

    1. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what you are saying is:

      Lets create a bunch of problems. Then we get to solve those problems.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:Its funny how the detractors by mOzone · · Score: 1

      the thing about having a process is that you can identify the problems and address them appropriately

      Cuz you know Chicago is full of great ideas and process's .. like murder rate -- drop out rate -- rape rates -- teamsters controlling half the city -- police force that doesn't show up unless bodily harm -- mass job loss -- leading all city's in most people shot in the ass for 2017 -- aaah yes they see the error and change course lol

    3. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well ya, it's the thinking that comes from entrepreneurs: come up with a good idea then get other people to make it a reality. So here it's coming up with a process and then letting others figure out how to make the stupid idea work.

    4. Re:Its funny how the detractors by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If the process has serious problems (and I'm convinced it will), and they perform a bureaucratic and political miracle and fix them in a year, that's one year of students that get screwed. I'd expect more.

      I'm also not convinced it will wind up being substantially better for the students. Most will want to do something after high school, like college or getting a job or something like that, so it seems to me more of an impediment than an incentive.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Excellent by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is really an excellent thing to do. If they have the resources in counselors to handle it, it's really a great idea, and it could be a real help to the US education system at large. So many of the country's political, social, environmental, and economic problems come from people not thinking ahead. I'd love to see this go into place. I think this would help knock some sense into a lot of people who've never stopped to think for a few minutes about the future. I think something this simple could really nudge a generation of kids into some basic thoughtfulness.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Excellent by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      will just funnel more kids into becoming college dropouts

    2. Re:Excellent by somenickname · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is really an excellent thing to do. If they have the resources in counselors to handle it, it's really a great idea,

      Well, it should be fairly easy to gauge whether or not they have enough counselors to handle it. Just watch the stats on high school graduation rate. My guess is that, in a place like Chicago, they are just about to plummet. It's kind of shocking to think that they are going to gamble the future of a generation of children based on whether or not they have enough competent councilors. But, sure, if they do have enough, it'll be glorious!

    3. Re:Excellent by MtHuurne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having kids think about the future is a good idea. Making it a requirement for graduation is not, in my opinion.

      Graduation is supposed to mark that the student has sufficiently mastered what they were supposed to learn. Maybe you could argue that "thinking about the future" is a skill that schools should be teaching, but then the way to test that would be to for example let them write an essay about it, not to require letters of acceptance.

      What rubs me in the wrong way is that the school would have criteria for what are considered acceptable plans for the future. They would not only be judging whether the student has thought about the future, but also the decision itself.

    4. Re:Excellent by fermion · · Score: 2
      It is worthless. Anyone can register for community college. You can probably pay on a plan where you pay 10%, get a note, and graduate, and then drop all the courses. That would likely be under $100, and that is if you don't get financial aid or a loan. Every public school I knows makes everyone fill ou a FASFA. Now the kid has $500 of debt they can't get rid of without paying, acruiing at high interest rates.

      Enlistment in the military is the simplest option. Send a certified retraction letter so it arrives before your DEP. if enough kids do this the military will be pissed off enough to either get the policy stopped, stop recruited students from Chicago schools, or reverse the policy of not bringing up AWOL recruits to a court martial. In all cases a huge amount of time will be wasted, though not taxpayer money because we have to pay recruiters anyway.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Excellent by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      How this will probably get implemented is that the students have to write an essay about their future plans. Anything that is written legibly and doesn't say "I wan b a dope dilla" will get a passing grade.

    6. Re:Excellent by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      Just pointing out that planning to be a drug dealer meets the criterion for having a future plan.

    7. Re:Excellent by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      This is really an excellent thing to do.

      No it's not. It forced people to make rash decisions to get a diploma which can lock them into something they don't want to do.

      I didn't know what to do highschool, so I defaulted to the "I have no fucking idea" degree and did business management. It wasn't until I was in my mid 20s that I realised engineering is tickles my fancy.

      Yay wasted degree, more education debt, and all those other good things.

    8. Re:Excellent by swb · · Score: 2

      And it would actually be a legitimate entrepreneurial path in Colorado and several other states, perhaps even Illinois some day.

    9. Re:Excellent by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Every public school I knows makes everyone fill ou a FASFA. Now the kid has $500 of debt they can't get rid of without paying, acruiing at high interest rates.

      Being approved for a loan doesn't disburse it to a school nor even require you to take it.

    10. Re:Excellent by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's not even quite true. The brain continues in development from 18 to about 25 or so. A lot of the development centers on handling emotion correctly. This is why teenagers tend to make different decisions than adults - emotions takes over thought processes more easily because they tend to overwhelm (think Romeo and Juliet).

    11. Re:Excellent by conquistadorst · · Score: 1

      This is really an excellent thing to do. If they have the resources in counselors to handle it, it's really a great idea, and it could be a real help to the US education system at large. So many of the country's political, social, environmental, and economic problems come from people not thinking ahead. I'd love to see this go into place. I think this would help knock some sense into a lot of people who've never stopped to think for a few minutes about the future. I think something this simple could really nudge a generation of kids into some basic thoughtfulness.

      I agree this is an interesting and well intentioned idea but this the wrong way to go about it. Yes, I completely agree that kids not having a clear idea of what to do after highschool is a big problem. So let's force them to come up with an idea in order to graduate? Yeah, that's not going to work... it's a top down solution to a bottom up problem. Why kids aren't *already* planning about life after highschool is the real problem. Kids not having plans after graduation is merely a symptom.

      Trying to litigate your way to improving social behavior just isn't very effective. Improving highschool education and improving parenting is the better (but much harder) route.

    12. Re:Excellent by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      What rubs me in the wrong way is that the school would have criteria for what are considered acceptable plans for the future. They would not only be judging whether the student has thought about the future, but also the decision itself.

      That's really scary. Where we have historically seen fuzzy criteria like this in places like crime sentencing, prosecutorial discretion, and voting literacy requirements, they have almost always resulted in higher standards being applied to minorities (particularly African Americans).

      Lest you think your skin color makes you immune to this problem, this is just the fairly easily quantifiable effect. Black Americans are the canary in the coalmine for locating an unfair subjective system. If you or your kid manages to get a bad rep, or has a weird hairstyle/color, or heaven forbid, actually ticks off the school administration, that could be you too.

    13. Re:Excellent by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly not sure if you are being serious or snarky.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    14. Re:Excellent by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I kinda stumbled from high school into a mathematics degree, and it seemed that the choices were actuary and programmer. I took programmer, and it turned out to be one of the best decisions I ever drifted into.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. This is fucking stupid by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It took me a couple years after high school to figure out what I wanted to do. Started out EE, then computer science, finally got a degree in Math.

    If, at 18, I'd had to lay out my future plans they would have been somewhere along the lines of "smoke a lot of dope. Get laid. Find money to pay for weed and women".

    1. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It took me a couple years after high school to figure out what I wanted to do. Started out EE, then computer science, finally got a degree in Math.

      Did you do all of that in a place called "college"? Because that's ok, according to this plan.

    2. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is moronically shortsighted and obviously not thought out. This is kind of like the TSA. Lets do something that looks good even if it accomplishes nothing so we can say that we did something with our time as bureaucrats.

      Problem 1. I barely knew what I wanted to do half way through university. Now you will get the poor saps that don't have strong personalities committing to some crap they don't really want or maybe even understand and then feeling they need to follow through with it. They then end up in a place they hate.

      Problem 2. If they are Alphas then they will just make some crap up. I have it all mapped out. I will backpack through Somalia handing out medical supplies and then will be applying to MIT, Harvard, and Miami Dade College as a backup. In other words, say whatever.

    3. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And yet, you went to college and probably have a stable job or are in graduate school. RTFA, they aren't asking for a detailed plan of everything you will do with your life, just if you've got one next step in the bag--i.e. college acceptance, trade school acceptance, etc. This is much better than sending kids home at age 18 with no job, no prospects, no college acceptance, nothing. If you had had that, you might still be smoking weed in the basement chasing women, but because you had a plan (i.e. college), you aren't.

    4. Re:This is fucking stupid by antdude · · Score: 1

      For me, it was entomology and then I decided to go to CS.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:This is fucking stupid by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      It doesn't say you have to do your plan, just that you have to have a plan. If in senior year of high school you thought you'd end up an EE and put that down as your plan, but then switched to CS and then math along the way, you met the requirements just fine.

      This is such a ridiculously low bar. Basically any answer besides your "smoke a lot of dope" joke gets a passing grade. It's little more than asking "what do you want to be when you grow up" (with the additional part being "and how do you think you're going to become that?"). You don't have to actually do that "when you grow up", just show that you have some idea for what you're going to do next. If the plans change along the way, no problem, just so long as you have somewhere or another in mind at the start.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    6. Re:This is fucking stupid by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's like just an anecdote man.

      Unfortunately I have the same anecdote (get laid, business management, then engineering), and my partner has the same anecdote (biochemical scientists, now teacher, and now masters of maths), and her sister has the same anecdote (gap year, then marketing, then well she's not old enough to have made a decision yet).

      Eventually the anecdotes pile into data. A lot of people have no idea what they are doing well into their 20s. But I guess it's important that they keep paying university fees for something they won't finish or need.

    7. Re:This is fucking stupid by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      If the student's plan is "I'm going to be an EE, and here's the acceptance letter from the college I'm going to go to to do that", then they pass.

      After that, if they decide to do CS instead, that's fine. The diploma doesn't get retroactively withdrawn if you don't follow through with the plan.

      Can't get into a good school? Can't get a good job? That's fine: "I'm going to go to crappy local community college and try to transfer to a better school from there" is an acceptable plan too. CCC will accept anybody so anybody can say they're going to do that. "I'm going to flip burgers part time at the local burger shack who'll hire anyone until I can figure out what the fuck else to do for a living" is an acceptable plan too.

      You're going to do something after you graduate high school. This new law basically just adds a mandatory assignment to senior year: show us what you're going to do after you graduate. It can be basically anything. Go to any school. Get any job. They can be shitty ones if you can't find better ones. You're going to end up doing one of those things or another eventually (or you're going to starve to death in the street), so just pick one and you pass. And then you can change your mind later if you figure out that a better option than those is actually available.

      All this assignment does is force to you figure out which, of the options immediately available to you, is the best one you can actually start doing now, and then show that you're going to start doing that. After that you can change direction all you want, so no opportunity is lost. It just makes you think about your future, and that's not a bad thing.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    8. Re:This is fucking stupid by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Question: Is "I'm going to veg for a couple years on my very well to do daddy's dime then decide what I want to do with my life." an acceptable plan?

      What if said enabler of a father then provides a notarized letter that he is fully supportive of that plan?

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    9. Re:This is fucking stupid by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Aaaaand that's the difference. The summary mentions they need to have SECURED a job or gap year program or college or whatever.

      I would be in favour of having them to have a PLAN for the future, but requiring them to have signed contracts is ridiculous. And that plan, while it should have been seen and reviewed by a counselor, it should not be judged.

      It#s a good thing to force them to think about the future, but a diploma still is earned with their previous achievements, not the future.

      --
      bickerdyke
    10. Re:This is fucking stupid by aicrules · · Score: 1

      If you live in Illinois, they'll take good care of that banked cash real soon now.

    11. Re:This is fucking stupid by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Receiving an acceptance letter to start doing a program doesn't mean you have to follow through on the program.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    12. Re:This is fucking stupid by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I'm not certain what a "gap year plan" is, but what you describe is what I picture when I hear that phrase, and it's included in their list of acceptable plans.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    13. Re:This is fucking stupid by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If, at 18, I'd had to lay out my future plans they would have been somewhere along the lines of "smoke a lot of dope. Get laid. Find money to pay for weed and women".

      Some of us didn't have the social skills to pull that off at 18. Other than that, it has its attractions.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  6. where does this end by esarjeant · · Score: 2

    So will it be acceptable if your college of choice now requires that you secure a job or post-graduate program before you can graduate there too? Imagine the awkward conversations you could have with the hiring manager; "So do you have a college degree?"... "Um, sortof"

    Rather than a graduation requirement for high school, maybe high school seniors could use this kind of preparation to boost their grade. If you are able to secure work, vocational training or some other post-high school education then you are entitled to an additional 0.5 points added directly to your GPA.

    --

    Eric Sarjeant
    eric[@]sarjeant.com

    1. Re:where does this end by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      People get bread only for specific purposes in test tubes. We destroy our planet with global warming in the next 200 years. One dude has sex and his missus gives birth the conventional way. Just as the planet implodes he fires this abomination into another solar system where the baby grows up in a strange atmosphere with a strange sun.

      The baby destroys half a city while having a fight with batman and pretends to die while an irrelevant movie comes out without him.

  7. Better goal by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Chicago would be better to put these resources towards making sure all of its children survive to graduation before spending more money the city doesn't have forcing them to make plans for what comes next.

  8. Not Consonant with a Free People by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those 18 year olds are free men and women. Neither Chicago, nor the State of Illinois, nor the Federal government own them. This proposal, however, presumes too much. One must have a diploma at minimum to participate in much of society. But now this paternalistic body speaks to these young men and women as if to say, "Before you can receive this academic certification, you must prove your willingness to offer years of your life to a corporate master (i.e. find an employer who will deign to accept you), a military hierarchy (with the concomitant possibility of losing your life), or to a bank (in the form of bankruptcy-proof student loans). The wealthy, of course, will be excepted by means of gap-year programs but you, peasant, you must swear fealty."

    I cannot deny the practical value of a proposal like this. It's certainly there. But I do deny the right of the state to gainsay an adults freedom to choose either to work or not work, to go to college or to spend a few years mooching off his willing parents, to take on debt or hang out in the basement writing or inventing or starting a business or playing video games.

    1. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would be better if there was a policy (with funding) that required schools to provide sufficient guidance services to all graduates who request them to help them find that first job, apprenticeship program, or post-secondary institution that will take them. Guidance services that should probably start in their freshman high school year.

      "Do this difficult adult thing, kid, or we will hobble your future" is nasty. "Here, let me help you do this difficult thing because that piece of paper alone won't cut it" isn't.

    2. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      You like formality, don'tcha? Regardless, I think your point is moot as the plan doesn't seem to be at all what you're describing. The actual description sounds a lot more reasonable: you need to have something, anything more concrete than "I dunno, chill with my crew, I guess" lined up after graduation. That doesn't seem like a bad thing.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it stinks when people come us with requirements to get things. They should just hand out diplomas to anyone. No requirements.

    4. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 2

      You like formality, don'tcha?

      Nah. That's just the way I talk when something aggravates me. Remember, the root of the word 'expletive' is 'to fill out'. I just use different filler.

      That doesn't seem like a bad thing.

      Again, I don't deny that it makes some practical sense. It's when we get to the principles of the thing that I object. Let's consider this case as a thought experiment:

      An 18 year old girl is preparing to graduate from a Chicago school. She's a diligent, straight-A student. She has a 20 year old boyfriend who is gainfully employed by his family's construction company. The couple plan to wed upon her graduation and, due to her love of children and the influence of their Mormon faith, she would like nothing better than to start a family and avoid the workforce.

      Now, the couple in this example have a very clear notion of what they want to do with their lives. It happens this doesn't involve subordinating oneself to some state-approved entity or having money enough to take a one-year state-approved vacation. But it's meaningful to them. It's what they wish to do. Who are we to deny them this? Who are we to tell them what objects they really ought to pursue in life? Even if there's some practical value to the state, should there be no sphere in life where the state's interests are weighed little in comparison to the private values of individuals and families? For I can say this much with certainty: "I wish to stay home and raise children" will sound exactly like, "I dunno, chill with my crew, I guess" to any state-approved professional. It may even sound worse, because even wealthy kids are known to chill with their crews, but having children while still young sounds like just the kind of behavior the proles need to be weened of.

      One might well say that she can do all this and just not get the diploma if it's so important to her. This is true. But supposing he bites it in some construction accident three years hence? We've now handicapped her ability to go and earn what she can for her family, when she most needs it, and for what? She met all her academic requirements; she only failed to have goals the state recognized as worthy. (And I have, in fact, known intelligent, lower-middle class girls loosely fitting the above description.)

      One might disapprove of her goals, but this would be most telling of all. For this reveals just how much we think our neighbor's business is our own. Yeah, maybe she wants to have kids rather than work 40 hours a week at the behest of some supervisor, but that's the wrong thing to want. Maybe she thinks family is more worthwhile than getting a business degree, but she's wrong. If she won't choose the right things, perhaps she can be made to do so. It's for her own good.

      In short, by what principle do we presume to dictate to this girl that her choice of something, anything lined up after graduation is wrong?

    5. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      TL;DR tell me where you found the evidence that they wouldn't allow your stay-at-home mom example. I saw a non-detailed news story that listed examples of future plans (school, work, military, etc.) but nothing that claimed to be exhaustive.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Has there ever been a counselor at a school worth anything? No counselor in any school I ever went to seemed all that interested in my academic or, later, financial life. It was all about how gifted (but troubled) I was and how concerned they were about me. They never mentioned anything concrete, there were no actionable lines of wisdom or advice, it was all feel-good bullshit.

      These schools need men -- yes, men -- in guidance roles who will be frank, but supportive. "I don't like this D. Why do you have a D in this subject? ... Okay, so let's work on it then. I'll set you up with a tutor. Let's talk to your parents about a solution so you can do well and find something meaningful to do with your life." Maybe that's too nice. Tone can be changed, but the core message these kids need is "I'm going to watch how you do, and I want you to succeed. I want to see you walk to the stage in X years and see you graduate. I'm in if you're in."

      Schools don't have any of that. Nobody's willing to look at a kid and say, "This isn't acceptable," *AND* legitimately help them get better. There's too much focus on "sink or swim", when these kids need concrete, stern advice and a little motivation. Their brains are literally less-developed, and it's our job to make them better people.

    7. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      Agreed, not in my experience either. Mine was not just worthless, but detrimental. My sister's too. A few years later one Christmas I got to hear one of the neighbor moms complaining about her kid's counselor. Based on the bad behavior described I asked if it was the same one I had and sure enough it was.

    8. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by eddeye · · Score: 1

      But I do deny the right of the state to gainsay an adults freedom to choose either to work or not work, to go to college or to spend a few years mooching off his willing parents, to take on debt or hang out in the basement writing or inventing or starting a business or playing video games.

      That same state paid for the kids education. 12-13 years of public schools paid with state tax dollars to reach graduation. Requiring the kid to do something in return for that massive gift isn't unreasonable. Some schools require kids perform a certain number of hours of public service to graduate. Same basic principle.

      Now this idea stinks for many reasons. It's paternalistic, it's classist, it hurts the most disadvantaged. But the govt's right to do it isn't one them.

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
    9. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by blindseer · · Score: 1

      The wealthy, of course, will be excepted by means of gap-year programs but you, peasant, you must swear fealty.

      I'm pretty sure the wealthy will be exempt by the nature of going to a private school, not public school.

      Also, "have a plan" is pretty vague, especially if it allows for a gap year. Tell the counselor that you are going to work for your uncle in his corner store, even if there is no job. Or corner store. Or uncle. Does the mayor think that schools won't find an "out" on this to avoid raising dropout rates? I think that the high schools will start doing summer programs for those that don't have a "plan" where they sign up for it but the school doesn't actually care if the students show up for it. In fact I'm sure they prefer they are a no show, less work for them then. At that point the students have their diploma, no obligations to the school (they'd be legally adults by then), and the school gets to tick the box for "graduated" so their numbers look good.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    10. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      One might well say that she can do all this and just not get the diploma if it's so important to her.

      Anyone saying that would be a capital A asshole. A straight-A student has earned her graduation certificate. That her future plans didn't align with those encouraged by the state isn't relevant.

      (I know we agree .. just saying)

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    11. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      That same state paid for the kids education. 12-13 years of public schools paid with state tax dollars to reach graduation.

      No, the State did not pay for the kid's public education.

      Property taxes paid by local property owners, likely including that kid's parents, paid for his public schooling, possibly with additional funds from taxes and lottery programs at the State level, which also all come from the citizens/taxpayers. Government has no money of it's own, only what it takes from the population.

      So, Chicago wants to withhold an educational diploma that this kid of yours has already earned with his educational achievements, and that his parents and community already paid for.

      Sounds legit.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    12. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by AmericaRunsOnDunkin · · Score: 1

      The govt is the people. Did you sleep through civics class?

      Those local tax payers who paid for the kids education elected those city officials. The officials represent those citizens and serve their needs. They are implementing this policy on behalf of those taxpayers. It is the taxpayers who implementing this requirement, via their duly elected officials.

      If it turns out the local tax payers don't like this policy, they can vote in new officials and overturn it. That's how govt works. The govt IS the people. What, you want every taxpayer showing up at graduation placing their own unique demand on every graduate because they paid for part of his education? It doesn't work that way dude. The taxpayers' collective rights to do this sort of thing are vested in their elected officials.

    13. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      The officials represent those citizens and serve their needs.

      In theory, yes. In practice, not so much, and as government size, scope, and power grows, it becomes even less until a tipping-point is reached, and then that is no longer even theoretically true.

      Also, locals only have so much choice how their education taxes are spent, as most things that truly matter are controlled by the Federal government. A county school system would not be allowed to determine the curricula taught outside a narrow range of choices, mostly in subjects not required for graduation.

      Of course, regardless of anything else that might be done to improve US public education or how much money is spent, it will all be wasted and for naught until the teacher's unions are banned and the Federal Dept. of Education is eliminated or at minimum seriously reduced in power & scope. (Public-sector unions are a criminal abomination and should be banned in any case.)

      "All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations..." -- FDR

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    14. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Requiring the kid to do something in return for that massive gift isn't unreasonable.

      You mean like paying for the next generation's education through taxes? That already happens.

    15. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      she wants to have kids rather than work 40 hours a week at the behest of some supervisor

      In other words, she wants to work 60 hours a week at the behest of an inarticulate immature erratic supervisor. It has its attractions.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. I find this horrifying by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and it's the kind of thing that makes me think there's something genuinely evil behind it. There's no benefit here. If a kid doesn't have problems in life they'll be college bound. But a kid who does just got a whole new set of problems to worry about. More friction at home. More fights.

    As for 'counselors' my kid just graduated. Her counselors were worse than useless. Overworked. Under trained and under resourced. They knew most of the kids were boned and made no secret of it. And this was in one of the best schools in the city. What I'm saying is any kid that doesn't have amazing parents (or at least rich ones) is screwed. Oh, and speaking of rich parents if you're the kind of rich brat that gets to travel for a year you can easily get exempted from this.

    My guess is this is the local businesses looking to get cheap labor from desperate kids who now must have a job to graduate. We'll probably see more 'internships' where you're working full time for little or no pay. I can't think of another reason to push something this awful and this obviously unpopular. If anyone else knows what evil thing is behind this let me know.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I find this horrifying by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's one of many baby steps towards neo-feudalism.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:I find this horrifying by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Look, as a community-college educator in a different part of the country (and who participates in academic conferences on this sort of thing): it's none of that. It's a desperate cry for help at the fact that most students sit glassy-eyed through the entirety of their K-12 and now community college years, having no idea why they should bother trying at any of it. No one fails classes anymore. Effectively no one fails to get a high school diploma. No one is denied placement at a community college ("open admissions"). And yet 80% of the people who get into community college are basically illiterate and innumerate, and can't pass even 6th-grade arithmetic or language tests. High school diplomas are pretty much worthless today. I have students who are sincerely astounded that the answer to "Is it possible to fail a class even when I have perfect attendance?" is "Yes".

      The people who lobby for this kind of thing want people to not starve to death because they can't support themselves. They want high school to mean something, so they go grasping for something like this. They want more people to graduate community college because that's correlated with higher income for those people (yes, there's a whole slew of criticisms to be made around that).

      You can legitimately think that this is a bad idea. I do. But the 5-score conspiracy theories about it here in this Slashdot thread are truly faked-Moon-landing, anti-vaxer quality.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    3. Re:I find this horrifying by swb · · Score: 1

      Did "counselors" ever do anything? In the early 1980s they did nothing at my high school, which at the time was possibly the best in the city.

      I still remember meeting my counselor at one of the few mandatory meetings and walking away wondering what the guy got paid for. All he did was tell me I was taking the right classes for college and that I should apply.

    4. Re:I find this horrifying by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      and it's the kind of thing that makes me think there's something genuinely evil behind it.

      You'd be amazed at the amount of harm that can happen because of well-meaning people working with policies that were intended to help people out. That's why the policies need to be thrashed out well, and subject to more scrutiny than they usually get.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  10. Maybe living to graduation a plus by JohnScott1514 · · Score: 1

    How about this Mr. Mayor. Let's just get more to live to graduate and not drop out and join gangs you idiot. Understanding the problem is the first step to solving it Mr. Mayor

  11. Re:Vicious circle by tsqr · · Score: 1

    Need diploma to get college acceptance..

    Spoken like someone who never got a college acceptance. Most college applications are due well before the end of the last year of high school.

  12. Conscription by dohzer · · Score: 1

    So this is basically conscription in disguise, right?

    1. Re:Conscription by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      If this was book or movie script about how a gov would do this?
      Feed the diploma mills offering loans for the students with academic skills. Take the loan for the freedom to select a course or the gov gets to decide on a job.
      A back door draft as a last resort to get the papers you qualified for released by the gov.
      That accredited trade apprenticeship or a gap year program won't be free so someone is making some money looking after the "students".

      Take a loan or accept a free gov grant?
      Go to war. Stop loss keeps that person stuck in that war for many years. Very few legal ways back home from endless wars.
      Or get a loan or have the wealth to pay for an approved apprenticeship?
      If the government pays for your apprenticeship does the government get your skills for a few years of work in their city? Some fine print about years of service back to the gov or city to help the USA for that "free" apprenticeship?
      Or find something the government accepts as been a gap year program?
      Just for a government to release school paperwork that been studied for in full?
      In debt for life or sent to some distant endless war or the risks of domestic duty?

      Be the first to try that government approved "program"?
      Have to sign up for the next year too or your papers are revoked.
      Been driven out to do hairdressing or digging ditches in some random "community" and been collected again late at night?
      A nice new gov loan for the shovel or a set of scissors. Wanted to learn to work with computers? Too late, should have joined the mil or taken a loan for that kind of academic request.
      The gov says poor people need care or the drains need cleaning. Thats freedom in a gov approved "program".
      Cant look after the gov issued shovel or scissors? A more sheltered workshop environment can be arranged for people who don't want to look after government property.
      Drop out or escape? Remember who did the cosigning.
      That family or kin gets that loan passed to them in full with extra payments due to the cost of trying to find the person.
      Sounds like some history text book about governments people have to escape from.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Conscription by uncle+slacky · · Score: 1

      Service Guarantees Citizenship! Would you like to know more?

      --
      Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
  13. Great fscking idea by mysidia · · Score: 1

    "High school: To get your diploma, you have to show us your job offer first."

    "Prospective employer: Sorry, to apply for this job, you have to show us your diploma first."

    1. Re:Great fscking idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Prospective Employer: "Y'know, if you don't take this unpaid internship you won't graduate. Just saying."

    2. Re:Great fscking idea by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Prospective Employer: "You're going to work, sorta, up to the day you get your diploma, then you're going to never show up here again. Right?"

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  14. Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by TheCowSaysMoo · · Score: 1

    According to WaPo article: "High school graduates are guaranteed admission to one of the city’s community colleges, if they apply, and about 40percent of the Class of 2015 enrolled in a four-year college, approaching the national average (44 percent) that year."

    Want your diploma and don't have any real plans for the future? Just apply to one of the city's (soon-to-be-extremely-overcrowded) community colleges, get your acceptance letter, show your acceptance letter, get your diploma in May/June, then go do whatever you feel like doing and never show up for community college in August/September.

    Given how obvious the loophole is, it makes you wonder if increased community college applications is the real end goal they're wanting...

    1. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      According to WaPo article: "High school graduates are guaranteed admission to one of the city’s community colleges, if they apply, and about 40percent of the Class of 2015 enrolled in a four-year college, approaching the national average (44 percent) that year."

      Want your diploma and don't have any real plans for the future? Just apply to one of the city's (soon-to-be-extremely-overcrowded) community colleges, get your acceptance letter, show your acceptance letter, get your diploma in May/June, then go do whatever you feel like doing and never show up for community college in August/September.

      Given how obvious the loophole is, it makes you wonder if increased community college applications is the real end goal they're wanting...

      A diploma is more than a piece of paper. Most future employers, colleges, etc. don't care at all about the piece of paper. They want an official transcript from your high school showing you've graduated. Don't show up to the college you've said you're going to attend? The high school "cancels" your diploma and any future transcripts issued will show you have not graduated.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by mentil · · Score: 1

      I doubt that. Considering how many people drop out of college after 1 semester, it's unlikely they'd revoke diplomas for all of those people; in practice, the diploma wouldn't be revoked, they'd just refuse to issue a transcript. Or what if you have a job lined up and it falls through/you get laid off/startup collapses etc.?
      That said, I've never been to a job interview or seen a job application where 'high school diploma transcript' was mentioned; graduation rates are high enough that you'll be taken at your word at any job willing to hire you.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    3. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A diploma is more than a piece of paper. Most future employers, colleges, etc. don't care at all about the piece of paper. They want an official transcript from your high school showing you've graduated.

      No employer gives a shit about your high school transcript. They just want you to check a box that says that you graduated high school because for one reason or another they have it as a requirement of employment. At that level all they really care is whether you have a pulse and whether they can look like they're doing their job. No employer I've had has ever asked for any proof of my educational history whatsoever.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by kenh · · Score: 1

      Most future employers, colleges, etc. don't care at all about the piece of paper.

      A high school education isn't about securing a piece of paper, anyone that thinks that has no understading of the world.

      They want an official transcript from your high school showing you've graduated.

      Colleges want "official Transcripts", employers want workers that can peform the job they are hiring for, and certainly have no interest in revieing your third year high school English grades or other such nonsense on your transcript.

      I've had several employers that require a background check (consulting firms that want to verify the resume they are presenting to a potential client, school districts) that includes a confirmation of my HS education, nothing more.

      --
      Ken
  15. Better yet - educate! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about just focusing on making sure they can read the newspaper, write at an equivalent level, perform basic math as needed to balance a checkbook, do basic geometry, learn about US history (at the very least - ideally world history as well), and have two years of science classes - biology, chemistry, physics? Oh - and can actually PASS the course without having "adjustments" made for life experiences. In essence - make sure they EARNED their degree, proving a minimal level of educational achievement. What they do with the degree after that is none of your concern, Rahm...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Better yet - educate! by swell · · Score: 1

      "perform basic math as needed to balance a checkbook..."

      Cute; I remember checkbooks. I used one as recently as last year. Geometry? I can't recall using that in recent decades. History yes. Most of those subjects will continue to be important.

      But none are a substitute for TFA. Young people need to learn what opportunities will be available to them and how to take advantage of them. It will be difficult because few teachers or school administrators know trends as well as we here do. Someone from Slashdot will have to sacrifice her $165K salary and show high school kids how the future is shaping up and how they can be part of it.

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
    2. Re:Better yet - educate! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Balance a checkbook: be able to do more than 2 math operations in a row. Turns out it is helpful in lots of situations, including just estimating how much money you're spending at the grocery store, how long your chore list will take to do, and yes - how much money you probably have left in your bank account. As far as geometry: it's a great foundation in basic logic (all those theorems are basic logic). Learn geometry, and you have an excellent grounding in basic logic.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Better yet - educate! by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      So when the cashier rings you up you just assume it's correct?

      The other month I took 30 1st graders to a park and when they rung us up they didn't give us the group package rate the website said we should have gotten. And no - it wasn't a simple "receipt says $X per person not $Y". It was $X for item A, $Y for item B, and $Z for item C because their POS system itemized each part of the package with an adult and child rate instead of just saying "Package" and then printed "X Child Items " instead of listing the per-person rate. (Literally the dumbest, most convoluted receipt I have ever seen).

      Simple arithmetic is how you notice that stuff and are able to tell the manager what they did wrong so they can fix it and refund you the overage. In the middle of a hoard of 1st graders who all just want to go inside and the cashier telling you that she rung you up right and the POS system is infallible.

    4. Re:Better yet - educate! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      "Geometry? I can't recall using that in recent decades."

      I find that difficult to believe. You never had to buy paint to repaint a room? How do you know how much to buy? Compute the area of the walls of the room perhaps? Same for buying grass seed or fertilizer for a lawn. Or carpet or tile for a floor. Thinking of how long of a ladder you need to get on your roof. If you had to do any kind of home maintenance you need some concept of geometry.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    5. Re:Better yet - educate! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      "perform basic math as needed to balance a checkbook..."

      Cute; I remember checkbooks.

      What's the shorthand term for a computerized accounting system? Logging into your bank account and checking your balance before buying something is not the same as taking control of your finances. If you write a check for local utilities (because that's all they take) and that check doesn't post for 20 days or so, you need to know that money is gone. If someone else's check / transaction posts to your account, you have to be able to spot the discrepancy (this has happened to me).

      The only difference between the 80's and now is that it's easier for anyone to download transactions from their bank to reconcile against. You still have to be able to spot the discrepancies if you care to find your missing money.

    6. Re:Better yet - educate! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's software for that now.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:Better yet - educate! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      There's software for that now.

      Isn't that what I'm talking about?

      What's the shorthand term for a computerized accounting system?

      There's just no generic two-syllable nickname for it - "checkbook" is close enough is what I'm saying. I enter every purchase into a digital accounting system and I reconcile it against an OFX file. That is no different than balancing a checkbook in anything but convenient name and convenient time savings.

      But the point I was responding to is that tracking your own finances is not outdated. People are just lazy.

    8. Re:Better yet - educate! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm lazy, but I used to keep track of what money I had available at all times. Then I got to the point that my wife and I were making more money than we needed for our lifestyle, and so there's plenty of reserve money for odd expenses. Probably after retirement I'll have to start being more careful.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Better yet - educate! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That was how lots of people did it during the checkbook era too. I tend not to keep extra money in my primary account outside of what I'll need for expenses during that period. Everything else is put away elsewhere. And yeah, it is a little more work - but I know about mistakes right away.

  16. Re:I planned to be a coder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But he did apply himself. Surely that was an appropriate action to take.

  17. Re:Not News for Nerds by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Bullshit.

    Education is a nerdy matter.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  18. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So many -1's yet no comments defending you. You don't even try to hide how pathetic you are for downmodding people that point out how sad you are.

  19. Re:Vicious circle by shellster_dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So every college student without a plan is going to go to their mailbox, pull out the latest "acceptance letter" from the nearest vampire college that takes anyone with a pulse, and submit it to get their diploma. Meanwhile, the idiots that wrote this law can do a press conference and talk about how he's thinking of the children.

  20. 50000 kids write down "astronaut" by rpresser · · Score: 1

    and overworked Chicago paper shufflers roll their eyes, stamp them "complete" and move on.

    Nothing changes.

  21. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This site was nice while it lasted, I'm out.

  22. Re:Not News for Nerds by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 2

    I disagree. It matters because it's adding an unnecessary stipulation that really shouldn't be implemented.

  23. Unconstitutional by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    That's an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. Good luck. No wonder Chicago is such a shit-hole.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  24. Gap Year Program by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    So doing nothing with your life if OK, as long as you spend oodles of money doing it?
    Bumming around Europe getting tens of thousands of dollars into debt is fine, but exploring America or just hanging around is not acceptable. God forbid these children be allowed to exist for a single moment without someone telling them what to do.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  25. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a constructive comment!

    we should construct a scenario where beauhd can positively, and constructively, suck on my DAMN balls

  26. start in 8th grade by swell · · Score: 1

    Or earlier. Each year review the economic realities, employment trends and future forecasts with the students. Each student must balance

    Interests,
    Abilities and
    Future Potential.

    Certain young people, for instance may have great Interest in a sports career. They may even have some Ability. But they need to be told about the reality that only one in a million will make those million$ that they dream of. Almost no Future Potential.

    I used to date a hot girl who worked in a strip joint. She understood that her looks & skills would not last forever, so she went to college and studied Sanitation Engineering (sewer management). I'm confident that she has had a rewarding life since then. Lots of Potential, little competition.

    When I went to college in the 60s I wanted to study psychology, but I kept getting turned down when I requested psych classes. One day I discovered that 30% of our students were psych majors ... and it was the same across the US. Thank doG I had sense to realise that Future Potential was not there (although it may be good now).

    It's all about balance and awareness and young people tend to be weak in that area. Schools can help.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  27. Re:Democrats by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    This stupidity will die in court. The first class that has >1 student denied a diploma will form the basis of a class action; Chicago is filled to the brim with the sort of lawyers that will not hesitate to argue that this policy is discriminatory due to the minority demographics of the district. They'll be climbing over each other to get the case. If you are a Chicago student that may graduate under this policy and do not otherwise have plans you could win a nice settlement by setting yourself up to have your diploma denied; the lawyers will be looking for a poster child. Groom yourself and practice some lines about how your "future is in jeopardy" because you can't get your diploma. This stuff writes itself.

    The whole thing is so obviously infeasible that all the possible explanations one is left with for how Chicago's leadership thought it was a good idea to float this trial balloon are cynical. Maybe they really are that profoundly naive... Maybe they think the citizens are dumb enough to give them credit for trying... Maybe it's a scheme to embiggen student financing. Which of these is the worst?

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  28. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    lol u dumbass millenial

  29. Yea right by mhkohne · · Score: 1

    The thought that Chicago (part of a state that hasn't had a budget in 2 years) will have enough guidance people to make this work is laughable. There is something deeply sinister about holding the diplomas hostage to the state's view of what you should be doing with your life.

    Offering the students help with college or job finding? Definitely should be doing. Making them take classes on relevant things like resume writing? Probably a good idea.

    Forcing them to go down a path approved by politicians? NOT OK.

    I'd love to see a real lawyer's take on this. Given that the government does insist rather firmly on children attending school (Wisconsin v. Yoder ended up in the Supreme Court), I think you've got a bit of a conflict here.

    I wonder if lack of guidance assistance (which should be easy to prove - the guidance people will be overwhelmed in short order) could be used to litigate against this stupidity? Though, if you can show that minorities are getting less guidance assistance than whites (a thing that is almost certain to happen), I bet you could get the ACLU involved.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  30. Starting a business is not on this list. by generic_screenname · · Score: 1

    Why is that? Why are we training people to wait idly for jobs that may not come? Why are we not teaching them how to make more jobs?

  31. Thinking About One's Future by mentil · · Score: 1

    I think I understand the reasoning for this. Last I read on the subject, the only indicator significantly correlated with academic success was "parents talking to their children about their future". So, they make 'thinking about your future' mandatory, in an attempt to improve grades/standardized test scores/higher education rates.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  32. The real question here is... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What colleges will they push you towards, and what kickbacks do the schools and/or government get for dong so.

    Lots of kids starting to wake up to how much pointless debt most of them are wracking up in college, but the colleges will not go down quietly... you'll see more deals like this to herd the cattle into the slaughterhouse (metaphorically speaking for the slow among you).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  33. Re:Not News for Nerds by nnet · · Score: 2

    presuming again? Instead of behaving child-like, just don't respond. You're an editor here, behave like one, and not like some thinskinned leader of an alleged free country.

  34. It will be ok by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Everyone's mind has matured by this stage of life - they've also had that flash of insight on how to carve a niche so "tout ira bien."

  35. Re:Not News for Nerds by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

    Constructive comments only.

    Constructive comments for nerds.
    Constructive comments that matter.

    Fucking snowflake.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  36. Re:The rest of your life to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You mean my parents paid for my college? LMFAO. No. Not even close. My dad never graduated high school. My mom barely graduated. They never impressed upon me that I should go to school after high school. They believe it's a liberal brainwashing camp. They also vote Trump. They also struggle with finances despite both owning their one small businesses.

    No, as an adult I realized I needed a degree, and didn't have the ability to live and go to school as a broke high school grad, so I joined the military for 3 years because I realized that having a degree was worth it when you look at the numbers and the minor chance I could be maimed or killed. Life is full of risks. Quit being a pussy. Safe is no better than sorry, to quote the ever-present 80s pop classic.

    And lo and behold, it was worth it.

    I went to a fairly expensive public research university. I had to take out loans above and beyond what the military provided me. I could have went to a cheaper school, but I liked the school a lot and felt it was worth it once I factored everything in. Students can come out of school with the same amount of debt as me (50k). They can then make a living wage while paying it down, and come WAY out in the lead in the long run.

    But given our high school education system, they'll never figure that math out on their own, unless they're already comfortable with it. And most aren't, which is sad.

  37. Re:Vicious circle by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    How the hell do your colleges know which students should be accepted if they haven't got their diploma yet?

    If it's a community college, they guarantee you entry with a high school diploma, if that. If it's a university, then entry is based upon the combination of your SAT or ACT score and your application letter. It has nothing to do with high school.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. Maybe Illinois Could Pass a Budget Plan First... by Tulsa_Time · · Score: 1

    Before they pass this law.

    --
    5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
  39. Oh come on. Easy A. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Plan:

    1. Graduate
    2. Invent time machine.
    -------

    As if our broken education system needs anymore reach into the lives of our young people.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  40. Re:You're probably not from Chicago by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Over 700 people were murdered in Chicago in 2016

    1994 saw 931 murdered. 970 in 1974. The ~760 of 2016 is only remarkable in that it is a recent spike: the previous 3 years were all <500.

    The spike is the Ferguson effect. Black inner cities around the US have all seen the same spike since Ferguson; the police have withdrawn and the gangs are running wild. The worm will turn at some point; we've reached peak BLM and in places like Baltimore the citizens are clamoring for a crackdown. A few years from now, once the police inculcate the fact that the DOJ isn't spending all it's resources persecuting them, the numbers will improve.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  41. it's stupid and only serves local colleges and mil by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    it's stupid and only serves local colleges, mcjobs and military.

    also. they should be able to get the diploma as just as the paperwork from pretty much any accredited high school if they have achieved all the necessary student credits to finish high school, shouldn't they?

    they left the loophole in there though: "I am having a gap year tending to my sick grandma and listening to old timey stories".

    never mind that you can cancel any of those plans (apart from military, maybe, if they require that you have already drafted yourself, which would be stupid _before_ acquiring the high school finishing papers).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  42. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You need to go. You're killing this site.

  43. Terrible by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    This is really an excellent thing to do.

    It's a terrible thing to do. The reason school kids don't think ahead is that they never need to: there are close to zero consequences for not thinking ahead throughout school. We had a school in Alberta fire a physics teacher for giving zeros when students did not hand in assignments even after cajoling and extensions because it was school policy never to give zeros. So there is no need to plan your time to get homework done because there are no consequences when you don't.

    Requiring students to present their plans does nothing if you have spent the previous decade showing them that forward thinking is irrelevant. On top of that, it is grossly unfair because it is no business of the school what their students will choose, or not choose, to do with their qualifications. Universities do not revoke the degrees of graduates who commit crimes because, even if they chose to misuse it, they still have the education.

  44. with student loans just about any one can go to 4 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    with student loans just about any one can go to 4 years ones and community colleges does really have seamless transfer
      so should be 2 + 2 = 4 ends up being 2 + 2.5-3 = 4.5-5

  45. Rahm can go fuck himself. by jcr · · Score: 1

    At a time when the city and state are in dire financial straits, this asshole decides to pull a stunt that's going to waste millions in litigation before the court gets around to telling him that social engineering is not his fucking job.

    If a kid earns a diploma, you fucking give it to him. Their plans after they get it are none of Rahm's goddamned business.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  46. Re:That's just great... by jcr · · Score: 1

    That's probably a huge part of the motivation for this bullshit. Distracting the public from the abject incompetence of the Chicago schools administration is a bonus.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  47. And let's not forget... by jcr · · Score: 1

    Rahm advocates slavery. That motherfucker has been beating the drum for "national service" since his days as Obama's chief lackey.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  48. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by dbIII · · Score: 1

    which would be stupid _before_ acquiring the high school finishing papers

    I'd argue the opposite. It seems these days that the military are just about the only ones actually training people. If you want to be a mechanic, electrician or a pile of other trades including aviation ones it's the choice that's most likely to actually get you there instead of having to wait for a lucky break. Friends and relatives that took the military path had a far smoother career track than I did.

  49. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    I'd argue the opposite. It seems these days that the military are just about the only ones actually training people. If you want to be a mechanic, electrician or a pile of other trades including aviation ones it's the choice that's most likely to actually get you there instead of having to wait for a lucky break. Friends and relatives that took the military path had a far smoother career track than I did.

    before acquiring hs papers? I mean, you actually get a better crack at getting into such training in usa military?

    anyways, in my country(not usa) the military is just a thing everyone(man) gets drafted for 6-12 months and.. well, the military decides where you go, though you have more oppurtunities if you have your highschool papers already or better yet are already in the university. the point being that it's better to move the enrollment beyond you having finished high school.

    that and.. well the thing about military(usa too afaik) having the ability to order you where they want not the other way around, potentially to a warzone. potentially to get shot.

    still, any one of those post-highschool options you would be better off (and some requiring) you to have actually finished high school so it does sound a bit of a chicken and egg thing. I would understand if they were to use it to withheld some social security benefits or shit like that instead of the piece of paper.

    like, I am not totally opposite the idea - just the thing of using the diploma of what you did for past 3 years as the ransom - it doesn't make any sense, unless there is some connection to local universities, mcjobs etc. which actually let you gain admittance without presenting proof of passing high school(due to getting the _information_ that you passed high school through some state system). ..like, if you get admitted to university, wtf do you need the diploma for more anyways?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  50. Re:Not News for Nerds by vtcodger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Education is important, but it's not clear this has anything much to do with education. This is about a probably nutty idea that punishes 17-18 year olds for not having a clear idea what they want to do with their lives. Or maybe it punishes them for having such an idea if it isn't conventional.

    My opinion. The kids did the school work. Give them their damn diploma.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  51. Curious by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    Does "I plan to travel the world for three years, scrounging to survive, before settling somewhere and seeking employment" count as a life plan?

    How about "I'd like to keep my options open; no plan as of yet?"

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  52. Bullshit by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    lots of kids fail. I just put a kid through high school and it was brutal. And if you're not a) well-to-do b) a sports kid or c) rocking a 4.0+top 10 percentile SAT you're not going to college. You won't be able to raise the funds. My kid is doing it because we borrowed a shit load of money _and_ we're devoting just about every spare penny to the costs those loans don't cover. And yes, we got Pell Grants, a scholarship and some tutition wavers. Ever since Regan/Clinton defunded the universities college _devours_ money.

    You're a Community College professor? How can you not know this? Are you not listening to a damn thing your students say? And you wonder why they sit glassy eyed? Maybe it's become you're not teaching, you're preaching.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  53. Supreme court challenge by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    This will undoubtedly end up in a supreme court challenge, to the taxpayers' great expense. Bravo.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  54. GED, here we come! by Badlight · · Score: 1

    Basically, he's going to make it harder to graduate high school.

    What an asshole.

  55. Re:What's wrong with national service? by jcr · · Score: 2

    Fuck off, slaver. The people are not the property of the state, to be commanded by politicians.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  56. Re:Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Extending the reach and size of Chicago's government.

  57. Who's paying for it again? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    "You cannot have kids think that 12th grade is done."

    If a high school education isn't enough to be considered having met the base level for training required for "the real world", the free public education children are guaranteed needs to include post-secondary education.

    1. Re:Who's paying for it again? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      An extra 3 years of free university education or been in the mil and a few wars will correct everything.
      People will always return to their old communities with good credit, be ready for work and be working.
      They will have real credit to buy cars and take out huge home loans.
      New homes or renovated homes will all need to be filled with products and services. Thats new jobs too.
      Fast networks will be built as the new professionals can afford good internet.
      A new generation of lawyers, doctors, engineers, nurses and electricians living together in areas that have undergone full gentrification.
      The next generation will have fast internet and really good local school given all the new wealth. Just like all the other normal communities all over the USA that always did so well in testing every decade.

      Just the lack of fast internet and good schools spending per generation was all that was holding back some cities.
      3 years of free university, fast internet and good schools will fix everything in a generation. Some good nutrition too? Some spending on attracting jobs to the state? Rail links? Road repair? Clean water? How about some power company credits so the lights stay on for homework? Free medical too? Dental? Parks and new bicycle paths?
      Just free university, a few extra things to make study more fun and the state will get it all back in taxes soon.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Who's paying for it again? by whoda · · Score: 1

      The 12th grade means that next year they can start collecting their own public assistance and move into their own Section 8 crib.
      That's their future.

  58. Re:Not News for Nerds by jopsen · · Score: 1

    When I graduated HTX, akin to technical high school, in Denmark, my average-grade was multiplied by 1.02 in the application to University.. This was a tiny bump given to students who applied for an education within 2 years... Intended to encourage people to move on quick.

    I don't recall if it was on my diploma or if it only affected my application... In practice it has little effect, but encourages people to move on, because everybody is talking about it :)

    I went to study CS which has so few applicants that anyone who graduates high school is guaranteed admission, so it made no difference to me (In Denmark most University slots are allocated by average-grades; with some ~25% allocated by an interview process -- money buys you nothing)

  59. Just point and laugh. by Chas · · Score: 1

    CPS has trouble graduating kids ALREADY. Less than 75% actually graduate.
    Over half of the graduates are simply not able to survive in college.
    And about 1/3rd of the remainder require extensive remedial courses before moving on to actual collegiate level classes.

    This is CPS's way of using a trebuchet to fire the cart WAYYY out in front of a very sickly, spavined old horse.

    All they're doing is setting these kids up for failure.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Just point and laugh. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And about 1/3rd of the remainder require extensive remedial courses before moving on to actual collegiate level classes.

      I used to work in a downstate university. This is absolutely true. In fact, there are late summer classes just for people with conditional admissions to acclimate them to college. And there is more assistance for first year freshmen there than I bet there ever was in the whole CPS system.

  60. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by dbIII · · Score: 1

    to order you where they want not the other way around, potentially to a warzone

    Well yes - one of the reasons I didn't do it (I'm crap at following orders) and one of the reasons I have utter contempt for a nearby politician who did sign on and weaseled out via political connections when he was ordered to serve overseas (yet he still makes a lot of noise about being in the army). If you are not willing you don't sign up IMHO. If you are willing it's a better deal than many.

  61. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Spending about four years in the military gets you great training - college level training that transfers to most colleges. You also get tuition assistance while in the military and the GI bill to pay for college when you get out. Many folks can finish their bachelors degree and most masters degree programs without needing to acquire a huge student loan burden.

    Folks getting ready to enter the military take an aptitude test to determine what skills they already possess. Depending on your score you have a list of jobs to choose from. Mechanic, heavy equipment, avioinics, supply, culinary specialist, administration, biomedical equipment technician, security training, etc are all college certified training courses.

    Your four years also gets you other veterans benefits like VA home loans, transition assistance (similar to job placement), some hiring preference, group life insurance, and a mental discipline that most employers seek out.

    OK, this starts to sound like a recruitment pitch, but so many people equate military service with what they see on TV regarding Army Infantry service. The Navy and Air Force have completely different training programs and job series. The military isn't just rucksacks and M-16s.

    --
    (Disclaimer. Yes, I'm a retired veteran with a bias toward military service being good for most people. But I also realize it isn't for everyone.)

  62. Re:Not News for Nerds by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    You might want to read the username before you feed the trolls next time.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  63. Re:Vicious circle by dwillden · · Score: 1

    Or they go to their local community college, pay the small Enrollment fee. And they are accepted to a college. Then once they graduate they do what ever they want. That community college will likely see the 'student' take a single class. But hey they were still accepted.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  64. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know people in their 60s who don't know what they wanna do when they grow up.

    This is just a power grab to keep people in the shit house longer.

  65. What a horrific idea... by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like just another way to shoehorn kids into some "socially acceptable" stream of behaviour.

    It's already *grossly* inappropriate to demand that 17/18 year olds choose an academic/career path that will shape the next decades of their lives. It denies them the very important maturing process of figuring that kind of thing out. How many people on this site, alone, changed majors in college? Dropped out to do something "fun"? Backpacked through Europe or Asia or South America or Africa trying to "find themselves"? How many work in fields unrelated to their education?

    Want a better plan to promote direction in youth? Do an economic assessment of your state, determine the jobs that will be needed 5 years down the road, and give preferential financial aid to those streams. Invest in the future, don't punish it.

  66. Re: Not News for Nerds by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

    unfortunately, a lot of them will settle for being a dishwasher or janitor. our neighbor has a son who is in the 7th grade and does calculus in his head and wants to be a pilot. his mother is a housekeeper and father is a local truck driver. go figure.

  67. Re:Not News for Nerds by yobjob · · Score: 2

    The punishment is potentially catastrophic. Imagine not being able to afford a college degree for your chosen career because 3 years earlier you were forced to go to college and do any old course to earn your damn high school certificate.

  68. Service Guarentees Citizenship by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Would you like to know more?_

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  69. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    On the one hand, I'm glad your military looks after ex-service personnel to some extent, but I am concerned that it disproportionately incentivises poor people to put their lives on the line as the only way out of the intergenerational poverty trap....

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  70. STUDENT 100-28738 MY PLAN upon graduation by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    IN TOTAL BLISSFUL COMPLIANCE with the new directive that states that Chicago, praised be its name, will hold diplomas to students at any academic achievement level until they smear on this one last layer of dogmatic bullshit... I HUMBLY SUBMIT my action packed BUSINESS PLAN for the future.

    It has been a long while since high school completion status had any direct bearing on functional intelligence. Traditional employers knew this at one time and routinely conducted interviews of job applicants, and used their super-duper powers of personal judgement to decide, during a brief conversation, whether an applicant's failure to complete high school would have been for academic reasons but far more important, to spot strengths in the individual that transcend academic ability. But today they lack the courage to conduct interviews and wish to sort people by their simple answers on computerized forms. Corporations wish to eliminate 'undesirables' from their applicant pools and exclude non-graduates routinely without any idea of whether those people would have performed the same or better. In this lack of empirical experimentation the HS flag has actually become a more theological construct than an actual measure of fitness.

    If you doubt this consider modern use of the GED flag. Corporate applications require one to divulge whether their HS mark was derived from GED. Why? To further subsort applicants in sterile HR process and cast out more, of course. In a sense whether GED was used to complete HS is every bit as personal as asking directly what is the gender preference. 50 years ago GED was actually a mark of distinction, it identified the bearer as accelerated student or at the least, one who had taken extra time and effort to voluntarily obtain this mark into adulthood. But as employers devalued "the interview" and started grading on simple presence of the HS mark, masses of people obtained GED solely for the purpose of compliance, or so it is perceived. And so the GED is devalued today.

    IT IS THIS THEOLOGICAL BIAS that I will, upon graduation, begin to exploit to my great personal advantage. MY BUDS IN THE HOOD know that THE MAN is out to REAM THEIR ASS, and they know that many cases they cannot be truthful and direct about their personal ambitions. They also know THE MAN IS READY TO TIP THE FBI should their revealing personal essays trip some SORRY-ASS PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE today or even in future years, since THE MAN KEEPS RECORDS FOREVER ON COMPUTERS TO KEEP THE BROTHERS DOWN. Therefore, in addition to being stellar students and completely ready to take on the responsibilities of society they know they must BULLSHIT THE MAN AND LAY DOWN ONE MORE PIECE OF CRAP INTO THE SYSTEM. They know it's gonna COST THEM to do it 'right'. As my principal mode of business I will be the one to do it for them and COLLECT.

    I will open a number of "life coaching" centers that are uniquely streamlined to get through the process and FOOL THE MAN. My business will succeed because it will not be weighed down with real coaching, which would be an insult to their natural intelligence anyway. Since many will go on to make more money than I anyway. I will create underground literature that helps to make them paranoid about the process, even cast it into political terms. I will have race-based campaigns and blue-collar campaigns tailored to exploit the anxieties of each individual, to convince them that Chicago wants to get something from them to keep on file.

    THEREFORE, my value-added "ambitions for the future" content sold by subscription and through HOOD franchises and COLLECTION 'AGENCIES', will supply these fine young men and women with a variety of quality custom life scenarios. They'll pick their future from a hat and I'll load the hat. My representatives will sit with them to describe their future profiles, develop a convincing presentation and ace the HS requirement.

    I'll use computers too so it'll be great. I'm the MAN!

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  71. no job? have to stay in high school? by lpq · · Score: 1

    So, if you have no plans because you haven't found a job ... that didn't seem to be on their list. Or can you say your plan is to "take some time off to think about what you want to do"?

    My bet is as 2020 approaches and they actually try to implement this -- they'll realize all the holes the new plan has.

    For the person thinking this would increase poverty -- if this law went into effect, some court will order the school to give out a diploma equivalency document for someone who didn't want to disclose their future plans at graduation.

  72. Re:Not News for Nerds by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd say that this lines up perfectly with the current trend of withholding benefits to people unless they work for them.

    If a graduate doesn't have a plan to "hit the ground running", then he/she is more likely to be a drain on the public coffers and we wouldn't want to see our hard-earned tax dollars wasted by some muzzy-minded HS graduate would we? Come to think of it, why don't we demand a drug test too? Our local Republican legislature is really big on thing like this.

    Speaking from real life, however, I can say that having a goal and actually being able to move towards that goal at age 18 aren't the same thing. I'm afraid that neither educational, home or community environments left me with any clue on how to advance to the next stage. I just muddled through until eventually I managed to sort of fall into a track that led ultimately to a career as a happy taxpayer.

  73. Re:Vicious circle by rfunches · · Score: 1

    If it's a university, then entry is based upon the combination of your SAT or ACT score and your application letter. It has nothing to do with high school.

    Incorrect. Some schools stopped requiring standardized test scores (SAT/ACT) years ago for undergraduate admissions. And I don't know of a U.S. university that will admit an undergraduate student who doesn't have a high school diploma, GED, or proof of secondary education. Three examples, one private, two public (not including my alma mater, which also had the same requirements):

    Carnegie Mellon University

    University of Virginia

    University of Maryland/University College (UMUC) -- also doesn't require the SAT/ACT for "most" degree programs

  74. Would we expect the same from higher education? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Would this be acceptable policy at a college or university? How would you feel if after completing your coursework the university withheld your diploma simply because you decided not to do anything else afterwards?

    Who enforces the planning outcome anyway? What happens when a high school senior simply walks away from a minimum wage job offer obtained only to fulfill a graduation requirement?

    Congratulations Rahm - you've just created yet another system to be gamed.

  75. Re: Not News for Nerds by bobschmagogee · · Score: 1

    "Students will soon have to show that they've secured a job or received a letter of acceptance to college, a trade apprenticeship, a gap year program or the military in order to graduate," - sounds like you have to a least begin to execute the plan by showing proof. That's more than just a plan.

  76. Re:Make it illegal to be dumb by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Make it illegal to be dumb

    Problem solved!

    Seriously, can you see Trump passing that one?

  77. It's Chicago by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    The best future plans they could make would be: " I'm leaving asap so I don't get gunned down by gang violence in a city that has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. "

    or

    " I'm leaving for Germany where I can get a full education without being a debt slave for the rest of my life. Is why I took German as my secondary language requirement. "

  78. What choices? by ai4px · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about a girl completing high school who just wants to marry and have some kids? Being a homemaker doesnt seem to be one of the prescribed choices! This is the central planner way of micromanaging everyone's life. If the kids show competency required to finish high school, give them their diploma. Not everyone knows what they want to be, nor does everyone actually become what they profess to want to be. I remember as a kid hearing about communist Russia dictating who would be what when they grew up. Seems we are moving in that direction - for the betterment of the dear citizens of course.

    1. Re:What choices? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Is the groom going to call off the wedding unless the bride has a high school certificate?

      I'm not saying a stay at home mom (or husband) should not have a high school education, they should. I'm saying that no one is going to check for a piece of paper for that lifestyle choice.

      Once the kids are grown the housewife/househusband might decide to enter the workforce and supplement a single earner income for retirement. Having a piece of paper that shows a high school education might be important then. There's plenty of low cost alternatives to that though.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:What choices? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      What about a girl completing high school who just wants to marry and have some kids? Being a homemaker doesnt seem to be one of the prescribed choices!

      I also don't see "lottery winner" as one of the prescribed choices, and for the same reason; your chances of success are slim to none.

      Gone are the days of surviving on only one income. Not only are both parents working these days, but they likely have more than one job each.

      The "gig" economy was born from necessity, not because it was deemed the hipster cool thing to do by millennials.

      And yes, it is sad that homemaker has almost become a financial impossibility, given the true value of spending quality time raising children.

    3. Re:What choices? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And yes, it is sad that homemaker has almost become a financial impossibility

      And so has childcare. If you're not well-qualified to make better than minimum wage, it may just about break even.

    4. Re:What choices? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I don't like the idea of "plenty of low-cost alternatives" here. She earned a diploma, and I consider it unacceptable to deny it because she chose a potentially reasonable alternative that wasn't covered. There are people who can make a reasonable income, enough to support a family (I'd suggest that the US median household income of $56K has got to be more than enough), and marrying one of those right out of high school with intent to stay home and raise a family sounds like a plan to me. I'd strongly advocate having a backup plan if the marriage goes sour, and a high school diploma is useful in that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:What choices? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The obvious solution to that is to make marriage a requirement for that path, and have them present their wedding license as "proof". (I kid!)

      The other thing that would be missing is entrepreneurship. Looks like working for the man is okay, but saying you're going to start your own business doesn't seem like it's going to be accepted.

    6. Re:What choices? by ai4px · · Score: 1

      I second your backup plan as well. Here's another upshot.... Say the stay home mom wants to homeschool their kids in the future and the State decides that since she doesn't have a high school diploma she cannot educate her own kids. It could happen the way society is going. After all, they aren't /our/ kids, they are The State's kids.

  79. Not regular plans, *future* plans by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    This grinds on me. Plans are inherently for the future.

    High School should teach economy of language.

    --
    -Dave
  80. Sounds fine by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

    They need to make sure that "I'm gonna be a Baller" and "I'm gonna be a Gansgtah" qualify as acceptable answers since most kids in the Inner City - or anywhere else for that matter - have no fucking clue beyond what they see around them or in the media or by dreams of making it our of the hood. This is frankly a white man assuming that everyone has a defined plan for their lives.

  81. Re:Not News for Nerds by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 2

    Education is important, but it's not clear this has anything much to do with education. This is about a probably nutty idea that punishes 17-18 year olds for not having a clear idea what they want to do with their lives. Or maybe it punishes them for having such an idea if it isn't conventional.

    My opinion. The kids did the school work. Give them their damn diploma.

    I figure that if they live in Chicago they've been punished enough already. If you live in Chicago your plan should be to find a job elsewhere and leave before it craters completely.

  82. Re:Not News for Nerds by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Add to your observation, a society that is winding down opportunities to participate, other than the upper spectrum of the professional classes.

    This Rahm move is the first stage of a grift. There will be introduced a whole new opportunity for private, post-academic life counseling "services" - similar to the "math training centers" for the aspirational.

    The rest will be more effectively bound to a school-to-prison scheme, which will swell in volume and record commensurate record shareholder gains. "They didn't even want to graduate" after all. Now they are assembling small electronics for 5 to 10.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  83. Re:Not News for Nerds by mydn · · Score: 2

    It punishes them for not wanting to tell the government about their plans.

  84. Plan? Yeah right by jediborg · · Score: 1

    Chicago's "Plan" already ruined most of these kids lives by giving them terrible education. Illinois's "Plan" has the whole state on the edge of bankruptcy, unable to pay its current bills and having to call an emergency session of congress. Yes, these people should TOTALLY be making a "Plan" for our kids to plan their future. OR they can shut the f up and let the kids dig the state out of the hole the planners created.

  85. Parents? by kenh · · Score: 1

    Why can't parents take on this responsibility? Can't they encourage their children to have a plan for post-high school?

    Let me guess, parents don't have time to turn to their 15 year-old and ask them "what do you want to be when you grow up?" The Chicago Public Schools have all but eliminated career counseling (according to the article, I have no first-hand experience with CPS), and now they want to make it mandatory that all seniors get career counseling?!?! Their commitment to this idea seems like a hastily slapped-together response to distract from a failing public school system.

    Honestly this seems like something that would make more sense after they eliminate "social promotion", enforce strict graduation requirements that has High School graduates performing at a high school level in things like math and reading, and have gotten their drop out rate under control.

    Just curious, can the Chicago community colleges absorb all the high school graduates that fail to either find a job or secure admission to a four year college? Because that is where they are going to head, in all likelyhood.

    --
    Ken
  86. Re:Vicious circle by kenh · · Score: 1

    Most college applications are due well before the end of the last year of high school.

    Applications are due around December/January, and acceptance letters (which seems to be what you are talking about) are contingent on your successful graduation from High School.

    --
    Ken
  87. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

    As long as they still have the option to sell me their organs I'm not seeing the problem.

  88. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Hell even if you don't want to go and get trained in one of those skilled positions the military is a really good way to get ahead. While I did not do the military I had a lot of friends and relatives who did and there are ways to really game the system. Not only the tuition assistance and GI bill but a bunch of other stuff. From what I can gather the best way to get ahead is to:

    1. Become an Eagle Scout, give you a an initial rank boost, I gather that being fairly high up in the civil air patrol also does this
    2. Join the national guard reserves when you turn 17 and you do your basic training the summer between your junior and senior year
    3. Apply to a college that has an ROTC program and get in it
    4. Inform your reserve unit leader that you are doing ROTC in college, this usually gets you another bump in rank and the additional pay
    5. Because you are in the reserves and ROTC you 4 year degree is fully paid for as well as everything else for college plus spending money
    6. After completing college if there is a commission available you get to serve out your ROTC debt and there will very likely be a spot for you given how much has already been invested
    7. At this point you have between 5 and 5.5 years of service and remember that Eagle scout you earned, so instead of going in as second lieutenant you will be at least a first lieutenant with a likely rapid promotion or even start as a captain.
    8. While serving out your officer duty continue taking advantage of the military for additional courses and continued education
    9. At the end of your mandatory service, I think it is now 6 years, you now have at least 11 years in total, so you can continue for another 9 and get an officers pension at age 37, go into the private sector as someone with lots of schooling and experience, go work for a government contractor, or decide to ladder climb and see if you can become an general or admiral.

    Once done you will have a debt free college education, training in a useful skill (you enlisted job training), have clear leadership skills (you were an officer), maybe a pension, additional classes beyond a bachelors degree, and provided you didn't drink your paycheck or do other really dumb things with it a good amount of savings. This assumes that everything works out perfectly and you get things sorted out early which is usually the hard part for most people as those first 3 steps are the hard ones to take. I know people who have done one or more from 1, 2 and 3 but never all and in each case they do have a leg up over those who didn't do any. This also assumes that you did fairly well in high school and got a reasonable ASVAB score that doesn't limit you.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  89. Re:Vicious circle by tsqr · · Score: 1

    No kidding? You actually need to graduate high school to get into college? Color me shocked.

    The original poster posited a "vicious circle" in which you need to get college acceptance to get the HS diploma you need to get college acceptance. Since in the Chicago case you just have to demonstrate that you have a plan, I'm sure a conditional acceptance would fill the need.

  90. Re:Not News for Nerds by WhiplashII · · Score: 3, Funny

    Um, Chicago is 200% Democrat, not Republican.

    200% because all the dead people vote Democrat too.

    --
    while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
  91. LMAO! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that one surviving the ACLU, NAACP et al.

  92. is it slavery if you get to choose your master? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Are we living in some sort of dystopia where the purpose of life is to be a productive little citizen and go straight to work for your corporate/military masters in your government-approved plan? You work not so much to make money, but to avoid becoming excommunicated and forced into destitution. Obey and you'll get enough to survive.

  93. Re:Vicious circle by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    When I applied to college (back when Nixon was President), I got one acceptance letter conditional on my graduation from high school, and one without a condition (College of Liberal Arts, University of Minnesota). Of course, the U did know I'd been in high school.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  94. Re: Not News for Nerds by aliquis · · Score: 1

    I don't even fix my own home.

  95. Re: Not News for Nerds by aliquis · · Score: 1

    There's really just two choices.
    A cuck or a Nazi.

  96. Re: it's stupid and only serves local colleges an by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Also related, OCS is quite difficult, at least in the Marines. I can't speak for the other services, but I was stationed with the sorry bastards that were doing OCS. I was not an officer.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  97. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It worked for the Romans so why not for us.
    Also why not - just because almost nobody else offering jobs to a major chunk of the population doesn't mean the military should abandon them as well instead of looking for people with potential. The answer IMHO is to have orgs other than the military and sports looking for talent outside of a narrow class range.

  98. Re:Not News for Nerds by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    And if Democrats weren't willing to adopt Republican concepts on occasion, we wouldn't have Obamacare.

    Florida's Republican legislature wanted all welfare recipients to be drug-tested so our tax dollars wouldn't be "wasted". But the legislators also receive our tax dollars, and while stoned poor people may lie around doing nothing all day, stoned legislators are likely to pass laws!

  99. Elephant by printwithstyle · · Score: 1

    Nobody is addressing the elephant in the room here, the fact that 'future plans' is an oxymoron! amiright?!

  100. No, nobody is this stupid by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the phrase "I'm from the government and I'm here to help" was popularized by right wing think tanks trying to demonize help from the government. There is no teacher alive that wouldn't tell the mayor to go pound sand if asked if this was a good idea. If they wanted to help they could spend more on consoling services.

    No, this is pure evil. The question is what, specific evil prompted it? I'd genuinely like to know. And I hop the folks in Chicago figure it out so they can shut it down and maybe vote the clown out that suggested this.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  101. Armed Forces Recruiting by bkk_diesel · · Score: 1

    This will be a good way to railroad the poor who aren't sure what they want to do yet in life into the Armed Forces.