Slashdot Mirror


Bold Eagles: Angry Birds Are Ripping $80,000 Drones Out of the Sky (cetusnews.com)

schwit1 found this story in the Wall Street Journal: Daniel Parfitt thought he'd found the perfect drone for a two-day mapping job in a remote patch of the Australian Outback. The roughly $80,000 machine had a wingspan of 7 feet and resembled a stealth bomber. There was just one problem. His machine raised the hackles of one prominent local resident: a wedge-tailed eagle. Swooping down from above, the eagle used its talons to punch a hole in the carbon fiber and Kevlar fuselage of Mr. Parfitt's drone, which lost control and plummeted to the ground... "It ended up being a pile of splinters"...

These highly territorial raptors, which eat kangaroos, have no interest in yielding their apex-predator status to the increasing number of drones flying around the bush. They've even been known to harass the occasional human in a hang glider... Camouflage techniques, like putting fake eyes on the drones, don't appear to be fully effective, and some pilots have even considered arming drones with pepper spray or noise devices to ward off eagles.

One mining survey superintendent said he's now lost 12 different drones to eagle attacks, costing his employer $210,000. Another drone was actually attacked by nine different eagles, and its pilot estimates eagles are now attacking 20% of all drone flights in rural Australia.

144 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. Good. Stop flying drones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nature has decided. No, you can't fucking pepper spray an eagle. Give it up.

    1. Re: Good. Stop flying drones. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Not with that attitude

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  2. Nature bats last by jodido · · Score: 3, Funny

    See subject line

  3. Uh huh... by Desler · · Score: 1

    and some pilots have even considered arming drones with pepper spray or noise devices to ward off eagles.

    Or, you know, they could just leave the eagles alone and fly somewhere else...

    1. Re:Uh huh... by Desler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then map the area in a way that doesn’t fuck with the wildlife. Otherwise, boo-fucking-hoo that the pissed off eagles are downing your drones. These people deserve nothing but crocodile tears.

    2. Re:Uh huh... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The question is then what they did before they had drones, which cost even more than a cool $80,000?

    3. Re:Uh huh... by gravewax · · Score: 1

      it is flying in a specific area generally because they thought it was a cheaper way of doing what is traditionally done by a full sized aircraft, turns out they were wrong!

    4. Re:Uh huh... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Why are these so expensive anyway? I mean holy crap, at $80K you're approaching the cost of actual human-carrying aircraft. Isn't the whole point of drones to do this stuff on the cheap?

    5. Re:Uh huh... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair and adhere to the law, should it continue, than legislation would be forced to ensure the safety of drones ie their blades would need to be shrouded to protect the birds when they choose to attack. As to putting on stuff to attack the birds, well, get caught and face a high risk of a short custodial sentences, something in the months. Replace plastic blades with steel ones and likely that sentence would blow out to years. As long as the birds attack drones and not people, basically, suck it up and fly elsewhere.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Uh huh... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Eagles are friggin' powerhouses. I have seen several videos shot from a drone getting 'killed' by one, and the eagles don't look like they get injured at all at least in those. Mind, I doubt people would post videos where the eagle got a foot chopped off.

      But let me ask you, even if pepper spray worked on birds (let's imagine a product that has the same effect), how safe do you think it would be for an eagle in flight to suddenly have severe pain in its eyes and an inability to see? That eagle would crash to the ground and die that way like the drone was 'supposed' to.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    7. Re:Uh huh... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Light aircraft flying back and forth.

      Noisy, polluting and expensive.

    8. Re:Uh huh... by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Or helicopters. Also noisy, polluting, and expensive.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    9. Re:Uh huh... by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Light aircraft flying back and forth.

      Noisy, polluting and expensive.

      I'm not so sure about the "expensive" part. The wet rate for a small airplane is in the $100-$170 per hour range. Compared to what the drones cost, and how short they seem to last, I don't think cost saving could be the reason here.
      Being able to hover and descend below safe flight levels to get better pictures might be a factor.

    10. Re:Uh huh... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The wet rate for a small airplane is in the $100-$170 per hour range. Compared to what the drones cost,

      If you're going to compare purchase cost, then do so. That would be a quarter of a million dollars for a small manned aircraft with a reasonable set of avionics that would allow it to be operated in most weather. $100k otherwise. Plus pilot training. And insurance. And when a small plain goes down, there are a couple of lives at stake. But those are human and not bird so they apparently don't count.

      If you want to compare operating costs, do that. $170 for the plane per hour, salary for the pilot and other occupant who is doing the mapping, versus a lot less for the drone.

      The drone wins in both purchase and operating expenses.

      Being able to hover and descend below safe flight levels to get better pictures might be a factor.

      Oh, helicopters are $250/hr minimum, and insurance costs are much higher. Yes, they can hover and descend, but there's a price for that.

    11. Re:Uh huh... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Isn't the whole point of drones to do this stuff on the cheap?

      Not the whole point. Maneuverability and liability are big issues. Not putting two or three humans' lives in danger is another.

    12. Re:Uh huh... by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where that 100 - 170 / hr rate comes from. But I know that the mapping costs for mining and oil and gas companies is orders of magnitudes more than that when it is done by a plane in Australia.

      The drone prices are inflated in this story as they are counting the costs of all the specialist sensors. Most of those would be recovered.

      I'd estimate that the actual cost of repair and replace after an eagle hit is barely into the 4 figures.

    13. Re:Uh huh... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      For a fair comparison, you need to include the fact that a small airplane can fly faster, higher, and with more duration than most drones. Thus, covering much more space in the same amount of time. So, maybe a cost to cover a square mile might be better.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    14. Re:Uh huh... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Google the cost of a used Cessna 152...they're much cheaper than you'd think. It's really the cost of maintenance and insurance that drives the TOC.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  4. Hmm. . . Angry Birds. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . ..seems like there could be a video game in that. . . .. . .Oh. Nevermind. . . (grin)

  5. Eagles are top of the food chain predators by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and they know it. They are defending their position as the master of the sky, deadliest flying living creature.

    They are smart and cunning and strong. They use their ability to fly high to develop a ton of momentum and tear apart their prey.

    Pretty hard to defend against them, they won't back down.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Eagles are top of the food chain predators by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I like to watch them hunt and fight. They're magnificent when they hunt, circling up really high, you can see the feathers off the tip of their wings like fingers feeling the air and when they see their moment they pull their wings in close and fall from the sky like they are pulling every bit of speed they can out of their momentum. I can't really express what it looks like in words adequately and video doesn't really convey the amount of height they strike from or how quickly they descend. You can see how and why jet fighters are designed they way they are.

      They also have a sense of humour. I saw a tree full of parrots all squawking and carrying on, they generally leave the tree all at once in one direction as a group. Well, this eagle wasn't having any of that and flew up to this tree and you could almost hear the parrots squawking HOLY SHIT ITS AN EAGLE and scatter, to which the eagle just kind of tilted and kept going, just reminding them.

      They get harassed by magpies, crows and other birds, to which they barely respond, just a beat or two of their wings that the other birds cannot match in power.

      Once, I saw two of them fighting, way up in the sky. They locked talons and fell, tumbling and rolling over each other closer and closer to the ground. I think the loser is the one breaking from the other first.

      Anyway, they are the wedge tailed eagle moments that stick out in my mind that I could share. I saw one up close on the ground once and was a little surprised at just how big it was, the talons, the beak, standing just over a metre high and as I looked into those calm, unconcerned avian eyes I realised it wasn't threatened by me at all, so I'm not surprised they smash drones.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re: Eagles are top of the food chain predators by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Apparantly you don't know how eagles mate, that wasn't fighting, that was dating.

    3. Re:Eagles are top of the food chain predators by Calydor · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you're describing is cartwheeling. It's a show of trust between them, and is an integral part of courtship.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    4. Re:Eagles are top of the food chain predators by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Your dick is making that funny sound again.

    5. Re: Eagles are top of the food chain predators by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      No, WE are The Apex Predators.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    6. Re: Eagles are top of the food chain predators by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Apparantly you don't know how eagles mate, that wasn't fighting, that was dating.

      I'm not sure whether to feel embarrassed or privileged for watching two eagles getting nasty, thanks for letting me know.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    7. Re: Eagles are top of the food chain predators by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      We don't generally eat eagles... the food chain can be considered to have multiple apexes, of which you're right in that we're probably at the top of the biggest one.

    8. Re:Eagles are top of the food chain predators by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      That's almost poetic. You came close to iambic pentameter.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    9. Re: Eagles are top of the food chain predators by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Don't worry about it, it's a quite fascinating thing they do. They weren't fucking, they were just doing the courting thing that all birds do (dancing, calling etc), eagles grab each other by the talons and plumet and let go at the last second, climb back up and do it again and again. When the female is satisfied then they get busy and do the whole parenting thing. It's actually the coolest courting in the animal kingdom IMO.

    10. Re: Eagles are top of the food chain predators by HiThere · · Score: 2

      No. The biggest one probably has ants, cockroaches, or termites at the top. I *think* the bacteria are too fragmented to have a competitor. And I'm judging the size of the food chain by the mass of it's components.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re:Eagles are top of the food chain predators by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      and they know it. They are defending their position as the master of the sky, deadliest flying living creature.

      They are smart and cunning and strong. They use their ability to fly high to develop a ton of momentum and tear apart their prey.

      Pretty hard to defend against them, they won't back down.

      Why not copy nature? Even eagles aren't immune to mobbing.

      The main drone could control an escort of small, cheap drones with swarming, aggressive AI. The swarm could even spray something unpleasant, though that would probably be frowned upon by regulators.

      Wouldn't be difficult or expensive, and they'd learn pretty quick to leave the drones alone.

    12. Re:Eagles are top of the food chain predators by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      I thought you were exaggerating on the size, but they do reach a maximum of over one meter (three feet) long! And up to over three meters (nine feet) wingspan! Holy mackerel, I didn't realize that any eagles got that large.

      Found an answer through a quick search: http://dinoanimals.com/animals...

      That last picture of the white-tailed eagle. Imagine something that large flying toward you in anger like that. Amazing scary.

    13. Re:Eagles are top of the food chain predators by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      And the operator would learn just as quickly what the words PROTECTED SPECIES means, wouldn't be difficult, but very expensive, and they'd learn pretty quick to leave the eagles alone.

      Are you deliberately being thick?

      The idea is to annoy, not harm. A drone swarm isn't going to harm an eagle any more than the crows can.

  6. deadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do we need further reminders that everything in Australia wants to kill you?

  7. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hope the eagles knock each and every one of these machines out of the sky. I hope it ends up costing these companies millions, and there's not a fucking thing they're going to be able to do about it. Drone operators/owners are some of the most selfish, self-entitled assholes around, and every time one of them loses one of their drones, I cheer. Good riddance.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  8. Maybe don't fly there? by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    Seems like you probably shouldn't fly expensive droves in those areas.

  9. I don't get this by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 2

    Aren't birds immune to pepper spray? Wouldn't simply being a drone add a lot of defense? I'd think rotors would break bird bones like twigs or at least hurt really bad.

    1. Re:I don't get this by gravewax · · Score: 4, Informative

      wedge-tailed eagles strike at speed with incredible power as they rely on this to stun/kill, they are also very large birds which can weigh up to around 6kg and while the rotors may do some damage the drone will still be destroyed by the impact. They are also a protected species

    2. Re:I don't get this by DeSigna · · Score: 1

      If a drone operator accidentally injured or killed a wedgie, there is potential jail time involved. They're heavily protected, with only about 200 pairs left.

      "They attacked my $80k flying camera" wouldn't be a good excuse, they're a known threat to drone operators and it would be negligent to allow the drone to injure them. Shooting/zapping at, reinforcing the drone to the point where it poses a danger to the eagle or switching from a fixed-wing to a multirotor drone without adequate protection - for the eagle - wouldn't go down too well in a courtroom.

    3. Re:I don't get this by DeSigna · · Score: 1

      Sorry - quick update - Wedgetails are protected, but it's a particular subspecies in Tassie which only has ~200 pairs left. Misread the wikipedia article.

    4. Re:I don't get this by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      OP is correct that birds are immune to capsaicin (the chemical in hot peppers which makes them "hot"). Speculation is that pepper plants use the chemical as a way to discourage land mammals from eating their fruits, thus guaranteeing their seeds would be dispersed more widely by birds. Pepper spray isn't going to do squat.

    5. Re:I don't get this by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Are their eyes also immune?

      I would doubt it.

    6. Re:I don't get this by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Capsaicin doesn't actually burn or damage cells. It interacts with the TRPV1 receptor, the protein that responds to heat, so that the neurons are tricked at a molecular level. Bird immunity to capsaicin is because their TRPV1 just doesn't respond to it. Spraying capsaicin in their eyes probably wouldn't be any worse than spraying a saline solution.

    7. Re:I don't get this by gravewax · · Score: 1

      woosh, I was answering the idiotic that claimed all our fauna was protected. It isn't and that is a good thing as things like Kangaroos are in plague proportions in many parts of the country.

    8. Re:I don't get this by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Interesting to know, thanks!

  10. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Anybody got a good recipe for eagle?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  11. That was a case of bad mission planning by Picodon · · Score: 4, Funny

    The machine ... resembled a stealth bomber.

    Tragically, though flying in broad daylight, it was not escorted by a protective formation of fighter drones, making it an easy pick for the latest Talon strike fighters of the austral Aquiline air force.

  12. Countermeasures won't be allowed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can bet that countermeasures of almost any effective type will be discouraged if not banned. Most countermeasure systems would aid in avoidance of military or police takedowns of drones.

  13. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Would pepper spray even work on an eagle? Birds can't taste capsaicin; if anything, it's numbing to them.

    It's interesting to see how territorial these birds are. You can find lots of videos on Youtube of them doing things like attacking ultralights and such. I think they're simply going to have to "eagleproof" their drones. Which unfortunately will make them need to be bigger (and more expensive) for a given-sized payload, since a greater chunk of the mass fraction will need to go into structure.

    --
    All we want to do is eat your brains.
  14. It's not nice by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Funny

    to fool Mother Nature.

    Hands up if you're old enough to remember that TV commercial!

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:It's not nice by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Hands up if you're old enough to remember that TV commercial!

      Sorry, I was holding my hand up but the bursitis made me bring it back down before you saw it.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:It's not nice by Stormbringer · · Score: 1

      Mother (Nature), please, I'd rather do it myself.

  15. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

    I'm dismayed you'd think it necessary to use projectile weapons. When instead you could use nitinol rotors with retractable guards. Yes, it blends!

  16. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    This is apparently _not_ a quad copter, it's a bunch of fixed wing drones.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  17. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 2

    I'm most dreadfully embarrassed.

  18. who'd have thunk by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    Never thought that birds could be more effective than shotguns... Your move, NRA card-holding privacy conscious anti-environmentalists. Your move...

    1. Re:who'd have thunk by iggymanz · · Score: 1, Redundant

      plenty of NRA people are pro-environment.

      By the way, which is more harmful to the environment, the person getting their meat from supermarket or the card holding NRA guy who gets his meat hunting?

    2. Re:who'd have thunk by DeSigna · · Score: 1

      My self-defense raptor is sitting on my copy of Padlocks Monthly.

    3. Re:who'd have thunk by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      nonsense, jacketed ammo doesn't leech and copper shot has to be used now

    4. Re:who'd have thunk by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      Never thought that birds could be more effective than shotguns...

      Your move, NRA card-holding privacy conscious anti-environmentalists.

      Your move...

      As a NRA card-holding privacy conscious environmentalists, I'm rooting for the eagles.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  19. Eagles sometimes attack Gliders by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Full size gliders. Normally the eagles are friendly enough, and can mark thermals. But sometimes they attack, ignoring the size difference. The go for the leading edge of the wing which would kill another bird. But it is the strongest part of the glider and the Eagles come off second best.

    The eagles generally let you know when they are not happy, first making aggressive movements. Maybe the drones need some wide angle cameras to see them.

    I personally have not been attacked by an eagle, but have been by a (much smaller) magpie. I was a bit low over its nest on a ridge and it flapped its way all the way up to me and dived at the cockpit (would be the eyes of another bird). I dived after it but of course it was hopeless, and the bird effortlessly got behind me for another go.

  20. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think they're simply going to have to "eagleproof" their drones. Which unfortunately will make them need to be bigger (and more expensive) for a given-sized payload, since a greater chunk of the mass fraction will need to go into structure.

    Or they could just make drones that don't look like pigs - then the angry birds would stop attacking.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  21. Apex-predator status? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Not when you have crows in the neighborhood. They frequently mob bald eagles and chase them off. The solution might be to develop a self-organizing swarm of smaller drones that surround and defend the parent (the one carrying the camera).

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Apex-predator status? by bakes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're talking about Australian Wedge-Tailed Eagles, not the American bald eagle (which is basically a glorified seagull).

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    2. Re:Apex-predator status? by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Um, you mean a glorified sea eagle?

      Gulls aren't even in the same order, let alone family.

    3. Re:Apex-predator status? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Why not just wrap some razor wire around the drone? If you don't care about hurting the eagles, that would be much cheaper.

  22. Well done by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Mr Eagle!

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  23. Eagles around the world fight for our freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Eagles around the world are fighting for our freedom to keep the sky safe from Russian drones and ISIS drones. These drones are trying to hack our elections, scramble our GPS signals, and listen in on our cell phones. The founding fathers knew of the great drone prophecy to come and selected the Eagle as the symbol of freedom, knowing this bird would one day fight in the "Drone Wars." George Lucas new about the "Drone War" prophecy but for the sake of his personal safety and that of his family and co-workers, he renamed the movie to "Clone Wars."

    Meanwhile.... in a secret lab, Elon Musk and Space X are working on a secret "Drone Killer" project that is powered by a mysterious and not-fully understood power source that was found in a crashed UFO. Soon these drones will take to the sky and fight along side the Eagles in the coming drone wars.

    See this banned video before it is too late and I crazy trick to lower your cholesterol.

  24. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by MangoCats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After the double bird strike put Sully in the east river, a shocking number of birds were killed in response.

  25. Typical Australia by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All the wildlife there is out to kill you.

    1. Re:Typical Australia by irving47 · · Score: 1

      I keep having to remind myself maybe there's a reason it was used to send prisoners to...

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    2. Re:Typical Australia by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Because the English thought sending you to a Canada was too cruel, probably because our winters scared the shit out of them.

    3. Re:Typical Australia by DeSigna · · Score: 1

      You haven't heard the Brits' opinion of our summers.

    4. Re:Typical Australia by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2

      Because the American colonies had rebelled & were no longer accepting England's detritus?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    5. Re:Typical Australia by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Explain koalas.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    6. Re:Typical Australia by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      Spend more time around adult Koalas. They aren't the cute things they're portrayed to be.

    7. Re:Typical Australia by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      All the wildlife there is out to kill you.

      I especially like the bit where they tried painting eyes on the drone. Reminds me of this radio talks show host:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      For those unable to see the link allow me to quote:
      "Ahhhhhhh the eyes don't work the eyes don't work, ahhhhhh, get it off, the eyes don't work. Get mum get mum get mum ahhhhhhh."

    8. Re:Typical Australia by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Aside from drop bears, they carry chlamydia.

  26. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

    Best of all, these eagles are listed as endangered and are protected by Australian law. In fact IIRC, the sections of the law that pertain to endangered species impose a "strict liability" standard on actions that injure a member of that species. That means you don't even have to intend to inure one of these eagles. Just being careless can get you serious prison time.

    So pretty much those drone operators have to suck it up.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  27. Wedge tailed eagles are big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Biggest eagles in the world.

    They'd eat a bald eagle for lunch.

  28. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nothing a 10 gauge goose gun can't fix.

    It's a protected species. Hope you like spending time in jail.

  29. Some basic rules: by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Fly faster than eagles.
    Or at night.
    Don't piss off sky predators.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  30. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by avandesande · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you are talking about large tracts of land there are plenty of legitimate non-dildastic uses for drones. I doubt someone flying an 80k machine is a drone enthusiast.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  31. Down under problems by MichaelJamesBattagli · · Score: 1

    It's their version of first world problems!

  32. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Could be: Some people make their hobbies a job.

  33. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The problem is $80k drones. Put the sensors in a separate package and fly them under a $100 slow stick, attach parachute to sensor package and done. Who cares if the eagles destroy some styrofoam, it's cheap.

    It's a classic case of "no one every got in trouble for buying CAT/Fluke/IBM etc. etc."

    Lose two dozen $80,000 top-of-the-line drones? No one cares, you bought the best gear around so clearly it couldn't have been anything other than one freak accident after the other, just fire the contractor hired to pilot it and be done. Attach a $20,000 sensor package to a cheap, consumer-grade airframe? The moment that sensor package ends up damaged in any way, shape or form, even if it's flown over 5,000 successful missions with your set-up and potentially saved hundreds of thousands in the long run, you'll be chewed out for "being an idiot and attaching such expensive equipment to such unreliable trash!"

  34. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These aren't people trying to peek into your window, flying their drones on private property without permission or even harassing busy locales with dangerous flights.

    They are quite literally a business using drones effectively for a legitimate purpose with purpose built aircraft: mining surveys, outback mapping etc. Are you really Glad these people are suffering setbacks because of some unforeseen consequences?

    Show me on the doll where the drone touched you because that reaction isn't normal for a situation like this.

  35. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Trogre · · Score: 1

    You sound like a car enthusiast describing cyclists.

    Did a drone pilot kill your favourite pet, or do you feel the same way about all operators of remote-controlled equipment?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  36. You're going to need a bigger drone. by Subm · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're going to need a bigger drone.

  37. Effective Countermeasure by voxelman · · Score: 2

    One countermeasure to bird attacks is to demonstrate superior flight capability. Of course this requires pre-emptive training of the raptors. A drone can out climb any bird and demonstrating this ability will often serve to prevent aggressive behavior. This is certainly not a cure all but one element of an effective strategy that includes maintaining appropriate situational awareness of one's flight environment of which these birds are a part.

  38. Re: Good. Stop flying drones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    more power to Mother Nature.

    drone ops...tossers and wankers.

  39. Problem solved. by Travco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Problem: Drone flies in a manner the that the Eagles think is either prey or competitor. Solution: Find a flying creature they don't attack - Most likely a vulture(everybody thinks vultures are icky, even other birds) - and imitate it's flight

    1. Re:Problem solved. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Solution: Find a flying creature they don't attack - Most likely a vulture

      But how are we going to simulate a lawyer flying?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  40. Raptor recruiting by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Since no flying dogs, Security services are evaluating training birds to attack drones. https://www.google.co.jp/amp/s... Back to the drawing board Wiley Coyote. Stealth drones, disposable decoys etc... escort pigeons , sky is the limit on alternative approaches. Drones have lots of potential but more to learn on optimizing use.

  41. Re: you are dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're not professionals, they can't even out fly an eagle.

  42. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    Are you really Glad these people are suffering setbacks because of some unforeseen consequences?

    Yes I am. Stop fucking with the eagles since they clearly don’t like drones in their territory.

  43. Eagles may soar... by emil · · Score: 1

    ...but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    1. Re:Eagles may soar... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Mostly it's geese and other rather dumb birds that get sucked into jet engines.

  44. Australian hang glider pilot here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Many years ago a friend I was flying with was attacked by a wedge-tailed eagle ("wedgie"). Came from above and behind, first he knew of it was when its talon ripped the top of his wing. Scared shit out of him, fortunately the rip stop nylon lived up to its name and he landed safely. Three neat parallel rips in the sail about 20cm long. Another time we were setting our gliders up on a hilltop, a couple of wedgies lazily thermalling 750 to 1000 feet above us. Suddenly one of them folded its wings up completely and basically dive bombed us head first. At what seemed an impossibly low altitude it opened its wings and executed an incredibly tight (and extremely loud) vertical u-turn, then slowly spiralled back up to its mate. I took this as a pretty unambiguous piece of inter-species communication: "Get the fuck out of my territory you pathetic amateurs, this is what a real pilot can do". Generally they left us alone though, unless they were nesting, apart from one or two individuals known to be cranky/territorial. I suspect that smaller, noisier, more maneuverable drones are seen by them as more of a threat.

  45. Eagles & Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is this the answer to the security services' prayers: trained eagles to down weaponised drones?
    I am reminded of the (UK) Great Exhibition of 1851: it was set up in Crystal Palace - a huge glass & iron building. Sparrows got in, nested out of reach high in the structure, & dumped on visitors. What to do? With the building made of glass, guns were a non-starter. Queen Victoria asked the Duke of Wellington (victor of Waterloo) for an idea. His answer: "sparrowhawks, Ma'am."

    1. Re:Eagles & Drones by Dantoo · · Score: 2

      I remember in the late 70s or early 80s there was a Cessna taken out by an Eagle. The pilot was able to land the plane and said that he saw nothing at all, just bang, blood and feathers. The windscreen exploded and the passenger was knocked unconscious IIRC. The pilot was quite badly injured but managed to land with some difficulty. There was an investigation as to why his mayday calls went unanswered. Amazingly enough the conclusion was that the microphone was made u/s by the massive amount of blood that had poured into it.

      There will be pics and more detail around somewhere. The formal investigation was published.

  46. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by avandesande · · Score: 2

    when you do it for money you are a professional

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  47. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nothing a 10 gauge goose gun can't fix.

    Go shooting protected birds in Australia, and you'll be lucky if the cops get you before the locals do. Most australians consider poaching somewhere between pedophilia and keeping dead hookers in the basement. When I worked at the department of parks, we'd have to think very hard over what info we'd release on animal abuse prosecutions, becuase people would react so angily that vigilantism was a real possibility.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  48. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

    I believe only the Tasmanian wedge tailed eagle is listed as endangered.

    The key word is "protected". Injuring or killing protected specieis is what gets you in for a bad time with an angry judge, regardless of whether its endangered, or not. Although its largely an academic distinction. Most non endangered protected species are only a bad summer away from endangered anyway.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  49. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

    The drones won't stop so you better get used to them.

    Wedge tails beg to differ.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  50. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

    These are mining companies with billions in the bank. These drones are almost nothing in their budget.

    Yep. I remember once installing a video conferencing system worth all up close to a quarter of a million dollars in the early 2000s. I asked the CEO "How do you guys financially justify spending all this money?" to which he replied "kid we got more money than we know what to do with, this is nothing", and he was right, the mining company in particular had ridiculous amounts of capital just lying around in bank accounts or investments a few million to stick crazy expensive video conferencing machines into all their regional HQs was barely pocket change for these people

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  51. Because they're not annoying enough.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ..no lets fit drones with car horns and pepper spray so the people they were hovering over and endangering can be even more upset about it.

  52. Idiots Fly Drones Too Close To Wild Animals by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

    ... should be the headline.

    It's kinda like when a bull kills a matador, all I can think is "Fuck Yeah!"

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  53. Re: Good. Stop flying drones. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    You can just burn the drone after you've shot it down, can't you? It's a big hassle digging a hole.

  54. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nothing a 10 gauge goose gun can't fix.

    Go shooting protected birds in Australia, and you'll be lucky if the cops get you before the locals do.

    What about "mining company" did you not understand? If there was something like "protected birds" for them, they would not be in business. They own the cops, and the locals have bones that can break under unfortunate circumstances.

  55. Re:Admirable by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You mean as some kind of payback? Let others feel what it's like if we fuck up their ecosystem by bringing in animals it's not prepared to handle?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  56. The human response by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    There's a species that meddles with what we want to do? Why is it allowed to continue existing? Remove it from the ecosystem.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  57. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by dwywit · · Score: 1

    Except that Wedge-tailed eagles are protected.

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  58. Ever consider why they're mapping? by go-nix.ca · · Score: 3, Informative

    Worried about the eagles? Mining companies generally do surveys not to enhance a species' habitat but to destroy it. Oh, we're not allowed to harm eagles? NP, we'll just mine the shit out of their territory, and they can sustain themselves by preying on the leftover boulders. Yummy!

  59. Li-Po batteries and sharp talons don't mix. by w0mprat · · Score: 2

    When an Eagle's talon strikes a Lithium Polymer battery it may not end well for the attacking Eagle. Although the impact of the bird alone is not healthy for such batteries, drones are designed with impacts in mind. Puncture wounds not much.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  60. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Nature has decided. No, you can't fucking pepper spray an eagle. Give it up.

    Nah but you could probably rig up a sweet net launcher.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  61. Re: Good. Stop flying drones. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking more spikes.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  62. Eagles and flying machines by samdutton · · Score: 2

    Reminded me of a story my dad wrote back in the 60s: The Wedge-Tailed Eagle.

  63. Think of it as evolution in action by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    This applies not just to people, but to their machines and to any given person-machine combination.

  64. Re:Good. Stop protecting species. by edtice1559 · · Score: 2

    Stop flying drones around the Australian outback!

  65. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

    Nature has decided. No, you can't fucking pepper spray an eagle. Give it up.

    You could use this......a machine gun armed quad-rotor drone. Problem solved... https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  66. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    If we could only teach them to recognize spy drones and target them primarily and frequently....

  67. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    My chickens eat habanero peppers like my grand kids eat chocolate candy. If you hit them in the eye it might bother them, otherwise I think nothing.

  68. Re:Good. Stop protecting species. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    The birds are more important to most people than your drone is. To the majority of people, there is no problem.

  69. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Bald eagles have gotten so numerous and are so aggressive that they are considering taking it off the protected list in the USA. Homer, Alaska is over run with them.

    http://abcnews.go.com/WN/story...

  70. Finally! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    An Angry Birds article worth reading.

  71. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by deadwill69 · · Score: 1

    Oh god! Too bad you can only get five points!!! Had I been drinking something...

  72. Article title gave me cancer by Tifer · · Score: 1

    I think robots and eagles should be allowed to fight each other to their hearts' content, but seriously: "Bold Eagles: Angry Birds..." is the worst title I've ever read. I don't know why, it just infuriates me.

  73. Can we get some of those eagles here?! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Keep your drone away from my airspace, or I'll unleash my imported wedge-tailed eagles on it!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  74. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Still, as an aside; that is one gorgeous bird.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  75. Re:Good. Stop protecting species. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's a good thing that Australia isn't full of livestock ranches that are thousands of square kilometers.

    Oh wait, it is. And I bet those people will stop caring about eagles if the price of their beef goes up.

    People like ranchers and miners use drones to survey large areas of land. They can map their property in a couple days and locate every herd. I guess one solution is to get rid of the big open ranches and just cram all the animals into warehouses, that would be better right? That way everyone always knows where their animals are. Or maybe there's a solution that allows the managers to use drones for photography without a bunch of idiots shouting at them for doing so. There's nothing wrong with flying a drone to survey your land. Maybe just a parachute/GPS pinger that would deploy and activate if a gyroscope detects it's in a spin or something like that. I'm sure that the vast majority of the damage comes from impact with the ground.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  76. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's exactly what I'd be saying about these cheap drones that can't survive a bird-strike.

    MQ-1's don't get taken down by eagles.

    Haha, I don't think they would, right. But now you've gone from an $80,000 drone to a $4 million drone. You can buy 50 of the cheaper ones for that price. And I imagine that the piloting hardware and operating costs for a Predator are just a bit higher than for the professional photography drones. Not to mention anything about the grand facilities, you can't exactly get in your pickup truck, drive out to wherever you're needed, and launch a Predator.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  77. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by butchersong · · Score: 2

    I don't think at that height that a shotgun will do you much good. What we really need to do is release an animal that can prey on these problematic eagles. We have DNA for the Haast's eagle they had a 10' wing span and could make short work of these. A grant for a few hundred thousand from the mining company could get things started.

  78. Re:Good. Stop protecting species. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I doubt anyone cares about them flying drones over their own land. Except for the eagles anyway. Yes, some kind of recovery system makes sense but really, they managed to raise cattle and mine before anyone invented drones.

  79. Re:Good. Stop protecting species. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    they managed to raise cattle and mine before anyone invented drones.

    And people managed to travel before they invented the horseless carriage, and travel across country in the US before the interstate highway system was developed. They managed to talk to other people before cell phones were invented, and they even managed to write and publish books prior to the computer text editor or Gutenberg. People survived bleeding as a cure for bacterial infections, many times, and TV really did pre-date cable and satellite.

    What was your point again, Mr. Ludd?

  80. Bald eagles. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I want some bald eagles in my area! :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  81. Re:Good. Stop protecting species. by Gussington · · Score: 1

    People like ranchers and miners use drones to survey large areas of land. They can map their property in a couple days and locate every herd. I guess one solution is to get rid of the big open ranches and just cram all the animals into warehouses, that would be better right?

    Or:
    Not use a drone as farmers (we call them farms, not ranches) have done for millenia, or:
    Come up with a way to use the drone that prevents the Eagles attacking them (most likely)
    I find it odd that the first option you jumped to was remove all the 'ranches' and put all the cows in a warehouse. That is a very peculiar thought process...

  82. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by Gussington · · Score: 1

    Drone operators/owners are some of the most selfish, self-entitled assholes around,

    All of them. Like all the Jews, or all the Blacks or all the Muslims. I got you brother, it's us vs them, whoever 'them' happens to be today...

  83. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    The cost of the sat link alone would bankrupt most people.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  84. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    There's plenty of historical evidence pointing to unintended consequences of importing predators to deal with pests. Be careful what you wish for.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  85. Re: Good. Stop flying drones. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    If an eagle is destroying your drones, protections do not apply. Any law that claims otherwise is unjust and corrupt.

    If your drone is invading or disturbing a protected species, then your drone and you both deserve corrective action. It's completely just and to say otherwise is idiotic.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  86. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Any company that has money just "lying around" is run by morons who will eventually be replaced by people who actually know how to run a business. Money is applied to projects or investments in order to provide a ROI. Possibly, these companies are privately owned, or have some kind of government protection against competition, otherwise they're simply being inefficient.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  87. Re:Good. Stop flying drones. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Had I been drinking something...

    If you weren't drinking something, then I timed it wrong.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  88. Re:Good. Stop protecting species. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    I find it odd that the first option you jumped to was remove all the 'ranches' and put all the cows in a warehouse. That is a very peculiar thought process...

    You didn't notice the sarcastic tone? Obviously large open land ranches are better for raising big livestock than the kind of factory farming that goes on in the US, that's the point. The point is that we can use technology to help manage those things rather than just cramming all the animals into a building like people decide to do in the US.

    I doubt you can prevent the eagles from attacking, changing the behavior that the eagles have learned over millions of years probably isn't going to work. Hopefully the attacks could either be made ineffective, or at least non-fatal to the drone.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black