Slashdot Mirror


EU Takes Ireland To Court For Not Claiming Apple Tax Windfall (reuters.com)

Philip Blenkinsop, reporting for Reuters: The European Commission said on Wednesday it was taking Ireland to the European Court of Justice for its failure to recover up to 13 billion euros ($15.3 billion) of tax due from Apple, a move labeled as "regrettable" by Dublin. The Commission ordered the U.S. tech giant in August 2016 to pay the unpaid taxes as it ruled the firm had received illegal state aid, one of a number of deals the EU has targeted between multinationals and usually smaller EU states. "More than one year after the Commission adopted this decision, Ireland has still not recovered the money," EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said, adding that Dublin had not even sought a portion of the sum.

110 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Also ordering Amazon to pay €250m ($293m) by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    in back taxes as it had been given an unfair tax deal in Luxembourg. OK: Amazon saved some tax, but that saving allowed it to under-cut its rivals, some of who have been put out of business - will there be any compensation for those competitors, the cost of which could dwarf the back-tax bill ? I suspect that the answer is no in which case Amazon's dodgy dealings have been highly profitable and will continue to be so in the future -- as it has fewer competitors.

    1. Re:Also ordering Amazon to pay €250m ($293m) by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Amazon saved some tax, but that saving allowed it to under-cut its rivals, some of who have been put out of business

      If the tax saving allowed Amazon to undercut its competitor's prices, then the money is still in Luxembourg or the EU. Their customers still have it (or they spent it, in which case the money helped other businesses). If, as insinuated, Amazon took all the 250m Euro it saved to the bank rubbing their hands in glee, then there was no price savings for the customers, and thus no negative consequences for Amazon's competitors. (A combination of both is also possible, with a diminished magnitude for both types of effect.)

      It's important to understand that you can't simply analyze this as Amazon depriving the EU of tax revenue. EU citizens with a certain amount of money spending it at a variety of stores including Amazon, with a percentage of those expenditures being converted into tax revenue for the EU. Unless the EU citizens have kept some of the money they saved from Amazon in their savings account, or Amazon has transferred more money out of its EU operations than if they had had to pay those taxes, then the total tax revenue by the EU shouldn't be much different. The difference will be that EU citizens were able to purchase more goods per Euro paid in taxes (either directly as VAT/sales tax or indirectly as corporate taxes).

      Or to put it more succinctly:

      (money the EU lost in tax revenue) = (money EU citizens got to keep and spend on other things) + (additional money Amazon got to keep for operations or as profit)

      Whether this has a negative or positive overall effect on tax revenue depends on whether the EU government would've spent that money more productively than the EU citizens (minus whatever Amazon kept and didn't spend on more EU operations).

    2. Re:Also ordering Amazon to pay €250m ($293m) by Knightman · · Score: 1

      You are missing a piece, Amazons shenanigans put some EU competition out of business which led to people losing their jobs which also means less taxes paid in the EU.

      So, no matter how you try to spin it - it was a net loss for EU.

      --
      --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
    3. Re:Also ordering Amazon to pay €250m ($293m) by Kkloe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you even know how it works?, Luxembourg could have had 1% in taxes, the problem was that they gave amazon a deal that gave them a 0.1% taxes when they had 1% as standard, and thats illegal according to EU regulations, everything pays the same or not, is simple as that.
      If they still wanted to keep giving amazon 0.1% they would have had to lower it for everyone else.

    4. Re:Also ordering Amazon to pay €250m ($293m) by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If you were one of those competitors it's not clear who you might sue... The government of Luxembourg negotiated the deal, but they could argue that they reasonably believed to be to legal and point to similar deals in Ireland as evidence. Amazon would probably argue that it's not their job to understand the finer points of tax law when offered a deal by a government, which is of course bullshit because you can bet their accountants were the ones who suggested it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess that would mean all companies based there would move.

  3. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, yeah, let's argue about this. I can call you something like "idiot", and then people can pick sides and we can all be angry at each other.

  4. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, God help us if companies are forced to pay their legally required taxes

  5. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by GerryGilmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, Ireland wants to - and will - remain in the EU as they benefit from membership much more than Britain. Also, the EU has already told Catalonia that they (EU) will NOT recognize their claim of independence. But sure - keep stirrin the pot, Mr. Trump-Bannon-Farage.

  6. the question is"Why?" by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    So if Ireland doesn't get tax money, and benefits from having some folks employeed are way below whatever they'd get from this tax, why would they even consider such a weird move?

    Other than someone in the government getting something from Apple...

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:the question is"Why?" by GerryGilmore · · Score: 5, Informative

      The answer is simple: as part of the EU treaty they signed, they can offer low tax rates overall, but their separate deal with Apple produced such low tax rates for Apple that the EU deemed it to be "state aid" to Apple, which is against EU rules. Zat help?

    2. Re:the question is"Why?" by lederhosen · · Score: 1

      They get tax from those that work at Apple. Maybe some politicians are getting sidekicks. Ireland get tax by letting Apple pay almost no tax in all of Europe. And Ireland takes more money from EU than it pays. Of course most of the other EU countries are not happy about it.

    3. Re:the question is"Why?" by lederhosen · · Score: 1

      s/sidekicks/kickbacks

    4. Re:the question is"Why?" by burhop · · Score: 1

      s/sidekicks/kickbacks

      I haven't used sed in 25 years. It is like riding a bike.

    5. Re:the question is"Why?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      EU as a whole, and most member and quasi-member nations, believe in social welfare, not corporate welfare. The US is different in this regard. Americans are against social welfare, but very much in favor of corporate welfare, under the misguided belief that this will translate into jobs.

      It doesn't of course. Less taxes means more profits but more profits doesn't lead to more jobs. But since Americans are against social welfare, they have a comparatively poor public education system, so it's hardly surprising that the average american voter can not understand much more than rudimentary economics. Just look at how much they confuse the concept of a government budget with that of their own personal budget. Utterly senseless.

    6. Re:the question is"Why?" by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      Don't know why you posted "AC" but this is a very accurate description...

    7. Re:the question is"Why?" by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Don't know why you posted "AC" but this is a very accurate description...

      Some people feel more comfortable posting anonymously. What is said is far more important than who said it.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    8. Re:the question is"Why?" by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Don't know why you posted "AC" but this is a very accurate description...

      Russian trolls don't care which side of an argument they provide. Their goal is just to create polarization and argument. If they don't have accounts, they can't be shown to be Russian trolls, and can't have their accounts banned.

    9. Re:the question is"Why?" by Xest · · Score: 1

      Ireland's economy is built on enticing tech by enabling tax evasion and avoidance.

      So if they don't win this fight, there's no reason for tech to go to Ireland anymore - the only reason they get this tax money is because tech is there, so whilst they can get this windfall, tech will leave and there'll be no more money afterwards. Ireland is playing the long game.

      But of course, it's also cheating at the game, so it's really a problem Ireland has created itself. Similarly Luxembourg and Switzerland are parasites in this way, rather than contribute something useful to the world just try to cheat to acquire wealth far beyond what their productivity dictates they should have at the expense of everyone else. However, for 10 years now everyone else has shown themselves sick of it, hence why parasite nations like Ireland, Luxembourg, and Switzerland now need to start figuring out how to pay their own way rather than steal the profits of the work of other nations.

  7. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by higuita · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but then big companies could not use the tax loophole to avoid paying tax in Europe... you could not safely transfer the low tax earnings from Ireland via EU free internal money transaction to Luxembourg or Netherlands to transfer then to the US using low tax money transfer from those countries (you can add other loops around, but this is basically it)

    This are well known loopholes that the each Country politics and EU central politics fail to close, because it would affect very powerful companies and, of course, also private money transfers... those politics have to earn their money!! but there is problem, the remaining tax payers (common people) will pay more tax for covering that missing money!

    --
    Higuita
  8. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It wouldn't matter if the EU did recognize Catalonian independence as Spain would probably not consent to them joining the EU.

    Also, isn't part of the reason that all of these companies incorporate in Ireland or have their European branched headquartered there officially so that they can funnel all of the revenue earned in the EU through Ireland for the lower taxes. Ireland leaving the EU removes the reason for those corporations to be there in the first place. It makes no sense for them to want to leave.

  9. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

    then they cant tax haven anymore. the russia backed cata movement will only fuck themselves.

  10. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by higuita · · Score: 1

    and by the way, US and many other countries also have known tax loopholes that nobody with power really want to close. This is a global problem

    --
    Higuita
  11. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it's actually based on decency. And Europe isn't Socialist. It's Democratic Socialist which means certain things are sacrosanct (e.g. health care, education, etc.) and everything else is fair game as long as the rules are followed.

    In Europe you generally don't see headlines about how some big corporation just reported its largest profit in its entire history and is also laying off thousands of workers.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
  12. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by gravewax · · Score: 2

    that would be economic suicide for them.

  13. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Europe you generally don't see headlines about how some big corporation just reported its largest profit in its entire history and is also laying off thousands of workers.

    Biggest corporate news out of Europe, about European company, that I can think about in past couple years is Volkswagen and their vast emissions scandal.

    Which is all the more ironic coming from Europe, given the 'Democratic Socialists' over there are so climate-woke and eco-conscious compared to us not-any-brand of socialist coal-burner Americans who allegedly make crappy sooty cars...but invented Tesla and autonomous driving anyways just for kicks.

    I think the stereotypes you subscribe to aren't working.

  14. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it's so they can funnel all the revenue earned GLOBALLY through Ireland.

  15. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They did pay their legally required taxes to Irelend. The EU decided that Ireland's sovereign tax rate wasn't high enough. It's big EU countries trying to dictate what Ireland should do. That should not be legal.

  16. Ok, ok ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... we'll asses the taxes.

    In related news: Announcing our corporate tax rebate program.

    -- Ireland

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Ok, ok ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Ireland is getting sued precisely because they are claiming Ireland's uncollected taxes are a corporate tax rebate program. Corporate tax rebates are a form of government assistance which are against EU rules.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  17. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    While would Ireland or Catalonia bail from the EU?
    And why the funk do you say: hopefully?
    What do you have to gain if a certain country leaves the EU? I'm pretty sure: nothing. You most likely will need a passport to travel there, afterwards. Hardly a gain ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  18. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm in.

    I think we should hitlerize the nazimistic terroristic pedophiliac child-endangerment side of the argument and stuff.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  19. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    Ireland is the Delaware of the EU.

    Both are business-friendly.

    Businesses have ____ (hint: lots of money).

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  20. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    ZOMG. A quantum-Godwin post. And I lived to see it.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  21. Re:European Union by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Sounds so much better than 4th Reich, doesn't it?

    We have all the tiki torches, so they couldn't have a Nazi demonstration.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by crashumbc · · Score: 1

    LOL, no just no.... Catalonia will get smacked down in less then a week...

  23. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about Europe but the EU isn't Democratic or Socialist. It's run by an unelected group who's primary concern is the protection of the banking system (especially the German banking system). If the EU were democratic or socialist Britain wouldn't be leaving. Catalonia, on the other hand would be as their beef is that it's not financially right-wing enough.

  24. Then what? by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    So the EU sues Ireland and the EU prevails - then what? Companies get shut down for evading taxes. You don't exactly shut down a country.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:Then what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The EU will simply stop to transfer funds to Ireland until it has reached the amount it should have claimed off Apple. And Ireland is not a large wealthy country, it cannot really afford to do without the rest of the EU's financial support.

  25. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, it wasn't posted on usenet, so Godwin's law does not apply.

  26. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by clonehappy · · Score: 1

    Do you realize how ridiculous you sound in the current year?

    It sounds like the 1700's!

    I imagine this... "The Crown has already told the Colonies that they will not recognize their claim of independence. But sure, keep stirrin the pot, Mr. Washington-Jefferson-Franklin." Sickening.

    Then again, I also forgot that if you care about "dead white guys" that makes you a racist in 2017.

  27. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

    Europe is not any one particular political system. It's not Socialist nor is it Social Democrat. It is numerous countries all with their own governments formed by their Citizens.

  28. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    By whom?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  29. Re: Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by guruevi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is a reason people like Trump and Farrage won.

    You may not agree but the majority of communities have real issues affecting them that DNC/EU leadership is failing to resolve and the Catalexit, Brexit (and more) is a symptom of overreaching governments.

    Read up on the role the US/EU played in getting Hitler in power, the issues in Britain, France and Spain are very similar to post-WWI Germany.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  30. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Biggest corporate news out of Europe, about European company, that I can think about in past couple years is Volkswagen and their vast emissions scandal.

    The emissions scandal wasn't specific to Volkswagen and I doubt it is the biggest corporate news out of Europe in the past couple of years.

    Which is all the more ironic coming from Europe, given the 'Democratic Socialists' over there are so climate-woke and eco-conscious compared to us not-any-brand of socialist coal-burner Americans who allegedly make crappy sooty cars

    They do. Dieselgate was about nitrous oxide, not about soot. And Volkswagen was not amongst the worst offenders, unlike Ford, Fiat Chrysler and Opel, which was a subsidiary of General Motors at the time.

    but invented Tesla

    Tesla was not 'invented'. It's a brand.

    and autonomous driving anyways just for kicks

    Daimler-Benz and Ernst Dickmanns are American now?

  31. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The only reason to choose an unapologetically capitalist system over a capitalist system with socialist add-ons is the honesty of the purely capitalist system: It doesn't aim for stability or decency. Its only driving force is greed. Everything that may be considered a failure in other systems is just part of the natural progression in a capitalist system. Crashed economy? That's how capitalism deals with economic bubbles. People losing their homes? They better learn from that and make better investments next time. Got shot at in Vegas and can't afford getting your wounds treated? GoFundMe.com.

  32. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by r1348 · · Score: 1

    Yeah sure. Because all the corporations have their offices there because of the rich, flourishing Irish internal market.
    Or maybe because they have access to the EU market while paying tax-haven level taxation?

  33. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by r1348 · · Score: 2

    Let me ask you, are those corporations that interested in the Irish market? So why doesn't Ireland leave big bad EU?

  34. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by r1348 · · Score: 2

    What is in dispute here is that Ireland is behaving like a tax haven while enjoying full access to the EU market. Same thing for Luxembourg.

  35. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Part of its wave-function is on usenet, so Godwin's Law does apply. And it doesn't. Actually I'm not sure. I'll ask my cat, after I open her box.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  36. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 1

    The emissions scandal wasn't specific to Volkswagen and I doubt it is the biggest corporate news out of Europe in the past couple of years.

    Volkswagen is only outfit that has been levied billions in fines, had to recall millions of vehicles, and had major corporate figures criminally charged stemming from the emissions scandal. What bigger corporate news has come out of Europe in past couple years? The oblivion of Nokia, maybe?

    They do. Dieselgate was about nitrous oxide, not about soot. And Volkswagen was not amongst the worst offenders...

    See my immediately previous comment.

    ...unlike Ford, Fiat Chrysler and Opel, which was a subsidiary of General Motors at the time.

    See my immediately previous comment (again).

    Tesla was not 'invented'. It's a brand.

    The Model S was invented. Invented by Tesla to be specific. Model S represents first physical embodiment of the notion that an electric car could be fast, not look like rolling birth control, and have merits beyond environmental abstractions of the powertrain choice. See BMW i3 for European example of mainstream electric car. I say no more.

    Daimler-Benz and Ernst Dickmanns are American now?

    No, they are not American. They follow Americans, in this case the suddenly-emerging trend of autonomous driving that American industry is spearheading.

  37. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes. And that means the companies were not paying their legally required taxes? Who decides what companies should pay within a sovereign nation? Is it the nation, or the EU? And if there is an issue - does it mean the company didn't pay its legally required taxes, or that the nation violated some trade agreement it had?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  38. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by samkass · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apple has had major facilities in Cork, Ireland since 1980-- 37 years ago, well before the Euro or modern EU existed. This isn't some non-operating legal entity deal like some other companies, which is what makes the EU going after Apple in particular so odd. Maybe some other companies have hopped onto some kind of Ireland loophole, and maybe Apple is getting a good deal there, but they moved into Ireland when that country wasn't in very good shape and have employed a generation of Irish, so it doesn't surprise me that Ireland is friendly to them.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  39. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    bestiality is wrong.

  40. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by geoskd · · Score: 1

    Hopefully Ireland decides to tell the EU to go to hell and bail along with Britain and soon-to-be Catalan.

    Hopefully governments get smart about this, and start insisting that any company that does business within their borders pays their tax rate. I'm all for these companies being able to deduct taxes paid elsewhere from their taxes due, but any company that does business in the US should pay the US tax rate. If they owe 15%, they should pay 15% to somebody.

    --
    I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
  41. When the EU thinks its above you... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    Its time to FIRE the EU, and go elsewhere. Do NOT trade YOUR OWN GOVERNANCE for EU rulers. You'll Regret it.

    1. Re:When the EU thinks its above you... by gravewax · · Score: 2

      I think the EU would be very happy for Ireland not to be a member, they have cost the rest of the EU a fortune in bailouts, lost tax revenues and problems. Ireland however would probably collapse, especially as without the EU market access none of the companies they gave the sweetheart tax deals too would stay and everyone would be free to impose tarrifs etc on a country that is using tax laws to steal from other nations. This is not about imposing rules on them, it is about making them meet the obligations they signed up to as a condition of entry to the EU marketplace.

    2. Re:When the EU thinks its above you... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Its time to FIRE the EU, and go elsewhere. Do NOT trade YOUR OWN GOVERNANCE for EU rulers. You'll Regret it.

      The EU isn't above anyone. It's just a plain trade agreement. If they weren't part of the EU and signed up to a trade agreement banning what they did they'd be in a same position. This is how international trade works. Break an agreement you made, expect the other person to come knocking.

      But hey you could cut yourself off from a trading bloc of 800million people. No one is forcing you to do business with very low tarifs or restrictions. The UK at least had some sway, if Ireland left we'd all just happy wave at them on the way out, like kicking out a smelly housemate who comes up with a new excuse every month of why they can't pay rent.

      I assume since Slashdot is American, that so are you. You should be entirely comfortable with the concept of whining to the court every time you feel hard done by anyone for anything.

    3. Re:When the EU thinks its above you... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that |Ireland broke its own governance. Their corporation tax is 12.5% (already low by EU standards) but they told Apple they didn't have to pay even that much.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  42. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes. And that means the companies were not paying their legally required taxes?

    Yes, companies were not paying their legally required taxes.

    Who decides what companies should pay within a sovereign nation? Is it the nation, or the EU?

    The nation. The nation made a decision to agree to certain terms when it joined the economic union known as the European Union. Those terms are binding on the nation as long as they're part of that union. Not enforcing those terms is the sovereign equivalent of signing up for a cell phone contract, then telling the cell phone company you're only going to pay 30% of the bill each month, because it's a better deal for you.

    And if there is an issue - does it mean the company didn't pay its legally required taxes, or that the nation violated some trade agreement it had?

    Both. The company didn't pay its legally required taxes and the nation that is letting it is violating a trade agreement by doing so.

    Really, this isn't hard. If you believe in the rule of law at all, then you must also believe that sovereign nations are subject to it, or treaties are totally meaningless, always. Which is certainly an option, if you want the world at each other's throats on a constant basis. Those of us who prefer peace and quiet would like to see treaties honored.

    And Apple can pay their fucking taxes. I have to. So do they.

  43. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by nojayuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Corporation tax in Ireland is 12.5%. Apple gets a sweetheart deal from the Irish government and pays a lot less than 12.5%. Sweetheart deals like this are banned in the EU to prevent a race to the bottom by other small states. It's OK under EU rules for them to charge less than 12.5% but that has to be the rate for all corporation tax payers in Ireland, not just Apple and other big multinationals with similar deals.

    It's something Ireland agreed to on accession to the EU. If they want to leave the EU and play these sorts of games, no problem but Apple relies on Ireland's EU membership to be able to shuffle their profits from all the other EU nations frictionlessly through their Irish offices and pay less tax than anywhere else. Outside the EU Ireland is no further use as a cheap-tax-rate haven for Apple et al.

    It's not Apple at fault here, it's the notoriously corrupt Irish government that has traditionally played fast and loose with such financial rules in many other circumstances. The EU has had enough. If Ireland don't collect the taxes due from Apple I'd expect various EU grants and subsidies to be cut back pro rata on the basis that the Irish government had the chance to raise those revenues properly themselves by charging the correct rate of tax in the first place.

  44. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by faraway · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's true! The fascist regime in place in the US since the 1980s only makes examples of foreign companies.

    American companies are free to rape American citizens and the world without any repercussions.

    Make America Great Again!

    I'm constantly amazed how all new slashdot users are far right nazi trump supporting fascist white trash. Probably why readership on /. has dwindled from 500-1000 posts per article to 50-80 posts / article.

    Seig heil!

  45. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 2

    Another one smoked by facts; hence one more back to the Nazi chant.

    BTW, unlike Tesla, autonomous driving, etc., one thing Europe invented was...Nazis. Just say'in!

  46. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For mine, we should simply call Ireland what it is.

    A tax haven. A parasite feeding off the rest of the world.

  47. What charges by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    What are the charges against Ireland? Does EU really have the power to sue a state for not collecting taxes? That would be funny since EU commission president Junker is an expert at that.

    1. Re:What charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are the charges against Ireland?

      providing state-aid to companies.

      Does EU really have the power to sue a state for not collecting taxes?

      Yes they do as equal taxation is one of the items Ireland agreed to in exchange for becoming an EU member and gaining the benefits of the EU Market and free movement of money, people and goods. They are basically in breach of contract for their part of the bargain.

  48. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by faraway · · Score: 1

    Yes, Europe did industrialize and experience unbridled capitalism first, you're right! Thankfully, they learned from their mistakes.

    The far right did get a hold of Germany and we saw what they did with their immigrants and 'others'. Nazi-ism (far right fascism) is by far no way an invention unique to Europe. The US is marching to its fascist anti-immigrant racist leader as we speak, and damn proud of it.

    Tesla you mean the company envisioned and started by a South African Canadian? Fascists all over the world love the US: your business pays little to no taxes, gets away with murder, and the worst you'll get is a talking down to in front of the Congress you've purchased. As a fascist, I too would move to the US, it's fantastic. You can build up unlimited amount of wealth in your family, socialize all costs and private all profits. It's a win-win.

    You must either be paid to post or really smart, I can't tell which one yet..

    America was great when the upper marginal tax rate was 92% from the 40s through the 60s/early 70s. The middle class existed then. Since then it's golden shower Reagenomics... open wide (wallets, anus, mouth), the fascists are coming.

  49. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by gravewax · · Score: 3, Informative

    Brussels doesn't get the cash, the cash actually goes to Ireland and Luxemburg. Brussels are trying to ensure that everyone isn't getting screwed over by the corrupt arrangements made by these two countries. If they want to make such deals with companies then they need to leave the EU (certainly and option) but then none of these companies would have any interest whatsoever in being in either of those countries as they are really using this as a tax haven to funnel money out of the rest of the EU which would no longer be possible once they left the EU.

  50. Is the problem in Apple or the Consumer? by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    If you've got a conscience, don't buy one. If you don't, buy one.

  51. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    MAJOR facilities in Cork? who the fuck are you trying to kid, in 1980 it was 60 people. A local office is NOT a major facility. It wasn't till they became a true tax haven for apple that it expanded.

  52. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by jcr · · Score: 1

    I look forward to the end of the 4th Reich. Free trade is a great idea, but the notion that you have to employ an army of parasites to get it is ludicrous.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  53. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    mostly true, though you could argue the EU is just the EEC on steroids and it replaced the EEC which was formed in 1957. part of the EU membership though was taxation rules around treatment of companies equally and no state-aid etc in exchange for free market access, so really Ireland has really been in breach of the EU agreement ever since the EU was formed, they try to hide their state-aid under various tax relief banners like discounts for local R&D etc but really it is just lipstick on the pig that is tax haven. gradually these loopholes are being shutdown and once they are all finally closed I would expect many of those companies that claim they aren't their for the tax haven benefits will mysteriously find other countries that they need to move too (also for completely non taxed related reasons).

  54. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

    Thanks for a better explanation than I gave!

  55. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I already said, "Delaware."

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  56. Kansas? by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    EU as a whole, and most member and quasi-member nations, believe in social welfare, not corporate welfare. The US is different in this regard. Americans are against social welfare, but very much in favor of corporate welfare, under the misguided belief that this will translate into jobs.

    It doesn't of course. Less taxes means more profits but more profits doesn't lead to more jobs. But since Americans are against social welfare, they have a comparatively poor public education system, so it's hardly surprising that the average american voter can not understand much more than rudimentary economics. Just look at how much they confuse the concept of a government budget with that of their own personal budget. Utterly senseless.

    You left out that if you lower the taxes which means more profits those profits get exported, instantly, to tax havens like Panama using creative bookkeeping methods where they further increase the estimated 29 trillion dollars kept in such tax havens. The US state of Kansas is a good example of this, they forged ahead with an experiment in massive tax cutting for the wealthy based on the notion that it would cause an increase in investment in the local economy and shrink government... it didn't. Rich people took the money they saved on taxes into out of state tax havens, state revenues fell off a cliff but since even the staunchest of conservatives did not want to make any cuts government did not shrink so they propped up the state of Kansas with borrowing. Republican Governor Sam Brownback is now watching his much lauded (by ultra conservatives) regimen of tax cuts being rolled back by, of all things, a moderate Republican-Democratic coalition which is now at war with Brownback trying to pass a veto proof income tax increase. Now try to imagine what kind of a raging dumpster fire of a fucking mess Brownback had to make of Kansas (or any American state for that matter) to motivate Republicans and Democrats to get together and raise taxes.

  57. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by jabuzz · · Score: 2

    Ireland joind the EEC along with the UK in 1974. It is at *THIS* point that they agreed to no state aid and it became possible to funnel profits from the rest of the EEC through Ireland. This is all *BEFORE* Apple existed as a corporate entity and well before 1980.

  58. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

    Declaring independence is an *AUTOMATIC* bail from the EU. They could apply to rejoin for sure, but as that requires the unanimous consent of the existing members the chances of that happening are *ZERO* as Spain would just veto it on the basis that they don't recognize Catalonia as a sovereign state.

  59. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Freischutz · · Score: 2

    In Europe you generally don't see headlines about how some big corporation just reported its largest profit in its entire history and is also laying off thousands of workers.

    Biggest corporate news out of Europe, about European company, that I can think about in past couple years is Volkswagen and their vast emissions scandal.

    Which is all the more ironic coming from Europe, given the 'Democratic Socialists' over there are so climate-woke and eco-conscious compared to us not-any-brand of socialist coal-burner Americans who allegedly make crappy sooty cars...but invented Tesla and autonomous driving anyways just for kicks.

    I think the stereotypes you subscribe to aren't working.

    Funny, what I remember most is a bunch of headlines coming out of Europe about a string of corporations being punished by the EU for abusive practices like using their dominant market position to stifle competition, price fixing and general anti-trust activities. The latest examples are Microsoft and Google which, incidentally, are still free to continue those abusive practices in the USA where the government sees nothing wrong with corporations abusing monopolies to screw the public. Still, these fines are often used by a certain species of US commentators to claim the EU preferentially victimises US corporations which is bullshit. Some other greedy corporations honoured by the EU with major fines include: Intel, Telefonica, Servier, Volvo, MAN, Volvo/Renault, Daimler, Iveco, DAF, Scania, Asahi, Pilkington, Saint-Gobain, Soliver, Sony, Qualcomm, Chunghwa, LG Electronics, Philips and Samsung SDI, Panasonic, Toshiba and Facebook to name a few examples. That list is not exactly dominated by US corporations. The EU seems to pretty evenhanded when it comes to handing out tough love. Oh... I doubt Apple will remain the only prominent name on the back-taxes to-do list for long.

  60. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    and those nations were fine with what was being paid

    Just like you're fine with buying a clearly stolen TV out of the back of a van? In many places you're non the less committing a crime.

    The nations made illegal deals with specific corporations, and that's the problem here. Accomplices to crimes are punishable in nearly every jurisdiction on the planet. You can't pretend that Apple and Amazon are completely innocent in a deal created specifically for them knowingly in breach of rules that ensure that corporations are treated equally within the bloc.

    I didn't kill him your honour. The assassin did. I only did a normal business transaction of paying money in exchange for services rendered!

  61. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    You most likely will need a passport to travel there, afterwards. Hardly a gain ..

    You already do with the UK and Ireland to to other EU countries and vice versa. Hardly a loss from your example for these countries.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  62. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    The British crown didn't recognise the colonies' claim to independence. There had to be a war.

    What about this?

    "The US government has already told the Confederate staters that they will not recognise their claim of independence"

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  63. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Britain is leaving the EU precisely so that the wealthy don't have to suffer the effects of the EU initiative to reclaim unpaid taxes.

    We're leaving the EU because that's the way we voted. My vote had nothing to do with "unpaid taxes".

    Plenty of other reasons and promises, many mutually incompatible, were give to people to encourage them to vote out.

    My vote was based on the remainer's argument. There is certainty in the EU. So, I looked at the trends based on their argument and decided I preferred uncertainty instead.

    EEC was brought in under the guise of it bringing prosperity, that's what I judged it under when it came time to vote.

    Also, the EU is not run by an unelected group.

    The EC which has overriding powers and it's members are not under influence of democratic voting mechanisms by the people in the EU.

    A group _appointed_ by elected people is responsible for creating the initial wording of legislation

    No, that's the EP, the EC can override the EP and even sets the topics that EP can discuss and vote on.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  64. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    The EU is run by theCouncil of Europe which consists of the democratically elected governments of the 28 member states (being a democracy is a condition of entry).

    The executive (called the European Commission) is appointed by the democratically elected governments of the 28 member states, much like the executive in the USA is appointed by the democratically elected president.

    There is also a directly elected parliament but it doesn't have as much power as the US Congress or the British parliament.

    In short, your statement is completely false.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  65. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Whibla · · Score: 1

    Biggest corporate news out of Europe, about European company, that I can think about in past couple years is Volkswagen and their vast emissions scandal.

    The clue is in the last word of this sentence: scandal!

    Scandal sells stories.

    The biggest news of the last couple of years out of Europe, about a European company, that I can think of would be the sale of ARM* to a Japanese firm (SoftBank) for £24 billion (and then the subsequent sale of 25% of it to a Saudi backed Investment fund - although, tbf, that's no longer 'European' news). The cash involved, and to a lesser degree the implications, dwarf the numbers relating to the VW affair. That you were unable to bring it to mind when trying to think of news about European companies merely highlights my first point.

    *If you need to ask who ARM is, or what they do ... try to imagine your current favourite smart phone without its processor.

  66. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by houghi · · Score: 1

    In Europe you generally don't see headlines about how some big corporation just reported its largest profit in its entire history and is also laying off thousands of workers.

    Does not mean it doesn't happen. It is already not done to shout about profits anyway.

    And if these things happen, laws change in favour of the people. e.g. when Renault in Brussels closed and several thousand workers where thrown out on the street, they where building a new factory in Spain with help from subsidies. Not only did they lose their subsidies, the law was changed in Belgium, so that you can't just say "we close" that easy. There have to be certain steps to be followed.
    If you want to fire a certain percentage and/or certain amount of people at the same time, it will take around 6 months to do as you now need to inform people in advance and look for alternatives.

    In general people in Europe are more interested in time than in money. Many people will work 4/5 times as they then have more time to spend with friends and family. They could work 5/5 and buy a new car sooner and a new phone and a larger tv and ... but why?

    Of the 10 direct co-workers I have 7 do 4/5 work. And yes, that means living in a smaller house than what is standard in the US. And yes, exceptions exist on both sides.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  67. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Tom · · Score: 1

    As compared to neo-liberalism, which punishes everyone equally (except for the top 0.01%, but that gets ignored as a rounding error) and is based on greed.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  68. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Megol · · Score: 1

    Eh, no. No chance in hell. The vote wasn't recognized by anyone, there are known suspect activities surrounding the voting and there were no trusted independent observers. A lot of people have said they would have voted if it was a valid vote rather than some PR activity, this including people that want an independent state and those that want to be part of Spain. So the vote is a joke.

    But even if the vote would be valid and recognized as such by the world they would not accept shit before Catalonia had broken free and functioning as a state. Well North Korea could perhaps do that in order to show support for those that fight against Spanish oppression or some shit like that, but that's just trolling or delusional ranting.

  69. Subtle differences by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    The US and the EU are thieves such that the former allow their victims to keep some of their money.

    When the EU thieves see money in the pockets of anyone they run around like the keystone cops. "We've never seen this before! TAKE IT! TAKE IT!!"

  70. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 1

    The biggest news of the last couple of years out of Europe, about a European company, that I can think of would be the sale of ARM* to a Japanese firm (SoftBank) for £24 billion (and then the subsequent sale of 25% of it to a Saudi backed Investment fund - although, tbf, that's no longer 'European' news). The cash involved, and to a lesser degree the implications, dwarf the numbers relating to the VW affair.

    First off, Volkswagen's current liability scandal estimate is ~$30 billion, and that number seems to grow every quarter - with many civil actions remaining to be settled still. I wager the Volkswagen cost will catch up to and surpass the costs to purchase ARM by this time next year.

    Also, as you alluded, ARM is British - distinct from Europe these days. And what is ARM, in the actual context of Europe or the UK? Virtually all the outfit's design, engineering, and production facilities are overseas. It grosses "only" a billion pounds a year, on patent royalties and little else. Their stuff is less what they make and more a spec, like an 802.11 standard one licenses from a proverbial IEEE instead of certifies it.

    So, if that's the best example other than Volkswagen you can think of - a not European but British midcap that essentially makes nothing on its own, well, I rest my case.

  71. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Brussels just wants the cash, that's all.

    The EU doesn't levy any taxes. Fail.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  72. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Spain can only veto so long ...
    E.g. until they want something from the EU and they get vetoed back ...

    Sooner or later Catalonia will be a full EU member.
    Sooner or later Spain will be reduced to a core, called Spain and a few more regions to join the EU ... or not to join if they don't desire so.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  73. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    No you don't.
    An ID card is enough.
    As UK has no ID cards, obviously they require a passport to visit other EU states.
    I don't require a passport to visit the UK.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  74. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Admission of new countries requires unanimity. Many other things don't..

    Also, assuming Spain is desperate for something which can be vetoed that could only be exercised by an existing member. Why would they? What the fuck do you think France or Italy could gain by doing so?

    I sometimes wonder if you could even point to Europe on a map.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  75. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    But we can send all the Polacks and Roma home. We'll bring Indians in instead, that'll stick it to the Frogs and Krauts!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  76. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    While would Ireland or Catalonia bail from the EU?

    They'd do it while what? While you were sleeping? While Rome burns? While I was going over the far-famed Kerry mountains?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  77. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    An ID card is enough.

    Only for domestic UK flights.

    As UK has no ID cards

    Actually driving licenses are classifed as ID cards.

    I don't require a passport to visit the UK.

    What you have is an identity document that is classified as a passport, it follows the ePassport standard, which is why it can be used as a passport. It is not unlike the UK's BRP cards or Gibraltar's Identity Document. You cannot come to the UK on just an "ID card", it needs to double as a passport. So, you can't use things like a driving license, like you can in the schengen area, you can't use a wojewodztwa, like you can in the schengen area, you can't use a voting card, like you can in the schengen area etc.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  78. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Your nitpicking does not help you, as you miss the point:
    Actually driving licenses are classifed as ID cards.
    In the UK. A UK drving license is not an ID card in Germany or France. Hence a UK citizen needs a passport.
    My ID card is valid in the UK ... and north Africa and plenty of other places: so I don't need a passport.

    You cannot come to the UK on just an "ID card", it needs to double as a passport.
    Google "Personalausweis", that is an ID card ... or how ever you want to translate it. It is not a passport. Most places in Europe have "simple ID cards" and passports are basically only needed for countries where you need a visa.

    My dictionary here translates "Ausweis" to "ID card", perhaps yo have a better translation :D

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  79. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    A UK drving license is not an ID card in Germany or France.

    It is sufficient for a flight from France to Germany, I would know. I've done it. All the documents I've mentioned above, I've used in the Schengen area on flights that are not valid for flights to the UK.

    My ID card is valid in the UK ... and north Africa and plenty of other places

    Your card doubles as a passport because it's using the ePassport standard. There are non-EU countries that accept these just as passports.

    Personalausweis

    Personalausweis follows the ePassport standard. They even use the same encryption certificates on the RFID chip as the regular German passports.

    Most places in Europe have "simple ID cards"

    A "simple ID card" wouldn't follow ePassport standards, like the wojewodztwa, UK driving license, voting card etc.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  80. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by Whibla · · Score: 1

    First off, Volkswagen's current liability scandal estimate is ~$30 billion, and that number seems to grow every quarter

    Well, that I didn't know, so thanks. I haven't actually paid that much attention to the ongoing fallout - they did wrong; they got caught; they got, financially, punitively punished; the executives essentially got away with it. Not worth worrying about further.

    Also, as you alluded, ARM is British - distinct from Europe these days.

    Despite what you might have heard, or what you might believe, the UK is still part of Europe, and still part of the European Union. It will remain part of the EU for at least another 18(ish) months.

    And what is ARM, in the actual context of Europe or the UK? Virtually all the outfit's design, engineering, and production facilities are overseas.

    Given that the original article is about Apple, and your comment is from from the perspective of "us not-any-brand of socialist coal-burner Americans" let's turn this nugget around shall we? And what is Apple in the actual context of Europe or the US? Virtually all the outfit's design, engineering, and production facilities are overseas.

    Although the design and engineering parts aren't, in the case of either ARM (Cambridge, UK) or Apple (CA, USA). But please don't let facts get in the way of your rhetoric.

  81. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Nope. A sales contract is a private agreement between Apple and the store. A treaty is binding law. Your analogy would work better if there was a law that forbade selling below recommended retail price, not a sales agreement.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  82. Re:Socialism - drag everyone down to the same leve by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 1

    Given that the original article is about Apple, and your comment is from from the perspective of "us not-any-brand of socialist coal-burner Americans" let's turn this nugget around shall we? And what is Apple in the actual context of Europe or the US? Virtually all the outfit's design, engineering, and production facilities are overseas.

    The comparison is silly and facile. Apple's new HQ in Silicon Valley is bigger than probably all ARM's facilities ever put together. They make Mac Pros in America. The Samsung-sourced silicon for Apple iPhones is made in Austin, Texas. The back of every Apple widget says 'Designed in California' for a reason. Apple has more cash and cash equivalents right now than all the liquidity in the entire economy of the United Kingdom.

    And, ironically, the probably most influential Brit in modern mainstream technology is named Jony Ive and he works for...Apple.

    You must have a really cool shovel, because you keep using it to dig an ever deeper rhetorical hole.

  83. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by r1348 · · Score: 1

    Wrong again. The EU is not asking any money from Apple. It's rather forcing Ireland to exact a fair taxation from Apple (tax money that then will stay in Ireland, mind you).
    Ireland doesn't want to do that as they know low taxation is the only reason corporations place their EU presence there. With harmonized EU taxation, corporations would move where there's better infrastructure.

  84. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Old Personalausweise don't have RFID. Nor did my last Passport have. Got a new one in May. However depending on age: they are still valid.

    You are nitpicking and have no clue.

    Half of the countries have besides a "passport" also a national "mini passport" We call it "Personalausweis". An "ID Card".

    With such an id card you can travel all over Schengen and everywhere the other country agrees to, e.g. as a German: Tunesia, Marocco, Switzerland etc. But you e.g. can not travel to Japan or Thailand.
    The UK has no such "id card" hence they need a passport to enter the rest of the EU.

    So: we don't need a passport. And we don't need a passport to enter the UK. Because our mini passport/id card is enough.

    A "simple ID card" wouldn't follow ePassport standards, like the wojewodztwa, UK driving license, voting card etc. This are not ID cards. I already told you: you have no proper translation for "Personalausweis!".

    The UK people need a passport to travel in other areas of the EU: because they have no "proper" ID card. E.g. no equivalent of our Personalausweis.

    Again: I don't need a passport to go to the UK. At lest not until BREXIT.
    And: my driving license is not an ID card, not in Germany, and no where in the EU.

    And all this has nothing to do with ePassport standards.

    So: no one from any Schengen country needs a passport to enter the UK. And probably nearly no one from other EU countries.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  85. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    What has "gain" to do with it?

    People want their freedom. Probably they want to (re)join the EU.

    When the richest part of Spain drops from the EU because it gets independent, why would the EU not want it back?

    Same for the next regions to drop ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  86. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Reading problems or simply a week mind?

    "While" obviously meant to be "why" ...

    How can one be so dumb?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  87. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Old Personalausweise don't have RFID. Nor did my last Passport have.

    Well no, in the past it would have just the older passport standards which was MRZ. But, standards move on.

    The UK people need a passport to travel in other areas of the EU: because they have no "proper" ID card. E.g. no equivalent of our Personalausweis.

    Again, I did not have problem with the IDs I mentioned on flights within the Schengen area.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  88. Re:AssFux (lol) tell us about your NDA lie by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    APK, you can sock puppet all you like, but it just makes you look desperate.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  89. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Well,
    you claimed I need a passport to enter the UK.
    I don't. I pointed out: the UK citizens usually have no passport or lower level "Personalausweis" equivalent.

    Which ID is enough for you I don't know. But I doubt a UK citizen can travel with a driving license only to Switzerland. Hence: he needs a passport. I don't.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  90. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    you claimed I need a passport to enter the UK.

    Indeed.

    I don't. I pointed out: the UK citizens usually have no passport or lower level "Personalausweis" equivalent.

    And I pointed out that these double as a passport and even treated as such by some non-EU countries. They're not merely an ID card.

    Which ID is enough for you I don't know.

    I pointed out that IDs which don't double as a passport because they don't follow the current ePassport standards etc. are valid in the Schengen area, but are not valid for travel to the UK.

    But I doubt a UK citizen can travel with a driving license only to Switzerland.

    A UK citizen cannot travel to the Schengen area on the IDs I mentioned, but they can travel within the Schengen area on flights etc. with the IDs I mentioned.

    But I doubt a UK citizen can travel with a driving license only to Switzerland.

    To be more specific, a UK EEA driving license is sufficient (which practically everyone who has a driving license has). But only from the Schengen area, not the UK - The UK is not part of the Schengen area.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  91. Re:Well, maybe Ireland will leave the EU next? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    neither MSRP or release dates are laws signed into being by treaty arrangements between governments.