Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10's Edge vs Chrome: We're Faster and Win in Battery Face-off, Says Microsoft (zdnet.com)

Microsoft has kicked off 2018 with two new ads promoting Windows 10 Edge's battery efficiency and speed compared with Google Chrome. From a report: Microsoft published the two new ads on New Year's Eve, pitting Edge against Chrome, the world's most popular browser. "Microsoft Edge is up to 48 percent faster than Google Chrome," Microsoft says in one of the 30-second ads. Not only that, but Microsoft argues that Edge is safer too, thanks to SmartScreen, its built-in equivalent of Google's Safe Browsing anti-phishing technology. Microsoft says: "Edge blocks 18 percent more phishing sites than Google Chrome." Microsoft doesn't cite the source of this statistic, but in October, NSS Labs released a report comparing Edge on the locked-down Windows 10 S with Chrome on Chromebooks, suggesting that Edge blocks more phishing URLs than Chrome.

157 comments

  1. phuck Edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Edge could cure cancer and I still wouldn't go anywhere near it, MS's IE blunder took care of that in perpetuity.

    1. Re:phuck Edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      thanks dude we were all worried about you possibly being an ie fan on slashdot cuz most people here dont like it and we want u to fit in
      does ur blog have rss feed so i can get timely updates on how bad micro$oft is

    2. Re:phuck Edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a pretty childish statement.

    3. Re:phuck Edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u r so cool

    4. Re:phuck Edge by Hylandr · · Score: 2

      You're so Edgy it hurtz.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  2. Don't Care by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Edge is still such a piece of crap, the UI so amateurish, that I'd gladly sacrifice a bit of battery life to use Chrome. So far as I'm concerned, Microsoft has lost the browser wars.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Don't Care by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      right? the nagging that occasionally pops up when running chrome is the nail in the coffin. So incredibly annoying when MS tries to nudge you into using their bullshit apps that are baked into the OS. Cortana, Skydrive, Edge.. Fuck off. If i had any desire to use these add-ons, I would.

      I abhor ads, especially when it's either impossible to disable/remove, or a convoluted regediting process. I bought the computer, I should get to choose what programs or features I use.

    2. Re:Don't Care by Stormwatch · · Score: 0

      It's not like Chrome's interface is any good either. That's why I stick to Firefox, it can be set to a tolerable state.

    3. Re:Don't Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up! You're a known Linux zealot and die-hard anti-Microsoft troll. There is zero objectivity coming from you.

      At least Linux distributions respect your privacy.

      Even if I choose Chrome I can easily prevent it phoning home either by configuration or using a different browser. You have to jump through hoops to prevent Edge from phoning home although that won't do you much good since the default setup for Windows 10 ticks all the boxes associated with malware.

    4. Re:Don't Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read shit like this and just shake my head.

      The interface of the big 3 browsers is virtually identical.

      PS you're an idiot.

    5. Re:Don't Care by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      right? the nagging that occasionally pops up when running chrome is ...

      Whoa. Someone runs Windows 10 without disabling the Tips and Suggestions features in the settings? What the heck is wrong with you!

    6. Re:Don't Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No actually, Edge does in fact have a more shitty interface. So recently i started to have an issue with Chrome on one computer where all the thumbnails on my new page tab page would disappear. I decided to give edge a try, but the home/new tab options are fucking retarded. you can ether have MSN, some specific webpage, or a blank page. You can also have "top sites" which appears to be a set list of popular shit i don't use. I ended up swapping to firefox quantum on that one computer.

    7. Re:Don't Care by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      We could all say the same thing about Google pushing the use of Chrome when using their search engine. I get constant reminders to switch over to Chrome on my Windows RT Tablet, which doesn't even run Chrome. Google is just as bad as Microsoft when it comes to pushing their browser on people.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:Don't Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I get the "Switch to Chrome, a smarter browser" prompt *every* time IE loads google.com, which is its home page. Been getting it for, literally, years.

    9. Re:Don't Care by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Nope. Not any longer. Waterfox and Classic Theme Restorer for me.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    10. Re:Don't Care by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      They are all shitty now. Edge, Chrome, FF57+, Opera, and Vivaldi all have terrible interfaces.
      Hell, Opera and Vivaldi are Chrome reskins with the same issues I have with Chrome.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    11. Re:Don't Care by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Well you still need a browser on the OS to download a better browser. At least it serves that purpose.

    12. Re:Don't Care by rogoshen1 · · Score: 0

      well, you're using google's browser, and search engine which are free. (aside from raping your privacy.. yes, every other tech company does it too.. it's not an excuse)

      for Windows/MS though, you are a paying customer. I get the annoyance factor directed at google, but (to me at least) it seems a slight bit 'different' than an OS .. which should act like an obedient child and not be heard from unless requested.

    13. Re:Don't Care by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Yes, Edge is just about good enough to be the first stage in a Chrome installation. I certainly don't use it for anything else.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re: Don't Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Linux and ROFLMAO

    15. Re:Don't Care by vandamme · · Score: 1

      But you didn't buy the operating system. You're just licensing it.

      (Disclaimer: mine is Linux Mint.)

    16. Re:Don't Care by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      At least until Microsoft bundles wget, which will happen sometime after the heat death of the universe.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  3. What about Firefox 57? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    vs Chrome and Edge? Firefox doesn't try to annoy you or nudge you into using any one product, it's fast, configurable, and doesn't ask you to "stink" with their "clown."

    Also: Opera.

    1. Re:What about Firefox 57? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my very slow (but very cheap) Atom-based Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 with Windows 10 I noticed that Firefox 57 is noticeably faster than Edge for most of the sites I visit (while using less memory to boot) though Edge has better-optimized video playback. With Edge, Youtube (for example) takes 10+ seconds to fully render the page whereas it takes under 5 with Firefox. I haven't tried Chrome on it since I'm happy with Firefox's performance.

    2. Re: What about Firefox 57? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you watch the video for 5 seconds before your activity is complete

    3. Re:What about Firefox 57? by retchdog · · Score: 2

      unless that one product is mr robot. https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    4. Re:What about Firefox 57? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC since I've got mod points...

      Not sure if Opera will remain a viable browser. It was sold to some Chinese mega-corp in 2016. This might be conspiracy talking but I wouldn't trust a Chinese mega-corp with my browsing data.

    5. Re:What about Firefox 57? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I'd trust the Chinese more than Google, Apple, or M$. At least the Chinese don't have an interest in cooperating with Western spy agencies and American mega-corps like Amazon.

    6. Re:What about Firefox 57? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it is their screenshot service, or pocket, or hello, or Mr. Robot, or windvine...

    7. Re:What about Firefox 57? by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Opera is just Chrome not made by Google.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  4. It's not terrible... by rwven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Edge is OK. Where I think it lacks, in the same way that the latest Firefox lacks, is in its integration support, mobile features, and plugins.

    I use Google services a lot, and the fact that Chrome has native sign-in to Google, makes the integration really clean. Also the plugins on Chrome tend to be a lot more mature and stable than those for the "lesser" browsers. That's less of an issue with FF, but it's still present.

    Edge IS quite fast, and does a good job with proper page rendering.

    I think the problem is that Chrome is just a great browser. It doesn't matter if Edge is "just as great," or even "a little greater in this one area." A ton of people are embedded with Chrome now, and unless there's a REAL incentive to change, why would they?

    1. Re:It's not terrible... by rwven · · Score: 1

      As an aside, the reason I haven't swapped to Firefox (their latest release is superb on the desktop) is that their mobile browser is a slob. The interface is decent, but I can't run more than 1-2 tabs without it just becoming totally unresponsive and/or crashing. If their browser ran as well as Chrome did, I would have swapped to FF and probably been pretty happy with it.

    2. Re:It's not terrible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of us not invested in Droid or Google services, Nope.

      Okay, I get that Google has won the search wars. But with DuckDuckGo or StartPage I can still maintain the illusion of being a rebel.

      Then Firefox admits to collecting telemetry by accident...Dang It! I'm getting off the Internets !

    3. Re:It's not terrible... by Mr.Radar · · Score: 1

      I currently have 40 tabs open in my Firefox for Android session and I haven't experienced any slowdown or crashes due to it (though Firefox tends to only keep the mostly recently-viewed 2-3 of them loaded at any time to save memory).

      --
      What if this signature were clever?
    4. Re:It's not terrible... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      I currently have 40 tabs open in my Firefox for Android session

      Which Firefox for Android - aren't there several now?

    5. Re:It's not terrible... by Touvan · · Score: 1

      Firefox's mobile version isn't super terrible, but it's lacking in some important areas. Their canvas performance is not even close to Chrome for example.

    6. Re:It's not terrible... by Mr.Radar · · Score: 1

      I'm using the mainline release version (57.0.1 right now), not Beta, Nightly, or Focus (which is just a Chromium wrapper).

      --
      What if this signature were clever?
    7. Re:It's not terrible... by atrex · · Score: 1

      I find that MS browsers suck in at least one major area: debugging support.

    8. Re:It's not terrible... by rwven · · Score: 1

      Can't argue with this. Their developer tools are lousy compared to Chrome/FF. I would give a slight edge to FF at the moment due to the fact that they support everything chrome does, and they also let you quickly and easily browse all events related to any element you're inspecting.

    9. Re:It's not terrible... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Edge IS quite fast, and does a good job with proper page rendering

      Really? I guess my normal browsing experiences must hit a lot of Edge cases.

      I'd see myself out after that joke, but I'm wearing my serious face right now, I have more trouble rendering pages properly with Edge than any other browser, IE included.

    10. Re:It's not terrible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Edge IS quite fast,

      I disagree. Our automated tests take about six hours with Firefox and Chrome, but take nearly a week with Edge. It's slow as crap. I don't understand why anyone puts up with waiting on it. It drives me insane. I have to use it since we have a couple of internal sites that require Edge. It makes me want to smash my keyboard and quit my job. I hate how slow it is.

    11. Re:It's not terrible... by rwven · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what examples you have of issues with Edge. I've used it on and off, and I've yet to see a single page render improperly.

    12. Re:It's not terrible... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's better recently. I haven't used it in well over half a year and ended up purging it from my system. Lots of various login problems, incompatibilities with Sharepoint (LOL), I also remember having difficulties reading the Financial Times.

      In any case I don't miss it. If it weren't for the problems then the infuriating interface would have done just as much to drive me away.

    13. Re:It's not terrible... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Double reply, but maybe it has something to do with Edge ignoring x-ua-compatible headers. According to the documentation on the MSDN if you run Enterprise licenses for Windows 10 you can force Edge to render with the IE11 engine when the x-ua-compatible header is set appropriately, but normal users are SOL.

  5. Cross platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does your browser work on other OS'es? Android? Linux?

    No?

    Pass.

    1. Re: Cross platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm posting this using Edge for Android.

    2. Re:Cross platform by rwven · · Score: 1

      https://play.google.com/store/...

      Over a million downloads so far. Haven't tried it though. Not sure if it's any good. (they have an iOS version as well, but we all know that's just a skin over the built in iOS browser...)

    3. Re:Cross platform by Mr.Radar · · Score: 1

      The Android Edge browser is just a wrapper around Chromium with Microsoft account integration (for bookmarks/history/etc. sharing with Edge Desktop). AFAIK Firefox is the only full-featured Android browser that ships its own rendering engine.

      --
      What if this signature were clever?
  6. Again with the browser speed... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... the quest for speed caused Firefox to dump much of the useful functionality of the browser. Is browser speed really the issue it is made out to be, or is the quest for speed being done just because browser speed is so easy to measure and compare?

    1. Re: Again with the browser speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speed is not that important; battery life is a factor especially on mobile. But Edge doesn't run on Android.

    2. Re: Again with the browser speed... by rwven · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. MS released it in 2017 and over a million people have downloaded it according to what it's saying in the Play Store at this moment.

      https://play.google.com/store/...

    3. Re: Again with the browser speed... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      the quest for speed caused Firefox to dump much of the useful functionality of the browser

      ... which ones? I've been using the new version since it came out and I haven't noticed any lack of features.

      Granted it broke a bunch of addons when it first came out, but most of them have been updated by this point or replaced with more or less equivalent ones.

      What am I missing?

    4. Re: Again with the browser speed... by Touvan · · Score: 1

      That's Edge in branding only. It's running a version of the Chromium engine underneath. It'd be great if MS ported their own EdgeHTML to other platforms. I hate having to boot up Windows just to test that stupid input focus stealing browser (with it's horrid dev tools).

    5. Re:Again with the browser speed... by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      It matters on lower end hardware.

      On high end systems, there's hardly any difference between Edge, Firefox and Chrome speed wise, but on lower end hardware such as older Intel atoms or AMD E series processors with 2GB of RAM, Edge Destroys Chrome in performance with Firefox being in between the two.

      The biggest reason I don't switch to Edge is that its sharing between browsers isn't close. Chrome and Firefox got this nailed down. You login with your sync or Google account and your stuff is there and in the case of Chrome, so are all of your extensions. Edge seems to sync erratically between browsers, even if both PC's are using Microsoft accounts, Especially bookmarks, which I've had duplicate bookmark entries or even all of the bookmarks but in reverse order in which they were organized.

    6. Re:Again with the browser speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        Is browser speed really the issue it is made out to be, or is the quest for speed being done just because browser speed is so easy to measure and compare?

      None of the above. Browser speed is being used because browsers are largely equivalent today, and the differences between them has become like comparing Coke to Pepsi. So MS has come up with a difference that they hope people will imagine is real, but largely isn't.

      So MS has turned to something that people are sometimes annoyed with (slow websites), but in truth, isn't the fault of the browser. Slow website loading is largely a function of the website, not the browser. That's a distinction lost on 99% of the populace (and also something that's intangible and actually HARD to measure unless you do it under controlled, scientific conditions). So MS's hope is that if you tell people it's faster, they'll just imagine it's true.

    7. Re:Again with the browser speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're really serious about wanting a faster browser (and if you have any interest in browser security), block ads and scripts. uBlock Origin and NoScript FTW.

    8. Re: Again with the browser speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

      Show me an equivalent addon to this one that runs on Firefox 57+ and maybe I'd be willing to use the browser. I can't stand the default key bindings.

    9. Re: Again with the browser speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right click mouse gestures in Linux do not work properly. There are several web extension addons for mouse gestures and none of them work well. Some bring up a context menu during a gesture. Some force you to right click twice to get a context menu. Gestures don't work at all on some web pages. You have to wait for a web page to load before gestures will work.

      Broken mouse gestures on Linux is the main reason that I stopped using Firefox after v57 came out.

    10. Re: Again with the browser speed... by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Nope. No equivalent for the following either
      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...
      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...
      I like my menus. I like my status bar.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    11. Re: Again with the browser speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Download Status Bar has been abandoned, Download Manager (S3) forked it.
      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

    12. Re: Again with the browser speed... by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      From that page:
      Unfortunately, WebExtensions (the new API for Firefox 57+) does not have the functionality for the correct operation of this addon in Firefox. So this addon will no longer work with the release of Firefox 57 in November 2017!

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    13. Re: Again with the browser speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no mention of WebExtensions compatibility, just that Download Status Bar has been abandoned.

  7. Number one concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How well does it block ads, etc?

    1. Re:Number one concern. by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Not well at all.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    2. Re:Number one concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, can you at least pretend you know what the fuck you are talking about. It supports ublock so it does exactly as well as firefox or chrome.

    3. Re:Number one concern. by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at least for me, there is a major performance hit in Edge that is not as severe FF/Chrome.
      Which is why I said not well and not at all.
      Also, require the Store to get the add ons. So if you remove it, like I have, no add ons.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  8. Battery claim is for when Edge isn't running by raymorris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Last I checked, Microsoft's battery claim is for sitting there watching a video, without the browser actually doing anything at all.

    1. Re:Battery claim is for when Edge isn't running by Mr.Radar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They definitely seem to have heavily optimized for the video playback use-case. On my slow (but cheap) Atom-based notebook video playback is noticeably smoother and uses less CPU than Firefox even though Edge is noticeably slower at actual web rendering.

      --
      What if this signature were clever?
    2. Re:Battery claim is for when Edge isn't running by CyberInferno · · Score: 1

      They definitely seem to have heavily optimized for the video playback use-case. On my slow (but cheap) Atom-based notebook video playback is noticeably smoother and uses less CPU than Firefox even though Edge is noticeably slower at actual web rendering.

      Yep, streaming video on my Surface Pro 3 is literally the only thing I switch from Chrome to Edge for. Edge uses about 1/5 of the CPU that Chrome does for that one purpose. Aside from that, it sucks as an actual web browser.

    3. Re:Battery claim is for when Edge isn't running by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Thing is, few give a shit about battery life on laptops or desktops. Even on phones most people don't care.

  9. Who cares by DarkRookie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Edge is still a browser made by MS. Edge, the best browser for downloading other browser in Win 10

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  10. I disagree. by pecosdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I added a second HDD to my work laptop and decided it was time to reinstall Windows yesterday.

    Edge is nearly all together broken. Nearly every page I load gives me a disconnected / time out type error. I could bring up the Brave website this morning, but I couldn't actually download brave using Edge.

    That's right - I started Internet Explorer to download another browser because Edge wasn't up to the task.

    It took me nearly an hour to log in, download, and install Office 365 yesterday using Edge as my on-ramp.

    I don't know what the hell is going on with Edge, but the rest of the system is working fine. Once I got Brave installed I was able to cruise the web just fine. For the purposes of this post I started up Edge on my Windows laptop to see if it's working. I was able to load Slashdot, it took a lot longer than Brave does.

    The only thing out of the ordinary about this laptop is I syspreped it, I left the factory SSD as most everything and I put \users on a 2 TB hybrid drive. Literally Edge is the only problem I've had since doing the install yesterday.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:I disagree. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      This is really weird, I installed Windows 10 fresh on an Optiplex 3010 next to me this morning and Edge is working fine, I decided to try downloading Brave with Edge again just to test, it tried to convince me to make it my default browser just fine, but when I hit download the fans spun up and it's like it's pegging the CPU. It's a Thinkpad W540. I haven't installed anything from the Lenovo site on it - it's just plain Windows 10 with a month or two old install image, all available patches installed, no splats in the device manager. It's one of those things that just bugs me. I don't need or want it, but the fact it's not working right and it seems to everywhere else just nags at me.....

      Other than my own laptop I do admit Edge has been fine functionally, a little annoying when users use it to open PDFs and blame I.T. when they don't know how to use Adobe instead. Easy enough fix. I don't want to use it personally, but it generally beats the hell out of IE. I ditched FIrefox for Brave about a month ago - I've played with Brave for quite a while, but it finally crossed some compatibility readiness lines I had been waiting for.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    2. Re:I disagree. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Edge has it's issues (UI, web rendering, the way it handles forms), but your example is completely FUBAR and unheard of. I would wager something went wrong during your install.

      I wouldn't say that there's anything that Edge can do that's better than Chrome or Firefox, but it's a far cry from unusable and I know a couple of people who use it without issue for Office 365 (though they are too stubborn to believe it would work better with something else.)

    3. Re:I disagree. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      I was just using Edge to login and get the installer yesterday.

      On occasion I do load up the web version of Office 365 on my Linux system at home. Last time I did it I was still using Firefox. I haven't tried it with Brave yet.

      Considering the system is perfectly fine otherwise I figure a patch will eventually come along that fixes Edge and I won't even notice for months...

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  11. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry Micro$oft Edge is a piece of crap - and quite lying about performance and battery use.

    1. Re:Bullshit by retchdog · · Score: 1

      it's not lying, it's just a customized benchmark. technically correct is the best kind of correct. ;-)

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  12. I switch between Edge, Chrome and Firefox All Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that Chrome is a big, bloated resource hog, I don't know why so many people are still so mindlessly locked into that browser. I switch between Edge, Chrome and Firefox all day and you can simply feel that Edge is the faster browser.

    I think many people are just locked into Google and dead set against any browser from Microsoft. I get that IE6 did irreparable damage to the Microsoft brand in the eyes of developers and coders everywhere, but Edge was coded from scratch, there's no reason not to give Microsoft a chance to reboot with a brand new browser

  13. That one annoying bug by Touvan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IE and now Edge have one annoying UI quirk - immediately after you start it, you can click into the address bar, then it almost always takes away focus for some damned reason (actually, Windows does this all over the place - it's the primary reason I can't use that OS).

    If they'd fixed this one problem, I'd probably use it more. I suspect they don't use their own software at Microsoft. They'd surely have noticed and fixed it by now if they did...

  14. Karma is a bitch by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0
    If Microsoft makes an announcement in the forest and there is no one heard it, did it make a sound?

    How sad! How the mighty have fallen!! There was a time Microsoft will make an announcement, hinting at the possibility of someday releasing a product to do X. And boom! venture capital will vanish for any company working on a product that does X. Even companies that have a viable product already in the market to do X, working hard to maintain the foothold and expand will sink. Sometimes Microsoft will deign to buy the dying company at fire sale prices, at other times, it simply would not even bother.

    Now it is pitching it hard. On a brand new Win10 machine the default opening home page will beg you not to install Chrome. The very first url people type in Edge is to find the Chrome browser or Firefox.

    Thousands of developers and companies begged and cried, trying to find anyone who would listen, but in vain. Now it is Microsoft's turn to beg and cry in vain.

    Karma is a bitch. Karma is sweet.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Karma is a bitch by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And a big middle finger to MS - if anybody deserves it, they deserve it more.

  15. Microsoft cheats when it comes to Edge performance by acroyear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When Chrome is running, Windows continues to run background processes like system updates.

    When Edge is running instead, I noticed the CPU and network usage of those background processes to drop to near 0.

    This is the exact same type of b.s. that got them sued by the DOJ 23 years ago.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  16. Edge is incompatible with SM-T350 by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'd try it, but Google Play Store won't let me. It lists Microsoft Edge as incompatible with my Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8" (SM-T350) running Android 7 "Nougat".

  17. Even assuming that were true by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Which browser subjectively does a better job at rendering content. My money is on Chrome.

    Personally I wouldn't use either because I don't really appreciate behemoths hoovering up all my web activity.

    1. Re:Even assuming that were true by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my wife hates Chrome for some reason and doesn't realize Edge isn't Internet Explorer somehow so she uses it, but there are a number of times where I'm called in to ask why a page isn't loading right and just tell her to use Chrome.

    2. Re:Even assuming that were true by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Why not use Firefox?

    3. Re:Even assuming that were true by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      That is what I suggested when she expressed her loathing for Chrome; I usually don't notice what browser I'm using unless there are problems, I'm not so sure what she finds objectionable about the relatively small UI differences.

    4. Re:Even assuming that were true by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Maybe what she finds objectionable is not the UI but using a browser made by a company whose business is to track your every move for advertising purposes. But you know your wife more than me.

  18. Other browsers behind $50 paywall by tepples · · Score: 1

    Edge, the best browser for downloading other browser in Win 10

    For now. In the long term, that depends on how long Microsoft continues to offer Windows 10 Home to OEMs. If Microsoft were to replace Windows 10 Home with Windows 10 S, that would put other browsers behind a $50 paywall to upgrade to Windows 10 Pro.

    1. Re:Other browsers behind $50 paywall by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And would likely, in the EU, at least, lead to Microsoft being financially punished and being forced on threat of even greater monetary fines to open up Windows S to other browsers. I don't think Microsoft has the guts to do it anymore. This isn't the MS of Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. Not that I think it isn't run by a pack of evil sociopaths, but Microsoft no longer has the operating system dominance to bully its way back up that way.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Other browsers behind $50 paywall by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Which would force me to stop using Windows 10 altogether. I would really miss some of the games I play and do not look forward to the effort of migrating my wife from one particular piece of software she uses which only comes in a Windows version (there exists an open source alternative which runs on Linux or Windows, but I do not want to go through the effort of learning the software she uses so that I can learn this other software well enough to teach her how to use it as proficiently as she does the current software...which she was able to find several people who would work with her to get configured the way she wants).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:Other browsers behind $50 paywall by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      And would likely, in the EU, at least, lead to Microsoft being financially punished...

      Why doesn't the EU punish Apple for forcing Safari (or technically, its rendering engine) on iOS?

    4. Re:Other browsers behind $50 paywall by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Because Apple doesn't have anything like a dominant position on mobile devices (that would be Android), whereas Microsoft still has that level of dominance on PCs.

      In other words; apples and oranges.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  19. Microsoft is so full of shit. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    It's gotta be tough being in the marketing department at Microsoft because you have to invent all these bizarre scenarios where an inferior product actually performs marginally better. Obviously, Edge is slower at loading websites and uses more electricity in the process so they resorted to the least realistic usage scenario: playing a video from disk for 15 hours.

    The truth of the matter is that they are all using hardware based video decoding which means all three browsers should have nearly equal run-time. I'm guessing the difference is how the file is or isn't cached which they exaggerated as much as possible.

    Microsoft's motto should be: if you can't compete then just cheat!

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Microsoft is so full of shit. by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      It's gotta be tough being in the marketing department at Microsoft because of people like here in Slashdot.

      Literally nothing is good enough. Edge could have 100% compatibility with CSS3, CSS4 HTML5 and HTML5.1, render faster and use less battery than other browsers, but no, it's "Micro$oft" so therefore bad!!

    2. Re:Microsoft is so full of shit. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      The motto is, if you can't win, change the rules.

      Has been for decades.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Microsoft is so full of shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Edge would need to actually do one of those things, then we can talk.

    4. Re:Microsoft is so full of shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are incorrect. Nothing is not good enough.

      And nothing is what they've brought to the table.

      Except hype.

  20. Laptops are not for browsing or media consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why we have tablets and phones.

    Kind of a pointless benefit.

  21. "Up to" by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Microsoft Edge is up to 48 percent faster than Google Chrome," Microsoft says in one of the 30-second ads

    "Up to" is a useless marketing term when only a single benchmark is given. Edge could be slower than Chrome at everything except one test, and you could still truthfully state that it was "up to 48%" faster than Chrome.

    For a one-line statement like that to be meaningful, it has to refer to average speed, or "at least".

    1. Re:"Up to" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I see a large company quoting any actual numerical benchmarks, my eyes gloss over and mind instantly begins to wander. I'll leave benchmarks to third parties because every benchmark and statistic will be littered with so many caveats that the value is typically meaningless.

      Anyways, I recently picked up a Surface Pro because I like the form factor and pen integration. In my mind, I thought I'd be creating lots of markup notes using the surface pen in Edge (among other things) but I've found myself very hesitant to become reliant on OneNote so I haven't really used it. Outside that set of use cases, I don't see myself using Edge.

  22. Re:What about Opera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Opera is Chrome - it's just a wrapper. The days when Opera was an innovative piece of software are LONG gone.

    How about Brave?

  23. Stop grasping at straws! by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know what people NEED in a browser? Compatibility with every web site they visit and flexibility to install extensions or plug-ins that make it a more useful tool for them!

    Speed is always a good thing, but it's got to be viewed as relative to the capability of the product. Right now, with Edge not supporting extensions or plug-ins, it's not even if the same league as the browsers it compares speeds with.

    I don't know anyone using Windows 10 who doesn't view Edge as the lightweight default browser you ignore except for the times Windows wants to open it to render something that was generated by clicking on an option in Windows itself.

    1. Re:Stop grasping at straws! by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Speed is always a good thing, but it's got to be viewed as relative to the capability of the product. Right now, with Edge not supporting extensions or plug-ins, it's not even if the same league as the browsers it compares speeds with.

      Edge supports extensions, by Plug-ins, do you mean something like Flash which is also supported?

    2. Re:Stop grasping at straws! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what people NEED in a browser? Compatibility with every web site they visit and flexibility to install extensions or plug-ins that make it a more useful tool for them!

      So... not Chrome, then.

      Right now, with Edge not supporting extensions or plug-ins, it's not even if the same league as the browsers it compares speeds with.

      Edge supports extensions and plug-ins just fine. It has since about March 2016, so, at the time of this writing, 21 months ago. Good job keeping up with the times.

      I don't know anyone using Windows 10 who doesn't view Edge as the lightweight default browser you ignore except for the times Windows wants to open it to render something that was generated by clicking on an option in Windows itself.

      I use Windows 10 every day, and I don't view Edge even remotely close to that. Edge is the I can't lock it down very well but at least my banking site works correctly without having to whitelist eleventy billion javascript origins browser on my system. Also, I use it to watch Twitch streams (for the same reason as the banking stuff). For everything else, there's Pale Moon+ABF+NoScript+RequestPolicy. Chrome can GFI.

    3. Re:Stop grasping at straws! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what people NEED in a browser? Compatibility with every web site they visit and flexibility to install extensions or plug-ins that make it a more useful tool for them!

      Web browsers are comparable to operating systems, and that is a problem. Still you focus on the key requirement. You need a modular design that supports, well, everything needed. The problem is you start seeing conflicts between all those features and reasonable levels of security, particularly if you throw performance in.

      I just think that for a better web browser we need a better web. Deprecate more old standards and stop supporting them. Require sanity on ads so they can be filtered and ideally replaced with a simple image or something. Web pages should mostly be event driven, not this massive javascript process...

      The web needs to return a little bit to where it began. Take weather.com. Why the hell do you need all that complex crap to give me the current hourly weather data? Can't you just have an sql query populate a simple table and a banner link for an ad served from the weather.com server?

      Complexity is not always the enemy, but if you can do the same thing with less complexity, it is usually a mistake not to do so.

    4. Re:Stop grasping at straws! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what people NEED in a browser? Compatibility with every web site they visit and flexibility to install extensions or plug-ins that make it a more useful tool for them!

      So... not Chrome, then.

      Right now, with Edge not supporting extensions or plug-ins, it's not even if the same league as the browsers it compares speeds with.

      Edge supports extensions and plug-ins just fine. It has since about March 2016, so, at the time of this writing, 21 months ago. Good job keeping up with the times.

      I don't know anyone using Windows 10 who doesn't view Edge as the lightweight default browser you ignore except for the times Windows wants to open it to render something that was generated by clicking on an option in Windows itself.

      I use Windows 10 every day, and I don't view Edge even remotely close to that. Edge is the I can't lock it down very well but at least my banking site works correctly without having to whitelist eleventy billion javascript origins browser on my system. Also, I use it to watch Twitch streams (for the same reason as the banking stuff). For everything else, there's Pale Moon+ABF+NoScript+RequestPolicy. Chrome can GFI.

      LOL GP gets modded Insightful, even though two people demonstrated he was flat out wrong
      but hey, it's M$ on Slashdot, so facts don't matter.

    5. Re:Stop grasping at straws! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf are you all doing on the internet that makes this a big deal. I have Windows 10, and I guess I use EdGE, does anyone care, I click a few webpages and link, I read stuff. Seriously, the way you all blather on about browser performance makes me wonder if I'm missing out on a whole extra level of interent enjoyment, because honestly, Edge, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, whats the fucking difference for normal people using the web

  24. I make any browser faster/safer via... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & NEW APK Hosts File Engine 10++ SR-1 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads/script/malware rob speed/security/privacy/bandwidth.

    Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns!

    Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirect (99++% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + DNS tracking & lighten DNS load & resolve faster via local RAM!

    * Via what u NATIVELY have in a FASTER kernelmode IP stack (does more w/ less).

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/ (self check vs. infection built-in)

  25. Who gives a shit? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Faster? With 99 billion ad-flash-whatnot bullshit loading before the content I came for gets loaded? Are you trying to be funny?

    Which browser loads less bullshit is the question I'd care about. Which browser discards tracking cookies by default and protects my privacy better is the question I care about. But I have the suspicion NEITHER of those two will do EITHER of those things.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which browser is the best at moving goalposts?

    2. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my experience, either Safari or Opera.

    3. Re:Who gives a shit? by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      The Epic browser does this.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  26. What about standard compliance? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    Performance as a metric doesn't tell me squat on its own, as it's pretty damn easy to have better performance by ignoring standards compliance, and Microsoft doesn't exactly have the best track record when it comes to fully complying to web standards.

    I'm sure that elinks renders even faster than Edge, but that fact on its own isn't all that helpful if you expect ECMAScript and full CSS support.

    Yaz

    1. Re:What about standard compliance? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Performance as a metric doesn't tell me squat on its own, as it's pretty damn easy to have better performance by ignoring standards compliance, and Microsoft doesn't exactly have the best track record when it comes to fully complying to web standards.

      I'm sure that elinks renders even faster than Edge, but that fact on its own isn't all that helpful if you expect ECMAScript and full CSS support.

      Yaz

      Maybe with IE, but Edge currently is about the same as Firefox and better than Safari when it comes to standards compliance

  27. Re:Microsoft cheats when it comes to Edge performa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any program can issue the net stop bits command before using the network and get that same effect. Chrome developers being too lazy to add this to their browser is no fault of Microsoft's.

  28. Re:Microsoft cheats when it comes to Edge performa by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

    I'm inclined to believe that Edge's advantage comes from its ability to utilize [GPU] hardware acceleration better and not from cheating on Microsoft's part.

  29. EEEVIL M$ +5 Insightful by Merk42 · · Score: 1

    OMG teh M$!! Edge is bad!! I've never used it but it's bad because M$!!!!!

    1. Re:EEEVIL M$ +5 Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably true, though you shouldn't jump to that conclusion.

      Luckily, many people here have used it and can confirm that it is indeed crap.

    2. Re:EEEVIL M$ +5 Insightful by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      Well, I have used it, and I can assure you it sucks like your sister at football practice.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  30. Re:I switch between Edge, Chrome and Firefox All D by Opportunist · · Score: 0

    Give me one reason to give them more than a bucket of water when they're being flooded.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Edge and Chrome fight to the death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Firefox sits in the corner eating glue with web extensions. Meanwhile all the power users have switched to Waterfox, Pale Moon and Basilisk to get back the XUL extension power they need. XUL until the heat death of the universe!

  32. Killer feature needed on all browsers. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    The killer feature that made millions to swtich to Firefox from InternetExplorer was the pop-up blocker, and the pop-under blocker, I still can not all those X-10 video surveillance camera ads.

    Today what we need is a way to simply and cleanly stop all the auto play videos and all the auto play sounds. Google has no interest in developing the feature. NoScript, AdBlock, FlashBlock all have issues on chrome. Even when you set all the possible settings for autoplay video, it still happens.

    If MS wants to get its market share back, it should implement a cleanly pause all autoplay audio/video. People will come back for that feature.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Killer feature needed on all browsers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/09/autoplay-policy-changes

  33. Sick of the "Edge is better" campaign by robvdl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had my first experience setting up Windows 10 the other day for a friend, I had been avoiding it all this time. Anyway the experience was horrible, first of all during the install Cortana starts talking to me, WTF? I don't like talking to AI's especially during setup when I didn't even turn Cortana on, so turn it off as soon as I can but it still seemed to be "listening" and picked up dialog from the TV going in the background and started selecting the wrong language setting because of the TV, what's up with that? Also during the install it has a whole page full of privacy settings, asking me if it's OK to spy on me basically, I untick everything off course. Next thing is I go to download Chrome using Edge. I think I got told about 2 or 3 times that I shouldn't be using Chrome because Edge is "better", that experience left a sour taste in my mouth. Also I mostly dislike Edge because I am a web developer and know just how bad IE was at web standards over the last decade, so no thanks, I am not using Edge. Anyway, first of all the Bing search results say something along the lines that Edge is better on Windows 10 than Chrome and that I should continue using it, I ignore it and install it anyway. Then I start Chrome and it recommends me to go to settings so I can change the default browser. I went to settings, it sat on 100% CPU for about 30 minutes, after FINALLY getting in there and changing the default browser it STILL tells me I shouldn't be changing the default browser because "Edge is better". I was quite annoyed at the whole process and constantly getting told by Microsoft not to install Chrome.

  34. I believe it, and still won't use either of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as long as they slurp up so much personal information. I couldn't care less that Firefox will run some irrelevant benchmark 20% slower, or load a webpage 10% slower, it's irrelevant in the light of the other browsers being spyware.

    The biggest reason people use Chrome today is fanboyism I suspect.

  35. If only speed was the primary factor by Ngarrang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If speed was the most important factor for choosing software, I would be running Linux instead of Windows 10.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
    1. Re:If only speed was the primary factor by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Depends on your metric of speed. Personally I don't like giving up modern design for speed, and if you compare modern with modern the snappyness of Windows 10 lays the default Gnome 3 / Unity interfaces many people will first see on Linux to waste, and let's not even begin to talk about games.

      That said fluxbox is where it's at if speed is the only metric. :-)

  36. Of course faster... by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 0

    at downloading another browser.

  37. Open sores fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice no one even gives a shit about any open sores browsers any more? Funny how you never hear from the Eric Raymonds and Tim O'Reillys of the world any more about how open sores is such a great way to do software development. Commence downvoting, freetards!

  38. We're faster and win in battery face-off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But we have a bigger button! And ours works!

  39. Re:Microsoft cheats when it comes to Edge performa by chispito · · Score: 1

    This is the exact same type of b.s. that got them sued by the DOJ 23 years ago.

    It is? The real world impact of this throttling of background processes, and these marketing claims by MS, are likely to approach zero. No special treatment is going to make Edge the more desirable browser. Besides, Google is not the best comparison to make for non-monopolistic behavior.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  40. Re:Microsoft cheats when it comes to Edge performa by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    This is the exact same type of b.s. that got them sued by the DOJ 23 years ago.

    But since Microsoft dodged any meaningful penalties for that bad behavior, they have no reason to stop doing it.

  41. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job MS. Can it render web pages? Is it available for any modern OSes?

  42. Re:What about Opera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Brave?

    Oh, you mean the browser that records my every move? No thanks. It doesn't matter what happens to the data that is generated. It shouldn't collect it. End of story.

  43. faster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We're faster ..." IS NOT "the products are faster"!!!.

    1. Re:faster? by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      And in this case, I think "faster" means we go all the way on the first date.

  44. Indeed... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ... just fuck off already, Microsoft.

  45. Edge is safe by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    I tried to use Edge to install software for the new Vive I got for Christmas. Edge wouldn't allow me to install anything. I couldn't even install DDU in order to install the Nvidia GTX 1060 I got to drive the Vive.

    Since it won't do anything, I guess that you could say that it is safe.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  46. Nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freaking Microsoft is SO annoying. Everyday, they are yapping about how great their shits smells. Microsoft can't even pay people to use their browser or search engine. Microsoft is like a desperate crack whore spreading her legs but noone is buying. MicrosoftCrackwhore.com

  47. Re:Microsoft cheats when it comes to Edge performa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is? The real world impact of this throttling of background processes, and these marketing claims by MS, are likely to approach zero.

    The HELL you say.

    I just spent a good chunk of my Christmas vacation doing "family IT support". (I don't mind so much. It's fine.) The biggest problem on the 4 laptops I looked at? Windows update didn't have a chance to properly update in recent times. The performance hit on 3 of the laptops was so bad that I thought they were infected with malware.

    I spent a lot of time hunting for what could be "the real problem" because I refused to believe that Windows Update background processes ALONE would impact each laptop so much. 50% CPU usage? "100%" disk usage?? (inaccurate measurement but the thrashing was noticeable). I couldn't believe that Windows Update would eat the laptop's lunch, but yes, that was THE problem. It made browsing difficult, and watching videos was a no-go.

    Once each laptop was FINALLY able to pull down and install the updates, they were able to idle without becoming as hot as the sun. It took one of the systems 14 hours to finally reach that point. (A more seasoned computer user would've let the thing idle overnight before it reached that point, but this particular laptop was in the hands of a non-savvy user; i.e., "real world conditions".)

    So, no, don't make a blithe guess that those services have minimal impact. In "real world" circumstances - including woefully underpowered systems that MS encouraged people to update to W10 - the performance impact of background Windows Update processes is significant. Throttling or disabling those services while IE is active is a huge cheat and that API should be advertised to FireFox and Chrome.

  48. Re:I believe it, and still won't use either of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest reason people use Chrome today is fanboyism I suspect.

    Or that it "just werks" for most use cases, plus the google account integration gives it a seamless experience across devices. Sure, you still need to install uBlock and NoScript, but that's the same deal as Firefox. I'm not praising google, but they make a product that lots of users want, and they're going to tailor it more towards those users than the power users who inevitably use other open source browsers.

  49. Big deal by nctritech · · Score: 1

    Battery claims don't matter when your browser royally sucks like Edge does. I will take a 50% loss of battery time if it means I can use a browser that can right-click and "save image" or "view image" or "copy image location." Edge can't even be used to save a copy of the current page. What a total piece of crap. Useless for any kind of real work.

    BUT IT MAKES YER BATTERY LAST LONGER WHILE YOU GET NOTHING DONE, HURR DURR HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

  50. Re:What about Opera? by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    Brave is another Chrome reskin like Opera and Vivaldi.

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  51. Re:I switch between Edge, Chrome and Firefox All D by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    You forget 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.
    Also, they are a multi-billion dollar company. I should not have to give them a chance for there new software. They should finish making things before they release them.

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  52. Edge has compatibility problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if you want most web apps to work pick chrome or safari.

  53. Edge doesn't work on my systems either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first upgraded my laptop (Asus) and desktop (Dell) to W10, Edge worked ok. Nothing fancy, but I used it as a "clean" browser when I needed a quick window. Now, after several W10 updates, Edge behaves exactly as pecosdave writes: it is glacially slow, can't download, and can't even access most websites. FFox and Chrome OTOH have no problem. MSFT broke it. Again.

  54. Windows tweaked to run Edge better by najajomo · · Score: 1

    Title corrected to more accurately reflect the reality.

  55. And the winner is... by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

    In a contest to see which browser is the fastest to track every single thing you do on-line, plus pull down your computer's pants and rape it for every bit of private information it can gather about you, your friends, your family and your business associates, and report all of the above to its master, the winner is...

    May I have the envelope, please...

    Well, ladies and gentlemen, I've never seen anything like this before. Ladies and gentlemen, we have a tie!

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  56. Dear Microsoft by Tom · · Score: 1

    I don't care.
    Not what you claim, nor whether or not it is true.

    You ruined your reputation through decades of being evil. It won't recover anytime soon, no matter what. Especially not as long as you don't admit to the massive damage you have done to computing. We would be 10 years into the future without you, so for at least that time, suck it up and stop crying.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  57. Chrome: Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chrome was like an ideal roommate at the beginning. He did what he said he was going to do, cleaned the place up, kept to his side of the apartment and was just cheery and positive all the time.

    A couple years on- that same roommate now drinks all the fucking soda in the fridge, puts his shit wherever he damn well pleases, stays up all goddamn nite doing god knows what, and invites all his reprobate friends over at ungodly hours. I could give a fuck if he could tell me the temperature in Bangok or the dominant cultural mores of eastern Morocco at the drop of a hat. He's a smug, entitled bore.

    Same with Chrome. What a fucking me-first bloatfest. I could go on with all the ways the Google of Now is turning into the Microsoft of Yore that used to be so eloquently enumerated here, but if you've got half a brain cell you could parse them yourself. Chances are, you already have begun to, in some form or another.

    Google's not the first champ to become self-importantly drunk on their own reflection. I use Edge and Safari. I'll break any Chromebook I can reasonably get away with.

    Did I mention fuck do-no-evil Google?

  58. Re:Microsoft cheats when it comes to Edge performa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this were true, then the solution would be to run an empty Edge window that you don't ever use.

    Don't get me wrong: I'm no Microsoft fan (I don't even use Windows anymore), but cynic in me thinks your anecdote is just wishful thinking.

  59. Re:I believe it, and still won't use either of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your use of "it just werks" makes it sound like other browsers don't work. For 99% of users out there, all the major browsers will view 99% of pages they visit perfectly.

  60. And wins for spying and data theft! Advertising ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a bonus!

  61. Update - had to do it again by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    So the laptop in question is nearly four years old and has had the same SSD the whole time.

    The SSD died last week, probably because the install flipped bits that hadn't been flipped in a long time.

    I reinstalled the OS from scratch AGAIN on a new SSD of the same size.

    Edge is working fine, I was able to download and install Brave without issue - all other hardware is the same and I used the same methodology and even the same install media to rebuild.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.