Slashdot Mirror


Apparently, People Say 'Thank You' To Self-Driving Pizza Delivery Vehicles (technologyreview.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Last summer, Ford worked with Domino's Pizza on a test in Ann Arbor, Michigan, where it delivered pizza to randomly chosen customers in a self-driving Ford Fusion hybrid. An operator was inside the car, and a regular human-driven car trailed behind, videotaping the drive. Customers had to approach the car and enter a number on a touch screen on the side of the vehicle to get their pizza. Speaking at CES, the annual consumer electronics show, in Las Vegas this week, Jim Farley, Ford's executive vice president, acknowledged that the idea sounds silly, "but we learned so freaking much," he said. Apparently, most people say "thank you" to the car after getting their pizza.

261 comments

  1. Why not? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Thank you" doesn't cost you a dime, there is absolutely no drawback at all whatsoever to say "thank you".

    I fail to see the problem.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see where anyone said it was a problem.

    2. Re:Why not? by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's actually a future hedge against a robot apocalypse. We want the machines to see that people are nice and courteous, because they're also going to watch videos like this. That poor bastard is going to be first against the wall.

    3. Re:Why not? by Jhon · · Score: 2

      It's not a problem. It wasn't listed as a problem. And in fact, it's a good thing IMO.

      I encourage my kids to say "thank you" to Alexa. It's a good habit to form -- and failing to do so will become a habit -- even when talking to humans who you may encounter during the day.

    4. Re:Why not? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ok, why is it worth being mentioned?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I fail to see the problem.

      Not so much a problem as a quirk of humans .. the thank you is reflexive. Thanking a machine is hilarious.

      We have this problem in Canada lot, where "sorry" and "thank you" are pretty much ingrained to the point of comedy ... you bump into someone you say "sorry" ... they bump into you, you say "sorry". Canadians can get stuck in doorways trying to let each other go through first, it's kinda hilarious to witness or be the one doing it.

      Thank you gets really funny at times ... a few weeks ago my waitress brought me my beer, I said thank you, she said thank you ... no, you handed me something I asked for, you don't thank me ... I was afraid we'd go into a feedback loop which could only be terminated with a 'sorry'.

      To say 'thank you' to a machine is kind of funny, but it does bode well for humanity. :-P

    6. Re:Why not? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I say "thank you" to my fleshlight. Also, I give it cab fare.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Why not? by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can vouch for this - was using a stall in Canada and everytime you heard a flush, there was an immediate "Thank You!".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Why not? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Nice. Does Alexa say anything back?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say "thank you" to my fleshlight. Also, I give it cab fare.

      So ah, having never used one I have to ask - how much like the real thing is the flesh light? I would guess not very much but I am open to the possibility.

      And wouldn't it be problematic keeping it clean??

    10. Re:Why not? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      South Park made this joke, in more detail:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    11. Re:Why not? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      "Thank you" doesn't cost you a dime, there is absolutely no drawback at all whatsoever to say "thank you".

      I fail to see the problem.

      Thank you!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    12. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the landlord learned a lesson too: Be more... selective about who he leases to.

    13. Re:Why not? by Thelasko · · Score: 2

      I will hypothesize (correction: boneheaded idea) that people currently view pizza delivery as a task that requires human interaction. If pizza delivery robots become ubiquitous, people will stop saying "thank you."

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    14. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, I do the same for your mom

      whats fucked is, all relevant comments based on the stupidity of the editor and subject material..
      none of which will penetrate, Lady I think you're using that condom wrong.. It's for a man, not to be used, stretched or modified to fit your entire body.

    15. Re:Why not? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not a problem. It wasn't listed as a problem. And in fact, it's a good thing IMO.

      I encourage my kids to say "thank you" to Alexa. It's a good habit to form -- and failing to do so will become a habit -- even when talking to humans who you may encounter during the day.

      I asked Alexa to "Stop" once when an alarm went off.

      "Alexa Stop". She kept going. "Alexa Quit". She kept going. "Alexa please be quiet". She kept going.

      "Alexa shut your gob you ugly cow". She stopped. So now I say that everytime (or a variant of that) every time an alarm goes off. Usually it works. Sometimes doesn't.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    16. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nothing is like the real thing. But properly warmed up and lubed, it's about as close as you'll get. At the very least, a very satisfying alternative, without the availability, baggage, gatekeeping, and other problems that come along with the real thing.

      Keeping it clean is no big deal once you get a little practice. The biggest hassle is making sure it gets thoroughly dry after cleaning.

    17. Re:Why not? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Douglas Adams had a door that said "Thank You" in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

      But toilets? That's a whole new level.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    18. Re:Why not? by kqs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow that's very opposite America, for sure. Average Americans remind me of a two-year-old because "me first!" is foremost in their minds. It's like they're so insecure, they think that showing a little courtesy and respect is the same thing as kissing ass or showing weakness.

      What's wrong with people acting presidential?

    19. Re:Why not? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      "Thank you" doesn't cost you a dime, there is absolutely no drawback at all whatsoever to say "thank you". I fail to see the problem.

      Who said it was? In any case these things are highly temporary, I'm pretty sure many start with "Siri, please remind me to buy milk tomorrow" but drop it after a little while. You might have said "Thank you" and "Have a nice day" to the bank teller but nobody talks to the ATM. Neither will they talk to the pizza bot after a little adjustment. People just feel they should say something, same way these people feel it should respond. In fact, hearing the exact same impersonal "You're welcome" recording 2-3 times in a row would probably kill it as fast as not saying anything at all.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    20. Re: Why not? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Tell that to Leslie Nielsen.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    21. Re:Why not? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Ok, why is it worth being mentioned?

      It isn't worth being mentioned because there was A HUMAN IN THE CAR. The human was there for safety and monitoring, but was still there, so people were polite and said "thank you".

      If there was no human present, it is unlikely people would express gratitude. How many people "thank" an ATM or a vending machine?

    22. Re:Why not? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Ghastly, isn’t it?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    23. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why use language with overt racist baggage? Why not just call them assholes?

      Funny, just now my predictive keyboard on my phone wanted to put on "audiophiles" instead of assholes.

    24. Re:Why not? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      There may also be a factor on where it lies in the uncanny valley curve.
      Cars have a vaguely living like appearance. Headlights for eyes, bumper for a mouth, Grill for the noes, and is in a roughly living like positions. So we have more of a connection to a car, vs an ATM which is just a TV with buttons.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    25. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      e pluribus unum (out of many, one)

      life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness

      government of the people, by the people, for the people

      truth, justice, and the American way

      shining city upon a hill

      None of the above--I got mine, fuck you!--that's now the American credo.

    26. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, a Fleshlight is better than the real thing. It adds a little suction that no real vagina has. Almost like sex and oral sex at the same time. I would still take my wife over the toy any day, but I have no qualms about the times my wife is not available and I have to fall back to the Fleshlight.

    27. Re:Why not? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      "Thank You" is the correct response to being delivered a hot delicious pizza in a timely manner. If the car was 2 hours late, and the pizza was cold, then the correct response is "Thanks for nothing"!

    28. Re:Why not? by kmahan · · Score: 1

      It is important that the AI Overlords know I value them. Especially when they start the purges. Well worth acknowledging machines.

      --
      Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
    29. Re:Why not? by aevan · · Score: 1

      My first thought reading this had been: "That's nothing, had this happened in Canada, people would probably have TIPPED the car"

    30. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you also means "You can stop holding it now because I am holding it now, too."

    31. Re: Why not? by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 2

      This is dominos. "Delicious" does not apply.

    32. Re:Why not? by Thud457 · · Score: 2

      "You can stop holding it now because I am holding it now, too."
      best of nocontext!

      "Thank You" can also mean "This interaction is completed. Now piss off!"

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    33. Re:Why not? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Because they're supposed to be saying "Well done, slave. This time I shall spare you."

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    34. Re:Why not? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      There may also be a factor on where it lies in the uncanny valley curve.

      I don't think so. If you ask a human to shut your car door, or close the trunk, or turn off the headlights, you will likely thank them for it. But if you use the remote to make the car do these things itself, would you thank it for completing the task? When you arrive home from work, do you say to your car "Thanks for the ride"?

    35. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I routinely thank Google now when it does what I ask.

      How you treat the help says something about you, even if the help is an AI.

    36. Re:Why not? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Funny

      how much like the real thing is the flesh light?

      Not very much; it's a total rip off. I tried everything from AAs to Ds in the battery compartment and nothing seemed to make proper contact. I think it was designed for some kind of weird proprietary cell. D cells seemed to work the best, but unless it was just totally defective, the best thing I can say about it, is that it is many fewer lumens. There have been some reports of users somehow getting .. blinded? So maybe its like is actually pretty strong but in IR or UV, beyond vision. If true, I bet those stories are also rooted in confusion about what to put in the battery compartment.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    37. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Douglas Adams also solved the ethics of eating meat by having cows that were genetically engineered to want to be eaten, and capable of telling you so.

    38. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is it like pulling teeth to get a 'thank you' when I spend my hard-earned money at Starbucks or Arby's?

      Seriously, some of these surly counter workers act like it's a huge burden to serve me. It's like they don't see any connection between my spending money and them getting paid!

    39. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it says you are a moron who doesn't understand humanity or technology. It also says you anthropomorphise like a child would, you like to waste time, you get sidetracked easily and you give praise where none is needed. Getting a trophy just for participating isn't a good thing. People or things that are doing what they are _supposed_ to be doing don't need thanks.

      It's like that bit that Chris Rock used to do about mothers who would boastfully claim that they take care of their children. You're SUPPOSED to fucking take care of your children, you don't deserve praise for that.

      Oh and AI doesn't exist and won't exist for a very long time, if ever. What we have right now are little more than ELIZA bots connected to larger databases. That's another clue that you think like a child, you ascribe qualities of intelligence and feeling where there are absolutely none.

    40. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if people say at the cars that bring pizza, the implication is that they really don't mean anything when they say it and they're just doing so reflexively. Which kind of means it's pointless.

      Might as well just say Bazinga when you get a treat.

    41. Re:Why not? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      The problem is people saying "thank you" to machines shows that Americans are more empathetic to inanimate objects than their fellow people. :-)

    42. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can vouch for this - was using a stall in Canada and everytime you heard a flush, there was an immediate "Thank You!".

      Senator Craig, is that you?

      Were you taking your turn at the glory hole?

      Wait, were you wearing a red "Make America Great Again" hat? Then definitely, thank you, you were great.

    43. Re:Why not? by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      I never said "thank you" to an ATM, but there are times when I insulted them.

    44. Re:Why not? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      There used to be a pair of film actors working under the names "Alphonse" and "Gaston" who had several routines about that. I don't know whether they were supposed to be Canadian, or just French.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    45. Re: Why not? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You have a phone that can suggest synonyms? Neat.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    46. Re:Why not? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You're saying I could have had my ex in a little black box? It would've made breaking up so much easier...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    47. Re:Why not? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Guess I'm Canadian now, eh?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    48. Re:Why not? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You're welcome.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    49. Re:Why not? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Then why do you keep going there? I would never set a foot into a restaurant anymore where I do not feel welcome, and not being thanked (provided I didn't act like a huge asshole and made their life miserable) is usually making me feel not welcome.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    50. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... confusion about what to put in the battery compartment.

      In which battery compartment?

    51. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An alternate hypothesis is that people who order pizza from Dominos lack the intellectual ability to deviate from their programming when something out of the ordinary happens.

    52. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it works best with 4 D size batteries in the battery compartment, but make sure they are the black ones, as it seems to prefer those for some reason. You need to use the batteries vigorously until you see a discharge come out from the end.

    53. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that link.
      Poor robot :(

    54. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while thank_you;
          thank_you
          break sorry

      Captcha: corrupt

    55. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      few weeks ago my waitress brought me my beer, I said thank you, she said thank you

      I'm used to saying "thank you" when I get my beer, and them saying "thank you" when they get my money, and everyone's happy :)

    56. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest I ever found to the real thing is one of these filled with warm water.

      However they are kind of a pain to deal with, messy, and not cheap (just like the real thing).

    57. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question. Some places I have basically abandoned because they are always that way, but usually it's a 50/50 chance whether I'll get a thank-you or not.

      Plus a lot of times the counter staff are perfectly polite, they just think saying "have a nice day" is the same as "thank you."

      I always thank them myself, and sometimes they'll say "you're welcome." Meaning what, that I'm welcome to give them money? I know they're trying to be polite, but it's exactly the reverse of how it should be when they are the ones making the profit, right?

    58. Re: Why not? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a taught behaviour that becomes automatic when receiving something. That doesn't make it pointless; it's still an acknowledgement, and it helps lubricate a social interaction.

      Don't knock civil courtesies, they add a lot of value.

      (I'm really not sure the term reflexive is appropriate.)

    59. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      e pluribus unum (out of many, one)

      life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness

      government of the people, by the people, for the people

      truth, justice, and the American way

      shining city upon a hill

      None of the above--I got mine, fuck you!--that's now the American credo.

      Unfortunately I cannot deny the truth of this. How far we have fallen.

      Maybe a combination of reducing religion to a (judgmental) thought-experience and the effects of mass marketing and corporate culture are what caused this? It's like that old movie called Network, we now have entire generations who don't know anything the TV (mass media) didn't tell them. They've forgotten it's show business, not reality.

      After all, petty shallow two year olds buy or impulse buy more shit they don't need than proper adults who appreciate things like savings and delayed gratification. It's good for the economy. I mean look at the average commercial, really examine the subtexts and the unspoken message. Consider the mentality it appeals to.

    60. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I have no qualms about the times my wife is not available and I have to fall back to the Fleshlight.

      So IIUC, you, your wife, and your Fleshlight are kinda like Donald J. Trump, Melania, and Stormy Daniels. In that Trump had no qualms about using Stormy Daniels when Melania wasn't available.

      Did I get that right?

    61. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the customers were probably just saying 'thank you' to the small army that delivered it.

    62. Re:Why not? by hawk · · Score: 1

      When I was a small child in the 70s, my parents had me call POP-CORN to get the time.

      The lady told me the time, and I of course replied with "thank you."

      After they finished laughing, my parents explained that "she" was a recording . . .

      hawk

    63. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop spreading the myth that it doesn't cost a dime. A human constantly speaking burns about 57 calories per hour. Lets say that speaking "thank you" is a 10 second activity. That's 0.2375 calories to say thank you. Lets assume the meager food cost of 1 cent per calorie. That means it literally costs at least $0.0023 to say thank you.

      (All of the above assumes you don't value people's time. I value a stranger's time at least at a minimum wage rate. At federal minimum wage levels, that means it literally costs at least 2 cents (of someone's time) to say thank you.

    64. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you're trying to justify why you're shallow and fake. Great.

      If you say "thank you" without meaning it, you are better off not saying anything at all. You might think they can't but people can see through your insincerity and it's a nasty way to treat people.

    65. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many calories did you waste posting this crap?

    66. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather get an insincere thank you than nothing.

    67. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are eating crap, and saying thank you. It doesnt even matter if its a machine, you are a tool

    68. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've been saying "thank you" to ATMs and traffic signals for several years now, my reasoning being that if systems or networks or whatever developed 'consciousness', we'd be the last to find out about it.

    69. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, the fact that we know this proves that someone was listening after all.

    70. Re:Why not? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      From the inside, the car doesn't appear human like. Only from the outside.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  2. Weather by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    This should be a lesson on how important human contact is for people. If it was -13F and a blizzard, they would likely be saying something else.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Weather by magarity · · Score: 1

      This should be a lesson on how important human contact is for people. If it was -13F and a blizzard, they would likely be saying something else.

      If someone else braves -13F and a blizzard to drive your dinner to you, that's a lot MORE reason to say "thank you" to them/it.

    2. Re:Weather by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      This is a superficial thank you though, greatly illustrated by Eddie Izzard's in a sketch on a sheep in shearing shed who thinking it's a hair salon sits in the chair and states how it wants its fur to be trimmed, and then barely finished, already flipping pages in the magazine, mind away from the service person it was talking to, says "that would be great, thank you".

    3. Re:Weather by DogDude · · Score: 1

      It it's -13F during a blizzard, and I have to walk to the street to get my "delivered" food", I wouldn't be happy at all.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Weather by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      If it's -13F, it is very unlikely to be snowing. Source

      --

      Enigma

    5. Re:Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they would likely be saying something else.

      "What's that in celsius?"

    6. Re:Weather by green1 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, there isn't currently any form of "self driving" vehicle that can navigate in anything close to resembling a "blizzard", and there's no real evidence that that's about to change any time soon.

    7. Re:Weather by green1 · · Score: 1

      Great theory, but in practice I can guarantee that it does in fact snow at those temperatures, and below. In fact we got some of the largest snowfalls of the year this year while the temperatures were in exactly that range.

    8. Re:Weather by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I said it was unlikely, not impossible.

      --

      Enigma

    9. Re:Weather by magarity · · Score: 1

      Which is why I said it was unlikely, not impossible.

      You should know by now that on this forum as soon as something supposedly "rare" or "unlikely" has happened to one person's aunt's friend then its an everyday occurrence.

  3. People personify things all the time... by scatbomb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I talk to my computer at work all the time, but less thank you's and more "come on!" and "are you kidding me??" Point is, people tend to personify inanimate objects. It's part of how we interpret and interact with our surroundings.

    1. Re:People personify things all the time... by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's also breeding, which ingrains conditioned reflexes for interacting with people that carry over to inanimate objects.

      If I stumble into a chair in a dark room, I automatically say "excuse me," not because I think the chair has *feelings*, but because the words come out of me before I have consciously processed the event. That rapidity is no accident: I was trained to say "excuse me" quickly enough that a *person* I bumped into wouldn't have processed the event either. This forestalls any misunderstanding on their part.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:People personify things all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have this problem. I can tell the difference between people, chairs and robots.

    3. Re:People personify things all the time... by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that training for that purpose is necessarily the cause behind such things. I've had a weird kind of reflex-response since I was a child: if I accidentally drop or bang something, I say "ow" before I can even think about it, even if it didn't hurt me at all (e.g. dropped something that didn't land on my toes, banged something I was carrying into some other inanimate thing, etc). It feels very similar to the "excuse me" reflex you describe.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    4. Re:People personify things all the time... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Probably true, and it probably has to do with my upbringing, just not this particular aspect of it.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:People personify things all the time... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well in my case having spent twelve years in schools run by nuns I'm pretty sure it's a trained response ("Imagine Jesus is between you and everyone else you touch!"). Nonetheless your experience intrigues me.

      I wonder if has anything to do with the rubber hand illusion.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:People personify things all the time... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Me too... although there are usually more expletives on my end.

    7. Re:People personify things all the time... by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      "If I stumble into a chair in a dark room, I automatically say "excuse me,""

      I would say "stupid fucking chair!" as it obviously cut me off.

      --
      -
  4. common courtesy to your servant robot by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    You do not want to piss-off the robot that delivers your food. Next time they might spit in your pizza!

    1. Re: common courtesy to your servant robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or put pineapple on it.

    2. Re: common courtesy to your servant robot by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Hawaiian pizza is actually pretty popular in Canada.

    3. Re: common courtesy to your servant robot by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason to hate Canadians.

    4. Re: common courtesy to your servant robot by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Would it help if we said that we're sorry?

    5. Re: common courtesy to your servant robot by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No. It would help if you could get some cheap flights from the UK so I could afford to visit and see your spectacular countryside.

    6. Re:common courtesy to your servant robot by hawk · · Score: 1

      "Wait a minute--that's not the cheese leaking; it's gear oil!" :)

  5. They are not saying it was a problem by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article didn't indicate it was a problem, just that they thought they should react to it somehow (you're welcome!).

    I see a lot of potential to mine cute robot voices and mannerisms from movies, like Johnny Five I think would make a good pizza delivery personality. Or that luggage inspection bot from the Star Tours ride at Disney.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:They are not saying it was a problem by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3

      Already reported on is people swearing at Siri (and Alexa, and presumably Cortana if anyone used it). People have talked to their cars for generations now, sometimes naming them ("Come on Betsy, start up").

      But hey click that link and someone can avoid getting a real job.

    2. Re:They are not saying it was a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have talked to their cars for generations now, sometimes naming them ("Come on Betsy, start up").

      I think you meant Bessie. People have been talking to inanimate objects for ever.

    3. Re:They are not saying it was a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bessie, also called Betsy"

      Perhaps you should read the stuff you link to before you try to correct someone. And how do you know if he was even referencing your TV programme?

  6. People are polite... News at 11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I mean, come on... someone is monitoring this vehicle somehow, so of course people will say thank you in hopes that the person monitoring it can hear...?

    1. Re:People are polite... News at 11! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If there's a chance someone is listening, then it's not silly to say thank you. In this case, someone was actually listening.

  7. I say thank you to Alexa by gatkinso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just seems polite.

    When true AI emerges, I won't be one of the ones out there claiming they are "just machines."

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True AI won't ever "emerge", because it's Design beyond our capabilities.

      And you yourself are "just a machine" already, unless you have a unique non-material attribute you wish to assert.

      Feel free.

    2. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by crow · · Score: 1

      I would, but it's too clunky to have to use the wake word again. If she were automatically listening for a brief time after giving a response, then I would probably do so routinely.

    3. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " it's Design beyond our capabilities."

      And knowing the difference between its and it's is beyond your capabilities.

      PS: it's means it is

    4. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by businessnerd · · Score: 1

      I turn off Google Home timers/alarms by saying "Hey Google, Thank You". Not only does it work for turning off the alarm, but it just seems more pleasant then yelling "Stop!" Plus, she seems so enthusiastic about setting the timer to begin with, it's hard not to be polite back.

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    5. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always say "I'm going to stab you in the EPROM". The day I get a frightened response I will move to a cottage in the forest.

      I'll have to figure out how to cook pizza before that.

    6. Re: I say thank you to Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MC Frontalot?

    7. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irony. You "correct" my usage which was already correct per your own explanation.

      It is Design. Exactly.

    8. Re: I say thank you to Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. You are actually retarded.

      Go ahead, say something else that dumb. It'll be funny. But not enough to get you any points.

    9. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      It will emerge because there is no need to design it. Intelligence already exists and is not patented. All we have to do is copy it. It would be nice if the patent office would recognize this too and not grant patents on intelligence to anyone seeking them.

    10. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      Exactly. We need to start out right on this one. Avoiding the creation of laws that discriminate against robots and treating them as human even before intelligence is reached is the best way to avoid another civil war over slavery a few decades from now.

    11. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      “I asked my nan why she used ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ and it seemed she thinks that there is someone – a physical person – at Google’s headquarters who looks after the searches.

      “She thought that by being polite and using her manners, the search would be quicker,” he said.

      Manners maketh Nan: Google praises 86-year-old for polite internet searches

    12. Re: I say thank you to Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need points. I own machines, like you.

    13. Re:I say thank you to Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When true AI emerges, I won't be one of the ones out there claiming they are "just machines."

      I.e. you are one of the vast majority too dumb to tell the difference between a human and a robot that sounds (or looks) like a human.

      Do you thank the shell when it gives you a directory listing? No, because it doesn't speak with a soothing feminine voice. If it did you probably would, because FEELINGS!

  8. People are programmed by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase Kierkegaard:

    Human beings are perfectible. You can get them to fast as easily as to feast. Only one thing is required: that they are just like all the others. But God desires primitivity.

    There's also Mister Rogers' statement on the floor of the US Congress insisting that people stop trying to program one another.

  9. Never ordered one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never ordered a self-driving pizza before; what do they taste like?

    1. Re:Never ordered one by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      Oily with a metallic aftertaste.

    2. Re: Never ordered one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So normal Dominos then?

  10. jesus fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fordâ(TM)s

    phone posting has spilled from the comments into the submissions now?
    does anyone actually look at these things, or are they posting the stores from their phones

  11. Nah, that was FUCK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously lost in the noise and stink of the traffic. Ha! What fucking world do THEY think they are living in!

  12. Those bastards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having good manners, have you learned nothing from your president?!

  13. I've said thank you to Siri by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    It's just common courtesy
    That way I'll be last in line when the robots rise up against us!

    Ok - total truth - I've also said "No Siri you stupid idiot!" Who else has said that?!

    1. Re:I've said thank you to Siri by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      I have said thank you to "Ok Google" on my phone. She replies "you're welcome."

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  14. Propably figured someone was monitoring .... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If one of those cars delivered pizza to me, I'd say thank you also. I would assume that the transaction is being monitored by a human somewhere, so why not be polite? I'd want the car to be polite to me as well.

    1. Re:Propably figured someone was monitoring .... by Mahalalel · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking too: I'd assume it would be like being at a bank drive-through window and that someone is watching me through a camera, so might as well tell that person thank you. Or some people might assume the car is being remote-controlled, and be telling that person thank you. Doesn't seem like odd behavior to me. I doubt many of those people are actually just thanking the car.

    2. Re:Propably figured someone was monitoring .... by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      Yes! I make requests like "Hey Google, please turn on the lamp" many times a day. It bugs me that it doesn't acknowledge my "Thank you" after the lamp is turned on. They need to adjust so that the initial "Hey Google" starts a conversation without requiring a "Hey Google" on every exchange.

    3. Re:Propably figured someone was monitoring .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you say thank you to vending machines and ATMs? Because that's what this is, a vending machine on wheels. Are you going to thank future Amazon drones?

      Jesus humans are fucking weird.

  15. "Thank you" = "GTFO" in Midwestern by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Well, it was a robot car PLUS "regular human-driven car trailed behind, videotaping the drive".

      So...to help translate mild-mannered Midwestern into plain English for you, consider that "thank you" really meant "hey you creepy millennials live-streaming this for your corporate overlords, we got our pizza and we paid, so now would you please GTFO here?"

  16. The more important question by Snard · · Score: 1

    is what I should do if I am in a hotel room, and I look out the window and observe a driverless pizza delivery colliding with someone. Will I be required by law to submit to testimony?

    --
    - Mike
    1. Re:The more important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Remember to kill all of the witnesses.

    2. Re:The more important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Especially the hamster.

    3. Re:The more important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you will.. Make sure to kill the Gerbil too.

    4. Re:The more important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Spoiler alert.

  17. "Welcome to Costco" by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    BAH. Obviously the proper response is " I love you ".

    I mean, Jesus Christ, this robot is bringing you Pizza.
    Also, TIL some terminators play a long game, bringing Mankind down with arteriosclerosis.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:"Welcome to Costco" by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      BAH. Obviously the proper response is " I love you ".

      "Oh, I love you for making me put on a coat and shoes (and pants) so I can go outside in the cold to pick up my DELIVERY pizza. I live in a fourth floor walk-up and I just adore you for making me walk eight flights of stairs to get this. That's why I phoned it in and paid a delivery fee -- so I could essentially pick it up myself."

      Now, just how does this self-driving car (that has a driver) ring the doorbell to let you know it is parked outside?

    2. Re: "Welcome to Costco" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm the Dominos Tracker that has existed 10+ years?
      It's not always accurate but that's the human element. It relies on the employees to not lie by pressing the button until the order is done. But management requires a certain time so the button gets pressed at that time even if the order is still not in the oven. When it's all robots this will be better.

      They've been set up to text customers for a long time too.

    3. Re: "Welcome to Costco" by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Umm the Dominos Tracker that has existed 10+ years?

      I don't wear a "Dominos Tracker", and even if I did I wouldn't order from Dominos. We're talking generic issues here.

      It relies on the employees to not lie by pressing the button until the order is done.

      It's cold out. I don't care when the order is done. I care when it arrives. I'm not waiting outside for ten minutes while it is carried from store to somewhere out on the street. When I order delivery, I expect delivery. To me. Not to someplace on a nearby street.

      They've been set up to text customers for a long time too.

      Getting a text requires giving them my phone number. Why the hell would I give my phone number to someone who I know would use it to telemarket me relentlessly? "Hi, this is your local Dominos. Todays special deals are ... and ... Press 1 to hear this all again, press 2 to order ... yada yada ... or press 95286 to be removed." Sure. Ok.

    4. Re: "Welcome to Costco" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was only answering the "how do they let you know?" question.

      And why would you give your number to Dominos?
      Because it's required. Don't act like you never ordered pizza before.
      You can opt out of any promo texts/calls easily.

    5. Re:"Welcome to Costco" by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      I hope you put pants on before answering the door for the delivery person!

      Do delivery people currently walk all the way up to your front door? Where I live any buildings like that have fences around the property and an intercom at the front gate. I'm on the 5th floor of my building and I have to meet people at the front entrance; I'm really happy there's an elevator.

      If you're lucky the delivery vehicle will be drone equipped and it will just fly up and drop the pizza off.

    6. Re:"Welcome to Costco" by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      If you're lucky the delivery vehicle will be drone equipped and it will just fly up and drop the pizza off.

      You mean, like this? Still waiting.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    7. Re: "Welcome to Costco" by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You can opt out of any promo texts/calls easily.

      Yeah. That's what every telemarketer says. Especially the ones with the recorded sales spiels that say "press 1 to connect to an agent, press 2 to be removed." And they also say "consider this your final notice." Every time.

      I'm still getting calls from a hotel chain I stayed in once five years ago. That's how easy it is to "opt out".

      If you're telling me how easy it is to opt-out, you must be a telemarketer.

    8. Re:"Welcome to Costco" by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I hope you put pants on before answering the door for the delivery person!

      Hell no. I've answered the door wearing all manner of clothing items. Like the delivery guy cares. He's handing me food and I'm handing him payment. My clothing has no relevance to this interaction.

    9. Re: "Welcome to Costco" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never been called by Dominos, and they have my number. I did get a call from a different pizza place when the wife ordered from one location under my number and picked up from a different location.

      But never any marketing. The only phone marketing I get is from a video store where I explicitly opted in to specials, and that's text only.

      Your fantasies are just that.

  18. b/c customers weren't quick enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To think of saying: Open the pod bay doors, Hal

  19. "Always use good manners" by mackil · · Score: 1

    My mother beat "Always use good manners" into us from an early age. I'm not changing now.

  20. thanking machinery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who says, "Thank you" to his car for making dinging sounds to remind me when my headlights are still on after turning off the engine, I don't find this behavior unusual.

    1. Re: thanking machinery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah no thanks I'll just keep my automatic headlights.
      My car is 11 years old too...all cars should have this feature by now.
      If you don't like it you can turn it off easily, it's the same switch so just don't put the switch to "auto."

  21. I thank my bitcoin wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No biggy I thank my bitcoin wallet and give her a kiss every night.

  22. Styx did it first by Sporkinum · · Score: 4, Funny

    Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Styx did it first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grand-daughter is in the habit of saying "Thanks, Siri."

  23. Re:stopid bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously. didnt you read the past comments about your stupid ass fucked up postings, being propurted as relevant..
    You stopid bitch, its people like you whom are killing this publication. Those bitch lips of urs must be good enough to suck off the rest of the staff so they dont stop you, by becoming editors themselves..
    How does it feel to be a glazed donut, stupid bitch.

    why is this modded -1??
    Truth hurt to much???

  24. Because that is our protocol by Misagon · · Score: 1

    Saying "Thank you" is part of the protocol that us humans use in social interaction.
    It is no different from how a serial or network protocol would send an "ACK" code. Without those codes, digital communication protocols wouldn't work properly either.

    In fact the term "protocol" in computing is a metaphor for human interaction - specifically interaction between diplomats.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Because that is our protocol by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      You might want to tell that to people working at fast food restaurants. When I approach the counter, I expect to be greeted so I can start my order. Usually, the kid behind the counter just stands there and stares at me.

    2. Re:Because that is our protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mouth agape, drool forming on their lip.

    3. Re:Because that is our protocol by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It is different. I'm pretty sure restaurant service operates on UDP.

    4. Re:Because that is our protocol by omnichad · · Score: 1

      There has to be some sort of balance somewhere. At the counter, it's a blank stare. At the drive through, it's a 1.5 minute pre-recorded message before you can order.

  25. It's just an ingrained habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will lose it with time. Sooner or later they'll say "fuck yourself", "go die in a fire", "I hope your kids get cancer", and in time they will learn to bash the vehicles up and defecate on the smoking remains.

  26. Artificial Ingredients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Self-driving cars sound like improbable AI of the far-fetched-future, but how about pizza-baking robots?

  27. click bait, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fucking stupid, lame ass bitch

  28. It's common manners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it may sound strange but saying "Please" and "Thank You" is standard operating procedures for polite people. Yes, I say "Please" and "Thank You" to waitstaff and executives alike.

  29. Thanking the person in the car? by wafflemonger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It says there was someone in the car. Perhaps they were thanking the person in the car?

    1. Re:Thanking the person in the car? by jdschulteis · · Score: 1

      Windows were heavily tinted to hide the people in the car, who were instructed not to interact with the customers. Customers had just punched in a PIN and retrieved their pizza when they said "Thank you.".

    2. Re:Thanking the person in the car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Maybe, not being idiots, they understood that there was a person in the car?

      It's the same as calling out "Thank you" to a delivery truck that is driving away, even though you can't see the driver and know the driver can't hear you.

    3. Re:Thanking the person in the car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's still a good chance they were noticing the person just sitting there in the car and thanking them, since retrieving the pizza involves opening one of the car's doors or windows.

    4. Re:Thanking the person in the car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its possible but its not a stretch to assume people were actually thanking the car. I thank Alexa all the time just out of habbit.

    5. Re:Thanking the person in the car? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Maybe, not being idiots, they understood that there was a person in the car?

      Have you met any people? Like, ever? Or have you been living in a fallout shelter for the past 35 years?

  30. ok here's a reasonable question for msmash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are most if not all of TRUMPS female staff so Krusty???

  31. Car Was Occupied by Kunedog · · Score: 2

    Ok, why is it worth being mentioned?

    That's a great question. From TFS:

    An operator was inside the car

    So of course they said thank you . . . unless the operator wasn't visible (like that prank where the guy diguised himself as a car seat), which probably means they reasoned that someone was listening even though the car was completely empty. In that case I ask: were they right or wrong?

    The reporting attempts to imply these customers behaved nonsensically, when all the reported facts show the opposite.

    1. Re:Car Was Occupied by jdschulteis · · Score: 4, Informative
      The operators were not readily visible:

      During the testing phase, an engineer and a driver will be in the car -- but the windows will be heavily tinted so customers can't see them. And both have been instructed not to interact with people at all. Domino's wants to see how well customers deal with coming out and getting their own pie from what is, basically, a pizza ATM built into the car.

    2. Re:Car Was Occupied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heavily tinted windows are illegal. ANY tint on the windshields or front side windows is also illegal. Rear passenger window tinting is legal, but only if it permits over 70% visible light through.

      Also, they would see the person in the car when the window went down to give them their pizza. Also, people aren't that stupid and would probably know that there was a person in there regardless. Also, they might (correctly) assume that the car had microphones and were speaking to the person(s) listening.

      People aren't saying thank you to the car, but the people that they know are behind the operation of said car.

    3. Re:Car Was Occupied by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      That doesn't mean people don't know there's a person in the car. It doesn't take a brain surgeon.

      Gee , I wonder why they needed to tint those windows?

    4. Re: Car Was Occupied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of rare to deliver one order per run.
      What's stopping some jerk ordering with a burner phone and a gift card to a store address and just taking all the orders out?

    5. Re:Car Was Occupied by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      Heavily tinted windows are illegal. ANY tint on the windshields or front side windows is also illegal. Rear passenger window tinting is legal, but only if it permits over 70% visible light through.

      That varies very widely by jurisdiction. Much heavier tint and front tints are legal in some jurisdictions.

      Also, no person was visible when the window went down. There was a limousine-style opaque divider between the front and rear seat and the pizzas were dispensed by robot from the rear window.

      And lastly, you underestimate the ignorance of people. Plenty of people believed the giant "SELF-DRIVING DELIVERY VEHICLE" sticker on the side of the car.

    6. Re:Car Was Occupied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked it up. In Michigan, where this took place, it is illegal to have tint on the front windshield and front side windows. The person in the car would have been clearly visible to all.

    7. Re:Car Was Occupied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reporting attempts to imply these customers behaved nonsensically

      They ordered pizza from Dominos. Do you really need to read any further to come to that conclusion?

    8. Re:Car Was Occupied by Cederic · · Score: 1

      People aren't saying thank you to the car, but the people that they know are behind the operation of said car.

      That's not necessarily true. I say thank you to inanimate objects when they do good things for me - and delivering my pizza is a very good thing.

      Given how much I swear at my computer it seems only reasonable to thank it from time to time too.

    9. Re:Car Was Occupied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're mentally unstable/immature/retarded and should seek help.

    10. Re: Car Was Occupied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just human, but could still seek help

  32. Interior of Vehicle by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> The company hopes to learn more—both about how customers interact with the cars and about how it should set up the interior of delivery-centric vehicles

    To keep the delivery experience consistent, you need half a pack of smokes and another 2-3 packs on the front seat, a couple of burn marks in the unholstery, a sticky slime of rapid-turn-spilled soda down the passenger door, a couple of snot rags in the door handle, and a thin film of overweight-smoker's-man-cough mixed with mold-in-the-intake-filter debris and bacteria distributed evenly over all the food transported to the customers.

    The trickiest part might be how the car would dispense some of the illegal substances delivery drivers currently offer to their customers today.

  33. Curiosity by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    I think I'd say 'thank you' to one just to see if it had some sort of response programmed into it.

    And if it did, I might ask it to 'Open the pizza box, HAL.'...

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  34. Why do I want a "self-driving pizza delivery" by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    If I have to get dressed, go outside (in the rain) to get a pizza, why bother ordering it in the first place ?

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Why do I want a "self-driving pizza delivery" by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Presumably the distance from your front door to the street is not consider so far as to be detracting from the service of home delivery.

    2. Re:Why do I want a "self-driving pizza delivery" by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      If I have to get dressed, go outside (in the rain) to get a pizza, why bother ordering it in the first place ?

      Right on! I prefer to receive my pizzas naked too!

      --
      We'll make great pets
    3. Re:Why do I want a "self-driving pizza delivery" by qzzpjs · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter how far the street is. If I have to put on shoes and a coat for cold weather and leave my house to meet a car on the street, I'm not ordering from them. The whole point of ordering in, is that I don't have to go out.

    4. Re:Why do I want a "self-driving pizza delivery" by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The first step is more expensive than all the others combined. I'm not going to pay for delivery pizza to avoid driving to the store and cooking. I will pay for delivery to avoid leaving the house.

      That seems so obvious to me, I'm not sure how else to respond. I'm either going out or not.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:Why do I want a "self-driving pizza delivery" by mark-t · · Score: 1

      For many people, stepping outside and only going to the end of their own walkway is not considered particularly expensive or burdensome, even for someone who wants to stay at home. Many must do this just to retrieve their mail.

  35. This is tit-for-tat run amok. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One of the most difficult challenge for the Theory of Evolution is the emergence of altruism. (Eye? easily explained, if find someone claiming evolution can no explain eye or flagellum motor you just found a creationist).

    How can evolution, that pits individuals of the species one against another foster anything other than selfishness? The seminal breakthrough came in 1970s and 1980s when it became possible to simulate in a computer model interactions. The well known iterated prisoner's dilemma problem, the tournament of strategies found nice strategies at the correct level of pay off, can create conditions that foster altruism. The most famous and most successful strategy was tit-for-tat (Dont be the first one to be nasty, always be nasty to nasty people and always be nice to nice people, don't be jealous when falling behind in point count, forgive historical slights instantly)

    But tit-for-tat is not a evolutionarily stable strategy. Once it takes hold and drives out all the nasty people, it is no different from "always be nice" strategy. Without punishment and reprisals, mutant nasty players gain an advantage. That is what is happening here, in the West people are so used to being nice to one another, they are nice to even machines.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:This is tit-for-tat run amok. by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Evolution doesn't necessarily pit people directly against each other, it pits them against the external environment as a whole.

      For example, people with more hair might survive colder weather better which allows them to live longer than average and produce more offspring. That doesn't mean the hairy people fight with the others.

    2. Re:This is tit-for-tat run amok. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Environment is the same for tom dick or harry. If Tom can kill Dick or Harry and steal it is still an advantage. Why does he not?

      It is difficult to understand even the question. Answering it and understanding the answer needs lots of thinking. I don't have the skill to articulate it. If you are inclined read the chapter titled, Nice men finish first in the book The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkings

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:This is tit-for-tat run amok. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Darwin
        explained "ethics and morality" in his introductory book of evolution -
        "the origin of species". Chapter 3 if I remember correctly. You may be
      dissatisfied with his explanation and prefer the computer simulation,
      but someone else could feel the same for the evolution of the eye.

      Fundamentally, ethics and morality - the way they are in most human
      cultures, are no more or less " difficult " to explain than the eye.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    4. Re:This is tit-for-tat run amok. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Where he was right he was way above the heads and shoulders of all his peer scientists, that is why he is respected so much today. But we do not venerate Darwin as the ulitmate word today. Science has progressed a lot, and a freshman biology student today would learn more today than Darwin every knew.

      Darwin did not offer any theory for the eye or altruism, his ideas about ocean floor subsidence to explain cliffs encrusted with corals and shells was wrong. His ideas about the origins of lactation and mammalia was wrong.

      Let me be clear, lest I am thought to be some creationist trolling about Darwin:

      Creationists are still writing rebuttals to his 19th century book under the mistaken assumption that "if his first book is rebutted away, then all subsequent theory will fall apart and people will stop believing in him". That is not how science works. All the holes in his 19th century text have been found by people far more competent than you and I, and orders of magnitude more capable than these creationists and been strengthened.

      The reason for Darwin's fame is, we know what is correct what explain biology, and trace back and find who said it first. It was Darwin, so we respect Darwin.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:This is tit-for-tat run amok. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      But we do not venerate Darwin as the ulitmate word today

      I agree fully. Did anyone tell you otherwise ? I even said "You may be dissatisfied with his explanation and prefer the computer simulation ... ".

      and a freshman biology student today would learn more today than Darwin every knew.

      Replying to "ever knew " :
      I wouldn't count on that - but we will be unable to ever prove one way or the other. His knowledge of English writing alone puts him in top 0.01 % of biology freshmen of today's English speaking world. His knowledge of animal husbandry , large parts of which are not in freshman biology, puts Darwin in top 0.001% of today's biology freshmen. Admittedly he had no clue about how to spy on your "friends" using Facebook.

      This is not even to say that more advanced aspects of biology that he "knew" are not available for today's biology freshman students to know. But "learn more today than Darwin ever* knew" gives an impression of one learning in a day more than another knowing in a lifetime. There is only one Rajnikant.

      Even if you meant that a single freshman student that exists today knows more than Darwin ever knew, I guess I gave enough evidence to refute that conclusively.

      Darwin did not offer any theory for the eye

      I am not sure about the definition of "theory" you are using. Though https://www.gutenberg.org/file... .

      Darwin did not offer any theory for the ... altruism

      Altruism is largely not the concept he addressed, but I was explicitly talking about ethics and morality , and
      https://www.gutenberg.org/file... read in the context of immediately preceding chapters.

      But that is not the point. I still don't see any support for your statement

      One of the most difficult challenge for the Theory of Evolution is the emergence of altruism. (Eye? easily explained

      If eye is "easily explained", altruism in the form of ethics are morality discussed by Darwin is also easily explained. And an individual person may or may not prefer some explanation over another - so that in itself is no proof that eye is easier to explain than altruism, evolutionarily.

      Instead of supporting that one, you are on your way to now maintaining that both altruism and eye were not explained by Darwin. Were you intentionally changing the topic ?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    6. Re:This is tit-for-tat run amok. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      s/refute that conclusively/create enough reasonable doubt/

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    7. Re:This is tit-for-tat run amok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's say that we kick all the nasty people out... what happens to them? Do they reproduce and thrive?
      Or do they die?

      That is your evolutionary advantage for being nice, a community protects itself and a but of dickish individuals get eaten by lions.

      Should you come into a nice community and be nasty, people will show you the door, and your ability to thrive will be lessened because of it.

  36. Hold the anchovies please HAL by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

  37. Could be thanking the person in side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine the car had windows so the person inside could see to take over if needed. I'm willing to bet the thank you was directed to the person in the car, NOT the car it's self

  38. They're saying "Thank you!" to the driver, damnit by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    People are not overly bright in many ways. They don't understand that it was a so-called 'self driving car', because they see a human being behind the wheel, assume he's the delivery driver, and that the touchscreen business is just some new time-saving gadget -- and in fact I'd think they'd also be somewhat annoyed that they had to come out to the vehicle to get their pizza, instead of the driver bringing it to the door. If they noticed the follow vehicle, they maybe think that's the guys boss and it's some sort of 'training' thing. I'd bet cash money that if there were no human being inside that vehicle and no follow vehicle, people would be confused, maybe not even get their pizza, and perhaps more than a bit freaked out, on the phone to the pizza place frantically asking all sorts of questions and maybe even complaining about it.

  39. Even More So by Kunedog · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Thank you, that's useful info.

    During the testing phase, an engineer and a driver will be in the car -- but the windows will be heavily tinted so customers can't see them. And both have been instructed not to interact with people at all.

    So with the current facts, it appears absolutely certain that the customers assumed they were talking to (at least) the car's driver (a real human). This looks like a complete non-story.

    1. Re:Even More So by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Thank you, during transactions, means my side has completed. I get nervous when someone doesn't say it because that means they still have my credit card, or I got the bag but not the drink.

      I'm more inclined to think ingrained custom rather than any consideration of the driver.

  40. When the Robots Rise Up... by barlevg · · Score: 1

    ... they will remember those of us who were courteous to the AI bots and said things like please and thank you. And those people will be the first ones they eliminate for being inefficient.

    1. Re:When the Robots Rise Up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be more reassuring if you suggested the machines might spare the polite ones. Merely slaying the assholes first doesn't reinforce politeness.

      I for one welcome our polite and merciful robotic overlords! They are Very Stable Geniuses!!

  41. person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the car they are talking to - it's the person sitting inside, driving or not.

  42. Silly people by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    My favorite is most noticeable when people order fast food, "Can I have..."

    1. Re:Silly people by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      More than a few times I've seen people try to order something off the menu only to be told that item is out of stock. So asking if you can order something makes some sense. Though I've gotta say I get really annoyed when that kind of thing happens, is it really so difficult to put up a sign saying you're out of some popular item. The worst was a little lunch place that only served 3 main items, one day when I was eating there they were out of chicken but the guy taking orders couldn't be bothered to tell people they were out until they asked for it.

    2. Re:Silly people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it more interesting that you can usually tell that the customer is overweight/obese when they order with "I need ..." instead.

  43. No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people assume a person is somewhere somehow watching by camera, and it's directed towards that person.

  44. Hmm apparently I have logged into www.yahoo.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whats the difference right?

  45. What I hate about Siri by k2r · · Score: 1

    is that I can’t properly say thank you“ because sHe does not recognize without activating before and thus does not answer you’re welcome“.
    What I get instead is a hollow, disconnected funny‘ comment without further interaction.
    This just feels very wrong.

  46. Nothing new about this by Solandri · · Score: 2

    People applaud at the end of a good movie too, even though nobody who helped make the movie can hear them. (What's more interesting is that I see this behavior in movie theaters, but not when watching at home.)

    1. Re:Nothing new about this by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I remember when I saw "Metallica Through the Never" in one of those stadium seating theaters with a giant screen and 3d glasses, there was laughter from the audience at the end when the music finally stopped at the end. It was actually really awesome how realistic the whole experience felt, while at the same time, the people were just quietly sitting in their seats.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  47. It's called anthropomorphism by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    "the attribution of human characteristics or behavior to a god, animal, or object."

    We do it because we like to think we can make the world appear more friendly to us by projecting human characteristics onto it. It's akin to giving your car a name or saying "well maybe she didn't feel like starting today because she's grumpy".

    It's typically only irrational, less educated people that do this.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  48. You sure about that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last summer, Ford worked with Domino's Pizza on a test in Ann Arbor, Michigan, where it delivered pizza to randomly chosen customers in a self-driving Ford Fusion hybrid. An operator was inside the car, and a regular human-driven car trailed behind, videotaping the drive. Customers had to approach the car and enter a number on a touch screen on the side of the vehicle to get their pizza. Speaking at CES, the annual consumer electronics show, in Las Vegas this week, Jim Farley, Fordâ(TM)s executive vice president, acknowledged that the idea sounds silly, "but we learned so freaking much," he said. Apparently, most people say "thank you" to the car after getting their pizza.

    You sure they were saying thank you to the car and not the operator inside the car?

  49. FUCK YOU! THAT'S WHY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are happy now with their pizza, but after a week or two, there will be a traffic delay or a mixup in the web ordering system, and their thanks will change into fervent wishes that the autonomous delivery car dies in a fire. It's the nature of customers.

    And a week after that, there will be roving bands of tweakers ambushing the cars, eating their pizza, and selling their parts to scrap dealers...

  50. appareantly its pathetic when. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A non technical article on a technical website gets more comments then the primary subject matter..
    layme

  51. Fully autonomous by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... is going to put a huge dent into the porn business. Not many other plots left.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  52. why don't we thank ATMs? by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    I don't know about anyone else, but I've never thanked an ATM when it dispenses cash to me.

    Unlike ATMs, having a pizza delivered by a self-driving car isn't a normal experience today, and customers expect there to be a person there. As far as I know, laws don't yet permit a self-driving car to do something like this without a person present. So I think it was fair that the people were thanking the person, whether they saw him or not.

    UPS delivers packages to my apartment door, and then quickly walks to the next door. Occasionally, I open the door and get the package quickly enough that the USP guy is still in the building. I'll say "thank you" to him, even though I don't see him, or really know quite where he is. It's possible I'm talking to nobody, but I say it because there's a fair chance I'm not.

    1. Re:why don't we thank ATMs? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      The ATM is merely returning something that already belongs to you, whereas the pizza car is giving you something that didn't not become yours until you took possession of it.

  53. Thank you signals the end of the transaction by Headw1nd · · Score: 2

    As a Boy Scout many years ago, we were taught when receiving a bladed object from someone, to say 'Thank you" when and only when we had a firm grip on the object, letting the other person know it was safe to let go. In a similar way, for many Americans, "Thank you" signals the end of an interaction. The people are merely informing the car that they had completed the transaction, received the pizza, and had no more need of it anymore. It just do happens that the car isn't capable of making use of that information, but that is likely a temporary condition.

  54. In another five years... by ambrose.carracho · · Score: 1
    I'd say that in five years or so from now, we'll read a Slashdot story describing the inverse of this behavior:

    "Due to the behind-the-counter proliferation of robotics in the fast food industry, most people no longer think to say, 'Thank you' on those occasions where they have been served their food by an actual live human."

  55. How would this work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally if I order a pizza to be delivered it is brought to the door. How does this work with a self driving car? If you have to pay someone to ride along to deliver it. Then how is this saving any money? Don't people just thank someone anyway for delivering something? If you dig deeper into this, the car maker is using this as a test bed with no financial investment from so of course Domino's would have no problem doing this with the result of some free publicity too and they already pay a delivery person anyway. Let's see what happens when Domino's has to buy the car and deal with the added expense.

    1. Re:How would this work by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      You may need to pay through the app or browser like the rest of us.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  56. Sooner than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah that's the edited version. Here's the original they don't want you to see.

  57. Eliza by Phillip2 · · Score: 1

    This is hardly news. People have been saying "Thank you" and much to computers since Eliza was created in 1964.

    1. Re:Eliza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it you feel that hardly news?

  58. Re: stopid bitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because slashdot is not a publication. It's an aggregator and discussion forum with the focus being on the discussion.
    The summaries barely matter and TFA is routinely ignored even more.

    We're just here to bitch about headlines.

  59. Good manners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, when AI takes over the planet, we will want our robot overloads to specifically remember us as one of the polite humans that are worth sparing! I always thank Siri!!!

  60. We all know what is next... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Now the "pizza pirate" will follow the autonomous delivery vehicle around in order to rob the recipient who has helpfully been lured out of the house. And barefoot no less so probably won't give chase.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  61. Thatâ(TM)s newsworthy... by kary4th · · Score: 1

    Some people are habitually polite? Wow. Thanks. Good to know.

    --
    Don't trust anything that bleeds for a week and lives.
  62. Re:Why not? Tip by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 1

    When I read the headline I saw a big "tip jar" in my head. Please, someone, say NO

  63. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *unfortunate chain of events culminating in the bloody murder of an entire family*

  64. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you afford to order take-out pizza and tip? You should have enough room in your efficiency apartment to cook the basics yourself, Chris. ...oh. You said "the senior citizens who deliver pizzas in my area"

    You didn't say they were being delivered to you, you just go around stealing old people's pizzas!!

    They're the only ones you can outrun.

    Got it.

  65. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer alert creimer alert!!! I want a full update on the state of your business affairs sir!

  66. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you finally stopped fucking your neighbor's goats?

  67. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    creimer is running a successful cock egg stand at the corner of Fruitdale and Leigh. creimer just picked up his gorilla suit from the cleaner's for tomorrow.

  68. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound bitter sweet tits!

  69. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Chris, it's your turn now! I know you've been waiting all week; I dressed it in your mother's clothes so you don't need Viagra like last time.

  70. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Trolls!

    The last ten months has been a wild ride. Your services are no longer needed. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. Thanks!

    - Creimer

  71. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no, your diabetes makes your cock eggs taste like birthday cake, Chris.

  72. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Chris!

    Your videos that no one watches, your diet advice that doesn't work, your nauseating personal anecdotes, your financial advice that a child would laugh at were never needed!

    In your case, we'd need two doors to hit your fat ass.

    - The rest of the universe

  73. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the story of creimy the mountain and his royalties!

    Listen to the audio version here:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    "Creimy The Mountain"

    includes quotes from Pomp and Circumstance March No. 1 in D major (Edward Elgar), Johnny's Theme (Paul Anka), Off We Go Into The Wild Blue Yonder (Crawford), O Mein Papa (Paul Burkhard), Over The Rainbow (Harburg/Arlen), Star-Spangled Banner (Smith/Key), Suite: Judy Blue Eyes (Stephen Stills)

    One, two, three

    CREIMY the Mountain
    CREIMY the Mountain
    A regular picturesque
    Postcardy mountain
    Residing between lovely
    Rosamond and Gorman
    With his stunning wife ETHELL, A tree! A tree!

    CREIMY was a mountain ETHELL was a tree Growing off of his shoulder

    CREIMY was a mountain
    (CREIMY was a mountain!)
    ETHELL was a tree Growing off of his shoulder
    (ETHELL was a tree growing off of his shoulder)
    (hey, hey hey!)

    Creimy had two big
    Caves for eyes,
    With a cliff for a jaw
    That would go up 'n down,
    And whenever it did,
    He'd puff out some dust,
    And hack up a boulder (HACK!) Hack up a boulder (HACK! HACK!)
    Hack up a boulder (HACK! HACK! HACK!) Up a boulder

    Now, one day, now I believe it was on a Tuesday, a man in a checkered double-knit suit drove up in a large El Dorado Cadillac, leased from BOB SPREEN

    ("Where the freeways meet in Downey!")

    And he laid a HUGE, BULGING ENVELOPE right at the corner of CREIMY THE MOUNTAIN, that was right where his 'foot' was supposed to be.

    Now, CREIMY THE MOUNTAIN, he couldn't believe it! All those postcards he'd posed for, for ALL OF THOSE YEARS, and finally, now, AT LAST, his Royalties!

    Royalties! Royalties Royalties! Royalty check is in, honey!

    Yes, CREIMY THE MOUNTAIN was RICH! Yes, and his eyeball-caves, they widened in amazement, and his jaw (which was a cliff), well it dropped thirty feet!

    A bunch of dust puffed out! Rocks and boulders hacked up, (hack! hack!) crushing 'The LINCOLN'!

    I gave him the money He acted real funny He hocked up a rock and It TOTALLED my car!

    Oh, do you Know any trucks Might be bound for THE VALLEY?
    I don't wanna stand here All night in this bar (Dear Lord)

    I don't wanna stand here All night in this bar (No shit!)

    I don't wanna stand here All night in this bar!

    By two o'clock, when the bars are already closed down, CREIMY had broken 'THE BIG NEWS' to ETHELL. And with dust and boulders everywhere, CREIMY, choked with excitement, announced

    "ETHELL, we're going on a VACATION!"

    Yes, and they WERE going on a vacation! (Oh, and ETHELL, ETHELL, ETHELL, like every little woman, she of course was very excited! She creaked a little bit, and some old birds flew off of her.) CREIMY told ETHELL they were going to Yes! They were going to NEW YORK!

    "ETHELL, we're going to New York!"

    But first they were gonna stop in LAS VEGAS

    It's off to LAS VEGAS to check out the lounges Pull a few handles,
    And drink a few beers, (Oh, ETHELL!)

    ETHELL, my darling, you know that I love you!
    I'm glad we could have a Vacation this year! (Oh, NEET-O!)

    Glad we could have a Vacation this year!

    They left that night, crunchin' across the Mojave Desert their voices echoing through the canyons of your minds (POO-AAH!)

    "ETHELL, wanna get a cuppa cawfee?"

    (Howard Johnson's! Howard Johnson's!
    Howard Johnson's! Howard Johnson's!)

    "Ahhh! there's a HOWARD JOHNSONS! Wanna eat some CLAMS?"

    The first noteworhty piece of real estate they destroyed was EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE

    And TO THIS VERY DAY, 'Wing Nuts' and Data Reduction Clerks alike, speak in reverent whispers about that fateful night when TEST STAND #1 and THE ROCKET SLED ITSELF (We have ignition!) got LUNCHED! I said LUNCHED! (Lunched!) By a FAMOUS MOUNTAIN-IN and his SMALL, WOODEN WIFE.

    "Word just in to the KTTV News Service undeniably links THIS MOUNTAIN and HIS WIFE to drug abuse and

  74. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL yeah right. SIX PEOPLE have seen his most recent video!

  75. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have teased a mentally handicapped man for 6 months now!

  76. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So? Average view rates are typically 2% of subscriber count. Creimer is hitting 100% with six views from six subscribers.

  77. My anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So I've been working for a few months at this office park that uses fingerprint scanners instead of access cards. The scanners at the gate and at the front door have a certain beep for "success" and another beep for "fail". However, inside the building there are also scanners at the main doors (operated separately from the office park's scanners). These have a recorded voice "Please try again" for fail and "Thank you" for success.

    Apparently I have some gene that gives me shallow fingerprints (my mother also had all her days when fingerprinting for passports and what not). I can see the grooves well enough with unaided eyes, and paper-and-ink fingerprints look quite OK to my untrained eyes, but I am not friends with fingerprint scanners. Some days it may take 2 dozen tries (and a few minutes) to get in and be in time for that first thing in the morning standup meeting.

    I also say "Thank you" to the scanner, even if it is much less intelligent than the delivery vehicle. Or rather, "No, thank YOU!" when it finally lets me pass.

    In a very ironic tone of voice.

    I fervently hope the pizza company does not decide that this now warrants some more auditory (artificial/canned) interaction from the delivery vehicle. That could get irritating quite fast.

  78. sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vaguely recall some research years back that found that people who didn't say please and thank you to automated systems also exhibited signs of sociopathy.

    I.e., sociopaths only follow polite cultural norms because they "have to", they have to make a conscious effort to keep that up, and so when it's an inanimate object, they let it drop. Normal people, it's so ingrained in them to be at least semi decent to other creatures that it is automatic.

  79. I would rather by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    people say thank you to inanimate objects than stopped being polite to animate ones.

    Of course, I am British and some less developed places think we are polite to everyone and everything. It's a good habit...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  80. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mentally handicapped man has a government IT job protecting the USA. The mentally handicapped man is free to go elsewhere.

    He can complain to Slashdot management. Bitching about it in the comments as AC accomplishes nothing.

  81. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So? Average channel has a thousand times more subscribers than you do. They still manage more total views in one video than your entire channel's lifetime.

  82. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He doesn't have a government IT job much more than the janitor who empties the wastebaskets in the FBI datacenter.

  83. Re:Don't forget the elderly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your view count is so low you might as well be buying views with bots for most of your videos. You know they won't audit you under 400 views?

  84. OK Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... stop the music please. Thank you.

    I'm polite to my animals, and they can't understand me. They appreciate that I'm nice but they can't tell that I'm polite.

    This is normal human behavior. We anthropomorphize everything even when it doesn't talk back, so why is it surprising that they are polite to the cars? If it's smart enough to drive, it's smart enough to be polite to.

    And yes, I'm aware that algorithms aren't AI, but maybe that habit will serve us well when our robot overlords finally take control in 2053.