Slashdot Mirror


Buying Headphones in 2018 is Going To Be a Fragmented Mess (theverge.com)

Vlad Savov, writing for The Verge: At CES this year, I saw the future of headphones, and it was messy. Where we once had the solid reliability of a 3.5mm analog connector working with any jack shaped to receive it, there's now a divergence of digital alternatives -- Lightning or USB-C, depending on your choice of jack-less phone -- and a bunch of wireless codecs and standards to keep track of. Oh, and Sony's working hard on promoting a new 4.4mm Pentaconn connector as the next wired standard for dedicated audio lovers. It's all with the intent of making things better, but before we get to the better place, we're going to spend an uncomfortable few months (or longer) in a fragmented market where you'll have to do diligent research to make sure your next pair of headphones works with all the devices you already own.

276 comments

  1. Don't buy... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't buy hardware that doesn't adhere to established, working standards, like USB, USB-C, or 3.5mm jack.

    The Pentaconn thing seems interesting, as it's still an analog connection.

    1. Re:Don't buy... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That is assuming that you buy such hardware with the initial intent of using such ports.

      While it is ironic that the iPhone was just a phone added to a mobile music player the iPod. However listening to music off the device isn't my main purpose of it. And wireless standards such a bluetooth are good enough for my usages.

      The problem is we are taking ports away from multi-purpose products. So the need for any one of the ports can be removed from the devices without hurting sales in any major way, and they can keep on repeating it, until we have a fully sealed device.

      We can keep this argument for older technology as well. Parallel port, Serial Port, SCSI, VGA.... Sure they may be big and bulky, but heck you can get nearly anything to work with them.
      They key argument against having a 3.5mm jack is the amount of space it takes up. Like having a 25pin parallel port on the back of your phone.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Don't buy... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The Pentaconn connector is basically five-pin stereo XLR for a five-foot run.

    3. Re:Don't buy... by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      Don't buy hardware that doesn't adhere to established, working standards, like USB, USB-C, or 3.5mm jack.

      "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from." - Adm. Grace Hopper or Prof. Andrew Tanenbaum (depending on who you ask)

    4. Re:Don't buy... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a phone is thinner than 3.5mm, it's difficult to hold anyway. What's the obsession with making phones paper-thin at the expense of durability and utility anyway? A few mm of thickness isn't a portability issue. OTOH, it being hard to find a screen smaller than 5.5 inches is a real issue -- footprint detracts from portability much more than thickness.

      Errr-merrr-gerd, my phone is 5-6mm thick, but I can replace the battery in 15 seconds, add storage using an SD card, and use any set of headphones made in the last few decades.

    5. Re:Don't buy... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The headphones I want are US$345 and they have Bluetooth and a built-in FM radio.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:Don't buy... by nctritech · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Don't buy hardware that doesn't adhere to established, working standards, like a 3.5mm jack."

      Fixed that a bit for you. For audio, especially audio on consumer playback devices, USB and Lightning are NOT "established working standards." 1/8-inch jacks have been the only standard for these things for many decades while 1/4-inch has been standard for headphones on hi-fi decks for longer than that. There is no need to reinvent this wheel. Wired headphones for portable use should have a 1/8-inch (3.5mm) jack, end of story. Any wired headphones that don't should be disregarded. Vote with your wallet against this crap.

    7. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The interop problem is already solved: forget cables, use Bluetooth.

      Cables get damaged and the mechanical connection can get strained and damaged as well. All it takes is one "oopsy" and you wreck the jack port or the jack. Either way, you are done listening to music for a while.

      A wireless connection has no such problems.

      As for standards, phones already have Bluetooth, and Bluetooth has more than enough bandwidth to push high quality audio to your headphones (that it often doesn't is purely the manufacturers being idiots) and have had it for almost a decade. In addition, pretty much every device these days has Bluetooth. You can't get more "open" than that.

      Cables DO have uses, but I would argue that they are limited to static installations, like your home cinema. For mobile devices, wireless is the way to go.

      I haven't used cables in my mobile devices in ages (apart from power cables, but that is about to change, hopefully).

      This is a solved problem.

    8. Re:Don't buy... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I have a CAT S60 and it satisfies my needs.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re:Don't buy... by torkus · · Score: 1

      I mean, Samsung gave up the replaceable battery but otherwise...uSD card? Check. Headphones jack? Check. Stylus with storage? Check(Note). Standards-based connector? Check.

      I've learned to do without the replaceable battery ... and TBH I very, very rarely replaced them even in the BB days when they were. I'd gladly give up an extra 1-2mm for another 20-30% of battery life though.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    10. Re:Don't buy... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      1/4" headphone jack! :)

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    11. Re:Don't buy... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Errr-merrr-gerd, my phone is 5-6mm thick, but I can replace the battery in 15 seconds, add storage using an SD card, and use any set of headphones made in the last few decades.

      Not without a converter, you can't. It won't take a quarter inch plug, which is still the standard for better than average cans. Nor a dual 3.5mm airplane/theatre plug, I'm sure.

    12. Re:Don't buy... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Don't buy hardware that doesn't adhere to established, working standard: 3.5mm jack.

      Fixed that for you. USB and USB-C are not fucking standard audio connectors and manufacturers can screw off trying to make them become one.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    13. Re:Don't buy... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Except that Bluetooth headphones require batteries, both for the transceiver and for powering the drivers. And you cannot play analogue music through Bluetooth.
      So they're essentially only for short term portable listening.

      You can have my Grado RS-1 cans when you pry them from my cold dead ears...

    14. Re: Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluetooth 4... Bluetooth 4 LE... Wait a couple years and they'll be outdated to the point that you'll really want to upgrade the Bluetooth part of it. 18 months or so and you'll see battery degradation.

      Wireless headphones are convenient, but expensive ones really need to start making the limited-time battery and the Bluetooth module swappable.

      Compare to the $300 headphones I got 5 years ago. The only really fragile part is the cord, and I can replace that just by unplugging it.

    15. Re:Don't buy... by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

      If a phone is thinner than 3.5mm, it's difficult to hold anyway.

      According to hardware designers I've talked to, the thickness of the 3.5mm plug isn't the issue. The problem is its volume and placement. It consumes 240 mm^3 on an outer edge, on one end of the phone, which is incredibly valuable real estate in a modern phone, because that's pretty much where the antennas have to be -- and phones have a lot of antennas, because they have a lot of radios (e.g. LTE requires 8 radios, and most phones support 5+ bands, plus Wifi, bluetooth, GPSr and NFC). It's also where speakers have to be, and they also require some depth, so significant volume. And where the charging/data port has to be.

      So from their perspective, being able to shift audio output functions to the data port and wireless frees up important volume and makes it easier to fit ever more stuff into an ever-smaller space (yes, phone thickness does come into play here).

      What's the obsession with making phones paper-thin at the expense of durability and utility anyway?

      Dunno. But it's undeniably what consumers want. Thick phones don't sell. Maybe it's not what you want, but the market focuses on volume.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    16. Re: Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quality headphones frequently come with 3.5mm jack as standard with a screw on 1/4" adaptor.

    17. Re: Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really though? I think many consumers look more at the screen, design and specs. It's rare to see a chunky high end smart phone

    18. Re:Don't buy... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Some Samsungs (mostly focused on developing/prepaid markets) like the J3 and J7 still have removable batteries. Why? Because the target demographic is poorer, and not having to buy a new phone every 12 months is important to them.

    19. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, I haven't found a technology that I like better than the 3.5mm. I'll continue to buy and support 3.5mm devices for very long into the future.

      Let me know when bluetooth headphone batteries last months, not hours. Cost less than $20 for a quality pair that I would get made when I run them through the washing mashing or lose them. I can buy a great sounding pair of headphones for ~$20 with a 3.5mm jack, never need to buy/charge batteries

    20. Re:Don't buy... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, there are still countries where not having to pay an additional $50 for a set of proprietary headphones is important, and phones focused on developing markets can be (relatively) easily used and imported to the US..

    21. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like the way they sound your ears are already dead.

      Sennheiser HD600 or GTFO.

    22. Re: Don't buy... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Quality headphones frequently come with 3.5mm jack as standard with a screw on 1/4" adaptor.

      That depends on your definition of "quality headphones".
      High ends intended for plugging into a pre-amp have 1/4" plugs because that's what the pre-amps have.
      They may or may not come with an adapter, depending on whether most 3.5mm devices can drive them or not. It saves on support calls to not deliver an adapter and get calls from people who can't drive them with their phones or other underpowered devices.

    23. Re:Don't buy... by starless · · Score: 1

      I only buy phones that have standard 1/4 inch jacks for headphone connections.
      None of this wimpy 3.5 mm stuff.
      And it's also easier to connect my guitar to it...

    24. Re:Don't buy... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, there are still countries where not having to pay an additional $50 for a set of proprietary headphones is important, and phones focused on developing markets can be (relatively) easily used and imported to the US..

      USB-C and Bluetooth are not proprietary.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    25. Re:Don't buy... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No, they just put a more expensive part (a DAC) into something that's more likely to be lost or broken than a phone.

    26. Re:Don't buy... by Shotgun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can buy a great sounding pair of headphones for ~$20 with a 3.5mm jack

      Which is why they're being pushed out by the big players. Bose can't charge $1,000 for a decent set of ear buds, so they have no incentive to make them. The market has been sufficiently covered by Chinese manufacturing. The only answer is to make something proprietary that you can charge ridiculous dollars to license.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    27. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minus the 3.5mm jack, all of them solve a problem that we never had until Apple created it. Ask me why I won't buy a phone without a 3.5mm jack.

    28. Re:Don't buy... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is a pain in the rear if you have more than one source. I can plug a cheap pair of headphones in and sit back and relax. I turn on my 5.1 sound system and try to play bluetooth across it, but it is already connected to a tablet that is stashed somewhere or maybe my wife's phone. Or, maybe my phone connects to a different device that I wasn't expecting. Or, I connect to the bluetooth earbuds, but the battery runs out 20 minutes later.

      If I rip the cables, I get another cheap pair.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    29. Re:Don't buy... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Also, 3.5mm will talk to any audio system made in the last 50 years or so, especially if you have a 3.5mm to 2x RCA/phono cable on hand. It's great, because I literally use audio equipment that I pick up off the street.

    30. Re:Don't buy... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      I have a CAT S60 and it satisfies my needs.

      I use a fleshlight for that, and it only costs a fraction of the CAT S60.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    31. Re:Don't buy... by tattood · · Score: 1

      Vote with your wallet against this crap.

      You are certainly free to not buy anything that doesn't have the specs you want. Unfortunately, there are millions of people who don't care about those specs, and will still buy the phone anyway. Once the manufacturers see that people are buying them, they will never go back to putting the ports in. The success of the headphone-jack-less phone has cemented their decision to remove it, and never put it back in.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    32. Re:Don't buy... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Especially, don't reward Sony for yet another attempt to foist their own proprietary standard on the world.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    33. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to hardware designers I've talked to, the thickness of the 3.5mm plug isn't the issue. The problem is its volume and placement. It consumes 240 mm^3 on an outer edge, on one end of the phone, which is incredibly valuable real estate in a modern phone

      See, I don't care which edge or how far along the edge the jack is, just that it HAS ONE.

      Dunno. But it's undeniably what consumers want. Thick phones don't sell.

      What if phone makers instead hyped the long battery life and durability? If consumers are told they want thick phones, they'll buy thick phones.

    34. Re:Don't buy... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      According to hardware designers I've talked to, the thickness of the 3.5mm plug isn't the issue. The problem is its volume and placement. It consumes 240 mm^3 on an outer edge, on one end of the phone, which is incredibly valuable real estate in a modern phone

      I know right! We need that space to put in a huge frigging vibrator for your pleasure.

      Mind you it's amazing that Apple couldn't figure it out when this guy here managed to do it without removing any Apple components including the incredibly useful taptic engine that Apple claims was the reason they *needed* to remove the jack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    35. Re: Don't buy... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      8 radios? That doesn't sound right. Do you mean chains or something? I'd be surprised if there was more than two radios between WiFi and LTE.

    36. Re:Don't buy... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1
      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    37. Re: Don't buy... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I've never owned high end headphones, but the ear cushion material is always the first to go for me, way before battery life issues appear.

    38. Re:Don't buy... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ...1/8-inch jacks have been the only standard for these things for many decades while 1/4-inch has been standard for headphones on hi-fi decks for longer than that. There is no need to reinvent this wheel.

      Yes there is a need, and it's summarized in one word; Profits.

      Why have a standard connector when you can charge every customer $29.95 for an adapter dongle.

      Vote with your wallet against this crap.

      Please. This concept died long ago. If it takes even the slightest bit of extra effort, the average consumer won't do it. They take whatever the hell the vendor throws at them and doesn't say a damn word. Consumers are lazy and they don't care to even try and fight for features anymore. And vendors know it, hence the "courage" that has become infectious.

    39. Re:Don't buy... by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      DACs of the quality that we're talking about are literally pennies or fractions of pennies to buy in volume. The DAC that Apple chose to use in its phones was actually quite good relatively speaking, but there's no way it cost more than a few cents, and moving that outside the phone into the cable doesn't really cost any more.

    40. Re:Don't buy... by willy_me · · Score: 1

      USB-C do not require a DAC. There are additional lines designed for analog signals (amongst other things) - specifically, the SBU1 and SBU2 pins. Analog quality on a cable will be crap but if you are connecting directly to a dock it should be OK. This is actually an improvement to the Micro-USB connectors where the USB data lines are used for analog signals. With USB Type-C you get the analog lines while still preserving the USB data connection.

      Of course a true digital connection with DAC is much better. There is no reason why mobile devices can not support both options at the same time - they probably already do. The cheap headphones can just take the hit on signal quality.

    41. Re:Don't buy... by skids · · Score: 1

      "This is a solved problem."

      Ahem. It's been 10 years or so since I bought my Sony Ericsson bluetooth headphones that didn't work with my Sony PS3 because they present a device profile the PS3 developers forgot to support... and many PS3 upgrades later... they still don't.

      GP translation: Don't buy any hardware. (Because nothing on the market fits those qualifiers.)

    42. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want the phone so thin, I can suffer from phone cuts like paper cuts. It's a nostalgia thing: With push for a paperless world, what about us folks that are nostalgic for paper cuts. Seems like our phones can fit that need as they are trying to fill all our other needs (besides make reliable phone calls)

    43. Re: Don't buy... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Quality headphones frequently come with 3.5mm jack as standard with a screw on 1/4" adaptor.

      That depends on your definition of "quality headphones".
      High ends intended for plugging into a pre-amp have 1/4" plugs because that's what the pre-amps have.
      They may or may not come with an adapter, depending on whether most 3.5mm devices can drive them or not. It saves on support calls to not deliver an adapter and get calls from people who can't drive them with their phones or other underpowered devices.

      Today I learned that my Sennheiser HD 560 Ovation II headphones are not quality headphones.

    44. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is utter bullshit. Apple had no problem cramming all these radios and antennas into previous models of iphone which were smaller in height and width. It should be miles easier for them to cram all the same stuff into the larger phones in height and width than their previous ones. There is more dimensional space to add more or spread out components on the motherboard, and components get smaller.

      Thickness of the phone has nothing to do with components like CPU, Radios, etc. They have always been mounted to a single board inside the phone, possibly a daughter board, but they were all still within the same 3d plane of each other. The thing that makes phones require thickness is the battery and somewhat the screen.

      This is the thing that has bitten apple in it's ass, by constantly chasing thinnest phone ever they have had to skimp on the battery because there wasn't enough thickness to put a proper battery into the device.

    45. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are propitiatory as far as audio goes, The ring and tip style audio connector has existed in one form or another for probably nearly a hundred years and still serves its purpose perfectly fine. There is the 1/4 inch variety that is common in high end audio, DJ setups, and used to be used in phone switchboards way back in the day. Then the common 3.5mm variety that everyone has been using for headphones forever, and there is the even smaller 1/8th inch I believe variety that was common on cell phones in the late 90's/early 2000's for corded headsets.

      They are fundamentally all the exact same plug with different dimensions.

    46. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention who's DAC do you trust to perform better? The one built into a device you spent hundreds of dollars on, or the cheap crappy Shenzhen market deal of the day DAC that is built into your $30 pair of earbuds?

      The only place where an external DAC makes any sense would be in high end headphones where you would hope a better DAC would get used than built into any device.

    47. Re:Don't buy... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Bose seems to be doing just fine. They're headphones have been the same price for over ten years now.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    48. Re:Don't buy... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      You are only as free to avoid a phone with specs you don't like as there are alternatives with specs you do like. If the thing you want isn't profitable for some company, then capitalism turns its back.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    49. Re:Don't buy... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Cables get damaged and the mechanical connection can get strained and damaged as well.

      \You say that as if Bluetooth headphones aren't the most fragile things on the face of the planet.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    50. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention before any of this USB C, lightning port BS. At least on Android phones the standard microusb port was capable of being a USB host, you can plug USB keyboards, mice, thumb drives and hell i've even plugged in a USB floppy drive into my note4 and it worked. you just need a USB OTG adapter to give you a standard size female USB plug. I see no conceivable reason other than drivers not being in the OS that an external USB DAC, or like the USB "sound cards" you can get for laptops and PCs would not also work.

      So in an older type android device with a 3.5mm headphone jack, you still could technically use an external DAC on the micro USB port.

    51. Re:Don't buy... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      They key argument against having a 3.5mm jack is the amount of space it takes up. Like having a 25pin parallel port on the back of your phone.

      The Gionee Elfie S5.1 and the Vivo X5Max (both released way back in Q4, 2014) are 5.1mm thick. Making them 2mm thinner than the iPhone 7. And both have a 3.5mm jack on them. I guess Apple engineers just aren't as good at packing components inside a cell phone as these second-tier Chinese brands who can figure out how to fit a 3.5mm diameter hole into a 5.1mm thick body...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    52. Re:Don't buy... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I'll take a nice and rigid and tough 1/4" to 3.5mm adpater any day over a Lightning-to-3.5mm soft and long cable dongle... Likewise I prefer a nice dual-prong (airplane) to 3.5mm right angle adapter, so my headphone plug isn't jabbing me in the ribs.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    53. Re: Don't buy... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The Focal Clear - considered one of the top headphones on the market today - comes with a 1.2m long cable that has a 3.5mm jack. Most of the high end headphones come with cables that support 3.5mm jacks mainly because the preponderance of portable DAPs sport a 3.5mm jack. And yes - I design and manufacture many of those items in the high-end headphone market.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    54. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit, this is just greedy corporations wanting to drm your headphones

    55. Re: Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s not about the run but the power; it allows for more watts from a smaller device. And the two channels do not share a common negative.

    56. Re:Don't buy... by hey! · · Score: 1

      I'm not in principle against using the data port for analog audio out too; the problem is the inability of manufacturers to make an adapter that can last more than a few days without breaking.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    57. Re: Don't buy... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      High ends intended for plugging into a pre-amp have 1/4" plugs because that's what the pre-amps have.

      Not for about twenty years, they don't. The 3.5mm plug is pretty much the standard for almost all headphone manufacturers now, and the good ones come with an adapter for 1/4" use. There are two reasons for this: better compatibility and reliability. And really, the transition to 3.5mm was mostly about reliability. That probably sounds counter-intuitive, because the 1/4" jack is so much stronger and more robust, but it turns out that other factors play a bigger role.

      Compatibility: non-pro gear almost invariably has a 3.5mm jack, and most people don't buy headphones purely to use with pro gear. Therefore, it is better to use the most common plug on the headphones to minimize the use of adapters.

      Reliability: Ironically, the 1/4" jack is actually too robust. As a result, adapting 1/4" headphones to plug into a device with a 3.5mm jack is a recipe for disaster, because the larger plug can't go down into the device, and when tugged sideways, the whole adapter turns into a giant lever that destroys the equipment that it is plugged into.

      Worse, it doesn't even help to use 1/4" connectors everywhere. If both your headphones and the device have a 1/4" connector, then when you walk away with cans on your head, you tend to destroy the wiring for your headphones (often at both ends) because the force required to pull out the plug is way too high. Something expensive still breaks.

      By using 3.5mm plugs, you avoid both of these problems. For 3.5mm-native gear, plugs tend to come out when tugged (even at an angle). In the worst case, the headphone cord breaks, but it would do that with 1/4" connectors, too, so you're still no worse off.

      For gear with 1/4" jacks, the 3.5mm-to-1/4" adapters are designed specifically to be sacrificial parts. When you walk away with cans on your head, the plastic parts of the adapters shatter into several pieces. Ten seconds, a pair of pliers, and a buck-fifty adapter later, you're back in business.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    58. Re:Don't buy... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I have a CAT S60 and it satisfies my needs.

      I use a fleshlight for that, and it only costs a fraction of the CAT S60.

      Just make sure to clean up afterwards.

      And if you sterilize it in the microwave, wait at least 5 minutes before use.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    59. Re:Don't buy... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Errr-merrr-gerd, my phone is 5-6mm thick, but I can replace the battery in 15 seconds, add storage using an SD card, and use any set of headphones made in the last few decades.

      Not without a converter, you can't. It won't take a quarter inch plug, which is still the standard for better than average cans. Nor a dual 3.5mm airplane/theatre plug, I'm sure.

      You you are ruining the party with your geegaws, velocipedes and unvarnished truth.

      I'm beginning to think that a lot of slashdotters don't know abou the real toys out there.

      Then again, if it was an android product that started this, they'd be extolling the virtues and forward thinking.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    60. Re: Don't buy... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Today I learned that my Sennheiser HD 560 Ovation II headphones are not quality headphones.

      You will be disappointed to know that you will need the dreaded Dongle to plug them in to quality equipment.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    61. Re:Don't buy... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Vote with your wallet against this crap.

      You are certainly free to not buy anything that doesn't have the specs you want. Unfortunately, there are millions of people who don't care about those specs, and will still buy the phone anyway. Once the manufacturers see that people are buying them, they will never go back to putting the ports in. The success of the headphone-jack-less phone has cemented their decision to remove it, and never put it back in.

      Because it doesn't mean a thing to them. I wen't bluetooth a long time ago, mainly because I don't want wires. It's phone, I'll be using it as a phone, and the last time I used wired headphones not in a quality environment was trying out the dreaded adapter with a pair of wired headphones. Went back to the bluetooth headset. Which I would use on any phone.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    62. Re:Don't buy... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Cables get damaged and the mechanical connection can get strained and damaged as well.

      \You say that as if Bluetooth headphones aren't the most fragile things on the face of the planet.

      they aren't as fragile as the wires on a wired headset, I've destroyed a few headsets in my day and wrecked jacks when they'd catch on something.

      Bluetooth? I've had4 pairs now, two of the stupid star trek communicator looking things, and two Logitechs. The only problem is that the foam is starting to rot of old age on one of them. Bummer.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    63. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the CAT phone can see when you're hot or not and is easier to wash.

    64. Re:Don't buy... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Errr-merrr-gerd, my phone is 5-6mm thick, but I can replace the battery in 15 seconds, add storage using an SD card, and use any set of headphones made in the last few decades.

      Exactly, do you see the problem?

      How can we profit off of you if you don't need to replace your phone every year?

    65. Re:Don't buy... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2

      If a phone is thinner than 3.5mm, it's difficult to hold anyway.

      According to hardware designers I've talked to, the thickness of the 3.5mm plug isn't the issue. The problem is its volume and placement. It consumes 240 mm^3 on an outer edge, on one end of the phone, which is incredibly valuable real estate in a modern phone, because that's pretty much where the antennas have to be -- and phones have a lot of antennas, because they have a lot of radios (e.g. LTE requires 8 radios, and most phones support 5+ bands, plus Wifi, bluetooth, GPSr and NFC). It's also where speakers have to be, and they also require some depth, so significant volume. And where the charging/data port has to be.

      If any of that were true, how was it a hobbyist (Scotty Allen) was able to retrofit a 3.5mm jack into his iPhone 7?

      No really, tell me.

    66. Re: Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In even moderately high-quality headphones, the ear cushions are readily replaceable.

    67. Re: Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and it's hilarious that when mobile and tablet manufacturers are complaining about the amount of space a 3.5mm headphone socket takes up... Sony comes out with a larger 4.4mm headphone socket design!

      Sony is repeatedly shooting itself in the foot. I wouldn't be surprised if their Playstation Network earnings take a massive dive this year: currently the only browsers you can login to Playstation.com with (say for people who might want to pay their monthly or annual subscriptions) are MS-IE on Windows (Chrome, Edge and Firefox don't work) or Safari on macOS (Chome and Firefox don't work). I've been hearing reports from a number of users that Sony has been breaking payment gateways at various banks, too, which is why we've been seeing an increase in PayPal-paid subscriptions lately.

    68. Re:Don't buy... by Megol · · Score: 1

      Errr-merrr-gerd, my phone is 5-6mm thick, but I can replace the battery in 15 seconds, add storage using an SD card, and use any set of headphones made in the last few decades.

      Not without a converter, you can't. It won't take a quarter inch plug, which is still the standard for better than average cans. Nor a dual 3.5mm airplane/theatre plug, I'm sure.

      You you are ruining the party with your geegaws, velocipedes and unvarnished truth.

      Not the truth. Some people still assume that high impedance headphones are better, they are wrong. Some assume a larger connector is better, they are wrong (well assuming reasonable design specifications - 2.5mm plugs are harder to work with).

      But as people assume that manufacturers sell the things to those who want it, often at a premium.

      Hooking up low impedance headphones to an amplifier designed for high impedance or vice versa can be a problem. It's still a problem with some designs however even those designs are normally of the cargo-cult thinking of "audiophiles" that wouldn't recognize good audio if it bit them in the ass.

      Modern designs allows the amplifier to work great from 30 ohm to 600 ohm. So then then the problem becomes one of adapting 3.5 to 6.3 - which is done in the cable.

      I'm beginning to think that a lot of slashdotters don't know abou the real toys out there.

      And I'm beginning to think you are one of those "audiophiles" that like to quote specifications without understanding them.

      Then again, if it was an android product that started this, they'd be extolling the virtues and forward thinking.

      Bullshit.

    69. Re: Don't buy... by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      The difference for me is that I've never had to jiggle any of my 1/4" cables to make them stop crackling, and then stay absolutely still so it doesn't happen again.

    70. Re:Don't buy... by quetwo · · Score: 1

      Except it's not just the physical jack (unless it's analog like the 3.5mm jack)... If you are using USB-C, lightning or other digital connectors, your headphones also have to support the audio profile AND the codec that is being used. New codecs are coming out all the time. Heck, the first USB-C Beats headphones don't support but half of the codecs in use today.... so they are already becoming obsolete, despite only being for sale for about 2 years...

    71. Re:Don't buy... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Errr-merrr-gerd, my phone is 5-6mm thick, but I can replace the battery in 15 seconds, add storage using an SD card, and use any set of headphones made in the last few decades.

      Not without a converter, you can't. It won't take a quarter inch plug, which is still the standard for better than average cans. Nor a dual 3.5mm airplane/theatre plug, I'm sure.

      You you are ruining the party with your geegaws, velocipedes and unvarnished truth.

      Not the truth. Some people still assume that high impedance headphones are better, they are wrong..

      Protip: If a person makes a comment starting with "GeeGaws, velocipedes and unvarnished ttruth", they are almost certainly not being serious, and you missed several other chances along the way to pick that up.

      So dear sir, you win the whoosh of the week

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    72. Re:Don't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, do those SBU pins allow for FM radio antenna too?
      If USB-C allows both FM antenna and data transmission simultaneously then it would at least replace USB + jack in that situation.

      But, the (improved) wikipedia article contradicts you :
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB-C#Analog_Audio_Out_&_Microphone
      Says no digital/data anything when using analog.
      There the possibility of 500mA power input which I did not know about. At least that's good news (to me)
      If you can merely do FM radio + 500mA at least that'll be something.

    73. Re:Don't buy... by willy_me · · Score: 1

      You are correct, looks like the standard is to use the USB 2.0 data lines for L,R analog audio - just like MicroUSB. But they do fit a dedicated analog ground line which is good and support for a microphone which is unexpected - but great. In this configuration nothing is preventing a USB 3.0 data connection - but those ICs are more expensive to work with. As far as a FM antenna goes, the cable shielding could be used. The shield would typically be left floating from the headphone side and tied to ground (with RC) on the mobile. The mobile would just have to be smart enough to "un-tie" the shield when it intends to use it as an antenna. One could forget about digital data - but it would work for straight analog headphones.

    74. Re:Don't buy... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If a phone is thinner than 3.5mm, it's difficult to hold anyway.

      According to hardware designers I've talked to, the thickness of the 3.5mm plug isn't the issue. The problem is its volume and placement. It consumes 240 mm^3 on an outer edge, on one end of the phone, which is incredibly valuable real estate in a modern phone, because that's pretty much where the antennas have to be -- and phones have a lot of antennas, because they have a lot of radios (e.g. LTE requires 8 radios, and most phones support 5+ bands, plus Wifi, bluetooth, GPSr and NFC). It's also where speakers have to be, and they also require some depth, so significant volume. And where the charging/data port has to be.

      Sounds like you need to talk to better hardware designers.

      Here is a 3.5 mm plug... and this is a large one.

      Having taken apart a Nexus 5, the actual electronics (circuit board, radios, SOC) take up about 1/4 to 1/3 of the phone. The bulk of the internal space is consumed by the screen and the battery. As the GP alluded to, it's the pointless race to be thinner that's to blame, not the internal components.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    75. Re:Don't buy... by Distortions · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I'd rather have a phone that had more battery life... Rather than thinner.
      They already feel like they might snap in half in your pocket.

      I can't comprehend the comments saying the 3.5mm jack is crap.
      It's just contacts providing voltage to speakers.

      There is no way to improve upon it.

      --
      Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
  2. I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know how to complain about companies ditching the 3.5mm jack without sounding like a Luddite.

    1. Re:I need help by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know how to complain about companies ditching the 3.5mm jack without sounding like a Luddite.

      I'm listening to your comment with my $350 Bose noise cancelling, wireless headphones, using the 3.5mm jack because farting around with Bluetooth audio is not how I like to spend my time.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:I need help by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's wrong with being a Luddite?

      Not that this is really Luddism -- interchangeable parts were a big part of the Industrial Revolution.

    3. Re: I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Iâ(TM)m reading your comment on an iPhone while sitting on the shitter and jacking my 35 centimeter dong.

    4. Re:I need help by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      It's not being a Luddite to complain about something that is only being changed to enhance a single company's profits and for no other good justifiable reason. Oh, I've heard Apple's rationalization for why they removed the headphone jack.

      Sort of like the "notch". Let rant about that for a sec . . . how about instead of a notch just have a little bit of bezel gap at the top AND bottom of the phone, and place fantastic stereo speakers there! (Oh, like some Android phones do.)

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    5. Re: I need help by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Well, Iâ(TM)m reading your comment on an iPhone while sitting on the shitter and jacking my 35 centimeter dong.

      A metric dong? Does it have a square cross section too?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    6. Re:I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dont buy phones without a 3.5mm jack", It's really easy, see, i'm doing right now! I can do this all year long. Samsung *seems* to have gotten the message (S8 didint have one, the leaked renders for the S9 again show a 3.5mm jack)...

    7. Re:I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I don't want batteries in my god damned headphones.

    8. Re:I need help by torkus · · Score: 1

      How about "you think it's stupid to give up a standard connector that's more broadly accepted and ubiquitous than the mains socket"?

      Until apple had a stupid, it was literally THE standard for lower power consumer audio connection (i.e. headphones and similar) worldwide. Every-freaking-where. For decades and through multiple complete generations of technology across every audio product.

      The changes to USB-C or lightning or whatever the F else some idiot wants to dream up don't even improve on the connector. I'd say they should have added something like magsafe if they were going to 'improve' but I actually like having something to catch my phone with when I drop it...

      For once I'm happy to yell at the kids to get off my lawn.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    9. Re:I need help by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Because I don't want batteries in my god damned headphones.

      Especially not for on-ear headphones, where you really don't want weight causing them to slide off if you move. But any tolerable weight is better spent on better drivers than batteries.

    10. Re:I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be a luddite. It's less stressfull, and all of our headphones just work :)

    11. Re: I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remove the jack and move to what?

      Bluetooth? Now I have 2 things I have to plug in and charge. The sound periodically drops for a split second which is not a killer in calls but certainly kills the atmosphere when I'm enjoying music. And there definitely seems to be a small amount of lag, which is annoying for movies and gaming.

      USB? Lightning? Now I can't use the headphones with any other devices.

    12. Re: I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on an S8 and it has a 3.5mm jack...

    13. Re:I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a state of the art ham radio connected to a state of the art computer via an audio jack on each. Just because something is "ancient" doesn't mean that it's not the best tool for the job. Have you used a hinge today? I'll bet that you have. Several, in fact.

      Don't confuse Luddism with common sense. ;)

    14. Re:I need help by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I have those headphones. I use them to listen to background crap when I don't want to listen to real high quality music. Unfortunately (fortunately?) my nice Sennheisers don't come in Bluetooth, or Lightning, and neither do most top quality headphones.

    15. Re:I need help by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      pretend you're a musician and you know that people are using the analog hole to pirate your stuff.

      see? just that easy.

      Pro Tip: there are roughly 3 bogeymen that apply to just about everything even tangentially related to technology:
      piracy, child porn, and terrorism.

      How quickly something gets moved on is a function of how many of those boxes are checked.

    16. Re: I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's got a floppy head. Soorry aboot that.

    17. Re:I need help by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Are you suggesting child pron requires Bluetooth ... or a 3.5mm Jack?

      Think of the headphones, dammit!

      Only pirates require thinner phones!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    18. Re: I need help by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      That's funny, your wife tells me your dong is fairly standard.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    19. Re:I need help by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I don't know how to complain about companies ditching the 3.5mm jack without sounding like a Luddite.

      I'm listening to your comment with my $350 Bose noise cancelling, wireless headphones, using the 3.5mm jack because farting around with Bluetooth audio is not how I like to spend my time.

      It is so hard.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  3. Yup. It's already a mess. by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Yup, we're already seeing the mess. My daughter's phone needs one connector. The laptop another. And the Nintendo switch a 3rd. (the switch is still using 3.1mm jack)

    Its beyond irritating, she used to just go from one device to antoher without even thinking... her old phone, her old laptop, and her old 3DS... now its a chore, carrying different headphones, little adapters...

    1. Re:Yup. It's already a mess. by chispito · · Score: 1

      Yup, we're already seeing the mess. My daughter's phone needs one connector. The laptop another. And the Nintendo switch a 3rd. (the switch is still using 3.1mm jack)

      Its beyond irritating, she used to just go from one device to antoher without even thinking... her old phone, her old laptop, and her old 3DS... now its a chore, carrying different headphones, little adapters...

      Her laptop doesn't have a 3.5mm jack?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:Yup. It's already a mess. by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, you're right that it does. The reality is a bit more complicated.

      The issue is that she has 2 sets of headphones. A wired 3.5mm pair, and a wireless pair. The wired pair doesn't work with her phone. The wireless pair doesn't work with the switch.

    3. Re:Yup. It's already a mess. by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even the "standard" 3.5 mm jack is fucked now.

      There's TS (mono), TRS (stereo), TRRS (stereo+mic), and now TRRRS (fucking bullshit). TRRS has been abused a lot in the past, with people using one connector for video, moving ground around, etc. The most recent disaster with TRSS was the confusion between the OMTP and CTIA standards. One has left, right, ground, mic, the other has left, right mic, ground. Depending on what your device has and what your headset (or TRS headphones) have, you can have issues ranging from added noise, the mic not being detected or usable, or even the voltage being fucked to the point you can't drive your headphones.

    4. Re:Yup. It's already a mess. by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      The Switch uses a standard headphone jack.

    5. Re:Yup. It's already a mess. by chill · · Score: 1

      Then back to the tried-and-true 1/4", balanced TRS with XLR used for the microphone port.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:Yup. It's already a mess. by arth1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Switch uses a standard headphone jack.

      No, it doesn't. A standard headphone jack takes a 1/4" plug. The Switch has a standard mini jack taking a 3.5mm plug.
      And it's not a standard headphone jack either, because it is TRRS headset jack and not a TRS headphone jack. Depending on where the connectors are, it may not work. It's a "works with most", not "works with all".

  4. Sorry what? by sinij · · Score: 0

    Sorry, what, I didn't quite heard what you just said. Maybe there is an issue with pairing of my headphones?

  5. 4.4mm? by ArtemaOne · · Score: 2

    I imagine this is true, but why are we getting 4.4mm jack, when so many phones are going super thin and they dropped 3.5mm because it was too big? Only thing I can imagine is if that's 4.4mm wide, and pretty flat. But if that's the case everyone (including Apple) should switch to just using USB-C. Sticking with Bluetooth for now.

    1. Re:4.4mm? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >they dropped 3.5mm because it was too big?

      No, they dropped the 3.5mm jack because the phone was too thin. Battery life suffers also. Thicker phone -> Thicker battery and 3.5mm jack. It's a win, win.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:4.4mm? by StormReaver · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only thing I can imagine is if that's 4.4mm wide, and pretty flat.

      This whole debacle is all about Digital Restrictions Management, and nothing else. None of these new jacks are analog, but rather are all digital. Remember the musical mafiaa's complaining about the "Analog Hole" for decades? They convinced Apple to fill it, and then everyone else dutifully followed along.

      This has nothing to do with aesthetics, size, production costs, and any of the other nonsensical explanations. This is solely to set the stage so you can't easily record what you hear.

    3. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but why are we getting 4.4mm jack, when so many phones are going super thin and they dropped 3.5mm because it was too big?

      Because this is Sony, who are the all time champs at pointless bullshit proprietary components to lock you into their shit.

      This isn't about anything better for consumers, this is about making sure you have to buy their stuff.

      Any time Sony comes out with a new spec, you can bet it's for this reason, and that anybody who is halfway intelligent will know to stay the hell away from it. A Sony proprietary thing is a sure fire sign that it is something you should avoid buying.

    4. Re:4.4mm? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Unless they drop CDs entirely, they're just wasting their efforts. Attempting to plug the analog hole, while shipping easily ripped digital media? Makes no sense.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:4.4mm? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      The Sony 4.4mm jack is analog. Besides, it's easy enough to bypass the "analog hole" with a 3.5mm adapter on Apple. This isn't DRM, more like cussedness and a way to nudge consumers to buy your standard, not buy a $10 set of phones at the local drugstore.

    6. Re:4.4mm? by MagicM · · Score: 1

      Only thing I can imagine is if that's 4.4mm wide, and pretty flat.

      It's not. It looks just like the old 3.5mm one but fatter.

    7. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait. There's a whole roadmap around "trusted" paths.

    8. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They just need to keep chipping away. How many people under 30 still bother with cds? Well then that bit of the analog closing itself. And where it used to be everyone could copy audio with a 3.5mm cable and a tape deck... well who owns a tape deck, and is that cable compatible with pinktooth 16.3 codec 5 alpha (tm) connectors?

      They don't need to completely close the analog hole, they just need to make it really, really inconvenient.

    9. Re:4.4mm? by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Because this is Sony, who are the all time champs at pointless bullshit proprietary components to lock you into their shit.

      I thought that was Apple as the lock-in champs, but I am willing to be corrected.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    10. Re:4.4mm? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Unless they drop CDs entirely, they're just wasting their efforts. Attempting to plug the analog hole, while shipping easily ripped digital media? Makes no sense.

      Moreover, until we get digital audio inputs wired into our brains the analog hole is forever un-pluggable.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, an ice pick might fix that.

    12. Re:4.4mm? by MaxiCat_42 · · Score: 1

      Sony beat Apple by years. They ALWAYS used a different standard to everyone else. I remember my daughter having a portable CD player (90s) which could play mp3 tracks IF they were encoded by Sony's software. They wouldn't play on anything else.

      Phil.

    13. Re:4.4mm? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I've never had more copied music than today. I can copy my collection in about 12 hours, would have taken about 10 years, dubbing, 5 with a late 80s high speed dubbing deck.

      It only takes one person to buy the CD. Then it's off to pirate bay.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:4.4mm? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Sounds like ATRAC, not mp3.

    15. Re:4.4mm? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and they dropped 3.5mm because it was too big

      Wow, someone fell for that marketing garbage?

    16. Re:4.4mm? by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the insight from a decade ago.

    17. Re:4.4mm? by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      No one actually likes phones being that thin, so I'll never understand the move.

    18. Re:4.4mm? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      Besides, it's easy enough to bypass the "analog hole" with a 3.5mm adapter on Apple.

      For now, but don't expect it to stay that way forever. This is a long game, and this is just the next move. It's like boiling a lobster slowly, so it won't release its poisons, rather than killing it outright.

    19. Re:4.4mm? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      yep, had a MD player back in the early 2000's, it wouldn't natively play MP3s, you had to encode them to atrac using their (horribly fucking bloated and cumbersome) software.

      Excellent hardware, minidisc was -- but something tells me that sales and marketing completely shit the bed on that one.

      Of course the writing was on the wall -- flash storage was just starting to get cheap enough to compete with MD.

    20. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm glad you finally came around, I mean 10 years is a long time to take for you to comprehend these facts...but some people, like YOU are special snowflakes that the rest of us have to feel sorry for and take care of.

    21. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like ATRAC, not mp3.

      In what way? ATRAC is from the early 90s.

    22. Re:4.4mm? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      That is what they claim. The reality is there were several phones released back in 2014 and 2015 which were thinner than 5.5mm AND kept the 3.5mm jack. Any claim about "too thin" is simply a lie.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    23. Re:4.4mm? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      You will NEVER fully plug the analog hole. You might make it inconvenient - but you cannot plug it. At some point, you convert to an analog voltage to drive a diaphragm (either a voice coil driven device like a traditional speaker or balanced armature, or a distributed conductor device like a planar magnetic or electrostat). You can always - ALWAYS - find a place to tap off an analog signal in the audio reproduction chain. It may be more difficult, but the hole will always be there.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    24. Re:4.4mm? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      What if I could show you a phone that was 2mm thinner than the iPhone 7 - and retained it's 3.5mm jack? What if I can show you several such phones?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    25. Re:4.4mm? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No I'm more talking about the guy who managed to install a 3.5mm jack along with some circuitry to connect to the lightning jack in his iPhone 7 without removing any of the internal components or making the phone any thicker than it already was.

    26. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if the only output devices allowed are implants connected directly to your auditory nerves, similar to cochlear implants today.

    27. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4.4mm jack is an analog port.... it is balanced instead of singled ended.

      I applaud 4.4mm jack; it allows you to drive balanced headphones with more power and no cross talk between the channels. Devices that have 4.4mm balanced output will also have 3.5mm unbalanced output as well.

    28. Re:4.4mm? by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      Then you could change the WORLD! Or not, lol

    29. Re:4.4mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fuck up was not having MD drives in 3.5" bays, storing arbitrary data.

      captcha : lawyers !

  6. Five headphone connectors by swb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would someone tell me how this happened? We were the fucking vanguard of headphones in this country. We made the headphones to own.

    Then the other guy came out with a three-connector headphone. Were we scared? Hell, no. Because we hit back with a little thing called the Turbo Headphones.. That's three connectors and an aloe strip. For moisture. But you know what happened next? Shut up, I'm telling you what happenedâ"the bastards went to four connectors. Now we're standing around with our cocks in our hands, selling three connectors and a strip. Moisture or no, suddenly we're the chumps. Well, fuck it. We're going to five connectors.

    1. Re:Five headphone connectors by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I bet you didn't see them taking the connectors off completely! Not even an aloe strip to heal your wounds. You need to go to -1 connectors. That's right, people are going to have to plug their headphones into something else, to listen to your music.

    2. Re:Five headphone connectors by DickBreath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Would someone tell me how this happened?

      Apple had the courage to remove a decades old, industry standard headphone jack.

      But industry standard is an understatement. This jack was used by much more than smartphones and tablets. It was the standard on PCs. Old stereo equipment back to the early 1980's had this jack. Walkman cassette players. Car entertainment systems use this jack. MP3 players and personal video pod type players. I can just barely describe how widely used this jack was and for how long. This jack was used everywhere on the entire planet. It was way more standard than electrical outlets which vary by country.

      But . . . Apple!

      The king of ever changing non standard connectors that have "premium priced" cables, dongles, etc. Do you see a pattern yet?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    3. Re:Five headphone connectors by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      We're going to five connectors.

      And two aloe strips.

    4. Re:Five headphone connectors by eneville · · Score: 1

      The king of ever changing non standard connectors that have "premium priced" cables, dongles, etc. Do you see a pattern yet?

      Yes, I get the bit about how they want to make money, but seriously? Who in the industry thinks the population is dumb enough to buy it.

      I can't see a point in changing it, there's no technical benefit. Anything that goes wireless is going to need batteries, fair enough, you have me there, improvements in latency and databus can happen, but in the cabled variety, really?

      Can't the public push back and choose to not buy? What can top a set of Sennheiser HD 206's? Anything above that price range isn't going to get any real, material benefit. Digital on the other hand is going to be subject to more variables and I don't honestly think people should be convinced they're getting any improvement there. Anything analogue that isn't 3.5mm are only buying something that has very limited use by comparison. Please world, make this nonsense stop.

    5. Re:Five headphone connectors by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The public cares more about what advertisers tell them is cool than what's functional. Otherwise, we'd all be driving Volvo 240s :)

    6. Re:Five headphone connectors by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Can't the public push back and choose to not buy?

      Some can. For example, my wife is an iPhone person - Has been for many years - But when it comes time to upgrade her iPhone 6 she'll be leaving Apple and buying a replacement phone with a headphone jack.

      However, she's in what appears to be a small minority.

      People are brand-loyal and seem incapable of 'choosing not to buy.'

    7. Re:Five headphone connectors by eneville · · Score: 1

      People are brand-loyal and seem incapable of 'choosing not to buy.'

      Me too! I /am/ brand-loyal. Loyal to the trusty 3.5mm I know so well. The little connector I've soldered many times to splitters, converters, and sometimes to weird things.

      There is no argument for this, the manufacturers are in cahoots, they've formed a racket

    8. Re:Five headphone connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're going to five connectors.

      And two aloe strips.

      It has seven blades on it! Seven !! Closest shave ever!

    9. Re:Five headphone connectors by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 3

      Old stereo equipment back to the early 1980's had this jack.

      Mmmmh, no. In the 1980's, stereo equipment had a 6.35 mm jack connector, as had my Revox headphones. During the transition to the new 3.5 mm jack, we had to use dongles. Just like an recent iPhone needs a lightning dongle for the audio jack.

      The problem today is not that a new standard is coming, but that I can't figure yet what is the safe choice for the next 5-10 years. Until then, I will stick to the 3.5 mm jack and dongles.

    10. Re:Five headphone connectors by qvatch · · Score: 1

      so Skarp then?

    11. Re:Five headphone connectors by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Isn't bluetooth a standard?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re: Five headphone connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well i just bought a galaxy s7 because it has standards i use at a good price point for me. Tfcard, 3.5mm jack. Life goes on, everything works. I suspect enough people are doing similar (buying hardware with 3.5mm) and 3.5mm may never die. Bluetooth for wireless/digital and 3.5mm for wired is so established apple with their decreasing market share may not be able to kill it. Just dont be the the sucker to pay top dollar for a new standard that you dont need thats going to be costly and annoying. I'll buy something else in about 2 years with it too. Who's going to build it for me? Im not going to replace my large and expensive PA audio system and want my phone with analog out to plug in to the analog mixing desk.....

    13. Re:Five headphone connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would someone tell me how this happened? We were the fucking vanguard of headphones in this country. We made the headphones to own.

      Excellent question. There are two reasons for this.

      First and foremost is the fact that content producers view any sort of analog display as a negative because they can no longer control the content (and, by extension, you). This is referred to as the "analog hole," and as the copyright industry wants to control you and everything you do with technology they have long sought to try to crush ways around it by legislation and, where that doesn't work, pushing new technology. Hence why you get justification for adding it like "courage," which is what was used to justify the iPhone getting these wretched things. In other words - "because I say so," according to Big Tech.

      The second factor is much more straightforward. They don't want you to be able to buy a pair of headphones for $10 that works with everything, they want you to buy a pair of headphones that costs $50-$200 (or more) that works with one or two things, and that itself will probably connect with no new devices in about five years or so. Welcome to the format treadmill!

      TL;DR - New headphone standards are about controlling you and your technology, and about greed. Just like almost every other thing that has to do with copyright these days.

    14. Re: Five headphone connectors by eneville · · Score: 1

      Tonight, on Cop Drama, they're going to say "shit" ... Twice!

    15. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Would someone tell me how this happened?

      Sarcasm alert.

      It's a bridge too far, and civilization is doomed. DOOMED I tell you!

      But wait!

      You people and your sissy 1/8th inch jacks think you own the world. The real standard is the 1/4 inch jack, or even better for the people who really know their headphones - direct wires into Fahnstock clips. That's what I'm talkin'about.

      All sarcasm aside, time moves on the 1/8th or 3.5 mm for the better people, jack and plug, is the VHS tape of connectors. It's shit, and just like VHS, it deserves the fate of shitty standards.

      And instead of going nuts, only buy a phone that has the Plug and jack that is the only one you accept. Then you'll be - oh hell, that might make you a hipster.

      Just don't pretend that it is the best thing going when you are yelling at people to get off your lawn.

      Sarcasm off, sorry if I made boo-boo feelings amoung the faithful.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      But industry standard is an understatement. This jack was used by much more than smartphones and tablets. It was the standard on PCs. Old stereo equipment back to the early 1980's had this jack. Walkman cassette players. Car entertainment systems use this jack. MP3 players and personal video pod type players. I can just barely describe how widely used this jack was and for how long. This jack was used everywhere on the entire planet. It was way more standard than electrical outlets which vary by country.

      So in the 50th century, we will have to use this same shitty little plug and jack? I had 1980's stereo equipment. It had 1/4 inch plugs and jacks. I still have professional radio and audio equipment. Not a 3.5 mm to be found. 1/4 inch and XLR connectors abound. I have cheap stuff with has those 3.5 mm plugs and jacks. My Studio headsets are 1/4 inch. I do have a headset that has 3.5 mm, So if I use it on the good stuff, I use an adapter, and don't suffer apoplexy for using it.

      My iPhone came with an adapter to plug a 3.5 mm headphone into it. Not a problem. I don't use it much though, because when I need headphones, I use Bluetooth.

      But y'all arguing about how wonderful that crappy little 3.5 mm connector is, and wailing and gnashing your teeth over it remind me of people yapping about how awesom VHS recording is.

      By the way, the reason a 1/4 inch jack is a lot better is that it has increased sprein strength of the contacts. The smaller you get in plug size, the less reliable the contacts become, because tehy cannot provide neough pressure, and the mini's contacts aren't very good. The micros are even worse, and to me, are useless.

      Can we get a Trabant vs Yugo discussion going here?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re: Five headphone connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but Bluetooth uses the square root of negative one connectors. I.e. imaginary connectors.

    18. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Can't the public push back and choose to not buy?

      Of course they can. But this is kind of like the replaceable battery problem. While some turn red and blow smoke out their ears in hellfire anger because a phone doesn't have a battery cover where they can simply pop open to replace it, few people really care. I'm an old school tinkerer, and I sure don't. It's only a phone, and the present business model is replacement every few years.

      And for all of the uproar from some people, I don't think that screaming and yelling as loud as you can actually increases the number of people who give a damn. If an adapter to plug the mythical 5 dollar Big Lot's earbuds with the holy 3.5 mm plug on them is a bridge too far a descent into hell that cannot be abided, there are probably a lot of knockoff Chiniese phones that have the required jack to plug those in without the unholy adapter.

      Please world, make this nonsense stop.

      Perhaps we should have stopped at feature phones, Or discrete transistors, or vacuum tubes. or Spark gaps or Carbon arc lamps.

      Despite slashdotters worshipping the small jacks, they are exceptionally poor connection systems. Going away is a good thing, and in the end, those 5 dollar Big Lot's ear buds might become even cheaper to plug into that knockoff phone.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Can't the public push back and choose to not buy?

      Some can. For example, my wife is an iPhone person - Has been for many years - But when it comes time to upgrade her iPhone 6 she'll be leaving Apple and buying a replacement phone with a headphone jack.

      Is it a matter of being too difficult to plug the provided adapter into the headset into the adapter and plug that into the phone? I'm curious. I normally listen via Bluetooth, but out of curiosity, plugged a 3.5 mm headset into the adapter and then into the phone. Took about 2 seconds, and didn't give a verygood sound, but that was the fault of the cheap headphones.

      However, she's in what appears to be a small minority.

      People are brand-loyal and seem incapable of 'choosing not to buy.'

      Rather many people simply don't see this as a problem. The undercurrent on Slashdot is that "Goddammit! Apple sucks, They took out that 3.5 mm Jack, and now I'll never buy one! Goddamned Hipster assholes anyhow!"

      When they simply hated Apple because of Ford versus Chevy, and it was a handy talking point, while most people shrug their shoulders because the unforgivable sin means nothing to them. I use Bluetooth because I didn't go wierless to have wires hanging off my phone to my head, just to get yanked and sometimes broken when they catch on something. And if I had a Samsung, I'd still use Bluetooth instead of that crappy 3.5 mm jack.

      So yeah, your wife is definitely in a minority.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    20. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      People are brand-loyal and seem incapable of 'choosing not to buy.'

      Me too! I /am/ brand-loyal. Loyal to the trusty 3.5mm I know so well. The little connector I've soldered many times to splitters, converters, and sometimes to weird things.

      There is no argument for this, the manufacturers are in cahoots, they've formed a racket

      I've worked a lot with 3.5 mm plugs and jacks. Poor quality which is inherent in the size and design. If they are adequate for your purposes, then use them. Only buy phones with the most important feature. But it isn't brand loyalty, its just something you demand, but the rest of us-aside from the wailers on Slashdot - don't give a hoot about.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    21. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Old stereo equipment back to the early 1980's had this jack.

      Mmmmh, no. In the 1980's, stereo equipment had a 6.35 mm jack connector, as had my Revox headphones. During the transition to the new 3.5 mm jack, we had to use dongles. Just like an recent iPhone needs a lightning dongle for the audio jack.

      Exactly. But you are messing up the truthieness of his story bro!

      And my good equipment still has the bigger jacks.

      The problem today is not that a new standard is coming, but that I can't figure yet what is the safe choice for the next 5-10 years. Until then, I will stick to the 3.5 mm jack and dongles.

      I'm almost all on Bluetooth for my phone. If I need really high quality music, I'll not be listening on my phone anyhow, so a fair to middling pair of bluetooth phones is just fine. But I fail to see how people have trouble with that adapter, and the archetype 5 dollar Big Lot's earbuds headphones they want to plug into their phones.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    22. Re:Five headphone connectors by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      No, we have hated Apple since Steve Jobs announced (gleefully) that the Macintosh was a hacker proof computer. He meant in the old sense of 'hacker' that we nerds can appreciate. The Apple ][ was open, it was easy to do a lot of your own cool things with using hardware.

      The Macintosh was designed to not allow us to do cool things with it. Unless you do it within the boundaries that Apple defines, you're screwed. And those boundaries were really fucking tight for the first decade of the Mac. It's nearly as tight today.

    23. Re:Five headphone connectors by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2

      That's right, people are going to have to plug their headphones into something else, to listen to your music.

      And I think we all know what they can plug.

    24. Re:Five headphone connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reason it was so ubitquitous is? (drum roll)
      It’s ROUND.
      No upsidedown. No wrong way round. Very rarely did one break the jack. My only gripe is (and don’t tell anyone) finding the hole in the dark. Magsafe would easily have fixed this issue of breaking and easy attaching. Simple, round, ubiquitous. This roundness could have paved the way for an actual digital connector as well. But fucking rectangle? And wrong way round? Meh.

    25. Re:Five headphone connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better removing the jack altogether than continuing pushing the extended version which caused the "Apple-compatible" headphones to becomes incompatible with some old jacked devices. A start might be the creation of a high bandwidth, very low latency NFC type or other wireless connection with a separately powered headphone amplifier, a non-distorted, non-crackling and non-hissing sound, and a standard jack.

    26. Re:Five headphone connectors by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I wish someone would just develop one universal standard that covers everyone's use cases.

    27. Re:Five headphone connectors by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      You're really missing the point, this 4.4mm connector serves no purpose what-so-ever that isn't already served by 3.5mm and other already existing audio connectors. Why are Sony even pushing this? For patent revenue? USB-C for audio makes sense since that will likely become the predominate phone connector.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    28. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No, we have hated Apple since Steve Jobs announced (gleefully) that the Macintosh was a hacker proof computer. He meant in the old sense of 'hacker' that we nerds can appreciate. The Apple ][ was open, it was easy to do a lot of your own cool things with using hardware.

      The Macintosh was designed to not allow us to do cool things with it. Unless you do it within the boundaries that Apple defines, you're screwed. And those boundaries were really fucking tight for the first decade of the Mac. It's nearly as tight today.

      Its kind of funny. I have my MacOS and OSX machines before that, and I can play with them a lot more than the Windows 10 machine I reluctantly have. I recently started writing for the iPhone for a learning experience. and by golly, it is just sorta fun.

      MacOS, being Unix, is quite capable. I use terminal every day for one reason or another, and it is as flexible as my Linux machines.

      What the anti-Apple crowd has trouble with? My conjecture is that using Apple products tends to be a smoother experience overall So a person with less computer experience might enjoy the experience more. Not everyone wants to dig into the operating system. Now the Android is a generally smooth experience as well. Windows - mainly 10, is not so smooth what with the BOHICA update concept.

      So whatever reasons you have for hating Apple, and how wrong they appear to be, I find that most Anti-Apple folk are just playing the old Ford Versus Chevy game. And there are plenty of Apple zealots for you to fight with, because wht fun is it to have a Ford Versus Chevy argument without the terrible person on the other end to fight with?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    29. Re:Five headphone connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to realise that abandonment of the 3.5mm analog jack and plug pretty much guarantees abandonment of the 6.5mm connectors as well, to be replaced with a mess of different digital connectors.

      If used with care 3.5 mm plugs and jacks are OK. It is true that with phone connectors in general, there is danger of damage by sideways force (the length of the plug +/- adaptor provides leverage). This can be alleviated by using plugs with a 90 degree cable attachment. And some minute connector will be just as prone to damage. There are numerous problems with (say) micro USB connections - having to pick dirt out of sockets, having to compress plugs to make them grip etc, etc).

      Apple removing an almost universal connector is absolutely TYPICAL of them. Right from the start they have used non-standard connectors to do ordinary jobs, as part of their overall policy of locking-in consumers and planned obsolescence wherever and whenever possible. They generate a cult mentality with their advertising, in conjunction with preying upon many people's limited knowledge of technology. It's a kind of Stockholm Syndrome. And other manufacturers do the same.

        Weirdly, the result of locked-in, supposedly "friendly" tech is to make the user's experience WORSE and more frustrating., faced with a mess of incompatible formats. It IS possible to improve things without resorting to lock-in. For instance, open source or publicly-available designs.

      Apple (and Android manufacturers who do the same) are doing consumers no service with this, just lining their own pockets.

    30. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to realise that abandonment of the 3.5mm analog jack and plug pretty much guarantees abandonment of the 6.5mm connectors as well, to be replaced with a mess of different digital connectors.

      I realize a lot of things. One of them is that there is a thing called time, and standards don't last forever. And some of them aren't very good. I'm just fine to have whatever works best.

      If used with care 3.5 mm plugs and jacks are OK.

      Well now there is a problem there. People don't use things with care. I'm always amazed at just how big a mess many people's phones are. Cracked bezels Scratched up and dented cases. Broken headphone jacks. People don't take very good care of their phones.

      Regardless, why whine and moan and pull your hair out on Slashdot. Simply buy a phone that has the most important thing ever put on a phone, which is the headphone jack. they still make them, so buy one and be happy, whjich you are displaying now - that you are exceptionally upset by the disappearance of the silly little thing. Life is too short to be upset by such trivial shit.

      Which is my major point in all of this. Most people simply do not care. If most Apple users are cool to use the adapter, or to use Bluetooth - you've made your decision, let them. If your critical component is as critical as you say, Apple will come crashing down as a result of their foolishness. Why should you and a few other people who (probably) hate Apple to begin with, dictate how they make their phones. But whatever phone has that important feature you demand.

      Buy it, enjoy it, and have the life of happiness you deserve.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    31. Re:Five headphone connectors by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Old stereo equipment back to the early 1980's had this jack.

      Mmmmh, no. In the 1980's, stereo equipment had a 6.35 mm jack connector, as had my Revox headphones. During the transition to the new 3.5 mm jack, we had to use dongles. Just like an recent iPhone needs a lightning dongle for the audio jack.

      The problem today is not that a new standard is coming, but that I can't figure yet what is the safe choice for the next 5-10 years. Until then, I will stick to the 3.5 mm jack and dongles.

      6.3 mm jacks are still common on musical instruments because they've never had a reason to be replaced.

      I don't see the 3.5mm jack going anywhere because there's no reason for it's replacement and most people end up using dongles to convert whatever to 3.5mm. The 3.5mm jack rose to prominence due to it's smaller size being more convenient for portable devices (and keep in mind, by portable I mean a boom box, this was long before the days of Sony's Walkman), there is no impetus for it's removal, same as there's no impetus to switch guitars from 6.3mm to 3.5.

      So for most of us, the headphone market will remain as simple and straightforward as it has been for the last 30 odd years as all headphones will be 3.5mm unless they specifically say otherwise on the front.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    32. Re:Five headphone connectors by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      No, it's not a Ford vs. Chevy argument. Not at all. We just hate Apple a lot more than we do Microsoft. And I am talking about the classical nerd anti-Apple people. The Slashdot community didn't like Apple at all before they gave up on producing a new MacOS and just pasted their GUI layer on top of NeXT Step.

    33. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No, it's not a Ford vs. Chevy argument. Not at all. We just hate Apple a lot more than we do Microsoft.

      Oh dear. Oh dear oh dear. I have all manner of computing devices. Apple. Android, Linus, and Microsoft OS run. They all work. I like some better than others. Note the difference in styles, I note they are different, and have an opinion, and you go on a rant about how "We Hate" It's exactly a Ford versus Chevy argument, you are simply incapable of seeing it.

      And people who constantly argue about Fords and Chevies claim thay aren't having Ford versus Chevy arguments as well, The Cognitive dissonance is strong in you Bing. Stay thirsty my friend. And buy only that which makes you happy, and if you need hate in your life, hate away. It tends to eat you alive, but some like that as well.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    34. Re:Five headphone connectors by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's not a purchasing choice. And quit using such fancy terminology to purvey your bullshit. Your fucking proprietary Apple shit is an abomination. It's the MOST proprietary, and in fact that's it's main distinction from any other hardware/software.

      You're a condescending dick, dude.

    35. Re:Five headphone connectors by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's not a purchasing choice. And quit using such fancy terminology to purvey your bullshit. Your fucking proprietary Apple shit is an abomination. It's the MOST proprietary, and in fact that's it's main distinction from any other hardware/software.

      Meanwhile, I seem to be able to program on the Mac or iPhone without a hitch. Just install Xcode and away I go. I've never bought a hard drive or RAM from Apple, or replacement or upgrade parts. Even when I had to get something right from Apple, like a Magic Mouse that went belly up on warrantee, a call to Cupertino at 5 pm Eastern had a replacement the next day at noon. I'm trying to figure out what these limitations are that you speak of. I have my Macs because there is software I need that is not on any other platform. I have my PC for the same reason.Software I need. I have my iPhone because it integrates nicely with my iMac and gives me features I like. I have my linux machines because I like playing computer, and with MacOS being Unix, it's an easy switch between the two.

      You're a condescending dick, dude.

      Well, my wife prefers to call me an irritating asshole. But I'm cute, so I have that going for me, which is nice.

      Chillaxe Bro, you're carrying around way too much anger for anything I've written.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  7. Better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless there is a single wireless standard and codec, nothing will be better than the old trusty 3.5mm connector, and even then it will still be questionable. Guess what, the analog, wired connection works, 100% of the time. If for some reason you find it's not working, you simply plug the cable back in and your working again. No wireless standard can state that fact, nor will they ever be able to.

    1. Re:Better? by dfghjk · · Score: 0

      "Unless there is a single wireless standard and codec, nothing will be better than the old trusty 3.5mm connector, "

      False choice. There are wired options other than 3.5mm that offer compelling benefits. 3.5mm itself is just an inferior version of the ¼" headphone jack, after all.

    2. Re: Better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it inferior?

    3. Re:Better? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      What makes it inferior? It is more than enough contact space to transfer sufficient electrons to give more than enough volume for even the deaf to hear it (by feeling the vibration in their skulls).

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  8. Is it? by chispito · · Score: 1

    I don't see any shortage of wired headphones with a 3.5mm connector.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  9. Sony's new 4.4 Pentaconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? A balanced connector for phone output? I know it's "better" and all, but it doesn't even makes sense.

    1. Re:Sony's new 4.4 Pentaconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Here's the technical reasons why it doesn't make sense:
      https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/audio-myth-balanced-headphone-outputs-are-better

  10. Stand your ground by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    If it has no 3.5mm jack, don't buy it. 'But there's an adapter' - NO. DON'T BUY IT, PERIOD.

    1. Re:Stand your ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are using Apple iPhone, you don't have a choice..

    2. Re:Stand your ground by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You did have a choice, but you made the wrong one.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re: Stand your ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone SE still has a headphone jack.

    4. Re:Stand your ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you followed the instructions, you aren't using an Apple iPhone...

    5. Re:Stand your ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to tell this to your wife/daughter? "But I want the pink one with the logo! Why do you always make a big deal out of this stuff? I hate you!"

    6. Re:Stand your ground by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      I would. Marriage isn't an obligation to buy junk for your family. Be a man, stand your ground.

    7. Re: Stand your ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Headphone adapters are annoying. We already learned this in the early 2000s with flip phones and the GBA SP. You even needed another adapter if you wanted to charge and use headphones at the same time on the SP.

    8. Re:Stand your ground by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      Who really cares about a cable ?

    9. Re:Stand your ground by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      If you're spending YOUR money, don't buy junk with it. If your spouse wants to spend THEIR money, they can do what they like. Kids get what their parents want to get and can afford, not what THEY want, unless they have a job.

  11. Come on you chickenshits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have some courage!

  12. What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    With all this wheel reinvention, what is fundamentally wrong with the 3.5mm jack, or the 1/4" one used in audio equipment? The Sony connector may be better with its balanced TRRRS architecture, but is it worth a new standard? Sony does have good formats, but they tend to be esoteric at best, or wind up on the wayside at worse (like memory sticks.)

    For digital output, USB-C should be what people use.

    1. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It lacks a very important feature: vendor lock-in.

    2. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The newest Sony phone, has a waterproof 3.5 mm jack.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      The newest Sony phone, has a waterproof 3.5 mm jack.

      There have been waterproof 3.5mm jacks for years. I had a Casio Gzone roughly 10 years ago that had one.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    4. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all this wheel reinvention, what is fundamentally wrong with the 3.5mm jack, or the 1/4" one used in audio equipment? The Sony connector may be better with its balanced TRRRS architecture, but is it worth a new standard? Sony does have good formats, but they tend to be esoteric at best, or wind up on the wayside at worse (like memory sticks.)

      For digital output, USB-C should be what people use.

      The problem with it is that it is fuctionally redundant with the phone's main I/O port as all curent generation phones use a port capable of sending audio over the wire.

      The issue with fragmentation of main I/O ports on phones is orthogonal to the issue of why a phone doesn't need a special I/O port for juts audio. At this point everything being USB C would probably be the most reasonable solution, with Apple opening the licensing for Lightning and standardizing on that arguably better (I personally like it better) but much less likely by enough to outweigh any possible benefits to pursuing it over pushing USB-C to be more widely adopted and hoping Apple hops on the wagon eventually.

    5. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Sure, but one theoretical advantage of bluetooth is one less opening in the case. I mentioned 'water proof' because it removes this advantage.

      No new connectors on their current generation flagship phones. Though I'm not sure about the insane large, uncarriable 'premium' version of the phone.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by swillden · · Score: 1

      It lacks a very important feature: vendor lock-in.

      So does USB-C audio. And Bluetooth.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest thing is the only two holes in my Sony "waterproof" (lol, not really) Aqua phone that did not leak were the 3.5 mm jack and the micro USB.

      SD and SIM slots? About as watertight as cheesecloth.

    8. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The Sony connector may be better with its balanced TRRRS architecture

      Short answer: Yes[1]

      [1] Long note to the short answer: One of the benefits of the TRRS setup is that it allows for balanced audio signals. These days with modern DACs having balanced outputs for virtually nothing it's a shame to see them unused as there are some real benefits including noise immunity, interference immunity and rejection of distortion. However that takes space and you won't see that inside a phone.
      Now if you're talking about TRRRS then you have a very different purpose but not related to headhpones: Headsets. By adding another ring you get bi-directional stereo sound allowing the person on the other end of the phone to hear you too :-)

    9. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Balanced DACs are great; balanced amplifiers? Not so much. You can use a good balanced DAC right into a single-ended amp. Using balanced amps not only halves your damping factor (twice the output impedance) and increases THD+N (two devices, not correlated, tend to add 3 dB more noise and distortion), but the "gain" of having a balanced system for noise immunity is irrelevant because the current levels are huge relative to induced fields from other sources.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    10. Re:What's wrong with the existing 3.5mm jacks? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. For all else being equal you would be right, but by its nature all else is not equal.

      Firstly damping factor: If an even 10 fold increase in damping factor is an issue for your headphones then you shouldn't be designing amplifiers. On the flip side for speakers especially low impedance speakers damping factors starts becoming an issue. So why then are balance amps favoured in the high end? Double the current output and double the slew rate often offsets the doubling of the damping factor, something which is only really an issue on tube amplifiers anyway rather than any solid state circuit (which is also why you don't see balanced tube amps).

      Secondly THD+N, split them up THD first. For all else being equal you double the THD because you're driving 2 signals. However THD is a factor of the input signal. Because the design is balanced you end up with double the voltage swing. You counteract this by halfing the input signal (bringing your total THD back down to where it was in the first place) or by halving the gain. Depending on your amp this would most commonly be done by increasing negative feedback ... bringing down the THD.

      +N second. There are two factors here in noise, noise applied as gain to the input signal which follows the same logic as the THD, it'll be the same. The noise inherent in the amplifying components. This shouldn't be a factor in any normal design as there's no post amplification to make it worse. The most common noise that comes through amplifiers (especially on those sharing digital circuitry) is from external interference and from the powersupply. The balanced design would cause this common mode to cancel out and the result is a dramatically increased noise floor as a result of improved PSRR.

      That is also what I meant by noise immunity. You're dead right induced fields on the headphone cable are irrelevant. If you're going to drive single ended you want to do it as close to the headphone as you want, but the single most common design for this is yet another conversation step after the main gain stage. This having all the downsides you attributed to balanced amps above but without any of the benefits.

  13. making things better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all with the intent of making things better.

    sure. just not for you.

  14. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3.5mm jack or no sale. Very easy.

  15. What's so confusing? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    It's called, "making a buck."

    3.5mm is ubiquitous and there's no future in that.

    When manufacturers stop innovating, they simply fuck stuff up and change shit so you'll be forced to buy accessories.

    Bluetooth makes sense for cases where a wire is inconvenient.

    There's no cleverness in designing a device that will not accept a 3.5mm wire, forcing consumers to buy something else, except, "making a buck."

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re: What's so confusing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about confusing...try reading your tripe.

      Tim Cook is a cocksucker.

    2. Re: What's so confusing? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Thank you for taking the time to read my post and I'm honoured that my observations motivated you to bother commenting.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  16. Simple for me by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

    Simple:
    If a device doesn't have a 3.5mm (aka "1/8 inch") connector, I'm not purchasing it.
    Call me a luddite, call me an old man, etc. That won't change my mind: it's a standard that works and is not in need of change.
    To those that argue digital audio is so much cleaner/clearer/crisper, I remind you that no humans have digital hearing.

    1. Re:Simple for me by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      The argument in favor of digital audio on phones falls apart for me when the follow up assertion is via bluetooth which has a max bandwidth capability of about 768kbps on a good day, and implies a requirement for batteries that frankly won't last very long at those types of speeds either.

    2. Re:Simple for me by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth has enough bandwidth to transfer a good lossy codec, such as Opus, which is audibly transparent above 96kbps for the majority of music, and definitely above 160kbps.

      The problem is that the bastards implementing Bluetooth audio cannot decide on a goddamn format, so a lot of stuff still has to fall back to the old SBC codec, which is just junk. I know it's fast and doesn't require much power, but it's junk. AptX is a shitty proprietary codec, as is Sony's LDAC. You can also push AAC over Bluetooth, which I think only Apple is doing. But nope, it seems like everyone shuns the shitty proprietary codecs because of licensing payments, and just ignore the perfectly fine royalty-free formats out there.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  17. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you

  18. The market will figure it out by turp182 · · Score: 1

    I have studio headphones (Audio Technica) with 1/4 inch jack that I convert to 3.5mm for travel. I will always have a computer (Alienware 17, sucks for travel but my only computer) and phone that supports this. I don't mind the excessively long cord either (16 feet, 5+ meteres).

    The market will provide, or I'll just go back to Nexus 5 phones (we've had 7 so far as they break rather easily). Swappa FTW!

    The actual story here is around products people will or will not purchase. As long as it's not Sony, I'm not brand observant. No Sony product will enter my house.

    For the record, I'm on a Blu low end phone, good headphone jack and BT music transfer. Otherwise it's just a phone that costs about $100. If the Chinese want to track my communications about groceries and child care arrangements I'm cool with that.

    Anything important is done face to face or via physical mail. We still get all bills via mail (email addresses can change, our address doesn't).

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
    1. Re:The market will figure it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything important is done face to face or via physical mail. We still get all bills via mail (email addresses can change, our address doesn't).

      Ok, now you've gone too far. I'm not going back to the 90s.

      What's wrong with coming home from work on payday, sitting down at your computer and paying your bills? That still has nothing to do with your Blu phone or your studio headphones.

      But it does make life much more convenient.

  19. only two connectors count by swschrad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    3.5mm stereo and 1/4-inch. everything else is a gimmick that will be crap in several years. stand your ground!

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:only two connectors count by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      USB-C has three pins that are supposed to mimic 3.5mm stereo's electric signal, hence the unpowered adapters. Still seems stupid to me.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  20. Not buying a new phone due to this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 6s and a crappy Alcatel phone with a headphone jack and FM radio. Iâ(TM)m not buying a new phone until they are both broken just for this reason.

    Youâ(TM)ll pry my headphone jack from my dead cold hands!

  21. vendor LOCKOUT by swschrad · · Score: 1

    I have great headphones. the best. bigly perfect. and no time for gimmick lock-in connectors for junk products that will migrate to something else in two years.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  22. My el-cheapo LG phone by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    does everything I want, was 1/4 the prices of an iPhone (1/5 if you count the X) and has a a 3.5 jack. Oh, and a replaceable battery too. And it's no thicker than an iPhone.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:My el-cheapo LG phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you just told us you're too cheap to buy something better.

      Congrats - welcome to the ranks of the unemployed.

    2. Re:My el-cheapo LG phone by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No, what he's saying is that it's cheaper AND better. Sounds like a man who knows the value of a dinar.

  23. Notice corporations don't give a shit about you by tanstaaf1 · · Score: 1

    You are their whore or their sheep or their hamburger; how can they extract more from you while delivering less by increasingly short planned obsolescence; gratuitous "features" while not actually making anything that fundamentally matters any better (and often worse); changing the "agreement" into something you have no real control of due to a dizzying confusion of changes. The headphone jack is the latest attempt to squeeze more from you by removing choices. Your old headphones were fundamentally better but won't won't be allowed to work with a new phone. We will FORCE you to get a new phone by throttling, bloating the OS with lots of crapola while taking away features and ease of use. "What are you going to do about it you fucking milk cow of a consumer?" I predict this ends eventually in MASSIVE hatred and backlash against the corporations and plutocrats, but by then Tim Cook figures to be well retired and the politicians who enabled all this monopolistic abuse will be retired as well. There is rape and then there is rape. It is so cunning how they manage us to make us surrender everything to them, including our privacy and pride. But there will eventually be huge backlash. It's unfortunate eventually can take a long time arriving.

  24. idiocracy in action by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    yet another bloody format war, and this time the established standard is being replaced with something inferior.

    Even the Pentaconn supposedly high-end connector is a single-pin design with 5 contact patches in a row, guaranteeing massive pops and hum when it's inserted. Has the entire industry lost its head?

    1. Re:idiocracy in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? You can create decent headphones with a USB-C connector now that doesn't have any pops or any of the analog issues of the past. There are decent manufacturers that are creating these type of headphones without any issues. Hell, even many gaming headsets are now USB connected and it's the greatest thing ever. No more fussing around with thousand of wires to have surround sound and connecting the mic. I have one simple connector and it works without any BS. They work both in linux and Windows.

      Seriously, what the hell are you complaining about?

    2. Re:idiocracy in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet another bloody format war, and this time the established standard is being replaced with something inferior.

      Even the Pentaconn supposedly high-end connector is a single-pin design with 5 contact patches in a row, guaranteeing massive pops and hum when it's inserted. Has the entire industry lost its head?

      "high-end" would be Lemo. Doesn't make any connection it shouldn't, connects shield first, easy to plug in and remove but will only come when pulling on the plug rather than on the cord. Available in a number of configurations. But the industry will never settle on something where they shell out $20 just for a connector, never mind how reliable it is. They want the customer to shell out serious money for connectors costing them pennies.

  25. obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your notion of owning your hardware is obsolete. The intent is to ensure that you break it before the next quarterly earning report is published.

    1. Re:obsolete by tattood · · Score: 1
      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    2. Re:obsolete by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      oh and also root out those filthy pirates by removing every analog out across all media.

  26. Oh look, a trap for idiots by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    3.5mm and Bluetooth are all you need. Just don't buy stuff that doesn't have one or both of those. Works for me.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Oh look, a trap for idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluetooth? Which version? Which codec at which bit rate? Which pairing method?

      "Works for me" is much too general for something as vague as that. Even "3.5mm" does not specify impedance and level: turns out that I get noticably better sound out of my old headphones using an external soundcard with dedicated headphone sockets (6.3mm, by the way, not 3.5mm) than out of the laptop. With higher impedance and lower levels, like in-ear thingies, the difference is less.

  27. So buy a phone that *does* have a jack by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    So buy a phone that does have a standard headphone jack. Like a Moto.

    Bonus: it won't be so thin that breathing on it snaps it.

  28. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 1

    Sigh.

    Do what always turns out best.

    Wait six months. Buy some cheap Chinese knockoff that has / supports them all.

    A guy in my workplace came to me last year with some stupendously expensive headphones his wife had bought him. I didn't know what they were but, as I took them, I mentioned that I'd just bought a couple of pairs of something similar.

    Over-the-ear headphones.
    Large amounts of sound insulation on the ear-cushions, so you were deaf to the world when they were on.
    Rechargeable wireless (with plain USB cable)
    Bluetooth.
    SD-Card.
    FM radio.
    And a 3.5mm socket. That you could use to either play music through the headphones when the bluetooth/battery wasn't on, or that you could pull the signal OUT of into another set of headphones for a friend if you were playing something on the FM/SD/Bluetooth.

    Mine not only outclassed his, out-sounded his and out-featured his, they lasted much longer than his, and they were ridiculously CHEAP rather than ridiculously expensive.

    To be honest, you don't need every connector. That headphone is fine. 3.5mm for "retro" stuff. Bluetooth for everything else. If your phone/laptop can't do Bluetooth but has anything else, adaptors are literally pence nowadays.

    Same as when I bought a DVD player (cheap one was region free, played everything, had every output on it, just works, expensive models from famous brands wouldn't even play a US DVD once locked to EU region and only had a handful of outputs), a Blu-Ray player (same), MP3 player, etc.

    To be honest, I've deliberately not upgraded my smartphone because they get rid of the ports, the battery slots, the SD-card slots etc. Fuck off. I don't want that, so I won't buy it.

    And I wouldn't buy headphones with a recognisable brand on if you gave me 50% off. They won't be any better than anything else, will still be over-priced, and likely won't have anything I want on them.

    1. Re:Sigh. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So what happens when you buy an adapter that is 'pence' and it fries your iphone? Apple will tell you you should have bought their 'many, many pence' adapter that is certified to use with Apple products.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  29. Where are the headphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides Sony apparently pushing for these changes are ANY of the decent headphone manufacturers (Sennheiser, Audio Technica, Beyerdynamic, Grado, etc) on board with this? Searching for usb-c or lightning headphones mostly leads me to adapters and the occasional cheap-o pair of earbuds or cans from some company I've never heard of. If I were cynical I might think these connector changes were solely for the purpose of vendor lock-in and selling dongles.

    1. Re:Where are the headphones? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Sennheiser, Audio Technica, Beyerdynamic, and Grado will be happy to sell you a new set of headphones that are compatible with XYZ standard. If you have to buy two headphones, one for audiophile home system and one for your smartphone, even better for them.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  30. Wear out your USB port faster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So while USB C connectors are rated to last longer than micro conncetors why would you want to wear it out even faster by plugging and unplugging head phones all the time? I get why manufacturers want you to do this. However it won't seem like a great idea when your phone doesn't charge or transfer things to your PC anymore.

  31. grrr. audio snobs ... by swell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My brother is an audiophile. I can't imagine he'll ever use Bluetooth headphones. But I, OTOH, can accept reasonable sound quality. Bluetooth works with all my devices effortlessly and the quality of sound is better than any of the speakers on those devices.

    Most nights I'll watch a TV show or movie with my headphones, especially if they are from the UK in accents that I struggle to understand- they are much more clear on the 'phones. When I'm on a bus or train or waiting for someone at the county jail, the BT 'phones are a blessing, giving me quality content while filtering external noise. The obvious headphones discourage people from trying to talk to me too. Perhaps the biggest blessing is NO WIRES pulling and getting tangled everywhere. And I'm not an audio snob who has to hear the latest pop music with super high quality electrostatic headphones. So brother- take your ancient 3.5mm jack and shove it!

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:grrr. audio snobs ... by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      The thing I just don't understand about bluetooth is, why would you want to put a cap on the physical limit of your headphones? No matter how much you spend on them, they will never sound better than bluetooth is able to make them sound. I just don't get it. I am by no means an audiophile, but part of the fun of buying headphones, whether cheap or expensive, is to see what they can do when you first plug them in. With Bluetooth, every headphone is performing the same. It's just boring.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:grrr. audio snobs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quality of Bluetooth is all about the codec. If it uses AAC or AptX, it can be quite decent. But you have to pick the one which matches your phone's OS and shop specifically for it.

    3. Re:grrr. audio snobs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see how knowing what to expect is a negative point when purchasing a product...

    4. Re:grrr. audio snobs ... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      If you can only expect sub par sound, then of course it's a negative point.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:grrr. audio snobs ... by Distortions · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth headphones are more expensive, and heavier ( batteries / circuitry ).
      I don't want to check if my headphones need recharging or new batteries.
      The bluetooth audio codec is crap.
      You just wrap the wires around the headphones for cans, or for buds you wrap them and put them in a tin/container.
      Besides, good headphones have flat tangle-free cables.
      And I loathe everything wireless, that randomly has interference or pairing problems... Or decides to suddenly connect to another device.

      Take your bluetooth and shove it.

      I'd rather have a thicker phone with more battery life, that won't snap in half
      You can spend the extra money for bluetooth headphones that sound like crap, and i'll put all that money into headphones that actually sound good.

      These are cheap, and probably sound 4 times better than your bluetooth headphones... and don't need electronic noise canceling.
      http://www.klipsch.com/product...

      --
      Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
    6. Re:grrr. audio snobs ... by Distortions · · Score: 1

      Also, remember rechargeable bluetooth headphones will probably stop working, or having decent battery life after a few hundred charges...
      And eventually they will come up with a new standard and phase out bluetooth.

      So, enjoy replacing your headphones in 5 years!

      I have some sony headphones I bought back when I had the original discman.
      They still work, and still sound good.

      --
      Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
  32. No it wont. by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The inventor of modern headphones still is quite conservative about their lineup and they still build some of the best in the industy. If you only look for expensive fidgety mainstream junk, you're in for trouble. Don't.

    For best cost/performance ratio I recommend the Custom 1 Pro +. ... Yeah, admitted, that name does suck. Then again they are genuises at headphones and a little low profile on marketing - who cares? And, yes, it's a regular headphone with a nice and neat 3.5mm jack, as it should be. Made in Germany, btw., not some chinese sweatshop. If that should mean something to you.

    You're welcome.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:No it wont. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Made in Germany, btw., not some chinese sweatshop. If that should mean something to you.

      Are the workers required to wear lederhosen while the headphones are made? I need that genuine German sound.

    2. Re:No it wont. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Made in Germany, btw., not some chinese sweatshop."

      It doesn't, because the vast majority of people are quite happy with the Chinese made headphones, because they sound just as good as your over engineered German expensive paper weight.

    3. Re:No it wont. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude who tf designed that website? Form over function clearly made by marketing decisions. The audio on all their things may be all the things but fuck me, that site hurts.

    4. Re:No it wont. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! Beyer Dynamic indeed makes excellent headphones. My favorite of the big brands. Though my American ears always gravitate to high end Grado. Low end Grado (SR80 for $100) still blows the ear pads off most "high end" department store brans.

      Beyer Danymic DT990 and DT770 are worth every penny. Every Grado is worth the asking price. Try both brands with your type of music and decide which your ears like. Get a good headphone amp and a mid range DAC ($100) and cure yourself of iPod ears.

      If you insist on using your smart phone, FiiO makes a great on the go DAC for $80. If you insist on no DAC/amp, the Grado RS60 or RS80 and the BD Custom One will work well and sound good with a smart phone/tablet.

    5. Re:No it wont. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but they do serve Weißwurst and pretzels for lunch. Every day. :0

    6. Re:No it wont. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1
      I love my Beyerdynamic DT 770's too ... the mobile ones are 32 ohms with a gold-plated 3.5 jack and 1/4" adapter.
      https://www.techwalls.com/beyerdynamic-dt-770-pro-32-ohm-headphones-review/
      Awesome cans for the price, they leave the expensive "modern" competition in the dust !

  33. I prefer good old TRRS by ReneR · · Score: 1

    Works everywhere, even on old reel-to-reel and such, also easier to repair / solder on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  34. "Better." by Samurai+Nigel · · Score: 1

    "but before we get to the better place..."

    Even as a mild audiophile, I do not believe any of this is "better" than what we currently have. I'm not some Luddite who hates progress, and I'm not so much an audio snob that Bluetooth ear buds just aren't "good" enough, but the current technology has been around for so long because it really is quite good.

    You know what it reminds me of? The good ol' DE-15 "VGA" plug. Are there "better" alternatives out there? Of course there are. VGA sticks around because it works, TONS of devices support it, and it doesn't require anything fancy or expensive to setup. Non-fruit companies continue to support it because it's cheap to implement and it has hundreds of millions of devices across decades that support it.

  35. I'm deaf by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

    Buying Headphones in 2018 is Going To Be a Fragmented Mess

    I'm deaf, you insensitive clod.

    1. Re:I'm deaf by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's harder for you to buy headphones. Why, you cannot even tell that Monster cables are better just by listening to them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:I'm deaf by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I will exlain what the argument is ... Think of it this way:

      If you go Bluetooth:

      • You can't strangle yourself with the cord
      • You will be worried that the standard is incompatible with nearly everything else

      OTOH, with a cable

      • You might strangle yourself or someone else
      • Your phone might have to be 0.001 microns thicker
      • You would have to learn what TRRXYZ stands for

      However, being deaf, you can ignore the whole POS and get on with your life in peace and quiet. Stop wingeing.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  36. Another layer of potential junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally think some of the adapters are just another layer of bad quality that can affect the sound. I do not think we have done the wired user any benefit by adding adapters. Of course the wireless industry would love for users to just spend double or triple on wireless because they will make more money. For me I tried bluetooth headphone, not cheap ones either. But the quality is just not there even as the manufactures claim it is. But it goes deeper with poor D/A chips, and lousy audio power output. Its no wonder music sales are in the tank.

    1. Re:Another layer of potential junk by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Its no wonder music sales are in the tank.

      You don't think that content might be responsible for that?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  37. Sennheiser Orpheus HE 90 by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Sennheiser Orpheus HE 90, electrostatic special connection. Very expensive setup relatively. Unique sound. I am open to new connections but wireless codecs and batteries still an issue for me.

  38. What's this about 3.5mm jacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My headphones use 6.3mm jacks. Like my audio equipment does. 3.5mm is not a socket, it's a toy, and plugs of that kind break off in those toy sockets. And you cannot fit cables suitable for the impedance of serious headphones into a 3.5mm plug anyway.

    1. Re:What's this about 3.5mm jacks? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      So no XLR connectors for you then.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  39. Solid reliability of a 3.5mm analog connector??? by Ross+Finlayson · · Score: 1

    "the solid reliability of a 3.5mm analog connector"

    You must have lived in a different universe to the rest of us. Have you *really* never had problems with the analog connector flaking out - and playing only one of the two stereo sides - unless you twisted the connector around 'just right'? A digital connector is a big improvement - though you're correct that the multitude of 'standards' is a bit of a problem.

  40. No I won't by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    >> you'll have to do diligent research to make sure your next pair of headphones works with all the devices you already own.

    Its not even a slight problem if you do what I do and simply avoid buying anything that doesn't have a 3.5mm socket.

  41. DRM by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for DRM to make its way into here somewhere. Didn't pay your monthly RIAA tax? No audio output for you!

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  42. *Real* headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Real* headphones use either 1/4" TRS plugs (unbalanced) or XLR (balanced). Who cares what these "toy" headphones use?

    1. Re:*Real* headphones by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      You missed the NATO TP120B connector that's also common in professional equipment. Real headphones also limits noise, like the Peltor headphones.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  43. See the Emperors new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headphones.

  44. Don't want... by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    ... won't buy.

    Seriously, does anyone actually want this crap?

  45. Just more fuel.. by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    Just more fuel for the eventual complexity collapse of of civilization. Complexity cannot continue to rise to infinity without expected consequences.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  46. Dongles... dongles everywhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First thing that came to mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XSC_UG5_kU

  47. 3.5mm jack offs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is with these wankers that want it dead so badly? I mean, if they're making a device where they can't afford to add an audio amplifier, that's one thing... but devices that are meant to output sound directly, or at least give the appearance of such... seems a bit silly and/or dickish.

  48. "The rest of us ..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... was, is, and never will be a valid argument. Just like "average Joe Moron".

    You and what army?
    Because, remember, your statement swings both ways! It is that most people are just livestock with no will and passive thinking. That meansI can just as much make such people want what I want them to want, as "them".

    In actual reality, it's just you, yourself, wanting that, because you are a spineless conformist coward.
    Because other than said livestock, you are fully aware and hence do have a choice of picking the right side. Yet *you* did choose the wrong side. Actively! (Active passivity ... a fascinating concept.)
    So your character is essentially that of a "house n1gger" or other traitor to his own people and even to himself.

    1. Re:"The rest of us ..." by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      ... was, is, and never will be a valid argument. Just like "average Joe Moron".

      You and what army? Because, remember, your statement swings both ways! It is that most people are just livestock with no will and passive thinking. That meansI can just as much make such people want what I want them to want, as "them".

      In actual reality, it's just you, yourself, wanting that, because you are a spineless conformist coward. Because other than said livestock, you are fully aware and hence do have a choice of picking the right side. Yet *you* did choose the wrong side. Actively! (Active passivity ... a fascinating concept.) So your character is essentially that of a "house n1gger" or other traitor to his own people and even to himself.

      I've tried to parse this several times, and friend - I think you just had an existential meltdown, because I can't connect anything you wrote to this sub-thread. Carry on, and I hope your day gets better.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  49. You know those connectors are bullshit, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The headphone current and voltage a minimal. As long as the touch points don't wobble or rust / gather dirt, and analog connections are well-shielded, the thing could be nearly microscopic.

    You sound like one of those, who buy huge-diameter audio cables, and connect them to speakers have exclusively tiny strands running inside of them because an actual engineer calculated what is needed for a tiny resistance, and made the hardware take even that into account.

    1. Re:You know those connectors are bullshit, right? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The headphone current and voltage a minimal. As long as the touch points don't wobble or rust / gather dirt, and analog connections are well-shielded, the thing could be nearly microscopic.

      I see. What will provide the pressure to maintain contact? the smaller the jack, the less pressure to press against the plug. This is not conjecture, it's inherent in the materials. It is exactly why the failure rate is higher, the smaller the connector. Take a 3.5 mm jack apart once and verify.

      You sound like one of those, who buy huge-diameter audio cables, and connect them to speakers have exclusively tiny strands running inside of them because an actual engineer calculated what is needed for a tiny resistance, and made the hardware take even that into account.

      Perhaps to a dilletante I do sound like that, but you would be wrong. This isn't about Triple Crown Speaker Cable, gold plated fuses, and silly audiophile rocks or special wood volume control knobs. It's about a fundamental material property.

      Even then, it is possible to design and build tiny jacks to function reliably. There can be spring mechanisms that apply pressure to the contact points in the plug that will give reliable results. It isn't rocket science. But it will increase the size dramatically, as well as the cost.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  50. Is OP an idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'll have to do diligent research to make sure your next pair of headphones works with all the devices you already own.

    Um, I'll just make sure the devices I buy have a 3.5mm jack and I won't have to research shit.

  51. Oh get a life, you insufferable snob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Pre-amp" ... seriously, mate? Has it got pre-pre amp too? Cause you know ... music is *unbearable* without it, and you can *really* tell the difference! I swear on my $400 extra-warmness wooden volume knob!

    Audio snobs are the worst. By far.
    Even worse (and more clueless and religious) than Whyhshkhyh-drinking Apple fans.

    Go ahead, and open your $50k speakers. You will find top materials like cardboard and tiny copper strands in there, that will make your huge outside cables look as over the top as a wrestler in an 80s Seat Ibiza with a Bozozoko-style spoiler of 2m.

    1. Re:Oh get a life, you insufferable snob. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "Pre-amp" ... seriously, mate? Has it got pre-pre amp too? Cause you know ... music is *unbearable* without it, and you can *really* tell the difference! I swear on my $400 extra-warmness wooden volume knob!

      Audio snobs are the worst. By far. Even worse (and more clueless and religious) than Whyhshkhyh-drinking Apple fans.

      Go ahead, and open your $50k speakers. You will find top materials like cardboard and tiny copper strands in there, that will make your huge outside cables look as over the top as a wrestler in an 80s Seat Ibiza with a Bozozoko-style spoiler of 2m.

      U mad Bro?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  52. Original connectors by Mister+Null · · Score: 1

    Still have and love my older headphones that use the original large connectors. Call me old fashioned but sound quality is my major concern

  53. Re:Solid reliability of a 3.5mm analog connector?? by Distortions · · Score: 1

    Your headphones are still analog. They are even sending analog audio out over USB-C.

    If you had to twist the jack to get it to work, it was broken.
    If it was digital, it would have just stopped working altogether.

    --
    Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
  54. Re:Solid reliability of a 3.5mm analog connector?? by Distortions · · Score: 1

    Also, it's nice to think if you break your new "headphone jack" connector with your headphones, you can't charge your phone anymore too!

    --
    Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.