Slashdot Mirror


Silicon Valley Is Over, Says Silicon Valley (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader shares a New York Times report: In recent months, a growing number of tech leaders have been flirting with the idea of leaving Silicon Valley. Some cite the exorbitant cost of living in San Francisco and its suburbs, where even a million-dollar salary can feel middle class. Others complain about local criticism of the tech industry and a left-wing echo chamber that stifles opposing views. And yet others feel that better innovation is happening elsewhere. "I'm a little over San Francisco," said Patrick McKenna, the founder of High Ridge Venture Partners who was also on the bus tour. "It's so expensive, it's so congested, and frankly, you also see opportunities in other places." Mr. McKenna, who owns a house in Miami in addition to his home in San Francisco, told me that his travels outside the Bay Area had opened his eyes to a world beyond the tech bubble. "Every single person in San Francisco is talking about the same things, whether it's 'I hate Trump' or 'I'm going to do blockchain and Bitcoin,'" he said. "It's the worst part of the social network."

[...] Complaints about Silicon Valley insularity are as old as the Valley itself. Jim Clark, the co-founder of Netscape, famously decamped for Florida during the first dot-com era, complaining about high taxes and expensive real estate. Steve Case, the founder of AOL, has pledged to invest mostly in start-ups outside the Bay Area, saying that "we've probably hit peak Silicon Valley." But even among those who enjoy living in the Bay Area, and can afford to do so comfortably, there's a feeling that success has gone to the tech industry's head. "Some of the engineers in the Valley have the biggest egos known to humankind," Mr. Khanna, the Silicon Valley congressman, said during a round-table discussion with officials in Youngstown.

304 comments

  1. Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Zorro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2018/03/05/epidemic-of-car-break-ins-makes-parking-a-nightmare-for-bay-area-drivers/

    SAN FRANCISCO (KPIX) — Car break-ins are on the rise across the Bay Area. In fact, 2017 was a record-breaking year for our three largest cities.

    We’re seeing record numbers of car burglaries in San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose. Chances it has happened to you or someone you know.

    San Francisco leads the pack with 31,120 break-ins last year.

    In the same period, San Jose reported 6,476 car burglaries. That number is the highest the city has ever seen and a 17 percent increase compared to 2016.

    It was also a record year in Oakland with 10,007 reported cases in 2017, up 32% compared to the previous year.

    1. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by localman · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. I probably parked in San Francisco 50 times over the decade I lived in the area, and had my car broken into twice. I've also live in South Africa for a few years, parked hundreds of times in Durban and other "dangerous" towns and never had a break-in. Or any problems at all. Saw a guy get stabbed at Mission and 16th BART station, though.

    2. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by valnar · · Score: 2

      Not to throw this into the right wing, but is it residents or illegals responsible for the rise in crime? Just curious.

    3. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by crgrace · · Score: 2

      I live in San Francisco. Had my car broken into three times over the last seven years.

      My favorite "experience", though, was this year. Someone stole our registration tags off our car while it was parked near my wife's work. We found out because we got a ticket for not having a registered vehicle.

      So, we sent it an appeal that included the police report and a photocopy of our valid DMV registration. Open and shut, right?

      Wrong. Our appeal was denied (!) and we were told we had to pay. We could go to their meeting in person to appeal again but I don't have the patience or time for that. It wasn't that expensive, so we paid the f-ing thing.

      So my take-away is they should change the SF Tourist Slogan to something like: "San Francisco: The City Where you Get a Ticket for Being a Crime Victim".

    4. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley has worked really hard to bring crime to the Internet.

      Now the Internet is full, and the crime has, naturally, spilled over into the streets.

      Tech companies already have private bus lines, so their employees don't need cars anyway.

      All they need to do is "Mad Max" armorize their buses, and then they will be all set to defend against Master Car Burglar Wez, and his pals.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a city where a six figure salary can barely get by, I'm not surprised there is a crime problem.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    6. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by doom · · Score: 0

      The "shit in the streets" jazz is shall we say, exaggerated, it's a fantasy our conservative friends love to spout to each other (I'm not sure precisely what this obsession says about them, they also seem rather excited about who gets to use which public restroom...).

    7. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by tatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong. Our appeal was denied (!) and we were told we had to pay. We could go to their meeting in person to appeal again but I don't have the patience or time for that. It wasn't that expensive, so we paid the f-ing thing.

      This is probably the reason they denied your appeal....they "knew" you would pay it rather than deal with the hassle. Its just another form of robbery imo.

      --
      I've always said English was my second language. Had Romeo and Juliet been written in C, I might have understood it.
    8. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "inefficient"
      I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    9. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho!, Ho! An article about Silicon Valley!

      Quick, quick! I have to plugin my digi-feces Silicon Valley comic con videos and post some spam links!

      --
      -cdreimer
      New Video:Outlining Batman, Robin & Riddler in Photoshop (Time Lapse)

    10. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by reg · · Score: 0

      As someone who was born, grew up in, and frequently visits Durban (my parents still live there), and who spent 2 years living in the Bay Area and currently live just outside it (for the last 13 years, and have parked in SF hundreds of times), all I can say is "stop talking kak". The Bay Area is an order of magnitude safer and cleaner than anywhere is South Africa. And, again, I say that as a proud South African. Sure there are some worse zones than others, but that is true of everywhere.

    11. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had that happen but received a fix-it ticket. I am not sure how they can cite you for having an unregistered vehicle when it is registered and shows up on their records as such. The relevant law is you must have a registration tag on your plate.

      I recommend scoring an "X" through the tag with a razor blade. This prevents it coming off in one piece.

      I wish California moved its registration tag to the inside windshield like Texas requires.

    12. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by zieroh · · Score: 2

      Anyone that lives in the Bay Area and owns a car deserves to have it broken into or stolen. Why the fuck would you even?

      Sounds like you don't know the Bay Area very well. Or at least not very much of it. There are large swaths of the Bay Area -- especially Silicon Valley -- where mass transit isn't useful and cars are the main mode of transit.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    13. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      When applying your new stickers each year:
      1. Remove as many layers of previous stickers as possible. Ideally, take it back to the paint on the plate.
      2. Clean the area with alcohol.
      3. After applying the sticker, score it several times with a sharp knife so that it is difficult, if not impossible, to get the sticker off in a form in which it can be reused. You may lose the sticker, but at least the thief won't benefit from it.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      FYI they definitely do not even read your first appeal. My wife did eventually win on the incorrectly filed parking ticket (she did not curb her wheels on a road with a 1% grade that was surveyed as a 1% grade, cited for not curbing wheels on a >4% grade).

    15. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP just said that he/she had never had a breakin in Durban, not that it was safer in general. Anecdotal but still.

    16. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, there's plenty of parts of the city that are clean, but the downtown area is disgusting.

      I live near downtown and the streets and alleys around me are filthy and inhabited by vagrants.

      Filthy people lay on the sidewalks passed out on drugs. People openly smoke crack and shoot up in the streets and the police just pass on by. When the sun comes out for a few days the stench of piss fills the nostrils. It's not uncommon to see shit on the sidewalk. SoMa and the Tenderloin are even worse.

      Have you seen the filth around City Hall? Have you seen how Fisherman's Wharf and Market Street around Union Square are pressure washed multiple times per week? Probably not, because they do it late at night or early in the morning when nobody is around. I see it happen when I'm out running.

      But really as disgusted as I am by what I see around me, I have to admit that it's nothing compared to what you'll see in the streets out in the industrial area around the Bayview area. It's an actual shantytown ghetto out there.

    17. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Solandri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's mostly due to Proposition 47. It was billed as a way to reduce overcrowding in jails, but did so by reducing the property theft crimes where less than $950 was stolen/damaged from a felony to a misdemeanor. In California, you can break into and steal from as many cars as you want now, and as long as you keep the property loss below $950 per incident, the only punishment you'll get (if you're caught) is a fine and maybe 1 year of jail time. In many cases the police can't be bothered to prosecute these cases anymore because it wastes more of their time and money than the thief's.

      There was initially a downtick in property theft crimes in 2015-2016 (part of a 30-year downward trend), leading Prop 47 proponents to claim they were right that it wouldn't affect crime rates. But it's looking more like it just took petty thieves a couple years to get a feel for how the new law worked.

    18. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice reality distortion field you live in. No shit, just a fantasy, huh? lol

    19. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iowa used to make the stickers that way. The glue they used was impossible to remove too. If you didn't hit the perfect spot the first time you could not redo it since the tag would shread itself if you tried to remove it.

      Now days I can pull them off very easily before applying the new one. Proof that"new" and probably cheaper isn't better.

    20. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by ichthus · · Score: 2

      It depends on your metric. If you're considering fossil fuel consumption, public transportation is the winner. If you're thinking about personal time spent getting to where you want to go, a private vehicle is likely more efficient.

      --
      sig: sauer
    21. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      Anyone that lives in the Bay Area and owns a car deserves to have it broken into or stolen.

      Why? I'm not from the area so I don't know the local customs as far as deserving to be the victim of a crime.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    22. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With liberals like the first transgender police commissioner, Theresa Sparks, that won't let the police arrest criminals, of course there's going to be more crime. We moved from downtown SF near Market and 4th to San Mateo because several employees were mugged and probably half of the employees had their cars broken into. In none of the cases would the police even dispatch much less try to investigate. San Mateo is better, but not that much better. A coworker was carjacked by a homeless guy, and the DA wouldn't prosecute because the criminal was homeless. Another was robbed at gun point, and the San Mateo police wouldn't even file a report since it was less than (IIRC) $950 stolen.

      With prop 47, over 10,000 criminals were re sentenced. I don't remember final numbers, but the majority of them were released from jail so there's a lot more criminals on the streets here now.

    23. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      Bumpkin. Live in a real city for a while then tell me how that private transport is working for you.

    24. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      It's those goddamned Martians, mostly.

    25. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      San Francisco is one of the great sewers if humanity. Enjoy all the shit!

    26. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Get real. Riding in the slave wagons ("company buses") will be an at-your-own-risk endeavor.

    27. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Liberals love taxes and fees. It's the only way they can fund their welfare state. I got nailed three different times with with red light camera tickets on Howard in SF, and the superior court didn't care that it wasn't my car. The model, color, and five digits of the license plate matched so I had to pay. I wasted two mornings off from work of PTO and expensive parking to protest the first two. The last one I just paid because it was cheaper and easier than trying to fight the government.

    28. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Shotgun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If by "real city", you mean "ant farm for humans", I'll pass.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    29. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >shit in the streets
      That. That right there is due to the pajeet factor. Import pajeets, import pajeet problems.

    30. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      1) Go to google maps
      2) Type in a destination
      3) choose different transportation methods
      4) observe how public transit almost always take longer and travels a further distance
      5)????
      6) Profit

    31. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When applying your new stickers each year: 1. Remove as many layers of previous stickers as possible. Ideally, take it back to the paint on the plate. 2. Clean the area with alcohol. 3. After applying the sticker, score it several times with a sharp knife so that it is difficult, if not impossible, to get the sticker off in a form in which it can be reused. You may lose the sticker, but at least the thief won't benefit from it.

      Or, be like other states and have the sticker on the inside of the windshield.

    32. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

      I guess NBC is part of the conservative movement? Or perhaps it's those stalwart conservative professors at Berkeley who make things up... I work a few days each week at Civic Center, and the feces, urine, and needles are quite real.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    33. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by ewibble · · Score: 1

      Probably because people can't afford to live there.

    34. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also cover the sticker, or even just the edges, in clear nail polish. You can get it back off with a razor blade (in a completely unusable form), but nobody's getting it with their fingernail.

    35. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by outlander · · Score: 1

      Not will be, is.
      People are already shooting at the tech buses...
      Even insufferable engineers don't deserve that.

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    36. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Residents from Oakland usually. There are videos of people standing on the BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) trains and using their tablets/smartphones and having them snatched out of their hands the minute the doors are about to close. The thieves take advantage of this and get a clean escape. Though they are usually stupid enough to use the smartphones to take selfies.

    37. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are fortunate enough to live within walking distance of your workplace, downtown and a supermarket, you could get by without a car, and use a taxi to get to those remote locations like dentists and hospitals. eg. North Mathilda Avenue in Sunnyvale. I did this at the time. But that only works if you are within 1/2 mile or 10 minutes walk of all those locations. This constrains you to the downtown areas of the various cities that have a Caltrain station or tram network. Buses are usually one an hour and can be delayed just as much.

      Anywhere more than a mile or two away would take an hour to walk to downtown, but then you would probably end up having to travel the opposite direction at your destination eg. East Sunnyvale to Facebook in Menlo Park.
      So it's quicker by car. Then many people can't afford a home on the peninsula so commute from the opposite side of the Bay Area via the Dumbarton bridge by car. Thus all these white van shuttles that go between the various corporate campuses. Companies like Apple have tried to defragment and move their staff into a single campus building.

    38. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by outlander · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it does happen. It's unpleasant and noisome and it does occur more than it should.

      But then the City has become stratified - it's terribly expensive to live there.
      Public conveniences like bathrooms are surprisingly few and far between.
      For better or for worse, it's got a large homeless population.
      And whether or not people like to admit it, that large homeless population is made of humans who need to eat, breathe, and empty themselves just like the rest of us.
      But there's really nowhere they can do it.
      There aren't public restrooms, in part bc of the hysteria after Sept 11th when the public restrooms in BART and MUNI were shut down, and partially because other bathrooms are shut to them bc some of the homeless use bathrooms to shoot up or whatnot, making them less safe for the rest of the population.
      So they poop in the street, and it sucks.

      Lest people think this is unique to SF, it's not. It seems to happen in every reasonably warm city in this country, from Savannah GA to a number of Gulf Coast cities to Austin and Dallas and more. And, more and more, it seems to be showing up in the suburbs, as people who have been comfortable up to now lose jobs and become homeless (for whatever reason).

      The Valley isn't unique, but because of the scrutiny it receives as an oasis of wealth, it's often a harbinger of what will happen elsewhere in places that don't have the economic power to maintain a small segment of the population while the rest suffers.

      And so I kind of have to think that it's not 'The Valley' that's over, it's the economic model that marginalizes people with limited skills while handsomely rewarding people with relatively narrow, specialized skillsets. As much as I love how much freedom and power tech provides, it also accelerates inequality (at least, in its current form) and ensures that non-STEM students are going to scrape by for a living....and not every kid is a STEM learner.
      IMHO, we as a nation need to start thinking about how we create opportunities and economic security for people who are not going to be university material - that will stem the tide, maybe, if we start realizing that we all need the people who do the thankless jobs. It's gonna be a long, long time until robots can take over, and I'd assume avoid pushing people to the brink of homelessness and beyond just because their job pays so little they can't live within an economically viable distance of their job.

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    39. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Brussels, Shanghai, and Los Angeles. Motorcycles and scooters work way better than public transportation. Private transport all the way!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    40. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      If by "real city", you mean "ant farm for humans", I'll pass.

      Is that a Zoolander reference?

    41. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      jim clark...you were never into future inovation.

    42. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, stop making Americans look bad, u fuckin retard. Scooters are standard in many parts of the world. Go back to clean to cleaning your guns, and don't forget to check the trigger while peering down the barrel, preferably loaded.

    43. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      Where I'm living now, in Ho Chi Minh City, motorbikes are the primary form of transport. The bikes are fun, quite fuel efficient, and usually a quick way to get to your destination. Except at rush hour, when a 2 mile trip takes over an hour.

      It's not the worst form of transport, but there are major downsides. The air pollution is godawful, riding a motorbike is much more dangerous than driving a car, and rain storms slow the city to a crawl. Then there's the matter of peak capacity mentioned above.

      If you've never ridden a tiny motorcycle at 3km/h in a dense crowd of thousands and thousands of commuters - try it! It's a terribly slow, mephitic, dangerous, and unpleasant way to get where you're going. But it's quite an interesting cultural experience.

    44. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what's fashionable in Moscow these days?

    45. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah just what he sees on the interwebs from his momâ(TM)s basement where he lives.

    46. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Apprently you've never been to Shanghai. I rode the metro lots of times - IF it was going to where I needed, or I was going across town. For more local runs - or when I wanted to go visit my wife's father's grave in Anting, we'd take a motorcycle because at that time there was no metro/train that even went close to it. You see, as big as the metro is, there is still massive swaths of the city that are nowhere near the metro. The central districts (Jing'an, Putuo, etc) are well-covered, but Pudong outside if Lujiazui? Or out towards Qibao town? Few and far between. But hey, you're just an AC trying to sound smart - and you failed.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    47. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Oh, I did that too! :) I rode motorcycle all over Malaysia and Thailand - and the traffic sucked. But for much of the city spaces, it was more convenient to use a motorcycle than a metro then hope to find a tuk tuk or taxi (or a rented motorcycle) to get you where you needed to go.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    48. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      10 million people a day on average...
      You think you could still do what you did with 10 million extra private vehicles on the road?
      Private transport all the way! LOL

    49. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spotted the American !!

    50. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wanna bitch, at least get the stereotypes right.
      Dems are for tax and spend, Republicans are for fees and spending and borrowing.

      Dems tax everyone. Republicans use fees that cops can selectively enforce.

    51. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by consolidating staff theyâ(TM)ve put a huge load on the local infrastructure. Watch the house prices soar and revel in knowing you could never afford to live near work. Everyone is doomed to a 2 hour commute one-way and a generally shitty quality of life that isnâ(TM)t spent with family.

      I used to work near Mathilda and itâ(TM)s basically as bad as the 101 at 4:30pm. Canâ(TM)t even turn onto the road without risking a nice dent, and Iâ(TM)ve seen plenty of road rage. Glad Iâ(TM)m out of it.

    52. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Anyone who claims that someone deserves to have something broken or stolen is a moron. Get some fucking morals.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    53. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like there needs to be some public torture here. Catch these theives in a sting with a decoy on the train, then slowly remove body parts, keeping them alive until the last thing remaining is part of a torso and a head. Make sure everyone in the area sees it.

    54. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      FYI they definitely do not even read your first appeal. My wife did eventually win on the incorrectly filed parking ticket (she did not curb her wheels on a road with a 1% grade that was surveyed as a 1% grade, cited for not curbing wheels on a >4% grade).

      Really?...that's a ticketable offense? In 40+ years I've never heard of that, though I certainly do it when I'm on a grade.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    55. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Ditto, but a lot of folks who don't live in them just don't get that it can be very difficult to get by on a six figure salary depending on where you live. Six figures in the DC Metro area puts you below average, and if you're supporting family, could leave you barely scraping by. Between the crazy cost of housing, and daily commute tolls that can go as high as $40 on I-66, and the actual cost of nearly everything being significantly higher than in the next county, it's a wonder more people don't move away, but then you have to put up with even more commuting costs, and time, in an area that has some of the worst in the nation. I'm just looking forward to getting the hell out when I retire, so that I can actually afford to enjoy it.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    56. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I saw similar during a recent visit to Sacramento when I spent a couple hours walking around the downtown area.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    57. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Just to follow up on this, this morning (March 8th) at 9:10 AM as I was walking into work at Market and Larkin, there was a homeless drug addict standing in the middle of the street, pissing. As I walked by, a police officer rolled up - don't know what happened after that, but public urination in the middle of the street right in the middle of the morning, right within eyesight (and a 3 minute walk) from City Hall. Gotta love that clean San Francisco!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    58. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a California prop 47 and 57 issue. Which in turn has caused an increasing opioid issue.

      I speak from experience.... lost a good friend who was living on the streets. I spent time with him and his "friends" on the streets in hopes of him going back to his family and teaching job. If he would've been thrown in jail for his drug use and possession, he would still be alive today.

      By the way... from what I've witnessed, homeless mental illness is caused by excessive drug use. Especially when they unknowingly use/inject drugs sold to them that are really cleaning solvents.

      Don't get into politics, but with those two policies we have become a mess

    59. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      If you're thinking about personal time spent getting to where you want to go, a private vehicle is likely more efficient.

      That's not my experience - because on public transportation, all that time was available to me for work, entertainment, or sleep. That's an efficiency that no non-zero-driving-time commute can beat. If you have a driver, or a carpool, or an autonomous vehicle, then a personal vehicle might be more efficient.

      (And I'm not interested in autonomous personal vehicles, personally. But then I also no longer commute.)

    60. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah. +1
      I periodically use train (ACE/Amtrak) and a bike to get to work. It's not terribly convenient - the times of the trains are poorly scheduled and they're routinely late. Plus, in a paean to the great American railroad robber-baron era, we only have one track running from the east bay through the marsh to the stations in the heart of the valley....so we can't run trains in both directions without an enormous amount of exception-based scheduling.

      When I get here, fortunately my office is only about a mile and a half from the station. If I had to use the VTA trams, it'd take a lot longer to get where I need to go. Yes, the VTA trams are clean and quiet and relatively fast, but even so, they're poorly coordinated and they don't really go where they need to. They're not on Stevens Creek, FFS, which is arguably one of the larger commercial thoroughfares in the city.

      And buses just suck. They get stuck in traffic like everything else on the road, all because GM wanted to sell more cars in the 1930s and 1940s (see National City Lines).

      So traffic is a thing, and private cars are a thing, and neither is going away until this society actually decides to invest in infrastructure. But that ain't gonna happen as long as cheap-labor capitalist rethuglicans out to profit off every transaction stop convincing working-class dumbfucks that the money they give to the government is going to bad brown people.

    61. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by outlander · · Score: 1

      Not so much. I spent a bunch of time in Japan, China, and Europe, and the public transit goes useful places and is reasonably fast and clean.
      It's a matter of priorities, not properties inherent in mass transit.

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    62. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has a proud neckbeard, though. It frames his second chin nicely.

    63. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      OP just said that he/she had never had a breakin in Durban, not that it was safer in general. Anecdotal but still.

      Or he/she never had his/her legs nearly sawed off outside Durban either.

    64. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Not to throw this into the right wing, but is it residents or illegals responsible for the rise in crime? Just curious.

      Residents. Illegals commit crime at a much lower rate, since they're trying to lay low in order to avoid ICE attention.

    65. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberals love taxes and fees. It's the only way they can fund their welfare state.

      You seem to have mixed up your political idiologies. What you describe is socialism, the opposite of liberalism.

    66. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would you find out?

    67. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in San Francisco. Had my car broken into three times over the last seven years.

      My favorite "experience", though, was this year. Someone stole our registration tags off our car while it was parked near my wife's work. We found out because we got a ticket for not having a registered vehicle.

      So, we sent it an appeal that included the police report and a photocopy of our valid DMV registration. Open and shut, right?

      Wrong. Our appeal was denied (!) and we were told we had to pay. We could go to their meeting in person to appeal again but I don't have the patience or time for that. It wasn't that expensive, so we paid the f-ing thing.

      So my take-away is they should change the SF Tourist Slogan to something like: "San Francisco: The City Where you Get a Ticket for Being a Crime Victim".

      This is certainly a case of infringement of fundamental rights under the "colour of law", and hence a Bill of Rights violations, and grounds for civil suit and criminal prosecution of the government officials involved under US federal law. All you need is several million dollars to pay the legal fees required to get action taken in your case.

      It's not like you can actually expect the government to obey the law without a strong shove - especially not in California, and especially not in San Francisco.

    68. Re:Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      It is a safety issue, as it is theoretically possible for a car to roll down a hill into traffic. But, no, it is not normal to cite for that, unless there is a real accident as a result. Even a 5% grade is not enough to create more than a tiny risk of the hand brake failing, so people are failing to curb all over our cities on 5% grades. And when handbrakes fails, what happens? A car slowly rolls somewhere and gently stops against something. Whatever. You do not actually need to write a ticket to a car owner who is obviously embarrassed that their car could have been mangled by their own stupidity.

      Of course, this particular ticket was a complete fraud and the person writing it up knew that. They could have dropped tickets on 30 cars on that same block for the same "offense" because no one ever curbs their wheels on a 1% grade. The reason that did not happen is presumably a supervisor could not quite ignore the problem performance of a parking enforcement officer who causes 10-20 appeals for one day's work, especially when those appeals might eventually get upheld and raise uncomfortable questions about whether the supervisor is instructing reports to file phoney tickets.

      Write three phoney tickets a day, and you can probably get away with that forever, and earn high marks from your supervisor for good performance. How many are going to be appealed? And after the first two appeals are denied, how many people actually file the third and final appeal?

    69. Re: Also Crime and Sh*t in the Streets. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Bangkok has made great strides in improving the BTS and the MRT recently. General Prayut may be an oppressive dictator - but he's a friend of public transport!

  2. Moving SV, Not Leaving It by tsqr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA: The trip, which took place on a luxury bus outfitted with a supply of vegan doughnuts and coal-infused kombucha, was known as the “Comeback Cities Tour.”

    Vegan doughnuts. Coal-infused kombucha. Wherever it is these people think they're going to relocate to, it looks like they're taking Silicon Valley with them.

    1. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegan doughnuts. Coal-infused kombucha. Wherever it is these people think they're going to relocate to, it looks like they're taking Silicon Valley with them.

      As long as they're supporting Big Coal they're welcome here in Appalachia! /s

    2. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to the South, we eat vegans!

    3. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Funny

      From TFA: The trip, which took place on a luxury bus outfitted with a supply of vegan doughnuts and coal-infused kombucha, was known as the “Comeback Cities Tour.”

      Vegan doughnuts. Coal-infused kombucha. Wherever it is these people think they're going to relocate to, it looks like they're taking Silicon Valley with them.

      I mean, you can't just pull them out cold turkey, they would go into shock. You have to ease them into it slowly. Like putting a fish in a new aquarium.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      This is often Big-City thinking, where outside such cities, people live in such an isolated world where trends and culture just don't reach them.
      When population shifts, people bring their preferences with them, and takes only a little coaxing to the grocery store that you want some type of food, that they can order it the next week, and often a restaurant will pop up to meet demand.

      Small towns may not have such things, not because they can't but because no one wanted it before. When people show up, such services appear.

      If Silicon Valley population and businesses spreads out equally across the country, then there will be little problems, other then a new restaurant, or some new food in the grocery isle.

      However the biggest risk is if the population moves to a small number of locations. Say to the Mid-West, Where there would be an influx of highly paid professionals genderfacating an area. Raising the cost of living.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by tsqr · · Score: 1

      However the biggest risk is if the population moves to a small number of locations. Say to the Mid-West, Where there would be an influx of highly paid professionals genderfacating an area.

      I can't figure out if you misspelled "gentrifying", or if you're on to something I haven't yet heard about. If it's the latter, it sounds terrifying.

    6. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing autocorrect/autocomplete

    7. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ivy League sure became Ivory Tower League. We're already seeing the flight of them. Quietly we will not hire ex dotcom people, they're wayyy too damn toxic.

    8. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I welcome them to come to Miami and try their hippy dippy anti-Trump shit here. Miami is a rough town and we're proud of it. And yes, every single Cuban I know is an avid Trump supporter. Which is funny since the SV left thinks Hispanics are against Trump.

    9. Re: Moving SV, Not Leaving It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarah?

    10. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by ranton · · Score: 2

      I welcome them to come to Miami and try their hippy dippy anti-Trump shit here. Miami is a rough town and we're proud of it. And yes, every single Cuban I know is an avid Trump supporter. Which is funny since the SV left thinks Hispanics are against Trump.

      Miami-Dade county voted for Clinton by 29 points over Trump, so it appears leftist anti-Trump individuals would fit in with a large subset (and likely majority) of Miami's population.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    11. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure it is a purposeful blend of gentrifying and defecating.

    12. Re: Moving SV, Not Leaving It by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      > vegan doughnuts

      Good idea. I always hated chicken doughnuts

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    13. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Kinda like boiling a frog or lobster

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    14. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      The Silly Valley is actually a near wasteland for vegan goods.

    15. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Which is funny since the SV left thinks Hispanics are against Trump.

      Most Hispanics are against Trump, but Cuban ex-pats are a very very different crowd.

    16. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      The boiling a frog thing is a myth. Thermal regulation by relocation is a big part of how they survive. I'm sure lobsters aren't too fond of it either but they can't really do much about it.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    17. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I wasn't attempting to state a fact, but let me help you with that. "The story is often used as a metaphor for the inability or unwillingness of people to react to or be aware of threats that arise gradually." There's debate on the topic of lobsters and if they do or don't feel pain.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    18. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      So you were trying to state a fake fact then? What's the purpose of that exactly?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    19. Re:Moving SV, Not Leaving It by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between a myth and a metaphor. Please check your sense of humor.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  3. No news here, move along by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

    "I'm a little over San Francisco," said Patrick McKenna, the founder of High Ridge Venture Partners

    Said the nobody.

    Complaints about Silicon Valley insularity are as old as the Valley itself.

    Slow news day huh?

    Basically the sky-high prices for property is true for any major city in the world, from London, to Paris, and especially Hong Kong.

    1. Re:No news here, move along by Carewolf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "I'm a little over San Francisco," said Patrick McKenna, the founder of High Ridge Venture Partners

      Said the nobody.

      Complaints about Silicon Valley insularity are as old as the Valley itself.

      Slow news day huh?

      Basically the sky-high prices for property is true for any major city in the world, from London, to Paris, and especially Hong Kong.

      San Fransisco is not a major city by any measure, and it is ridiculously overpriced even compared to real major cities.

    2. Re:No news here, move along by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      SF proper is small. SF proper doesn't contain Silicon Valley, or any real tech worth speaking of.

      When people say 'SF' they generally mean the SF bay area.

      SF is like Manhattan.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:No news here, move along by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Are you on crack? There's a huge number of top tech companies based in SF. Uber, Twitter, Square, Dolby. Google, Yahoo, and Cisco have big offices there. It's not as big as Palo Alto (and doesn't have have the space for the huge office complexes Google and so forth have) but it's definitely one of the top tech cities in the Bay.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:No news here, move along by XXeR · · Score: 1

      And even this GitHub project.

      I was going to mod you up, but that last link is useless in the context of this conversation. My home town of 10k people in the middle of the midwest is on it..

    5. Re:No news here, move along by sootman · · Score: 1

      > San Fransisco is not a major city by any measure

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Yeah, It's only the 13th largest city in the U.S. Not major at all. :-/

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re: No news here, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll the USA has lost a lot of international relevancy as of late.

    7. Re: No news here, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google mountain view. Cisco San Jose. Yahoo Sunnyvale. Tons and tons more in South Bay.

      The others you listed in SF are famous but not big.

    8. Re:No news here, move along by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      Are you on crack? There's a huge number of top tech companies based in SF. Uber, Twitter, Square, Dolby. Google, Yahoo, and Cisco have big offices there. It's not as big as Palo Alto (and doesn't have have the space for the huge office complexes Google and so forth have) but it's definitely one of the top tech cities in the Bay.

      Those are all in the bay area not actually in SF or even near SF.

    9. Re:No news here, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google "Uber Headquarters."

      Google, Yahoo, and Cisco do have big offices in SF.

    10. Re: No news here, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you reading comprehension? "Some companies are based in SF. Also, Google, Yahoo, and Cisco have big offices there."

      SF has a lot of tech companies and a lot of tech jobs. Not as much as MV or PA, but more than SJ or a lot of other SV cities.

  4. FAKE NEWS by Merk42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not over, Season 5 starts March 25th.

    1. Re:FAKE NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't wait but fear it won't be the same without Erlich.

  5. There is an answer to this by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    The obvious conclusion from the wave of car breakins in San Francisco is this - not only do we need self driving cars, but we need self-defending cars and a amendment to the second amendment that specifically lays out the right for self driving cars to be armed.

    Thus we have the three laws of self-driving cars:

    1) A self-driving car may not cause harm to other cars, or through inaction allow humans to damage or scuff the paint job of another car.

    2) A self-driving car must obey orders given by the owner except when it would conflict with the protection of itself or other self-driivng cars.

    3) A self-driving car must protect its own existence unless self-immolation would protect cars of higher value, or result in a really awesome YouTube video.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:There is an answer to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep Summer safe.

    2. Re: There is an answer to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about just getting rid of the cars? Thatâ(TM)ll solve a lot of problems in one go, including making SF a nicer place to live

    3. Re:There is an answer to this by decipher_saint · · Score: 1
      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    4. Re: There is an answer to this by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      My brother, I have long appreciated your comments. So I can only assume this is meant with... levity.

      If not - are you on crack?

    5. Re:There is an answer to this by Thelasko · · Score: 1
      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    6. Re:There is an answer to this by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re: There is an answer to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it wont. The cars aren't causing the issue. It's all the shifty immigrants and shithead hipsters living there that have ruined the place.

      Both need to be exterminated.

    8. Re: There is an answer to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be that stupid...

  6. Everyone's on drugs by maas15 · · Score: 0

    Everyone's on drugs, companies treat investor money like it's a gift rather than an obligation, and a "barely scraping by" wage is 100k/yr. Which means that the budget programmer the company your money is tied up in actually costs $120k/yr despite his or her massive roxycodone addiction which is why he or she gets jack shit done. There is NO WAY I would ever invest in the SF tech economy.

  7. Million Dollar Middle Class? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the exorbitant cost of living in San Francisco and its suburbs, where even a million-dollar salary can feel middle class.

    LOL. I appreciate that money doesn't quite go as far there as other places, but I suspect this asshat really has no clue what it feels like to live like the middle class.

    1. Re: Million Dollar Middle Class? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you need to be able to own a home and have well prepared retirement savings to be middle class.

      Oh, did you mean Obama's definition? Yeah, sorry, Amazon workers making $11/hr have never been middle class, no matter how much soap you chew.

    2. Re:Million Dollar Middle Class? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It depends on where Middle Class lives. So lets go by the standard rule of thumb of purchasing a house for 3x your salary.

      A house in Rural Upstate NY with 2,000 sq/ft and an acre of land is about $250,000. So a home like that would require a Salary of $83k (Well into middle/middle class for the area, bordering on upper middle class)

      A house in SF with the same properties will be 3-4million dollars. So you would need a million dollar salary to life the same type of life style as someone making 1/12 the salary.

      That being said, not everything scales proportional to you salary in the SF area. The cost of an automobile isn't 12x as much, nor is the cost of Food and Fuel 12x more. So while I may be living in a Larger home, I have a smaller car, will need to budget more carefully extra expenses, food and fuel take up a good part of my budget. A $1000.00 iPhone, is considered a major purchase, which I plan to keep for years, and not until the next model comes out. New Furniture and repairs need to be budgeted and planned for. So my larger home, may not be as nice as the smaller SF home, and perhaps a decade behind the times.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  8. Left wing echo chamber is stifling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get that man in front of HR immediately.

  9. What's your priority? by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

    I recently took a training at work on the 7 habits of highly effective people. In that I did an exercise where we list what's important to us, big picture and long term. What I wrote down didn't surprise me as much as what was missing; being part of a start-up that was successful. The point of the exercise was to make one really think about what they wanted out of life. You can't go somewhere until you know where you want to go.

    Even though I'm not working on anything really exciting that might change the world. Even though I don't earn nearly as much as I would in San Francisco. That's never been my priority. Living in Salt Lake City I earn a hefty income that is more the capable of providing for my family. Cost of living here is fairly low at 108. In all, for me, my life is much better here.

  10. Case? by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

    Steve Case hates SV because everybody from SV rightfully hated AOL. Just human nature to hate on groups that deflate your ego.

    If we're going to list out of control egos, DC politicians would be at the _top_ of that list. I bet Pelosi thinks she earned her stolen money.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  11. "Opposing Views" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're not stifling "opposing" views. When one half the population says women and negros are encouraged, while the other half says women and colored folk are not welcome, while those two views are indeed opposing, one side is acceptable and the other is not, no matter where you live in the US.

    1. Re:"Opposing Views" by Dread_ed · · Score: 0

      The funny part is that the people accused of being anti-woman and anti-minority are the ones who are totally cool with women and minorities. It's the people who say they are on the side of women and minorities, fighting for their whatevers, that say women and minorities are not welcome. That is how they justify their screeching and screaming, name calling, and finger pointing.

      What a conundrum. It is the anti-division advocates that create division.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    2. Re: "Opposing Views" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, I'm not that AC, but this is total bullshit.

      I'm a white dude. Do you know how many times I've been pulled over by a cop? Dozens. Know how many times he told me to step out of the car? Zero.

      Know how many times I've been in the car when a black friend was pulled over? Twice. Know how many times I was told to step out of the car and subsequently frisked while backup arrived? Twice.

      Both of those times for nothing more than your usual traffic stop. Nothing on either of us. Only difference was the guy driving was black.

      So... whatever.

    3. Re:"Opposing Views" by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It is far more complex then that and you should know that.
      Sexism/Racism is an issue that is wider problem them just political leaning.

      For most if not nearly all of these jobs, your political leaning, has little to do that will affect the quality of your work, and even your standing in the company. You can have a friendly, collaborative, intelligent conservative in your organization without it being a detriment to the work culture. Often having a conservative view point may be handy, because it will often offer up a simpler solution to a problem, because it may had already been solved before.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:"Opposing Views" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cute strawman... should feed more than a few horses with it.

    5. Re: "Opposing Views" by swan5566 · · Score: 1

      But that's not what he's talking about. It's not about whether or not there's racism. It's about whether there's a group of people who cross the line accusing other people of being racist when they actually aren't. And, this happens to include anyone tries to call them out for crossing the line.

      --
      In debates about Christianity, there are two groups: those looking for answers, and those looking to just ask questions.
    6. Re: "Opposing Views" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Dozens of times? Why have you been pulled over dozens of times? You're doing something wrong. Which leads me to wonder about your driving habits, and by extension those of the company you keep.
      2) So, with your black friend, it happened twice. There's a fine line between citing realistic experiences (vs theory), and mere personal anecdotes. Yours sounds like the latter since you're light on details and examples.
      I've been pulled over a total of 6 times in my entire life, and twice I was asked to step out.. and I'm white.

    7. Re: "Opposing Views" by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I'm a white dude. Do you know how many times I've been pulled over by a cop? Dozens. Know how many times he told me to step out of the car? Zero.

      What the fuck are you doing that you're getting pulled over dozens of times??
      Good lord.

  12. Please God let it be true by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

    If we could get rid of the billionaire VC's and 58% of these insufferable millennials, San Francisco could flourish again! Where do I send the vegan doughnuts and coal infused kombucha to help make this happen?

  13. Come to Austin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave SF, come to Austin. Texans consider Californians as the ruling class, and you will get the respect you deserve here. More amenities, no traffic issues, and dirt cheap housing prices.

    1. Re:Come to Austin... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Works in Oregon and Colorado too! All these places know they need to do something about their regional average IQs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Come to Austin... by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 1

      Somehow I find your assertion about Texans' view of Californians as "the ruling class" to be unlikely. That said, I'm in a SF suburb and have been giving serious thought to relocating to San Antonio to be near family and to get away from the crowds, the expense, and most importantly the hyper-sensitivity I sometimes see about accusations of sexual harassment here. It's amazing to me that I have worked in the valley for 30 years and have yet to see any of the hype so frequently decried by SJWs here in the greater bay area. This isn't to say it doesn't exist, but maybe it's not so pervasive as some people would have the public believe. My hope is that Texas will offer a respite from all of this madness.

    3. Re:Come to Austin... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      San Antonio isn't a bad town to move to. It has two (going on three) loops, where even at 5:30 rush hour, you can still get around town at a reasonable clip. Yes, it has crime, but it is nowhere what it used to be. Only real notable thing to watch out for are uninsured motorists, so bump up your PIP and underinsured/uninsured coverage.

    4. Re:Come to Austin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to move because you think there's too much hyper-sensitivity to sexual harassment? WTF? I live in the Bay Area and this is something I come across, I dunnow, maybe once every other year? Even if it was 10 times as bad, would it really be something to move over?

      Texas is annoying as fuck. A bunch of people who are convinced there backwater state is the center of the world. Literally strangers will come up and tell you that TX has everything it needs and doesn't need stuff from other states. I guess living in a place like that has cheap houses if you can't make it in the Bay Area, though.

    5. Re:Come to Austin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, their regional average IQs are too high and they need to be pulled down?

    6. Re:Come to Austin... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Yes. And I never hear anything like that from Californians. Never. Ever.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    7. Re: Come to Austin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. I've lived for years in each of those states. They're about equally endowed with that attitude.

  14. Miseplled by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Homo - or Mofo...

    Oh yeah.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Miseplled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      homo

    2. Re:Miseplled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound more like a Hofo.

  15. If the Bay Area were really "over"... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the Bay Area were really "over", then the traffic issues and high rents would disappear overnight. The Bay Area is crowded and expensive because (surprise!) people actually want to live, work, and start businesses there!

    Good climate, access to research universities (Stanford, Berkeley, etc), a collection of extremely smart, talented people are pluses. In many ways, the area is a victim of its own success.

    1. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the Bay Area were really "over", then the traffic issues and high rents would disappear overnight.
      No it wouldn't, it'd slooowly decline over a period of decades. The jobs would then suddenly start drying up, and there'd be a massive, massive housing crisis as there's suddenly a housing glut for those over-priced homes. People will start panicking, and the entire SV area will collapse in a Detroit style manner. (Remember Detroit was a huge Car manufacturing darling shangri-la in the 1950s, until a later decline in the 70s/80s.)

      You think it all starts at once? Declines happen slowly but surely, not all of a sudden. I've known a couple people in SV who live in a reality distortion field, thinking they'd suddenly "get rich", while paying multi-thousand dollar rent, and pissing away their money on crap they didn't need while not making any savings. That was 10 years ago, and I'm sure they haven't smartened up yet.

    2. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're having fun. Just making it in Silicon Valley with interesting people, good climate, beaches, beautiful scenery 50 miles away, is a lot better than living it up in Arizona or Michigan.

    3. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Bay Area were really "over", then the traffic issues and high rents would disappear overnight. The Bay Area is crowded and expensive because (surprise!) people actually want to live, work, and start businesses there!

      Good climate, access to research universities (Stanford, Berkeley, etc), a collection of extremely smart, talented people are pluses. In many ways, the area is a victim of its own success.

      It's like you didn't even bother to read the fucking summary.

      The entire point of this was to highlight the fact that Silicon Valley is through with the "Bay Area". I don't even live there, but as far as I'm concerned, good fucking riddance. Keep your "smart" millionaires living their median uber-hipster left-wing lifestyle.

      Actual smart people can thrive anywhere. And this is the 21st Century. People don't need "access" to local unis, that's what the internet is for.

    4. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Yogi Berra said it best: "Nobody goes there any more. It's too crowded".

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    5. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're having fun. Just making it in Silicon Valley with interesting people, good climate, beaches, beautiful scenery 50 miles away, is a lot better than living it up in Arizona or Michigan.

      People seem to forget that "making it" also includes not pissing away 99.9% of your income on stupid shit so you can actually afford to retire at some point and not be destitute.

    6. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      "Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded." --Yogi Berra

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    7. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The San Andreas can't displace soon enough.

    8. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Listening to a lecture on YouTube is not the same as listening to a professor lecture, asking questions, chatting after class, and meeting other smart fellow students. And going to live speakers, events, etc at the university. And research opportunities in labs -- not everything can be done remotely.

      A good local university still beats online "edumacation" hands down.

    9. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mark Zuckerberg put it best. He could go anywhere, but he took Facebook to California because that's where the talent is.

      California is an at-will employment state (Yes, a company's freedom to fire you for any nondiscriminatory reason is good for you) AND has banned non-compete contracts. This leads to extremely high worker mobility that has proven over the decades to be the secret sauce to tech innovation. People sharing ideas is what makes things happen.

      Other states have tried to build their own tech cradles but few succeed because of low worker mobility.

      https://law.stanford.edu/index.php?webauth-document=publication/256234/doc/slspublic/NYULawReview-74-3-Gilson.pdf

      Not saying the Bay Area is perfect. They've got a real zoning and NIMBY problem that prevents housing construction and THAT is what pushes housing prices up. Simply not enough homes.

    10. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Just making it in Silicon Valley with interesting people, good climate, beaches, beautiful scenery 50 miles away, is a lot better than living it up in Arizona or Michigan.

      Yes, Michigan is terrible. Don't live here. We certainly do not have a larger number of higher ranking universities than the entire state of California has to offer. We certainly don't have gorgeous beaches that are so uncrowded many days you can treat them like your own private resort. We lack culture and do not have "extremely smart and talented people" having the area with the highest concentration of professional engineers the world has ever seen. There is no diversity. Literally no middle-eastern, latino, or black people live here. It's so white and racist. A 3000 sq ft beachfront home with 300 feet of personal white sand doesn't cost less than 350k. The rents are high and salaries low.

      No don't come here. It's flyover country. Cold. Miserable. Backwards hick-infested land. Terrible place. Just terrible. Stay on the coasts.

    11. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High rents exist because there's a mismatch between supply and demand due to unrealistically restrictive zoning rules. Traffic exists because too many people drive rather than using transit, transit is not comprehensive like it is in other countries, and people insist on living further apart which means they have to travel longer distances.

    12. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real catalyst for the Rust Belt collapse was foreign competition brought on by the oil shocks of the early 70s. It took a lot to wreck Detroit. You had that external hit, then the business that drove the economy had to make the wrong decisions. In that case, it was building big cars and failing to focus on quality when the public was shifting (at least partly) from gas-guzzlers to econo-boxes.

      What series of setbacks could possibly Detroit the Bay Area? Foreign competition has already taken the wafer fab business; but that was replaced by the more lucrative design business. The Navy pulled out of Alameda; but there are still contractors around and the civilian tech industry was more than enough to fill the void. Anyplace else, a base closure could ruin the economy. Not that far away, a major base closure in Monterey kept housing cheaper near the base for a while, but hey it's Monterey so when I say "cheap" it's all relative. I'm given to understand that Seaside got funky for a while but is back. Salinas has gang issues, but I understand even that has settled down a bit recently.

      Anyway, not that long ago East Palo Alto had one of the nation's worst murder rates. I suspect the historically weak areas would be the first to show issues if the economy were suffering. Oakland would go back into the dumper first, etc.

      We're not seeing any sign of that. Plainly the BA ain't over. Far from it; but the side show crazies are doing their best every Saturday night. Those damn capitalists! Smashy-smashy, trashy-trashy. Oakland. The canary in the coal mine, I guess. If it's all going over the edge, that's the place to watch IMHO.

    13. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're having fun. Just making it in Silicon Valley with interesting people, good climate, beaches, beautiful scenery 50 miles away, is a lot better than living it up in Arizona or Michigan.

      you keep telling yourself that.... And we keep living the good life...

      Silicon valley isn't horrible, it's just extremely overrated. I have friends and family who live there and I don't envy them one bit, because they are constantly stressed out and work extreme hours just to live in overpriced homes (compared to what I have at 1/8 the cost) in extremely boring neighborhoods with crappy parks, no trails, no walk-ability and lots of theft.

      No thanks, I think I made a better choice.

    14. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I drove through the place once. Where was that beautiful scenery you speak of? I don't consider scrub brush covered hills with shabby house squirted on them "scenic" in any way.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    15. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      There is more than one way to fix traffic problems. One issue with San Francisco is geography. Without that issue, you could easily build 6 lane freeways every 15 miles or so.

    16. Re: If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The need to save for retirement is a myth perpetuated by the finance industry (they want liquidity in the investment market) and government (they want you to work your whole life at a level harder than you need to).

      There is already a perfectly functional retirement system that does not involve investment: it's called having children. After they are raised all children have a moral and social obligation to look after their parents after they retire. If you don't have children then that's fine, you're going to have to work harder to build up that investment account, but you are the exception, not the rule.

      For the vast majority of people it is just a scam - heck, a lot of old people's retirement money ends up going back to the children as inheritance, minus the tax, legal and financial services fees, of course.

    17. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep going until to you hit Portland or Seattle. Looking at Mt Rainier from my office in Seattle right now.

    18. Re:If the Bay Area were really "over"... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If the Bay Area were really "over", then the traffic issues and high rents would disappear overnight.

      Worth mentioning that in 2008 and especially 2001 this is exactly what happened. It was nice for a while then the traffic problems returned, worse than ever.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  16. As opposed to the rest of the country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where people say, "I hate Trump", and "I'm not going to work on blockchain and bitcoin."

  17. Bad Political Statements? by foxalopex · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The whole Left echo chamber statement seems idiotic. Left or worded better liberal views fit the development of technology better than right or conservative views. The word or idea itself (conservative) is not the ideal way to run a small tech start-up for example. Being conservative implies that you don't like taking risks which is the opposite of what's needed to work on new technology. All new technology is by its very nature risky which is why technological centres tend to be left politically. The main reason why I would think Silicon Valley is not an ideal place anymore is the fact that everything is too expensive.

    1. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right that the terms 'Liberal' and 'Leftist' are mutually exclusive, and the people who silence dissent and seek echo chambers would be leftists, and certainly not liberal.

    2. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Indeed. People who are actually conservative by modern political standards and technologists are a minuscule minority, because the conservative mindset clashes with the required open-mindedness. We do, however, have lots of mavericks. Mavericks are all over the map, and we have many libertarians and anarchists and socialists here. People sometimes get excited by pointing at people like Thiel -- "oh, look! a conservative!" No. He is a maverick with strong libertarian tendencies. Put Thiel in a room full of regular folk conservatives and sparks will fly ("regular folk" not meaning fellow billionaires, but people who get their hands dirty for a living).

    3. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole Left echo chamber statement seems idiotic. Left or worded better liberal views fit the development of technology better than right or conservative views. The word or idea itself (conservative) is not the ideal way to run a small tech start-up for example. Being conservative implies that you don't like taking risks which is the opposite of what's needed to work on new technology. All new technology is by its very nature risky which is why technological centres tend to be left politically. The main reason why I would think Silicon Valley is not an ideal place anymore is the fact that everything is too expensive.

      Oh, everything is too expensive? You sure that's not those "creative" left-wing types in real estate taking risks by marketing a beach shack as a million-dollar investment? After all, I'm sure they felt it's what's needed in order to sustain their business there...

    4. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main reason why I would think Silicon Valley is not an ideal place anymore is the fact that everything is too expensive.

      Gentrification isn't so nice when it happens to an area where people considered themselves well off, is it?

    5. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a victim of the echo chamber, evidenced by your complete inability to conceive of someone being left-leaning and not agreeing with you on everything.
      The rest of your post is a bunch of biased assumptions and leaps of logic. "Being conservative implies you don't like taking risks?" No it doesn't. You could argue that it implies they don't like taking risks in very specific areas of their lives, but the definition of "conservative" is a fairly malleable thing outside of your bubble. Do you think a conservative in California would have much in common with a conservative from South Korea, for example?

      Case in point, I'm very much on the liberal end of the spectrum, I find the contemporary left to be utterly disgusting. Especially San Fransisco "liberals." Who are liberal in name only.

    6. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Tsolias · · Score: 1

      Left or worded better liberal views fit the development of technology better than right or conservative views

      what a load of crap.
      Technology has been the no1 priority of all the conservative governments around the world.
      Internet internet, computers, rockets, space exploration, nuclear reactors for electricity generation, boats, airplanes, monument construction, have been since the dawn of time characteristics of strict political environments.
      Have you seen a leftist pleb say "let's build the pyramids", "I wonder what will happen if we split the atom", or "let's connect several computers for shitposting".
      Your misconception of what conservatism is, blocks your view of your history book.
      Conservatism has to do with family ideals and tradition, it doesn't have to do with technology.
      Technology and sciences are in hand with races. There are civilizations who did nothing for thousands of years and others who built wonders in mere eons... and that's not because the weather was warm in one place and colder in the other, it was because different races have different intelligence.
      Have you visited Rome at all?
      Mussolini rebuild Rome as if it was the Empire's capital.
      Only authoritarian nations thrived in the past and those will continue to thrive, while the rest will be occupied with their genders and policing virtual hug criminals.

    7. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's entirely possible to be left liberal, or right liberal. Of, indeed, right or left authoritarian..,

    8. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean authoritarians, not leftists. Authoritarians (social policy) do that. If you function on the a single-axis of civics, your view is too simple.

    9. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the problem here is that people such as yourself don't understand the difference between conservative, neocon and libertarian. At least not in an applied sense. You hinted at it but made enough faux pas to appear ignorant in the matter.

    10. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Conservative" and "liberal" have multiple meanings, and their meaning in American politics is significantly different than their other meanings. The basic meaning of conservative is supporting incremental reforms rather than radical revolutionary change. The basic meaning of liberal is support for democracy, equality, and free trade ("we're all in this together and equal under [deity]"), as opposed to authoritarianism, supremacy, and protectionism ("us vs them"). As you see those are very different from American left-vs-right positions. In American terms, liberal and conservative tend to mean pro vs anti New Deal, with additional differences related to corporate welfare, deference to white and Christian sensibilities, and different attitudes to foreign intervention. A "conservative start-up" would me more like the former (cautious, not taking risks, the tortoise vs the hare). Whether that's a good way to run a startup is a more complicated question: it may have less booms but also less busts. It probably depends more on the specific things they do and the luck of the environment, than on a general conservative/non-conservative strategy (because "liberal" is not the right word, but something close to "risk-taking").

    11. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      A "liberal" supports free speech. A "leftist" wants to take away free speech from others.

    12. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Being conservative means conserving ideals and morals not conserving the status quo. I don't know how people get this so wrong so often.

    13. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being conservative means conserving ideals and morals not conserving the status quo. I don't know how people get this so wrong so often.

      Because so many people who identify as conservatives are hypocrites? (That's been my experience & our fearless p***y-grabbing leader is a more public example.)

    14. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      I don't generally like studies with a sample size of 1.

    15. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But nobody uses "leftists" except people watching foxnews and gang. It's a shibboleth. An invented slur. You might as well say libtard, it means about the same thing.

    16. Re:Bad Political Statements? by UnConeD · · Score: 1

      That is true, in theory, but the people in the left echo chamber aren't actually liberal by objective standards. They are authoritarian, censorious, close-minded and hypoallergenic to puritanical levels. Their ideology is mainly an excuse to shut off empathy towards entire demographics they feel are undeserving of it.

      These are the hallmarks of social conservatives, they just have a liberal veneer. So yes, they are detrimental to the development of new technology.

    17. Re:Bad Political Statements? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. "People" want to take away speech from others if you disagree with them. Does not matter if they are liberal, left, right, Christian, Muslim, communist, teacher, policeman, kid, adult,, yellow, white, ...

      As long as they are human, they would like you to shut up if they disagree with you, because they are wrong. I even told my sister to shut up when I was 7, because she was a poopiehead.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    18. Re:Bad Political Statements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's interesting. I speculate that when guys get very rich and successful, they tend to think they're generally better than others and "deserve" what they have. After all, if that weren't true, it would be partly luck and unearned privilege, and they might feel badly.
      Once you think you are better and deserve more, you become more receptive to many right-wing ideas, like you shouldn't have to pay for stuff you use (roads, schools for your employees' children, if not your own, etc.).
      That isn't particularly "conservative" but it is "right-wing", and there is a lot of overlap there. So while they have no particular respect for tradition or America's rural golden-age past or so many other things true conservative claim to be inspired by, they do want the power to channel the dough to themselves.
      This would make them impatient with Lefties, even while they are not true conservatives. And they may decide to move to areas where the population has a more forelock-tugging attitude toward management than in CA.

  18. True words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Some of the engineers in the Valley have the biggest egos known to humankind"

    True. Horrible people to work with and self-righteous as well. It's been like this for a long time though.

    Maybe it's the drug culture that is pervasive, maybe the Stanford, Berkeley, Caltech degrees, or maybe it's just the Cali attitude about everything.

    Austin is much better. But shhhh about that one.

  19. More like a diaspora... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    If they were just moving it in-situ, they'd pick a city and gang up on it. For awhile I thought Austin, TX would be the New Silly Valley, but nope... companies are (at least form what I've seen) moving to New York, Oregon, Washington, Texas, lot of other places...

    The days of needing to be in one physical spot are, well, over. All you need is decent Internet infrastructure these days. The same is coming true for startups as it is coming true for tech workers.

    I see this as a good thing, and would love to see it accelerate a bit - now all that flirting I get from SV companies won't require me to knee-jerk a "...hell no, I ain't moving to that shithole!" just to do interesting and exciting things in technology.

    The only real danger I see form the overarching evolution would be an increase in outsourcing (because if you follow it to its logical conclusion, a remote worker in India or wherever can be just as competitive as one in Utah or Ohio.)

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  20. Leftwing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only somebody with a reality distortion field can look at the worldwide example of successful cutthroat capitalism, complete with million-dollar salaries considered middle-class, and equate that with an ideology that in this country is frequently considered encroaching on communism.

    You can't have it both ways. Pick one.

    1. Re:Leftwing by sfcat · · Score: 0

      The people complaining about SV's "leftist echo chamber" are socially conservative...to put it lightly. Often they're techno-commercialist neoreactionaries who are into scientific bigotry like it's 1899 if they're locals (Hi Thiel and Damore!), or just angry frothing deplorables likely to goose-step with tiki torches on the weekend if they're not.

      Wow, you complain about something in the first paragraph that you do in the second paragraph. The folks you call socially conservative are most likely just those that object to quota systems for hiring. You seem smart but completely lacking in self-awareness and are doing the exact behaviors that you complain about. The certainty of youth is certainly attractive but its old why older folks don't listen to the young as much as perhaps you wished...

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
  21. There are reasons to either embrace or avoid SV by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

    This handwaving article only makes these nominal "leaders" sound vacuous in their treatment of the issue. Not saying that these people are vacuous. Or not. However what comes through is a lot of whining while they are coddled during their looking-for-tax-breaks-from-cash-strapped-cities tour.

    In a nutshell, if you need to grow a company very quickly for strategic reasons, you need access to many seasoned engineers or you will be throwing your money down the toilet. You cannot just import 5 solid engineers from the Valley and hope that 50 college grads mixed in will figure it out -- that doesn't work.

    There are many options if your business model is around organic growth over a decade(s). But that is not really what this article is about.

    1. Re:There are reasons to either embrace or avoid SV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot just import 5 solid engineers from the Valley and hope that 50 college grads mixed in will figure it out -- that doesn't work.

      Actually, for a company requiring 55 engineers that is about the right ratio to succeed.

    2. Re:There are reasons to either embrace or avoid SV by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Evidence to support your hypothesis is conspicuously lacking.

      Do you really think the people writing the checks have not noticed that they could fund 4 start ups in the Midwest for the price of 1 in Silicon Valley? 25 years ago SV cost twice as much as some smallish town near a good engineering school. Now it is four times as much.

      Obviously there is some point where competitive parity is achieved, but it is not going to be because new college grads stop sucking less at competing with the pros than those who came before them. It will be because enough seasoned pros are available locally that you can build out a company with them and fill in the less critical position with new grads.

  22. Won't happen because economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To understand the situation in silicon valley (and other high income job hubs such as NY, London etc), you really have to ask who is losing out and who is gaining from cramming more and more businesses into a smaller area. The reality is that these centres are extremely efficient rent seeking operations. And the group who benefit from rent seeking opportunities the most is the financial industry. Which is also the source of the funding for these businesses.

    Wake up people. There is no better scam then paying smart people $200k+ salaries so they think they are getting lots of money, while siphoning it off in mortgage/rent payments at the other end. I'm not saying this is a giant coordinated rort. I just don't see why any of those who are benefitting from this situation would be incentivised to do anything to change it. It is the same reason why many places cannot build enough housing any longer. Those who build housing have little incentive to try to collapse prices with new supply, so they rather predictably don't.

    Once upon a time we had stronger leaders who could bang heads together to fix this sort of thing. Now we have a mess.

    1. Re:Won't happen because economics by Captain+Damnit · · Score: 1

      It is the same reason why many places cannot build enough housing any longer. Those who build housing have little incentive to try to collapse prices with new supply, so they rather predictably don't.

      The problem isn't the lack of appetite from builders...they're putting the finishing touches on a housing development on Treasure Island between SF and Oakland that literally sits atop a former radioactive waste spill. As long as land acquisition + construction + taxes + profit > sale price, they'd build atop a pile of dogshit floating in the Bay if they could. I think the locals in South Bay refer to that concept as "seasteading".

      In my part of the woods (Lafayette, just east of Berkeley/Oakland) our local species of NIMBY have waged a thus-far successful fight for almost two decades against a proposed development at the other end of town. Although the stated objections have included traffic, quality of life issues, school capacity, and environmental concerns, the real reason is that no elected official wants to be responsible for telling their constituents that $1M in equity just evaporated like a fart in the wind so that their kids (or, more likely, someone fleeing SF or Oakland) can afford a starter house.

    2. Re:Won't happen because economics by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately high home prices tends to create a self-reinforcing anti-virtuous cycle. The heavy financial burden of home buying creates enormous anxiety about anything and everything that could possible cause the price to dip or even rise less quickly. The more financially successful an individual person, family, or community is, the more likely they are locked into this mindset.

      Thus NIMBYism is on the rise, and it only seems to be getting worse.

      The topic just makes me sad.

  23. I love this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    California, in general, should be left to the lunatic mob. An I'm an native Californian.

    Now, repeat after me; "San Francisco isn't part of Silicon Valley..."

    1. Re:I love this bullshit by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      San Diego is beautiful, not yet overcrowded, and more affordable than the other two major CA cities.

    2. Re:I love this bullshit by chispito · · Score: 1

      San Diego is beautiful, not yet overcrowded, and more affordable than the other two major CA cities.

      And yet it sounds like you are advocating for high paying companies to locate there, driving up the cost of living for the average San Diegan.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    3. Re:I love this bullshit by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No, I was mentioning it as an option for PEOPLE who don't want either LA or SF. A bit more livable, and sharing a border with a foreign country for day trips is also nice,

    4. Re:I love this bullshit by chispito · · Score: 1

      No, I was mentioning it as an option for PEOPLE who don't want either LA or SF. A bit more livable, and sharing a border with a foreign country for day trips is also nice,

      Yeah, it's nice down there. A little too nice. I would be perpetually afraid of it becoming the new hotness and getting expensive and crowded. Best weather in the state, best park in the state with (arguably) the best zoo in the world, interesting geography, lots to do, very good public transit for its size. No more NFL team but I'm not a sports guy and, anyway, at least you have the Padres.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:I love this bullshit by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Lack of NFL team to suck at the teat of public funds (most NFL stadiums receive heavy public funding) is a feature, not a bug. The city of SD should have let the Chargers leave a lot sooner, and not spent money negotiating with their owner. Buh-bye, nice knowing 'ya.

  24. Leaving because of high cost of living? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the captains of tech industry leave SV to escape congestion and high cost of living they should check their own shoe instead of just wantonly tracking that shit elsewhere.

  25. yeah, yeah. by kyusaku · · Score: 1

    once every month or so, there's a story in a new york periodical about how silicon valley is just the worst. they talk about SV a lot. it's almost like they're .. insecure.. about something.

  26. All the reasons to move here are gone by t0qer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My family has been in San Jose over 100 years. We lived through many tech and population booms, but they were always manageable. Traffic wasn't too bad in the 70's and 80's. Schools were pretty good, housing was affordable, and there was enough space to feel like you could escape the bay area.

    90's came, and that's when a huge influx of people started moving in. Every square inch of buildable land was built out. None of it had any of the charm, uniqueness or craftsmanship of the previous architecture. Slowly we started seeing OSB and stucco square boxes everywhere. A lot of places started doing "mixed use" putting retail on the bottom and residential on top. Our politicians, fueled by special interests began dismantling laws meant to keep the growth in check. As more people came in, the freeways congested. Not just Monday through Friday, but every day of the week. We had a small stall during 9/11 as the economic downturn caused a lot of people to lose their jobs, but through the 2000's and into the 2010's the growth was fast and steady.

    Today it's very very hard living here. State income tax is sky high. Property taxes, home prices, hell even rentals are so high that it causes everything else to be expensive. Food, gas, clothes, cars, everything is $0.50 higher than it would be in any neighboring state. Even if you wanted to take a drive over the hill for the day to Santa Cruz, you can't, because everyone has the same idea. The gas is sky high, and a night at the movies for your family is a $100 affair. Some people act like $100 isn't a lot of money, well it is when you have a family of 4. Don't get me wrong, I love my kids, and in the words of Goonies Data's father, "My greatest invention" Your prison is basically stay home. At least my family has computers and can keep ourselves entertained, but we can't let the kids go out and play because there are 4 sex offenders on every block. It's not the life I grew up with.

    At some point, maybe you do get a vacation. You pack your wife, kids, and dog into the car to drive up the Oregon coast. You realize that slower life you had, the decent people, the lack of trash, graffitti and income inequity simply don't exist. People don't go 15 miles under the speed limit in the fast lane, and if they do, they move over. Traffic doesn't crawl to a stop because of a little rain. Nobody tries to run you over in a crosswalk. You can all go to the movies for $40 less than in the bay area. Gas stations actually have employees that fill your tank so you don't have to get out of you car.. It's such an odd feeling NOT having to pump your own gas. As if.. customers were important up there. Please, thank you, you're welcome aren't considered quaint little constructs, but are demanded.

    I'm really getting tired of living and working here. I just don't feel it anymore. I'm tired of the tribal politics. Tired of my neighbors constantly trying to get into my business, or my employer spying on my social media. I have to have some forms of "social media" now, every employer needs linkedin as a minimum. You also need indeed, monster, dice, all told at least a good 6 profiles so your employer knows you're a real person here.

    It's not all bad, there are some good points, but are they even worth mentioning? Crime, cost of living, homeless suffering, bad schools, the list goes on. Not sure if it's worth the salary anymore.

    1. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I was with you until you claimed that Oreganos don't drive SLOW and SHITTY.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to Toronto! You can have all this, plus a horrible 4-6mo winter, for alot less pay.

    3. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Why don't you move?

      (I am not being snarky.)

      Are you locked into the area due to your job?

    4. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if one of your points about moving out of CA is "It's such an odd feeling NOT having to pump your own gas. As if.. customers were important up there." Your priorities are outta wack.

    5. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Nah, we just don't want to uproot our kids right now. When they get college age we're probably going to move.

    6. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gas stations actually have employees that fill your tank so you don't have to get out of you car.. It's such an odd feeling NOT having to pump your own gas. As if.. customers were important up there.

      If you paid any attention to the opposition to letting people pump their own gas in rural areas, you would realize that it is less about caring about the customers and more about not wanting the customers anywhere near gasoline for everyone's safety. Somehow, these people have never learned about pumping gas despite owning a car and truly believe that it will be the end of the world if other people like them are forced to work a gas pump. I'm not sure that they're wrong...

    7. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Funny

      FYI...

      1) You get your gas pumped for you in Oregon because someone thought it would be a great (protectionist) idea to make it a LAW to not allow folks to pump their own gas in most circumstances. It sucks waiting for someone to amble out and pump your gas for you on your commute (and if it's someone new to the job, well, that car wash you did the day before just went to hell...)

      2) A lot of us drive slow as hell up here. Kinda sucks, but fortunately I only have to commute about once a week, so for me at least, it's tolerable.

      3) Oregon is full. Move to Washington. ;)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    8. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the good parts of Toronto! Namely, that the Maple Leafs will win the Stanley Cup this year. ... /bwahahahaha I couldn't keep a straight face, either.

    9. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      ". Even if you wanted to take a drive over the hill for the day to Santa Cruz, "

      VALLEY GO HOME

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough I miss seeing that scrawled across the highway 1 overpass.

    11. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by t0qer · · Score: 1

      In other words, Oregon is awesome! Don't fuck it up by moving up here! Don't worry I won't. I'm not like the rest of the asshats moving up there for "Cheaper cost of living" I could stay here perpetually. I'm not leaving the Bay Area, it's left me.

    12. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody in the bay area is from there!!!
      I have some relatives that still live there, and any "locals" left a long time ago.

      The Bay Area "locals" are from everywhere in the world, but Cali.
      Thats the thing none of the douchebags who bitch about it understand.

    13. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you until you claimed that Oreganos don't drive SLOW and SHITTY.

      And how is it a good thing that they're incapable of something as simple as pumping their own fuel? It'd be one thing if it was just offered as a service but it's stupid that you're actually forbidden by state law from fueling your own vehicle.

      When they do leave their home state do they just sit at gas stations like idiots waiting for the non-existent attendant to arrive?

    14. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pack your wife, kids, and dog into the car to drive up the Oregon coast.

      Don't even think of moving up here. We're full. We might make some exceptions for Calif. people escaping before the hippies confiscate their AR-15s. The rest of you: stay out.

    15. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by thedarb · · Score: 1

      3) Oregon is full. Move to Washington. ;)

      We sure as hell don't want ya. Go East!

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    16. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, come to Seattle if you can handle the 9 months of rain and overcast winters (personally I like the weather) and the Seattle freeze (personally I don't give a shit about having bunches of friends and a cool social life).

    17. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Seattle effectively turned into San Francisco years ago, which is why Oregon started seeing infill.

      FWIW NJ has the same stupid fuel pumping law.

    18. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the best short story illustrating the alienation and atomization of late capitalism I've ever read.

      PS Let your kids go play, they'll be safe (and safer for it in the long run.)

    19. Re:All the reasons to move here are gone by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      If you paid any attention to the opposition to letting people pump their own gas in rural areas, you would realize that it is less about caring about the customers and more about not wanting the customers anywhere near gasoline for everyone's safety. Somehow, these people have never learned about pumping gas despite owning a car and truly believe that it will be the end of the world if other people like them are forced to work a gas pump. I'm not sure that they're wrong...

      That's not the reason for it, though it's a cute after-the-fact scare rationale.
      The gas-pumping thing is a jobs program. Nothing more than that. It's meant to keep the gas pumpers employed.

  27. Typical NY arrogance/ignorance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silicon Valley is NOT San Francisco! It is the Santa Clara valley (biggest city in it is San Jose) and is about a hour hour drive south of San Fran (with no traffic.)

    1. Re:Typical NY arrogance/ignorance! by PPH · · Score: 1

      No. Typical SF/Silicon Valley arrogance. We've all seen the private bus services provided for SV workers who _simply_must_ live in SF and commute. Living south or west of SV could probably get you a shorter commute for less money. But not the San Francisco hipster badge.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  28. no, you should stay there. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    No, you should stay there. Really. Please.

    "Every single person in San Francisco is talking about the same things, whether it's 'I hate Trump' or 'I'm going to do blockchain and Bitcoin,'" he said. "It's the worst part of the social network."

    So, you're going to stop talking that way when you go elsewhere?

  29. Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that no one has tried to turn Detroit into the next SV. You've got a decent sized city that's on the rebound (although it still needs A LOT of work), a large and affluent suburban ring around the city, and tons of well educated people already in tech with the car industry. Not to mention you have the uber liberal Ann Arbor and U of M a half hour away. The only major thing holding Detroit back is the lack of good infrastructure, but that could be remedied if someone was willing to pay for it. Land is beyond cheap in Detroit, in fact a savvy tech investor could probably buy what's leftover from Dan Gilbert's shopping spree and split the city with him. True the weather isn't the best here (although it's not the worst) but is is right next to Canada and all they have to offer. Maybe it's just easier to move into a sparsely populated area and build it up rather than tear down and rebuild?

  30. On the East coast they say that about NYC by edi_guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We know this to be tried and true Slashdot click-bait. Damn I miss actual technology & science articles. There's some subset of people who want SV to implode, others to defend it. Some predict the whole place will fall into the ocean ("A View to a Kill" style) or that SV is just at the cusp of a 1000 year AI-induced dominance.

    But you get the same talk about other places like NYC, London, etc. It's too expensive, traffic is terrible, its crowded. But those places and their respective industries still thrive despite some firms leaving, and others setting up shop. Nothing is forever, but for our respective generations things won't change that dramatically. Heck, even Hong Kong was supposed to empty out after China took over, but it's as strong as ever. Just that those people now have vacation homes in Vancouver too.

    People should just be content with where they want to live and work not worry about everyone else. It's exhausting. You want to live in the countryside and telecommute, kudos to you. You want a three car garage in the burbs, good for you. Wanna spend $3k/mo for a 1 BR in SF, why not.

    1. Re:On the East coast they say that about NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was discussion on Linkedin or somewhere else about the cost of rent per square foot. Central London was £175/square foot. Office space outside of London was around £25/square foot vs 1 hour train journey to Waterloo/Victoria station. Go to the South Coast and it's £11/square foot vs a 2 hour train journey.

    2. Re:On the East coast they say that about NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly for "the best" building or something, but high status buildings can be had for £50-60, and even some modern skyscrapers for under £40.

    3. Re:On the East coast they say that about NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an escapee from Detroit, traveled many times to the west coast and can't imagine living there. So I'm in New York. No, not the City; the real NY, where we keep the trees, mountains, and air.

  31. Left-wing echo chamber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Every single person in San Francisco is talking about the same things, whether it's 'I hate Trump'....

    SF may be a little more liberal than most of America, but hating on Trump is a pretty mainstream opinion you'll find coast-to-coast (even among the 49% of America that voted for him).

    1. Re:Left-wing echo chamber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hating on Trump is a pretty mainstream opinion you'll find coast-to-coast

      That is not what I have found. Or did you mean "coast-AND-coast"?

    2. Re:Left-wing echo chamber? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Do try to leave your echo chamber from time to time. Even SNL made a skit about people like you.

  32. Wrong idea about "conservative" by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The word or idea itself (conservative) is not the ideal way to run a small tech start-up for example. Being conservative implies that you don't like taking risks

    That is totally wrong. It means conserving energy for things that are important. So risk taking is fine, but you can be prepared for failure or alternative paths before you take risks, not just jump in blindly.

    It can also mean taking BIGGER risks, just fewer of them. Basically you cannot ascribe risk taking with a political bent, as people of all persuasions are happy to take risks, they just have different approaches or conditions.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Wrong idea about "conservative" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mitigating failure and taking fewer risks costs you time and opportunities. That's radioactive rat poison in the fast-paced tech company world. You get your lunch eaten moving slowly and deliberately as more agile and stupid companies innovate ahead of you. Fast paced innovating start-up companies aren't being run by conservatives and that's a basic statement of fact. I think you can ascribe risk taking to political bent though I would more classify it as philosophy than one's own politics. I do this simply because big C Conservatism as a political force has been deviating far from little c conservatism as a philosophy.

    2. Re:Wrong idea about "conservative" by sfcat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mitigating failure and taking fewer risks costs you time and opportunities. That's radioactive rat poison in the fast-paced tech company world. You get your lunch eaten moving slowly and deliberately as more agile and stupid companies innovate ahead of you. Fast paced innovating start-up companies aren't being run by conservatives and that's a basic statement of fact. I think you can ascribe risk taking to political bent though I would more classify it as philosophy than one's own politics. I do this simply because big C Conservatism as a political force has been deviating far from little c conservatism as a philosophy.

      I've seen this attitude cripple and break more startups than I care to count. Its great to innovate, but first do the basics correctly and without those basics your innovation means shit. Example, spending all your time experimenting with Machine Learning while your site has > 4 sec latency costing the company over a billion dollars a year in revenue. And this isn't the unique weird case, this is the typical case. You are making the classic mistake of thinking you can learn from other's success. That's proof by induction (which isn't valid) and very prone to missing the reasons for success. Learning happens best after failure, not success and perhaps that's your real problem, you don't learn from your failures very well and repeat them often which is something SV has done quite a bit.

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
  33. As a Michigander by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Incompetent city and state government is what prevents any significant tech investment in Michigan or Wayne County. A large portion of the technology and industry is attached to the auto industry, and most of the nice things we have in our schools are because Ford or GM donated. Betsy DeVos is from my part of Michigan. She works hard to ruin public schools for the middle and working class. Not that they were so great before she got involved.

    Operating a business in Michigan is about making sure every little pissant gets their cut. And while your business taxes will be lower, that most of the infrastructure is missing or broken means you'll end up having to spend money to work around it. In rich parts of California like SF Bay or LA you can find real infrastructure for businesses, shipping, schools, and commuting. (even if just highways that are in perpetual gridlock, it's still better than what I used to do in Michigan)

    Also I think most people would rather live where you can grow orange and lemon trees in your yard rather than where you have to shovel snow. (although if I didn't have to work for a living I would love to live on the lakeshore in West Michigan)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:As a Michigander by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      >>Also I think most people would rather live where you can grow orange and lemon trees in your yard rather than where you have to shovel snow. (although if I didn't have to work for a living I would love to live on the lakeshore in West Michigan)

      Actually I grow lemons in my house, so it is possible to grow lemons in Michigan. :) The snow isn't so bad, but the oppressive humidity in the summers are what gets me. It's like being in Florida, only without the huge cockroaches and alligators.

    2. Re:As a Michigander by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      My parents grow them in Michigan too, after converting the deck into a large sun room / green house (I call it The Conservatory). The lemons are small and not very abundant. I probably throw out a bushel of oranges a year at my California home because they start to pile up on my yard waste, and they don't seem to compost that well. It's amazing how many things I can grow here in Silicon Valley, but not so amazing when I realized that this land used to be cherry, peach, plum, apricot and orange groves some 70 years ago.

      There are certainly advantages and disadvantages to either location. And I love winter sports, but I don't like driving to work in bad weather. I'd like to add that fishing is far superior in Michigan than it is in California in terms of accessibility and fun (subjective, I know). But you can eat the fish in California more readily, especially if deep sea fishing, as there is less environmental contamination in California's lakes and coasts than Michigan (with obvious exceptions like Santa Clara's Almaden Lake and other lakes part of the old mercury mining industry).

      It's a lot easier to get a house on a large lot and commute a reasonable distance in Michigan than it is in California. But the large cities in California all seem to have better infrastructure than anything I experienced in Michigan (but not as good as NYC). There are cheaper places to live in California than in the big coastal cities, but it's harder to get a tech job if you're in some remote town. (the towns are often lovely though. on my list of places I'd like to retire would be in a little mountain town in the Sierras)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  34. Exploitation of Midwest workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be fucking fooled, this is little more than the money folks looking for "hungry" -- their term -- workers to exploit to lower costs.

  35. Find new friends by hawguy · · Score: 1

    "Every single person in San Francisco is talking about the same things, whether it's 'I hate Trump' or 'I'm going to do blockchain and Bitcoin,'" he said. "It's the worst part of the social network."

    Stop surrounding yourself with people just like yourself - if you want diversity, seek it out. But don't hang out in a tech-heavy bar sipping $18 hand crafted artisanal cocktails and bemoan the lack of diversity there. There are still a *lot* of people in SF and the Bay Area that don't work in tech.

  36. I disliked the bay area by quietwalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It wasn't the weather - that was great.
    It wasn't the traffic - I grew up outside of chicago and lived all over the country. It's not fun, but it's not a big deal.
    It wasn't the cost of living - pay was commiserate with the increased costs.

    I loved that the Frys was right down the street, that I could get great food from a million different cultures easily, and that there was so much to do and see and hear.

    It was the people, though, that made it horrible. Shallow, money-oriented, image-driven, always so focused on labeling everyone: Suit, Hippy, LGBT Activist, Clubber, Gang Member, Artist, etc.

    Story time: I worked at a big company in the area, we had 3 buildings on the campus I was on, each 3 floors, each with at least 1000 employees. At 4:30, I was working on my floor by myself. How do I know? The overhead fluorescents were sensor based, and only the one by my cube was still on. I was organizing test results in an excel sheet when I heard the mechanical 'ka-chunk' and humming noise that indicated another group of lights had just spun up.

    It was the cleaning staff. I watched as each bank of lights turned on as they made their way down the path, a slow snake of lights as they explored the bin in each cube, till they arrived at mine.

    He was an illegal. I'm not judging. He radiated it without shame. He wore that identity like a comfortable sweater, and exuded it in his body language and broken english. Folks like that probably don't get the acknowledgement they deserve, so I made it a point to always smile, make eye contact, and nod to them when I see them.

    So I smile, make eyecontact, and nod at him. He looks at the screen, sees numbers, looks at me - young, working late by the standards of my coworkers - makes some sort of decision about social interactions - and starts giving me quetionable stock market tips in a thick Latin (or maybe Portuguese) accent.

    So I thank him for that, smile broadly and make sure to include my eyes in the smile so he knows I appreciate it, make some statement about how work never seems to end for folks like us, and go back to it.

    But internally, I'm putting him in the bucket with everyone else. He can't even speak english, and what he wants to do is talk stocks? This is a guy who - and yes, I am judging here a bit - probably hasn't got a legitimate bank account, much less trading account, and he vacuums office buildings for a living. Given his current situation, he does not instill within me the belief that he is a highly successful backchannel stock market advisor. ... but that's not his fault. He seemed like a hard working, genuine person in all other ways. See, that's what this area does to you. You end up getting hollowed out, till you're focused on the money and outer appearances. You start thinking those are the most important things, the things that defines you and allows you to relate to others.

    The mail guy (we were big enough to have an actual mail department) bought an 80,000 dollar car. He HAD to. He couldn't afford it, but he HAD to have it. He couldn't justify it any other way except that it was expected, knowing he had to, to be known, caring that others cared about him for his car.

    That's my takeaway from the bay area. Nice place to visit, but for the people.

    1. Re:I disliked the bay area by t0qer · · Score: 1

      I mention the identity politics in my post above. No doubt one of the biggest reasons I want to leave. Why can't I just be myself? Why do I have to fit into some category in the first place?

    2. Re:I disliked the bay area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of your stupid long story was you can't believe that even a Mexican is interested in stocks and wanted to talk to you about it. You are the world's most boring person and seem like a really shitty human being as well. Please stop posting to Slashdot.

    3. Re:I disliked the bay area by quietwalker · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a pretty racist stereotype sentiment you yourself expressed. Every janitor in california has to be an illegal mexican immigrant?

      I have no idea what his nation of birth was. There are more nations that speak spanish than just Mexico, and he could have been from any one of them or Brazil or heck, not even from middle or south america. Not every hispanic is of Mexican descent, and not every illegal is Mexican, and not every janitor is any of those.

      That, and the stock tips he gave me were not really tips. He was just repeating something he overheard, jumbled up a bit because he didn't understand it, and spit it out because he thought that would be what I was interested in. He had been conditioned by the environment to think that instead of saying "nice day," or even "hello," that the first thing you do is say, "How about *** stock?," where *** was the name of some million dollar funded bio-engineering company that was considering IPO at the time but quickly went bust instead, so long ago I can't even remember it.

      He was talking about stocks rates of a company that didn't even have stocks available, and not even understanding that, because he had been conditioned to believe you must bring up stocks when starting conversations with people. The environment he was in did that to him. That's the whole point.

    4. Re:I disliked the bay area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't flip your racism back on that poster.

      "He was an illegal. I'm not judging. He radiated it without shame. He wore that identity like a comfortable sweater, and exuded it in his body language and broken english."

      That's what you said. When you say "I ain't judging" we all know you really are. And that exuding comment...I have no words. Your issue is that you can't seem to come to terms that you, yourself, became that hollowed out shitheel of a person that you were bitching about. You assumed he was dumb because he couldn't communicate well. The validity of the stock tips is irrelevant. What he wanted was someone to talk to. He was making friends. You have no obligation to be his friend, but you really don't have to be so smug about it. Stop and reflect on your internal demons. You have work to do.

    5. Re:I disliked the bay area by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Appeal to ridicule is your fallacy. Here's your sign.

    6. Re:I disliked the bay area by PPH · · Score: 1

      Given his current situation, he does not instill within me the belief that he is a highly successful backchannel stock market advisor.

      Maybe he is. I've worked with blue collar people (linemen) that were smart enough to make sure they could retire very comfortably by 40. Because who wants to climb poles after that. And I've worked for Boeing execs would couldn't figure out that penny stocks were a bad deal.*

      *Anecdote: My boss at Boeing saw me reading the WSJ every morning. And he thought of himself as a crafty investor (Mr penny stock). So one day he walks up and asks me for a good stock tip. "Buy 100 shares of Berkshire Hathaway", I say. He asks, "What's the price?" So I flip to the NYSE quotes, "Fourty nine, seventy five a share." $4975 a share back in those days. He thought I meant $49.75. The next day, he came in with the screwiest look on his face. I'm sure he called his broker, who probably asked him where the hell he was going to come up with half a mill.

      A company VP was chatting with a bunch of us engineers. To break the ice, he asked who our heros were. "Warren Buffet," I say. "Uh, isn't he a folk singer or something?"

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:I disliked the bay area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the cleaner a self made billionaire that just likes to do a simple low stress job :-) maybe you should pay attention to those stock tips.

    8. Re:I disliked the bay area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, most of the shallow money-oriented people moved here super recently *from* places like New York and, yes, Chicago.

      You're just pining for your childhood.

    9. Re:I disliked the bay area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL;DR, move out of the bay area and change careers. You'll be much happier.

    10. Re:I disliked the bay area by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      âLook, I'm not judging, but when an illegal immigrant janitor who shouldn't be interested in stocks talks about stocks, I'm disgusted."

      I can't believe such shitty rhetoric got modded to +5. I bet it's OK for the OP if rich, white bankers in Wall Street do the same thing.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    11. Re:I disliked the bay area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, this is an invitation for one of the largest pump group in Japan.
      Japanese people occupy the largest population of the crypto currency economy,
      and they are rich enough to invest large amount of money. In our group,
      you can join a huge pump!
      Join our group with below link right now!

      Every satarday&sunday Bigpump+BTCWomenCoinAirdrop
      https://discord.gg/akwPC3c

  37. There *ARE* conservatives in technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both in applied sciences and less tangible stuff like tech.

    *HOWEVER* you usually don't hear about them because they don't espouse their views too loudly unless you happen upon a 'trigger' for them, such as the time I brought up the (then new) Lord of the Rings movie in passing to an as it turned out Christian Conservative who now thought depictions of magic were evil and against God. Many of these are 'later in life' conservatives, but there are also earlier in life conservatives pushing the boundaries of tech because it doesn't infringe on the aspects of their world view they are most conservative about.

    Having said that: I do get tired of the religious conversion aspects, which I have now had from teachers, friends, and former lovers all of whom were various forms of Christians. But hey, at least they were ready to murder me for masturbation like the one Muslim guy I cracked a joke to in a class one time. I didn't know anybody felt that strongly about rubbing one off. Although, in retrospect, I'd be wound up too if I wasn't rubbing one off every day!

    1. Re:There *ARE* conservatives in technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just going to go out on a limb here and say that never happened. Cool story though bro.

    2. Re:There *ARE* conservatives in technology... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      such as the time I brought up the (then new) Lord of the Rings movie in passing to an as it turned out Christian Conservative who now thought depictions of magic were evil and against God.

      Too bad, should have told him that Tolkien was Christian, that LotR is quite Christian-compatible, and that the only uses of magic in the series are by angels sent by God to guide mankind against the fallen (like Gandalf, Radagast, those two blue magi you never heard from again) or fallen angels and their corrupted evil (Saruman, the Nazgul). The only exception would be elves, but they are also the chosen of Illuvatar, and as such were called to leave the world of man over the sea. By that point when he wrote the Lord of the Rings, Tolkien was already deemphasizing the "fairy tale" playful-magic elements that were more prevalent in the Hobbit, also bringing it a little more in line with Christian theology. I would suspect C.S. Lewis had a little to do with this, but that's nothing more than suspicion.

      Oh yeah, you can also tell him that it's a WORK OF FICTION and as such is not actually magical. Depiction is not practice.

  38. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by michael_cain · · Score: 1

    Immediately to the north/northeast of Detroit is Oakland County. Population 1.2M, one of the 25 richest counties in the country by median household income (top 10 if you only consider counties with >1.0M people), one of the largest concentrations of engineering jobs in the country. When a new research or design center is opened in the area -- and that happens from time to time -- they very carefully site it in Oakland County, where the real estate prices are much closer to an Austin or Denver than to Detroit.

    Ask why none of those firms are willing to go into Detroit.

  39. Re:Hating Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank goodness. We don't need people like you with open mouths and closed minds living in our community.

  40. Need more guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, they need more guns and laws that allow protecting property to use deadly force.

    4 hrs at the gun range helps to clear my mind after a stressful week.

    1. Re: Need more guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How big is the range that is taken you four hours to clear it out? Or are you a bad shot...
      Posted from my keisterphone.

  41. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    What made silicon valley is the 3 large and very many small universities producing a large "high-tech" labor force ready to be exploited....er...disrupt industry at a particular time in history where we were going though an economic revolution, and in a location where people wanted to live, with extremely good infrastructure already in place, where there were already several world-class research operations running (ie. Xerox PARC and DoD/NASA $$).

    So you can't just say "but the land's cheap!" or "we've got a liberal enclave" or "taxes are low!" and create a new Silicon Valley.

    You need a large stream of new graduates (more than one major university can produce). You need the place to be desirable to move to before your "tech center" is up and running (or the executives aren't going to even fly there to take a look). You need good infrastructure already in place (they're not willing to wait a few years for it to be built). You need some major R&D dollars already in place for people to meet and start inventing stuff (doesn't happen in today's corporate governance).

    And even then, you aren't at the right moment in history. We aren't in 1960, about to totally reinvent how every first-world worker does their job (even ditch digging involves computers now).

    There isn't going to be another Silicon Valley. Instead, we'll invent some other radical change to humanity's existence, and that will produce another "hotbed" with the right mix of inputs.

  42. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    There is also one commodity Michigan has, which California doesn't... water.

  43. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just when I'm gearing up to move there.

    Seriously though, people have been proclaiming the death of the valley for decades. The only thing that might finally kill it is competition from China.

    The claims of a left-leaning echo chamber are a bit overstated and very dependent on which company you work for. In San Diego, working for a military contractor, I'm currently in a right-leaning echo chamber(pro-war, anti-muslim/immigrant).

    From what I can tell, Silicon Valley is great as long as you don't want to buy a house. Thanks to divorce/alimony, I'm no longer a home owner and I'm seeing the benefits of renting. I'm paying $2,200/mo for a 2 br in San Diego(way north, or I'd pay even more). I can get a place in Mountain View(!!!) for $2,800/mo. I can make around $100k more up there. Why the hell would I stay in San Diego?

  44. brilliant by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Oh, they JUST NOW figured out the cost of living and tax rate in California is awful, not to mention the overreacting governmental decisions. They really are the best and brightest apparently.

    1. Re:brilliant by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Oh, they JUST NOW figured out the cost of living and tax rate in California is awful, not to mention the overreacting governmental decisions. They really are the best and brightest apparently.

      Yes,they are the best and brightest, having figured out that a diverse left wing workforce creates more income. Duh
      Wherever you try to move, prices will follow

  45. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, no. While I've got myself locked in a nice house in a nice neighborhood at a fairly nice price, and thus wouldn't mind seeing my salary skyrocket (along with my property value) without having to move, I don't want that. I don't want the whole culture/mentality here, nor the traffic. And I sure as hell don't want my daughters to grow up and be forced to move away because they can't afford to live where they grew up. I'll take some business and growth, but I sure as hell don't want an explosion.

  46. Paraphrasing Yogi Berra by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    "Nobody does business there any more, it's always too crowded."

  47. Rich people pretending to be poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who thinks prices in SF are so high that a million dollar salary feels middle class doesn't know what it feels like to be middle class. These are just asshole rich people whining that they can't have quite as much luxury as they want because stuff isn't cheap there, and pretending to be poor when they're rich.

  48. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Detroit's infrastructure is weak and crumbling and the weather is god awful for a big piece of the year. No chance.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  49. New York 2.0 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's the "new" New York city. Newer York? You don't work in NY city because you want a big house with a white picket fence, you work in NY because you want to be "where the action" is.

  50. Re:No, don't leave the echo chamber! by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    You beat me to it with the echo chamber comment. South Cali has gotten intellectually incestuous. Thou shall not deviate from the group think!

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  51. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

    Depends on your definition of 'god awful' is. Sure we get snow but we don't get blizzards or a foot of snow dumped on us at a time like some other parts of the state. SE Michigan is actually a micro-climate of sorts. Check any planting map and you'll see it listed a zone 5a instead of just zone 5. The lack of sunshine for much of the winter is a killer though. We get a lot of gray overcast days, but if that were that big of a deterrent to people then Seattle would be a ghost town.

  52. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

    Oh and you can thank our corrupt as sh*t road commission for the crumbling roads. It doesn't matter who is in charge, Republican or Democrat, the road commission will continue to do the absolute minimum they can as cheaply as they can. Budget doesn't matter, that all goes into kickbacks and contractor pockets.

  53. Re:Hating Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think you could prove the parent's point any harder if you tried. For the sake of humanity I really hope you were being over the top to try and prove the point.

  54. sure thing princess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >a left-wing echo chamber that stifles opposing views

    mmm hmm. thats a real thing FOR SURE.

    cry moar faggits.

    1. Re:sure thing princess by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Are those like bundles of chick-lets. I'm always running out of bubble gum.

  55. Re:Hating Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I specifically live in places where I don't have to be around Trump people. My family and I won't live near these mouth breathers. Life is simply too short to interact with people like that. I find it's strange that the author of this indicates that being around people who talk about 'I hate Trump' as a negative.

    Life is too short to hear from people you disagree with? Hardly. Life is far too long to talk about the same subject every day.

  56. Re:Hating Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at his previous posts in other topics, he has a stiff one for Microsoft. I doubt he has a lucid thought, but lives inside a vapid world from what he's spoon-fed from the pretty color magic picturebox.

    Just discount this fool and let him live amongst the liberals. By playing with themselves, they won't turn our red states blue.

    CAPTCHA: expunge. What we should do with these glassy eyed brains full of mush.

  57. I make my bed then sleep at the neighbors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who am I?

  58. It's not over until the "Big One" hits by Danathar · · Score: 1

    I'll reserve judgement until the big one hits. It's actually very interesting. Everybody KNOWS that a big earthquake is due in SF, but people seem to be able to arrange their minds so that somehow when it happens, THEIR livelihood and real estate will not be affected.

  59. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, just ask the good people of Flint and they'll tell you all about it.

  60. Re:Hating Trump by Bryansix · · Score: 2

    How do you deal with being on the Internet when lurking around every corner might be a comment or idea you disagree with?

  61. Re:Hating Trump by DogDude · · Score: 1

    There's a vast difference between disagreeing with people, and living and working alongside Nazi sympathizers and overt racists.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  62. Old news by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    When you start seeing 30% of under 30 billionaires in North Dakota, try this one again.
    Old, old, fake news

  63. Look at who wrote it... by michael_cain · · Score: 1

    I have to admit that I find it amusing that the NY Times is, in effect, going to lecture me about how the Midwest will reverse a >60 year pattern of migration and "brain drain", and take a significant number of jobs from California and the West.

    Just as supporting evidence that the flow hasn't slowed particularly in recent years, the Midwest and Northeast states are currently projected to lose eight seats in the US House to the West and South after the 2020 census.

  64. Thank God by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

    I moved to San Francisco in the mid-90's for the culture, politics, and community. I did have a job waiting for me in Silicon Valley, but I was determined to not make it the sole focus of my life.

    Now, many of my newer neighbors just hate it here. Their focus is solely on the job and the money they're making. They only want to make their first or second million and then get the hell out.

    To which I must reply, please hurry!

  65. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by psycho12345 · · Score: 1

    The other missing ingredient is worker mobility. California is both at-will employment (so employers can ditch people fast if needed) AND effectively banned non-competes (so employees can ditch employers fast if needed).

    Seems to produce the most equitable thing for both sides, leading to stiff competition and ideas flowing to where it is rewarded, instead of the paltry joke of a bonus most companies give out for patent submissions (usually less then 3k total, assuming it gets accepted by Patent Office).

  66. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Both of those are after Silicon Valley was starting to become Silicon Valley.

    At-will employment got legally codified in 1959, and CA started adding exceptions to in the next year or so.

    Non-competes were almost unheard of in the 1960s, and were not really banned until far more recently.

    So while those features are relevant today, they didn't make Silicon Valley.

  67. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by thedarb · · Score: 1

    It's cold. The available houses have had all their copper stolen. It's not a coastal city. And this... And that... No.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  68. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by thedarb · · Score: 1

    Aha!

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  69. Re: Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The available houses have had all their copper stolen

    No they haven't. The shithole ruins of old crap houses have had their copper stolen. Those would never have been housing candidates anyway, copper or no copper. Any potential SV influx people would either be living in much better houses in better areas, or they would be levelling the area with those crap houses (buying out any remaining residents) and rebuilding new from scratch.

  70. Re:Hating Trump by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    There is nothing like pigeon holing half the country by claiming they all hold the same beliefs. You should actually talk to people who disagree with you and see what they actually believe before assigning them into one of your predetermined classifications based on stereotypes. You could learn something.

  71. Re:Hating Trump by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Nazi sympathizers? Other random racists? People who worship money and stupidity? Nah, I'm good.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  72. Over? The mass exodus started 2 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The smart companies started leaving two years ago.

    My wife and I have turned down several jobs, all paying $150K plus annual salary, because we would spend all of our spare time in a car, or on mass transit, just to go to an office in the most overpriced city on the continent.

    Instead, I now work remote, from a small village near the shore in New England, making $150K plus, and don't have to deal with the S.F. garbage, I have quality of life, and don't have to hear the echo chamber of how my CIS white male (which I didn't choose) self can live in peace.

  73. Thank You Captains Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God, even in realizing what arrogant sociopaths you are you manage to come off as arrogant sociopaths.

    Thanks genius disruptors, but what you think is news has been painfully obvious for about a decade to people with hearts and souls.

    But, here's the thing. STAY THE FUCK WHERE YOU ARE! We don't need you spreading your disease to the four corners of the earth.

  74. Re:Hating Trump by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    In case you haven't figured it out yet, those you opposed don't fit neatly into any of those categories.

  75. Re:Hating Trump by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I don't want to have anything to do with anybody who thinks that Trump is an acceptable human being. Kinda' like I also don't like to have anything to do with people who think that Hitler wasn't such a bad guy.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  76. Re:Need a New SV? Why Not Detroit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Ask a resident of Flint about the water.

  77. Re:Hating Trump by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Most Trump supporters don't support the person, they support his policy positions.