Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Ban 'Offensive Language' From Skype, Xbox, Office and Other Services (csoonline.com)

According to Microsoft's new Terms of Services agreement, you could get banned for "offensive language," resulting in the termination of your Gold Membership and/or any Microsoft account balances. The changes go into effect on May 1. CSO Online reports: [I]f you and a significant other are getting hot and heavy via Skype, you better watch your language and any nudity because that, too, can get you banned. The ban hammer could also fall if Cortana is listening at the wrong moment or if documents and files hosted on Microsoft services violate Microsoft's amended terms. But how would Microsoft even know if you had truly been "offensive?" Well, that part falls under Code of Conduct Enforcement, which states, "When investigating alleged violations of these Terms, Microsoft reserves the right to review Your Content in order to resolve the issue." Microsoft did add, "However, we cannot monitor the entire Services and make no attempt to do so." I'm not sure that will make you feel better, as another portion states that Microsoft "may also block delivery of a communication (like email, file sharing or instant message) to or from the Services in an effort to enforce these Terms or we may remove or refuse to publish Your Content for any reason."

162 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. Fuck that by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, who uses offensive language on Skype?

    1. Re:Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ask any of the hundreds of sexy women who added me out of the blue and graciously linked me to their website.

    2. Re:Fuck that by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I do, quite often, particularly when it doesn't work properly. Believe me, there are few things as irritating and capable of bringing out the foul language than dropped or frozen connections and the other insanity that goes along with trying to make Skype work.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Fuck that by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Would need to be able to get on Skype first....

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    4. Re:Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So you call your left hand "hundreds of sexy women," nice

    5. Re:Fuck that by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Really, who uses offensive language on Skype?

      Probably those complaining about Skype:

      "This f&cking Skype is a b&stardized pile of steaming sh&t!"

    6. Re:Fuck that by Humbubba · · Score: 4, Funny
      jfdavis668 said

      Really, who uses offensive language on Skype?

      Depends. Offensive how? I once skyped, 'Now that Steve Job is dead, where will Microsoft get their killer ideas? Xerox PARC?' Had problems with them ever since.

    7. Re:Fuck that by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      His name was Steve Jobs

    8. Re:Fuck that by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It's impossible to really police. People will just use code words. Already I know that the guys I worked with that had racist tendencies quit using the N word many years ago. Now they go "yeah one of those DEMOCRATS down there said" blah blah. It's a moving goal post. You can ban anything and it'll just get replaced with something else.

    9. Re: Fuck that by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      "Halcyon days??" LOLOL, they sure as fuck don't... but why not a Chinese shill? I bet they've got a lot more of 'em...

    10. Re: Fuck that by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Remember when Skype used to be *good*? Before Microsoft bought them. And replaced the original p2p architecture with a server-based architecture, in order to facilitate snooping.

    11. Re:Fuck that by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Clippy: It sounds like you took offence to that statement. Since I don't have the power to ban Humbubba, would you like me to mod him into oblivion instead?

    12. Re: Fuck that by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      That whole post went over your head. Go back, read it again and try thinking.

    13. Re:Fuck that by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Russian Troll spotted. Nobody uses that word.

      Microsoft?

    14. Re:Fuck that by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Ballmer, who oversaw the great decline of Microsoft? Those were halcyon days?
      Gates, maybe, but Ballmer?

    15. Re:Fuck that by jelabarre · · Score: 1

      Everyone will just start using Cockney Rhyming Slang... Oh wait, that has the word "cock" in it; guess we'll have to call it Penis-ney Rhyming Slang.

    16. Re:Fuck that by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      as in "we totally respect your privacy" and your unique right to equality and we are absolutely not trying to control every aspect of your life ... fuck that indeed : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. Why else would anyone use these services? by Grog6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The web was built on porn; remove it at your peril. :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re: Why else would anyone use these services? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      No it's not, September child.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re: Why else would anyone use these services? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And this, children, is why trusting cloud providers is a hideously bad idea that will always bite you eventually.

    3. Re:Why else would anyone use these services? by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Insightful

      SJW want to inspect and ban words and images between users now.
      Big US brands support the political views of SJW.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Why else would anyone use these services? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      SJW?

      This is a direct result of the actions of our Republican-led Congress. They would be horrified to be called SJWs. SJWs, in general, would not approve of this kind of attack on free speech on the web.

      We've now seen Craigslist, Google, and Microsoft cave. These are all companies that make monies in other ways, so they have the least to lose by cracking down to avoid the new penalties and the most to lose if they don't cave in. They are the first wave. The companies that have everything to lose, such as dating sites will eventually start falling as the liability issues hit.

      And setting up your own servers to replace the services being lost just puts you in the legal situation these powerful companies have decided to avoid. If the new law is fully enforced, it will be the end of the internet as a social engine. Nobody will risk it.

    5. Re: Why else would anyone use these services? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      The SJW contingent have always been running dogs of big money. They really are dreadful joyless Puritans, that's not an act. It just happens that their brand of nutty zealotry is fully compatible with tyrannical Financialism.

      So the Financialists trot out the SJW tools who willingly, proudly take the blame for the heinously unpopular, anti-American laws their masters demand.

    6. Re: Why else would anyone use these services? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Thank you Mrs Slocombe!

    7. Re:Why else would anyone use these services? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Just look at a PG B-movie from the 80s - Beastmaster - Full Frontal Nudity (bathing scene, at a distance). Although there was an another accidental 1 second shot of the actress' bum that had to be cut to avoid an R rating. R-ratings would get full frontal (closer) and/or sex.

      That's because there was no PG-13 rating. Unless it was a hard R, everything defaulted to PG. "Outrage" over intense PG-rated films like Poltergeist (a guy graphically rips off all the skin and flesh from his face), Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and Gremlins resulted in a reigning in of these movie types and the creation of the PG-13 rating (all three of them were Spielberg movies too..)

      Of course, the ratings agencies are subject to political manipulation as well. I remember Roger Ebert's annoyance with the MPAA when Whale Rider was given a PG-13 rating for "drug paraphernalia " because in one shot you could see a bong in the background in a bookshelf. I'm trying to think of a film that was rated PG-13 where the content really SHOULD have been rated R, but the producer had political clout and was able to lobby for a lower rating. I know this has happened often (with Spielberg in particular), but this sort of thing is hard to search for in Google.

  3. Hmm by war4peace · · Score: 1

    It looks like typical process. You must be reported for your content to be reviewed, and the other party can provide it to Microsoft.
    In other words, MS isn't actively monitoring, so if me and friends are on Skype playing a game and we F-this and F-that, nobody's going to give a shit. But if I start swearing at someone on Skype during gaming, well, that someone could report me and provide chat logs or session times to MS, at which point I'd probably be banned or punished in some way.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It looks like typical process. You must be reported for your content to be reviewed, and the other party can provide it to Microsoft.
      In other words, MS isn't actively monitoring, so if me and friends are on Skype playing a game and we F-this and F-that, nobody's going to give a shit. But if I start swearing at someone on Skype during gaming, well, that someone could report me and provide chat logs or session times to MS, at which point I'd probably be banned or punished in some way.

      The problem is changing standards over time. What is acceptable today may be offensive tomorrow. What if your friend decides to punish you and report you?

    2. Re:Hmm by war4peace · · Score: 1

      It's always a risk. Just like when you're at work and make a comment towards a female coworker, a comment which you deem harmless but she thinks otherwise. Guess who's going to regret it?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re: Hmm by sycodon · · Score: 1

      "In other words, MS isn't actively monitoring"

      Soon...soon

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re: Hmm by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Real time speech to text is old tech. Just have a list of banned words, terms, names and look up the words used.
      One wrong word and the account stops.
      Images as files can be checksum to see if they are banned.
      New images that should be reported can be automatically detected.
      No more games and no desktop computer log in once that online account is detected and reported.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re: Hmm by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I remember when folks on Slashdot weren't convinced that every phone conversation in the US was recorded, translated to text, and the text indexed and searched for keywords in real-time. Snowden settled that argument. Seems a bit naive to assume that skype conversations don't get the same treatment - heck, if MS is doing it, it would just be part of the servers.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re: Hmm by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Why do the chat logs need to be fully analyzed? A basic keyword search would be enough to find most offenders.

      I would honestly be surprised if they even had a human review the chat logs, as doing so brings up obvious privacy issues. Just have the search bot look for X number of fuck/piss/shit etc mentions within a 24 hour period, and send out an automatic account suspension notice. If you're dumb enough to exceed the threshold a second time, lock their account and ban their IP from the service. If the users get cocky and start using $hit and pi$$ instead, add those words to the ban list as well.

      Seriously... This isn't rocket science, various chat programs and forum software have been doing this for years.

    7. Re: Hmm by war4peace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that's why they've been unsuccessful so far, only succeeding in pissing off customers.
      English isn't the only language in the world, you know.
      In Romanian, "cum" is a very common set of letters and has absolutely no offensive meaning. Alone, those letters mean "how". There's also the word "precum" meaning "just like" or "similarly to".
      In the Philippines, "porn" is a common part of the name. There are people called "Wanaporn", "Siriporn", "Pornsak", etc.
      India has lots of names containing "Shit" in them, I had a colleague called "Sumana Shit".

      I'm currently playing a mobile game which replaces "cum" in chat by stars, it's very difficult to talk to another Romanian player because of the constant "***" showing up instead of words.

      Furthermore, people always find new and creative ways of slightly changing words so that a human can understand what's being said but automatic matching has no chance. "Fkc y00" or "Sk me ck" for example.

      So yeah, I could say it IS rocket science. Actually, rocket science is more likely to succeed.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re: Hmm by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Sorry, what I meant was "analyzed for this purpose" but my brain ate the full meaning of what I wanted to say.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    9. Re: Hmm by war4peace · · Score: 2

      It would never work. There's an endless number of ways text can be changed to fool automatic matching, same with images. Add some fuzziness to the image in certain areas, change a letter here and a letter there and you're good.
      The list of bannable words would expand so much that it would drive normal people away because they won't be able to talk to each other anymore.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    10. Re: Hmm by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "The list of bannable words would expand so much that it would drive normal people away because they won't be able to talk to each other anymore."
      The SJW don't care. They want the brand to detect the words and then ban the users they don't like.
      Then links, images, video clips, politics.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    11. Re: Hmm by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      That ECHELON https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... would be so complex for any computer system ever.
      It was a nice talking point by the military–industrial complex.
      Now every word used is compared in real time to a ban list and the user gets removed.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    12. Re: Hmm by cwatts · · Score: 1

      Where is george carlin when we need him!?

      fu1ck shit piss cunt cocksucker motherfucker.... tit!
      fuck sh2it piss cunt cocksucker motherfucker.... tit!
      fuck shit pis3s cunt cocksucker motherfucker.... tit!
      fuck shit piss cun4t cocksucker motherfucker.... tit!
      fuck shit piss cunt cocks5ucker motherfucker.... tit!
      fuck shit piss cunt cocksucker mot6herfucker.... tit!
      fuck shit piss cunt cocksucker motherfucker.... ti7t!
      fuck shit piss cunt cocksucker motherfucker.... tit!

      --
      chris watts íë¦ìS ì(TM)ì
    13. Re: Hmm by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      And...."tits" shouldn't even be on the list!!!

      It sounds like a snack....new Nabisco TITS!!

      Cheese Tits

      Onion Tits......

      .....TATER TITS!!

      Ah...man, I really miss George.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re: Hmm by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this, wasn't aware of the article.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  4. Who is to say what is offensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is offensive is subjective... and some times culture based.

    To me the word Microsoft is extremely offensive. So they should block that one right away!

    1. Re:Who is to say what is offensive? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      Next they'll ban defensive language and we won't be able to say anything.

    2. Re:Who is to say what is offensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please stop using the word "ban". It implies the taking away of personal rights, and I find that offensive.
      Oh, and you used the word "able", I think that is discriminating against people with disabilities.
      And lets not even get started on the offensive insinuations that go with your use of "we".

    3. Re:Who is to say what is offensive? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder WHY

      Cultural change begins with right think.

  5. And the top three words on the list are... by kgroombr · · Score: 1

    Linux Apple Google

    1. Re:And the top three words on the list are... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      So you're saying Linux Apple Google are the reason servers are slow to respond to requests?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  6. Corporate Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What business would risk putting their documents on One Drive / Office with these terms?

    No sane business would.

    Between Windows 10 and now this, Microsoft is over for the business world. Over.

    1. Re:Corporate Suicide by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you underestimate the entrenchment factor here. Micro$oft is the new "Nobody ever got fired for using IBM."

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    2. Re:Corporate Suicide by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

      Arbitrary termination, common employee failings, and MS pocketing account balances are pretty negative business reasons alright.

    3. Re:Corporate Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually he is correct. If anyone of my employees attempted to propose a microsoft solution they would be fired on the spot. We switched to linux for a very good reason after all the insane decisions microsoft has been making and it was probably the best financial and business decision we ever made. Everything has been going wonderfully and our IT team and even most of the non-IT staff couldn't be happier that everything just WORKS now without having to perform what equates to high-tech voodoo just to get through a regular business day without the machines revolting against us in some way or other.

      So your entirely wrong, people do have and will continue to be absolutely fired for proposing a solution that cripples an otherwise functional business. It really just depends on wether or not management is competant enough to recognize microsoft is not just a bad solution its like anti-solution, financial kryptonite. You will certianly see microsoft being used in many places however it is becoming a red flag where you can immediately sense that no one there has any real strategy and they are just sheepling along. When a place is just marching on whatever anyone else is doing they might as well be shambling zombies.

    4. Re:Corporate Suicide by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Lolz. Its not going to happen. Windows is way too entrench for Apple or Linux to really get in there.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    5. Re: Corporate Suicide by BlazeMiskulin · · Score: 2

      What business do you think exists (other than MS devs) that absolutely requires Microsoft systems to run?

    6. Re:Corporate Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is over for the business world. Over.

      Spoken like someone outside the business world. There's no real alternative to the MS ecosystem that doesn't involve having a flock of neckbeards cobble together an incomprehensible unmaintainable unsupported jumble of less capable programs that will require you to retrain your entire staff.

    7. Re:Corporate Suicide by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the alternatives to MS are probably just as sucky & leaky, especially if not maintained/monitored properly, which is usually the case in the work world. Dilbert is Truth.

      Microsoft's true motto should be: "We standardized suckage".

    8. Re:Corporate Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone whose life is the business world. All my clients are Apple and Google users. I fucking hate it worse than I hate MS, but have to live with it.

      So, what the fuck were you trying to say? That you're somehow superior and I'm just a stupid neckbeard, was that it?

      The business world has changed. It is not 1995 anymore.

    9. Re:Corporate Suicide by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Lol this is great for business, exactly what they want. Business is probably the reason these rules came in.

      Business wants filters like these to protect employees, and by extension protect themselves from lawsuits over harassment and hostile work environments.

      Businesses won't be worried. These are exactly the same ToS they put on their own services.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Corporate Suicide by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      Much safer to use Google Drive, they'd never remove your content.

    11. Re:Corporate Suicide by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually he is correct. If anyone of my employees attempted to propose a microsoft solution they would be fired on the spot.

      All your employees must be terrified of suggesting anything.

      At my workplace, if someone suggests something stupid, we may say "That's stupid", but we don't fire the guy.

    12. Re: Corporate Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So when they piss you off, all you need to do is upload one "offensive" document and shut your employers business down.

      Sweet sabotage opportunity.

    13. Re:Corporate Suicide by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      One user says the wrong word on an account and MS locks up your business computer used by that same worker.
      Only use Microsoft for computer games.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    14. Re:Corporate Suicide by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You're nuts. If anything like that is in any of our corporate documents or emails, we have bigger problems than a TOS. What corporation do you know that needs to be able to Skype "offensive language"?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    15. Re:Corporate Suicide by DogDude · · Score: 1

      ... says the AC.

      Right. Somehow, our business has been doing well for the past 15 years using MS stuff. It sounds like there might be some pretty poor management in your company (if it exists) that can't handle Windows workstations.

      But, somehow I doubt that this little story is even real.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    16. Re:Corporate Suicide by DogDude · · Score: 1

      So when the entire business' Office account is suspended without notice and no fees refund due to the action of one employee

      What you're describing has never happened, and is unlikely to ever happen.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    17. Re: Corporate Suicide by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Awwwwww shit - someone said "shit" in a company email. Quick, call the lawyers!!

    18. Re: Corporate Suicide by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Like these conservative SJWs, you mean?

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/worl...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Corporate Suicide by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What business would risk putting their documents on One Drive / Office with these terms?

      These terms are for worthless consumers only. Businesses aren't shitty lower class citizens like the rest of us.

    20. Re:Corporate Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unlikely...

      It's unlikely until it happens - which it will.

      No business should accept this risk. It's not for some blue-haired nutjob at Microsoft (or Google) to decide whether your content is acceptable... and if not, you lose your business.

    21. Re:Corporate Suicide by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      If you ever actually got a job in the real world, you'd find out that the answer is "just about all of them", and MS is doing as well as they always have.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    22. Re:Corporate Suicide by art123 · · Score: 1

      The actual mention of offensive language specifically mentions "publicly display ... or share" so authoring Office documents and storing them on OneDrive would not be affected by this policy. Having a private Skype conversation doesn't break the rule (counter to what the top post says). Using OneDrive to share a document could break the rule.

      "Don’t publicly display or use the Services to share inappropriate content or material (involving, for example, nudity, bestiality, pornography, offensive language, graphic violence, or criminal activity)."

    23. Re:Corporate Suicide by nyquil+superstar · · Score: 1

      We would! We are a pretty small startup with a couple million in revenue (and are in the black quite healthfully!), and we use Office 365 though and though. OneDrive, Teams, Dynamics, etc. I have to tell you, it's awesome. The price/feature mix is really, really good, and saves an insane amount of time. I compare it to the traditional IT model of my last place, and it's no contest. We host our app on Azure as well. 10/10 would recommend.

    24. Re:Corporate Suicide by nyquil+superstar · · Score: 1

      That hasn't been my experience, but I'm glad it's working for you!

    25. Re:Corporate Suicide by DworkinLV · · Score: 1

      I agree totally. Thank you, thank you Microsoft, for once in decades you have made my life easier not harder. As of now the use of a MS account or the store (for the same reason) is a termination event in the business. That means no one drive, and no new revenue streams (IE no new MS office). Not only have you made my life easier, you have made it cheaper. Plonk, Bye Bye

      --
      Browsing without an adblocker is like fucking without a condom - Mal-2
    26. Re: Corporate Suicide by Early+Six+Digit+UID · · Score: 1

      There are still quite a few programs which are Windows only, one of which is ArcGIS, used for mapping and spatial data. Other options like QGIS are out there, but they're still lacking in a few key features which make ArcGIS worth the cost of entry. As to the post a few levels above, firing someone for proposing a reasonable MS solution sounds like a terrible way to run an organization - maybe they've thought of something you missed. I can't imagine getting rid of someone who is legitimately trying to propose solutions, even if I didn't like what they were proposing.

    27. Re:Corporate Suicide by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      English is significantly less important than most people imagine. Punctuation and spelling are less important than conveying meaning, being constantly hung up on the nitty gritty is for obsessives with a chronic inability to see the forest for the trees.

      No... It's the metric we, or at least some of us, use to see if someone is educated, thoughtful, and puts a little bit of effort into writing. I would not call someone out for 1 or 2 errors, but your post was riddled with them. I would be surprised if you could balance a checkbook properly.. Maybe you can but you certainly don't convey it.

      Spelling and punctuation are not just for your benefit. The way you write your words benefits the reader just as much as the writer. Meanings are made clear and the exchange of ideas and information is enhanced, simplified, and made more precise.

      As for your argument that punctuation is "less important", I can give a humorous example that blows that statement out of the water.

      Would you help your uncle, Jack, off of a horse.

      Would you help your uncle jack off a horse.

      The words are precisely the same, but that comma becomes all important. The entire meaning of the sentence has changed. ENORMOUSLY.

  7. Offensive? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please define "Offensive".

    Audience matters. What offends one audience, won't offend another.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Offensive? by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Please define "Offensive".

      Audience matters. What offends one audience, won't offend another.

      If it's anything that could possibly offend anyone, you are gonna be fucked.

      I can't think of a sentence that I could say or write that wouldn't offend someone... (including this one) /s

    2. Re:Offensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This! We live in an era where everyone is offended by everything different than themselves. Pro-Trump statements offend Obama/Hillary supporters. Pro-Obama/Hillary statements are offensive to Trump supporters. And so forth on every policy topic in society. Open source was at one time offensive to Microsoft. Microsoft's proprietary EULA is offensive to various aficionados of libre software. Every policy, every school of thought, every belief system is offensive to someone out there. And then the offended audience reports for enforcement (which works better if coordinated en masse).

    3. Re:Offensive? by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait for the SJW to add to that list.
      Politics and funny cartoons about politics.
      History
      Art. No using the wrong words about a movie.
      Music
      Books
      Authors
      Blasphemy
      Words like illegal immigration.
      Anything thats related to or translated from Cyrillic.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Offensive? by philmarcracken · · Score: 1

      Offensive to our advertisers.

    5. Re:Offensive? by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2

      Audience matters. What offends one audience, won't offend another.

      Right, so as a practical matter it's the least common denominator. Which pretty much allows MS to arbitrarily ban people at will. Which theoretically could be bad.

    6. Re:Offensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please define "Offensive".

      Audience matters. What offends one audience, won't offend another.

      You want today’s definition? Or tomorrow’s? You can’t tell in advance what will be considered offensive. You just suffer the consequences when you overstep their arbitrary and shifting boundaries. Retroactively.

    7. Re:Offensive? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Depends on the century or even the decade, the country, the state/province/region, etc.

      Not to mention that you could debate about what "reasonable" and "offensive" mean for each person involved for a long time.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re: Offensive? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Nah. In a court of law, they just weigh the briefcases full of money that each side brought along as a bribe. Biggest money wins!

    9. Re:Offensive? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How about banning Cosmo from Walmart shelves?

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/worl...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re: Offensive? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      When big US tech brands support one side of US politics and use censorship its not capitalism AC.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. Just mix in some Cyrillics by mi · · Score: 2

    You can't, actually, do that on /., which rejects Cyrillic characters outright. But on most sites and with most applications you can replace the characters common between Latin and Cyrillic with those from the latter in the offensive words, and it will defeat today's filters. Of course, the censors will wise up to the technique eventually, but for now it works...

    Not even your target will see it, screaming internally at his inability to call you "an asshole" in response, while enraged over your ability to use the terms like that with impunity.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Just mix in some Cyrillics by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Fuçk you, assholè!

    2. Re:Just mix in some Cyrillics by mi · · Score: 1

      Yes, something like that. Except Cyrillic characters would be a better replacement — tails and umlauts at all.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  9. Ooo. Yah. by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    A vaguely word ToS that would ban, what, 80% of XBL users if they wanted to.

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  10. Re:Micro-shafted by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    And who pays $100+ for Office when there are free alternatives?>

    Pay for? No. Use. Yes.

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  11. This is f**king ridiculous by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    A dumb pipe should be a dumb pipe.
    It should be an insulated pipe (i.e. end-to-end encrypted).

    Do Microsoft and whoever really want to be considered responsible for everyone's sh*t-stained content out there? Really?
    They should be doing everything in their power to not be technically able to know what's flowing.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:This is f**king ridiculous by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      With FOSTA passing they don't have much of a choice-- they're potentially liable anyway. I understand why the're hedging bets on their services.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    2. Re:This is f**king ridiculous by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      With FOSTA passing they don't have much of a choice-- they're potentially liable anyway. I understand why the're hedging bets on their services.

      I'm curious to see if Slashdot has to start censoring posts to avoid prosecution under FOSTA. With all the GNAA and other troll/shit-posting occurring here, it could come to where posts are delayed while they are examined for possibly-"offensive" content like libertarian/conservative views. (as if most aren't already down-modded by the 50-cent armies employed by the Left)

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    3. Re:This is f**king ridiculous by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced of this. I think this is something they wanted to do. FOSTA, bad as it is, is just a convenient cover.

    4. Re: This is f**king ridiculous by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      Progressives are *NOT* liberals.

    5. Re: This is f**king ridiculous by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Fuck no they are not. Proper communists want NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the SJW puritanical running dogs of global imperialism.

    6. Re:This is f**king ridiculous by jelabarre · · Score: 1

      Website owners will abandon direct content moderation altogether and leave it to user volunteers, who have proven historically to be much more effective defenders of the groupthink than a team of hired moderators could ever be.

      Websites can then indirectly implement any desired content policies/censorship by taking measures that encourage or discourage certain types of users from participating as moderators, or just limit the "wrong" users' moderation privileges somehow. (So think 'Jim Crow', only instead of dreaming up creative ways to block blacks from voting, you're blocking wrongthinkers from expressing their opinions)

      Ah, you mean the StackExchange model...

  12. AWESOME, another competitor dieing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, let MSFT put such silly restrictions on 'use of their services', for one thing why are they snooping on anyone's conversation on Skype, even if they otherwise suggest they can't/won't/don't, having a Term of Service that implies otherwise immediately means I won't use any MSFT services as the only way to enforce such restrictions IS to 'snoop', so whatever they say to the contrary they clearly are.

    Most importantly any company who tries to apply nebulous concepts such as 'offensive' is going to ban so broadly that people will leave it 'en masse'. Consider if I need to make sure the message "Hey, I need your pole in my hole NOW!" could easily get banned because of the 'offensive nature of it' when all I meant is I need the flag pole in the hole I dug ASAP. Basically MSFT has just guaranteed they'll lose users en-masse as this stupidity starts kicking in.

    Now, just need to either set up a competing service or just move to a less silly provider & MSFT will die a nice death.

    MSFT can ban whatever they want, its their service, happily we can choose to use any other available services. This is the way the free market works. AWESOME.

  13. Wow... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

    I'm not welcome anywhere.... ... I give up.

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:Wow... by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      There is always IRC.

      What I want to know is how they plan to censor office. Am I not going to be allowed to write certain words into my office documents?

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    2. Re:Wow... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Maybe you could try inserting words into your documents and try to pass them up as typos. Sure, your cunter-arguments won't be the breasts, but at least you'll have fun.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Wow... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Everyone is just going to think it's a Freudian thing and not typos, and you'll be in even more hot water.

  14. What the Fuck that by shanen · · Score: 1

    Really, who uses offensive language on Skype?

    You forgot the <sarcasm> tags and you were apparently taken literally in some way?

    I think that censorship is insane and offensive language is sometimes the only or at least the best way to express certain emotional states or to show sincerity. Right now I'm still reserving judgment because I think the story is quite likely an early April Fool's joke. (The problem with that theory is why pick Microsoft? A cunning selection of the highly improbable target of the joke to make it seem credible?)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:What the Fuck that by st0nes · · Score: 1

      I think the story is quite likely an early April Fool's joke. (The problem with that theory is why pick Microsoft? A cunning selection of the highly improbable target of the joke to make it seem credible?)

      No, the problem with that theory is that it isn't April Fools' Day.

      --
      Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis
  15. Encrrypted? by Jerry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, Microsoft is admitting that they can read or watch and listen to encrypted connections. Well, with "Legal Intercept" we knew that for some time. I banned Microsoft from my PC years ago in favor of Linux (KDE Neon on Btrfs). If you don't want MS to be your nanny then its time you moved to Linux as well.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:Encrrypted? by jpaine619 · · Score: 2

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

      .... newbie..

      over 21 years, here. :)

    2. Re:Encrrypted? by Glarimore · · Score: 1

      How do you know someone runs Linux on their desktop at home?

      They'll tell you! Linux desktop users are the vegans of tech.

  16. Well, by no-body · · Score: 1

    Puritan mindset alive - God is watching (over) you, and from there an upbringing "don`t put foul words in your mouth", and on it goes, just always doing the "right" thing, in case of doubt, even more right, to be on the save side. Corporate culture, fitting in automagically....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTLBsIzk3UE

    1. Re:Well, by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Puritan mindset alive - God is watching (over) you, and from there an upbringing "don`t put foul words in your mouth", and on it goes, just always doing the "right" thing, in case of doubt, even more right, to be on the save side. Corporate culture, fitting in automagically....

      This is not about "Puritanism" or any particular moral standards.

      This is primarily/initially a CYA to protect themselves from the recently-passed FOSTA stupidity, which itself is not about sex trafficking, but getting the censor-camel's nose and his ass both into your pants and your thoughtcrimes.

      With things like Citibank barring the use of any of their services by either individuals or businesses for the legal purchase or sale of firearms, how long do you think it will be before the list of "offensive content" includes political/ideological speech TPTB dislike?

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re:Well, by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its not a Puritan mindset. The US politics of religious intervention stopped in the 1990's.
      They could not block the early internet, music, lyrics, movies, art, culture. If the USA was allowing religious intervention all that art and culture would have faced bans by the US gov in the 1980-90's.

      The SJW are pushing this.
      What can now ban words, images and users can then ban comments about news and links about US politics.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Well, by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Its not a Puritan mindset. The US politics of religious intervention stopped in the 1990's.

      It has declined, but not stopped. Maybe the best way to think of it is "two steps forward, one step back." Culture will change, then there will be a pushback. Then it will change, and there will be more pushback. We're in the pushback era at the moment.

      There's a mini-revival of Puritanism at the moment since the current President has put extreme religious conservatives into various departments. Trump doesn't actually seem that religious himself, in fact he acts quite often in a very un-Christian manner, but Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Council, said that "from a policy standpoint, he has delivered more than any other president in my lifetime." He's 54, so that includes Nixon, Reagan, and both Bushes. Most on the left think Trump has done nothing and don't understand how someone could talk about his "accomplishments." But from an evangelical point of view, he's the president who has accomplished the most in their lifetime. There's a pretty wide gap of understanding between the two views.

      From Tony Perkin's Politico interview: "Evangelical Christians “were tired of being kicked around by Barack Obama and his leftists, [...] And I think they are finally glad that there’s somebody on the playground that is willing to punch the bully.”

      What about turning the other cheek?

      “You know, you only have two cheeks,” he said. “Look, Christianity is not all about being a welcome mat which people can just stomp their feet on.”

  17. yet another reason... by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...not to bother with Cortana or use Microsoft cloud services.

    "Cortana listening at the wrong moment"?? That's so wrong on several levels.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  18. "Talk dirty to me" by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    "Sorry, I can't, Skype doesn't allow it."

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:"Talk dirty to me" by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      "Talk dirty to me."

      "I haven't used the vacuum cleaner in six months. My sink is full of dishes. I haven't showered in over four days. I can't remember the last time I used mouth wash."

      That kind of thing?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  19. P2P voice/chat client alternative? by polgair · · Score: 1

    How about a chat/video/voice client that has a real p2p component. I only know of one on the market and it's Zyptonite. Unfortunately the clients are closed source.

    See here: https://app.zyptonite.com/ [zyptonite.com]

    Is there anything that is free software?

  20. Re:Skype desktop client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft just recently restored (and updated to 7.41.0.101) the "classic" Skype which you can use on the desktop instead of the 'dumbed down' new-fangled one.

  21. Tumblr, stop giving Microsoft ideas... by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    She's beautiful.
    Who?
    The FBI agent reading this.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  22. This covers account.microsoft.com by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    So Microsoft is literally reserving the right to permanently lock you out of your own desktop if it doesn't like what you're doing it.

    1. Re:This covers account.microsoft.com by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Thats why MS should only be trusted for computer games.
      Once that account is locked for any reason, so is the log in for the other OS.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  23. Yeah, pretty much it is. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    The web is mostly pirated material, porn, and everything else no government wants you to have free and easy access to.

    Given a free hand, most people would stay home and browse pornhub.

    Search "Celebrity Deepfakes"

    That shit has every celebrity in the world shitting their pants, because Celeb porn is going to be everywhere soon.

    I saw how shutting down Pirate bay has worked, lol.

    Sure businesses use the web these days, but 90% of people using the web are looking for porn of some kind.

    That covers a lot of ground these days. :)

    So, lay back and fire up You favorite Tubgirl (or Goatse) video, porn will be here for a loooong time. :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:Yeah, pretty much it is. by mapkinase · · Score: 2

      You said "built" which implies in this case historic perspective. Neither Internet nor WWW was "built" on porn. Being a media, not matter what was the original purpose, it is of course immediately used for sharing various sort of crap, be it porn, be it catz, or cute babies (yes, there was a time on the Internet, when cute babies were as popular as cute pets, nowadays of course, a human degraded so much and so suddenly that the only feeling that a human being can feel looking at a picture of a cute baby is a criminal sexual desire to devour the child. O, humanity.).

      "Used a lot for" != "built".

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:Yeah, pretty much it is. by jelabarre · · Score: 1

      The web is mostly pirated material, porn, and everything else no government wants you to have free and easy access to.

      Actually, more likely they'd *prefer* you were looking at porn, that way you'll be too busy to notice what nasty shit *they're* up to.

  24. Chinese hate Skeletons, finding that out sucked. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    NT.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  25. Re: Up Top by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Its just the paid subscription to Xbox live, which you need to play multiplayer games and so on. Unless you had an xbox or at least kept up with that part of the market, it's not something you'd be aware of.

  26. Yet another reason by DougDot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to not use Microsoft product.

  27. Another likely reason for this: by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

    Spam, with no content but "Hey, check this out", and a link to goatse or something stored on OneDrive. They're saying this to give themselves cover when they nuke porno-spammers.

    Any online cloud storage place that lets you share links to your content is infested with this. It's absolutely rampant, along with links to virus-infected documents, images of 419 scam letters, etc. It's the latest dodge to avoid spam filters.

    Now, if they actually do start playing the eavesdropping Mrs. Grundy with peoples' Skype conversations, then we have another issue. But I really doubt that's going to happen. As someone else said, it's probably going to require a complaint about the content they're hosting to trigger action.

  28. Re: Up Top by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    As to their Gold Membership, it's another manifestation of Microsoft's penis obsession.

  29. Done with M$: Try Linux! by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 2

    This year marks another interesting milestone, another Linux desktop install and attempt to try to 'survive' without Windows. It's doable now, there's enough gaming choices for native Linux and plenty of emulation available to get a rich fulfilling gamer setup on Linux, at last. And in the nick of time, last fucking thing I need is my frickin' operating system telling me what I can and cannot type, look at, send and receive. Outrageous.

    Still running a dual booting box, but, Windows 10 is seeing very little use now that I've got Linux taking over it's duties and doing a fine job too!

    The point of posting? Try Linux. Start with Mint if you're frightened of Linux. It's plenty easy to use, as easy as Windows most of the time. Microsoft has pulled a lot of really dirty stunts over the years. This latest is the straw that breaks this camel. Done, finished. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gunna go play some SimCity 4 which runs fantastic on wine and Linux, flawless.

  30. Solution time [If it's not an April Fool's joke.] by shanen · · Score: 1

    No it's not, September child.

    But it is close to April, as in April Fool's day... And yet, that actually appears to be an authentic Microsoft website and the MSA does include the actual word "offensive" and MS is not known for its corporate sense of humor. Right now I'm leaning the other way, that it is for real, as in real crazy.

    I'm really straining my brain for some way to interpret this as reasonable. Maybe it's a new make-work project to avoid firing people? From a company that used to have a policy of continuously firing the bottom-ranked people? Now Microsoft will just assign them to offensive-language-checking and they will sit around for 8 hours a day reviewing the complaints of "offensive" language? You have to admit that (1) It's a bottomless pit, and (2) They won't have to fire anyone because they'll all quit. Yeah, there will be one Guinness record holder who actually likes the work and wants to defend his world record, but the rest of them will soon be gone.

    Let me offer a suggestion to actually do this in a sane fashion. It involves my old fantasy of EPR (Earned Public Reputation). As I've noted before, this should be a multidimensional concept, and the basic idea to to save time by favoring the nice people and filtering the un-nice people. If the default setting is just slightly positive, then most of the trolls and sock puppets are already banished to their private limbo, but let's consider the simple dimension of "politeness" and how it works with real people. If someone says something rude or offensive, then you would be able to rate that comment as negative on the "politeness" dimension, citing the rude comment as evidence.

    This would be used in (at least) three ways. First, (from your perspective as an identity earning a reputation) if you are massively and repeatedly impolite, then that might tip your overall EPR into the bit bucket. Second, (as a reader) if you are easily offended by offensive language, then you could increase the weighting on that specific dimension of "politeness", and just stop seeing the offensive people (even if they have favorable reputations in other dimensions). Third, (as an earner of EPR) if you want to become more polite, then you can check your own rating on the politeness dimension and tone your rudeness down a bit.

    BtW, the EPR should be linked to the data, and the data should age over time, with more recent comments and interactions counting more heavily than older ones. Lots of detailed suggestions available upon polite request, but I must warn you that I've been thinking about this topic for some years... I even have suggested solutions for the problem of inherently biased dimensions, where "politeness" might be an example. (Hint: How can you get people to report positive politeness when it is normally taken for granted?)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  31. Re: Up Top by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Its just the paid subscription to Xbox live

    Nah dude, I rock a PS4 and a gaming PC. I don't fuck with no Xbox.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  32. Positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I figured I'd post the single positive comment on this article. At least Microsoft is being upfront about it. How long had Google been accepting 'offensive' content to grow their dominance then suddenly bans it all once they have the processing power to automatically tag everything?

    Well, it started out positive...

    Remember, language (and advertising fads) change. Gay used to mean happy. Which of your content will disappear and accounts be banned in a couple years because definitions changed and content filtering services aren't able to take those into account. No one will stand up for you then because you curren't don't stand up for those types of things now.

  33. So I won't be able to type "orifice"... by Mnemennth · · Score: 1

    ...into MicroSpank Orifice? mnem Damned shame...

  34. Re:AI being invented just to serve as SJW by bigmacx · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, home to the mentally ill AC since the 90s. It'll be OK snowflake. You can go back to layered sarcasm and depression at DailyKos

  35. This more self censorship chilling effects from by waspleg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the "sex trafficking" laws. There are cam girls and whatnot that sell private shows, guess what some of them use? Yea. Microsoft's enemies (Facebook/Google/Apple) helped back this bill.

    There's a lot of "OMG THINK OF THE CHILDREN@)(*#)$*" bullshit with this. This is how free speech dies, passing laws based on knee jerks that make people, or in this instance, platforms self-censor rather than repealing the 1st amendment.

    1. Re:This more self censorship chilling effects from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "OMG THINK OF THE CHILDREN@)(*#)$*" is so 90's. "OMG THINK OF THE WOMEN@)(*#)$*" is the new moral outrage slogan de jure. Women are the new infants of the world. Because they're strong and independent, but simultaneously need protecting and to be sheltered from anything that might upset their delicate constitutions.

    2. Re:This more self censorship chilling effects from by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The encrypted protection part stops on the OS so the user can read the text and type in their own text.
      The word detection system will be waiting in the OS for all words it can detect.
      Well after any encrypted software to the OS.
      Working encryption needs a trusted OS. Not an OS that reports every word and bans users.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  36. Re:Dear Microsoft: by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Fuck the fucking fuckers. - 50% of the letters are the word "fuck".

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  37. Look, what we are really saying is.... by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Our engineers are tired of hearing your foul mouths while they data-mine/eavesdrop on your conversations for incriminating evidence and trade secrets. Most of our employees are contractors with no health insurance, so I'm sure you can imagine how hard it is to keep all of our already overworked and underpaid people drinking the cool-aide in the break-room. That, and what-with our government looking for scapegoats and patsies for every nut-job with a gun these days, we feel you will understand. After all, shit rolls down hill. Locking the accounts of all of the thought criminals, and the wrong-speakers (and the opposing party) is really in every ones best interest. The good people's computers will continue to operate just fine.

    Now we can't exactly define offensive language in any certain terms, so we're just going to start locking accounts containing content we don't agree with, or the accounts of anybody our leaderships says is a bad person, or the accounts somebody somewhere else says may be involved in a crime, or the accounts of.... well you get the idea, and again, we're sure you understand, this is for your protection.

    Now before you get all huffy puffy in your latte, let me just say, you can't sue us. We already ran this by our lawyers, and they said "If they still don't understand the difference between ownership, and licensing, then we are just going to have to show them the other side of the coin. Nobody actually thought our "free" new OS theirs anyway, it's all right there in the TOS!"

    In closing, we wan't to thank you all for being such loyal products, and hope you continue to serve us for many years to come.

    Sincerely,

    The Microsoft account team.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  38. Re: Up Top by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Wait, people have to PAY Microsoft in order to play multiplayer games, on top of buying the console, buying the games and also paying for their own internet connection? I can understand paying a monthly fee for some of the more complex games like MMORPGs, but paying Microsoft on top of that?

    What bullshit is this? And people keep buying Xbox consoles?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  39. Re:AI being invented just to serve as SJW by bigmacx · · Score: 1

    lmao, why i gotta be flamebait? truf hurthz

  40. FuCENSOREDck MicCENSOREDroSoCENSOREDft by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 2

    Just about the only thing I wonder when I see a story like this is "How the hell is Microsoft still even in business at this point?" Who is propping them up? Isn't everyone using GNU/Linux (or Macs) now? What business is stupid enough to be using Microsoft Office or any other of their crappy software at this point? What government is so careless with their taxpayer's revenue that they can afford to waste it, squander it really, on trash software that causes more problems than it solves? Especially when there are better, free alternatives to everything Microsoft makes? The appropriate response in the future to any story having anything to do with Microsoft should be, "who?"

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:FuCENSOREDck MicCENSOREDroSoCENSOREDft by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      "How the hell is Microsoft still even in business at this point?" Who is propping them up?

      Paying enterprise customers who aren't treated like shit like the rest of us. Don't pretend we are all equal.

    2. Re: FuCENSOREDck MicCENSOREDroSoCENSOREDft by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Inertia is a powerful thing.

      For instance, I've lost confidence in Canonical Inc and therefore in Ubuntu Linux. But I'm not going to up and migrate all my company's systems to something else. Because that would be a huge amount of labor for dubious business value.

      I think the same sort of thing happens with companies who are running Microsoft desktops. The setup they have works fairly well, so they're not going to invest the effort and risk of changing to something else.

  41. Re: Up Top by vux984 · · Score: 1

    "Wait, people have to PAY Microsoft in order to play multiplayer games"

    Yes. $50/year or something like that, I think. I *don't* have an xbox (and that's one of the reasons why).

    You need to pay that annual subscription to be able to use free 2 play games (yeah, I know!!) as well as online multiplayer play, and voice chat support.

    I'm under the impression that you also need to have multiple subscriptions for multiple players who use the same xbox in the same home, if they want to have their own profile (their own acheivement tracking, their own friends lists, their own whatever...)

  42. Re:Dear Microsoft: by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    Fuck the fucking fuckers. - 50% of the letters are the word "fuck".

    No......

    There are 21 letters. 12 of them are the word fuck..

    For 50% you'd have needed 24 letters (3 more). Your sentence is 57.14% the word "fuck"

    You FAIL.

    "Fuck the fucking fucker's ass."

    That sentence is 50% the word fuck.

    I'm amused you thought you could get away with that on Slashdot.....

  43. Re: Microsoft's reason to spy? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    They already do. Don't think they even deny it, do they?

  44. Next up: offensive language on Windows 10 systems by johannesg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you use any offensive language anywhere on or near your computer, or store files that have offensive contents, or do anything that's offensive to someone somewhere without even using a computer, Microsoft will withdraw your Windows 10 license and erase all your... I mean _their_, who are we kidding after all... files.

    Yeah, this AI revolution will be so great... Only yesterday having automated nannies watching over everyone's shoulders and approving, or disapproving, their behaviour seemed like a dystopian future. Now it seems like it has become a dystopian _now_...

  45. Essay on East European swearing by Evtim · · Score: 2

    We could go international (until they improve the algorithms). One of the best swears is Serbian (swearing champions of Europe - Serbia, Hungary, Bulgaria), immortalized in the movie Underground where it is used against both the Nazi and the UN "peace keepers" 50 years later - "Mamku im/ti iebem fashistichku". No translation I have seen gives it justice - the official one is "fucking Fascist motherfucker(s)" but it actually is a promise/intention/desire to fuck the mothers of the fascists (swearing on mother is the ultimate offense; only old folks swear on God or disease in our part of the world).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    Here - it's what he says just before nutting the UN blue beret (no subs, sorry, you can watch the full version with subs - it is a great movie actually)

    All Slavic languages are similar, so the "bad words" are understood by all of us. Some, like "putka" (pussy, cunt) will be recognized by (some) Westerners, like the Spaniards or the French (puta); still, imagine the hilarity in Eastern Europe around the name Vladimir Putin (only the Russians differ slightly here - "pizda" is their word - used in Lord of War for instance). Another recognized one is "hui" which is a dick and of course "eba, ebane" - to fuck.

    The Hungarians are a special case. First, their language is of course very different from all (apart from Finish). They swear like crazy! They say "horse dick" with the same ease we say "shit". Hungarians laugh hysterically during the scene in Blade runner when Gaff approaches Deckard at the food joint, he calls him "hey, horse dick!". Olmos was given the task to assemble futuristic, metropolitan blended language (like in Clockwork Orange) so he came up with that :)
    The Hungarans are the only ones I am aware off that blended fucking and God in a one swear - the most offensive one there translates literally as "I will fuck your Jesus".

    Now, finally I have to announce that I will not be able to use any censored products, since I am genetically disadvantaged (hey, another victim category for the neo-Marxists to protect) - my four grandparents come from four different countries and three of those are the above mentioned champion swearers (the last quarter is Romanian which is not much better). So I can't help it but fuck their fascist mothers....with a horse dick ;)

    1. Re:Essay on East European swearing by mi · · Score: 1

      We could go international (until they improve the algorithms).

      "We" could, but this approach would require both the insulted and the insulting to know the same terms of abuse, which the medium they are using does not recognize. That's a long shot. It will also be caught up by the censoring programs much quicker as their makers seek to market to users in different countries and so have to recognize swear words in multiple languages. In fact, they probably already do.

      No, what I proposed is using the existing and well-known terms, but evading censors by mixing character-sets. Yours spellchecker will be confused too...

      The Hungarians are a special case.

      I may not know Magyars as well as a certain sapper Vodichka used to, but yes, I have heard of them being a special case in many ways...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  46. GMYS by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    Go Microsoft Yourself.

    It's about time we made that innuendo mainstream.

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  47. Ireland by zakeria · · Score: 1

    Is gonna be pissed at being banned

  48. Re:Next up: offensive language on Windows 10 syste by EricTDuckman1414 · · Score: 1

    Of course! Now that Windows is a "service", all our files belong to Micro$oft!

  49. Encryption by Miser · · Score: 1

    ... and be done with it.

    Obviously you can't do that via Skype, but if you're storing your data on Microsoft's servers (cloud! synergy! apps!) why aren't you encrypting it?

    Then, they can't see inside that data to look for "offensive" content.

  50. They just want to silence discontent users by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The most swearing i heard on any of their platforms was directed at their products.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  51. Re: Up Top by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    PS4 has the same monthly fee for playing games online now, gramps.

    It's not about a "fee", sonny.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  52. John Spartan, you are fined one credit.... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    Remember folks - Demolition Man was a warning, not an instruction manual - plus, its funnier than 1984 and you don't need to be able to read...

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  53. OBJECTION, your Honor! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    What about my RIGHT to FREEDOM OF SPEECH?!

    Someone needs to educate the fucking idiot foreigner at the MS helm!

    Just goes to prove that India naturals need to stay out of US roles.
    Who let him away from the overseas help desk anyway?!

    WAIT! Now I see it!
    Knowing that everyone hates getting a India national that cannot speak or understand intelligible English when you call the help desk,
    they want to stop us from cursing at them for their obvious lack of qualifications and stealing good US jobs!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  54. Re:Micro-shafted by jelabarre · · Score: 1

    As quick as I am to get on MS, I'm not sure that this is a case of something they wanted to do. Given the timing, I wonder if this happens to have anything to do with that stupid anti-sex trafficking legislation that just passed.

    Of course, they could just be dicks,...

    Probably both. Why not make use of new legislation as a NEW excuse to be dicks.

  55. Re:Wow..... by jelabarre · · Score: 1

    What the fucking fuckity fuck.

    Going to have trouble streaming episodes of "The Thick Of It" then.

  56. Early April Fool's Joke? by fygment · · Score: 1

    The policy makes no sense legally or otherwise.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  57. obligatory by Kogun · · Score: 1

    Nipple

  58. Re:AI being invented just to serve as SJW by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    The net affect: what appears to me to be a 90% dropoff in-game chat overall

    Given the quality of chat, this sounds like a win for just about everyone.