Slashdot Mirror


Chile Becomes First Country In Americas To Ban Plastic Bags (ewn.co.za)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Eyewitness News: Chile's Senate has passed a bill that will prohibit the use of plastic bags in stores, with a vote in their House of Representatives overwhelmingly in favor of the measure, with 134 supporting the bill and one abstention. According to The Independent, the new law would give large retailers one year to phase out the use of plastic bags, and smaller businesses two years. This makes Chile the first country in the Americas to ban plastic bags, and officially recognize how important such a ban would be in the effort to reduce unnecessary single-use plastic waste.

At first, the measure was only meant to ban plastic bags in Patagonia, but it was approved by both the senate and president for the entire country. The Association of Plastic Industries registered Chile as using 3,400 million plastic bags per year, or 200 per person. Telesur reports that the Minister of the Environment, Marcela Cubillos, said the country needs a larger cultural change for people to start replacing plastic with reusable bags.

126 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. What about pet waste? by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's great and all, but where am I supposed to put pet waste? I can't flush litter box bombs down the toilet, because the litter will clog it. (I've tried) Damned if I'm going to use a reuseable bag for that...

    --
    3. Profit!
    2. ???
    1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
    1. Re:What about pet waste? by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Paper bags? How did people survive before plastic bags were invented?

    2. Re:What about pet waste? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Do grocery stores still offer Paper Bags anymore?

      Plastic bags work great for cleaning up after the dog on a walk....

    3. Re:What about pet waste? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      It isn't a universal ban on all plastic bags, only disposable grocery/shopping bags that stores hand out for free.

      It's perfectly workable.

      What do you think everyone uses for kitty litter disposal bags? I refuse to pay for my plastic bags!

    4. Re:What about pet waste? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Stop using practice-babies and have an actual baby instead.
      And use cloth, not disposable.

      Hey, I'm fighting climate change here!

      https://www.theguardian.com/en...

    5. Re:What about pet waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's great and all, but where am I supposed to put pet waste? I can't flush litter box bombs down the toilet, because the litter will clog it. (I've tried) Damned if I'm going to use a reuseable bag for that...

      Flush the cat.

      Problem solved.

    6. Re:What about pet waste? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      They do in Maryland/DC/VA because there is a tax on plastic bags to encourage reusable bags. Maybe some other states have the same thing. Eventually plastic bags will be phased out here as well. Amazingly people lived for years, decades, millenia before plastic bags.

    7. Re:What about pet waste? by shadowturtle · · Score: 1

      Good thing you're not a store and the law doesn't apply to you. I'm sure you can find plastic bags other than reusing ones your purchased items came in. Those usually have holes in them anyway and using for pet waste is probably not the best idea.

    8. Re:What about pet waste? by hierofalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't just cat litter. I also use the plastic bags for all the trash can liners in the house since the City wants all garbage bagged. They aren't as strong as a real trash can liner, but they work. The extras get donated to the church food bank for people to use to take home the stuff they pick up there. They aren't single use for a great many people, and having to buy higher grade plastic bags to replace their second use is crazy.

    9. Re:What about pet waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your store currently has higher prices to pay for the free plastic bags it gives you. They aren't really free, you're just indirectly paying for them.

    10. Re:What about pet waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Train your cat to use toilet. (Okay, admittedly, it's a long shot, but everyone who's ever done it says it was worth it.)

      2. Use brown paper lunch sacks. They're like $4 for a pack of 100.

      3. Get a diaper-genie and just shovel right into that.

      4. Save your bread-bags. They're not just for little kids to get their snow-boots on!

      5. Zip locks?

      I mean, we can't just stop using all plastic, but the least we can do is eliminate it from drifting around our highways and oceans by eliminating it from one specific use-case that generates a lot, can easily be replaced with alternatives, and is only used once. (Your pets notwithstanding.) BTW: we have a cat, and are in the same boat. But I'm not worried.

    11. Re:What about pet waste? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Garbage bags, Pet waste (pooper picker) bags. Which are actually much better because they won't have a random hole in it, and they are designed to hold biomater.

      Plastic Grocery bags. For an average shopping experience you will get 7 or 8 a normal week. and 10 - 12 for a large shopping week. So you will normally collect more bags then most people will normally reuse. Specialty bags, while still will pollute are often much smaller, because they are designed to hold waste for a day, vs. Food for a week.

      I actually like reusable bags. They are often bigger (Can hold more stuff), Cloth handles so they are not cutting into your hand for heavy loads. Are in shapes of rectangles so they are easier to stack in your car. The only issue is hygiene, I still ask to have my meat wrapped in plastic. and occasionally will need to wash the bags with soap and water.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re:What about pet waste? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Paper bags? How did people survive before plastic bags were invented?

      It isn't like paper bags have no environmental footprint.

      So people will whine about that. I'm not certain that recycled paper will be very good for grocery bags, because every time paper is recycled, the individual fibers get shorter and shorter. I think Trader Joe's uses recycled, and their paper bags are pretty weak.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:What about pet waste? by dmatos · · Score: 1

      Certified compostable bags that can go in my green bin, to divert all of that kitty litter from landfills.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    14. Re:What about pet waste? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I've seen a few stores that actually charge for them now, and that model has been used frequently in other countries. The grocery store I go to doesn't charge for plastic bags, but they do give a small discount if you bring your own reusable bag. I also noticed that a lot of stores are adding plastic bag recycling bins at their stores, which probably helps considerably with cutting down on the number that end up in landfills.

    15. Re:What about pet waste? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Stop using practice-babies and have an actual baby instead. And use cloth, not disposable.

      The "actual baby" is only for wealthy people today. https://www.usatoday.com/story...

      Obviously some folks rely on the guvmint to help, but yeah, it cost my wife and I over a quarter million to raise one kid.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re: What about pet waste? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Tree killer! ...and also good luck finding an "industrial strength" paper bag in the year 2018. The OP is right, unless you have a cheap source for canvas/burlap bags or a time machine to source "proper" paper ones good luck with that. (even then they were useless if they got wet but they were quite strong otherwise), we used to cover our school textbooks with them and they lasted all year.

      For the record I still use (reusable) plastic bags. They are literally waste products of the petroleum refining process and the issue is not you using them, it's you using them the one time and letting the wind carry them away. I fail to see how this harms the environment provided you reuse the bags and don't leave them out in the sun (and dispose of them properly)

    17. Re:What about pet waste? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Take a step back and think about whether it should even be culturally acceptable to walk around a neighborhood and shit on sidewalks and lawns. Maybe plastic bags are an answer to an absurd question?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re:What about pet waste? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Great story of a man who toilet trains a monkey.

      https://player.themoth.org/#/?...

    19. Re:What about pet waste? by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      Actually here in Canada there was a big push in 2009 to ban and charge for plastic bags, however most of the stores that adopted it have reversed due to the fact that competitors give them away for free.

      I think that Toronto actually had a bi-law to ban them but reversed it a couple of years ago (not 100% sure of that).

    20. Re:What about pet waste? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      That's great and all, but where am I supposed to put pet waste? I can't flush litter box bombs down the toilet, because the litter will clog it. (I've tried) Damned if I'm going to use a reuseable bag for that...

      You can still buy trashbags, plastic bags, etc... It's just illegal for a store to hand them out like candy every time you buy something. The specific law makes it illegal to use plastic bags for "transportation of merchandise in commerce" and appears to only be at the point of sale so all other uses are still completely legal. Pet waste is not generally considered merchandise so you are in the clear.

    21. Re:What about pet waste? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a NYer I hate paper bags because roaches love them.

      And I love plastic bags from the store because I put my garbage in them and each time I leave the apartment I throw out my trash.

      This is far superior to reusable bags in which I must then BUY plastic garbage bags. Now that's retarded.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    22. Re: What about pet waste? by makerfixer · · Score: 2

      Sure, but a whole lot of them didnâ(TM)t live and died from Salmonella and other diseases. There will be an uptick as always happens in areas banning plastic bags. Taking away sanitation in all forms does seem like a progressive goal given the current state of California.

    23. Re:What about pet waste? by swb · · Score: 1

      Ours does, choice of paper or plastic. I always choose paper because they're bigger and make transporting groceries faster and less of a mess than the plastic bags, which are smaller and tend to dump out their contents.

      Occasionally they put stuff in a plastic bag (meats or frozen items) but I think this mostly an attempt to be sanitary (no meat leakage onto other items) or to prevent frozen stuff from getting the bags wet and making them rip.

      We have a mish-mash of reusable grocery bags that we use at Costco, but I think we'd need to make more effort and need about 3x the number of bags so we always had a supply of them in the car for regular grocery use. It's too easy to not have them for spontaneous grocery stops or outright forget them on planned trips, so a bunch more bags kept staged in the car would make this possible.

      But with free paper bags that are recyclable, it's kind of hard to get organized enough to achieve this.

    24. Re:What about pet waste? by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 2

      I was skeptical of that fact, then we did the math out-loud in my office and I'm starting to suspect that is an extreme low-ball estimate. Daycare alone is $10-12,000 a year so you're halfway there by the time their 10 years old. The additional food cost is probably negligible, but the medical and, eventually, the auto insurance sure as hell isn't. Then clothing and after school activities would easily put you over that mark. That doesn't even mention vacations. It's a quarter million to raise a child, but how much is it to raise a functional kid?

    25. Re:What about pet waste? by Bongo · · Score: 1

      In this country I pay the required five pence for plastic bags when I find I want them, and 90% of them get re-used for something else, including the bins around the house, the putting of dirty shoes inside plastic bag for packing in the suitcase, and so on. Sometimes I end up with spares, and they go into the appropriate recycling. I also carry a "long life" plastic bag for groceries on most days. Anyway, point is, the environmental thing so often focusses on this trivial stuff, whilst avoiding the big issues like, oh say for sake of argument, investing in nuclear. It is as if ineffectual-ism is a core feature of green.

      Still, I do wish people would be taught to be more conscientious and not just let the bags blow away in the wind. That is just bad on so many levels.

    26. Re:What about pet waste? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I use reusable bags whenever I remember them, but when I get plastic bags I try to reuse them. My problem has been that plastic bags have been getting flimsier and flimsier. Many come with holes in the bottom from the outset - making them horrible to store any kind of trash that could leak out. It really hampers the "reuse" component of "reduce, reuse, recycle."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    27. Re:What about pet waste? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      The additional food cost is probably negligible

      There's these things called "teenagers". They eat a lot.

    28. Re:What about pet waste? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Certified compostable bags that can go in my green bin, to divert all of that kitty litter from landfills.

      Compostable waste disposal, that would be nice. Around here the price for recycling is rather high and no compostable separation, and most of my trash is non-recyclable anyway.

    29. Re:What about pet waste? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      It isn't a universal ban on all plastic bags, only disposable grocery/shopping bags that stores hand out for free.

      It's perfectly workable.

      What do you think everyone uses for kitty litter disposal bags? I refuse to pay for my plastic bags!

      Those plastic bags they give away at the fruit/vegetable market/produce departments? I save those for cat litter. One time I ran out so I ordered a roll of them online, so I am never without. $15, don't be a cheapskate.

      I'm mostly being sarcastic, but that is hard to determine without smiles these days given what some people (no, never me!) post.

    30. Re: What about pet waste? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      "I fail to see how this harms the environment except for the way which it currently does. Why should we change?"

      FTFY.

    31. Re:What about pet waste? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Your store currently has higher prices to pay for the free plastic bags it gives you. They aren't really free, you're just indirectly paying for them.

      Probably but I don't know any stores in my area that don't give away those free plastic bags. The few high end organic stores that may not give away bags (I don't know honestly) typically import food from other states, rather than using local farms.

    32. Re:What about pet waste? by hierofalcon · · Score: 1

      There's usually enough of an oversupply that for any waste can that could have an issue with leaking, you can double bag, just like the grocery stores, and still avoid purchasing the slightly more durable "real" trash can liners. The kitty litter bags, for example, I always double bag. For the few that tear or have an inconvenient hole, add them to the garbage. We do landfill here, so they aren't much of a threat to the birds or rivers or oceans, and as thin as they are, they should bio-degrade faster than the purchased trash can liners as well.

    33. Re:What about pet waste? by Sloppy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Take a step back and think about whether it should even be culturally acceptable to walk around a neighborhood and shit on sidewalks and lawns.

      Critters and shit were around long before sidewalks and lawns had been invented. If the sidewalk and lawn people freak out whenever they see a piece of shit, then they should go back to whatever planet they came from.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    34. Re:What about pet waste? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Critters and shit were around long before sidewalks and lawns had been invented

      I don't understand this argument at all. Lots of things were around before sidewalks - take dysentery, for instance. We know a lot more about disease now than we did when we were hucking spears around the forest. One important finding is transmission of disease in fecal matter. Pooping right in the middle of where you are going to walk, then tracking that poop into our living spaces. You would probably call the cops if a guy dropped trou and took a shit in the middle of the sidewalk, even if he picked it back up when he was done. The same guy brings his pet to that location and does exactly the same thing, it's all cool. And of course you can't pick up piss.

      Sure, if you live out in farm country, a little animal shit (or human shit, for that matter) won't hurt anyone. But cram 27,000 people into a square mile and shit of any form is harmful.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re:What about pet waste? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Nobody is banning anyone from buying plastic garbage bags. The ban is on plastic grocery bags.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    36. Re:What about pet waste? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They aren't single use for a great many people

      Dual use is not better, especially when you consider the single use plastic bags break down into small parts piece of plastic very quickly. Encouraging people to actually go and choose a replacement bag rather than being given one gives them the opportunity to go green.

      Chile isn't the first country to do this, there are examples all over the globe where plastic waste has been successfully reduced by this policy.

      Disclosure: I have an animal and buy plastic bags.

    37. Re:What about pet waste? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Certified compostable bags that can go in my green bin, to divert all of that kitty litter from landfills.

      Composting cat litter is not a good idea.

    38. Re:What about pet waste? by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      The additional food cost is probably negligible

      There's these things called "teenagers". They eat a lot.

      Just like technology has been reducing the life-cycle of their products, so too do parents need to get with the times. By the time that child is 9 or 10, you need to start thinking about changing it out for a newer model.

    39. Re:What about pet waste? by hierofalcon · · Score: 2

      If your dual use is also going to be a heavier weight plastic bag - which virtually all trash can liners are - then reusing the first bag is definitely a win. Just because the heavier weight bag - more plastic - takes longer to break down doesn't change the fact that it also will break down. I fail to see where the time difference matters. As long as it is still a plastic bag - why not pick the one that has less plastic?

      And yes, all of us know that the cost of the bags are rolled into the overhead of the store and we end up paying something for them anyway. But the amount that is charged for those bags is much less than the cost of the off the shelf bags - because they are cheap and not well made - but serviceable for many uses.

      Let's start a movement to ban the manufacture of trash can liner bags and rely on the plastic bags at the checkout line. It would make more sense.

    40. Re:What about pet waste? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      So use new trash bags for groceries.

    41. Re:What about pet waste? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Do grocery stores still offer Paper Bags anymore?

      Plastic bags work great for cleaning up after the dog on a walk....

      Many do (typically the upscale ones that trend on the eco-hippie side of things).

      Another option is to buy your own bags. That's what we do at home.

    42. Re:What about pet waste? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      That's great and all, but where am I supposed to put pet waste? I can't flush litter box bombs down the toilet, because the litter will clog it. (I've tried) Damned if I'm going to use a reuseable bag for that...

      Double paper bag. It would be a problem if the poop is watery.

      A better, more resilient solution are paper bags with a film of paraffin, petroleum jelly or mineral oil at worst (which are biodegradable) or beeswax or emulsified vegetable oils (which biodegrade more easily.)

      I typically keep old newspaper to make small containers for organic trash when I do not have garbage bags.

      With that said, plastic bags have their place, specially for heavy duty disposal.

    43. Re:What about pet waste? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a NYer I hate paper bags because roaches love them.

      But it depends on the environment around them. Roaches just don't sprout on paper unless there's edible stuff (home trash, food particles, etc) around them.

      And I love plastic bags from the store because I put my garbage in them and each time I leave the apartment I throw out my trash.

      That's what I do.

      This is far superior to reusable bags in which I must then BUY plastic garbage bags. Now that's retarded.

      It is only far superior from a point of convenience, not environmental sustainability. Yeah, maintaining the environment carries costs.

      With that said, a lot of these problems with plastic bags is the lack of a proper recycling policy.

      In Japan, people are meticulous how they pack their garbage. Pet litter, diapers, chemicals, and toxic stuff on one bin. Kitchen garbage on another bin. Recyclable paper on another bin. Plastics, aluminum cans and glass on another bin. All other in yet another bin.

      People do it and stick to it. Then government facilities sort all that shit out in whatever way is best.

      When we go about banning plastic bags is because our garbage disposal systems suck and we have no way to contain the flood of plastics, be it in Chile or in the US. It's really that simple.

      Banning plastics bags is an abdication that we cannot - technically and culturally - dispose of our garbage properly.

      Better than nothing I guess, so hooray?

    44. Re: What about pet waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or you can just pick up the shit and eat it.

      There, problem solved.

    45. Re:What about pet waste? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Leave Masuka alone, Deb.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    46. Re:What about pet waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That was what I used to do as well. Now our municipality has mandated that all garbage be placed in clear bags including any bags within the clear outer bag ("to confirm there are no recyclables being thrown away"). If you put waste into opaque grocery bags they won't pick up your garbage. The exception is that you're allowed one opaque bag (of a limited size) within for privacy reasons, but you're greatly reduced in the number of grocery bags that you can reuse.

    47. Re:What about pet waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The big change over to plastic shopping bags came to be in the 80's because the environmental groups declared paper bags to be bad for the environment. Ironic, isn't it?

    48. Re:What about pet waste? by Rakarra · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Paper bags? How did people survive before plastic bags were invented?

      Their dogs just pooped all over the place and no one cleaned it up, that's how it was done way in the past.
      Paper bags are one option, biodegradable bags like BioBags are probably a better option.

    49. Re:What about pet waste? by Hall · · Score: 1

      The majority of "baggers" at grocery stores have no clue how to properly load paper bags. Plus, using plastic bags is so simple, it's why in most stores, the cashier also bags your stuff.

      I say this jokingly, but you would think the bag manufacturers PAY the stores to get bags with the number they use / waste. I have went to the store on more than once occasion, bought a few items and they have PUT ONE ITEM PER BAG. So with three items, they use three bags ! Buying milk THAT HAS A HANDLE ? They will still put it in a bag !

    50. Re:What about pet waste? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      What city is that? that sounds really, really fucking annoying and overbearing.

    51. Re:What about pet waste? by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      Paper bags? How did people survive before plastic bags were invented?

      It isn't like paper bags have no environmental footprint.

      True but those costs won't be quite as externalized. Paper bags left along the side of the road will turn into mush and decompose pretty quickly. Plastic bags left along the side of the road will sit there till the state has to clean them up.

    52. Re: What about pet waste? by makerfixer · · Score: 1

      Yes, reusable bags, which fall apart when washed and need someone to carefully segregate meats/vegetables and hope clerks can figure it out each time. Which leads to disease outbreaks after plastic bag bans. You can throw out the bagsbut since each bag is the same energy/materials as 50 plastic bags....

    53. Re:What about pet waste? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      That's great and all, but where am I supposed to put pet waste? I can't flush litter box bombs down the toilet, because the litter will clog it. (I've tried) Damned if I'm going to use a reuseable bag for that...

      Just do what the homeless do with their own poop in California (which also banned plastic bags): Leave on the streets and sidewalks.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    54. Re:What about pet waste? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I was skeptical of that fact, then we did the math out-loud in my office and I'm starting to suspect that is an extreme low-ball estimate. Daycare alone is $10-12,000 a year so you're halfway there by the time their 10 years old.

      Its an inconvenient truth of modern life, but anyone doing a cost analysis will come up with the knowledge that we're doing it all wrong. If you are married, and want to have children, one of the couple should really stay at home with the child until they are in pre-school.

      Otherwise you are doing two things. First is that you are spending a lot of money on child care, and the second thing is that you are not raising your child - someone else is.

      The smart money is on having a child during the prime reproductive years, then building a career during your late 20s. Its done backwards now, especially from the female end. Start a career, then in your mid thirties look for a husband, maybe freeze your eggs for later fertility treatments. Assuming you find a man who wants to start raising a family in their mid forties, and the fertility treatments take, you are then in your 60s by the time the kid leaves home. Assuming those children likewise wait until their mid 40's to attempt to have children, there is a real good chance that many people will never see their grandchildren. Or perhaps take their 3 year old to visit Grandma in the dementia unit at the nursing home.

      The additional food cost is probably negligible, but the medical and, eventually, the auto insurance sure as hell isn't. Then clothing and after school activities would easily put you over that mark. That doesn't even mention vacations. It's a quarter million to raise a child, but how much is it to raise a functional kid?

      We had our son in travel Hockey, which is incredibly expensive. The protective equipment for a growing boy, the ice time and association costs, the travel and hotels, the summer training camps, and yup, the insurance. The low cost option at my workplace wouldn't work for traveling - so I paid hundreds more a month.

      Not complaining - I could afford it. But the cost analysis is shocking.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    55. Re:What about pet waste? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The additional food cost is probably negligible

      There's these things called "teenagers". They eat a lot.

      Har - Our food intake at home was outlandish. During my son's teen years I was playing three games of Ice Hockey a week, and he had at least two, with three practices a week, and often helping on my team. Breakfast, middle morning "snack" Lunch, 3 O'clock "snack", Dinner, 7 O'clock snack, 10 O'Clock snack, and some times something at 3 a.m. if we were feeling a little peckish.

      It was like the Tour de France riders, just shoveling food in their mouths constantly just to not lose a lot of weight. My guess is we were packing away around 8-10 Kilocalories a day at least.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    56. Re: What about pet waste? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      odd, yeah.. i wonder what costs more in terms of garbage man salary, time, fuel etc:

      Having garbage men CHECK EVERY FUCKING BAG at pickup
      OR
      Doing the sorting at the dump/collection depot

      green washing at its best =/

    57. Re: What about pet waste? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      We don't have a waste bin in our apartment; there are communal ones - roughly beer keg sized - in the basement. We used to use the plastic bags that brought the shopping home to transport the garbage down to them. It's nice. There's a sort of symmetry to it. Now, we have to buy new bags made of new materials for that.

      Now we could buy a medium sized bin, and use it with no liner (because that's another sodding bag, and it'd just be duplicating the council approved ones in the downstairs bins that you have to use or they just leave it there and/or fine you), but then we'd have to scald/bleach the fucker out at least once a week in winter and once a day in summer which is polluting and using resources too.

      I don't see the saving for the environment, at least if you're not a twat who throws them away in the street.

      I think the greenest thing to do is just die. And some ratbastard would probably complain if you did that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    58. Re:What about pet waste? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"It isn't just cat litter. I also use the plastic bags for all the trash can liners in the house since the City wants all garbage bagged."

      +1000 Exactly this.

      I have never ONCE had "too many" plastic bags. I reuse every single one of them. Smelly garbage, liners for all my small trashcans. Disposing of things that are wet. Nothing I reuse them for would ANY other type of bag be good for. So I would have to BUY those bags ANYWAY, and then end up:

      1) With MORE TOTAL trash than before.
      2) With less money.
      3) With huge inconvenience because paper bags are too weak and usually have no handles, so I can only carry one at a time.

      And not ONCE has an empty bag left my hand or property to float free into the environment. "Solutions" that punish everyone for the acts of a few are not solutions.

    59. Re: What about pet waste? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Only if you didn't dispose of yourself in the most ecologicslly friendly manner. Are there compost bin recommendations for people?

    60. Re: What about pet waste? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're full of shit. England and Ireland (and other EU countries) have vastly reduced the use of single use plastic bags and there has been no outbreak of disease due to meat contamination like you claim will happen.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    61. Re: What about pet waste? by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

      Only if you didn't dispose of yourself in the most ecologically friendly manner. Are there compost bin recommendations for people?

      I want to be preserved in a block of Lucite (I imagine it to be more of a fake-bug-in-an-ice-cube than a Han-Solo-in-carbonite...) and propped up in the corner of the living room (or at least a dark corner of the attic -maybe taken out for Halloween.)

      Take that environmentalists!

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    62. Re: What about pet waste? by makerfixer · · Score: 1

      https://www.huffingtonpost.com... There are other references but the bottom line is that you have a reusable bag that sometimes houses meat and sometimes houses vegetables. That is not a good combination. Plastic bags exist for a reason and most of the world can deal with the waste responsibly. As far the hygiene goes, San Francisco is joining so many other places in having open-air homeless encampments with their own dumps and no proper sanitation. Watch for another round of infectious disease this summer. People living near garbage and rats and fleas leads to not-good things. This is the direction of many progressive policies.

    63. Re: What about pet waste? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      So you're passing on the organ donor and solyent green initiatives? Bully for you Mr Solo.

    64. Re: What about pet waste? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Most of the rest of the world can't deal with the plastic bag waste responsibly which is why they're accruing against plastic bags.

      As for your like, well, I guess SF sucks. Over here we have 65 million people who somehow have managed too cope with vastly reduced plastic bag use without giving ourselves ecoli.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    65. Re:What about pet waste? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Paper bags? How did people survive before plastic bags were invented?

      We used cloth, string or hessian bags, otherwise things were put into a box which was a pain in the arse to carry.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    66. Re:What about pet waste? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      then reusing the first bag is definitely a win

      No, precisely the opposite. Those light bags that crumble in UV are a massive contributor to micro plastics in our food cycles. The larger heavier ones tend to sit in dumps, are more likely to be recycled, are more cost effective to recycle. That's before you skipped my comment about green bags being made available.

      Let's start a movement to ban the manufacture of trash can liner bags and rely on the plastic bags at the checkout line. It would make more sense.

      No let's really frigging not. It's a horrible idea. Less plastic != better. And even if your small bags were somehow better, the evidence of actual plastic consumption and disposal in countries where they've already banned it has shown the ban to be incredibly effective.

    67. Re: What about pet waste? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There's a professor somewhere who's been mummified and placed in an office.

      When there's a committee meeting he's recorded as "present, but not voting".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    68. Re:What about pet waste? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      I see your point.

      ...

      But my dog is extra special and super cute, so I demand an exemption!

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  2. Why would any American country ban plastic bags? by ITRambo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ocean pollution problem apparently comes from ten rivers located in Asia. North and South America are not killing whales. This is just another pointless feel-good move to show that "they care" in Chile.

  3. Re:Billion? by gnick · · Score: 1

    According to Oxford dictionary, a billion is now a thousand million in both British and real English.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  4. Re:Billion? by alvinrod · · Score: 2

    They write thousand million

    Letting a perfectly good milliard go to waste.

  5. Why I Lost by Topwiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this mean that Hillary Clinton won't be allowed in the country?

    1. Re:Why I Lost by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Only in stores.

      She'll be allowed in other places, say, in hospitals (not that she's sick, or has ever had any medical conditions...ever. Did the Russians tell you that? Fake news! Fake news!)

      --
      -Styopa
  6. Re:Theocracy rules by Kohath · · Score: 1

    I hope I don't get expelled from the congregation and shunned by the faithful.

  7. Incorrect problem vector by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem, here, isn't the bags: It's the people who can't bother to dispose of them properly. Can we ban the lazy, inconsiderate people, instead?

  8. Re: We were told that the plastic is "biodegradabl by triffid_98 · · Score: 2

    They sort of are...the sun degrades them into tiny tiny bits, fish eat them and then you eat the fish. It's the cycle of life from Disney's "Lion King" franchise, just with toxic petroleum products.

  9. This law ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... has been sponsored by the specialty plastic bag manufacturing industry. Who were not seeing sufficient sales of their product due to the second use of grocery bags for trash can liners, pet poop and homeless peoples' storage needs.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:This law ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Where similar measures have been tried in other countries it has been found to be effective at reducing the total amount of plastic being used for bags of one kind of another. It seems that people use more of something if it is free*.

      * Obviously the cost is rolled into their shopping bill, but that's psychologically very different to being charged a few cents at the checkout.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:This law ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Good. Those speciality plastic bag manufacturers produce bags that are less likely to break down into microplastics, and are more likely to offer products that biodegrade. They are just as bad as that evil solar panel industry or that nasty electric car industry.

  10. Re:Why would any American country ban plastic bags by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    The ocean pollution problem apparently comes from ten rivers located in Asia. North and South America are not killing whales. This is just another pointless feel-good move to show that "they care" in Chile.

    That's pretty much my assessment - macro sized plastic from third world countries, and microsphere plastic from developed places.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/1...

    http://www.digitaljournal.com/...

    Cites provided because the prominent search results blame countries that already recycle a lot of plastic. Making someone in those countries feel guilty about themselves, while doing nothing about the Pacific Rim countries will accomplish exactly nothing.

    This is not to say plastic in the oceans is not a problem. It's that completely eliminating the first world contributions to the problem will stall out at a 10 percent reduction.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  11. Re:Really? by ledow · · Score: 1

    What about asbestos or CFCs or radon? Both fit your original question. Though plastic isn't directly dangerous in the same manner, it's still just a waste of oil that's causing problems. Almost all countries have an alternative. Most of them sell plastic bags. It's just single use plastics that are an absolute waste and don't degrade.

  12. Re:Billion? by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

    According to Oxford dictionary, a billion is now a thousand million in both British and real English.

    Indeed UK used to have so called 'long scale' but now sticks with short.
    More on names of large numbers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Another link with some historical details: https://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/u...

    To me the long scale seems more logical 'ards' as thousands (10^3) and 'lions' as millions (10^6), but unification is more important in this case, and we all know which one will win.

  13. Re:Why would any American country ban plastic bags by skids · · Score: 1

    They are starting to realize a lot of the freshwater microplastic is from large businesses putting compostables in plastics bags which get ground up and spread on fields.

    We recycle all our plastic bags here... it isn't hard. However given that their are always going to be assholes throwing them out the car window, I suppose it is better to phase them out. Which means I need some sort of mnemonic for remembering to put the reusables back in the car. And better reusables than the crap ones the grocery store sells which can't hold three 2-liters without ripping the side because they sewed the handle support into a single ply of cloth... and usually straight through foil on the thermal bags, which goes first since it cannot stretch. Stupid.

  14. What about soft drink bottles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Soft drinks are a much worse waste of plastic. Every day at lunch i have a bottle. The weight of a bottle far exceeds that of a plastic bag (a hundred times?). A bag is an environmental problem as they travel and get places but really bottles are much worse problem surely? Soft drink companies really need to think about this as they have to be the worst offenders by a huge margin. Capitalism sure!y has to take some blame as if someone made it expensive to create these then a solution would be found? Future generations will look at us with shame and we obviously are just ignoring it but know better.

    1. Re:What about soft drink bottles? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Make rope out of them?

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    2. Re:What about soft drink bottles? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      what about them? It is well known that plastic bag use can easily be cut massively because a number of countries have done so. It's not a big win but it's an easy one. Do you reckon we should ignore it while fighting a bigger problem and not reap the benefit of merely good while chasing perfection?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  15. Re:Billion? by arth1 · · Score: 1

    To me the long scale seems more logical

    Indeed.

    With the long scale, it's easy to understand what the name represents:
    billion = 10^(6 * bi) = 10^12
    trillion = 10^(6 * tri) = 10^15 ...
    septillion = 10^(6 * sept) = 10^42

    With the short scale, it's harder to remember, as it's two operations:
    billion = 10^(3 + 3 * bi) = 10^9
    trillion = 10^(3 + 3 * tri) = 10^12 ...
    septillion = 10^(3 + 3 * sept) = 10^24

    Also, with we need the long scale to fully appreciate the following gruk:

    Nature, it seems, is the popular name
        for milliards and milliards and milliards
    of particles playing their infinite game
        of billiards and billiards and billiards.
    -- Piet Hein

    At any rate, "thousand millions" is unambiguous in both scales, so highly recommended.

  16. Re:Billion? by vikingpower · · Score: 2

    If I have a discussion with, say, a non-techie on, say, power usages, and most of the figures we quote are of the order of magnitude of some hundreds of kiloWatts, then it makes perfect sense to treat an outlier as several thousand kiloWatts, and not as a few Megawatts, it seems to me. An engineer would immediately folow me making a jump into Megawatts, a non-techie not necessarily so.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  17. I guess you've never heard of paper bags by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    They're quite common in some places and for smaller loads work fine. For bigger supermarket visits you can buy a proper bag that will last years.

    1. Re:I guess you've never heard of paper bags by Raenex · · Score: 1

      [Paper bags are] quite common in some places and for smaller loads work fine.

      There's an environmental cost to paper, too.

      For bigger supermarket visits you can buy a proper bag that will last years.

      You have to use that bag over a 100 times to make up for the costs of producing it versus plastic bags. And of course you have to clean it, and it won't serve secondary uses such as picking up dog poop. And people will inevitably forget or buy new reusable bags at a rate that ends costing more in the long run.

    2. Re:I guess you've never heard of paper bags by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      OTOH it won't be sitting in landfill or floating around in the ocean for 100 years and won't poison the food chain. And some of the unpleasent chemicals used in paper production are the bleaches used for white paper. For brown bags they're irrelevant. The acids used can easily be neutralised.

  18. Re:Billion? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    registered Chile as using 3,400 million plastic bags per year, or 200 per person.

    3,400 million ... apparently the person writing this has never heard of the concept of billion.

    What an odd way to write that.

    Apparentley the person who wrote that is an ignorant Xenophobe who doesn't know that other countries do things differently than his.

    --
    No sig today...
  19. Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I live in a "bagless" community. It's not that bad and "bagless" is a serious misnomer.

    First of all there are the exceptions. You still get bags at the produce aisle in the grocery store, at the liquor store, and several other places. The local bylaw that implemented this had to be amended once or twice to increase the number of allowed exceptions. Reusable bags (themselves made from recycled plastic) are sold everywhere.

    The main thing is to remember to bring your reusable bags when you go shopping. And if you forget, you buy a couple more reusable bags on the spot. So it's not about banning bags, it's about reducing the number of bags, and mainly about reducing the number of "single use" bags.

    It's made a difference too. There are noticeably fewer bags blowing around as litter and garbage, which is a win in my book. Few things make an area look worse than thousands of bags choking a street, a field, or a grove of trees.

  20. Re:Theocracy rules by Zedrick · · Score: 1

    If you're not a "religious" environmentalist, you are ignorant and/or suicidal.

    Most people, at least in the western world (apart from the US, where some people seems to think nature is a communist plot), are environmentalists no matter where they are are on the political spectrum. It's a matter of survival.

  21. Paper plants want to ban plastic bags. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Stores in and near Portland, Oregon stopped supplying plastic bags. The reason appeared to be that International Paper (world map) has a plant near Portland.

    Paper is far more damaging to the environment. First, a huge truck must go to a place where there are trees. The trees are cut and trucked to a processing plant. The plant uses poisonous chemicals to make the paper.

    The problem appears to be that there is not sufficient identification and recycling of waste. Plastic should not be allowed in streams and rivers.

    Paper buried in trash areas can eventually degrade, but that usually doesn't happen because there is usually not enough oxygen to support the breakdown process.

    1. Re:Paper plants want to ban plastic bags. by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do your realize that your downsides also apply to plastic? Poisonous chemicals and decomposition in landfills are problems for plastic bags too.

    2. Re:Paper plants want to ban plastic bags. by hey! · · Score: 1

      And petroleum extraction, refinery and conversion into plastic doesn't use trucks, heavy machinery, or toxic chemicals?

      Evaluating the environmental impacts of two alternative products is not so simple. In theory an plastic bag could be more sustainable than paper, because the molecules in it can be recycled indefinitely. So at one extreme you have a hypothetical world where everyone was scrupulous about recycling every last scrap of plastic; in such a world plastic would have less impact. At the other extreme you have a world in which there is no recycling at all. In that world paper is likely more sustainable, because they molecules are are recycled by decomposition over the course of months rather than decades.

      In the world we actually live in, switching from one to the other is a matter of shifting environmental damage from one place to another. So the best choice might well depend on your locality and the problems you -- although plastic has a smaller carbon footprint.

      Of course paper vs. plastic doesn't exhaust the possibilities. There's also disposable vs. reusable. In that, a sturdy polyethylene fiber (e.g., "Tyvek") bag may well be the winner.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  22. Pointless by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    95% of the plastic in the oceans comes from Africa and Asia.

    1. Re:Pointless by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Yeah someone else is doing something worse so we should never try to do anything better.

      Insightful my arse.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  23. Re:Theocracy rules by Kohath · · Score: 1

    It's a matter of survival.

    Environmentalism has only been a thing since the 1970s. It became a religion in the 1980s when it transcended rational conservation and became about advancing the sanctity of "the Earth" rather than making choices that were best for humans.

    Before 1970, end-times Earth apocalypse wasn't a threat to survival. Now you're enlightened, so now survival requires daily rituals and observances and sacrifice.

  24. Some of the paper plants in Chile: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "CMPC is a Chilean pulp and paper company, being one of the biggest in Latin America. ... Revenue: US$ 5.1 billion (2017)"

    Another plant: CELCO Valdivia Pulp Mill pollution: "The company had been dumping more dioxins and heavy metals than had been approved by the regulating agencies into the river from a waste tube that had been approved by the authorities. It had also been producing far above levels approved in its Environmental Impact Assessment, and was cited for multiple violations of environmental and health laws."

    "In July 2007 CELCO agreed to pay CLP$614 millions to Valdivian tourism companies to avoid legal actions for supposed losses of the tourism sector of Valdivia due to contamination of Carlos Anwandter Nature Sanctuary."

    "The Secretary of State for the Environment said that, despite having large financial and technical resources, CELCO had an extremely poor environmental record."

  25. Re:Really? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

    Saving the Earth is very rational - there is no replacement for the planet in the foreseeable future.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  26. Take your canvas bags by rsilvergun · · Score: 1
    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  27. Re:Theocracy rules by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    If you're not a "religious" environmentalist, you are ignorant and/or suicidal.

    Not suicidal, just homicidal. Old rich people have nothing to fear.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  28. Plastic is made from natural gas. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    How much oil is used to make plastic?: "Although crude oil is a source of raw material (feedstock) for making plastics, it is not the major source of feedstock for plastics production in the United States."

    Natural gas is less polluting. Still a problem, but not as much of a problem as using oil.

    1. Re:Plastic is made from natural gas. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      And?

      Natural gas as the feedstock does not change that you have to react that feedstock with other chemicals. And those are toxic, like the chemicals used to create paper.

  29. Re:Theocracy rules by Kohath · · Score: 1

    It's almost as though people hate to see plastic bags up in their trees.....It's almost as though they have .. aesthetics?

    Poor people can’t afford your whimsical aesthetics.

  30. To all those that think it is a bad idea by houghi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The comments so far that I have read anout how this is bad are basically reduced to "This is an inconvinience for me." and then tryt to find another reason. So here is how it works in places where they are already doing this.

    Instead of using a bag one time, you take a cotton bag that you can use many times over years. You take it with you when you go shopping. Sure, you will forget it a few times, but most people are not snowflakes and will start to remember, just like you remember to take your phone with you.

    Where I live most people can not use the bag for trash anyway. You need to buy special bags for special garbage. So there is no gain there.

    The single use items need to stop. I just bought 4 microSD cards and the amount of garbadge I got with it is immense. I get a SD sleeve (or whatever it is called) that I do not need. They are placed in a plastic that I do not need inside an even bigger plastic that is put inside a carton. That was the put inside a box that was filled with filling paper. 4 microSD cards Could have bneen send in an envelope, yet they decided to use the size of a small shoebox. I guess 99.9% waste.

    I also use 1 use-based items, because I am as lazy as the rest (and perhaps even more so as I do this at work), yet I changed my behaviour in using plastic bags and I did not try to sweasel my way out of it and find excuses. I adapted my behaviour and after a month it was ok.

    So now when I go shopping, I take two small nags that are both the size of a wallet with me. I always have at least one with me at all times in case I suddenly need it. Something like this and yes, they exist in other materials as well, but you need to search foir yourself as I am lazy and my shift is almost over.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:To all those that think it is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reusable cotton bags have been found to harbor festering colonies of disease-causing bacteria.
      Go ahead and put your raw food in them. I'll use sanitary plastic bags, thank you very much.
      If you need sources, GTFW.

      The reason the SD cards are packaged that way is so shoplifters and warehouse workers can't pocket them. Not a great solution, but cheaper than trying to catch and meaningfully prosecute scumbags.

    2. Re:To all those that think it is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. You have to use that damned cloth bag over 300 times to break even. It's a joke. I bought plastic bags online and just use those. It's fine.
      https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/09/to-tote-or-note-to-tote/498557/

    3. Re:To all those that think it is a bad idea by edi_guy · · Score: 1
      Same here. The area I live in banned plastic bags and charges you 10-25 cents for a paper bag. Initially I was bitchy about it as well, but after a couple weeks you are totally used to it and the refuse that is floating around the streets is demonstrably, much greatly reduced. It's so much better, I wouldn't go back even if they let us. In a recent trip back to my childhood home I was astounded at the amount of plastic bag litter that existed. Add in the stuff that blows out to sea, the difficulty recycling, etc. My Trader Joe's bags have lasted for over 4 years, at 99 cents each, a bargain. And no stupid bags breaking in the parking lot.

      Second great thing cities should look at, is commercial scale composting. Green bin for foodstuffs, soiled paper towels, tissues etc. The city picks it up once a week with your trash/recycling. In a large setting (think bulldozers/front loaders rotating the piles) the heat generated is quite high and the stuff breaks down very quickly into compost. Doesn't stink up your place (except for shrimp peels...that stuff stinks)

  31. Obvious point being missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good job Chile!!!!!!!
    Chile has taken leadership and did the right thing, now who's is next!?

  32. Re:Really? by Kohath · · Score: 1

    You sound like a denier. What makes you doubt the plastic bag apocalypse?

    Sure, all the rest of the apocalypses turned out to be hugely exaggerated or outright false. But c'mon, plastic bags!!!

  33. Re:Billion? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    It's a milliard. We already have it.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  34. Re:Theocracy rules by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    Environmentalism has only been a thing since the 1970s.

    Or for the past couple thousand years. But close enough, eh?

  35. Re:Really? by Raenex · · Score: 1

    But c'mon, plastic bags!!!

    I hear they suffocate you in your sleep. Will no one save us from this plastic bag menace?

  36. Can somebody explain this joke to me? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    It got modded +5 so I assume there's a joke here but I'm lacking context.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Can somebody explain this joke to me? by Topwiz · · Score: 1
  37. What's proper? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    if you mean recycling they were just being shipped to China and dumped in landfills there. If you mean "thrown in with the rest of the trash" isn't the issue that they're filling up landfills?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  38. Poop in the street by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    I guess they don't get the unintended consequences of things like that. When they did that in California, they eliminated the only refuge for the homeless to dispose of their waste in a sanitary manner.

    It's why there's so much human feces all over the streets and sidewalks in San Francisco and San Diego these days. And where the hepatitis outbreaks came from.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
    1. Re:Poop in the street by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Works fine in England and Ireland.

      Maybe that's just an American problem, not a generic unintended consequence.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  39. Re:Plastic bags by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    Never mind cat poop. What do all the homeless people do with their human poop?

    San Francisco poop map

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  40. Re:Billion oddities. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    it's not as bad as detractors would have it

    I'm a detractor and I say that it's like Latin with the grammar tooked out.

    Are you saying it isn't?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  41. Re:Why would any American country ban plastic bags by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    A link follows to a map of the ten rivers. Trigger alert! Daily Mail ahead, Do Not Soil Yourselves: link

    I suspect we're going to see a lot fewer of these plastic patch, oceans are full of plastic stories now that the bulk (90%+) of the problem has been credibly traced to Asia. Doubtless they'll try to attribute it all to "western consumption herp derp," but it's still a speed bump and will reduce coverage dramatically.

    So... problem solved! We now return you to your regularly scheduled Carbon anxiety stories.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  42. Re:Really? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    It does help.
    Plastic crap leaks plasticisers that are not healthy for organisms that take that plastic crap with their food. This absolutely can disrupt whole ecosystems.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap