Slashdot Mirror


57% of Tech Workers Are Suffering From Job Burnout, Survey Finds (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A survey conducted among the tech workers, including many employees of Silicon Valley's elite tech companies, has revealed that over 57% of respondents are suffering from job burnout. The survey was carried out by the makers of an app that allows employees to review workplaces and have anonymous conversations at work, behind their employers' backs. Over 11K employees answered one question -- if they suffer from job burnout, and 57.16% said "Yes."

The company with the highest employee burnout rate was Credit Karma, with a whopping 70.73%, followed by Twitch (68.75%), Nvidia (65.38%), Expedia (65.00%), and Oath (63.03% -- Oath being the former Yahoo company Verizon bought in July 2017). On the other end of the spectrum, Netflix ranked with the lowest burnout rate of only 38.89%, followed by PayPal (41.82%), Twitter (43.90%), Facebook (48.97%), and Uber (49.52%).

181 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. I hole-hardedly agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But, allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like itâ(TM)s a peach of cake.

    1. Re: I hole-hardedly agree... by f3rret · · Score: 1

      It's copypasta.
      What'd you expect?

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  2. I just landed my first career IT gig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    My blood pressure has never been higher!

    Not to mention my managers who openly joke about how being stressed "is just something you deal with" and openly laugh about it in front of me anytime someone mentions it.

    Fark this noise

    1. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try working construction for minimum wage and not knowing where your next job will come from. Then have your blood pressure tested.

    2. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've done both (since there are almost no tech jobs where I live and I refuse to move). I can certainly say that while writing code and designing hardware (I do both) is stressful and dealing with insane deadlines and stupid managers can certainly be frustrating. Blue collar work is far more damaging to your body. As an engineer you worry about what will happen in your 40's when being hired becomes more difficult. If you're a construction worker you worry about that next injury taking you out and living under a bridge.

    3. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by penix1 · · Score: 1

      Try working Emergency Management. Then you will know real pressure.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    4. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Jfetjunky · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is usually the type of thing I tell myself to keep perspective. But the truth is that tech jobs can be stressful too. I imagine people in blue collar jobs believe we are living high on the hog with not a care in the world, but it's not really that way. But I also have two brothers that work jobs requiring much more manual labor. It absolutely takes a toll on your body.

      We've recently had a few people come over to hardware management (I am a hardware developer). Both my manager and I told them, hardware projects change EVERY DAY. Every day its, "so and so (big customer) just had issues with this", or "The market is way behind on these parts and we are short", or "The product you just designed is failing ____ test right now, what are we doing to fix it".

      I've watched it drive many people out. My own mentor told me when I first started "I'll tell you the first thing my Mentor told me, 'Get out now'". A bit much for a new engineer to take in, but now I know why he said it. Right before he left the company, he started telling me he wasn't sure how much longer he could handle the pressure.

      Honestly, I don't care as much about the pay, the fancy benefits, or any of the fluff. What has nearly drove me out is when I feel like every day is just another barrage of unbounded problems. Like you're the guy on the track, your problem is the chains holding you there, and management is driving the train and they aren't slowing it down. You better get those chains undone.

      I've been an auto mechanic, welder, machinist, and now EE. My back-up plan / exit strategy is machining. I enjoy it, it is so much more bounded (in my opinion), and still presents good challenges to keep me engaged. I already have a colleague in another company on his way. We've talked at length about it.

    5. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Then just go get a construction job and quit complaining.

    6. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Try living in a shack not knowing where your next meal comes from.

    7. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Most people I know self medicate with alcohol or pot. You take caffeinate during the day and then hit a bar to come down.

    8. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Strongit · · Score: 1

      This. My team at my old job was the sole reason the company started handing out drink tickets at company events. We racked up a 5 digit bill between 18 people.

    9. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      " and I'd rather be outside moving around and getting shit done... even if it is tough physical work. "

      You just said that. What are you getting so upset about snowflake? Go do it then.

    10. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by The-Ixian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try living in a paper bag in the middle of the lake and then talk to me about your resort shack!

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    11. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by rkordmaa · · Score: 2

      Learn your fair share of Dilbertism, then it's not so bad anymore. Can't keep stressing out all the time, you gotta learn when something is really on fire and when you can just not give a fuck. "Customer just had an idea" type of situations can more often that not be ignored until they go away. "Production is down, entire factory has just stopped working because of your mistake" kind of situations cannot be ignored, even if it's bloody 2am. Just make sure stuff like that doesn't happen very often and you will have less to stress out about.

    12. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      At least you have water. My shack is in the desert.

    13. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Construction doesn’t pay minimum wage.

    14. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Cederic · · Score: 1

      In the UK those are day rates, not hourly. Not many people will get $1000/day.

      Shit, the top-end consultancies are only charging $4-5k/day for their senior talent and that comes with their full support structure underneath it.

      I work for blue chip companies and they just wouldn't countenance $500/hour. There just aren't individual skillsets we can't get for much cheaper.

    15. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Cederic · · Score: 1

      What has nearly drove me out is when I feel like every day is just another barrage of unbounded problems. Like you're the guy on the track, your problem is the chains holding you there, and management is driving the train and they aren't slowing it down. You better get those chains undone.

      That's common across software development too. There are multiple approaches and techniques for dealing with it, many of which don't require you to quit the job (or profession).

      What doesn't get taught are those approaches and techniques, and (worse than that) people failing to understand them (let alone implementing them badly) mean that people frequently reject the things that might help them.

      If I knew how to solve this I'd make a fortune. Shit, people are making fortunes just pretending they know how to solve this.

    16. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Some of us don't want to switch off. Hell, deep programming bugs are best solved while having a shit, or in the shower, or (if you're into that) both.

      The trick for me was dissociating the work from my personal sense of self. I had to learn that I am not my work, and more importantly, my work is not me. Sometimes work doesn't follow the route I want; these days I've learned look at the new route and identify how to make that work for me.

    17. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by jockeys · · Score: 1

      LUXURY. We used to DREAM of having a shack.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    18. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by jbengt · · Score: 1

      It does in economically depressed areas of non-union states.

    19. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But the truth is that tech jobs can be stressful too. I imagine people in blue collar jobs believe we are living high on the hog with not a care in the world, but it's not really that way.

      I was pulling long hours one week to try and finish a software update in time. The deadline was fast approaching and the outlook was grim. As usual, the cleaning lady came by to collect the trash that evening and we got to chit-chatting like we usually did (I arrived late and stayed late back then, so my being there when she did her rounds was perfectly normal). Part way through the conversation she paused for a moment, then said something to the effect of, "You know, before I started working here I used to think that you guys all had it easy with your cushy jobs and nice offices. But then I see people here with the look that you have in your eyes right now and I realize I was wrong. It's just as tough. Different, but just as tough, if not tougher."

      I think I mustered a tired "Thanks?" in response.

      I don't make any claim to having it tougher than anyone else (I have a MASSIVE appreciation for manual workers, among many other fields, since I couldn't do that work), but the only people I find suggesting that tech work is easy are those who either aren't in the field and have no awareness of what it entails, or those who are a burden on everyone else around them in the field.

    20. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by Shotgun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked for a large company that made networking equipment. My job was to run a sanity test framework for their operating system. Developers load the images in a queue, the system pulls them, loads them on real hardware, and executes a body of tests.

      The problem was that a bad image would hose the system to where it couldn't reboot, and then it would not be able to correct itself. Every image after that would fail. My job was to come in, clean up the mess, and apologize to each developer. It was actually stressful.

      I repeatedly told the manager how I could fix it, and he always said we didn't have time. I waited for him to travel for a week, I shut down the system, and fixed it so that the system got completely initialized between every run. From that point on, every failure was a real failure cause by that developer's changes.

      My job became a cake walk. I find most of the stress in this industry is self induced by clueless fucks being in charge.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    21. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Why would you not be able to find another high paid job? You've got skills, you've got contacts, you have wide-ranging experience.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    22. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by dev-in-seattle · · Score: 1

      Congrats on your new career. How were you able to make that change? Usually there's a lot of education and background experience required to get to the point of employability. We need more people to see the opportunity, there's a severe worker shortage in tech/it/software development related fields.

    23. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Note that he said "IT" rather than development. Really, what kind of programmer is on call?

      Switching off for a sysadmin means not responding to fires or people calling about fires.

      Programmers occasionally have to deal with those big puzzles that consume their soul.

    24. Re:I just landed my first career IT gig by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Music while cycling in traffic is suicidal. Compartmentalize those two separately and listen to your favorite black metal while in a safe location, not while 3 ton metal death machines are zooming by your comparatively frail human body.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  3. Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> one question -- if they suffer from job burnout, and 57.16% said "Yes."

    I doubt they know what burnout is then. Are you dragging yourself to work AND finding yourself still getting there two hours late because fuckit AND then working at home past when you really wanted to go to bed multiple nights in a row AND hating your job AND not caring if the current deathmarch you are on actually yields a product? Then, yes, you're burned out and it's time to find a cush corporate job or maybe just a few weeks of beach/mountain/whatever. Did someone at work hurt your feelings this week but you're still OK with the work for the money? Well then not so much.

    1. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      Are you dragging yourself to work AND finding yourself still getting there two hours late because fuckit AND then working at home past when you really wanted to go to bed multiple nights in a row AND hating your job AND not caring if the current deathmarch you are on actually yields a product?

      Wait, this doesn't happen to 100% of people in 100% of jobs ?

    2. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> gatekeep

      The word you are looking for is "define". Yes, this survey did a piss-poor job of defining "job burnout" so I'm helping them with the task.

    3. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Telling people that aren't being abused quite as badly as you are that they aren't being abused is itself a kind of abuse.

      That you are in worse straits than some others does not qualify you to define the term for those others. There are also people worse off than you are, is your life therefore perfect?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by hai_Priesty · · Score: 1

      While the definition of burnout might not have been adequately explained to the surveyed and thus make me doubt a little of its accuracy , I suspect the percentage of Tech Workers that burnt out is higher than the 57% quoted, considering the possibility of even higher % of the severely burnout left IT for other fields, or worse, suffered ill health (physical of mental) and is now sitting at home broken. The survey seem to only question those still fit enough and produce good enough quality of work output to not get fired.

    5. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> the percentage of Tech Workers that burnt out is higher than the 57% quoted, considering the possibility of even higher % of the severely burnout left IT for other fields, or worse, suffered ill health (physical of mental) and is now sitting at home broken

      Over their lifetime? Yes, I'd say the "burned out at least once in their lifetime" number is higher than 57%. (I've been there myself twice in a twenty-year career.) My original point is that you need to understand that there's a real difference between "golly, this job is _hard_ and not everyone _likes_ me" and "I really can't handle this shit". If 57% of us were all at the second point ("I'm truly burned out") at any given point in time, then IT/tech would seriously cease to function.

      Career-wise you just need to make sure you're making enough bank during the high-stress periods of your job that you CAN say "fuck it - I'm going home" on any given Tuesday at 2:14pm, if that's when you realize you're truly burned out (and your health/marriage/friendships/parenting/etc. is suffering).

    6. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by TomBauserman · · Score: 2

      Are you seriously trying to gatekeep job burnout? This is some quintessential crotchety greybeard material.

      gatekeep? You going to call someone a virtue signaller next?

    7. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      >> gatekeep The word you are looking for is "define". Yes, this survey did a piss-poor job of defining "job burnout" so I'm helping them with the task.

      A good definition would be "your only motivation for coming in to work and doing your job is so you don't make a mistake and have all 8 of your bosses stopping by to hassle you about TPS reports."

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    8. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      +1 funny!

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    9. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> your only motivation for coming in to work and doing your job is so you don't make a mistake and have all 8 of your bosses stopping by

      If you don't go into work, you won't have any bosses stopping by: problem solved! (In all seriousness, make sure this is really in your solution set and you'll be happier wherever you are.)

    10. Re:Not sure you know what "burn out" is then by ath1901 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the survey means nothing since they didn't define burnout. The results would have been different if they had used something like:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      It's not really burnout until you start experiencing mental deficiencies (cognitive or emotional).

  4. Surprise, working people to death leads to burnout by sinij · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tech work culture is seriously broken when 80 hour weeks and never going on vacation for any reason is encouraged and celebrated. Burnout under such conditions is inevitable.

  5. Gee, I can't imagine why? by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Long on call hours. Declining inflation adjusted wages. Having to spend hours and hours of your own time training because companies don't train anymore. Constant threats of outsourcing or being replaced by an H1-B applicant (despite the fact that that is explicitly illegal).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Gee, I can't imagine why? by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      ...and companies not investing in proper process creation, leading to duplicate or incorrect work because no one knows what is going on.

      ...and companies choosing to hire new management externally instead of promoting from within, creating management that has power and no idea how the company does things.

      ...and companies that think culture means free lunch and happy hour.

    2. Re:Gee, I can't imagine why? by H3lldr0p · · Score: 1

      Imagine some of the opposites here.

      A company that jumps at every opportunity to create a process but never does anything with them.

      A company that only promotes from within and then wonders why they can't move on to new tech as no one knows it or how to introduce it.

      A company that doesn't do any get togethers with anyone since in their mind family comes first.

      There are good ways to do these things and bad ways. The trick is knowing which is which.

  6. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Always take it. Every year -- don't set a precedent that you're overly hard-working...

  7. Re:What we need to enact... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    Or at least raise the wage floor where overtime == time and a half. Obama tried this, Trump unfortunately rolled it back. Also, sometimes you need to work overtime two weeks in a row, crunch time to finish a project. I'd change that requirement to get the time back to something like a 2-3 month period.

  8. Re:Define "Burnout" by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Insightful

    $250k/yr if you have no time to enjoy it is worthless unless you plan to work for a few years, live like a miser, and invest enough of it in rental property so you never have to work again.

  9. A good chunk of it is probably incentive by MikeRT · · Score: 2

    If companies were to regularly take 10-20% of their profits and divide them up into bonuses for employees who work overtime, I bet a lot of these people would be much happier. Where I work, it is just a given that even if you brought in a few million dollars of new work for the company, if you're not "management," you typically don't see a bonus. Then they wonder why no one below management tends to give a damn about finding new business unless they're guaranteed a salaried slot on it (which is rare, so motivation is low).

    1. Re:A good chunk of it is probably incentive by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Not enough. Money is not a substitute for time off and free time.

    2. Re:A good chunk of it is probably incentive by Cederic · · Score: 1

      People are rarely motivated by just money. One thing that a lot of people value is time out of the office.

      Giving them more money often has minimal impact.

    3. Re:A good chunk of it is probably incentive by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you'd think. But that's more true of physical labor rather than knowledge workers.

      Still... That's a pretty obvious path to apathy when making the company millions doesn't get you a dime.

  10. What is the opposite of burnout?... by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    ... because that word describes my current situation quite well. I do work a ton, on quite demanding stuff and by taking lots of risk. Currently, I am not precisely earning a lot. But I do love my job, perhaps even a bit too much. And I think that this is the key issue here: really liking what you do or not.

    "Most of tech workers not liking their jobs are suffering from job burnout" sounds more descriptive of the actual reality. The tech world does seem quite tough for those not truly enjoying it, in general or under the given conditions.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    1. Re:What is the opposite of burnout?... by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      Stockholm Syndrome?

      I work for myself and I put lots of effort/time into getting what I want in the way I want it. I see it as an long-term investment. Anyone directly enjoying the outputs of my work will always pay the fair price. In any case, my point was that, even under very tough conditions, tech doesn't seem too burnout-prone, at least among those really liking it.

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    2. Re:What is the opposite of burnout?... by losfromla · · Score: 1

      If you're working for yourself, at your own company or pet project then you are not part of the group under discussion. Go set yourself over next to Elon there, you can give each other a wank while you discuss how much more productive you are now that you moved a couch into your workspace.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    3. Re:What is the opposite of burnout?... by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      Go set yourself over next to Elon there

      So, I say that I am self-employed and you are automatically assuming that I am rich (Elon-like rich!!). At least in my country, Spain, self-employment represents a relevant proportion of the total workforce and most of them are far from being rich. Usually, this situation is associated with systematically (over-)working and taking lots of risk. In fact, my situation is a quite extreme case as far as meeting my expectations is very difficult and, as clearly highlighted in my profile description, I don't have too much money. Even if my situation wasn't that hard, it would probably have been worse than the one of most of US-based developers, whose salaries and working conditions are really good.

      I have to work much harder than someone with a full-time job (looking for clients, promoting myself, managing lots of others issues, etc.) and this doesn't even guarantee me to get money. Logically, the potential benefits are much higher than the ones associated with a more conservative situation, exactly the same that happens with anything else. On the other hand, for someone like Elon (not sure about his whole life story but I understand that his family is wealthy) there isn't exactly a properly speaking risk as far as converting a lot into much more is relatively easy. This is certainly not my situation. My personality is also quite far away from ideas like egoism, narcissism, careerist, etc. which seem advantageous under these conditions. I might even say that my personality and expectations have a relevant negative impact on my growth as a self-employed programmer.

      Long story short: burnout would be the most probable outcome of my working conditions if I wouldn't like my job (basically coding, data analysing and having lots of things up and running perfectly; I also might move a couch or take care of lots of things about which a full-time employee will never have to worry, but all of this is unpaid over-work) so much. I can certainly choose my working conditions or with whom I want to work, but that comes at some expense similarly to what happens when you quit a job which you don't like.

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    4. Re:What is the opposite of burnout?... by losfromla · · Score: 1

      I was not assuming you were Elon-rich, if you read my comment, you will notice that I never described you as wealthy. So your entire rant is based on a misread of my very clear response, the self-employed are in a different category.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    5. Re:What is the opposite of burnout?... by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      So your entire rant is based on a misread of my very clear response, the self-employed are in a different category.

      My entire rant was based on the idea underlying your whole post that I or what I do or what most of self-employed programmers do is related at all to what someone like Elon Musk, personally (billionaire) or as per his job (C-level tasks in a multi-billion company), does at work. And I explained you that I do pretty much everything that any full-time employee does (senior developer specialising in quite demanding stuff) + many other things = more burnout probability for me. I understood both your post and your misperception (+ prejudices?) perfectly.

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    6. Re:What is the opposite of burnout?... by losfromla · · Score: 1

      You read things into my post that were not written in my post. The underlying idea behind my post was not what you imagined it to be. The underlying idea was that you do what you do for yourself and your own enrichment. No one makes you do it, that was the point. Anything else was you letting your imagination put things into my response that were not written there. I only used Elon as an example because if I used some more obscure person or someone from the past, like early-days Wozniak, the post would have become awkwardly long and less relatable.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    7. Re:What is the opposite of burnout?... by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      you do for yourself and your own enrichment. No one makes you do it, that was the point.

      Can you please tell me what are the motivations of full-time employees as opposed to mine? Employees want to enrich themselves and nobody forces them to work on a given company. If they don't like certain conditions, they could try to get a different job. Exactly the same than I do by replacing jobs/bosses with clients. If I want to find ideal clients, I would have to spend much more time/effort/money, like any employee rejecting non-ideal jobs.

      Although your intention is slightly clearer now, your post still shows your misconception regarding what self-employment involves. You picture a very famous, rich, successful version without understanding that this is the best possible outcome, not a descriptive sample. Usually, the over-work or stress levels associated with riskier situations are much higher. A salary, long-term job gives stability, quasi-certainty, a controlled environment; even the working conditions are usually easier as far as you have to follow instructions and bear a limited amount of responsibility. Equivalent ideas can be applied to small, struggling companies vs. big, well-established ones.

      One descriptive example: company A wants a given piece of software to be built and hires company B. In company B, the upper managers B1, B2 and B3 will take all the blame for any problem with the contract, payments, company A not liking the product, etc. Boss B4 will be responsible for any miscommunication between upper management and the technical levels. Bosses B5 and B6, leading the two development teams taking care of the implementation, will be held responsible for any technical problem avoiding company A to have the contracted product as expected. Developer B53, developing the modules 1, 2 and 3, will take all the blame for any problem provoked by a mistake in any of those. Developer B53 might not like these specific tasks or boss B5 might be pushing him a bit too much (because boss B4 is pushing him too, because...). His working conditions, in this project or in general, might be objectively very hard and he might burn out. But he is doing this work because he wants. He is being pushed because he accepts to be pushed. And he is not looking for any other job because he doesn't want to do so. Now replace company B with self-employee C and unify all these stratified responsibilities, stresses, problems into the same person. This is what self-employment is basically about. A different story is self-employee C (because of having lots of work or having lots of money or because of whatever reason) hiring other people, becoming the top boss with absolute independence and basically performing the kind of tasks that your comments are suggesting. Technically speaking this would be a company and self-employee C would be its owner. On the other hand, this isn't necessarily the normal or even ideal evolution of self-employment; some people might not even aspire to be bosses and to manage people, but just to continue performing their work under the conditions they want.

      By taking your Apple analogy, my situation wouldn't be like the one of Jobs (manager) + Wozniak (technical stuff), but like just a Wozniak with no Jobs and not wanting to have one. In fact, this is a very common form of self-employment: specialised workers focusing on what they are good at, by taking all the risk and looking for the conditions they want. They leave the safety of a regular salary and other people taking care of lots of side issues, over-work a lot and, eventually, accomplish what they want or get burnout after having been dealing with many more problems than what a full-time employee will ever do. They certainly decide to do that, exactly the same that anyone working for a company makes that conscious decision. You might prefer a more conservative approach and perhaps cannot even understand why self-employment exist, but thinking that taking much more risk/responsibility doesn't notably increase

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  11. Re: Demand vaca time and use it. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    The medical field in the US still values its employees, unlike IT.

  12. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with not being promoted -- just do your job well, take your pay and vacation time. Work to live, don't live to work. A snazzy job title isn't the pinnacle of human achievement.

  13. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by jrumney · · Score: 2

    Meanwhile, in the civilised world, the government would be sending in labour inspectors and shutting your employer down if they heard that they gave you 3 weeks vacation, and only after you demanded it.

  14. Re:What we need to enact... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

    In my field, year-long spikes are common.

    I'd support having all such things (including scheduled days off, vacation, overtime/comp time, etc.) kept indefinitely, with maximum caps for each kind. If an employee leaves for any reason, including being fired, they get paid out whatever they haven't used.

    I'm quite happy to help my team meet their goals and go the extra mile to deliver a quality product to our customer..... but I certainly expect that once that's done, I'll get to go spend time with my family.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  15. Re:What we need to enact... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    If the spike is a year long, time to hire more people vs abusing your own workers.

  16. The office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've done a lot of Peopleware like consulting, mostly for software development teams. The IT office space is in general the enemy of these teams. They are noisy and destroy your concentration. You can only break someones concentration for a finite number per day, certainly with introverts, after that the dev is just excausted. As a rule of thumb, the correlation is more people wearing headphones -> more burnout. It's fucked up that people need to wear headphones to attempt to do their work, and a clear sign the environment is poison to their jobs. Of course they put all these people in the same space, to save money. Hardly ever do they do the math, and contemplate how much it costs them in burnout and turnover.

  17. so... by buddyglass · · Score: 5, Informative

    Does this result argue for wider adoption of Netflix's H.R. model, as expressed in the manifesto that went viral a few years back? Namely:

    1. Hire "A" players, because the competence of one's coworkers is a large contributor to employee satisfaction.
    2. Don't use golden handcuffs as a means of mitigating hiring churn; you want employees to stay at the company because they want to be there. Employees choose how much stock they want vs. cash.
    3. Don't use performance based bonuses; high performance is the base level expectation, not something to be singled out and rewarded.
    4. "We're a team, not a family." You don't "cut" people from a family; you do "cut" people from a pro sports team.
    5. "Hard work - Not Relevant". They care about productivity, not how hard you worked to be productive.
    6. Low tolerance for "brilliant jerks".
    7. Pay "top of market" wages. "One outstanding employee gets more done and costs less than two 'adequate' employees." "Employees should feel they are being paid well relative to other options in the market."

    1. Re:so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      7. Pay "top of market" wages. "One outstanding employee gets more done and costs less than two 'adequate' employees." "Employees should feel they are being paid well relative to other options in the market."

      This is probably THE most important policy here, and what gets the other 99% of the market so frustrated. When you're a salaried worker with zero overtime benefit on call and working 60 - 80 hours a week, the LEAST your employer can do is pay a decent fucking wage.

      And yet, so damn many of them refuse to do so.

    2. Re:so... by TFlan91 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then refuse to work, yes you may get fired, but what's worse than getting fired? Working for free.

      My boss is lucky if I even look at my phone off-business-hours, let alone pick it up and respond.

      Sure, if an email is prefixed with "URGENT" or whatever, I take a look, but then I lazily come in the next day an hour or two "late".

      It's all about the contract you signed with your employer. Don't sign shit you haven't read, and don't sign away your youth for pennies.

    3. Re:so... by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      "Hard work - Not Relevant" is probably the most important part. Trying to implement it, however, is much harder. At some point, there'll be someone who finishes all their work in 3 hours and goes home. Most managers will intervene when they see this, either by coming up with busywork or just telling them to stay to keep up appearances.

    4. Re:so... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      And yet, so damn many of them refuse to do so.

      And yet, they continue to find people to fill those positions. I think there's just disagreement over whether "pay top wages and get top people" is the optimal strategy to pursue organization-wide. Netflix apparently believes it is. Most companies, judging by their behavior, do not. Here's why I tend to side with Netflix:

      a. The difference between "top pay" and "average pay" is not that huge. Maybe 10-20%. If your interview process is at all effective, "top pay" will probably allow you to get people who are more than 10-20% more effective than the ones you'll get at "average pay".
      b. Working with "top people" is a job perk that serves to mitigate how much pay it takes to recruit "top people". If I knew going into a salary negotiation that my coworkers would be high-quality, then I would be willing to accept a lower level of compensation.

    5. Re:so... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      you better believe they are increasing the salary of top talent

      Quite likely, since this doesn't contradict anything in their manifesto. It specifically discusses compensating employees above their individual market value. A superstar is going to have a higher individual market value. Unless I just missed it, it doesn't stipulate anywhere that all employees with a given title need to be paid roughly the same.

    6. Re:so... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No shit, of course they will. If you only had 3 hours work then you should be given more.

      If it's an occasional thing, fine. If it's regular, it suggests the employee is under utilised and that's definitely something to address.

      I've fucked off home at 2pm many times, going, "I'm not being productive, I'll see you tomorrow."
      I've also been last person in the office many times, going, "This bastard thing gets finished tonight."

      What I never do is go, "Oh, I finished all my work." I can always find new and different ways to add value to my employer.

    7. Re:so... by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      What I never do is go, "Oh, I finished all my work." I can always find new and different ways to add value to my employer.

      Just curious, how much of that value actually gets passed on to you?

    8. Re:so... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Enough that I'm taking a gap year, doing a lot of travelling, enjoying life. Not enough that I can retire.

    9. Re:so... by sad_ · · Score: 1

      Does this result argue for wider adoption of Netflix's H.R. model

      I hope not, even netflix, even though best in class, still has a burn-out rate of almost 40%, that is still way to high!

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    10. Re:so... by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      1. Hire "A" players, because the competence of one's coworkers is a large contributor to employee satisfaction.

      By definition, most players will NOT be "A" players.

    11. Re:so... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Apparently better than the alternatives, though. Perhaps Netflix's rate is the best we can hope for given the nature of the work.

    12. Re:so... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Agreed. In this context, the "A player" designation is relative to the entire universe of possible candidates. If the top 5% (choose your metric) are "A players", then Netflix may strive to hire exclusively from this small set of candidates.

  18. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by TrippTDF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lots of companies now offer "unlimited" PTO- but that really just means there is less incentive to let you take time off, and you won't get paid out for unused vacation when you leave.

    I've worked for companies that offer 2 - 3 weeks and unlimited. The companies with the unlimited policies ALWAYS track your PTO more closely than the ones that give a set number of days.

  19. Surprise, poor survey sampling gives poor results by ranton · · Score: 2

    I'm not surprised that a significant number of users who don't feel comfortable talking to coworkers without anonymity are feeling burnout at work. This wasn't a commissioned study with careful target sampling, they just showed this question to their users. The title of this article should be "57% of Tech Workers Who Use The Blind App Are Suffering From Job Burnout, Survey Finds".

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  20. Fallacy of relative privation by sjbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Try working construction for minimum wage and not knowing where your next job will come from. Then have your blood pressure tested.

    Ahh the "staving people in Africa" argument your mother made to get you to eat your vegetables. Great example of the fallacy of relative privation. Just because other people have it worse doesn't mean you should be grateful for a possibly better but still bad situation.

    1. Re:Fallacy of relative privation by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you should be grateful, but you are an ungrateful self centered little shit. Common malady.

    2. Re:Fallacy of relative privation by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Try working construction for minimum wage and not knowing where your next job will come from. Then have your blood pressure tested.

      Ahh the "staving people in Africa" argument your mother made to get you to eat your vegetables. Great example of the fallacy of relative privation. Just because other people have it worse doesn't mean you should be grateful for a possibly better but still bad situation.

      I would posit that humans in fact need someone to be worse off than them as a coping mechanism for their own suffering/misfortune/whatever. No matter what you are going through, the knowledge that someone else has it worse than you allows you to claim some sort of superiority or status over them. A child that is neglected or abused at home becomes a bully at school because he can exert power over his victims. A low wage worker in an unskilled menial job supports cutting safety nets because "I'm busting my ass and can barely get by, why should they get by for free?". It's why poverty porn works, part of why we scapegoat. Humans are hierarchical animals and in a hierarchy the worst place to be is on the bottom and, if you can't identify a group below you, you are on the bottom.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Fallacy of relative privation by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I would posit that humans in fact need someone to be worse off than them as a coping mechanism for their own suffering/misfortune/whatever

      For many of us the younger self is a perfectly adequate foil.

      Right now my income is lower than at any point since before I left school. I'm still better off than I was through large portions of my life.

      Shit, I just ordered pizza. I was 19 before I ever had a pizza that wasn't a shop bought bread base with some cheese and pepperoni on it, because pizza in restaurants was too expensive and delivery cost more.

    4. Re:Fallacy of relative privation by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Great example of the fallacy of relative privation.

      Plus 110010001000 has clearly never worked a day of construction in his life. Frankly I don't think he's ever worked a day of anything in his life, since that's hard to do from his mother's basement.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Fallacy of relative privation by losfromla · · Score: 1

      For the same reason that you're a racist douchebag, I imagine. No offense.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  21. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by houghi · · Score: 2

    Working in Belgium and some of the things I have had happened to me.This is in several companies:
    On a Friday at the end of February: Hello, you still have not taken your 5 last days and you need to take them at the end of Febrary. "So that means I have the week of next week?" Yes. OK. Have a nice day I see you after that.
    They literately told be right before I went home, so no way to hand over anything. Yes, my manager was there and wished me a nice unexpected holiday.

    Another one:
    "We see you have worked 2 hours extra, when are you going to take them this week?"

    And a nice one. We saw you worked from 9 till 5 for the last year. However we forgot to mention that this did not include you break, so please work the legal hours from now on and sorry for the misunderstanding. (No, they never asked to do those hours they paid)

    In Belgium a manager of a supermarket was fired, because he came in early to do extra work, so his employees would need to do less. That company had a strict "no overtime" policy. Mind you, before they fire somebody, they will be warned at least 2 times if not more.
    No, it did not matter that he did not claimed the payment for it.

    And having a healthy work-play relation is important in most European companies. In many places people will work 4/5, meaning having one day extra of and earning enough with the 4/5th to make it interesting. This on top of e.g. homeworking.

    Yes, I do have 35 holidays and unlimited sick days, because being sick is not something you know how long it will take. Could be one day, could be 10 months.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  22. Comparison data? by cleavet · · Score: 2

    Does anyone know how this compares with other professions?

  23. Re:What we need to enact... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

    Then in the off years, we'd have layoffs.

    People tend to like that even less.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  24. Re:Manage your choices wisely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you work under such conditions by choice then it is on your shoulders alone.

    No, you're wrong. Those working conditions are spreading everywhere. Companies have figured out that instead of hiring more people, they can force others to work more for the same pay.

    Don't like it? Get out. And then there's the bullshit of "well, others are doing it!"

    And the days of walking out of one job into another are gone - unless you're in the hot skill du jour. Which these days is AI. And god forbid you're over 40: things get real hard then.

    And then how does one check on that when interviewing? I had questions about hours and being on call and the interviewer picked up on it. When asked if I had a problem with long hours, I replied, "I want a life."

    I received an email later that day, "We're sorry, but you don't have the skills. We are going with another candidate."

    I had recruiters stop calling me when I stressed my need for free time and the requirement of 40 hour work weeks. I even got a lecture.

    This field is shit and pays shit for the time and stress one endures.

  25. Re:Define "Burnout" by greenwow · · Score: 1

    I work with several devs making nearly that much, and they most certainly are burned out. When you work constant death marches with Seattle Hundreds (16 hours a day Mon-Thu and 12 hours a day Fri-Sun) that almost always happens. I work almost that much, and I moved over a year ago and still haven't even unpacked yet. High pay helps, but you still have a breaking point. There just aren't enough programmers to meet demand.

  26. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by Notabadguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Working in Belgium and some of the things I have had happened to me.This is in several companies:
    On a Friday at the end of February: Hello, you still have not taken your 5 last days and you need to take them at the end of Febrary. "So that means I have the week of next week?" Yes. OK. Have a nice day I see you after that.

    These stories are precisely why Belgium, and the rest of Europe are the king of tech development, innovation, and the global leader in envelope-pushing ideas.

  27. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    35 days a year basline seems to be the gold standard in Europe. Typically around 22-25 days you can take whenever you like, plus the rest as paid public holidays.

    Unfortunately I find many companies don't like to negotiate extra time off. My current employer lets me buy one or two weeks a year, basically unpaid leave no-questions-asked and with the cost spread over the year. I'm quite happy with that.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  28. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by avandesande · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hear this all the time but WTH actually does this? Anyone here at slashdot? Even when I was younger I did an all nighter just once or twice. I've been working 8 hour days the last 15 years.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  29. Re:What we need to enact... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    40 hour work weeks, enforced. 30 days paid vacation per year, plus holidays and weekends.

    Par for the course in the UK.

    If you work overtime one week, you get those hours back the next week.

    Not par for the course, but it's pretty common the you will get it back sometime. A busy period coming up to a deadline could cover a few weeks.

    Everyone gets two days off in a row every week.

    .. usually happens

    If you give up those days for some special reason, you get comp vacation time to be used within the next month.

    You would usually get this, but may have to wait until the peak is over before taking the time back. Alternatively you could be paid - time and a half is quite common

    Everyone takes all their vacation, every year.

    In the UK it's exceptional for anyone not to take all their time. A company I worked for switched the "holiday year" from a fixed January-December to a year based on when you joined to prevent a large number of people being off at the end of the year to use their entitlement,

  30. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by greenwow · · Score: 1

    The no vacation thing pisses me off. My entire adult life, I've only had one "real" vacation if you define it as a whole week off.

    One reason there's such a lack of vacation time here in Seattle is that in Washington state, the law only requires less than 2/3 be paid out. In CA, we have to pay out 100%. That's why in CA we require employees to take PTO to get it off of the books, but in WA we basically don't allow vacation time. No company I've ever worked for let programmers take even a fifth (as a guess) of the time we earned.

  31. Strawmen galore! by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, but the stress that tech people experience is completely fake. It REALLY doesn't matter if your work is done on time.

    It does if you want to remain employed with your current company. If that doesn't matter to you then you probably aren't stressed to begin with. If anyone who worked for me expressed that attitude they would be "succeeding elsewhere" in short order.

    No one is going to die if your software or network doesn't work.

    I'd like to introduce you to some folks who work in medical IT who will disagree with you rather strongly. Same thing with software that controls/drives cars or airplanes or manned rockets or traffic signals or ocean navigation or food safety or electrical grids or nuclear reactor controls or.... The list is very long for things that actually do matter. Yeah, nobody probably cares if your word processor crashes but more than a few of us do things that have serious consequences.

    Amazingly humans survived for thousands of years without IT or computers.

    Ok we're done here. Claiming people shouldn't have stress because computers didn't exist 200 years ago is irrelevant and stupid.

    1. Re:Strawmen galore! by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

      You're painting a grim picture in saying that the work someone does does not matter but you are right that Jfetjunky is stressing himself out way too much, it's not that big of a deal if the deadline is met. I've met so many people people who do burn themselves out because somehow think that the world will come to an end if they don't hit that deadline.

      The truth is that if you care about what you're doing and are clearly doing what you can about the situation then it's unlikely you'll get fired. If you do get fired and you did the best you could then you're probably better off without that company anyway.

      I think it was the book, The Pragmatic Programmer by Hunt, Thomas, where I learned several key principles as a way to help keep from getting burned out.

    2. Re:Strawmen galore! by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You said it much better than I did. When I say it doesn't "matter" I mean it isn't worth stressing yourself to death about it, not that it isn't useful work. The world won't end (even if your entire IT company disappears!). What if Google went away tomorrow? Would the world end? Is Google useful, sure.

    3. Re:Strawmen galore! by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, stressing over a software deadline to add more whitespace to your app to make it more "appy" 2 weeks before your nearest competitors app does the same thing is stupid. I'm starting to get a bit depressed that literally everything I do in software is ephemeral, and in 3 months - 5 years completely irrelevant. Why should I stress out if some overlord won't get his bonus because he pulled some deadline out os his ass?

    4. Re:Strawmen galore! by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In the software industry, all deadlines are completely fake. Most deadlines revolve around impressing Gartner and things like that. On the other hand, we need deadlines, otherwise people will be posting in Slashdot all day.

    5. Re:Strawmen galore! by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Give me break. If you are doing your job, you aren't going to get fired. And if you aren't, go get another one. The world needs good software people. If you are good, you are going to get a job.

    6. Re:Strawmen galore! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Most of my deadlines are driven by real things.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:Strawmen galore! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I'd like to introduce you to some folks who work in medical IT who will disagree with you rather strongly. Same thing with software that controls/drives cars or airplanes or manned rockets or traffic signals or ocean navigation or food safety or electrical grids or nuclear reactor controls or.... The list is very long for things that actually do matter. Yeah, nobody probably cares if your word processor crashes but more than a few of us do things that have serious consequences.

      If my word processor crashes, it will cost someone money. The CEO will threaten the Division Head, the Division Head will threaten the Branch Chief, the Branch Chief will threaten me, and since I don't have anyone lower to threaten, I'm in trouble! It might not matter in the grand scheme, but it can sure matter to me.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Strawmen galore! by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I've been at this for 20 years now.

      Every few years you will throw out all the technology you've learned, and learn new technology that does the exact same thing. Get used to it. Your job is to learn new stuff...that does exactly what the old stuff did.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    9. Re:Strawmen galore! by losfromla · · Score: 1

      A schedule is not a real thing. It is something that a CAM pulled out of his ass. Even launch dates slip, everything is negotiable, you do your best and that is all you can do. Long hours just make you stupid, less productive, less creative, and result in a premature death. You also make other bad choices due to lack of sleep and relaxation including bad diet, lack of exercise, lack of socializing, poor hygiene, etc.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    10. Re:Strawmen galore! by losfromla · · Score: 1

      You're the one that sounds angry, calling 110010001000 a dipshit. You're also being generally angry and rude, and seeing anger in others, which appears to be more a statement about your state of mind than anyone else's.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  32. They're highly paid by DogDude · · Score: 1

    IT people are highly paid. If they're not, then they're in the wrong career. Take a few months off between jobs or something. "Burnout" is only a problem if you've got no other options. Otherwise, it's a life choice.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:They're highly paid by geekmux · · Score: 1

      IT people are highly paid. If they're not, then they're in the wrong career. Take a few months off between jobs or something. "Burnout" is only a problem if you've got no other options. Otherwise, it's a life choice.

      It's good advice, but I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that IT people are that much more wealthy where they can afford to take a 6-month sabbatical with little or no income. Certified Financial Scrooge is not part of an IT certification track, and IT people aren't really any better than the average person in avoiding debt or living paycheck to paycheck, even with a six-figure salary.

      Also, when I read "highly paid" with regards to IT jobs, I wonder exactly what that definition is. A low six figure salary might provide great life options in Nebraska, but it's considered damn near poverty in Silicon Valley.

  33. meaningless wanking by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A single data point is statistically meaningless "woe is us" wanking UNLESS other industries are surveyed.

    If the "burnout" rate for tech workers is 57%, but for medical workers is 75%, factory line workers is 62%, and teachers is 60%, then the rate for tech workers is really not bad.
    If OTOH other industries scale at 20-30%, then the tech sector really is dire.

    In short: I suspect that everyone feels like they are underappreciated, underpaid, and is "fed up with all the bullshit at work"...like everyone else.

    --
    -Styopa
  34. Need unions and OT pay! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Need unions and OT pay!

  35. Re:Define "Burnout" by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    How does the company even end up with 100 hours of work per week for everyone? Is that all essential work, or just busywork? If burnout rate is super high, wouldn't you end up with even more work and fewer people to do it?

  36. Re:Manage your choices wisely by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is very nice to be independently wealthy and not have to worry about getting a paycheck, but for the rest of us we have to do it for a paycheck or face homelessness and possibly starvation.

    If all available work is under such conditions, is that really a choice?

  37. Re:What we need to enact... by The+Fat+Bastard · · Score: 1

    You just described a government IT job.

  38. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I see it everyday. Every shop I've been in has the superstars. And everyone else is compared to that person or persons.

    So unless you're willing to do the same, you wont get promoted, wont get a raise, wont get to do the new cool stuff.

    Fortunately, for me anyway, there is always another job. But switching jobs also takes its toll and makes you look bad in some circumstances.

    I think it all boils down to the fact that technology sucks and doesn't work nearly as well as what we're told, so you wind up thinking that you are the problem or will be viewed as the problem when in fact we're just 21st century factory workers pushing buttons.

  39. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by Hydrian · · Score: 2

    Because US's annual raises rarely meet the US's annual inflation rates. So you are forced to move up the salary chain or effectively get a pay cut ever year.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
  40. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by swb · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work with people who proudly complain about "working until 2 am" or willingly take on all kinds of client work at ridiculous times because it burnishes their reputation.

    Some after hours work is unavoidable in IT, but I just refuse to work those kinds of hours regularly without added compensation of some kind (added vacation days without strings and/or more money).

    As a more skilled/experienced/older worker, I think I can get away with it but I'm not gonna lie, the people who do it seem to have more street cred in the organization because they are willing to bend over.

    I think it's highly organization dependent and sometimes individually dependent (ie, can you get done what needs doing in normal work hours). And I think there are definitely orgs where if you're not doing that, you might as well resign now because you will get shuffled to the shit work.

  41. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by ranton · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with not being promoted -- just do your job well, take your pay and vacation time. Work to live, don't live to work. A snazzy job title isn't the pinnacle of human achievement.

    While I agree with the sentiment that most people shouldn't feel pressured into living to work, the pinnacle of human achievement in any discipline is nearly always achieved through an insane devotion to the task. The people responsible for this level of excellence generally live to work.

    There is nothing wrong with working to live, but there often is nothing wrong with living to work as long as it is a decision made freely.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  42. Re:Define "Burnout" by greenwow · · Score: 1

    ...end up with even more work and fewer people to do it?

    The part I find fascinating about that is that the junior/recent college grads stick with jobs despite the long hours for the experience and the most experienced people stick with jobs because they know it's the same most everywhere else. I guess it's the devil you know. The guys in the middle with five to fifteen years experience are the ones that keep jumping ship to try to find somewhere better.

    My company has about eighty people with less than three years experience and around twenty with more than twenty-five years of experience, like myself. I think there's only one person in the middle. Everyone else in that middle quit after we announced a two year death march. Well, they didn't call it that of course. They just said we were requiring scrum teams to add 50% to their velocity for the next 52 sprints.

  43. Re:janitorial jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Too many tech jobs are just cleaning up after Indian disaster after Indian disaster. And not in any sort of permanent way, just putting out the same fires over and over.

    There are two kinds of IT people. Those who create. And those who fix creations. If you're tired of doing one, then figure out how to get paid doing the other, and feel good knowing you'll be working to fix your own disasters.

  44. Way to go Netflix! by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Only 38%-39% of your IT employees are burning out.

    That's something to be really proud of.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  45. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by rnturn · · Score: 1

    I worked for a companies where IT people used to look for places to go on vacation that had no phones or pager service. For one co-worker's rafting trip on the Colorado River through the Grand Canyon started a trend among the IT staff: where can I go where the phone/pager coverage is really poor or non-existent? Far, far North Canadian fishing trips started getting considered. Can't have people actually having an outside-of-work life so the companies bought satellite phones. No more vacations for you without a corporate leash. Check in daily. Or else.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  46. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Nobody really does. Drama queens. If you are regularly working 80 hour weeks in IT, you are dumb or you just really like to work.

  47. Re: ...if an email is prefixed with "URGENT" by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ...got sent to me on a weekend, my employer would be lucky if I saw it before Sunday night. If it went to my work email account, it most definitely wouldn't get seen until Monday morning.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  48. Am I surprised? by whitroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yep, so many folks LOOOVVVVEEE 50, 60, 70 hour weeks, and having to respond to the boss 24x7x365.25. Who needs a life?

    UNIONS are why we have benefits, weekends, holidays and vacations. No company did that out of the alleged kindness of their hearts.

    But none of you here need them, they're *so* "ancient", never mind they could get you a 40 hour week and no being bothered off hours, no, enjoy your (non-) life.

    1. Re:Am I surprised? by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how you can get people to love slavery.

  49. Pathetic by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Yes, you should be grateful, but you are an ungrateful self centered little shit. Common malady.

    Grow up. You post some of the most ridiculous drivel on this site and then have the stones to start calling names when someone points it out. If you don't actually have a rebuttal more eloquent than calling someone names then shut up and move on to your next troll.

    1. Re:Pathetic by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Pointing out that you are spoiled and ungrateful isn't drivel or name calling. It is reality. You SHOULD be grateful you live in a relatively wealthy country and work in IT and can post to slashdot. You should travel around the world and see how others live. The fact that you aren't makes you ungrateful for the things you have.

  50. Re:What we need to enact... by The+Fat+Bastard · · Score: 1

    Mod down! Creimertard pastebin!

  51. Dragging down others by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I would posit that humans in fact need someone to be worse off than them as a coping mechanism for their own suffering/misfortune/whatever.

    Only the more pathetic and narcissistic among us. Sadly that seems to be a rather large percent of the population. I fear people don't need that but quite a number seem to enjoy it. If we do actually need to feel better than others then that is a very sad commentary on us as a species.

    1. Re:Dragging down others by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I would posit that humans in fact need someone to be worse off than them as a coping mechanism for their own suffering/misfortune/whatever.

      Only the more pathetic and narcissistic among us.

      Not necessarily. The pathetic and narcissistic among us my do so consciously, but I would argue a vast majority do it subconsciously. We are always comparing ourselves to others in some way, even if we don't explicitly realize we are doing so. It's in our nature.

      I fear people don't need that but quite a number seem to enjoy it. If we do actually need to feel better than others then that is a very sad commentary on us as a species.

      It's not needed, but it's a coping tool, one of several that we have. Fear and hatred towards the "other" is another big one that is being prominently featured right now(think Terror Management Theory without the overly-morbid focus on death of the self and more it's projection onto other groups). There's also escapism, whether through relatively harmless acts such as fantasy or role play (cosplayers/furries/etc) or more damaging acts such as the increasing opioid epedemic.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  52. More than just money by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Who ISNT working for a paycheck?

    Do I really have to explain that some people don't really give a shit about what they are doing? Sure everyone works to get paid but some people actually try to enjoy what they are doing along the way so that the job is more than just a means to get money.

  53. Options by sjbe · · Score: 2

    It is very nice to be independently wealthy and not have to worry about getting a paycheck, but for the rest of us we have to do it for a paycheck or face homelessness and possibly starvation.

    You don't have to be independently wealthy to make a living doing something that you don't enjoy. If you hate IT work then go find something else to do. It's a big world with lots of opportunity.

    If all available work is under such conditions, is that really a choice?

    Are you seriously claiming that someone who is bright enough to find work in the tech sector will find it impossible to do something else if they put their mind to it? Possibly even something they actually enjoy doing with reasonable hours and adequate pay. Point is very few people are forced to work in IT. Arguing that they don't have a choice is really just nonsense in almost all cases.

    1. Re:Options by sinij · · Score: 1

      It's a big world with lots of opportunity.

      Old timer, this is no longer the case. It may have been true when you were young, but these days it is IT, gigs, or unemployment. Too many people in a globally connected world competing for the same few jobs.

    2. Re:Options by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      That's hilarious. Do you have any idea how many jobs there are available in academia? Not many. The issue is that if you do what you love, what's the incentive to stop? There's a reason that the average age of professors always hovers in the 50s and 60s. It's not uncommon to find semi-retired professors still kicking around well into their 70s teaching one or two classes they love.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    3. Re:Options by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      This.

      A big part of the "must work" paradigm is the "I must have this what ever this is. So people take on a big pile of debt to have the car/house/RV/boat/whatever, and now they need the ridiculous salary to keep it all going.

      Add to that the "I must work in (the most expensive place on the planet to live), because there are no jobs anywhere else" myth. Right now there are absolutely jobs out there. Many of them are not in the coastal corridors. All kinds of companies exist outside silicone valley and Washington state. If you have a masters degree you can teach. There are teaching jobs all over the U.S. You might not want to do that as a permanent gig, but it can be a nice break, and if you think about it like that you can duck the stress of worrying about academic politics stress.

      Heck if you want to teach there are jobs all over the world. Great pay, as long as you go in knowing the limits and environment of such work.

    4. Re:Options by sinij · · Score: 1

      What you say is superficially true. However, lets frame this question in 'quality of life'. Can you optimize it by changing locations or lowering your standards? Absolutely. However, having to do work is very hard to avoid. You must be willing to live in a cave or cardboard box to completely move away from doing any work.

    5. Re:Options by sinij · · Score: 1

      Academia is absolutely the wrong way to go if you want quality of life. As a new PhD your fate is underpaid and overworked adjunct with no job security or at best publish-or-perish hell for 10 years. Tenured professors are minority of academia, and getting to that from fresh PhD is like winning a lottery.

  54. Re:What we need to enact... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Hire people as term-contract workers with the understanding that they're temporary unless otherwise informed.

  55. Skewed towards Silicon Valley by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Most of the companies mentioned are Silicon Valley tech firms, where the competition for jobs is fierce, and hours are brutal. In the rest of the country, my impression is that stress levels are much lower. I personally can't imagine a better job than the one I have, and I know many who agree.

  56. Re:Define "Burnout" by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

    I work with several devs making nearly that much, and they most certainly are burned out. When you work constant death marches with Seattle Hundreds (16 hours a day Mon-Thu and 12 hours a day Fri-Sun) that almost always happens. I work almost that much, and I moved over a year ago and still haven't even unpacked yet. High pay helps, but you still have a breaking point. There just aren't enough programmers to meet demand.

    I've never worked anywhere with that kind of schedule....or known anyone who has. Then again, I have never lived in shit holes like Seattle or California.

    I simply wouldn't work like that. If it were that, or go on welfare, I'd say fuck it and go on welfare, or just rob houses for a living - leaving that kind of schedule to the suckers.

    If my employer required me to work more than 50 hours per week on anything other than a rare occasion, I'd find a new employer. ASAP.

  57. Is burnout a medical term? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    What is burnout? Feeling stressed? To me, burnout is being incapable of doing your job any longer.

  58. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I worked 55-60 hours a week for most of a year, mainly due to two senior people leaving with a month's difference and a third knocked his head pretty bad leaving me and a few juniors to sort it out. That was as an IT consultant though so I had a billing bonus that gave me pretty good kickback. If I recall correctly it kicked in at about 2/3rd = 67% billable time and the company average was 75-80% somewhere, so your average consultant would get bonus for like 10% while I could hit 50%+. Normally they wouldn't have let anyone rack up that many bonus hours but they were desperate to deliver so they paid me well to get out of a tight spot.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  59. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

    I've taken 4 weeks of vacation in 30 years. One week when my dad died. One week for a camping trip, and the remaining two weeks were for things like my children being born.

    Then you've been suckered, or have different priorities. One year, I took 6 weeks off to travel around the country. Another year, I took 4 weeks off and went to Australia. Another year, I took 6 weeks off and went to Africa. I've taken multiple 2-week vacations. Without checking e-mail. And yes, I live in the U.S.

  60. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    That's when you job-jump laterally between companies... loyalty is a cruel joke in IT.

  61. Re: Demand vaca time and use it. by lars5 · · Score: 1

    ...unless you're a nurse, then you still get treated like crap.

    (the above statement is based on my own anecdotal evidence and is in no way intended to be taken scientifically)

    (also, Wik)

    --
    Don't Panic.
  62. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I can definitely see how this can happen to a consultant and needing to make hay while the sun shines.. Mostly was addressing salary folks :)

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  63. Re: Demand vaca time and use it. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    NPs seem to do fine. There's also research/academic nursing. So not always...

  64. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by painandgreed · · Score: 2

    I hear this all the time but WTH actually does this? Anyone here at slashdot? Even when I was younger I did an all nighter just once or twice. I've been working 8 hour days the last 15 years.

    My understanding would be Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, etc. although I've only really heard from people that have worked at Amazon. They hire new young and eager workers who they can work and fire them when they burn out. However, just as many leave before that. It's all part of an understood system where new workers agree to be overworked while padding their resume and looking for a new job. This lastrs for an average of 18 months before they have found a new job or get laid off. They hopefully hop to a better paying job than does the same till they decide upon an exit strategy of looking for a place with less upward mobility but more stability once they have reached the desired salary and skillset.

  65. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Same boat as you being an older worker. These guys get stuck on something (all night) and I usually can figure it out in an hour or two- I know it takes time but managers do appreciate folks that are cool and consistent.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  66. Re:Statistics by Cederic · · Score: 1

    The single data point is 57% of IT workers.

    That 11000 people were surveyed to create that single data point does not magically multiply it. It's still a single data point.

  67. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    Sarcasm? Why is it a bad thing not to be "top dog?" Being less innovative with better quality of life is just fine with me.

  68. Re:Define "Burnout" by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    Ditto. I could make far more money if I was willing to sacrifice my life for it, but I'm not. When I look for jobs, I make it clear that I value a solid work-life balance.

    My work flatlines after about 30 hours. I get paid to solve hard problems. That's not something you can just do for 50-60 hours every week. I don't do assembly-line work. If that's what you need done, I'm not the person you want to hire.

    Yes, it limits my job opportunities and my pay, but I'm pretty damn happy with my life because of it.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  69. Re: You need a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You posted 20 times in this thread about working people. During working hours.

    Hows life on welfare you loser?

  70. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    Bull fucking shit. Lived in Seattle and worked there for 7 years. Everyone took vacation. Everyone took time off. Nobody worked 80 hour weeks, nobody even worked 50. Nobody ever had a hard time taking vacation. This was at both startups and major companies (Amazon).

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  71. -1 Troll? It is meant to be FUNNY! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's FUNNY! It is written by someone with an extensive knowledge of English colloquial expressions, or copied from someone with that knowledge. MOD PARENT UP!

    (There are areas where English is trashy. You may need to take a shower after you read this.)

    Title: "I hole-hardedly agree..." -- I whole-heartedly agree...
    "doubles advocate" -- devil's advocate
    "all intensive purposes" -- all intents and purposes
    "a diamond dozen" -- a dime a dozen
    "a blessing in the skies" -- a blessing in disguise.
    "on a petal stool" -- on a pedestal
    "a bunch of pre-Madonnas" -- a bunch of primadonnas
    "taking something very valuable for granite" -- taking something very valuable for granted"
    "mustard up all the strength you can" -- muster up all the strength you can
    "it is a doggy dog world" -- It is a dog-eat-dog world
    "you have a huge ship on your shoulder." -- you have a huge chip on your shoulder.
    " throw everything in but the kids Nsync" -- throw everything in but the kitchen sink
    "you are having a feel day with this" -- you are having a field day with this
    "I have a sick sense" -- I have a sixth sense
    "I cannot turn a blonde eye" -- I cannot turn a blind eye
    "I have zero taller ants" -- I have zero tolerance
    "what comes around is all around" -- what comes around goes around [what goes around comes around]
    "supply and command" -- supply and demand
    "Make my words" -- Mark my words
    "when you get down to brass stacks" -- when you get down to brass tacks
    "it doesn't take rocket appliances" -- it doesn't take rocket science
    "to get two birds stoned at once" -- to kill two birds with one stone
    "who makes the pants in this relationship" -- who wears the pants in this relationship
    "sometimes you just have to swallow your prize" -- sometimes you just have to swallow your pride
    "come to this conclusion through denial and error" -- come to this conclusion through trial and error
    "I swear on my mother's mating name" -- I swear on my mother's maiden name [not a usual expression]
    "when you put the petal to the medal" -- when you put the pedal to the metal
    "you will pass with flying carpets" -- you will pass with flying colors
    "it's a peach of cake" -- it's a piece of cake

    1. Re:-1 Troll? It is meant to be FUNNY! by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      It's FUNNY! It is written by someone with an extensive knowledge of English colloquial expressions, or copied from someone with that knowledge. MOD PARENT UP!

      If you have to explain it, the clearly the author missed the mark and there post is a damp squid.

  72. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Else.

  73. Consider the source. by Thruen · · Score: 1

    This data MIGHT be accurate, it might even represent much more than just tech workers. But, the source of this data is a voluntary survey conducted within an app whose sole purpose is to allow you to chat with coworkers behind your employers back and anonymously review the place you work. Usage is probably skewed a bit toward those that aren't happy with their workplace. Personally, I'm more surprised that 43% of respondents from an app like that didn't claim to be burned out.

  74. Surveys are mostly meaningless by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Unless the sample selection is random, it's not an opt-in survey and there's no opt-out, then its results have no meaning.

    Only people who have personal motivation to answer the survey will - those who feel burnt out and want to complain about it in this case.

  75. Thanks Agile! by devslash0 · · Score: 1

    Long live Waterfall!

  76. Re:Manage your choices wisely by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    I'm 51. I don't work like that. I suggest you move out of the "high tech" areas. Nobody expects you to work like that in Raleigh, NC.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  77. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Also an older worker. In my current gig, I was asked why I wasn't working all weekend like the other developers. Quote, "Because, my stuff works."

    I'm not the company superstar, but I've had the time to build two airplanes. My pay is still good.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  78. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Did a phone interview with Amazon once. Told him at the end that I wasn't interested. I could see right through what he was getting at, and it is exactly what you reference.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  79. Re:Define "Burnout" by losfromla · · Score: 1

    haha! you're the same agile consultant! haha!

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  80. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    I certainly don't do it. You want me to work overtime, you can damn well pay me.

    But the common phrase around an embedded development shop in Denver is "I've already hit my 40 this week".

    I stayed way late one time making up some hours and a co-worker complained that "working late doesn't make me look special when everyone does it". And yeah, the lights are usually still on at 7pm. SOMEONE is still here.

    Some people are just workaholics.

  81. Re: Define "Burnout" by losfromla · · Score: 1

    It's idiots that work extra hours for free that are driving this problem. Make them pay over time at 1.5 times hourly rate, and don't work extra hours, watch the problem magically solve itself. Unionization might be the only solution.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  82. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Samers for me. I've been at it for 21 years. Worked through X-mas once but that was at triple-time, so not a problem. If I work extra hours (EWW) they are paid hours.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  83. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Then get yourself an Indian wife, do some plowing, and quit your bitching.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  84. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by losfromla · · Score: 1

    ^^^^^^^^
    IIIIIIIIIIII

    exactly!

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  85. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by losfromla · · Score: 1

    maybe it's time to renegotiate your salary, do this while taking all the vacation time you've missed in 30 years, they owe you about 56 weeks, plenty of time for them to think about your demands. You're probably also of retirement age or close enough which makes you all that much stronger in a negotiation.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  86. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Sign me up. Fuck Seattle, I choose you Belgium!

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  87. Re:washtech org by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Except that repugnicans pushed for this just as strongly. Don't create divisions where none exists. Us fighting amongst ourselves only helps keep us all down while we are raped by the wealthy.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  88. meaningless pedantic wanking indeed by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    A single data point is statistically meaningless "woe is us" wanking UNLESS other industries are surveyed.

    Other data points are irrelevant to the subject at hand. How more or less other workers are burned out in comparison has jack and shit to do with IT, and Jack left town. If waitresses have it worse, it doesn't mean IT has it better. If accountants have it easier, it doesn't mean IT has it harder.

    Your attempt to forcibly inject relevance to the subject has no relevance.

    1. Re:meaningless pedantic wanking indeed by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Not at all. I mean, I get your point: IT workers are miserable. Got it.

      But my comment about it being meaningless wanking has to do with POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES. The world isn't absolutes; it's about relative options.
      The entire *point* of the story is about sympathizing with the plight of those workers.

      If any *other* job they can get people are MORE miserable, then, relatively, they're doing pretty well.

      --
      -Styopa
  89. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by houghi · · Score: 1

    And if you are not convinced yet, we also have the worlds best beers and chocolates. The waffles are only for the tourists.Oh and the company pays for public transport, I get 8 EUR per day in meal money, I just received 250 EUR in Ecochecks and I have extra hospitalization and pension insurance.

    None of these are a rarity and neither is the 13th month. But be warned, the standard amount of holidays is only 21 days for (I think) 35 or 37 hour weeks, so what most companies do is let you work a bit longer (I work 37.5 hours per week) and let the hours accumulate, so you get more days off.

    Some sectors will give extra holidays and you might get extra for years in a company and/or age. Friend of mine has 50 paid holidays. Try to get into the banking or insurance sector.

    And larger companies will be better if days off is your thing. Join a union or not. Nobody cares. And they are not trade unions, so you can pick almost anyone you like (again: or don't)

    You can also join any moment you desire. Nobody will ask if you joined or not, because nobody cares.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  90. Re:Demand vaca time and use it. by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

    You forgot the part in Belgium where your gross revenue is taxed 13% social security + 50% federal tax + 4% local tax (8% on the 50%). Oh, and your employer also pays 33% on your gross salary.
    What's that? the federal tax of 50% is only in the highest tax bracket? right, the bracket over 35k$. Luckily the lower tax brackets are only 45% between 20k and 35K and 40% between 10k and 20k.
    I sure am thankful I get to keep 1/3rd of my gross income (sarcasm).

  91. Another by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1
    "copy pasta from 4chan" -- copy and paste from 4 chan

    It must be difficult for people for whom English is a 2nd language.

    Thanks for the insight. I found that on reddit.com/r/copypasta/ from a year ago.

    Also: 9/20/2016 Quoting:

    My girlfriend has a knack for creative phrases. Today's gem was "he's a hard egg to crack". Another recurring utterance is "pigeon toed" instead of "pigeonholed"

  92. Re:janitorial jobs by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    Most people can't be creators, society needs more fixers than creators.

  93. Dr. Hyman "broken brain" explanation by apol · · Score: 1

    Why so many more burnouts declared today than before? Perhaps we just have more awareness. Perhaps our jobs are indeed more stressful.

    These may be important factors, but I don't think they explains this phenomenon alone. We see a huge increase in diverse kinds mental problems (ADHD, Alzheimer, depression). I think the "Broken Brain" hypothesis by Dr. Hyman quite plausible.

    http://drhyman.com/blog/2017/1...

    He claims that important factors for the decline of our mental health are diet and exposure to toxins, besides stress.

  94. Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Did a phone interview with Amazon once. Told him at the end that I wasn't interested. I could see right through what he was getting at, and it is exactly what you reference.

    Friend of mine played that game for about five years at Amazon, jumping around internally. Finally decided what he wanted to do and found a job out of state with a well padded resume at a company that desired stability.

  95. The trick is to stop caring by Rastl · · Score: 1

    tl;dr. Artificial deadlines, expectations of 60 hour work weeks, expectations of being connected 24/7/365, and caring about the same things as management are all the ways to crush your spirit.

    It sounds like burnout and it's darn close but honestly not caring about things helps put it all into perspective.

    I don't have my work email on my personal cell phone. So anyone sending a high priority email to me after my work hours isn't getting a response until my next work day. If they start requiring me to check my email all the time they can furnish me with a device to do so.

    I'm salaried but that salary is based on me working regular 40 hour weeks with an occasional rotation on call. If they start doing the 'work until the job is done no matter how long it takes' push then I continue my 40 hour weeks and see what happens. I honestly don't mind an occasional all-hands deadline but when they become more than a quarterly exception then it's a sign that management has no idea what they're doing.

    I learned long ago that working at a high rate of speed only gets you more work while the slower workers get tasks reassigned to the .. ones who work faster. Since I'm not that much of an idiot I don't try to stand out of the herd.

    Almost every deadline is arbitrary and only benefit the managers who set them. Those are the same managers who are going to get heat when their deadlines aren't met. It does roll downhill but again being in the middle of the pack shelters you quite nicely.