Slashdot Mirror


Mumbai Bans Plastic Bags, Bottles, and Single-Use Plastic Containers (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: Mumbai has the become the largest Indian city to ban single-use plastics, with residents caught using plastic bags, cups or bottles to face penalties of up to 25,000 rupees (~$365) and three months in jail from Monday. Council inspectors in navy blue jackets have been posted across the city to catch businesses or residents still using plastic bags. Penalties have already kicked in for businesses and several, reportedly including a McDonald's and Starbucks, have already been fined. Penalties range from 5,000 rupees (~$73) for first-time offenders to 25,000 rupees (~$365) and the threat of three months' jail for those caught repeatedly using single-use plastics.

174 comments

  1. In place of plastic bags.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will they have some sort of designated replacement?

    1. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they have some sort of designated replacement?

      Yeah! What DID we do before disposable containers? I mean, go back to drinking out of coconuts and shoes?! Or just our hands?!?!

      And my disposable pens....what happens when they take those away?!

      And my disposable fast food containers.....

      Those people just want to stick us back into the stone age where we are drinking out of stone knives and bearskins. No! Wait.....eating and drinking out of stone knives and bearskins .... there! I don't look like an idiot now!

    2. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by xonen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah! What DID we do before disposable containers? I mean, go back to drinking out of coconuts and shoes?! Or just our hands?!?!

      And my disposable fast food containers.....

      Paper.

      Paper food containers work just fine. So do thicker -and thus reusable- plastic shopping bags. Your disposable pen is actually a quality item with long durability.

      Coming from Europe i was stunned by the amount of thin plastic bags the USA customers consume. Walmart happily packs 1 bottle of soda in a plastic bag. Spending $50 gets you home with at least a dozen of useless plastic bags.

      I'm used to buying a (slightly thicker) plastic bag for $0.15 that's actually usable several times (and i will, because i'm cheap), and will contain most of that $50 groceries in one bag. Alternatively, i bring my own sturdier bags. Sometimes filled with refund plastic bottles. Once you're used to it, it's really not such a big deal. And yes, we still have those thin plastics for certain goods, like fresh fruit or veggies.

      I'm not saying our streets and highways are not littered with trash, cause they are.. Plastic drinking bottles or cans all around, cause people are *ssh*s. But removing those thin disposable plastic bags really does make a difference.

      --
      A glitch a day keeps the bugs away.
    3. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would assume thicker mil plastic bags are allowed since they are considered multi use (according to the state of California.) That seems to be where these laws go. Next, expect harder to decompose plastic bags rolling down the street and a "use tax" to try and curtail even those (like in California.)

    4. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Coming from Europe i was stunned by the amount of thin plastic bags the USA customers consume. Walmart happily packs 1 bottle of soda in a plastic bag. Spending $50 gets you home with at least a dozen of useless plastic bags.

      Most people reuse those bags as liners on small trash cans, but I do agree people tend to get a few too many.

    5. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Was about to mention similar... these bags more often than not get a second life around the household - as small trashcan liners, to package used cat litter (or any other animal waste), to toss stuff in that the kid has to take to school that day, as a quickie it of waterproofing for a small laptop bag, etc.

      I can also agree that you end up with way too many... some stores often use a bag for like 1-2 items (while others cram it full... kind of a crap-shoot, truth be told.)

      I much prefer the reusable bags (especially the insulated ones for cold stuff), but usually that's because it's 25 miles to the nearest grocery store, and you end up carrying the same amount of stuff in less bags when it comes time to drag it all into the house.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by stooo · · Score: 2

      >> What DID we do before disposable containers
      Glass
      Ceramic
      Metal
      Paper
      Plastic(multi use)
      etcetcetc...

      Get used to it.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    7. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK, working on the assumption that this isn't a joke/troll/misplaced irony:

      - supermarket purchases were put in paper bags - which were quite large and reinforced - or boxes - of which the supermarket has an oversupply for obvious reasons.

      - glass bottles... ever heard of them?

      - no, you do not need a straw. No-one needs a straw, ever.

      - milk, juice etc came in waxed cardboard cartons that did the job just fine.

      - ever heard of a pencil (wood and graphite) or a non-disposable pen?

      In more recent news... are you honestly telling me you've never got take-away in a box (pizza? noodles? hell even my local curry joint has figured that out, though they still try and put said box in a plastic bag for reasons unknown). And cutlery - try putting "bamboo knives and forks" into your google machine. And, supposing you do find a foodstuff that can't be housed in a non-plastic container (I don't know: soup made from sulfuric acid?) then how about growing a pair, putting on some pants and actually eating it in the restaurant from a non-disposable plate/bowl/other with a non-disposable fork/spoon/other?

    8. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Reusable bags are very common in the US now, despite everyone predicting doom and gloom. Charities send you more bags over time until have more than you need. I do have some old single-use bags from before the ban, but I keep those for use in my small wastebasket in the bathroom. However when I do take my reusable bags to grocery stores in other counties, they will give me odd looks like I'm from Mars.

    9. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Also remember, we actually re-used those paper bags, because they weren't flimsy. Go a bit further back, I can remember one of my grandmothers with a small foldable grocery cart, of which I saw many in use in the neighborhood.

      I remember some sturdy melamine type utensils, that you used in car hops (ie, those Happy Days type drive-ins). You didn't take them with you. Today at work we have biodegradable utensils that are cheap.

    10. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I really liked the old paper bags. They would easily hold up over multiple uses, and were handy for storage and the like. Back in the 70s many people saved those rather than treating them as disposables (even though disposable was all the fashion in the 70s). You start talking to people who were around in the great depression and they didn't treat anything as disposable.

    11. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those thick 15c bags need to be used at /least/ 50 times to be the same impact as the thin bags:
      http://www.abc.net.au/news/201...

      Plus, I never use the thin ones once, they're always bin liners or cat litter bags, or dog crap bags, etc. So that means the 15c one needs 100 uses.

      I'd suggest that's unlikely verging on the ridiculous.

      And the paper containers aren't much better, worse on some measures.

    12. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I reuse the plastic bags all the time, from trash can liners to bringing my lunch in one until they fall apart, and its actually fairly rare around here to see them as litter

      what does make a shit ton of litter around my area is paper, its freaking everywhere cause people get it bangged in to their head that they biodegrade so that must mean the second it touches the ground it goes poof into thin air

      so the problem really is not the material in all cases, its fuckwits that do not understand to not throw their biohazard garbage onto the ground

    13. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by LordKronos · · Score: 0

      OK, working on the assumption that this isn't a joke/troll/misplaced irony:

      Well, you know what they say....when you assume you make an ass out of u and me. Although in this case I think you just made an ass out of yourself. Could you really not see the sarcasm in that ACs post? What, you REALLY thought that he though we went straight from coconuts to plastic cups? The sarcasm in his post is blatantly obvious.

      No human being could possibly be so dense. I'm convinced we've got AI trolls posting on slashdot. I mean, something like Watson surely is advanced enough to read phrases like "What DID we do before disposable containers?", search its database of everything on the web, and come up with an answer, all without the ability to detect the glaring sarcasm. But a human? Surely it couldn't be.

    14. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when my city instituted a bag ban, I bought 500 from Amazon and use them. As before I use them for trash liners. It is about 1/10th the cost of buying trash liners and bonus, I carry my groceries in them.

    15. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      - no, you do not need a straw. No-one needs a straw, ever.

      A friend with cerebal palsy needs to use a straw because - can't lift the cup to mouth without spilling all over.

      But most people don't need straws.

    16. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Not my memory of paper bags,at all. lol I can count on one bag ripping or falling apart from some meat liquid and having all those nice groceries on the ground.every trip. I use cloth bags now don't rip they get messy watch them.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    17. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by AJWM · · Score: 1

      - no, you do not need a straw. No-one needs a straw, ever.

      Tell that to someone who has had their broken jaw wired shut.

      But waxed paper straws (or re-usable heavy duty plastic) also work.

      --
      -- Alastair
    18. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Stores used to have cardboard boxes available (ie left over from when they received deliveries)... These were much better for anyone who visited the store by car as they fit together in the back of the car much better than plastic bags which tend to slip around and spill their contents.
      Bags are only useful for people on foot who have to carry them.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    19. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      So get the thicker plastic bags and only use them once, making the problem even worse.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    20. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's incorrect comparison.

      As GP said, you can use the 15c bag once you go to grocery, instead of getting for example a dozen useless thin ones. In this case you only have to use 9 times 15c bag to go to grocery, unlike your calculation that is 100 times.

    21. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by CipherBandit · · Score: 1

      I agree in spirit but not really with most of your bullted points Big fan of super market boxes, not a fan of the thicker 'reusable bags'. Unsure of their use case as I'm already swimming in actual reusable bags that are given away everywhere. Meanwhile I would reuse the thin bags for garbage liners and other waste disposal which relegates even a multi-use bag to single use, upping the resources spent per use. Not sure if glass is a better alternative to plastic as we're starting to use up all the sand in the world. Sure it's recyclable but that doesn't always happen, it's also heavier and bulkier so more petroleum will be used to move the goods it houses than would otherwise be used further diminishing theoretical gains. Some people do need straws, especially if they are facing jaw / dental problems. Also straws are correlated to a reduction in cavities. If you prevent a single cavity from being formed I'm willing to bet you're coming out thousands of straws ahead in terms of resources as you'd be consuming fuel to goto the dentist for consultation on tooth pain, and an additional trip for fixing the cavity after insurance approves plus materials used by the dentist, the paperwork that has to get faxed back and forth to the insurance providers, etc. Non-plastic reusable straws would be a better alternative to no straws, ie: harvest straws, re-usable stainless straws, glass straws are all good choices.

    22. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      My favorite is when they ask you if you want your gallon jug of milk or similar juice/drink jugs in a bag... umm it has a handle built into it! Why put it in a much flimsier container?

    23. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      Paper gets recycled, those thin ass plastic bags just become landfill or get tossed into the ocean. Sure, some will end up tossed out the window by a**hats but paper has a much higher recycling rate.

    24. Re: In place of plastic bags.. by Nocturna81 · · Score: 1

      They still have them here. And yes I agree, they're much easier to handle when going by car. I do prefer them when I forgot my shopping bags, especially since I recycle them with the other waste paper I have

    25. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest that's unlikely verging on the ridiculous.

      Errm...why is that ridiculous?

      I have plenty of those thicker ~$0.15 which are several years old...some are 10 years old. They have been used hundreds of times. Each such bag can be used for a year at least (and in reality, for many years), if you go grocery shopping at least twice a week (lowball estimate, most people visit the supermarket more often), and take the bag with you, that's 104 uses per year. Far from unlikely, and certainly not ridiculous.

      Btw, reusing the thin plastic bags in whatever capacity (as garbage bags etc.) is good, but whether it's single or dual use, they still end up at the landfill where they take literally ages to decompose. I've started buying biodegradable garbage bin liners (since after I reduced by thin plastic bag use, I started running out of bags to throw out my garbage in).

    26. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Yeah! What DID we do before disposable containers? I mean, go back to drinking out of coconuts and shoes?! Or just our hands?!?!

      And my disposable fast food containers.....

      Paper.

      Paper food containers work just fine....

      Milk cartons, paper cups and paper food containers are made liquid-resistant by coating them with (can you guess?) plastic. While not IMPOSSIBLE to recycle, recycling is more difficult/expensive (and not all locales may have the necessary machinery/processes in place). They do not compost. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic-coated_paper.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    27. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by MS · · Score: 0

      I'm shocked to read, that 99% of us-americans have cerebral palsy. I'm so sorry for you.

    28. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      It's ridiculous because they get holes in them long before 10 years, and if you do have a 10 year old bag that's just more evidence that you buy a lot more thick plastic bags than you mean to because people forget them or shop opportunistically and don't always remember the bags. Certainly, driving home to get the bags you forgot would be more environmentally costly than a dozen thin ones.

      The decomposition speed of plastic bags, both thick and thin, was included in the study.

      Oh and your "low ball" estimate of twice a week is twice as often as we go... per head it's 6 times as often as we go... but honestly, set aside 4 or 5 of your thick plastic bags and use them exclusively, they won't last 1 year, let alone 10.

      Are you also running around in hemp clothing? Because washing most clothes creates thousands of plastic micro particles that end up in the water. If they were serious about this stuff they would have nothing but the old string bags made from jute for about $15 each, but those things WILL last 10 years.

    29. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes, single reuse of the worst kind of plastic, the kind that breaks down into small pieces and enters the food cycle.
      Banning them at least make people aware of alternatives, such as biodegradable bin liners. The rest of the plastic cycle of stupidity is the same. Ban straws and people may realise lips can do more than just making a duck face for instagram.

      But ultimately we as a species are screwed. People can't think beyond what they are told to believe. It's like when my workplace tried to deal with it's plastic problem by replacing the plastic cups in the coffee machine with paper/wax ones. Do you know what would work even better? Getting people to bring in their own mugs and rinse it out at the end of the day.

    30. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Even the reduced number we get in Europe is too many to use up around the house. I also prefer proper bin liner bags because as well as being stronger and leak-proof* they are larger so I have to empty them less often.

      * Shopping bags have to have air holes in case kids put them over their heads.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      I'll add that not only animal waste, but used diapers are also a great thing to use these for.

    32. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What DID we do before disposable containers?

      Die due to unsanitary containers.

    33. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by slash.jit · · Score: 1

      Ha ha.. Yes. American consumption is reckless!
      Coming from India I was surprised to see this, I thought America was a very civilized nation where people don't do this kind of stuff.

    34. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked to read, that you think the only value other than 100%, is 99%. I'm so sorry for you.

    35. Re: In place of plastic bags.. by swillden · · Score: 1

      They still have them here. And yes I agree, they're much easier to handle when going by car. I do prefer them when I forgot my shopping bags, especially since I recycle them with the other waste paper I have

      I prefer the thin plastic bags for the exact reason that it's easier to carry more in fewer trips. They have loop handles and the way they're designed it ends up being very easy to thread my fingers through the loops of a dozen or more bags. The limit on the amount I can carry in one trip from the car to the pantry is dictated more by arm strength than anything else, because I can load up both hands to the point that I can't lift either of them above my waist. I'm not a weightlifter, but neither am I particularly weak.

      Heftier bags with handles with enough slack in them would work as well this way, I think. Boxes would take more trips unless they were closed so I could stack them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    36. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Not my memory of paper bags,at all. lol I can count on one bag ripping or falling apart from some meat liquid and having all those nice groceries on the ground.every trip. I use cloth bags now don't rip they get messy watch them.

      In my memory, they got used for kitchen trash sacks. Currently, they still do on the West Coast since most places have composting. Using paper grocery sacks is easier than buying compostable bags.

    37. Re: In place of plastic bags.. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Still do offer cardboard boxes that can be used to carry groceries to the trunk of the car. There is nothing wrong with using paper bags that can be used a few times. Not all pro juice is going to soil those paper bags.
      Plastic drinking straws are on their way out with waxed paper straws coming back. Is there any problem to drink a soda pop directly from the edge of the cup without the need of a straw? Let's see if ice cream parlors could make edible spoons.
      When there is a will to come back plastic pollution everyone will find a way to contribute.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    38. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      OK, I realize that may be we are not talking about the same thing, as prices for these things vary from place to place.

      You are probably referring to the slightly thicker and bigger plastic bags you would get for free when you buy something at a clothing or shoe store, but for which they charge you some small amount at supermarkets. I was mainly thinking of the much thicker, sturdier plastic bags/sacs. I agree that the former will usually not last for years, while the latter easily will (those are the ones that I have which are ~10 years old in some cases). However, even the former should last you 6-12 months easily.

      Heck, my grandmother used to wash (yes, wash! and put out on the clothes line to dry) the regular, thin grocery plastic bags and reuse them. So she got a few weeks or months out of each on average before they would tear or become too dirty to clean.

      Of course, bags (of any thickness) can break, so you have to be careful about how much you load them. Yes, people shop opportunistically - so they should always keep a few reusable bags/sacs in their car, just for that purpose. You see, that's partly the point - if you want to reduce waste, you have to actively THINK about it and modify your behaviour from the "everything is disposable" mindset. This is not something new actually, it was the default mode of human thinking until about the 1960s/70s.

      People's shopping habits differ btw. I go to the grocery store almost every day. A reusable bag (even one which lasts only a couple of months) saves a lot of waste on what would otherwise be single-use (if they tear by the time I get home, which happens to like 50% of them) or dual-use (if they get reused as garbage bags) thin grocery bags. This is typical of where I live. If that doesn't make sense for you, well, don't use the 0.15$ bags, buy the string sacks instead, or whatever.

      Finally, it's a bit cheap to come back always with some "yeah that's fine but what about the pollution you make from ... X?" - yeah, what about it? (Most of my clothes are 100% cotton btw. I'm not a fan of polyester and the like - not an environmental thing, but a preference.) It's like saying "why bother locking up the thieves if we can't catch all the rapists?" Less pollution and less waste is always good. Especially when you can do it with things that are totally non-essential, like single-use plastic grocery bags. If those became unavailable tomorrow, the world would go on just as well.

    39. Re:In place of plastic bags.. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      the bags get recycled here as well, and most are some sort of corn base

  2. and three months in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet, now we can measure the rest of Donald Trump's treasonous life in prison in plastic bags. Fitting.

  3. Residents caught using? by PPH · · Score: 0

    What about going after the people who make/distribute the bags? If I see someone using (better yet, re-using) an item, that's a good thing. Now you are just going to encourage people to throw them out. In places that won't lead back to them.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  4. When an Indian city is more progressive... by losfromla · · Score: 1, Interesting

    than every city in the USA. What are we number one at again?

    --
    Only I can judge you.
    1. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Austin, SF, and many other cities have plastic bag bans.

    2. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When an Indian city is more progressive... than every city in the USA. What are we number one at again?

      Every city? Lots of cities in the US have banned single use plastic bags and the entire state of California has banded them. Also, look at the picture in the article. I don't know of any US beaches that look like that. Although, Texas recently unbanned plastic bags.

    3. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At using plastic bags

    4. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Idiocy maybe?

      Have fun using your paper straws.

    5. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sending people to jail, and imposing massive fines for something like plastic bags isn't "progressive", it's fascist. This sort of zero tolerance, clamp down hard stuff is insane. It seems like both ends of the political spectrum have gotten less and less tolerant, and more and more aggressive in whatever it is they don't like.

    6. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The individual penalty is regressive affecting the ones who can least afford it. Do the wealthy do their own shopping? Go out to a fast food restaurant?

    7. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obese incoherent rebellion against... politeness in public?

    8. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      ...the entire state of California has banded them.

      As someone who lives in California, the situation in California is now utterly ridiculous. Since grocery stores aren't allowed to give out thin plastic bags (for free) they now give out thick "multi-use" plastic bags for 10 cents bags. So basically the law is forcing people to carry their groceries in plastic bags that are much thicker than necessary.

      I suppose it could be worse. Not so long ago Germany thought that the key to solving their problems was sending Jews to the gas chambers. And then, more recently, most people in the USA thought that terrible things would happen if gay people were allowed to marry. So if Californians think that forcing people to use thicker plastic bags for their groceries is going to solve their problems, well, there are far worse ways to be stupid.

    9. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      than every city in the USA. What are we number one at again?

      well thank god it isn't being Progressive.

    10. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A glimpse into SJW rule.

      Now report to your detention center for an attitude adjustment.

    11. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They still poop in the street in that Indian city (this, sadly, is cold-hard fact).

    12. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reducing waste is fascist?

      Have you fucking SEEN the Ganges? That's supposed to be a "sacred" river. It's horrible how much waste is in Indian cities.

    13. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Texas is often the asshole of the nation when it comes to situations like this, with their reasoning usually consisting of "because I can!"

      Using spite to make policy decisions is a horrible way to run anything.

    14. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So basically the law is forcing people to carry their groceries in plastic bags that are much thicker than necessary.

      No, the law isn't forcing you to do that ... your inability to buy yourself some re-usable grocery bags is.

      My wife and I have a stack of them, folded up and kept inside one of them ... when we go for groceries, we bring the bag because otherwise we'd have to pay for them. I think we paid about $0.99 each reusable bag, and they've all been used dozens if not hundreds of times, making their cost per use practically nothing after all these years.

      We've had some of those reusable bags for a decade or so, and while on keels over every now and then, they've been pretty durable. As I recall, they're actually made from recycled soda bottles, and then they've been reused for years and washed as needed.

      I suppose it could be worse. Not so long ago Germany thought that the key to solving their problems was sending Jews to the gas chambers.

      Are you seriously trying to equate being too stupid and lazy to buy some reusable bags so you don't have to pay 10 cents for a thicker plastic bag with the fucking holocaust? Really?

      The law isn't forcing you to use thicker plastic bags, your own stupidity is. Bringing your own bags to the grocery store is hardly a taxing prospect.

    15. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      You REUSE those bags! In europe those were one euro per bag. I get cloth bags send to me by some charities as a thank you give, and those last a very long time. If youre spending 10c every trip to get a bag, you're doing it wrong. There's nothing silly or unusual about the California rules.

    16. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you actually been to India? They trash and litter all over the place, they shit on streets ffs.
      More progressive lol.

    17. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not taking a shit in the middle of the road

    18. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except those bags need to be washed and California is enacting strict water usage regulations as well. Soon you'll have to decide whether to use your water for a shower or for sanitizing your re-usable grocery bag.

    19. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - imbecile for president: yep, Obama
      - Pissing off your historical allies: yep, Obama
      - Making policy based on feels and beliefs instead of facts and evidence: yep, Obama and every progressive
      - Whining about how nobody else things you're as awesome as you do: yep, that fits Obama's self righteous finger pointing as well as Hillary's "deplorables"
      - Mass shootings: Not new under Trump and likely more related to the feminist movement over doing their anti-male crusade as well as things like participation trophies not teaching kids that failure and losing is a normal part of life. We've broken the psyche of many boys
      - Incarceration rates: If you don't want to be in jail, don't break the law.
      - Withdrawing from treaties: It's not a treaty if not approved by Congress. Perhaps a President shouldn't make agreements by executive order and should actually try to enter in to international agreements as prescribed in the Constitution. All part of Obama whining that nobody else thinks he's as awesome as he is and making policy based off of feelings and beliefs
      - Actually believing your President is the leader of the free world: I accepted that the legitimately elected Obama was the President despite not agreeing with his policy. It's the whining lefties that don't want to respect the results of an election because of feeling rather than facts and evidence
      - Obesity: Yay for body shaming someone. How hypocritical is that?

    20. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The reusable bags make sense when you make a planned trip to the grocery store...
      But unless you carry reusable bags with you at all times, they are useless if you happen to make an unplanned trip to the store. That's my biggest annoyance, I usually don't make planned trips and just go when i need something.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    21. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We call it "fun camp".

    22. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by yes-but-no · · Score: 1

      waste can't be sacred? wow.. news!

    23. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by CipherBandit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Although I use them to save money, I don't agree with the idea that cloth reusable grocery bags are the way to go to reduce resource usage. I can definitely agree that they reduce litter which is an important consideration as well. There have been studies that show it is vitally important to regularly wash reusable grocery bags to prevent cross contamination of groceries purchased, along with any surfaces the bags come in contact with. The overwhelming majority of RGB users don't do this. Aside from health risks of this, an emergency trip to the hospital likely costs far more resources than you'd save in a lifetime of re-using bags, and while motivated individuals may be vigilant against cross contamination, the population as a whole will not be which makes forcing this as the only cost-effective strategy to grocery shop somewhat short sighted.

    24. Re: When an Indian city is more progressive... by Nocturna81 · · Score: 1

      So, just buy one of these https://pt.aliexpress.com/item... and clip them on your keys, problem solved.

    25. Re: When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only homeless people do that, you racist nerd dumbass.

    26. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Used to be that "socialist" was the term to mean "Anything the government does that I don't like." Now, presumably because word "Fascist" has become important again, that seems to be taking on the role, either because people are treating it as an expletive, or because it's a word whose power supporters of strongly nationalist and racist, authoritarian, violent governments want diluted.

      Either way, calling ban on certain types of products that cause very real harm "fascist" is ridiculous and stupid. Stop it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    27. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why you are -1. I guess that's the "-1: Unpleasant Truth" mod in action

    28. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you want to say Obama is guilty of those things, none of those have changed under Trump. Wasn't he supposed to change things? Drain the swamp?

    29. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      One in your car, one in your bike, one in your office bag, one little one in your pocket. If still not sufficient, grocery stores sell some for a little money.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    30. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The swamp is draining.

      Trust the plan.

    31. Re:When an Indian city is more progressive... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Pocket of what? Do you suggest always wearing the same clothes so you dont remember to take the bag?
      In any case, my clothes often dont have much pocket space - wallet and phone about fills them so carrying more stuff becomes an inconvenience.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    32. Re: When an Indian city is more progressive... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      And you bought these clothes to get an excuse to use more one-time use plastic ?
      Or at least bought them in an environment where you were not responsible for indirect cost of using one time use plastic?

      Why is your lack of pockets a problem of the world ? Why can't you pay the cost of taking a bag from the car /home/bike for the privilege of wearing clothes without pockets ?

      Ever heard of actions and consequences ?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    33. Re: When an Indian city is more progressive... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Only the plastic bags from stores are not one time use, after using them to carry groceries many people then use them to hold trash. If plastic grocery bags are not available then i have to buy plastic trashbags instead, the amount of plastic being discarded is the same but the cost and inconvenience is increased.

      Like many of these policies that are supposed to be about protecting the environment, they end up doing more harm than good.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    34. Re: When an Indian city is more progressive... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Like many of these policies that are

      Like your policy of wearing clothes without enough pockets that was formulated when such a law did not exist ? And you persist in the policy when the reality , under which the policy was formulated , changes so that you end up generating more plastic waste ?

      You are the only one responsible for generating more plastic waste in this scenario - not the "policy". In general there may be policies that end up doing more bad than good, but it is on you this time.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  5. Should be 1/2 of their income or jail by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    That would be more fair.

    And, yes, there have been replacements for plastic bags for decades.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Should be 1/2 of their income or jail by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      That would be more fair.

      And, yes, there have been replacements for plastic bags for decades.

      I'm guessing that 25K rupees is way more than 1/2 of the income of many people who live in Mumbai.

  6. Excessive Money Grubbing by Government by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "penalties of up to 25,000 rupees (~$365) and three months in jail from Monday."

    That is excessive punishment.
    This is the government using fines to raise revenues.
    Government greed.

    1. Re:Excessive Money Grubbing by Government by stooo · · Score: 1

      Nope.
      This is the level where all people really take the matter instantly.
      This is the level that really works.
      So it won't really make bucks.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    2. Re:Excessive Money Grubbing by Government by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      ...and what's a few ruined lives in the process? (seriously - those are some pretty massive-assed fines for the average Indian.)

      Even on a smaller scale, now the cost of groceries, take-out, whatever just went up.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Excessive Money Grubbing by Government by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      No, it did not. You only think that because you've externalized the cost of disposing of single use plastic on the world/environment. Charge the appropriate fee for proper disposal, and it's likely this would be a money saving change.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re:Excessive Money Grubbing by Government by lgw · · Score: 2

      There is no such cost (at least, none worth measuring). There is a cost to not disposing of them, however - letting them litter the streets, dumping them at sea, and so on. Really hard to keep assholes from dumping trash at sea, though.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Excessive Money Grubbing by Government by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The cost is in extracting the oil, refining it, manufacturing the plastic bag/straw complete with printed logo, transporting it to the shop, lining the bin to contain it when discarded, transporting the waste to landfill, dumping it, making the landfill site safe, and then at some point in the future dealing with the emissions from decaying plastic.

      It may seem insignificant per individual item, but we are using billions of such items and much of that cost is difficult to directly measure. How much does securing the supply of disposable plastic cost, how much land is wasted on landfill, how much will people in the future have to pay to deal with it?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Excessive Money Grubbing by Government by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Nope. This is the level when they pay 10% of the money to the police officer catching them and litter even more.

      Stronger punishment rarely leads to higher compliance - more likelihood of getting caught has a far bigger effect. But strength of punishment is negatively correlated with likelihood of getting caught due to corruptibility of agents of law.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    7. Re:Excessive Money Grubbing by Government by lgw · · Score: 1

      The cost per item is still trivial, accounting for everything, as long as the plastic makes it to a dump. No problem there. The real world problems we're seeing are from people who lack the basic decency to throw their trash away in the trash, or to not simply dump garbage at sea instead of delivering it to a dump.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  7. More worried about the container clean water comes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More worried about the container that clean water comes in than the filth in their rivers.

    How about fixing the raw sewage in the rivers before banning the only means for drinking clean water.

  8. Export all plastic to Mumbai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will have plastic and they WILL like it.

  9. What about single-use intravenous lines? by greenwow · · Score: 1

    Seattle has talked about banning them. That scares the hell out of me.

  10. Jail? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's happening over there in India? Sending someone to jail over a plastic bag (even repeatedly) sounds an awful lot like fascism to me.

  11. How are those not reusable? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've used a lot of plastic bags quite a few times.

    I have a Fuji water bottle I bought at an airport that I like the size of, so I've been refilling it for a few years.

    Almost anything CAN be reusable if you try. What a shame they are getting rid of some really useful items that took a long time for human to advance enough to produce.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How are those not reusable? by MoralCharacter · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised to find I'm not the only one who will re-use the same 'disposable' water bottle for several years. The Aquafina bottle I have at my desk is from 2015 - I go to a local 'water and ice' (a chain here in Arizona) and buy RO water to fill it and several jugs at $0.25/gallon. Granted, while the tap water out here is perfectly safe to drink, it isn't very palatable straight from the tap. Filtering it takes the canal taste out of the water.

    2. Re:How are those not reusable? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Dunno... BPA would keep me out of doing that. I'll settle for an actual cup.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:How are those not reusable? by GNious · · Score: 1

      how much of that bottle has leached into you so far?

    4. Re:How are those not reusable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a Fuji water bottle I bought at an airport that I like the size of, so I've been refilling it for a few years.

      Based on the water bottles I've seen recently (seriously conference venues: quit with the free plastic bottled water and just put out some glasses and a jug already!) they seem to have move to some sort of super-flimsy plastic that I'd think twice about using more than once for fear of leaks.

      Almost anything CAN be reusable if you try.

      Agreed. Sadly most people seem to work by the logic that things that are cheap/free (or "just" a container you bought something in) then it should be tossed out. Otherwise we wouldn't need tax incentives, bans etc.

    5. Re:How are those not reusable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I used to reuse plastic bags around the home, mostly as bin liners. But in recent years they've grown so thin that it's increasingly rare to get one home at all without a major tear in it. The odds of them surviving a couple of weeks of regular use (as something other than a bin liner) are vanishingly tiny now.

      A plastic bag is reusable. A plastic bag with a great hole torn in it - has severely diminished utility, to say the least.

    6. Re:How are those not reusable? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Why not use a faucet filter (PUR, Brita, etc.)? They are rated at 100 gallons per filter and cost a lot less than $25. Also you wouldn't have to carry jugs of water home from the "water and ice" store.

    7. Re:How are those not reusable? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Based on the water bottles I've seen recently (seriously conference venues: quit with the free plastic bottled water and just put out some glasses and a jug already!)

      Glasses at a concert venue? The death toll would be massive. There's a reason most festivals ban any sort of glass container.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:How are those not reusable? by thePsychologist · · Score: 1

      The problem is most people don't reuse them. And if you get a plastic nalgene bottle is lasts much longer than a plastic "disposable" one and is much easier to clean.

      --
      "What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." Ralph Waldo Emerson
    9. Re:How are those not reusable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a shame they are getting rid of some really useful items that took a long time for human to advance enough to produce.

      Nobody is getting rid of plastics, we are getting rid of single use plastics. There is a difference, I don't understand why it is so complex to understand. Plastics will be still part of the all things including packaging, commercial products, water bottles, etc.
      And nobody is going to jail for using plastics bag. The problem is western people don't understand the situation in other country and deduce India is a draconian state. And for most people it may be big news, there is nothing new, plastics is banned in majority of cities, especially almost every tourist cities and other big commercial cities like Bangalore and many other cities.
      This laws are meant to deter people from using plastics and help them slowing moving away from plastic trash and a greener planet, while western people debate about moving out of climate deals and BPA in plastic bottles and blah blah. The steep fine is a deterrent, and the fine is too big for most of the Indians. 5K is a big amount to make people think multiple times. And the move is not for people but for establishments like grocery store who were happily giving free disposable plastics for a small milk packet also. Most supermarkets now charge big bucks for providing even a small reusable plastics bag, and so the trend is now most people bring their own jute bags, or other reusable bags from home to avoid extra payments and thus promoting truly reusing of plastics or moving away from plastics. Small eateries are forced to avoid disposable plastic plates and move to reusable stainless steel or disposable paper plates.
      The laws are meant here to promote healthier lifestyle choices and avoiding plastic as much as possible and not to make money by fine or sending people to jails. There is a difference in law implementation and interpretation, we here don't use teaser guns on kids or minorities or anyone and definitely no one is going to jail for using plastics bags.

    10. Re:How are those not reusable? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I've used a lot of plastic bags quite a few times.

      Out of necessity or out of environmental courtesy? One thing we have learnt over the years is that latter doesn't work. The one person who looks after the environment won't offset the other who runs his heater in one room, AC in the other and leaves the door open between them.

      Banning plastic bags forces this issue towards necessity. I too had a re-use bag when I go shopping. I have for many years. I also used biodegradable bin liners. Yet when shops started charging for plastic bags years back people thought the world would end. End result a lot of behaviors changed.

      This is also why for the global warming debate we need to start thinking of mitigation rather than prevention. The human race is too up itself to achieve prevention en mass.

    11. Re:How are those not reusable? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Or just buy the Brita waterbottle with built in filter.

    12. Re:How are those not reusable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      I'm the same, since none of the 'permanent' water bottles have easy access for me to handwash them: I typically use a bottle for a month.

      People shouldn't be fined for (RE)USING any of these. Just don't dispense them any more.

    13. Re:How are those not reusable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because those aren't R/O filters - they're carbon filters. Sure... they adjust the flavor, but it's not the same........

    14. Re:How are those not reusable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is about intent rather than off-label use. Sure, some people sometimes reuse their bags for dog waste or can liners. How many don't? If you were at a bridge underpass, or near a drainage gate along a highway: Would you bet me $5 there isn't a plastic bag in sight?

      Single use plastics may still have use, but we could be using paper or "intentionally reusable" plastics a lot more.

    15. Re:How are those not reusable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those bottles have a finite shelf life before the plastic begins to leak into the water. There is a reason why bottled water has an expiration date on it.

  12. I don't understand. by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Funny

    and the threat of three months' jail for those caught repeatedly using single-use plastics.

    If people are repeatedly using them, they're not single-use plastics, by definition.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:I don't understand. by MoralCharacter · · Score: 1

      I'm going to hope they aren't nearly as draconic as that sounds, and that it was more meant that if they catch people making use of disposable plastics and not re-using them. Maybe they're going to go digging through peoples trash?

    2. Re:I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Repeatedly using does not mean reusing the same bags in the context of the topic. There is a difference.

      For example, I can repeatedly use pencils to stab you, or I can stab you repeatedly with the same pencil. Still don't understand?

    3. Re:I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common sense is not so common.

    4. Re:I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and we are also hiring few Americans to dig the trash.

    5. Re:I don't understand. by fgouget · · Score: 1

      That was a joke, Sheldon.

  13. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    About fucking time! But I agree with the fact that we should go after who make plastic containers not the final users. It's really simple, you want to make plastic container and packaging? Good, you must abide to some strict regulation that ensure that your products "will be fully recycled" and you must account for them, every month you put out 500'000 plastic container? Then every month you must scoop up 500'000 container to be recycled in your factory.

  14. Dogs? by xaosflux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So when you walk your dog - where do you put the poo? In nice breathable paper sacks?

    1. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shit on the street with your dog

    2. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In your pocket of course. Then you can go from Level 5 Vegan to Level 6 and do pocket mulching!

    3. Re:Dogs? by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      So when you walk your dog - where do you put the poo?

      You let the blue-coated inspector stop you and you happily surrender your full bags to them.

    4. Re:Dogs? by stooo · · Score: 1

      You let it decompose in the forest, like any other animal's poo.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    5. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poo in the loo

    6. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because of additives to dog food now, dog feces just doesn't decompose like it used to. I live in Seattle and have several neighbors that let their dog poop in my front yard and on my porch. There's a lot of dog feces that have been there for over a year that haven't broken down yet.

    7. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gee I wonder why they shit in your lawn

    8. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of additives to dog food now, dog feces just doesn't decompose like it used to. I live in Seattle and have several neighbors that let their dog poop in my front yard and on my porch. There's a lot of dog feces that have been there for over a year that haven't broken down yet.

      It's not food additives. It's their hair.

      I have tracked wolves for a conservation effort via their droppings. Wolf scat does not disappear until sufficient precipitation and wind disperses or another animal eats it.

    9. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In India? The dogs shit next to the humans. It's just how they roll.

    10. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So will your neighbors also allow their dogs to eat chocolate or peanut butter found in your front yard?

    11. Re:Dogs? by idji · · Score: 1

      bioedegrable plastic sacks.

    12. Re:Dogs? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Biodegradable ones. Shit man put at least some token effort into engaging your brain rather than (literally) shitting on the environment.

    13. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough*

      You're aware that there are unofficially-designated outdoor pooping streets in Mumbai, right? As in: human needs to poop, so human runs over, dodges as much human poop as possible, and then takes a gigantic poop somewhere in the garbage+poop pile that covers the street. Then they go wash their feet in the bloated-human-corpse-infested river.

      Those places might actually smell nicer if people don't pick up the dog poop, since it'll help cover the smell of all the human poop and the smell of the bloated, decomposing human corpses!

    14. Re:Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's India... they have designated shitting streets because they don't understand the concept of poo in loo.

  15. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA:

    India’s use of plastic is less than half of the global average: about 11kg a year per capita compared with 109kg in the US.

    In a world where 20,000 children a day die of poverty, 25 lbs of plastic a year per capita really just doesn't seem that high on the list of the world's problems. To me it seems like vita signaling: take some trivial issue and get all self-righteous about how if you care about such a trivial issue then you must really care about the other issues. That's not to say that I'm opposed to alternatives to disposable plastic containers. But unless you can solve the problems of infectious disease associated with reusable containers then you're likely to create quite a but of suffering and even death.

    1. Re:I don't get it by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I assume it has more to do with gumming up water treatment.

      Plastic can be problematic closer to home than the ocean.

      Clogged drains, clogged water treatment, these things cost money and/or spread disease.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  16. I predict ... by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    ...lots of Tupperware parties.

    1. Re:I predict ... by stooo · · Score: 1

      Or Bollywoodware for that matter

      --
      aaaaaaa
  17. Re:Jail? Really? by stooo · · Score: 1

    Nope.
    Using and overusing plastic bags is an obvious lack of respect and should be punished.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  18. pet vs PET by stooo · · Score: 2

    The problem is 99.9999999 of the bottles aren't a "Pet bottle" like your's.
    They are the trash that line our citie's surroundings.
    They're PET bottles, not reusable, not recycled as a matter of fact.

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:pet vs PET by swillden · · Score: 1

      The problem is 99.9999999 of the bottles aren't a "Pet bottle" like yours

      I assume you meant 99.9999999%. That would mean that only one out of every 1,000,000,000 bottles gets reused. That would mean that out of the 40B bottles used (and not recycled) in the US every year, only 40 of them get reused. Since I personally know a dozen or so people who do this regularly, you've got to be off by a few orders of magnitude.

      (Yes, I'm making a pedantic point about your excessive number of nines. Yes, I know you didn't actually calculate an estimate, but just pounded the '9' until you felt satisfied. This is a common thing innumerate people do and it's really obnoxious. 99.99% would be a far more realistic guess, and would have made your point just as effectively.)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  19. There are replacements to plastic bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you go to a fish shop, ask him that to take away a fish, use a padfoot of paper or a biodegradable bag instead of a plastic bag.

    What marvelous is it three decades ago!!!

  20. Because most people use them once by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    context matters. Very, very few people will reuse a thin plastic bottle. I use plastic bags from the grocery store but a) I get more than even I can use (only have 1 dog) and b) they're too flimsy for much else.

    You have to consider what the majority of people are going to do and not what a few outliers do when you make policy.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Because most people use them once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in an apartment and use the plastic bags from grocery store as garbage bags. They are better sized for the small bin you can accommodate under the sink and are better priced (from free to 5c a pop) compared to "specialized" garbage plastic bags. It's not uncommon for me to purchase few $ worth of this bags as I usually bring my own reusable bags for actual grocery.

      And fwiw everybody I know who live in appt or condos does the same. This bags are just perfect.

  21. Re:More worried about the container clean water co by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Worse than you think: Some of those rivers get half-burned human (and various un-burned animal) corpses dumped into them on a very regular basis (and if we're talking about the Ganges, we're talking near-industrial-scale corpse-dumping), let alone the massive amount of un/semi-treated sewage.

    I guess this little step is better than no step, but yeah, you're right... there are way bigger problems that could be addressed here.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  22. I very much disagree - educational/practical issue by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The problem is 99.9999999 of the bottles aren't a "Pet bottle" like your's.

    Based on what I have seen I highly doubt the percentage of people re-using light plastic bottles is that low.

    The biggest change around that has been airport bottle filling stations. I see people using those all the time when I fly from old plastic bottles. In fact old plastic bottles are BETTER for this when they are lighter, because they compact flat when empty until you are ready to re-fill.

    So in India for example, you could have bottle filling stations all around a city an encourage people to use bottles multiple times. The bottled water companies might not like it but it would be a massive public good if they could offer truly clean water to everyone in a city.

    For plastic bags, no reason you could not get a small credit for bringing you own plastic bags the same way you do for the fabric bags in stores.

    Plastic bags and bottles are really, really useful - again I ask why do we need to throw out such useful tech simply because it has been misused and carelessly discarded by some?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. If you are worried about that, fear "reusable". by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    how much of that bottle has leached into you so far?

    As far as I'm concerned this fear of plastic "leeching" into you in any quantity is right up there with anti-vaxxer nonsense.

    I've used the same bottle for years, and there is absolutely no change in structural strength or even appearance nor taste in the water I fill the bottle with. So how much of it could possibly have "leeched" into me - not to mention that plastic is wholly inert anyway, and even if I chose to eat the bottle it would simply flow through my system and go out the other end with almost no change.

    I'll grant you some *reusable* plastic bottles can lend water a bit of an aftertaste. I'm still not scared of what tiny amounts of whatever may be in there, however the taste puts me off enough that is actually why I prefer to simply re-use bottles used to sell bottled water, because they impart no taste to the water at all unlike the heavier and supposedly more reusable plastic bottles (stainless steel bottles seem mostly fine, but are way too heavy).

    So getting rid of the plastic bottles water is sold in, is actually a *detriment* to people who will be forced to use reusable plastic bottles that do actually leech something noticeable into water...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:If you are worried about that, fear "reusable". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you scrub the inside? I've had water bottles turn scummy before...

    2. Re:If you are worried about that, fear "reusable". by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I just rinse them out with water, not even soap, and let them dry - then rinse them out again before filling.

      I do sometimes use soap to clean the top of the bottle where mouths have touched. I've never had them get scummy before, as long as I re-fill them if they've been sitting for more than a few days.

      I generally only fill them with water from a fridge filer though, in a pinch I use tap water directly from hotels but it's pretty rare. Maybe unfiltered water is the source of what you are seeing.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. This Should Be A Boon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for mortuaries disposing of dead council workers.

  25. Plastic bags are a liberal conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 80s when we hated commies and gay people, we just drank put of the water fountain. Today in our progressive compassionate era where we hate racists and pedophiles, we are afraid of touching out fellow human beings because they carry germs. Hence we have a massive plastics industry making everything from plastic gloves for food handling to plastic bottles to hold water.

  26. Re:More worried about the container clean water co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Distance from Mumbai to Allahabad (a city on the banks of the Yamuna and Ganga Rivers):
    1,352 km (~840.094 mi)

  27. Re:More worried about the container clean water co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people still poop in the streets/beaches out of superstitious fear, lack of facilities, or pure cultural inertia. all of that untreated poop goes into streams, rivers & oceans. they've tried numerous public works projects & advertising to stop it.

  28. Re:More worried about the container clean water co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i see Penguinisto's post mentioning cows and cadavres in a discussion about plastic as flame bait. nonetheless, i hazard human cadavres (or other half-singed animal remains) have a much slimmer decomposition half-life than polyethlyne plastic compounds etc.
    "eight to twelve years to decompose [a human cadavre] to a skeleton" and not sure how many decades more for the bones to dustify.

    vs. a 500 to 1000 year half-life for some plastics ?

  29. Correction.. Its the whole state of Maharashtra by bain_online · · Score: 3, Informative
    *Ahem* Its not just Mumbai, but the whole state of Maharashtra that has banned plastics

    I live in Pune, about 120km east of Mumbai and its the same. Its strange not to get straws to drink soda in McDonalds now. But a good change anyways. The country is getting littered way too much.

    --
    BAIN http://www.devslashzero.com
    1. Re:Correction.. Its the whole state of Maharashtra by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I have another idea. Instead of banning plastic and hiring people to patrol, why don't they just hire people to clean up the litter?

  30. Re:Jail? Really? by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Sending someone to jail over a plastic bag (even repeatedly) sounds an awful lot like fascism to me.

    You have a wrong understanding of what fascism is.
    Fascism is a right-wing nationalism where corporations and government are in bed with each other. That's pretty much the opposite of what we see here.
    Were you thinking of "police state", perhaps?

  31. Because India cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If India gave a crap about the world they would ban using the best antibiotics in the world on chickens to increase egg production.

  32. Nigh impossible to address by aepervius · · Score: 1

    The half burned corpse problem is about funeral rites. Imagine that in the US suddenly out of ecological concern everybody is suddenly requested to burn their loved one. Some might not see a problem, but for many religious folk it would be. Same with the funeral rite on the gange. Heck a way to alleviate the problem would be for the state to provide fuel for the poorest to get a proper burning, but stopping those funeral rite won't work. Anyway the corpse will rot and be washed out. The plastic bags will not.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  33. Re:I very much disagree - educational/practical is by stooo · · Score: 1

    >> So in India for example, you could have bottle filling stations all around a city an encourage people to use bottles multiple times
    Doesn't work.
    In these countries, people don't trust tap water.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  34. priorities! by sad_ · · Score: 1

    drinking from a plastic cup can get you 3 months in jail, all the while nothing much is done about the rape problem they have.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:priorities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have banned plastic condoms too.

  35. Re:I very much disagree - educational/practical is by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Based on what I have seen I highly doubt the percentage of people re-using light plastic bottles is that low.

    I don't think the issue here is percentage of people so much as percentage of bottles. We do this kind of re-use all the time, but the reality is our recycle bin is absolutely full to overflowing with plastic bottles at the end of the week anyway.

    I agree with your solutions BTW, I just felt the lead sentence placed the emphasis on the wrong group. Realistically, there's a problem in (most of) the US in terms of emphasizing recycling over reuse, with little incentive given to return bottles to the supermarkets that sold them (who wouldn't know what to do with them if we did.)

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  36. Nice. Like it. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Let's see how this plays out. Humanity as a whole needs to move towards zero-garbage. Like, fast.
    A doorstep country showing the first world how it is done is a nice thing indeed.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Nice. Like it. by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Humans will always make garbage; the problem is what do you do with it. Bad: throw non-biodegradable plastic in the street. Good: recycle, reuse. Same with everything else, from paper to poop. You can't have zero garbage any more than you can have zero poop.

  37. ashes by bingoUV · · Score: 1

    You have no clue what gets dumped into the river, do you ? Only the ashes and big bones that do not disintegrate even in a large fire are dumped. A 70 kg human body leaves behind much less than 1 kg stuff to be dumped. Thin / weak people leave a fistful.

    For all purposes of hygiene , that part can be licked by babies and nothing much would happen except some nourishment. Calling it half-burned displays your colossal ignorance.

    Anyway it is far more environmentally sustainable than burying dead bodies in the ground, to speak nothing of preventing contagious diseases.

    --
    Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  38. Plastic bag use by Contract+Gypsy · · Score: 0

    A neighbor of ours did a great job of dispatching a skunk without stinking up the place. So he tied it into one of the thin white plastic bags and tossed it into the woods. Only one problem, the handles of the bag got caught on a branch too high to reach. So, the bag just hung there for a few days and apparently the smell started to come out of the bag. Our neighborhood had the slight smell of skunk every time we were downwind from that bag. So that is use #2368 for plastic bags!

    --
    Life is in a state of dynamic equilibrium, it both blows and sucks
  39. Treating the symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plastic litter and waste is a symptom of a larger problem (bad parenting? manners? culture?). Treating the symptom will have short term effects until the impracticality of policing this long term fades and you are back to square one.