Slashdot Mirror
Scott Pruitt Resigns as EPA Administrator (cnbc.com)
Scott Pruitt's polarizing tenure as head of the Environmental Protection Agency has come to an end. From a report: President Donald Trump tweeted on Thursday that he has accepted Pruitt's resignation. Trump said that the agency's deputy administrator, Andrew Wheeler, will become the acting head of EPA. The departure follows months of scrutiny that gathered momentum following reports that Pruitt had rented a Capitol Hill condominium linked to an energy lobbyist on favorable terms. The revelation exacerbated concerns about the high cost of Pruitt's travel and security detail and triggered a flood of allegations that Pruitt fostered a culture of workplace retaliation, wasteful spending and self-dealing at EPA. The steady flow of negative news stories prompted multiple government investigators to open several inquiries into Pruitt. His EPA now faces about a dozen probes into its spending, ethics and policy decisions. In a statement, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) said, "Good." Further reading: Judge Orders EPA To Produce Science Behind Pruitt's Climate Claims
Just sayin
Fill it so high that America gags, then drain it the tiniest bit and try to get everyone to ignore the stink of dried out shit around their necks.
Whatever you say Ivan.
You are all cows. Cows say moo. MOOOOOO! MOOOOOO! Moo cows MOOOOO! Moo say the cows. YOU ENVIRONMENTALLY PROTECTED COWS!!
Asshole, doorknob. Make sure you don't hit it on the way out.
The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
Is the swamp drained yet? Are we tired of "winning" yet? Is America great again yet?
Thoughts and prayers.
... but the EPA needs to be curtailed in every way. Trump gave him a chance because he's a known EPA-hater, but he turned out to be in it for the money. Maybe the next guy can actually change things at EPA. Suck on that lefties.
And yet, he had the most harmful agenda toward his own agancy of any predecessor.
What's crazy is that it took an ethics scandal over sweetheart deals with a gas industry lobbying firm to get him out
Yeah, I guess you can say at least he's out, but who knows who Trump will replace him with. Probably just another oil and coal industry lapdog.
Scott Pruitt resigning is a good thing, but is his replacement going to be as bad, or worse? We need an EPA that puts protecting the environment ahead of corporate interests and ignores 'personal loyalty' to Trump, and you can call me 'anti-Trump' (true, but irrelevant for this subject) or 'pro-Hillary' (untrue, and just as irrelevant), but if your kids are getting cancer (or YOU get cancer) or are born with birth defects because there's toxic substances in your drinking water and/or air, I guarantee that you will care, and if your nice coastal home has to be abandoned because sea levels rise permanently and flood you out, you will care. Try thinking in the long term, Conservative types, and not just about punishing so-called 'liberals', or only as far ahead as next quarters' profits.
Wonder what really was the tipping point..did he hit on Ivanka?
>"agency's deputy administrator and former coal industry lobbyist, Andrew Wheeler, will become the acting head of EPA"
That's not good news either, lets hope it slows down the destruction of environment for time being.
Melania is going to get the boot as a surprise twist during the fall season premier.
I hear that Anthony Weiner is open to exploring new opportunities. Does anyone have Matt Lauer or Harvey Weinstein or Charlie Rose on speed dial? Now that the bar has been set sufficient low I'm sure that any of them would be fine candidates.
Trump knows great people, the best people, good people , if they weren't the best people he wouldn't have pardoned them.
I'm a U.S. citizen, live in the U.S., and wish the U.S. eventually will have a healthy government again.
The problem with replacing Sessions is he's recused. Anyone Trump gets in there besides him won't be, and would end the investigations causing the big Constitutional crisis that could really... be bad for everybody.
I don't put it past Trump to burn the White House down if he can't have it.
Go ahead and find me a poor politician, I'll wait.
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
(someone had to say it)
Pruitt had become the poster child for government corruption, but I think Trump actually liked his flamboyance about it. Sort of created cover for Trump's own shenanigans. I am sort of curious which camel broke the straw's back, but mostly I agree with the "good riddance" comments and I'm offended by the holier-than-thou hypocrisy.
The last of the vestigial TRUE Republicans are dying or retiring. The brand has been hijacked.
Gee, do you suppose it would deter the hijackers like Scott Pruitt if someone would lock up their kids? You know, the old collective responsibility thing.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
Too many of the articles seem to be things designed to "engage" people, and aren't terribly informative. And by "engage" I mean get people to start arguing.
*nodding*
The term 'myopians' comes to mind, if you follow me.
I do love the Abolish ICE thing. "We're not anti-police! We just want to abolish all police! Open borders! Let in all refugees! Don't let police arrest minorities! All crime by non-whites is legal! Why is no one coming under our tent?"
You're hitting on a serious problem with America's political system there. If you want competent politicians on both sides, and if you agree that the issues are complicated, then where do you store the losers of the last election? That's on the theory that they were actually competent to run for office in the first place.
For elections to be meaningful, we need more than one choice, regardless of how long the incumbent has been "studying" the issues. We need some politicians who want to serve the public interests, not just people who are so rich that they don't care about losing and doing nothing until the next election. We especially don't need politicians who are just trying to rig the game to make themselves and their friends richer.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
I firmly believe that many of Trump's base are his base not because they like Trump so much, but because they hated Obama and all Democrats and used their ballots for revenge, and to hell what it did to the Country, let it all burn to the ground so far as they're concerned; it's the ugly underside of having a democratic republic, nothing prevents people from abusing their right to vote in such a way that they use it to cause damage just out of spite. I also firmly believe that many of Trump's supporters are in so deep now that they don't think they can do and about-face without losing everything, so they continue to hold their noses, and that members of the GOP who are suddenly retiring from office are doing so because they can't hold their noses anymore, but aren't going to 'sell out' their own party (although ironically, they did exactly that by supporting Trump as a candidate).
Wow. The parent comment is reasonable and probably correct for the most part, but is being down-moderated as "Trolling"? Really?
It looks like a lot of Trumptards have moderation privileges today (and unlike the parent post, I don't feel the need to coddle their precious feelings) and are doing their best to use them to silence criticism of their orange god.
I wonder if we should start blocking IP addresses in Trumptardia (the American Outback, or in other words, rural counties where critical thinking exceeds the mental capacity of the entire hick population). See, unlike the parent's comment, I don't sugar coat it. But hey, at least if I'm modded a Troll, that's one less moderation point that can be abused to silence more thoughtful posts.
Fox doesn't need to "tell" anyone anything other than what democrats say. Or are you saying Kirsten Gilibrand, Alexandria Cortez, Bill de Blasio, and others are lying? Even in the clinton emails talked about supporting open borders.
Democrats really do have a problem of being quoted.
http://thehill.com/opinion/imm...
Unfortunately, it would be hard to do the experiment at an actual Trump rally, but maybe it could be simulated at one of the protests against separating the kids? What if each of the protestors has a piece of paper with Trump's face on it and they use it for a "Word from the OTHER side" chant? Just a minute or two of chanting somewhere in the protest? I think the video of a mob of angry Trump faces chanting "Lock kids up, LOCK KIDS UP!" would have the potential to go viral--and it might even get into the heads of some of Trump's followers.
In other words, a false-flag operation? No. Just no. Very bad idea.
Stick to the truth. It wins in the end.
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
lol, so you support fox news lies with an OPINION piece by a fox news commentator
frickin hilarious
And it didn't even work, we could still hear him.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
There was a great new yorker article about him and his "philosophies".
https://www.newyorker.com/maga...
like he sued the EPA 14 times before he became the administrator and plenty of other horrible industry funded activities. Literally the last and most corrupt and paranoid person you could get to run that agency...
As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
Not at all, but your reply mostly makes me wonder if you're one of Putin's professionals. Let's pretend you just don't understand the suggestion.
A false flag would involve a sincere pretense of flying some other flag. There is NO way to claim that the sarcastic intention would not be obvious. Well, actually I can imagine one way, but I've never seen a video of Trumpsters wearing Trump masks en masse. Maybe I shouldn't give them the idea? They might like it.
My idea actually came from my extremely minor participation in a June-30th protest against family separation and in favor of keeping children with their parents. Have you [not just ClickOnThis, but anyone reading this] done at least as much?
The most effective part of the protest was the reading of victims' stories. There were various other activities of lesser interest, and I've already forgotten most of the details. The LEAST effective part was the chanting, but that's actually a good thing. We don't want to be part of an angry chanting mob, even when protesting against something as horrible as imprisoning children for the possible crimes of their parents.
By the way, you do know that seeking asylum is NOT a crime, right?
We seem to be dealing with a lot of shifting standards of "justice" these days. In criminal trials, we're supposed to have a strong presumption of innocence and a high standard of proof. In civil trials things can sink to a preponderance of evidence and the penalties are highly negotiable, to put it mildly. Returning to the original story, Pruitt's standard for his behavior was apparently "Well, it might be legal and I wanna do it anyway."
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
Either you are willfully ignorant or blind to reality. Or a professional troll paid to fake it. Or you might even be one of Stephen Miller's personal sock puppets.
Go watch some of Trump's rallies. If you are sane, then I doubt you have the stomach to watch the entire thing.
On the other hand, I do think everyone is more or less insane. The craziest one is the guy who's insisting he's perfectly sane. I bet Trump has made that claim, though I haven't heard it in the blizzard of insanity he spews.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
is a true case of kettle calling pot black.
Seriously, CREW is about as corrupt as they get.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
First of all, a tip of the hat to you for participating in the protests.
For the record, I am most definitely not one of Putin's "professionals." Nor am I at all a supporter of Trump and his administration. Very much the opposite.
My original concern about your "lock kids up" protest is that although the sarcasm of it may be obvious to many, there will be those who try to spin it as the "other side" misrepresenting who Trumpists are. On reflection, I'm thinking your idea may not be such a bad one after all, if carried out briefly, and with an obvious display of parody.
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
Just like vaccines, right-wing ideologues can't imagine a world where acid rain, lead in gasoline and paint (i.e. just about everywhere), and Superfund sites that are decades away from being completely cleaned up.
Maybe we should kill the IRS too, because they're evil according to __fill-in-the-blank__
I'm a registered GOP voter, but sometimes the more ignorant, emotionally-driven members of our party really embarrass the rest of us.
I'd imagine that the soundproof room was to prevent outside people from recording the marching orders that Pruitt was receiving from the gas and oil industry executives.
Of course, now that the room has been built, don't expect the next EPA admin from the Trump administration to be in a hurry to tear it down.
We might finally find a purpose for the existence of Kim Kardashian. Trump should make her the new EPA chief.
Sure she won't be great at it, but she'll be less bad than any other Trump pick.
Well, there seems to be a wide range of views within the Democratic party. Most of the Republicans however have all gotten behind Trump, even many who were initially opposed to him. Bizarre views from some Democrats can usually be seen as outliers, whereas bizarre views by Republicans seem to be increasingly mainstream.
FYI, I am not registered with either party.
They are the Eggmen,
I am the Walrus! Koo Koo ka Joo! ah Koo Koo ka Joo!
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
This is only because people have been changing the meanings of those words over time. I think the vast majority of environmentalists are what you call a conservationist, they do not want to get rid of all people. You look at a few outliers and assume this represents the whole.
I knew someone would jump on that and here you are!
We give you examples and you blow them off just like you did in your second sentence. You act like there aren't videos of your nationalists, tea partiers, and other deplorables marching alongside Nazis in several states. You constantly go on about all the bad guys when the evening news just shows another crazy conservatard shooting up a school or a mall. The evidence is there. Thousands of videos on Youtube. Somehow though all a liberal conspiracy to make thousands of fake news videos. You guys aren't racist, no siree, those black kids in georgia just magically ended up in those trees last year. Google shit, I ain't doing it for ya. And if YOU, in particular, are getting so worked up about being a racist twat, then A) police your team, they're giving YOU a bad name, and B) you have internalized some bad shit man, and it's trying to get out, meaning you either are racist or want to be racist. It's called projection. So if you aren't Projecting, you need to be Ejecting the nazis out of your party instead of voting them in. That also happened. A California district IIRC. Google that shit too. I mean, I know you won't because you don't actually care. You're just tired of being called poopypants even though you literally have poop in your pants. Change your pants, stop shitting in them, or own that shit. Either way, shut the fuck up.
Actually, the Nobel Peace Prize is not a real Nobel Prize. Its winners are chosen by all the orevious winners. The entire thing is a joke.
Yeah, Obama's gonna play a major role in picking the next one.
And HE didn'd "denuclearize" shit!
He's just one figurehead at the front of the ship. His purpose was/is decorative. And distractive. While the ship is actually steered by the one behind the wheel and commanded by the captain. (Like Darth Cheney in JarJar Bush years.}
My feeling is that 15 or 20 seconds of video should make the point, but with practice, it could be juicier. Start out as a coherent chant and devolve into unintelligible howling from the mob.
The goal is to make SOME of the Trumpsters think about the bandwagon they are riding, and maybe decide they don't want to be there after all. Having said that, I really would like to know what percentage of them actually would sincerely chant "Lock kids up!"
Not sure it belongs here, but I just composed a little rant about justice:
It's a funny thing about justice... There are different kinds of justice and various standards. For example, If you're a vet, then you must remember the UCMJ. In the case of an actual crime in civilian jurisdictions in normal America, there is a strong presumption of innocence and the standard of proof is quite high. In a civil matter, the preponderance of the evidence can be sufficient and the punishment is highly negotiable, to say the least.
Interesting example just came up. Scott Pruitt was using a different standard of justice: The "It's probably legal and I want to do it!" standard. Took a long time to catch up to him.
Shaky as that seems, it's probably firmer than #PresidentTweety's grasp of the law. Seems like Trump's idea is to grab Lady Justice by the pussy and shake her until she does what he wants. I don't think that's going to work well after Mueller gets her deposition...
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
That's possible, but I actually agree when Chomsky says that Nixon was the last actually liberal president. Don't forget he came from California, where he was apparently a better governor than Saints Reagan or Schwarzenegger. Nixon also used a special kind of impartial briefing to guide him in difficult decisions? Maybe Brandeis? I actually think Nixon believed in justice but had delusions of grandeur that misled him and ultimately negated his good ideas.
It's a funny thing about justice... There are different kinds of justice and various standards. For example, If you're a vet, then you must remember the UCMJ. In the case of an actual crime in civilian jurisdictions in normal America, there is a strong presumption of innocence and the standard of proof is quite high. In a civil matter, the preponderance of the evidence can be sufficient and the punishment is highly negotiable, to say the least.
In today's story, we see that Scott Pruitt was using a different standard of justice: The should-be-patented Scott-Pruitt "It's probably legal and I want to do it!" standard. Took a long time to catch up to him.
Shaky as that seems, it's probably firmer than #PresidentTweety's grasp of the law. Seems like Trump's idea is to grab Lady Justice by the pussy and shake her until she does what he wants. Let's see if Mueller can help her file a few charges...
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
the Senate will have to write a huge list of exceptions before swearing him in and wipe their dirty assholes on the US Constitution.
...sounds like a Tuesday on Capital Hill.
If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
and Vlad Smiles...or more likely gets an erection, and cues up the "pee tape" yet again... All Going according to plan...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Looking for some insight into the reason why Pruitt was apparently fired now. The most plausible theory I've heard so far is that General Kelly wanted to tie up a few loose ends before he leaves, and Pruitt was the closest thing to a gangrene-infested wound in the body politic. If it's true, I'm actually surprised Kelly still has that much influence.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
Oh gosh! A corrupt politician?
Who could have forseen this?
But why are we focusing specifically on Donald Drumpf?
Aren't all politicians corrupt?
The horror.
They won't allow you to own a tank either. Or a nuke.
Whatever *is* the world coming to?
"They were both unfit for the office." To me, that seems correct. For example, Hillary was amazingly poor at dealing with conflicts.
True: "Who do I think will cause less damage" should NOT be what determines who you vote for.
I didn't read your post, APK, but you're a lying cunt and this is the only response you deserve.
"Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
Z^-1
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.