Slashdot Mirror


Theme Park Deploys Trained Crows To Collect Litter (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Guardian: Six crows trained to pick up cigarette ends and rubbish will be put to work next week at a French historical theme park, according to its president. "The goal is not just to clear up, because the visitors are generally careful to keep things clean" but also to show that "nature itself can teach us to take care of the environment", said Nicolas de Villiers of the Puy du Fou park, in the western Vendee region.... The birds will be encouraged to spruce up the park through the use of a small box that delivers a nugget of bird food each time the rook deposits a cigarette end or small piece of rubbish.
"There's an easier way to get rid of all the cigarette butts," suggests one anonymous Slashdot reader.

"Just train the crows to attack smokers."

181 comments

  1. Can ... by Martin+S. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... they be trained to deliver parcels?

    They can't be any worse than most courier companies.

    1. Re: Can ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://youtu.be/UbC_rehHNHU

      Enjoy.

    2. Re: Can ... by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      I can see this going horribly wrong. Crows know cigarettes and rubbish get rewards. This could easily devolve into a an Alfred Hitchcock movie.

    3. Re:Can ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are confusing crows with swallows.

    4. Re:Can ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the airspeed of an unladen swallow?

  2. It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But let's not forget they're not all arseholes.

    1. Re:It's fun to hate on smokers by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe not but they are all ash-holes.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    2. Re:It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Yes, they are. There's not a single reason to smoke. Period.

    3. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by reanjr · · Score: 2

      You apparently have a poor imagination. There are absolutely reasons to smoke.

      For instance, the number one reason is because you want to.

    4. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot meeting kettle.

    5. Re:It's fun to hate on smokers by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but if you just have to smoke in public and can't be bothered to get a cheap, reusable, portable ashtray, and instead choose to conveniently litter, then you are a huge asshole. And no, you don't get to justify it by complaining that there are no ashtrays around; just because society stopped catering to you does not make you the victim.

    6. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      For instance, the number one reason is because you want to.

      Most smokers do not want to smoke, and wish they had never started.

      The number one reason for smoking is addiction.

      Most smokers want to quit, and have tried multiple times

    7. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      At this point, just go for vapor. It's a low effort alternative that will dramatically improve your health.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:It's fun to hate on smokers by mentil · · Score: 1

      If they are smoking there is a good chance they are unable to extinguish themselves.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    9. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You apparently have a poor imagination. There are absolutely reasons to smoke.
      For instance, the number one reason is because you want to die.

      FTFY

    10. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And will burn your hands, your face or a hole in your pockets when the battery explodes!

    11. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, who would be stupid enough to hold a lithium battery close to his face and carry it everyday in his pocket.

    12. Re:It's fun to hate on smokers by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      But let's not forget they're not all arseholes.

      I never met one yet that thought twice about throwing the butt on the floor when there's no ashtray within eight inches.

      --
      No sig today...
    13. Re:It's fun to hate on smokers by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      What's needed is cigarette packs with a butt-compartment on the bottom - so the fabled "non asshole smokers" can take their butts home with them.

      --
      No sig today...
    14. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think advertising and social pressures caused a lot of people to start smoking during the latter part of the 20th century. Bizarrely the same can be said for the anti-smoking attitudes of today. Brain washing if you like on both counts. It's a funny old World and shows just how gullible we all are!

    15. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by paulpach · · Score: 3

      The number one reason for smoking is addiction.

      Quitting is easy, I have done it many times.

    16. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf. if i dont smoke, why would I put vapor in my lungs? jesus. if i was trying to quit smoking, why would i put something else in my lungs? not putting ANYTHING in your lungs other than the air around you (pollution notwithstanding) is the expected healthy norm. there is absolutely no health benefit to vaping. none. zero. using it is as stupid as smoking.

    17. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Vaping will make your neckbeard grow out of control

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    18. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, who would be stupid enough to hold a lithium battery close to his face and carry it everyday in his pocket.

      AFAICT, all the vapesplosions so far have involved modified or custom rigs, though it's probably true that there are low-end vapes which come without any current protection. If you buy from a reputable shop, though, you can be sure that this is not a problem. I've got a vape pen I'm pretty happy with, although the next one I buy will definitely have a USB socket instead of requiring that special charger.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Smoking will make your balls shrink.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    20. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      using it is as stupid as smoking.

      That is provably false.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    21. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's weird though. Did you know you can get lung cancer and never smoke a day in your life? (Smoking is going to make that an almost sure thing though.)

      Also: if people are against things that are bad for your health, its weird that the major killer right now: heart disease and metabolic syndrome (ie: being fat) isn't something more people take more seriously? Losing weight is easy. No fad diets. Just limit calories.

    22. Re:It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've met hundreds.

    23. Re:It's fun to hate on smokers by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      True, but if you just have to smoke in public and

      No need to continue. If you smoke in public, you're being an asshole. The end.

    24. Re: It's fun to hate on smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have another one.

      The number one reason for smoking is fear of ending up being a selfrighteous anti-smoking asshole.

  3. I wonder by RandomFactor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do these cows need nicotine patches if they aren't deployed for a while?

    --
    --- Mercutio was right.
    1. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cows?!?! Wow, that is a whole new angle on this story.

      French theme park deploys herd of cows to clean up cigarette butts!!!!

      Who cleans up after the cows?

    2. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first glance, I read it as 'cows'. Double-take.

    3. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...Just glad that cows don't fly"

    4. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I first read your comment, I was genuinely confused, because I, just like OP, had initially read the headline as "cows" instead of "crows".

      Honestly, I think cows would've been cooler.

    5. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we can fix that. *readies the Trebuchet*

  4. Attack smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > "There's an easier way to get rid of all the cigarette butts," suggests one anonymous Slashdot reader.
    > "Just train the crows to attack smokers."

    Chances are the training they have already given to crows will inadvertently have trained them to target smokers, just give it some time.

    1. Re:Attack smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh more than that.

      The crows will create an association between "stuff goes in box, box produces food" and start throwing everything in it.

      If they specifically make it so that only cigarette butts and "pencil shaped" objects can fit, then you'll start seeing them stealing pens, plastic forks and knives, and such.

    2. Re:Attack smokers by dohzer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or the crows will take up smoking to create more butts.

    3. Re:Attack smokers by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:Attack smokers by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      More accurately the crows will try to game the system by delivering what ever they can that will provide a reward. If you are training them to create savings for the park, wouldn't it be smarter to teach them to pick up money, more money more reward. Then of course they can figure out wallets and purses are full of money. Watch where you put your cigarette packs, crows are smarter than people think and untrained crows will learn to mimic the actions of trained crows and of course seek to improve on it, like raiding near to park ash trays.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:Attack smokers by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Honest question: Does each crow have to be individually trained, or can new crows learn by watching how the already trained crows get free food?

    6. Re:Attack smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It has been shown in previous studies that crows can learn from others, so after an initial few have been taught then I'd imagine that is enough.

    7. Re:Attack smokers by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      You could create a pretty effective bird crime network, by just teaching a few to steal money from wallets and bring them in for rewards. No wallets, jsut notes or jewelry. Eventually other crows would realise the good thing going on and eventually you have half the Corvidae in the city, sneaking in chimneys and carelessly opened doors to snatch anything they can loot to bring in for rewards, all the potentially neat legal defence of "Shit I dont know what was going on, birds just keep giving me stuff so I give them stuff.".

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    8. Re:Attack smokers by sysrammer · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You could create a pretty effective bird crime network". Maybe, but it would all come crashing down due to a few stool pigeons.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    9. Re:Attack smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the crows realise that they don't have to wait for the cigarette to be smoked. Result: put a cigarette in your mouth, have it stolen by a waiting crow. I'd love to see that.

    10. Re:Attack smokers by White+Yeti · · Score: 2

      And Batman.

    11. Re:Attack smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didja hear the one about the crowminal underworld?
      Yeah, a little bird told me.

  5. Was I the only one ... by rickyb · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one to read this as "trained cows" the first time?

    1. Re:Was I the only one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was I the only one to read this as "trained cows" the first time?

      I'm sorry. Your mom will not be there.

    2. Re:Was I the only one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it said "trained crews," so of course I didn't believe it.

    3. Re:Was I the only one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because what company in their right mind spends money on training people instead of requiring 5 years experience in a programming language that's only been around for 2?

  6. Crows Will Cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They'll bring trash from offsite, and wherever they can find it. And they'll hack the food pellet dispenser if they can.

    1. Re:Crows Will Cheat by guruevi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's what I thought too. The crows will eventually learn that small rocks and sticks will trigger the system.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Crows Will Cheat by Pfhorrest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hopefully they learn to take cigarettes from the people actively smoking them, and then go offsite to get more, and teach others crows this behavior, and finally the ash-hole problem will be solved.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    3. Re:Crows Will Cheat by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The crows will eventually learn that small rocks and sticks will trigger the system.

      . . . and here I thought the crows would learn to start stealing packs of cigarettes out of the hands of people, and start chain smoking to support their bird feed nugget habit . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Crows Will Cheat by PPH · · Score: 1

      They'll just start smoking their own.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Crows Will Cheat by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

      That's an excellent way to get nicotine addicts to start killing crows.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    6. Re:Crows Will Cheat by nnet · · Score: 1

      and they'll start smoking themselves.

    7. Re: Crows Will Cheat by reanjr · · Score: 0

      As a former smoker, I can assure you the problem with cigarette butts has more to do with poor city governance than with the behavior of smokers.

      If you find litter in your community and there's not a garbage can on every corner, then you should blame your incompetent city council, not litterbugs.

      If you find human urine or feces on your city streets and there's not a public bathroom on every corner, you should blame your city council, not the homeless.

      And if you find cigarette butts all over and there's not an ashtray on every corner, blame your city council, not the smokers.

      Your community needs to provide services for the citizens they have, not the citizens they pretend to have to make the city fashionable.

    8. Re: Crows Will Cheat by BlacKSacrificE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What complete bullshit.

      I am a smoker, and as such I spend a lot of time around fellow smokers. I regularly see people standing a meter from a bin flick their butts into the gutter. I regularly see people flick butts out of their cars despite a good percentage of vehicles on the roads having ashtrays in them. And every time I see it, I tell these dipshits "you realise there is a bin literally right there don't you?", to which at best I get a shrug, and at worst I get told to fuck myself.

      My biggest motivator to quit is to not be associated with these assholes. And it's not just a smoker thing. These are the same spanners that will drop rubbish a meter from a bin, throw a bottle out of the car window, spit gum out onto a footpath, and otherwise demonstrate them selves to be completely ignorant of keeping the environment in which they live clean. I have a small screw top jar in my sidebag for situations where there is not a bin, and if I don't have my sidebag, my butt goes back into the pack till next I am near a bin.

      How dare you make excuses for such basic behaviour. More bins is not the answer. Teaching people to not act like 5 year olds who think it is everyone else's problem to clean up after them, is.

      --
      [Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
    9. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought I saw something sometime (sorry, vague) about crows that were given a feeding box and then taught to deposit trash and it would dispense said food. The crows got smart and started tearing the trash into smaller pieces and getting more and more food.

    10. Re: Crows Will Cheat by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      As a former smoker, I can assure you the problem with cigarette butts has more to do with poor city governance than with the behavior of smokers.

      You choosing to make litter in a place with no easy disposal is somehow the city's fault? How about some personal responsibility? How about carrying it home with you or not generating the litter in the first place.

      If you find litter in your community and there's not a garbage can on every corner, then you should blame your incompetent city council, not litterbugs.

      How about blaming the arseholes like you who are too lazy and selfish to arry litter home with them.

      I've seen people standing next to a litter bin with a built in ashtray chuck away the butts. It sounds like you really: it's the conucil's faul for not having a bin riiight next to the person.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    11. Re:Crows Will Cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like NJ Seagulls, they stopped picking up dropped food and started mugging you as soon as you walk away from the boardwalk food counter making you drop the food :(

    12. Re: Crows Will Cheat by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If you're motivated to quit, just switch right now to vapor. You'll start to see health increases immediately as you stop putting tar in your lungs. Later if you want you can try various strategies to kick it completely but at this point vapor is a clear positive.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you find human urine or feces on your city streets and there's not a public bathroom on every corner, you should blame your city council, not the homeless.

      Yes, because human beings won't wait a few minutes if they can't see a toilet immediately in view. They'll use the nearest tall object just like a dog. Idiot. People should be decent enough to hold it in while they go look for one. Between public ones, local cafes/restaurants/pubs and just waiting until you get home you shouldn't have a problem.

    14. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you live in Paris you have to smoke to fit in. Otherwise they will think you are an American.

    15. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      You choosing to make litter in a place with no easy disposal is somehow the city's fault?

      In the commons human nature is to litter. The city says you should not litter. Beyond asking nicely, what has the city done to modify human nature?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    16. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] blame your city council, not the homeless.

      just waiting until you get home you shouldn't have a problem.

      The stupid is strong in this one...

    17. Re: Crows Will Cheat by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The city says you should not litter.

      It's not the city, it's other people asking if you can not shit everywhere and make the world a nasty place.

      Beyond asking nicely, what has the city done to modify human nature?

      Fine the shit out of people littering, I hope.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    18. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

      I'm a distance runner. The thing I found most interesting when I visited Tokyo (on business, but I ran a minimum of six miles every morning for a week, setting out in a different direction every morning) was the total absence of garbage cans visible anywhere and how clean all the sidewalks and streets were.

      I don't know if what I saw was a bizarre exception, but it was a clear and striking impression that I noticed and couldn't stop noticing the entire time I was there. So many people, so many buildings, no trash that I could see and no trash cans or recycling bins that I could see.

    19. Re:Crows Will Cheat by fgouget · · Score: 1

      The crows will eventually learn that small rocks and sticks will trigger the system.

      The system already prevents that through image recognition: After the camera has recognised the cigarette filter as a filter, it returns a bit of food to the table in front of the crow.

    20. Re: Crows Will Cheat by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      My biggest motivator to quit is to not be associated with these assholes.

      You could always switch to vaping, and be associated with a different group of assholes...

      Teaching people to not act like 5 year olds who think it is everyone else's problem to clean up after them, is.

      Best of luck with that, which I mean simultaneously sincerely and sarcastically.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re: Crows Will Cheat by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      One of these puts tar into your lungs: vaping/smoking. Which do you think is better, having tar in your lungs, or not? Vaping is clearly better than smoking, look up the statistics.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    22. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      True that.

      Perhaps we should train grizzly bears. Not to pick up trash and butts, but to attack directly the messy droppers! That would be solving the problem at its source, ne?

      Maybe not grizzly bears: they'd be expensive to feed. Perhaps honey badgers?

    23. Re: Crows Will Cheat by reanjr · · Score: 1

      And how many of those people do you suppose have been conditioned by poor access to receptacles?

    24. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Not everyone is an asshole. I've been plenty of places without trashcans and I carry my trash until I find one. I also sometimes even pick up other trash I find if I have some easy way to carry it. I then wait till I find a trashcan. I've also never shit on the street. I always seem to manage to find a bathroom. The people who litter are assholes and many of them will litter even when there are nearby trashcans. Granted, frequent trashcans likely would reduce some of the trash but aggressive policing and zero tolerance for the behavior would likely be more effective.

    25. Re: Crows Will Cheat by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Where I grew up, they decided to get rid of littering, and just cranked up the fines until people stopped. So it's a bit shocking, after having moved to a new city, to see people doing it.

      The smokers somehow dodged most of the littering enforcement, so they still toss their butts everywhere. Except every once in a while there's a funny story, like some ass getting fined $10000 for tossing a butt out a car window while driving through a forest during fire season.

    26. Re: Crows Will Cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never argue with an idiot. Let him die without interacting with him. You can't change him, doesn't matter how much you try, just let him be...

    27. Re: Crows Will Cheat by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Europe has all that and still a huge littering problem. The US has none of it and comparatively little littering problems. You will also see that cities that have problems with littering follows a certain ideology.

      In the area I currently live, we have signs saying: "Litter: $500 fine" (and in some areas like wildlife areas $1500) and they are enforced. In the city nearby, the fines are $100, the leftist mayor says those laws "target minorities" and littering is a huge problem.

      In large cities they are often not enforced but they can be ridiculously low like Chicago ($50), San Francisco ($100) and Detroit ($165).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  7. Interesting idea by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

    Crows are one of the most intelligent birds. They are trainable.
    It could work.

    1. Re:Interesting idea by ls671 · · Score: 2

      Yes they are smart, how long before they figure out how to fool the system and submit false cigarette butts or fake false small pieces of rubbish or go get them straight from the factory or the from local trash drop off or from the ashtrays?

      In the city where I live, most businesses lock their outdoor ashtrays so the homeless people don't come pick through them. Watch those crows! They will figure out a way to unlock them! Jackpot!

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:Interesting idea by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Jackpot!

      Nicely done!

      (For those who don't know, a jackpot is called so because of the jackdaw, a member of the crow family, being notorious for stealing shiny things. So a jackpot is a nest full of shinies.)

    3. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (For those who don't know, a jackpot is called so because of the jackdaw, a member of the crow family, being notorious for stealing shiny things. So a jackpot is a nest full of shinies.)

      No it isn't. It originates from playing cards.

    4. Re:Interesting idea by dromgodis · · Score: 1

      You give the crows' intelligence too little credit.

      I predict that they will soon learn to crap on all guests that don't have a cigarette in their hand. Smokers will have a more pleasurable experience in the park and thus over time become a larger portion of the visitors.

    5. Re:Interesting idea by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      My guess is the crows eventually discover the loop

      10 Groundskeepers regularly empty the "butt collectors" into garbage bags and move them to a dumpster somewhere.
      20 The crows then raid that dumpsters, opening all the bags, and taking everything they deposited into the "butt collectors"
      30 GOTO 10

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    6. Re:Interesting idea by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Yes they are smart, how long before they figure out how to fool the system and submit false cigarette butts or fake false small pieces of rubbish

      The system already prevents that through image recognition: After the camera has recognised the cigarette filter as a filter, it returns a bit of food to the table in front of the crow.

    7. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What!? You mean I didn't instantly spot a crippling flaw in the system that was overlooked by the people who dedicated hundreds of hours to developing it and working the kinks out? I'm not a Special Clever Little Man like my mom told me? Impossible!

  8. Not good by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    These crows are taking our jobs!!!

    1. Re:Not good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Or maybe we could instead convince the precious snowflake generation that jobs of any nature is a good thing.

      Too late, they weren't raised as Puritans. Jobs of an extractive nature aren't a good thing, they're imminentizing the eschaton.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Not good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These crows are taking our jobs!!!

      Stone them!!

    3. Re:Not good by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here, arm yourself with some knowledge, for a change: The park is in France.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:Not good by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      Wow, xenophobe much?

    5. Re:Not good by arth1 · · Score: 1

      No, they are taking the jobs of the immigrants because, as seems to be common knowledge, is that there are some jobs that Americans simply will not do.

      Cleaning French theme parks being one of them.

    6. Re:Not good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sustainable Lawn mower at work https://imgur.com/a/3aRlli9
      they work on the old fortifications of Copenhagen http://vestvolden.dk/en/vestvolden/
      It's volunteer work and they get 'free' meat.

    7. Re:Not good by mentil · · Score: 1

      Politicians won't care, because they're cawcasian.
      I'll see myself out.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    8. Re:Not good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      These crows are taking our jobs!!!

      You misspelled "terking" and "jerbs" there

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. And 2nd time. I just woke up to trained cows by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I read it a couple of times and still saw trained cows. Wjen I got to the mention of "birds" I backed to see if they said it was bovines and avians.

    Of course, I just woke up from a nap so my eyes and brain are foggy.

  10. Um... by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    "nature itself can teach us to take care of the environment"

    How does this follow when humans are training the crows to clean up the human mess?

    1. Re:Um... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      /pedantic: Last time I checked crows AND humans were part of nature. *shrugs*

      The usage is that nature refers to everything else but us, which is a little bit of oxymoron.

      You can read it two ways:

      * Nature itself can teach nature to take care of the environment"

      Or

      * Another part of nature can teach our part of nature to take care of the environment.

      I won't fault your response if it is:

      Gee, no shit, Sherlock!

      But yeah, either way, it is still an awkward phrasing.

    2. Re:Um... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The usage is that nature refers to everything else but us, which is a little bit of oxymoron.

      It seems fair to me to differentiate, since we're the only animals capable of doing a long-term study which tells us in detail what's wrong with our activity, which we then generally ignore.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Who is that anonymous commenter... by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    ...who is mentioned in the article, and where can I subscribe to his newsletter?

    Also, can we implement his suggestion nationwide, or at least buy pretrained crows to guard our own localities / follow us around and clear the area of those filthy ash-holes?

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    1. Re:Who is that anonymous commenter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nobody. The editors of slashdot have decided to fake comments before any comments were posted.

      It is, quite amazingly, the apotheosis of slashdot. After it peaked years ago. Amazing.

    2. Re: Who is that anonymous commenter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They didn't fake comment. Not sure where you are getting that. They never said it was in a posted comment. They said

      There's an easier way to get rid of all the cigarette butts," suggests one anonymous Slashdot reader

      And the story said it was submitted by an anonymous reader. Clearly the person who submitted the story also made that comment. I didn't think it was very confusing.

  12. Yes, train the crows to attack smokers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once the crows eliminate all of the smokers, train them to attack the beer drinkers. Then the meat eaters, music and movie pirates, and anyone that dares to use a plastic straw. If you're going to train a murder of crows, don't half-ass it.

    1. Re:Yes, train the crows to attack smokers. by Scarletdown · · Score: 2

      I believe it was the Apostle Paul who once said, "In all of your undertakings, settle not for a half-assed job. Instead, thou should endeavour to use both cheeks."

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re: Yes, train the crows to attack smokers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An even wiser guy said "Don't half-ass two things, whole-ass one"

  13. Wait - What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0
    So all of the cow shit is better to step in than cigarette butts?

    Release the Dung Beetles!

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Wait - What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2
      Wait .....What? Dumbass me read cows rather than crows.

      Christ, I'm fucking worthless some days.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re: Wait - What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did the same thing like eight times. And you have to admit that it sounds a lot funnier with cows.

    3. Re: Wait - What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it as crews.

    4. Re:Wait - What? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Wait .....What? Dumbass me read cows rather than crows.

      Christ, I'm fucking worthless some days.

      It seems like half of slashdot read it as cows, which is proof (if it were needed) that there aren't many country-dwellers here. The idea that you could train a cow to do anything other than eat grass and shit is laughable.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Wait - What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Wait .....What? Dumbass me read cows rather than crows.

      Christ, I'm fucking worthless some days.

      It seems like half of slashdot read it as cows, which is proof (if it were needed) that there aren't many country-dwellers here. The idea that you could train a cow to do anything other than eat grass and shit is laughable.

      Au contraire! Anyhow, for the Lulz, here is a cow that a young lady rides like a horse - jumping even! https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Meet Lilac, another cow. More riding and jumping. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Being from the country, I know that some of the stereotypes of animals are just that. Cows and pigs are often incredibly affectionate, and while the poor white chickens are cursed by their breeding, most chickens are magnificent and handsome critters. I've never ridden a cow, but the second woman on Lilac does a right good job.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  14. Slashdotter comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey douche, not all smokers throw their cigarette butts wherever.

    Maybe they should teach the crows to attack you.

  15. WTF? by msauve · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "There's an easier way to get rid of all the cigarette butts," suggests one anonymous Slashdot reader. "Just train the crows to attack smokers."

    Not in the discussion. WTF? Is editordavid making up shit out of whole cloth to disguise a personal bias? And, it appears that this "anonymous Slashdot reader" is not only ignorant of French culture, but one of those extremely intolerant Antifa members.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nobody drops cigarette butts or other trash, would the crows attack humans to obtain said items?

    2. Re:WTF? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      "There's an easier way to get rid of all the cigarette butts," suggests one anonymous Slashdot reader.

      Not in the discussion.

      I presumed they were the same anonymous Slashdot reader who submitted the story. They could also have been someone who was reading over the editor's shoulder.

      It's equally likely BS, but you haven't discovered a smocking gun.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to mock your "smocking gun", but I googled it first and found out you stole it from Trump. Well played.

    4. Re:WTF? by msauve · · Score: 1

      That would be disingenuous - "one anonymous Slashdot reader" instead of "the submitter", or even better, just include the private comment as part of the summary, like other submissions. On /., "editor" isn't. More of a moron than an oxymoron. Are they paid for their shit?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nobody drops cigarette butts or other trash, would the crows attack humans to obtain said items?

      Has a crow ever snatched a french fry out of your mouth? Then unless the food pellets they'd be trading them for are laced with cocaine, I'm going to say NO.

    6. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There's an easier way to get rid of all the cigarette butts," suggests one anonymous Slashdot reader.

      "Just train the crows to attack smokers."

      Not in the discussion. WTF? Is editordavid making up shit out of whole cloth to disguise a personal bias? And, it appears that this "anonymous Slashdot reader" is not only ignorant of French culture, but one of those extremely intolerant Antifa members.

      WOW, found her trigger!

      Seriously, leave us your address and if we post about French butts again, we'll send someone by to escort you to a quiet room with coloring books, k?

        - anonymous Slashdot reader

    7. Re:WTF? by metalmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      "There's an easier way to get rid of all the cigarette butts," suggests one anonymous Slashdot reader.

      Not in the discussion.

      I presumed they were the same anonymous Slashdot reader who submitted the story. They could also have been someone who was reading over the editor's shoulder.

      It's equally likely BS, but you haven't discovered a smocking gun.

      Maybe the comment they were referring to was from when the story was originally posted to Slashdot last year.
      https://news.slashdot.org/stor...

    8. Re:WTF? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      extremely intolerant Antifa members.

      Not tolerating people wh advocate genocide? Oh! the humanity!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:WTF? by fgouget · · Score: 1

      "There's an easier way to get rid of all the cigarette butts," suggests one anonymous Slashdot reader. "Just train the crows to attack smokers."

      Not in the discussion. WTF?

      Somewhat different wording but the last time this story was on Slashdot, last october, there was a thread about crows attacking smokers.

      And, it appears that this "anonymous Slashdot reader" is not only ignorant of French culture, but one of those extremely intolerant Antifa members.

      I don't see the issue with french culture and I'm not sure the editor is the one revealing personal bias here.

    10. Re:WTF? by samwichse · · Score: 1

      teach them... (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 15, 2017 @01:22AM (#55371305)
      "Maybe teach the crows to attack the smoker until they pick it up."

      Re:human smokers will be trained (Score:3)
      by jellomizer ( 103300 ) Alter Relationship on Saturday October 14, 2017 @04:01PM (#55369553)
      "Done give away their actual motive. We can make robots to clean the streets. But we need animals to actually attack the cause. Plausible deniability."

      Checks out.

    11. Re:WTF? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Technically, if the editor reads slashdot (a stretch, I know), and they wish not to reveal that they are the source of a comment, then they can be an "anonymous Slashdot reader."

    12. Re:WTF? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      is not only ignorant of French culture

      Just because French culture is defined as a breakfast made of a bagette and a cigarette doesn't mean they shouldn't be actively mocked.

    13. Re:WTF? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If nobody drops cigarette butts or other trash, would the crows attack humans to obtain said items?

      Has a crow ever snatched a french fry out of your mouth? Then unless the food pellets they'd be trading them for are laced with cocaine, I'm going to say NO.

      They should use seagulls instead. They'd happily take something out of your mouth that wasn't superglued there.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. This will have side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not 100% sure, it's worth testing this idea, but I'm an avid reader of studies and research like this and almost invariably there are unattended consequences, enough that the project must be cancelled.

    This isn't the same because it's human flaws and not other animal flaws, but for example in some Indian villages where they paid people to bring in invasive species, it worked very well for a few months but then they found out that people were started to breed ridiculous amounts of invasive species and bringing them all in to make huge amounts of money. So instead of reducing invasive species it actually magnified the problem significantly.

    In this case, I don't know what the crows might do, but I'm sure over time there will be some flaws coming forth.

    1. Re:This will have side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "unattended consequences"

      I HATE unattended consequences. They're even worse than unintended consequences.

      Are you paying attention?

    2. Re:This will have side effects by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      "unattended consequences"

      I HATE unattended consequences. They're even worse than unintended consequences.

      Are you paying attention?

      Paying attention? Obviously not, because he is not attending the consequences. :-P

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  17. not even surprised by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Crows are surprisingly intelligent. Look up the crow abuse/Nixon mask experiment

    1. Re:not even surprised by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Crows are surprisingly intelligent.

      And rooks, which is the crow family member here, especially so.

      Probably too intelligent for this system to work for long, because they'll quickly figure out how to deposit the same loot twice, or what else can be substituted that's easier to find, how to raid other sources, or something else we haven't anticipated.

  18. hmmmm.... by meglon · · Score: 1

    There's a "secret cow level"joke in here somewhere....

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  19. There's a Youtuber named Aronra by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    who made a good point that there are several animals (Dolphins, Raccoons) that have nearly human level brains but that their limited bodies (no arms/thumbs) means they're probably stuck at a dead end. My first thought was the Uplift series of books.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:There's a Youtuber named Aronra by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      who made a good point that there are several animals (Dolphins, Raccoons) that have nearly human level brains but that their limited bodies (no arms/thumbs) means they're probably stuck at a dead end. My first thought was the Uplift series of books.

      Dolphins would be screwed even if they had hands with opposable thumbs, because they live underwater and thus cannot use fire. You'd have to give them antigrav harnesses (ala the aforementioned Uplift saga) along with the hands in order for them to move forwards.

      Racoons, on the other hand, probably have enough manual dexterity already, and could potentially evolve more. Some of them get big enough to move large items around, so they seem like pretty good candidates if their species stuck around long enough. But you'd think that some other apes would evolve civilization long before them, since they're so far ahead, if only we weren't destroying their habitats. Raccoons can live in many marginal situations, or even live in cities like rats can, so I guess it's reasonable to imagine that they have a better change at long-term survival than the other primate species on this planet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:There's a Youtuber named Aronra by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Haven't read that series, but could certainly get down with Racoons being enhanced. LeGuin and many others have had Racoon characters in a lot of stories: they're "fun and mischevious; the lovable little thief trope", and allows the author to display their comedic talents. Larry Niven's Ringworld universe includes dolphins that could make use of their intelligence. Mechanical "hands" were invented so the dolphins could manipulate their environment. With all the magnesium laying around at the bottom of the oceans, fire not needed.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  20. Crows are smart... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    How long until they are swooping cigarettes from the mouths of those still smoking ? or bumming them verbally from other people. Hey Buddy gotta smoke I can bum, I need a crow pellet fix :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re: Crows are smart... by reanjr · · Score: 1

      About as long as it has taken for crows to start swooping in and stealing food out of the hands or mouths of people.

      So, it's gonna be a while...

    2. Re: Crows are smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, seagulls have been known to do this. We don't generally hand feed crows. Addiction is a powerfully thing. This is a very likely outcome.

    3. Re: Crows are smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About as long as it has taken for crows to start swooping in and stealing food out of the hands or mouths of people.

      Visit the zoo in Bangkok to see this happen live.

  21. oh,cRows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first time I saw this headline I was on my phone and read it as "trained cows" which mad much less sense.

    (hmm... captcha: utterly)

  22. Not the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... take care of the environment ...

    The environment didn't buy cigarettes or refuse to dispose of them safely.

  23. Both are true by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > These are the same spanners that will drop rubbish a meter from a bin, throw a bottle out of the car window, spit gum out onto a footpath

    I've seen that too. I've called people out on it. For smokers, I've pointed out that making a mess is a great way to get management to make the whole place non-smoking.

    ALSO I've looked for trash cans and ash trays in places one would definitely expect them to be, and found none. Entrances to malls and other places that people spend over an hour, but they can't smoke inside, are places that people will smoke. Many people (such as yourself) will put the butt in the can, if there is a can available. Butts smell really bad for a couple hours, so carrying it around with you inside isn't a great option. Even throwing away inside will make the indoor area around an uncovered trash can stink for a while.

    So it's a good idea to have a butt can / ashtray near entrances to places people can't smoke inside and they'll be there for a couple hours. Not everyone will use the butt can, just like not everyone will throw their empty cup in a trash can, but many people will.

    1. Re:Both are true by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Putting bins by the entrance will encourage people to stand there, blocking the entrance and polluting the air.

      Put the bins 200 yards away and use fire hoses on anything burning closer.

    2. Re: Both are true by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Then any smoker coming from another direction will miss it and throw it in the corner by the door, which is a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

    3. Re: Both are true by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Only if the fire hose misses them, and they're an ignorant fuck.

    4. Re: Both are true by reanjr · · Score: 1

      If you don't know where the receptacle is because some asshat hid it 200 feet away, then where do you expect people to deposit their burning butt?

      You're a fucking moron or a facist; not sure which.

    5. Re: Both are true by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Wait, I'm the moron? I'm not the fuckwit that carried a burning stick around without thinking about how to safely dispose of it without littering and/or causing a fire hazard.

      People want to smoke, they should carry an ashtray.

    6. Re: Both are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought only people who didn't rub the lotion on the skin got the hose

    7. Re: Both are true by reanjr · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you understand how fire works.

    8. Re: Both are true by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you've properly explored the interaction of a fire hose and a lit cigarette, but keep failing miserably to understand my point if it helps you feel good about yourself.

  24. Re:8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-_. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I support Moscow Hillary's collusion with the most corrupt side of the intelligence community to spread lies meant to shield HRC from accountability for the many corrupt, slimey, illegal, awful things HRC has done in the last decade, because I am a gullible sheep just like the DNC propaganda is designed to make me.

    I am a Democrat. I am thoughtless.

  25. Dyslexia is fun by mistr · · Score: 1

    I was going to call bullshit until I realised I had misread cows

  26. Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our avian overlords.

  27. Great idea, except by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    The more trash one picks up it seems, the more trash people feel they can deposit. Soon they'll be training elephants to pick up trash.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  28. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't anyone else think using crows in this way is exploitative? It's not their job to clean up human messes.

  29. Theme Park Deploys Trained Crows Collect Litter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My name is Viorel S. (Still an "Anonymous Coward"?)
    I had a better, much better idea: do away with the infamous, hard-to-pick-up cigarette butt. It is, maybe, as deleterious to one's health as the laundry list of poisons to be found in each of the notorious "nails" smokers drive into their coffins every day. Its addition was a catastrophic lack of vision. The butt of the genius who implemented it should be kicked all the way into eternity. The buttless butt, tobacco and paper, turns into dust under the passersby's (tricky genitive) footsteps or is dissolved and washed away into the sewage system by rain. No pollution whatsoever. The tip(s) of the cigarette can be compacted mechanically or chemically to prevent loss of tobacco shreds. And, Philip Morris, your bottom line would grow exponentially by the cutting of the appendix and the time allotted to making each cigarette. In the end, the crow quoth, "Nevermore". No ifs, ands, or butts. Dixi.

    1. Re:Theme Park Deploys Trained Crows Collect Litter by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      indeed, get rid of the filter and send smokers to hell faster, the're a net negative walking around on two legs

  30. Please litter by BinBoy · · Score: 1

    Please throw trash on the ground or the poor birds will go hungry.

  31. dasterdly by mr.dreadful · · Score: 1

    sounds more like a plot to kill crows with nicotine.

    1. Re:dasterdly by mr.dreadful · · Score: 1

      seeing as cig butts are little time bombs of toxins.

  32. Re:8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-_. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try Don Jr.

  33. Yea, I wonder by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Yeah, who would be stupid enough to hold a lithium battery close to his face and carry it everyday in his pocket.

    6.8 billion people have cell phone subscriptions.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re: Yea, I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit Sherlock

    2. Re: Yea, I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dig deeper Watson

  34. Re: 8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-_. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a nice rocket ship!

  35. Why don't they just remove the trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that litters in the first place? Is it that hard to kick people out for being selfish disgusting picks?

  36. Crows are not assholes? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    You can train crows but you can't train some selfish, entitled pricks who literally would not see a bin if they were standing in it.

  37. Commenting by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    Cause I accidentally downmodded a funny comment.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  38. I prefer numbers over headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Number of smokers asked in survey 338
    Number of former-smokers asked in survey 546.

    Some people read these headlines as if they are facts. They are if you rewrite them: Most out of 338 smokers asked, want to quit, and have tried multiple times. Leaving out the sample size of a survey leads us incapable of assigning weight to the statement.

    I'm pretty sure everyone who smoke is addicted. It doesn't mean you can't stop, it means you suffer from withdrawal symptoms if you do.