Slashdot Mirror


The Cryptocurrency Industry is 'On the Brink of an Implosion', Research Says (bloomberg.com)

Echoing sentiments of mainstream economists, Juniper Research is warning that many of the metrics in the cryptocurrency world are pointing to a market implosion. From a report: Industry bellwether Bitcoin had seen its daily transaction volumes fall from an average of around 360,000 a day in late 2017 to just 230,000 in September 2018. Meanwhile, daily transaction values were down from more than $3.7 billion to less than $670 million in the same period, Juniper said in the study, The Future of Cryptocurrency: Bitcoin & Altcoin Trends & Challenges 2018-2023. The market as a whole has contracted quickly as well. In the first quarter, cryptocurrency transactions totaled just over $1.4 trillion, compared with less than $1.7 trillion for 2017 as a whole, Juniper said. However, by the second quarter, transaction values had plummeted by 75 percent, with total market capitalization falling to just under $355 billion. "Based on activity during the first half of Q3, Juniper estimates a further 47 percent quarter-on-quarter drop in transaction values in that quarter," the researcher said in an accompanying white paper.

187 comments

  1. It's about time ... by sa666_666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let me start playing the worlds smallest violin.

    1. Re:It's about time ... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only the smallest one, but continuously shrinking to boot?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me start playing the worlds smallest violin.

      I've been looking for a tiny violin to play while taunting my enemies (aka Everyone). Where did buy yours? Can I pay with Bitcoin?

      Asking for a friend.

    3. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to tip a busker with a paper bitcoin wallet and by the time it hit his guitar case it had turned to dust.

    4. Re: It's about time ... by Calydor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Real currencies have the backing of material goods and the agreement of the entire world that these are real currencies with THIS value.

      Cryptocurrencies were never much more than Monopoly money in a really big game of Monopoly.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bankster shill

    6. Re: It's about time ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd say it a bit differently: cryptocurrencies have the potential to be accepted for good and services, just like (some) traditional currencies. If they ever do, they'll be a currency like any other, but they have yet to make much progress in that regard. They remain "almost, but not completely, unlike currency".

      Canadian Tire Money remains more well accepted than BTC, but there's nothing inherent in BTC that makes this so.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re: It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Failure to understand the fractional reserve system.

    8. Re:It's about time ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      But is the violin on the blockchain?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    9. Re: It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian Tire Money remains more well accepted than BTC, but there's nothing inherent in BTC that makes this so.

      10-12 minute (at best) transaction confirmation times ensures that BTC will NEVER be adopted as a form of electronic money that could replace Visa et al.

    10. Re:It's about time ... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Let me start playing the worlds smallest violin.

      The real implosion comes 2022-2025, when quantum computers reach the point they can crack Shor's algorithm and hapless Bitcoin shills realize en mass that it's too late to make the cutover to post-quantum protocols. You can tell the whole thing is a scam because the post-quantum cutover needs to happen years in advance, must be initiated individually by each wallet owner, and the protocols which would allow for it are on the order of 30+kB PER transaction signature (as in, not just per block, per every individual transaction on a block - no lightning network solution for this because that would invalidate the whole list of transactions save for one "trusted" verifier.)

    11. Re: It's about time ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      10-12 minute (at best) transaction confirmation times ensures that BTC will NEVER be adopted as a form of electronic money that could replace Visa et al.

      Of course Visa isn't a currency, and if BTC were a currency you'd have BTC-denominated Visa cards. Banks would likely still do ACH transactions, and only move BTC between banks to the same extent that they move cash between banks today.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:It's about time ... by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately, it's not just people who should know better who get sucked into something like this. You also get people who are just trying to do what they ought to, which is to put some of their surplus income into savings.

      Saving isn't rocket science, but most people don't learn how to do it in schools. Nor do schools equipment them with a functioning understanding of economics, or technology. So in the absence of any educational foundation that would enable them to evaluate speculation in cryptocurrency critically, they turn to the information sources at hand, and that's actually worse than just being completely ignorant.

      The Internet has infected civilization with what may be a fatal bug: engagement metrics equal profit. The system that delivers the bulk of everyone's awareness of the world is not focused on delivering information that they need, but on provoking measurable reactions. Pushing people's emotional buttons, in other words.

      Apply this principle to creating content on something like cryptocurrencies, and you'll quickly see that informing people of the downsides of speculation isn't going to generate profit. Since most people aren't speculating in cryptocurrencies yet, you can't engage them with information about the risks. You can, however, engage those people with this message: you are missing out. Media coverage of cryptocurrencies did a poor or non-existent job of explaining the risks of speculation, and played up stories of people just like you getting rich overnight.

      To an informed point of view the idea of putting money you will actually need into cryptocurrency was extremely stupid; but to a mind pickled in clickbait that actually looks economically rational, because of opportunity costs. If, hypothetically speaking, you could be getting rich quick in an investment which was perfectly safe, then dollar cost averaging into a mutual fund with low risk and moderate return would be the stupid thing to do.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what cryptocurrency is resistant to Shor's algorithm. It would be nice to have one use proof of storage (which will make SSDs drop in price eventually) instead of proof of work.

      Of course, I have some ideas for a cryptocurrency, but don't feel like being a huckster doing an ICO. One idea would be having every transaction "copy" part off to the government for taxes. That way, Alice spends one unit of currency. Bob gets one unit, and Charlie gets 1/10 of a unit of currency as income/transaction tax. Yes, this means inflation since every transaction adds 10% of the currency into the equation, but it would be useful for ensuring taxes are paid without penalizing anyone.

    14. Re: It's about time ... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      You haven't been keeping up with the latest developments: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    15. Re:It's about time ... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      There is not enough information on the blockchain to crack a bitcoin wallet using Quantum methods until after funds have *already been spent*.

    16. Re:It's about time ... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      It's not about the proof, it's about the signatures. You can make a proof out of any arbitrarily complex thing. Signatures need to be for every set of transactions sent from a wallet and post-quantum protocols at their best come in at about 30kB per signature. Scale that up to Bitcoin's 360,000 transactions a day and you're looking at 10.8GB/day without even accounting for the data, ~4TB/year. That's data you don't get to truncate, and it has to be downloaded in full by everyone who isn't relying on someone else to say "yeah, trust us this is safe," which would in itself effectively void the entire utility of blockchain as a financial concept. At the end of the day you might as well be swapping P2P credits without any authentication, it would likely be more secure just because people wouldn't be fooled into relying upon a blockchain nobody can actually look at.

    17. Re:It's about time ... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      There is not enough information on the blockchain to crack a bitcoin wallet using Quantum methods until after funds have *already been spent*.

      This is just flat out wrong. The security of blockchain transactions comes from the published signatures. No signatures and it's no longer a blockchain. All you have to do is crack the key behind the signature for a given wallet to "own" that wallet and be able to spend it as desired. This is why quantum computers put a hard limit of 2022-2025 (given current growth rates) before Bitcoin is worthless, AND it's why you need to initiate the cutover years before that (it doesn't work as just "upgrading" everyone's client - every single wallet holder has to be able to publish a ~30KB public key signed by their existing signature to convert their wallet to the new system, anyone who doesn't effectively loses everything they have saved up to that point and given the transaction fees involved many wallets don't even contain the funds required to salvage themselves.

    18. Re: It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about stable coins? What about projects such as Nebula Network?

    19. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      It's always wild to me that SlashDot users have aged like dinosaurs and are actually, it seems, as a majority, not that bright. You do realize that once one algorithm is broken, that the chain itself can implement the next strongest algorithm indefinitely, right? Y'all need to go back and get a NEW CS degree, then actually try to stay with the times. Assume the current algorithm was broken and all funds were stolen. The chain itself is the public ledger, rewind to the point of failure, implement to the new stronger (resistant) algorithm, and press the play button. It happens again? Scale the algorithm to the new encryption model that is resistant to that time's systems. Rinse and repeat. You all talk as if the laws of mathematics are going to be rewritten and it's a bummer to know that I'm surrounded by so many dummies on this site.

    20. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, I was waiting for this. People laughed when I sold all of my bit shares as a long short.
      Guess who'll be laughing next after the collapse...

      CAP === 'selector' (This is submitted by a bot.)

    21. Re:It's about time ... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      There is more than enough information on the blockchain, things like tracking down IP addresses, to find the owner of the wallet and well, basically crack their bones until they crack their crypto wallet for you.

      The collapse of unbacked crypto will not follow normal economic patterns because it is tightly tied to organised crime, money laundering and other criminal activities. In the normal market it will slowly die off and the authorities will become involved and seek to ban it, as it's users start dying off, as a result of the greater concentration of criminal activity in it's trade, as the normal market dries up. More criminals, means more dangerous for holders of unbacked unsecured crypto.

      So the criminals will keep unbacked crypto going, until the fallout from that activity forces it's banning. Energy backed crypto, not going to be a US thing, too late for them.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    22. Re: It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QRL

    23. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor do schools equipment them with a functioning understanding of economics, or technology

      ... nor grammar? (I kid, I kid. yes I know you meant "equip". autocorrect?)

    24. Re:It's about time ... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yep. Posting on a phone is a bad habit.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    25. Re: It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LN is not a solution to a blockchain that is by design slow. Your BTC will be stuck in channels waiting for channel closure due to the incredibly slow number of tx/second on the base chain.

      Unless you're cool with BTC being stuck in a channel basically forever.

    26. Re:It's about time ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Yup, And nothing of value was lost.

    27. Re:It's about time ... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      The public key isn't published until an address spends the money; the Quantum Computer would have to break it in under 10-20 minutes, and get it into a block first.

      That's not gonna be possible for a VERY long time.

    28. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you sound so woke!

    29. Re:It's about time ... by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Constantly hard-forking as you are suggesting here is a lot harder to do than you make it sound - haven't you been paying attention? You're basically suggesting centralization which undermines the value that bitcoin inherently has.

    30. Re:It's about time ... by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      Assume the current algorithm was broken and all funds were stolen. The chain itself is the public ledger, rewind to the point of failure, implement to the new stronger (resistant) algorithm, and press the play button.

      You have no idea of how economics work, do you? There is no easy-peasy unwinding of transactions in the real world. It won't be a case of , "And here, right here is where everyone lost their money, we'll wind it back to then." There will be legitimate transactions amongst the fraudulent ones, and people will have already exchanged cryptocoins for goods and services that have now suddenly been unwound, or transferred value out of the currency elsewhere, or made subsequent transactions, etc.

      You can't pause and sort out the fraudulent transactions "somehow" and unwind/play forward again, because the interruption of service and loss of confidence will crash the value as soon as you resume transactions.

      It will be a complete and utter shitshow.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    31. Re: It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I'm so happy with my state-backed venezuelan currency!

      Things are worth what people agree are worth. Period.

    32. Re: It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LN also is vulnerable to double-spending if an attacker is able to DDoS the victim. If you think someone isn't willing to fire up a botnet to ensure someone else can't get their coins into the base chain, you need a re-education fast.

    33. Re: It's about time ... by reanjr · · Score: 1

      And your credit card takes a full day to clear at least. What's your point? Ten minutes sounds better than 24 hours, unless you have an unjustified hatred/jealousy of crypto-holders.

      Go learn how Bitcoin works before making such ignorant statements.

    34. Re: It's about time ... by reanjr · · Score: 1

      There are already solutions to that problem, but Bitcoin tends towards protocol stability. There is little reason to doubt this issue will be completely resolved by the time quantum comuters become powerful enough to "break" the protocol.

    35. Re:It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: The Ponzi scheme has been figured out finally by more than a few % of people with money to blow.

    36. Re:It's about time ... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You all talk as if the laws of mathematics are going to be rewritten

      No, they talk as though the current level of computer cryptography and its reliance on the computational difficult of factoring arbitrary large primes is going to break when that factoring ceases to be 'difficult'.

      it's a bummer to know that I'm surrounded by so many dummies on this site

      Ah, that old classic. The age-old riposte: Look in a mirror.

    37. Re: It's about time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to most estimates, Chinese miners control anywhere between 65 and 75 percent of the Bitcoin network's hash rate.
      If you think that means Bitcoin is effectively a "decentralized" system, you need to go learn how China works.

    38. Re: It's about time ... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Real currencies have the backing of material goods

      That doesn't even make sense; if it did, there'd be government warehouses full of material goods 'backing the dollar' (in fact nothing physical - except force -has backed the dollar since '72).

    39. Re:It's about time ... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      When a quantum computer can run Shor's algorithm it can be broken in well under a minute - that's the whole point.

    40. Re: It's about time ... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's a resolution. It involves switching everyone over to 30KB+ signatures prior to the time quantum computers come, so starting around 2019 at the latest. The issue is that those signature sizes result in an unmanageable blockchain size - by the time the quantum computers arrive the notion of a blockchain will already be worthless because nobody will actually be able to verify anything on it due to the size of the thing and storage space required to do so.

    41. Re:It's about time ... by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      Warren Buffett's simple advice is to invest in index funds. Keeps the fees low and it's great for long-term. The best thing for the average person to do is go to a local financial management office and open an IRA.

    42. Re: It's about time ... by DaveHowe · · Score: 1

      Force is enough though; businesses across the US are obliged to accept it, and heaven help any country that threatens the petrodollar....

      --
      -=DaveHowe=-
  2. Excellent, get your popcorn ready! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is gonna be all kinds of funny!

  3. They keep measuring against fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the real question should be how many coins are moving around.

    > daily transaction values were down from more than $3.7 billion to less than $670 million in the same period

    Yeah, that's what happens when the base value drops, but does that mean 10k less bitcoin were moved, or the USD value just dropped?

    This constant pissing contest against fiat needs to end. It conflates the performance of the asset.

    1. Re: They keep measuring against fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah, bitcoin was always just a get rich in dollars quick Ponzi scheme, so of course it is measured in dollars.

    2. Re:They keep measuring against fiat by Smidge204 · · Score: 0

      > Yeah, that's what happens when the base value drops, but does that mean 10k less bitcoin were moved, or the USD value just dropped?

      Well considering I can go out and spend my USD to buy products and services at roughly the same price as they were last year (not counting typical fluctuations and the impacts of cheeto-brained tariffs), I'm going to say that the value of the US dollar has not changed significantly over this timeframe.

      Your concern is noted, though.
      =Smidge=

    3. Re:They keep measuring against fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump will resign for 'health reasons' after the 2018 midterms rip his collaborators out of the other branches.

    4. Re:They keep measuring against fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, stupid idiots with TDS. I value your opinion about as much as my dogs.

    5. Re:They keep measuring against fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks. Trump will declare himself Emperor of the US and throw out the democratic system, just as soon as he has finished taking over the legal system and then the heads of the military.
      Then you will all have to wear shirts with his picture on them.

    6. Re: They keep measuring against fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also no one cares how much crypto has gone up compared to before the hysteria

    7. Re: They keep measuring against fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction, that is the NEXT president

      Look at the incredible divide of opinion that will not even try to see the other side.

      Once the anti-trump is elected to "save the people" you'll see full blown desire to make that person ever-strong to avoid "another Trump"

      Either its all a ploy for supreme dictatorship of USA, or a case of "the people arnt ready for freedom"

      But this is how it will go down

  4. Bubbles and Fads. by Zorro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good thing Tulips and Beanie Babys are safe investments....

    1. Re:Bubbles and Fads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Bubbles and Fads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent comparison to display how much you don't understand computer networks, cryptography, and economics. Good luck using your global network of beanie baby dealers as a cryptographically secure ledger that respects no governmental wishes or map lines. When I see anyone make this comparison, it makes me automatically write them off as absolutely retarded. Anyone following regurgitating this comparison needs to be neutered or sent back to school. Your neckbeard is showing, crawl back to the nest.

    3. Re:Bubbles and Fads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      400 years after Tulip Mania and they still haven't dropped to $0. Pretty good!

    4. Re:Bubbles and Fads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent analysis. Time to buy more crypto then when it goes up you can move out of your parents' basement. Sure to happen any day now...

    5. Re: Bubbles and Fads. by reanjr · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because 17th century futures contracts that bubbled for a season before complete collapse is exactly like a 21st century distributed payment network which has been growing for a decade.

    6. Re: Bubbles and Fads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, looks who's talking. But you probably don't understand the reference.

    7. Re: Bubbles and Fads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mere fact that you can't see how the two things are infact instances of the same human trait, mainly greed, is telling.

      Then again, ignorance is a bliss

    8. Re: Bubbles and Fads. by reanjr · · Score: 1

      The fact that you can't see that also applies to the stock market is pretty telling.

  5. A fool and his money... by nwaack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know it's an overused saying but it applies perfectly here.

    1. Re:A fool and his money... by pr0t0 · · Score: 2

      Ha, that's what you think! The $20 in Doge I bought is finally going to be at the same level as the big boys! Champagne wishes and caviar dreams, suckers!

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
  6. Miners need to be seized by xack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, governments should make it illegal to blatantly waste electricity. People cry about net neutrality, but electricity neutrality should be discussed too. In any other industry, wasting resources for no reason but to print electronic tokens would be cracked down on. It's is coming up to the 10th anniversary of the bailouts of the financial crisis that was caused by funny money mortgages, we need to arrest the designers of asics for environmental terrorism. I hope 100 years from now when our great grandchildren have to suffer in a climate changed world to ask that why didn't our generation stop the bitminers.

    1. Re: Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Satoshi was really a consortium of power companies.

    2. Re: Miners need to be seized by TFlan91 · · Score: 1

      *gasp* It all makes sense now...

    3. Re:Miners need to be seized by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Why don't we crack down on people watching sports on TV ?

    4. Re:Miners need to be seized by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      In any other industry, wasting resources for no reason but to print electronic tokens would be cracked down on.

      We could require that they shoot other people in a "battle royale" of sorts in order to earn those tokens, at which point their activity would be indistinguishable from the way that tens of millions of other people are already wasting time and electricity in a socially acceptable manner.

    5. Re:Miners need to be seized by Calydor · · Score: 1

      You just outlawed computer games.

      Well done.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    6. Re:Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of course traditional ways of storing wealth, such as gold and diamonds, are incredibly good for the environment ....

    7. Re:Miners need to be seized by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Energy Star already do this?

    8. Re:Miners need to be seized by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      > Seriously, governments should make it illegal to blatantly waste electricity.

      Are you referring to slashdot servers?

    9. Re:Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dog piss and shit

    10. Re:Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, governments should make it illegal to blatantly waste electricity.

      I agree. Now please report to the shed out back for wasting electricity by shitposting on Slashdot.

    11. Re:Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After crypto implodes, and all the miners are silenced, the energy companies will go bankrupt too!

    12. Re: Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to apply the data plan model to electricity. You only get so much per month and if you go over, you only get X kWh per day for the rest of the month unless you pay a significant fee. That or exponential pricing where every 100kWh or so doubles your bill.

    13. Re:Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about all the weebs watching anime?

    14. Re:Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent. Wasting electricity is stupid. Let's start the ban off with your electric car. It isn't doing jack shit for me.

    15. Re:Miners need to be seized by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Why don't we crack down on people watching sports on TV ?

      That's what mother-in-laws are for.

    16. Re:Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miners secure the network. It's no more waste than e.g. playing a computer game, or maybe you want to make that illegal as well..

    17. Re:Miners need to be seized by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Seriously, governments should make it illegal to blatantly waste electricity.

      Once that train starts, you can't stop it anymore. As a matter of fact, it is not just a train, but a huge railway station.

      First, define "waste electricity". For you, it's cryptominers. For me, it's public street lighting. For others, it would be computers in general. Or TVs. Or pool pumps. Or CERN.
      Then, it expands to "waste". Did you water your lawn? Oh my, you wasted a lot of perfectly good water. To the gallows with you!
      Does your car guzzle more than one gallon per 50 miles? We are providing you with a perfectly fitting dungeon chamber where you'll spend large amounts of time thinking about how you wasted resources.
      Are you heating your house to temperatures more than 10 degrees Celsius above freezing? What a waste of energy! We heard there's a dire shortage of working citizens in Siberian mines, our Russian friends will be more than happy to welcome you there, where water is being served in cubes.

      You're opening a giant can of worms with that statement.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    18. Re:Miners need to be seized by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Then, it expands to "waste". Did you water your lawn? Oh my, you wasted a lot of perfectly good water. To the gallows with you!

      Already illegal in many jurisdictions during droughts (and why would you water it if there was no drought?)

      Does your car guzzle more than one gallon per 50 miles? We are providing you with a perfectly fitting dungeon chamber where you'll spend large amounts of time thinking about how you wasted resources.

      Car taxes (or "fines" if you prefer that word to make it more like a punishment) based on fuel use exist in multiple countries.

      Are you heating your house to temperatures more than 10 degrees Celsius above freezing?

      Insulation standards are common in countries with cold climates.

      Waste is already illegal in many places. The gulags are nowhere to be seen. I think we'll be OK on that train.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    19. Re: Miners need to be seized by reanjr · · Score: 1

      You are ignorant of how the electricity consumption of the Bitcoin network works. Feel free to search my old comments for an education, but I've given up trying to explain this to people who are willfully ignorant.

    20. Re: Miners need to be seized by Cederic · · Score: 1

      That is now my favourite quote of the year.

    21. Re: Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did this get modded up?

      Why is mining 'bad' while watching 'the voice' or survivor or playing fortnite, or running AC "good."

      I agree that mining is a waste of resources, but as long as miners aren't stealing power, tell me again how you or the government gets to decide?

    22. Re: Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching TV serves a purpose.

    23. Re:Miners need to be seized by doconnor · · Score: 1

      What about all the doorless fridges and freezers in grocery stores stores?

  7. Always thought about getting in by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    5+ years ago I looked at starting to run servers and taking bitcoin in my business but even then it seemed like the train had already left the station. I decided to just stick with my market trading accounts.So that is the direction I stuck with. I just wish online trading accounts were around when I was young. Back then you had to deal through a broker.
    Now I am with the get your popcorn ready crowd. And how about yesterdays regular market drop! Not even talking about bitcoin ;) Lets see how all this works out.

    Just my 2 cents ;)

    1. Re:Always thought about getting in by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Now I am with the get your popcorn ready crowd. And how about yesterdays regular market drop! Not even talking about bitcoin ;) Lets see how all this works out. Just my 2 cents ;)

      It's almost like people are starting to realize that exponential growth quarter after quarter isn't realistic or sustainable and that these valuations built on the expectation of constant growth might as well be built on sand.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Always thought about getting in by Targon · · Score: 1

      You mean like the stock market as a whole, while the overall economy has been stagnant? Growth of the stock market while the economy remains in the toilet should result in a crash at some point.

    3. Re:Always thought about getting in by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Corporate profits have never been higher. Why shouldn't the stock market? It tracks corporate profits, not the overall economy.

  8. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is my Dogecoin doing OK???

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better than stocks today

    2. Re:But... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Your Dogecoins will always be okay. The trade ratio of one Dogecoin to one Dogecoin is rock-solid.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  9. It really is too bad by ERJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me start with, crypto as an investment is stupid. But, it really is too bad if it fails. It would be nice to have a replacement for cash that has a similar anonymity to cash.

    Look, I'm not looking to do anything illegal or illicit but the situation of today where Visa could conceivably sell my purchase history to Google who would then target advertising to me or be able to provide the number of Snickers bars I ate this past year to health care or insurance providers doesn't sit particularly well with me either. So being able to purchase some groceries, clothes, etc through electronic means but in an anonymous fashion has a certain draw for me.

    1. Re:It really is too bad by AuMatar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Buy a giftcard or prepaid visa at a physical store with cash.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I agree, crypto would be terrible as an investment. Who's going to invest in an algorithm that scrambles numbers in a reversible way. I guess maybe if you got a patent on it....

    3. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For both of those, issuance is centrally controlled.

    4. Re:It really is too bad by DogDude · · Score: 1

      the situation of today where Visa could conceivably sell my purchase history to Google

      It's more than conceivable. This and a lot more is happening today.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, crypto never should've had valuation fluctuations. It should've been a trading platform, like paypal, or whatever. A way to transfer monies.

    6. Re:It really is too bad by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The connection to real currencies exist at the mercy of government, they treated crypto with kid gloves for a while but it was never going to last. Once all the billionaires are out and there's no one lobbying for cryptocurrency it will go the way of e-gold.

      People who pretend cryptocurrency can somehow route around government are deluding themselves. If the EU and the US don't allow banks to cooperate with conversion or transact with any foreign bank which does, cryptocurrency is dead.

    7. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or not controlled, gift cards can become worthless, and prepaid can be hacked

    8. Re:It really is too bad by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Use Tether or Gemini ... it won't last though, they are essentially e-gold v2.0 and they will go the same route.

    9. Re:It really is too bad by mea2214 · · Score: 1

      Visa could conceivably sell my purchase history to Google

      Worse, it can be sold to insurance companies and credit score companies who use predictive algorithms based upon crackpot theories to evaluate you as a risk. i

    10. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that anonymous in the end.

    11. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well crypto doesn't make you anonymous abd if anything it is even worse when it comes to advertising as they don't even need to buy the information, it is all freely publically available for them to scoop up and target you with.

    12. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Username should be Pinky's nipple or something equally stupid. You do understand this was meant to be P2P cash, right? And you do understand you can't rewrite the laws of mathematics, right? Anyone using crypto with banks is a fool. But then again, good luck, banks, finding out what a transaction was for. What do you think, they will require a photo of the apple you purchased from another human being to transact value if you choose to use a bank account to do so?

      TRY AGAIN.

    13. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, it really is too bad if it fails.

      No, it's not too bad.

      Cash doesn't disappear if the power goes out. A computer virus can't steal the cash from the wallet sitting on my nightstand.

      Cash isn't perfect, but crypto was never a replacement for cash. Crypto solves small problems and introduces a whole bunch of huge ones.

    14. Re:It really is too bad by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      Why not simply use cash? Safe, simple, private, secure.

    15. Re:It really is too bad by xpiotr · · Score: 1

      FYI Mastercard already sold your data to Google.
      I am wondering if the EU GPDR data law could help to force Mastercard to reveal what data they have and how they have shared it.

    16. Re:It really is too bad by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It would be nice to have a replacement for cash that has a similar anonymity to cash.

      Define anonymous. Anonymous in the sense that no one can see what you spend your money on? Or Anonymous in the sense that no one can identify you?

      Cryptocurrencies can't achieve the former.
      Any financial transactions that aren't done in person where all parties are blind folded can't achieve the latter.

    17. Re: It really is too bad by reanjr · · Score: 1

      And pay a 3% premium on everything? No thanks.

    18. Re: It really is too bad by reanjr · · Score: 1

      The anonymity is available, but costs some extra money and time (and may be illegal if you are using it to hide fraud; not sure on that). But the real selling point isn't anonymity as much as it is control. No one can really stop you from using it, even if - for example - you want to send money back home to Iran.

    19. Re: It really is too bad by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's frustrating when the power goes out and the whole Internet gets deleted and we have to re-create it every time...

    20. Re: It really is too bad by reanjr · · Score: 1

      How do I submit my dollar bills through a web form?

    21. Re:It really is too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that is the beauty of crypto, it doesn't need the grace of governments or banks, it doesn't need the connection to real currency. That is in fact the main reason why it can be so destructive to old power-systems. There's no need for me to trade my bitcoin to dollars if I can buy my groceries, my car and my house with it. But we've been ingrained with a slave-master relation for so long, that people are convinced that we need someone else to tell us that it's ok to do this, like we're all kids in a playground waiting for mommy's approval to go on a merry-go-round.

      People in power are terrified of decentralization. And if crypto fails, it's not because there is no interest or benefit to it, but because it was brought down or usurped by people who want to hold on to what they have.

    22. Re:It really is too bad by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Crypto currencies give it away for free.

  10. On the brink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like it's in the MIDDLE of an implosion to me. The sooner it's completely gone, the better. What an utter waste of resources it's been.

    1. Re:On the brink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not even a has-been --- it's more of a never was.

  11. Check your local dumpsters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There might be bags of good used video cards tossed after this all goes bust.

    1. Re:Check your local dumpsters... by r1348 · · Score: 1

      I got myself a 6-months-old Sapphire RX580 Nitro+ Special Edition for 180€ on eBay a month ago. Some French dude was selling like 50 of them.

    2. Re:Check your local dumpsters... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      There might be bags of good used video cards tossed after this all goes bust.

      You laugh, but I bought a pair of nice GeForce 1080 Ti's from a day trader who thought he was going to mine bitcoin and then decided that there was no such thing as free money. I see him sitting at the Starbucks with his Macbook, wheeling and dealing. Meanwhile, I've got a nice gaming card in my rig and a second one sitting here in case the other one blows up.

      I wonder how his move back to the stock market is going.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Check your local dumpsters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diarrhea is delicious

    4. Re:Check your local dumpsters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is your mom.

    5. Re:Check your local dumpsters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She does produce some of the best diarrhea.

  12. "Brink" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Meanwhile, daily transaction values were down from more than $3.7 billion to less than $670 million in the same period, Juniper said in the study, The Future of Cryptocurrency: Bitcoin & Altcoin Trends & Challenges 2018-2023. The market as a whole has contracted quickly as well. In the first quarter, cryptocurrency transactions totaled just over $1.4 trillion, compared with less than $1.7 trillion for 2017 as a whole, Juniper said. However, by the second quarter, transaction values had plummeted by 75 percent, with total market capitalization falling to just under $355 billion.

    That sounds like it passed the "brink of an implosion" about 65 percent ago.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:"Brink" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      less speculation but the value of bitcoin is still quite high.

  13. About time. by r1348 · · Score: 2

    Maybe all those obnoxious "Youtube economists" will crawl back to their mom's basements...

  14. Short Sighted by Doc+Right · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So some folks with more dollars than sense dumped a bunch of money into the cryptocurrency market trying to make a quick buck. Some won, some lost. It's been long accepted that most of the alt-coins available today will eventually disappear, leaving only the strongest and most useful cryptocurrencies. Speculation is what drove the market up to unsustainable levels. I believe it has come back down where it belongs, if not a bit lower, against the U.S. Dollar. But remember, we're talking about currencies, not stocks. People need to get out of the investment mentality and see the technology for what it is: Digital CASH. Blockchain will never die. Cryptocurrency as a whole will never fail. The genie is already out of the bottle. It just might take a little time for people to change their mentality about it.

    1. Re:Short Sighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People need to get out of the investment mentality and see the technology for what it is: Digital CASH.

      ...and as Digital CASH, it fails miserably when compared to it's competitors. Not just BTC, but ALL crypto. Blockchain will never die? LOL. You sound like a religious nutter.

    2. Re:Short Sighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So some folks with more dollars than sense dumped a bunch of money into the cryptocurrency market trying to make a quick buck. Some won, some lost. It's been long accepted that most of the alt-coins available today will eventually disappear, leaving only the strongest and most useful cryptocurrencies.

      Speculation is what drove the market up to unsustainable levels. I believe it has come back down where it belongs, if not a bit lower, against the U.S. Dollar. But remember, we're talking about currencies, not stocks. People need to get out of the investment mentality and see the technology for what it is: Digital CASH.

      Blockchain will never die. Cryptocurrency as a whole will never fail. The genie is already out of the bottle. It just might take a little time for people to change their mentality about it.

      I hope you remain trapped with your buddies in your indelible fucking cockchain and are forced to excavate Buttcoins from each other for the rest of eternity.

  15. Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lets compare a real currency, with a cryptocurrency:

    1: A government can print all they want for a real currency. A cryptocurrency like Bitcoin only has "x" amount of currency, and only will get less. This makes your stake in the currency more valuable as time progresses, no matter how much is mined.
    2: Cryptocurrencies are a secure means of exchange. Once the transaction hits the blockchain and is verified, it is done. No chargebacks, no counterfeit paper money, no bounced checks. You get paid and stay paid.
    3: Cryptocurrencies are far better for ensuring transactions happen. I set up a multisig transaction with an escrow agent and the person I am buying from. The other party ships me a widget. I check if the widget is OK, say all is good, escrow agent allows the transaction to go through. Everyone is happy. Yes, the escrow agent could collude with one of the other side, but that is a lot less of an issue than the massive fraud committed today in general.
    4: Cryptocurrencies can be stored securely. Even if a place gets raided, the wallet will be secure. I can add other mechanisms as well, such as paper wallets, x out of y key retrieval, and even duress codes which can lock a wallet for a certain amount of time.
    5: Cryptocurrencies only get more useful as time progresses. Bitcoin's price has stabilized, and in a few years, will be the gold standard for long term currency saving, and unlike the dollar, it is immune to inflation.

    Someone show me the disadvantage of cryptocurrencies, other than that clueless people fail to understand them?

    1. Re: Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it cannot be easily manipulated then governments and their leash holders, banks, will not allow it to become dominant. I think cryptocurrency has potential, especially in the area of reimbursement to artists. Giving up financial power to the general population is not happening anytime soon.

    2. Re:Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got some tulip bulbs to sell you.

    3. Re: Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A currency with all the stability of the stock market is not a good idea, ever, especially when 80-90% of it is hoarded with no intention of ever spending it in the hope that it will randomly spike in value significantly, triggering massive sell-offs that completely crash the market, then repeat with a new bunch of "investors".

    4. Re:Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crypto disadvantages is literally fucking everything about them. Not a single thing you said was true either.

    5. Re:Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by geoskd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ok, I'll have a go:

      1: There is nothing intrinsic to crypto that makes it go up. If demand (i.e. utilization) is not growing as fast as new coins are mined, then the value drops. This is even more pronounced when the utilization growth goes negative. See yesterday, and last month, and this whole year. BTC is currently worth less than half what it was last year, and has the potential to drop all the way to zero without major changes to the world we live in. USD by contrast would only be capable of dropping to zero by way of the apocalypse.

      2: They are only as secure as the software that is used to handle it. Software in general is notoriously insecure. Also see 51% attack.

      3: You can achieve this same effect using a brokerage service, of which there are millions in every flavour you could want. The easiest to use variants are Credit Cards which are accepted almost universally. Visa handles 150M transactions per day, or approximately 3 orders of magnitude more than bitcoin, and in spite of that high load, they handle individual transactions in seconds. Nothing about cryptocurrency is inherently faster, better or safer.

      4: Oh Really?

      5: Only if they are universally accepted. If people stop accepting them, then they loose utility, and less people will be inclined to use them, which makes them even less useful. This is known as a death spiral, and the research cited in this story seems to indicate that bitcoin is headed in exactly that direction. This phenomenon is not unique to cryptocurrency, and is one of the reasons that AmEx plays dirty pool to force retailers to keep accepting their cards.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    6. Re: Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it cannot be easily manipulated then governments and their leash holders, banks, will not allow it to become dominant.

      DUUUUUUUUUH, what do you think is happening now? You stupid is painful.

    7. Re:Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://99bitcoins.com/obituary-stats/ - bitcoin has died 315 times and counting. This is exactly the same shit people were saying after it peaked to 1000. it ended up falling to $200 for over a year. Transaction volumes way down... bla bla bla... if only you would have just bought at 200... well this is the new 200. its going to be like this for probably another year to 18 months before it goes crazy again. Might even go down more before then but at the end of the day, its a more efficient technology then any other previously created tech. it will in the end, become the dominant force.

    8. Re:Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 51% attack is impossible.

    9. Re: Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Plenty of currencies are volatile. But if the volatility of Bitcoin - for example - is part of a long-term upward trend, then it serves as a much better currency than many national currencies.

      Bitcoin isn't going to compete with the USD; it competes with all the flaky currencies of the third world, and in that competition, it does pretty well as a currency.

    10. Re: Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by reanjr · · Score: 1

      That's not true. If the Chinese government and the NSA decided they wanted to kill it, they could probably still do it. But it would be expensive af.

  16. Miner Miner Forty-Niner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1849. Live the dream. Again. Make 'murika Greedy Again.

  17. Market overvalued currently, few real transactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of the people who invest in crypto currencies are almost as retarded as those that are anti-crypto. There are few real transactions in the crypto world that aren't people just trading back and forth. Crypto currencies have a lot of promise- but the valuation is utterly ridicules given where things stand. Crypto currencies are probably overvalued right now in raw dollars by a factor of ten. However at the same time the future looks bright if you aren't looking at it from an investor stand point. We're seeing more and more businesses adopting it offline in the places that it really matters: New Hampshire and Venezuela. Nowhere else matters because the population of users are too scattered for it to take off. In New Hampshire there is demand because of the migration of libertarians and the Free State Project. There is marketing, promotion, and usage by others because of that. Everywhere else people aren't using it. They are "investing" in it and artificially inflating the value.

    If you want the benefits of crypto currencies and the development to continue you should be looking at New Hampshire as a guide. What is happening in New Hampshire you probably won't see in most other regions for another 10-20 years (at least successful adoption where people can actually utilize it reliably at the local level around town). It took credit cards 40 years to see widespread adoption and it started similarly. Hotels and restaurants that catered to a particular market: traveling salesmen.

  18. So the banking industry and governemnts by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    would have you believe. When it proved to be beyond big businesses ability to control the only thought that occurred to them was that they be destroyed. They can't have a means of monetary movement or compensation beyond their grasp and control. Crypto currency will be valuable for brief quick transfers and compensation, but probably never stable enough for big business to feel comfortable dumping funds into and wholesale raping, but it could always be a quick and dirty way to transfer/launder money with big brother getting involved.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:So the banking industry and governemnts by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      When it proved to be beyond big businesses ability to control

      That's cute. IBM and Goldman are the big winners (directly) on cryptocurrenicies, with nVidia and other hardware providers making bank as well. It wasn't a big "fuck you" to business, it was an opportunity for them. I mean, the original people were outsiders, but in the past 5 years...?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:So the banking industry and governemnts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you honestly think that the power-structures of today exist because they're selling trinkets? Power isn't about having lots of money, it's about the relation between who has the money and who needs it. Since every dollar in the system is loaned, we are forever in debt, whether that is you or nVidia is irrelevant, but that is the real problem of traditional currencies, centralization and control, not rich people.

  19. Yeah, OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crypto will never "implode". The people that have yet to understand the real world uses (and downright needs) that crypto provides, probably never will because they are just too ignorant. Now, as long as these currencies have real world uses, they have real world value. Even if the price of bitcoin fell to around $100 again, it would still be used and inherently have some value. It's even possible that bitcoin gets abandoned for the most part because, let's be honest, it is a very heavy, poorly made currency. However, it did kick everything off and now we have thousands of different currencies, one of which would simply replace bitcoin as the most commonly traded coin. Crypto as a whole is here to stay whether you like it or not and it will continue to evolve long into the future.

    1. Re:Yeah, OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if the price of bitcoin fell to around $100 again, it would still be used and inherently have some value.

      Still be used? For what? 99% of it's use right now is separating fools from their money. Is that the use you're talking about?

    2. Re: Yeah, OK... by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Funny. Everyone I know who bought Bitcoin has made a profit.

  20. who actually uses Crypto??? by bkmoore · · Score: 1

    Who actually uses crypto to make everyday purchases such as toilet paper, food, gasoline, etc., not just for impulse buying Lamborghinis or South Bay real estate. Imho, it's not really a "currency" unless it fulfills the same role as cash, not just in theory, but also in practice.

    1. Re:who actually uses Crypto??? by cshark · · Score: 1

      There are several ways to do it. But with the volatility of bitcoin at any given moment, I wouldn't advise using any of them.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:who actually uses Crypto??? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Who actually uses stocks to make everyday purchases such as toilet paper, food, gasoline, etc., not just for impulse buying Lamborghinis or South Bay real estate? Same argument.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:who actually uses Crypto??? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Who actually uses stocks to make everyday purchases such as toilet paper, food, gasoline, etc., not just for impulse buying Lamborghinis or South Bay real estate? Same argument.

      You appear to be in violent agreement that BTC isn't a currency. I'm not sure that that is waht you intended.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    4. Re:who actually uses Crypto??? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Yes it's a currency but the "nerds" around here don't see that money is made by treating them as stocks. The buy and hold days are long gone.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    5. Re: who actually uses Crypto??? by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Who knows? Maybe lots. You can get a debit card that spends Bitcoin, but works over any standard credit/debit network. It's a solid stratey for Bitcoin belivers to put most of their money into Bitcoin until they need it. So, it's hard to say how much is used for everyday transaction, as these transactions are generally off-chain.

  21. This needs to be put in terms we can understand by istartedi · · Score: 1

    How many delicious 16 oz. steaks have been wasted on crypto-mining?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  22. FINALLY!!!! by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

    Maybe now I can afford a new graphics card for my gaming PC!

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  23. Nothing to see here. by cshark · · Score: 2

    They talk about the market imploding and correcting itself as though that's a bad thing. This happens with Bitcoin every couple of years. The system and the market always comes out stronger at the end of the cycle. This isn't news.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

    1. Re:Nothing to see here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a market though. Market implies something of value being exchanged for something of equal value. This is just pure speculation.

    2. Re: Nothing to see here. by reanjr · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as a gold market?

  24. Fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Replace fiat with crypto and you have an accurate assessment of our current financial situation.

  25. I'm paying for by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    I'm paying for the electricity. Who are you to tell me what I can do with it?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  26. Ransomware authors, drug dealers, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's about it.

  27. This time is different, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that we've got credit card processors and PayPal banning Americans for not subscribing to management's ideology it's pretty clear to me that cryptocurrency has a perfectly legal and attractive use case. Adoption is the thing that fueled growth, historically. The media can hype BTC up to 20k and the media can FUD it back down to 2k, no one is denying this, but saying it's dead? How many articles were written declaring PC gaming and/or console gaming dead?

  28. It's not a fiat currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's backed by hope. That's it. It's bound to implode. I told people at work (all the young guys) that it will be worthless in 10 years and no one will be talking about it. We're on like year 3.

    1. Re: It's not a fiat currency by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Your knowledge of Bitcoin might only be three years old, but Bitcoin has already cruised by its tenth anniversary.

    2. Re: It's not a fiat currency by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

      He said nothing about how long Bitcoin has existed.

      We are 3 years into his 10 year window.

      You sir are either an idiot or a pedantic shrill, care to weigh in?

    3. Re: It's not a fiat currency by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should be more pedantic so you'd understand what the word "might" means.

      And try to acquire some critical thinking skills while you're at it to realize I was pointing out a decade of longevity to counter the baseless prognostication in the GP.

  29. It won't go away completely by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    unless the major gov'ts legalize drugs and crack down on the money laundering. Until then it's got a floor from the utility of using it to buy illegal services.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It won't go away completely by feedayeen · · Score: 1

      A drug seller doesn't value Bitcoins, they can't pay their rent with it and someone down the line needs to pay taxes with boring old fiat currency. Someone has to facilitate the transaction between fiat to bitcoin and back to fiat. That person is your weak point which can be targeted by governments.

      If cryptocurrency's entire utility is reduced to money laundering, tax evasion, and similar illegal activities, it is in the governments' interest to eliminate it. Any business operating or transferring financial assets into our out of their borders needs to be heavily regulated to ensure compliance with local laws or declared illegal. That law would relatively easily pass in country with gambling, drug, or finance laws which represents almost the entire world. Those exchanges would be forced to move to smaller and less developed countries. Now we need a legal way to get money from good ol' USA into Timbuktu legally. 2 more middlemen are born to handle either end of the exchange and I'm thinking that it'll be easier to just walk over to the sketchy part of town with a 50 in cash before submitting my credit card number to that sketchy website.

  30. If it makes you feel better they can't do that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they know where you shop but not what you bought. Since most Snickers bars (and junk food in general) are bought at grocery & convenience stores that information isn't terribly useful. Retailers know better than to give up that data to anyone, let alone payment companies.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:If it makes you feel better they can't do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, they apparently can:

      https://globalnews.ca/news/4461315/will-your-cannabis-credit-card-purchases-be-visible-to-u-s-border-officials-some-might-some-wont/

  31. Nope, watch what happens with crypko.ai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the more recent interesting episodes in cryptocurrency was ethereum nearly falling over due to the mass volume of transactions ramping up due to, cryptokitties, a trading card game. The devs worked like mad to up the transaction processing rate, and made a number of big advances in blockchain processing. I suppose one could call it the necessity of the situation, but it could also be said that to be a via ecosystem, the platform has to perform.

    So, now crypko.ai will be launching (WITHOUT an ICO) shortly. Why is this big? Because this unlocks a new, hardcore subgroup of users who will throw money/resources at ethereum and overload it. We are talking hardcore otaku guys who are obsessive collectors, desperately trying to collect anime character cards, and spending god knows how much money. Look at how much money those anthropomorphic ship character card collector games make right now. When they start pumping that into ethereum, you will see a trigger sparking even more new development.

  32. Re:Market overvalued currently, few real transacti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free State Project = "Let's all move someplace small where we can easily outnumber the locals and take over." Fuck yourself.

  33. Bitcoin != Cryptocurrency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin (BTC) is dying because BlockSteam/Core failed to scale it. However, adaptation of e.g. Bitcoin (BCH) has been growing nicely because instead of the stupid "store of value" narrative Bitcoin (BCH) developers wisely decided to scale on-chain..

    1. Re: Bitcoin != Cryptocurrency by reanjr · · Score: 1

      LOL! So, you're holding lots of losing BCH and hope it someday recovers?

  34. Bitcoin is dying by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BTC is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BTC community when IDC confirmed that *BTC market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BTC has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BTC is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BTC's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BTC faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BTC because *BTC is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BTC. As many of us are already aware, *BTC continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood...

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  35. It was an all time high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The price and volume is lower than what it was on an all time high... You don't say. It's an all time high... It's in the name.
    Are the price an volume smaller than they were before the surge? Nope.

    1. Re: It was an all time high by reanjr · · Score: 1

      +7 Insightful.

  36. Re: Market overvalued currently, few real transact by reanjr · · Score: 1

    There's little in the way of gold-denominated transaction either, outside of selling back and forth. Not sure if your intention was to liken Bitcoin to the best solid investment of the last 2,000 years...

  37. Funny, money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Echoing sentiments of mainstream economists'

    Everyone does know there are vested interests in CAUSING an implosion, yes?

    This is the exact kind of news developed to do that.

    I can understand people who want/hold silver and gold

    I cannot understand people who want government backed bills and assume they know nothing about the situation

  38. Again? by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 2

    Wow, since 2012 I've heard this roughly 1337 times. It must be true this time......

  39. As history once again repeats itself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it's fun watching the show.

    About a year, year and a half ago one of the young guys at work asked me what video card I'd recommend for a PC he wanted to build. So naturally I asked him what games he wanted to play and what they required. After the best deer-in-headlights look ever, he explained that his goal was to build a "profitable mining rig".

    For a few futile minutes I tried to explain about speculation bubbles, but he just wanted to get rich dammit so tell him the right answer already. I had no idea so in the end just told him to buy whatever was the newest that other "miners" thought was good, and keep in mind plan B will most likely be to just enjoy playing games on it. Then he sold me his 2 month old card for half price because he was disgusted with how much he spent and just wasn't making as much money as youtube told him he should be getting...

    As best I can recall: housing, dot-com, s&l, tulips... I'm sure there's more of the same periodically littering the history books. Oddly enough, "if it sounds too good to be true...", is actually pretty good advice.