Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Passes Windows 7 in Market Share (venturebeat.com)

An anonymous reader writes: More than three years after its release, Windows 10 has passed Windows 7 in market share. That means more desktop computers are now running Microsoft's latest and greatest operating system than any other OS, according to Net Applications. The milestone is a nice way for Microsoft to end 2018, even though the company surely was hoping it wouldn't take this long for Windows 10 to overtake Windows 7.

105 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Latest and greatest? by hashish · · Score: 3, Informative

    Was this article written by MS?

    1. Re:Latest and greatest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Windows 10 may be the latest, but Windows 7 was the greatest.

    2. Re:Latest and greatest? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For it's time, Windows 2000 was mighty fine. It killed Desktop Linux.

    3. Re:Latest and greatest? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Windows 2000 was the first really robust OS from Microsoft that had 'enough in it' to be a good desktop system, and was several magnitudes of scale better than Windows 98. Before it, NT 3.51 was a good 'UNIX like' OS, but they screwed that up with NT 4. Then after Windows 2000, they stuck in thick layers of cruft again with XP. It took until Windows 7 to recover. Windows 10 is just an unmitigated disaster. I recently tried to open up my Windows 10 convertible laptop in 'tablet' mode, and had to kind of force it into a shutdown because it wouldn't respond to ANYTHING I could do on the touchscreen.

    4. Re:Latest and greatest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows 8.1 + Classic Shell is the best version of Windows. That isn't saying much since everything Microsoft has ever made is crap.

    5. Re:Latest and greatest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You just have to be able to translate Msmash shill-speak into English. :-)

      "Latest" in English means "most recently deceased."

      And "Greatest" in English simply means it's the most "bloated" version.

      A depressing day, if true. Every version of Windows since XP SP3 has been worse and buggier than its predecessor.

    6. Re:Latest and greatest? by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Gnome (almost) killed desktop Linux, if you had to point at one single factor. With two factors, it would be Gnome and Microsoft dirty tricks.

      Well arguably, Gnome is a Microsoft dirty trick too, given that Miguel got a cushy job at Microsoft immediately after laying waste to the Linux desktop ecology. Of course it could have just been incompetence rather than malice, but...

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re: Latest and greatest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Linux desktop HAS NEVER been ALIVE . N E V E R

    8. Re:Latest and greatest? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is all the people who seem to think "GNOME or KDE?" is the blocker rather than this. If you're a gamer Linux is fairly useless when it comes to AAA games. Heavy productivity suites like everything from Adobe equally so. And a lot of the very light users would probably be better off with a Chromebook. Yes, you could say that LibreOffice is close enough to MS Office, GIMP is close enough to Photoshop, there are fun independent games on Steam and so on... but it's not the same. Or you have some funny driver issue because your laptop never officially supported Linux, I mean there's a reason there's dedicated shops and models for that. As long as your "desktop paradigm" is not entirely dysfunctional, it's not the problem.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re: Latest and greatest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Windows XP was much faster at file operations than Windows 7. The Vista crap wasn't fully reverted.

    10. Re:Latest and greatest? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 has been the only OS I have never had to reinstall, admittedly that was a dual boot system and I have used Kubuntu to repair windows 7 on more than one occasion.

      If M$ was still selling windows 7 at the same time as Windows anal probe 10, which would be the best selling OS for M$ and we all know the answer for that.

      Next boxen likely to be Apple, my first one ever. I will never run Windows anal probe 10, NEVER.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:Latest and greatest? by dwywit · · Score: 2

      "foam about that all you want"

      You need to have a cup of tea and a good lie down.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    12. Re:Latest and greatest? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Impressed everyone with your witty rejoinder.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re:Latest and greatest? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Well the only people you managed to impress were the members of the local linux users' club.

      I mean, "Artists don't use Gimp for painting these days, they use Krita, which is the best digital painter in the known universe."

      That's called hyperbole, and not serious critical appraisal. You shot yourself in the foot, there. Unless you've bought that 6-digit account, you should know better.

      And

      "Productivity suite users are moving away from MSFT office in droves, they are moving to Google Office now. "

      Hence the rise in MS revenues from Office subscriptions. Ya know, "droves" might imply that some of us at the coalface have seen this happening. More hyperbole. Not a single one of my customers, domestic or small business, use Google Office 'apps'. They're happy to use the storage, but not the apps.

      Then, skipping the gaming stuff because gaming isn't my thing:

      "BTW, LibreOffice is now better than MS Office, the source code isn't a complete steaming pile of shit like MS Office, just for one of many reasons."

      LibreOffice is a fine product - but it's not what most people use. Use what you prefer, I don't care - until you send me a file that renders inaccurately. I'd also be interested to see your critique of MSOffice source code. With examples and references, of course.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    14. Re:Latest and greatest? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      There was nothing Unix like about NT 3.51, it was also pretty horrible to use given it had a Windows 3.1 type UI.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    15. Re:Latest and greatest? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Gnome (almost) killed desktop Linux

      I prefer the term late-stage abortion. "Killing" implied that it was alive and healthy at some point.

    16. Re:Latest and greatest? by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is that even FOSS software works better in Windows. I can download and install the latest VLC in Windows 7 with half a dozen clicks. Can an Ubuntu or Mint LTS from just 3 years ago do that? No. The repositories have an ancient version of VLC, so you will have to recompile the application (seriously). Or move to a rolling (aka continuously breaking) release. Or just go to Windows. Then there are countless driver issues (particularly around graphics and HDMI audio) and various power management issues which make apps run badly and/or for less amount of time on battery. No I don't care whose fault it is.

    17. Re:Latest and greatest? by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      If an OS for you is a layer that manages your hardware and runs your apps, aka a means not an end, Windows is good (not crap). It has good drivers for most hardware, manages battery power well enough and doesn't require any repository middlemen to repackage applications before you can have your favorite applications. Unlike Desktop Linux.

    18. Re:Latest and greatest? by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Funny how when Microsoft tries to do the right thing for things like security, reliability and component management (as they did with Windows Vista and Windows 7) the Linux people are the first to bite. This explains a lot about the state of Desktop Linux, I guess.

    19. Re:Latest and greatest? by Bobtree · · Score: 1

      So Windows must suck because you can't play Bayoneta.

      Your point about exclusives is valid, but FYI: https://store.steampowered.com...

    20. Re:Latest and greatest? by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Well if the Microsoft "dirty trick" was to have a better and more coherent disktop than linux then you might be on to something. Sorry people, but Microsoft has always had a better and more thought out desktop than linux. It has not always been the prettiest but when it comes to getting work done it is better.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    21. Re:Latest and greatest? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      "Artists don't use Gimp for painting these days, they use Krita, which is the best digital painter in the known universe."

      That's called hyperbole, and not serious critical appraisal.

      It's a fact, and you are out of touch. Krita is not only the best digital painting program on Linux, it's the best digital painting program period.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    22. Re:Latest and greatest? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has always had a better and more thought out desktop than linux.

      Yah no. I occasionally have reason to go slumming in the Windows GUI and it always amazes me that anybody is willing to put up with such awkwardness compared to KDE Plasma. Never might the antivirus hell, surprise reboots, crappy updates and all the other reasons that Windows is a nightmare and people who leave it never go back.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    23. Re:Latest and greatest? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of talent on Deviantart, but your reference there is to a discussion about Krita vs. Photoshop. Surely a more meaningful comparison would be about Illustrator? Or haven't you used Illustrator?

      To open up that discussion, when Adobe ports the entire Creative Cloud suite to linux , or even someone else makes an *entire* integrated suite of equivalent quality, I'll happily fork out the money. Until then, most of the professional creatives will continue to use CC. I've never seen a professional artist that didn't use some part of CC - they may not like it (and many don't), but the simple fact is that there is no suite available for linux. Individual tools, perhaps, but no integrated suite.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    24. Re:Latest and greatest? by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Well denial isn't just a river in Egypt. Yeah, you can keep on telling yourself that all you want too. Doesn't make it true but if It helps you sleep at night. Enjoy your fantasy.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    25. Re:Latest and greatest? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Illustrator is for vector art, not painting. And Krita 4 added a bunch of vector art features while further strengthening its lead in painting.

      For photo/image work Gimp is fine and gets major improvements every release. The only people missing Photoshop on Linux are ones that only know that interface, which is hardly the best possible. The big deal is the price per seat: $0.00 for Gimp.

      If you must run Photoshop on Linux then go ahead and run it.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    26. Re:Latest and greatest? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      You would appear to be the one in denial. How's that antivirus working out for you? Did it let any through? Are you sure? Of course those strange stalls you're experiencing could be just anything. Never mind, just wipe the machine and reinstall... one more them.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    27. Re:Latest and greatest? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      [Windows] keeps freezing, the taskbar keeps crashing and becoming completely unresponsive or stops refreshing, desktop just goes black at random forcing a reboot etc.

      FTFY

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:Latest and greatest? by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I'm sure your just trolling now, ether that or you really don't know what your doing. You could just have crappy hardware. Which leads back to you not knowing what you are doing.

      But then just in case you are not trolling and are really this much of a linux zealot, I would suggest you get rid of your linux system and get a Mac. You are exactly the kind of person we don't need or want in the linux community. You and people like you are the reason linux has a image problems that it does. You're part of the problem, hell you are the problem.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  2. Many businesses have no choice by StuartHankins · · Score: 5, Informative

    Windows 10 has a bunch of serious issues, that's not news, and those who can avoid it are lucky. Guess what? My machine is wanting to install the Windows feature update again, and I'm staving it off because the last time I tried it, after 2 hours of WTF-is-it-doing and then trying to roll back, it left things in such a mess after the "successful" rollback that I restored the entire VM from backup.

    This is one reason why I no longer store documents within the VM, and do most of my work remoted onto Windows servers which seem to have fewer issues. Between Office 365 "updates" and forced Windows "updates" my machine has never been so "updated" yet suffering from so many issues before... and I go back to Windows 3.0

    I would create another VM from scratch, but Windows 10 is the issue here. What a hot mess!

    1. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      LTSB is not recommended. No Linux support, slow as fuck Windows Update, No Windows Store which is a problem for Office 2019 as Sway and OneNote have moved to the Store only, and many other countless updates since 2015.

    2. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Enterprises get the enterprise version, which removes almost all of the "hot, new, amazing" technology and cedes control of the OS to the admin to make for an actually reliable OS.

      Other users are stuck with home and pro versions which are the worst MS operating system since... I have problems finishing this sentence, as I had better luck even with ME.

    3. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 3, Informative

      I bought a retail box version of Windows 10 to put on my desktop because I was running a sketchy copy of Windows 7 that kept deactivating. After a few months running the Windows 10, I went on eBay and bought a legitimate retail box copy of Windows 7 to replace it.

      At least now I have a legitimate copy of Windows 7 to run in perpetuity. I have several machines with legit OEM copies of Windows 7 as well.

      If you did have a legit Windows 7 machine and you let them do the 'free upgrade' on it, your old license is expired. That was part of the agreement to get the 'free' Windows 10.

    4. Re: Many businesses have no choice by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      But there is the newer LTSC released in last couple of months.

      It is not hard to enable Windows store for LTSC/LTSB.

      I gave it a shot. It took 3 hours to update one machine and we couldn't get OneNote nor an app some site used that was from the appstore. I think looking forward in time 2 to 5 years from now (normal image lifespan) that the WindowsStore will have a larger role. If a user has to install something without admin rights we know it will contain malware from the store. Vendors are slowly moving to it too.

      Linux support is important for many slashdotters too which is nice.

    5. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      My customer mandated W10 for security reasons. 7 will not be supported forever.

      I don't mind it other than using a keyboard is not an option in many places. That's maybe 5% of my needs, but it's weighted to 80% of my hate. Likely to get worse, too.

    6. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. You rewarded Microsoft twice (thrice?) for making your life miserable. Once for buying the retail box Windows 10, a second time by buying a retail box Windows 7, and possibly an initial third time from your original sketchy Windows 7 (perhaps an OEM pre-installation image that started failing after too many hardware upgrades?).

      Multiply your story times the number of other people in the world that did something similar and it becomes obvious why Microsoft makes shoddy versions of Windows. It's more profit in their pockets the harder they make life for you all.

    7. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LTSB is not recommended. No Linux support, slow as fuck Windows Update

      It's called Cygwin or a virtual machine.

      No Windows Store which is a problem for Office 2019 as Sway and OneNote have moved to the Store only

      Nobody cares.

      and many other countless updates since 2015.

      Again nobody cares, not even a little.

    8. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of which "new hardware support" was achieved by literally forcing OEMs and hardware designers into not releasing win7 drivers. They even strong armed intel itself into not releasing full support for win7 on its most modern CPUs.

    9. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Considering your name and posting history, you're not just a fan. You're a full blown astroturfer, and the only question I have if you're doing this as a hobby or a paid assignment. Content of this post proves it, as even the points of stability, original release has been by far the most stable. Even the first update literally broke a whole bunch of software, to the point where microsoft themselves recommended "running in win7 compatibility mode if you experience stability issues". It has gotten only worse since, to the point where after snafu #3 or so, I just ripped the update process out of the only laptop I have running win10 entirely after re-imaging it. If it ever gets pwned, I'll just re-image it back.

    10. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      by Billly Gates ( 198444 )

      Username checks out.

      LTSB is not recommended. No Linux support,

      There's Cygwin, there's Docker for Windows, there's Virtualbox and VMWare Workstation and Hyper-V...

      slow as fuck Windows Update,

      That's not a bug, that's a feature.

      No Windows Store

      Also a great feature.

      which is a problem for Office 2019

      I'm sure the CtR installer still works just fine, though odds are good that anyone with a licensed copy of LTSB will still have a volume license of Office, and anyone who gets it off The Pirate Bay similarly won't care.

      as Sway

      Who the hell has ever used Sway? I've never once met one person who used it. Even if it's a nice combination of Publisher, Wordpress, and Wix.com, the Youtube tutorial I watched didn't indicate any sort of export function; it's all browser based so it's barely a loss.

      and OneNote

      Ahhh, the incredibly powerful (if forever a sleeper) data organization and categorization tool that is a husk of its former self in Microsoft's pursuit of Evernote. It was a college student's best friend, but Microsoft could never understand that OneNote was a power user's tool, while Evernote focused on simplicity. While a 'simple mode' or 'OneNote Cloud' could have been a spinoff product, the UWP iteration of OneNote retains its name, and little else.

      have moved to the Store only

      Then it's not a part of Office anymore, is it? It's a spinoff product, likely from the same team, with similar branding...but it's not a part of Office if the Office installer doesn't include it.

      and many other countless updates since 2015.

      See, the problem is this false equivalence that newer is better. For a while, it was a safe bet. However, I'm hard pressed to come up with a feature added to Windows 10 that I have actually sought to implement, rather than disable. AFAIK, the LTSB still gets security updates, but is generally intended to be stable...which, at this point, is all a whole lot of Windows users really want.

    11. Re:Many businesses have no choice by e432776 · · Score: 1

      Just curious, why did you prefer 7 o 10? I don't do most of my computing in Windows, but find 10 to be pretty good..

    12. Re:Many businesses have no choice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This is one reason why I no longer store documents within the VM

      Why are you trying to outsmart your OS? Just put the documents in the cloud. MS themselves consider their system so unreliable and so malware prone that this is a fundamental and necessary feature of Windows 10.

    13. Re:Many businesses have no choice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh look you're trying to be clever. Good work ignoring the GP's requirements. But let me correct you on your sillyness:

      - Cygwin is not a suitable replacement for WSL. Your talk about VMs shows that you don't understand the point in the first place
      - Slow updates ARE a problem when security is involved. You can happily delay non security updates for 365 days in Windows 10 Pro. LTSB is stupid in this regard.
      - No windows store is a problem on Windows 10 desktop. It's a central license store for features not only for software. You mention OneNote as if you think you know what you're talking about. Are you aware that OneNote UWP is nearly feature comparable and in many ways surpasses the Office version? Are you aware that depending on what Office 365 subscription you have OneNote activates a different set of features within the app and it requires the presence of the Store to do that?

      AFAIK, the LTSB still gets security updates, but is generally intended to be stable...which

      So is Windows 10 Pro which as I mentioned provides you more than enough control over updates and is why LTSB adoption is poor even within enterprises that could license the product.

    14. Re:Many businesses have no choice by StuartHankins · · Score: 1
      • 1. Versioning. I get hourly Time Machine backups by not storing my only copy to the cloud.
      • 2. Large files are clunky to save to and retrieve from cloud
      • 3. Windows 10 recently had an issue where people's documents saved to the Microsoft cloud (OneDrive) were lost. That alone should be good enough reason not to store important documents "in the cloud" but especially with Microsoft's cloud.
    15. Re:Many businesses have no choice by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Oh look you're trying to be clever.

      Not clever, just realistic.

      Good work ignoring the GP's requirements.

      Yes, because they're dumb requirements.

      But let me correct you on your sillyness

      Go right ahead.

      Cygwin is not a suitable replacement for WSL. Your talk about VMs shows that you don't understand the point in the first place

      And your condescending description indicates that you miss *my* point. The thesis statement here is that LTSB is a bad option for the listed reasons. My point is that while WSL has its advantages, Cygwin and/or a separate Linux VM and/or Docker for Windows has been the way to perform the same tasks from a Windows workstation for over a decade now; a one-year-old method of doing certain Linux tasks without Cygwin or a VM is far from a compelling argument.

      Slow updates ARE a problem when security is involved.

      True, but any environment worth a damn has multiple layers of security, including antivirus, a decent firewall, UAC, some security-enhancing GPOs, and possibly some specialist software like Cryptoprevent. Getting security updates is important, but it's incredibly rare for a vulnerability to effectively exploit a system solely based on the absence of a security patch.

      More to the point, my go-to example is one time when Windows 10 did an update on the laptop I used for controlling my intelligent lighting. That update got the machine stuck in a boot loop. I don't care what that laptop was vulnerable to prior to that update, and I don't care what new features are available after. 'preventing your computer from working properly' is a core description of the very malware the security updates are intended to prevent, and the updates caused more problems than the malware.

      You can happily delay non security updates for 365 days in Windows 10 Pro. LTSB is stupid in this regard.

      What's even better is not having monolithic patches.

      No windows store is a problem on Windows 10 desktop.

      ...But why is it integrated into the OS to the point where it's not possible to be added on later? Valve seems to have figured out how to do that a decade ago.

      It's a central license store for features not only for software.

      Golden 'duh' award - those features are still software. Also, again, this is a solved problem except that the intent is unnecessary integration.

      You mention OneNote as if you think you know what you're talking about.

      I do.

      Are you aware that OneNote UWP is nearly feature comparable

      I mean, 'nearly' wasn't good enough for a Linux VM or Cygwin, but apparently it is now, because, reasons I guess...

      and in many ways surpasses the Office version?

      But OneNote was a part of Office when Billy Gates made the argument the first time? At least my arguments are consistent. Either way, I'm not saying it's useless now, but at the very least it's a royal PITA to use it without a Microsoft account, so even if it does everything else beautifully, the fact that it so heavily steers users to saving to Teh Cloud(tm) is a huge detriment.

      Are you aware that depending on what Office 365 subscription you have OneNote activates a different set of features within the app and it requires the presence of the Store to do that?

      ...and yet, it was possible to have a single installation media with differing sets of active features, based on a product key, for over a decade? I know this because that's how Microsoft supplied Windows Vista. The need for the store is artificial, the inability to make the CtR installer download the required feature sets is also artificial, and even if all of that is somehow acceptable, we're still back to the fact that Valve solved di

    16. Re:Many businesses have no choice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Aside from my comment being in jest and not ment to be taken seriously there's a few parts I do want to comment on

      2. Large files are clunky to save to and retrieve from cloud

      If this is the case then it sounds like you are actually fighting your OS. Cloud integration in Windows 10 is not only seamless but differential. Handling large files is trivial (I don't use OneDrive personally but I'm forced to through work).

      That alone should be good enough reason not to store important documents "in the cloud"

      I had an unreadable backup tape once. Clearly I shouldn't use backup tapes for important documents? Note this isn't a question, just an example of how absurd your comment.

    17. Re:Many businesses have no choice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes, because they're dumb requirements.

      The mark of a true IT pro, ignore the requirements of the user. You'll go far in this world.

      My point is that while WSL has its advantages, Cygwin and/or a separate Linux VM and/or Docker for Windows has been the way to perform the same tasks from a Windows workstation for over a decade now; a one-year-old method of doing certain Linux tasks without Cygwin or a VM is far from a compelling argument.

      What an absurd comment to make. "The way we've done it in the past" is the antithesis of technology and using that to justify ignoring advantages of a new way is just mindblowingly stupid in the IT world.

      That update got the machine stuck in a boot loop. I don't care what that laptop was vulnerable to prior to that update, and I don't care what new features are available after. 'preventing your computer from working properly' is a core description of the very malware the security updates are intended to prevent, and the updates caused more problems than the malware.

      What you're describing is a problem *you* had in a specific scenario and is completely irrelevant when discussing security of a desktop OS. You're on fire with this "ignoring the user" bit.

      What's even better is not having monolithic patches.

      Strawmen not relevant to the discussion at hand are even better than monolithic patches.

      Golden 'duh' award - those features are still software

      I'm out. You're being intetionally dense in this discussion.

      have a good day.

    18. Re:Many businesses have no choice by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Just curious, why did you prefer 7 o 10? I don't do most of my computing in Windows, but find 10 to be pretty good..

      I can answer for myself, and that is totally the UI. They changed how everything is interacted with. That is a learning curve, but even after you learn it, I have compared and most things take more clicks to get to in Win10 than Win7. Then that is only for things you can get to by navigating with a mouse. Most of their time, their solution is to "Just type whatever you are looking for into the search field and it will find it". Well, to do that I have to take my hand off my mouse, move to a typing positiong with both hands on the keyboard and actually type, hope I remember the exact name, and pray it doesn't decide I want to do a web search instead of finding the thing I'm looking for. Overall, it really kills productivity and usefullness.

    19. Re:Many businesses have no choice by e432776 · · Score: 1

      This makes sense, and I can see that inefficiency would be a nuisance- thank you for replying. I did not use Windows 7 heavily, so the change to 10 was as noticeable to me. However, the few times I interacted with 8 and 8.1 - the schizophrenic UI problems in those were very noticeable.

  3. Groove, Cortana, Ad crapware cannot be removed :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, windows 10 includes crap ware like Groove, Cortana, Ads that cannot be uninstalled

  4. Windows 10 does wonders! by zilym · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My Dad was happily using Windows 8, was forcefully upgraded to Windows 10 by accident. Hated Windows 10, downgraded back to Windows 8, then kept getting warning messages popping up from time to time about some DLL that got lost in all the shuffle. Didn't seem to do anything useful (app store DLL?) but annoying. Fed up with all that, he finally bite the bullet and switched to Ubuntu 18.04 this fall. Thanks Microsoft!

    1. Re:Windows 10 does wonders! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      My Dad was happily using Windows 8

      See, now I know you're making this up...

      Kidding aside, I have my own frustrations with Windows 10, as I can't upgrade my two Windows 10 machines past 1709. Honestly, I don't really mind the OS that much aside from that. So far I've been able to turn off most of the annoying features.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  5. Re: Just try Ubuntu (Mint) by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    Lots of serious professional software only runs on Windows. Software you've probably never heard of but nonetheless is widely used in a particular industry. The applications barrier to entry is still going strong.

  6. not a milestone by Espectr0 · · Score: 2

    no the sum of all windows 10 releases (they have been plenty) now has more market share that the single release of windows 7? that's not a milestone.

    wake me up when a single release of windows 10 does that.

  7. Re:Groove, Cortana, Ad crapware cannot be removed by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    I know my eyes ar,shall we say, sub optimal, but I’ve never seen those ads you ar talking about. Where are they? I ron win 10 pro (non oem) if thst has anything to do with thelack of ads, I allso dissabled live tiles, in fact remived all tiles from the start menu

  8. Windows XP passed Windows 8.1 by xack · · Score: 1

    If you were to believe the stats that netmarketshare posted. Estimating stats is so unreliable these days other than Enterprises using Windows 7 and Home users using Windows 10. In practice all browsers these days are Chrome based or chrome-imitating so just worry about being Chrome compatible.

    1. Re:Windows XP passed Windows 8.1 by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe that one.
      Some people really cling to their Windows XP, but if you can choose between Windows 8 and Windows 8.1, I see no reason not to prefer 8.1.

      Note that I don't include myself in any of these. For me it is Windows 7 as long as it's supported, then probably Xubuntu.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  9. Naaaaa. by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    "Windows 10 Passes Windows 7 in Market Share"

    That's no good at all. Wake me when it can crank up to 11.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    1. Re:Naaaaa. by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      That's no good at all. Wake me when it can crank up to 11.

      Microsoft promised there won't be Windows 11, and I believe them -- they alternate between a passable version of windows and a bad one. Why do you think Win 9 got skipped?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Naaaaa. by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      they alternate between a passable version of windows and a bad one. Why do you think Win 9 got skipped?

      Not this shit again...

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    3. Re:Naaaaa. by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      Why do you think Win 9 got skipped?

      Same reason Mac didn't do OS9 - trademark issues.

    4. Re: Naaaaa. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      My recollection was that there was a OS 9 from Apple. Yes there was a trademark lawsuit which Apple won.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  10. Oh kid. Don't even try. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I bet you have never even seen a minicomputer, and think the world stands for a Mac mini.

    I worked in music and film production, craft businesses, and manufacturing. I know all the shity cancer of industry-specific software out there. I even wrote some of it. (For warehouse management, color mixing machines, custom data management, and similar small side-gigs.)

    And they all either got replaced by server-side software that runs on large metal linux boxen, by small single-board computer gadgets with client/web interfaces, have never been Windows software (like film/music/3D software), or are more and more moving away from Windows.

    Nowadays, Windows has only two domains left:
    * Businesses too young/small for big iron and a Unix history and
    * too old/big for sucking Apple dick.
    So basically just boring medium/small companies ran by PHBs.

    1. Re:Oh kid. Don't even try. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      hahaha, no. Step out of your mom's basement and get real job before commenting. The main tools business uses are windows only. The major market share of CADD software (AutoCAD/Fusion360, SolidWorks, ProE/PTC Creo) are Windows only. Even big the enterprise Unix financial systems require a Windows Desktop or work cannot be done.

    2. Re: Oh kid. Don't even try. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I started in IT in 1989 working with IBM mainframes. Those are still very much in use 40 years later. I've been hearing about how Linux is going to replace Windows since I started using it in 1998 and guess what? It still hasn't happened.

      I'll give you an example from my previous job at a fairly large law firm. What are the Linux equivalents of Aderant, WorkSite, BigHand and Cisco Jabber and how much would it cost to migrate? How easy is it to use Microsoft Word templates and Excel macros in Libre Office? Is there a plug in for Libre Office that allows you to design templates for Contracts Express Dealbuilder? Does Contracts Express Dealbuilder support Libre Office templates?

      Windows is massively entrenched in businesses because the software that runs on it doesn't run on any other systems. Any OS that wants to eat into that market has to find a way of getting around that.

    3. Re:Oh kid. Don't even try. by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      From ibm.com: https://www.ibm.com/it-infrastructure/z/os/linux-tested-platforms.
      I don't think it gets any bigger than one of those mainframes. Except for some supercomputers in research, but many of those are running Linux too.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  11. Not Good by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Windows 7 goes EOL in 1 year. Yikes. Even XP was surprised by 7 several years before it hit retirement.

    1. Re:Not Good by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You're kidding right? EOL in one year? They have already been failing miserably to keep it secure ever since the "Vault 7" NSA weapons release hit the interwebs.

      Yes. 1/2020 is EOL and will no longer get security updates.

    2. Re:Not Good by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 goes EOL in 1 year.

      Ugh. Our primary computers at home are all Macs, but we have a Windows 7 VM on the iMac because most of my wife’s sewing machine / embroidery software is Windows based. I’m very tempted to just leave that at 7 even after it’s EOL’ed - she doesn’t use Internet Explorer for anything, and the VM is isolated inbound.

      I’ve seen plenty of the Windows 10 hot mess at work (as an observer - I’m on Mac and Linux there 99% of the time)... I don’t really want to deal with it myself if I can avoid it.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Not Good by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Your wife is good. She uses her up to date Mac to browse the web and do work outside of her proprietary app.

      I replaced to that poster saying it is a mess. I am not a Microsoft apologist but he made a poor generalization because of his one corrupted install. FYI running a feature update will break machines where Realtek or Intel do not update the drivers. Windows Update by default now will ignore the latest Windows 10 versions after probably for Intel display drivers and realtek audio and just put in security so I would not worry if you do have to run 10.

      Enterprises have been quietly migrating to 10 for a few years now with no issues. It is much smoother than the transition from XP to 7. 7 is a very different beast than XP due to security, active directory, and driver models that caused many problems back in 2013/2014. It is not the same this time around at the same level.

    4. Re:Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Windows Update by default now

      No reason to continue reading. The damage was already done.
      Years of damage. Probably millions in dollars of either wasted time or outright damage.
      Microsoft simply never gave a shit until it started blowing up, forcing them to hire actual developers to fix the shitheap.
      I will never trust a future Windows OS on native ever again. They are dead to me.
      I've defended Microsoft plenty of times before, but Win10 is indefensibly bad. Criminally bad, even!
      Win10 has got to be the biggest shitshow that has ever happened in tech. More so than WinME and Vista combined. At least they were killed off quickly. Win10 is still here, and still shit, and it shows no signs of stopping.
      Windows as a Service. LMAO. That new CEO is the worst. He makes Tim Cook look sensible and Steve Jobs an actual god.
      For me, now, it will forever be Windows as a VM image.

    5. Re:Not Good by antdude · · Score: 1

      No one stopping you to keep using W7. Just keep it off the Internet and be a smart user to be secured. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  12. Re: Just try Ubuntu (Mint) by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    Lots of serious, professional, LEGACY software. Which often runs better in dosbox or on WINE than it does in WinX.

  13. Re:Windows sucks but at least it's not Android by zilym · · Score: 1

    Android by itself is quite good. Java blows, but Android did the best job they could with it. What I really enjoy is that I can port all my apps in Qt to run on Android without much fuss. It's really great fun being able to run my apps on such a tiny, portable piece of tech.

    What I hate is all the vendor added crapware and hardware lockdown anti-features that third parties forced upon the users. We need more hackers breaking this stuff down so we can install tighter, cleaner, more up-to-date builds of Android on to our devices.

  14. And all it took was removing it from the market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To be clear: You can't buy windows 7 so the fact it took this long for win10 to out pace it is a pretty good indication of just how badly it sucks.

  15. Re: Just try Ubuntu (Mint) by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    False. You'll notice the "platinum" "gold" and "silver" lists of things that run without problem on wine are games. Meanwhile, adults needing to make money for a living will find their wares will have problems.

    Wine is not for the professional

  16. Wow! That was SO FAST! by Chas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Only too 3.5 years and fucking with hardware and software to artificially obsolete Win7!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Wow! That was SO FAST! by markdavis · · Score: 2

      >"Only too 3.5 years and fucking with hardware and software to artificially obsolete Win7!"

      You forgot to mention them also trying over and over again to force it down users' throats with unrequested (and usually unwanted) "upgrades" from 7 to 10.

    2. Re:Wow! That was SO FAST! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Only too 3.5 years and fucking with hardware and software to artificially obsolete Win7!

      Plus there is only 5 more years before EOL for Windows 10. Now is the time to get ready to upgrade to Windows 11!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  17. Windows 10 is great by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    I just hope Microsoft doesn't screw it up. They have this tendency to release good version/bad version of Windows since they flopped with Vista after XP. Windows 8 was a similar flop after the great Windows 7.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  18. I'm waiting for Windows 11 by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I hear it's one louder.

  19. Re:Just try Ubuntu (Mint) by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Serious professional software runs on Linux anyway. (E.g. 3D modeling software.)

    Which software would that be? Everyone I know doing Creo, Solidworks, or NX is using Windows...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  20. Re:Groove, Cortana, Ad crapware cannot be removed by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Turn off Cortana.

    Remove Groove.

    Ads? Is that Windows thing, or is that from your browser?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  21. Re:And all it took was removing it from the market by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    To be clear: You can't buy windows 7 so the fact it took this long for win10 to out pace it is a pretty good indication of just how badly it sucks.

    Not to mention that MS "upgraded" so many Win7/8 users to Win10 unwittingly by dirty tricks. I'm amazed that it has taken this long for 10 to overtake 7. Fortunately Win7 is still available for download from pirate sites.

  22. Windows 10 by Z80a · · Score: 2

    Why are we celebrating that more than half of the windows boxes are infected by a terrible malware that attack via the windows update mechanism then proceeds to display Ads,add a very annoying search bar, track the user's every move and potentially can turn him into a bot, given how hard it is to disable it's ability to download updates?

    1. Re:Windows 10 by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      Why are we celebrating that more than half of the windows boxes are infected by a terrible malware that attack via the windows update mechanism then proceeds to display Ads,add a very annoying search bar, track the user's every move and potentially can turn him into a bot, given how hard it is to disable it's ability to download updates?

      The attack began 20 years ago with the rise of smart phones and drm'd games. Back when the videogame industry was pushing to get rid of game ownership by rebranding rpg's in development "MMO's". Everyone saw what kind of profits you could get from a locked down platform like android/iphone via apps + in app purchases. So the big plan is to turn the desktop PC into a locked down platform. Just like steam, mmo's and phones.

  23. This news is almost as sad as Linux economics by shanen · · Score: 2

    I really think this is sad news. Now Microsoft can start wrecking Windows 10 to create demand for a new and "improved" OS. I think the only reason they gave free upgrades to Windows 10 was because of the fiasco of Windows XP. At least that's how it looked to Microsoft's accountants when people were basically satisfied with the OS and had no desire to upgrade.

    In reality the OSes and the hardware have already surpassed our normal human needs. Yeah, in theory it's always nicer to do things a bit faster, but the computers have run away from our human perceptions. Opening a program in 20 ms makes no significant difference against 40 ms or even 1 ms.

    Humans just don't care anymore. We have a good enough OS (and a fast enough computer and a powerful enough smartphone).

    How do you create demand when the customers' real needs have been satisfied? By polishing things up and making good enough better? Or by using upgrades to break things?

    One of my older machines has been having increasing troubles with Windows 10 over the last few months. The machine's hardware is still in pretty good shape (except for the DVD drive), but I predict things are going downhill from here, starting with the very next unneeded upgrade.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:This news is almost as sad as Linux economics by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that's a bit exaggerated, there's always new hardware and software standards like for example 10 years ago NVMe didn't exist. Sure, to the user it might look "the same" except much faster but a lot is changed under the hood. Same with new USB standards, WiFi standards and so on. I wouldn't mind Win10 if there was an off switch for most the features, the actual core is improved since Win7/8. It's everything else they do for business reasons that makes me dislike it.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:This news is almost as sad as Linux economics by shanen · · Score: 1

      So how much money do you want to spend to partake of a new standard? Or would you settle for a minor software upgrade at a much lower cost if Microsoft felt like offering it?

      I actually hoped that Linux would follow that path, but now I feel like all my hopes and expectations for Linux were childish delusions. Corporate cancers rule and make the rules.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    3. Re:This news is almost as sad as Linux economics by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Now Microsoft can start wrecking Windows 10 to create demand for a new and "improved" OS. I think the only reason they gave free upgrades to Windows 10 was because of the fiasco of Windows XP. At least that's how it looked to Microsoft's accountants when people were basically satisfied with the OS and had no desire to upgrade.

      Opinion, not fact. We have Windows XP systems still kicking around. They aren't exposed to the internet for obvious reasons but they operate critical pieces of equipment. Runs on low spec hardware and doesn't crash. I can say the same of Windows 7 since we still have a number of workstations running here..

      In reality the OSes and the hardware have already surpassed our normal human needs

      That's a narrow view of the world and actually far from the truth. If all you do is youtube, spreadsheets and word then you're correct but otherwise you are simply WRONG. Virtualization and SSD are two very good reasons for advancements in OS. Windows 10 did good there. Additionally the OS was redesigned with multi device support in mind which if you ask developer, they'll tell you they love it (BTW, this reduces software cost and increase usability). There are also a number of significant changes for corporations running DCs so it's far from being a waste (If you don't know what a DC is then you clearly weren't in a position to comment on the OS).

      You are clearly only speaking from your perspective which means it's just an uneducated opinion. Microsoft has already accepted it's lost the typical home user market to mobile devices which is why they focused their efforts on back-end and virtualization.

    4. Re:This news is almost as sad as Linux economics by shanen · · Score: 1

      If I am so wrong, then why are you citing evidence to support my "opinion"? Perhaps you could clarify which part of your apparent self-contradiction is your actual opinion? Let me clarify that I am NOT criticizing you for your continued use of XP, but Microsoft is quite unhappy with bad (or "naughty"?) customers like you.

      Anyway, if you don't understand my "considered opinions" (and want to), then you should feel free to ask for clarification. I would actually thank you for your support, but find that difficult until you clarify what you are trying to say. Alternatively, you could try to clarify where you think they are insufficiently considered, but that usually calls for some persuasive evidence against them.

      I think it would be interesting to do a historical analysis of the discussions on Slashdot to see when they tilted away from productive and constructive. Perhaps such discussions were never in the majority and my memory is merely playing tricks on me. So many trolls, so little time.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    5. Re:This news is almost as sad as Linux economics by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I didn't even come close to providing support for your opinion. On the opposite, it's an OS that has supported critical systems for 17 years. It's lack of support for security updates after 2014 is the only reason a technology leader would not leave it connected to a live network.

      I think the issue is that you lack industry knowledge which in turn has you making large assumptions. It also sounds like you don't know what the life expectancy of an OS is.

      FACT. When an OS reaches a certain age, it's core structure needs to change to adapt to the new technological realities. This is true of all OSes. Windows XP for example was the most successful OS ever produced in regards to adaptation and length of use. It was launched in 2001 and still occupies a small segment of the desktop market (although I would advise against at this point). The product was supported until April 2014. That's 13 years for an OS. There is no other OS that has that kind of track record for Desktop computers while continue to support new hardware.

      I think it would be interesting to do a historical analysis of the discussions on Slashdot to see when they tilted away from productive and constructive. Perhaps such discussions were never in the majority and my memory is merely playing tricks on me. So many trolls, so little time.

      If your benchmark for how good/bad an OS was is Slashdot, then I question your judgement.

      Anyway, if you don't understand my "considered opinions" (and want to), then you should feel free to ask for clarification.

      Actually, why don't you back your claims with facts. I can and have. The numbers presented above are readily available online with a simple "windows xp" lookup on google.

    6. Re:This news is almost as sad as Linux economics by shanen · · Score: 1

      Seems like a pointless attempt at a discussion. If you made any sincere attempt to understand what I actually wrote, then I am unable to detect it. In fact, it now looks to me like you don't even understand what YOU wrote.

      So here's the punchline. My REAL project just now is polishing up the final exam I am about to administer to some of the top computer science students in the country. At least they think so, and the university where I'm pinch-hitting has a pretty fancy reputation. I've supposedly spent an entire semester helping them learn how to write comprehensible and unambiguous technical papers and dissertations. In English, which is not the native language of any of the students. When I reviewed their personal linguistic histories, English was 3rd or 4th for some of the Chinese students... From the samples I've seen so far, I'm rather doubtful you could pass the course, even though I'm a pretty easy grader.

      The students have also told me quite a bit about their research. That's coming on top of my 15 years supporting researchers in a high reputation lab for one of the big TLCs in the industry. I was mostly surprised by how many of the same old problems remain mostly unsolved and only occasionally surprised by the progress that's been made on a few of them. Even worse, it's clear that most of these students are smarter than I ever was (in spite of graduating from two top-ranked universities) and a few of them are quite probably geniuses.

      Just for grins, I actually considered including the abstract of the arXiv article they have to deal with. I'd have wagered you couldn't make hide nor hair of it. One of the authors is an old friend and heavy mathematician with an Erdos number of 2. He spent about an hour explaining it to me a couple of months ago...

      Perhaps my memory is failing me, but I think there was a time when visiting Slashdot didn't feel like slumming.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    7. Re:This news is almost as sad as Linux economics by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I get it. You don't have counter arguments but you don't like MS so this is how you tangent from the comments you made.

      At least now I know to ignore your comments as they unverified opinions and lack facts.

  24. Economic models matter by shanen · · Score: 1

    My wife was actually quite satisfied with Windows 8, but about equally satisfied with Windows 10. There were even some people who thought Windows ME was okay. The important aspect is why Microsoft allows the quality of OSes to fluctuate so widely. My longer comment above focuses on the economics of creating demand under false pretenses and why we are now in trouble since the last good version (Windows 7) has been eclipsed by a new version (Windows 10), which I suspect (but I haven't seen the source code) is really just Windows 7 with "improvements" to make it more easily breakable with future upgrades.

    Do I need to qualify my response? I've never purchased a Windows 10 computer (though I've advised on the purchase of some). All 2-1/2 of my Windows 10 machines were upgraded from Windows 7. Most of my Ubuntu machines were upgraded from Windows XP. My newest machine is actually a Mac, but I dislike Apple for other reasons... Not sure what I'm going to do the next time I am forced to buy a new machine. None of the above is not a viable option (and hoping I die first is even worse, though it solves the problem of viability).

    Times up, so I bid you ADSAuPR, atAJG.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  25. Not market share by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    This should be "user base" instead of "market share", since what is measured is web site clients, and not anything sold.

  26. Forced obsolescence by nctritech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    New Win10 machines have ACPI 5.0 (or some AMD chips' AGESA with the same effect) which doesn't work with Windows 7 and no option to use the older styles. OR they have UEFI with no CSM or with CSM boot crippled. OR they have hardware for which drivers aren't being put out for Win7. OR they have hardware which Microsoft has decided is arbitrarily not allowed to run Win7 and does what they can to frustrate such usage via updates when a user is successful in installing it.

    Yeah, what a shock. Hardware fails as it ages and must be replaced with new hardware. Your new OS is an objectively worse system all-around except for a few kernel/driver improvements (native XHCI and UAS and direct support for USB booting) that could easily have been backported and a few multi-monitor improvements, but it has that big fat milk teat called "Windows Store" that you can use to milk wallets in your own Apple-esque walled garden of bloated misaligned Electron-style apps. Do everything you possibly can to force people who need to get new hardware for any reason onto your new platform even though the old one is still supported for two more years and OF COURSE the market share will increase over time.

    Windows 10 is an abomination. As soon as Bill Gates left the company, it all went to pot. Windows 7 was not perfect at all, but it's what I use whenever possible because the Windows 8+ era took all the fundamentals of proper user interface design and chucked them right out the window in favor of a UI race to the bottom that functions everywhere and is useful nowhere.

    Worse yet, you have these brats that think all that glitters is gold that listen to someone like me going off about Windows 10 and declare that I'm just mad because I can't keep up and that I need to get with the times and that Windows 10 is feature-packed ooh shiny awesome stuff and I have no idea what I'm talking about. Tell you what, junior: open a File Explorer window, find a folder eight levels deep on your C: drive, and bang out the keyboard shortcut to make a new folder. I'll time you. Wait, you don't know any keyboard shortcuts and what's a folder and why do I own a 3D printed save icon? Get off my lawn and go back to your shitty tablet.

  27. F Win 10 by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    The largest effect a W10 install has had on me is to make me more of a Mac person...I had to do some updates, etc on a W10 machine, what a POS. Under three layers of crap lie the win 7 panels, but you have to find them. I hope Apple doesn't blow it, or I'll have nowhere to go

  28. Re:Groove, Cortana, Ad crapware cannot be removed by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    I guess you didn't follow the 2nd link? It's about removal - not just disabling - Groove. And it's a process that applies to Cortana and pretty much everything else.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  29. Re:GOOD POINT "King Billy"... apk by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    That reminds me. I could use a suggestion for a host file APK. Any ideas if I should create one?

  30. Untrue, not same (I used both extensively)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OS/2 was different & didn't have a 'registry' (well, kind of but not same in ".ini" files BUT NOT TEXT like Windows ones, these were BINARY format iirc (Faster reads that way, & smart but not simple to work with like text)) & configured via config.sys (like DOS) & though NT had a DOS 'subsystem', OS/2 was the one that had a "better DOS than DOS" (both could run multiple instances but iirc, NT has to have a reg setting for SEPARATING Win16 instances into diff. memspace - OS/2 did that off the bat for Win16 subsystem BUILT-INTO it (literally Windows 3.1)). The Workplace Shell OS/2 desktop was a TRUE OOP type desktop - IF I had to describe Win9x or NT? I'd call theirs an "Object Request Broker" @ most/best.

    REXX was a scripting language I felt was a LOT MORE POWERFUL than NT had in DOS batchfiles too.

    HPFS was the 'default filesystem' (or FAT) on OS/2 - NTFS was on NT (the latter is better though).

    I used OS/2 2.0 - 2.1 & Warp 3 (still have the boxes for them all here, staring @ them now) as last ones I used though - things changed since then? Some, in "internetability" (for lack of a better expression)

    * I don't mean to "bust your balls" - BUT they were QUITE different (& a lot of what you stated is "right on" though).

    (It's been literally 24++ yrs. since I used it last but I should be FAIRLY ACCURATE above (if not, anyone can feel free to correct me/re-enlighten me/refresh me)).

    I liked OS/2 a LOT - never got to develop on it though (I was mainly only a rookie programmer back then & didn't have the 'chops' to use Watcom C++ or Borland C++ for OS/2 then (I was still learning & doing character mode/tty term/DOS programs ONLY then, GUI came a year later or so circa 1992-1994 iirc for me (@ least to the point I could say I was 'fairly proficient' @ it)).

    APK

    P.S.=> REPOST vs. WHIPSLASH DELETING THIS POST which was +4 INFORMATIVE rated https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... ... apk

  31. Re: Just try Ubuntu (Mint) by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    If it's that simple then why is Windows so prevalent on the desktop? I posted a list of software above. Perhaps you can tell me how well they run under WINE.

  32. Re:Groove, Cortana, Ad crapware cannot be removed by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately, windows 10 includes crap ware like Groove, Cortana, Ads that cannot be uninstalled

    All of which can be turned off, uninstalled, or other wise neutered in the windows 10 pro version. I know this because I have done it. Well I did turn cortana back on after awhile. She is kind of useful when you take the time to figure her out. Even the "spy wear" those of you of the tin foil cap like to grouse about can be turned off.

    At least in the pro version of windows 10. I think if you get the home version certain things cant be turned off because that is the trade off for getting a cheaper version.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  33. Re:Groove, Cortana, Ad crapware cannot be removed by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    I believe the ads he is talking about are what windows calls "suggestions." They appeared to me as "suggestions" on the windows menu. But lets be honest, they are ads and not suggestions. They where also successfully eviscerated with a few clicks.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  34. Public masturbation of 2621787 by shanen · · Score: 1

    Z^-1

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.