Slashdot Mirror


Facing Opposition, Amazon Reconsiders NY Headquarters Site: Report (washingtonpost.com)

Amazon.com is reconsidering its plan to bring 25,000 jobs to a new campus in New York City following a wave of opposition from local politicians, The Washington Post reported Friday [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source], citing two people familiar with the company's thinking. From the report: The company has not leased or purchased office space for the project, making it easy to withdraw its commitment. Unlike in Virginia -- where elected leaders quickly passed an incentive package for a separate headquarters facility -- final approval from New York state is not expected until 2020. Tennessee officials have also embraced Amazon's plans to bring 5,000 jobs to Nashville, which this week approved $15.2 million in road, sewer and other improvements related to that project. Amazon executives have had internal discussions recently to reassess the situation in New York and explore alternatives, said the two people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly about the company's perspective.

88 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Objecting to the give-away by XXongo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What they're objecting to, of course, is not the jobs being brought in, but the massive taxpayer funded give-away that New York politicians promised (without any oversight) to give Amazon to tempt them to come, along with the tax breaks they promised as well, to make sure that they don't pay for it.

    A billion here, a billion there-- it adds up

    1. Re:Objecting to the give-away by XXongo · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...and not to mention that Amazon required a nondisclosure agreement from the cities bidding, so that the taxpayers actually couldn't know what their politicians were giving away.

      Which was: 3 billion dollars.

    2. Re:Objecting to the give-away by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      What they're objecting to, of course, is not the jobs being brought in

      It is unlikely many jobs would be created. The limiting factor is housing, and very little new construction is being permitted. The roads can't handle many more commuters, and there are already shortages of labor in the area. So all this facility would do is suck employees from existing businesses.

      There would be little net economic benefit, which is another reason that the subsidies and tax giveaways were misguided. They are just replacing many small businesses that pay taxes and contribute to the community with one big business that doesn't.

    3. Re: Objecting to the give-away by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Amazon needs a large, highly-educated workforce, and I'm not sure the people they need would be willing to move en masse to Amarillo, Texas.

    4. Re:Objecting to the give-away by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yadda yadda yadda, taxes bad. Taxes pay for things like education (NY state has some great schools and colleges), public transportation (I love trains!), and a social safety net. Those things actually make places livable. You know what's bad? Squandering $6 trillion on the Federal level on military homicide sprees and security theater. Wars and nudie scanners don't actually make places more livable.

    5. Re:Objecting to the give-away by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A tax break is not giving them money.
      It's simply refraining from taking it from them.

      Be that as it may, it's still asking other businesses which are being taxed so subsidize Amazon who is getting preferential treatment. I think that high taxes are idiotic and usually counter-productive, but if some city or state wants to enact them, then they should be applied fairly and evenly to all who live and do business there. If those cities or states find that it drives out businesses, then they can vote to reduce the tax rates.

    6. Re:Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A tax break *to a specific company* is picking a winner, which the government shouldn't be doing. If they cut taxes for *all companies*, that's one thing... that's not what was happening here.

    7. Re:Objecting to the give-away by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taxes are great when they're used to pay for useful services like education, public transit, infrastructure, and public health care. Taxes suck when they're squandered on security theater, wars on moral panics like drugs, or wars abroad. Yeah, yeah, the latter is Federal, but NY sends much more money to DC than it gets back, so it adds up. Time to REALLY put America first and stop squandering tax money on nonsense.

    8. Re:Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NYS had a 3.9% unemployment rate which is below structural (ie the minimum possible unemployment rate)

      NYC is probably the most attractive place for a company to set up in the East Coast and has the easiest time attracting young educated people

      It doesn't need to pay Amazon as everyone who wants a job has one and the available workforce is top of the line

      Wisconsin paid 4 billion dollars for 1000 jobs (down from the 13K promised) because no one wants to move there, companies or people

      NYS/NYC does not have that problem

    9. Re:Objecting to the give-away by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The people that Amazon employs are likely to earn more than the people they displace, which means the state will collect additional income tax simply due to the higher wages, but also because Amazon workers will fall into a higher tax bracket. Those workers also have more disposable income which means more money being spent into the local economy. If people are being pushed out at a 1:1 ratio with every person Amazon brings in, there's no net change in road utilization (unless Amazon workers are more likely to drive) or other utilization. If it displaces other types of labor, it just means that value of what remains increases due to more limited supply, so it would raise wages for those jobs. There's also plenty of housing available, but some of it needs to be reclaimed but idiotic development laws typically mean that no one wants to spend the time or money dealing with it.

      It may still be that the net effect doesn't result in much additional revenue for the state or city, but I'm not sure if I agree with the reasoning that you've used to arrive at that conclusion.

    10. Re: Objecting to the give-away by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Well it is the catch 22 of today's economy.
      Small rural towns, would love a big company to come in and bring in jobs. Because the influx of jobs would bring in more higher skilled people who would then require services which brings in more jobs. However these companies will not open in these small rural towns because they don't have the educated workforce, or the infrastructure to deal with the services they will want.

      For the old factory jobs, this was easy for a small town to get a factory, and grow the economy. Because you needed basic labor, and skilled labor only needed a couple of months of training. Now we need people with College Degree and advanced specialized skills. You can open a company in the middle of nowhere, but you will have a hard time attracting people who can do the work, and people will not flock to that location because the small town couldn't support them.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There goes the left thinking that people in fly-over country are dumb hicks. What a load of bullshit. You think people in Amarillo are stupid? This is what the left thinks people that don't live in big cities are dumb, low class, uneducated and possibly racists. They think the are so elite and better than everyone else. This is what the left thinks and believes.

    12. Re:Objecting to the give-away by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Very good point

    13. Re:Objecting to the give-away by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      New Yorkers have already voiced their opposition to 25,000 techbros coming to their city. Misogynists are not welcome in NYC and the people have made their voices clear.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re: Objecting to the give-away by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yet another one of capitalism's nasty positive feedback loops - left to its own devices, it would prefer to pack us all into stupidly expensive megacities like bees in a hive so that we can work ourselves most of the way to death for the privilege of living near the high-paying jobs that you need so that you can barely pay for that expensive real estate (further enriching the ownership class in the process)...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually the statistics demonstrate that people with higher educations tend to favor Democratic policies and ideals. ....

      In other words, people who grew up sheltered, never had to work for a living, and had mommy and daddy around to pay for college?

      Education != intelligence

      Just look and the current Marxist bae of the left - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She's so "educated" that she had to 404 her "New Green Deal" off her web site in less than 24 hours, because it was bog-standard election-losing leftist STUPID drivel like "everyone is entitled to economic security whether they want to work or not."

      AOC is so fucking "educated" with her economics degree paid for by her parents from Boston University that she's TOO FUCKING STUPID to know how unemployment works:

      Ocasio-Cortez said, "Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their family."

      So you wanna spout crap about "education"? That STUPID shit is from someone who graduated summa cum laude with a degree in economics.

      In other words, "education" today is fucking worthless.

      You watch - after dragging Democrats down with her Marxist/Communist/Socialist FWEEEE STUFFFZZ!!!, AOC is gonna get primaried and shitcanned in 2020.

    16. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually the statistics demonstrate that people with higher educations tend to favor Democratic policies and ideals. That's not "the left" that's a fact.

      Democratic results by a democratic survey by a democrat college? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, that they came away with the result they wanted. Search youtube or the internet and you'll find it has been debunked but you wouldn't know that by listening only to foul mouthed democrats.

    17. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So people in Red States are dumb and uneducated. Wow just wow.. This is what the left thinks and believes. You type of people would march us into the gas chambers if it wasn't for our right to bear arms.

    18. Re:Objecting to the give-away by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's why NY leads the country in population loss.

      New York State is not New York City.

      Upstate NY is doing very poorly, decimated by the same manufacturing sector ills that have hit the rest of the rust belt. It is suffering large-scale population loss, not because of taxes, but because there's zero reason to build a factory there. Why build your factory in a place famous for massive winter snowfall when Alabama exists? Or Juarez? Low taxes do not stop lake effect snow. If anything, low taxes would make lake effect snow worse since they would start to have trouble affording plows.

      New York City is doing quite well, and attracting a lot of people....despite having an even higher tax rate than upstate NY.

    19. Re:Objecting to the give-away by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      our issue upstate isnt any of those things. its the taxes and the fact that our governor panders to some groups and screws over others (example, a bunch of schools put in requests for emergency funding, shockingly the only schools that were denied were the schools in districts that didnt vote cuomo(BR)(BR) our roads are falling apart yet we spend over 10 grand a year in property taxes for small quarter acre lots , have some of the highest fuel taxes. There are jobs, but albany has been screwing NYS while pandering to NYC for way to long.

      apples to apples, im looking to go to north carolina and for the same square footage home on the same size property, in NY- 300 grand and 11 grand in taxes. in NC 150 grand and 1100 in taxes.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    20. Re:Objecting to the give-away by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think this just shows the real problem with taxes. Half of the things you think are great, are not good use of tax dollars according to another group of people. Some of what you want to spend more taxes on is going to be considered squandering tax money on nonsense by others. No one has a problem identifying the wastefulness of government spending in the things the consider to be bad, yet seem to believe that such could not happen with those things that they want tax dollars to fun. Once you legitimize government largess, it's no wonder that people will crawl out of the woodwork to direct some of it towards themselves.

      And New York seems to consider it a fine idea to take from those who have most and redistribute to those who have less. They are one of the richer states, so shouldn't they be happy that more federal money is being spent on the states that contribute less? Everyone loves the notion of taking from those who have more, but most don't realize that they're quite far up the ladder themselves and there's a whole wider world that has much, much less.

    21. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Holi · · Score: 1

      Probably more thinking about the fact that Amarillo has about a 200k population with the majority having only a high school education or some college experience. But the vast majority does not have a degree of any sort.

      Not really the place to move your high tech company to when you need a highly educated workforce.

      It's not that we think your dumb, it's just applying even the lightest common sense would have shown you why this was such an idiotic suggestion.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    22. Re:Objecting to the give-away by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Misogynists are not welcome in NYC

      There is zero evidence that tech workers are more misogynistic. I have worked in several professions, and tech is the least misogynist. Have you ever worked with salesmen, or warehouse workers? They make nerds look like saints.

    23. Re:Objecting to the give-away by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The problem, we haven't legitimized government largesse -- we've legitimized military and law enforcement parasitism. i.e. many Americans are brainwashed to think that using tax money against other people (military homicide sprees, mass incarceration) is better than using it to actually help people and make their lives easier. It's a typical attitude in failing societies.

    24. Re: Objecting to the give-away by magzteel · · Score: 1

      Probably more thinking about the fact that Amarillo has about a 200k population with the majority having only a high school education or some college experience. But the vast majority does not have a degree of any sort.

      Not really the place to move your high tech company to when you need a highly educated workforce.

      It's not that we think your dumb, it's just applying even the lightest common sense would have shown you why this was such an idiotic suggestion.

      Did you ever look at the statistics for New York City?
      According to https://www.towncharts.com/New...
      New York City has 37% of people with a bachelors degree or higher. Is that a "vast majority"?

    25. Re:Objecting to the give-away by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      If it was taxes, then NYC would be doing worse than upstate, because NYC has higher taxes.

      Pretend I'm looking for a place to build my factory. Manufacturing is more high-tech than it used to be, so I need employees that have at least a good high school education.

      I'm trying to pick between Utica and oh, let's say Huntsville, AL. And let's pretend I've negotiated a sweetheart deal where I pay no state taxes so we take those completely out of the decision.

      Why do I pick Utica for my factory? The weather's worse. The transportation network I need for my supply chain is worse. The nearest airport is an hour away. The schools are worse. The dream of the local high school students is to move as far away as possible, leaving me with the ones that couldn't pull that off. So I need to do more on-the-job-training. The houses are old and not being replaced. The supermarkets are all competing for the cheapest place to use food stamps.

      The gas station in my neighborhood started selling crack pipes at the registers (you had to ask for the stuff to go into the pipes. At least according to the multiple arrests there). The owners of the gas station decided to lose their branding instead of no longer selling crack pipes, so it's no longer a Chevron station. It is considered the nice part of town.

      Taxes are not the problem with upstate NY. Infrastructure and weather are. Infrastructure is not just roads. It's schools and workers too.

    26. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      90% of Americans would repeal the 2A if it ever came to a vote.

    27. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not quite right. What it shows is people with *post-graduate* degrees prefer Democrats, but in the aggregate, people with college degrees prefer Republicans.

      So it depends how you parse âoemore educatedâ.

      I helped my uncle Jack off a horse...

    28. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not based on gun ownership, you can always dream thou.

      Also it would take a ridiculous majority to repeal that amendment so never going to happen.

    29. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really? I work at a particle physics lab. Iâ(TM)m gonna guess that those red-state farmers will do just fine if we stop shooting neutrinos under their corn fields.

      Iâ(TM)ll also guess we wonâ(TM)t do so good if they cut off our food supply.

    30. Re:Objecting to the give-away by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

      ... then they should be applied fairly and evenly to all who live and do business there ...

      Agree, otherwise small businesses are at a disadvantage, which practically puts them out of business if by chance they are competitors.
      Incentives like city infrastructure or tax brakes proportional to created new jobs for any business - I am okay with, otherwise the same rules for all the players.

    31. Re:Objecting to the give-away by bws111 · · Score: 1

      A person in Utica that makes only $30K will be paying state income tax at a rate of 6.33%. That same income in Huntsville will be paying 5%.

      The person in Utica will be paying property taxes of 2.21%, while the person in Huntsville is paying 0.45%

      Yet you're saying the transportation network, schools, and general infrastructure are worse in Utica. So what are the people in Utica (and upstate as a whole) getting for their ridiculously high taxes?

      It's not just the tax rate, it's that the high taxes are paying for things that people in NYC want the taxes spent on rather than things that benefit the taxpayers in Utica. Keep telling yourself that taxes aren't the problem.

    32. Re:Objecting to the give-away by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      In terms of health care, why not just pay doctors directly rather that having the government as a middle man?

    33. Re:Objecting to the give-away by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      It's not just the tax rate, it's that the high taxes are paying for things that people in NYC want the taxes spent on rather than things that benefit the taxpayers in Utica.

      I'd like you to explain how spending taxes "better" will stop lake effect snow. 'Cause that's part of the problem with the infrastructure.

      Also, the people in Utica weren't asking for "better" spending. They were asking for lower taxes as if that alone would magically create jobs. Heck, it's what the local politicians spent their money on: tax breaks for businesses. Not, say, making SUNY-IT competitive.

    34. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All it would take would be a treaty like the UN Small Arms Treaty to be signed and ratified by the Senate. Marbury vs. Madison does not cover treaties, so SCOTUS would not be able to strike down an international gun ban treaty.

    35. Re:Objecting to the give-away by gabebear · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah. That's why NY leads the country in population loss. https://www.democratandchronic...

      New York City’s population grew 5% between 2010-2018.

      By your linked numbers New York State(not City) lost 0.25% of its population 2017-2018, and has only increase 0.85% since 2010... which more seems like the population is stable in the state rather than falling.

      Suburbia is going to continue to collapse for probably another decade; this will probably be good in the long run for both NYC and NYS.

    36. Re: Objecting to the give-away by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      This is false. Treaties can not override the Constitution. They can only override laws (by effectively being a law).

    37. Re:Objecting to the give-away by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that there are fewer than three misogynists total in all sales departments or warehouses? The point wasn't that no tech workers are misogynistic (good luck finding zero anything in any large group of people), only that a smaller percentage of them are.

    38. Re: Objecting to the give-away by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      What a bunch of closed minded bigots.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    39. Re: Objecting to the give-away by gorehog · · Score: 1

      In other words, people who grew up sheltered, never had to work for a living, and had mommy and daddy around to pay for college?

      You're thinking of richpublicans.

    40. Re: Objecting to the give-away by blindseer · · Score: 1

      90% of Americans would repeal the 2A if it ever came to a vote.

      Then bring it to a vote. It shouldn't be all that hard with such support.

      Here's the problem, gun laws are largely unenforceable. There is no firearm registry, and there never will be. Canada tried it and they had maybe a 30% compliance rate. A group of people that opposed it had a "swap meet" where they had swapped firearms so that any existing database was useless in telling who had what. "But that's breaking the law!!!" Yes, it was a mass of people breaking the law, what are you going to do about it?

      Such registries, confiscations, and bans, have been tried all over the world. This includes a number of states in the USA. I recall reading how Missouri repealed their gun registry because the sheriffs were not complying. Many didn't even know it was a law, sheriffs and citizens. Kind of hard to have any gun control if law enforcement can't be bothered to even look up the law. They got better things to do than keep records on law abiding gun owners.

      Oh, and South Dakota just passed "constitutional carry" into law and Oklahoma is considering it now. Vermont never had any restriction on the carry of concealed sidearms. That doesn't sound like a 90% support of the repeal of the Second Amendment to me. There's at least 12 states with such laws now, and many more with no prohibitions on the open carry of sidearms.

      There is no wide support for gun control in the USA. Even if there were then you'd still have to convince law enforcement to bother with harassing law abiding citizens on the keeping and carrying of sidearms when they have to worry about actual criminals preying on these same law abiding citizens.

      New York wants to drive out Amazon and all the jobs they'd bring? Fine, let the jobs land in places where people are free to defend themselves against crime. Places like Virginia where crime seems to miraculously stop at the border with nearby DC. DC has crime far higher than Virginia, and they have far more restrictions on sidearm ownership. If the criminals in DC are going to VA to buy the guns and then crossing back to commit their violence then all that does is prove DC gun laws unenforceable. If DC wants these laws then let them enforce them. If they can't enforce them then maybe the people there need to leave for their own safety.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    41. Re: Objecting to the give-away by blindseer · · Score: 1

      You realize the parties switched at one point in history right?

      Sure, then they switched back again. Funny how that works.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    42. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Correct. You won't find that in Amarillo. In Austin, yes, but now you're competing with several other hundred tech companies for talent.

      However, in southern New Hampshire... in the Manchester area or south of that even, you have a very healthy brain bucket available within 60 mile radius in every direction.

      If you keep it out of Mass. and its taxes, Amazon could make that work to their advantage. This isn't a sorting facility, which already exists in New England. This is HQ2, and Amazon REALLY needs to do something to improve their image here, above beyond your standard behemoth looking for political handouts.

    43. Re: Objecting to the give-away by blindseer · · Score: 1

      What does Amazon do that requires so many people with a college degree? As a contractor I've done a lot of jobs that, on paper at least, "require" a college degree. As I get into many of these jobs I realize that most of what I do is something someone with a high school education and a bit of on the job experience could do. What college has become is a means to teach people what they should have learned in high school, and/or filter out for intelligence like a high school education would have.

      This "leave no child behind" crap has meant that a high school diploma means next to nothing. Statistics on intelligence tells us that those one standard deviation below average intelligence (average being an IQ of 100 by definition) have about a 50/50 chance of graduating high school. That's about 15% of the population, again by definition of a standard deviation. This means that if we had held the standard of a high school education the same then we'd have about a 10% dropout rate. That was deemed "unacceptable" by the powers that be. So, they lowered the standards for a diploma until it became "acceptable". This means people with an IQ below 85, that's one standard deviation below 100, graduate even though their ability to on the "three Rs" are at about what a 9th or 8th grade level education used to be.

      College graduates will have an average IQ of about 105, because colleges have been able to keep their standards up for a bit longer. If we keep driving people into college when they don't need it and/or can't meet the traditional standards of a degree, then we will see the value of college be diluted to nothing like a high school education has.

      There's nothing wrong with having only a 9th grade education, my dad and his brothers had only that much education and they went into farming, the military, and business. They all retired as millionaires, which used to mean far more than it used to but inflation means that's not a high bar any more.

      Small towns are still good places to find workers. These tend to be filled with skilled labor from farming and light industry. These small communities tend to be free from the politics of "leave no child behind" nonsense that made a high school education nothing more than a certificate of having been babysat until they got to be 18 years old. Those without a high school education will still find work as skilled labor where a good work ethic and a good attitude means more than having read Shakespeare in college. Those with a proper high school education should be able to fill most any job Amazon would offer.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    44. Re: Objecting to the give-away by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Stop eating crayons.

    45. Re:Objecting to the give-away by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gamergate.

      So Amazon engineers are misogynist because some gamers once were?

      Since when does playing games make you "tech"?

    46. Re: Objecting to the give-away by sp0tter · · Score: 1

      Technically no but while we are sparing with strawmen you may wish to note %37 is higher than the national average https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      you don't eat crackers in the bed of your future--or else you'll get all scratchy
    47. Re:Objecting to the give-away by sp0tter · · Score: 1

      maybe because I don't have $100k sitting around in case I suffer a heart attack?

      --
      you don't eat crackers in the bed of your future--or else you'll get all scratchy
    48. Re:Objecting to the give-away by sp0tter · · Score: 1

      The people that Amazon employs are likely to earn more than the people they displace,

      can you support that claim? This is NYC not Fife, AL

      --
      you don't eat crackers in the bed of your future--or else you'll get all scratchy
    49. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Amazon is a technology company that creates new technologies, masters the use of existing ones and does some bloody interesting things with data.

      People with the ability to do those things tend to go to college.

    50. Re: Objecting to the give-away by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Amazon is a technology company that creates new technologies, masters the use of existing ones and does some bloody interesting things with data.

      People with the ability to do those things tend to go to college.

      Assuming that a college degree is actually required then you can find those people in small towns too. You think small towns are just full of uneducated hicks? Lot's of people go to college and end up in small towns. Even if it's not the people there currently there's the children that would love to find a good job near family. It's also not like people can't commute from a nearby larger town, or move there for the job.

      A dollar goes a lot further in a small town. Amazon could attract smart people that can figure that out.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    51. Re: Objecting to the give-away by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I was responding to the challenge that recruiting people with a college degree was necessary. It is, because there's only a tiny overlap between the desired recruitment pool and people with no degree.

      None of that comments on small towns but since you've raised it, yes, you can find intelligent people with and without college degrees in small towns.

      But take Amarillo. That's a large town of 200,000 people. Only 47% of the population in the US actually work, so that's a labour pool in Amarillo of around 94000 people.

      Only around 2.6% of the people working in the US work in IT. So the pool of people in Amarillo with the desire, aptitude and capability of working in IT (and that inexplicably didn't move somewhere that could offer them such a job) is nearer 2500 people.

      However, Amazon doesn't want generic IT workers. They outsource those jobs, and want to employ top-end workers. Lets assume they drop standards and accept employees at the 90th percentile.

      So basically Amazon could employ every single viable candidate in Amarillo and still only have 250 people. That hasn't taken into account other jobs those people have, whether they'd want to work for Amazon, whether Amazon can even make them aware of the opportunity, whether Amazon can accurately identify which 250 people they are and whether there are other factors that might prevent Amazon from employing them.

      Note that I haven't even discussed college degrees here. I'll bet 240 of those 250 have college degrees.

      you can find those people in small towns too

      No, you can't, if you're trying to build a global company headquarters to run a multi-national that relies on technology and its technology advantages over its competitors. There just aren't enough of them to meet your needs.

    52. Re:Objecting to the give-away by Can'tNot · · Score: 1

      And New York seems to consider it a fine idea to take from those who have most and redistribute to those who have less.

      Your claim is not supported by the facts at hand, these protests were provoked by New York taking money from those who have less and giving it to those who have more.

      Also, what does this: "so shouldn't they be happy that more federal money is being spent on the states that contribute less?" have to do with anything? You're wondering off into your own world, with unrelated tangents and baseless assumptions.

    53. Re:Objecting to the give-away by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      heh you know my home county well (orange)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  2. Let it be by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    Good. Quit blowing politicians who need your jobs but ride to power trumpeting how evil you are.

    Let the voters weigh the relative importance. That's why the pols are huffing and puffing in the first place.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Let it be by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Let the voters weigh the relative importance.

      That's why Amazon required a non-disclosure agreement - they knew most voters would balk at the massive scale of the give-away the company was looking for.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  3. GTFO of Virginia, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Crystal City is the absolute worst place to put Amazon. Commuting there by any means is already a disaster.

    1. Re:GTFO of Virginia, too. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      AWS is making heavy plays into government contracts. You have to be in the DC area for that, so there's no way they're leaving Crystal City.

    2. Re:GTFO of Virginia, too. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > I was personally surprised they didn't pick Reston

      I'm going to guess "Acela" is the reason. Acela's current route (and the NEC) ends at Union Station... but AFAIK, Virginia is about to electrify the CSX tracks from Union Station south to Richmond (and effectively extend the NEC further south, eventually all the way from Richmond to Atlanta). Those tracks pass through Potomac Yards. Likewise, Long Island City is along the same tracks as Sunnyside Yards, and the route Acela follows to reach Boston.

      Fast forward 10 years. Amazon buys a building within a block or two of the Acela station in Philadelphia, outfits it with conference rooms, and convinces Amtrak to extend the NY-DC Acela route (by paying to build the two new stations, and guaranteeing Amtrak some minimum amount of annual ticket purchases) so the NY-DC trains begin their run at a new station in Long Island City before stopping at Penn Station for ~15 minutes (not necessarily saving a lot of TIME for Amazon employees, but enormously more convenient), then continuing onward to DC. At the DC end, they stop long enough for DC passengers to disembark at Union Station, then continue south to a new station in Arlington (requires replacement of the Long Bridge to add capacity). Northbound, they do the same thing... start in Arlington & spend 15 minutes at Union Station (not saving time, but offering one-train convenience), then continue to New York and ending at LIC. When New York and DC Amazon employees need to have a face to face meeting, they book a conference room in Philadelphia, print their tickets, and now have a convenient central meeting spot halfway between their DC and NY offices.

      As a practical matter, Acela trains terminating or starting at Penn Station sit at Sunnyside Yard ANYWAY until shortly before they're scheduled to arrive at Penn Station. I'm not sure how pressed Union Station is for idle-train storage space, but in any case, if the tracks were electrified all the way down to Potomac Yards, a final hop to Arlington from Union Station wouldn't be much of a problem for Amtrak... it wouldn't increase the total NY-DC travel time, and would almost certainly make it easier for Amtrak to sell more seats on its DC-NY Acela route.

      The only real issue would be for Amtrak to decide whether it wanted to have Boston-NY-DC trains stop at LIC. As I understand it, Boston-NY Acela trains all continue onward to DC, but during most of the day, Amtrak runs additional NY-DC Acela trains in between the Boston-NY-DC trains (because more people travel between NY and DC than travel between Boston and NY, and Amtrak's capacity through Connecticut is constrained, so if ALL trains had to run end to end, it would just limit the total number of trains Amtrak could run between NY and DC).

    3. Re:GTFO of Virginia, too. by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Looks like you'll have twice as many people coming to Virginia now.

  4. Money by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Any city that offers tax cuts to a large corporation and than hosts that corporation should at least get money out of the deal for a top-notch and modern transit system.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Money by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The NY subway isn't getting entirely rebuilt (it's built under too much expensive real states), but a few tens of billions for upgrading the electrical systems, signalling systems, and completing the 2nd ave line from 125th St to Canal St would definitely help.

    2. Re:Money by Micah+NC · · Score: 1

      If there are more jobs, doesn't that mean more people are paying taxes?

      If more people are paying income taxes ... doesn't that mean the government has more money (to create transit systems or whatever)?

      In the US retailers generally let people pay small sums on credit cards because they are encouraging more people to come to their store. This seems to be working. Couldn't government get some mileage out of the same strategy? Deferred collection, etc?

    3. Re:Money by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1

      It may not mean more net jobs. It may mean that these jobs replace other jobs at companies that pay their share of taxes. If that is the cast then the government ends up with less money for infrastructure, education, etc.

    4. Re:Money by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      What does the 2nd Ave line have to do with a theoretical Amazon entity in Long Island City? Is that to help the maybe one or two people who might commute from the lower East side to LIC for work?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    5. Re:Money by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      If Amazon wants a deal with NYC, they should get to help the whole city, not just projects that benefit them. Milk them for all they're worth, pretend you're Bezos' mistress and the Enquirer photographer is watching...

    6. Re:Money by hey! · · Score: 1

      Why, to transport Amazon nabobs from their pied-à-terres on in the East Village, of course!

      $2500/month will get you a 1 bedroom apartment with kitchenette, plus access to hip neighborhood businesses catering to bohemian 1990s New Yorkers. It's almost as if EPCOT opened a New York pavilion.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Money by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Not if you have thrown away all those tax breaks in benefits to Amazon. Also how many local people will really be employed?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  5. Re:Good Thing by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    2.3 billion looks big and scary until you realize that NY State's total population is 20 million. That's about $115 per person. Total state budget is $168 billion, so that's about 1.3% of total budget.

    The real problem downstate is that Albany controls NYC's purse strings. The subways would run much better if they were run by the NYC Department of Transportation directly, not subject to authority of clueless bureaucrats from Albany.

  6. Re:Techies will follow the jobs. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a company town. Will it come with "jumper nets" for overworked employees, like Foxconn's factories in China do?

    And, BTW, "techies" tend to like to live around other smart people, not in a company campus surrounded by frack fields and coal-rollin' pickups.

  7. They should just change their name by bobstreo · · Score: 2

    to Omni Consumer Products and move to Detroit. /s

  8. Re:Unionized Workers - reason by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    They're hiring developers and business types in NY -- seems like a pretty good place to move to. TN has cheap land, it's a good place for a warehouse, but it lacks many of the aspects that attract techies to NY.

  9. Re:Techies will follow the jobs. by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    Techies tend to live where the jobs are, not where they want to. So many techies like to live rural when they can remote in for their jobs.

  10. How big is the AMI Hq? by Blinkin1200 · · Score: 1

    Jeff can probably pick it up for a song after he destroys the company and the management goes to prison.

  11. Re:Unionized Workers - reason by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    TN has cheap land, it's a good place for a warehouse, but it lacks many of the aspects that attract techies to NY.

    That depends on where in TN you are. If you're near Nashville, then it's got much of the same stuff; food, culture, relatively liberal politics. Neither one has reasonable cannabis laws, though. (Neither does California any more, oddly, but at least they are less unreasonable.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Re:Techies will follow the jobs. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Amazon is so large they'd be surrounded by other smart people anyway. Techies tolerate living in campers to get jobs. They tolerate long commutes in horrific traffic to get jobs. They tolerate never being able to afford a home to get jobs. They tolerate having low disposable incomes to get jobs.

    If you are rich enough to be picky by all means do so, but never confuse yourself with anyone else.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  13. Moving from Seattle to New York is Pointless by SmaryJerry · · Score: 1

    Politically the two areas are very closely related and neither are good for Amazon. No where can be as bad as Seattle is for corporations who tried to basically pass an "Amazon tax" which basically just targeted Amazon/Amazon employees. Luckily that got repealed as soon as they found out Amazon had decided to cancel it's construction of new buildings in Seattle and also was searching for two new HQ locations. New York may not be as socialist as Seattle's city council but it's still not as corporation friendly as many other cities.

    1. Re:Moving from Seattle to New York is Pointless by SmaryJerry · · Score: 1

      Something wrong with you. What does rent price have to do with socialism?

    2. Re:Moving from Seattle to New York is Pointless by sp0tter · · Score: 1

      it was repealed when Amazon's bought-and-paid-for politician (Mayor Jenny Durkan) got her orders. Don't be fooled for a second they will never leave Seattle.

      --
      you don't eat crackers in the bed of your future--or else you'll get all scratchy
  14. Re:Techies will follow the jobs. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    None of those things are done "to get jobs." Those things are done to get jobs in an area where it's actually interesting and pleasant to live -- i.e. be around other interesting humans.

  15. Re:Unionized Workers - reason by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

    Money attracts people to NYC. NOTHING ELSE. The people are terrible, the traffic is terrible, the culture is obnoxious, the pizza is the worst in the US, and everything is dirty. If Amazon built their HQ in the middle of the desert, but offered NYC wages, a city would sprout from the dry earth around them.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  16. Re:Techies will follow the jobs. by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

    Techies will follow the jobs.

    Only to a limited extent.

    I lived in upstate NY for a while. The area was a former manufacturing center that has been economically destroyed by the same things that hit the rest of the rust belt. The local politicians were sure the techies would follow the jobs, so they had several programs to try and recruit companies to the area. And hey, housing is really cheap so cost-of-living is low. So clearly techies would flock to the area.

    It failed. The area is just too shitty now. The schools are awful, the roads are barely maintained, there's little to do outside your own house, drug use and it's accompanying problems are rampant and overall quality of life is bad. Recruiting and maintaining a high-tech workforce there is very difficult, even with NY city pay scales and rural cost-of-living.

  17. Re:Unionized Workers - reason by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Higher education system: many good universities within a few miles of each other. CUNY/Columbia/NYU/Pratt/Hunter/Cooper/CUNY Grad Center/Rockefeller. Public transport system is awesome; I love trains and not having to drive a stinking car daily is awesome. The people are awesome, BTW, once you stop hanging with rich suburban transplants.

  18. Re:Unionized Workers - reason by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    California is probably as good as it gets in the US, since they allow home-grow for personal use. NYC's laws aren't reasonable, but there's progress towards reform and (frankly) weed is extremely available.

    Nashville doesn't have: functional public transport, the same concentration of world-class research universities (other than Vanderbilt, what is there?), the same cultural diversity, easy access to beaches, etc.

  19. Re:Unionized Workers - reason by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    California is probably as good as it gets in the US, since they allow home-grow for personal use.

    California left it up to the counties, most of which have fucked it up completely. They want licensing and registration, there's all kinds of places you can't have it at all, you can only use it in a private residence in almost every county...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Re:Ha Ha socialists by hey! · · Score: 1

    Jobs created with, wait for it -- state funded incentives!

    It reminds me of what my old bolshie Uncle Ivan used to say back in the 60s: "Kid, nobody believes in a socialism. Nobody believes in capitalism either. It's always 'socialism for me, capitalism for you!'"

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  21. Reality TV by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

    Man, this whole thing is starting to feel like a dating reality show where the star can't make up their mind on who they want to date. Amazon decided to do this highly public publicity stunt on who they'd pick, ending up with the two cities everyone thought from the beginning, while stringing along hundreds of communities desperate for the economic shot-in-the-arm those 50K (or now 25K given the split) would bring. If Amazon wants to be revolutionary and really help its community, place it in a rust-belt city in Indiana, Ohio, or Pennsylvania where it would spur a life-changing transformation in the community.

  22. Right Way (Virginia) vs. Wrong Way (New York) by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    There's a right way and a wrong way to do incentives. Virginia was smart about their incentives - large amounts were deals to do additional investments in Arlington - reach X number of jobs, we'll upgrade the subway station, upgrade the light rail, etc. New York just gave them a giant bag of money.