Slashdot Mirror


Apple Plans To Launch an 'All-New' 16-inch MacBook Pro and 32-inch 6K Monitor This Year, Says Report (theverge.com)

Apple is planning an "all-new" MacBook Pro design for this year, well-connected analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has said. From a report: The lineup is reportedly led by a model with a screen of between 16 and 16.5 inches, which would make it the biggest screen in a Mac notebook since the 17-inch models stopped being sold in 2012. Kuo says the lineup may also include a 13-inch model with support for 32GB of RAM; right now only the 15-inch MacBook Pro can be configured with that amount of memory.

[...] More interestingly, Kuo has the first credible details of the external monitor that will mark Apple's return to the pro display market. It's said to be a 31.6-inch 6K display with a "Mini LED-like backlight design." Apple discontinued its last monitor, the Thunderbolt Display, back in 2016; right now the best option for owners of more modern Macs is the Apple-sanctioned but imperfect 27-inch LG UltraFine 5K.

211 comments

  1. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do not have that monitor in stock as far as I can tell.

    1. Re: Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aptly named but ghastly

    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the vomitive format of Apple for the popular movies that are 1920x1080, 4K and 8K.

      The Apple's 6K is VERY INCOMPATIBLE with the standard of panoramic films.

    3. Re: Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashvertisement and usual Apple worship!

    4. Re: Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16:9???

      You support an aspect ratio that is pure shit for real work.

  2. I got 16 inches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hell yeah

    1. Re:I got 16 inches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like millimeters.

    2. Re:I got 16 inches by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Heh, 16 millimetres is sub-micropenis territory, and 16 inches is just going to hurt her cervix, but 16 centimetres is a respectable length. You know what they say though - it ain't the size of the boat, it's the motion of the ocean.

    3. Re:I got 16 inches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, 16 millimetres is sub-micropenis territory

      So like, Kendallville.

    4. Re: I got 16 inches by registrations_suck · · Score: 2

      Words of a guy who never got much shore leave.

    5. Re: I got 16 inches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes yes... You have my 16 inches in your ass

  3. Do it, Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict they will be the first to remove all connectors. Wireless charging, bluetooth, and wifi. What more could a user ask for?
     
    captcha: mistakes

    1. Re: Do it, Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My captcha was: twist

    2. Re: Do it, Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope the price will be 16k to keep things consistent...

    3. Re:Do it, Apple! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No wired network is a killer in some settings.

    4. Re:Do it, Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      irrelevant... apple could care less whether that is an issue or not.... ever since Ive took over total control of engineering, the look means everything, function means nothing.

    5. Re:Do it, Apple! by blindseer · · Score: 3, Informative

      No wired network is a killer in some settings.

      I agree. What bothers me is the increasing lack of Ethernet ports and no support for an inexpensive alternative. All it would take is the small step of support for USB to USB networking with a passive cable. This was written in the USB spec 10 years ago, but it seems few people bothered to implement it. It's in section 5.5.2 of the USB 3.0 whitepaper.

      https://www.usb3.com/whitepape...

      Apple doesn't have this problem because they have USB-C ports on all new computers and support networking over a passive cable by use of the Thunderbolt protocol. An inexpensive passive cable will connect two Apple computers at 10 Gbps. A wired network does not necessarily mean Ethernet.

      I guess if Apple supported this kind of connection with USB 3.0 it might go just as fast, and be able to connect to any computer with a USB-A port with a widely available an inexpensive USB-A to USB-C cable, but then the other computer would have to support this as well. There's little incentive by Apple to support this if Windows and Linux can't be bothered to support a direct PC to PC connection by USB.

      Oh, and if you really needed to have Ethernet to connect by a wire to another computer then there's all kinds of adapters out there for this. Given the increasing scarcity of Ethernet ports on new Windows computers, especially laptops and tablets, the need for such an adapter is shared with Apples. But, again, I can connect two new Apple computers together at 10 Gbps with a $10 cable I can get at most any Best Buy, Wal-Mart, or whatever. I can't do this with Windows or Linux, or at least I haven't seen it yet.

      I'd like to be able to do the same with Windows and Linux. Why after 10 years has no one bothered to read the USB spec and implement a very useful wired connection between PCs? Seems to me that there would be no hardware limitation for this, all we need is the software. Has no third party read this either and seen the possibilities?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    6. Re:Do it, Apple! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      >apple could care less

      So they care more?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    7. Re:Do it, Apple! by EETech1 · · Score: 2

      I've got a LapLink cable you can have:)

    8. Re:Do it, Apple! by infolation · · Score: 1

      It's an 'all-new' Apple, so they won't renew the connectors, they'll just invent new ones. Proprietory, never-seen-before, custom, Apple-licensed connectors that require a 'new generation of peripherals' that conform to a new standard that lasts 24 months.

    9. Re:Do it, Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. What bothers me is the increasing lack of Ethernet ports and no support for an inexpensive alternative. All it would take is the small step of support for USB to USB networking with a passive cable. This was written in the USB spec 10 years ago, but it seems few people bothered to implement it. It's in section 5.5.2 of the USB 3.0 whitepaper.

      Sure, they define a pinout of a cable to be used for debugging applications and the like. There is no definition of how to use that for data transfer though - anything will be proprietary. It also implies that one device will negotiate host and the other be the target device - but only some operating systems contain functionality to be a USB target device.

      An inexpensive passive cable will connect two Apple computers at 10 Gbps.

      With newer Macs, a USB-C cable under a certain length (20"?) will be a passive Thunderbolt 3 40 Gbps connection. Longer I believe is 20 Gbps.

      I guess if Apple supported this kind of connection with USB 3.0 it might go just as fast, and be able to connect to any computer with a USB-A port with a widely available an inexpensive USB-A to USB-C cable, but then the other computer would have to support this as well. There's little incentive by Apple to support this if Windows and Linux can't be bothered to support a direct PC to PC connection by USB.

      There's no spec for how the data would be sent, that one side negotiate acting like a particular device. This also will only work between two 3.x ports - the D+/D- wires are not connected.

    10. Re: Do it, Apple! by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Laplink over Thunderbolt. There is a good idea...

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    11. Re:Do it, Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, there's a dongle for this.

    12. Re:Do it, Apple! by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      It's such a rarity these days that a (laugh all you want) dongle works good enough.

    13. Re:Do it, Apple! by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Not having read the spec myself, I have one simple question: Is it an optional feature? If yes, then there is your answer. Manufacturers want to say they provide USB support, but they want to put the minimum effort into it, so they will only do the bare minimum.

      Also, with USB-C there is no such thing as passive cables anymore. Literally every single cable needs to be active to negotiate capabilities with the host device. Why TF this needs to happen on the cable and not between the host and target devices is beyond me, but that's how it is AFAIK.

      USB-C is the single most idiotic, consumer-unfriendly "standard" produced in a very long time.

    14. Re:Do it, Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think a thunderbolt cable is passive? How cute.

    15. Re:Do it, Apple! by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      That's one of the things I miss about Firewire: being able to run a standard cable between two PC's and getting a network link. No fuss, no special cables, nothing. And at the time it was faster than using ethernet.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    16. Re:Do it, Apple! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I know Laplink still sells transfer cables, they have a USB 3.0 version for $50. https://web.laplink.com/cables...

      At that price I'd be better off buying a couple USB to Ethernet adapters and an Ethernet cable. That would be faster, possibly cheaper, not require any drivers (or at least none not easily obtained), and still offer the ability to breakup this "home brew Laplink" to connect a couple computers to an Ethernet network.

      By looking hard enough I was able to find someone selling a passive, and USB 3.0 compliant, USB-A to USB-A cable for about $15. https://www.datapro.net/produc...

      The warning on the DataPro webpage indicates that this cable will not support networking or file transfer with Windows, macOS, or Linux. Well, why not? Clearly this is supported in the USB spec and Microsoft provides debugging on this cable with some registry editing. Apple seemed to figure out how to write the software needed for networking on a passive cable for Thunderbolt, Firewire, Ethernet, and going all the way back to serial ports with LocalTalk. Seems to me that they are more than halfway there with the hardware and software, they need only to take those last few steps to take this from the realm of superusers to the everyday.

      I can understand why Apple doesn't support direct USB to USB networking. First, they support higher speeds on other ports. Second, there's a lot of non-compliant USB cables floating about and they likely don't want to be held responsible for someone burning up their laptop over this. Third, without support from other manufacturers and OS publishers there's no real market for it.

      Let's ignore the USB-A to USB-A aspect of this for a moment. I should be able to connect a couple computers together with a USB-A to USB-C cable, or USB-C to USB-C cable, and do more than charge up a laptop battery. There is a data connection there, all we need is the software to transfer some data. Given that Ethernet ports are disappearing from computers, and USB-C is taking their place, one would think that a computer manufacturer would want to assure that the ability to make a fast and direct connection to another computer was maintained. Well, I mean, besides just Apple.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    17. Re:Do it, Apple! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Oh, and if you really needed to have Ethernet to connect by a wire to another computer then there's all kinds of adapters out there for this.

      I've used the adapters, and they work pretty well. Some Slashdotters really hate adapters though.

      But on laptops, the Ethernet port has pretty much gone the same way as the DB9 serial port.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:Do it, Apple! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's an 'all-new' Apple, so they won't renew the connectors, they'll just invent new ones. Proprietory, never-seen-before, custom, Apple-licensed connectors that require a 'new generation of peripherals' that conform to a new standard that lasts 24 months.

      I too miss my parallel port and telephone modem ports.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. Neat. I moved on years ago. by DogDude · · Score: 2

    Neat! I gave up on Apple making serious hardware years ago. I get my *nix meets met via Virtualbox on Windows on *any* size laptop with *any* amount of RAM and *any* size hard drive I want, thanks.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  5. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its apple, obsolete tech from the dark ages in a pretty case... with features like, non upgrade everything, soldered on SSD's and ram. No way to recover data.....

    Anyone who is still silly enough to buy apple, gets what they deserve.

    1. Re: who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stability? Works out of the box? Productivity? I'm done futzing around trying to get Linux to work on a laptop

    2. Re: who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to buy old apple hardware back from when you can remove drives and ram. Just got a nice 17" MacBook pro i5 for $100.

    3. Re: who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fang you very much. You must be on that Goldman Sachs medicine.

    4. Re: who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New emoji "keyboard" works a couple of weeks out the box. Yeah, that is great "productivity".

    5. Re: who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stability? Works out of the box? Productivity? I'm done futzing around trying to get Linux to work on a laptop

      I'd gladly take an upgradable Windows laptop over a non-upgradable MacBook these days. Both are just as stable. With most PCs you get an upgradable system at a lower price. Apple's vision of the future is to make the landfill as big as it can be while charging the customer twice as much as their competitors.

    6. Re:who cares? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Also glued-in keyboards that feel horrible and die at the end of the warranty period.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:who cares? by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I replaced a glued in keyboard on my daughter's Macbook Air last month. It was a MASSIVE pain in the ass and took two hours, but the total cost was $50 vs the $700 that the Apple Store was going to charge for it.

      Don't spill nail polish remover on your keyboards, people.

  6. Finally! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have long awaited the return of the 17" Macbook Pro ever since Apple stopped selling them - mine is still used to this day every day for work in my house.

    The 15" I have been using primarily is fine as it has the same resolution, but I really missed the physically larger screen of the 17".

    With Apple's reduction in bezel sizes the new 16" should have about the same screen size as the old 17" in a slightly smaller form factor.

    The only downside to having a larger laptop is a surprising number of bags or laptop compartments are optimized for the 15" laptops, and may not even fit a larger laptop - maybe the 16" can squeeze into a few bags the 17" could not.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Finally! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Apple is the "Anthropologie" of computing.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re: Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And google is the autopilot driving at 1,000 mph when it should have gone much much slower

    3. Re:Finally! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It will be the glued-shut, no-port, soldered-everything version of the old 17" MacBook Pro ... this thing will be to power laptops like the Jeep Compass is to off-road vehicles.

    4. Re:Finally! by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With Apple's reduction in bezel sizes the new 16" should have about the same screen size as the old 17" in a slightly smaller form factor.

      I hate to break it to you but that's not how screen sizes are measured. A 16 inch screen will be 1 inch smaller screen size than a 17 inch, regardless of bezel size.

    5. Re: Finally! by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      It's sure a good thing there is more than Google and Apple to choose from.

    6. Re: Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey do you want the fuckin computer or not? Go buy one or quit your AC bitching

    7. Re:Finally! by chrism238 · · Score: 2

      I believe that a 16inch screen, with almost no bezels, would easily fit "on" the form-factor of my 15.4inch 2013 MBP. Backpack problem easily addressed.

    8. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be the glued-shut, no-port, soldered-everything version of the old 17" MacBook Pro ... this thing will be to power laptops like the Jeep Compass is to off-road vehicles.

      Could be worse: could be a Hummer.

    9. Re: Finally! by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I'd switch to a briefcase. Aluminum, with the detachable handles like the models I saw on GITS-- triggers would unnecessarily draw attention (and possibly return fire)

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    10. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the aspect ratio.

      A 19" 5:4 monitor is about the same height as a 23" 16:9 monitor.

    11. Re:Finally! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      That 's a good point, maybe they would pretty much keep the existing form factor and just increase screen as much as possible - that makes more sense than building out the case size much.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    12. Re:Finally! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I loved my 17” MacBook Pro back in the day... but I can’t believe I allocated that much weight to backpacking around Southeast Asia back in the day. About 8.5 pounds when the power cords and stuff were factored in.

      Now I have moved on. MacBook Air and a couple iPads really serve me better. A dock with a 27” monitor is a hell of a lot better ergonomically than the laptop form factor, and portability really trumps all for a laptop.

    13. Re:Finally! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I try to travel with an iPad too when I can, but I'm a consultant who has to work on site sometimes - for that I prefer a larger portable screen, which is what I really liked the 17" for (though I have to admit I also did my fair share of international travel lugging the 17" around and you are right that it weighs a LOT!).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    14. Re: Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky your motherboard hasnâ(TM)t died from bad soldering. My early-2011 one was repaired under AppleCare and then again two years ago. I got it it working again for a while with baking-in-the-oven trick to reflow the solder. Otherwise, yeah, really nice machine and very much missed here.

      Iâ(TM)d bet with drop in thickness and weight that a 16â MBP would fit in many bags designed for 15â laptops.

    15. Re: Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't think it by looking at the banter going back and forth around here.

  7. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

    I'm really surprised that VMWare doesn't make their own laptop with a VMWare hyperviser in firmware. Basically, boot into any OS you want, and backup the entire stack to the cloud.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  8. Re: Neat. I moved on years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh VMWare offered something like this to select enterprise customers but they all wanted free storage. Oh well

  9. 6k display? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And just what Mac will be able to run such a thing without having shedloads of problems? Certainly nothing they're shipping today, judging by how they interact with 4K displays.

    I'd love it if I could go even one day without displays randomly flickering to black while I'm trying to use them on a MacBook Pro with a discrete GPU.

    Maybe fix your shitty GPU drivers before you start shipping shit you probably can't even plug in and drive. Not like it would be the first time though.

    1. Re:6k display? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just what Mac will be able to run such a thing without having shedloads of problems?

      Native TB3 (which is not just USB-C DP which a lot of the current "4K" monitors are using) could drive such a resolution.

      However, at least one rumor suggested the device will come with its own dedicated GPU, so it will be just another eGPU which happens to have a direct attached monitor.

    2. Re:6k display? by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Now that would actually be a lovely idea - *if* it used a standard PC video-card slot so that you could easily upgrade the GPU in the future. Somehow though I suspect that's not the case.

      I have the same basic objection to "all-in-one" PCs - a good monitor is worth investing in, and will likely outlast many PCs - unless you integrate the two, and generate a huge additional stream of trash as the fast-evolving tech goes predictably obsolescent, taking a perfectly good screen with it.

      Even if you've got the money to burn, and upgrade your monitor as often as your PC, consigning a high-quality monitor to an early grave rather than many years of cherished second-hand value should hurt your heart. It's wanton wealth-destruction.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  10. 6K - is that the resolution, or the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait to see how much Apple charges for their monitor.

  11. I can see the store page now. by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The MacBook Pro Pro. Starting at $3999.

    I miss the days when minor new features and upgraded components were part of a normal product refresh and didn't justify a new name and pricing tier.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:I can see the store page now. by thecombatwombat · · Score: 1

      Eh, the days we're in now don't seem that different from the past, at least as far as Apple laptops go. The current touch bar models are abominations that got me off the Mac after more than a decade, but they've had the same design for several years and gone through multiple incremental updates.

      Over that decade it was Powerbook, then MacBook Pro, then unibody MacBook Pro, then Retina. The pace seems about the same to me. I'm not sure what days you're missing?

    2. Re: I can see the store page now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am missing MacBooks from before 2015 - that was quite a decent Pro. Loved keyboard, trackpad, ports, MagSafe, overall look and feel.

    3. Re:I can see the store page now. by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Here's base model MBPs by year:

      2006: $1999 / 2.0GHz x 2 Core 2 / 1GB RAM / 120GB HDD / Classic
      2007: $1999 / 2.2GHz x 2 Core 2 / 2GB RAM / 120GB HDD / Classic
      2008: $1999 / 2.4GHz x 2 Core 2 / 2GB RAM / 250GB HDD / Unibody
      2009: $1699 / 2.56GHz x 2 Core 2 / 4GB* RAM / 250GB HDD / Unibody
      2010: $1799 / 2.4GHz x 2 i5 / 4GB RAM / 320GB HDD / Unibody
      2011: $1799 / 2.2GHz x 4 i7 / 4GB RAM / 500GB HDD / Unibody
      --- Tim Cook becomes CEO
      2012: $2199 / 2.3GHz x 4 i7 / 8GB RAM / 256GB SSD / Retina
      2013: $1999 / 2.0GHz x 4 i7 / 8GB* RAM / 256GB SSD / Retina
      2014: $1999 / 2.2GHz x 4 i7 / 16GB* RAM / 256GB SSD / Retina
      2015: $1999 / 2.2GHz x 4 i7 / 16GB* RAM / 256GB SSD / Retina
      2016: $2399 / 2.4GHz x 4 i7 / 16GB RAM / 256GB SSD / Touch Bar
      2017: $2399 / 2.8GHz x 4 i7 / 16GB RAM / 256GB SSD / Touch Bar
      2018: $2399 / 2.2GHz x 6 i7 / 16GB RAM / 256GB SSD / Touch Bar

      * some RAM is allocated to integrated video on these models

      In Jobs' time the machines tended to get cheaper over time, even with new designs and incremental improvements every year.
      Once Cook took over, spec bumps have slowed and prices ratchet up with each redesign.

      I bought a first generation Retina MBP for $2900. To get a replacement MBP today with the same clock speed, RAM, and storage, I'd pay about $2800. Six and a half years later. That's not progress.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    4. Re:I can see the store page now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, probably starting at $2999 with 128 GB disk and 8 GB RAM, $3999 will get you 256GB disk and 8 GB RAM.

    5. Re:I can see the store page now. by thecombatwombat · · Score: 1

      I suppose what you mean is closer to "I miss the days where they didn't couple incremental upgrades with useless, mandatory, horribly expensive features I don't want in the first place." In which case I'm with you. If I could buy the 2018 MBP in the body of the 2015 without paying $400 for a touch bar, I'd still use a MacBook Pro. Instead, I moved on.

      Though still, it seems to me to only be the one cycle (the introduction of the touch bar) you (we, lots of us) really have a problem with. The Retina only moved the price for one year, and it was worth it. I bought one, you bought one, they pretty much leapfrogged everything else on the market that year and then the price came back down.

    6. Re:I can see the store page now. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I bought a first generation Retina MBP for $2900. To get a replacement MBP today with the same clock speed, RAM, and storage, I'd pay about $2800. Six and a half years later.

      Yeah but it has a touch bar instead of F keys, and the lowest travel/tactility keyboard on the market! And USB-C! Progress!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re: I can see the store page now. by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Agree. The only thing between me and an upgrade is that crap thin keyboard. I can live with the Touch Bar

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  12. Re: Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better than driving into guardrails playing with yourself and talking on the phone all the time

  13. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virtualbox is trash and everyone knows it.
    KVM absolutely mops the floor with that creaky piece of shit

  14. "Support" for 32GB of RAM... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does "Support for 32GB of RAM" mean you can plug in two 16GB modules, or does it just mean that you can pay 3x the street price of the RAM extra to buy a laptop with it soldered to the motherboard?

    1. Re:"Support" for 32GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does "Support for 32GB of RAM" mean you can plug in two 16GB modules, or does it just mean that you can pay 3x the street price of the RAM extra to buy a laptop with it soldered to the motherboard?

      As long as hipsters keep buying the garbage with the soldered ram and drives apple will keep selling it.

    2. Re: "Support" for 32GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way. Apple is not satisfied with just hipsters. They want to tap more markets with that obnoxious keyboard etc

    3. Re: "Support" for 32GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will feature an often requested feature - LED apple logo on the front, next to a popular (pro)fessional emoji bar.

    4. Re:"Support" for 32GB of RAM... by melted · · Score: 2

      It's Apple, so you don't get to "plug in" anything, likely including your headphones.

    5. Re:"Support" for 32GB of RAM... by walllaby · · Score: 1

      “Plug in”? I though to upgrade, you just threw your old one in the trash and ordered a new one.

    6. Re:"Support" for 32GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 32GB model means you get soldered DDR4 instead of soldered LPDDR3. For Apple standards you can consider this an incredibly consumer-friendly move, it took many years until they allowed this! even though OSX + a browser + video RAM on Intel GPU machines probably ate most of the 16GB.

    7. Re:"Support" for 32GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... hipsters...

      The 1950s called, they want their slan back.

    8. Re:"Support" for 32GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... hipsters...

      The 1950s called, they want their slan back.

      They earned the title with their lumberjack costumes.

    9. Re:"Support" for 32GB of RAM... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      “Plug in”? I though to upgrade, you just threw your old one in the trash and ordered a new one.

      No, you just mate your Bluetooth headset. Of course on Slashdot, you have to be on a leash connected to the computer.

      When I've had to used wired headphones, I've always been surprised at how many times I've forgotten I was on a leash, and walked away only to have the phones ripped off my head. Destroyed a few phone jacks that way too.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  15. Re:Too late by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    Even the automakers didn't weld their wheels on to keep for from changing tires.

  16. Use DisplayPort. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    And just what Mac will be able to run such a thing without having shedloads of problems?

    If you use DisplayPort from any modern TB3 Mac, you can drive any 4k display at 60FPS.

    I never had any issues even using my older 2013 MacBook Pro (with discreet GPU) on an LG 4k monitor using DisplayPort adaptors. Certainly no flickering.

    Not that I'm saying Apple couldn't stand to improve GPU drivers, mind you. Just saying there are ways to use 4K displays more reliably.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Use DisplayPort. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That actually illustrates the problem - they don't support 5k/60Hz over DisplayPort. You have to use Thunderbolt which means you can only buy a Thunderbolt based 5k monitor, and the only option is that LG one.

      DisplayPort 1.3, released in 2014, supports 5k/60Hz.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  17. We'll see... by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It will be the glued-shut, no-port, soldered-everything version of the old 17" MacBook Pro

    That seems very unlikely given what they did with the iMac Pro, and even the MacBook Pro updates - more ports and some flexibility in expansion.

    I am even fine with all USB-C ports, as long as there's four or so. In a larger form factor they will probably include more ports.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. Re: Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sounds like fun, is there a meetup group for it?

  19. TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there?
    Full DP 1.5 port?
    HDMI 2.1?
    Display with build in video card (linked by pci-e X4 over TB3) at a cost of $1500-$2000?

    1. Re:TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there? by roskakori · · Score: 1

      TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there?

      Nothing keeps them from designing TB4 with support for up to 8K (or maybe even more).

    2. Re:TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      TB4 = pci-e 4.0?? runs to long. maybe TB4 = pci-e 3.0 X8 (good for an remote GPU)

    3. Re:TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we will finally get the optical kind of TB that was promised for 1.0...

    4. Re:TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It can drive dual-4k displays, 6K is "only" ~6Gbps whereas the bus can push 40Gbps. Why wouldn't it be able?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re:TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha!

      That was just pure marketing wank wank wank.

      You'll never see consumer desktop optical fiber.

  20. Re: Neat. I moved on years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much says it all

  21. Say 800mm when you mean 800mm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    31.6 bogo-obsoleto-nits? Say 800mm when you mean 800mm.

    1. Re: Say 800mm when you mean 800mm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Apple had literally a year or two to name and price these but they just had to try and stuff a bunch of shit in and rename everything. No thanks. I guess if you are not able to hook someone long term in all your junk you must not need any sales. Or maybe they think people will not buy again if they are not locked in. What does that say about their business model? Not much I am afraid

  22. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    And no updates at all after 1-2 years? no put it on a small pci-e ssd.

  23. Apple falling short by 2K by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

    8K was all over CES this year, I can't believe they are doing a stop-gap at 6K. Do either 4K or 8K - and support all the coming media demands for 8K.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re: Apple falling short by 2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you have too much sense. Too bad Apple doesnâ(TM)t get to ask you

    2. Re:Apple falling short by 2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We don't even have true HD in most cases and you think there is going to be 8K content.

    3. Re: Apple falling short by 2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need 8k three feet from your face? Do you have a Borg implants?

      Can I get some?

    4. Re:Apple falling short by 2K by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      4K for the 4K video.
      The extra 2K is for the software to place its GU to work on the 4K video.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Apple falling short by 2K by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Lots of content is generated at 4K - and judging from the number of 8K cameras at CES, there will be a lot of 8K content as well. Netflix and cable will still dither it down to 1080p (at best), but for the content creators - you need an 8K screen to edit your 8K video.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re: Apple falling short by 2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Resistance is futile.

    7. Re: Apple falling short by 2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we just need 4/6/8K so there can be asinine dpis involved so idiots can post their unscaled screen shots to forums that make the forum scroll sideways 4 feet.

      See this a lot on tech forums. Someone posts a screen shot from their 15" laptop with a greater than 1080p screen, so they are running something like 300dpi, then you view said screenshot on a normal 1080p screen and the widget that is normal sized on the laptop is now like 4 inches across on the 1080p screen.

    8. Re: Apple falling short by 2K by tigersha · · Score: 1

      The IBorgEye is planned for 2021. Only monoscopic in v1.0. V2 will be Stereo

      You should check the specs. NASA is planning to replace Hubble with a few astronauts with these puppies. Can see to the edge of the universe.

      And v3 can do IR and UV

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  24. Re:Too late by Ultra64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >planned obsolescence

    Really? My 2014 macbook pro still runs like a champ.

  25. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More garbage from apple.

  26. Crappy Keyboards by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    Will we see a return to the non craptacular keyboards that don't let dust freak them out?

    If no, then I'll continue to stick with my aging 2015 Macbook Pro. No reason to ever upgrade until they either change the style of keyboard or revert back to a design that works.

    Steve Jobs is clearly turning in his grave at what has become of Apple.

    1. Re:Crappy Keyboards by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it’ll be hilarious if this large 16” laptop has a grand total of four ports - all Thunderbolt 3, natch - and that awful low-travel keyboard.

      Or - even better - if it’s the first Apple laptop with a glass, no-actual-keys “keyboard”. It seems reasonable to assume one big reason for their current crap keyboards is to get people used to typing on an immobile surface (like a phone or tablet) in a larger form factor.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Crappy Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it’ll be hilarious if this large 16” laptop has a grand total of four ports - all Thunderbolt 3, natch - and that awful low-travel keyboard.

      Or - even better - if it’s the first Apple laptop with a glass, no-actual-keys “keyboard”. It seems reasonable to assume one big reason for their current crap keyboards is to get people used to typing on an immobile surface (like a phone or tablet) in a larger form factor.

      So a glass version of the Sinclair ZX80 keyboard.

    3. Re:Crappy Keyboards by Misagon · · Score: 1

      I find it more likely that they would use the same keyboard mechanism as the Ipad Pro's "Smart Keyboard".
      It is the "butterfly" switch with a flexible keyboard condom on the [i]outside[/i] to protect it from dust. It looks and feels even worse than the "keyboard" on the recent MacBook.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    4. Re:Crappy Keyboards by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Will we see a return to the non craptacular keyboards that don't let dust freak them out?

      The new keyboards work fine these days as long as you don't hammer them like blacksmith and clean them out with a dust buster or compressed air once in a while. If you are irked by the 'feel' of the thing you really are on you own. The next step in this arena will probably be fixed keys with haptic feedback. Call me schadenfreudig, but I am actually looking forward to the loud-voiced outpourings of religious indignation we'll get when those things hit the market.

      If no, then I'll continue to stick with my aging 2015 Macbook Pro.

      That's what I thought until I got a MBP with a fingerprint sensor. One can debate how secure that thing is but the convenience is un-debatable. Not a fan of the task bar thingy at the top of the keyboard though.

    5. Re: Crappy Keyboards by tigersha · · Score: 1

      I am a Mac user but my surface pro logs me in when I look at the screen. That is better then fingerprint

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  27. Ho hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No interest here. Call me when you have something nice, or even useful. I have money.

  28. Apple is weird and incompatible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And i will buy this computer: AMD Ryzen2+ 4.0 GHz, nVidia, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB harddisk, 8K monitor, Windows 10, big speakers.

    And it will be very smooth and better than the rival.

    --- i like the Cinema in home ---

  29. Good point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I hate to break it to you but that's not how screen sizes are measured.

    True, I forgot that was really referring to screen size and not the laptop dimensions itself

    Still should have a decently larger physical display in a substantially smaller physical package than the older 17".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. Amazing! I cannot wait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have been a hard core OpenBSD developer and user for two decades but this laptop has me and many of my colleges drooling. A huge number of us will be making the switch permanently to Apple and at this point I see no reason to ever consider any other product. Apple absolutely rules when it comes to technology.

  31. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by finkployd · · Score: 1

    I moved on this week. Literally, just placed my order on a Lenovo X1E after using a Macbooks professionally for almost 20 years.

  32. Gonna be hard to tell from a 15" by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A 15" Macbook Pro actually has a 15.4" diagonal screen (16:10 aspect ratio, vs 15.6" 16:9 aspect ratio for most PC laptops). So you're going to be hard-pressed to tell the difference between a 16" and the existing 15" model. A 16.0" screen would have 16^2 / 15.4^2 = 1.07944 or just 8% more screen area than the 15". Most people won't be able to tell them apart unless they're side-by-side. A 16.5" screen would have 16.5^2 / 15.4^2 = 1.148 or 15% more screen area than the 15", which might be noticeable.

    By contrast, the 17" model (17.0" 16:10 aspect ratio, vs 17.3" 16:9 aspect ratio for most PC laptops) was 17^2 / 15.4^2 = 1.2186 or 22% more screen area than the 15", which is definitely noticeable.

    1. Re:Gonna be hard to tell from a 15" by chrism238 · · Score: 1

      All of which would be true is screens were square.

    2. Re:Gonna be hard to tell from a 15" by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      As long as you are using the same aspect ratio it factors out...

  33. new iMac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we get a new (non-Pro) iMac as well please? It's been about 1.5 years since the least update and the current model is seriously long-in-tooth.

    I'd really love to know why Apple doesn't do an annual spec-bump "point" release of their Macs. I understand that iOS is their money maker, but there's plenty of people sitting at desks that need non-mobile systems.

  34. And a pro tower? by sandbagger · · Score: 2

    Wharrr. Wharrr pro tower?

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:And a pro tower? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Sir Ives is putting the final touches on the new banana shaped case. A pro banana from Apple? Magical.

    2. Re:And a pro tower? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Wharrr. Wharrr pro tower?

      Supposedly, they'll preview one at WWDC in June. However, don't expect it till 2020. You also might not get hopes up about a tower. They are saying a modular, upgradable Mac Pro. Chances are it will have to be a tower, but they always might spring some other form factor. They have certainly done desktops and pizza boxes before.

  35. Re:TB3 CAN drive 6K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TB3 can't drive 6K so what is there plan there?

    With Intel's Titan Ridge TB3 allows for DP 1.4, which supports 8K@30Hz plain and even 60Hz with DSC:

    * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort#Resolution_and_refresh_frequency_limits

    Higher refresh rates are possible with chroma sub-sampling.

  36. 5.7GB Ram 13.673" screen with a 923gb hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whats with apple and using odd sizes? is that the value added part?

  37. Learn to code by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    your next app at 6K.
    Got the needed GPU?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Learn to code by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      When the did a 5k monitor with LG there was a decent reason for using Thunderbolt, in that DisplayPort wasn't quite there yet. Now it is, even for 6k... But it looks like they are going for Thunderbolt again.

      Shame because that could be a good PC monitor, but if it's like the LG one it will lack any controls or decent software to drive it. Forget about calibration outside of OSX.

      6k at 32" is ideal. Basically you want to keep the DPI to 2x the base 2k/24" to make scaling perfect.

      4k @ 24"
      5k @ 27"
      6k @ 32"

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Learn to code by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      DPI does not matter for Macs ...
      You can plug in as many monitors as you want and have windows spanning them, the UI/OS scales them accordingly.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Learn to code by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It just scales the bitmaps, it does't re-render fonts and vector elements for example. Windows has the same problem, one display is the master and the other renders at the master's DPI and then scales the resulting bitmap.

      There is also an issue with non-integer scaling of bitmaps looking kinda bad, and older apps that don't support proper DPI awareness. For those having exact 2x scaling is the best option.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Learn to code by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      It depends on the skill and the ability of the people who have to look after the OS.
      Is the OS ready for 6K, 8K support? Fonts, color accuracy, a GUI that's ready for that resolution, support for people making a software, a full list of supported GPU.
      Once an OS lists that 6K, 8K as a supported resolution everything on the OS side has to be ready to look great and to code any software with.
      Fonts, a/the supported GPU, color, code to create applications that look the same at 4K, then 6K.
      Thats different from finding a working 4K, 8K GPU and having and the GPU show the OS at a resolution above 4K.

      Lots of work by very smart people and it has to be ready and supported.
      That is what sets modern OS apart. Support and the ability to code, color accuracy, software that supports new software creation.
      Other OS focus on games and getting the most out of the generations of GPU hardware and having ready sound and graphics support for creating games.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Learn to code by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      it does't re-render fonts
      Yes, it does, or why do all 4 corners of a window stretched over four displays with different DPI look equal?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Learn to code by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Every screenshot I've seen doesn't look like it re-renders. Do you have one to demonstrate?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Learn to code by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Not at the moment, and it would not be a screenshot, but a shot with the camera showing multiple screens and a window spanning them.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  38. Re: Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am more concerned they will put it in this new slim and retarded form factor, with shitty keyboard, huge trackpad, and a stupid logo on the front panel.
    Definitely NOT looking to it.

  39. For the humor impaired..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sarcasm is the best revenge.

    1. Re:For the humor impaired..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Apple's revenge has been sweet to watch. All the lamedroid, windoze and linsux users crying themselves to sleep every night is a pleasure to think about.

  40. Re:TB3 CAN drive 6K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has Titan Ridge shipped in a single product yet? Been hearing about it for a while, but devices coming out even now still have Alpine Ridge inside.

    captcha: ovaries

  41. so an $2000 GPU vs an $500 GPU for that 8K apple by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    so an $1000 GPU vs an $500 GPU for that 8K at apple pricing.

    also 8K content will cost a lot on apple over priced SSD's as well.

  42. GODDAMN! APPLE GOT DA BIGGEST DICK OF ALL!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And dey prooofed it!

  43. Wonâ(TM)t fix the stupid keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they donâ(TM)t fix it, I am not buying a new one.

    1. Re: Wonâ(TM)t fix the stupid keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree

  44. Oh goody-gumdrops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A brand-new $$$$ Apple monitor with the word "SAMSUNG" emblazoned on the lower bezel. Sign me up & bend me over!!

  45. No more Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for me either. I now buy $199 Dell laptops from Walmart and max them out on RAM and run Ubuntu, Works fine. As an IT guy, I don't need much beyond a browser and a terminal window anyway. Android phone completes the picture. The iSheep line up and file into the reality distortion field every time Apple drop a new device somehow hoping to find meaning in a new shiny handset or iSomething. Apple ceased innovating some years back.

  46. Maybe, just maybe they are listening by Snufu · · Score: 2

    I understand the most recent Macbook pro has more modular components and ports, suggesting they are responding to criticism of the glued together, fake pro direction they had been taking. Is it an inflection point in design philosophy after burning the goodwill they created for pro users?

    Not a fan boy, but typing this on a 2009 17 inch MB pro that has been used every day for the last decade and still works like new. Possibly the best machine I have owned of ANY kind. That level of quality earns loyalty. It was assumed they would never again make a laptop larger than 15 inches because the profit margins are too small. Selling a loss leader product to command respect from the pros is the kind of strategy they displayed when Jobs ran the show. Could be a good sign.

    (But not holding my breath.)

    1. Re:Maybe, just maybe they are listening by Megane · · Score: 1

      The only bad thing about the (pre-Retina) Unibody era is those fucking Nvidia GPUs that were manufactured improperly and fall apart inside after a few years. Say what you will about modern Apple laptops and planned obsolescence, but Nvidia beat them to the punch.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  47. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    Neat! ... Windows ...

    HERETIC!!!

  48. Why not something really new? by quenda · · Score: 1

    Monitors and laptops are hardly new for Apple.
    A company of that size should be diversifying, before they find it is too late, and they implode like Kodak, Nokia or Xerox.

    Sony and IBM may not have their former glory, but are still alive and making big money. As well as diversifying, they actually did basic research and genuine innovation. Why doesn't Apple?

    Apple makes wonderful products, don't get me wrong, but the closest they have ever come to an original invention is probably the App Store.

  49. More features no one is asking for...... by Proudrooster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quick Survey. did anyone ask for?

    • Face ID on their MBP laptop
    • 16" Display on their MBP laptop
    • 6K on their MBP laptop
    • Face ID on their MBP laptop

    Here is what was on my list:


    • Better keyboard
      Option for Touch Screen
      Better Repairability (See Louis Rossman, easy to replace keyboard and battery)
      Better Upgradability (Not Soldered in HDD and RAM)
      Better Water Resistance
      Return of the MagSafe
      More Ports on the Pro Model including a classic USB3.0 port
      eGPU Options for High End Cards with Plug N Play
    1. Re:More features no one is asking for...... by walllaby · · Score: 2

      Modern Apple has never been the company to respond to what consumers want. They create a product and then convince the consumer why it will make their life better. And in many cases, they have succeeded! The iPhone and iPod are the darling examples. “Truck” hardware is hard to innovate upon because it’s pretty much plateaued. Apple did take a chance—it’s called the iPad.

    2. Re:More features no one is asking for...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better keyboard
      Option for Touch Screen
      Better Repairability (See Louis Rossman, easy to replace keyboard and battery)
      Better Upgradability (Not Soldered in HDD and RAM)
      Better Water Resistance
      Return of the MagSafe
      More Ports on the Pro Model including a classic USB3.0 port
      eGPU Options for High End Cards with Plug N Play

      U mad bro. That shit doesn't fit into a thin foldable rounded corner format. There is barely any space left for rectal biometric probe as it is. What next? You gona drag a CRT into a Starbucks? What a time to live in.

    3. Re:More features no one is asking for...... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the touchpad could double as a pen input pad. A lot of artists would love that I think. Then again I'm sure Apple would rather sell them an iPad Pro for that kind of use, but then they don't get the functionality of OSX and a proper keyboard.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:More features no one is asking for...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Soldered in HDD"? No modern Mac laptop has an internal HDD, let alone a soldered in one.

    5. Re:More features no one is asking for...... by ReneR · · Score: 1

      +1 where are my moderation points when I need them?! recently swapped my brothers MacBook battery, OMG: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    6. Re: More features no one is asking for...... by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Actually most external keyboards for an iPad is better than the MacBook keyboard. Mouse for iPad might be useful

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    7. Re:More features no one is asking for...... by zaq1xsw2cde9 · · Score: 1

      I would love FaceID on an MBP. I would prefer 17" rather than 16", but I'll take every bit I can get. So yes. There are some people who want these features.

    8. Re:More features no one is asking for...... by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

      Anything newer than a 2016 MBP has a soldered in SSD, not upgradable, not replaceable.

      https://blog.macsales.com/4461...

  50. What use is a 6K monitor? by iggymanz · · Score: 0

    There are not that many pixels 19 MP) in the human eye (6M cones / 3 = 2MP), it is impossible for 6K to be useful to a human in any situation except where the screen is intentionally much bigger than what the eye can view in field (planetarium, amusement park ride background, etc.)

    This is bullshit.

    1. Re:What use is a 6K monitor? by Megane · · Score: 1

      5K was useful for pros who do 4K video editing, to have room for a UI around the video. But the next mastering size is 8K. I don't see what the point of 6K is except "it's one bigger".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:What use is a 6K monitor? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      of course 4K is also more pixels than you eye has, so having room for editing controls around such a video is hilarious... unless said video going to be used in circumstance where people were going to be looking at sections of it at a time. for a monitor or movie screen it's an absurdity, wasted.

    3. Re:What use is a 6K monitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > of course 4K is also more pixels than you eye has

      That's a meaningless statement on its own, since it depends on how big the screen is and how far away you are sitting.

      But even so, the retina is estimated to have the equivalent of over 500 megapixels, and 4K is only about 12.6 megapixels.

    4. Re:What use is a 6K monitor? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      wrong, Distance and size irrelevant to the truth of my statement. If the whole screen is in view, it pointless to have more pixels on screen than there are in the eye. There is no way for you to distinguish more than one pixel on the screen focused on one pixel in the eye.

      You have false statistic, the eye has only 2M "pixels", that's 6M cones divided by the 3 color types.

      You are the one making false and meaningless statements, the science of the situation is as I have stated.

    5. Re:What use is a 6K monitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the cones, dummkopf. Only 12 million or so of them...

      Also, it's not pointless because you don't direct your gaze to the entire screen at once. Your fovea has the highest concentration of light-sensitive cells and only the part of the screen you're staring at will get the full detail.

      It entirely depends on angular density of pixels, which varies with the size of screen and viewing distance. Not to mention you don't stare fixedly at the screen, your eyes are constantly re-adjusting your gaze (in saccades) so you can take in much more detail than the density of cells on your retina would ostensibly limit you to.

      SO, in short, you don't know what you're talking about!

    6. Re:What use is a 6K monitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You forgot the cones, dummkopf. Only 12 million or so of them...

      Ack! RODS. I meant rods!

  51. Louis Rossman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Louis Rossman will have to fix them within 6 months of release.

    I'm pretty sour on Apple hardware these days.

    1. Re:Louis Rossman by maralatho · · Score: 1

      Except that he won't be able to source the parts.

  52. Re: Neat. I moved on years ago. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Good choice, the Dell XPS has weak body construction.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  53. Re: Neat. I moved on years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neat...Windows

    Blasphemy! STONE HIM!

    Hey, I was talking to you, stoner.

  54. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out Apple is just really bad at planning obsolescence.

    They keep trying, they just can't get it right!

  55. Will be wildly overpriced with great commercials by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    I work with iOS and the only reason I have a Macbook is because of that. I tried going Mac-only at home and I lasted about 6 months before I went back to PCs where I could get software I wanted besides graphic design apps.

    Every time I see a pitch for Apple's next "oooh" product, it's like getting an email from the car dealership who ripped you off on that jalopy you just sold at a loss.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  56. Loved, but add by Texmaize · · Score: 1

    The above post mirrored my sentiments, but i would add in just one thing.
    Can we get off the thinner fetish and make the machine thick enough where it can cool itself properly?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
  57. Re: Miss Mash's ovaries are DELICIOUS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck my dong, msmash!

  58. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >planned obsolescence

    Really? My 2014 macbook pro still runs like a champ.

    My 2012 Mac Book pro is also running like a champ!

  59. Re:Too late by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    New law: Any consumable part must be user replaceable, e.g. batteries.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  60. THERE ARE ALWAYS CONSEQUENCES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL ALWAYS BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES AND PROPAGANDA NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  61. imperfect by sad_ · · Score: 1

    can you believe those apple fans?
    unless it's a screen with an apple logo on it, it's imperfect.
    only a real apple thunderbolt display will do!

    pure lunacy

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  62. Fuck everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we're doing 7K.

  63. Re: Too late by tigersha · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure your local red light district will have an establishment that caters to your needs

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  64. What customer does Apple want by sjbe · · Score: 1

    No wired network is a killer in some settings.

    Do you think these use cases are ones Apple actually gives a shit about? For those who care there are USB-C and Thunderbolt docking stations available and they work fine. Personally I'm with you and would rather have a 8P8C ethernet port built in but clearly I'm not the customer Apple is courting.

    1. Re:What customer does Apple want by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No wired network is a killer in some settings.

      Do you think these use cases are ones Apple actually gives a shit about?

      Only on Slashdot has the disappearance of built in RJ45 somehow become an Apple issue.

      Apple laptops don't have have DB9 serial ports, parallel ports or built in firewire ports either.

      For those who care there are USB-C and Thunderbolt docking stations available and they work fine. Personally I'm with you and would rather have a 8P8C ethernet port built in but clearly I'm not the customer Apple is courting.

      And for my purposes, I'd like a DB9 serial port on laptops as well. But alas, I fear that the availability of inexpensive adapters make these edge cases addressable. My new tricked out Dell 5530 Workstation laptop requires adapters for Old school USB, RJ45, and HDMI.

      This is the direction that laptops are going. And not just Apple.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  65. YAY by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    Another Macbook Pro - with even fewer ports!

  66. Sager/Clevo is already doing it by kick6 · · Score: 1

    Sager/Clevo just released a line of 16.1" screens in the same chassis as their previous 15.6" models. They just reduced the size of the bezel. This isn't a massive step forward, exactly.

    1. Re:Sager/Clevo is already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is a "Sager/Clevo"? I have literally never seen those two words before you just now used them.

  67. Re: Too late by tigersha · · Score: 1

    So is my 2013 model. And I schlep it around every single day

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  68. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then it must not have an Nvidia discrete GPU.

  69. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Margins are thin and even if you just get a Chinese OEM to build the laptop for you, you still have to provide on-going support for it. There probably just isn't enough money in it, especially with the relatively small volumes they would be selling, and when the competition is someone like Lenovo with world-wide support coverage and established business relationships.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  70. Thin + Low DTP = Slow by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Air doesn't like to make the right-angled turns required from a thin laptop. Apple will likely not produce a notebook computer with the big heatsinks and power brick necessary for serious work. A small heatsink is fine when you apply an occasional Photoshop filter, or nudge something in a CAD program, but when it comes time to export video, or animate something, render something, or compile something, or run a solver, then a computer needs proper cooling.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  71. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    There were a couple of attempts by different companies to make client-side type 1 hypervisors a thing but they never caught on.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  72. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our batteries are rechargeable and so not considered consumable." -Apple

  73. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >planned obsolescence

    Really? My 2014 macbook pro still runs like a champ.

    My 2012 Mac Book pro is also running like a champ!

    And my 2010 MacBook Pro is also quite champ-like in its running.

  74. Re:Will be wildly overpriced with great commercial by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    I can just see the commercials. But they get it backwards. A 32-inch Macbook Pro, and a 16-inch 6K monitor.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  75. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lenovo

    LOL

  76. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weighs almost 2kg and has one of those Windows viruses preloaded. Enjoy.

  77. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by finkployd · · Score: 1

    Slightly lighter than my Macbook Pro and is being immediately wiped and having Linux installed. I will enjoy.

  78. Re:Too late by finkployd · · Score: 1

    The keyboard and overall build quality is lightyears better than the current generation for that matter.

  79. That's not exactly right... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Macs do support 5k/60Hz, you are right that you use thunderbolt but only insofar as you need to get a thunderbolt3 to dual DisplayPort adaptor.

    Since from that adaptor you can use DisplayPort, you can use any 5k monitor that has DisplayPort. Some may require both DisplayPort cables to be connected (see first link I posted as it talks a little about that).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  80. ORLY 3 by jf_moreira · · Score: 1

    Apple can launch whatever they want. I will NEVER buy anything overpriced from them. Never had, never will. No wonder they are losing sales and sales year after year.

    1. Re:ORLY 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No wonder they are losing sales and sales year after year.

      Uh, no they're not.

  81. Re:Neat. I moved on years ago. by Kjella · · Score: 1

    My guess it's probably related to OEM pricing, you can use "any" OS but Apple doesn't license OS X and Microsoft is sure to put some clauses requiring it to boot Windows natively and exclusively to get the best price. After all Microsoft has their own virtualization technology and is a direct competitor plus they don't want to give any other OS a foothold, like I've never seen any OEM offer dual-boot. Even if they can't formally do it because of anti-trust I'm sure anyone who did would be put on the unofficial shit list. And if you're doing Linux-on-Linux virtualization there are better options...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  82. Re:Will be wildly overpriced with great commercial by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

    Serious question: What software *can't* you get for Mac? About five years ago, I worked in an MS Office environment where no one knew I was using Pages, Numbers or, in a pinch, NeoOffice/LibreOffice. I used OmniGraffle for Visio needs. Nowadays, I do embedded development for Cortex chips using MCUXpresso natively on the Mac. When I was playing with the nvidia Jetson platform, it needed a Linux environment to perform the firmware updates, but I was able to run a Linux instance under VirtualBox for that. I use CrossOver to run some Windows app for programming Digi XBee chips. I understand The Gimp isn't exactly "soup" for replacing Photoshop, so that's a possibility.

    So, again, what software can't you get for Mac?

  83. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does my 2011 MBP with original battery that still gives 5hrs browsing time. But no Mojave, so yeah...